No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.
Mitochondrial DNA editing in mice with DddA-TALE fusion deaminases
Hyunji Lee, Seonghyun Lee, Gayoung Baek and 4 more
Nature Communications · 2021 · CC BY
doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21464-1
Abstract
DddA-derived cytosine base editors (DdCBEs), composed of the split interbacterial toxin DddA tox , transcription activator-like effector (TALE), and uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), enable targeted C-to-T base conversions in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Here, we demonstrate highly efficient mtDNA editing in mouse embryos using custom-designed DdCBEs. We target the mitochondrial gene, MT-ND5 ( ND5 ), which encodes a subunit of NADH dehydrogenase that catalyzes NADH dehydration and electron transfer to ubiquinone, to obtain several mtDNA mutations, including m.G12918A associated with human mitochondrial diseases and m.C12336T that incorporates a premature stop codon, creating mitochondrial disease models in mice and demonstrating a potential for the treatment of mitochondrial disorders.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Mitochondrial DNA plays a critical role in cellular respiration via the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system. Because the OXPHOS system is essential for survival, mutations in mtDNA cause severe malfunctions in multiple organs and muscles, especially in high-energy demand tissues. Typically, in humans with a mitochondrial disease, wild-type (WT) and mutant mtDNA with single-base mutations coexist in a cell, resulting in a heteroplasmic state of the mtDNA population. The balance between mutant and WT mtDNA determines the development of mitochondrial diseases with clinical phenotypes. Programmable nucleases have been used to cleave a mutant mtDNA, but not the WT mtDNA to reduce the mutant mtDNA population in vitro and in vivo,. But these nucleases cannot induce or revert a specific mutation in mtDNA, possibly because DNA double-strand breaks are not efficiently repaired in mitochondria by nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination, unlike those in the nucleus.
Mok et al. recently developed a base editing approach using the bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin, DddAtox, to demonstrate efficient C-to-T base conversions in vitro. In this approach, split DddAtox nontoxic halves fused to transcription activator-like effector (TALE) proteins, which can be custom-designed to recognize predetermined target DNA sequences, form a functional cytosine deaminase within the editing window to induce C-to-T base editing at the target site in mtDNA.
In this study, we investigate whether DdCBEs can achieve mtDNA base editing in vivo to create animal models with mitochondrial mutations and to show germline transmission of the resulting mitochondrial mutations in mice.
Assembly of DdCBE plasmids
To facilitate the assembly of custom-designed TALE arrays in DdCBEs, we constructed expression plasmids encoding split DddAtox halves and used our Golden-Gate cloning system, which employs a total of 424 (=6 × 64 tripartite + 2 × 16 bipartite + 2 × 4 monopartite) modular TALE array plasmids, (Fig. 1a). We mixed six TALE array plasmids and an expression vector in a single Eppendorf tube to construct a ready-to-use DdCBE plasmid that encodes 15.5–18.5 repeat variable diresidue arrays (Supplementary Fig. 1). The resulting DdCBEs recognized DNA sequences of 17–20 base pairs (bps) in length, including a conserved T at the 5′ terminus (Supplementary Table 1). As a result, a functional DdCBE pair recognized 32- to 40-bp DNA sequences (Fig. 1b).
Mitochondrial DNA editing in vitro
We chose the Mus musculus mitochondrial ND5 gene encoding NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5 protein to demonstrate in vivo mtDNA editing using our Golden-Gate assembly system. The ND5 protein is a core subunit of NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone), which catalyzes the transfer of electrons from NADH to the respiratory chain. In humans, mutations in the ND5 gene are known to be related to mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS), as well as some symptoms of Leigh’s syndrome and Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). We sought to generate mouse models with genetic variations in the mitochondrial gene to mimic the dysfunctions in humans.
First, we assembled several DdCBE plasmids that were designed to induce two possible silent mutations, m.C12539T and m.G12542A, in the ND5 gene. We transfected these plasmids into the NIH3T3 mouse cell line, and measured editing frequencies at day 3 post transfection. As expected, cytosine bases in the editing window were successfully converted into thymine with editing efficiencies of up to 19% (Fig. 2a). In line with the previous report showing that DddAtox exclusively deaminates cytosine in a “TC” motif, only the two cytosine bases in a TC context were edited. Indels and other types of point mutations were not detectably induced in the editing window.
