Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

Altered mitochondrial dynamics and function in APOE4-expressing astrocytes

Eran Schmukler, Shira Solomon, Shira Simonovitch and 4 more

Cell Death & Disease · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41419-020-02776-4

Abstract

APOE4 is a major risk factor for sporadic Alzheimer’s disease; however, it is unclear how it exerts its pathological effects. Others and we have previously shown that autophagy is impaired in APOE4 compared to APOE3 astrocytes, and demonstrated differences in the expression of mitochondrial dynamics proteins in brains of APOE3 and APOE4 transgenic mice. Here, we investigated the effect of APOE4 expression on several aspects of mitochondrial function and network dynamics, including fusion, fission, and mitophagy, specifically in astrocytes. We found that APOE3 and APOE4 astrocytes differ in their mitochondrial dynamics, suggesting that the mitochondria of APOE4 astrocytes exhibit reduced fission and mitophagy. APOE4 astrocytes also show impaired mitochondrial function. Importantly, the autophagy inducer rapamycin enhanced mitophagy and improved mitochondrial functioning in APOE4 astrocytes. Collectively, the results demonstrate that APOE4 expression is associated with altered mitochondrial dynamics, which might lead to impaired mitochondrial function in astrocytes. This, in turn, may contribute to the pathological effects of APOE4 in Alzheimer’s disease.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by brain Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, neuronal loss and cognitive decline. The ε4 allele of APOE gene, a major AD risk factor, is associated with increased Aβ deposition and neuronal degeneration. Nonetheless, the mechanisms mediating APOE4 pathological effects remain unknown. Mitochondrial dysfunction plays a fundamental role in AD pathogenesis and represents an early event. Mitochondrial dynamics include fusion, fission, and degradation events, linked to mitochondrial function,. Fusion and fission regulate mitochondrial network size/shape depending on cellular demands. Damaged mitochondria are degraded by selective autophagy, termed mitophagy, following fission. Mitochondrial dynamics were shown to be abnormal in AD brains.

Several proteins are required for mitochondrial fusion, including the mitofusins (Mfn1/Mfn2),. This process is triggered by increased mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and involves the oligomerization of mitofusins on the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM). Mitochondrial fusion is enhanced under stress and high energetic demands, allowing increased bioenergetic efficiency. During mitochondrial fission, cytosolic Drp1 is recruited to mitochondrial receptors (e.g., Fis1),, allowing mitochondrial partitioning, turnover and reduction of network size under low energetic demand,. Mitophagy proceeds mitochondrial fission and is triggered by decreased MMP. It allows the removal of damaged/excessive mitochondria via the lysosome. Several pathways mediate mitophagy, including the PINK1/parkin pathway,. The mitochondrial kinase PINK1 is stabilized on the OMM leading to the recruitment and activation of parkin (E3 ubiquitin ligase), which ubiquitinates several mitochondrial proteins leading to mitophagy,. Several studies demonstrated a link between APOE4 and mitochondrial dysfunction, mainly in neurons–; yet the effect of APOE4 on mitochondrial dynamics was less studied. Also, although astrocytes play a fundamental role in AD pathology, little is known about APOE4 effect on their mitochondria.

Previously, others and we have found that APOE4 is associated with impaired autophagy in astrocytes,, which is linked to reduced clearance of Aβ plaques and protein aggregates,. Also, our recent findings revealed differences in the expression of mitochondrial dynamics proteins in APOE4 transgenic mouse brains. Here, we further investigated the effect of APOE4 expression on various mechanistic aspects of mitochondrial dynamics, including mitophagy, and mitochondrial function specifically in astrocytes. Our results show that APOE4 expression is associated with altered mitochondrial dynamics, namely, reduced mitochondrial fission and parkin-mediated mitophagy, under basal and mitochondrial stress conditions. Furthermore, mitochondrial function is compromised in the APOE4 astrocytes. Notably, induction of mitophagy by rapamycin restored mitochondrial function. Taken together, the results suggest that impaired mitochondrial dynamics in APOE4 astrocytes is involved in mitochondrial dysfunction and contribute to AD pathology.

