Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation

Abstract

Inexpensive and accessible sensors are accelerating data acquisition in animal ecology. These technologies hold great potential for large-scale ecological understanding, but are limited by current processing approaches which inefficiently distill data into relevant information. We argue that animal ecologists can capitalize on large datasets generated by modern sensors by combining machine learning approaches with domain knowledge. Incorporating machine learning into ecological workflows could improve inputs for ecological models and lead to integrated hybrid modeling tools. This approach will require close interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the quality of novel approaches and train a new generation of data scientists in ecology and conservation.

References 154

1. 1.
   Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction · 2020

   No notice
2. 2.

   Committee, T. I. R. L. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species - Strategic Plan 2017-2020. Tech. Rep., IUCN (2017).

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Witmer GW. Wildlife population monitoring: some practical considerations. Wild. Res. 2005;32:259-263.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   McEvoy JF, Hall GP, McDonald PG. Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1831.

   Not in our library10.7717/peerj.1831

5. 5.

   Burghardt GM, et al. Perspectives–minimizing observer bias in behavioral studies: a review and recommendations. Ethology. 2012;118:511-517.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Giese M. Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success. Biol. Conserv. 1996;75:157-164.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Köndgen S, et al. Pandemic human viruses cause decline of endangered great apes. Curr. Biol. 2008;18:260-264.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.012

8. 8.

   Weissensteiner MH, Poelstra JW, Wolf JBW. Low-budget ready-to-fly unmanned aerial vehicles: an effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy-breeding bird species. J. Avian Biol. 2015;46:425-430.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Sasse, D. B. Job-related mortality of wildlife workers in the united states, 1937–2000. Wildl. Soc. Bull.31, 1015–1020 (2003).

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science348, aaa2478 (2015).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaa2478

11. 11.

    Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974;49:227-266.

    Not in our library10.1163/156853974x00534

12. 12.

    Hodgson JC, et al. Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods Ecol. Evolution. 2018;9:1160-1167.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Betke M, et al. Thermal imaging reveals significantly smaller Brazilian free-tailed bat colonies than previously estimated. J. Mammal. 2008;89:18-24.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Rollinson CR, et al. Working across space and time: nonstationarity in ecological research and application. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2021;19:66-72.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Junker J, et al. A severe lack of evidence limits effective conservation of the world’s primates. BioScience. 2020;70:794-803.

    Not in our library10.1093/biosci/biaa082

16. 16.

    Sherman J, Ancrenaz M, Meijaard E. Shifting apes: Conservation and welfare outcomes of Bornean orangutan rescue and release in Kalimantan, Indonesia. J. Nat. Conserv. 2020;55:125807.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    O’Donoghue P, Rutz C. Real-time anti-poaching tags could help prevent imminent species extinctions. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016;53:5-10.

    Not in our library10.1111/1365-2664.12452

18. 18.

    Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. & Magrath, M. J. L. A comprehensive overview of technologies for species and habitat monitoring and conservation. BioScience biab073. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biab073/6322306 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1093/biosci/biab073

19. 19.

    Gottschalk T, Huettmann F, Ehlers M. Thirty years of analysing and modelling avian habitat relationships using satellite imagery data: a review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005;26:2631-2656.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Steenweg R, et al. Scaling-up camera traps: monitoring the planet’s biodiversity with networks of remote sensors. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2017;15:26-34.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Hausmann A, et al. Social media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 2018;11:e12343.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW, Llusia D. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience. 2018;69:15-25.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Wikelski M, et al. Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists. J. Exp. Biol. 2007;210:181-186.

    Not in our library10.1242/jeb.02629

24. 24.

    Belyaev, M. Y. et al. Development of technology for monitoring animal migration on Earth using scientific equipment on the ISS RS. in 2020 27th Saint Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems (ICINS), 1–7 (IEEE, 2020).

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Harel R, Loftus JC, Crofoot MC. Locomotor compromises maintain group cohesion in baboon troops on the move. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2021;288:20210839.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2021.0839

26. 26.

    Farley SS, Dawson A, Goring SJ, Williams JW. Situating ecology as a big-data science: current advances, challenges, and solutions. BioScience. 2018;68:563-576.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Lasky, M. et al. Candid critters: Challenges and solutions in a large-scale citizen science camera trap project. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice6, 10.5334/cstp.343 (2021).

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, 2001).

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Christin S, Hervet É, Lecomte N. Applications for deep learning in ecology. Methods Ecol. Evolution. 2019;10:1632-1644.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Kwok R. Ai empowers conservation biology. Nature. 2019;567:133-135.

    Not in our library10.1038/d41586-019-00746-1

31. 31.

    Kwok R. Deep learning powers a motion-tracking revolution. Nature. 2019;574:137-139.

    Not in our library10.1038/d41586-019-02942-5

32. 32.
    Deep learning · 2015

    No notice
33. 33.

    Pichler M, Boreux V, Klein A-M, Schleuning M, Hartig F. Machine learning algorithms to infer trait-matching and predict species interactions in ecological networks. Methods Ecol. Evolution. 2020;11:281-293.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Knudby A, LeDrew E, Brenning A. Predictive mapping of reef fish species richness, diversity and biomass in Zanzibar using IKONOS imagery and machine-learning techniques. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010;114:1230-1241.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Rey N, Volpi M, Joost S, Tuia D. Detecting animals in African savanna with UAVs and the crowds. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017;200:341-351.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Beery, S., Morris, D. & Yang, S. Efficient pipeline for camera trap image review. in Proceedings of the Workshop Data Mining and AI for Conservation, Conference for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2019).

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Kellenberger, B., Marcos, D. & Tuia, D. When a few clicks make all the difference: improving weakly-supervised wildlife detection in UAV images. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (2019).

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Schofield D, et al. Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaaw0736.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aaw0736

39. 39.

    Ditria EM, et al. Automating the analysis of fish abundance using object detection: optimizing animal ecology with deep learning. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020;7:429.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Kellenberger B, Veen T, Folmer E, Tuia D. 21 000 birds in 4.5 h: efficient large-scale seabird detection with machine learning. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 2021;7:445-460.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Automated detection of sea cucumbers in turbid subtidal marine habitats: An explainable approach · 2025
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.