Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg and 2 more
Nature Communications · 2021
doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Publishers’ policies have the capability to increase transparency in scholarly literature. Malički and colleagues carried out a systematic review of over 150 studies that have examined scholarly journals’ recommendations. They find that requirements in terms of authorship, conflict of interests, data sharing, funding disclosure or ethics approval declaration vary greatly over time, among journals and across disciplines.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.