Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Exosomes: roles and therapeutic potential in osteoarthritis

Zhenhong Ni, Siru Zhou, Song Li and 7 more

Bone Research · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41413-020-0100-9

Abstract

Exosomes participate in many physiological and pathological processes by regulating cell–cell communication, which are involved in numerous diseases, including osteoarthritis (OA). Exosomes are detectable in the human articular cavity and were observed to change with OA progression. Several joint cells, including chondrocytes, synovial fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and tenocytes, can produce and secrete exosomes that influence the biological effects of targeted cells. In addition, exosomes from stem cells can protect the OA joint from damage by promoting cartilage repair, inhibiting synovitis, and mediating subchondral bone remodeling. This review summarizes the roles and therapeutic potential of exosomes in OA and discusses the perspectives and challenges related to exosome-based treatment for OA patients in the future.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent type of degenerative joint disease that affects over 300 million people worldwide. Chronic pain and motion dysfunction induced by OA seriously reduced the quality of life of patients. In addition, the socioeconomic burden of OA on patients and society is considerable. Current OA management is broadly divided into nonpharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical treatments.– Nonpharmacological treatments, such as exercise, weight loss, and physical therapy, are suggested as the appropriate therapy for early-stage OA patients. Pharmacological treatments are mainly aimed at achieving pain control for better function and quality of daily life. Surgical treatment is most widely used for end-stage patients with serious functional disability. At present, there are few satisfactory strategies to improve joint homeostasis and delay OA progression., Understanding the underlying mechanisms of OA can facilitate the development of novel therapies for future clinical needs.

OA has been previously described primarily in terms of articular cartilage destruction, but accumulating evidence has revealed that OA is a disease with whole-joint damage and dysfunction., During OA progression, the pathologic changes in joints include cartilage damage, remodeling of the subchondral bone, inflammatory activation in the synovium, degeneration of ligaments and the menisci, and changes in the joint capsule, bursa, periarticular muscles, nerves, and local fat pads. Several factors have been revealed to be associated with pathological changes in the OA joint, including aging, trauma, mechanical loading, and genetic and metabolic disorders., Moreover, the different tissues in the joint could influence each other during the course of OA, which may synergistically contribute to OA pathology and clinical symptoms.– Subchondral bone is a layer of cortical bone below the articular cartilage and the underlying trabecular bone in the joint, which was recently proposed to play a significant role in OA pathogenesis. The subchondral bone could affect cartilage degeneration through mechanical changes or paracrine-mediated bone-cartilage cross-talk.– The cytokines from synovial fibroblasts (SFB) of inflammatory cells could influence the degradation of the cartilage matrix and the formation of osteophytes by releasing proinflammatory factors such as IL-1β and bone-regulated factors including BMP-2. Inflammatory activation of the synovium and infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) can lead to the release of various proinflammatory mediators that not only cause widespread changes in the structure and function of synovial tissue but also promote articular cartilage damage and accelerate OA development.– Therefore, investigating intercellular communication within and/or among different joint cells during OA development could be beneficial for understanding the pathogenesis of OA and exploring new therapeutic strategies for OA in the future.

Exosomes are considered important mediators of cell–cell communication that participate in numerous physiological and pathological processes. Recently, the roles and therapeutic potential of exosomes in OA have been increasingly addressed in this field. In this review, we summarize the existing research on exosomes in OA and discuss the perspective and challenges related to exosome-based treatment for OA patients.

Intercellular communication mediator

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound vehicles that can be divided into three types, including exosomes, microvesicles (MVs), and apoptotic bodies. As an important kind of EV, exosomes have received the most attention over the past decade. Exosomes can be secreted by various cells and mediate intercellular communication via their contents, including lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins.

The diameter of exosomes usually ranges from 30–150 nm, and the density is between 1.13 and 1.19 g·mL−1. Trams et al. found that exfoliated membrane vesicles may serve a physiologic function and suggested these vesicles as exosomes. In 1983, Harding et al. observed that membrane-bound vesicles could be released by multivesicular endosome (MVE) exocytosis. Later, researchers found that the transferrin receptor could transfer from the surface of the cell into internal vesicles to form MVEs. In 1987, Johnstone et al. observed that exosome release during reticulocyte maturation was associated with plasma membrane activities. Raposo et al. later found that exosomes played an important role in antigen presentation and T cell activation. Then, the relationship between exosomes and tumors was reported., In 2007, Valadi et al. found that mRNA and microRNA can be sent to other cells by exosomes, indicating that exosomes may mediate intercellular communication by delivering nucleic acids. Thereafter, an increasing number of studies have shown that exosomes play important physiological and pathological roles by mediating cell–cell communication.,

Exosome biogenesis

Exosome biogenesis can be divided into different phases, including early endosome formation by invagination of the plasma membrane, late endosome formation by cargo selection, the formation of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) from late endosomes and membrane fusion between MVBs and the plasma membrane, leading to the release of the vesicular contents, named exosomes– (Fig. 1). The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), gene-2-interacting protein X linked by apoptosis and tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG-101), is mainly responsible for the formation and release of exosomes.– The ESCRT is mainly composed of ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III in complex. ESCRT-0, -I and -II contain ubiquitin-binding subunits that can capture ubiquitin-tagged cargo, while ESCRT-III contributes to vesicle budding and scission., However, exosome formation can occur independently of the ESCRT complex under certain conditions. The lipids are capable of promoting exosome formation. For example, the transfer of exosome-associated domains into the endosome lumen in a ceramide-activated model does not rely on ESCRT function.,

Methods of exosome separation

The enrichment of exosomes with high purity was the critical step for basic research and the further clinical application of exosomes. Currently, different methods for exosome separation, including ultracentrifugation, size-based techniques, immunoaffinity purification, precipitation, and microfluidics-based isolation techniques, have been developed based on the size, shape, density, and surface proteins of exosomes. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages and need to be further improved to promote the research on exosomes and their application.–

Ultracentrifugation

Ultracentrifugation is the most common method to separate different biological components, such as viruses, bacteria, subcellular organelles, and EVs. Ultracentrifugation is currently considered the classical method of exosome isolation and can be divided into density gradient ultracentrifugation and differential ultracentrifugation. A centrifugal force between ×100 000 and 150 000 g is often used in this separation method. However, ultracentrifugation has some shortcomings, such as requiring advanced supercentrifugation and consuming extensive time. Moreover, ultracentrifugation may influence the structures of exosomes, which would impede downstream analysis.

Size-based technique

Size-based technique such as ultrafiltration is another kind of isolation method and has been used to harvest exosomes from urine, serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and cell culture medium by particle size or molecular weight.,, This exosome isolation method does not require complex equipment, and the operation procedure is relatively simple. However, this method still poses some challenges., For example, the isolated exosome may be contaminated by molecular aggregates, decreasing exosome purity. In addition, the shear stress produced in the isolation process may induce the deterioration of exosomes.

Immunoaffinity purification

Based on marker proteins in the bilayer membranes of exosomes, exosomes can be selectively separated through immunoprecipitation mediated by specific immobilized antibodies. This isolation method could effectively improve exosome purity in some cases without complicated procedures. In addition, immunoaffinity purification could distinguish different subgroups of exosomes according to their special marker proteins, which may be beneficial for detailed mechanistic investigations in the future. Nevertheless, this method requires excellent antibody specificity, rigorous sample preparation, and costly reagents. In addition, only those EVs expressing the antibody-recognized protein can be separated, which may result in a low yield of exosomes.

Precipitation

Precipitation with polyethylene glycols (PEGs) is widely used to isolate viruses and small particles.,– Polymers can adhere to water molecules, decreasing exosome solubility, and this effect can be used to separate exosomes from conditioned media, serum, or urine. The use of precipitation for exosome isolation is convenient and does not require special equipment. In addition, the concentration of isolated exosomes is relatively high. However, there are still many problems with this method, such as low recovery and high impurities.

Microfluidics-based isolation techniques

Microfluidics-based isolation is an alternative isolation method that is based on physical and biochemical properties, such as size, density, and immune affinity. In addition, it is a new sorting method that involves acoustic, electrophoretic, and electromagnetic procedures.– The steps of this method mainly include immunoaffinity, sieving, and trapping exosomes on porous structures. This method consumes small amounts of sample volume, reagents, and separation time. In addition, microfluidics-based isolation could synergistically enrich exosomes and improve purity in combination with other exosome separation methods. However, this method requires advanced equipment, which may restrict its large-scale application.

Exosome identification

Exosome identification is mainly based on morphological features, particle size, and signature proteins such as CD9, CD63, CD81, and HSP90. There are different methods to identify the characteristics of exosomes. First, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can be used to identify exosomes directly. SEM observes the exosome surface microstructure, while TEM has a maximal resolution of 0.2 nm and can reveal the internal structure and morphology of exosomes. Second, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) could analyze the particle size and the concentration of exosomes. The process of NAT-based detection is relatively simple, and the result can be better quantified. Third, western blot technology contributes to estimating specific marker proteins in exosomes, including CD63, CD8, TSG101, flotillin-1, ALIX, CD9, CD81, and CD82. Fourth, flow cytometry (FCM) can be used to analyze the size of exosomes by labeling targeted exosomes with specific antibodies or fluorescent dyes. FCM has some advantages for exosome analysis, including high-throughput screening and data quantification. Moreover, FCM can be used to distinguish different subpopulations of exosomes. In addition to the above methods, atomic force microscopy, tunable resistive pulse sensing, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) could also be used for the identification of exosomes.

The function of exosomes in bone homeostasis

Over the past decades, exosomes have been found to affect several physiological and pathological processes via the exosomal contents, including RNAs, DNAs, proteins, and lipids. To date, cumulative evidence has revealed that exosomes participate in many biological processes, including angiogenesis, cell differentiation, immunomodulation, metabolic balance, and development,,,– and are highly involved in many diseases, such as cancer, neurodegenerative disease, autoimmune diseases, and cardiovascular diseases.– Recently, the roles of exosomes in bone homeostasis have been extensively addressed.

Bone homeostasis is primarily maintained by bone resorption and bone formation, which are involved in various types of cells, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and MSCs. Abnormalities in bone homeostasis are closely related to bone diseases in several ways, such as affecting the onset and progression of osteoporosis and the wound repair of bone fractures. Many studies have shown that cells in the bone microenvironment can secrete exosomes to regulate bone resorption and bone formation. Osteoblast-derived exosomes carry potential osteogenesis-related signaling, such as the eukaryotic initiation factor-2 pathway, which may participate in bone formation. Exosomes from mineralizing osteoblasts could promote the differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells to osteoblasts. Exosomes from osteoclasts could inhibit osteoblast function, osteogenic differentiation, and bone formation via exosomal miRNAs, including miR-214-3p and miR-23a-5p.– miR-218 contained in osteocyte-derived exosomes plays an important role in the myostatin-mediated inhibition of osteoblastic differentiation. In addition, MSCs can produce and release exosomes to participate in maintaining bone homeostasis. The exosomes produced by MSCs can prevent osteocytes from undergoing apoptosis in a hypoxia/serum deprivation model and glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis model., The exosomes excreted by iPS-derived MSCs can promote the regeneration of bone defects via enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis in an ovariectomized rat model. Exosomal transfer RNA-derived fragments from the plasma of osteoporosis patients, including tRF-25, tRF-38, and tRF-18, were significantly increased compared with those from healthy controls, suggesting that these tRFs may be new diagnostic biomarkers for osteoporosis. Exosomes from the BMSCs of osteoporosis patients decrease the osteogenic ability of MSCs by targeting the microRNA-21/SMAD7 pathway. Exosomes from different tissue-derived MSCs or iPS cell-derived MSCs could prevent bone loss, promote bone formation, and prevent osteoporosis in experimental animal models,– indicating that MSC-derived exosomes could be a potential therapeutic treatment for osteoporosis.

