No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and neutralizing activity in donor and patient blood
Dianna L. Ng, Gregory M. Goldgof, Brian R. Shy and 46 more
Nature Communications · 2020 · CC BY
doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18468-8
Abstract
Given the limited availability of serological testing to date, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in different populations has remained unclear. Here, we report very low SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in two San Francisco Bay Area populations. Seroreactivity was 0.26% in 387 hospitalized patients admitted for non-respiratory indications and 0.1% in 1,000 blood donors in early April 2020. We additionally describe the longitudinal dynamics of immunoglobulin-G (IgG), immunoglobulin-M (IgM), and in vitro neutralizing antibody titers in COVID-19 patients. The median time to seroconversion ranged from 10.3–11.0 days for these 3 assays. Neutralizing antibodies rose in tandem with immunoglobulin titers following symptom onset, and positive percent agreement between detection of IgG and neutralizing titers was >93%. These findings emphasize the importance of using highly accurate tests for surveillance studies in low-prevalence populations, and provide evidence that seroreactivity using SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid protein IgG and anti-spike IgM assays are generally predictive of in vitro neutralizing capacity.
References 16
- 1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2001017
- 2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.2648
- 3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30079-5
- 4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 5.
- 6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1
- 7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciaa344
- 8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1093/cid/civ951
- 9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01009.x
- 10.
- 11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1093/ije/dyab010
- 13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.8279
- 14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.5445
- 15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
Cited by papers we hold 8
- Persistent but dysfunctional mucosal SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA and low lung IL-1β associate with COVID-19 fatal outcome: A cross-sectional analysis · 2022Not checked
- Undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States · 2021No notice
- Three-quarters attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in the Brazilian Amazon during a largely unmitigated epidemic · 2021No notice
- Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data · 2020No notice
- SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in blood products from patients with COVID-19 is not associated with infectious virus · 2020No notice
- Rapid generation of durable B cell memory to SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins in COVID-19 and convalescence · 2020No notice
- Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review · 2020No notice
- Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications · 2020No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.