No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Pathological alteration and therapeutic implications of sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis

Chao Cao, Muming Yu, Yanfen Chai

Cell Death & Disease · 2019 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41419-019-2015-1

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction syndrome caused by dysregulated host response to infection that leads to uncontrolled inflammatory response followed by immunosuppression. However, despite the high mortality rate, no specific treatment modality or drugs with high efficacy is available for sepsis to date. Although improved treatment strategies have increased the survival rate during the initial state of excessive inflammatory response, recent trends in sepsis show that mortality occurs at a period of continuous immunosuppressive state in which patients succumb to secondary infections within a few weeks or months due to post-sepsis “immune paralysis.” Immune cell alteration induced by uncontrolled apoptosis has been considered a major cause of significant immunosuppression. Particularly, apoptosis of lymphocytes, including innate immune cells and adaptive immune cells, is associated with a higher risk of secondary infections and poor outcomes. Multiple postmortem studies have confirmed that sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis occurs in all age groups, including neonates, pediatric, and adult patients, and it is considered to be a primary contributing factor to the immunosuppressive pathophysiology of sepsis. Therapeutic perspectives targeting apoptosis through various strategies could improve survival in sepsis. In this review article, we will focus on describing the major apoptosis process of immune cells with respect to physiologic and molecular mechanisms. Further, advances in apoptosis-targeted treatment modalities for sepsis will also be discussed.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Facts

1Sepsis leads to uncontrolled inflammatory response with immunosuppression.Immune cell alteration induced by uncontrolled apoptosis is a major cause of profound immunosuppression.Therapeutic perspectives targeting apoptosis through various strategies could improve survival in sepsis.

2Sepsis leads to uncontrolled inflammatory response with immunosuppression.

3Immune cell alteration induced by uncontrolled apoptosis is a major cause of profound immunosuppression.

4Therapeutic perspectives targeting apoptosis through various strategies could improve survival in sepsis.

Open questions

5It is known that apoptotic depletion of immune cells is responsible for immune dysfunction; however, how do immune cells, including innate and adaptive immune cells, change in the course of sepsis?What are the specific molecular mechanisms and interactions involved in the pathways mediating physiological alteration of immune cells?Are there specific pathways and related factors that can be diagnostic and therapeutic targets for sepsis-induced immunosuppression?

6It is known that apoptotic depletion of immune cells is responsible for immune dysfunction; however, how do immune cells, including innate and adaptive immune cells, change in the course of sepsis?

7What are the specific molecular mechanisms and interactions involved in the pathways mediating physiological alteration of immune cells?

8Are there specific pathways and related factors that can be diagnostic and therapeutic targets for sepsis-induced immunosuppression?

Introduction

9Sepsis is a major public health challenge worldwide owing to protracted inflammation, immune suppression, susceptibility to infections, and even death. Despite improvements in the understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and therapeutic strategies, no specific therapeutic agent for the treatment of sepsis has been approved to date,.

10Sepsis treatment, including antibiotic therapies, ventilator management, blood glucose maintenance, and resuscitative strategies, has rapidly progressed,, particularly the supportive therapies recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. However, few novel effective therapies have been identified, and the incidence of sepsis has increased,, with approximately 31.5 million cases of sepsis, 19.4 million severe sepsis, and 5.3 million deaths reported annually. Sepsis with subsequent multiple organ dysfunction remains the leading cause of mortality in hospitalized patients, and it is projected to increase at an alarming rate over the next two decades. Even more alarming is the increasing rate of sepsis-associated intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, which is the most common cause of death in ICU patients; severe sepsis accounts for >50% of ICU mortality. Patients with sepsis are also hospitalized longer and have an eight times higher risk of death during hospitalization than other inpatients.

11In general, the pathophysiology of sepsis is considered as an initial hyperinflammatory phase that lasts for several days followed by a more protracted immunosuppressive phase. The current death distribution indicates peaks during the early phase, although at a lower magnitude, and another peak after 2–3 months that continues to increase over the next 3 years, (Fig. 1). However, varying definitions and ineffective clinical strategies have led to discrepancies in the incidence and mortality rates of sepsis, and thus the criterion should be redefined. In the third International Consensus for Sepsis and Septic Shock, sepsis was clinically defined as a life-threatening condition of organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated immune response to infection. These changes shift the focus of pathophysiology on sepsis-induced immune dysfunction and long-term outcomes of sepsis patients who survive from a fatal stage owing to sophisticated care in the ICU. Sepsis can be considered as a race to death between the pathogens and host immune response, where the pathogens seek an advantage by incapacitating various aspects of host immunity. Numerous studies have shown that a large number of patients who died of sepsis had unresolved opportunistic infections, and immunosuppressive features,, (Fig. 2). Several mechanisms are responsible for sepsis-induced immunosuppression, including apoptotic depletion of immune cells, increased expression of negative costimulatory molecules, increased regulatory T (Treg) cell expression, expression of programmed cell death (PD)-1 on CD4+ T cells, and cellular exhaustion. Of these, immune cell apoptosis has been increasingly recognized as a key factor in the pathophysiology of septic complications–.

12Widespread lymphocyte apoptosis occurring in the lymphoid (spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes) and other organs that results in impaired immune cell activity (including that of neutrophils, monocyte and macrophages, B cells, natural killer cells [NK cells], and dendritic cells [DCs]) is a crucial contributing factor to the development of the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis. Multiple studies have reported that preventing immune cell apoptosis could markedly improve survival,,. In this review, we will highlight the importance of sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis, including the role of innate and adaptive immune cells in the pathogenesis of sepsis, alterations in their immune metabolic stage, and the clinical implications and potential therapeutic interventions.

Apoptosis in sepsis

13Apoptosis is a tightly regulated form of cell death that is vital in both embryo implantation and development and turnover of tissues during maturation. During sepsis-induced immunosuppression, apoptosis plays a pivotal role in the selection of immune cell populations and maintenance of functional immune responses. Cell death in innate and adaptive immune systems benefits the host by downregulating inflammatory response in sepsis, but the extensive loss of immune cells may compromise the ability of the host to eliminate invading pathogens. Immune cell apoptosis in lymphoid tissues and gut-associated lymphoid tissues could cause marked depletion of immune cells, including monocytes and macrophages, DCs, NK cells, and B cells, contributing to immune suppression or secondary infection. The depletion of these immune cells is a universal finding in all age groups and is particularly noteworthy because it occurs during life-threatening infection when clonal expansion of lymphocytes should be occurring. Although circulating lymphocytes undergo significant apoptosis, no apparent apoptosis in the heart, kidneys, lungs, and other substantive organs occurs during the progression of sepsis. Sepsis-induced apoptosis of immune cells could undermine host immunity through anergy, latent infection reactivation, and susceptibility to secondary infections. Importantly, the magnitude of lymphocyte apoptosis is possibly valuable for determining the severity of sepsis. However, the activity of immune cells differs under diverse apoptotic signals during sepsis. Cellular death through apoptosis directly leads to microvascular dysfunction and organ failure during sepsis, with apoptotic immune cells contributing to secondary infection or immune suppression.

Mechanisms and consequences of apoptosis in sepsis

14Although immune cell depletion is a crucial event in the pathology of sepsis-induced immunosuppression, the mechanisms responsible for this are not fully understood. One theory is that sepsis could affect apoptosis-induced decrease in the number of DCs, which are the most potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs). This then leads to impaired innate and adaptive immune response. In addition, the profound decrease in the number of some critical cells could influence adaptive immune responses between the innate and adaptive systems. The other theory is that some factors, including steroids, cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, high mobility group box-1 protein, FasL, and heat shock protein), could regulate apoptosis by directly modulating the activities of caspase-8 in the death-induced signaling complex or by changing the levels of death and survival factors that control the Fas apoptotic pathway. Conversely, the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor beta, could accelerate apoptosis.