In addition to osteoporosis, MSC-derived exosomes also greatly contribute to fracture healing. The exosomes from hypoxically preconditioned MSCs had a higher miR-126 level and promoted fracture healing via the SPRED1/Ras/Erk signaling pathway. The injection of BMSC-derived exosomes can rescue the retardation of fracture healing in the femur fracture model of CD9(−/−) mice. Similarly, BMSC-derived exosomes can enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis partially through the BMP-2/Smad1/RUNX2 and HIF-1alpha/VEGF pathways at fracture sites to accelerate fracture repair in a femoral nonunion rat model. Moreover, umbilical cord MSC-derived exosomes also promote fracture healing in a rat model of stabilized fracture, which is involved in the HIF-1alpha-mediated regulation of angiogenesis.

In addition to osteoporosis and fracture, an increasing number of studies have revealed that exosomes are closely involved in OA pathology and have strong therapeutic potential for this disease.

Exosomes in OA

The roles and underlying mechanisms of exosomes in OA have attracted great interest from researchers. To date, there are two main research directions in this field. One set of studies have mainly focused on the diagnostic significance and biological effects of endogenous exosomes during OA (Fig. 2). In another, researchers have paid attention to the therapeutic effects of stem cell-derived exosomes on OA and potential optimization strategies (Fig. 3).

Exosomes from joint tissues

Some research has indicated that exosomes are present in human synovial fluid (SF).– Moreover, the quantity and composition of SF-derived exosomes could be changed in joint diseases, including OA, rheumatoid arthritis, and reactive arthritis.– Skriner et al. reported that citrullinated proteins, including fibrinogen D fragment, Sp alpha (like CD5 antigen protein) receptor, fibrinogen beta-chain precursor, Sp alpha (like CD5 antigen protein) receptor, fibrin beta-chain, and fibrin alpha-chain fragment, were observed in synovial exosomes from RA patients but not in those with OA, indicating that exosomes carrying citrullinated peptides may be unique in different joint diseases. Kolhe et al. revealed the characterization of miRNAs in exosomes from the SF of OA patients. Their data showed that the SF-derived exosomal miRNAs differed between male and female OA patients and that the specific miRNAs for female OA patients are relevant to the estrogen response and toll-like receptor signal. OA SF-derived EVs functionally influence the expression of anabolic and catabolic activity-related genes. In addition, Domenis et al. found that exosomes from the SF of patients with gonarthrosis function to enhance the production of proinflammatory factors from M1 macrophages, which suggests that SF-derived exosomes may play a role in the pathological process of joint diseases.

Zhao et al. reported that SF samples obtained from both early OA and late-stage OA contained much higher exosome levels than those from controls. In addition, the levels of exosomal lncRNA PCGEM1 from OA SF gradually increased with OA progression. Moreover, Gao, K. demonstrated that exosomes from end-stage knee OA patients have a higher level of chemokines and could recruit inflammatory cells and inhibit cartilage proliferation, which may ultimately promote joint degeneration. The above data provide the clinical relevance of exosomes and OA pathology, which improves our understanding of the OA microenvironment from the new perspective of exosomes (Table 1).

Cartilage-derived exosomes

Chondrocytes are the only cell type in articular cartilage. Previous studies have revealed that chondrocytes can release small membrane-bound extracellular articular cartilage matrix vesicles (ACVs) with a diameter of 100 nM to participate in the pathologic mineralization of osteoarthritic articular cartilage., Exosomes have been shown to share many features of matrix vesicles, including lipid and protein content, size and morphology, suggesting that matrix vesicles and exosomes may be homologous. Moreover, these ACVs contain significant amounts of RNA, similar to exosomes, which are protected from enzymatic degeneration and can be transferred to intact primary chondrocytes. The distinction between ACVs and chondrocyte-derived exosomes is still unclear and needs more research. Nevertheless, an increasing number of studies have revealed that both ACVs and chondrocyte-derived exosomes could mediate cell–cell communication.– Exosomes from primary chondrocytes cultured in a normal environment (D0 exosomes) could restore mitochondrial dysfunction and enhance M2 macrophage penetration with a reduction in M1 macrophages. The intra-articular administration of D0 exosomes efficiently delayed OA progression. We found that exosome-like vesicles derived from osteoarthritic chondrocytes could stimulate inflammasome activation and increase mature IL-1β production in macrophages via the miR-449a-5p/ATG4B/autophagy pathway, which may aggravate synovitis and accelerate the progression of OA. In addition, Chen et al. reported that exosomes derived from chondrocytes (CC-Exos) could induce efficient ectopic chondrogenesis of cartilage progenitor cell (CPC) constructs in subcutaneous environments, which may represent a cell-free therapeutic approach for cartilage regeneration. Moreover, chondrocyte-secreted exosomes could affect chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix synthesis via the miR-95-5p-regulated expression of HDAC2/8. The exosomes from OA chondrocytes could inhibit cell proliferation and enhance the apoptosis of chondrocytes, which was involved in the GSK-3β-mediated enrichment of HULC and decrease in miR-372-3p in exosomes. In addition, exosomes from chondrocytes could promote the chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs by activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which was related to the inhibition of GSK-3β expression by exosomal miR-8485. These results supported that chondrocytes could produce exosomes that mediate cell–cell communication, which play a functional role in AC maintenance and OA pathogenesis.

Synovium-derived exosomes

The synovium is a key component of synovial joints and greatly contributes to maintaining the homeostasis of articular cartilage. Abnormalities of the synovium, especially low-grade inflammation, have been reported to be associated with clinical signs and joint histopathology of OA patients.– The inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines produced by synovial macrophages and synoviocytes have been found to play important roles in regulating cartilage degradation and osteophyte formation.,– However, the role and cross-talk between synovium-derived exosomes and joint cells in OA pathology are poorly understood.

Headland et al. reported that neutrophil-derived MVs can penetrate cartilage, indicating that EVs from the synovium could mediate the cross-talk between the synovium and cartilage. Kato et al. isolated exosomes from IL-1beta-motivated SFB of human normal knee joints and cocultured these exosomes with articular chondrocytes. They found that exosomes from IL-1beta-stimulated SFB dramatically increased the levels of catabolism-related genes, including MMP-13 and ADAMTS-5, while decreasing the expression of anabolism-related genes, including COL2A1 and ACAN. Moreover, the exosomes from IL-1beta motivated SFBs to induce more proteoglycan derived from cartilage explants. These data first suggested that exosomes from the synovium could induce OA-like changes in vitro and ex vivo. In addition, synovial mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could also produce functional exosomes (SMSC-Exos) that could be taken up by articular chondrocytes. These SMSC-Exos activated YAP via dephosphorylation and decreased ECM secretion, and they induced articular chondrocyte proliferation and migration via Wnt5a and Wnt5b signaling. Moreover, exosomes collected from miR-140-5p-overexpressing synovial MSCs (SMSC-140s) promoted the proliferation and migration of articular chondrocytes but did not affect the secretion of ECM in vitro. The SMSC-140s also significantly ameliorated the severity of joint wear in a rat OA model. These findings revealed that the synovium could release functional exosomes, and their function can be regulated by their contents. In addition to SFB and MSCs, exosomes from other synovial cells, including macrophages, T cells and endothelial cells, should also be given close attention. Recently, Tsuno et al. investigated the effects of salazosulfapyridine and methotrexate on the proteome of exosomes produced by a human synovial sarcoma cell line (SW982). Their data indicated that these anti-rheumatic drugs changed the protein profiles of SW982-derived exosomes and inhibited the effect of IL-1beta on the exosomal proteome. The effects of anti-OA strategies on synovium-derived exosomes are worth further study.

Subchondral bone-derived exosomes

Subchondral bone plays an important role in the protection of normal joints and undergoes structural changes, including bone sclerosis, during the OA process., The remodeling of subchondral bone was strongly associated with the grade of cartilage lesions in clinical OA patients and somewhat related to joint pain in some cases. In experimental OA models, targeting specific signals in subchondral bone, such as TGF-β, could attenuate the pathological severity of OA and reduce the pain response.,– Previous studies revealed that exosomes could function by regulating the TGF-β signal of their targeted cells.– In addition, Cai et al. reported that exosomes from TGF-β1 gene-modified dendritic cells delayed the development of inflammatory bowel disease by increasing CD4 + Foxp3 + Tregs and inhibiting Th17 in a dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced mouse model. The effects of exosomes on the signaling pathway of subchondral bone cells, including TGF-β signaling, and their potential roles in OA progression deserve further attention. Cells, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes and bone marrow MSCs, can secrete exosomes to regulate the bone microenvironment and mediate cell–cell communication,– but their roles and underlying mechanisms in the remodeling of subchondral bone during the OA process are not well known. Recently, Liu et al. harvested subchondral bones from OA patients with different severities of joint wear and obtained osteoblasts from them. They determined that osteoblast cells from OA subchondral bones could produce exosome-like EVs 30~150 nm in diameter containing exosomal markers (CD9, HSP70, and Flotillin-1). Moreover, these exosomes from the osteoblast cells of subchondral bones (SB-OC-EXOs) from OA patients contained high levels of hsamiR-4717-5p, hsa-miR-885-3p, hsa-miR-135a-3p, hsamiR-210-5p, and hsa-miR-1225-5p. The physiological and pathological effects of SB-OC-EXOs need further investigation. In addition, exosomes from other cells of subchondral bones are also worthy of attention.

Infrapatellar fat pad-derived exosomes

Infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP), also termed Hoffa’s fat pad, is a knee adipose tissue that plays important roles in knee joint function and pathology., The size of the IPFP is closely related to knee cartilage volume and structural abnormalities in the clinic. In addition, an increasing number of studies have identified IPFP as an emerging source of inflammation that could contribute to OA progression, including pathological severity and knee pain.,,– Moreover, IPFP-derived MSCs (IPFP-MSCs) presented potent capability for cartilage regeneration in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that these stem cells are promising cell sources for OA treatment.– Recently, we separated and identified exosomes from IPFP-MSCs (MSC(IPFP)-Exos). Our data demonstrated that MSC(IPFP)-Exos can ameliorate gait abnormalities in OA mice and alleviate articular cartilage lesions in vivo. Exosomal RNA-seq revealed that miR-100-5p was highly abundant in MSC(IPFP)-Exos. MSC(IPFP)-Exos may regulate the biological behaviors of chondrocytes via miR-100-5p-mediated inhibition of mTOR signaling. In addition to exosomes from MSCs, the physiological and pathological effects of exosomes from other IPFP-derived cells, including adipocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, and granulocytes, should also be investigated in the future.

Tendon-derived exosomes

The tendon is an important part of the joint structure that maintains joint stability and regulates the range of motion. Abnormalities of the tendon have been observed during OA progression and shown to be related to OA development.– Ibrahim et al. found increased tendon degeneration in patients with shoulder OA. The samples from OA-derived tendons presented a degenerative appearance with increased scar tissue and noncollagenous ECM. Failed repair of the subscapularis tendon (SSC) significantly increased the risk of developing secondary glenohumeral OA, which indicates that enhancement of tendon repair may be a potential strategy for preventing secondary OA after joint injury. Recently, some studies revealed that tendon-derived exosomes could promote tendon repair and regeneration., Xu et al. reported that tenocytes could secrete exosomes that promote the tenogenic differentiation of MSCs. Moreover, the tenogenic differentiation of MSCs induced by tenocyte-derived exosomes could be blocked by the inhibition of TGF-beta signaling. In addition, Wang et al. harvested exosomes from conditioned culture medium of tendon stem cells (TSCs) using ultra-high-speed gradient centrifugation and estimated the effect of these exosomes on tendon injury healing. Their experimental results showed that TSC-derived exosomes significantly enhanced tendon matrix maintenance in vitro and increased the biomechanical characteristics of ultimate tension and maximal charging in a rat Achilles tendon tendinopathy model. More research is needed on role of tendon-derived exosomes in OA cartilage or other tissues.

