Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Insights into the role of sialylation in cancer progression and metastasis

Christopher Dobie, Danielle Skropeta

British Journal of Cancer · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01126-7

Abstract

Upregulation of sialyltransferases—the enzymes responsible for the addition of sialic acid to growing glycoconjugate chains—and the resultant hypersialylation of up to 40–60% of tumour cell surfaces are established hallmarks of several cancers, including lung, breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer. Hypersialylation promotes tumour metastasis by several routes, including enhancing immune evasion and tumour cell survival, and stimulating tumour invasion and migration. The critical role of enzymes that regulate sialic acid in tumour cell growth and metastasis points towards targeting sialylation as a potential new anti-metastatic cancer treatment strategy. Herein, we explore insights into the mechanisms by which hypersialylation plays a role in promoting metastasis, and explore the current state of sialyltransferase inhibitor development.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Background

The number of new cases of cancer exceeds 18 million globally per year, and is predicted to increase further due to our growing and ageing population; lung cancer is the most common type, followed by breast, prostate and colorectal cancer.– The main cause of death in these patients is metastasis, the multistage translocation of a cancer cell to a distant organ where it develops into a new lesion.– Although much knowledge has been gained about the metastatic cascade over the past two decades,, particularly about the early invasion and migration stages,, there is still more to uncover about the genomics of the process, about the circulation and colonisation stages and, in particular, about the role of glycosylation—the attachment of glycans to proteins—in metastasis.–

Cell-surface glycans have been implicated in tumour aggressiveness, metastasis and chemoresistance,, and their presence can be targeted by therapeutic agents, as well as being used for diagnostic purposes; for example, the carbohydrate antigens CA19-9, CA125 and CA15-3 are used for pancreatic, ovarian and breast cancer detection, respectively.–

Of the various sugars that make up N-linked and O-linked glycans, sialic acids at the terminal end of glycans are of critical importance. In humans, the most common sialic acid is N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), which plays an essential role in numerous cellular interactions, including with the extracellular matrix, immune cells, epithelial cells, antibodies and other intercellular processes. The synthesis of sialylated glycans utilises Golgi-resident, membrane-bound sialyltransferase enzymes, of which there are 20 subtypes in humans: all use cytidine monophosphate N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-Neu5Ac) as the donor. The sialyltransferases catalyse the formation of a glycosidic linkage between C2 of the sialic acid from the donor and a C3, C6 or C8 hydroxyl of a glycan acceptor, and are named as ST3, ST6 or ST8 subtypes accordingly., These are further categorised based on whether the acceptor sugar is galactose (Gal), N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) or another sialic acid (Sia) moiety. The most well-described sialyltransferase in the literature is human ST6Gal I, which produces glycans with the sialic acid linked to C6 of a galactose acceptor.

While 20 sialyltransferase subtypes are a large array, expression of each is regulated across cell types and each presents particular substrate specificities, although with some redundancies. This has been studied particularly in relation to the most commonly investigated sialyltransferases, ST3Gal I and ST6Gal I. This review of the human sialyltransferase family by Harduin-Lepers et al. comprehensively details their substrate specificity, sequence alignment, gene expression and roles in O-glycan and ganglioside biosynthesis. On the other side of the sialylation equation, there are four human neuraminidase enzymes (NEU1–4), which cleave sialic acid from glycan chains, thereby also regulating cell-surface sialylation.

Described as a subclass of the glycome, the ‘sialome’ has been linked to a dense forest covering the cell membrane in a varied array of complex sialylated structures that play vital roles in cell–cell interactions. Dysregulation of this crucial system has far-reaching consequences for cancer, inflammation, infection and immune diseases.– A primary example is tumour hypersialylation, an increase in sialic acid residues of up to 40–60% on the surface of cancer cells. Hypersialylation can occur via the upregulation of sialyltransferases, the downregulation of neuraminidases or a combination of both,, and results in an excess of the negatively charged sialic acid on the cell surface. Oncogenes such as Ras and c-Myc have been implicated in the increased transcription of sialyltransferases, among other factors. The accumulation of sialic acid is linked to immune evasion, along with blocking vital signalling pathways and reducing the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Furthermore, hypersialylation promotes tumour metastasis via several routes, including stimulating tumour invasion and migration through integrin-mediated processes,, inhibiting Fas-mediated apoptosis and evading immunosurveillance., Although an increase in sialyltransferase expression promotes a pro-metastatic phenotype in many cancer tissues, it can have the opposite effect on cancers originating in neural tissues, such as glioma, possibly owing to the fact that polysialylation plays a key role in the regulation and regeneration of neural systems.

Several key reviews of sialylation in cancer have been published elsewhere.,,, In this review, we discuss insights into the specific mechanisms by which altered sialylation promotes cancer metastasis during the stages of invasion, intravasation, circulation, extravasation and colonisation. Owing to the critical role of sialylation in tumour metastasis, reducing sialylation or regulating sialic acid-mediated processes through small-molecule inhibitors, lectins or blocking antibodies have emerged as potential new cancer treatment strategies. We present the most promising findings, along with future challenges and opportunities for bringing these therapies to the clinic.

Immune system evasion

For cancer cells to successfully metastasise and spread throughout the body, they must be able to avoid detection and destruction by the immune system. This can be achieved by mimicking the glycosylation patterns of healthy immune cells by employing a ‘self’ signal and thereby avoiding immune attack. Hypersialylation of the surface of cancer cells makes these cells prime ligands for sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectins (Siglecs), which are found on the surface of immune cells., Once bound to sialylated glycans, Siglecs promote immunosuppressive signalling, thus conferring protection on the tumour cell.,, For example, natural killer (NK)-cell-mediated tumour cell death is inhibited by interactions between NK-expressed Siglec-7 or Siglec-9 and sialylated glycans (Siglec ligands) on tumour cells., Accordingly, monoclonal antibodies targeting Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 have shown promise in both in vitro and in vivo models as they prevent Siglec–Siglec ligand interactions (Fig. 1). Santegoets et al. showed that glioma cells evade myeloid-derived suppressor cells by expressing ligands for Siglec-3, Siglec-5, Siglec-7 and Siglec-9, the latter two being most abundant. The binding of Siglec-9-expressing macrophages to a Siglec-9 ligand, such as sialylated mucin-1, has been shown to induce a tumour-associated macrophage phenotype and to ‘educate’ myeloid cells to release factors that promote disease progression (such as interleukin 6 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor), in studies using soluble mucin-1 and mucin-1 expressed on T47D breast cancer cells., Multiple myeloma cells have also been shown to evade NK cells by binding to Siglec-7 and Siglec-9. However, treatment with neuraminidase to cleave the sialic acid residues or inhibition of sialylation using the sialyltransferase inhibitor 3Fax-Neu5Ac (see later section on ‘Sialyltransferase inhibitors’) enabled primary NK cells to kill multiple myeloma cells.,

The highly sialylated cell-surface protein CD24, which is overexpressed in some forms of ovarian and breast cancer, binds to Siglec-10 on macrophages, thereby protecting the tumour cells from phagocytotic cell death (Fig. 1). However, treatment of MCF-7 breast cancer cells with an anti-CD24 monoclonal antibody, or genetic ablation of either CD24 or Siglec-10 restored phagocytosis. Furthermore, an in vivo murine xenograft model showed a reduction in MCF-7 tumour growth and increased survival in mice that had tumours deficient in CD24.

The specific sialylated ligands for several Siglecs have not been fully characterised. Singh and Choi demonstrated that knockout of the sialyltransferase ST3Gal III in melanoma cells reduced α-2,3-sialylation and the metastatic characteristics of these cells. Typically, melanoma cells bind to subcapsular sinus macrophages in lymph nodes that express Siglec-1, resulting in colonisation of the nodes. In a murine colon cancer model established by Shapiro and co-workers, it was noted that α-2,8-linked di-sialic acids bound Siglec-E (a homologue of human Siglec-9) expressed on the surface of macrophages, inhibiting the immune response and allowing increased tumour growth. Overexpression of the sialyltransferase ST8Sia VI in its model decreased the survival time from greater than 6 months to 2–3 months. Further examples of immune evasion include upregulation of ST6Gal I and consequent α-2,6-sialylation in hepatocarcinoma cells, which was shown to inhibit the proliferation of T cells in the tumour microenvironment, thereby promoting immune evasion (Fig. 1).

Evading apoptosis and cell death

Apoptosis and other mechanisms of cell death are crucial for the body to kill metastatic cells, and so evasion of these processes is critical for proliferation of cancer cells to secondary sites. One of the ways in which cancer cells evade apoptosis and cell death signalling is via ST6Gal-I-mediated hypersialylation of the Fas receptor (FasR). This in turn blocks Fas internalisation and the formation of the death-inducing signalling complex (DISC), thereby disabling apoptotic signalling (Fig. 2). ST6Gal I upregulation has a similar effect on tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-induced cell death by sialylation of TNF receptor 1, which inhibits its internalisation, thereby preventing the induction of apoptosis and promoting cell survival (Fig. 2).

Galectins

Galectin-1 is a hypoxia-responsive β-galactoside-binding lectin with elevated expression in many cancers, where it plays a pro-tumorigenic role by promoting angiogenesis and evasion of T-cell- dependent immunity as reviewed elsewhere.– Knockout mice models have helped elucidate the role of Gal-1 in promoting immunosuppression and metastasis in breast cancer and Lewis lung carcinoma. Inhibition of Gal-1 is being explored as a potential cancer treatment with calixarene OTX008 reaching Phase 1 clinical trials in 2013, although no further trial data have been reported., Alongside inhibiting galectins, there is an emerging role of sialylation as a negative regulator of galectin binding and function that requires further investigation (Fig. 2).– One such example is the sialylation of the fibronectin receptor α5β1-integrin, which impairs its ability to trigger anoikis (apoptosis in response to detachment from the underlying extracellular matrix) by reducing its binding affinity to extracellular Gal-1.,

Galectin-3 also plays a key role in tumour angiogenesis, migration and invasion, along with an emerging regulatory role in cancer stemness. However, Gal-3 has a broad spectrum of activity in tumour growth, where intracellular Gal-3 protects cells from apoptosis, while extracellular Gal-3 can induce apoptosis. Elevated levels of Gal-3 are typically associated with a pro-metastatic tumour phenotype; however, Pereira et al. have reported that reduced Gal-3 expression during breast cancer progression correlated with increased metastasis of 4T1 murine breast cancer cells to the bone marrow.

Sialylation can inhibit the interaction between Gal-3 and its binding partners (integrins, mucins, collagen and fibronectin). Bellis et al. have shown that elevated levels of ST6Gal I in human colon carcinoma result in α-2,6-sialylation of β1 integrins that impairs adhesion to extracellular Gal-3 and confers a selective advantage by protecting the tumour against Gal-3-induced apoptosis. Santos et al. have shown that elevated ST6GalNAc 1 in gastric cancer results in decreased Gal-3 cell-surface- binding sites, leading to intracellular accumulation of Gal-3 and increased chemotherapeutic resistance. Desialylation of malignant lymphoma cells using an O-glycosylation inhibitor was found by Suzuki et al. to enhance cell adhesion to galectin and inhibited cell invasion.

On the other hand, Murugaesu et al. have shown that ST6GalNAc II acts as a metastasis suppressor in breast cancer by regulating the pro-metastatic role of Gal-3. They found that elevated ST6GalNAc II expression in oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers impaired Gal-3 binding to the tumour cell surface, and correlated with reduced lung metastasis and improved survival. As sialylation was found to regulate Gal-3 binding, it was proposed that galectin inhibitors would be most effective for low ST6GalNAc II-expressing cells. It was found that Gal-3 expression levels did not correlate with clinical outcomes, whereas it was proposed that monitoring of ST6GalNAc II expression could be used to stratify patient treatment or to predict metastasis in ER-negative breast cancers.

