No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Redox regulation: mechanisms, biology and therapeutic targets in diseases

Bowen Li, Hui Ming, Siyuan Qin and 4 more

Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · 2025 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02095-6

Abstract

Redox signaling acts as a critical mediator in the dynamic interactions between organisms and their external environment, profoundly influencing both the onset and progression of various diseases. Under physiological conditions, oxidative free radicals generated by the mitochondrial oxidative respiratory chain, endoplasmic reticulum, and NADPH oxidases can be effectively neutralized by NRF2-mediated antioxidant responses. These responses elevate the synthesis of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, as well as key molecules like nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and glutathione (GSH), thereby maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. Disruption of this finely tuned equilibrium is closely linked to the pathogenesis of a wide range of diseases. Recent advances have broadened our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning this dysregulation, highlighting the pivotal roles of genomic instability, epigenetic modifications, protein degradation, and metabolic reprogramming. These findings provide a foundation for exploring redox regulation as a mechanistic basis for improving therapeutic strategies. While antioxidant-based therapies have shown early promise in conditions where oxidative stress plays a primary pathological role, their efficacy in diseases characterized by complex, multifactorial etiologies remains controversial. A deeper, context-specific understanding of redox signaling, particularly the roles of redox-sensitive proteins, is critical for designing targeted therapies aimed at re-establishing redox balance. Emerging small molecule inhibitors that target specific cysteine residues in redox-sensitive proteins have demonstrated promising preclinical outcomes, setting the stage for forthcoming clinical trials. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the intricate relationship between oxidative stress and disease pathogenesis and also discuss how these insights can be leveraged to optimize therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

1The term “redox” is a portmanteau derived from “reduction” and “oxidation,” describing the chemical process involving the transfer of electrons between reactants in chemical reactions. Redox reactions are fundamental reactions in chemistry, occurring not only ubiquitously in everyday life but also alongside biological activities., The acquisition of energy in organisms is closely associated with redox reactions, where the energy supply originates from oxidative respiration within cells. For example, in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, the electron transfer process involves sequential redox reactions accompanied by the gradual release of energy., During this process, known as oxidative phosphorylation, energy drives the phosphorylation of ADP to produce ATP, providing energy for various activities., During the course of redox reactions, a series of reactive oxygen species (ROS) with oxidizing capabilities can be produced within organisms, including superoxide, singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals. Hydrogen peroxide was synthesized in 1818, marking the first known synthesis of ROS. Radicals were not confirmed in living organisms until 1954. In 1967, it was found that the mitochondrial electron transport chain could produce hydrogen peroxide. Further research identified the NADPH oxidase (NOX) system as a critical source of H2O2 in cells, including non-phagocytic ones, emphasizing its signaling role under physiological conditions. Now we recognize that ROS can be generated through mechanisms such as the mitochondrial electron transport chain, the endoplasmic reticulum, and NOX.,

2ROS can be scavenged by various reducing substances, including reducing small molecules, redox enzymes, and high-abundance redox proteins., The antioxidative system in organisms possesses a sensing mechanism for oxidants or electrophilic agents, which activates the transcription of antioxidative genes by triggering relevant transcription factors, thereby promoting the expression of antioxidative enzymes. Despite the presence of several antioxidative transcription factors in organisms, including AP-1 and HO-1, NRF2 is often referred to as the master regulator. NRF2 was first identified in 1994, and by 1996, it had been discovered that under oxidative stress conditions, it could activate the expression of antioxidative enzyme genes, including NQO1, GPX4, TXN, and PRDX1. Due to the superior efficacy of antioxidative enzymes in scavenging ROS compared to exogenous molecules, the antioxidative effects mediated by NRF2 are notably significant. Additionally, based on their importance, the antioxidative enzymes in the body can be categorized into the first and second lines of defense against oxidative stress. The first line includes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), which encompass cytosolic SOD1 and mitochondrial matrix SOD2 that remove O2•−, catalases, and GPxs that eliminate H2O2, and certain GPxs and PRDXs that reduce lipid peroxides. By 1969, Researchers have discovered that SOD exhibits physiological catalytic activity by reducing O2•− to hydrogen peroxide, which was the first antioxidant enzyme discovered to utilize superoxide anions as substrates. Consequently, many current antioxidant strategies are designed around SOD. The second line of defense involves the use of NADPH to reduce GSSG and TrxS2 by TRX, GCL, and glutathione synthetase responsible for GSH synthesis, glutathione reductase, and thioredoxin reductase. In typical organisms, the generation and clearance of ROS are maintained in a balanced state (redox homeostasis)., In 1985, oxidative stress was defined as a cellular imbalance between oxidants and reductants, leading to the differentiation of eustress and distress to describe oxidative stress states under physiological and pathological conditions, thereby advancing our understanding of oxidative stress in human diseases., The traditional view is that ROS are toxic byproducts of body metabolism, destroying macromolecules and leading to pathogenic processes., However, with the increasing understanding of redox reactions, multiple lines of experimental evidence show that redox reactions are similar to many other modification modes and can affect molecular signaling pathways through redox modification, thereby affecting various biological activities.–

3Thiols, highly reactive constituents in protein residues, serve as crucial agents in the transduction of redox signals and their interactions with small molecules., Influenced by ROS, thiols can participate in reversible oxidative reactions, including the formation of disulfide bonds (S-S), S-glutathionylation (SSG), S-nitrosylation (SNO), and S-sulfenylation (SOH)., These oxidative modifications of cysteine can be reverted to the free thiol state (-SH) by specific reductants., These redox alterations are instrumental in modulating protein structure and functionality, subsequently affecting the cellular physiological processes. The principles of the Redox Code were raised in 2015, including the regulation of NADH and NADPH systems in metabolism, dynamic control of thiol switches in the redox proteome, activation and deactivation cycles of H2O2 production, and the response of redox signaling to environmental changes at various cellular levels, paved the way for new insights into disease-specific therapeutic targets through advanced biotechnological exploration of redox proteomics. In addition to directly affecting genome stability, redox signaling can also affect biological processes through nongenetic pathways, including epigenetic modification, and protein homeostasis. Investigating the mechanisms of redox regulation can provide novel strategies for the treatment of human diseases from a new perspective.