15This process ultimately leads to major consequences. First, with respect to immune response, excessive apoptosis causes massive loss of immune cells. For example, the depletion of macrophages and NK cells impairs microorganism clearance,, which leads to protracted inflammatory responses. The second major consequence is that uncontrolled apoptosis of immune cells results in immunological tolerance with anti-inflammatory properties. During apoptosis, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines is inhibited, but the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors is activated, indicating a shift from T helper type 1 (Th1) to Th2 cytokine production,. The sepsis-induced functional and quantitative changes in immune cells result in lymphopenia, with progression of immune paralysis.

Apoptosis-induced lymphopenia during sepsis

16Sepsis could affect the function of virtually all types of immune cells. In the following section, we will discuss these various immunosuppressive effects on the different cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems.

Neutrophils

17Neutrophils are produced in the bone marrow (BM) and released into the circulation as the most prevalent and integral innate cell population. They are fundamental components of innate immunity and are essential for microbial eradication and for sepsis survival. Neutrophils are the most abundant leukocyte in systemic circulation. They are also present in small amounts in the spleen, liver, and lung, apart from the BM, and thus they are critical for early immune response,. In addition, neutrophils may function as APCs and mediate between innate and adaptive responses in various pathological infections.

18In physiological conditions, neutrophils are constitutively pro-apoptotic and are short-lived granulocytes that undergo energy- and caspase-dependent apoptosis within 24 h. However, in the early stage of sepsis, the level of neutrophils increase rapidly owing to delayed neutrophil apoptosis, as evidenced by the high neutrophil count observed in animals and sepsis patients only during the first 24 h of sepsis initiation. This then leads to persistent neutrophil dysfunction, compounded by the release of immature neutrophils from the BM that culminates in neutrophil deficits in oxidative burst, cell migration,, complement activation, and bacterial clearance, all of which contribute to immune dysfunction and persistent inflammation (Fig. 3). In addition, immature neutrophils are produced and released from the BM, and their circulation aggravates the delayed apoptosis. Thus the inhibition of neutrophil apoptosis in sepsis could be harmful to host immunity, and neutrophil infiltration into tissues could damage organ function,. For example, neutrophil infiltration in the lungs is a pathological hallmark of sepsis-induced acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Increased circulating neutrophils result in a dysregulated immune response by releasing cytokines and reactive oxygen species at sites distal to the infectious focus, leading to multiple organ failure (Fig. 4). However, accelerated apoptosis resulted in inflammation resolution in several preclinical models of injury,.

19Various mechanisms governing neutrophil apoptosis have been implicated in sepsis. Intravenous lipopolysaccharide or endotoxin could increase the levels of various gene transcripts in neutrophils, which result in the suppression of neutrophil apoptosis. The delayed apoptosis of neutrophils is associated with disease severity, whereas increased apoptosis is beneficial for fighting infection in hemorrhagic shock. Meanwhile, delayed neutrophil apoptosis but accelerated apoptosis of other immune cells might impair host immune system by increasing the dephosphorylation of epithelial cell caspase-8. Although delayed neutrophil apoptosis results in increased neutrophil counts, some functional deficit in neutrophils are evident during the early and late time points in sepsis patients. Further, some functions decline with protracted sepsis. More interestingly, neutrophil deficiency hastens the development of nosocomial and secondary infections, which is probably due to impaired bacterial clearance and altered pulmonary cytokine response. Currently, neutrophil apoptosis-induced lymphopenia is given more attention for its involvement in the development of secondary infection and as a potential predictor of mortality at 1 year after sepsis. One potential mechanism by which apoptosis-induced lymphopenia occurs is that some neutrophil subsets during sepsis could secrete excessive amounts of IL-10, which restrains the proliferation of T lymphocyte. Another mechanism is that complex interactions between the neutrophils and complement system could also cause complement-induced innate immune damage during sepsis. In addition, von Gunten et al. reported that the apoptosis response of neutrophils to a death stimulus (Siglec-9 cross-linking) varies significantly between patients and at different stages of septic shock. The feasibility of neutrophil function and immature neutrophil count as predictors of sepsis has also been evaluated based on the delayed neutrophil apoptosis observed in septic animals and patients.

Monocytes and macrophages

20The impact of sepsis on monocyte subpopulations has been extensively studied. The most notable change during sepsis is that the impairment of bold monocytes from the patients initiates “endotoxin tolerance” and leads to poor outcome. Monocytes and macrophages are major components of the innate immune system and play pivotal roles in orchestrating host immune response during sepsis. At the early phase of sepsis, two different lymphocytes secrete an increased level of pro-inflammatory factors and chemokines, which aggravate the inflammatory response, and could contribute to increased mortality rate. As sepsis progresses, the excessive apoptosis of monocytes and macrophages could result in immunosuppression and the higher risk of secondary infection or mortality,. Furthermore, monocyte and macrophage dysfunction leads to decreased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12, whereas the release of anti-inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) and IL-10, is neither impaired nor enhanced (Fig. 3)–. These changes indicate that intracellular signaling has shifted from production of pro-inflammatory cytokines toward anti-inflammatory mediators associated with nosocomial infections and increased mortality.

21Aside from accelerated apoptosis during sepsis, functional defects in monocytes also contribute to the pathophysiology of sepsis-induced immunosuppression, which is characterized by suppressed mononuclear cell HLA-DR expression in monocytes. The decreased level of monocyte HLA-DR could be considered as a marker of monocyte anergy, as it impairs the function of monocytes and decreases lymphocyte proliferation in response to invading pathogens. Notably, HLA-DR expression is a reliable predictor for the development of nosocomial infections and mortality during sepsis–, and immunotherapies targeting monocyte function in patients with sepsis are being developed,.

22Macrophages are essential in maintaining and activating host inflammatory responses. Traditionally, macrophages perform two most well-known polarizations: M1 (i.e., expression of inflammatory cytokines) and M2 (i.e., expression of factors that resolve or suppress inflammatory responses). Macrophage phagocytosis leads to an imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, resulting in polarization of macrophages to an M2 phenotype. This is characterized by predominant release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and IL-1ra, and decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Collectively, sepsis-induced extensive depletion of macrophages could seriously impair host antimicrobial defenses, but anti-apoptotic therapies targeting macrophages through anti-apoptotic proteins, such as modulation of Bcl-2 family members, could effectively ameliorate the host response and decrease sepsis-induced morbidity and mortality.

Dendritic cells

23DCs arise from BM progenitors and seed the peripheral tissues as immature cells. They are the most potent APCs and play an essential role in pathogen recognition, regulation of immune response, and inflammation, by linking the innate and adaptive immunity,. DCs are classified into two types: conventional DCs (cDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). cDCs, such as monocytes, can also secrete IL-12, while pDCs are similar to plasma cells and secrete large amounts of interferon (IFN)-α. DCs, including plasmacytoid and myeloid DCs, are markedly reduced in the spleen and circulation during sepsis. Notably, the loss of DCs seems associated with worse clinical outcomes in sepsis including death and nosocomial infections–. For example, the number of DCs was markedly reduced in both the spleen and mesenteric nodes at 12 h in septic models created via cecal ligation puncture. Although the excessive depletion of DCs could induce accelerated differentiation of monocytes into DCs,, it does not compensate for the excessive depletion of DCs, and the number of DCs continue to decrease along with impaired functional capability. The levels of surface molecules associated with the function of DCs, including CD40 and CD86 as well as major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-DR, markedly decrease, but the release of IL-10 tends to increase (Fig. 3),. These changes lead surviving DCs to transform to tolerogenic DCs, which are DCs that are unable to induce an allogeneic T cell activation but lead to either T cell anergy or Treg cell proliferation. Under this condition, DCs with immunosuppressive properties that undermine immune responses are lost, thus leading to failure of activation of the immune response of effector T cells and ultimately results to an immunosuppressive state and organ injury,. Thus the profound depletion of DCs has been considered as an early predictive biomarker for the outcome of sepsis.

