Hydrogel crosslinking modulates macrophages, fibroblasts, and their communication, during wound healing

Abstract

Biomaterial wound dressings, such as hydrogels, interact with host cells to regulate tissue repair. This study investigates how crosslinking of gelatin-based hydrogels influences immune and stromal cell behavior and wound healing in female mice. We observe that softer, lightly crosslinked hydrogels promote greater cellular infiltration and result in smaller scars compared to stiffer, heavily crosslinked hydrogels. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we further show that heavily crosslinked hydrogels increase inflammation and lead to the formation of a distinct macrophage subpopulation exhibiting signs of oxidative activity and cell fusion. Conversely, lightly crosslinked hydrogels are more readily taken up by macrophages and integrated within the tissue. The physical properties differentially affect macrophage and fibroblast interactions, with heavily crosslinked hydrogels promoting pro-fibrotic fibroblast activity that drives macrophage fusion through RANKL signaling. These findings suggest that tuning the physical properties of hydrogels can guide cellular responses and improve healing, offering insights for designing better biomaterials for wound treatment.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 74

1. 1.

   Walmsley GG, et al. Scarless wound healing: chasing the holy grail. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015;135:907-917.

   Not in our library10.1097/prs.0000000000000972

2. 2.

   Farahani M, Shafiee A. Wound healing: from passive to smart dressings. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021;10:e2100477.

   Not in our library10.1002/adhm.202100477

3. 3.

   Butenko, S. et al. Engineering immunomodulatory biomaterials to drive skin wounds toward regenerative healing. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 15, a041242 (2023).

   Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a041242

4. 4.
   Transcriptomic Analysis of Monocyte-Derived Non-Phagocytic Macrophages Favors a Role in Limiting Tissue Repair and Fibrosis · 2020

   Not checked
5. 5.

   Shook BA, et al. Myofibroblast proliferation and heterogeneity are supported by macrophages during skin repair. Science. 2018;362:eaar2971.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.aar2971

6. 6.

   Ozkale B, Sakar MS, Mooney DJ. Active biomaterials for mechanobiology. Biomaterials. 2021;267:120497.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120497

7. 7.

   Kwon, S. H., Padmanabhan, J. & Gurtner, G. C. in Mechanobiology in Health and Disease (ed Stefaan, W. V.) Vol. 14, 415-448 (Academic Press, 2018).

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Zhang, L., Li, Y. & Jiang, W. A novel wound dressing material for full-thickness skin defects composed of a crosslinked acellular swim bladder. Front. Mater. 9, 1037386 (2022).

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Hua Y, et al. Moldable and removable wound dressing based on dynamic covalent cross-linking of thiol-aldehyde addition. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019;5:4048-4053.

   Not in our library10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00459

10. 10.

    Hsieh JY, et al. Matrix crosslinking enhances macrophage adhesion, migration, and inflammatory activation. APL Bioeng. 2019;3:016103.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.5067301

11. 11.

    Meli VS, et al. YAP-mediated mechanotransduction tunes the macrophage inflammatory response. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eabb8471.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.abb8471

12. 12.
    Mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1 modulates macrophage polarization and stiffness sensing · 2021

    No notice
13. 13.

    Meli VS, et al. Biophysical regulation of macrophages in health and disease. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019;106:283-299.

    Not in our library10.1002/jlb.mr0318-126r

14. 14.

    Harn HI, et al. The tension biology of wound healing. Exp. Dermatol. 2019;28:464-471.

    Not in our library10.1111/exd.13460

15. 15.

    Blakney AK, Swartzlander MD, Bryant SJ. The effects of substrate stiffness on the in vitro activation of macrophages and in vivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2012;A 100:1375-1386.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.34104

16. 16.

    Jansen LE, et al. Zwitterionic PEG-PC hydrogels modulate the foreign body response in a modulus-dependent manner. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19:2880-2888.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00444

17. 17.
    Dissecting the microenvironment around biosynthetic scaffolds in murine skin wound healing · 2021

    No notice
18. 18.

    Huang J, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals functionally distinct biomaterial degradation-related macrophage populations. Biomaterials. 2021;277:121116.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121116

19. 19.

    Cherry C, et al. Computational reconstruction of the signalling networks surrounding implanted biomaterials from single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2021;5:1228-1238.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41551-021-00770-5

20. 20.

    Griffin DR, Weaver WM, Scumpia PO, Di Carlo D, Segura T. Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:737-744.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat4294

21. 21.

    Reinhardt JW, Breuer CK. Fibrocytes: a critical review and practical guide. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:784401.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2021.784401

22. 22.