4Redox regulation is crucial in multiple human diseases characterized primarily by two mechanisms. The accumulation of ROS in cells directly damages biomolecules such as nucleic acids, membrane lipids, structural proteins, and enzymes, leading to cellular dysfunction or death., Alternatively, dysregulation in redox modifications leads to aberrant redox signaling, in which hydrogen peroxide generated under physiological or pathological stimuli serves as a secondary messenger, closely linked to the cellular redox state. Diseases like atherosclerosis, radiation-induced lung injury, and paraquat poisoning are directly attributed to or primarily caused by redox imbalances.– In contrast, in conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypertension, type II diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome, redox regulation indirectly influences disease progression through signal transduction pathways. In these scenarios, redox signaling pathways do not regulate biomolecular and cellular activities through direct oxidative damage, but rather through redox modifications and the downstream signaling pathways they activate. In such cases, redox signaling regulation intersect with various cellular molecular events and is subject to reversible control, a biological function often overlooked in previous scientific research. These molecular events typically include those related to stress responses within the cell, such as DNA repair, epigenetic regulation, protein homeostasis, metabolic regulation, and the modulation of the extracellular microenvironment., Ultimately, through regulation at the tissue and organ levels, these processes influence the onset and progression of diseases in the organism. Antioxidant treatments may mitigate or treat diseases where redox imbalance is a primary factor.– However, given the complexity of redox signaling, broad-spectrum antioxidant interventions can lead to adverse effects and may not fulfill therapeutic objectives. Therefore, understanding redox regulation mechanisms in diverse human diseases and identifying specific drug targets or critical modification sites may provide novel approaches for devising precise therapies for intractable diseases.

5This review will focus on the intricate relationship between oxidative stress and human diseases, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the impact of redox signaling (Fig. 1). Additionally, we summarize the current potential redox regulatory targets and the latest clinical research progress, which are expected to provide new strategies for treating human diseases.

Redox signaling orchestrated regulation of genomic stability

6The genome within organisms and cells plays a critical role in health and disease. Disruption of its integrity is closely associated with the onset of various diseases, including cancer, neurological abnormalities, immune deficiencies, and aging.– During life, organisms commonly face various sources of stress from the external environment and internal cellular factors. Among these factors, oxidative stress is one of the significant factors contributing to the disruption of genome integrity and stability. External factors such as psychological stress, radiation, and mechanical pressure can increase the levels of oxidative stress within cells. This in turn promotes the accumulation of reactive oxygen species., During DNA replication or transcription, ROS can chemically induce DNA missense mutations, truncation mutations, or even DNA breakage., Consequently, the integrity of the DNA is compromised, ultimately leading to the destabilization of proteins and RNA within cells and promoting the pathological process. Apart from its significant impact on DNA damage, redox signaling can also influence the repair status of DNA damage by finely regulating the redox modifications of DNA repair-related proteins (Fig. 2)., Therefore, in-depth research summarizing the detailed regulatory effects of redox signaling on DNA repair proteins will contribute to understanding and developing clinical intervention measures.

Double-strand breaks

7DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are common and significantly impactful forms of DNA damage that typically occur when cells are exposed to ionizing radiation or during replication. DNA double-strand damage and defects in its repair mechanisms are associated with radiation sensitivity, aging, tumorigenesis, as well as neurological, immunological, and developmental deficiencies., These repair mechanisms require the involvement and catalysis of multiple essential proteins, many of which are finely regulated by redox signaling. The activation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated protein kinase (ATM) is triggered by the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex when damage occurs, facilitating the repair of double-strand breaks., Upon activation, the C-terminal kinase domain of ATM undergoes autophosphorylation, attracting DNA repair proteins such as p53 and CHK2 to regulate the cell cycle., Dysfunction of these proteins can result in genomic instability and Ataxia-Telangiectasia syndrome.– Oxidative stress can modify ATM through cysteine oxidation, phosphorylation, and acetylation, which leads to ATM activation and subsequent phosphorylation of downstream proteins independent of MRN. Active ATM forms dimers via disulfide bonds, particularly at Cys2991. Mutation at Cys2991 abolishes redox sensitivity while maintaining activation by DNA damage. Similarly, a truncation mutation (R3047X) located near Cys2991 in ATM results in insensitivity to oxidative stress. The role of ATM as a sensor of oxidative stress suggests a novel function independent of DNA damage repair that is crucial for preventing DNA damage under oxidative stress conditions.

8Typically, cells have two options for fixing DSBs: homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining., Homologous recombination is a precise repair process mainly active in the S and G2 stages of the cell cycle, utilizing a sister chromatid as a repair template., DSBs are first detected, then the DNA ends are trimmed to form 3′-ssDNA. Replication protein A (RPA) stabilizes single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which is subsequently substituted by RAD51 to create a nucleoprotein filament crucial for the processes of homology searching and strand invasion., The RAD51-ssDNA filament penetrates a similar DNA sequence, typically the sister chromatid, creating a displacement loop (D-loop) and initiating the repair process guided by a template. The oxidation-reduction state of the RAD51 Cys319 site regulates the formation of RAD51 foci. Upon exposure to DNA damage-inducing stimuli such as ionizing radiation, the RAD51 Cys319 site undergoes oxidation, allowing it to polymerize with PRDX1, thereby facilitating the formation of RAD51 foci. This process recruits DNA damage repair proteins to sites of DNA damage, thereby promoting DNA repair.– However, in the absence of PRDX1, the formation of RAD51 foci is impaired. Moreover, XRCC3 plays a crucial role in homologous recombination repair via RAD51. Its absence disrupts RAD51 focus formation, inhibiting recombination repair and causing genomic instability. The sensitivity of XRCC3 to UVA-induced oxidative stress is associated with structural changes, possibly due to C-terminal oxidation blocking antibody detection regions. This oxidation sensitivity is reversible (Cys86, Cys328); mutating all cysteines to serine abolishes this effect. Additionally, XRCC3 oxidation affects its response to DNA damage, indicating that the oxidation state may influence its role in oxidative stress versus DNA repair.