Both galectins and sialylation mask the underlying β-galactoside ligand and are characterised as pro-tumorigenic/metastatic, and both are linked to cancer stemness., While they could be expected to work in concert to promote tumour progression, immune evasion and metastasis, the complete picture is far more complex. The intricate relationship between sialylation and galectins extends beyond cancer into cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease, and highlights a potential role for combination strategies that target both galectins and sialylation in cancer (and other diseases).,

Altered adhesion and invasion

One key mechanism in metastatic cancer spread is the reduced adhesion between cancer cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM), and other cells in the same tumour mass. This decreases the stability of a tumour mass and allows for cells to more readily separate and invade blood vessels, leading to circulation and potential metastasis at a secondary site. Thus, sialylation of cell–ECM-adhesion molecules, such as integrins, plays a key role in the increased metastatic potential of many cancers through a change to their adhesive properties (Fig. 3).

Integrins

Glycosylation of integrins, in particular sialylation, controls integrin cell functions. Bellis et al. found that Ras upregulates ST6Gal I in colon epithelial cells, leading to increased sialylation of β1-integrin receptors. Further in vivo studies showed that relative to ST6Gal I non-expressors, ST6Gal I- expressing SW48 colon cancer cells exhibited greater attachment to collagen I and laminin, enhanced migration towards collagen I and increased association with talin. Similarly, Almarez et al. reported that increased sialylation enhanced integrin-mediated cell mobility on collagen and fibronectin in SW1990 pancreatic cancer cells. Chiang et al. investigated the effect of a lithocholic acid-based sialyltransferase inhibitor, which decreased sialylation of α5, αv and β1 integrins in A549 lung cancer cells, leading to significantly reduced invasion, as well as suppression of lung metastasis in vivo.

In order to identify the distinct enzymes responsible for sialylation of integrin and other target proteins, Qi et al. developed a series of knockout HeLa cell lines and found that ɑ-2,3-sialylation of β1 integrin occurred in zones of the Golgi apparatus rich in ST3Gal IV and for EGFR in zones containing ST3Gal VI. The ɑ-2,3-sialylation of N cadherin occurred in Golgi zones containing ST3Gal III, ST3Gal IV and ST3Gal VI, while ST6Gal I was ubiquitously distributed across all zones. This study suggests that distinct α-2,3-sialyltransferases modify specific target proteins, including integrins, and thereby regulate different cellular functions.

β1 Integrin is the main carrier of the sialyl-Tn (STn) epitope, a tumour-associated antigen associated with poor prognosis in several cancers. Sialyl Tn is a truncated O-glycan comprising α-2,6-sialylated GalNAc residue on Ser/Thr and synthesised by ST6GalNAc I, while the sialyl T antigen is a related α-2,3-sialylated disaccharide (Galβ1–3GalNAc) synthesised by ST3Gal I, and both are highly abundant in carcinoma cell lines. Fujita et al. used a ST6GalNAc I-expressing MDA-MB-231 cell line and found, contrary to their expectations, that STn expression impaired adhesion of the breast cancer cells to bone marrow stromal cells, fibronectin and type I collagen. The authors highlighted the limitations of the study and the need to investigate other adenocarcinomas and bone metastasis models. However, Ata and Antonescu have noted that while sialylation regulates integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration, this could vary for specific integrin heterodimers and ECM substrate combinations.

Selectins

Selectins are cell-adhesion receptors that bind sialylated glycans and mediate numerous cell- adhesion processes, including leukocyte recruitment, extravasation and homing of lymphocytes, as well as play a key role in cancer metastasis.– They are classified as E-, P- and L-selectins based on their expression on endothelial cells, platelets and leukocytes, respectively, with distinct ligand specificities for sialyl Lewisx (sLex) for E-selectin, sLea or sLex for P-selectins and the sulfated glycan, sialyl 6-sulfo LeX for L-selectin (Fig. 4).– The selectin ligands are found at the terminus of both N- and O-glycans of mucins, cell-surface antigens such as CD24 and CD44 and the P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1). The increased expression of sialylated selectin ligands on tumours by upregulation of sialyltransferases (and fucosyltransferases) is correlated to enhanced metastasis in many cancers, including melanoma, gastric, pancreatic, colon and lung cancer. Gomes et al. found that the expression of ST3Gal IV in MKN45 gastric cancer cells resulted in enhanced synthesis of the sLex antigen and an increased invasive phenotype both in vitro and in vivo. In another study, Shen et al. elevated α-2,3 sialylation by promoting ST3Gal IV expression, which led to increased metastatic potential in gastric cancer cells (particularly MGC-803 cells), as demonstrated by lectin-binding and wound-healing assays. The analysis of tissue samples from 80 patients showed a positive correlation between α-2,3-sialylation and the extent of lymph-node metastasis, cancer stage and depth of tumour invasion.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)

EMT is the process by which polarised, immotile epithelial cells transition into motile mesenchymal cells with a central role in promoting carcinoma invasion and metastasis. Wu et al. showed that the ST3Gal family of sialyltransferases appears to play an integral role in transforming growth-factor (TGF)-β-associated EMT in ovarian cancer cells. The study found that treating SKOV-3 and A2780 cells with TGF-β increased the expression of ST3Gal I mRNA, and that this increase led to a decrease in E-cadherin levels and an increase in N-cadherin and vimentin levels; conversely, knockdown of ST3Gal I had the opposite effect, with TGF-β then having no impact whether present or absent. Wen et al. also observed an increase in E cadherin and a corresponding decrease in N cadherin in ES2 ovarian cancer cells when ST3Gal I was knocked down. By contrast, however, Du et al. found that global inhibition of sialylation promoted EMT in HaCaT keratinocytes, and that sialylation levels decreased upon induction of EMT, but increased again once cells were in the mesenchymal state. These observations indicate that the process is complex, and that while α-2,3-sialylation can promote EMT, other patterns of sialylation may inhibit certain transitions in the EMT, and hypersialylation becomes a phenotype of cells in the mesenchymal state.

Growth-factor receptors

In ovarian cancer cells, α-2,6-sialylation of fibroblast growth-factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) by ST6Gal I activates the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) pathways, promoting cell proliferation and migration (Fig. 3). However, Chandler et al. have observed that N-glycosylation and subsequent α-2,6-sialylation of vascular endothelial growth-factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) at Asn-247 can deactivate this receptor, resulting in the development of abnormal tumour blood vessels; however, further investigation of sialylation at other N-glycosylation sites is needed.

In a study of 633 breast cancer patients in China, higher expression of ST6Gal II in cancer tissue relative to healthy tissues was found to be associated with increased tumour stage, decreased survival time and oestrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)/human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. This observation led the authors to investigate the effects of silencing ST6Gal II in MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells, which resulted in the inhibition of cancer progression by arresting cell-cycle progression at G0/G1, as well as inhibiting the expression of the adhesion and migration molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1, CD24, MMP2, MMP9 and CXCR4. Overall, increased ST6Gal II expression correlated positively with focal adhesion and metastasis pathways, whereas downregulating ST6Gal II expression led to reduced cell adhesion and invasion, leading the authors to propose that ST6Gal II is a potent oncogene and a potential target for treating breast cancer.

Decreased cellular adhesion and increased migration and invasion have been linked to an upregulation of the sialyltransferase ST6GalNAc I, which plays a key role in the synthesis of the sialyl Tn antigen (Fig. 3)., Munkley et al. have highlighted how high levels of STn result in a decrease in the stability of tumour masses, leading to increased metastatic potential. Baeza-Kallee et al. showed that an increase in the expression of ST8Sia III in glioblastoma cells caused elevated cell proliferation, migration and clonogenicity, whereas treatment with neuraminidase inhibited metastatic potential. In a study of five breast cancer cell lines, one brain cancer cell line and a brain-seeking breast cancer cell line, an increase in total N-glycan abundance and overall sialylation levels was associated with increased invasiveness. The greatest degree of sialylated N-glycan expression was observed in the brain-seeking cell line 231BR, highlighting the link between sialylation and cancer metastasis.

In contrast to the examples described above, however, in neural cancers, it has been reported that an increase in the expression of sialyltransferases might have an inhibitory effect on metastasis. For example, ST6GalNAc V is usually expressed in normal brain tissue, and upregulation of this enzyme in other cancers (e.g. breast) can lead to metastasis to the brain. However, glioma cells show a marked decrease in ST6GalNAc V expression, and transfecting the ST6GALNAC5 gene into U373MG glioma cells was found to inhibit glioma growth. Further examples looking at the positive effects of increased sialylation include the intravenous infusion of recombinant ST6Gal I by Lau et al. They have shown that therapeutic administration of rST6Gal I can regulate de novo inflammatory cell production and dampen the inflammation mediator cascade in a murine model of acute lung inflammation.

Circulation, extravasation and colonisation

For cancer cells circulating in the bloodstream or lymphatic system to metastasise to a secondary site, they must first tether to cells at the site via the interaction of extracellular molecules. Tethering is followed by ‘rolling’ of the cell against endothelial cells, increasing the number of contacts between the cancer cell and endothelium, resulting in firm adhesion. This allows for extravasation and colonisation at a secondary site to occur.

Circulating tumour cells express several ligands for E-, P- and L-selectins, including sLea, sLex and CD44, with ST3Gal enzymes most often implicated in their synthesis.– Once circulating tumour cells have entered the bloodstream or lymphatic system, these selectin ligands help to tether the cells to the endothelium near the target organ prior to extravasation. CD24 is another ligand for P-selectins expressed on platelets and endothelial cells that is modified with sLex, and aids in P-selectin-dependent rolling of breast and bladder cancers during metastasis to the lungs (Fig. 4). Sialylation of CD133 (another cell-surface molecule identified as a cancer stem-cell marker) is also strongly linked to invasion and metastasis. In 2019, Scott and Drake reported that breast cancers with high levels of sLex show affinity for E-selectins on endothelial cells, leading to extravasation at potential secondary sites (Fig. 4).

In recent years, E-selectin has emerged as a key regulatory component of the bone marrow haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) vascular niche., Barbier et al. have shown that adhesion to E-selectin in the vascular niche promotes cell survival in acute myeloid leukaemia blasts, while inhibition with a glycomimetic (Uproleselan) reduced this effect and re-sensitised cells to chemotherapy. SLex overexpression has also been linked to the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the spread to massive liver metastasis and significantly worse patient survival., SLex is expressed on a ligand for P-selectins on the peritoneal mesothelium, which allows for site-specific metastasis of SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells. P-selectin-bound metastatic cancer stem cells were found to be resistant to shear stress, which highlights the strength of sLex binding to P-selectins in a circulating fluid environment. Meanwhile, L-selectins have been implicated in monocyte recruitment, promoting lung metastasis through enhanced extravasation., A study undertaken by Mondal et al. has demonstrated that ST3Gal IV is the primary sialyltransferase that synthesises sLex and other selectin ligands on human myeloid leukocytes, facilitating tethering to the vascular endothelium (Fig. 4).

In 2020, Natoni et al. reported that pan-sialyltransferase inhibition in multiple myeloma (MM) cells alters the post-translational sialylation of α4 integrin affecting its affinity for its counter-receptor, as well as reducing interactions between MM cells with E-selectins, MADCAM1 and VCAM1. Using an in vivo mouse model of aggressive myeloma, sialylation blockade improved survival by enhancing bortezomib sensitivity. The authors propose that sialylation is important for retention of the myeloma cells in the protective bone marrow microenvironment, and that inhibiting sialylation could increase the ratio of circulating to bone marrow-resident MM cells to increase the efficacy of anti-myeloma therapies.