Mitochondrial DNA editing in vivo
We chose the most active DdCBE pair (left-G1397-N and right-G1397-C) for an in vivo study. At day 4 post microinjection of in vitro transcripts encoding this DdCBE pair into one-cell stage C57BL6/J embryos, we were able to obtain nine edit-positive embryos out of a total of 32 embryos (28%; Table 1). The TALE–DddAtox deaminase efficiently induced C ∙ G to T ∙ A transitions, with frequencies that ranged from 2.2 to 25% at the m.C12539 position and from 0.63 to 5.8% at the m.G12542 position (Fig. 2b). Next, we implanted DdCBE-injected embryos into surrogate mothers, and obtained offspring carrying m.C12539T and m.G12542A mutations (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Three out of four newborn (F0) mice harbored C ∙ G to T ∙ A conversions with frequencies that ranged from 1 to 27% (Fig. 2c). Two pups showed similar mutation frequencies in the toe and the tail, which were retained for at least 14 days after birth. Furthermore, these mtDNA mutations were detected in various tissues obtained from a fully grown adult F0 mouse at day 50 post birth (Fig. 2d). This result suggests that mtDNA heteroplasmy induced by DdCBEs in one-cell stage zygotes can be maintained throughout development and differentiation.
To investigate whether the DdCBE-induced mutations can be transmitted to the next generation, we crossed the female F0 mouse with a WT C57BL6/J male and obtained F1 offspring. The m.C12539T and m.G12542A mutations were observed in two newborns with frequencies that ranged from 6 to 26% (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, these two mtDNA edits were detected at comparable frequencies in 11 different tissues (Fig. 3b).
DdCBE-mediated MT-ND5 G12918A mutation
Next, we sought to produce the m.G12918A point mutation, which can cause mitochondrial disorders in humans. Note that mutations at this position give rise to multiple mitochondrial diseases, such as Leigh disease, MELAS syndrome, and LHON syndrome,. The cytosine base at this position has adjacent thymine, amenable for DdCBE-mediated base editing (Fig. 4a). We assembled four DdCBE pairs and confirmed successful base editing at this position in NIH3T3 cells with up to 6.4% efficiency (Fig. 4b). We then microinjected the best-performing DdCBE combination into mouse zygotes and measured editing efficiencies in the resulting blastocysts. Eleven out of 44 (25%) embryos harbored the m.G12918A mutation with editing efficiencies that ranged from 0.25 to 23% (Fig. 4c). Next, we implanted DdCBE-microinjected embryos into surrogate mothers to obtain the G12918A mutant offspring (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Four out of 11 newborn mice harbored the mutant allele with frequencies of 3.9–31.6% (Fig. 4d). Although no apparent phenotypes were observed right after birth, possibly because the pups were still very young and also because the WT mitochondrial DNA coexists with the mutant DNA in a heteroplasmic state, these data suggest that DdCBEs can be used to create animal models with mitochondrial disorders.
MT-ND5 nonsense mutation
Last but not the least, we investigated whether a loss-of-function mutation in ND5 would be tolerated in mice by creating a nonsense mutation in the gene. We chose m.C12336 as a target cytosine for incorporation of a premature stop codon at the 199th position of the ND5 protein (Q199*; Fig. 5a). We first determined the editing activity of four custom-designed DdCBE combinations in transfected NIH3T3 cells and found that the most effective DdCBE pair induced the nonsense mutation at an editing efficiency of 5.7% (Fig. 5b). This DdCBE also induced a C-to-T conversion, albeit less efficiently, at m.G12341A in the editing window, which created a silent mutation (Q200Q). In 19 out of 37 (=51%) mouse embryos, we also observed the two m.C12336T and m.G12341A mutations with editing frequencies of up to 32% and 23%, respectively (Fig. 5c).
Encouraged by these results, we implanted mouse embryos into surrogate mothers, and obtained offspring with m.C12336T and m.G12341A mutations (Supplementary Fig. 2c). A total of 9 out of 27 F0 mice (23%) harbored C ∙ G to T ∙ A conversions with frequencies that ranged from 0.22 to 57% (Fig. 5d, e), showing that the ND5 nonsense mutation did not lead to embryonic lethality.
