Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and mechanisms in bone formation, homeostasis, and disease

Lifang Hu, Wei Chen, Airong Qian and 1 more

Bone Research · 2024 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41413-024-00342-8

Abstract

Wnts are secreted, lipid-modified proteins that bind to different receptors on the cell surface to activate canonical or non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways, which control various biological processes throughout embryonic development and adult life. Aberrant Wnt signaling pathway underlies a wide range of human disease pathogeneses. In this review, we provide an update of Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and mechanisms in bone formation, homeostasis, and diseases. The Wnt proteins, receptors, activators, inhibitors, and the crosstalk of Wnt signaling pathways with other signaling pathways are summarized and discussed. We mainly review Wnt signaling functions in bone formation, homeostasis, and related diseases, and summarize mouse models carrying genetic modifications of Wnt signaling components. Moreover, the therapeutic strategies for treating bone diseases by targeting Wnt signaling, including the extracellular molecules, cytosol components, and nuclear components of Wnt signaling are reviewed. In summary, this paper reviews our current understanding of the mechanisms by which Wnt signaling regulates bone formation, homeostasis, and the efforts targeting Wnt signaling for treating bone diseases. Finally, the paper evaluates the important questions in Wnt signaling to be further explored based on the progress of new biological analytical technologies.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Wnt signaling, an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway from nematodes to mammals, plays key roles in regulating multiple biological processes, including embryonic development, organogenesis, tissue homeostasis in adults, and numerous diseases., The term “Wnt” is the combination of the terms “wingless” and “int”. Int-1, which was later renamed Wnt1, is the first Wnt gene discovered in mouse breast tumors induced by mouse mammary tumor virus in 1982. The wingless gene, which controls segment pattern during the development of Drosophila larva, was identified as the homolog of Wnt1 (int-1) in 1987. Later, researchers demonstrated the Wnt signal transduction in Drosophila by delineating the components of the signaling, including zeste-white 3 (the homolog of mammalian glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3)), disheveled (Dvl), and armadillo (the homolog of vertebrate β-catenin).– Further, injection of Xenopus eggs with mouse Wnt1 RNA caused duplication of the embryonic axis, suggesting a critical role of Wnt signaling in vertebrate development. These foundational studies reveal the importance of Wnt signaling in development. Since these pioneering discoveries, there is an explosion of research on the Wnt signaling pathway, ranging from signal transduction and complex regulation to its role in normal development and diseases.

There are 19 known Wnt proteins that either function through the canonical Wnt signaling pathway or the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway. The best-studied Wnt signaling pathway is the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, which is also referred to as the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway for its dependency on β-catenin transcriptional function. Otherwise, the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway is a β-catenin independent pathway. There are two well-known non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways: the Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway and the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway. Both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways play crucial roles in normal tissue development and homeostasis.– Moreover, the Wnt signaling pathway plays key roles in the pathogenesis of human diseases. In the early 1990s, the Kinzler and Nishisho groups independently found the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene in familial adenomatous polyposis, a hereditary cancer syndrome, which was the first connection of the Wnt signaling pathway to human disease., Later, the APC protein was found to interact with β-catenin, and APC deficiency resulted in constitutively active β-catenin/TCF (T-cell factor) signaling in colon carcinoma cells. These findings demonstrated the close link between Wnt signaling and human disease. After decades of research, evidence show that Wnt signaling pathways is involved in many human diseases, including numerous tissue diseases, metabolic diseases, and cancers.,–

As an evolutionarily conserved complex signaling pathway, Wnt signaling is involved in multiple key events during embryo development and adult tissue homeostasis. Wnt signaling shows versatility not only in the signaling components but also in its physiological and pathological functions. This review summarizes the current knowledge of Wnt signaling pathways and reviews the advances of Wnt signaling pathways in bone formation, homeostasis, and disease. Furthermore, the therapeutic treatment of bone disease by targeting Wnt signaling is also discussed. Overall, this review will provide researchers with a comprehensive understanding of Wnts, the role of Wnt signaling pathways in bone homeostasis and disease, and therapeutics that target Wnt signaling and will serve as a reference for future studies.

Wnt proteins (Wnts)

The Wnt proteins (Wnts) act as intercellular signals and regulate a wide range of cellular behavior including cell fate specification, cell proliferation, survival, migration, polarity, and differentiation. Wnt proteins are conserved in all metazoan animals along with multiple associated genes. There are 19 in mammals, 16 in Xenopus, 11 in chicks, 12 in zebrafish, 7 in Drosophila, and 5 in C. elegans (http://www.stanford.edu/rnusse/wntwindow.html). Wnts encoded by Wnt genes are ~40 kD-secreted glycoproteins that are structurally related, containing 23 or 24 cysteine residues. The demonstration of Wnts as a lipid-modified protein was confirmed through the first successful purification of Wnt3a. The lipid modification involves the attachment of a palmitoleic acid (a mono-unsaturated fatty acid) to a highly conserved serine residue. The palmitoylation of Wnt is required for its binding to the Frizzled (Fzd) receptor, initiating signal transduction, and the glycosylation of Wnt that is necessary for its eventual secretion.

Wnts were historically categorized as either canonical or noncanonical Wnts. However, the distinction is questionable because some Wnts can stimulate both canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways and typically noncanonical Wnts can activate canonical Wnt signaling.–

Wnt receptors and co-receptors

Wnt signal transduction involves the binding of Wnts to cell-surface Wnt receptors and co-receptors, which primarily contain members of the Fzd family and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) family. Further, the receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor-1 (ROR1), ROR2, an atypical receptor tyrosine kinase (Ryk),, protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), and other molecules were also demonstrated as Wnt co-receptors.

Frizzled (Fzd) proteins

Fzd proteins are widespread high-affinity Wnt receptors. From the first Wnt receptor identified, the Fzd family now contains 10 members in humans, Fzd1 to Fzd10. They are seven-transmembrane receptors containing a large extracellular N-terminal cysteine-rich domain (CRD), which is conserved among the receptor family and mediates high-affinity binding to Wnts.,– Fzds transmit signaling through both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways by cooperating with other co-receptors (Fig. 1). In the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, Wnt–Fzd form a ternary complex with low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6), whereas, in Wnt/PCP signaling pathway, Wnt–Fzd interact with ROR,, (see below: Wnt signaling pathways, Fig. 1).

Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins (LRPs)

The LRP family is an evolutionarily conserved single-pass transmembrane receptor family. Beyond the Fzds, the members of the LRP family are required for Wnt signaling. Arrow in Drosophila and LRP5 and LRP6 in vertebrates are identified to function as co-receptors in the Wnt signaling pathway.,, The primary structures of LRP5 and LRP6 are more than 70% identical to each other and are widely co-expressed during embryogenesis and in adult tissues., The intracellular domain of LRP5 interacts with Axin and stabilizes β-catenin, and thus induces lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF-1) activation. LRP6 is the best-studied LRP. The extracellular domain (ECD) of LRP6 mediates the interaction with Wnt and Fzd, resulting in ternary complex formation. The ECD contains multiple independent Wnt-binding sites to allow different Wnts to bind simultaneously in conjunction with Fzd.

Receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor -1 and -2 (ROR1 and ROR2)

The receptors of the Ror family are membrane-spanning tyrosine kinases that bind Wnts either alone or as Fzds co-receptors to activate non-canonical Wnt signaling., ROR1 and ROR2 are also co-receptors for Wnt5a and mostly transduce Wnt/PCP signaling.– Wnt5a can induce ROR1/ROR2 hetero-oligomerization. Wnt5a-ROR1/ROR2 signaling is involved in tissue development and cancer.– Moreover, via ROR2, Wnt5a inhibits Wnt3a-induced Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Receptor related to tyrosine kinases (Ryk)

Ryk is an atypical member of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family, showing no detectable intrinsic protein tyrosine kinase activity. It is a single-pass transmembrane protein that contains an extracellular Wnt inhibitory factor (WIF) domain, an intracellular atypical kinase domain, and a PSD95/DlgA/ZO-1 (PDZ) binding motif. It was previously shown that Derailed, the Ryk homolog in Drosophila, is another receptor for Wnt, which binds to Wnt5a in the absence of Fzd or Dvl. However, Lu et al. demonstrated that mammalian Ryk, unlike Derailed, functions as a co-receptor along with Fzd for Wnts. Furthermore, Ryk also binds to Dvl, providing a link between Wnt and Dvl, thereby activating the canonical Wnt signaling pathway.

Protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7)

PTK7, originally identified as colon carcinoma kinase 4, is another single-pass transmembrane Wnt receptor. It contains seven extracellular immunoglobulin domains, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular catalytically inactive tyrosine kinase domain, which serves as an interaction site for several intracellular signaling molecules (e.g., Dvl, β-catenin)., PTK7 can interact with Wnt3a, Wnt8, Fzd7, LRP6, and ROR2,– suggesting its involvement in both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways. The up-regulation of the PCP signaling pathway by PTK7 is well established in current literature. PTK7 cooperates with Fzd to recruit Dvl to the plasma membrane to activate the Wnt/PCP signaling. However, there are conflicting findings on the function of PTK7 in canonical Wnt (Wnt/β-catenin) signaling. Peradziryi et al. reported that PTK7 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Xenopus and Drosophila model systems. The inhibition effect of PTK7 on Wnt/β-catenin signaling was also observed in zebrafish during late gastrula and segmentation stages. In contrast, Puppo et al. found that PTK7 interacts with β-catenin in a yeast two-hybrid assay, and mammalian cells and PTK7-deficient cells show weakened Wnt/β-catenin activity. Bin-Nun and colleagues also reported that PTK7 protein depletion inhibits embryonic Wnt/β-catenin signaling by strongly decreasing LRP6 protein levels. These findings demonstrate the activating role of PTK7 in regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Thus, further experiments will be needed to uncover the underlying molecular mechanism of PTK7 regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)

MuSK, also known as unplugged, is required for neuromuscular junction (NMJ) formation by responding to a critical nerve-derived signal agrin., MuSK functions as a Wnt receptor and has an extracellular region that contains the CRD, which is homologous to the CRD of Fzd. Evidence demonstrates that Wnt11, Wnt4, and Wnt9a all play important roles in regulating NMJ formation through binding to MuSK via the CRD.– Wnt11 interacts with MuSK to activate PCP signaling in regulating synapse formation during neuromuscular development. Wnt4 contributes to the formation of vertebrate NMJ by binding to MuSK and initiating an increase in associated MuSK phosphorylation level. Moreover, Wnt9a and Wnt11 induce acetylcholine receptor clustering in muscle cells by binding to MuSK and inducing MuSK dimerization along with tyrosine phosphorylation in an LRP4-dependent manner.

Wnt signaling pathway

Wnts can induce different signaling pathways by binding to different receptors. Generally, Wnt signaling is divided into two branches depending on the different requirements for β-catenin, a cytoplasmic adaptor protein with membrane and nuclear functions. The β-catenin-dependent pathway is also known as the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, otherwise, the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway is independent of β-catenin transcriptional function. The canonical Wnt signaling pathway is also called the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Fig. 1a). For non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway, there are two major types: the Wnt/PCP pathway and Wnt/calcium (Ca2+) pathway, in which Wnts trigger signal transduction in different ways (Fig. 1b).

Canonical Wnt signaling pathway (Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway)

The canonical Wnt signaling pathway is well-known and extensively referred to as the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. This pathway plays important and versatile roles from embryologic development to adult tissue homeostasis, and its aberrations cause numerous diseases.,, In the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, β-catenin functions as a key transcriptional co-activator and transmits extracellular signals to activate the target genes (Fig. 1a). Without Wnt, β-catenin is sequestered by a destruction complex composed of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), Axin, APC, and casein kinase 1 (CK1). This complex is then constitutively phosphorylated, after which it is degraded by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis (Fig. 1a). However, the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway initiates with the binding of a Wnt to its receptor complex, including the seven-transmembrane receptor Fzd and the co-receptor LRP5 or LRP6. This binding of Wnt to its receptor complex further mobilize GSK3β and CK1 to the cell membrane, where they phosphorylate serines on Lrp5/6, promoting the formation of a signalosome, and the recruitment of Dvl, and Axin., This results in the release of β-catenin from the destruction complex and induces the accumulation of cytosolic β-catenin, which enters into the nucleus and binds to TCF/LEF to activate the target gene expression (Fig. 1a).

Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling pathway

The Wnt/PCP signaling pathway is the most extensively studied of the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways. PCP specifically refers to the organization of the epithelium orthogonally to the apicobasal polarity axis. The Wnt/PCP pathway mainly functions in regulating cell polarity in morphogenetic processes, such as coordinating cell polarity and morphology during the morphological polarization of hair follicles, pulmonary angiogenesis, morphogenetic movements, and the closure of caudal neural plate.,– The pathway also shows a key role in determining eventual cell fate. Wnt/PCP pathway can be activated by various Wnts, especially Wnt5a, Wnt7, and Wnt11. Fzds act as receptors in the Wnt/PCP pathway, with Fzd3, Fzd6, and Fzd7 favoring this signaling pathway. Instead of LRP5/6, the members of the receptor tyrosine kinase family (ROR2, RYK, and PTK7) and other membrane proteins (VANGL2, Glypican, Syndecan 4) are adopted as co-receptors in Wnt/PCP pathway.,,– The binding of Wnts recruits Dvl to Fzds and activates the small GTPases Rac1 and RhoA, which in turn induce changes in the actin cytoskeleton, and activate JUN-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and RHO kinase (ROCK) to regulate downstream signals. (Fig. 1b).

Wnt/calcium (Ca2+) signaling pathway

Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway is another non-canonical (β-catenin-independent) Wnt signaling pathway that was initially identified in X. laevis and zebrafish. This pathway functions as a key mediator in development, and is involved in physiological (e.g., hematopoiesis, neuronal excitability, neuron regeneration) and pathological (e.g., inflammation, neurodegeneration, and cancer) processes.– In Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway, the binding of Wnts to Fzd mediates the activation of a G protein. In turn, the G protein activates phospholipase C (PLC), leading to the generation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) which increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Moreover, Wnt/Fzd additionally activates cGMP (cyclic guanosine monophosphate) - specific phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6), resulting in a decrease of cellular cGMP and the inactivated protein kinase G (PKG), which in turn increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration. The Ca2+ activates calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), calcineurin, or protein kinase C (PKC), which further activates various transcription factors (NF-κB (nuclear factor κB), NFAT (nuclear factor associated with T cells) and CREB (cAMP-responsive element-binding protein)) that regulate downstream gene expression, (Fig. 1b). Notably, the Wnt/Ca2+ signaling and Wnt/β-catenin are coupled in cells, which challenges the canonical and non-canonical categorization of Wnt signaling.,

For both the canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling transduction, the Dvl proteins are involved in and regarded as the hub of Wnt signaling. In the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, Dvl is recruited by the receptor Fzd and prevents the phosphorylation and degradation of cytosolic β-catenin. In the non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling pathway, Dvl functions via the DAAM-RhoA axis and the Rac1 axis. In the non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway, Dvl signals through the PLC or PDE6 to induce the downstream Ca2+ signaling.

Activators/agonists of Wnt signaling

Besides Wnts, there are additional described proteins known to activate Wnt signaling, including R-spondin (RSpo) proteins and Norrin proteins,– two different families of growth factors. In addition, microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 (MACF1), a versatile spectraplakin and FOXB2, an uncharacterized forkhead box family transcription factor, are demonstrated as potent activators to promote Wnt signaling, (Fig. 2a, Table 1).

R-Spondin (RSpo)

The R-spondin (RSpo) is a family of cysteine-rich secretory proteins. There are four members, RSpo1, RSpo2, RSpo3, and RSpo4, who show an overall similarity of 40%–60% sequence homology and structural homologies. All four RSpos are composed of an N-terminal signal peptide, two furin-like CRDs, one thrombospondin type I domain, and a C-terminal basic acid-rich domain. All RSpos are demonstrated as activators of the Wnt signaling pathway, showing that RSpo2 and RSpo3 are more potent than RSpo1, while RSpo4 is relatively inactive., The RSpos synergize with Wnts and require the presence of Wnts and LRP6 to activate Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction.– The activation effect of RSpos on Wnt/β-catenin signaling is implemented by interfering with Dickkopf1 (Dkk1)-mediated LRP6 and Kremen association., In addition, RSpo3 interacts with Fzd8 and LRP6 to enhance Wnt signaling. Recent evidence demonstrates that the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 4/5/6 (LGR4/5/6) functions as a receptor of RSpos to potentiate Wnt/β-catenin signaling., The RSpo/LGR5 complex functions by neutralizing ring finger 43 (Rnf43) and zinc and ring finger 3 (Znrf3), two transmembrane E3 ligases that function as negative feedback regulators of Wnt signaling by removing Wnt receptors Fzd and LRP6 on the cell surface. The interaction between RSpos and LGR4/5/6 is mediated by the furin-like CRD of RSpos., Besides the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, RSpos also modulate the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway. RSpo3 promotes the Wnt/PCP signaling pathway while RSpo1 inhibits the non-canonical Wnt7a/Fzd7/Rac1 signaling pathway. RSpo2 suppresses Wnt5a/Fzd7-driven non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway while RSpo3 activates the non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+/NFAT signaling pathway. These differences may be due to the different components of non-canonical signaling pathways.

Norrin

Norrin is a small, highly conserved secreted signaling molecule that exhibits a cystine-knot motif and functions as an atypical Wnt ligand by forming complex with Fzd4 and LRP5/6., Norrin specifically binds to Fzd4 with high affinity and activates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in a LRP5/6-dependent manner., Although showing similarity with Wnt in activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, the structure of Norrin is completely different from Wnt. The Norrin structure contains a cystine-knot motif and forms a homodimer via intermolecular disulfide bonds. Moreover, Norrin is not lipid-modified like Wnt. The crystal structure analysis of the Fzd4CRD-Norrin complex reveals the specific interaction between Norrin and Fzd4 via the CRD of Fzd4. More recently, Bang et al. evaluated the conformational change of Fzd4 upon Norrin binding and demonstrated that the linker domain (the region between CRD and transmembrane domain) of Fzd4 is responsible for its tight binding to Norrin rather than CRD. Therefore, Norrin functions as an activator of Wnt signaling through binding to Fzd4.

Microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 (MACF1)

MACF1 was first discovered as a member of the actin crosslinker superfamily and named actin crosslinking factor 7 (ACF7). Subsequent studies reveal the association of ACF7 with both actin and microtubules (MTs), thus renaming it MACF/MACF1. As a versatile spectraplakin, MACF1 is widely involved in multiple cellular processes (e.g., cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation), embryo development, tissue homeostasis, and disease., Given the similar phenotype of MACF1−/− embryo and Wnt3−/− and LRP5/6 double-knockout embryos,, which lacks the primitive streak, node, and mesoderm, a relationship between MACF1 and Wnt signaling was indicated. Chen et al. firstly reported that the reduction of MACF1 resulted in the suppression of Wnt-induced TCF/β-catenin-dependent transcriptional activation, suggesting a positive role of MACF1 in regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. They demonstrated that MACF1 positively regulated the Wnt/β-catenin signaling by translocating the Axin complex (Axin, β-catenin, and GSK3β) from cytoplasm to cell membrane, where GSK3β was inactivated by phosphorylation and β-catenin was released and entered into the nucleus to activate target genes. Similarly, we found that MACF1 played a positive role in increasing β-catenin level in osteoblasts, facilitating β-catenin translocation into the nucleus and increasing its transcription activity by phosphorylating GSK3β., Therefore, MACF1 can be considered a novel activator for Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

FOXB2

FOXB2, an uncharacterized forkhead-box family transcription factor, was recently identified as a potent activator of Wnt signaling in normal and cancer cells by Moparthi et al. They found that FOXB2 induced multiple Wnt ligands, including Wnt7b, to increase TCF/LEF-dependent transcription without activating Wnt co-receptor LRP6 or β-catenin. Several transcription regulators, including YY1, JUN, and DDX5, act as cofactors in FOXB2-dependent Wnt signaling. Moreover, Moparthi et al. found that FOXB2-controlled Wnt signaling was induced in the neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer cells, implicating FOXB2 expression in advanced prostate cancer. Their findings suggest that FOXB2 is a tissue-specific Wnt activator.

Inhibitors/antagonists of Wnt signaling

There exists both secreted and transmembrane Wnt signaling inhibitors/antagonists (Fig. 2b, Table 1). The secreted inhibitors mainly contain six families, including the Dkk family of proteins,, secreted Frizzled related proteins (sFRPs), Wnt inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1), Wise, Sclerostin (SOST),, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 (IGFBP-4), and Cerberus. Additionally, Bighead, a secreted protein, was identified as a novel Wnt inhibitor. The transmembrane inhibitors mainly contain Shisa proteins, Tiki1, Wnt-activated inhibitory factor 1 (Waif1/5T4), and adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1 (APCDD1). These factors antagonize Wnt signaling by preventing ligand-receptor interactions or Wnt receptor maturation (Fig. 2b, Table 1).