Ligament-derived exosomes

The ligament is an important intraarticular structure that greatly contributes to joint function. A previous study revealed that the degeneration of the intraarticular ligament was highly associated with cartilage and bone damage during the OA process. Destruction of ligament integrity, such as the cruciate ligament, seriously decreased joint stability and promoted the development of knee OA, indicating an important role of the ligament in OA disease.– Zhao et al. isolated exosomes from periodontal ligament stem cells using an ultracentrifugation method and identified their exosomal characteristics by TEM, western blot and nanosight tracing analysis. Cyclic stretch force promoted the secretion of exosomes from periodontal ligament cells (PDL cells), and these PDL-derived exosomes inhibited the production of IL-1beta in macrophages through the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. In addition, Zhao et al. also revealed that human PDL fibroblasts (hPDLFs) could produce exosomes. The hPDLF-derived exosomes promoted the inflammatory response and inhibited the osteogenic activity of osteoblasts, which affected bone remodeling in vitro. In addition to the PDL, exosomes from joint ligaments, such as the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee joint, should be further studied. Moreover, it is worth exploring the underlying mechanisms of ligament-derived exosomes in joint diseases, including OA.

The therapeutic effects of stem cell-derived exosomes on OA

Stem cells such as bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and adipose mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs) have shown potent cartilage regeneration ability and have been clinically tested for OA treatment.– Clinical trials of intra-articular injection of MSCs into the knee with OA have exhibited reliable safety and feasibility,, while this approach could ameliorate the knee society clinical rating system (KSS) and OA outcome score, and partially alleviate knee pain.– However, the detailed mechanisms for this and other stem cell-based OA treatments have not been well clarified. An increasing number of studies have suggested that the therapeutic effects of stem cells are mainly dependent on the paracrine function of stem cells, including the secretion of EVs.,, To date, exosomes from different types of stem cells have been revealed to regulate cartilage regeneration and attenuate OA progression in certain models (Fig. 3, Table 2).

Exosomes from bone mesenchymal stem cells

The exosomes derived from BMSCs could affect cell fate, including apoptosis, proliferation, invasion, and migration., Moreover, BMSC-derived exosomes can regulate a variety of physiological and pathological processes, including the immune response, osteogenesis, fibrosis, and angiogenesis.,– Several studies have reported that BMSC-derived exosomes significantly promote the regeneration and repair of injured tissues, including cartilage and subchondral bone.,– The exosomes as well as MVs/microparticles (MPs) from TGFβ3-pretreated BMSCs significantly increased the expression of anabolic markers and decreased the levels of catabolic marker genes in osteoarthritic chondrocytes. In addition, these BMSC-derived exosomes could prevent osteoarthritic chondrocytes from undergoing apoptosis. Qi et al. observed that BMSC exosomes could be taken up by chondrocytes to abolish IL-1β-induced cell apoptosis and damage to the mitochondrial membrane potential, in which p38, ERK, and Akt pathways were involved. Chen et al. also reported that chondrocytes could take up BMSC exosomes labeled with Dio fluorescent dye. These Dio-labeled exosomes were mainly localized in the perinuclear region of chondrocytes and could be fused with the mitochondria. Their data also suggested that BMSC-derived exosomes could rescue mitochondrial dysfunction in degenerative chondrocytes. In addition, BMSC-derived exosomes could suppress the activity of osteoclasts in subchondral bone via inhibition of the RANKL-RANK-TRAF6 signaling pathway.

Moreover, BMSC-derived exosomes could also regulate the biological phenotypes of other OA-related cells, including SFB and macrophages. Jin et al. revealed that human BMSC-derived exosomes inhibited the proliferation and enhanced the apoptosis of IL-1β-treated SFB via a miRNA-26a-5p-mediated decrease in PTGS2. BMSC-derived exosomes decreased the percentages of F4/80+ macrophages that expressed CD86, MHCII, or CD40 markers. These exosomes also markedly downregulated the level of TNF-α and upregulated that of IL-10, suggesting that BMSC exosomes could inhibit the activation of macrophages in vitro.

In the collagenase-induced murine model, intra-articular injection of BMSC exosomes reduced articular cartilage damage and subchondral bone degradation. Similarly, the damage to cartilage and subchondral bone in the lumbar facet joint (LFJ) OA model can be largely abrogated by BMSC exosomes. Moreover, BMSC-derived exosomes could inhibit aberrant nerve invasion and the abnormal formation of H-type vessels in the subchondral bone to relieve pain in LFJ OA mice. In an experimental rat OA model, hBMSC-derived exosomes decreased synovial tissue proliferation and inflammatory cell infiltration, downregulating the levels of proinflammatory factors and alleviating pathological changes in the synovium. Most current studies in animal OA models mainly focus on the analysis of pathological changes caused by BMSC-derived exosomes, but there is still a lack of assessments of behavioral changes in these models.

Drug intervention or gene modification could regulate the secretion and contents of exosomes, which may influence the effects of exosomes on their targeted cells.,,– Mao et al. investigated the influence of exosomes from miR-92a-3p-overexpressing BMSCs on chondrogenesis and cartilage degeneration. The BMSCs were transfected with miR-92a-3p mimic, and then the exosomes were collected and named MSC-miR-92a-3p-Exos. They found that MSC-miR-92a-3p-Exos significantly upregulated the levels of aggrecan, SOX9, COL9A1, COL2A1, and COMP and downregulated the expression of COL10A1, RUNX2 and MMP13, suggesting that BMSC-derived exosomes promote chondrogenesis and prevent cartilage matrix degradation in a miR-92a-3p-dependent manner. Moreover, the MSC-miR-92a-3p-Exos could effectively protect the articular cartilage from damage and delay the progression of early OA in a collagenase-induced mouse model. In addition, exosomes derived from kartogenin-preconditioned BMSCs were reported to be more effective for cartilage repair and matrix formation in vitro and in vivo than exosomes from BMSCs without kartogenin treatment. Therefore, the regulation of exosomal secretion and contents by drug intervention or gene modification could be a potential strategy to enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of BMSC-derived exosomes for OA.

Exosomes from synovial mesenchymal stem cells

Synovial mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs) have shown preferable chondrogenic differentiation capacity in vitro.– Koizumi et al. also reported that SMSCs from OA or RA patients could efficiently enhance cartilage repair using allogenic tissue engineered constructs in vitro and in vivo. Intra-articular injection of SMSCs could markedly promote cartilage repair and be used to treat joint-related diseases, including OA, in experimental animal models.–

Recently, several studies revealed that exosomes derived from SMSCs could effectively promote cartilage regeneration and attenuate OA progression.,, Tao et al. reported that SMSC-derived exosomes could induce the proliferation and emigration of articular chondrocytes in a Wnt5a/Wnt5b/YAP-dependent manner. However, these SMSC exosomes decreased ECM secretion. Exosomes derived from SMSCs transfected with miR-140-5p (SMSC-140-Exos) not only promoted the proliferation and migration of chondrocytes but also prevented ECM damage in vitro. Moreover, SMSC-140-Exo treatment significantly lessened joint wear, decreased OARSI scores and delayed OA progression in a rat OA model. Similarly, Zhu et al. found that exosomes isolated from human synovial membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells (SMMSCs) promoted the migration and proliferation of chondrocytes in vitro. Moreover, SMMSC exosomes (SMMSC-Exos) elevated ICRS scores, decreased OARSI scores and maintained the collagen II content in a collagenase-induced mouse OA model. In addition to cartilage homeostasis, exosomes derived from SMMSCs can also regulate bone remodeling in vitro and in vivo. It was reported that SMMSC-derived exosomes decreased glucocorticoid (GC)-induced fatty cell accumulation, bone marrow necrosis, and trabecular bone loss. Micro-CT analysis also revealed that SMMSC-Exos significantly improved the microstructures of trabecular bone and mineral density in GC-induced ONFH (femoral head osteonecrosis) in rats. In addition, SMMSC-derived exosomes partially reversed GC-induced proliferation arrest and the apoptosis of BMSCs in vitro. As bone remodeling, including subchondral bone change and osteophyte formation, is commonly observed during the OA process and is closely related to OA progression, the effects of exosomes derived from SMMSCs or other cells on bone remodeling in OA pathogenesis are worth investigating.

Exosomes from adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells

Adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs) were demonstrated to have potent capability for cartilage regeneration and inflammatory modulation and are considered an excellent cell source for OA treatment.– However, the mechanisms of AMSC-induced cartilage regeneration are still not clear. Increasing evidence suggests that AMSCs may prevent cartilage erosion and improve joint function primarily through the paracrine secretion of trophic factors to regulate the local microenvironment, making it more favorable for repair and regeneration. Tofino-Vian et al. reported that EVs, including MVs and exosomes, mainly mediate the paracrine effects of AMSCs on osteoarthritic osteoblasts. The MVs and exosomes from human AMSCs significantly decreased the activity of senescence-associated β-galactosidase and γH2AX foci accumulation, reduced IL-6 and PGE2 levels, enhanced the release of IL-10, and downregulated mitochondrial membrane potential in IL-1β-treated osteoblasts. Moreover, AMSC-derived MVs and exosomes could inhibit the production of proinflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α, IL-6, PGE2, and NO, and MMP activity and MMP-13 levels while increasing the levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and chondrocyte-specific molecule collagen II in OA chondrocytes, which suggested potential anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects of AMSC-derived MVs and exosomes. These findings provide a new perspective for developing therapeutic approaches for OA based on AMSC-derived EVs.

Recently, our group isolated and identified IPFP MSC-derived exosomes. We found that MSC(IPFP)-Exos could significantly ameliorate the pathological severity of articular cartilage and partially improve the abnormal gait in DMM-induced OA mice by regulating cartilage homeostasis. miR-100-5p was abundant in MSC(IPFP)-Exos and may mediate the inhibition of mTOR and autophagy enhancement by binding to the 3′-untranslated region of mTOR. Similarly, Woo et al. reported that EVs (mean diameter of 86.46 nm) from human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) enhanced the proliferation and migration of human OA chondrocytes and maintained the chondrocyte matrix. Intra-articular injection of hASC-EVs could delay OA progression and protect cartilage from degeneration in both MIA rat and DMM mouse models. In addition, Zhao et al. isolated ADSCs from donor adipose tissue after elective liposuction surgery and collected exosomes from these cells (ADSCs-Exos). They found that ADSCs-Exos could downregulate the levels of proinflammatory genes and upregulate the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines in activated SFB, enhancing the proliferation and chondrogenic potential of periosteal cells via upregulation of miR145 and miR221. Collectively, these studies further support AMSC-derived exosomes as a potential therapeutic solution for OA in the future.