Discussion
Base editing, catalyzed by a Cas9 nickase fused to a deaminase protein, is a powerful method for inducing point mutations or substitutions in the nuclear genome without double-stranded DNA cleavage,. Previously, we were able to use both cytosine and adenine base editors to create animal models with point mutations in the nuclear genome and to correct them in vivo,. Unlike the nuclear genome, however, mitochondrial DNA has never been successfully edited in vitro or in vivo using the Cas9 nickase–deaminase fusion proteins, possibly because it is difficult to deliver both the protein component and guide RNA to mitochondria at the same time. Mok et al. demonstrated that a base editing system, free of guide RNA, composed of a TALE array fused to DddAtox enables mtDNA base editing in cell lines. In this study, we used DdCBEs to create various point mutations, including silent, nonsense, and missense mutations, in the mitochondrial ND5 gene in mice for the first time (Table 1). To this end, we developed a Golden-Gate cloning system that consists of a total of 432 plasmids (8 expression plasmids plus 424 TALE array plasmids) to assemble DdCBE plasmids rapidly. MtDNA mutations induced by the resulting DdCBEs were detected in various tissues in an adult mouse, showing that mtDNA heteroplasmy induced by DdCBEs was maintained throughout the development and differentiation. We also showed successful germline transmission of mtDNA edits induced by DdCBEs, suggesting that it is possible to create animal models with mitochondrial disorders. We propose that our Golden-Gate plasmids are valuable resources for studying the functions of mitochondrial genes in vitro and in vivo, and to correct pathogenic mutations for the treatment of mitochondrial genetic disorders in the future.
Plasmid construction
We adapted our transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) assembly system to construct expression vectors for the split DddA halves, as well as final TALE–DddAtox constructs. Beginning with the expression vector from the TALEN system, we replaced the fragments encoding the nuclear localization sequence and FokI obligatory heterodimeric halves with fragments encoding mitochondrial translocation sequences (MTS), DddA deaminase dimeric halves, and uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI). The MTS-, DddA-, and UGI-encoding sequences were synthesized by IDT. To construct expression plasmids, DNA fragments for Gibson assembly were amplified using Q5 DNA Polymerase (NEB), and subjected to PCR and gel purification. Purified gene fragments were assembled with a HiFi DNA assembly kit (NEB); assembled plasmids were chemically transformed into Escherichia coli DH5ɑ (Enzynomics), and their identity confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Thereby, we obtained eight expression plasmids, which include BsaI restriction enzyme sites between regions encoding the N-terminal domain and C-terminal half domain (NG) of TALE for Golden-gate assembly. For DdCBE plasmid assembly, each expression plasmid was mixed with six module vectors (each encoding a TALE array), BsaI (10 U), T4 DNA ligase (200 U), and reaction buffer in a single tube (Supplementary Fig. 1). Next, restriction–ligation reactions were performed in a thermocycler, with 20 cycles of 37 °C and 50 °C for 5 min each, followed by final incubations at 50 °C for 15 min and 80 °C for 5 min. Ligated plasmids were chemically transformed into E. coli DH5ɑ, and subjected to Sanger sequencing to confirm the identity of the constructs. Correct plasmids were midi-prepped (Qiagen) for cell transfection.
Mammalian cell culture and transfection
NIH3T3 (CRL-1658, American Type Culture Collection) cells were cultured and maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) bovine calf serum (Gibco) without any antibiotics. For lipofection, cells were seeded in 12-well cell culture plates (SPL, Seoul, Korea) at a density of 1.5 × 104 cells per well, 18–24 h before transfection. Lipofection using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) was performed with 500 ng of each TALE half monomer plasmid to make up 1000 ng of total plasmid DNA. Cells were harvested at day 3 post transfection.
mRNA preparation
The mRNA templates were prepared by PCR using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB) with the following primers (F: 5′-CATCAATGGGCGTGGATAG-3′, R: 5′-GACACCTACTCAGACAATGC-3′). DdCBE mRNAs were synthesized using an in vitro RNA transcription kit (mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Ultra kit, Ambion) and purified with a MEGAclear kit (Ambion).
Animals
Experiments involving mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Institute for Basic Science. Super ovulated C57BL/6 J females were mated to C57BL/6 J males, and females from the ICR strain were used as foster mothers. Mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility under a 12 h dark–light cycle, and constant temperature (20–26 °C) and humidity maintenance (40–60%).
Microinjection of mouse zygotes
Steps prior to microinjection, including superovulation and embryo collection, as well as microinjection itself, were performed as described previously. For microinjection, a mixture containing left DdCBE mRNA (300 ng/μl) and right DdCBE mRNA (300 ng/μl) was diluted in DEPC-treated injection buffer (0.25 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4), and injected into the cytoplasm of zygotes using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ti micromanipulator and a FemtoJet 4i microinjector (Eppendorf). After injection, embryos were cultured in micro drops of KSOM + AA (Millipore) at 37 °C for 4 days in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Two-cell-stage embryos were implanted into the oviducts of 0.5-d.p.c. pseudo-pregnant foster mothers.