9On the other hand, nonhomologous end joining is a repair process that is prone to errors and does not require a matching template., Nonhomologous end joining plays a vital role in the repair of double-strand breaks, particularly in cells that are not actively replicating, by directly connecting the damaged ends of DNA.– Initiating the procedure involves attaching the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer to the ends of DNA, shielding them from over-resection., This complex recruits other proteins, including DNA-PKcs, which form a bridge over the DSB to facilitate end processing. End-processing enzymes, such as Artemis, trim DNA ends to prepare them for direct ligation., Finally, the ligase IV complex, which includes XRCC4, XLF, and PAXX, ligates the processed ends together, albeit sometimes incorporating small deletions or insertions at the junction site.,

10Ku forms a DNA-end ring, facilitating end rejoining, with high DNA binding affinity and unknown dissociation mechanisms., Oxidative stress from UV exposure inhibits Ku-DNA binding, which can be reversible by reducing agents., Oxidation induces conformational changes, enhancing dissociation rates, particularly in the C-terminus of Ku80, which contains Cys493 and Cys638 and is crucial for DNA-PKcs recruitment. The redox state of Ku influences DNA binding and downstream protein recruitment, suggesting that oxidation may regulate repair pathway selection, aiding in repair pathway decisions. DNA-PKcs, a critical component in the repair of double-strand breaks through NHEJ, plays a crucial role in recognizing DNA damage and facilitating DNA repair., With 4128 amino acids (87 Cys), DNA-PKcs is sensitive to oxidative stress and nitrosylation, impacting its activity and expression., Nitric oxide enhances DNA-PKcs expression and activity via SP1 binding, potentially protecting against DNA damage. The production of RONS increases the sensitivity of cells to genotoxic drugs by decreasing the activity of DNA-PKcs, hindering repair processes, and leading to the accumulation of DSBs.

11In summary, contrary to traditional views that oxidative stress merely leads to increased DNA damage and disease progression, a deeper understanding of redox signaling reveals that redox modifications can enhance the activity of ATM, facilitating the formation of RAD51 foci. Additionally, redox modifications of Ku and DNA-PKcs each promote their biological functions, thereby aiding the repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Base excision repair

12Base excision repair (BER) addresses base lesions, including oxidative and methylated damage, and maintains genomic stability.– BER dysfunction leads to error propagation, DNA breaks, and genomic instability,, leading to the progression of several diseases, including cancer, immune deficiency, and neurodegenerative diseases., Under oxidative stress, BER components are modified and inhibited, contributing to the accumulation of DNA damage. The BER process begins with the recognition and excision of the damaged base by DNA glycosylases., Alkyl-adenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) is a critical enzyme that removes methylated DNA bases in BER., Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) treatment induces the formation of methylated DNA lesions via AAG. GSNO treatment enhances BER intermediates after MMS exposure, particularly during recovery, in an AAG-dependent manner. GSNO transfers an NO group to AAG, activating its activity by nitrosylating Cys167. Elevated GSNO inhibits downstream APE1, leading to base accumulation. Bases are mutagenic and can cause single-strand breaks and DSBs, exacerbating cell damage.

138-Oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1) is crucial for recognizing and excising oxidized DNA bases, generating base excision repair.– Research involving mice lacking OGG1 validated its ability to eliminate 8-oxoguanine (8oxoG) damage., OGG1 has eight Cys residues and is sensitive to oxidative stress induced by various oxidants, such as cadmium., Cadmium changes the redox status of cells by reducing glutathione levels and increasing reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, resulting in the inhibition of OGG1., This effect is not influenced by chelating agents but relies on antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Nitrosylation also regulates OGG1, inhibiting its activity. Singlet oxygen from UV exposure also inhibits OGG1, causing oxidative DNA damage. The common OGG1 variant Ser326Cys is redox-sensitive due to introducing a Cys residue. Ser326Cys forms disulfide bonds under oxidative stress, leading to dimerization and nonproductive DNA binding, further inhibiting its activity. This variant also lacks tight DNA binding ability and coordination with BER steps, causing DNA damage accumulation and genomic instability, particularly under inflammatory conditions due to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced oxidative stress and NO release. These findings underscore the link between inflammation, oxidative stress, and disease through OGG1 modulation.

14In addition to OGG1, MUTYH is responsible for repairing oxidative DNA damage by removing adenine, which is incorrectly inserted across 8oxoG., MUTYH is a 60 kDa glycosylase that comprises 546 amino acids, including twelve Cys residues. Oxidative stress inhibits MUTYH activity, potentially impeding DNA damage repair and highlighting its susceptibility to redox modification. Thus, ROS generated by UV exposure can hinder two critical enzymes involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. APE1 consists of 318 amino acids, including seven Cys residues., It operates in BER and autonomously controls the oxidation‒reduction status of transcription factors., The N-terminus of APE1 facilitates protein‒protein interactions and redox activity, while the C-terminus mediates endonuclease activity. Redox sensitivity involves Cys65, which is essential for the biological function of APE1. Oxidative modifications, such as nitrosylation at Cys93 and Cys310, influence subcellular localization. Oxidative stress induces reversible glutathionylation at Cys99, inhibiting DNA binding and endonuclease activity of APE1.