Dickkopf (Dkk) family

The Dkk family of cysteine-rich secretory proteins are well-characterized inhibitors for Wnt signaling. Since the discovery of Dkk1, 4 main members (Dkk1, Dkk2, Dkk3, and Dkk4) were identified in the Dkk family. They specifically inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Dkk1, Dkk2, and Dkk4 bind to LRP5/6 to disrupt the Fzd-LRP5/6 complex formation, thus inhibiting Wnt signaling,,, while Dkk3 does not bind to LRP5 or LRP6 and does not affect Wnt signaling. Besides LRP5/6, Dkks also bind to Kremen (Krm) proteins (Krm1 and Krm2), which are single-pass transmembrane receptors. Krms greatly enhance the inhibitory ability of Dkks on Wnt signaling. Krm1 and Krm2 cooperate with Dkk1 to form a complex with LRP6 and inhibit the Wnt-Fzd-LRP6 function. However, the study of Krm1−/−/Krm2−/− double-mutant mice demonstrates that Krms is not completely required for Dkk1 function, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of Dkk1 on Wnt-LRP6 interaction may be sufficient to suppress Wnt signaling. Notably, Dkk2 acts not only as an inhibitor but also as an activator for Wnt signaling depending on the cellular context. In Xenopus embryos, Dkk2 synergizes with Fzd receptor or interacts with LRP6 to activate rather than inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. However, Dkk2 inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in HEK293T cells. This dual role of Dkk2 may be modulated by the Krm2, which converts Dkk2 from an agonist to an antagonist of LRP6.

Secreted Frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs)

The sFRPs, the largest family of Wnt inhibitors, resemble the ligand-binding CRD found in the Fzds of Wnt receptors. The first sFRP member, Fzdb (Frizzled motif associated with bone development), was discovered as a chondrogenic factor and was subsequently shown as a Wnt antagonist. Subsequently, other sFRPs were identified. In humans, there are five members in the sFRP family, including sFRP1, sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4, and sFRP5. Sharing sequence similarity with CRDs of Fzds, sFRPs directly bind to Wnts, preventing the interaction of Wnts and their receptors, and thus inhibiting Wnt signaling., sFRPs are demonstrated to inhibit both canonical Wnt signaling and non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling., However, Holly et al. demonstrated that sFRP proteins functioned as facilitators of Wnt signaling within the dorsal retina. Further investigation of sFRP1 by Xavier et al. showed that sFRP1 either inhibited or enhanced Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling, depending on its concentration and the specific cellular context.

Wnt inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1)

Similar to sFRPs, WIF-1 is a secreted inhibitor for Wnt signaling by directly binding to and sequestering Wnts. WIF-1 is composed of an N-terminal secretion signal sequence, a unique and highly conserved WIF domain, five epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, and a hydrophilic C-terminal domain. The WIF domain is responsible for the binding of WIF-1 to Wnts. Moreover, the crystal structure analysis of human WIF-1 in combination with biophysical and cellular assays reveals that Wnts bind to both the WIF domain and the EGF-like domains of WIF-1. By binding to both types of Wnts and sequestering them, WIF-1 suppresses both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling.–

Sclerostin (SOST)

Sclerostin is the product of the Sost/SOST gene that is localized to human chromosome region 17q12-q21. It is an osteocyte-expressed glycoprotein. Sclerostin was first considered as an antagonist of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling due to its competition with type I and type II BMP receptors for binding to BMPs and decreased BMP signaling. However, subsequent studies demonstrate that it is also an antagonist/inhibitor of Wnt signaling by binding to Wnt co-receptors LRP5 and LRP6, thereby disrupting the formation of the Wnt-receptor complex.,, In addition, LRP4, another LRP family member, facilitates the inhibitory action of sclerostin on Wnt signaling. Evidence shows that the suppressive action of sclerostin on Wnt signaling transduction occurs in both osteoblasts and osteocytes in both paracrine and autocrine manner.

Wise

Wise, also refered as sclerostin domain containing 1, Ectodin, and uterine sensitization-associated gene-1, is a secreted factor that was identified by a functional screen for novel factors with the potential to alter the anteroposterior character of neutralized Xenopus animal caps. In Xenopus, Wise either inhibits or activates Wnt signaling in different assays, suggesting it as a context-dependent regulator of Wnt signaling. By sharing 38% amino acid identity with sclerostin, Wise also inhibits Wnt signaling by binding to LRP5 or LRP6. Moreover, Wise binds to LRP4 to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

IGFBP-4

IGFBP-4 is a member of the family of IGFBPs that regulate numerous cellular processes by modulating the actions of insulin-like growth factors. IGFBP-4 was identified as an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signaling required for cardiogenesis. It inhibits Wnt signaling by binding to both Fzd and LRP6. Interestingly, both IGFBP-4 and Dkk1 are inhibitors of canonical Wnt signaling and are crucial for heart development, but they play opposing roles in cardiac ischemia by differentially targeting LRP5/6 and β-catenin. IGFBP-4 protects the ischemic heart by inhibiting β-catenin while Dkk1 enhances the injury response by inducing LRP5/6 endocytosis and degradation. Moreover, IGFBP-4 activates canonical Wnt signaling in human renal cell carcinoma. These different findings on the role of IGFBP-4 in modulating Wnt signaling may be dependent on the cellular context.

Cerberus

Cerberus was discovered in Xenopus as a head-inducing secreted factor that is expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann’s organizer and was identified as a multifunctional inhibitor of Nodal, BMP, and Wnt signaling., Subsequently, Cerberus-like proteins were identified in other vertebrates (e.g., mouse, chick, zebrafish) and grouped in the Cerberus/Dan family, showing key roles in the regulation and generation of asymmetries in the early embryo. Furthermore, Cerberus also contains a cystine-knot domain. However, proteolytically processed isoforms of Xenopus Cerberus that still contain the cystine-knot domain cannot bind to Wnt8, suggesting that the inhibitory ability of Cerberus on Wnt signaling might be regulated by proteolysis.

Bighead

Like Cerberus, Bighead was also screened in the Spemann organizer as a secreted protein and identified as a novel inhibitor of Wnt signaling by causing LRP6 endocytosis and lysosomal degradation. Bighead overexpression within embryos leads to the development of larger fetal heads, while its deficiency reduces head development by regulating Wnt signaling., As a novel Wnt inhibitor, the role of Bighead in modulating Wnt signaling needs further investigation.

Shisa proteins

Shisa proteins compose a big family that consists of nine subfamilies in vertebrates at present. Shisa proteins are characterized by an N-terminal cysteine-rich domain and a proline-rich C-terminal region and are a novel family of modulators of both Wnt and FGF signaling. Xenopus Shisa (Xenopus Shisa 1), the founding member of the Shisa family, was first identified as a novel antagonist of Wnt signaling for head formation by Yamamoto et al. Thereafter, Xenopus Shisa 2 was demonstrated to inhibit Wnt signaling. Moreover, mShisa, a mouse homolog of Xenopus Shisa 1, also antagonizes Wnt signaling. Shisa proteins inhibit Wnt signaling by physically interacting with immature forms of Fzd within the endoplasmic reticulum to impair Fzd maturation.,

Tiki1

Tiki1 is another transmembrane Wnt antagonist that is identified by functional cDNA screening as a Spemann-Mangold Organizer-specific gene required for anterior development. It antagonizes Wnt function by acting as a protease to cleave eight amino-terminal residues of a Wnt, leading to oxidized Wnt oligomers that exhibit impaired receptor-binding capability.

Wnt-activated inhibitory factor 1 (Waif1/5T4)

Waif1/5T4 is a single-pass transmembrane protein with eight leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) in the extracellular region and Waif1a was recently identified as a transcriptional target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in zebrafish embryos. Moreover, Waif1 acts as an antagonist of Wnt8-mediated β-catenin signaling by controlling LRP6 availability, while activating non-canonical Wnt/PCP Wnt signaling through enhancing a non-canonical function of DKK1. Zhao et al. identified the crystal structures of the extracellular domain of Waif1/5T4, which reveal a highly glycosylated rigid core containing eight LRRs. Besides, they suggested that Tyr325 plus the LRR1 surface centered on a second exposed aromatic residue, Phe97, are essential for the inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1 (APCDD1)

APCDD1 is a novel inhibitor of Wnt signaling identified by Shimomura et al. when studying hereditary hypotrichosis simplex. It is a membrane-bound glycoprotein and is abundant in human hair follicles. APCDD1 is shown to inhibit Wnt signaling by physically interacting with Wnt3a and LRP5, which impairs the formation of the Wnt receptor complex. Being broadly expressed in various tissues and cell types, APCDD1 plays important roles in other Wnt-regulated biological processes, and further coordinates vascular pruning and barrier maturation by precisely modulating Wnt/Norrin signaling activity. Moreover, APCDD1 promotes adipogenic differentiation by inhibiting Wnt signaling but maintains the expression and activation of β-catenin during the osteogenic differentiation of human dental follicle cells. These contrary findings suggest that APCDD1 may regulate Wnt signaling depending on the cellular context.

Interaction of the Wnt signaling pathway with other signaling pathways

As a versatile signaling pathway, Wnt signaling pathway interacts with multiple other signaling pathways such as Notch, Hedgehog, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)/BMP, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and estrogen signaling pathways (Fig. 3).

Wnt signaling and Notch signaling

The Notch signaling pathway is a highly conserved pathway that is important in controlling cell function and tissue homeostasis. Both Notch signaling and Wnt signaling are found in all multicellular animals and they represent two major pathways in controlling cell behavior during development. Therefore, a strong interaction between Wnt signaling and Notch signaling is supposed. The interaction between these two signaling pathways was initially reported in the context of development. Furthermore, increasing evidence demonstrates the strong interaction between Wnt and Notch signaling pathways., β-catenin activates Notch signaling by targeting Jagged 1, the Notch ligand, indicating that the Notch pathway is downstream of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway., In contrast, Notch negatively regulates β-catenin stability. Moreover, components of Wnt signaling including GSK3β and Dvl play key roles in Notch signaling by modulating the Notch intracellular domain.

Wnt signaling and Hedgehog signaling

The Hedgehog signaling pathway shows critical roles in both physiological and pathological processes. There are three vertebrate Hedgehog homologs, including Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), Desert Hedgehog (Dhh), and Indian Hedgehog (Ihh). Shh mainly functions in neuronal development, Dhh exerts its main role in the gonads, while Ihh is important for skeletal development. Similar to Wnt signaling, Hedgehog signaling also plays a key role throughout embryonic development. Therefore, the interaction between Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways shows profound physiological effects, such as regulating embryogenesis, tumorigenicity, and blood-brain barrier development., sFRP1, an inhibitor of Wnt signaling, is an important cross-point between Wnt signaling and Hedgehog signaling. Hedgehog signaling negatively regulates Wnt signaling by activating sFRP1 expression, while Wnt signaling inhibits Hedgehog signaling through regulating the expression of glioma-associated oncogene homolog 3 (Gli3), the main repressor of Hedgehog signaling.

Wnt signaling and TGF-β/BMP signaling

The TGF-β superfamily is composed of more than 40 members, including TGF-βs (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3), BMPs (14 BMPs), and activins and growth differentiation factors. These members are involved in two main pathways, the TGF-β signaling pathway, and the BMP signaling pathway. Like Wnt signaling, TGF-β signaling also regulates cell fate and proliferation during development and tissue maintenance. Therefore, the interaction between the TGF-β/BMP and Wnt pathways is the focus of many studies. Throughout an animal’s lifespan, the two pathways are interconnected, and they interact at many stages of the signal transduction pathway, including at the extracellular, cytoplasmic, and nuclear levels. Extracellularly, TGF-β/BMP and Wnt regulate the production of their respective ligands in a reciprocal manner. In the cytoplasm, there are interactions between the components of these signaling pathways, such as Dvl-1 and Smad1 interaction. Moreover, Dvl is targeted for degradation by Smurf2 (SMAD ubiquitination regulatory factor 2), which is a regulator of TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway. Conversely, Dvl activates Smurf2 to allow Smurf2 ubiquitinate the substrates from Wnt/PCP pathway and TGF-β/BMP pathway. In the nucleus, these signaling pathways interact to regulate a variety of shared target genes synergistically. Numerous studies demonstrate the interaction between TGF-β/BMP signaling and Wnt signaling in patterning the mesoderm, cell differentiation, and tissue development.–

Wnt signaling and PTH signaling

PTH (parathyroid hormone) is an 84-amino-acid polypeptide hormone and is essential in regulating calcium homeostasis. As a major regulator of bone remodeling, PTH interacts with the Wnt signaling pathway. Studies reveal that PTH induces osteoblast differentiation by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling, while Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates chondrocyte differentiation via PTH. PTH shows increased effects on the expression of Wnts and decreased effects on inhibitors of Wnt signaling, such as sclerostin, DKK1, and sFRP1., Evidences demonstrate that PTH inhibits sclerostin expression in osteocytes by promoting nuclear accumulation of histone deacetylases to repress myocyte enhancer factor 2 type C (MEF2C)-dependent Sost enhancer.– Furthermore, Li et al. showed that LRP6 was required for PTH suppression of Sost expression through MEF2C. Moreover, PTH exhibits a regulatory effect on the expression of Wnt signaling components, such as LRP5, LRP6, FZD-1, β-catenin, and TCF/LEF. Furthermore, Wnt/β-catenin signaling also exhibits a regulatory effect on PTH signaling. Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibits parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) signaling activity.

Wnt signaling and estrogen signaling

Estrogens are the main female sex steroids that control many cellular processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation. Estrogens exert their biological actions by binding to one of two specific estrogen receptors (ERs) ERα and ERβ. As a key regulator of bone mass, estrogen deficiency is one main cause of osteoporosis. Evidence indicates that estrogen levels are inversely associated with the production of sclerostin, an antagonist of Wnt signaling, suggesting the interaction between Wnt signaling and estrogen signaling. Kim et al. found that estrogen 17β-Estradiol (E2) suppressed the SOST expression induced by BMP2, but increases the expression and activation levels of β-catenin in osteoblasts. ERα antagonist abolishes the effect of E2 on SOST expression, demonstrating that estrogen signaling in osteoblasts negatively regulates SOST expression. In addition, ERα is requisite for the effectiveness of Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributing to bone cell early response to mechanical strain. ER and Wnt signaling interacts to regulate bone mass adaption in response to mechanical loading., However, Galea et al. reported that the inhibitory effect of estrogen signaling on Sost expression in osteoblasts was mediated by ERβ but not ERα. This contrary result with Kim’s finding may be due to the different cell type adopted in experiments. Recently, Suthon et al. found that 17β-Estradiol (E2) suppressed WNT5B expression through its receptor ERα binding at the enhancer containing single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2887571. As WNT5B suppresses osteoblast differentiation via ROR1/2, which inhibits β-catenin activity, the above findings demonstrate that estrogen promotes osteoblast differentiation by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Wnt signaling in bone formation and homeostasis

Bone is a rigid organ that provides support and physical protection to various organs, and stores minerals for the body. Bone is formed through two major ways, either intramembranous ossification or endochondral ossification. Intramembranous ossification is responsible for the formation of flat bone and is initiated by the condensation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The MSCs differentiate into osteoblasts that secrete osteoid matrix and further differentiate into osteocytes. Endochondral ossification occurs in the formation of long bone and begins with the MSCs condensation. As opposed to intramembranous ossification, endochondral ossification begins with a deposited cartilaginous template that is later replaced by bone formation. In adult bone, bone homeostasis is maintained by the intricate balancing of bone remodeling, bone formation conducted by osteoblasts, and bone resorption conducted by osteoclasts. Disruption of this balance results in bone diseases, such as osteoporosis and osteopetrosis.

The first connection between the Wnt signaling pathway and skeletal development was demonstrated in 1994 when Takada et al. found that Wnt3a-deficient mouse embryos exhibited axial defects. Additionally, studies of various mouse models reveal that abnormality of the components within Wnt signaling causes bone defects (reviewed by refs.,, Table 2). Wnt signaling regulates bone development and maintains bone homeostasis by regulating the functions of bone cells, mainly including bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes (Fig. 4).

Wnt signaling in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs)

BM-MSCs are MSCs residing in the bone marrow. As the common origins of osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes, the tightly controlled lineage commitment of BM-MSCs is crucial in the maintenance of bone formation and homeostasis. The alteration of the commitment of BM-MSCs to osteoblasts and adipocytes occurs in bone pathological conditions, such as osteoporosis.,

Among the numerous signaling pathways involved in regulating the lineage commitment of BM-MSCs (BMP, Hedgehog, Notch, Wnt), Wnt signaling inhibits BM-MSC’s commitment to the adipogenic and chondrogenic lineages while promoting their differentiation into the osteoblasts.– Wnt3a-induced canonical Wnt signaling stimulates osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by activating transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), which is a key transcriptional modulator of MSC differentiation., Furthermore, Wnt3a also enhances osteoblast differentiation and suppresses adipocyte differentiation of human BM-MSCs via non-canonical JNK signaling. Wnt3a and Wnt7b also promotes osteogenic differentiation and bone formation via PKCδ-mediated non-canonical Wnt signaling. The non-canonical Wnt5a suppresses PPARγ activation to suppress adipogenic differentiation and promote the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and also induces osteoblast differentiation of BMSCs under mechanical stimulation. Wnt5a also shows promotion effect on chondrogenesis of MSCs by activating non-canonical Wnt signaling, such as Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway., Recently, Wnt7a shows the role to promote osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs by increasing Runx2 expression, which is mechanistically conducted by Wnt7a to promote the binding of TCF1 to the Runx2 promoter. Wnt10b enhances osteoblastogenesis and suppresses adipogenesis of mesenchymal progenitors, thus increasing bone formation and bone mass. The further study demonstrates that Wnt10b shifts mesenchymal cells toward osteoblasts, rather than adipocytes, by increasing the expression of osteogenic transcription factors (runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), Dlx5, and Osterix) and suppressing the expression of adipogenic transcription factors (C/EBPα and PPARγ)., Conversely, Wnt10b deficiency decreases mesenchymal progenitor activity and number, resulting in bone loss. In addition, Wnt6 and Wnt10a also facilitate osteogenic differentiation and suppress adipogenic differentiation of MSC via β-catenin. Besides, Dvl shows a role in regulating osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs. Following the osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs, the methylation level of Dvl decreases, which results in the elevated expression of Dvl, demonstrating Dvl as a promoter for osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs. Moreover, β-catenin is required for promoting osteoblast differentiation and inhibiting chondrocyte differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells, and the inactivation of β-catenin results in defective skeletal development., More recently, Matsushita et al. demonstrated that Wnt-mediated transformation of the bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) identity orchestrates skeletal regeneration. They found that quiescent Cxcl12-creER+ perisinusoidal BMSCs differentiate into cortical bone osteoblasts solely during regeneration and quiescent Cxcl12-creER+ BMSCs transform into osteoblast precursor cells in a manner mediated by canonical Wnt signaling.

Wnt signaling also shows key roles in mediating the function of numerous molecules in BM-MSCs to regulate cell differentiation capacity. Core-binding factor subunit β (Cbfβ), a non-DNA-binding partner of Runt-related transcription factors (Runx1, Runx2, and Runx3), plays a key role in governing osteoblast−adipocyte lineage commitment by enhancing β-catenin signaling. Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1), a member of the Zα family, increases osteogenic differentiation while suppressing adipogenic differentiation of mouse BM-MSCs. It was demonstrated that ZBP1 is required for β-catenin translocation into nuclei and is a novel regulator of bone and fat trans-differentiation via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Serpin Family B Member 2 (SerpinB2) is a member of the clade B subgroup of serine protease inhibitors (serpins). Exogenous SerpinB2 protein inhibits osteoblast differentiation while the silencing of SerpinB2 promotes osteoblast differentiation of human BM-MSCs via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Our previous work demonstrated that conditional knockout (cKO) of MACF1 in mesenchymal stem cells inhibited osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs and elevated bone surface adipocyte number, which results in decreased bone formation. Wu et al. identified a novel nuclear factor I/X (NFIX) - high-mobility group AT-Hook 1 (HMGA1) - Wnt/β-catenin regulatory axis that governs the cell fate of mouse BM-MSCs, favoring osteoblast differentiation and blocking adipocyte formation. HMGA1, as a downstream target of NFIX, functions by transcriptionally regulating LRP5 expression and thereafter activating canonical Wnt signaling. Moreover, Circ-FBLN1 (a circular RNA acting as a sponge for let-7i-5p) promotes cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs by regulating the let-7i-5p/FZD4 axis and repressing Wnt/β-catenin pathway. More recently, non-canonical Wnt signaling is shown to mediate the regulation of phosphate on human MSCs’ osteogenic differentiation. Phosphate treatment upregulated the expression of Wnt5b, Wnt11, and phosphorylated-c-Jun to promote osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs. Overall, by interacting with and regulating the activity of the aforementioned proteins and biomolecules, Wnt signaling plays a critical role in regulating BM-MSCs differentiation capacity.