Materials and methods

The antibodies, buffers, and reagents used are described in the supplementary methods.

Cell lines and primary astrocytes

The human APOE3 and APOE4 targeted-replacement astrocyte cell lines were previously described. The study was conducted according to the NIH Guidelines for Use and Care of Laboratory Animals, following the approval by Animal Care Committee of TAU (#L-04-16-002). Mouse primary astrocytes were prepared and grown as previously described.

Brain sections preparation and IHC

APOE3/APOE4 targeted-replacement mice were perfused with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were removed, post-fixed for overnight at 4 °C in 4% paraformaldehyde followed by 20% sucrose in PBS for 48 h at 4 °C. Coronal serial cryostat sections were cut (20 µm) and stained as described previously. Sections were imaged using fluorescence microscopy (Olympus motorized inverted research microscope Model IX81; ×20 magnifications).

Lysate preparation, immunoblot and immunoprecipitation

Preparation of cell lysates and Western Blot analysis was performed as previously described. For the immunoprecipitation, agarose beads conjugated to mouse anti-ubiquitin antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used. For no IgG control samples, protein G PLUS-agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used.

Immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Immobilon Crescendo substrate, Millipore). Bands were visualized by Amersham Imager 600 within the linear range, employing the Automatic/Semi-autmatic exposure options, which allows optimal exposure times below saturation to enable accurate quantification (according to manufacturer instructions). Target protein band intensities were quantified using the ImageJ software and normalized to loading controls.

Mitochondrial fractionation

Mitochondrial fractionation of the cells was performed using the ProteoExtract® Cytosol/Mitochondria Fractionation Kit (EMD Millipore), according to manufacturer protocol.

Analysis of mitochondrial network morphology

APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes cell line was incubated with 100 nM MitoTracker™ Deep Red FM (MTDR, Invitrogen) for 30 min at 37 °C or infected with Mito-GFP as described below, nuclei were stained with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 and fixed in ice-cold methanol for 15 min (MTDR) or in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at RT (Mito-GFP). Mitochondrial network morphology of individual cells was visualized by Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (×63 magnifications) and analyzed using the ImageJ macro tool MiNa.

Retroviral infection and generation of APOE3/APOE4 cell lines stably expressing Mito-GFP

HEK-293T cells were transfected using the calcium-phosphate method with the following retroviral vectors: pCMV-VSV-G, pCMV-Gag-Pol and pQCXIP containing the EGFP-TA-MAO sequence (Mito-GFP; EGFP-tagged OMM localization signal peptide), which was a gift from Prof. Reuven Stein, Tel Aviv University. Medium containing viral particles was collected and used to infect the APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes cell line. Astrocytes stably expressing Mito-GFP were selected using 2 µg/ml puromycin.

Transient transfection with the LC3-EGFP-mRFP vector

Transient transfection of APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes cell line with the tandem LC3-EGFP-mRFP (Addgene ptfLC3) was performed using Lipofectamine® 2000 reagent (Invitrogen). Nuclei were stained; the cells were fixed and microscopically analyzed as described above.

Electron microscopy

Preparation of cellular TEM samples from APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes cell line is described in the supplementary. The samples were analyzed using G-12 Spirit FEI electron microscope.

MTT, ATP levels, and cell number measurement

MTT and CellTiter-Glo (Promega) assays were used in APOE3/APOE4 cell line to assess mitochondrial metabolism and ATP levels, respectively, and the results were normalized to cell number using the methylene blue assay according to the manufacturer instructions and as previously described,.

Measurement of MMP by flow cytometry

The APOE3/APOE4 cell line was incubated with either 100 nM MitoTracker™ Red CMXRox (MTR, Invitrogen) or 50 nM MitoTracker™ Deep Red FM (MTDR, Invitrogen) to assess MMP or mitochondrial mass, respectively, by flow cytometry, as described–. The cells were then trypsinized, washed and resuspended in PBS. MTDR/MTR fluorescence was collected using Stratedigm S1000EXi Flow Cytometer (mCherry and APC filters, respectively), and analyzed using Cyflogic software.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes cell line, reverse-transcribed into cDNA and used for RT–PCR as described previously. The primers used are described in the supplementary.