15PARP1 contains 3 zinc finger domains crucial for DNA‒protein interactions, shielding Cys residues from oxidation., Heavy metals such as arsenic displace zinc, heightening Cys sensitivity to oxidative stress and inhibiting DNA binding. Nitrosylation disrupts zinc coordination, inhibiting PARP1 and leading to DNA damage accumulation. XRCC1, a protein of 69.5 kilodaltons and consists of 633 amino acids (including six cysteines), aids in recruiting proteins for base excision repair by interacting with PARP1, ligase III, APE1, and polβ. Its N-terminal domain, which contains redox-sensitive Cys residues (Cys12, Cys20), binds polβ. The oxidation process causes a 6.4 Å shift between cysteine 12 and cysteine 20, resulting in a 25-fold increase in the attraction of XRCC1 to polβ. Cys12 is crucial for polβ recruitment; mutating it to Cys12Ala delays recruitment. Pro2 forms a stabilizing proline carbamate adduct upon CO2 exposure. The efficiency of base excision repair and DNA repair is influenced by the conformational changes caused by oxidation in XRCC1.

16Unlike double-strand DNA repair, redox modifications play a dual role. Redox modifications enhance the enzymatic activity of AAG and promote the interaction between XRCC1 and polβ, facilitating DNA repair. However, the enzymatic activities of OGG1, MUTYH, and APE1 are inhibited following redox modifications. These varied outcomes resulting from redox modifications reflect the diversity in biological functions of different redox modifications and modifications at specific cysteine sites on various proteins. Therefore, comprehensive consideration of the overall outcomes should be given when developing therapeutic models that regulate global redox states.

Direct reversal pathway

17The direct reversal pathway of DNA repair is a critical and efficient mechanism that directly corrects certain types of DNA damage, restoring the original DNA structure without requiring extensive processing or synthesis.– One of the most well-characterized reactions in this pathway is the repair of methylated guanine., When guanine bases in DNA are alkylated to form O6-methylguanine, they can mispair with thymine during replication, leading to mutations., O6 methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) is vital for repairing O6 methylguanine lesions and prevents GC-to-AT mutations. MGMT, comprising 207 amino acids with five Cys residues and a molecular weight of 21 kDa, transfers methyl groups to Cys145, its active site. This action triggers MGMT degradation, making it a suicide protein. Nitrosylation of Cys145 by nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) inactivates MGMT, leading to its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation and reducing its half-life from 24 to 1.3 h. This degradation results in DNA damage, potentially contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis, particularly in hepatocellular tumors with high NO synthase and low GSNOR levels.

Telomere attrition by oxidative stress

18Telomeres are DNA‒protein complexes devoid of gene coding function located at the ends of cell chromosomes., As cells replicate their DNA, the ends of chromosomes cannot be fully replicated, resulting in a loss of DNA at each cell division., Telomeres serve to protect the genomic integrity of chromosomes. Similar to DNA damage, telomeric sequences are also susceptible to oxidative stress-induced damage. While DNA damage often leads to genomic instability and tumorigenesis, damage at the telomeres can promote cell death. Numerous research papers have separately examined the topics of DNA damage and telomere shortening. Hypoxia-induced oxidative stress can be alleviated by human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression, which is facilitated by the presence of binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) in the promoter of hTERT., Tankyrase (TNKS) is a crucial telomere-associated protein (TAP) that maintains the structural and functional integrity of telomeres. TNKS protects eroded telomeres from cellular senescence caused by ROS and ultraviolet radiation. Thus, TNKS appears crucial when external conditions damage telomeres. Telomeric damage may enhance TNKS activity, leading to the maintenance of telomere structural integrity beyond its usual level. Meanwhile, TNKS can also coordinate cell proliferation pauses by regulating p21 stability, thereby influencing the progression of various diseases, including cancer and aging. Even with various antioxidant systems in place, the production of ROS could surpass the ability of the defense network, leading to oxidative stress. Oxidative stress suppresses telomerase activity and promotes telomeric erosion. Telomeric DNA is prone to oxidative damage due to the less efficient repair of single-strand breaks caused by oxidative damage in telomeres compared to nontelomeric regions. Additionally, G-quadruplexes tend to accumulate 8oxoG lesions, which are affected by the base excision repair pathway. The DNA replication machinery is compromised by oxidative stress, leading to telomeric shortening as a result of decreased expression of hTERT. Hypoxia leads to the expression of HIFs, which control hTERT and modify the length of telomeres. The maintenance of telomeres is influenced by continuous exposure of cells to free radicals.

19Overall, redox modifications generally promote DNA repair, while some DNA repair enzymes are inhibited by these modifications. These differences may arise from variations in oxidative stress levels in different experimental models, or due to the intrinsic properties of different DNA repair enzymes. Therefore, in exploring the regulation of redox states for disease treatment, precise targeting of specific DNA repair enzymes can be considered. This approach necessitates further research into the molecular mechanisms of redox signaling.

Redox signaling-mediated epigenetic regulations

20Epigenetics is a heritable and reversible change in gene expression that is not caused by gene sequence changes and involves regulating and maintaining gene expression., It has important implications for understanding biology and disease pathogenesis., Unlike diseases caused by alterations in genetic material, epigenetically mediated diseases are often induced by environmental factors. For instance, epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation can influence gene expression within an organism without altering the DNA sequence and serve as a crucial mechanism in tumorigenesis. Moreover, psychiatric disorders including depression and schizophrenia, which are related to postnatal environmental factors, are also intricately linked with epigenetics. Additionally, epigenetics is associated with cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, autoimmune disorders, endocrine disruptions, and aging. Recent studies have shown that redox regulates epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNA (Fig. 3)., Due to the reversible nature of epigenetics, identifying potential key epigenetic molecules affected by oxidative stress is expected to provide potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for various human diseases.,

DNA methylation

21DNA methylation is one of the best-studied epigenetic modifications.– DNA methyltransferase catalyzes specific DNA sequences, and S-adenosylmethionine is used as a methylation donor to achieve methylation group modification through covalent bonding., Recent research indicates that DNA methylation is possible on cytosine and adenine bases, including 5-methylcytosine (5mC), N6-methyladenine (6mA), and N4-methylcytosine (4mC). Among these modification types, the 5mC modification of CpG islands, which can repress gene transcription, is the most common DNA methylation in mammals., The level of DNA methylation in the body has the characteristics of an epigenetic clock, which shows that the overall level of epigenetic modifications in the body decreases with age. Furthermore, a study involving the sequencing of whole blood samples from 18,413 volunteers analyzed the association between DNA methylation and 19 diseases. Notably, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain, breast cancer, and ischemic heart disease demonstrated strong associations with DNA methylation at specific loci. However, the underlying molecular mechanism needs to be further elucidated.,

