Identifying substitutional oxygen as a prolific point defect in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides

Abstract

Chalcogen vacancies are generally considered to be the most common point defects in transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductors because of their low formation energy in vacuum and their frequent observation in transmission electron microscopy studies. Consequently, unexpected optical, transport, and catalytic properties in 2D-TMDs have been attributed to in-gap states associated with chalcogen vacancies, even in the absence of direct experimental evidence. Here, we combine low-temperature non-contact atomic force microscopy, scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy, and state-of-the-art ab initio density functional theory and GW calculations to determine both the atomic structure and electronic properties of an abundant chalcogen-site point defect common to MoSe 2 and WS 2 monolayers grown by molecular beam epitaxy and chemical vapor deposition, respectively. Surprisingly, we observe no in-gap states. Our results strongly suggest that the common chalcogen defects in the described 2D-TMD semiconductors, measured in vacuum environment after gentle annealing, are oxygen substitutional defects, rather than vacancies.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 58

1. 1.

   Manzeli S, Ovchinnikov D, Pasquier D, Yazyev OV, Kis A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017;2:17033.

   Not in our library10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33

2. 2.

   Lin Z, et al. Defect engineering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. 2D Mater. 2016;3:022002.

   Not in our library10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/022002

3. 3.

   Wang S, Robertson A, Warner JH. Atomic structure of defects and dopants in 2D layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:6764-6794.

   Not in our library10.1039/c8cs00236c

4. 4.

   Pandey M, et al. Defect-tolerant monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2016;16:2234-2239.

   Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04513

5. 5.

   Haldar S, Vovusha H, Yadav MK, Eriksson O, Sanyal B. A systematic study of structural, electronic and optical properties of atomic scale defects in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides MX2 (M = Mo,W; X = S, Se, Te). Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:235408.

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.92.235408

6. 6.

   Mahjouri-Samani M, et al. Tailoring vacancies far beyond intrinsic levels changes the carrier type and optical response in monolayer MoSe2−x crystals. Nano Lett. 2016;16:5213-5220.

   Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02263

7. 7.

   Naik MH, Jain M. Substrate screening effects on the quasiparticle band gap and defect charge transition levels in MoS2. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018;2:084002.

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.084002

8. 8.

   Yuan S, Roldán R, Katsnelson MI, Guinea F. Effect of point defects on the optical and transport properties of MoS2 and WS2. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90:041402.

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.90.041402

9. 9.

   Qiu H, et al. Hopping transport through defect-induced localized states in molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2642.

   Not in our library10.1038/ncomms3642

10. 10.
    Defects activated photoluminescence in two-dimensional semiconductors: interplay between bound, charged and free excitons · 2013

    No notice
11. 11.

    Chow PK, et al. Defect-induced photoluminescence in monolayer semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano. 2015;9:1520-1527.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn5073495

12. 12.

    Carozo V, et al. Optical identification of sulfur vacancies: bound excitons at the edges of monolayer tungsten disulfide. Sci. Adv. 2017;3:e1602813.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.1602813

13. 13.

    Zhang S, et al. Defect structure of localized excitons in a WSe2 monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:046101.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.119.046101

14. 14.

    Li H, et al. Activating and optimizing MoSe2 basal planes for hydrogen evolution through the formation of strained sulphur vacancies. Nat. Mater. 2016;15:48-53.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat4465

15. 15.

    Voiry D, et al. The role of electronic coupling between substrate and 2D MoS2 nanosheets in electrocatalytic production of hydrogen. Nat. Mater. 2016;15:1003-1009.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat4660

16. 16.

    Pető J, et al. Spontaneous doping of the basal plane of MoS2 single layers through oxygen substitution under ambient conditions. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:1246-1251.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41557-018-0136-2

17. 17.

    Chen Y, et al. Tuning electronic structure of single layer MoS2 through defect and interface engineering. ACS Nano. 2018;12:2569-2579.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b08418

18. 18.
    Exploring atomic defects in molybdenum disulphide monolayers · 2015

    No notice
19. 19.

    Komsa H-P, et al. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides under electron irradiation: defect production and doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:035503.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.109.035503

20. 20.

    Addou R, Colombo L, Wallace RM. Surface defects on natural MoS2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:11921-11929.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.5b01778

21. 21.

    Liu X, Balla I, Bergeron H, Hersam MC. Point defects and grain boundaries in rotationally commensurate MoS2 on epitaxial graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:20798-20805.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02073

22. 22.
    The intrinsic defect structure of exfoliated MoS2 single layers revealed by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy · 2016

    No notice
23. 23.

    Komsa H-P, Kurasch S, Lehtinen O, Kaiser U, Krasheninnikov AV. From point to extended defects in two-dimensional MoS2: evolution of atomic structure under electron irradiation. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;88:035301.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.88.035301

24. 24.

    Pennycook, S. J. and Nellist, P. D. Scanning transmission electron microscopy: imaging and analysis. (Springer, New York 2011).

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Ugeda MM, et al. Giant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 2014;13:1091-1095.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat4061

26. 26.

    Altibelli A, Joachim C, Sautet P. Interpretation of STM images: The MoS2 surface. Surf. Sci. 1996;367:209-220.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0039-6028(96)00864-3

27. 27.

    Peng J-P, et al. Molecular beam epitaxy growth and scanning tunneling microscopy study of TiSe2 ultrathin films. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:121113.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.91.121113

28. 28.

    Hildebrand B, et al. Doping nature of native defects in 1T-TiSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;112:197001.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.112.197001

29. 29.