24There are several mechanisms involved in the induction of DC apoptosis, including abnormal activation of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) and an influx of extracellular Ca2+ and calcineurin-dependent nuclear NFAT translocation. Further investigation found that DCs profoundly affected the systemic impact of severe sepsis through Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathways by increasing the expression of MHC class II antigen and costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD8. Multiple reports have shown that blocking sepsis-induced DC apoptosis or augmenting DC function could enhance sepsis survival–, indicating that preventing DC apoptosis could be a promising treatment strategy for sepsis.

NK cells

25NK cells have been heavily studied in sepsis due to their low number in the circulation but high numbers in tissues; thus their contribution to the pathophysiology of sepsis remains unclear. Only 5–15% of blood lymphocytes do not express specific receptors. Traditionally, NK cells are recognized as immune regulators and are divided into different subpopulations based on CD16 and CD56 expression. In humans, NK cells are characterized as CD3− NKp46+ CD56+ cells. Under normal conditions, NK cells can induce a rapid, non-specific innate immune response against intracellular bacteria, pyogenic bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viral infections, through direct cytotoxicity against virus-infected cells and early production of cytokines that can inhibit viral replication. Further, NK cells are the major producers of IFN-γ. In addition, NK cells play an important role in initiating host defense and coordinating innate and adaptive immune responses during sepsis.

26The most important change is that the accelerated apoptosis of NK cells leads to the decreased number of circulating NK cells, that lasts for several weeks during sepsis. Both CD56hi and CD56lo NK cell subpopulations are altered, and this is associated with increased mortality in patients with sepsis,. More importantly, the cytotoxic function of NK cell is decreased, which contributes to sepsis-induced immunosuppression (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the decreased level of IFN-γ caused by excessive apoptosis of NK cells increases the risk of secondary infection.

27The loss of NK cells directly affects the immune responses in sepsis patients and thus may be a potential target for therapeutic intervention,. For example, PD-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) blockade-based immunotherapy can be used during sepsis-associated immunosuppression that develops due to the loss of protective function of NK cells,. Thus NK cell-based immunotherapy and immunomodulatory molecules specifically targeting NK cells and their immunometabolism may open a future avenue to target sepsis.

Gamma delta (γδ) T cells

28γδ T cells are a distinct lymphocyte population with a unique and expansive function. They play a pivotal role in protecting tissues against bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogen damage. γδ T cells comprise a small subset of T cells that possess a distinct T cell receptor (TCR) on their cell surface, that is, a TCR comprised of one γ chain and one δ chain. These cells exhibit features of both innate and adaptive immunity and play an indispensable role in host defense, immune surveillance, and homeostasis. γδ T cells contribute to both innate and acquired immune responses during sepsis, with IFN-γ, IL-17, and other chemokines being released after γδ T cell activation.

29In sepsis patients, γδ T cells are activated with increased surface expression of CD69 and HLA-DR, but the number of circulating γδ T cells is significantly lower than that of healthy subjects,, and the reductions correlate with the severity of illness and highest mortality rates,. This is probably because the apoptosis-induced loss of γδ T cells in the intestinal mucosa results in higher susceptibility to secondary infections as pathogens invade the circulation or peritoneal cavity (Fig. 3). The number of γδ T cells in the peripheral circulation decreases by as much as 80%. Liao et al. found that changes in the function-related markers of γδ T cells in the blood of sepsis patients and impaired IFN-γ expression by γδ T cells after antigen stimulation are associated with mortality in sepsis patients. Furthermore, γδ T cell deficiency impairs the immune defenses and increases the mortality risk in sepsis. Expansion of the γδ T cell population increased the resistance of immunodeficient mice to bacterial infection. Collectively, these findings show that preventing γδ T cell apoptosis could attenuate inflammatory responses, providing new insight in the understanding of the functions of γδ T cells in sepsis.

CD4+ T cells and associated subpopulations

30T lymphocytes are key elements in all adaptive immune responses. CD4+ T cells are among the most important peripheral lymphocyte subsets in terms of modulating successful immune responses, influencing innate and adaptive immune cells through cytokine production, and cell-to-cell interaction,. When presented with peptide antigens, mature CD4+ T cells become activated and rapidly divide into several subsets that facilitate various immune responses by differing cytokine generation and secretion upon activation. Among these cell subsets, Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells are major representatives of Th cells and are further explored here.

31Apoptosis of T lymphocytes is critical in the pathophysiology of sepsis, and CD4+ T cells could directly mediate the host response to sepsis. The number of T lymphocytes undergoing apoptosis is significantly reduced during sepsis and is even higher in non-survivors than survivors. One of the most notable T cell defects induced by sepsis is the development of apoptosis, which destroys the CD4+ T cell population (Fig. 3),. Uncontrolled apoptosis of CD4+ T cells causes marked lymphocytopenia, which is particularly serious because clonal expansions are critical to overcome potentially lethal infections. Patients who died of sepsis were found to have a much greater magnitude of CD4+ T cell apoptosis than survivors.

32Several treatments to prevent immunosuppression have targeted the apoptosis of CD4+ T cells in animal models,. Of note, IL-7 has emerged as a promising therapeutic agent because it has been found to be essential in preventing T cell depletion. IL-7 administration has been shown to effectively improve T cell viability and trafficking and release of IFN-γ and restore the delayed-type hypersensitivity response to recall antigens, which improves survival in sepsis. Another promising approach in reversing immunosuppression in sepsis involves blockade of the co-inhibitory molecules PD-1 and PD-L1. PD-1 blockade has been reported to increase the release of IFN-γ and prevent T cell apoptosis in patients with active infections. However, the mechanisms inhibiting T cell apoptosis during sepsis are complex and yet to be completely understood.

33Not only the number of CD4+ T cell populations but also the function of the remaining lymphocytes is reduced during sepsis. Sepsis leads to uncontrolled apoptosis-induced depletion of CD4+ T cells, and some remaining cells are rendered dysfunctional or exhausted due to the prolonged exposure to excessive pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. CD4+ T cell exhaustion has been typified by T cells that have severely impaired effector functions and has been found in patients with sepsis. The prolonged duration of sepsis is characterized by high antigen load and elevated pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, which is conducive for T cell exhaustion. The association between T cell exhaustion and increased mortality in sepsis is due to immune paralysis and secondary nosocomial infections,. Multiple independent studies have reported that blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway could attenuate T cell exhaustion, increase IFN-γ production, prevent apoptosis, and improve survival in various pathologic models of sepsis–. Collectively, these findings indicate that T cell exhaustion is also a major etiology of immune dysfunction in sepsis and that reversal of putative T cell exhaustion is a promising modality in the treatment of sepsis.