Wnt signaling in osteoblasts

Osteoblasts originate from BM-MSCs and are responsible for bone formation. Wnt signaling is critical for osteoblast function and most of its signaling components play important roles in regulating bone development and maintenance.,

The components of Wnt signaling in osteoblasts

Multiple Wnts including Wnt1, Wnt3a, Wnt5b, Wnt7b, Wnt10b, Wnt11, and Wnt16 regulate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.,– Canonical Wnt signaling promotes osteoblast differentiation by directly activating the expression of the key bone-related transcription factor Runx2 via β-catenin/TCF1 signaling. Wnt16 promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation through canonical Wnt signaling. Besides, Tu et al. reported that non-canonical Wnt signaling promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation via activating G-protein-linked PKCδ. Recently, Lawson et al. demonstrated that inhibition of osteoblast-specific Wnt secretion alters skeletal homeostasis by suppressing bone formation and increasing bone resorption, reducing the anabolic response to mechanical loading, and demonstrating that Wnt ligand secretion is required for adult bone formation and homeostasis. Additionally, this indicates that osteoblast-derived Wnts are important in mediating the bone anabolic response to mechanical loading. Besides, Wnt primary receptors Fzds play an important role in osteoblast and bone formation. Albers et al. demonstrated that Fzd9 is required for osteoblast mineralization and bone formation. They developed an Fzd9−/− mouse line and found that Fzd9−/− mice displayed lower bone mass caused by decreased bone formation, with Fzd9−/− primary osteoblasts showing defective matrix mineralization. Two co-receptors of Wnt signaling, LRP5/6, are required for optimal Wnt signaling in osteoblasts, and each plays a key distinct role in bone formation. Lrp6, rather than Lrp5, is crucial for mediating Wnt3a signaling in osteoblasts and shows different effects on osteoblastic gene expression. Lrp5 is required for the late stages of differentiation while Lrp6 is required for the early stages of osteoblast differentiation. Mice with a targeted disruption of Lrp5 develop a low bone mass phenotype, which becomes evident postnatally and is secondary to decreased osteoblast proliferation. A LRP5 gain of function mutation in osteoblasts causes increased bone mass/bone mineral density (BMD) in human and transgenic mice and an increase in the number of active osteoblasts, further confirming the important role of LRP5 in bone formation and homeostasis., LRP6 knockout mice were perinatal fatal, with truncations of the axial skeleton and limb defects., Moreover, Lrp4 and Lrp8 were demonstrated to play important roles in bone remodeling by modulating Wnt signaling., Lrp4 binds to sclerostin to facilitate the inhibitory effect of sclerostin on Wnt/β-catenin signaling, thus inhibiting bone formation. The osteoblast/osteocyte-specific Lrp4 knockout induces elevated serum sclerostin, promotes osteoblast function, and results in an increase in bone mass. Lrp8 was demonstrated to play a role in Wnt3a-induced osteoblast differentiation. Furthermore, Dvl is involved in osteoblast differentiation. Zhou et al. found that ubiquitin-specific peptidase 4 (USP4) inhibited Wnt/β-catenin signaling by removing Lysine-63 linked poly-ubiquitin chain from Dvl and promoting β-catenin polyubiquitination, which leads to decreased cytosolic β-catenin and downstream signaling. USP4 inhibits osteoblast differentiation while USP4 depletion promotes osteoblast differentiation. These findings demonstrate Dvl as a target of USP4 in regulating osteoblast differentiation. In addition, several studies reveal the necessity of β-catenin in the osteoblast lineage.,, Deletion of β-catenin in a different stage of osteoblastic differentiation in mice causes low bone mass phenotype due to both defective osteoblast differentiation along with increased osteoclastic bone resorption that is caused by decreased OPG (osteoprotegerin)/RANKL (receptor activator of NF-κB ligand) ratio., All these findings together reveal the importance of Wnt signaling components in controlling osteoblast function.

The modulators of Wnt signaling in osteoblasts

The modulators of Wnt signaling also play important roles in osteoblast. R-spondins, activators of Wnt signaling, are highly expressed in skeletal tissues and promote osteoblast differentiation., MACF1, an activator of Wnt/β-catenin, shows promotion effects on osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and bone formation.,,– sFRPs, the largest family of Wnt inhibitors, are demonstrated as important regulators of osteoblast function and bone formation. Deletion of sFRP1 activates Wnt canonical signaling, which increases the expression of Runx2 and osteocalcin, thus enhancing osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Besides, sFRP1 deficiency inhibits osteoblast lineage apoptosis and enhances osteoblast proliferation. sFRP1−/− mice exhibit increased trabecular bone mineral density while sFRP1 transgenic mice display decreased bone formation and trabecular bone mass., Moreover, sFRP2 and sFRP4 are critical for proper distal limb formation and bone formation., Dkk1, a member of the Dkk family (Wnt inhibitor), is a key negative regulator of osteoblasts. Endogenous Dkk1 is primarily expressed in osteoblasts and osteocytes. Dkk1 suppresses osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by binding to LRP5/6 to inhibit Wnt signaling. Osteoblast overexpression of Dkk1 in transgenic mice induces diminished osteoblastic bone formation and severe osteopenia, while heterozygous Dkk1-deficient (Dkk1+/-) mice display increased osteoblast number, mineral apposition, bone formation, and bone mass. Dkk1 overexpression in primary calvaria cells completely inhibits osteoblast differentiation and mineralized nodules in vitro. Dkk4 also functions as an inhibitor of osteoblast differentiation by suppressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Unlike Dkk1 and Dkk4, Dkk2 is required for terminal osteoblast differentiation and mineralized matrix formation, with Dkk2−/− mice showing decreased bone formation. Krm1 and Krm2, co-receptors of Dkk1, interact with Dkk1 to attenuate Wnt/β-catenin signaling during limb development, as shown by Krm1−/−Krm2−/− mice presenting with increased bone formation. Overexpression of Krm2 in osteoblasts in transgenic mice leads to severe osteoporosis. In addition, sclerostin, another inhibitor of Wnt signaling, is crucial for osteoblast function and bone formation. Sclerostin suppresses proliferation/differentiation and promotes apoptosis of osteoblasts and overexpression of sclerostin suppressing bone formation.,,, SOST−/− mice exhibit increased high bone mass due to increased bone formation, while SOST transgenic mice exhibit low bone mass due to decreased bone formation, (for review, see Sebastian et al.).

Other molecules modulate osteoblast function via Wnt signaling

Wnt signaling is also involved in mediating the function of numerous biomolecules in osteoblasts. Runx1, a highly expressed protein in osteoblast, maintains osteoblast differentiation by up-regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Chemerin, a novel adipocyte-derived signaling molecule, shows an inhibitory effect on osteoblast differentiation and proliferation through the inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Large conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channels encoded by the Kchma1 gene are among the K+ channels that have unusually large single-channel conductance. Jiang et al. uncovered that the BK channel is essential for osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and bone formation via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Conditional knockout of Kcnma1, which encodes the pore-forming α-subunits of BK, results in a decrease in β-catenin in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which inhibits Runx2 expression and leads to bone loss. More recently, miR-12200-5p was demonstrated to significantly inhibit osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by simultaneously targeting multiple members of the Wnt signaling, including APC, TCF4, TCF7, Wnt3a, Wnt5a, and LRP6.

Recently, Wnt signaling was demonstrated to be crucial for modulating cellular metabolism in osteoblasts. Wnt signaling stimulates aerobic glycolysis, glutamine catabolism, and fatty acid oxidation in osteoblast-lineage cells.

Wnt signaling in osteocytes

Osteocytes are the most abundant cells in bone. They are terminally differentiated osteoblasts embedded within the mineralized matrix. Osteocytes help orchestrate the signaling that regulates osteoblasts and osteoclasts during bone remodeling. Moreover, they are believed as mechanosensory cells., During the terminal mineralization process, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is downregulated. The activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in osteocytes suppresses dendrite development, inhibits dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) expression, and alters normal mineral crystallinity. Moreover, Wnt signaling is involved in osteocytes sensing mechanical stimuli and regulating bone remodeling to coordinate normal bone homeostasis.,,

The components of Wnt signaling in osteocytes

Joeng et al. reported that osteocyte-specific Wnt1 loss- or gain-of-function mice presents low bone mass or high bone mass, respectively. Besides, Wnt receptor LRP5 shows a key role in osteocytes. LRP5-mediated Wnt signaling in osteocytes contributes to the maintenance of mechanical properties and bone mass. Mice with an osteocyte-specific deletion of Lrp5 exhibit reduced bone mass, lower Young’s modulus of bone, and significantly diminish load-driven bone formation. In addition, β-catenin, a key mediator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, is necessary for maintaining osteocyte viability and for the ability of osteocytes to respond to mechanical stimuli. Osteocyte-specific β-catenin deficient mice exhibit low bone mass phenotype in association with increased osteoclast number and bone resorption and do not respond to mechanical loading. Tu et al. also found that activation of osteocytic β-catenin signaling increases both osteoclasts and osteoblasts, resulting in bone gain, identifying osteocytes as central target cells of the anabolic actions of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in bone. Therefore, the components of Wnt signaling are critical in osteocytes by mediating osteocyte mechanotransduction and the regulatory role of osteocytes in osteoblasts and osteoclasts.

The modulators of Wnt signaling in osteocytes

Osteocytes express several inhibitors of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, including sclerostin, Dkk1, and sFRP1, all of which regulate bone mass. Sclerostin is well known for its specific expression in osteocytes,, with osteocytes secreting sclerostin via their dendritic attachments. The secreted sclerostin functions on osteoblasts to suppress the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, thus inhibiting osteoblast differentiation and bone formation (see Wnt signaling in osteoblasts for detail). Moreover, in line with the mechanical response of osteocytes, sclerostin expressed by osteocytes is demonstrated as a mechanosensitive protein, and its expression is regulated by mechanical stimuli. Mechanical loading reduces the sclerostin expression and promotes bone formation, while mechanical unloading increases sclerostin expression and inhibits bone formation, both processes involving Wnt signaling., Interestingly, both SOST−/− mice and DMP1-SOST transgenic mice exhibit reduced sensitivity to mechanical stimulation., SOST−/− mice are resistant to mechanical unloading-induced bone formation reduction in association with unaltered Wnt/β-catenin signaling. While DMP1-SOST transgenic mice exhibit reduced load-induced bone formation and unaltered Wnt signaling. Therefore, sclerostin is critical for mechano-transduction and mechanical stimuli regulating bone formation via Wnt signaling. Besides sclerostin, osteocytes express sFRP1 and Dkk1 to inhibit osteoblast differentiation and bone formation (see Wnt signaling in osteoblasts for detail). The expression of Dkk1 is also regulated by mechanical stimuli.

Wnt signaling in osteoclasts

Osteoclasts are the bone-resorbing cells that originated from hematopoietic monocyte/macrophage lineage cells and are involved in the bone remodeling process. Recent studies demonstrate that Wnt signaling plays a direct role in regulating osteoclast function. Targeted deletion of β-catenin in osteoclast precursors inhibits the precursor proliferation and accelerates osteoclast differentiation, while deletion of β-catenin in more committed stages of osteoclast differentiation enhances the rate of cell specialization.– Additionally, Ruiz et al. reported that conditional deletion of β-catenin in Cathepsin K-expressing cells increases osteoclast activity. These findings demonstrate that Wnt signaling promotes osteoclast progenitor proliferation and suppresses osteoclast commitment and differentiation. In addition, Dvl, a key component of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, plays a role in regulating osteoclastogenesis by interacting with PTH1R (type 1 parathyroid hormone receptor). Mutation of Dvl results in inhibition of β-catenin activation and blocks osteoclastogenesis under PTH induction. More recently, Weivoda et al. found that Wnt signaling suppresses osteoclast differentiation by activating canonical and non-canonical cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) pathways. Besides, sFRP4, a Wnt inhibitor, dramatically suppresses the osteoclast differentiation by suppressing non-canonical Wnt/ROR2/JNK signaling.

Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and osteocytes also indirectly regulates osteoclast differentiation. Wnt signaling in osteoblasts inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppressing the expression of RANKL and increasing the expression and secretion of the RANKL decoy receptor, OPG.,,, In addition, osteocyte Wnt signaling also represses osteoclast differentiation by increasing the expression of OPG, thus decreasing the RANKL/OPG ratio. However, Albers et al. reported that there is increased osteoclastogenesis in Fzd8-deficient mice, which was independent of OPG, suggesting a direct negative influence of canonical Wnt signaling on osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, non-canonical Wnt5a secreted from osteoblast lineage cells promotes osteoclastogenesis and bone resorbing ability by increasing RANK (receptor activation of nuclear factor-κB) in bone marrow macrophages via the ROR2/JNK non-canonical signaling., Wnt5a-ROR2 noncanonical signaling is also required for the formation of actin ring and the bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts., In contrast, Wnt16 suppresses osteoclast differentiation by activating non-canonical Wnt signaling and suppressing RANKL-induced activation of NF-κB and expression of NFATC1. Although most components of the Wnt signaling pathway (e.g., Wnts, Fzds, and LRPs) are expressed by osteoclasts, the role of Wnt signaling in osteoclasts still needs further investigation.

Wnt signaling in bone disease

The necessity of Wnt signaling (including Wnt ligands, receptors, intracellular components, transcription factors, and antagonists) for bone development, formation, and homeostasis has been broadly studied in mouse models (Table 2). Given the necessity of Wnt signaling for bone, it is not surprising that aberrant Wnt signaling results in various bone diseases, such as osteoporosis, sclerosteosis, osteoarthritis (OA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Table 3, Fig. 5).–

Wnt signaling and osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a degenerative disease characterized by low bone mass and deteriorative microarchitecture of bone. The alteration of Wnts causes human skeletal diseases, with mutations in Wnts such as Wnt1 causing osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta.– Studies demonstrate that Wnt1 mutation results in decreased β-catenin and thus the decreased Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which causes osteoporosis., Wnt3 expression is essential at the early stages of human limb formation. The homozygous nonsense mutation in the Wnt3 gene, which truncates Wnt3 at its amino terminus, results in tetra-amelia, a rare human genetic disorder characterized by the complete absence of all four limbs and other anomalies. Moreover, missense mutations of Wnt16 are associated with osteoporotic fractures. Jing et al. found that Wnt signaling is inhibited persistently in BM-MSCs during osteoporosis and histone acetylation levels on Wnt genes (Wnt1, Wnt6, Wnt10a, and Wnt10b) are decreased in BM-MSCs from ovariectomized (OVX) mice. Besides, the homozygous mutation in LRP5, a co-receptor for Wnts, results in the autosomal recessive disorder osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG), a syndrome exhibiting severe, early-onset osteoporosis and abnormal eye vasculature. More recently, Astiazaran et al. identified a novel homozygous LRP5 mutation in Mexican patients with OPPG. In addition, Wnt10b expression is regulated by Cbfβ/Runx2 and the Cbfβ deficient mice in osteoblast lineage exhibit severe osteoporosis. Besides, ROR1/2, the coreceptor for activating non-canonical Wnt signaling, plays important roles in development, regeneration, and diseases of the bone. More recently, Wnt11 is identified as a new gene associated with early onset osteoporosis with loss-of-function inhibiting bone formation through both canonical and non-canonical pathways.

Wnt signaling and sclerosteosis

Sclerosteosis is a rare bone disease characterized by increased bone density in association with bone overgrowth. The discovery of sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease, which are rare high bone mass genetic disorders caused by SOST loss-of-function mutations, exemplifies the critical role of sclerostin in bone health., Humans lacking sclerostin display progressive bone overgrowth due to increased bone formation. Moreover, point mutation of LRP5 (G171V) causes high bone mass trait., Mechanistically, point mutation of LRP5 (G171V) impairs the inhibition effect of Dkk1 on Wnt signaling and thus results in increased Wnt signaling activity, which leads to high bone density. Fijalkowski et al. detected a novel LRP4 mutation in a patient with sclerosteosis. They found the replacement of the arginine residue on position 1 170 of LRP4 by glutamine, which impaired the binding between LRP4 and sclerostin, resulting in decreased inhibition of sclerostin on Wnt/β-catenin signaling. This study indicates that LRP4 is an anchor for sclerostin and responsible for sequestering the sclerostin.

Wnt signaling and osteoarthritis (OA)

OA is the most common age-related degenerative joint disease, which is characterized by cartilage damage, synovial inflammation, osteophyte formation, and subchondral bone sclerosis. Wnts also play a key role in OA. Wnt5a is upregulated in OA-like chondrocytes and is involved in Col2A1 degradation. Furthermore, the elevated Wnt5a is detected in OA patients., Wnt5a promotes chondrocyte catabolic activity presented as reducing the expression of ACAN and Col2A1 but increasing the expression and secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, 3, and 13) via non-canonical Wnt signaling including CaMKII and JNK, while Wnt5a induces the abnormal differentiation in osteoblast via both the non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling and Wnt/Ca2+ signaling in OA osteoblasts. Similarly, upregulation of Wnt5b is observed in OA,, suggesting the promotion effect of Wnt5b on OA. Wnt5b inhibits chondrogenic differentiation, promotes fibrosis by increasing collagen type I expression, and increases MMP13 expression in SMSCs (synovial resident mesenchymal stem cells), leading to joint degeneration. All these findings demonstrate the promotion effect of Wnt5a and Wnt5b on OA development. However, Wnt7a and Wnt10a show a protective effect on OA. There is a negative correlation between Wnt7a expression and the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and IL-1β in human OA cartilage specimens. Wnt7a suppresses IL-1β-induced MMP and iNOS gene expression in primary human articular chondrocytes and attenuates articular cartilage damage in OA mice. Wnt10a specifically cleans up the senescent OA SMSCs (synovial resident mesenchymal stem cells) by inducing cell apoptosis. Mechanistically, Wnt10a activates non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+ signaling. Wnt16 also shows protective effect on OA. This is indicated by the findings that global knockout of Wnt16 (Wnt16−/−) or chondrocyte-specific knockout of Wnt16 in mice promote OA development with decreased expression of lubricin, increased chondrocyte apoptosis, upregulated MMP13 and Col10a1 (Collagen type X alpha 1) expression, and deteriorated articular cartilage integrity., Mechanistically, Wnt16 functions through both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling. Nalesso et al. demonstrated that Wnt16 antagonizes excessive Wnt/β-catenin activation by reducing the capacity of Wnt3a to activate the signaling, thus protecting cartilage in OA. Tong et al. found that Wnt16 activates PCP/JNK and crosstalks with the mTORC1-PTHrP pathway to inhibit chondrocyte hypertrophy during OA pathogenesis. Besides, LRP5 shows a key role in the pathogenesis of OA at a genetic level., Heterozygous loss-of-function mutation in LRP6 also leads to suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and deterioration of degenerative OA after ligament and meniscus injury. Evidences demonstrate the important role of β-catenin in OA. Activation or overexpression of β-catenin leads to OA development in knee joint, hip joint, temporomandibular joint and facet joint. Therefore, inhibition of β-catenin signaling shows therapeutic effect on OA. Zhu et al. found that AMPK (adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase) activator metformin blocked β-catenin nucleus translocation by inhibiting β-cateninS552 phosphorylation and showed chondro-protective effect in OA progression,, suggesting that AMPK activation may inhibit OA development partially through inhibition of β-catenin signaling. However, Xuan et al. found that superficial zone (SFZ)-specific β-catenin-knockout accelerates OA development while SFZ-specific β-catenin activation suppresses cartilage degeneration. They found that β-catenin deficiency decreases the expression of Prg4, the encoding gene for lubricin, while β-catenin activation increases Prg4 expression in SFZ cells. Moreover, Wnt inhibitors, such as Dkk1, WIF-1, and sclerostin, also play a role in OA. Dkk1 is indicated to be positively correlated with OA. Weng et al. found the increase of Dkk1 in the cartilages of OA patients in association with increased inflammatory cytokines. They demonstrated that Dkk1 mediates chondrocyte apoptosis by suppressing nuclear β-catenin accumulation and Akt activation and contributes to cartilage deterioration and OA. They further found that Dkk1 antisense oligonucleotide (Dkk1-AS) treatment decreased the OA-associated increase of Dkk1 and abrogated chondrocyte apoptosis in OA in rats. Dkk1 is also upregulated in OA cartilage and synovial fluid, but there is no significant difference in the serum Dkk1 concentration between the OA patients and healthy controls. However, a significant lower expression of WIF-1 is found in OA chondrocytes than in normal chondrocytes. Overexpression of WIF-1 increases cell proliferation and suppresses apoptosis of OA chondrocytes by eliminating high reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reducing the secretion of MMPs. Most studies show that sclerostin is increased in chondrocytes as a protective mechanism in OA to prevent further degeneration of joint. Besides the Wnt signaling-related components, Runx1, one key transcription regulator for cartilage formation, inhibits OA development by reducing the level of active β-catenin, thus inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Wnt signaling and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

RA is an autoimmune disease characterized by damage of cartilage and bone due to inflammation. Wnt signaling shows critical roles in RA. Wnt5a is highly expressed in synovial fibroblasts in RA patients and promotes the expression of inflammatory cytokines in synovial fibroblasts.– Transfection of normal fibroblasts with a Wnt5a expression vector induces the expression of inflammatory cytokines. Meanwhile, inflammatory cytokine enhances Wnt5a expression in RA synoviocytes. Recently, Rodriguez-Trillo et al. found that Wnt5a specifically promoted migration and invasion of RA FLS (fibroblast-like synoviocytes) and induced the expression of inflammatory cytokines through non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+ and ROCK pathways. All these findings demonstrate the promotion effect of Wnt5a on RA (for review, see Huang et al.). LRP5 and Krm1 are associated with joint destruction in RA patients. By studying 1 418 patients with RA in four cohorts, de Rooy et al. found that in the Leiden early arthritis clinic cohort, six Dkk1, three Sost, one Krm1, and 10 LRP5 SNPs are significantly associated with radiological progression of joint destruction. Studies further indicate the important involvement of sclerostin and Dkk1 in RA development. The serum sclerostin/SOST and Dkk1 are significantly higher in RA patients than in controls and correlate with bone erosion and inflammation., Sclerostin is upregulated in FLS of RA patients but inhibition of sclerostin accelerates TNFα-dependent inflammatory joint destruction in RA mice, demonstrating a protective role of sclerostin in TNF-mediated inflammation. Since Dkk1 is upregulated by TNFα, some studies indicate that treatment with TNFα inhibitors, such as Certolizumab pegol, decreases the serum concentration of Dkk1 in RA patients., In addition, RA-associated osteoporosis might be the result of both increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation, due to increased TNFα-driven osteoclast activity and overexpression of Dkk1. Besides, Dkk1 and Sost SNPs and the interactions between SNPs on Dkk1 and Sost are associated with RA. sFRP2, sFRP4, and sFRP5, antagonists of Wnt signaling, show a suppressive effect on RA.– sFRP2 inhibits the proliferation of RA fibroblast-like synovial cells and the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 and inhibits RA pathogenesis through suppressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Mechanistically, DNA methylation plays a key role in regulating the expression of sFRP2 and sFRP4 and the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in RA., sFRP5 shows an anti-inflammatory role in FLS in RA patients by downregulating c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Furthermore, other molecules are also involved in RA by regulating Wnt signaling. Acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a), phospholipase D1 (PLD1), Aquaporin 1, and neuron navigator 2 (NAV2) all show a promotive effect on RA by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.– ASIC1a, PLD1, Aquaporin 1, and NAV2 promote cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and inflammation of RA FLS through activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.– Moreover, noncoding RNAs are involved in RA by regulating Wnt signaling. Sun et al. found that long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) OIP5-AS1 promotes the occurrence and development of RA by downregulating the expression of miR-410-3p, which increases Wnt7b expression and activates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Wang et al. reported that LINC00152 increased the proliferation of RA FLS by promoting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Mir-125a-3p suppresses cell proliferation and inflammation of RA fibroblast-like synovial cells by inactivating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Targeting wnt signaling in bone disease treatment

The important involvement of Wnt signaling in bone formation, homeostasis and diseases drives extensive research efforts to target Wnt signaling for treating bone diseases. Studies show the therapeutic effects on bone diseases in both animal models and clinical trials by targeting either the extracellular molecules, cytosol components, or nuclear components of Wnt signaling (Table 4).