Exosomes from embryonic mesenchymal stem cells

Embryonic MSCs have been regarded as another potential candidate for cartilage regeneration and OA treatment.– Recently, some studies revealed that exosomes from embryonic MSCs evidently regulated the biological phenotypes of chondrocytes and delayed OA progression in experimental OA models.– In 2016, Zhang et al. successfully isolated and identified exosomes from HuES9 human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). After intra-articular injections of hESC-derived exosomes into osteochondral defects in rats, they observed that the damage to cartilage and subchondral bone was largely reversed at 6 weeks and almost completely restored at 12 weeks, indicating that embryonic MSC exosomes (MSC-Exos) could be a cell-free therapeutic alternative for cartilage repair and joint-related disease. Similarly, exosomes from deathless E1-MYC 16.3 human embryonic stem cell-derived MSCs enhanced integration and surface regularity with neighboring host cartilage at 12 weeks and 6 weeks in a rat osteochondral defect model. Moreover, these exosomes significantly promoted neotissue formation and extracellular matrix deposition, increased M2 macrophage infiltration, and reduced M1 macrophage and proinflammatory cytokine production as early as 2 weeks. This study also demonstrated that embryonic MSC-derived exosomes could be endocytosed by chondrocytes to regulate chondrocyte migration, proliferation and matrix synthesis through adenosine-dependent AKT and ERK signaling pathways. In the DMM-induced OA model, exosomes from human embryonic stem cell-induced mesenchymal stem cells (ESC-MSCs) significantly prevented cartilage destruction and matrix degradation after 4 weeks of intra-articular injection. In addition, exosomes from embryonic MSCs could reduce the inflammatory response, relieve early pain, and promote the repair of cartilage and healing of subchondral bone in an OA model of the temporomandibular joint of immunocompetent rats. Embryonic MSC-derived exosomes reversed the IL-1β-mediated inhibition of s-GAG synthesis and reduced the IL-1β-induced production of nitric oxide and MMP13 via adenosine-mediated activation of AKT, ERK, and AMPK. Furthermore, TGF-β1 enhanced miR-135b expression in embryonic MSC-derived exosomes, which may promote chondrocyte proliferation by decreasing the expression of Sp1 and accelerating cartilage repair in a rat OA model.

Other stem cell-derived exosomes in OA

Recently, Zavatti, M. et al. explored the effect of amniotic fluid stem cell (AFSC)-derived exosomes on cartilage repair in an MIA-induced animal OA model. The AFSC exosomes enhanced pain tolerance and induced an almost complete restoration of hyaline cartilage with good surface regularity. They also observed that AFSC exosomes inhibit M1 polarization, indicating role of AFSC exosomes in regulating inflammation in OA treatment. Yan et al. revealed that exosomes from umbilical MSCs (U-MSC-Exos) had potent chondroprotective effects, including stimulating chondrocyte proliferation and migration, increasing matrix synthesis and inhibiting chondrocyte apoptosis. Intra-articular injection of U-MSC-Exos could significantly promote the repair of cartilage defects in vivo. Moreover, their data also showed that the U-MSC-Exos produced from 3D culture exerted a stronger effect on cartilage repair than those from conventional 2D culture. In addition, the exosomes of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs) have been revealed to inhibit inflammatory reactions and maintain anabolism homeostasis in temporomandibular joint chondrocytes via miR-100-5p-mediated mTOR inhibition. The exosomes produced by induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs (iMSC-Exos) were isolated using an ultrafiltration method and identified by western blot assay, tunable resistive pulse-sensing analysis and TEM. iMSC-Exos with a diameter of 50–150 nm significantly promoted chondrocyte migration and proliferation in vitro and had a stronger therapeutic effect on OA collagenase-induced mice than SMMSC-Exos, indicating that iMSC-Exos would be more ideal for future use in OA treatment.

The exosomal contents in OA

The exosomal contents in OA are the basis of exosome physiological function in intercellular communication and signal transduction. The contents, including microRNA, long noncoding RNA, DNA, lipid, and protein, could vary with disease progression and greatly contribute to pathological changes in disease., In addition, the exosomal contents were also closely related to the therapeutic effect of MSC-derived exosomes on the repair and regeneration of injured tissues., To date, increasing work has revealed the important roles and underlying mechanisms of exosomal contents during the OA process, including miRNAs, lncRNAs, and proteins. However, other types of RNA and the lipid composition of exosomes in OA pathology have not been reported and need to be further investigated.

Exosomal miRNA in OA

The miRNA content of SF exosomes differed between OA- and non-OA-derived samples. There is significant gender-specific differential expression of exosome miRNAs in SF from OA patients. In the male group, 69 miRNAs, such as miR-6878-3p, were downregulated, while 45 miRNAs, including miR-210-5p, were upregulated in exosomes isolated from OA-derived SF. In the female group, 91 miRNAs, including miR26a-5p, miR-146a-5p, and miR-6821-5p, were decreased, while 53 miRNAs, including miR-16-2-3p, were increased. GO and KEGG analyses revealed that specific exosomal miRNAs from female OA SF are closely associated with the estrogen response and TLR (toll-like receptor) signaling pathways. Mao et al. detected the expression profiles of miRNAs in exosomes derived from OA and normal chondrocytes by miRNA microarray. They found that the expression of 22 miRNAs was markedly increased, while the expression of 29 other miRNAs was decreased in OA chondrocyte-secreted exosomes in comparison with that in normal chondrocytes. Compared with normal chondrocytes, exosomal miR-92a-3p and miR-95-5p secreted from OA chondrocytes were significantly downregulated. miR-146a-5p was found to be enriched in the EVs of adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) cultured under inflammatory OA SF conditions and may contribute to OA progression. In addition, IL-1β treatment could change the miRNA profile of exosomes from human SFB, including the upregulation of 11 miRNAs and downregulation of 39 miRNAs. Using high-throughput sequencing, 124 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified by screening in OA patient-derived subchondral osteoblasts. Among these miRNAs, hsa-miR-4717-5p had the maximum fold change and targeted a multifunctional regulator of G-protein signaling RGS2. These studies indicate that exosomal miRNAs from different joint tissues vary with OA disease and are potential candidates for diagnostic OA markers and therapeutic targets.

Exosomal miRNAs play an important role in the therapeutic effects of exosomes on OA (Table 3). Jin et al. reported that miRNAs could be successfully transferred from MSCs to OA-related cells, such as SFB, through exosomes. The overexpression of miR-26a-5p could regulate hBMSC-exosome function to promote the survival of SFB via downregulation of PTGS2 in vitro and reduce synovitis in a rat OA model. TGF-β1 could increase the level of miR-135b in MSC-Exos; these exosomes thus showed enhanced stimulation of chondrocyte proliferation in vitro by negatively regulating Sp1 expression and may subsequently promote cartilage repair in vivo. The exosomes from anti-miR-92a-3p-transfected MSCs inhibited chondrogenic differentiation and the synthesis of cartilage matrix by upregulating the level of WNT5A, while the exosomes from miR-92a-3p-transfected MSCs significantly promoted cell proliferation and increased matrix synthesis in primary OA human chondrocytes. The exosomes produced by IPFP-MSCs contained abundant miR-100-5p that can bind to the 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) of mTOR to decrease its expression. The decreased mTOR may initiate autophagy and restore cartilage homeostasis in vitro and vivo.,– Similarly, miR-100-5p was also enriched in the exosomes of stem cells isolated from human exfoliated deciduous teeth and participated in the suppression of inflammation in TMJ OA chondrocytes via directly targeting mTOR signaling. The exosomes from miR-140-5p-overexpressing SMSCs (SMSC-140-Exos) could activate the YAP signal and promote the proliferation and migration of chondrocytes without decreasing ECM secretion. These SMSC-140-Exo-mediated effects were mainly dependent on the miR-140-5p/RalA/SOX9 signaling pathway. The exosomes from normal chondrocytes transfected with miR-95-3p mimicked binding to the 3ʹ-UTRs of HDAC2/8, and maintained cartilage development and homeostasis via the miR-95-3p-mediated transcriptional inhibition of HDAC2/8. In addition to its protective roles, the miRNA also contributes to the effects of exosomes on joint inflammation and OA progression. The exosomes from osteoarthritic chondrocytes (OC-Exos) could stimulate IL-1beta processing and production in macrophages via miR-449a-5p-mediated autophagy inhibition. miR-449a-5p can bind to the 3′-UTR of the ATG4B gene to inhibit its expression, which leads to autophagy inhibition and inflammasome activation of macrophages in vitro and may ultimately promote synovitis and cartilage erosion in DMM-induced mice. Antagonizing miR-449a-5p reversed OC-Exo-mediated proinflammatory effects and cartilage destruction, which provided a new perspective for OA treatment based on miR-449a-5p of OC-Exos.

The exosomal lncRNAs in OA

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are important exosomal contents that participate extensively in the regulation of a wide range of pathological and physiological processes. Exosomal lncRNAs, such as lncRNA CRNDE-h and lncRNA-p21, are considered possible biomarkers for carcinoma diagnosis and prognosis., Recently, Zhao et al. harvested SF samples from prearthritic patients, early-stage OA patients and late-stage OA patients. The exosomes from these samples were extracted by ultracentrifugation and subjected to RNA detection. They found that the exosomal lncRNA PCGEM1 was gradually elevated with OA progression and exhibited a positive relationship with the WOMAC Index (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), suggesting that exosomal lncRNA PCGEM1 could be a potent indicator for OA diagnosis and recognizing the difference between early OA and late OA in clinical practice. In addition, exosomes can modulate multiple cell phenotypes, including tissue repair and regeneration, via exosomal lncRNAs.– Liu et al. reported that MSC-Exos upregulated Col2a1 and aggrecan levels, downregulated MMP13 and Rux2 expression, and promoted the survival of IL-1β-treated chondrocytes mainly through exosomal lncRNA-KLF3-AS1. The lncRNA KLF3-AS1 enhanced the expression of GIT1 by sponging miR-206 in vitro. The overexpression of miR-206 or knockdown of GIT1 partially attenuated MSC(KLF3-AS1)-Exo-mediated effects on chondrocyte repair. These studies suggested that exosomal lncRNA-KLF3-AS1 plays an important role in the effect of MSC-Exos on osteoarthritic chondrocytes mainly through targeting the miR-206/GIT1 axis. Moreover, exosomal lncRNA-KLF3-AS1 significantly contributed to MSC-exo-mediated cartilage repair in a collagenase II-induced OA model.

The exosomal proteins in OA

Several types of specific cellular proteins can be selectively sorted into MVBs and secreted as exosome loading cargo.– Exosomal proteins have been demonstrated to contribute to cell–cell communication and signal transduction, which are highly involved in various diseases.– The synovial exosomes from RA patients contained potential autoantigenic content, including citrullinated proteins, which may participate in the autoimmune reaction. Tsuno et al. extracted serum exosomal proteins from the healthy group, OA group and RA group and identified the exosomal proteins via 2D-DIGE and mass spectrometry methods. They found that the exosomal protein profiles from the serum of the three groups were significantly different. There were 21 spots in the exosomal protein profiles with different intensities between the OA group and the healthy group, such as cathepsin F and Igalpha-2 chain C region, indicating the potential roles of these proteins in OA. Moreover, exosomal proteins have been revealed to participate in the exosome-mediated regulation of the biological response in chondrocytes. CD73/ecto-5′-nucleotidase was expressed in MSC-Exos. The CD73 inhibitor AMPCP or the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline could reduce MSC exosome-induced AKT and ERK phosphorylation in chondrocytes, indicating that exosomal CD73/ecto-5′-nucleotidase played an important role in the biological effect of MSC-Exos on cartilage.

Perspective

Exosomes may become potent candidate risk factors and early diagnostic markers for clinical OA patients in the future. Subgroups of exosomes distinguished by the levels or activity of exosome-specific proteins were highly associated with cancer onset and progression and can be used to detect early cancer., In addition, miRNAs and lncRNAs in exosomes have also been considered as potential diagnostic markers for several kinds of diseases, including RA and OA.,,,– More studies are needed to identify the different subgroups of exosomes from OA peripheral blood or SF samples and analyze their relationship with OA pathological changes and clinical classification. In addition, we can attempt to identify the original secreted cells of exosomes based on exosome-specific markers. Moreover, urine can be harvested through noninvasive approaches, which may be more acceptable for patients in clinical practice. Previous studies have revealed that the components of urine were changed with OA progression and could predict cartilage degradation as a biochemical marker, indicating that urine could be used to evaluate joint-related diseases.– In addition, the contents from urine exosomes are highly relevant to several types of disorders, including cancer, and could be used as potential diagnostic markers for these diseases.– Therefore, exosomes from body fluids other than blood, such as urine, should be given additional attention to explore their availability as diagnostic markers for OA patients.