Altered neuraminidase activity

Whereas hypersialylation of the surface of cancer cells is often attributed to sialyltransferase upregulation, downregulation of neuraminidase (NEU) enzymes, which thereby prevents the cleavage of sialic acids from cell-surface glycoconjugates, also gives rise to increased sialylation. For example, a decrease in NEU activity was identified as a significant contributor to cancer progression by Miyagi et al., who also reported in their study on HT-29 colon cancer cells that NEU1 overexpression resulted in a significant reduction in liver metastasis. The proposed mechanism for reduced metastasis involves a decrease in β4-integrin sialylation, which thereby suppresses cell migration, invasion and adhesion. Conversely, NEU1 and NEU4 downregulation have been reported to facilitate metastasis in colorectal cancers.,

Tringali and co-workers have shown that silencing the NEU4 gene in glioblastoma stem cells resulted in the downregulation of ST3Gal III, leading to decreased survival (potentially as a regulatory response to control the overall levels of sialylation), while increased levels of NEU4 increased the survival rate of the cells. Miyagi and co-workers also demonstrated an increase in serum NEU3 levels amongst cancer patients, as well as the presence of an unidentified NEU3 inhibitor in human serum, which could function to protect cancer cells from sialidase activity. It could be that the increase in NEU3 is an immune response to reduce cell-surface sialylation, while the NEU3 inhibitor may be expressed by cancers as a defence mechanism.

Sialylation-based cancer biomarkers

Several biomarkers used in clinical practice take advantage of the hypersialylation of the tumour cell surface, including the widely employed pancreatic cancer marker CA19-9 (sLea) and the sialylated mucin biomarkers CA125 (MUC16) and CA15-3 (MUC1 analogue) used to detect ovarian and breast cancer, respectively.,, Further investigations into additional biomarkers of hypersialylation include the analysis of expression levels of soluble E-selectin and five sialyltransferases (ST3Gal I–IV, ST6Gal I) in 135 surgically treated node-negative breast cancer patients, who found that a high ST3Gal III:ST6Gal I ratio and high levels of soluble E-selectin correlated with a poor prognosis for both relapse-free and overall survival.

In a 2018 study of ovarian cancer using ST6GAL1 mRNA levels from a public database (n = 517), along with the analysis of ST6GAL1 protein levels of 204 tumour samples, Wichert et al. found that high ST6GAL1 mRNA levels correlated with lymphovascular invasion and shorter survival, while high levels of ST6GAL1 protein expression correlated with advanced stage, metastasis and shorter recurrence-free intervals, indicating that ST6GAL1 expression levels could help identify the risk of chemoresistance and metastatic relapse.

MicroRNAs (miRs) are small non-coding RNAs that function as gene regulators, increasingly implicated in the development of drug resistance, along with targeting genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis. Liu et al. demonstrated that oncogenic miR-182 and miR-135b mediate the tumorigenesis and invasiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), supported by others. They also found that miR-182/-135b inversely regulated ST6GALNAC2 expression via the PI3K/AKT pathway, and suggested that this could be used as a potential predictive marker for CRC. However, the picture around ST6GalNAc II expression in cancer is far from clear. The ST6GALNAC2 gene is downregulated in ER-negative breast cancer tumours as described earlier, while mutations in the ST6GALNAC2 gene (along with B3GNT2 and B4GALT2) have been observed in patient-derived CRC cells. Yet, in a 2020 glycoproteomic study, the ST6GALNAC2 gene was highly upregulated across all oncogenic cell lines investigated, compared with other glycosylation proteins (including other sialyltransferases) that were downregulated in KRAS and HER2 clusters, but upregulated in BRAF, AKT, EGFR and MEK oncogenic clusters. While there may be potential for ST6GalNAc II as a cancer biomarker, further studies are needed.

Patents on sialylation-based biomarkers are largely based on either detection of the sialyltransferase enzyme (or related gene) or sialylated products such as the tumour-associated sialyl Tn antigen discussed earlier (Fig. 3). ST3Gal I has been patented as a biomarker for predicting prognosis and/or monitoring progression of prostate cancer. ST3Gal I is also one of the genes identified in a 2014 patent that is expressed in circulating tumour cells and used to differentiate these cells from primary tumour cells, as well as being highlighted as a potential target to inhibit metastasis.

Small-molecule inhibitors

The earliest methods for controlling sialylation used small-molecule inhibitors of sialyltransferases. The most well-known class of sialyltransferase inhibitors includes those that mimic the transition state of the sialyl transfer step of the enzyme-catalysed mechanism based on the activated form of the sialic acid donor CMP-Neu5Ac (Fig. 5a). This class of sialyltransferase inhibitor was pioneered by Schmidt,, with 2,3-didehydro-2-deoxyneuraminic acid (DANA, Neu5Ac2en) and aryl-based phosphodiester compounds shown in Fig. 5b (Ki = 29 nM, rat α-2,6-ST) and Fig. 5c (Ki = 70 nM, rat α-2,6-ST; Ki = 19 nM, hST6Gal I), that were developed two decades ago, still amongst the most potent agents used today. Numerous analogues of these CMP-based sialyltransferase inhibitors have been explored over the past 5–10 years with a range of activities, including the cyclopentyl derivative (Fig. 5d; Ki = 28 nM, hST6Gal I) and benzamide derivative (Fig. 5e; Ki = 16 nM, hST6Gal I), as well as high-affinity fluorescently labelled analogues of the 2,3-didehydro-2-deoxyneuraminic acid compounds shown in Fig. 5b.

Although they show excellent potency, there are potential pharmacokinetic issues with these highly polar phosphodiester-based inhibitors in terms of cell permeability, stability and potential susceptibility to phosphatase cleavage in vivo. To address these issues, several groups have sought to replace the charged phosphodiester linker with a neutral bioisostere, such as an amide, sulfonamide, carbamate or 1,2,3-triazole to improve both drug likeness and synthetic accessibility.– The publication of the crystal structures of porcine ST3Gal I and human ST6Gal I, ST8Sia III and ST6GalNAc I has enabled the use of structure-based design to improve selectivity without compromising potency. A new series of carbamate-linked ST inhibitors have been recently described.

Screening for natural and synthetic sialyltransferase inhibitors

A number of natural products with sialyltransferase inhibitory activity in the low micromolar range have been identified, including the soybean-derived soyasaponin I, which is active against ST3Gal I, ginsenosides, which inhibit both α-2,3- and α-2,6-sialylation in HepG2 liver cancer cells and lithocholic acid, which also inhibits ST3Gal I (Fig. 5f: IC50 = 21 µM, ST3Gal I). Further cell-permeable derivatives of lithocholic acid have been developed, the most promising of which (Lith-O-Asp) suppresses invasion and metastasis of lung cancer cells by inhibiting FAK/paxillin and integrin-mediated signalling (patented in 2016).,– Along with screening natural products, high-throughput screening (HTS) has also been explored. Rillahan et al. developed a HTS platform involving a fluorescence polarisation assay to screen for both sialyltransferase and fucosyltransferase inhibitors (ST6Gal I, ST3Gal I, ST3Gal III, FUT6 and FUT7). The lead sialyltransferase inhibitor from their screen was pyrazole (Fig. 5g, referred to as HAN00305), which demonstrated high selectivity towards ST3Gal III (Ki = 1.7 μM).

Peracetylated 3Fax-Neu5Ac

Glycocalyx engineering pioneered by Reutter, and Bertozzi– exploits the promiscuity of glycosyltransferases by feeding artificial sugar biosynthesis precursors into a cell, resulting in the presentation of modified sialic acids on the cell surface that can be used for a variety of purposes. This technique has the potential to revolutionise cancer diagnostics and treatments, and has been widely reviewed elsewhere.– Extending this concept, in 2012, Paulson et al. developed the cell-permeable peracetylated 3Fax-Neu5Ac (Fig. 5h), which acts as a global metabolic inhibitor of sialylation., The fluorinated prodrug is converted intracellularly into the active inhibitor CMP-3Fax-Neu5Ac using the cell’s own biosynthetic machinery, and globally inhibits all sialyltransferase enzymes, while concurrently interfering with sialic acid biosynthesis inside the cell, thereby reducing overall sialylation. However, when the peracetylated 3Fax-Neu5Ac (Fig. 5h) was tested in vivo in a murine model, the global inhibition of sialylation caused kidney and liver dysfunction, highlighting the need for selective inhibitors of sialyltransferase enzymes that target the key subtypes upregulated in cancer.

The delivery of peracetylated 3Fax-Neu5Ac (Fig. 5h) encapsulated into tumour-targeting nanoparticles has been shown by Bull et al. to prevent metastasis in a murine lung cancer model while bypassing the toxicity issues of global inhibition of sialylation. Bull et al. have also explored intra-tumoural injection of 3Fax-Neu5Ac that was shown to suppress tumour growth by promoting T-cell-mediated immunity. Further derivatives of 3Fax-Neu5Ac have been patented for a range of potential applications in cancer.– At the same time, peracetylated 3Fax-Neu5Ac, along with several natural product sialyltransferase inhibitors (e.g. soyasaponin and lithocholic acid), is commercially available, providing valuable tools in the further development of new and improved sialyltransferase inhibitors.

Targeting sialic-based interactions of siglecs, selectins and galectins

A review by Cagnoni et al. outlined therapeutic strategies to disrupt Siglec–glycan interactions to control metastasis and inflammation. These approaches include a highly sulfated Neu5Ac derivative NMSO3 that inhibited P-selectin-mediated tumour cell adhesion in human promyelocytic leukaemia, as well as C-9-modified Neu5Ac derivatives with enhanced affinity for human CD22., The latter example was further modified at the C-2 position by attaching a doxorubicin-loaded liposome, which resulted in a significant increase in survival rates in a xenograft model of human B-cell lymphoma.

Cagnoni’s review also highlighted strategies targeting galectin–glycan interactions that have been explored, including synthetic lactose and lactosamine-based derivatives with improved bioavailability over the natural ligand, which is sensitive to hydrolysis. Lead compounds such as thiodigalactoside (TDG) have been shown to reduce tumour progression and metastasis in murine models of breast and colon cancer via Gal-1 inhibition., TDG is widely used as a tool in galectin studies to block sugar-binding activity.

Novel routes for targeting Siglec–sialic-acid interactions were reviewed by Daly et al. in 2019, including Bertozzi’s approach to target and de-sialylate cancer cells using a sialidase (from Vibrio cholera) conjugated to the HER2-targeting antibody Trastuzumab. The antibody–sialidase conjugate exhibited enhanced tumour cell killing in HER2-positive breast cancer cells compared with the antibody alone. Further examples of sialic acid analogues as probes of sialidases and Siglecs were reported in 2020 by Liu et al., including sialic acid clusters with high affinity for Siglecs, as well as fluorophore-labelled sialic acid analogues for imaging cell-surface sialylation.

Adhesion inhibitors that block the interaction between selectins and sialylated ligands expressed on the tumour cell surface are also being actively explored. A variety of approaches have been investigated, including sulfated oligosaccharides such as heparin and dermatan sulfate, as well as sLex-based glycomimetics and glycopeptides. Uproleselan (GMI-1271) is a small-molecule glycomimetic and E-selectin-specific antagonist that inhibits binding of cells to E-selectin. Uproleselan entered Phase 3 clinical trials in 2019 (NCT03616470) in combination with chemotherapy to treat 380 patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Another compound from the same company (GMI-1359) has been developed as a dual inhibitor of both E-selectin and CXCR4, and is being investigated as an adjuvant to taxane-based therapy to reduce bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Following a different approach, Racotumomab (trade name Vaxira) is a therapeutic vaccine that triggers an immune response against the tumour antigen N-glycolyl GM3 ganglioside (NeuGcGM3), which completed Phase 2 clinical trials against small-cell lung cancer in 2014 (NCT01240447) with further trials ongoing for neuroblastoma (NCT02998983)., NeuGc is an immunogenic, non-human sialic acid that is abundant in almost all other mammals including non-human primates, as well as highly expressed on the surface of aggressive cancers., Humans cannot synthesise NeuGc; therefore, its incorporation into tumour cells is from dietary sources, in particular red meat., Varki and co-workers have led the field in understanding NeuGc biology and its role in disease, paving the way for others to explore NeuGc-based approaches in immunotherapy and as a cancer biomarker.