22Earlier studies on the effects of redox reactions on DNA focused on direct oxidative modification of DNA sequences., Cells exposed to hypochlorous acid (HOCl) exhibit heightened levels of chlorinated nucleobases (e.g., 5-chlorocytosine (5-ClC)). Further studies have shown that 5-ClC binds to the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 and disrupts the site specificity of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), resulting in changes in DNA methylation patterns. However, 5-ClC is detected at a relatively low frequency of 3 per 108 bases, and its impact on mutagenicity may outweigh its effects on global DNA methylation. Additionally, the oxidation of guanosine to 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) at CpG sites directly interferes with methylation., However, the reported extent of 8-oxodG occurrence is one lesion per 105–106 deoxyguanosines. Notably, mouse models of chronic inflammation and colonic samples from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) did not exhibit increased levels of 8-oxodG or other conventional oxidative DNA lesions compared to control samples. Therefore, recent research has focused on the biological significance of redox processing. Intriguingly, a recent study showed that exposure to sublethal hydrogen peroxide led to a long-term genome-wide decrease in DNA methylation. Another study used the neutrophil-derived oxidant glycine chloramine to treat Jurkat T lymphoma cells by inhibiting the activity of DNMT and the formation of the intracellular methylation donor SAM.– Consistent with these findings, brain iron loading-mediated oxidative stress decreased the enzyme activity of DNMTs in mouse models, indicating an increase in the risk of neurodegeneration. In contrast to the biological functions described above, recent research has shown that hypoxia-mediated oxidative stress can increase the expression of DNMTs and facilitate hypermethylation of the NDGR2 promoter. These different results suggest that in-depth mechanistic research, such as the study of the effects of oxidative stress on DNMT enzyme activity, transcription, protein stability, and redox modification patterns, will help researchers understand the different biological functions of oxidative stress and develop new treatment strategies.

Histone modification

23The DNA nucleotide sequence winds around histones through electrostatic interactions in the chromosome. Modification of histones can affect the exposure of the DNA nucleotide sequence and thus affect the transcription level of the gene.– Therefore, studying the regulatory mechanism of oxidative stress on histone modification is of great help in understanding the mechanism of selective protein expression.

Histone methylation

24Histone methylation is one of the most common histone modifications.– After specific amino acids (e.g., lysine or arginine) are methylated, they affect the tightness of DNA and nucleosome binding, affecting the transcription level of particular genes on DNA. The methylation of histones is a complicated process that controls the dynamics of chromatin and the transcription of genes. This balance is regulated by histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and histone demethylases (HDMs). Oxidative stress, such as H2O2 in diabetic retinopathy, increases H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 while reducing the acetylation of histones such as H3K9ac and H4K8ac. In diabetic nephropathy, 12(S)-HETE upregulates SET7, promoting profibrotic gene expression. Artery occlusion decreases H3K4me3 levels in astrocytes. PRMTs are oxidized by H2O2, reducing histone arginine methylation. LSD1 produces hydrogen peroxide in response to DNA damage. Base excision repair proteins influence epigenetic modifications. Additional investigations are needed to determine how redox agents, dosage, cell/tissue specificity, and pathological conditions affect epigenetic control and gene expression.

25As mentioned earlier, DNMTs and HMTs add methyl groups to DNA or histones by transferring methyl groups from SAM to the substrate, resulting in the formation of S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH). Methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) converts methionine into SAM using ATP. The decrease in SAM levels caused by reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (RO/NS) results in a decrease in the activity of DNMTs and HMTs. Hydrogen peroxide causes a change in Cys121 of MAT by generating hydroxyl radicals, leading to the inactivation of MAT and a decrease in SAM biosynthesis. The SAM reduction induced by H2O2 in A549 cells leads to hypomethylation of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1). Additional research is needed to clarify how various redox signals, dosage reactions, and short-term versus long-term exposure to RO/NS impact SAM, DNA, and histone alterations.

Histone acetylation

26Histone acetylation is affected by RO/NS.– At present, researchers have identified eighteen histone deacetylases (HDACs) that are classified as zinc/iron-dependent deacetylases, including class I (HDACs 1, 2, 3, and 8), class II (HDACs 4, 5, 7, and 9), class IIB (HDACs 6 and 10), and class IV (HDAC11)., In contrast, sirtuins 1–7, class III HDACs, depend on NAD+ for their function and do not require zinc or iron. Numerous HDACs exhibit redox regulation. TRX1 reduces oxidized molecules, such as class II HDACs, through the thiol-disulfide exchange, which helps with nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. TRX1 induces DnaJb5, which forms a complex with class II HDACs. When exposed to ROS/H2O2, Cys274/Cys276 within DnaJb5 and Cys667/Cys669 in HDAC4 could undergo oxidation, leading to the creation of disulfide bonds within the molecules that can be reduced by TRX1. The importance of reducing Cys274/Cys276 in DnaJb5 for interaction with HDAC4 has been emphasized, as has the impact of decreasing Cys667/Cys669 in HDAC4 on preventing its nuclear export. Other Cys residues in HDACs are sensitive to H2O2. PRDXs act as cellular antioxidants and may relay H2O2 signaling, with PRDX I and II targeted by HDAC6, decreasing H2O2 reductive activity. Class I HDACs, notably HDAC1, are redox-sensitive, potentially via Cys residues, impacting histone acetylation patterns and gene expression. Cys102 and Cys153 in HDAC8 are integral to its redox switch, with disulfide bond formation under oxidative conditions potentially resulting in reversible enzyme activity loss. Overall, redox RO/NS modulates chromatin accessibility by altering HDAC/histone acetylation, necessitating further investigation into HDAC responses to redox signaling.