    Su W, Jin L, Qu X, Huo D, Yang L. Defect passivation induced strong photoluminescence enhancement of rhombic monolayer MoS2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:14001-14006.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6cp00241b

30. 30.

    Lu J, et al. Atomic healing of defects in transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2015;15:3524-3532.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00952

31. 31.

    Gross L, Mohn F, Moll N, Liljeroth P, Meyer G. The chemical structure of a molecule resolved by atomic force microscopy. Science. 2009;325:1110-1114.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1176210

32. 32.

    Moll N, Gross L, Mohn F, Curioni A, Meyer G. The mechanisms underlying the enhanced resolution of atomic force microscopy with functionalized tips. New J. Phys. 2010;12:125020.

    Not in our library10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/125020

33. 33.

    Hapala P, et al. Mechanism of high-resolution STM/AFM imaging with functionalized tips. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90:085421.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.90.085421

34. 34.

    Barja S, et al. Charge density wave order in 1D mirror twin boundaries of single-layer MoSe2. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:751-756.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphys3730

35. 35.

    Komsa H-P, Krasheninnikov AV. Native defects in bulk and monolayer MoS2 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:125304.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.91.125304

36. 36.

    Wei X, et al. Mo-O bond doping and related-defect assisted enhancement of photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. AIP Adv. 2014;4:123004.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.4897522

37. 37.

    Klein J, et al. Robust valley polarization of helium ion modified atomically thin MoS2. 2D Mater. 2017;5:011007.

    Not in our library10.1088/2053-1583/aa9642

38. 38.

    Liu H, Han N, Zhao J. Atomistic insight into the oxidation of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides: from structures to electronic properties. RSC Adv. 2015;5:17572-17581.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4ra17320a

39. 39.

    Liu M, et al. Temperature-triggered sulfur vacancy evolution in monolayer MoS2/graphene heterostructures. Small. 2017;13:1602967.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201602967

40. 40.

    Schuler, B. et al. Large spin-orbit splitting of deep in-gap defect states of engineered sulfur vacancies in monolayer WS2. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/quant-ph/0208066 (2018).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.123.076801

41. 41.

    Hybertsen MS, Louie SG. First-principles theory of quasiparticles: calculation of band gaps in semiconductors and insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985;55:1418-1421.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.55.1418

42. 42.

    Refaely-Abramson S, et al. Quasiparticle spectra from a nonempirical optimally tuned range-separated hybrid density functional. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:226405.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.109.226405

43. 43.

    Lüftner D, et al. Experimental and theoretical electronic structure of quinacridone. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90:075204.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.90.075204

44. 44.

    Hybertsen MS, Louie SG. Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: band gaps and quasiparticle energies. Phys. Rev. B. 1986;34:5390-5413.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.34.5390

45. 45.

    Deslippe J, et al. BerkeleyGW: a massively parallel computer package for the calculation of the quasiparticle and optical properties of materials and nanostructures. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2012;183:1269-1289.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cpc.2011.12.006

46. 46.

    Bradley AJ, et al. Probing the role of interlayer coupling and coulomb interactions on electronic structure in few-layer MoSe2 nanostructures. Nano Lett. 2015;15:2594-2599.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00160

47. 47.

    Qiu DY, da Jornada FH, Louie SG. Screening and many-body effects in two-dimensional crystals: Monolayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:235435.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.93.235435

48. 48.

    Qiu DY, da Jornada FH, Louie SG. Optical spectrum of MoS2: many-body effects and diversity of exciton states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111:216805.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.111.216805

49. 49.

    Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 1965;140:A1133-A1138.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrev.140.a1133

50. 50.

    Refaely-Abramson S, Qiu DY, Louie SG, Neaton JB. Defect-induced modification of low-lying excitons and valley selectivity in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;121:167402.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.121.167402

51. 51.

    Krivanek OL, et al. Atom-by-atom structural and chemical analysis by annular dark-field electron microscopy. Nature. 2010;464:571-574.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08879

52. 52.

    Zhang Y, et al. Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014;9:111-115.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2013.277

53. 53.

    Kastl C, et al. Multimodal spectromicroscopy of monolayer WS2 enabled by ultra-clean van der Waals epitaxy. 2D Mater. 2018;5:045010.

    Not in our library10.1088/2053-1583/aad21c

54. 54.

    Horcas I, et al. WSXM: a software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007;78:013705.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2432410

55. 55.

    da Jornada FH, Qiu DY, Louie SG. Nonuniform sampling schemes of the Brillouin zone for many-electron perturbation-theory calculations in reduced dimensionality. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;95:035109.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.95.035109

56. 56.

    Shao M, et al. Low rank approximation in G0W0 calculations. Sci. China Math. 2016;59:1593-1612.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11425-016-0296-x

57. 57.

    Lebègue S, Arnaud B, Alouani M, Bloechl PE. Implementation of an all-electron GW approximation based on the projector augmented wave method without plasmon pole approximation: application to Si, SiC, AlAs, InAs, NaH, and KH. Phys. Rev. B. 2003;67:155208.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.67.155208

58. 58.

    Kotani T, van Schilfgaarde M. All-electron GW approximation with the mixed basis expansion based on the full-potential LMTO method. Solid State Commun. 2002;121:461-465.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0038-1098(02)00028-5

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Nanoscale redox mapping at the MoS2-liquid interface · 2021
  Not checked
• The role of chalcogen vacancies for atomic defect emission in MoS2 · 2021
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.