Glycomic profiling of cell-surface sialylation

The development of mass spectrometry-based N-glycan profiling over the last decade has enabled the simultaneous analysis of hundreds of cell-surface glycans revealing rich information regarding disease-based changes in cell-surface glycosylation. In order to facilitate high-throughput analysis, the terminal sialic acids are sometimes removed (via neuraminidase treatment) prior to glycan analysis to simplify the overall analysis procedure. While this improves efficiency, complementary methods can be used to provide in-depth analysis of intact sialylated species to reveal the dynamic process of cell-surface sialylation throughout the various stages of cancer aggressiveness. Cell-surface-capture methods such as those developed by Wollscheid et al. are used to covalently label hundreds of N-glycans on live cells to generate a global view of the glycoproteome., Activated ion electron-transfer dissociation (AI-ETD) is a mass-spectrometry- based glycopeptide-profiling method that enables large-scale analysis of intact glycopeptides including sialylated glycans.,

A 2012 glycoproteomic study from Yarema’s group on SW1990 pancreatic cancer cells revealed that bulk metabolic flux through the sialic acid pathway markedly increased sialylation of certain proteins more than twofold. The increased sialylation enhanced CD44-mediated adhesion to selectins and integrin-mediated cell mobility, indicating that cells can promote metastasis by controlling protein sialylation via metabolic flux. Using glycoproteomic analysis, Packer, Hancock and Fanayan have identified N-glycosylation differences in colorectal cancer that correlate with a more metastatic and aggressive phenotype. They compared the N-glycan profiles of membrane proteins from metastatic LIM1215, moderately differentiated LIM1899 and poorly differentiated LIM2405 colorectal cancer cell lines, and found a dominance of high mannose-type glycan structures (70–90%) and high relative abundance of α-2,6-linked sialic acid containing N-glycans in all three cell lines. On the other hand, α-2,3-sialylation was only observed in the LIM2405 cell line, indicating that glycosylation profiles may be able to differentiate between disease stages in colorectal cancer in the future.

Along with sialylation, fucosylation also plays a key role in assembly of the sLex ligand required for E-selectin binding to a cell. In particular, Fut3/Fut6 are linked to promotion of bone metastasis. Using N-glycoprotein-capture mass spectrometry, Esposito et al. identified CD44 as the top candidate substrate of human Fut enzymes in MDA-MB-231 and SUM159-M1a breast cancer cells. However, a CRISPR/Cas9 CD44 knockout in BM2 cells did not decrease E-selectin binding in vitro or inhibit bone metastasis in vivo, implying that murine models of bone metastasis may not be E-selectin dependent.

Using a combination of glycomic analysis with lectin-staining and cell studies, Amano et al. have shown that tumour suppressor p16(INK4a) modulates cell-surface sialylation and galectin expression to induce anoikis in human Capan-1 pancreatic carcinoma cells by downregulation of key enzymes involved in sialic acid biosynthesis, in particular the bifunctional UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase (GNE). This provides an additional means of controlling cell-surface α-2,6-sialylation via regulation of sialic acid biosynthesis rather than ST6GAL1 expression.

Conclusions

The ability of tumours to mimic host-like cell-surface sialylation—in particular, hypersialylation—is a key element of cancer progression and aggressiveness by enabling evasion of the immunosurveillance system and cell death pathways, while increasing the capacity for metastasis. Hypersialylation of cancer cells also plays a cytoprotective role and contributes to chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance in several cancers via mechanisms that are still being explored, but believed to be partly due to the added physical barrier of excess sialic acid, both absorbing ionising radiation and blocking diffusion of drug molecules into the cell. It has been shown that increased sialylation of cancer cells can confer resistance to chemotherapeutics such as paclitaxel and cisplatin.– To date, no specific hypersialylation mechanisms that promote radiotherapy resistance have been identified, although correlations have been observed, which implicate the importance of STs in radioresistance, especially in colorectal cancers.– Further investigation into these sialic acid-related processes is needed to enable the design of effective anti-metastatic agents that target the key sialyltransferase subtypes involved, with further potential to disarm resistance mechanisms.

Further research into translating knowledge of tumoural cell-surface glycosylation into diagnostic applications is ongoing and described as ‘the second golden age for glycomics’.,– Powerful new multiplexed glycoproteomic approaches are emerging involving large-scale analysis of intact sialylated glycans in a linkage-specific manner that are rapidly expanding our understanding of the cell-surface glycoproteome., There are also exciting prospects to use metabolic glycoengineering to exploit cancer cell metabolism for theranostic applications., Although the opportunities for developing new sialylation-based cancer biomarkers and therapeutics look promising, many challenges remain to be addressed. These challenges include the non-specific nature of protein sialylation,, the roles of extracellular sialyltransferases in remodelling cell-surface glycans, and a greater understanding of potential compounding genetic and environmental effects on sialylation levels,, including diet,, exercise, ageing, alcoholism and stress., Future genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can also help reveal whether sialyltransferase genes are statistically associated with predisposition to cancer, metastasis and radio-/chemotherapeutic resistance.

Currently, ST3Gal I and ST6Gal I are the most widely studied sialyltransferases and are consequently also the most commonly investigated and targeted of these enzymes in cancer and metastasis. Much opportunity, therefore, remains in terms of wider studies on the entire panel of 20 human sialyltransferases and their different (or overlapping) roles in cancer progression. On this note, it is essential for sialyltransferase inhibitors to be subtype-selective if they are to proceed to clinical trials, due to potential off-target effects on the liver and kidneys, such as those exhibited by the pan-inhibitor peracetylated 3-Fax-Neu5Ac. Along with selectivity, cell permeability and bioavailability are also important elements to address regarding the development of clinically relevant selective sialyltransferase inhibitors as potential cancer treatments. There is much to be gained from the ability to regulate sialylation in disease and, in particular, in cancer metastasis, but also still much to explore to deepen our understanding of sialylation in cancer progression and metastasis.

References 242

  1. 1.

    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394-424.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21492

  2. 2.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:7-30.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21590

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Nguyen DX, Bos PD, Massague J. Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:274-U265.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc2622

  5. 5.

    Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A Perspective on Cancer Cell Metastasis. Science. 2011;331:1559-1564.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1203543

  6. 6.

    Minn AJ, Gupta GP, Siegel PM, Bos PD, Shu WP, Giri DD, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature. 2005;436:518-524.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03799

  7. 7.

    Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiongenesis and metastasis—correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;324:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199101033240101

  8. 8.

    Fidler IJ. Timeline - The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:453-458.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1098

  9. 9.

    Joyce JA, Pollard JW. Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:239-252.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc2618

  10. 10.

    Qian B-Z, Pollard JW. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell. 2010;141:39-51.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.014

  11. 11.

    Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464:1071-U1148.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08975

  12. 12.

    Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 2019;69:363-385.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21565

  13. 13.

    Seyfried TN, Huysentruyt LC. On the origin of cancer metastasis. Crit. Rev. Oncogen. 2013;18:43-73.

    Not in our library10.1615/critrevoncog.v18.i1-2.40

  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Blsakova A, Kveton F, Kasak P, Tkac J. Antibodies against aberrant glycans as cancer biomarkers. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2019;19:1057-1068.

    Not in our library10.1080/14737159.2020.1687295

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Kailemia MJ, Park D, Lebrilla CB. Glycans and glycoproteins as specific biomarkers for cancer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017;409:395-410.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00216-016-9880-6

  19. 19.

    An HJ, Kronewitter SR, de Leoz MLA, Lebrilla CB. Glycomics and disease markers. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009;13:601-607.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.08.015

  20. 20.

    Skropeta D. The effect of individual N-glycans on enzyme activity. Bioorg. Med Chem. 2009;17:2645-2653.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bmc.2009.02.037

  21. 21.

    Varki A. Sialic acids in human health and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2008;14:351-360.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2008.06.002

  22. 22.

    Lairson LL, Henrissat B, Davies GJ, Withers SG. Glycosyltransferases: structures, functions, and mechanisms. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2008;77:521-555.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.061005.092322

  23. 23.

    Li Y, Chen X. Sialic acid metabolism and sialyltransferases: natural functions and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;94:887-905.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-012-4040-1

  24. 24.

    Szabo R, Skropeta D. Advancement of sialyltransferase inhibitors: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. Med Res Rev. 2017;37:219-270.

    Not in our library10.1002/med.21407

  25. 25.

    Harduin-Lepers A, Vallejo-Ruiz V, Krzewinski-Recchi MA, Samyn-Petit B, Julien S, Delannoy P. The human sialyltransferase family. Biochimie. 2001;83:727-737.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0300-9084(01)01301-3

  26. 26.

    Noel M, Gilormini P-A, Cogez V, Yamakawa N, Vicogne D, Lion C, et al. Probing the CMP-sialic acid donor specificity of two human β-d-galactoside sialyltransferases (ST3GalI and ST6GalI) selectively acting on O- and N-glycosylproteins. ChemBioChem. 2017;18:1251-1259.

    Not in our library10.1002/cbic.201700024

  27. 27.

    Cohen M, Varki A. The sialome-far more than the sum of its parts. OMICS. 2010;14:455-464.

    Not in our library10.1089/omi.2009.0148

  28. 28.

    Freeze HH, Aebi M. Altered glycan structures: the molecular basis of congenital disorders of glycosylation. Curr. Op. Struc Biol. 2005;15:490-498.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2005.08.010

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    Kim YJ, Varki A. Perspectives on the significance of altered glycosylation of glycoproteins in cancer. Glycoconj. J. 1997;14:569-576.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1018580324971

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Büll C, Stoel MA, den Brok MH, Adema GJ. Sialic acids sweeten a tumor’s life. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3199-3204.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-0728

  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    Daly J, Sarkar S, Natoni A, Henderson R, Swan D, Carlsten M, et al. Hypersialylation protects multiple myeloma cells from NK cell-mediated immunosurveillance and this can be overcome by targeted desialylation using a sialyltransferase inhibitor. Blood. 2019;134:1047.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Bordron A, Bagacean C, Mohr A, Tempescul A, Bendaoud B, Deshayes S, et al. Resistance to complement activation, cell membrane hypersialylation and relapses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with rituximab and chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2018;9:31590-31605.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.25657

  36. 36.

    Liu Y, Pan D, Bellis SL, Song Y. Effect of altered glycosylation on the structure of the I-like domain of beta 1 integrin: a molecular dynamics study. Proteins. 2008;73:989-1000.

    Not in our library10.1002/prot.22126

  37. 37.

    Chiang C-H, Wang C-H, Chang H-C, More SV, Li W-S, Hung W-C. A novel sialyltransferase inhibitor AL10 suppresses invasion and metastasis of lung cancer cells by inhibiting integrin-mediated signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 2010;223:492-499.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.22068

  38. 38.

    Swindall AF, Bellis SL. Sialylation of the fas death receptor by ST6Gal-I provides protection against fas-mediated apoptosis in colon carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:22982-22990.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.211375

  39. 39.