Medium pH measurement

The medium was collected from APOE3/APOE4 cell line, placed in sealed tubes, and pH was measured using Sartorius PB-11 Basic Benchtop pH Meter. The number of cells in the cultures was simultaneously measured.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed at least 3 times. Experimental differences were tested for statistical significance using one-sided Student’s t test. p-value of < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Altered mitochondrial dynamics proteins expression and morphology in APOE4 astrocytes

To investigate the link between APOE4 and mitochondrial dynamics, we first examined the expression of fission, fusion and mitophagy proteins in astrocytes expressing human APOE4 or APOE3 (Fig. 1a). As shown, APOE4 astrocytes exhibit lower Drp1 levels (fission), higher Mfn1 levels (fusion) and increased parkin levels (targets mitochondria for mitophagy, followed by proteasomal/lysosomal degradation–). In addition, we measured the levels of autophagic markers, SQSTM1/p62 and LC3. APOE4 had no effect on p62 levels; however, it reduced LC3-II/LC3-I ratio, indicating decreased autophagy. Importantly, similar pattern of these mitochondrial dynamics proteins was detected in primary astrocytes generated from APOE4 mice (differences in Drp1 levels were detected only in 12 weeks cultures) and brain sections from these mice demonstrated increased levels of parkin and Mfn1, specifically in astrocytes (Fig. 1b, c). These results imply that APOE4 astrocytes exhibit altered mitochondrial dynamics.

To further explore mitochondrial dynamics, we examined the mitochondrial fraction of the APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes. As shown (Fig. 2a), APOE3 astrocytes exhibited higher levels of mitochondrial Drp1 and LC3-II, indicating less mitochondrial fission and association of LC3 with mitochondria in APOE4 astrocytes. Moreover, increased levels of parkin and ubiquitin were detected in APOE4 astrocytes mitochondria, indicating either increased recruitment of parkin and ubiquitination of mitochondria, or accumulation due to reduced mitochondrial degradation. Therefore, we measured the mitochondrial recruitment of mitophagy/autophagy proteins by examining the mitochondrial fraction following chloroquine treatment,. As shown in Fig. 2a, increased accumulation (differences between CQ treated and untreated cells) of parkin, p62, LC3-II and ubiquitin was observed in the mitochondrial fraction of the APOE3 astrocytes following treatment, suggesting their degradation is reduced in APOE4 astrocytes. Interestingly, although the levels of LC3-II, p62 and ubiquitin in the mitochondrial fraction of CQ-treated APOE3 cells were higher compared with APOE4 cells, the levels of parkin did not differ (Fig. 2a), suggesting that the recruitment of parkin to the mitochondria of the APOE4 astrocytes is intact. Also, fractionation and immunostaining revealed that mitochondrial apoE4 levels are higher compared to apoE3 (Fig. 2a, b), which is not due to increased APOE4 mRNA synthesis (Fig. 2c). Chloroquine induced accumulation only of mitochondrial apoE3 (Fig. 2a), suggesting increased accumulation of mitochondrial apoE4.

To further explore whether APOE4 is associated with decreased mitochondrial fission and degradation, the mitochondrial network morphology was visualized using MitoTracker Deep Red staining or Mito-GFP expression. As demonstrated (Fig. 2d, e), the mitochondrial network of the APOE4 astrocytes is indeed more hyperfused (exhibits more branching and less individual mitochondria).