    Mittal M, et al. TNFalpha-stimulated gene-6 (TSG6) activates macrophage phenotype transition to prevent inflammatory lung injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E8151-E8158.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1614935113

23. 23.

    Yaseen H, et al. Galectin-1 facilitates macrophage reprogramming and resolution of inflammation through IFN-β. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:901.

    Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2020.00901

24. 24.

    Chen PC, et al. Prostate cancer-derived CCN3 induces M2 macrophage infiltration and contributes to angiogenesis in prostate cancer microenvironment. Oncotarget. 2014;5:1595-1608.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.1570

25. 25.

    Bradshaw AD. The role of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) in cardiac repair and fibrosis: Does expression of SPARC by macrophages influence outcomes? J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2016;93:156-161.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.014

26. 26.

    Webster NL, Crowe SM. Matrix metalloproteinases, their production by monocytes and macrophages and their potential role in HIV-related diseases. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006;80:1052-1066.

    Not in our library10.1189/jlb.0306152

27. 27.
    Reactive Oxygen Species in Macrophages: Sources and Targets · 2021

    No notice
28. 28.

    Liu WF, et al. Real-time in vivo detection of biomaterial-induced reactive oxygen species. Biomaterials. 2011;32:1796-1801.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.029

29. 29.
    Metabolism Supports Macrophage Activation · 2017

    No notice
30. 30.

    Afroz SF, et al. Mitochondrial dynamics in macrophages: divide to conquer or unite to survive? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2023;51:41-56.

    Not in our library10.1042/bst20220014

31. 31.
    UCell: Robust and scalable single-cell gene signature scoring · 2021

    No notice
32. 32.

    Alfonso-Garcia A, et al. Label-free identification of macrophage phenotype by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016;21:46005.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.21.4.046005

33. 33.

    Lefebvre A, Ma D, Kessenbrock K, Lawson DA, Digman MA. Author Correction: Automated segmentation and tracking of mitochondria in live-cell time-lapse images. Nat. Methods. 2022;19:770.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-022-01506-2

34. 34.
    Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitochondrial Dynamics: The Yin and Yang of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cancer Progression · 2018

    No notice
35. 35.
    Complement Receptors and Their Role in Leukocyte Recruitment and Phagocytosis · 2021

    No notice
36. 36.

    Tan C, et al. Soluble Thy-1 reverses lung fibrosis via its integrin-binding motif. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e131152.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.131152

37. 37.

    Kruglikov IL, Scherer PE. Caveolin-1 as a target in prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring. NPJ Regen. Med. 2019;4:9.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41536-019-0071-x

38. 38.
    Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat · 2021

    No notice
39. 39.

    Shao X, et al. MatrisomeDB 2.0: 2023 updates to the ECM-protein knowledge database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D1519-D1530.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkac1009

40. 40.

    Yang K, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta induced protein regulates pulmonary fibrosis via the G-protein signaling modulator 2 /Snail axis. Peptides. 2022;155:170842.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.peptides.2022.170842

41. 41.

    Sideek MA, et al. A central bioactive region of LTBP-2 stimulates the expression of TGF-beta1 in fibroblasts via Akt and p38 signalling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2114.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms18102114

42. 42.

    Kanaan R, Medlej-Hashim M, Jounblat R, Pilecki B, Sorensen GL. Microfibrillar-associated protein 4 in health and disease. Matrix Biol. 2022;111:1-25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matbio.2022.05.008

43. 43.

    Mori R, Shaw TJ, Martin P. Molecular mechanisms linking wound inflammation and fibrosis: knockdown of osteopontin leads to rapid repair and reduced scarring. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:43-51.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20071412

44. 44.

    Lee CH, Chun T. Anti-inflammatory role of TAM family of receptor tyrosine kinases via modulating macrophage function. Mol. Cells. 2019;42:1-7.

    Not in our library10.14348/molcells.2018.0419

45. 45.

    Di Stasi R, De Rosa L, D'Andrea LD. Therapeutic aspects of the Axl/Gas6 molecular system. Drug Discov. Today. 2020;25:2130-2148.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.022

46. 46.

    Hongu T, et al. Perivascular tenascin C triggers sequential activation of macrophages and endothelial cells to generate a pro-metastatic vascular niche in the lungs. Nat. Cancer. 2022;3:486-504.

    Not in our library10.1038/s43018-022-00353-6

47. 47.

    Abbadi D, et al. Local production of tenascin-C acts as a trigger for monocyte/macrophage recruitment that provokes cardiac dysfunction. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018;114:123-137.

    Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvx221

48. 48.

    Imanaka-Yoshida K, Matsumoto KI. Multiple roles of tenascins in homeostasis and pathophysiology of aorta. Ann. Vasc. Dis. 2018;11:169-180.

