Human-sized magnetic particle imaging for brain applications

Abstract

Determining the brain perfusion is an important task for diagnosis of vascular diseases such as occlusions and intracerebral haemorrhage. Even after successful diagnosis, there is a high risk of restenosis or rebleeding such that patients need intense attention in the days after treatment. Within this work, we present a diagnostic tomographic imager that allows access to brain perfusion quantitatively in short intervals. The device is based on the magnetic particle imaging technology and is designed for human scale. It is highly sensitive and allows the detection of an iron concentration of 263 pmol Fe ml −1 , which is one of the lowest iron concentrations imaged by MPI so far. The imager is self-shielded and can be used in unshielded environments such as intensive care units. In combination with the low technical requirements this opens up a variety of medical applications and would allow monitoring of stroke on intensive care units.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 47

1. 1.

   Feigin VL, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245-255.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4 (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.

   Gleich B, Weizenecker J. Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles. Nature. 2005;435:1214-1217.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature03808 (opens in a new tab)

3. 3.

   Harisinghani Mukesh G., Barentsz Jelle, Hahn Peter F., Deserno Willem M., Tabatabaei Shahin, van de Kaa Christine Hulsbergen, de la Rosette Jean, Weissleder Ralph. Noninvasive Detection of Clinically Occult Lymph-Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;348(25):2491-2499.

   Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa022749 (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Reimer P, Balzer T. Ferucarbotran (resovist): a new clinically approved res-specific contrast agent for contrast-enhanced mri of the liver: properties, clinical development, and applications. Eur. Radiol. 2003;13:1266-1276.

   Not in our library10.1007/s00330-002-1721-7 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.

   Wang YXJ, Hussain SM, Krestin GP. Superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents: physicochemical characteristics and applications in mr imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2001;11:2319-2331.

   Not in our library10.1007/s003300100908 (opens in a new tab)

6. 6.

   Weizenecker J, Gleich B, Rahmer J, Dahnke H, Borgert J. Three-dimensional real-time in vivo magnetic particle imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2009;54:L1-L10.

   Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/l01 (opens in a new tab)

7. 7.

   Graeser M, et al. Towards picogram detection of superparamagnetic iron-oxide particles using a gradiometric receive coil. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:6872.

   Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-06992-5 (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.
   Magnetic Particle Imaging tracks the long-term fate of in vivo neural cell implants with high image contrast · 2015

   No notice
9. 9.

   Sattel T, et al. Single-sided device for magnetic particle imaging. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2009;42:1-5.

   Not in our library10.1088/0022-3727/42/2/022001 (opens in a new tab)

10. 10.

    Ludewig P, et al. Magnetic particle imaging for real-time perfusion imaging in acute stroke. ACS Nano. 2017;11:10480-10488.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b05784 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Yu EY, et al. Magnetic particle imaging for highly sensitive, quantitative, and safe in vivo gut bleed detection in a murine model. ACS Nano. 2017;11:12067-12076.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b04844 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Zhou XY, et al. First in vivo magnetic particle imaging of lung perfusion in rats. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017;62:3510.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6560/aa616c (opens in a new tab)

13. 13.

    Bulte JW, et al. Quantitative “hot spot” imaging of transplanted stem cells using superparamagnetic tracers and magnetic particle imaging (mpi). Tomography. 2015;1:91.

    Not in our library10.18383/j.tom.2015.00172 (opens in a new tab)

14. 14.

    Sedlacik J, et al. Magnetic particle imaging for high temporal resolution assessment of aneurysm hemodynamics. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160097.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0160097 (opens in a new tab)

15. 15.

    Arami H, et al. Tomographic magnetic particle imaging of cancer targeted nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2017;9:18723-18730.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7nr05502a (opens in a new tab)

16. 16.

    Cooley Clarissa Zimmerman, Mandeville Joseph B., Mason Erica E., Mandeville Emiri T., Wald Lawrence L. Rodent Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) changes during hypercapnia observed using Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) detection. NeuroImage. 2018;178:713-720.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.004 (opens in a new tab)

17. 17.

    Haegele J, et al. Multi-color magnetic particle imaging for cardiovascular interventions. Phys. Med. Biol. 2016;61:N415.

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/61/16/n415 (opens in a new tab)

18. 18.

    Salamon J, et al. Magnetic particle/magnetic resonance imaging: In-vitro mpi-guided real time catheter tracking and 4d angioplasty using a road map and blood pool tracer approach. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156899.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0156899 (opens in a new tab)

19. 19.

    Herz S, et al. Magnetic particle imaging guided real-time percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in a phantom model. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2018;41:1100-1105.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00270-018-1955-7 (opens in a new tab)

20. 20.

    Rahmer J, Wirtz D, Bontus C, Borgert J, Gleich B. Interactive magnetic catheter steering with 3-d real-time feedback using multi-color magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2017;36:1449-1456.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2679099 (opens in a new tab)

21. 21.

    Knopp T, Gdaniec N, Möddel M. Magnetic particle imaging: From proof of principle to preclinical applications. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017;62:R124.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6560/aa6c99 (opens in a new tab)

22. 22.