Targeting extracellular molecules of Wnt signaling

Targeting extracellular molecules taking part in Wnt signaling is of prime importance for treating bone diseases. To date, various biomolecules have been studied to target the extracellular molecules of the Wnt signaling pathway to treat bone disease.

Wnt ligands are attractive targets for treating bone diseases. Due to the promotion effect of Wnt signaling on bone mass, the addition of Wnts can improve osteoporosis by increasing bone mass. Yu et al. reported that Wnt4 prevents bone loss in osteoporosis by inhibiting NF-κB via non-canonical Wnt signaling. Jiang et al. suggested that stimulation using a pulsed electromagnetic field can activate the Wnt10b/LRP5/β⁃catenin pathway, which results in upregulation of Wnt10b, LRP5, β-catenin, OPG, and Runx2 and downregulation of Axin2, PPAR-γ, and Dkk-1 to prevent bone loss and improve lipid metabolism disorders in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis rats. In line with the findings of Jiang et al., Fan et al. also found that the application of electroacupuncture stimulation leads to increased expression of Wnt3α, β⁃catenin, and Runx2, which affects bone formation and promotes bone metabolism in rats with postmenopausal osteoporosis. More recently, Diegel et al. showed the significance of inhibiting Wnt secretion in alleviating high bone mass in three mouse models due to Sost loss-of-function and Lrp5 gain-of-function mutations. For OA treatment, Wnt pathway is also an attractive target. SM04690, a Wnt pathway inhibitor, appeared safe and well tolerated and showed disease-modifying OA drug properties for OA treatment in a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02095548). Further phase 2 clinical trial of SM04690 (Lorecivint, LOR) for intra-articular therapy of moderate to severe knee OA showed that SM04690 improved the pain and cartilage degradation (NCT03122860).– The involvement of Wnt5a produced by synoviocytes in RA suggests that suppression of Wnt5a is a potential treatment of RA., Wnt5a knockout mice were resistant to RA development, presenting as reduced inflammation parameters and less cartilage destruction. As Wnt5a promotes RA via ROCK signaling, ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 inhibits Wnt5a-induced RA FLS migration and reduced inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, MMP3, MMP9 and MMP13 levels. Moreover, traditional Chinese medicine, such as Ginkgolide B and Resveratrol, show anti-RA effect for reducing articular cartilage and bone destruction and decreasing inflammatory cytokine levels through suppressing Wnt5a level., All these results suggest Wnt5a a critical drug target for treating RA (for review, see Huang et al.). Liu et al. found that miR-21 overexpression inhibits the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 and relieves RA by suppressing Wnt expression. In addition, upregulation of Wnt16 through intra-articular injection of adenovirus-Wnt16 into mouse knee joint dramatically attenuated all the OA parameters. Fowler et al. designed an antibody-based platform to generate potent and selective Wnt mimetics and engineer bi-specific Wnt mimetics that target Fzd and LRPs. They found that the synthetic Wnt mimetics induce rapid and robust bone-building effects and that the Wnt mimetics correct bone mass deficiency and bone defects in various disease models, including osteoporosis, and long bone fracture. Additionally, these Wnt mimetics show improvement in the therapeutic effects of antiresorptive bisphosphonates and anti-sclerostin antibody. All these findings demonstrate Wnt mimetics as promising agents for treating bone disease. One recent study reveals a promising effect of a Wnt-induced osteogenic tissue model on maintaining the osteogenesis of human skeletal stem cells and repairing bone defects, demonstrating manipulation of Wnt signaling as promising strategy in treating bone disease.

Secreted Wnt inhibitors/antagonists, such as Dkk1, sclerostin, WIF-1, and RSpo2, become attractive targets for the treatment of skeletal diseases. Exogenous end-capped phosphorothioate Dkk1-AS treatment significantly alleviates both estrogen depletion-induced bone loss in OVX rats and glucocorticoid-induced bone loss., Moreover, exosomal miR-196a from BM-MSCs significantly promotes osteoblast differentiation by targeting Dkk1 to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for bone diseases such as osteoporosis. In human osteoblasts, miR-483-3p directly binds to and negatively regulates DKK2, an antagonist of Wnt signaling, thus increasing the expression of Wnt1, β-catenin, and cyclin D1. This increase in expression promotes the bone formation process by increasing osteoblast proliferation, pre-osteoblast differentiation into mature osteoblasts, and new bone matrix formation. Oh et al. found the upregulation of Dkk1 in both human and mouse experimental OA cartilage and showed that overexpression of Dkk1 by intraarticular injection of AdDkk1 significantly inhibits OA in mice, suggesting Dkk1 as a therapeutic target for OA treatment. However, Weng et al. found that Dkk1-AS treatment decreases the OA-associated increase of Dkk1 and abrogates chondrocyte apoptosis in OA in rats. These contrary findings may be due to different stages of OA progression and further clinical experiments are necessary.

The genetic linkage of sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease (two high bone mass diseases) to the SOST gene and the specificity of sclerostin in osteocytes strongly demonstrate that sclerostin is a target for osteoporosis therapy. Gao et al. demonstrated sclerostin as a target for enhancing the osteogenesis of BM-MSCs in the treatment of osteoporosis. They found that SOST overexpression significantly inhibited BM-MSCs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, while Icariin promoted osteogenesis of BM-MSCs by regulating sclerostin, which activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Besides, a sclerostin antibody has been developed to improve bone mineral density. Anti-sclerostin antibody treatment significantly improves the bone quantity and quality of a Wnt1-related osteogenesis imperfecta mouse model. Presently, various studies that adopted animal models of human low bone mass diseases show the effectiveness and safety by targeting sclerostin for the treatment of osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, and osteoporosis pseudoglioma. Currently, romosozumab, a fully humanized monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody, has been approved for the clinical application of treating osteoporosis in humans and shows efficacy in increasing BMD and reducing fragility fractures in both male and female osteoporotic patients., Phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials (NCT00896532, NCT01575834, NCT01796301) show that romosozumab increases bone mineral density and bone formation, decreases bone resorption and reduces fracture risk in both postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and men with osteoporosis– (for review, see Sølling et al. and Kerschan-Schindl). More recently, sclerostin small-molecule inhibitors induced de novo bone to promote bone fusion, showing the potential to be used in novel, cost-effective bone graft substitutes for bone fusion and fracture defects healing. In addition, a bispecific antibody against both sclerostin and Dkk1 shows superior bone repair activity compared with monotherapies. Further, Choi et al. found that a sclerostin antibody/Dkk1 antibody combination approach was highly efficacious in the cancellous bone mass, suggesting that the osteoanabolic effects of Wnt pathway targeting can be made more efficient if multiple antagonists are simultaneously targeted.

Zhu et al. showed that overexpression of WIF-1 promotes proliferation and suppresses apoptosis of OA chondrocytes by eliminating ROS and reducing the secretion of MMPs via blocking the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, providing a new therapeutic theory for OA treatment. Melnik et al. demonstrated that miR-181a targets RSpo2, which is the activator of Wnt signaling and repressor of BMP signaling, to promote chondrogenesis of MSC. Moreover, they observed the disruption of a tight correlation between miR-181a and miR-218 expression levels in OA cartilage, highlighting the importance of the Wnt-BMP signaling crosstalk for preventing OA.

The combination of these findings suggests that targeting either components or regulators of the Wnt signaling pathway could provide anabolic treatments for bone diseases.

Targeting cytosol components of Wnt signaling

Cytosolic components of Wnt signaling like GSK3β, Dvl, and APC, and its modulators, such as MACF1, also play significant roles in targeting agents involved in treating bone disorders.

GSK3β, a cytosolic component of Wnt signaling, shows promise as a potential treatment target for treating various bone disorders. The inhibition of GSK3β from phosphorylating β-catenin through using lithium, which results in osteogenic differentiation and increasing bone mass in mouse models., Moreover, we demonstrated MACF1, the activator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, as a promotor for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation,, and a novel potential therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis. Overexpression of MACF1 specifically in mesenchymal stem cells prevented aging-induced osteoporosis in 18- and 21-month-old mice.

Small molecules cause great attention for their convenient application in the treatment of disease. Some small molecules show therapeutic effects on bone disease by targeting Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Wang et al. discovered that Daphnetin, a major active component of daphne odora var. marginatai, increases the dexamethasone (DEX)-induced reduction in bone mineral content (BMC) and microstructure parameters, and restores the levels of bone turnover markers in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in vivo. Additionally, they found that Daphnetin promotes proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization in DEX-treated pre-osteoblasts in vitro and showed that Daphnetin activates Wnt/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling. Their findings demonstrate the potential therapeutic effect of Daphnetin on osteoporosis by targeting Wnt/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling. Gentiopicroside, a class of natural compounds, promotes BM-MSC osteogenesis by regulating the β-catenin-BMP signaling pathway both in vitro and in vivo. As silencing of β-catenin blocks the osteogenic differentiation induced by Gentiopicroside in BM-MSCs, β-catenin was revealed as the target for Gentiopicroside. The recent increase in understanding of Gentiopicroside may provide a novel strategy for the treatment of osteoporosis. Anthocyanin-enriched polyphenols from the petal of H. syriacus L. (Ahs) enhance osteoblast differentiation and bone formation both in vitro and in vivo while ameliorating prednisolone-induced osteoporosis. Ahs is able to bind to GSK3β and exerts the promotional effect on osteogenic activities by inhibiting GSK3β and subsequently activating β-catenin, leading to anti-osteoporosis. Troxerutin, a semi-synthetic derivative of the natural bioflavonoid rutin, enhances osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs by stimulating the expression of the critical transcription factor β-catenin and several downstream target genes of Wnt signaling, such as Cmyc, CD44, and Survivin, thus activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Besides, Dvl-CXXC5 interaction is targeted for treating osteoporosis. CXXC5 is a negative feedback regulator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling through interacting with Dvl. By targeting Dvl-CXXC5 interaction, small molecules activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling, enhance osteoblast differentiation, and rescue bone loss in OVX mouse by inhibiting Dvl-CXXC5 interaction, demonstrating that targeting Dvl-CXXC5 interaction is a new strategy for treating osteoporosis. Furthermore, troxerutin stimulates new bone formation and accelerates the healing of femur fractures in rats. Apigenin, a natural plant flavone, promotes osteogenesis in vitro and facilitates the healing of fractures in vivo by enhancing β-catenin expression and activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling, indicating that Apigenin is a promising therapeutic candidate for bone fracture repair. Bai et al. found that glycyrrhizic acid (GA), a major triterpene glycoside isolated from licorice root, promotes osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs by increasing both active β-catenin and total β-catenin protein, with GA-GelMA hydrogels promoting bone fracture healing, demonstrating GA as a potential and cost-effective treatment of bone defects.

Recent findings demonstrate exosomes and noncoding RNAs as novel strategies for bone disease treatment. BM-MSCs-derived exosomes overexpressing miR-424-5p suppress osteogenesis by regulating the WIF-1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, demonstrating miR-424-5p as a new biomarker for the treatment of osteoporosis. BM-MSCs-derived exosomal miR-335 promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone fracture recovery via activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by targeting VapB (vesicle-associated membrane protein B), which is a regulator of vesicle trafficking. This finding provides a novel insight into therapeutic approaches in bone fracture treatment. BM-MSC-derived exosomes carrying miR-136-5p target and inhibit LRP4 expression to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, thus promoting osteoblast proliferation and differentiation and initiating the healing of fractures. Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma (PRP-Exos) promote proliferation and migration, inhibit apoptosis of OA chondrocytes and prevent OA progression by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Exosomal miR-127-3p derived from BM-MSCs promotes cell viability, suppresses apoptosis of OA chondrocyte, and alleviates OA by inhibiting CDH11, thereby blocking the Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation. Chen et al. found that piRNA-63049 is significantly increased in both bone tissues and plasma of osteoporotic rats and postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. Overexpression of piR-63049 inhibits osteoblastogenesis of BM-MSCs while knockdown of piR-63049 promotes the osteoblastogenesis of BM-MSCs through the upregulation of the Wnt2b/β-catenin signaling pathway. PiR-63049-antagonist can attenuate bone loss in OVX rats by promoting bone formation, suggesting piR-63049 as a possible novel target for treating osteoporosis.

Targeting the nuclear components of Wnt signaling

Like extracellular molecules and cytosolic components, the nuclear components of Wnt signaling can also be targeted for treating bone diseases. As a key mediator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, β-catenin translocates into the nucleus to bind to TCF/LEF transcription factors that regulate the transcription of the downstream target genes. Therefore, targeting β-catenin, TCF/LEF, or the interaction of β-catenin and TCF/LEF in the nucleus is an opportunity for disease therapy.

MicroRNAs show possible therapeutic potential by targeting the nuclear components of Wnt signaling. Let-7i-3p negatively regulates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by targeting LEF1 and inhibiting osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) under cyclic strain in vitro. Therefore, either inhibition of Let-7i-3p or overexpression of LEF1 promotes osteogenic differentiation of hASCs, demonstrating the targeting of LEF1 as a therapeutic strategy for treating disease. Moreover, miR-129-5p targets TCF4 to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling, thus inhibiting osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Thus, inhibition of miR-129-5p enhances osteoblast differentiation and bone formation, showing a rescue effect on osteoporosis. Recently, Hu et al. demonstrated that miR-320c can inhibit chondrogenic degeneration during OA by downregulating the β-catenin protein level in the nucleus and decreasing the relative transcriptional activity of the β-catenin/TCF complex. Intra-articular injection of mmu-miR-320-3p attenuates OA progression in the OA mouse model, demonstrating miR-320-3p as a novel therapeutic agent for OA treatment.

Taken together, from the extracellular components, cytosol components to the nuclear components of the Wnt signaling pathway, multiple components have been studied as drug targets to modulate Wnt signaling, making Wnt signaling a perfect target for treating bone diseases.

Conclusions and perspectives

Wnt signaling is a universal signaling pathway involved in development, physiology, and pathology. Here we highlight data exploring the role of both canonical (Wnt/β-catenin) and noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways in bone physiology and pathology by discussing Wnt proteins, receptors, activators, and inhibitors, and their interactions. Moreover, the efforts targeting Wnt signaling for treating bone disease are summarized. Human bone diseases and skeletal abnormalities resulting from aberrant Wnt signaling mimicked in mutant mice reveal the importance of Wnt signaling in bone development. Different animal models and human diseases studies establish a complex Wnt signaling pathway network with multiple players. Defects in Wnt ligands and agonists may lead to bone development disorders, joint formation abnormality, or osteoporosis. Mutation in LRP5/6, the Wnts receptors, leads to various bone diseases. Sclerostin is an extracellular antagonist that is involved in several bone diseases, including van Buchem disease and sclerosteosis. The mutation of other inhibitors such as WIF and Dkk causes altered bone density. In addition, the Wnt signaling pathway overlaps with other pathways related to bone development such as the PTH pathway, the Ihh pathway, and the TGF-β/BMP pathway. Through this interconnected network of signaling pathways, Wnt signaling regulates both bone remodeling and the determination of mesenchymal stem cell fate.

The Wnt signaling pathway has been studied for decades, however, many important questions regarding Wnt signaling remain unanswered. What are the molecular structures of Wnt pathway components? What is their mechanism of interaction, the complicated network between the canonical Wnt pathway, noncanonical Wnt pathway, and other pathways? Where does Wnt signaling take place in cell organelles? What is the insight into the mechanisms of action of these Wnt receptors? Can we identify a truly potent Wnt inhibitor or agonist? Whether further complexity of Wnt-regulated gene expression will be uncovered through comparative analyses of Wnt-responsive transcription programs that depend on TCF/LEF versus others?

As Wnt signaling plays an important role in bone formation, homeostasis and diseases, it become the topic of drug development for bone diseases. The approach to the Wnt pathway focuses on extracellular mediators such as Sclerostin, which is selectively and highly expressed in bone. Agents that specifically target Sclerostin show great promise for simultaneously treating osteoporosis and repairing bone fractures. The FDA approved the first-in-class anti-sclerostin antibody for osteoporosis in 2019. While current osteoporosis drugs decrease bone breakdown and bone formation, the anti-sclerostin antibody simultaneously increases bone formation and decreases bone breakdown. The Wnt signaling pathway consists of numerous antagonists, ligands, and intracellular proteins that alter the development of bone as well as the pathogenesis of bone diseases. Thus, it would be useful to investigate more upstream targets in the Wnt canonical pathway for further drug discovery, which could yield more promise than targeting β-catenin and downstream events.

New biological analytical technologies, including single-cell RNA-seq analysis and spatial transcriptomics should enable us to dissect where, when, and how Wnt signaling occurs inside the cells. New imaging technologies, such as spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells will facilitate the visualization of the dynamic Wnt signaling events in vivo. Novel regulators will likely continue to be identified using classical genetic, molecular, modern genomic, proteomic approaches, bioinformatics, and protein structure biology using cryo-electron microscopy and Deep learning system, AlphaFold, an artificial intelligence (AI) program, which performs predictions of protein structure. As there are multiple components in Wnt signaling, identification of the key regulator or the key interaction between these components involved in specific tissue physiology or disease will be helpful for both understanding the underlying mechanism and providing a target for specific disease therapy. Besides, it will be helpful to identify specific activators and inhibitors of the specific components of Wnt signaling based on their structure, both for studying their physio-pathological role and for investigating therapeutic methods. Answering these questions and identifying these issues will provide a deeper understanding of the physiological and pathological role of Wnt signaling and will make Wnt signaling a more suitable target for bone disease therapy.

References 501

  1. 1.

    Steinhart Z, Angers S. Wnt signaling in development and tissue homeostasis. Development. 2018;145:dev146589.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.146589

  2. 2.

    Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β-catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169:985-999.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016

  3. 3.

    Nusse R, et al. A new nomenclature for int-1 and related genes: the Wnt gene family. Cell. 1991;64:231.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(91)90633-a

  4. 4.

    Nusse R, Varmus HE. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell. 1982;31:99-109.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(82)90409-3

  5. 5.

    Nusslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 1980;287:795-801.

    Not in our library10.1038/287795a0

  6. 6.

    Rijsewijk F, et al. The Drosophila homolog of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell. 1987;50:649-657.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(87)90038-9

  7. 7.

    Siegfried E, Chou TB, Perrimon N. wingless signaling acts through zeste-white 3, the Drosophila homolog of glycogen synthase kinase-3, to regulate engrailed and establish cell fate. Cell. 1992;71:1167-1179.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80065-0

  8. 8.

