Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 5, 2026.

Pathogen effector recognition-dependent association of NRG1 with EDS1 and SAG101 in TNL receptor immunity

Xinhua Sun, Dmitry Lapin, Joanna M. Feehan and 13 more

Nature Communications · 2021 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/2020.12.21.423810

Abstract

Plants utilise intracellular nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors to detect pathogen effectors and activate local and systemic defence. NRG1 and ADR1 “helper” NLRs (RNLs) cooperate with enhanced disease susceptibility 1 (EDS1), senescence-associated gene 101 (SAG101) and phytoalexin-deficient 4 (PAD4) lipase-like proteins to mediate signalling from TIR domain NLR receptors (TNLs). The mechanism of RNL/EDS1 family protein cooperation is not understood. Here, we present genetic and molecular evidence for exclusive EDS1/SAG101/NRG1 and EDS1/PAD4/ADR1 co-functions in TNL immunity. Using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry, we show effector recognition-dependent interaction of NRG1 with EDS1 and SAG101, but not PAD4. An EDS1-SAG101 complex interacts with NRG1, and EDS1-PAD4 with ADR1, in an immune-activated state. NRG1 requires an intact nucleotide-binding P-loop motif, and EDS1 a functional EP domain and its partner SAG101, for induced association and immunity. Thus, two distinct modules (NRG1/EDS1/SAG101 and ADR1/EDS1/PAD4) mediate TNL receptor defence signalling.

References 69

  1. 1.

    Jones JDG, Vance RE, Dangl JL. Intracellular innate immune surveillance devices in plants and animals. Science. 2016;354:aaf6395.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaf6395

  2. 2.

    Tamborski J, Krasileva KV. Evolution of plant NLRs: from natural history to precise modifications. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020;71:355-378.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-arplant-081519-035901

  3. 3.

    Wang J, Chai J. Molecular actions of NLR immune receptors in plants and animals. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020;63:1-14.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11431-019-9532-5

  4. 4.

    Monteiro F, Nishimura MT. Structural, functional, and genomic diversity of plant NLR proteins: an evolved resource for rational engineering of plant immunity. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018;56:243-267.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045817

  5. 5.

    Cui H, Tsuda K, Parker JE. Effector-triggered immunity: from pathogen perception to robust defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015;66:487-511.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040012

  6. 6.

    Saur IML, Panstruga R, Schulze-Lefert P. NOD-like receptor-mediated plant immunity: from structure to cell death. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;21:305-318.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41577-020-00473-z

  7. 7.

    Wang J, et al. Reconstitution and structure of a plant NLR resistosome conferring immunity. Science. 2019;364:eaav5870.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aav5870

  8. 8.

    Ma, S. et al. Direct pathogen-induced assembly of an NLR immune receptor complex to form a holoenzyme. Science370, eabe3069 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abe3069

  9. 9.

    Martin, R., et al. Structure of the activated ROQ1 resistosome directly recognizing the pathogen effector XopQ. Science370, eabd9993 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abd9993

  10. 10.

    Horsefield S, et al. NAD(+) cleavage activity by animal and plant TIR domains in cell death pathways. Science. 2019;365:793-799.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aax1911

  11. 11.

    Wan L, et al. TIR domains of plant immune receptors are NAD(+)-cleaving enzymes that promote cell death. Science. 2019;365:799-803.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aax1771

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Mine A, et al. The defense phytohormone signaling network enables rapid, high-amplitude transcriptional reprogramming during effector-triggered immunity. Plant Cell. 2018;30:1199-1219.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.17.00970

  14. 14.

    Bartsch M, et al. Salicylic acid-independent ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 signaling in Arabidopsis immunity and cell death is regulated by the monooxygenase FMO1 and the Nudix hydrolase NUDT7. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1038-1051.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.039982

  15. 15.

    Ngou BPM, Ahn H-K, Ding P, Jones JDG. Mutual potentiation of plant immunity by cell-surface and intracellular receptors. Nature. 2021;592:110-115.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03315-7

  16. 16.

    Yuan M, et al. Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity. Nature. 2021;592:105-109.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03316-6

  17. 17.

    Jubic LM, Saile S, Furzer OJ, El Kasmi F, Dangl JL. Help wanted: helper NLRs and plant immune responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019;50:82-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2019.03.013

  18. 18.

    Wu, C. -H. et al. NLR network mediates immunity to diverse plant pathogens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA114, 8113 (2017).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1702041114

  19. 19.

    Castel B, et al. Diverse NLR immune receptors activate defence via the RPW8-NLR NRG1. N. Phytol. 2019;222:966-980.