27Histone acetylation is catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs).– P300/CREB-binding protein (CBP) is one such protein., The enzymes alter preserved lysine (K) sites on histone tails by moving an acetyl group from acetyl-CoA to create ε-N-acetyl-lysine. This process causes a reduction in histone binding to DNA, leading to the relaxation of chromatin and increased transcription of genes. In Escherichia coli, an elevated ratio of NADH to NAD+ inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity, impeding the formation of acetyl-CoA, as the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA relies on PDH. This process causes a reduction in histone binding to DNA, leading to the relaxation of chromatin and increased gene transcription. In mammalian cells, H2O2 enhances HAT activity, resulting in increased acetylation of H3/H4 histones.

28Redox modifications inhibit HDAC activity and may promote the activation of HAT, leading to an increase in histone acetylation and the promotion of gene expression. This process may be associated with the onset and progression of certain diseases, necessitating further experimental validation.

Non-coding RNA

29With the implementation of the Human Genome Project, researchers discovered that over 98% of the human genome consists of non-coding DNA. Further studies by the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project indicated that up to 80% of the human genome, including coding DNA, can undergo transcription, suggesting the presence of a substantial amount of non-coding RNA in the human body. Similar to DNA, oxidative stress can induce 8-oxoG modifications in RNA, potentially altering its stability or base pairing fidelity. Given the longer sequences of non-coding RNAs, the impact of 8-oxoG modifications might be less significant overall, whereas, for shorter microRNAs, these modifications could have a more pronounced effect. Researchers have examined the oxidation of nucleic acids in rat cardiac cells under oxidative stress conditions, with miR-184 exhibiting the most significant changes in oxidative modifications. Following oxidative modification, miR-184 acquires new nucleic acid pairing capabilities, allowing it to bind to the mRNA of BCL-xL and decrease its translation level, thereby promoting apoptosis. In the absence of oxidative modifications, this binding capability is absent, suggesting that redox modifications can specifically regulate the initiation of biological activities. Oxidative miRNA sequencing of a rat model with cardiac hypertrophy induced by oxidative stress revealed an 8-oxoG modification at position 7 of miR-1. Introduction of 7o8G-miR-1 alone could induce cardiac hypertrophy in mice, while specific inhibition of 7o8G-miR-1 alleviated the hypertrophy, suggesting that oxidative modifications of miR-1 induced by oxidative stress could serve as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Moreover, oxidative modifications at different positions on miRNA molecules can lead to varied effects on disease progression. For instance, a study on hepatocellular carcinoma demonstrated that an 8-oxoG modification at the third position of miR-122 promotes tumorigenesis, whereas further oxidation of the second nucleotide to yield 2,3o8G-miR-122 transforms it into a tumor-suppressive miRNA. These findings underscore the intricate mechanisms of nucleic acid functional regulation by oxidative modifications, providing valuable insights for studying molecular mechanisms in disease progression and developing targeted therapeutic strategies.

Redox determinants of protein degradation

30The processes of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease are mainly linked to disrupted systems that break down proteins.– When cells produce proteins, they clear improperly folded or redundant proteins to maintain intracellular protein homeostasis., When cells accumulate large amounts of misfolded peptides and oxidatively damaged proteins, protein degradation systems are required to degrade them to maintain cellular homeostasis. Two main pathways for protein degradation exist: the ubiquitin‒proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagy-lysosome pathway (ALP) (Fig. 4).,

The ubiquitin-proteasome system

31UPS is an essential process for breaking down cell proteins, involving a series of enzymes and approximately 500–1000 proteins., The ATP-dependent proteolytic mechanism operates by the combined effects of three main enzymes: the E1 enzyme activating ubiquitin (Ub), the E2 enzyme for conjugating Ub, and the E3 enzyme for ligating Ub., Collectively, these enzymes facilitate the ubiquitylation of protein substrates, a process critical for targeting proteins for degradation., The human genome encodes more than 600 E3 ligases, underscoring the vast diversity and specificity of substrates targeted by the UPS. This system targets misfolded or damaged proteins and regulates the levels of numerous short-lived proteins, playing a pivotal role in maintaining cellular function and homeostasis. The UPS plays a crucial role in multiple cellular functions, such as regulating the cell cycle, transmitting signals, and modulating immune reactions, underscoring its importance in both healthy cell activities and pathological conditions.

32The Arg/N-degron pathway, previously known as the Arg/N-end rule pathway, is crucial for controlling protein degradation through the UPS interface and autophagy. As discovered in 1986, this pathway facilitates the breakdown of proteins and nonprotein entities, such as subcellular organelles and pathogens, through N-degrons. Specific N-recognin E3 ubiquitin ligases, such as UBR1, UBR2, UBR4/p600, and EDD/UBR5, target N-degrons located at the N-termini of proteins through conserved UBR boxes. Key N-degrons consist of a positively charged N-terminal Arg, Lys, and His (type 1), as well as bulky hydrophobic Trp, Phe, Tyr, Leu, and Ile (type 2). The binding of N-recognins to these degrons triggers ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation. N-terminal-Arg (Nt-Arg), a key N-degron, is produced by the arginylation of Nt-Asp or Nt-Glu through ATE1-encoded Arg-tRNA transferases or by the deamidation of Nt-Asn and Nt-Gln by specific amidases, as highlighted in the literature. Additionally, Nt-Cys becomes arginylation-compatible following oxidation, illustrating its role in regulating protein functions through redox reactions and metal ion interactions.