Genotyping
Blastocyst stage embryos and tissues were incubated in lysis buffer (25 mM NaOH, 0.2 mM EDTA, pH 10) at 95 °C for 20 min, after which the pH was adjusted to 7.4 using HEPES (free acids, without pH adjustment) at a final concentration of 50 mM. Genomic DNA was extracted from pups for PCR genotyping using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kits (Qiagen), and subjected to Sanger and targeted deep sequencing.
Mitochondrial DNA isolation for high-throughput sequencing
To isolate mitochondria from NIH3T3 cells in 12-well cell culture plates, the culture medium was aspirated, and 200 µl of Mitochondrial isolation buffer A (ScienCell) was added to each well. Cells were scraped with cell lifter, collected into microtubes, and homogenized with a disposable pestle designed for cell grinding. After 15 strokes, the homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a clean microtube and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 20 µl of lysis solution (25 mM NaOH, 0.2 mM EDTA, pH 10), and incubated at 95 °C for 20 min. To lower the pH, we added 2 µl of 1 M HEPES (free acids, without pH adjustment) to the lysed mitochondrial solution. A total of 1 µl of lysate was used as a template for high-throughput sequencing.
Targeted deep sequencing
To create a high-throughput sequencing library, nested first PCR and second PCR were performed, and final index sequences were incorporated, using Q5 DNA Polymerase. The library was subjected to paired-end read sequencing using MiniSeq (Illumina). In all cases, the paired-end sequencing results were joined into a single fastqjoin file and analyzed via CRISPR RGEN Tools (http://www.rgenome.net/).
Data analysis and display
Microsoft Excel (2019) and Powerpoint (2019) was used for drawing figures, graphs, and tables. Genome alignment, primer design, and cloning design were performed with Geneious (version 2021.0.1) and Snapgene 5.2.3, using NC_005089 genome as a reference.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
References 17
- 1.
Craven L, Alston CL, Taylor RW, Turnbull DM. Recent advances in mitochondrial disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2017;18:257-275.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-genom-091416-035426
- 2.
Schon EA, DiMauro S, Hirano M. Human mitochondrial DNA: roles of inherited and somatic mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:878-890.
Not in our library10.1038/nrg3275
- 3.
Gorman GS, et al. Mitochondrial diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16080.
Not in our library10.1038/nrdp.2016.80
- 4.
Hashimoto M, et al. MitoTALEN: a general approach to reduce mutant mtDNA loads and restore oxidative phosphorylation function in mitochondrial diseases. Mol. Ther. 2015;23:1592-1599.
Not in our library10.1038/mt.2015.126
- 5.
Bacman SR, Williams SL, Pinto M, Peralta S, Moraes CT. Specific elimination of mutant mitochondrial genomes in patient-derived cells by mitoTALENs. Nat. Med. 2013;19:1111-1113.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.3261
- 6.
Mok BY, et al. A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature. 2020;583:631-637.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2477-4
- 7.
Boch J, et al. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science. 2009;326:1509-1512.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1178811
- 8.
Kim Y, et al. A library of TAL effector nucleases spanning the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:251-258.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2517
- 9.
Sung YH, et al. Knockout mice created by TALEN-mediated gene targeting. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:23-24.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2477
- 10.
Chol M, et al. The mitochondrial DNA G13513A MELAS mutation in the NADH dehydrogenase 5 gene is a frequent cause of Leigh-like syndrome with isolated complex I deficiency. J. Med. Genet. 2003;40:188-191.
Not in our library10.1136/jmg.40.3.188
- 11.
Shanske S, et al. The G13513A mutation in the ND5 gene of mitochondrial DNA as a common cause of MELAS or Leigh syndrome: evidence from 12 cases. Arch. Neurol. 2008;65:368-372.
Not in our library10.1001/archneurol.2007.67
- 12.
Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. 2016;533:420-424.
Not in our library10.1038/nature17946
- 13.
Gaudelli NM, et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 2017;551:464-471.
Not in our library10.1038/nature24644
- 14.
Ryu SM, et al. Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:536-539.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.4148
- 15.
Kim K, et al. Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:435-437.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3816
- 16.
Hur JK, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in mice by electroporation of Cpf1 ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016;34:807-808.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3596
- 17.
Park J, Lim K, Kim JS, Bae S. Cas-analyzer: an online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:286-288.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btw561
Cited by papers we hold 5
- Mitochondrial diseases: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic advances · 2025No notice
- In vivo mitochondrial base editing via adeno-associated viral delivery to mouse post-mitotic tissue · 2022Not checked
- CRISPR-free base editors with enhanced activity and expanded targeting scope in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA · 2022No notice
- Precision modeling of mitochondrial diseases in zebrafish via DdCBE-mediated mtDNA base editing · 2021Not checked
- Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA editing in plants · 2021No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.