The endogenous exosomes in our body have many physiological and pathological functions and have been considered potent therapeutic targets in a variety of diseases.– The roles and underlying mechanisms of exosomes from different joint tissues in OA pathogenesis are quite variable and could be affected by many factors, including sex, obesity, aging, basic diseases, therapeutic intervention, joint motion, and microenvironment. For example, exosomes from chondrocytes cultured in a normal environment can increase M2 macrophage infiltration and delay OA progression, while exosomes from IL-1β-treated chondrocytes promote inflammasome activation in macrophages and aggravate OA pathological severity. Intensive studies of endogenous exosomes originating from joint cells during the OA process would be beneficial for developing novel targeted therapeutic strategies. More investigations should aim to reduce the release of pro-OA (promoting OA onset and progression) exosomes and the pro-OA contents of these exosomes or inhibit exosome-mediated signal transduction in targeted cells. Conversely, some measures could be taken to increase the production of endogenous anti-OA (inhibiting OA onset and progression) exosomes, such as IPFP MSC-Exos and synovial MSC-Exos,, and to enhance their anti-OA capacity by acting on the target cells.

To date, several types of exosomes derived from MSCs of different tissues have exhibited protective effects on cartilage in vitro and in vivo. However, the separation methods for these MSC-derived exosomes are quite different (Table 3) and have some disadvantages, which may influence clinical standardization and potential application. Ultracentrifugation, the most classic separation method, usually requires extended time to harvest exosomes in vitro, which may increase the risk of infection. PEG-mediated isolation of exosomes may influence the biological activity of exosomes for subsequent clinical application. Chen et al. compared the efficiency of three separation techniques (ultracentrifugation, filtration combined with size exclusion chromatography and 8% polyethylene glycol) for extracting synovial tissue-derived exosomes (Syn-Exos). They found that the efficiency of exosome isolation differed among these three isolation methods and recommended ultracentrifugation and filtration combined with size exclusion chromatography for the extraction of Syn-Exos. Therefore, additional measures are needed to optimize and standardize the existing separation methods so that the clinical use of MSC-Exos is safe and convenient.

Regulation of the secretion and contents of exosomes by drug intervention or gene/material modification contributes greatly to the therapeutic action of MSC-Exos in diverse diseases,– so it is advisable to develop engineering technology for MSC-Exos for OA treatment. Recently, MSC-Exos combined with a hydrogel sponge were used to accelerate wound healing and regeneration in animal injury models, including a cartilage damage model,– suggesting a potential application of this technology in OA treatment. The hydrogel sponge could make the MSC-Exos more stable in vivo and might better control the release of MSC-Exos according to changes in the joint cavity microenvironment, such as increased proinflammatory factors and matrix metalloproteinase activity or excessive mechanical load. Apart from MSCs, exosomes from other cells or tissues may also have a potential therapeutic effect on OA. A recent study revealed that exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma (PRP-Exos) can significantly protect cartilage from damage by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, whose therapeutic effect was even better than that of activated PRP. Additional research is needed to improve the therapeutic effects of exosomes derived from different sources.

Nevertheless, there are also some challenges and problems in this field. There is still a lack of direct evidence that endogenous exosomes could transfer from one cell to another cell in the joint in vivo, which restricts further studies, such as the identification of the major target cells of different exosomes. Moreover, the mechanisms of exosome generation and release in the joint are still unclear, limiting exosome-based targeted intervention. In addition, there are some difficulties in achieving the protective effects of MSC-Exos on chondrocytes during the early stage of OA. As cartilage is relatively complete at the early OA stage, it may be difficult for exosomes to permeate through the cartilage matrix to enter chondrocytes, especially the chondrocytes in the deep layer. Therefore, the key points of engineering MSC-Exos for use in the early OA stage may focus on superficial chondrocytes, synovial cells, and other joint cells that are easily accessible by exosomes, or on cartilage matrix maintenance.

Conclusions

As an important intercellular communication mediator, exosomes greatly contribute to OA onset and progression and have shown strong potential for OA treatment. Exploring the detailed mechanisms of exosomes in OA pathological changes will help us to screen and identify potential therapeutic targets. Moreover, we need to optimize MSC-Exos to improve their therapeutic effects on OA. Studies on the roles, underlying mechanisms, and diagnostic/therapeutic application of exosomes in OA are only beginning, and there are still many problems to be solved in this field. With advances in technology, we speculate that exosome-based treatment will be applied to OA patients in the future.

References 270

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Hawker GA, White D, Skou ST. Non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017;25:S4.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Bannuru RR, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019;27:1578-1589.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011

  4. 4.

    Kloppenburg M, Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020;28:242-248.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.002

  5. 5.

    Dieppe P, Lim K, Lohmander S. Who should have knee joint replacement surgery for osteoarthritis? Int J. Rheum. Dis. 2011;14:175-180.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1756-185x.2011.01611.x

  6. 6.

    Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1697-1707.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.34453

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    Vina ER, Kwoh CK. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: literature update. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018;30:160-167.

    Not in our library10.1097/bor.0000000000000479

  9. 9.

    Burr DB. The importance of subchondral bone in osteoarthrosis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 1998;10:256-262.

    Not in our library10.1097/00002281-199805000-00017

  10. 10.

    de Lange-Brokaar BJ, et al. Synovial inflammation, immune cells and their cytokines in osteoarthritis: a review. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2012;20:1484-1499.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.027

  11. 11.

    Glyn-Jones S, et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2015;386:376-387.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60802-3

  12. 12.

    Lin C, et al. Activation of mTORC1 in subchondral bone preosteoblasts promotes osteoarthritis by stimulating bone sclerosis and secretion of CXCL12. Bone Res. 2019;7:5.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-018-0041-8

  13. 13.

    Zhen G, et al. Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling in mesenchymal stem cells of subchondral bone attenuates osteoarthritis. Nat. Med. 2013;19:704-712.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3143

  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Kuang L, et al. FGFR3 deficiency enhances CXCL12-dependent chemotaxis of macrophages via upregulating CXCR7 and aggravates joint destruction in mice. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:112-122.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215696

  17. 17.

    Clockaerts S, et al. The infrapatellar fat pad should be considered as an active osteoarthritic joint tissue: a narrative review. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010;18:876-882.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.014

  18. 18.

    Maas SLN, Breakefield XO, Weaver AM. Extracellular vesicles: unique intercellular delivery vehicles. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27:172-188.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2016.11.003

  19. 19.

    Thery C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2006;Chapter 3:Unit 3:22.

    Not in our library10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30

  20. 20.

    Trams EG, Lauter CJ, Salem N, Heine U. Exfoliation of membrane ecto-enzymes in the form of micro-vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1981;645:63-70.

    Not in our library10.1016/0005-2736(81)90512-5

  21. 21.

    Harding C, Heuser J, Stahl P. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of transferrin and recycling of the transferrin receptor in rat reticulocytes. J. Cell Biol. 1983;97:329-339.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.97.2.329

  22. 22.

    Pan BT, Teng K, Wu C, Adam M, Johnstone RM. Electron microscopic evidence for externalization of the transferrin receptor in vesicular form in sheep reticulocytes. J. Cell Biol. 1985;101:942-948.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.101.3.942

  23. 23.

    Johnstone RM, Adam M, Hammond JR, Orr L, Turbide C. Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes). J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:9412-9420.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Raposo G, et al. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J. Exp. Med. 1996;183:1161-1172.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.183.3.1161

  25. 25.

    Wolfers J, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL cross-priming. Nat. Med. 2001;7:297-303.

    Not in our library10.1038/85438

  26. 26.

    Zitvogel L, et al. Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel cell-free vaccine: dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Nat. Med. 1998;4:594-600.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm0598-594

  27. 27.

    Valadi H, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:654-659.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1596

  28. 28.

    Mathieu M, Martinjaular L, Lavieu G, Thery C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:9-17.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9

  29. 29.

    Pluchino S, Smith JA. Explicating exosomes: reclassifying the rising stars of intercellular communication. Cell. 2019;177:225-227.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.020

  30. 30.

    Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:569-579.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri855

  31. 31.

    Batista BS, Eng WS, Pilobello KT, Hendricks-Muñoz KD, Mahal LK. Identification of a conserved glycan signature for microvesicles. J. Proteome Res. 2011;10:4624-4633.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr200434y

  32. 32.

    Heijnen, H. F. G., Schiel, A. E., Fijnheer, R., Geuze, H. J. & Sixma, J. J. Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules. Blood94, 3791–3799 (1999).

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Hanson, P. I., Shim, S. & Merrill, S. A. Cell biology of the ESCRT machinery. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 568–574 (2009).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2009.06.002

  34. 34.

    Hurley JH, Odorizzi G. Get on the exosome bus with ALIX. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012;14:654-655.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2530

  35. 35.

    Mayers, J. R. & Audhya, A. Vesicle formation within endosomes: an ESCRT marks the spot. Commun. Integr. Biol.5, 50–56 (2012).

    Not in our library10.4161/cib.18208

  36. 36.

    Nabhan JF, Hu R, Oh RS, Cohen SN. Formation and release of arrestin domain-containing protein 1-mediated microvesicles (ARMMs) at plasma membrane by recruitment of TSG101 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:4146-4151.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1200448109

  37. 37.

    Henne WM, Stenmark H, Emr D. Molecular mechanisms of the membrane sculpting ESCRT pathway. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013;5:a016766.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a016766

  38. 38.

    Raiborg, C. & Stenmark, H. The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of ubiquitylated membrane proteins. Nature458, 445–452 (2009).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07961

  39. 39.

    Kalluri, R. & LeBleu, V. S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science367, eaau6977 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aau6977

  40. 40.

    Trajkovic, K. et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science319, 1244–1247 (2008).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1153124

  41. 41.
  42. 42.

    Li P, Kaslan M, Lee SH, Yao J, Gao Z. Progress in exosome isolation techniques. Theranostics. 2017;7:789-804.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.18133

  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    Zarovni N, et al. Integrated isolation and quantitative analysis of exosome shuttled proteins and nucleic acids using immunocapture approaches. Methods. 2015;87:46-58.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.05.028

  45. 45.

    Jeppesen DK, et al. Comparative analysis of discrete exosome fractions obtained by differential centrifugation. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2014;3:25011.

    Not in our library10.3402/jev.v3.25011

  46. 46.

    Cheruvanky A, et al. Rapid isolation of urinary exosomal biomarkers using a nanomembrane ultrafiltration concentrator. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2007;292:F1657-F1661.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00434.2006

  47. 47.

    Heinemann ML, et al. Benchtop isolation and characterization of functional exosomes by sequential filtration. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014;1371:125-135.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.026

  48. 48.

    Batrakova EV, Kim MS. Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery. J. Control Release. 2015;219:396-405.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.030

  49. 49.

    Yamamoto KR, Alberts B, Benzinger R, Lawhorne LW, Treiber G. Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification. Virology. 1970;40:734-744.

    Not in our library10.1016/0042-6822(70)90218-7

  50. 50.

    Lewis G, Metcalf TG. Polyethylene glycol precipitation for recovery of pathogenic viruses, including hepatitis A virus and human rotavirus, from oyster, water, and sediment samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988;54:1983-1988.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.54.8.1983-1988.1988

  51. 51.