B cells

34B cells play an important role in both adaptive and innate immune response. Under physiological circumstances, activated effector B cells could differentiate into plasma cells or memory B cells and drive the humoral immune response and act as APCs to activate effector T cells. B cell function is relegated to the production of antibodies (Abs) and the development of memory plasma B cells. Multiple studies have documented that impaired B cell function,, along with the production of IL-10,, the presentation of microorganism antigens to T lymphocytes, and interaction of several bacterial products with B cells,, weakens immunity during sepsis. The relative proportion of B cell subsets is decreased on admission day in critically ill patients with sepsis, indicating that the apoptosis of B cells was induced,. In addition, endotoxemia causes a transient depletion of memory B cells and regulatory B cells from the circulation, but the functional capacity of B cells to produce IL-10 is maintained (Fig. 3).

35Excessive apoptosis of B cells in sepsis likely involves multiple pathogen-sensing receptors and redundant signaling pathways. For example, Octavia et al. found that myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) was effective in blocking the apoptosis of B cells, and MyD88 deficiency could markedly decrease B cells apoptosis, but the mortality rate significantly increased. However, administration of Tubastatin A, a selective inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6, restored the percentage of B lymphocytes and significantly increased the percentages of innate immune cells and macrophages. Therefore, therapies targeted at reversing B cell depletion should be actively investigated.

Treg cells

36Treg cells are a component of adaptive immunity that suppress responses of other effector T cell subsets, helping to maintain tolerance to self-antigens and suppression of autoimmune disease. Treg cells are involved in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance and control of the immune processes,. Furthermore, Treg cells play a key role in controlling inflammation in many infectious diseases, including sepsis,. In sepsis and critical illness, Treg cells are detrimental to the proliferation and functional activity of effector T cells and other immune cells; for example, Treg cells inhibit both monocyte and neutrophil function.

37The number of circulating Treg cells increase in septic shock, particularly in the early stages after initiation. Further, although this increase was observed immediately after the onset of sepsis, it persisted only in those who subsequently died. Further study revealed that the increase in Treg cells is caused by the loss of effector T cells rather than an absolute increase in Treg cells. The involvement of these cells in long-term sepsis-induced immune dysfunction may be attributed to inhibition of monocyte function through a pro-apoptotic mechanism involving the Fas/FasL pathway. Treg cells are less vulnerable to sepsis-induced apoptosis; therefore, the percentage of Treg cells increases in patients with sepsis,. Cell apoptosis is a continuous state, but Treg cells are more resistant to sepsis-induced apoptosis than other T cell subpopulations,, thus the increased ratio of Treg cells during the early period after sepsis. Increased Treg cell population would prevent recovery of the immune system from excessive immune responses. Importantly, these resistant effects are possibly due to TLR4 deficiency and associated NF-κB signal pathways.

38The higher number of Treg cells in sepsis patients impairs immunity and contributes to secondary infections and mortality by acting both on innate and adaptive immune cells (Fig. 3). However, the role of Treg cells in septic injury is yet to be clarified. Although prevention of Treg cell apoptosis inhibited immune responses or decreased survival in animal models of sepsis, the removal of Treg cells via anti-CD25 monoclonal Ab administration did not improve survival in animal model. This may be because not only Treg cells but also other T cell subpopulations are depleted. In conclusion, Treg cells are more resistant to apoptosis in sepsis, thus potentially serving as targets for immune modulation.

Clinical perspectives

39Given the profound immunosuppression induced by depletion of immune cells that occurs during sepsis, the ability to sequentially follow the uncontrolled lymphocyte apoptosis as a means to evaluate the efficacy of immune-adjuvant therapies provides promising novel therapeutic opportunities. The potential of preventing lymphocyte apoptosis as a treatment strategy in sepsis has been supported by many animal model studies. The first study to report that prevention of apoptosis improved the survival in sepsis showed that Bcl-2 overexpression is more resistant to sepsis-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, an increasing number of immunoadjuvant therapies to prevent sepsis-induced immune paralysis have been identified as apoptosis dependent. IL-7 and anti-PD-L1 have been found to have potent effects to prevent lymphocyte apoptosis. IL-7 administration is an attractive therapy in sepsis, because it blocks sepsis-induced apoptosis of immune effector cells and increases IFN-γ, a cytokine that is critical for an effective host response against invading pathogens. This presents a potential novel strategy in the treatment of patients with sepsis by restoring adaptive immunity. Such immune-based therapy should be broadly protective against numerous bacterial and fungal pathogens. More specifically, other agents, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IFN-γ, IL-15, anti-PD-1/PD-L1, and anti-B and T lymphocyte attenuator will target the immunosuppressed state in critically ill patients (Table 1). Therefore, development of a non-invasive imaging modality to detect and serially follow apoptotic cell death could be helpful in evaluating the efficacy of immunoadjuvant therapies in sepsis patients. This provides a bright prospect of autophagic modulation in clinical application.

Conclusion

40Impaired apoptosis aggravates sepsis-induced immunosuppression in both innate and adaptive immune systems. Thus manipulating apoptosis could be a new therapeutic approach in sepsis. Further, exploring potential therapeutic targets related to apoptosis will be valuable in reversing sepsis-induced immunosuppression.