APOE4-expressing astrocytes exhibit impaired mitophagy

The reduced fission/mitophagy observed in the APOE4 astrocytes may result from abnormal metabolic state, or may represent mitophagy impairment. Thus, we next examined the effect of mitochondrial damage induced by mitochondrial uncoupler CCCP on mitochondrial dynamics. CCCP markedly increased LC3 puncta (red), as well as their co-localization with mitochondria (green), suggestive of mitophagy induction (Fig. 3a), which was higher in APOE3 astrocytes. Likewise, EM analysis revealed that in the APOE3 astrocytes, CCCP increased the number of autophagosomes containing mitochondria and the formation of spheroid mitochondria, which represents mitochondria interacting with autophagosomes/lysosomes, (Fig. 3b). In contrast, in APOE4 astrocytes the treatment induced significant formation of autophagosomes that do not contain mitochondria (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, using the tandem LC3-GFP-RFP reporter, we found that following CCCP treatment, ~90% of autophagosomes in the APOE3 astrocytes were fused with lysosomes, compared to ~55% in the APOE4 astrocytes (Fig. 3c). Accordingly, APOE3 astrocytes treated with CCCP combined with chloroquine showed increased accumulation of LC3-II compared to APOE4 astrocytes, indicating higher autophagic flux (Fig. 3d). Thus, damaged mitochondria recognition by autophagosomes and their delivery to lysosomes is hampered in APOE4 astrocytes. Consistently, in APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes stably expressing Mito-GFP, treatment with CCCP resulted in decreased number of branches per network, which was more profound in the APOE3 astrocytes (Fig. S1a).

We next studied the effect of CCCP on fission/mitophagy at the protein level. As shown, CCCP treatment induced a dose-dependent decrease of parkin and Mfn1 levels (indicating their degradation) and increased LC3-II/LC3-I ratio (autophagosomes formation), consistent with mitophagy induction (Fig. S1b); yet, the effect was more pronounced in the APOE3 cells. In addition, 12 µM CCCP treatment reduced p62 levels only in the APOE3 astrocytes, indicating increased p62 degradation in these cells (Fig. S1b). Examination of the mitochondrial fractions revealed that CCCP treatment increased mitochondrial Drp1 levels only in the APOE3 astrocytes, and elevated mitochondrial LC3-II, which was more prominent in the APOE3 astrocytes (Fig. S1c). This suggests that following treatment, less fission and association of LC3-II with damaged mitochondria occurs in APOE4 astrocytes. Taken together, the results further demonstrate dysfunctional fission and mitophagy in the APOE4 astrocytes following mitochondrial damage.

APOE4-expressing astrocytes exhibit altered synthesis, ubiquitination and proteasomal/lysosomal degradation of mitochondrial dynamics proteins

We next characterized the levels of synthesis, ubiquitination and turnover of mitochondrial dynamics proteins. According to qRT-PCR (Fig. 4a), the observed elevation of Mfn1 protein in APOE4 astrocytes (Fig. 1) is not due to increased MFN1 transcription. However, blockage of proteasomal degradation (MG-132), led to accumulation of Mfn1, only in the APOE3 astrocytes (Fig. 4b). Therefore, we next measured the levels of Mfn1 ubiquitination (Fig. 4c). Following MG-132 treatment the total amount and accumulation of ubiquitinated Mfn1 was higher in APOE3 compared to APOE4 astrocytes. During mitophagy, Mfn1 undergoes ubiquitination by parkin followed by proteasomal degradation, which suppresses mitochondrial fusion and allows the removal of mitochondria from the network. Thus, it appears that the basal differences of Mfn1 levels observed in APOE4 result from reduced Mfn1 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, possibly contributing to their hyperfused mitochondrial network (Fig. 2d, e).

The reduced levels of Drp1 in APOE4 astrocytes (Fig. 1) could result from decreased DNM1L (Drp1) mRNA synthesis (Fig. S2a), while degradation does not appear to contribute to this difference, since MG-132/chloroquine had no effect of Drp1 protein levels (Fig. S2b, c).