    Macauley MS, Crocker PR, Paulson JC. Siglec-mediated regulation of immune cell function in disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:653-666.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri3737

  40. 40.
  41. 41.

    Schnaar RL, Gerardy-Schahn R, Hildebrandt H. Sialic acids in the brain: gangliosides and polysialic acid in nervous system development, stability, disease, and regeneration. Physiol. Rev. 2014;94:461-518.

    Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00033.2013

  42. 42.

    Schultz MJ, Swindall AF, Bellis SL. Regulation of the metastatic cell phenotype by sialylated glycans. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012;31:501-518.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10555-012-9359-7

  43. 43.

    Boligan KF, Mesa C, Fernandez LE, von Gunten S. Cancer intelligence acquired (CIA): tumor glycosylation and sialylation codes dismantling antitumor defense. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015;72:1231-1248.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-014-1799-5

  44. 44.
  45. 45.

    Laubli H, Varki A. Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) detect self-associated molecular patterns to regulate immune responses. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020;77:593-605.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-019-03288-x

  46. 46.

    Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:255-266.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri2056

  47. 47.

    Rambaruth NDS, Dwek MV. Cell surface glycan–lectin interactions in tumor metastasis. Acta Histochem. 2011;113:591-600.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.acthis.2011.03.001

  48. 48.

    van de Wall S, Santegoets KCM, van Houtum EJH, Büll C, Adema GJ. Sialoglycans and siglecs can shape the tumor immune microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:274-285.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.it.2020.02.001

  49. 49.

    Hudak JE, Canham SM, Bertozzi CR. Glycocalyx engineering reveals a Siglec-based mechanism for NK cell immunoevasion. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:69-75.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1388

  50. 50.

    Daly, J., Carlsten, M. & O’Dwyer, M. Sugar free: novel immunotherapeutic approaches targeting siglecs and sialic acids to enhance natural killer cell cytotoxicity against cancer. Front. Immunol. 10, 1047 (2019).

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2019.01047

  51. 51.

    Bärenwaldt, A. & Läubli H. The sialoglycan-siglec glyco-immune checkpoint—a target for improving innate and adaptive anti-cancer immunity. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets23, 839–853 (2019).

    Not in our library10.1080/14728222.2019.1667977

  52. 52.

    Santegoets KCM, Gielen PR, Bull C, Schulte BM, Kers-Rebel ED, Kusters B, et al. Expression profiling of immune inhibitory Siglecs and their ligands in patients with glioma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2019;68:937-949.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00262-019-02332-w

  53. 53.

    Beatson R, Tajadura-Ortega V, Achkova D, Picco G, Tsourouktsoglou TD, Klausing S, et al. The mucin MUC1 modulates the tumor immunological microenvironment through engagement of the lectin Siglec-9. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:1273-1281.

    Not in our library10.1038/ni.3552

  54. 54.

    Rillahan CD, Antonopoulos A, Lefort CT, Sonon R, Azadi P, Ley K, et al. Global metabolic inhibitors of sialyl- and fucosyltransferases remodel the glycome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012;8:661-668.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.999

  55. 55.

    Natoni, A., Bohara, R., Pandit, A. & O’Dwyer, M. Targeted approaches to inhibit sialylation of multiple myeloma in the bone marrow microenvironment. Front. Bioeng. Biotech.7, 252 (2019).

    Not in our library10.3389/fbioe.2019.00252

  56. 56.

    Barkal AA, Brewer RE, Markovic M, Kowarsky M, Barkal SA, Zaro BW, et al. CD24 signalling through macrophage Siglec-10 is a target for cancer immunotherapy. Nature. 2019;572:392-396.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1456-0

  57. 57.

    Singh R, Choi BK. Siglec1-expressing subcapsular sinus macrophages provide soil for melanoma lymph node metastasis. eLife. 2019;8:e48916.

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.48916

  58. 58.

    Friedman, D. J., Shapiro, M., Rajcula, M., McCue, S. & Shapiro, V. S. ST8Sia6 Overexpression accelerates tumor growth, alters macrophage polarization and the immune response. J. Immunol. 202, Article 135.138 (2019).

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Wang L, Li S, Yu X, Han Y, Wu Y, Wang S, et al. α2,6-Sialylation promotes immune escape in hepatocarcinoma cells by regulating T cell functions and CD147/MMP signaling. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2019;75:199-207.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13105-019-00674-8

  60. 60.

    Holdbrooks AT, Britain CM, Bellis SL. ST6Gal-I sialyltransferase promotes tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-mediated cancer cell survival via sialylation of the TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) death receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:1610-1622.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m117.801480

  61. 61.

    Banh A, Zhang J, Cao H, Bouley DM, Kwok S, Kong C, et al. Tumor galectin-1 mediates tumor growth and metastasis through regulation of T-cell apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4423-4431.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-4157

  62. 62.
  63. 63.

    Ito K, Stannard K, Gabutero E, Clark AM, Neo S-Y, Onturk S, et al. Galectin-1 as a potent target for cancer therapy: role in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Met. Rev. 2012;31:763-778.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10555-012-9388-2

  64. 64.

    Cagnoni AJ, Pérez Sáez JM, Rabinovich GA, Mariño KV. Turning-off signaling by siglecs, selectins, and galectins: chemical inhibition of glycan-dependent interactions in cancer. Front. Oncol. 2016;6:109-109.

    Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2016.00109

  65. 65.

    Compagno D, Tiraboschi C, Garcia JD, Rondón Y, Corapi E, Velazquez C, et al. Galectins as checkpoints of the immune system in cancers, their clinical relevance, and implication in clinical trials. Biomolecules. 2020;10:750.

    Not in our library10.3390/biom10050750

  66. 66.

    Dalotto-Moreno T, Croci DO, Cerliani JP, Martinez-Allo VC, Dergan-Dylon S, Méndez-Huergo SP, et al. Targeting galectin-1 overcomes breast cancer-associated immunosuppression and prevents metastatic disease. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1107-1117.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2418

  67. 67.

    Banh A, Zhang J, Cao H, Bouley DM, Kwok S, Kong C, et al. Tumor galectin-1 mediates tumor growth and metastasis through regulation of T-cell apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4423-4431.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-4157

  68. 68.

    Leung Z, Ko FCF, Tey SK, Kwong EML, Mao X, Liu BHM, et al. Galectin-1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma and the combined therapeutic effect of OTX008 galectin-1 inhibitor and sorafenib in tumor cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:423.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13046-019-1402-x

  69. 69.

    Astorgues-Xerri L, Riveiro ME, Tijeras-Raballand A, Serova M, Rabinovich GA, Bieche I, et al. OTX008, a selective small-molecule inhibitor of galectin-1, downregulates cancer cell proliferation, invasion and tumour angiogenesis. Eur. J. Can. 2014;50:2463-2477.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2014.06.015

  70. 70.

    Zhuo Y, Bellis SL. Emerging role of alpha 2,6-sialic acid as a negative regulator of galectin binding and function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:5935-5941.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.r110.191429

  71. 71.

    Suzuki O, Abe M. Galectin-1-mediated cell adhesion, invasion and cell death in human anaplastic large cell lymphoma: regulatory roles of cell surface glycans. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;4:1433-1442.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2014.2319

  72. 72.

    Nielsen MI, Stegmayr J, Grant OC, Yang Z, Nilsson UJ, Boos I, et al. Galectin binding to cells and glycoproteins with genetically modified glycosylation reveals galectin–glycan specificities in a natural context. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:20249-20262.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra118.004636

  73. 73.

    Amano M, Eriksson H, Manning JC, Detjen KM, André S, Nishimura S-I, et al. Tumour suppressor p16INK4a—anoikis-favouring decrease in N/O-glycan/cell surface sialylation by down-regulation of enzymes in sialic acid biosynthesis in tandem in a pancreatic carcinoma model. FEBS J. 2012;279:4062-4080.

    Not in our library10.1111/febs.12001

  74. 74.

    Seales EC, Jurado GA, Brunson BA, Wakefield JK, Frost AR, Bellis SL. Hypersialylation of beta1 integrins, observed in colon adenocarcinoma, may contribute to cancer progression by up-regulating cell motility. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4645-4652.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-3117

  75. 75.
  76. 76.

    Nangia-Makker P, Hogan V, Raz A. Galectin-3 and cancer stemness. Glycobiology. 2018;28:172-181.

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwy001

  77. 77.

    Pereira JX, Dos Santos SN, Pereira TC, Cabanel M, Chammas R, de Oliveira FL, et al. Galectin-3 regulates the expression of tumor glycosaminoglycans and increases the metastatic potential of breast cancer. J. Oncol. 2019;2019:9827147-9827147.

    Not in our library10.1155/2019/9827147

  78. 78.

    Zhuo Y, Chammas R, Bellis SL. Sialylation of β1 integrins blocks cell adhesion to galectin-3 and protects cells against galectin-3-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:22177-22185.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m8000015200

  79. 79.

    Santos SN, Junqueira MS, Francisco G, Vilanova M, Magalhães A, Dias Baruffi M, et al. O-glycan sialylation alters galectin-3 subcellular localization and decreases chemotherapy sensitivity in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:83570-83587.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.13192

  80. 80.

    Suzuki O, Abe M, Hashimoto Y. Sialylation and glycosylation modulate cell adhesion and invasion to extracellular matrix in human malignant lymphoma: Dependency on integrin and the Rho GTPase family. Int J. Oncol. 2015;47:2091-2099.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2015.3211

  81. 81.

    Murugaesu N, Iravani M, van Weverwijk A, Ivetic A, Johnson DA, Antonopoulos A, et al. An in vivo functional screen identifies ST6GalNAc2 sialyltransferase as a breast cancer metastasis suppressor. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:304-317.

    Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0287

  82. 82.

    Schultz MJ, Holdbrooks AT, Chakraborty A, Grizzle WE, Landen CN, Buchsbaum DJ, et al. The tumor-associated glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I regulates stem cell transcription factors and confers a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3978-3988.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2834

  83. 83.
  84. 84.

    Bellis SL. Variant glycosylation: an underappreciated regulatory mechanism for beta1 integrins. Biochim. Biophys Acta. 2004;1663:52-60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.03.012

  85. 85.

    Almaraz RT, Tian Y, Bhattarcharya R, Tan E, Chen S-H, Dallas MR, et al. Metabolic flux increases glycoprotein sialylation: implications for cell adhesion and cancer metastasis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2012;11:M112-017558.

    Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m112.017558

  86. 86.

    Qi F, Isaji T, Duan C, Yang J, Wang Y, Fukuda T, et al. ST3GAL3, ST3GAL4, and ST3GAL6 differ in their regulation of biological functions via the specificities for the α2,3-sialylation of target proteins. FASEB J. 2020;34:881-897.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.201901793r

  87. 87.

    Eavarone DA, Al-Alem L, Lugovskoy A, Prendergast JM, Nazer RI, Stein JN, et al. Humanized anti-sialyl-Tn antibodies for the treatment of ovarian carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0201314.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0201314

  88. 88.

    Dziadek S, Brocke C, Kunz H. Biomimetic synthesis of the tumor-associated (2,3)-sialyl-T antigen and its incorporation into glycopeptide antigens from the mucins MUC1 and MUC4. Chem. Eur. J. 2004;10:4150-4162.

    Not in our library10.1002/chem.200400228

  89. 89.
  90. 90.

    Fujita R, Hamano H, Kameda Y, Arai R, Shimizu T, Ota M, et al. Breast cancer cells expressing cancer-associated sialyl-Tn antigen have less capacity to develop osteolytic lesions in a mouse model of skeletal colonization. Clin. Exp. Metast. 2019;36:539-549.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10585-019-09999-6

  91. 91.
  92. 92.