References 204

1.
Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013;13:260-268.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70001-x
2.
Marshall JC. Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed? Trends Mol. Med. 2014;20:195-203.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.007
3.
Fink MP, Warren HS. Strategies to improve drug development for sepsis. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014;13:741-758.
Not in our library10.1038/nrd4368
4.
Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:304-377.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6
5.
Marik PE, et al. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:625-632.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y
6.
Dellinger RP, Vincent JL. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign sepsis change bundles and clinical practice. Crit. Care. 2005;9:653-654.
Not in our library10.1186/cc3952
7.
Suarez De La Rica A, Gilsanz F, Maseda E. Epidemiologic trends of sepsis in western countries. Ann. Transl. Med. 2016;4:325.
Not in our library10.21037/atm.2016.08.59
8.
Cohen J, et al. Sepsis: a roadmap for future research. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2015;15:581-614.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(15)70112-x
9.
Fleischmann C, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. current estimates and limitations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016;193:259-272.
Not in our library10.1164/rccm.201504-0781oc
10.
van der Poll T, et al. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017;17:407-420.
Not in our library10.1038/nri.2017.36
11.
Langley RJ, et al. An integrated clinico-metabolomic model improves prediction of death in sepsis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017;5:195ra195.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3005893
12.
Hall MJ, et al. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;62:1-8.
Not in our library
13.
Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013;13:862-874.
Not in our library10.1038/nri3552
14.
Delano MJ, Ward PA. Sepsis-induced immune dysfunction: can immune therapies reduce mortality? J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:23-31.
Not in our library10.1172/jci82224
15.
Needham DM, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit. Care Med. 2012;40:502-529.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e318232da75
16.
Kaukonen KM, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1629-1638.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1415236
17.
Vincent J-L, et al. Sepsis definitions: time for change. Lancet. 2013;381:774-775.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61815-7
18.
Singer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-810.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2016.0287
19.
Kahn JM, et al. The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States. Crit. Care Med. 2015;43:282-287.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000000710
20.
Hotchkiss RS, Opal S. Immunotherapy for sepsis–a new approach against an ancient foe. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:87-89.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmcibr1004371
21.
Torgersen C, et al. Macroscopic postmortem findings in 235 surgical intensive care patients with sepsis. Anesth. Analg. 2009;108:1841-1847.
Not in our library10.1213/ane.0b013e318195e11d
22.
The late phase of sepsis is characterized by an increased microbiological burden and death rate · 2011
No notice
23.
Boomer JS, et al. Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure. JAMA. 2011;306:2594-2605.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2011.1829
24.
Hotchkiss RS, et al. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16045.
Not in our library10.1038/nrdp.2016.45
25.
Hotchkiss RS, Nicholson DW. Apoptosis and caspases regulate death and inflammation in sepsis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006;6:813-822.
Not in our library10.1038/nri1943
26.
Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Karl IE. Role of apoptotic cell death in sepsis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2009;35:585-592.
Not in our library10.1080/00365540310015692
27.
Delano MJ, Ward PA. The immune system's role in sepsis progression, resolution, and long-term outcome. Immunol. Rev. 2016;274:30-353.
Not in our library10.1111/imr.12499
28.
Hattori Y, et al. Insights into sepsis therapeutic design based on the apoptotic death pathway. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2010;14:354-365.
Not in our library10.1254/jphs.10r04cr
29.
Hotchkiss RS, Crouser E. Imaging apoptosis in sepsis–a technology we would die for! Crit. Care Med. 2015;43:2506-2508.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000001289
30.
Oberholzer, C. et al. Targeted adenovirus-induced expression of IL-10 decreases thymic apoptosis and improves survival in murine sepsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98,11503–11508 (2001).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.181338198
31.
Ayala A, et al. Blockade of apoptosis as a rational therapeutic strategy for the treatment of sepsis. Novartis Found. Symp. 2007;280:37-49.
Not in our library10.1002/9780470059593.ch4
32.
Cohen JJ, et al. Apoptosis and programmed cell death in immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1992;10:267-293.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.iy.10.040192.001411
33.
Ayala A, et al. Apoptosis in sepsis: mechanisms, clinical impact and potential therapeutic targets. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009;14:1853-1859.
Not in our library10.2174/138161208784980617
34.
Hotchkiss RS, et al. Rapid onset of intestinal epithelial and lymphocyte apoptotic cell death in patients with trauma and shock. Crit. Care Med. 2000;28:3207-3217.
Not in our library10.1097/00003246-200009000-00016
35.
Zheng D, et al. Inhibition of microRNA 195 prevents apoptosis and multiple-organ injury in mouse models of sepsis. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;213:1661-1670.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiv760
36.
Benjamim CF, et al. Reversal of long-term sepsis-induced immunosuppression by dendritic cells. Blood. 2005;105:3588-3595.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2004-08-3251
37.
Zeerleder S, et al. Elevated nucleosome levels in systemic inflammation and sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2003;31:1947-1951.
Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000074719.40109.95
38.
Hotchkiss RS, et al. Cell death. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1570-1583.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmra0901217
39.
Huber-Lang MS, et al. Complement-induced impairment of innate immunity during sepsis. J. Immunol. 2002;169:3223-31.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.3223
40.
Chiche L, et al. Interferon-gamma production by natural killer cells and cytomegalovirus in critically ill patients. Crit. Care Med. 2012;40:3162-3169.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e318260c90e
41.
Henson PM, Bratton DL. Antiinflammatory effects of apoptotic cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:2773-2774.
Not in our library10.1172/jci69344
42.
Lerman YV, et al. Sepsis lethality via exacerbated tissue infiltration and TLR-induced cytokine production by neutrophils is integrin alpha3beta1-dependent. Blood. 2011;124:3515-3523.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2014-01-552943
43.
Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006;6:173-182.
Not in our library10.1038/nri1785
44.
Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013;13:159-175.
Not in our library10.1038/nri3399
45.
Neutrophil kinetics in health and disease · 2010
No notice
46.
Tamayo E, et al. Evolution of neutrophil apoptosis in septic shock survivors and nonsurvivors. J. Crit. Care. 2012;27:415 e1-11.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.09.001
47.
Borregaard N. Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity. 2010;33:657-670.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2010.11.011
48.
Davey MS, et al. Microbe-specific unconventional T cells induce human neutrophil differentiation into antigen cross-presenting cells. J. Immunol. 2014;193:3704-3716.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1401018
49.
Geering B, Simon HU. Peculiarities of cell death mechanisms in neutrophils. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:1457-1469.
Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2011.75
50.
Taneja R, et al. Delayed neutrophil apoptosis in sepsis is associated with maintenance of mitochondrial transmembrane potential and reduced caspase-9 activity. Crit. Care Med. 2004;32:1460-1469.
Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000129975.26905.77
51.
Delano MJ, et al. Sepsis induces early alterations in innate immunity that impact mortality to secondary infection. J. Immunol. 2013;186:195-202.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1002104
52.
Eash KJ, et al. CXCR2 and CXCR4 antagonistically regulate neutrophil trafficking from murine bone marrow. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:2423-2431.
Not in our library10.1172/jci41649
53.
Delano MJ, et al. Neutrophil mobilization from the bone marrow during polymicrobial sepsis is dependent on CXCL12 signaling. J. Immunol. 2011;187:911-918.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1100588
54.
Grailer JJ, et al. Persistent neutrophil dysfunction and suppression of acute lung injury in mice following cecal ligation and puncture sepsis. J. Innate Immun. 2014;6:695-705.
Not in our library10.1159/000362554
55.
Abraham E. Neutrophils and acute lung injury. Crit. Care Med. 2003;31(4 Suppl):S195-199.
Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000057843.47705.e8
56.
Grommes J, Soehnlein O. Contribution of neutrophils to acute lung injury. Mol. Med. 2011;17:293-307.
Not in our library10.2119/molmed.2010.00138
57.
Leitch AE, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases 7 and 9 specifically regulate neutrophil transcription and their inhibition drives apoptosis to promote resolution of inflammation. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:1950-1961.
Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2012.80
58.
Lucas CD, et al. Downregulation of Mcl-1 has anti-inflammatory pro-resolution effects and enhances bacterial clearance from the lung. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:857-868.
Not in our library10.1038/mi.2013.102
59.
de Kleijn S, et al. Transcriptome kinetics of circulating neutrophils during human experimental endotoxemia. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38255.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0038255
60.
Fialkow L, et al. Neutrophil apoptosis: a marker of disease severity in sepsis and sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care. 2006;10:R155.
Not in our library10.1186/cc5090
61.
Anne Morrison C, et al. Increased apoptosis of peripheral blood neutrophils is associated with reduced incidence of infection in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. J. Infect. 2013;66:87-94.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jinf.2012.10.001
62.
Jia SH, Parodo J, et al. Activated neutrophils induce epithelial cell apoptosis through oxidant-dependent tyrosine dephosphorylation of caspase-8. Am. J. Pathol. 2014;184:1030-1040.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.12.031
63.
Patera AC, et al. Frontline Science: Defects in immune function in patients with sepsis are associated with PD-1 or PD-L1 expression and can be restored by antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016;100:1239-1254.
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.4hi0616-255r
64.
Morris AC, et al. C5a-mediated neutrophil dysfunction is RhoA-dependent and predicts infection in critically ill patients. Blood. 2011;117:5178-5188.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2010-08-304667
65.
Robertson CM, et al. Neutrophil depletion causes a fatal defect in murine pulmonary Staphylococcus aureus clearance. J. Surg. Res. 2008;150:278-285.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.009
66.
Drewry AM, et al. Persistent lymphopenia after diagnosis of sepsis predicts mortality. Shock. 2014;42:383-391.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0000000000000234
67.
Kasten KR, Muenzer JT, Caldwell CC. Neutrophils are significant producers of IL-10 during sepsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;393:28-31.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.066
68.
Liu L, Sun B. Neutrophil pyroptosis: new perspectives on sepsis. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019;76:2031-2042.
Not in our library10.1007/s00018-019-03060-1
69.
von Gunten S, et al. Different patterns of Siglec-9-mediated neutrophil death responses in septic. Shock. 2009;32:386-392.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0b013e3181a1bc98
70.
Seok Y, et al. Delta neutrophil index: a promising diagnostic and prognostic marker for sepsis. Shock. 2012;37:242-246.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0b013e3182454acf
71.
Parihar A, Eubank TD, Doseff AI. Monocytes and macrophages regulate immunity through dynamic networks of survival and cell death. J. Innate Immun. 2010;2:204-215.
Not in our library10.1159/000296507
72.
Lauvau G, Loke P, Hohl TM. Monocyte-mediated defense against bacteria, fungi, and parasites. Semin. Immunol. 2015;27:397-409.
Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2016.03.014
73.
Hamidzadeh K, et al. Macrophages and the recovery from acute and chronic inflammation. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2017;79:567-592.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034348
74.
Molgaard-Nielsen D, Pasternak B, Hviid A. Oral fluconazole during pregnancy and risk of birth defects. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:2061-2062.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1301066
75.
Wang TS, Deng JC. Molecular and cellular aspects of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.). 2008;86:495-506.
Not in our library10.1007/s00109-007-0300-4
76.
Biswas SK, Lopez-Collazo E. Endotoxin tolerance: new mechanisms, molecules and clinical significance. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:475-487.
Not in our library10.1016/j.it.2009.07.009
77.
Fumeaux T, Pugin J. Is the measurement of monocytes HLA-DR expression useful in patients with sepsis? Intensive Care Med. 2008;32:1106-1108.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-006-0205-7
78.
Sinistro A, et al. Downregulation of CD40 ligand response in monocytes from sepsis patients. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 2008;15:1851-1858.
Not in our library10.1128/cvi.00184-08
79.
Drewry AM, et al. Monocyte function and clinical outcomes in febrile and afebrile patients with severe sepsis. Shock. 2018;50:381-387.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0000000000001083
80.
Lukaszewicz AC, et al. Monocytic HLA-DR expression in intensive care patients: interest for prognosis and secondary infection prediction. Crit. Care Med. 2009;37:2746-2752.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181ab858a
81.
Monneret G, et al. Monitoring immune dysfunctions in the septic patient: a new skin for the old ceremony. Mol. Med. 2008;14:64-78.
Not in our library10.2119/2007-00102.monneret
82.
Venet F, et al. Human CD4+CD25+ regulatory t lymphocytes inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced monocyte survival through a Fas/Fas ligand-dependent mechanism. J. Immunol. 2006;177:6540-6547.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6540
83.
Schefold JC. Measurement of monocytic HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) expression in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: assessment of immune organ failure. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1810-1812.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-010-1965-7
84.
Drewry AM, et al. Comparison of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression and stimulated tumor necrosis factor alpha production as outcome predictors in severe sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit. Care. 2016;20:334.
Not in our library10.1186/s13054-016-1505-0
85.
Wu JF, et al. Changes of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression as a reliable predictor of mortality in severe sepsis. Crit. Care. 2011;15:R220.
Not in our library10.1186/cc10457
86.
Cazalis MA, et al. Decreased HLA-DR antigen-associated invariant chain (CD74) mRNA expression predicts mortality after septic shock. Crit. Care. 2013;17:R287.
Not in our library10.1186/cc13150
87.
Andonegui G, et al. Targeting inflammatory monocytes in sepsis-associated encephalopathy and long-term cognitive impairment. JCI Insight. 2018;3:99364.
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.99364
88.
Hamers L, Kox M, Pickkers P. Sepsis-induced immunoparalysis: mechanisms, markers, and treatment options. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:426-439.
Not in our library
89.
Gordon S, Martinez FO. Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions. Immunity. 2010;32:593-604.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007
90.
Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:787-795.
Not in our library10.1172/jci59643
91.
Benoit M, Desnues B, Mege JL. Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections. J. Immunol. 2008;181:3733-3739.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.3733
92.
Peck-Palmer OM, et al. Modulation of the Bcl-2 family blocks sepsis-induced depletion of dendritic cells and macrophages. Shock. 2009;31:359-366.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0b013e31818ba2a2
93.
Reizis B. Classical dendritic cells as a unique immune cell lineage. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:1053-1056.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20121038
94.
Baratin M, et al. Homeostatic NF-kappaB signaling in steady-state migratory dendritic cells regulates immune homeostasis and tolerance. Immunity. 2015;42:627-639.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2015.03.003
95.
Niessen F, et al. Dendritic cell PAR1-S1P3 signalling couples coagulation and inflammation. Nature. 2008;452:452654-452658.
Not in our library10.1038/nature06663
96.
Phenotype changes and impaired function of dendritic cell subsets in patients with sepsis: a prospective observational analysis · 2009
No notice
97.
Mildner A, Jung S. Development and function of dendritic cell subsets. Immunity. 2014;40:642-656.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2014.04.016
98.
Pietruczuk M, et al. Alteration of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in acute pancreatitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006;12:5344-5351.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v12.i33.5344
99.
Grimaldi D, et al. Profound and persistent decrease of circulating dendritic cells is associated with ICU-acquired infection in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1438-1446.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-011-2306-1
100.
Kumar V. Dendritic cells in sepsis: potential immunoregulatory cells with therapeutic potential. Mol. Immunol. 2018;101:615-626.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molimm.2018.07.007
101.
Guisset O, et al. Decrease in circulating dendritic cells predicts fatal outcome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:148-152.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-006-0436-7
102.
Strother RK, et al. Polymicrobial sepsis diminishes dendritic cell numbers and function directly contributing to impaired primary CD8 T cell responses in vivo. J. Immunol. 2016;197:4301-4311.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1601463
103.
Pene F, et al. Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 contribute to sepsis-induced depletion of spleen dendritic cells. Infect. Immun. 2009;77:5651-5658.
Not in our library10.1128/iai.00238-09
104.
Elsayh KI, et al. Dendritic cells in childhood sepsis. J. Crit. Care. 2013;28:881 e7-13.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.05.007
105.
Fan X, et al. Alterations of dendritic cells in sepsis: featured role in immunoparalysis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:903720.
Not in our library10.1155/2015/903720
106.