    Adams A. Concentration of epstein-barr virus from cell culture fluids with polyethylene glycol. J. Gen. Virol. 1973;20:391-394.

    Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-20-3-391

  52. 52.

    Wang Z, et al. Ciliated micropillars for the microfluidic-based isolation of nanoscale lipid vesicles. Lab Chip. 2013;13:2879-2882.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3lc41343h

  53. 53.

    Lee K, Shao H, Weissleder R, Lee H. Acoustic purification of extracellular microvesicles. ACS Nano. 2015;9:2321-2327.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn506538f

  54. 54.

    Davies RT, et al. Microfluidic filtration system to isolate extracellular vesicles from blood. Lab Chip. 2012;12:5202-5210.

    Not in our library10.1039/c2lc41006k

  55. 55.

    Liga A, Vliegenthart ADB, Oosthuyzen W, Dear JW, Kersaudy-Kerhoas M. Exosome isolation: a microfluidic road-map. Lab Chip. 2015;15:2388-2394.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5lc00240k

  56. 56.

    Wunsch BH, et al. Nanoscale lateral displacement arrays for the separation of exosomes and colloids down to 20 nm. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016;11:936-940.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2016.134

  57. 57.

    Lässer C., Eldh M., Lötvall J. Isolation and characterization of RNA-containing exosomes. J. Vis. Exp. 59, e3037 (2012).

    Not in our library10.3791/3037

  58. 58.

    Wu, Y., Deng, W. & Klinke, D. J. 2nd. Exosomes: improved methods to characterize their morphology, RNA content, and surface protein biomarkers. Analyst140, 6631–6642 (2015).

    Not in our library10.1039/c5an00688k

  59. 59.

    Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367:eaau6977.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aau6977

  60. 60.

    Thery C, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2018;7:1535750.

    Not in our library10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750

  61. 61.

    Escola JM, et al. Selective enrichment of tetraspan proteins on the internal vesicles of multivesicular endosomes and on exosomes secreted by human B-lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:20121-20127.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.273.32.20121

  62. 62.

    Thery C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:569-579.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri855

  63. 63.

    Melo SA, et al. Glypican-1 identifies cancer exosomes and detects early pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2015;523:177-182.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14581

  64. 64.

    Ruivo CF, Adem B, Silva ML, Melo SA. The biology of cancer exosomes: insights and new perspectives. Cancer Res. 2017;77:6480-6488.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0994

  65. 65.
  66. 66.
  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Yang C, Robbins PD. Immunosuppressive exosomes: a new approach for treating arthritis. Int. J. Rheumatol. 2012;2012:573528.

    Not in our library10.1155/2012/573528

  69. 69.

    Kim SH, et al. Exosomes Derived from IL-10-Treated Dendritic Cells Can Suppress Inflammation and Collagen-Induced. Arthritis. 2005;174:6440-6448.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6440

  70. 70.

    Michael A, et al. Exosomes from human saliva as a source of microRNA biomarkers. Oral Dis. 2010;16:34-38.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01604.x

  71. 71.

    Lai RC, Chen TS, Lim SK. Mesenchymal stem cell exosome: a novel stem cell-based therapy for cardiovascular disease. Regen. Med. 2011;6:481-492.

    Not in our library10.2217/rme.11.35

  72. 72.
  73. 73.
  74. 74.

    Rodan GA. Bone homeostasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:13361-13362.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.23.13361

  75. 75.

    Ge M, Ke R, Cai T, Yang J, Mu X. Identification and proteomic analysis of osteoblast-derived exosomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015;467:27-32.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.135

  76. 76.

    Cui Y, Luan J, Li H, Zhou X, Han J. Exosomes derived from mineralizing osteoblasts promote ST2 cell osteogenic differentiation by alteration of microRNA expression. FEBS Lett. 2016;590:185-192.

    Not in our library10.1002/1873-3468.12024

  77. 77.
  78. 78.
  79. 79.

    Yang J-X, Xie P, Li Y-S, Wen T, Yang X-C. Osteoclast-derived miR-23a-5p-containing exosomes inhibit osteogenic differentiation by regulating Runx2. Cell. Signal. 2019;70:109504.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109504

  80. 80.

    Qin Y, et al. Myostatin inhibits osteoblastic differentiation by suppressing osteocyte-derived exosomal microRNA-218: A novel mechanism in muscle-bone communication. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:11021-11033.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m116.770941

  81. 81.

    Kuang MJ, et al. Exosomes derived from Wharton’s jelly of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reduce osteocyte apoptosis in glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head in rats via the miR-21-PTEN-AKT signalling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019;15:1861-1871.

    Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.32262

  82. 82.

    Ren L, et al. Adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes ameliorate hypoxia/serum deprivation-induced osteocyte apoptosis and osteocyte-mediated osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;508:138-144.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.109

  83. 83.

    Qi X, et al. Exosomes secreted by human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells repair critical-sized bone defects through enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis in osteoporotic rats. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016;12:836-849.

    Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.14809

  84. 84.

    Zhang Y, et al. Transfer RNA-derived fragments as potential exosome tRNA-derived fragment biomarkers for osteoporosis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2018;21:1659-1669.

    Not in our library10.1111/1756-185x.13346

  85. 85.

    Jiang LB, Tian L, Zhang CG. Bone marrow stem cells-derived exosomes extracted from osteoporosis patients inhibit osteogenesis via microRNA-21/SMAD7. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;22:6221-6229.

    Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_201810_16028

  86. 86.

    Zhao P, Xiao L, Peng J, Qian YQ, Huang CC. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improve osteoporosis through promoting osteoblast proliferation via MAPK pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;22:3962-3970.

    Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_201806_15280

  87. 87.
  88. 88.

    Yang BC, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes act via the miR-1263/Mob1/Hippo signaling pathway to prevent apoptosis in disuse osteoporosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;524:883-889.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.02.001

  89. 89.

    Liu X, et al. Exosomes secreted from human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells prevent osteonecrosis of the femoral head by promoting angiogenesis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2017;13:232-244.

    Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.16951

  90. 90.

    Li Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes: a possible therapeutic strategy for osteoporosis. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018;13:362-368.

    Not in our library10.2174/1574888x13666180403163456

  91. 91.

    Hao ZC, et al. Stem cell-derived exosomes: a promising strategy for fracture healing. Cell Prolif. 2017;50:e12359.

    Not in our library10.1111/cpr.12359

  92. 92.

    Liu W, et al. Hypoxic mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote bone fracture healing by the transfer of miR-126. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020;103:196-212.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.020

  93. 93.

    Furuta T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote fracture healing in a mouse model. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2016;5:1620-1630.

    Not in our library10.5966/sctm.2015-0285

  94. 94.
  95. 95.
  96. 96.

    Domenis R, et al. Characterization of the proinflammatory profile of synovial fluid-derived exosomes of patients with osteoarthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:4814987.

    Not in our library10.1155/2017/4814987

  97. 97.

    Skriner K, Adolph K, Jungblut PR, Burmester GR. Association of citrullinated proteins with synovial exosomes. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2006;54:3809-3814.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.22276

  98. 98.

    Gao K, et al. Association between cytokines and exosomes in synovial fluid of individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Mod. Rheumatol. 2019;2019:1-7.

    Not in our library10.1080/14397595.2019.1651445

  99. 99.
  100. 100.

    Headland SE, et al. Neutrophil-derived microvesicles enter cartilage and protect the joint in inflammatory arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:315ra190.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5608

  101. 101.

    Zhao Y, Xu J. Synovial fluid-derived exosomal lncRNA PCGEM1 as biomarker for the different stages of osteoarthritis. Int. Orthop. 2018;42:2865-2872.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00264-018-4093-6

  102. 102.

    Anderson HC. Matrix vesicles and calcification. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2003;5:222-226.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11926-003-0071-z

  103. 103.

    Jubeck B, et al. Promotion of articular cartilage matrix vesicle mineralization by type I collagen. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2008;58:2809-2817.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.23762

  104. 104.

    Shapiro IM, Landis WJ, Risbud MV. Matrix vesicles: are they anchored exosomes? Bone. 2015;79:29-36.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.013

  105. 105.

    Mitton E, Gohr CM, McNally MT, Rosenthal AK. Articular cartilage vesicles contain RNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;388:533-538.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.038

  106. 106.

    Zheng L, et al. Primary chondrocyte exosomes mediate osteoarthritis progression by regulating mitochondrion and immune reactivity. Nanomed. (Lond.). 2019;14:3193-3212.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm-2018-0498

  107. 107.
  108. 108.

    Chen Y, Xue K, Zhang X, Zheng Z, Liu K. Exosomes derived from mature chondrocytes facilitate subcutaneous stable ectopic chondrogenesis of cartilage progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018;9:318.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13287-018-1047-2

  109. 109.

    Mao G, et al. Exosomal miR-95-5p regulates chondrogenesis and cartilage degradation via histone deacetylase 2/8. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018;22:5354-5366.

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.13808

  110. 110.

    Song, J., Kang, Y., Chun, C. H. & Jin, E. J. Selective loading of exosomal HULC and miR-372 is responsible for chondrocyte death during OA pathogenesis. Anim. Cells Syst.21, 397–403 (2017).

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Li Z, et al. Chondrocytes-derived exosomal miR-8485 regulated the Wnt/beta-catenin pathways to promote chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;523:506-513.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.065

  112. 112.

    Baker K, et al. Relation of synovitis to knee pain using contrast-enhanced MRIs. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010;69:1779-1783.

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.2009.121426

  113. 113.

    Benito MJ, Veale DJ, FitzGerald O, van den Berg WB, Bresnihan B. Synovial tissue inflammation in early and late osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005;64:1263-1267.

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.2004.025270

  114. 114.

    Hill CL, et al. Synovitis detected on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to pain and cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007;66:1599-1603.

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.2006.067470

  115. 115.

    de Lange-Brokaar BJ, et al. Association of pain in knee osteoarthritis with distinct patterns of synovitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:733-740.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.38965

  116. 116.

    Robinson WH, et al. Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12:580-592.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrrheum.2016.136

  117. 117.

    Krenn V, et al. Grading of chronic synovitis–a histopathological grading system for molecular and diagnostic pathology. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2002;198:317-325.

    Not in our library10.1078/0344-0338-5710261

  118. 118.
  119. 119.

    Bondeson J, et al. The role of synovial macrophages and macrophage-produced mediators in driving inflammatory and destructive responses in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:647-657.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.27290

  120. 120.

    Pérez-Garcia S, et al. Wnt and RUNX2 mediate cartilage breakdown by osteoarthritis synovial fibroblast-derived ADAMTS-7 and -12. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019;23:3974-3983.

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.14283

  121. 121.
  122. 122.

    Tao SC, et al. Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage tissue regeneration and prevent osteoarthritis of the knee in a rat model. Theranostics. 2017;7:180-195.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.17133

  123. 123.

    Tsuno H, et al. Effects of methotrexate and salazosulfapyridine on protein profiles of exosomes derived from a human synovial sarcoma cell line of SW982. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2016;10:164-171.

    Not in our library10.1002/prca.201500064

  124. 124.

    Castañeda S, Roman-Blas JA, Largo R, Herrero-Beaumont G. Subchondral bone as a key target for osteoarthritis treatment. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012;83:315-323.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2011.09.018

  125. 125.

    Stewart HL, Kawcak CE. The importance of subchondral bone in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:178.

    Not in our library10.3389/fvets.2018.00178

  126. 126.

    Maas O, Joseph GB, Sommer G, Wild D, Kretzschmar M. Association between cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone remodeling in patients with knee osteoarthritis comparing MRI and (99m)Tc-DPD-SPECT/CT. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2015;23:1713-1720.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.014

  127. 127.
  128. 128.