    Noordermeer J, Klingensmith J, Perrimon N, Nusse R. dishevelled and armadillo act in the wingless signalling pathway in Drosophila. Nature. 1994;367:80-83.

    Not in our library10.1038/367080a0

  9. 9.

    Peifer M, Sweeton D, Casey M, Wieschaus E. Wingless signal and Zeste-white 3 kinase trigger opposing changes in the intracellular distribution of Armadillo. Development. 1994;120:369-380.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.120.2.369

  10. 10.

    McMahon AP, Moon RT. Ectopic expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 in Xenopus embryos leads to duplication of the embryonic axis. Cell. 1989;58:1075-1084.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(89)90506-0

  11. 11.

    Munoz-Descalzo S, Hadjantonakis AK, Arias AM. Wnt/ß-catenin signalling and the dynamics of fate decisions in early mouse embryos and embryonic stem (ES) cells. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015;47-48:101-109.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.08.011

  12. 12.

    Rudnicki MA, Williams BO. Wnt signaling in bone and muscle. Bone. 2015;80:60-66.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.009

  13. 13.

    Lojk, J. & Marc, J. Roles of non-canonical wnt signalling pathways in bone biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (2021).

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms221910840

  14. 14.

    Kinzler KW, et al. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science. 1991;253:661-665.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1651562

  15. 15.

    Nishisho I, et al. Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science. 1991;253:665-669.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1651563

  16. 16.

    Rubinfeld B, et al. Association of the APC gene product with beta-catenin. Science. 1993;262:1731-1734.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.8259518

  17. 17.

    Su LK, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Association of the APC tumor suppressor protein with catenins. Science. 1993;262:1734-1737.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.8259519

  18. 18.

    Korinek V, et al. Constitutive transcriptional activation by a beta-catenin-Tcf complex in APC−/− colon carcinoma. Science. 1997;275:1784-1787.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.275.5307.1784

  19. 19.

    Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149:1192-1205.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012

  20. 20.

    Ackers I, Malgor R. Interrelationship of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signalling pathways in chronic metabolic diseases. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2018;15:3-13.

    Not in our library10.1177/1479164117738442

  21. 21.

    Krishnamurthy N, Kurzrock R. Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cancer: Update on effectors and inhibitors. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018;62:50-60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.11.002

  22. 22.

    Miller JR. The Wnts. Genome Biol. 2002;3:Reviews3001.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-reviews3001

  23. 23.

    Willert K, et al. Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature. 2003;423:448-452.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature01611

  24. 24.

    Takada R, et al. Monounsaturated fatty acid modification of Wnt protein: its role in Wnt secretion. Dev. Cell. 2006;11:791-801.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.003

  25. 25.

    Kurayoshi M, Yamamoto H, Izumi S, Kikuchi A. Post-translational palmitoylation and glycosylation of Wnt-5a are necessary for its signalling. Biochem. J. 2007;402:515-523.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20061476

  26. 26.

    Du SJ, et al. Identification of distinct classes and functional domains of Wnts through expression of wild-type and chimeric proteins in Xenopus embryos. Mol. Cell Biol. 1995;15:2625-2634.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.15.5.2625

  27. 27.

    Tao Q, et al. Maternal wnt11 activates the canonical wnt signaling pathway required for axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell. 2005;120:857-871.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.013

  28. 28.

    Toyama T, et al. Noncanonical Wnt11 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and migration. Mol. Cancer Res. 2010;8:254-265.

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-09-0238

  29. 29.

    Tian S, et al. Secreted AGR2 promotes invasion of colorectal cancer cells via Wnt11-mediated non-canonical Wnt signaling. Exp. Cell Res. 2018;364:198-207.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.02.004

  30. 30.

    Mikels AJ, Nusse R. Wnts as ligands: processing, secretion and reception. Oncogene. 2006;25:7461-7468.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1210053

  31. 31.

    Hsieh JC, Rattner A, Smallwood PM, Nathans J. Biochemical characterization of Wnt-frizzled interactions using a soluble, biologically active vertebrate Wnt protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:3546-3551.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.7.3546

  32. 32.

    Tamai K, et al. LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction. Nature. 2000;407:530-535.

    Not in our library10.1038/35035117

  33. 33.

    Grumolato L, et al. Canonical and noncanonical Wnts use a common mechanism to activate completely unrelated coreceptors. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2517-2530.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1957710

  34. 34.

    Bonkowsky JL, et al. Axon routing across the midline controlled by the Drosophila Derailed receptor. Nature. 1999;402:540-544.

    Not in our library10.1038/990122

  35. 35.

    Lu W, Yamamoto V, Ortega B, Baltimore D. Mammalian Ryk is a Wnt coreceptor required for stimulation of neurite outgrowth. Cell. 2004;119:97-108.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.019

  36. 36.

    Peradziryi H, Tolwinski NS, Borchers A. The many roles of PTK7: a versatile regulator of cell-cell communication. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2012;524:71-76.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.abb.2011.12.019

  37. 37.

    Masiakowski P, Yancopoulos GD. The Wnt receptor CRD domain is also found in MuSK and related orphan receptor tyrosine kinases. Curr. Biol. 1998;8:R407.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70263-5

  38. 38.

    Bhanot P, et al. A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature. 1996;382:225-230.

    Not in our library10.1038/382225a0

  39. 39.

    MacDonald, B. T. & He, X. Frizzled and LRP5/6 receptors for Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.4 a007880 (2012).

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a007880

  40. 40.

    Dann CE, et al. Insights into Wnt binding and signalling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains. Nature. 2001;412:86-90.

    Not in our library10.1038/35083601

  41. 41.

    Janda CY, et al. Structural basis of Wnt recognition by Frizzled. Science. 2012;337:59-64.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1222879

  42. 42.

    Agostino M, Pohl, S O, Dharmarajan A. Structure-based prediction of Wnt binding affinities for Frizzled-type cysteine-rich domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:11218-11229.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m117.786269

  43. 43.

    Nishita M, et al. Ror2/frizzled complex mediates Wnt5a-induced AP-1 activation by regulating Dishevelled polymerization. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:3610-3619.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00177-10

  44. 44.

    Wehrli M, et al. arrow encodes an LDL-receptor-related protein essential for Wingless signalling. Nature. 2000;407:527-530.

    Not in our library10.1038/35035110

  45. 45.

    Pinson KI, et al. An LDL-receptor-related protein mediates Wnt signalling in mice. Nature. 2000;407:535-538.

    Not in our library10.1038/35035124

  46. 46.

    Houston DW, Wylie C. Cloning and expression of Xenopus Lrp5 and Lrp6 genes. Mech. Dev. 2002;117:337-342.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00205-8

  47. 47.

    Kelly OG, Pinson KI, Skarnes WC. The Wnt co-receptors Lrp5 and Lrp6 are essential for gastrulation in mice. Development. 2004;131:2803-2815.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.01137

  48. 48.

    Mao J, et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. 2001;7:801-809.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00224-6

  49. 49.

    Bourhis E, et al. Reconstitution of a frizzled8.Wnt3a.LRP6 signaling complex reveals multiple Wnt and Dkk1 binding sites on LRP6. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:9172-9179.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.092130

  50. 50.

    Minami Y, Oishi I, Endo M, Nishita M. Ror-family receptor tyrosine kinases in noncanonical Wnt signaling: their implications in developmental morphogenesis and human diseases. Dev. Dyn. 2010;239:1-15.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.21991

  51. 51.

    Fukuda T, et al. Antisera induced by infusions of autologous Ad-CD154-leukemia B cells identify ROR1 as an oncofetal antigen and receptor for Wnt5a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:3047-3052.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0712148105

  52. 52.

    Oishi I, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is involved in non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK signalling pathway. Genes Cells. 2003;8:645-654.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00662.x

  53. 53.

    Hikasa H, Shibata M, Hiratani I, Taira M. The Xenopus receptor tyrosine kinase Xror2 modulates morphogenetic movements of the axial mesoderm and neuroectoderm via Wnt signaling. Development. 2002;129:5227-5239.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.129.22.5227

  54. 54.

    Yu J, et al. Wnt5a induces ROR1/ROR2 heterooligomerization to enhance leukemia chemotaxis and proliferation. J. Clin. Investig. 2016;126:585-598.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci83535

  55. 55.

    Ho HY, et al. Wnt5a-Ror-Dishevelled signaling constitutes a core developmental pathway that controls tissue morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:4044-4051.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1200421109

  56. 56.

    Qi X, Okinaka Y, Nishita M, Minami Y. Essential role of Wnt5a-Ror1/Ror2 signaling in metanephric mesenchyme and ureteric bud formation. Genes Cells. 2016;21:325-334.

    Not in our library10.1111/gtc.12342

  57. 57.

    Wu X, Yan T, Hao L, Zhu Y. Wnt5a induces ROR1 and ROR2 to activate RhoA in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2803-2815.

    Not in our library10.2147/cmar.s190999

  58. 58.
  59. 59.

    Hovens CM, et al. RYK, a receptor tyrosine kinase-related molecule with unusual kinase domain motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:11818-11822.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.89.24.11818

  60. 60.

    Halford MM, Stacker SA. Revelations of the RYK receptor. Bioessays. 2001;23:34-45.

    Not in our library10.1002/1521-1878(200101)23:1<34::aid-bies1005>3.0.co;2-d

  61. 61.

    Mossie K, et al. Colon carcinoma kinase-4 defines a new subclass of the receptor tyrosine kinase family. Oncogene. 1995;11:2179-2184.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Shnitsar I, Borchers A. PTK7 recruits dsh to regulate neural crest migration. Development. 2008;135:4015-4024.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.023556

  63. 63.

    Puppo F, et al. Protein tyrosine kinase 7 has a conserved role in Wnt/beta-catenin canonical signalling. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:43-49.

    Not in our library10.1038/embor.2010.185

  64. 64.

    Peradziryi H, et al. PTK7/Otk interacts with Wnts and inhibits canonical Wnt signalling. EMBO J. 2011;30:3729-3740.

    Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2011.236

  65. 65.

    Bin-Nun N, et al. PTK7 modulates Wnt signaling activity via LRP6. Development. 2014;141:410-421.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.095984

  66. 66.

    Martinez S, et al. The PTK7 and ROR2 protein receptors interact in the vertebrate WNT/Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:30562-30572.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.697615

  67. 67.

    Berger H, Wodarz A, Borchers A. PTK7 faces the Wnt in development and disease. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2017;5:31.

    Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2017.00031

  68. 68.

    Hayes M, et al. Ptk7 promotes non-canonical Wnt/PCP-mediated morphogenesis and inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin-dependent cell fate decisions during vertebrate development. Development. 2013;140:1807-1818.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.090183

  69. 69.

    DeChiara TM, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK is required for neuromuscular junction formation in vivo. Cell. 1996;85:501-512.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81251-9

  70. 70.

    Glass DJ, et al. Agrin acts via a MuSK receptor complex. Cell. 1996;85:513-523.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81252-0

  71. 71.

    Gordon LR, Gribble KD, Syrett CM, Granato M. Initiation of synapse formation by Wnt-induced MuSK endocytosis. Development. 2012;139:1023-1033.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.071555

  72. 72.

    Strochlic L, et al. Wnt4 participates in the formation of vertebrate neuromuscular junction. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29976.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0029976

  73. 73.

    Zhang B, et al. Wnt proteins regulate acetylcholine receptor clustering in muscle cells. Mol. Brain. 2012;5:7.

    Not in our library10.1186/1756-6606-5-7

  74. 74.

    Angers S, Moon RT. Proximal events in Wnt signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;10:468-477.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm2717

  75. 75.

    Bilic J, et al. Wnt induces LRP6 signalosomes and promotes dishevelled-dependent LRP6 phosphorylation. Science. 2007;316:1619-1622.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1137065

  76. 76.

    Niehrs C, Shen J. Regulation of Lrp6 phosphorylation. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:2551-2562.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-010-0329-3

  77. 77.

    Devenport D, Fuchs E. Planar polarization in embryonic epidermis orchestrates global asymmetric morphogenesis of hair follicles. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:1257-1268.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1784

  78. 78.

    Yuan K, et al. Activation of the Wnt/planar cell polarity pathway is required for pericyte recruitment during pulmonary angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:69-84.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.09.013

  79. 79.

    Lopez-Escobar, B. et al. The non-canonical Wnt-PCP pathway shapes the mouse caudal neural plate. Development145, dev157487 (2018).

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.157487

  80. 80.

    Huang YL, Niehrs C. Polarized Wnt signaling regulates ectodermal cell fate in Xenopus. Dev. Cell. 2014;29:250-257.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2014.03.015

  81. 81.

    Andre P, et al. The Wnt coreceptor Ryk regulates Wnt/planar cell polarity by modulating the degradation of the core planar cell polarity component Vangl2. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:44518-44525.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.414441

  82. 82.

    Sakane H, et al. Localization of glypican-4 in different membrane microdomains is involved in the regulation of Wnt signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:449-460.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.091876

  83. 83.

    Carvallo L, et al. Non-canonical Wnt signaling induces ubiquitination and degradation of Syndecan4. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:29546-29555.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.155812

  84. 84.

    Sebbagh M, Borg JP. Insight into planar cell polarity. Exp. Cell Res. 2014;328:284-295.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.005

  85. 85.

    Kuhl M, et al. The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway: a new vertebrate Wnt signaling pathway takes shape. Trends Genet. 2000;16:279-283.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02028-x

  86. 86.

    Anakwe K, et al. Wnt signalling regulates myogenic differentiation in the developing avian wing. Development. 2003;130:3503-3514.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.00538

  87. 87.

    Saneyoshi T, Kume S, Amasaki Y, Mikoshiba K. The Wnt/calcium pathway activates NF-AT and promotes ventral cell fate in Xenopus embryos. Nature. 2002;417:295-299.

    Not in our library10.1038/417295a

  88. 88.

    Undi RB, et al. Wnt signaling: role in regulation of haematopoiesis. Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus. 2016;32:123-134.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12288-015-0585-3

  89. 89.
  90. 90.

    De A. Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway: a brief overview. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2011;43:745-756.

    Not in our library10.1093/abbs/gmr079

  91. 91.

    Cao X, et al. WNT10A induces apoptosis of senescent synovial resident stem cells through Wnt/calcium pathway-mediated HDAC5 phosphorylation in OA joints. Bone. 2021;150:116006.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2021.116006

  92. 92.

    Zhen H, et al. The Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway is essential for the regeneration of GABAergic neurons in planarian Dugesia japonica. Faseb J. 2020;34:16567-16580.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.201903040rr

  93. 93.

    Semenov MV, Habas R, Macdonald BT, He X. SnapShot: noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways. Cell. 2007;131:1378.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.011

  94. 94.

    Thrasivoulou C, Millar M, Ahmed A. Activation of intracellular calcium by multiple Wnt ligands and translocation of beta-catenin into the nucleus: a convergent model of Wnt/Ca2+ and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:35651-35659.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.437913

  95. 95.

    Wu S, Yu Q, Lai A, Tian J. Pulsed electromagnetic field induces Ca2+-dependent osteoblastogenesis in C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells through the Wnt-Ca2+/Wnt-beta-catenin signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503:715-721.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.066

  96. 96.

    Gao C, Chen YG. Dishevelled: the hub of Wnt signaling. Cell Signal. 2010;22:717-727.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.11.021

  97. 97.

    Jin YR, Yoon JK. The R-spondin family of proteins: emerging regulators of WNT signaling. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012;44:2278-2287.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2012.09.006

  98. 98.

    Xu Q, et al. Vascular development in the retina and inner ear: control by Norrin and Frizzled-4, a high-affinity ligand-receptor pair. Cell. 2004;116:883-895.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00216-8

  99. 99.

    Braunger BM, et al. Constitutive overexpression of Norrin activates Wnt/beta-catenin and endothelin-2 signaling to protect photoreceptors from light damage. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013;50:1-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nbd.2012.09.008

  100. 100.

    Ke J, et al. Structure and function of Norrin in assembly and activation of a Frizzled 4-Lrp5/6 complex. Genes Dev. 2013;27:2305-2319.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.228544.113

  101. 101.

    Hu L, et al. MACF1, versatility in tissue-specific function and in human disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017;69:3-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.05.017

  102. 102.

    Chen HJ, et al. The role of microtubule actin cross-linking factor 1 (MACF1) in the Wnt signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1933-1945.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1411206

  103. 103.

    Moparthi L, Pizzolato G, Koch S. Wnt activator FOXB2 drives the neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:22189-22195.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1906484116

  104. 104.

    He Z, et al. R-spondin family biology and emerging linkages to cancer. Ann. Med. 2023;55:428-446.

    Not in our library10.1080/07853890.2023.2166981

  105. 105.

    Binnerts ME, et al. R-Spondin1 regulates Wnt signaling by inhibiting internalization of LRP6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14700-14705.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0702305104

  106. 106.

    Kim KA, et al. R-Spondin family members regulate the Wnt pathway by a common mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:2588-2596.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e08-02-0187

  107. 107.

    Nam JS, et al. Mouse cristin/R-spondin family proteins are novel ligands for the Frizzled 8 and LRP6 receptors and activate beta-catenin-dependent gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:13247-13257.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m508324200

  108. 108.

    Wei Q, et al. R-spondin1 is a high-affinity ligand for LRP6 and induces LRP6 phosphorylation and beta-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:15903-15911.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m701927200

  109. 109.

    Carmon KS, et al. R-spondins function as ligands of the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:11452-11457.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1106083108

  110. 110.

    de Lau W, et al. Lgr5 homologues associate with Wnt receptors and mediate R-spondin signalling. Nature. 2011;476:293-297.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10337

  111. 111.

    de Lau W, Peng WC, Gros P, Clevers H. The R-spondin/Lgr5/Rnf43 module: regulator of Wnt signal strength. Genes Dev. 2014;28:305-316.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.235473.113

  112. 112.

    Wang D, et al. Structural basis for R-spondin recognition by LGR4/5/6 receptors. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1339-1344.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.219360.113

  113. 113.

    Ohkawara B, Glinka A, Niehrs C. Rspo3 binds syndecan 4 and induces Wnt/PCP signaling via clathrin-mediated endocytosis to promote morphogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2011;20:303-314.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.006

  114. 114.

    Lacour F, et al. R-spondin1 controls muscle cell fusion through dual regulation of antagonistic Wnt signaling pathways. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2320-2330.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.036

  115. 115.

    Dong X, et al. RSPO2 suppresses colorectal cancer metastasis by counteracting the Wnt5a/Fzd7-driven noncanonical Wnt pathway. Cancer Lett. 2017;402:153-165.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2017.05.024

  116. 116.

    Scholz B, et al. Endothelial RSPO3 controls vascular stability and pruning through non-canonical WNT/Ca2+/NFAT signaling. Dev. Cell. 2016;36:79-93.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.015

  117. 117.

    Ye X, et al. Norrin, frizzled-4, and Lrp5 signaling in endothelial cells controls a genetic program for retinal vascularization. Cell. 2009;139:285-298.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.047

  118. 118.

    Smallwood PM, et al. Mutational analysis of Norrin-Frizzled4 recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:4057-4068.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m609618200

  119. 119.
  120. 120.

    Bang I, et al. Biophysical and functional characterization of Norrin signaling through Frizzled4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:8787-8792.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1805901115

  121. 121.

    Byers TJ, Beggs AH, McNally EM, Kunkel LM. Novel actin crosslinker superfamily member identified by a two step degenerate PCR procedure. FEBS Lett. 1995;368:500-504.

    Not in our library10.1016/0014-5793(95)00722-l

  122. 122.

    Leung CL, et al. Microtubule actin cross-linking factor (MACF): a hybrid of dystonin and dystrophin that can interact with the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:1275-1286.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.147.6.1275

  123. 123.

    Hu L, et al. Isoforms, structures, and functions of versatile spectraplakin MACF1. BMB Rep. 2016;49:37-44.

    Not in our library10.5483/bmbrep.2016.49.1.185

  124. 124.

    Liu P, et al. Requirement for Wnt3 in vertebrate axis formation. Nat. Genet. 1999;22:361-365.

    Not in our library10.1038/11932

  125. 125.

    Hu L, et al. Microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 promotes osteoblast differentiation by promoting β-catenin/TCF1/Runx2 signaling axis. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:1574-1584.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.26059

  126. 126.

    Zhang Y, et al. MACF1 overexpression by transfecting the 21 kbp large plasmid PEGFP-C1A-ACF7 promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Hum. Gene Ther. 2018;29:259-270.

    Not in our library10.1089/hum.2017.153

  127. 127.

    Cruciat CM, Niehrs C. Secreted and transmembrane wnt inhibitors and activators. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013;5:a015081.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a015081

  128. 128.

    Fedi P, et al. Isolation and biochemical characterization of the human Dkk-1 homologue, a novel inhibitor of mammalian Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:19465-19472.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.274.27.19465

  129. 129.

    Mao B, et al. LDL-receptor-related protein 6 is a receptor for Dickkopf proteins. Nature. 2001;411:321-325.

    Not in our library10.1038/35077108

  130. 130.