33In 2002, the Cys/N-degron pathway was shown to act as an oxygen detector in cardiovascular signaling. This process begins with the oxidation of N-terminal Cys2 and then proceeds with arginylation and proteasomal breakdown. Important molecules such as RGS4, RGS5, and RGS16, which serve as GTPase-activating proteins for G protein α-subunits, are subject to oxygen-dependent breakdown facilitated by the Met-Cys motif. Typically, Nt-Met is removed by Met aminopeptidases, which expose Cys2 for oxidation and subsequent arginylation. The resulting Arg-CysO2(H) acts as an N-degron, which is identified by UBR1 and UBR2 for ubiquitylation and subsequent degradation. Under hypoxic conditions, the oxidation of Nt-Cys2 is impaired, stabilizing RGS proteins that then suppress G protein signaling, which is critical for cardiovascular function. This pathway allows cells to adapt to varying oxygen levels by regulating essential proteins, potentially including the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-32 (IL-32), which is also degraded via this mechanism. The full scope of proteins affected by this pathway, estimated at approximately 300 in the mammalian genome, remains to be explored.

34Transcription factors such as group VII ethylene response factors (ERFs), the polycomb repressive complex 2 component VRN2, and LITTLE ZIPPER2 (ZPR2) are examples of substrates containing an Nt-Cys2. Under typical oxygen conditions, Nt-Cys2 undergoes oxidation catalyzed by either plant cysteine oxidase 1 (PCO1) or PCO2, followed by arginylation by ATE1, resulting in the formation of Nt-Arg-CysO2(H) (RCO2). The N-degron is identified by the N-recognin PRT6, resulting in ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Under hypoxia, these transcription factors are stabilized and activate hypoxic/anoxic responses by binding to hypoxia-responsive elements. This route enables plants to react to low oxygen levels, such as being submerged or exposed to cold temperatures. In contrast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not rely on this pathway, suggesting oxygen sensing might not be as critical in lower eukaryotes.

The autophagy-lysosome pathway

35ALP is a critical component of the cellular protein quality control system, acting as a secondary line of defense for degrading misfolded proteins and other harmful cellular debris., Although the UPS is the primary way to eliminate misfolded proteins from different cell parts, such as the cytosol, nucleus, and ER, it may not always efficiently break down all abnormal proteins. Proteins that escape monitoring by the UPS can clump together, creating harmful substances that are difficult for the proteasome to break down and remove. When such aggregates form, the ALP takes over, providing an alternative degradation route to handle these more significant, complex structures. The ALP is involved in various processes, such as microautophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy, and macroautophagy.– Each mechanism differs in how cellular cargo is delivered to the lysosome for breakdown. Macroautophagy, commonly referred to simply as autophagy, is particularly significant. This process includes trapping items such as misfolded protein clumps, impaired cell parts, and even intruding pathogens in autophagosomes, which are double-membrane vesicles. These autophagosomes subsequently fuse with lysosomes, forming autolysosomes where lysosomal enzymes degrade the sequestered material. Thus, autophagy is an essential protective mechanism that safeguards cells from various intracellular and extracellular threats, thereby maintaining cellular integrity and function.

36In 2021, a study revealed that Nt-Cys triggers the degradation of proteins and other autophagic cargoes, including misfolded proteins, through cis- and trans-pathways to maintain quality control. The Ub chains direct substrates toward autophagic breakdown through the UBA domain of p62, aiding in the elimination of harmful substances during periods of stress. Research has demonstrated that autophagy promotes longevity by mitigating the deleterious effects of cellular senescence and accumulation of damaged biomolecules, which are hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases.– Enhanced autophagy has been observed to correlate with increased lifespan in several model organisms, including yeast, nematodes, and flies.– The integrin/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is influenced by oxidative stress, leading to the activation of autophagy and accelerating the pathologic process., Additionally, hypoxia-induced oxidative stress stimulates autophagy by inhibiting mTOR activity. However, various studies have shown that oxidative alterations to autophagy regulators exert an inhibitory effect., For example, oxidation of Cys292 and Cys361 on ATG4B hinders its capacity to degrade the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B light chain 3 (LC3), leading to a disruption in autophagic flux. Likewise, the oxidation of Cys263 on ATG3 and Cys572 on ATG7 hinders the attachment of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) to LC3. This contradictory outcome may be attributed to intracellular negative feedback regulatory mechanisms that maintain the equilibrium of protein homeostasis. The specific molecular mechanisms may require more refined redox assays and more rigorous experimental designs for further exploration.

Redox signaling in metabolic reprogramming

37Metabolic reprogramming plays a critical role in various diseases, including obesity, fatty liver disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, gout, cancer, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, by adapting cellular energy mechanisms to meet changing physiological needs over time., Recent research, integrating metabolic features from 233 circulating metabolites in 136,016 samples, has revealed the associations between metabolic characteristics and disease onset. Significantly, these metabolic features can characterize the onset of diseases such as diabetes, renal failure, and benign uterine tumors. As diseases process, there is a shift in the balance between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation in cells, which is highly correlated with mitochondrial function.– Additionally, pathology-related changes in metabolism are closely linked to the regulation of lifespan and diseases. Metabolic pathways, influenced by nutrient-sensing mechanisms and hormonal changes, dictate cellular responses, influencing both energy production and the cellular maintenance systems., Redox signaling participates in regulating these processes by modulating the activity of critical regulators (Fig. 5)., Through its influence on both mitochondrial function and nutrient-sensing pathways, redox signaling helps dictate how effectively a cell can respond to metabolic demands and environmental stress, impacting the pathological process.

Redox control of mitochondrial dysfunction

38Mitochondria are a significant source of ROS, acting as vital organelles for controlling inflammation and triggering cell death., When diseases advance, mitochondrial function deteriorates due to multiple factors, impairing the ability of mitochondria to generate ATP, increasing ROS production, and potentially enhancing mitochondrial membrane permeability, thus promoting inflammation and cell death.–

39Current clinical evidence suggests a beneficial therapeutic effect of L-carnitine on frailty symptoms in older men, possibly achieved through inhibiting fatty acid oxidation in mitochondrial membranes. Experimental studies in aged mice have shown that inhibiting mitochondrial ATP synthesis using TPP-thiazole can improve metabolic health and delay aging phenotypes. Metformin has also been demonstrated to exert anti-cancer effects by binding to mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes., However, no direct evidence indicates that inhibiting mitochondrial function can increase human healthspan or lifespan.

