Structure and chemistry of graphene oxide in liquid water from first principles

Abstract

Graphene oxide is a rising star among 2D materials, yet its interaction with liquid water remains a fundamentally open question: experimental characterization at the atomic scale is difficult, and modeling by classical approaches cannot properly describe chemical reactivity. Here, we bridge the gap between simple computational models and complex experimental systems, by realistic first-principles molecular simulations of graphene oxide (GO) in liquid water. We construct chemically accurate GO models and study their behavior in water, showing that oxygen-bearing functional groups (hydroxyl and epoxides) are preferentially clustered on the graphene oxide layer. We demonstrated the specific properties of GO in water, an unusual combination of both hydrophilicity and fast water dynamics. Finally, we evidence that GO is chemically active in water, acquiring an average negative charge of the order of 10 mC m −2 . The ab initio modeling highlights the uniqueness of GO structures for applications as innovative membranes for desalination and water purification.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 63

1. 1.

   Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:228-240.

   Not in our library10.1039/b917103g (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.

   Zhu Y, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:3906-3924.

   Not in our library10.1002/adma.201001068 (opens in a new tab)

3. 3.

   Joshi RK, et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science. 2014;343:752-754.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1245711 (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Su Y, et al. Impermeable barrier films and protective coatings based on reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3906.

   Not in our library10.1038/ncomms4906 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.

   Kumar S, et al. Graphene oxide–MnFe2O4 magnetic nanohybrids for efficient removal of lead and arsenic from water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:17426-17436.

   Not in our library10.1021/am504826q (opens in a new tab)

6. 6.

   Favaro M, et al. Multiple doping of graphene oxide foams and quantum dots: new switchable systems for oxygen reduction and water remediation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:14334-14347.

   Not in our library10.1039/c5ta01561h (opens in a new tab)

7. 7.

   Dutta D, Thiyagarajan S, Bahadur D. SnO2 quantum dots decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for efficient water remediation. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;297:55-65.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.130 (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.

   Yadav R, Subhash A, Chemmenchery N, Kandasubramanian B. Graphene and graphene oxide for fuel cell technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018;57:9333-9350.

   Not in our library10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02326 (opens in a new tab)

9. 9.

   Farooqui U, Ahmad A, Hamid N. Graphene oxide: a promising membrane material for fuel cells. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018;82:714-733.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.081 (opens in a new tab)

10. 10.

    Nakajima T, Mabuchi A, Hagiwara R. A new structure model of graphite oxide. Carbon. 1988;26:357-361.

    Not in our library10.1016/0008-6223(88)90227-8 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Szabó T, et al. Evolution of surface functional groups in a series of progressively oxidized graphite oxides. Chem. Mater. 2006;18:2740-2749.

    Not in our library10.1021/cm060258+ (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Stankovich S, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS. Synthesis and exfoliation of isocyanate-treated graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Carbon. 2006;44:3342-3347.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.004 (opens in a new tab)

13. 13.

    Stankovich S, et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon. 2007;45:1558-1565.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 (opens in a new tab)

14. 14.

    Yang D, et al. Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by X-ray photoelectron and micro-raman spectroscopy. Carbon. 2009;47:145-152.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.045 (opens in a new tab)

15. 15.

    Schniepp HC, et al. Functionalized single graphene sheets derived from splitting graphite oxide. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:8535-8539.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp060936f (opens in a new tab)

16. 16.

    McAllister MJ, et al. Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite. Chem. Mater. 2007;19:4396-4404.

    Not in our library10.1021/cm0630800 (opens in a new tab)

17. 17.

    He H, Klinowski J, Forster M, Lerf A. A new structural model for graphite oxide. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998;287:53-56.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00144-4 (opens in a new tab)

18. 18.

    Lerf A, He H, Forster M, Klinowski J. Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:4477-4482.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp9731821 (opens in a new tab)

19. 19.

    Yan J-A, Xian L, Chou MY. Structural and electronic properties of oxidized graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:086802.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.103.086802 (opens in a new tab)

20. 20.

    Lee DW, et al. The structure of graphite oxide: Investigation of its surface chemical groups. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114:5723-5728.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp1002275 (opens in a new tab)

21. 21.

    Bagri A, et al. Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nat. Chem. 2010;2:581-587.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchem.686 (opens in a new tab)

22. 22.

    Wei N, Peng X, Xu Z. Understanding water permeation in graphene oxide membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:5877-5883.

    Not in our library10.1021/am500777b (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Devanathan R, Chase-Woods D, Shin Y, Gotthold DW. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that water diffusion between graphene oxide layers is slow. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:457.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep29484 (opens in a new tab)

24. 24.

    Cohen-Tanugi D, Lin L-C, Grossman JC. Multilayer nanoporous graphene membranes for water desalination. Nano Lett. 2016;16:1027-1033.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04089 (opens in a new tab)

25. 25.

    Hou D, Yang T. A reactive molecular dynamics study of graphene oxide sheets in different saturated states: structure, reactivity and mechanical properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20:11053-11066.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8cp00813b (opens in a new tab)

26. 26.

    Cassagneau T, Guérin F, Fendler JH. Preparation and characterization of ultrathin films layer-by-layer self-assembled from graphite oxide nanoplatelets and polymers. Langmuir. 2000;16:7318-7324.

    Not in our library10.1021/la000442o (opens in a new tab)

27. 27.

    Boukhvalov DW, Katsnelson MI. Modeling of graphite oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:10697-10701.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja8021686 (opens in a new tab)

28. 28.

    Yang Q, et al. Ultrathin graphene-based membrane with precise molecular sieving and ultrafast solvent permeation. Nat. Mater. 2017;16:1198-1202.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat5025 (opens in a new tab)

29. 29.