    Coupland LA, Parish CR. Platelets, selectins, and the control of tumor metastasis. Semin Oncol. 2014;41:422-434.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.04.003

  93. 93.

    Läubli H, Borsig L. Selectins as mediators of lung metastasis. Cancer Microenviron. 2010;3:97-105.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12307-010-0043-6

  94. 94.

    Rosen SD, Bertozzi CR. The selectins and their ligands. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994;6:663-673.

    Not in our library10.1016/0955-0674(94)90092-2

  95. 95.

    McEver RP, Cummings RD. Role of PSGL-1 binding to selectins in leukocyte recruitment. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;100:S97-S103.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    Trinchera M, Aronica A, Dall’Olio F. Selectin ligands sialyl-lewis a and sialyl-lewis x in gastrointestinal cancers. Biology. 2017;6:16.

    Not in our library10.3390/biology6010016

  97. 97.

    Gomes C, Osório H, Pinto MT, Campos D, Oliveira MJ, Reis CA. Expression of ST3GAL4 Leads to SLex expression and induces c-Met activation and an invasive phenotype in gastric carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66737.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0066737

  98. 98.

    Shen L, Luo Z, Wu J, Qiu L, Luo M, Ke Q, et al. Enhanced expression of alpha2,3-linked sialic acids promotes gastric cancer cell metastasis and correlates with poor prognosis. Int J. Oncol. 2017;50:1201-1210.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2017.3882

  99. 99.

    Yang J, Weinberg RA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev. Cell. 2008;14:818-829.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.009

  100. 100.
  101. 101.

    Wen K-C, Sung P-L, Hsieh S-L, Chou Y-T, Lee OK-S, Wu C-W, et al. α2,3-sialyltransferase type I regulates migration and peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:29013-29027.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.15994

  102. 102.

    Du J, Hong S, Dong L, Cheng B, Lin L, Zhao B, et al. Dynamic sialylation in transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:12000-12013.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.636969

  103. 103.

    Ou L, He X, Liu N, Song Y, Li J, Gao L, et al. Sialylation of FGFR1 by ST6GalI overexpression contributes to ovarian cancer cell migration and chemoresistance. Mol. Med Rep. 2020;21:1449-1460.

    Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2020.10951

  104. 104.

    Chandler KB, Leon DR, Kuang J, Meyer RD, Rahimi N, Costello CE. N-Glycosylation regulates ligand-dependent activation and signaling of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:13117-13130.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra119.008643

  105. 105.

    Cheng J, Wang R, Zhong G, Chen X, Cheng Y, Li W, et al. ST6GAL2 Downregulation inhibits cell adhesion and invasion and is associated with improved patient survival in breast cancer. Onco.Targets Ther. 2020;13:903-914.

    Not in our library10.2147/ott.s230847

  106. 106.

    Sewell R, Bäckström M, Dalziel M, Gschmeissner S, Karlsson H, Noll T, et al. The ST6GalNAc-I sialyltransferase localizes throughout the golgi and is responsible for the synthesis of the tumor-associated sialyl-Tn O-glycan in human breast cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:3586-3594.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m511826200

  107. 107.

    Loureiro LR, Sousa DP, Ferreira D, Chai W, Lima L, Pereira C, et al. Novel monoclonal antibody L2A5 specifically targeting sialyl-Tn and short glycans terminated by alpha-2–6 sialic acids. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:12196.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-30421-w

  108. 108.
  109. 109.

    Baeza-Kallee N, Bergès R, Soubéran A, Colin C, Denicolaï E, Appay R, et al. Glycolipids recognized by A2B5 antibody promote proliferation, migration, and clonogenicity in glioblastoma cells. Cancers. 2019;11:1267.

    Not in our library10.3390/cancers11091267

  110. 110.

    Peng W., Goli M., Mirzaei P. & Mechref Y. Revealing the biological attributes of N-glycan isomers in breast cancer brain metastasis using porous graphitic carbon (PGC) liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). J. Proteome. Res.18, 3731–3740 (2019).

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00429

  111. 111.

    Bos PD, Zhang XH, Nadal C, Shu W, Gomis RR, Nguyen DX, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature. 2009;459:1005-1009.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08021

  112. 112.

    Kroes RA, He H, Emmett MR, Nilsson CL, Leach FE, Amster IJ, et al. Overexpression of ST6GalNAcV, a ganglioside-specific alpha2,6-sialyltransferase, inhibits glioma growth in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:12646-12651.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0909862107

  113. 113.

    Nasirikenari M., Lugade A. A., Neelamegham S., Gao Z., Moremen K. W. & Bogner P. N. et al. Recombinant sialyltransferase infusion mitigates infection-driven acute lung inflammation. Front. Immunol.10, 48 (2019).

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2019.00048

  114. 114.

    Burdick MM, Henson KA, Delgadillo LF, Choi YE, Goetz DJ, Tees DFJ, et al. Expression of E-selectin ligands on circulating tumor cells: cross-regulation with cancer stem cell regulatory pathways? Front Oncol. 2012;2:103-103.

    Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2012.00103

  115. 115.

    Brungs D, Minaei E, Piper A-K, Perry J, Splitt A, Carolan M, et al. Establishment of novel long-term cultures from EpCAM positive and negative circulating tumour cells from patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:539.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-57164-6

  116. 116.

    Rodrigues JG, Balmaña M, Macedo JA, Poças J, Fernandes Â, de-Freitas-Junior JCM, et al. Glycosylation in cancer: Selected roles in tumour progression, immune modulation and metastasis. Cell Immunol. 2018;333:46-57.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.03.007

  117. 117.

    Barthel SR, Gavino JD, Descheny L, Dimitroff CJ. Targeting selectins and selectin ligands in inflammation and cancer. Expert Op. Ther. Targets. 2007;11:1473-1491.

    Not in our library10.1517/14728222.11.11.1473

  118. 118.

    Barkeer S, Chugh S, Batra SK, Ponnusamy MP. Glycosylation of cancer stem cells: function in stemness, tumorigenesis, and metastasis. Neoplasia. 2018;20:813-825.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neo.2018.06.001

  119. 119.

    Brungs D, Aghmesheh M, Vine KL, Becker TM, Carolan MG, Ranson M. Gastric cancer stem cells: evidence, potential markers, and clinical implications. J. Gastroenterol. 2016;51:313-326.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00535-015-1125-5

  120. 120.

    Irollo E, Pirozzi G. CD133: to be or not to be, is this the real question? Am. J. Transl. Res. 2013;5:563-581.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    Scott DA, Drake RR. Glycosylation and its implications in breast cancer. Expert Rev. Proteomic. 2019;16:665-680.

    Not in our library10.1080/14789450.2019.1645604

  122. 122.

    Winkler IG, Barbier V, Nowlan B, Jacobsen RN, Forristal CE, Patton JT, et al. Vascular niche E-selectin regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy, self renewal and chemoresistance. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1651-1657.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2969

  123. 123.

    Esposito M, Mondal N, Greco TM, Wei Y, Spadazzi C, Lin SC, et al. Bone vascular niche E-selectin induces mesenchymal-epithelial transition and Wnt activation in cancer cells to promote bone metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:627-639.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41556-019-0309-2

  124. 124.
  125. 125.

    Gupta, R., Leon, F., Thompson, C. M., Nimmakayala, R., Karmakar, S., Nallasamy, P. et al. Global analysis of human glycosyltransferases reveals novel targets for pancreatic cancer pathogenesis. Br. J. Cancer112, 1661–1672 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41416-020-0772-3

  126. 126.

    Takahashi S, Oda T, Hasebe T, Sasaki S, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, et al. Overexpression of sialyl Lewis x antigen is associated with formation of extratumoral venous invasion and predicts postoperative development of massive hepatic metastasis in cases with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pathobiology. 2001;69:127-135.

    Not in our library10.1159/000048767

  127. 127.

    Balmana M, Sarrats A, Llop E, Barrabes S, Saldova R, Ferri MJ, et al. Identification of potential pancreatic cancer serum markers: Increased sialyl-Lewis X on ceruloplasmin. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2015;442:56-62.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.007

  128. 128.

    Li S-S, Ip CKM, Tang MYH, Tang MKS, Tong Y, Zhang J, et al. Sialyl Lewisx-P-selectin cascade mediates tumor–mesothelial adhesion in ascitic fluid shear flow. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2406.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-019-10334-6

  129. 129.

    Borsig L. Selectins in cancer immunity. Glycobiology. 2018;28:648-655.

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwx105

  130. 130.

    Mondal N, Buffone A, Stolfa G, Antonopoulos A, Lau JTY, Haslam SM, et al. ST3Gal-4 is the primary sialyltransferase regulating the synthesis of E-, P-, and L-selectin ligands on human myeloid leukocytes. Blood. 2015;125:687-696.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2014-07-588590

  131. 131.

    Natoni A, Farrell ML, Harris S, Falank C, Kirkham-McCarthy L, Macauley MS, et al. Sialyltransferase inhibition leads to inhibition of tumor cell interactions with E-selectin, VCAM1, and MADCAM1, and improves survival in a human multiple myeloma mouse model. Haematologica. 2020;105:457-467.

    Not in our library10.3324/haematol.2018.212266

  132. 132.

    Miyagi T, Takahashi K, Hata K, Shiozaki K, Yamaguchi K. Sialidase significance for cancer progression. Glycoconj. J. 2012;29:567-577.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10719-012-9394-1

  133. 133.

    Uemura T, Shiozaki K, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki S, Satomi S, Kato K, et al. Contribution of sialidase NEU1 to suppression of metastasis of human colon cancer cells through desialylation of integrin beta4. Oncogene. 2009;28:1218-1229.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2008.471

  134. 134.

    Yamanami H, Shiozaki K, Wada T, Yamaguchi K, Uemura T, Kakugawa Y, et al. Down-regulation of sialidase NEU4 may contribute to invasive properties of human colon cancers. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:299-307.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00403.x

  135. 135.

    Silvestri I, Testa F, Zappasodi R, Cairo CW, Zhang Y, Lupo B, et al. Sialidase NEU4 is involved in glioblastoma stem cell survival. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1381-e1381.

    Not in our library10.1038/cddis.2014.349

  136. 136.

    Hata K, Tochigi T, Sato I, Kawamura S, Shiozaki K, Wada T, et al. Increased sialidase activity in serum of cancer patients: Identification of sialidase and inhibitor activities in human serum. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:383-389.

    Not in our library10.1111/cas.12627

  137. 137.

    Chen K., Blixt O. & Wandall H. H. Mucins as biomarkers in cancer. in Mucins and Cancer, 34–49 (2013).

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    Drake PM, Cho W, Li B, Prakobphol A, Johansen E, Anderson NL, et al. Sweetening the pot: adding glycosylation to the biomarker discovery equation. Clin. Chem. 2010;56:223-236.

    Not in our library10.1373/clinchem.2009.136333

  139. 139.

    Hebbar M, Krzewinski-Recchi MA, Hornez L, Verdiere A, Harduin-Lepers A, Bonneterre J, et al. Prognostic value of tumoral sialyltransferase expression and circulating E-selectin concentrations in node-negative breast cancer patients. Int J. Biol. Markers. 2003;18:116-122.

    Not in our library10.1177/172460080301800204

  140. 140.

    Wichert B, Milde-Langosch K, Galatenko V, Schmalfeldt B, Oliveira-Ferrer L. Prognostic role of the sialyltransferase ST6GAL1 in ovarian cancer. Glycobiology. 2018;28:898-903.

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwy065

  141. 141.
  142. 142.

