Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

Mapping and phasing of structural variation in patient genomes using nanopore sequencing

Mircea Cretu Stancu, Markus J. van Roosmalen, Ivo Renkens and 14 more

Nature Communications · 2017 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/129379

Abstract

Despite improvements in genomics technology, the detection of structural variants (SVs) from short-read sequencing still poses challenges, particularly for complex variation. Here we analyse the genomes of two patients with congenital abnormalities using the MinION nanopore sequencer and a novel computational pipeline—NanoSV. We demonstrate that nanopore long reads are superior to short reads with regard to detection of de novo chromothripsis rearrangements. The long reads also enable efficient phasing of genetic variations, which we leveraged to determine the parental origin of all de novo chromothripsis breakpoints and to resolve the structure of these complex rearrangements. Additionally, genome-wide surveillance of inherited SVs reveals novel variants, missed in short-read data sets, a large proportion of which are retrotransposon insertions. We provide a first exploration of patient genome sequencing with a nanopore sequencer and demonstrate the value of long-read sequencing in mapping and phasing of SVs for both clinical and research applications.

References 56

  1. 1.

    Gilissen C, Hoischen A, Brunner HG, Veltman JA. Unlocking Mendelian disease using exome sequencing. Genome Biol. 2011;12:228.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-228

  2. 2.

    Ashley EA. Towards precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:507-522.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg.2016.86

  3. 3.

    Ng SB, et al. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature. 2009;461:272-276.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08250

  4. 4.

    Ashley EA, et al. Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome. Lancet. 2010;375:1525-1535.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60452-7

  5. 5.

    Conrad DF, et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature. 2010;464:704-712.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08516

  6. 6.

    Stankiewicz P, Paweł S, Lupski JR. Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 2010;61:437-455.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-med-100708-204735

  7. 7.

    Deamer D, Akeson M, Branton D. Three decades of nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016;34:518-524.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3423

  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    Goodwin S, et al. Oxford nanopore sequencing, hybrid error correction, and de novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome. Genome Res. 2015;25:1750-1756.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.191395.115

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Chaisson MJP, et al. Resolving the complexity of the human genome using single-molecule sequencing. Nature. 2015;517:608-611.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13907

  13. 13.

    Pendleton M, et al. Assembly and diploid architecture of an individual human genome via single-molecule technologies. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:780-786.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3454

  14. 14.

    Lam ET, et al. Genome mapping on nanochannel arrays for structural variation analysis and sequence assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012;30:771-776.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2303

  15. 15.

    Mostovoy Y, et al. A hybrid approach for de novo human genome sequence assembly and phasing. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:587-590.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3865

  16. 16.

    Redin C, et al. The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies. Nat. Genet. 2017;49:36-45.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3720

  17. 17.

    Kiełbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 2011;21:487-493.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.113985.110

  18. 18.

    Hehir-Kwa JY, et al. A high-quality human reference panel reveals the complexity and distribution of genomic structural variants. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12989.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms12989

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    Chen X, et al. Rapid detection of structural variants and indels for clinical sequencing applications. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:1220-1222.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv710

  21. 21.

    Kloosterman WP, et al. Constitutional chromothripsis rearrangements involve clustered double-stranded DNA breaks and nonhomologous repair mechanisms. Cell Rep. 2012;1:648-655.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.009

  22. 22.

    Chiang C, et al. Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:390-7, S1.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2202

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    fritzsedlazeck. fritzsedlazeck/Sniffles. GitHub. https://github.com/fritzsedlazeck/Sniffles (accessed 21 October 2016).

    Not in our library

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    de Pagter MS, et al. Chromothripsis in healthy individuals affects multiple protein-coding genes and can result in severe congenital abnormalities in offspring. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2015;96:651-656.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.02.005

  27. 27.

    Francioli LC, et al. A framework for the detection of de novo mutations in family-based sequencing data. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016;25:227-233.

    Not in our library10.1038/ejhg.2016.147

  28. 28.

    Li H. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:2103-2110.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152

  29. 29.

    Huddleston J, et al. Discovery and genotyping of structural variation from long-read haploid genome sequence data. Genome Res. 2016;27:677-685.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.214007.116

  30. 30.

    nanopore-wgs-consortium/NA12878. GitHub.https://github.com/nanopore-wgs-consortium/NA12878 (accessed 19 June 2017).

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    1000 Genomes Project Consortium, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68-74.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature15393

  32. 32.
  33. 33.

    Thung, D. T. et al. Mobster: accurate detection of mobile element insertions in next generation sequencing data. Genome Biol. 15, 488 (2014).

    Not in our library10.1186/s13059-014-0488-x

  34. 34.

    Boeva V, et al. Control-free calling of copy number alterations in deep-sequencing data using GC-content normalization. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:268-269.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq635

  35. 35.

    Ye K, Schulz MH, Long Q, Apweiler R, Ning Z. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2865-2871.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp394

  36. 36.

    Sudmant PH, et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2504 human genomes. Nature. 2015;526:75-81.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature15394

  37. 37.

    Marschall T, Hajirasouliha I, Schönhuth A. MATE-CLEVER: Mendelian-inheritance-aware discovery and genotyping of midsize and long indels. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:3143-3150.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btt556

  38. 38.

    Tewhey R, Bansal V, Torkamani A, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. The importance of phase information for human genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011;12:215-223.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg2950

  39. 39.

    Corradin O, et al. Modeling disease risk through analysis of physical interactions between genetic variants within chromatin regulatory circuitry. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:1313-1320.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3674

  40. 40.

    Patterson M, et al. WhatsHap: weighted haplotype assembly for future-generation sequencing reads. J. Comput. Biol. 2015;22:498-509.

    Not in our library10.1089/cmb.2014.0157

All 56 references

Cited by papers we hold 18

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.