    Not in our library10.1111/nph.15659

  20. 20.

    Peart JR, Mestre P, Lu R, Malcuit I, Baulcombe DC. NRG1, a CC-NB-LRR protein, together with N, a TIR-NB-LRR protein, mediates resistance against tobacco mosaic virus. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:968-973.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.053

  21. 21.

    Collier SM, Hamel L-P, Moffett P. Cell death mediated by the N-terminal domains of a unique and highly conserved class of NB-LRR protein. Mol. Plant–Microbe Interact.®. 2011;24:918-931.

    Not in our library10.1094/mpmi-03-11-0050

  22. 22.

    Bonardi V, et al. Expanded functions for a family of plant intracellular immune receptors beyond specific recognition of pathogen effectors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:16463-16468.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1113726108

  23. 23.

    Daskalov A, et al. Identification of a novel cell death-inducing domain reveals that fungal amyloid-controlled programmed cell death is related to necroptosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:2720-2725.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1522361113

  24. 24.

    Mahdi LK, et al. Discovery of a family of mixed lineage kinase domain-like proteins in plants and their role in innate immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:813-824.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2020.08.012

  25. 25.

    Wu Z, et al. Differential regulation of TNL-mediated immune signaling by redundant helper CNLs. The. N. Phytol. 2019;222:938-953.

    Not in our library10.1111/nph.15665

  26. 26.

    Lapin D, et al. A coevolved EDS1-SAG101-NRG1 module mediates cell death signaling by TIR-domain immune receptors. Plant Cell. 2019;31:2430-2455.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.19.00118

  27. 27.

    Wiermer M, Feys BJ, Parker JE. Plant immunity: the EDS1 regulatory node. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005;8:383-389.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.010

  28. 28.

    Lapin D, Bhandari DD, Parker JE. Origins and immunity networking functions of EDS1 family proteins. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2020;58:253-276.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012840

  29. 29.

    Gantner J, Ordon J, Kretschmer C, Guerois R, Stuttmann J. An EDS1–SAG101 complex is essential for TNL-mediated immunity in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell. 2019;31:2456-2474.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.19.00099

  30. 30.

    Wagner S, et al. Structural basis for signaling by exclusive EDS1 heteromeric complexes with SAG101 or PAD4 in plant innate immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:619-630.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.006

  31. 31.

    Rietz S, et al. Different roles of Enhanced Disease Susceptibility1 (EDS1) bound to and dissociated from Phytoalexin Deficient4 (PAD4) in Arabidopsis immunity. N. Phytol. 2011;191:107-119.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03675.x

  32. 32.

    Bhandari DD, et al. An EDS1 heterodimer signalling surface enforces timely reprogramming of immunity genes in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:772.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-019-08783-0

  33. 33.

    Cui H, et al. A core function of EDS1 with PAD4 is to protect the salicylic acid defense sector in Arabidopsis immunity. N. Phytol. 2017;213:1802-1817.

    Not in our library10.1111/nph.14302

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Qi T, et al. NRG1 functions downstream of EDS1 to regulate TIR-NLR-mediated plant immunity in Nicotiana benthamiana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E10979-e10987.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1814856115

  36. 36.

    Saucet SB, et al. Two linked pairs of Arabidopsis TNL resistance genes independently confer recognition of bacterial effector AvrRps4. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6338.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms7338

  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Coll NS, et al. The plant metacaspase AtMC1 in pathogen-triggered programmed cell death and aging: functional linkage with autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:1399-1408.

    Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2014.50

  40. 40.

    Coll NS, et al. Arabidopsis type I metacaspases control cell death. Science. 2010;330:1393-1397.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1194980

  41. 41.
  42. 42.

    Rustérucci C, Aviv DH, Holt BF, Dangl JL, Parker JE. The disease resistance signaling components EDS1 and PAD4 are essential regulators of the cell death pathway controlled by LSD1 in Arabidopsis. Plant cell. 2001;13:2211-2224.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.010085

  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    Feys BJ, Moisan LJ, Newman MA, Parker JE. Direct interaction between the Arabidopsis disease resistance signaling proteins, EDS1 and PAD4. EMBO J. 2001;20:5400-5411.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/20.19.5400

  45. 45.

    Feys BJ, et al. Arabidopsis SENESCENCE-ASSOCIATED GENE101 stabilizes and signals within an ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 complex in plant innate immunity. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2601-2613.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.033910

  46. 46.