Pastille E, et al. Modulation of dendritic cell differentiation in the bone marrow mediates sustained immunosuppression after polymicrobial sepsis. J. Immunol. 2011;186:977-986.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1001147
107.
Faivre V, et al. Human monocytes differentiate into dendritic cells subsets that induce anergic and regulatory T cells in sepsis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47209.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0047209
108.
Wu DD, Li T, Ji XY. Dendritic cells in sepsis: pathological alterations and therapeutic implications. J. Immunol. Res. 2017;2017:3591248.
Not in our library10.1155/2017/3591248
109.
Weber GF, et al. Analysis of circulating plasmacytoid dendritic cells during the course of sepsis. Surgery. 2015;158:248-254.
Not in our library10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.013
110.
Luan YY, et al. Insights into the apoptotic death of immune cells in sepsis. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2015;35:17-22.
Not in our library10.1089/jir.2014.0069
111.
Scumpia PO, et al. CD11c+ dendritic cells are required for survival in murine polymicrobial sepsis. J. Immunol. 2005;175:3282-3286.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.3282
112.
Bohannon J, et al. Dendritic cell modification of neutrophil responses to infection after burn injury. J. Immunol. 2010;185:2847-2853.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0903619
113.
Gautier EL, et al. Enhanced dendritic cell survival attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced immunosuppression and increases resistance to lethal endotoxic shock. J. Immunol. 2008;180:6941-6946.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.180.10.6941
114.
Chiche L, et al. The role of natural killer cells in sepsis. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011;2011:986491.
Not in our library10.1155/2011/986491
115.
Bohannon J, Guo Y, Sherwood ER. The role of natural killer cells in the pathogenesis of sepsis: the ongoing enigma. Crit. Care. 2012;16:185.
Not in our library10.1186/cc11881
116.
Vivier E, et al. Functions of natural killer cells. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:503-510.
Not in our library10.1038/ni1582
117.
Poli A, et al. CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset. Immunology. 2009;126:458-465.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03027.x
118.
Vivier E, et al. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science. 2011;331:44-49.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1198687
119.
Stevenson MM, Riley EM. Innate immunity to malaria. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4:169-180.
Not in our library10.1038/nri1311
120.
Bjorkstrom NK, et al. Rapid expansion and long-term persistence of elevated NK cell numbers in humans infected with hantavirus. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:13-21.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20100762
121.
Arase H, et al. Direct recognition of cytomegalovirus by activating and inhibitory NK cell receptors. Science. 2002;296:1323-1326.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1070884
122.
Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ. Natural killer cells in sepsis: detrimental role for final outcome. Crit. Care Med. 2014;42:1579-1580.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000000352
123.
Guo Y, et al. The biology of natural killer cells during sepsis. Immunology. 2018;153:190-202.
Not in our library10.1111/imm.12854
124.
Forel JM, et al. Phenotype and functions of natural killer cells in critically-ill septic patients. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e50446.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0050446
125.
Venet F, et al. Early assessment of leukocyte alterations at diagnosis of septic shock. Shock. 2010;34:358-363.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0b013e3181dc0977
126.
Holub M, et al. Lymphocyte subset numbers depend on the bacterial origin of sepsis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003;9:202-211.
Not in our library10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00518.x
127.
Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F, et al. Toll-like receptors expression and interferon-gamma production by NK cells in human sepsis. Crit. Care. 2012;16:R206.
Not in our library10.1186/cc11838
128.
Halstead ES, et al. Reduced frequency of CD56 dim CD16 pos natural killer cells in pediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome/sepsis patients. Pediatr. Res. 2013;74:427-432.
Not in our library10.1038/pr.2013.121
129.
Wesselkamper SC, et al. NKG2D is critical for NK cell activation in host defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection. J. Immunol. 2008;181:5481-5489.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5481
130.
Inoue S, et al. IL-15 prevents apoptosis, reverses innate and adaptive immune dysfunction, and improves survival in sepsis. J. Immunol. 2010;184:1401-1419.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0902307
131.
Limaye AP, et al. Cytomegalovirus reactivation in critically ill immunocompetent patients. JAMA. 2008;300:413-422.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2008.697
132.
Hsu J, et al. Contribution of NK cells to immunotherapy mediated by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:4654-4668.
Not in our library10.1172/jci99317
133.
Targeting Immune Cell Checkpoints during Sepsis · 2017
No notice
134.
Kumar V. Natural killer cells in sepsis: underprivileged innate immune cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2019;98:81-93.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejcb.2018.12.003
135.
Taniguchi T, et al. Malaria protection in beta 2-microglobulin-deficient mice lacking major histocompatibility complex class I antigens: essential role of innate immunity, including gammadelta T cells. Immunology. 2007;122:514-521.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02661.x
136.
Zheng J, et al. γδ-T cells: an unpolished sword in human anti-infection immunity. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2013;10:50-57.
Not in our library10.1038/cmi.2012.43
137.
Heffernan DS, et al. A divergent response of innate regulatory T-cells to sepsis in humans: circulating invariant natural killer T-cells are preserved. Hum. Immunol. 2014;75:277-282.
Not in our library10.1016/j.humimm.2013.11.004
138.
Andreu-Ballester JC, et al. Association of gammadelta T cells with disease severity and mortality in septic patients. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 2013;20:738-746.
Not in our library10.1128/cvi.00752-12
139.
Douglas JJ, Tsang JL, Walley KR. Sepsis and the innate-like response. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:249-251.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-013-3141-3
140.
Tschop J, et al. Gammadelta T cells mitigate the organ injury and mortality of sepsis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2017;83:581-588.
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.0707507
141.
Heffernan DS, et al. Inflammatory mechanisms in sepsis: elevated invariant natural killer T-cell numbers in mouse and their modulatory effect on macrophage function. Shock. 2013;40:122-128.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0b013e31829ca519
142.
Liao XL, et al. Phenotypic changes and impaired function of peripheral gammadelta T cells in patients with sepsis. Shock. 2017;48:321-328.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0000000000000857
143.
Chung CS, et al. Deficiency of gammadelta T lymphocytes contributes to mortality and immunosuppression in sepsis. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2006;291:R1338-1343.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpregu.00283.2006
144.
Wang L, et al. Antibacterial effect of human V gamma 2V delta 2 T cells in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;108:1349-1357.
Not in our library10.1172/jci200113584
145.
Hu YM, et al. Glutamine administration modulates lung gammadelta T lymphocyte expression in mice with polymicrobial sepsis. Shock. 2014;41:115-122.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0000000000000086
146.
Pepper M, Jenkins MK. Origins of CD4+ effector and central memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:467-471.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.2038
147.
Jensen IJ, et al. Sepsis-induced T cell immunoparalysis: the ins and outs of impaired T cell immunity. J. Immunol. 2018;200:1543-1553.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1701618
148.
Gutcher I, Becher B. APC-derived cytokines and T cell polarization in autoimmune inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:1119-1127.
Not in our library10.1172/jci31720
149.
Kasten KR, et al. T-cell activation differentially mediates the host response to sepsis. Shock. 2010;34:377-383.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0b013e3181dc0845
150.
Gouel-Cheron A, et al. CD4+ T-lymphocyte alterations in trauma patients. Crit. Care. 2012;16:432.
Not in our library10.1186/cc11376
151.
Inoue S, et al. Reduction of immunocompetent T cells followed by prolonged lymphopenia in severe sepsis in the elderly. Crit. Care Med. 2013;41:810-819.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e318274645f
152.
Failure to normalize lymphopenia following trauma is associated with increased mortality, independent of the leukocytosis pattern · 2012
No notice
153.
Shindo Y, et al. Interleukin-7 and anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody have differing effects to reverse sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Shock. 2015;43:334-343.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0000000000000317
154.
Widera A. Physics. A walk across a quantum lattice. Science. 2015;347:1200-1201.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aaa6885
155.
Mackall CL, Fry TJ, Gress RE. Harnessing the biology of IL-7 for therapeutic application. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:330-342.
Not in our library10.1038/nri2970
156.
Unsinger J, et al. IL-7 promotes T cell viability, trafficking, and functionality and improves survival in sepsis. J. Immunol. 2010;184:3768-3779.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0903151
157.