Interestingly, according to qRT-PCR, the increased parkin levels in APOE4 astrocytes are at least partially due to increased PARK2/PARKN mRNA synthesis (Fig. 4d). Additionally, treatment with chloroquine/MG-132 led to parkin accumulation only in the APOE3 astrocytes (Fig. 4e, f), indicating its reduced mitophagic and proteasomal degradation, respectively, in the APOE4 astrocytes. Proteasomal degradation of parkin was demonstrated during mitophagy due to autoubiquitination, halting its activity,,,. Immunoprecipitation assay revealed that the levels of ubiquitinated parkin (Fig. 4g) are higher in APOE4 astrocytes, and that treatment with MG-132 induces accumulation of ubiquitinated parkin only in APOE3 astrocytes (Fig. 4g). Therefore, the results indicate that parkin undergoes ubiquitination in APOE4 astrocytes, yet it is not degraded by the proteasome. It is possible that the high levels of ubiquitinated parkin in the APOE4 astrocytes interfere with its ability to ubiquitinate other proteins (e.g., Mfn1), resulting in their reduced labeling for proteasomal/mitophagic degradation. Indeed, the levels of two other mitochondrial parkin substrates, namely Tom40 and Tom20, exhibited higher levels in APOE4 astrocytes (Fig. S2d). The elevated levels of Tom40 were not due to mRNA synthesis (Fig. S2e), and following MG-132 treatment, Tom40 accumulated only in APOE3 astrocytes (Fig. S2f), suggesting that reduced ubiquitination of Tom40 underlies its increased levels in APOE4 astrocytes. Collectively, the results indicate that parkin activity is altered in the APOE4 astrocytes.

APOE4 astrocytes exhibit impaired mitochondrial function

Since mitochondrial dynamics are related to mitochondrial quality control, we next investigated several aspects of mitochondrial function. We first focused on PINK1, which accumulates on the OMM following MMP reduction, while it undergoes cleavage in healthy mitochondria due to proteasomal degradation,. As shown, APOE4 astrocytes express higher levels of full-length PINK1 (Fig. 5a), which does not result from increased mRNA synthesis (Fig. S3a), and lower levels of cleaved PINK1 compared to APOE3 astrocytes, which were increased following MG-132 treatment only in APOE3 astrocytes (Fig. 5a). Collectively, the results indicate that PINK1 cleavage is reduced in APOE4 astrocytes, indicating reduced MMP. Likewise, the fluorescence of the MMP-sensitive MitoTracker Red, was significantly lower in the APOE4 astrocytes (Fig. 5b). This probably does not reflect reduced mitochondrial content in the APOE4 astrocytes, since their fluorescence of MitoTracker Deep Red, which is less sensitive to MMP,,, was significantly greater compared to MitoTracker Red (Fig. 5b); and the levels of several abundant mitochondrial proteins and transcripts were similar in the APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes (Fig. S3b, c).

Similarly, the APOE4 astrocytes exhibit reduced mitochondrial metabolism as measured by MTT, (Fig. 5c), and by less dense cristae, which is another indicator of impaired mitochondrial activity, (Fig. 5d). Interestingly, the APOE4 astrocytes also exhibit lower medium pH, suggestive of increased compensatory glycolysis (Fig. 5e) and reduced ATP levels (Fig. 5f).

Rapamycin induces mitophagy and restores mitochondrial function in APOE4-expressing astrocytes

We next examined whether non-toxic mitophagy induction could counteract mitochondrial dysfunction in APOE4 astrocytes. For this aim we have used rapamycin, which promotes autophagosome formation, and was shown to induce mitophagy by upregulating the parkin/PINK1 pathway,–.

Rapamycin treatment increased LC3-II/LC3-I ratio and decreased p62 levels, in both the APOE3/APOE4 astrocytes (Fig. 6a), indicating enhanced autophagosome formation and cargo degradation. Furthermore, in the APOE4 astrocytes, rapamycin decreased Mfn1 and parkin levels, which is not the result of reduced gene expression (Fig. 6a, b), and is indicative for mitophagy induction (Fig. S1b). Accordingly, rapamycin decreased APOE4 astrocytes’ mitochondrial content, as demonstrated by MitoTracker Deep Red (Fig. S3d). Rapamycin had no effect on cleaved PINK1 levels in APOE4 astrocytes, indicating no reduction in MMP, yet it elevated FL-PINK1 levels (Fig. 6a), which probably results from enhanced PINK1 mRNA synthesis (Fig. 6b). Notably, in the APOE4 astrocytes, rapamycin restored mitochondrial metabolism (MTT), augmented MMP (MitoTracker Red), and corrected the altered medium pH without affecting cell number (Fig. 6c–e). Taken together, these results demonstrate that rapamycin restores mitochondrial function in the APOE4 astrocytes.