    Galli LM, et al. Differential inhibition of Wnt-3a by Sfrp-1, Sfrp-2, and Sfrp-3. Dev. Dyn. 2006;235:681-690.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.20681

  131. 131.

    Malinauskas T, et al. Modular mechanism of Wnt signaling inhibition by Wnt inhibitory factor 1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011;18:886-893.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.2081

  132. 132.

    Itasaki N, et al. Wise, a context-dependent activator and inhibitor of Wnt signalling. Development. 2003;130:4295-4305.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.00674

  133. 133.

    Li X, et al. Sclerostin binds to LRP5/6 and antagonizes canonical Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:19883-19887.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m413274200

  134. 134.

    Zhu W, et al. IGFBP-4 is an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signalling required for cardiogenesis. Nature. 2008;454:345-349.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07027

  135. 135.

    Piccolo S, et al. The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Nature. 1999;397:707-710.

    Not in our library10.1038/17820

  136. 136.

    Ding Y, et al. Bighead is a Wnt antagonist secreted by the Xenopus Spemann organizer that promotes Lrp6 endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E9135-e9144.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1812117115

  137. 137.

    Yamamoto A, et al. Shisa promotes head formation through the inhibition of receptor protein maturation for the caudalizing factors, Wnt and FGF. Cell. 2005;120:223-235.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.051

  138. 138.

    Zhang X, et al. Tiki1 is required for head formation via Wnt cleavage-oxidation and inactivation. Cell. 2012;149:1565-1577.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.039

  139. 139.

    Kagermeier-Schenk B, et al. Waif1/5T4 inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and activates noncanonical Wnt pathways by modifying LRP6 subcellular localization. Dev. Cell. 2011;21:1129-1143.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.015

  140. 140.

    Shimomura Y, et al. APCDD1 is a novel Wnt inhibitor mutated in hereditary hypotrichosis simplex. Nature. 2010;464:1043-1047.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08875

  141. 141.

    Glinka A, et al. Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature. 1998;391:357-362.

    Not in our library10.1038/34848

  142. 142.

    Niehrs C. Function and biological roles of the Dickkopf family of Wnt modulators. Oncogene. 2006;25:7469-7481.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1210054

  143. 143.

    Bafico A, et al. Novel mechanism of Wnt signalling inhibition mediated by Dickkopf-1 interaction with LRP6/Arrow. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:683-686.

    Not in our library10.1038/35083081

  144. 144.

    Patel S, et al. Structural and functional analysis of Dickkopf 4 (Dkk4): new insights into Dkk evolution and regulation of Wnt signaling by Dkk and Kremen proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:12149-12166.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra118.002918

  145. 145.

    Mao B, et al. Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2002;417:664-667.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature756

  146. 146.

    Ellwanger K, et al. Targeted disruption of the Wnt regulator Kremen induces limb defects and high bone density. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;28:4875-4882.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00222-08

  147. 147.

    Wu W, Glinka A, Delius H, Niehrs C. Mutual antagonism between dickkopf1 and dickkopf2 regulates Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Curr. Biol. 2000;10:1611-1614.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00868-x

  148. 148.

    Brott BK, Sokol SY. Regulation of Wnt/LRP signaling by distinct domains of Dickkopf proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;22:6100-6110.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.22.17.6100-6110.2002

  149. 149.

    Mao B, Niehrs C. Kremen2 modulates Dickkopf2 activity during Wnt/LRP6 signaling. Gene. 2003;302:179-183.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-1119(02)01106-x

  150. 150.

    Zhang W, et al. Secreted frizzled-related proteins: a promising therapeutic target for cancer therapy through Wnt signaling inhibition. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023;166:115344.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115344

  151. 151.

    Hoang B, Moos M, Vukicevic S, Luyten FP. Primary structure and tissue distribution of FRZB, a novel protein related to Drosophila frizzled, suggest a role in skeletal morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:26131-26137.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.271.42.26131

  152. 152.

    Leyns L, et al. Frzb-1 is a secreted antagonist of Wnt signaling expressed in the Spemann organizer. Cell. 1997;88:747-756.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81921-2

  153. 153.
  154. 154.

    Li Y, et al. Sfrp5 coordinates foregut specification and morphogenesis by antagonizing both canonical and noncanonical Wnt11 signaling. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3050-3063.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1687308

  155. 155.

    Satoh W, et al. Sfrp1, Sfrp2, and Sfrp5 regulate the Wnt/beta-catenin and the planar cell polarity pathways during early trunk formation in mouse. Genesis. 2008;46:92-103.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvg.20369

  156. 156.

    Holly VL, Widen SA, Famulski JK, Waskiewicz AJ. Sfrp1a and Sfrp5 function as positive regulators of Wnt and BMP signaling during early retinal development. Dev. Biol. 2014;388:192-204.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.01.012

  157. 157.

    Xavier CP, et al. Secreted Frizzled-related protein potentiation versus inhibition of Wnt3a/beta-catenin signaling. Cell Signal. 2014;26:94-101.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.09.016

  158. 158.

    Zhang J, et al. Wnt inhibitory factor-1 functions as a tumor suppressor through modulating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2014;348:12-19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2014.02.011

  159. 159.

    Vassallo I, et al. WIF1 re-expression in glioblastoma inhibits migration through attenuation of non-canonical WNT signaling by downregulating the lncRNA MALAT1. Oncogene. 2016;35:12-21.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2015.61

  160. 160.

    Surmann-Schmitt C, et al. Wif-1 is expressed at cartilage-mesenchyme interfaces and impedes Wnt3a-mediated inhibition of chondrogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:3627-3637.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.048926

  161. 161.

    Balemans W, et al. Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:537-543.

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/10.5.537

  162. 162.

    van Bezooijen RL, et al. Sclerostin is an osteocyte-expressed negative regulator of bone formation, but not a classical BMP antagonist. J. Exp. Med. 2004;199:805-814.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20031454

  163. 163.

    Winkler DG, et al. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J. 2003;22:6267-6276.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/cdg599

  164. 164.

    Holdsworth G, et al. Characterization of the interaction of sclerostin with the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) family of Wnt co-receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:26464-26477.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.350108

  165. 165.
  166. 166.

    Leupin O, et al. Bone overgrowth-associated mutations in the LRP4 gene impair sclerostin facilitator function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:19489-19500.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.190330

  167. 167.

    Krause C, et al. Distinct modes of inhibition by sclerostin on bone morphogenetic protein and Wnt signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:41614-41626.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.153890

  168. 168.

    Ahn Y, Sanderson BW, Klein OD, Krumlauf R. Inhibition of Wnt signaling by Wise (Sostdc1) and negative feedback from Shh controls tooth number and patterning. Development. 2010;137:3221-3231.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.054668

  169. 169.

    Ahn Y, et al. Lrp4 and Wise interplay controls the formation and patterning of mammary and other skin appendage placodes by modulating Wnt signaling. Development. 2013;140:583-593.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.085118

  170. 170.

    Firth SM, Baxter RC. Cellular actions of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Endocr. Rev. 2002;23:824-854.

    Not in our library10.1210/er.2001-0033

  171. 171.

    Wo D, et al. Opposing roles of Wnt inhibitors IGFBP-4 and Dkk1 in cardiac ischemia by differential targeting of LRP5/6 and beta-catenin. Circulation. 2016;134:1991-2007.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.116.024441

  172. 172.

    Ueno K, et al. IGFBP-4 activates the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and induces M-CAM expression in human renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2011;129:2360-2369.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.25899

  173. 173.

    Bouwmeester T, et al. Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann’s organizer. Nature. 1996;382:595-601.

    Not in our library10.1038/382595a0

  174. 174.

    Zhang Y-J, Shi D-L. Diversification of amphioxus and vertebrate Cerberus protein function in modulating Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2020;2:16-23.

    Not in our library10.1007/s42995-019-00024-z

  175. 175.

    Belo JA, et al. Generating asymmetries in the early vertebrate embryo: the role of the Cerberus-like family. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2009;53:1399-1407.

    Not in our library10.1387/ijdb.072297jb

  176. 176.

    Colozza, G. Purified Bighead protein efficiently promotes head development in the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. microPubl. Biol.2021, 10.17912/micropub.biology.000347 (2021).

    Not in our library10.17912/micropub.biology.000347

  177. 177.

    Pei J, Grishin NV. Unexpected diversity in Shisa-like proteins suggests the importance of their roles as transmembrane adaptors. Cell Signal. 2012;24:758-769.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.11.011

  178. 178.

    Nagano T, et al. Shisa2 promotes the maturation of somitic precursors and transition to the segmental fate in Xenopus embryos. Development. 2006;133:4643-4654.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.02657

  179. 179.

    Furushima K, et al. Mouse homologues of Shisa antagonistic to Wnt and Fgf signalings. Dev. Biol. 2007;306:480-492.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.028

  180. 180.

    Zhao Y, Malinauskas T, Harlos K, Jones EY. Structural insights into the inhibition of Wnt signaling by cancer antigen 5T4/Wnt-activated inhibitory factor 1. Structure. 2014;22:612-620.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2014.01.009

  181. 181.

    Mazzoni J, et al. The Wnt inhibitor Apcdd1 coordinates vascular remodeling and barrier maturation of retinal blood vessels. Neuron. 2017;96:1055-1069.e1056.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.025

  182. 182.

    Yiew NKH, et al. A novel role for the Wnt inhibitor APCDD1 in adipocyte differentiation: Implications for diet-induced obesity. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:6312-6324.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m116.758078

  183. 183.

    Viale-Bouroncle S, Klingelhoffer C, Ettl T, Morsczeck C. The WNT inhibitor APCDD1 sustains the expression of beta-catenin during the osteogenic differentiation of human dental follicle cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015;457:314-317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.107

  184. 184.

    Hayward P, Kalmar T, Arias AM. Wnt/Notch signalling and information processing during development. Development. 2008;135:411-424.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.000505

  185. 185.

    Collu GM, Hidalgo-Sastre A, Brennan K. Wnt-Notch signalling crosstalk in development and disease. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2014;71:3553-3567.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-014-1644-x

  186. 186.

    Gao J, Fan L, Zhao L, Su Y. The interaction of Notch and Wnt signaling pathways in vertebrate regeneration. Cell Regen. 2021;10:11.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13619-020-00072-2

  187. 187.

    Estrach S, et al. Jagged 1 is a beta-catenin target gene required for ectopic hair follicle formation in adult epidermis. Development. 2006;133:4427-4438.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.02644

  188. 188.

    Pannequin J, et al. The wnt target jagged-1 mediates the activation of notch signaling by progastrin in human colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6065-6073.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2409

  189. 189.

    Kwon C, et al. Notch post-translationally regulates β-catenin protein in stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1244-1251.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2313

  190. 190.

    Bale AE. Hedgehog signaling and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2002;3:47-65.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genom.3.022502.103031

  191. 191.

    Martí E, Bovolenta P. Sonic hedgehog in CNS development: one signal, multiple outputs. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:89-96.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02062-3

  192. 192.

    O’Hara WA, et al. Desert hedgehog is a mammal-specific gene expressed during testicular and ovarian development in a marsupial. BMC Dev. Biol. 2011;11:72.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-213x-11-72

  193. 193.

    Long F, et al. Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development. 2004;131:1309-1318.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.01006

  194. 194.

    Ding M, Wang X. Antagonism between Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways regulates tumorigenicity. Oncol. Lett. 2017;14:6327-6333.

    Not in our library10.3892/ol.2017.7030

  195. 195.

    Gozal E, Jagadapillai R, Cai J, Barnes GN. Potential crosstalk between sonic hedgehog-WNT signaling and neurovascular molecules: implications for blood-brain barrier integrity in autism spectrum disorder. J. Neurochem. 2021;159:15-28.

    Not in our library10.1111/jnc.15460

  196. 196.

    Feng XH, Derynck R. Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005;21:659-693.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.022404.142018

  197. 197.

    Guo X, Wang X-F. Signaling cross-talk between TGF-β/BMP and other pathways. Cell Res. 2009;19:71-88.

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2008.302

  198. 198.

    Liu Z, et al. A dishevelled-1/Smad1 interaction couples WNT and bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways in uncommitted bone marrow stromal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:17156-17163.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m513812200

  199. 199.

    Bernatik, O., Paclikova, P., Sri Ganji, R. & Bryja, V. Activity of Smurf2 ubiquitin ligase is regulated by the Wnt pathway protein dishevelled. Cells9, 1147 (2020).

    Not in our library10.3390/cells9051147

  200. 200.

    Hoppler S, Moon RT. BMP-2/-4 and Wnt-8 cooperatively pattern the Xenopus mesoderm. Mech. Dev. 1998;71:119-129.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0925-4773(98)00004-5

  201. 201.

    Nishita M, et al. Interaction between Wnt and TGF-beta signalling pathways during formation of Spemann’s organizer. Nature. 2000;403:781-785.

    Not in our library10.1038/35001602

  202. 202.
  203. 203.

    Bergenstock MK, Partridge NC. Parathyroid hormone stimulation of noncanonical Wnt signaling in bone. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1116:354-359.

    Not in our library10.1196/annals.1402.047

  204. 204.

    Wang Y, et al. Wnt and the Wnt signaling pathway in bone development and disease. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed). 2014;19:379-407.

    Not in our library10.2741/4214

  205. 205.

    Lee M, Partridge NC. Parathyroid hormone signaling in bone and kidney. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2009;18:298-302.

    Not in our library10.1097/mnh.0b013e32832c2264

  206. 206.

    Tamura Y, Kaji H. Parathyroid hormone and Wnt signaling. Clin. Calcium. 2013;23:847-852.

    Not in our library

  207. 207.

    Leupin O, et al. Control of the SOST bone enhancer by PTH using MEF2 transcription factors. J. Bone Min. Res. 2007;22:1957-1967.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.070804

  208. 208.
  209. 209.

    Sun N, et al. Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor Scriptaid and parathyroid hormone on osteocyte functions and metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:9722-9733.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra118.007312

  210. 210.

    Li C, et al. Lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 is required for parathyroid hormone-induced Sost suppression. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2016;1364:62-73.

    Not in our library10.1111/nyas.12750

  211. 211.

    Kulkarni N, et al. Effects of parathyroid hormone on Wnt signaling pathway in bone. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005;95:1178-1190.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.20506

  212. 212.

    Guo X, Mak KK, Taketo MM, Yang Y. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway interacts differentially with PTHrP signaling to control chondrocyte hypertrophy and final maturation. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6067.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0006067

  213. 213.

    Matthews J, Gustafsson JA. Estrogen signaling: a subtle balance between ER alpha and ER beta. Mol. Int. 2003;3:281-292.

    Not in our library10.1124/mi.3.5.281

  214. 214.

    Mirza FS, Padhi ID, Raisz LG, Lorenzo JA. Serum sclerostin levels negatively correlate with parathyroid hormone levels and free estrogen index in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;95:1991-1997.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2009-2283

  215. 215.

    Kim RY, et al. Estrogen modulates bone morphogenetic protein-induced sclerostin expression through the Wnt signaling pathway. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2015;21:2076-2088.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0585

  216. 216.

    Armstrong VJ, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is a component of osteoblastic bone cell early responses to load-bearing and requires estrogen receptor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:20715-20727.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m703224200

  217. 217.

    Liedert A, et al. Estrogen receptor and Wnt signaling interact to regulate early gene expression in response to mechanical strain in osteoblastic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;394:755-759.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.065

  218. 218.

    Liedert, A. et al. Effects of estrogen receptor and wnt signaling activation on mechanically induced bone formation in a mouse model of postmenopausal bone loss. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 8301 (2020).

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms21218301

  219. 219.

    Galea GL, et al. Estrogen receptor α mediates proliferation of osteoblastic cells stimulated by estrogen and mechanical strain, but their acute down-regulation of the Wnt antagonist Sost is mediated by estrogen receptor β. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:9035-9048.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.405456

  220. 220.

    Suthon S, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha and NFATc1 bind to a bone mineral density-associated SNP to repress WNT5B in osteoblasts. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2022;109:97-115.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.11.018

  221. 221.

    Franz-Odendaal TA. Induction and patterning of intramembranous bone. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed). 2011;16:2734-2746.

    Not in our library10.2741/3882

  222. 222.

    Karaplis, A. Embryonic development of bone and the molecular regulation of intramembranous and endochondral bone formation. Princ. Bone Biol. 33–58 (2002).

    Not in our library

  223. 223.

    Takada S, et al. Wnt-3a regulates somite and tailbud formation in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 1994;8:174-189.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.8.2.174

  224. 224.

    Vlashi R, Zhang X, Wu M, Chen G. Wnt signaling: essential roles in osteoblast differentiation, bone metabolism and therapeutic implications for bone and skeletal disorders. Genes Dis. 2023;10:1291-1317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gendis.2022.07.011

  225. 225.

    Zhou S, et al. Age-related intrinsic changes in human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to osteoblasts. Aging Cell. 2008;7:335-343.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00377.x

  226. 226.

    Kawai M, de Paula FJ, Rosen CJ. New insights into osteoporosis: the bone-fat connection. J. Intern. Med. 2012;272:317-329.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02564.x

  227. 227.

    Day TF, Guo X, Garrettbeal L, Yang Y. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:739-750.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.016

  228. 228.

    Hill TP, et al. Canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:727-738.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013

  229. 229.

    Wu M, et al. Cbfβ governs osteoblast-adipocyte lineage commitment through enhancing β-catenin signaling and suppressing adipogenesis gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10119-10124.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1619294114

  230. 230.

    Byun MR, et al. Canonical Wnt signalling activates TAZ through PP1A during osteogenic differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:854-863.

    Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2014.8

  231. 231.

    Hong JH, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309:1074-1078.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1110955

  232. 232.

    Qiu W, Chen L, Kassem M. Activation of non-canonical Wnt/JNK pathway by Wnt3a is associated with differentiation fate determination of human bone marrow stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;413:98-104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.061

  233. 233.

    Tu X, et al. Noncanonical Wnt signaling through G protein-linked PKCδ activation promotes bone formation. Dev. Cell. 2007;12:113-127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2006.11.003

  234. 234.

    Okamoto M, et al. Noncanonical Wnt5a enhances Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during osteoblastogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4493.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep04493

  235. 235.

    Gu Q, et al. Wnt5a/FZD4 mediates the mechanical stretch-induced osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;48:215-226.

    Not in our library10.1159/000491721

  236. 236.

    Qi Y, et al. An oriented-collagen scaffold including Wnt5a promotes osteochondral regeneration and cartilage interface integration in a rabbit model. FASEB J. 2020;34:11115-11132.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.202000280r

  237. 237.

    Deng Y, et al. Biomaterial-mediated presentation of wnt5a mimetic ligands enhances chondrogenesis and metabolism of stem cells by activating non-canonical Wnt signaling. Biomaterials. 2022;281:121316.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121316

  238. 238.

    Yang, L. et al. Wnt7a promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Med.47, 94 (2021).

    Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2021.4927

  239. 239.

    Bennett CN, et al. Regulation of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass by Wnt10b. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:3324-3329.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0408742102

  240. 240.

    Kang S, et al. Wnt signaling stimulates osteoblastogenesis of mesenchymal precursors by suppressing CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:14515-14524.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m700030200

  241. 241.
  242. 242.

    Cawthorn WP, et al. Wnt6, Wnt10a and Wnt10b inhibit adipogenesis and stimulate osteoblastogenesis through a beta-catenin-dependent mechanism. Bone. 2012;50:477-489.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.010

  243. 243.

    Han X, Li X, Zhong G, Liu Z. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation by DNA methylation of the dishevelled gene in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017;9:4848-4855.

    Not in our library

  244. 244.
  245. 245.

    Zhao X, et al. ZBP1 (DAI/DLM-1) promotes osteogenic differentiation while inhibiting adipogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells through a positive feedback loop of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Bone Res. 2020;8:12.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-020-0085-4

  246. 246.

    Hang K, et al. Knockdown of SERPINB2 enhances the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:525.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13287-021-02581-6

  247. 247.

    Zhao, F. et al. Mesenchymal MACF1 facilitates SMAD7 nuclear translocation to drive bone formation. Cells9, 616 (2020).

    Not in our library10.3390/cells9030616

  248. 248.

    Wu X, et al. High-mobility group AT-Hook 1 mediates the role of nuclear factor I/X in osteogenic differentiation through activating canonical Wnt signaling. Stem Cells. 2021;39:1349-1361.

    Not in our library10.1002/stem.3418

  249. 249.

    Zhang Z, et al. Circ_FBLN1 promotes the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by regulating let-7i-5p/FZD4 axis and Wnt/β-catenin pathway. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2021;53:561-572.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10863-021-09917-0

  250. 250.

    Rui S, et al. Phosphate promotes osteogenic differentiation through non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway in human mesenchymal stem cells. Bone. 2022;164:116525.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2022.116525

  251. 251.

    Haffner-Luntzer, M. et al. Wnt1 boosts fracture healing by enhancing bone formation in the fracture callus. J. Bone Miner. Res.38, 749–762 (2023).

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.4797

  252. 252.

    Gaur T, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:33132-33140.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m500608200

  253. 253.

    Tu X, et al. Noncanonical Wnt signaling through G protein-linked PKCdelta activation promotes bone formation. Dev. Cell. 2007;12:113-127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2006.11.003

  254. 254.