Singh A, et al. Inhibiting the programmed death 1 pathway rescues Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific interferon gamma-producing T cells from apoptosis in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;208:603-615.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jit206
158.
Crouser ED, Hotchkiss RS. Desperate times call for desperate measures: self-cannibalism is protective during sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2017;45:145-147.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000002106
159.
Ono S, et al. Mechanisms of sepsis-induced immunosuppression and immunological modification therapies for sepsis. Ann. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2018;2:351-358.
Not in our library10.1002/ags3.12194
160.
Inoue S, et al. Persistent inflammation and T cell exhaustion in severe sepsis in the elderly. Crit. Care. 2014;18:R130.
Not in our library10.1186/cc13941
161.
Programmed death-1 levels correlate with increased mortality, nosocomial infection and immune dysfunctions in septic shock patients · 2011
No notice
162.
Huang, X. et al. PD-1 expression by macrophages plays a pathologic role in altering microbial clearance and the innate inflammatory response to sepsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 6303–6308 (2009).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0809422106
163.
Blockade ofthe negative co-stimulatory molecules PD-1 and CTLA-4 improves survival in primary and secondary fungal sepsis · 2013
No notice
164.
Targeting the programmed cell death 1: programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway reverses T cell exhaustion in patients with sepsis · 2014
No notice
165.
Mauri C, Bosma A. Immune regulatory function of B cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012;30:221-241.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074934
166.
Rauch PJ, et al. Innate response activator B cells protect against microbial sepsis. Science. 2012;335:597-601.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1215173
167.
Monserrat J, et al. Early alterations of B cells in patients with septic shock. Crit. Care. 2013;17:R105.
Not in our library10.1186/cc12750
168.
Kelly-Scumpia KM, et al. B cells enhance early innate immune responses during bacterial sepsis. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:1673-1682.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20101715
169.
Fillatreau S, et al. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3:944-950.
Not in our library10.1038/ni833
170.
Mizoguchi A, et al. Chronic intestinal inflammatory condition generates IL-10-producing regulatory B cell subset characterized by CD1d upregulation. Immunity. 2002;16:219-230.
Not in our library10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00274-1
171.
Vaughan AT, Roghanian A, Cragg MS. B cells–masters of the immunoverse. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011;43:280-285.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2010.12.005
172.
Rawlings DJ, et al. Integration of B cell responses through Toll-like receptors and antigen receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012;12:282-294.
Not in our library10.1038/nri3190
173.
Shankar-Hari M, et al. Activation-associated accelerated apoptosis of memory B cells in critically ill patients with sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2017;45:875-882.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000002380
174.
Hotchkiss RS, et al. Sepsis-induced apoptosis causes progressive profound depletion of B and CD4+ T lymphocytes in humans. J. Immunol. 2001;166:6952-6963.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6952
175.
Brinkhoff A, et al. B cell dynamics during experimental endotoxemia in humans. Biosci. Rep. 2019;39:BSR20182347.
Not in our library10.1042/bsr20182347
176.
Peck-Palmer OM, et al. Deletion of MyD88 markedly attenuates sepsis-induced T and B lymphocyte apoptosis but worsens survival. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008;83:1009-1018.
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.0807528
177.
Deng Q, et al. Protective effect of tubastatin A in CLP-induced lethal sepsis. Inflammation. 2018;41:2101-2109.
Not in our library10.1007/s10753-018-0853-0
178.
Liston A, Gray DH. Homeostatic control of regulatory T cell diversity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:154-165.
Not in our library10.1038/nri3605
179.
Sakaguchi S, et al. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell. 2008;133:775-787.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.009
180.
Tanoue T, Atarashi K, Honda K. Development and maintenance of intestinal regulatory T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:295-309.
Not in our library10.1038/nri.2016.36
181.
Cao C, et al. The role of regulatory T cells in immune dysfunction during sepsis. World J. Emerg. Med. 2015;6:5-9.
Not in our library10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.01.001
182.
Monneret G, et al. Marked elevation of human circulating CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Crit. Care Med. 2003;31:2068-2071.
Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000069345.78884.0f
183.
Venet F, et al. Increased circulating regulatory T cells (CD4(+)CD25 (+)CD127 (-)) contribute to lymphocyte anergy in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:678-686.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-008-1337-8
184.
Cavassani KA, et al. The post sepsis-induced expansion and enhanced function of regulatory T cells create an environment to potentiate tumor growth. Blood. 2010;115:4403-4411.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2009-09-241083
185.
Venet F, et al. Regulatory T cell populations in sepsis and trauma. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008;83:523-535.
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.0607371
186.
Leng FY, et al. Increased proportion of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells during early-stage sepsis in ICU patients. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2013;46:338-344.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmii.2012.06.012
187.
Cao C, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 deficiency increases resistance in sepsis-induced immune dysfunction. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018;54:169-176.
Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2017.11.006
188.
Cao C, et al. Ulinastatin mediates suppression of regulatory T cells through TLR4/NF-kappaB signaling pathway in murine sepsis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018;64:411-423.
Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2018.09.025
189.
Carrigan SO, et al. Depletion of natural CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells with anti-CD25 antibody does not change the course of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced acute lung infection in mice. Immunobiology. 2009;214:211-222.
Not in our library10.1016/j.imbio.2008.07.027
190.
Venet F, et al. Monitoring the immune response in sepsis: a rational approach to administration of immunoadjuvant therapies. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2013;25:477-483.
Not in our library10.1016/j.coi.2013.05.006
191.
Hotchkiss RS, et al. Overexpression of Bcl-2 in transgenic mice decreases apoptosis and improves survival in sepsis. J. Immunol. 1999;162:4148-4156.
Not in our library
192.
Watanabe E, Thampy LK, Hotchkiss RS. Immunoadjuvant therapy in sepsis: novel strategies for immunosuppressive sepsis coming down the pike. Acute Med. Surg. 2018;5:309-315.
Not in our library10.1002/ams2.363
193.
Hutchins NA, et al. The new normal: immunomodulatory agents against sepsis immune suppression. Trends Mol. Med. 2014;20:224-233.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.002
194.
Francisco-Cruz A, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: not just another haematopoietic growth factor. Med. Oncol. 2014;31:774.
Not in our library10.1007/s12032-013-0774-6
195.
Meisel C, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reverse sepsis-associated immunosuppression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009;180:640-648.
Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200903-0363oc
196.
Hall MW, et al. Immunoparalysis and nosocomial infection in children with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:525-532.
Not in our library10.1007/s00134-010-2088-x
197.
Docke WD, et al. Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: restoration by IFN-gamma treatment. Nat. Med. 1997;3:678-681.
Not in our library10.1038/nm0697-678
198.
Nalos M, et al. Immune effects of interferon gamma in persistent staphylococcal sepsis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012;185:110-112.
Not in our library10.1164/ajrccm.185.1.110
199.
PD-L1 blockade improves survival in experimental sepsis by inhibiting lymphocyte apoptosis and reversing monocyte dysfunction · 2010
No notice
200.
Upregulation of programmed death-1 on T cells and programmed death ligand-1 on monocytes in septic shock patients · 2011
No notice
201.
Pellegrini M, et al. IL-7 engages multiple mechanisms to overcome chronic viral infection and limit organ pathology. Cell. 2011;144:601-613.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.011
202.
Yang X, et al. T cell Ig mucin-3 promotes homeostasis of sepsis by negatively regulating the TLR response. J. Immunol. 2013;190:2068-2079.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1202661
203.
Zhao Z, et al. Blockade of the T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain protein 3 pathway exacerbates sepsis-induced immune deviation and immunosuppression. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2014;178:279-291.
Not in our library10.1111/cei.12401
204.
Inoue S, et al. Dose-dependent effect of anti-CTLA-4 on survival in sepsis. Shock. 2011;36:38-44.
Not in our library10.1097/shk.0b013e3182168cce

Cited by papers we hold 3

Bacteriophage-antibiotic combination therapy against extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection to allow liver transplantation in a toddler · 2022
No notice
Advances in sepsis diagnosis and management: a paradigm shift towards nanotechnology · 2021
Not checked
Inflammation and Cell Death of the Innate and Adaptive Immune System during Sepsis · 2021
No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.