Discussion

Changes in mitochondrial dynamics and mitochondrial dysfunction are recognized as hallmarks of AD, and although mitochondrial deterioration in astrocytes occurs early in the disease development, the mechanism is vague. Among the risk factors for AD is the APOE4 allele; however, its effects on mitochondrial dynamics and dysfunction are unclear. Previously, it was shown that APOE4 is associated with impaired autophagy in astrocytes,, as well as with changes in mitochondrial dynamics proteins expression in transgenic mice brains. This prompted us to further explore the mechanisms involved in the effect of APOE4 on mitochondrial dynamics and function specifically in astrocytes.

Using primary astrocytes and GFAP-stained brain sections generated from APOE3/APOE4 targeted-replacement mice, we demonstrated differences in mitochondrial dynamics proteins expression similar to those observed in APOE3 and APOE4-expressing immortalized astrocytes. We further demonstrated that APOE4 expression in astrocytes is associated with altered synthesis, recruitment, ubiquitination and degradation of mitochondrial dynamics proteins. Drp1 protein and mRNA levels and its mitochondrial recruitment, are decreased in APOE4 astrocytes, indicating reduced mitochondrial fission. Mitochondrial fusion is mediated by mitofusins, which are regulated by transcription and protein modification, including ubiquitination. During mitophagy, parkin ubiqitinates Mfn1, leading to its proteasomal degradation and fusion inhibition,. We found that Mfn1 ubiquitination/degradation is reduced in APOE4 astrocytes, leading to increased Mfn1 levels and fusion, possibly interfering with mitophagy.

Parkin labels mitochondria for mitophagy by ubiquitinating specific mitochondrial proteins; parkin is then degraded by the proteasome/lysosome due to autoubiquitination–. APOE4 astrocytes exhibit increased levels of parkin, possibly due to reduced degradation of ubiquitinated mitochondrial parkin. This inefficient turnover of parkin might impair its activity, leading to deficient labeling of mitochondria for mitophagy. In fact, abnormal parkin ubiquitination was shown to prevent its proteasomal degradation and impede parkin-mediated mitophagy. Consistently, the ubiquitination/proteasomal degradation of Mfn1 and Tom40,, as well as of total mitochondrial ubiquitin, are reduced in the APOE4 astrocytes, further indicating impaired parkin activity. Moreover, the interaction of the autophagic proteins LC3-II and p62 with the mitochondria, and the lysosomal degradation of mitochondrial LC3-II and p62 are reduced in APOE4 astrocytes. Therefore, the results indicate that mitochondrial dynamics are altered in APOE4 astrocytes, and specifically suggest reduced parkin-mediated mitophagy.

To investigate whether these findings represent mitophagy impairment, we examined mitochondrial dynamics following induction of mitochondrial damage (CCCP), which normally activates mitophagy. Mitophagy induction following damage was impaired in APOE4 compared to APOE3 astrocytes. Consistently, other studies have demonstrated impaired mitophagy and parkin accumulation in AD neurons,. Interestingly, we also detected less autophagosomes-lysosomes fusion in APOE4 astrocytes following CCCP treatment, which is consistent with other lysosomal dysfunctions associated with APOE4. The mechanism by which APOE4 affects mitochondrial dynamics is yet to be investigated; it may involve a detrimental interaction of apoE4 itself with the mitochondria, as was shown in neurons, and is consistent with our findings. Alternatively, apoE4 may affect mitochondrial dynamics indirectly, by interfering with the autophagy/lysosomal machineries, which affects upstream processes (e.g., mitochondrial fission and labeling) as was demonstrated in other neurodegenerative disorders,.