    Cui Z, et al. Halofuginone attenuates osteoarthritis by inhibition of TGF-beta activity and H-type vessel formation in subchondral bone. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016;75:1714-1721.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207923

  129. 129.

    Zhu S, et al. Subchondral bone osteoclasts induce sensory innervation and osteoarthritis pain. J. Clin. Invest. 2019;129:1076-1093.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci121561

  130. 130.

    Chen Y, et al. Attenuation of subchondral bone abnormal changes in osteoarthritis by inhibition of SDF-1 signaling. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017;25:986-994.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2017.01.008

  131. 131.

    Xu T, et al. Tenocyte-derived exosomes induce the tenogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through TGF-beta. Cytotechnology. 2019;71:57-65.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10616-018-0264-y

  132. 132.

    Zhu QJ, Zhu M, Xu XX, Meng XM, Wu YG. Exosomes from high glucose-treated macrophages activate glomerular mesangial cells via TGF-beta1/Smad3 pathway in vivo and in vitro. FASEB J. 2019;33:9279-9290.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.201802427rrr

  133. 133.
  134. 134.

    Cai Z, et al. Immunosuppressive exosomes from TGF-beta1 gene-modified dendritic cells attenuate Th17-mediated inflammatory autoimmune disease by inducing regulatory T cells. Cell Res. 2012;22:607-610.

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2011.196

  135. 135.

    Liu B, et al. [Differential expression of exosomal miRNAs in osteoblasts in osteoarthritis]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018;43:1294-1300.

    Not in our library10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2018.12.003

  136. 136.

    Gandhi R, et al. Microarray analysis of the infrapatellar fat pad in knee osteoarthritis: relationship with joint inflammation. J. Rheumatol. 2011;38:1966-1972.

    Not in our library10.3899/jrheum.101302

  137. 137.

    Ioan-Facsinay A, Kloppenburg M. An emerging player in knee osteoarthritis: the infrapatellar fat pad. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013;15:225.

    Not in our library10.1186/ar4422

  138. 138.

    Cai J, et al. Association between infrapatellar fat pad volume and knee structural changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2015;42:1878-1884.

    Not in our library10.3899/jrheum.150175

  139. 139.

    Ballegaard C, et al. Knee pain and inflammation in the infrapatellar fat pad estimated by conventional and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in obese patients with osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2014;22:933-940.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.018

  140. 140.
  141. 141.

    Distel E, et al. The infrapatellar fat pad in knee osteoarthritis: an important source of interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:3374-3377.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.24881

  142. 142.

    Koh YG, Choi YJ. Infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2012;19:902-907.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.001

  143. 143.

    Toghraie FS, et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis with infrapatellar fat pad derived mesenchymal stem cells in Rabbit. Knee. 2011;18:71-75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.knee.2010.03.001

  144. 144.

    Buckley CT, et al. Functional properties of cartilaginous tissues engineered from infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biomech. 2010;43:920-926.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.005

  145. 145.

    Buckley CT, Vinardell T, Kelly DJ. Oxygen tension differentially regulates the functional properties of cartilaginous tissues engineered from infrapatellar fat pad derived MSCs and articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010;18:1345-1354.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2010.07.004

  146. 146.

    Wu J, et al. miR-100-5p-abundant exosomes derived from infrapatellar fat pad MSCs protect articular cartilage and ameliorate gait abnormalities via inhibition of mTOR in osteoarthritis. Biomaterials. 2019;206:87-100.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.022

  147. 147.

    Ibrahim M, Kartus JT, Steigen SE, Olsen R, Meknas K. More tendon degeneration in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019;27:267-275.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00167-018-5186-x

  148. 148.

    Plachel F, et al. Repair failure increases the risk of developing secondary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A long-term follow-up after open repair of large subscapularis tendon tears. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019;105:1529-1533.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.021

  149. 149.

    Meknas K, et al. Could tendinosis be involved in osteoarthritis? Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2012;22:627-634.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01287.x

  150. 150.
  151. 151.

    Schulze-Tanzil G. Intraarticular ligament degeneration is interrelated with cartilage and bone destruction in osteoarthritis. Cells.8, 990 (2019).

    Not in our library10.3390/cells8090990

  152. 152.

    Hill CL, et al. Cruciate ligament integrity in osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:794-799.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.20943

  153. 153.

    Johnson VL, et al. Loss of anterior cruciate ligament integrity and the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a sub-study of the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2015;23:882-887.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.001

  154. 154.
  155. 155.

    Zhao LR, Mao JQ, Zhao BJ, Chen J. [Isolation and biological characteristics of exosomes derived from periodontal ligament stem cells]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019;28:343-348.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    Wang Z, et al. Cyclic stretch force induces periodontal ligament cells to secrete exosomes that suppress IL-1beta production through the inhibition of the NF-kappaB signaling pathway in macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1310.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2019.01310

  157. 157.

    Zhao M, et al. Periodontal ligament fibroblasts regulate osteoblasts by exosome secretion induced by inflammatory stimuli. Arch. Oral. Biol. 2019;105:27-34.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.06.002

  158. 158.

    Kong L, Zheng LZ, Qin L, Ho KKW. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in osteoarthritis treatment. J. Orthop. Translation. 2017;9:89-103.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jot.2017.03.006

  159. 159.

    Lee WY, Wang B. Cartilage repair by mesenchymal stem cells: Clinical trial update and perspectives. J. Orthop. Translation. 2017;9:76-88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jot.2017.03.005

  160. 160.

    De Bari C, Roelofs AJ. Stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for cartilage defects and osteoarthritis. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2018;40:74-80.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coph.2018.03.009

  161. 161.

    Di Matteo B, et al. Minimally manipulated mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:1735242.

    Not in our library10.1155/2019/1735242

  162. 162.

    Wang W, Cao W. Treatment of osteoarthritis with mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. China Life Sci. 2014;57:586-595.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11427-014-4673-7

  163. 163.

    Jo CH, et al. Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a 2-year follow-up study. Am. J. Sports Med. 2017;45:2774-2783.

    Not in our library10.1177/0363546517716641

  164. 164.

    Kim S. H., et al. Intra-articular injection of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells without adjuvant surgery in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Sports Med. 363546519892278 (2019).

    Not in our library10.1177/0363546519892278

  165. 165.

    Garay-Mendoza D, et al. The effect of intra-articular injection of autologous bone marrow stem cells on pain and knee function in patients with osteoarthritis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2018;21:140-147.

    Not in our library10.1111/1756-185x.13139

  166. 166.

    Jo CH, et al. Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Stem Cells. 2014;32:1254-1266.

    Not in our library10.1002/stem.1634

  167. 167.

    Yokota N, et al. Comparative clinical outcomes after intra-articular injection with adipose-derived cultured stem cells or noncultured stromal vascular fraction for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Am. J. Sports Med. 2019;47:2577-2583.

    Not in our library10.1177/0363546519864359

  168. 168.

    Shin YS, Yoon JR, Kim HS, Lee SH. Intra-articular injection of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells leading to better clinical outcomes without difference in MRI outcomes from baseline in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2018;30:206-214.

    Not in our library10.5792/ksrr.17.201

  169. 169.

    Meirelles Lda S, Fontes AM, Covas DT, Caplan AI. Mechanisms involved in the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20:419-427.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.10.002

  170. 170.

    Phinney DG, Pittenger MF. Concise review: MSC-derived exosomes for cell-free therapy. Stem Cells. 2017;35:851-858.

    Not in our library10.1002/stem.2575

  171. 171.

    Xu Y, et al. microRNA-16-5p-containing exosomes derived from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit proliferation, migration, and invasion, while promoting apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells by downregulating ITGA2. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:21380-21394.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28747

  172. 172.

    Xie C, Du LY, Guo F, Li X, Cheng B. Exosomes derived from microRNA-101-3p-overexpressing human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells suppress oral cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and migration. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2019;458:11-26.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11010-019-03526-7

  173. 173.
  174. 174.

    Zhao C, et al. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit complement activation in rats with spinal cord injury. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2019;13:3693-3704.

    Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s209636

  175. 175.
  176. 176.
  177. 177.

    Xiong L., et al. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells can alleviate early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage through miRNA129-5p-HMGB1 pathway. Stem Cells Dev.29, 212–221 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1089/scd.2019.0206

  178. 178.

    Zhu G, et al. Exosomes from human-bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury via transferring miR-199a-3p. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:23736-23749.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28941

  179. 179.

    Zhao L, et al. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing microRNA-25 protect spinal cords against transient ischemia. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019;157:508-517.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.095

  180. 180.

    Asghar S, Litherland GJ, Lockhart JC, Goodyear CS, Crilly A. Exosomes in intercellular communication and implications for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2020;59:57-68.

    Not in our library10.1093/rheumatology/kez462

  181. 181.
  182. 182.
  183. 183.

    Qi H, et al. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells inhibit mitochondrial dysfunction-induced apoptosis of chondrocytes via p38, ERK, and Akt pathways. Vitr. Cell. Develop. Biol. Anim. 2019;55:203-210.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11626-019-00330-x

  184. 184.

    Chen P, et al. Desktop-stereolithography 3D printing of a radially oriented extracellular matrix/mesenchymal stem cell exosome bioink for osteochondral defect regeneration. Theranostics. 2019;9:2439-2459.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.31017

  185. 185.

    Li J, et al. BMSCs-derived exosomes ameliorate pain via abrogation of aberrant nerve invasion in subchondral bone in lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis. J. Orthop. Res. 2019;38:670-679.

    Not in our library10.1002/jor.24497

  186. 186.

    Jin Z, Ren J, Qi S. Human bone mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes overexpressing microRNA-26a-5p alleviate osteoarthritis via down-regulation of PTGS2. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;78:105946.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105946

  187. 187.
  188. 188.

    Shelton MN, Huang MB, Ali SA, Powell MD, Bond VC. Secretion modification region-derived peptide disrupts HIV-1 Nef’s interaction with mortalin and blocks virus and Nef exosome release. J. Virol. 2012;86:406-419.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.05720-11

  189. 189.

    Liu C, Su C. Design strategies and application progress of therapeutic exosomes. Theranostics. 2019;9:1015-1028.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.30853

  190. 190.
  191. 191.

    Liu C, et al. Kartogenin enhances the therapeutic effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes in cartilage repair. Nanomed. (Lond.). 2020;15:273-288.

    Not in our library10.2217/nnm-2019-0208

  192. 192.

    Kurth T, et al. Chondrogenic potential of human synovial mesenchymal stem cells in alginate. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2007;15:1178-1189.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.015

  193. 193.

    Shirasawa S, et al. In vitro chondrogenesis of human synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells: optimal condition and comparison with bone marrow-derived cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2006;97:84-97.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.20546

  194. 194.

    Miyamoto C, Matsumoto T, Sakimura K, Shindo H. Osteogenic protein-1 with transforming growth factor-beta1: potent inducer of chondrogenesis of synovial mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J. Orthop. Sci. 2007;12:555-561.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00776-007-1176-4

  195. 195.

    Koizumi K, et al. Synovial mesenchymal stem cells from osteo- or rheumatoid arthritis joints exhibit good potential for cartilage repair using a scaffold-free tissue engineering approach. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016;24:1413-1422.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.006

  196. 196.

    Enomoto T, et al. Timing of intra-articular injection of synovial mesenchymal stem cells affects cartilage restoration in a partial thickness cartilage defect model in rats. Cartilage. 2020;11:122-129.

    Not in our library10.1177/1947603518786542

  197. 197.