    Friedman MS, Oyserman SM, Hankenson KD. Wnt11 promotes osteoblast maturation and mineralization through R-spondin 2. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:14117-14125.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m808337200

  255. 255.

    Shin HR, et al. Pin1-mediated modification prolongs the nuclear retention of beta-catenin in Wnt3a-induced osteoblast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:5555-5565.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.698563

  256. 256.

    Alam I, et al. Osteoblast-specific overexpression of human WNT16 increases both cortical and trabecular bone mass and structure in mice. Endocrinology. 2016;157:722-736.

    Not in our library10.1210/en.2015-1281

  257. 257.

    Lawson LY, et al. Osteoblast-specific Wnt secretion Is required for skeletal homeostasis and loading-induced bone formation in adult mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2022;37:108-120.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.4445

  258. 258.

    Albers J, et al. Control of bone formation by the serpentine receptor Frizzled-9. J. Cell Biol. 2011;192:1057-1072.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201008012

  259. 259.

    Sebastian A, et al. Wnt co-receptors Lrp5 and Lrp6 differentially mediate Wnt3a signaling in osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188264.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0188264

  260. 260.

    Riddle RC, et al. Lrp5 and Lrp6 exert overlapping functions in osteoblasts during postnatal bone acquisition. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63323.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0063323

  261. 261.

    Kato M, et al. Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor. J. Cell Biol. 2002;157:303-314.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200201089

  262. 262.

    Little RD, et al. A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002;70:11-19.

    Not in our library10.1086/338450

  263. 263.

    Cui Y, et al. Lrp5 functions in bone to regulate bone mass. Nat. Med. 2011;17:684-691.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2388

  264. 264.
  265. 265.

    Simon-Chazottes D, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor LRP4 cause abnormal limb development in the mouse. Genomics. 2006;87:673-677.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.01.007

  266. 266.

    Chang MK, et al. Disruption of Lrp4 function by genetic deletion or pharmacological blockade increases bone mass and serum sclerostin levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E5187-E5195.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1413828111

  267. 267.

    Zhang J, et al. LRP8 mediates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and controls osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:2065-2074.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.1661

  268. 268.

    Zhou F, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 4 antagonizes osteoblast differentiation through dishevelled. J. Bone Min. Res. 2016;31:1888-1898.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2863

  269. 269.

    Rodda SJ, McMahon AP. Distinct roles for Hedgehog and canonical Wnt signaling in specification, differentiation and maintenance of osteoblast progenitors. Development. 2006;133:3231-3244.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.02480

  270. 270.

    Song L, et al. Loss of Wnt/β-catenin signaling causes cell fate shift of preosteoblasts from osteoblasts to adipocytes. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:2344-2358.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.1694

  271. 271.

    Holmen SL, et al. Essential role of beta-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21162-21168.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m501900200

  272. 272.

    Glass DA, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:751-764.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017

  273. 273.

    Sharma AR, et al. Rspo 1 promotes osteoblast differentiation via Wnt signaling pathway. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 2013;50:19-25.

    Not in our library

  274. 274.

    Knight MN, et al. R-spondin-2 is a Wnt agonist that regulates osteoblast activity and bone mass. Bone Res. 2018;6:24.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-018-0026-7

  275. 275.

    Hu L, et al. Knockdown of microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 inhibits cell proliferation in MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells. BMB Rep. 2015;48:583-588.

    Not in our library10.5483/bmbrep.2015.48.10.098

  276. 276.

    Hu L, et al. MACF1 promotes osteoblast differentiation by sequestering repressors in cytoplasm. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:2160-2178.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41418-021-00744-9

  277. 277.

    Yin C, et al. MACF1 alleviates aging-related osteoporosis via HES1. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021;25:6242-6257.

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.16579

  278. 278.

    Bodine PV, et al. The Wnt antagonist secreted frizzled-related protein-1 is a negative regulator of trabecular bone formation in adult mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004;18:1222-1237.

    Not in our library10.1210/me.2003-0498

  279. 279.

    Yao W, et al. Overexpression of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 inhibits bone formation and attenuates parathyroid hormone bone anabolic effects. J. Bone Min. Res. 2010;25:190-199.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.090719

  280. 280.

    Morello R, et al. Brachy-syndactyly caused by loss of Sfrp2 function. J. Cell Physiol. 2008;217:127-137.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.21483

  281. 281.

    Nakanishi R, et al. Osteoblast-targeted expression of Sfrp4 in mice results in low bone mass. J. Bone Min. Res. 2008;23:271-277.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.071007

  282. 282.

    Li J, et al. Dkk1-mediated inhibition of Wnt signaling in bone results in osteopenia. Bone. 2006;39:754-766.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2006.03.017

  283. 283.

    Morvan F, et al. Deletion of a single allele of the Dkk1 gene leads to an increase in bone formation and bone mass. J. Bone Min. Res. 2006;21:934-945.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.060311

  284. 284.

    Hiramitsu S, Terauchi M, Kubota T. The effects of Dickkopf-4 on the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of osteoblasts. Endocrinology. 2013;154:4618-4626.

    Not in our library10.1210/en.2013-1387

  285. 285.

    Li X, et al. Dkk2 has a role in terminal osteoblast differentiation and mineralized matrix formation. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:945-952.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng1614

  286. 286.

    Schulze J, et al. Negative regulation of bone formation by the transmembrane Wnt antagonist Kremen-2. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10309.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0010309

  287. 287.

    ten Dijke P, et al. Osteocyte-derived sclerostin inhibits bone formation: its role in bone morphogenetic protein and Wnt signaling. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008;90:31-35.

    Not in our library10.2106/jbjs.g.01183

  288. 288.

    Sutherland MK, et al. Sclerostin promotes the apoptosis of human osteoblastic cells: a novel regulation of bone formation. Bone. 2004;35:828-835.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2004.05.023

  289. 289.

    Loots GG, et al. Genomic deletion of a long-range bone enhancer misregulates sclerostin in Van Buchem disease. Genome Res. 2005;15:928-935.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.3437105

  290. 290.

    Li X, et al. Targeted deletion of the sclerostin gene in mice results in increased bone formation and bone strength. J. Bone Min. Res. 2008;23:860-869.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.080216

  291. 291.

    Lin C, et al. Sclerostin mediates bone response to mechanical unloading through antagonizing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J. Bone Min. Res. 2009;24:1651-1661.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.090411

  292. 292.

    Sebastian A, Loots GG. Genetics of Sost/SOST in sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease animal models. Metabolism. 2018;80:38-47.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.metabol.2017.10.005

  293. 293.

    Tang CY, et al. Runx1 is a central regulator of osteogenesis for bone homeostasis by orchestrating BMP and WNT signaling pathways. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009233.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1009233

  294. 294.

    Han L, et al. Loss of chemerin triggers bone remodeling in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Metab. 2021;53:101322.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101322

  295. 295.

    Gonzalez-Perez V, Lingle CJ. Regulation of BK channels by beta and gamma subunits. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019;81:113-137.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034038

  296. 296.

    Jiang L, et al. BK channel deficiency in osteoblasts reduces bone formation via the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Mol. Cells. 2021;44:557-568.

    Not in our library10.14348/molcells.2021.0004

  297. 297.

    Li, H. et al. MiR-12200-5p Targets multiple members of Wnt signaling pathway to inhibit osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets23,1254–1264 (2023).

    Not in our library10.2174/1871530323666230301150350

  298. 298.

    Karner CM, Long F. Wnt signaling and cellular metabolism in osteoblasts. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2017;74:1649-1657.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-016-2425-5

  299. 299.

    Delgado-Calle J, Bellido T. The osteocyte as a signaling cell. Physiol. Rev. 2022;102:379-410.

    Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00043.2020

  300. 300.

    Klein-Nulend J, et al. Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes. Bone. 2013;54:182-190.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.013

  301. 301.

    Zhou Y, et al. Aberrant activation of Wnt signaling pathway altered osteocyte mineralization. Bone. 2019;127:324-333.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2019.06.027

  302. 302.

    Osorio J. Osteocyte-specific activation of the canonical Wnt-beta catenin pathway stimulates bone formation. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015;11:192.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2015.11

  303. 303.

    Kramer I, et al. Osteocyte Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for normal bone homeostasis. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:3071-3085.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01428-09

  304. 304.

    Joeng KS, et al. Osteocyte-specific WNT1 regulates osteoblast function during bone homeostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127:2678-2688.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci92617

  305. 305.

    Zhao L, et al. Inactivation of Lrp5 in osteocytes reduces young’s modulus and responsiveness to the mechanical loading. Bone. 2013;54:35-43.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.033

  306. 306.

    Javaheri B, et al. Deletion of a single beta-catenin allele in osteocytes abolishes the bone anabolic response to loading. J. Bone Min. Res. 2014;29:705-715.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2064

  307. 307.

    Tu X, et al. Osteocytes mediate the anabolic actions of canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in bone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E478-E486.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1409857112

  308. 308.

    Weidauer SE, et al. NMR structure of the Wnt modulator protein Sclerostin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;380:160-165.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.062

  309. 309.

    Poole KE, et al. Sclerostin is a delayed secreted product of osteocytes that inhibits bone formation. FASEB J. 2005;19:1842-1844.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.05-4221fje

  310. 310.

    Robling AG, et al. Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:5866-5875.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m705092200

  311. 311.

    Tu X, et al. Sost downregulation and local Wnt signaling are required for the osteogenic response to mechanical loading. Bone. 2012;50:209-217.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.025

  312. 312.

    Vaananen HK, Laitalaleinonen T. Osteoclast lineage and function. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008;473:132-138.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.abb.2008.03.037

  313. 313.

    Otero K, et al. TREM2 and beta-catenin regulate bone homeostasis by controlling the rate of osteoclastogenesis. J. Immunol. 2012;188:2612-2621.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1102836

  314. 314.

    Wei W, et al. Biphasic and dosage-dependent regulation of osteoclastogenesis by beta-catenin. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;31:4706-4719.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.05980-11

  315. 315.

    Ruiz P, et al. CathepsinKCre mediated deletion of betacatenin results in dramatic loss of bone mass by targeting both osteoclasts and osteoblastic cells. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36201.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep36201

  316. 316.

    Romero G, et al. Parathyroid hormone receptor directly interacts with dishevelled to regulate beta-Catenin signaling and osteoclastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:14756-14763.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.102970

  317. 317.

    Weivoda MM, et al. Wnt signaling inhibits osteoclast differentiation by activating canonical and noncanonical cAMP/PKA pathways. J. Bone Min. Res. 2016;31:65-75.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2599

  318. 318.

    Chen K, et al. Sfrp4 repression of the Ror2/Jnk cascade in osteoclasts protects cortical bone from excessive endosteal resorption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:14138-14143.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1900881116

  319. 319.

    Spencer GJ, et al. Wnt signalling in osteoblasts regulates expression of the receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand and inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 2006;119:1283-1296.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.02883

  320. 320.
  321. 321.

    Albers J, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling inhibits osteoclastogenesis independent of osteoprotegerin. J. Cell Biol. 2013;200:537-549.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201207142

  322. 322.

    Maeda K, et al. Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling between osteoblast-lineage cells and osteoclast precursors enhances osteoclastogenesis. Nat. Med. 2012;18:405-412.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2653

  323. 323.

    Kobayashi Y, Uehara S, Koide M, Takahashi N. The regulation of osteoclast differentiation by Wnt signals. Bonekey Rep. 2015;4:713.

    Not in our library10.1038/bonekey.2015.82

  324. 324.

    Uehara, S. et al. Protein kinase N3 promotes bone resorption by osteoclasts in response to Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling. Sci Signal10 (2017).

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aan0023

  325. 325.

    Uehara S, Udagawa N, Kobayashi Y. Non-canonical Wnt signals regulate cytoskeletal remodeling in osteoclasts. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:3683-3692.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-018-2881-1

  326. 326.

    Movérare-Skrtic S, et al. Osteoblast-derived WNT16 represses osteoclastogenesis and prevents cortical bone fragility fractures. Nat. Med. 2014;20:1279-1288.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3654

  327. 327.

    Qiang YW, et al. Characterization of Wnt/beta-catenin signalling in osteoclasts in multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2010;148:726-738.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.08009.x

  328. 328.

    Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat. Med. 2013;19:179-192.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3074

  329. 329.
  330. 330.

    Cici, D., Corrado, A., Rotondo, C. & Cantatore, F. P. Wnt signaling and biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (2019).

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms20225552

  331. 331.
  332. 332.

    Yuan Y, Guo M, Gu C, Yang Y. The role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the pathogenesis and treatment of multiple myeloma (review). Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021;13:9932-9949.

    Not in our library

  333. 333.

    Laine CM, et al. WNT1 mutations in early-onset osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1809-1816.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1215458

  334. 334.

    Fahiminiya S, et al. Mutations in WNT1 are a cause of osteogenesis imperfecta. J. Med. Genet. 2013;50:345-348.

    Not in our library10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101567

  335. 335.

    Hu, J. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic spectrum and pathogenesis of WNT1 variants in a large cohort of patients with OI/osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.108, 1776-1786 (2023).

    Not in our library10.1210/clinem/dgac752

  336. 336.

    Peris P, et al. Osteoporosis related to WNT1 variants: a not infrequent cause of osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2023;34:405-411.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00198-022-06609-2

  337. 337.

    Niemann S, et al. Homozygous WNT3 mutation causes tetra-amelia in a large consanguineous family. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;74:558-563.

    Not in our library10.1086/382196

  338. 338.
  339. 339.
  340. 340.

    Gong Y, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513-523.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00571-2

  341. 341.

    Beighton P. Osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome. Clin. Genet. 1986;29:263.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-0004.1986.tb00823.x

  342. 342.

    Astiazaran MC, et al. Novel homozygous LRP5 mutations in Mexican patients with osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome. Genet Test. Mol. Biomark. 2017;21:742-746.

    Not in our library10.1089/gtmb.2017.0118

  343. 343.

    Kamizaki K, Endo M, Minami Y, Kobayashi Y. Role of noncanonical Wnt ligands and Ror-family receptor tyrosine kinases in the development, regeneration, and diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Dev. Dyn. 2021;250:27-38.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.151

  344. 344.

    Caetano da Silva C, et al. WNT11, a new gene associated with early onset osteoporosis, is required for osteoblastogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2022;31:1622-1634.

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddab349

  345. 345.

    Boyden LM, et al. High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:1513-1521.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa013444

  346. 346.

    Fijalkowski I, et al. A novel domain-specific mutation in a sclerosteosis patient suggests a role of LRP4 as an anchor for sclerostin in human bone. J. Bone Min. Res. 2016;31:874-881.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2782

  347. 347.

    Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1697-1707.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.34453

  348. 348.

    Shi S, et al. Silencing of Wnt5a prevents interleukin-1β-induced collagen type II degradation in rat chondrocytes. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016;12:3161-3166.

    Not in our library10.3892/etm.2016.3788

  349. 349.

    Huang G, Chubinskaya S, Liao W, Loeser RF. Wnt5a induces catabolic signaling and matrix metalloproteinase production in human articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017;25:1505-1515.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2017.05.018

  350. 350.

    Martineau X, et al. Alteration of Wnt5a expression and of the non-canonical Wnt/PCP and Wnt/PKC-Ca2+ pathways in human osteoarthritis osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180711.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0180711

  351. 351.
  352. 352.

    Shi FL, Ren LX. Up-regulated miR-374a-3p relieves lipopolysaccharides induced injury in CHON-001 cells via regulating Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 5B. Mol. Cell Probes. 2020;51:101541.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mcp.2020.101541

  353. 353.

    Huang J, et al. Dysregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway and synovial stem cell dysfunction in osteoarthritis development. Stem Cells Dev. 2020;29:401-413.

    Not in our library10.1089/scd.2019.0260

  354. 354.

    Gibson AL, et al. Wnt7a inhibits IL-1β induced catabolic gene expression and prevents articular cartilage damage in experimental osteoarthritis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41823.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep41823

  355. 355.

    Ye X, Liu X. Wnt16 signaling in bone homeostasis and osteoarthristis. Front. Endocrinol. 2022;13:1095711.

    Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2022.1095711

  356. 356.

    Nalesso G, et al. WNT16 antagonises excessive canonical WNT activation and protects cartilage in osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:218-226.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208577

  357. 357.

    Tong W, et al. Wnt16 attenuates osteoarthritis progression through a PCP/JNK-mTORC1-PTHrP cascade. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019;78:551-561.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214200

  358. 358.

    Smith AJ, et al. Haplotypes of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene: are they a risk factor in osteoarthritis? Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2005;13:608-613.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2005.01.008

  359. 359.

    Yerges-Armstrong LM, et al. Association analysis of BMD-associated SNPs with knee osteoarthritis. J. Bone Min. Res. 2014;29:1373-1379.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2160

  360. 360.

    Joiner DM, et al. Heterozygosity for an inactivating mutation in low-density lipoprotein-related receptor 6 (Lrp6) increases osteoarthritis severity in mice after ligament and meniscus injury. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013;21:1576-1585.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.019

  361. 361.

    Zhu M, et al. Activation of β-catenin signaling in articular chondrocytes leads to osteoarthritis-like phenotype in adult β-catenin conditional activation mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2009;24:12-21.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.080901

  362. 362.

    Xia C, et al. Activation of β-catenin in Col2-expressing chondrocytes leads to osteoarthritis-like defects in hip joint. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:18535-18543.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28491

  363. 363.

    Hui T, et al. Activation of β-catenin signaling in aggrecan-expressing cells in temporomandibular joint causes osteoarthritis-like defects. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 2018;10:13.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41368-018-0016-z

  364. 364.

    Lu K, et al. Upregulation of β-catenin signaling represents a single common pathway leading to the various phenotypes of spinal degeneration and pain. Bone Res. 2023;11:18.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-023-00253-0

  365. 365.

    Zhu Z, et al. AMPK activator decelerates osteoarthritis development by inhibition of β-catenin signaling in chondrocytes. J. Orthop. Transl. 2022;38:158-166.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jot.2022.10.005

  366. 366.

    Li J, et al. Metformin limits osteoarthritis development and progression through activation of AMPK signalling. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:635-645.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216713

  367. 367.

    Xuan F, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributes to articular cartilage homeostasis through lubricin induction in the superficial zone. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019;21:247.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13075-019-2041-5

  368. 368.

    Weng LH, et al. Inflammation induction of Dickkopf-1 mediates chondrocyte apoptosis in osteoarthritic joint. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2009;17:933-943.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2008.12.008

  369. 369.

    Weng LH, et al. Control of Dkk-1 ameliorates chondrocyte apoptosis, cartilage destruction, and subchondral bone deterioration in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1393-1402.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.27357

  370. 370.

    Oh H, Chun CH, Chun JS. Dkk-1 expression in chondrocytes inhibits experimental osteoarthritic cartilage destruction in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2568-2578.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.34481

  371. 371.

    Theologis T, et al. Association between serum and synovial fluid Dickkopf-1 levels with radiographic severity in primary knee osteoarthritis patients. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017;36:1865-1872.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10067-017-3640-7

  372. 372.

    Zhu Z, et al. A study on the mechanism of Wnt inhibitory factor 1 in osteoarthritis. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020;16:898-906.

    Not in our library10.5114/aoms.2020.95667

  373. 373.

    Chin KY, Ekeuku SO, Pang KL. Sclerostin in the development of osteoarthritis: a mini review. Malays. J. Pathol. 2022;44:1-18.

    Not in our library

  374. 374.
  375. 375.

    Sen M, et al. Blockade of Wnt-5A/frizzled 5 signaling inhibits rheumatoid synoviocyte activation. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:772-781.

    Not in our library10.1002/1529-0131(200104)44:4<772::aid-anr133>3.0.co;2-l

  376. 376.

    Sen M, Carson DA. Wnt signaling in rheumatoid synoviocyte activation. Mod. Rheumatol. 2002;12:5-9.

    Not in our library10.3109/s101650200001

  377. 377.

    Lories RJ, Corr M, Lane NE. To Wnt or not to Wnt: the bone and joint health dilemma. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2013;9:328-339.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrrheum.2013.25

  378. 378.
  379. 379.

    Miao P, et al. Regulatory effect of anti-gp130 functional mAb on IL-6 mediated RANKL and Wnt5a expression through JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway in FLS. Oncotarget. 2018;9:20366-20376.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.23917

  380. 380.

    Rodriguez-Trillo A, et al. Non-canonical WNT5A signaling through RYK contributes to aggressive phenotype of the rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:555245.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2020.555245

  381. 381.

    Huang Y, et al. Wnt5a: a promising therapeutic target for inflammation, especially rheumatoid arthritis. Cytokine. 2023;172:156381.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2023.156381

  382. 382.

    de Rooy DP, et al. Genetic studies on components of the Wnt signalling pathway and the severity of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013;72:769-775.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202184

  383. 383.

    Singh A, Gupta MK, Mishra SP. Study of correlation of level of expression of Wnt signaling pathway inhibitors sclerostin and dickkopf-1 with disease activity and severity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Drug Discov. Ther. 2019;13:22-27.

    Not in our library10.5582/ddt.2019.01011

  384. 384.