The hyperfused mitochondrial network morphology observed in APOE4 astrocytes may reflect reduced mitophagy and fission, and correlates with findings from AD fibroblasts. Yet, we did not detect a greater mitochondrial mass in APOE4 astrocytes, suggesting that their mitochondrial network is in a static hyperfused state; i.e., less fission/degradation occurs together with reduced mitochondrial biogenesis. Therefore, less quality control and mitochondrial turnover is possible, leading to increased population of dysfunctional mitochondria. Accordingly, we found impaired mitochondrial activity in APOE4 astrocytes. Possibly, this mitochondrial dysfunction reduces energy production, which, in turn, represses Drp1 expression and mitochondrial fission to maintain high mitochondrial volume,.

Assuming that impaired removal of damaged mitochondria underlies APOE4 astrocytes mitochondrial dysfunction, it is plausible that mitophagy induction, without causing mitochondrial damage, will improve mitochondrial function. Indeed, rapamycin treatment, which was shown to stimulate mitophagy,,, partially improved APOE4 astrocytes’ mitochondrial function. Hence, non-toxic mitophagy might induce efficient removal of dysfunctional mitochondria, therefore improving mitochondrial activity, which in turn, improves AD-related function in APOE4 astrocytes.

Taken together, our results show that APOE4 astrocytes exhibit altered mitochondrial dynamics, specifically impaired mitophagy. In addition, these cells display a mitochondrial dysfunction that might be linked to the impaired mitophagy. Thus, the results suggest that altered mitochondrial dynamics in astrocytes plays a role in the pathological effects of APOE4.

References 53

  1. 1.

    Michaelson DM. APOE epsilon4: the most prevalent yet understudied risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2014;10:861-868.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.015

  2. 2.

    Swerdlow RH. Mitochondria and mitochondrial cascades in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.: JAD. 2018;62:1403-1416.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-170585

  3. 3.

    Eisner V, Picard M, Hajnoczky G. Mitochondrial dynamics in adaptive and maladaptive cellular stress responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:755-765.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41556-018-0133-0

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Pickles S, Vigie P, Youle RJ. Mitophagy and quality control mechanisms in mitochondrial maintenance. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:R170-R185.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004

  6. 6.

    Zhu X, Perry G, Smith MA, Wang X. Abnormal mitochondrial dynamics in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2013;33:S253-262.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-2012-129005

  7. 7.

    Westermann B. Bioenergetic role of mitochondrial fusion and fission. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1817:1833-1838.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.033

  8. 8.

    Truban D, Hou X, Caulfield TR, Fiesel FC, Springer W. PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial quality control: what can we learn about Parkinson’s disease pathobiology? J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2017;7:13-29.

    Not in our library10.3233/jpd-160989

  9. 9.

    Dose J, Huebbe P, Nebel A, Rimbach G. APOE genotype and stress response—a mini review. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15:121.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12944-016-0288-2

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Chen HK, et al. Apolipoprotein E4 domain interaction mediates detrimental effects on mitochondria and is a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:5215-5221.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.151084

  12. 12.

    Lampinen, R., Belaya, I., Boccuni, I., Malm, T., Kanninen, K. M. in Astrocyte – Physiology and Pathology (ed. D’Amato MTGaLC), INTECH 139–162 (2018). 10.5772/intechopen.71825.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Simonovitch S, et al. Impaired autophagy in APOE4 astrocytes. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51:915-927.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-151101

  14. 14.

    Parcon, P. A., et al. Apolipoprotein E4 inhibits autophagy gene products through direct, specific binding to CLEAR motifs. Alzheimer’s Demen.10.1016/j.jalz.2017.07.754 (2017).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jalz.2017.07.754

  15. 15.

    Simonovitch S, Schmukler E, Masliah E, Pinkas-Kramarski R, Michaelson DM. The effects of APOE4 on mitochondrial dynamics and proteins in vivo. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70:861-875.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-190074

  16. 16.

    Morikawa M, et al. Production and characterization of astrocyte-derived human apolipoprotein E isoforms from immortalized astrocytes and their interactions with amyloid-beta. Neurobiol. Dis. 2005;19:66-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nbd.2004.11.005

  17. 17.