    Voss M, Toelzer C, Bhandari DD, Parker JE, Niefind K. Arabidopsis immunity regulator EDS1 in a PAD4/SAG101-unbound form is a monomer with an inherently inactive conformation. J. Struct. Biol. 2019;208:107390.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2019.09.007

  47. 47.

    Zhou Y, Hartwig B, James GV, Schneeberger K, Turck F. Complementary activities of TELOMERE REPEAT BINDING proteins and polycomb group complexes in transcriptional regulation of target genes. Plant cell. 2016;28:87-101.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.15.00787

  48. 48.

    Thomas WJ, Thireault CA, Kimbrel JA, Chang JH. Recombineering and stable integration of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 61 hrp/hrc cluster into the genome of the soil bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1. Plant J. 2009;60:919-928.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03998.x

  49. 49.

    Sohn KH, et al. The nuclear immune receptor RPS4 is required for RRS1SLH1-dependent constitutive defense activation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004655.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1004655

  50. 50.
  51. 51.

    Schultink A, Qi T, Lee A, Steinbrenner AD, Staskawicz B. Roq1 mediates recognition of the Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas effector proteins XopQ and HopQ1. Plant J. 2017;92:787-795.

    Not in our library10.1111/tpj.13715

  52. 52.

    Tameling WI, et al. The tomato R gene products I-2 and MI-1 are functional ATP binding proteins with ATPase activity. Plant Cell. 2002;14:2929-2939.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.005793

  53. 53.

    Williams SJ, et al. An autoactive mutant of the M flax rust resistance protein has a preference for binding ATP, whereas wild-type M protein binds ADP. Mol. Plant–microbe Interact. 2011;24:897-906.

    Not in our library10.1094/mpmi-03-11-0052

  54. 54.

    El Kasmi F, et al. Signaling from the plasma-membrane localized plant immune receptor RPM1 requires self-association of the full-length protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E7385-E7394.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1708288114

  55. 55.

    Mestre P, Baulcombe DC. Elicitor-mediated oligomerization of the tobacco N disease resistance protein. Plant Cell. 2006;18:491-501.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.037234

  56. 56.

    Burdett H, et al. The plant “Resistosome”: structural insights into immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:193-201.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.020

  57. 57.

    Jirage D, et al. Arabidopsis thaliana PAD4 encodes a lipase-like gene that is important for salicylic acid signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:13583-13588.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.23.13583

  58. 58.

    Morel J-B, Dangl JL. The hypersensitive response and the induction of cell death in plants. Cell Death Differ. 1997;4:671-683.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.cdd.4400309

  59. 59.

    Straus MR, Rietz S, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Bartsch M, Parker JE. Salicylic acid antagonism of EDS1-driven cell death is important for immune and oxidative stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010;62:628-640.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04178.x

  60. 60.

    Zavaliev R, Mohan R, Chen T, Dong X. Formation of NPR1 condensates promotes cell survival during the plant immune response. Cell. 2020;182:1093-1108e1018.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.016

  61. 61.

    Pruitt, R. N. et al. Arabidopsis cell surface LRR immune receptor signaling through the EDS1-PAD4-ADR1 node. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2020.11.23.391516 (2020).

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Wu, Z., Tian, L. & Li, X. N-terminally truncated helper NLR NRG1C antagonizes immunity mediated by its full-length neighbors NRG1A and NRG1B. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2021.01.27.428547 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1093/plcell/koab285

  63. 63.

    Duxbury Z, et al. Induced proximity of a TIR signaling domain on a plant-mammalian NLR chimera activates defense in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:18832.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2001185117

  64. 64.

    Witte CP, Noël LD, Gielbert J, Parker JE, Romeis T. Rapid one-step protein purification from plant material using the eight-amino acid StrepII epitope. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004;55:135-147.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11103-004-0501-y

  65. 65.

    Klock HE, Lesley SA. The Polymerase Incomplete Primer Extension (PIPE) method applied to high-throughput cloning and site-directed mutagenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009;498:91-103.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-59745-196-3_6

  66. 66.

    Bensmihen S, et al. Analysis of an activated ABI5 allele using a new selection method for transgenic Arabidopsis seeds. FEBS Lett. 2004;561:127-131.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0014-5793(04)00148-6

  67. 67.

    Gantner J, et al. Peripheral infrastructure vectors and an extended set of plant parts for the Modular Cloning system. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197185.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0197185

  68. 68.

    Folta KM, Kaufman LS. Isolation of Arabidopsis nuclei and measurement of gene transcription rates using nuclear run-on assays. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:3094-3100.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2006.471

  69. 69.

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.