    Zhou K-G, et al. Electrically controlled water permeation through graphene oxide membranes. Nature. 2018;559:236-240.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0292-y (opens in a new tab)

30. 30.

    Kudin KN, et al. Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 2008;8:36-41.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl071822y (opens in a new tab)

31. 31.

    Yan J-A, Chou MY. Oxidation functional groups on graphene: structural and electronic properties. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;82:17.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Wang B, Bocquet M-L, Marchini S, Günther S, Wintterlin J. Chemical origin of a graphene Moiré overlayer on Ru(0001). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008;10:3530-3534.

    Not in our library10.1039/b801785a (opens in a new tab)

33. 33.

    Wang B, Bocquet M-L, Günther S, Wintterlin J. Comment on “Periodically rippled graphene: growth and spatially resolved electronic structure”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;101:099703.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.101.099703 (opens in a new tab)

34. 34.

    Zhou S, Bongiorno A. Origin of the chemical and kinetic stability of graphene oxide. Sci Rep. 2013;3:457.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep02484 (opens in a new tab)

35. 35.

    Kumar PV, et al. New insights into the thermal reduction of graphene oxide: impact of oxygen clustering. Carbon. 2016;100:90-98.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.087 (opens in a new tab)

36. 36.

    Xia S, Ni M, Zhu T, Zhao Y, Li N. Ultrathin graphene oxide nanosheet membranes with various d-spacing assembled using the pressure-assisted filtration method for removing natural organic matter. Desalination. 2015;371:78-87.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.005 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Abraham J, et al. Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017;12:546-550.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2017.21 (opens in a new tab)

38. 38.

    Khoei AR, Khorrami MS. Mechanical properties of graphene oxide: a molecular dynamics study. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2016;24:594-603.

    Not in our library10.1080/1536383x.2016.1208180 (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    Fraux, G. Chemfiles, available online at https://zenodo.org/record/3490304#.Xab2mS3M1QI.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Fraux, G. cfiles, available online at https://github.com/chemfiles/cfiles.

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    Jeffrey, G. A. An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Coudert F-X, Cailliez F, Vuilleumier R, Fuchs AH, Boutin A. Water nanodroplets confined in zeolite pores. Faraday Discuss. 2009;141:377-398.

    Not in our library10.1039/b804992k (opens in a new tab)

43. 43.

    Fogarty AC, Coudert F-X, Boutin A, Laage D. Reorientational dynamics of water confined in zeolites. ChemPhysChem. 2014;15:521-529.

    Not in our library10.1002/cphc.201300928 (opens in a new tab)

44. 44.

    Savazzi F, Risplendi F, Mallia G, Harrison NM, Cicero G. Unravelling some of the structure–property relationships in graphene oxide at low degree of oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9:1746-1749.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00421 (opens in a new tab)

45. 45.

    Agmon N. The Grotthuss mechanism. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995;244:456-462.

    Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(95)00905-j (opens in a new tab)

46. 46.

    Nair, R. Private communication.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    Konkena B, Vasudevan S. Understanding aqueous dispersibility of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide through pKa measurements. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:867-872.

    Not in our library10.1021/jz300236w (opens in a new tab)

48. 48.

    Siria A, et al. Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube. Nature. 2013;494:455-458.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11876 (opens in a new tab)

49. 49.

    Grosjean B, et al. Chemisorption of hydroxide on 2D materials from DFT calculations: graphene versus hexagonal boron nitride. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:4695-4700.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02248 (opens in a new tab)

50. 50.

    Hutter J, Iannuzzi M, Schiffmann F, VandeVondele J. CP2K: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014;4:15-25.

    Not in our library10.1002/wcms.1159 (opens in a new tab)

51. 51.

    Hafner J. Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: density-functional theory and beyond. J. Comput. Chem. 2008;29:2044-2078.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21057 (opens in a new tab)

52. 52.

    Vandevondele J, et al. Quickstep: fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves approach. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2005;167:103-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 (opens in a new tab)

53. 53.

    Lippert G, Hutter J, Parrinello M. A hybrid gaussian and plane wave density functional scheme. Mol. Phys. 1997;92:477-488.

    Not in our library10.1080/002689797170220 (opens in a new tab)

54. 54.

    Grosjean B, Bocquet M-L, Vuilleumier R. Versatile electrification of two-dimensional nanomaterials in water. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2541.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-019-09708-7 (opens in a new tab)

55. 55.

    VandeVondele J, Hutter J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases. J. Chem. Phys. 2007;127:114105.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2770708 (opens in a new tab)

56. 56.

    Goedecker S, Teter M, Hutter J. Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54:1703-1710.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.54.1703 (opens in a new tab)

57. 57.

    Hartwigsen C, Goedecker S, Hutter J. Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn. Phys. Rev. B. 1998;58:3641-3662.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.58.3641 (opens in a new tab)

58. 58.

    Krack M. Pseudopotentials for H to Kr optimized for gradient-corrected exchange-correlation functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2005;114:145-152.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00214-005-0655-y (opens in a new tab)

59. 59.

    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865-3868.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 (opens in a new tab)

60. 60.

    Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010;132:154104.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.3382344 (opens in a new tab)

61. 61.

    Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011;32:1456-1465.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21759 (opens in a new tab)

62. 62.

    Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 2007;126:014101.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2408420 (opens in a new tab)

63. 63.

    Martínez L, Andrade R, Birgin EG, Martínez JM. Packmol: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:2157-2164.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21224 (opens in a new tab)

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Multifunctional GelMA platforms with nanomaterials for advanced tissue therapeutics · 2022
  No notice

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.