    Liu B, Liu Y, Zhao L, Pan Y, Shan Y, Li Y, et al. Upregulation of microRNA-135b and microRNA-182 promotes chemoresistance of colorectal cancer by targeting ST6GALNAC2 via PI3K/AKT pathway. Mol. Carcinog. 2017;56:2669-2680.

    Not in our library10.1002/mc.22710

  143. 143.
  144. 144.

    Jia L, Luo S, Ren X, Li Y, Hu J, Liu B, et al. miR-182 and miR-135b mediate the tumorigenesis and invasiveness of colorectal cancer cells via targeting ST6GALNAC2 and PI3K/AKT Pathway. Dig. DisSci. 2017;62:3447-3459.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10620-017-4755-z

  145. 145.

    Venkitachalam S, Revoredo L, Varadan V, Fecteau RE, Ravi L, Lutterbaugh J, et al. Biochemical and functional characterization of glycosylation-associated mutational landscapes in colon cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23642.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep23642

  146. 146.

    Leung KK, Wilson GM, Kirkemo LL, Riley NM, Coon JJ, Wells JA. Broad and thematic remodeling of the surfaceome and glycoproteome on isogenic cells transformed with driving proliferative oncogenes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:7764-7775.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1917947117

  147. 147.

    Hsiao, P.-W., Tsai, C.-H., Tzeng, S.-F., Hsieh, S.-c., & Lee M.-S.. Inventors. Biomarkers for predicting prostate cancer progression Patent WO2019237098A1 (2019).

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    Tin, D. T., Haber, D. A. & Maheswaran, S. Inventors. Methods and assays relating to circulating tumor cells. Patent WO2015095527A1 (2014).

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    Szabo R, Skropeta D. Advancement of Sialyltransferase Inhibitors: Therapeutic Challenges and Opportunities. Med. Res Rev. 2017;37:219-270.

    Not in our library10.1002/med.21407

  150. 150.

    Amann F, Schaub C, Muller B, Schmidt RR. New potent sialyltransferase inhibitors - Synthesis of donor and of transition-state analogues of sialyl donor CMP-Neu5Ac. Chem. Eur. J. 1998;4:1106-1115.

    Not in our library

  151. 151.

    Muller B, Schaub C, Schmidt RR. Efficient sialyltransferase inhibitors based on transition-state analogues of the sialyl donor. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 1998;37:2893-2897.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2893::aid-anie2893>3.0.co;2-w

  152. 152.

    Dufner G, Schworer R, Muller B, Schmidt RR. Base- and sugar-modified cytidine monophosphate N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-Neu5Ac) analogues - Synthesis and studies with alpha(2-6)-sialyltransferase from rat liver. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000;2000:1467-1482.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    Skropeta D, Schworer R, Haag T, Schmidt RR. Asymmetric synthesis and affinity of potent sialyltransferase inhibitors based on transition-state analogues. Glycoconj. J. 2004;21:205-219.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:glyc.0000045093.96413.62

  154. 154.

    Li W, Niu Y, Xiong D-C, Cao X, Ye X-S. Highly substituted cyclopentane–CMP conjugates as potent sialyltransferase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:7972-7990.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01181

  155. 155.

    Skropeta D, Schworer R, Schmidt RR. Stereoselective synthesis of phosphoramidate alpha(2-6)sialyltransferase transition-state analogue inhibitors. Bioorg. Med Chem. Lett. 2003;13:3351-3354.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-894x(03)00672-3

  156. 156.

    Guo J, Li W, Xue W, Ye X-S. Transition state-based sialyltransferase inhibitors: mimicking oxocarbenium ion by simple amide. J. Med Chem. 2017;60:2135-2141.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01644

  157. 157.

    Preidl JJ, Gnanapragassam VS, Lisurek M, Saupe J, Horstkorte R, Rademann J. Fluorescent mimetics of CMP-Neu5Ac are highly potent, cell-permeable polarization probes of eukaryotic and bacterial sialyltransferases and inhibit cellular sialylation. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 2014;53:5700-5705.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201400394

  158. 158.

    Kumar R, Nasi R, Bhasin M, Huan Khieu N, Hsieh M, Gilbert M, et al. Sialyltransferase inhibitors: consideration of molecular shape and charge/hydrophobic interactions. Carbohydr. Res. 2013;378:45-55.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carres.2012.12.017

  159. 159.

    Dobie C, Montgomery AP, Szabo R, Skropeta D, Yu H. Computer-aided design of human sialyltransferase inhibitors of hST8Sia III. J. Mol. Recognit. 2018;31:e2684.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmr.2684

  160. 160.

    Montgomery A, Szabo R, Skropeta D, Yu H. Computational characterisation of the interactions between human ST6Gal I and transition-state analogue inhibitors: insights for inhibitor design. J. Mol. Recognit. 2016;29:210-222.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmr.2520

  161. 161.

    Montgomery AP, Skropeta D, Yu H. Transition state-based ST6Gal I inhibitors: mimicking the phosphodiester linkage with a triazole or carbamate through an enthalpy-entropy compensation. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14428.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-14560-0

  162. 162.

    Montgomery, A. P., Xiao, K., Wang, X., Skropeta, D. & Yu H. Computational Glycobiology: Mechanistic Studies of Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes and Implication for Inhibitor Design. (ed C.T. K.) Structural and Mechanistic Enzymology, Vol. 109, 25–76 (2017).

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.apcsb.2017.04.003

  163. 163.

    Rao FV, Rich JR, Rakic B, Buddai S, Schwartz MF, Johnson K, et al. Structural insight into mammalian sialyltransferases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009;16:1186-1188.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.1685

  164. 164.

    Kuhn B, Benz J, Greif M, Engel AM, Sobek H, Rudolph MG. The structure of human a-2,6-sialyltransferase reveals the binding mode of complex glycans. Acta Crystallogr D. 2013;69:1826-1838.

    Not in our library10.1107/s0907444913015412

  165. 165.

    Volkers G, Worrall LJ, Kwan DH, Yu CC, Baumann L, Lameignere E, et al. Structure of human ST8SiaIII sialyltransferase provides insight into cell-surface polysialylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015;22:627-635.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.3060

  166. 166.

    Moremen KW, Ramiah A, Stuart M, Steel J, Meng L, Forouhar F, et al. Expression system for structural and functional studies of human glycosylation enzymes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018;14:156-162.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.2539

  167. 167.

    Montgomery AP, Dobie C, Szabo R, Hallam L, Ranson M, Yu H, et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of carbamate-linked uridyl-based inhibitors of human ST6Gal I. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020;28:115561.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115561

  168. 168.

    Huang W, Sun L, Wang B, Ma Y, Yao D, Han W, et al. Ginsenosides, potent inhibitors of sialyltransferase. Z. Naturforsch. C. J. Biosci. 2020;75:41-49.

    Not in our library10.1515/znc-2019-0150

  169. 169.

    Chang, K.-H., Lee, L., Chen, J. & Li, W.-S. Lithocholic acid analogues, new and potent α-2,3-sialyltransferase inhibitors. ChemComm 629-631 (2006).

    Not in our library10.1039/b514915k

  170. 170.

    Chen J-Y, Tang Y-A, Huang S-M, Juan H-F, Wu L-W, Sun Y-C, et al. A novel sialyltransferase inhibitor suppresses FAK/paxillin signaling and cancer angiogenesis and metastasis pathways. Cancer Res. 2011;71:473-483.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-1303

  171. 171.

    Li, W.-S., Hung, W.-C. & Shen, C.-N. Inventors. Sialyltransferase inhibitors and uses thereof. Patent WO2017035501A1 (2016).

    Not in our library

  172. 172.

    Rillahan CD, Brown SJ, Register AC, Rosen H, Paulson JC. High-throughput screening for inhibitors of sialyl- and fucosyltransferases. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 2011;50:12534-12537.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201105065

  173. 173.

    Kayser H, Zeitler R, Kannicht C, Grunow D, Nuck R, Reutter W. Biosynthesis of non-physiological sialic acid in different rat organs using N-propanoyl-D-hexosamines as precursors. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:16934-16938.

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    Keppler OT, Horstkorte R, Pawlita M, Schmidts C, Reutter W. Biochemical engineering of the N-acyl side chain of sialic acid: biological implications. Glycobiology. 2001;11:11R-18R.

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/11.2.11r

  175. 175.

    Mahal LK, Yarema KJ, Bertozzi CR. Engineering chemical reactivity on cell surfaces through oligosaccharide biosynthesis. Science. 1997;276:1125-1128.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.276.5315.1125

  176. 176.

    Prescher JA, Dube DH, Bertozzi CR. Chemical remodelling of cell surfaces in living animals. Nature. 2004;430:873-877.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02791

  177. 177.

    Chang PV, Prescher JA, Hangauer MJ, Bertozzi CR. Imaging cell surface glycans with bioorthogonal chemical reporters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:8400.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja070238o

  178. 178.

    Kramer JR, Onoa B, Bustamante C, Bertozzi CR. Chemically tunable mucin chimeras assembled on living cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:12574-12579.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1516127112

  179. 179.

    Beck A, Wagner-Rousset E, Bussat MC, Lokteff M, Klinguer-Hamour C, Haeuw JF, et al. Trends in glycosylation, glycoanalysis and glycoengineering of therapeutic antibodies and Fc-fusion. Proteins Curr. Pharm. Biotech. 2008;9:482-501.

    Not in our library10.2174/138920108786786411

  180. 180.

    Du J, Meledeo MA, Wang ZY, Khanna HS, Paruchuri VDP, Yarema KJ. Metabolic glycoengineering: sialic acid and beyond. Glycobiology. 2009;19:1382-1401.

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwp115

  181. 181.

    Wratil PR, Horstkorte R, Reutter W. Metabolic glycoengineering with N-acyl side chain modified mannosamines. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 2016;55:9482-9512.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201601123

  182. 182.

    Büll C, Boltje TJ, Wassink M, de Graaf AMA, van Delft FL, den Brok MH, et al. Targeting aberrant sialylation in cancer cells using a fluorinated sialic acid analog impairs adhesion, migration, and in vivo tumor growth. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013;12:1935-1946.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-13-0279

  183. 183.

    Macauley MS, Arlian BM, Rillahan CD, Pang P-C, Bortell N, Marcondes MCG, et al. Systemic blockade of sialylation in mice with a global inhibitor of sialyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:35149-35158.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m114.606517

  184. 184.

    Bull C, Boltje TJ, van Dinther EAW, Peters T, de Graaf AMA, Leusen JHW, et al. Targeted delivery of a sialic acid-blocking glycomimetic to cancer cells inhibits metastatic spread. ACS Nano. 2015;9:733-745.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn5061964

  185. 185.

    Büll C, Boltje TJ, Balneger N, Weischer SM, Wassink M, van Gemst JJ, et al. Sialic acid blockade suppresses tumor growth by enhancing T-cell–mediated tumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3574-3588.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-3376

  186. 186.

    Boltje, T., Heise, T., Pijnenborg, J., Bull C. & Adema, J. A. Inventors. New potent sialyltransferase inhibitors. Patent WO2019145562A1, 2019.

    Not in our library

  187. 187.

    Heise T, Pijnenborg JFA, Büll C, van Hilten N, Kers-Rebel ED, Balneger N, et al. Potent metabolic sialylation inhibitors based on C-5-modified fluorinated sialic acids. J. Med Chem. 2019;62:1014-1021.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01757

  188. 188.

    O’Dwyer, M., Ritter, T., Ryan, A. & Lynch, K. Inventors. Method for treatment of cancer. Patent WO/2019/086554, (2019).

    Not in our library

  189. 189.

    Shodai T, Suzuki J, Kudo S, Itoh S, Terada M, Fujita S, et al. Inhibition of P-selectin-mediated cell adhesion by a sulfated derivative of sialic acid. Biochem Biophys. Res Commun. 2003;312:787-793.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.10.188

  190. 190.