    Wang SY, et al. Circulating Dickkopf-1 is correlated with bone erosion and inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2011;38:821-827.

    Not in our library10.3899/jrheum.100089

  385. 385.

    Wehmeyer C, et al. Sclerostin inhibition promotes TNF-dependent inflammatory joint destruction. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:330ra335.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aac4351

  386. 386.

    Fassio A, et al. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis results in acute changes of bone modulators. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;67:487-489.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2018.12.050

  387. 387.

    Adami G, et al. Effects of TNF inhibitors on parathyroid hormone and Wnt signaling antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2016;99:360-364.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00223-016-0161-3

  388. 388.

    Miao, C. et al. DNA hypermethylation of SFRP2 influences the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis through the canonical Wnt signaling in model rats. Autoimmunity 1–14 (2018). 10.1080/08916934.2018.1516760

    Not in our library10.1080/08916934.2018.1516760

  389. 389.

    Miao CG, et al. MeCP2 modulates the canonical Wnt pathway activation by targeting SFRP4 in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rats. Cell Signal. 2013;25:598-608.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.11.023

  390. 390.

    Kwon YJ, et al. Secreted frizzled-related protein 5 suppresses inflammatory response in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes through down-regulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Rheumatology. 2014;53:1704-1711.

    Not in our library10.1093/rheumatology/keu167

  391. 391.

    Xu Y, et al. Acid sensor ASIC1a induces synovial fibroblast proliferation via Wnt/β-catenin/c-Myc pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022;113:109328.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109328

  392. 392.

    Zhang Z, et al. PLD1 knockdown reduces metastasis and inflammation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis by modulating NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. Autoimmunity. 2021;54:398-405.

    Not in our library10.1080/08916934.2021.1963957

  393. 393.

    Zhou MY, et al. Lentivirus-mediated overexpression or silencing of aquaporin 1 affects the proliferation, migration and invasion of TNF-α-stimulated rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes by Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021;14:1945-1957.

    Not in our library10.2147/jir.s312783

  394. 394.

    Wang R, et al. NAV2 positively modulates inflammatory response of fibroblast-like synoviocytes through activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021;11:e376.

    Not in our library10.1002/ctm2.376

  395. 395.

    Sun Y, et al. LncRNA OIP5-AS1/miR-410-3p/Wnt7b axis promotes the proliferation of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes via regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Autoimmunity. 2023;56:2189136.

    Not in our library10.1080/08916934.2023.2189136

  396. 396.

    Wang, W. et al. FOXM1/LINC00152 feedback loop regulates proliferation and apoptosis in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Biosci. Rep.40, BSR20191900 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1042/bsr20191900

  397. 397.

    Wang Y, et al. MiR-125a-3p inhibits cell proliferation and inflammation responses in fibroblast-like synovial cells in rheumatoid arthritis by mediating the Wnt/β-catenin and NF-κB pathways via targeting MAST3. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2021;21:560-567.

    Not in our library

  398. 398.

    Yu B, et al. Wnt4 signaling prevents skeletal aging and inflammation by inhibiting nuclear factor-κB. Nat. Med. 2014;20:1009-1017.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3586

  399. 399.

    Jiang Y, et al. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on bone formation and lipid metabolism of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis rats through canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016;2016:4927035.

    Not in our library10.1155/2016/4927035

  400. 400.

    Fan H, et al. Electroacupuncture stimulation at CV4 prevents ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats via Wnt-beta-catenin signaling. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016;13:2485-2491.

    Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2016.4849

  401. 401.

    Diegel CR, et al. Inhibiting WNT secretion reduces high bone mass caused by Sost loss-of-function or gain-of-function mutations in Lrp5. Bone Res. 2023;11:47.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-023-00278-5

  402. 402.

    Yazici Y, et al. A novel Wnt pathway inhibitor, SM04690, for the treatment of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a 24-week, randomized, controlled, phase 1 study. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017;25:1598-1606.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.006

  403. 403.

    Yazici Y, et al. A phase 2b randomized trial of lorecivivint, a novel intra-articular CLK2/DYRK1A inhibitor and Wnt pathway modulator for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2021;29:654-666.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2021.02.004

  404. 404.

    Tambiah JRS, et al. Individual participant symptom responses to intra-articular lorecivivint in knee osteoarthritis: post hoc analysis of a phase 2B trial. Rheumatol. Ther. 2021;8:973-985.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40744-021-00316-w

  405. 405.

    Tambiah JRS, et al. Comparing patient-reported outcomes from sham and saline-based placebo injections for knee osteoarthritis: data from a randomized clinical trial of lorecivivint. Am. J. Sports Med. 2022;50:630-636.

    Not in our library10.1177/03635465211067201

  406. 406.

    MacLauchlan S, et al. Genetic deficiency of Wnt5a diminishes disease severity in a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017;19:166.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13075-017-1375-0

  407. 407.

    Cao W, et al. Depleting the carboxy-terminus of human Wnt5a attenuates collagen-induced arthritis in DBA/1 mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;504:679-685.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.030

  408. 408.
  409. 409.

    Xie C, et al. Ginkgolide B attenuates collagen-induced rheumatoid arthritis and regulates fibroblast-like synoviocytes-mediated apoptosis and inflammation. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8:1497.

    Not in our library10.21037/atm-20-6420

  410. 410.

    Oz B, et al. Resveratrol inhibits Src tyrosine kinase, STAT3, and Wnt signaling pathway in collagen induced arthritis model. Biofactors. 2019;45:69-74.

    Not in our library10.1002/biof.1463

  411. 411.

    Liu XG, et al. MiR-21 relieves rheumatoid arthritis in rats via targeting Wnt signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2019;23:96-103.

    Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_201908_18635

  412. 412.
  413. 413.

    Okuchi Y, et al. Wnt-modified materials mediate asymmetric stem cell division to direct human osteogenic tissue formation for bone repair. Nat. Mater. 2021;20:108-118.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41563-020-0786-5

  414. 414.

    Wang FS, et al. Knocking down dickkopf-1 alleviates estrogen deficiency induction of bone loss. A histomorphological study in ovariectomized rats. Bone. 2007;40:485-492.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.004

  415. 415.

    Wang FS, et al. Modulation of Dickkopf-1 attenuates glucocorticoid induction of osteoblast apoptosis, adipocytic differentiation, and bone mass loss. Endocrinology. 2008;149:1793-1801.

    Not in our library10.1210/en.2007-0910

  416. 416.

    Peng, Z. et al. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promoted osteogenic differentiation by delivering miR-196a that targeted Dickkopf-1 to activate Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Bioengineered14, 1996015 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1080/21655979.2021.1996015

  417. 417.

    Zhou B, et al. miR‑483‑3p promotes the osteogenesis of human osteoblasts by targeting Dikkopf 2 (DKK2) and the Wnt signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020;46:1571-1581.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2020.4694

  418. 418.

    Gao J, et al. Icariin promotes the osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through regulating sclerostin and activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021;2021:6666836.

    Not in our library10.1155/2021/6666836

  419. 419.

    Marini, F., Giusti, F., Palmini, G. & Brandi, M. L. Role of Wnt signaling and sclerostin in bone and as therapeutic targets in skeletal disorders. Osteoporosis Int.34, 213–238 (2022).

    Not in our library10.1007/s00198-022-06523-7

  420. 420.

    Kerschan-Schindl K. Romosozumab: a novel bone anabolic treatment option for osteoporosis? Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2020;170:124-131.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10354-019-00721-5

  421. 421.

    Sølling ASK, Harsløf T, Langdahl B. The clinical potential of romosozumab for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2018;10:105-115.

    Not in our library10.1177/1759720x18775936

  422. 422.

    McClung MR, et al. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:412-420.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1305224

  423. 423.

    Cosman F, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1532-1543.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1607948

  424. 424.

    Eriksen EF, et al. Modeling-based bone bormation after 2 months of romosozumab treatment: results from the FRAME clinical trial. J. Bone Min. Res. 2022;37:36-40.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.4457

  425. 425.

    Langdahl BL, et al. Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1585-1594.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31613-6

  426. 426.

    Lewiecki EM, et al. A phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of romosozumab in men with osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:3183-3193.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2017-02163

  427. 427.

    Sangadala, S. et al. Sclerostin small-molecule inhibitors promote osteogenesis by activating canonical Wnt and BMP pathways. Elife12, e63402 (2023).

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.63402

  428. 428.
  429. 429.

    Choi RB, et al. Improving bone health by optimizing the anabolic action of Wnt inhibitor multitargeting. JBMR. 2021;5:e10462.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm4.10462

  430. 430.

    Melnik S, et al. MiR-181a targets RSPO2 and regulates bone morphogenetic protein—WNT signaling crosstalk during chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:747057.

    Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2021.747057

  431. 431.
  432. 432.

    Clément-Lacroix P, et al. Lrp5-independent activation of Wnt signaling by lithium chloride increases bone formation and bone mass in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:17406-17411.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0505259102

  433. 433.

    Zhang K, et al. MACF1 overexpression in BMSCs alleviates senile osteoporosis in mice through TCF4/miR-335-5p signaling pathway. J. Orthop. Transl. 2023;39:177-190.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jot.2023.02.003

  434. 434.

    Wang Y, et al. Daphnetin ameliorates glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis via activation of Wnt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2020;409:115333.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.taap.2020.115333

  435. 435.

    Jiang, H. et al. Gentiopicroside promotes the osteogenesis of bone mesenchymal stem cells by modulation of β-catenin-BMP2 signalling pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med.25, 10825–10836 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.16410

  436. 436.

    Karunarathne W, et al. Anthocyanin-enriched polyphenols from Hibiscus syriacus L. (Malvaceae) exert anti-osteoporosis effects by inhibiting GSK-3β and subsequently activating β-catenin. Phytomedicine. 2021;91:153721.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153721

  437. 437.

    Yang X, et al. Troxerutin stimulates osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell and facilitates bone fracture healing. Front. Pharm. 2021;12:723145.

    Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2021.723145

  438. 438.

    Kim HY, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of the Dishevelled-CXXC5 interaction are new drug candidates for bone anabolic osteoporosis therapy. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016;8:375-387.

    Not in our library10.15252/emmm.201505714

  439. 439.

    Pan FF, et al. Apigenin promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and accelerates bone fracture healing via activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021;320:E760-e771.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.00543.2019

  440. 440.

    Bai J, et al. Glycyrrhizic acid promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Front. Pharm. 2021;12:607635.

    Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2021.607635

  441. 441.

    Wei Y, et al. miR-424-5p shuttled by bone marrow stem cells-derived exosomes attenuates osteogenesis via regulating WIF1-mediated Wnt/β-catenin axis. Aging. 2021;13:17190-17201.

    Not in our library10.18632/aging.203169

  442. 442.

    Hu H, et al. Role of microRNA-335 carried by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles in bone fracture recovery. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:156.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41419-021-03430-3

  443. 443.

    Yu H, Zhang J, Liu X, Li Y. microRNA-136-5p from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes facilitates fracture healing by targeting LRP4 to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Bone Jt. Res. 2021;10:744-758.

    Not in our library10.1302/2046-3758.1012.bjr-2020-0275.r2

  444. 444.
  445. 445.

    Dong J, Li L, Fang X, Zang M. Exosome-encapsulated microRNA-127-3p released from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviates osteoarthritis through regulating CDH11-mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway. J. Pain. Res. 2021;14:297-310.

    Not in our library10.2147/jpr.s291472

  446. 446.

    Chen G, et al. PiRNA-63049 inhibits bone formation through Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021;17:4409-4425.

    Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.64533

  447. 447.

    Luo Y, et al. The osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells is regulated through the let-7i-3p/LEF1/β-catenin axis under cyclic strain. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019;10:339.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13287-019-1470-z

  448. 448.

    Yin C, et al. miR-129-5p inhibits bone formation through TCF4. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:600641.

    Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2020.600641

  449. 449.

    Hu S, et al. MicroRNA-320c inhibits development of osteoarthritis through downregulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Life Sci. 2019;228:242-250.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2019.05.011

  450. 450.

    Rawadi G. Wnt signaling and potential applications in bone diseases. Curr. Drug Targets. 2008;9:581-590.

    Not in our library10.2174/138945008784911778

  451. 451.

    Mullard A. FDA approves first-in-class osteoporosis drug. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019;18:411.

    Not in our library10.1038/d41573-019-00083-y

  452. 452.

    Chen KH, et al. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science. 2015;348:aaa6090.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaa6090

  453. 453.

    Barrow JR, et al. Ectodermal Wnt3/beta-catenin signaling is required for the establishment and maintenance of the apical ectodermal ridge. Genes Dev. 2003;17:394-409.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1044903

  454. 454.

    Spater D, et al. Wnt9a signaling is required for joint integrity and regulation of Ihh during chondrogenesis. Development. 2006;133:3039-3049.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.02471

  455. 455.
  456. 456.

    Yamaguchi TP, Bradley A, McMahon AP, Jones S. A Wnt5a pathway underlies outgrowth of multiple structures in the vertebrate embryo. Development. 1999;126:1211-1223.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.126.6.1211

  457. 457.

    Yang Y, Topol L, Lee H, Wu J. Wnt5a and Wnt5b exhibit distinct activities in coordinating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development. 2003;130:1003-1015.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.00324

  458. 458.

    Parr BA, Mc Mahon AP. Dorsalizing signal Wnt-7a required for normal polarity of D−V and A−P axes of mouse limb. Nature. 1995;374:350-353.

    Not in our library10.1038/374350a0

  459. 459.

    Pöpperl H, et al. Misexpression of Cwnt8C in the mouse induces an ectopic embryonic axis and causes a truncation of the anterior neuroectoderm. Development. 1997;124:2997-3005.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.124.15.2997

  460. 460.

    Guo X, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is sufficient and necessary for synovial joint formation. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2404-2417.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1230704

  461. 461.

    Carroll TJ, et al. Wnt9b plays a central role in the regulation of mesenchymal to epithelial transitions underlying organogenesis of the mammalian urogenital system. Dev. Cell. 2005;9:283-292.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2005.05.016

  462. 462.

    Jin YR, Han XH, Taketo MM, Yoon JK. Wnt9b-dependent FGF signaling is crucial for outgrowth of the nasal and maxillary processes during upper jaw and lip development. Development. 2012;139:1821-1830.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.075796

  463. 463.

    Bennett CN, et al. Wnt10b increases postnatal bone formation by enhancing osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2007;22:1924-1932.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.070810

  464. 464.

    Johnson EB, Hammer RE, Herz J. Abnormal development of the apical ectodermal ridge and polysyndactyly in Megf7-deficient mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005;14:3523-3538.

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddi381

  465. 465.

    Holmen SL, et al. Decreased BMD and limb deformities in mice carrying mutations in both Lrp5 and Lrp6. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004;19:2033-2040.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.040907

  466. 466.

    Iwaniec UT, et al. PTH stimulates bone formation in mice deficient in Lrp5. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2007;22:394-402.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.061118

  467. 467.

    Yadav VK, et al. Lrp5 controls bone formation by inhibiting serotonin synthesis in the duodenum. Cell. 2008;135:825-837.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.059

  468. 468.

    Joeng KS, et al. Lrp5 and Lrp6 redundantly control skeletal development in the mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 2011;359:222-229.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.08.020

  469. 469.

    Niziolek PJ, et al. High-bone-mass-producing mutations in the Wnt signaling pathway result in distinct skeletal phenotypes. Bone. 2011;49:1010-1019.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.034

  470. 470.

    Kokubu C, et al. Skeletal defects in ringelschwanz mutant mice reveal that Lrp6 is required for proper somitogenesis and osteogenesis. Development. 2004;131:5469-5480.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.01405

  471. 471.

    Mukhopadhyay M, et al. Dickkopf1 Is required for embryonic head induction and limb morphogenesis in the mouse. Dev. Cell. 2001;1:423-434.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00041-7

  472. 472.

    Yao GQ, Wu JJ, Troiano N, Insogna K. Targeted overexpression of Dkk1 in osteoblasts reduces bone mass but does not impair the anabolic response to intermittent PTH treatment in mice. J. Bone Min. Metab. 2011;29:141-148.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00774-010-0202-3

  473. 473.

    Oh H, et al. Misexpression of Dickkopf-1 in endothelial cells, but not in chondrocytes or hypertrophic chondrocytes, causes defects in endochondral ossification. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012;27:1335-1344.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.1583

  474. 474.

    Lories RJU, et al. Articular cartilage and biomechanical properties of the long bones in Frzb-knockout mice. Arthritis Rheumat. 2007;56:4095-4103.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.23137

  475. 475.

    Cho HY, et al. Transgenic mice overexpressing secreted frizzled-related proteins (sFRP)4 under the control of serum amyloid P promoter exhibit low bone mass but did not result in disturbed phosphate homeostasis. Bone. 2010;47:263-271.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.010

  476. 476.

    Hoeflich KP, et al. Requirement for glycogen synthase kinase-3β in cell survival and NF-κB activation. Nature. 2000;406:86-90.

    Not in our library10.1038/35017574

  477. 477.
  478. 478.

    Nelson, E. R. et al. Role of GSK-3β in the osteogenic differentiation of palatal mesenchyme. PLoS One6, e25847 (2011).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0025847

  479. 479.

    He F, et al. Gsk3β is required in the epithelium for palatal elevation in mice. Dev. Dyn. 2010;239:3235-3246.

    Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.22466

  480. 480.

    Gillespie JR, et al. Deletion of glycogen synthase kinase-3β in cartilage results in up-regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3α protein expression. Endocrinology. 2011;152:1755-1756.

    Not in our library10.1210/en.2010-1412

  481. 481.

    Itoh S, et al. GSK-3α and GSK-3β proteins are involved in early stages of chondrocyte differentiation with functional redundancy through RelA protein phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:29227-29236.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.372086

  482. 482.

    Perry Iii WL, et al. Phenotypic and molecular analysis of a transgenic insertional allele of the mouse fused locus. Genetics. 1995;141:321-332.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/141.1.321

  483. 483.

    Yu HMI, et al. The role of Axin2 in calvarial morphogenesis and craniosynostosis. Development. 2005;132:1995-2005.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.01786

  484. 484.

    Yan Y, et al. Axin2 controls bone remodeling through the β-catenin-BMP signaling pathway in adult mice. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:3566-3578.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.051904

  485. 485.

    Dao DY, et al. Axin2 regulates chondrocyte maturation and axial skeletal development. J. Orthop. Res. 2010;28:89-95.

    Not in our library10.1002/jor.20954

  486. 486.

    Holmen SL, et al. Essential role of β-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21162-21168.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m501900200

  487. 487.

    Miclea, R. L. et al. Adenomatous polyposis coli-mediated control of β-catenin is essential for both chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of skeletal precursors. BMC Dev. Biol.9, 26 (2009).

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-213x-9-26

  488. 488.

    Soshnikova N, et al. Genetic interaction between Wnt/β-catenin and BMP receptor signaling during formation of the AER and the dorsal-ventral axis in the limb. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1963-1968.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.263003

  489. 489.

    Akiyama H, et al. Interactions between Sox9 and β-catenin control chondrocyte differentiation. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1072-1087.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1171104

  490. 490.

    Dao DY, et al. Cartilage-specific β-catenin signaling regulates chondrocyte maturation, generation of ossification centers, and perichondrial bone formation during skeletal development. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:1680-1694.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.1639

  491. 491.

    Chen J, Long F. Beta-catenin promotes bone formation and suppresses bone resorption in postnatal growing mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:2344-2358.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.1834

  492. 492.

    Mirando, A. J. et al. Β-catenin/cyclin D1 mediated development of suture mesenchyme in calvarial morphogenesis. BMC Dev. Biol.10, 116 (2010).

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-213x-10-116

  493. 493.

    Wei W, et al. Biphasic and dosage-dependent regulation of osteoclastogenesis by β-catenin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011;31:4706-4719.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.05980-11

  494. 494.

    Kramer I, et al. Osteocyte Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for normal bone homeostasis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010;30:3071-3085.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01428-09

  495. 495.

    Mikasa M, et al. Regulation of Tcf7 by Runx2 in chondrocyte maturation and proliferation. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2011;29:291-299.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00774-010-0222-z

  496. 496.

    Korinek V, et al. Depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine of mice lacking Tcf-4. Nat. Genet. 1998;19:379-383.

    Not in our library10.1038/1270

  497. 497.

    Brugmann SA, et al. Wnt signaling mediates regional specification in the vertebrate face. Development. 2007;134:3283-3295.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.005132

  498. 498.

    Van Genderen C, et al. Development of several organs that require inductive epithelial- mesenchymal interactions is impaired in LEF-1-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2691-2703.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.8.22.2691

  499. 499.

    Galceran J, et al. Wnt3a-/–like phenotype and limb deficiency in Lef1−/−Tcf1−/− mice. Genes Dev. 1999;13:709-717.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.13.6.709

  500. 500.

    Noh T, et al. Lef1 haploinsufficient mice display a low turnover and low bone mass phenotype in a gender- and age-specific manner. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5438.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0005438

  501. 501.

    Hoeppner LH, et al. Lef1ΔN binds β-catenin and increases osteoblast activity and trabecular bone mass. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:10950-10959.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.165100

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.