    Rahmer J, Stehning C, Gleich B. Remote magnetic actuation using a clinical scale system. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0193546.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0193546 (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Mason, E. et al. Design analysis of an MPI human functional brain scanner. Int. J. Magn. Part. Imaging3 (2017). 10.18416/ijmpi.2017.1703008.

    Not in our library10.18416/ijmpi.2017.1703008 (opens in a new tab)

24. 24.

    Kaul MG, et al. Combined preclinical magnetic particle imaging and magnetic resonance imaging: Initial results in mice. RöFo. 2015;187:347-352.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0034-1399344 (opens in a new tab)

25. 25.

    Schmale, I. et al. Human PNS and SAR study in the frequency range from 24 to 162 kHz. Int. Workshop Magnetic Particle Imag. 1–1 (2013). 10.1109/IWMPI.2013.6528346.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Saritas E, Goodwill P, Zhang G, Conolly S. Magnetostimulation limits in magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2013;32:1600-1610.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2013.2260764 (opens in a new tab)

27. 27.

    Sperber C, Karnath HO. Topography of acute stroke in a sample of 439 right brain damaged patients. NeuroImage. 2016;10:124-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.012 (opens in a new tab)

28. 28.

    Bristow MS, et al. Mr perfusion and diffusion in acute ischemic stroke: human gray and white matter have different thresholds for infarction. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2005;25:1280-1287.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600135 (opens in a new tab)

29. 29.

    Christen T, et al. High-resolution cerebral blood volume imaging in humans using the blood pool contrast agent ferumoxytol. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;70:705-710.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.24500 (opens in a new tab)

30. 30.

    Southern Paul, Pankhurst Quentin A. Using the ‘dispersion-retention-formulation method’ to estimate clinical and preclinical dosage limits for interstitial nanomedicines or agents. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2019;473:74-78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.019 (opens in a new tab)

31. 31.

    Haegele, J. et al. Magnetic particle imaging: kinetics of the intravascular signal in vivo. Int. J. Nanomed. 4203–4209 (2014). 10.2147/IJN.S49976

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s49976 (opens in a new tab)

32. 32.

    Khandhar AP, et al. Evaluation of peg-coated iron oxide nanoparticles as blood pool tracers for preclinical magnetic particle imaging. Nanoscale. 2016.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6nr08468k (opens in a new tab)

33. 33.

    Rahmer J, et al. Nanoparticle encapsulation in red blood cells enables blood-pool magnetic particle imaging hours after injection. Phys. Med. Biol. 2013;58:3965.

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/58/12/3965 (opens in a new tab)

34. 34.

    Kaul MG, et al. In vitro and in vivo comparison of a tailored magnetic particle imaging blood pool tracer with resovist. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017;62:3454.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6560/aa5780 (opens in a new tab)

35. 35.

    Knopp T, et al. Trajectory analysis for magnetic particle imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2009;54:385-397.

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/54/2/014 (opens in a new tab)

36. 36.

    Werner F, Gdaniec N, Knopp T. First experimental comparison between the cartesian and the lissajous trajectory for magnetic particle imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017;62:3407.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6560/aa6177 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Goodwill P, Conolly S. Multi-dimensional x-space magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2011;30:1581-1590.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2011.2125982 (opens in a new tab)

38. 38.

    Graeser M, von Gladiss A, Weber M, Buzug T M. Two dimensional magnetic particle spectrometry. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2017;62(9):3378-3391.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6560/aa5bcd (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    Graeser M, Knopp T, Grüttner M, Sattel TF, Buzug TM. Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging. Med. Phys. 2013;40:042303.

    Not in our library10.1118/1.4794482 (opens in a new tab)

40. 40.

    Knopp, T. et al. MDF: magnetic particle imaging data format. Preprint at arXiv:1602.06072 (2016).

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    Lawaczeck R, et al. Magnetic iron oxide particles coated with carboxydextran for parenteral administration and liver contrasting: pre-clinical profile of sh u555a. Acta Radiol. 1997;38:584-597.

    Not in our library10.1080/02841859709174391 (opens in a new tab)

42. 42.

    Reimer P, Schuierer G, Balzer T, Peters PE. Application of a superparamagnetic iron oxide (resovist) for mr imaging of human cerebral blood volume. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995;34:694-697.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.1910340507 (opens in a new tab)

43. 43.

    Them K, et al. Sensitivity enhancement in magnetic particle imaging by background subtraction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2016;35:893-900.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2015.2501462 (opens in a new tab)

44. 44.

    Straub M, Schulz V. Joint reconstruction of tracer distribution and background in magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2018;37:1192-1203.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2017.2777878 (opens in a new tab)

45. 45.

    Knopp T, Them K, Kaul M, Gdaniec N. Joint reconstruction of non-overlapping magnetic particle imaging focus-field data. Phys. Med. Biol. 2015;60:L15.

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/l15 (opens in a new tab)

46. 46.

    Knopp T, Hofmann M. Online reconstruction of 3D magnetic particle imaging data. Phys. Med. Biol. 2016;61:N257.

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/61/11/n257 (opens in a new tab)

47. 47.

    Moreira, M., Dias, P., Cordeiro, M., Santos, G. & Fernandes, J. M. International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. 141–150 (Springer, Póvoa de Varzin, Portugal, 2010).

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Magnetically Driven Micro and Nanorobots · 2021
  No notice

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.