    Wolfson E, Solomon S, Schmukler E, Goldshmit Y. Pinkas-Kramarski R. Nucleolin and ErbB2 inhibition reduces tumorigenicity of ErbB2-positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:47.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41419-017-0067-7

  18. 18.

    Valente AJ, Maddalena LA, Robb EL, Moradi F, Stuart JA. A simple ImageJ macro tool for analyzing mitochondrial network morphology in mammalian cell culture. Acta Histochemica. 2017;119:315-326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.acthis.2017.03.001

  19. 19.

    Schmukler E, Wolfson E, Elazar Z, Kloog Y, Pinkas-Kramarski R. Continuous treatment with FTS confers resistance to apoptosis and affects autophagy. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0171351.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0171351

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Esteban-Martinez L, Villarejo-Zori B, Boya P. Cytofluorometric assessment of mitophagic flux in mammalian cells and tissues. Methods Enzymol. 2017;588:209-217.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.081

  22. 22.

    Shibata T, et al. T-2307 causes collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential in yeast. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5892-5897.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.05954-11

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Mauro-Lizcano M, et al. New method to assess mitophagy flux by flow cytometry. Autophagy. 2015;11:833-843.

    Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2015.1034403

  25. 25.

    Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, et al. Impaired mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy in neuronal models of tuberous sclerosis complex. Cell Rep. 2016;17:2162.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.051

  26. 26.

    Vives-Bauza C, et al. PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:378-383.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0911187107

  27. 27.

    Narendra D, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Youle RJ. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2008;183:795-803.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200809125

  28. 28.

    Seirafi M, Kozlov G, Gehring K. Parkin structure and function. FEBS J. 2015;282:2076-2088.

    Not in our library10.1111/febs.13249

  29. 29.

    Rakovic A, et al. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1)-dependent ubiquitination of endogenous Parkin attenuates mitophagy: study in human primary fibroblasts and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:2223-2237.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.391680

  30. 30.

    Klionsky, D. J. et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy12, 1–222 (2016).

    Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

  31. 31.

    Cook KL, et al. Mitochondria directly donate their membrane to form autophagosomes during a novel mechanism of parkin-associated mitophagy. Cell Biosci. 2014;4:16.

    Not in our library10.1186/2045-3701-4-16

  32. 32.

    Ding WX, et al. Parkin and mitofusins reciprocally regulate mitophagy and mitochondrial spheroid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:42379-42388.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.413682

  33. 33.

    Chaugule VK, et al. Autoregulation of Parkin activity through its ubiquitin-like domain. EMBO J. 2011;30:2853-2867.

    Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2011.204

  34. 34.

    Byrd RA, Weissman AM. Compact Parkin only: insights into the structure of an autoinhibited ubiquitin ligase. EMBO J. 2013;32:2087-2089.

    Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2013.158

  35. 35.

    Yoshii SR, Kishi C, Ishihara N, Mizushima N. Parkin mediates proteasome-dependent protein degradation and rupture of the outer mitochondrial membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:19630-19640.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.209338

  36. 36.
  37. 37.

    Woods DC. Mitochondrial heterogeneity: evaluating mitochondrial subpopulation dynamics in stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:7068567.

    Not in our library10.1155/2017/7068567

  38. 38.

    Nielsen J, et al. Plasticity in mitochondrial cristae density allows metabolic capacity modulation in human skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2017;595:2839-2847.

    Not in our library10.1113/jp273040

  39. 39.

    Celotto AM, Chiu WK, Van Voorhies W, Palladino MJ. Modes of metabolic compensation during mitochondrial disease using the Drosophila model of ATP6 dysfunction. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25823.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0025823

  40. 40.

    Bartolome, A. et al. MTORC1 regulates both general autophagy and mitophagy induction after oxidative phosphorylation uncoupling. Mol. Cellular Biol.37, e00441 (2017).

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00441-17

All 53 references

Cited by papers we hold 6

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.