    Kelm S, Madge P, Islam T, Bennett R, Koliwer-Brandl H, Waespy M, et al. C-4 modified sialosides enhance binding to Siglec-2 (CD22): towards potent Siglec inhibitors for immunoglycotherapy. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 2013;52:3616-3620.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201207267

  191. 191.

    Kelm S, Gerlach J, Brossmer R, Danzer CP, Nitschke L. The ligand-binding domain of CD22 is needed for inhibition of the B cell receptor signal, as demonstrated by a novel human CD22-specific inhibitor compound. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:1207-1213.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20011783

  192. 192.

    Chen WC, Completo GC, Sigal DS, Crocker PR, Saven A, Paulson JC. In vivo targeting of B-cell lymphoma with glycan ligands of CD22. Blood. 2010;115:4778-4786.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2009-12-257386

  193. 193.

    Ito K, Ralph SJ. Inhibiting galectin-1 reduces murine lung metastasis with increased CD4(+) and CD8 (+) T cells and reduced cancer cell adherence. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2012;29:561-572.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10585-012-9471-7

  194. 194.

    Ito K, Scott SA, Cutler S, Dong LF, Neuzil J, Blanchard H, et al. Thiodigalactoside inhibits murine cancers by concurrently blocking effects of galectin-1 on immune dysregulation, angiogenesis and protection against oxidative stress. Angiogenesis. 2011;14:293-307.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10456-011-9213-5

  195. 195.

    Shatz-Azoulay H, Vinik Y, Isaac R, Kohler U, Lev S, Zick Y. The animal lectin galectin-8 promotes cytokine expression and metastatic tumor growth in mice. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:7375.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-64371-z

  196. 196.

    Xiao H, Woods EC, Vukojicic P, Bertozzi CR. Precision glycocalyx editing as a strategy for cancer immunotherapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:10304-10309.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1608069113

  197. 197.

    Liu GJ, Jia LY, Xing GW. Probing sialidases or siglecs with sialic acid analogues, clusters and precursors. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2020;9:42-52.

    Not in our library

  198. 198.
  199. 199.

    DeAngelo DJ, Erba HP, Jonas BA, O’Dwyer M, Marlton P, Huls GA, et al. A phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of uproleselan (GMI-1271) with chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:TPS7066-TPS7066.

    Not in our library

  200. 200.

    Festuccia C, Mancini A, Gravina GL, Colapietro A, Vetuschi A, Pompili S, et al. Dual CXCR4 and E-selectin inhibitor, GMI-1359, shows anti-bone metastatic effects and synergizes with docetaxel in prostate cancer cell intraosseous growth. Cells. 2019;9:32.

    Not in our library10.3390/cells9010032

  201. 201.

    Adams OJ, Stanczak MA, von Gunten S, Läubli H. Targeting sialic acid–Siglec interactions to reverse immune suppression in cancer. Glycobiology. 2018;28:640-647.

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwx108

  202. 202.

    Casaco A, Oliva J, Fernandez L, Oliva J. Evidences of GM3 (NeuGc) ganglioside expression in breast and lung cancer tumors. Use of 14F7 monoclonal antibody labeled with 99mTc for personalized medicine in racotumomab and GM3 (NeuGc) vaccine treated patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2013;54:1320.

    Not in our library

  203. 203.
  204. 204.

    Altman MO, Gagneux P. Absence of Neu5Gc and presence of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies in humans—an evolutionary perspective. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:789.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2019.00789

  205. 205.

    Zaramela LS, Martino C, Alisson-Silva F, Rees SD, Diaz SL, Chuzel L, et al. Gut bacteria responding to dietary change encode sialidases that exhibit preference for red meat-associated carbohydrates. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:2082-2089.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41564-019-0564-9

  206. 206.

    Samraj AN, Pearce OMT, Läubli H, Crittenden AN, Bergfeld AK, Banda K, et al. A red meat-derived glycan promotes inflammation and cancer progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:542-547.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1417508112

  207. 207.

    Dhar C, Sasmal A, Varki A. From “Serum Sickness” to “Xenosialitis”: Past, present, and future significance of the non-human sialic acid Neu5Gc. Front Immunol. 2019;10:807.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2019.00807

  208. 208.

    Yehuda S, Padler-Karavani V. Glycosylated biotherapeutics: immunological effects of N-glycolylneuraminic acid. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:21.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2020.00021

  209. 209.

    Leung KK, Wilson GM, Kirkemo LL, Riley NM, Coon JJ, Wells JA. Broad and thematic remodeling of the surfaceome and glycoproteome on isogenic cells transformed with driving proliferative oncogenes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:7764-7775.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1917947117

  210. 210.

    Yang Y, Franc V, Heck AJR. Glycoproteomics: a balance between high-throughput and in-depth analysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35:598-609.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.010

  211. 211.

    Wollscheid B, Bausch-Fluck D, Henderson C, O’Brien R, Bibel M, Schiess R, et al. Mass-spectrometric identification and relative quantification of N-linked cell surface glycoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27:378-386.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1532

  212. 212.
  213. 213.
  214. 214.
  215. 215.

    Sethi MK, Thaysen-Andersen M, Smith JT, Baker MS, Packer NH, Hancock WS, et al. Comparative N-glycan profiling of colorectal cancer cell lines reveals unique bisecting GlcNAc and α-2,3-linked sialic acid determinants are associated with membrane proteins of the more metastatic/aggressive cell lines. J. Proteome Res. 2014;13:277-288.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr400861m

  216. 216.

    Esposito M, Mondal N, Greco TM, Wei Y, Spadazzi C, Lin S-C, et al. Bone vascular niche E-selectin induces mesenchymal-epithelial transition and Wnt activation in cancer cells to promote bone metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:627-639.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41556-019-0309-2

  217. 217.

    Schultz MJ, Swindall AF, Wright JW, Sztul ES, Landen CN, Bellis SL. ST6Gal-I sialyltransferase confers cisplatin resistance in ovarian tumor cells. J. Ovarian Res. 2013;6:25.

    Not in our library10.1186/1757-2215-6-25

  218. 218.

    Ou L, He X, Liu N, Song Y, Li J, Gao L, et al. Sialylation of FGFR1 by ST6GalI overexpression contributes to ovarian cancer cell migration and chemoresistance. Mol. Med Rep. 2020;21:1449-1460.

    Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2020.10951

  219. 219.

    Liu Q, Ma H, Sun X, Liu B, Xiao Y, Pan S, et al. The regulatory ZFAS1/miR-150/ST6GAL1 crosstalk modulates sialylation of EGFR via PI3K/Akt pathway in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:199.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13046-019-1208-x

  220. 220.
  221. 221.

    Punch, P. R., Irons, E. E., Manhardt, C. T., Marathe, H. & Lau J. T. Y. The sialyltransferase ST6GAL1 protects against radiation-induced gastrointestinal damage. Glycobiology30, 446–453 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwz108

  222. 222.

    Lee M, Lee HJ, Bae S, Lee YS. Protein sialylation by sialyltransferase involves radiation resistance. Mol. Cancer Res. 2008;6:1316-1325.

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-07-2209

  223. 223.

    Lee M, Lee HJ, Seo WD, Park KH, Lee YS. Sialylation of integrin β1 is involved in radiation-induced adhesion and migration in human colon cancer cells. Int J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010;76:1528-1536.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.022

  224. 224.

    Park JJ, Lee M. Increasing the α 2, 6 sialylation of glycoproteins may contribute to metastatic spread and therapeutic resistance in colorectal cancer. Gut Liver. 2013;7:629-641.

    Not in our library10.5009/gnl.2013.7.6.629

  225. 225.

    Taniguchi N, Hancock W, Lubman DM, Rudd PM. The second golden age of glycomics: from functional glycomics to clinical applications. J. Proteome Res. 2009;8:425-426.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr801057j

  226. 226.
  227. 227.

    Reis CA, Osorio H, Silva L, Gomes C, David L. Alterations in glycosylation as biomarkers for cancer detection. J. Clin. Pathol. 2010;63:322-329.

    Not in our library10.1136/jcp.2009.071035

  228. 228.

    Vreeker GCM, Nicolardi S, Bladergroen MR, van der Plas CJ, Mesker WE, Tollenaar R, et al. Automated plasma glycomics with linkage-specific sialic acid esterification and ultrahigh resolution MS. Anal. Chem. 2018;90:11955-11961.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02391

  229. 229.

    Badr HA, AlSadek DMM, El-Houseini ME, Saeui CT, Mathew MP, Yarema KJ, et al. Harnessing cancer cell metabolism for theranostic applications using metabolic glycoengineering of sialic acid in breast cancer as a pioneering example. Biomaterials. 2017;116:158-173.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.044

  230. 230.
  231. 231.

    Moremen KW, Tiemeyer M, Nairn AV. Vertebrate protein glycosylation: diversity, synthesis and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:448-462.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm3383

  232. 232.

    Dougher CWL, Buffone A, Nemeth MJ, Nasirikenari M, Irons EE, Bogner PN, et al. The blood-borne sialyltransferase ST6Gal-1 is a negative systemic regulator of granulopoiesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2017;102:507-516.

    Not in our library10.1189/jlb.3a1216-538rr

  233. 233.

    Manhardt CT, Punch PR, Dougher CWL, Lau JTY. Extrinsic sialylation is dynamically regulated by systemic triggers in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:13514-13520.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.c117.795138

  234. 234.

    Lin QZ, Yin RX, Guo T, Wu J, Sun JQ, Shen SW, et al. Association of the ST3GAL4 rs11220462 polymorphism and serum lipid levels in the Mulao and Han populations. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:123.

    Not in our library10.1186/1476-511x-13-123

  235. 235.

    Song J, Xue C, Preisser JS, Cramer DW, Houck KL, Liu G, et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the ST3GAL4 gene with VWF antigen and factor VIII activity. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160757.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0160757

  236. 236.

    Yida Z, Imam MU, Ismail M, Ismail N, Ideris A, Abdullah MA. High fat diet-induced inflammation and oxidative stress are attenuated by N-acetylneuraminic acid in rats. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015;22:96.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12929-015-0211-6

  237. 237.

    Sprenger N, Duncan PI. Sialic Acid Utilization. Adv. Nutr. 2012;3:392S-397S.

    Not in our library10.3945/an.111.001479

  238. 238.

    Hanisch F, Weidemann W, Großmann M, Joshi PR, Holzhausen H-J, Stoltenburg G, et al. Sialylation and muscle performance: sialic acid is a marker of muscle ageing. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e80520-e80520.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0080520

  239. 239.

    Krištić J, Vučković F, Menni C, Klarić L, Keser T, Beceheli I, et al. Glycans are a novel biomarker of chronological and biological ages. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014;69:779-789.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/glt190

  240. 240.

    Gong M, Garige M, Hirsch K, Lakshman MR. Liver Galbeta1,4GlcNAc alpha2,6-sialyltransferase is down-regulated in human alcoholics: possible cause for the appearance of asialoconjugates. Metab: Clin. Exp. 2007;56:1241-1247.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.metabol.2007.04.022

  241. 241.

    Karabatsiakis A, Hamuni G, Wilker S, Kolassa S, Renu D, Kadereit S, et al. Metabolite profiling in posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Mol. Psychiatry. 2015;3:2-2.

    Not in our library10.1186/s40303-015-0007-3

  242. 242.

    Dabelic S, Flogel M, Maravic G, Lauc G. Stress causes tissue-specific changes in the sialyltransferase activity. Z. Naturforsch. C. J. Biosci. 2004;59:276-280.

    Not in our library10.1515/znc-2004-3-427

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.