    Mak J, et al. Intra-articular injection of synovial mesenchymal stem cells improves cartilage repair in a mouse injury model. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23076.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep23076

  198. 198.

    Kondo S, et al. Transplantation of aggregates of autologous synovial mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of cartilage defects in the femoral condyle and the femoral groove in microminipigs. Am. J. Sports Med. 2019;47:2338-2347.

    Not in our library10.1177/0363546519859855

  199. 199.

    Ozeki N, et al. Not single but periodic injections of synovial mesenchymal stem cells maintain viable cells in knees and inhibit osteoarthritis progression in rats. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016;24:1061-1070.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2015.12.018

  200. 200.
  201. 201.

    Guo SC, et al. Exosomes from human synovial-derived mesenchymal stem cells prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head in the rat. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016;12:1262-1272.

    Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.16150

  202. 202.

    Kim YS, Koh YG. Comparative matched-pair analysis of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with versus without an injection of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for varus knee osteoarthritis: clinical and second-look arthroscopic results. Am. J. Sports Med. 2018;46:2669-2677.

    Not in our library10.1177/0363546518785973

  203. 203.

    Manferdini C, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells exert antiinflammatory effects on chondrocytes and synoviocytes from osteoarthritis patients through prostaglandin E2. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1271-1281.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.37908

  204. 204.

    Skalska U, Kontny E. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from infrapatellar fat pad of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis have comparable immunomodulatory properties. Autoimmunity. 2016;49:124-131.

    Not in our library10.3109/08916934.2015.1113267

  205. 205.

    Damia E, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: are they a good therapeutic strategy for osteoarthritis? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1926.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms19071926

  206. 206.

    Maumus M, et al. Adipose mesenchymal stem cells protect chondrocytes from degeneration associated with osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11:834-844.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scr.2013.05.008

  207. 207.

    Lee WS, Kim HJ, Kim KI, Kim GB, Jin W. Intra-articular injection of autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a phase IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2019;8:504-511.

    Not in our library10.1002/sctm.18-0122

  208. 208.
  209. 209.
  210. 210.

    Woo CH, et al. Small extracellular vesicles from human adipose-derived stem cells attenuate cartilage degeneration. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2020;9:1735249.

    Not in our library10.1080/20013078.2020.1735249

  211. 211.

    Zhao C, et al. Exosomes from adiposederived stem cells promote chondrogenesis and suppress inflammation by upregulating miR145 and miR221. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020;21:1881-1889.

    Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2020.10982

  212. 212.

    Ma Q, Liao J, Cai X. Different sources of stem cells and their application in cartilage tissue engineering. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018;13:568-575.

    Not in our library10.2174/1574888x13666180122151909

  213. 213.

    Oldershaw RA. Cell sources for the regeneration of articular cartilage: the past, the horizon and the future. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2012;93:389-400.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2613.2012.00837.x

  214. 214.

    Hwang NS, Elisseeff J. Application of stem cells for articular cartilage regeneration. J. Knee Surg. 2009;22:60-71.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0030-1247728

  215. 215.

    Mamidi MK, Das AK, Zakaria Z, Bhonde R. Mesenchymal stromal cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016;24:1307-1316.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.003

  216. 216.

    Gibson JD, et al. Regeneration of articular cartilage by human ESC-derived mesenchymal progenitors treated sequentially with BMP-2 and Wnt5a. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2017;6:40-50.

    Not in our library10.5966/sctm.2016-0020

  217. 217.

    Zhang S, et al. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016;24:2135-2140.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.022

  218. 218.

    Zhang S, et al. MSC exosomes mediate cartilage repair by enhancing proliferation, attenuating apoptosis and modulating immune reactivity. Biomaterials. 2018;156:16-27.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.028

  219. 219.
  220. 220.

    Zhang S, et al. MSC exosomes alleviate temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis by attenuating inflammation and restoring matrix homeostasis. Biomaterials. 2019;200:35-47.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.006

  221. 221.

    Wang R, Xu B, Xu H. TGF-beta1 promoted chondrocyte proliferation by regulating Sp1 through MSC-exosomes derived miR-135b. Cell Cycle. 2018;17:2756-2765.

    Not in our library10.1080/15384101.2018.1556063

  222. 222.

    Zavatti M, Beretti F, Casciaro F, Bertucci E, Maraldi T. Comparison of the therapeutic effect of amniotic fluid stem cells and their exosomes on monoiodoacetate-induced animal model of osteoarthritis. BioFactors. 2019;46:106-117.

    Not in our library10.1002/biof.1576

  223. 223.
  224. 224.

    Luo P, Jiang C, Ji P, Wang M, Xu J. Exosomes of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth as an anti-inflammatory agent in temporomandibular joint chondrocytes via miR-100-5p/mTOR. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019;10:216.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13287-019-1341-7

  225. 225.

    Tai YL, Chen KC, Hsieh JT, Shen TL. Exosomes in cancer development and clinical applications. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:2364-2374.

    Not in our library10.1111/cas.13697

  226. 226.

    Deng H, et al. Lipid, protein, and microRNA composition within mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Cell. Reprogramming. 2018;20:178-186.

    Not in our library10.1089/cell.2017.0047

  227. 227.

    Zhang ZG, Buller B, Chopp M. Exosomes - beyond stem cells for restorative therapy in stroke and neurological injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019;15:193-203.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41582-018-0126-4

  228. 228.

    Ragni E, et al. Identification of miRNA reference genes in extracellular vesicles from adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells for studying osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1108.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms20051108

  229. 229.

    Carames B, et al. Autophagy activation by rapamycin reduces severity of experimental osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012;71:575-581.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200557

  230. 230.
  231. 231.

    Zhang Y, et al. Cartilage-specific deletion of mTOR upregulates autophagy and protects mice from osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015;74:1432-1440.

    Not in our library10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204599

  232. 232.

    Dragomir M, Chen B, Calin GA. Exosomal lncRNAs as new players in cell-to-cell communication. Transl. Cancer Res. 2018;7:S243-S252.

    Not in our library10.21037/tcr.2017.10.46

  233. 233.
  234. 234.
  235. 235.
  236. 236.

    Lang HL, et al. Glioma cells promote angiogenesis through the release of exosomes containing long non-coding RNA POU3F3. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017;21:959-972.

    Not in our library

  237. 237.
  238. 238.
  239. 239.

    Liu Y, et al. Exosomal KLF3-AS1 from hMSCs promoted cartilage repair and chondrocyte proliferation in osteoarthritis. Biochem. J. 2018;475:3629-3638.

    Not in our library10.1042/bcj20180675

  240. 240.

    Liu Y, et al. MSC-derived exosomes promote proliferation and inhibit apoptosis of chondrocytes via lncRNA-KLF3-AS1/miR-206/GIT1 axis in osteoarthritis. Cell Cycle. 2018;17:2411-2422.

    Not in our library10.1080/15384101.2018.1526603

  241. 241.

    Gross JC, Chaudhary V, Bartscherer K, Boutros M. Active Wnt proteins are secreted on exosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012;14:1036-1045.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2574

  242. 242.

    Buschow SI, Liefhebber JM, Wubbolts R, Stoorvogel W. Exosomes contain ubiquitinated proteins. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2005;35:398-403.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.08.005

  243. 243.

    Thery C, et al. Molecular characterization of dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Selective accumulation of the heat shock protein hsc73. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:599-610.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.147.3.599

  244. 244.

    Yuan D, et al. Macrophage exosomes as natural nanocarriers for protein delivery to inflamed brain. Biomaterials. 2017;142:1-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.07.011

  245. 245.

    Whiteside TL. Exosomes carrying immunoinhibitory proteins and their role in cancer. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2017;189:259-267.

    Not in our library10.1111/cei.12974

  246. 246.

    Goetzl EJ, et al. Decreased synaptic proteins in neuronal exosomes of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2016;30:4141-4148.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.201600816r

  247. 247.

    Tsuno H, et al. A proteomic analysis of serum-derived exosomes in rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:35.

    Not in our library10.1186/s41927-018-0041-8

  248. 248.

    Kawakami K, et al. Gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in exosomes as a potential marker for prostate cancer. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:316.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12885-017-3301-x

  249. 249.

    Rabinowits G, Gercel-Taylor C, Day JM, Taylor DD, Kloecker GH. Exosomal microRNA: a diagnostic marker for lung cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer. 2009;10:42-46.

    Not in our library10.3816/clc.2009.n.006

  250. 250.

    Lv LL, et al. MicroRNA-29c in urinary exosome/microvesicle as a biomarker of renal fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2013;305:F1220-F1227.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00148.2013

  251. 251.

    Song J, et al. PBMC and exosome-derived Hotair is a critical regulator and potent marker for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015;15:121-126.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10238-013-0271-4

  252. 252.

    van Spil WE, DeGroot J, Lems WF, Oostveen JC, Lafeber FP. Serum and urinary biochemical markers for knee and hip-osteoarthritis: a systematic review applying the consensus BIPED criteria. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010;18:605-612.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2010.01.012

  253. 253.

    Charni N, Juillet F, Garnero P. Urinary type II collagen helical peptide (HELIX-II) as a new biochemical marker of cartilage degradation in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1081-1090.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.20930

  254. 254.

    Garnero P, Charni N, Juillet F, Conrozier T, Vignon E. Increased urinary type II collagen helical and C telopeptide levels are independently associated with a rapidly destructive hip osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006;65:1639-1644.

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.2006.052621

  255. 255.

    van der Lubbe N, et al. The phosphorylated sodium chloride cotransporter in urinary exosomes is superior to prostasin as a marker for aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2012;60:741-748.

    Not in our library10.1161/hypertensionaha.112.198135

  256. 256.

    Yazarlou F, et al. Urinary exosomal expression of long non-coding RNAs as diagnostic marker in bladder cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018;10:6357-6365.

    Not in our library10.2147/cmar.s186108

  257. 257.

    Street JM, Koritzinsky EH, Glispie DM, Star RA, Yuen PS. Urine exosomes: an emerging trove of biomarkers. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2017;78:103-122.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.acc.2016.07.003

  258. 258.
  259. 259.

    Gernapudi R, et al. Targeting exosomes from preadipocytes inhibits preadipocyte to cancer stem cell signaling in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015;150:685-695.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10549-015-3326-2

  260. 260.

    Hornick NI, et al. AML suppresses hematopoiesis by releasing exosomes that contain microRNAs targeting c-MYB. Sci. Signal. 2016;9:ra88.

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aaf2797

  261. 261.

    Chen P, et al. Extraction and identification of synovial tissue-derived exosomes by different separation techniques. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2020;15:97.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13018-020-01604-x

  262. 262.

    Kamerkar S, et al. Exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2017;546:498-503.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature22341

  263. 263.

    Qi H, et al. Blood exosomes endowed with magnetic and targeting properties for cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2016;10:3323-3333.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.5b06939

  264. 264.

    Tian T, et al. Surface functionalized exosomes as targeted drug delivery vehicles for cerebral ischemia therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;150:137-149.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.012

  265. 265.
  266. 266.

    Liu X, et al. Integration of stem cell-derived exosomes with in situ hydrogel glue as a promising tissue patch for articular cartilage regeneration. Nanoscale. 2017;9:4430-4438.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7nr00352h

  267. 267.

    Wang C, et al. Engineering bioactive self-healing antibacterial exosomes hydrogel for promoting chronic diabetic wound healing and complete skin regeneration. Theranostics. 2019;9:65-76.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.29766

  268. 268.
  269. 269.

    Han C, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes encapsulated in functional peptide hydrogels promote cardiac repair. Biomater. Sci. 2019;7:2920-2933.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9bm00101h

  270. 270.

Cited by papers we hold 5

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.