    Not in our library10.3400/avd.ra.17-00118

49. 49.

    Chen YC, et al. Functional human vascular network generated in photocrosslinkable gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012;22:2027-2039.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201101662

50. 50.

    Bianchera, A., Catanzano, O., Boateng, J. & Elviri, L. in Therapeutic Dressings and Wound Healing Applications (ed. Boateng, J.) 337–366 (Wiley, 2020).

    Not in our library

51. 51.

    Martin KE, Garcia AJ. Macrophage phenotypes in tissue repair and the foreign body response: Implications for biomaterial-based regenerative medicine strategies. Acta Biomater. 2021;133:4-16.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.038

52. 52.

    Bian N, et al. Immunomodulatory biomaterials and emerging analytical techniques for probing the immune micro-environment. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2023;20:11-24.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13770-022-00491-z

53. 53.

    Chakraborty M, et al. Mechanical stiffness controls dendritic cell metabolism and function. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108609.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108609

54. 54.
    The Good and the Bad: Monocytes’ and Macrophages’ Diverse Functions in Inflammation · 2022

    No notice
55. 55.

    Hoffmann MH, Griffiths HR. The dual role of Reactive Oxygen Species in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: evidence from preclinical models. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018;125:62-71.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.03.016

56. 56.

    Manresa MC, Godson C, Taylor CT. Hypoxia-sensitive pathways in inflammation-driven fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014;307:R1369-R1380.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpregu.00349.2014

57. 57.
    Effects of Surface-Bound Collagen-Mimetic Peptides on Macrophage Uptake and Immunomodulation · 2020

    Not checked
58. 58.

    Witherel CE, Abebayehu D, Barker TH, Spiller KL. Macrophage and fibroblast interactions in biomaterial-mediated fibrosis. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019;8:e1801451.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201801451

59. 59.

    Buechler MB, Fu W, Turley SJ. Fibroblast-macrophage reciprocal interactions in health, fibrosis, and cancer. Immunity. 2021;54:903-915.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2021.04.021

60. 60.

    Hu KH, et al. Transcriptional space-time mapping identifies concerted immune and stromal cell patterns and gene programs in wound healing and cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30:885-903.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2023.05.001

61. 61.

    Frohlich A, et al. Comprehensive analysis of tumor necrosis factor receptor TNFRSF9 (4-1BB) DNA methylation with regard to molecular and clinicopathological features, immune infiltrates, and response prediction to immunotherapy in melanoma. EBioMedicine. 2020;52:102647.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102647

62. 62.
    Fibroblast polarization over the myocardial infarction time continuum shifts roles from inflammation to angiogenesis · 2019

    No notice
63. 63.

    Peters VA, Joesting JJ, Freund GG. IL-1 receptor 2 (IL-1R2) and its role in immune regulation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013;32:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2012.11.006

64. 64.

    Kim YS, et al. Different molecular features of epithelioid and giant cells in foreign body reaction identified by single-cell RNA sequencing. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2022;142:3232-3242.e3216.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jid.2022.06.014

65. 65.

    Ebina-Shibuya R, Leonard WJ. Role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in allergy and beyond. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023;23:24-37.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41577-022-00735-y

66. 66.

    Camelo AA-O, et al. IL-33, IL-25, and TSLP induce a distinct phenotypic and activation profile in human type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Blood Adv. 2017;1:577-589.

    Not in our library10.1182/bloodadvances.2016002352

67. 67.

    Griffin DR, et al. Activating an adaptive immune response from a hydrogel scaffold imparts regenerative wound healing. Nat. Mater. 2021;20:560-569.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41563-020-00844-w

68. 68.

    Sadtler K, et al. Developing a pro-regenerative biomaterial scaffold microenvironment requires T helper 2 cells. Science. 2016;352:366-370.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aad9272

69. 69.

    Bredfeldt JS, et al. Computational segmentation of collagen fibers from second-harmonic generation images of breast cancer. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19:16007.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.19.1.016007

70. 70.

    Takeshita S, Kaji K, Kudo A. Identification and characterization of the new osteoclast progenitor with macrophage phenotypes being able to differentiate into mature osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000;15:1477-1488.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1477

71. 71.
    Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data · 2021

    No notice
72. 72.

    Wu T, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innov. 2021;2:100141.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141

73. 73.

    Valente AJ, Maddalena LA, Robb EL, Moradi F, Stuart JA. A simple ImageJ macro tool for analyzing mitochondrial network morphology in mammalian cell culture. Acta Histochem. 2017;119:315-326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.acthis.2017.03.001

74. 74.

    Legland D, Arganda-Carreras I, Andrey P. MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3532-3534.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btw413

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.