40Protein production in cells involves the synthesis of polypeptides by cytosolic ribosomes and their subsequent folding into functional structures. Synthesis and folding can occur simultaneously, as ribosomes enlist different chaperone systems to facilitate the correct folding process within their polypeptide exit tunnels. Disulfide formation in proteins is reversible, as two cysteine thiols are oxidized into a linked disulfide via thiol-disulfide exchange or oxygen-dependent reactions, often requiring catalysts such as transition metals or flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) due to kinetic barriers., Recent findings indicate a high presence of proteins containing structural disulfides in the intermembrane space of mitochondria, leading to a thorough examination of the key elements responsible for oxidizing mitochondrial proteins. The disulfide relay system within the mitochondria, essential for creating disulfide bonds in proteins, is critical in facilitating the movement of recently produced intermembrane space (IMS) proteins through the mitochondrial outer membrane., Central to this process are Mia40 and Erv1. The localization of Mia40, an IMS protein that is conserved, differs between mammals and plants, where it is soluble, and fungi, where it is membrane-anchored. Containing a crucial redox-active disulfide within a cysteine-proline-cysteine pattern, this element oxidizes cysteine residues in new polypeptide chains, securing them in a firmly folded condition to block their return through the membrane., This results in direct transport into the IMS. Erv1, a FAD-containing sulfhydryl oxidase family member that includes enzymes in the secretory pathway and viral proteins, reoxidizes Mia40. Erv1 utilizes two crucial cysteine-x-x-cysteine pairs to transfer electrons from Mia40 to FAD. In vitro, Erv1 can be reoxidized by oxygen to generate hydrogen peroxide, but in vivo, it primarily transfers electrons to cytochrome c, connecting to the respiratory chain and improving reoxidation efficiency while inhibiting hydrogen peroxide buildup in the IMS., The mitochondrial oxidation machinery also includes Hot13, a small metal-binding protein, further integrating the complex network of mitochondrial protein management.

41Mitochondria serve as crucial hubs within the cellular calcium signaling network, where calcium ions participate in mitochondrial and cellular physiological processes intricately linked to cellular energy metabolism and survival.– The transport of calcium ions across mitochondria is mediated by the mitochondrial calcium uptake family member protein (MICU). Evidence suggests that various diseases, including cardiovascular and neurological disorders, are closely associated with this process.– Recent studies have revealed that MICU3 can form a disulfide bond with MICU1 at the Cys515 site, thereby enhancing calcium uptake by mitochondria. This suggests that the redox modification of MICU3 may finely regulate mitochondrial calcium influx, consequently modulating the progression of human diseases.

Redox signaling involved in nutrient-sensing mechanisms

42The nutrient-sensing network is integral to how cells perceive and respond to their nutritional environment, directly impacting pathologic processes.– It includes receptors that sense intracellular cascades, such as AMPK, mTOR, RAS-MEK-ERK, and PI3K-Akt.,

43AMPK is a crucial protein in cellular sensing of energy metabolism. When the AMP or ADP to ATP ratio significantly increases within the cell, AMPK is activated to maintain energy homeostasis in the organism., In response to energy stress, AMPK restores ATP levels by inhibiting biosynthetic pathways that consume ATP, such as glycogen and lipid synthesis, while activating catabolic pathways that regenerate ATP through macromolecule degradation, which is highly related to human diseases.– Oxidation-reduction modifications also participate in the regulation of AMPK activation, where Cys130 and Cys174 of AMPK can form disulfide bonds through oxidation, thereby impeding the binding of AMPK kinase to AMPK and subsequent AMPK activation. Therefore, the reduction of AMPK oxidation-reduction sites is also one of the essential conditions for AMPK activation.

44Furthermore, mTOR, particularly mTORC1, is crucial for regulating cellular metabolism and growth by detecting and combining different nutritional and environmental signals.– mTORC1 is sensitive to nutrients, such as glucose and amino acids, and is responsive to cellular stressors such as hypoxia and energy depletion, positioning it as a central regulator of cellular function., Research has shown a strong connection between the function of nutrient detection systems and longevity in both humans and different animal species., Research has shown that under oxidative stress conditions, mTOR can undergo oxidation at Cys1483, forming intermolecular disulfide bonds, thereby inhibiting cardiomyocyte survival and mitochondrial function.

45The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway is a fundamental signaling cascade that transduces external signals into intracellular responses, guiding cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and survival., Oxidative stress can cause the oxidation of tyrosine-protein kinase Fyn at Cys488, leading to the initiation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade. Current research has focused on understanding how ERK1/2 controls the regulation of more than 300 substrates during oxidative stress. Recent studies have indicated that oxidative changes at vulnerable cysteine sites, such as Cys38, Cys159, Cys161, Cys183, and Cys214, are involved in the precise control of the ERK1/2 pathway. R-SO2/3 modification of Cys38 and Cys214 enhances the interaction between MEK and ERK1/2, increasing the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 by MEK. Moreover, the alteration of Cys159 through R-SOH enhances the formation of ERK2 crystals when ATP is present. On the other hand, altering Cys183 through R-SNO reduces the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 at both T183 and Y185, leading to apoptosis when cells are treated with sodium nitroprusside. Previous research has highlighted the varied effects of redox alteration on the ERK pathway. The PI3K/Akt pathway, another nutrient-sensing-related pathway, is upregulated due to the oxidation of PTEN at Cys124 and Cys71. The PI3K/Akt pathway is crucial in sensing nutrients and regulating cellular metabolism, controlling cellular functions such as growth, survival, and metabolism., This pathway is pivotal in translating extracellular nutrient signals into appropriate intracellular responses, ensuring cellular homeostasis and adaptation to environmental changes.

Redox regulation of disease microenvironment

46The transition from cellular to organismal pathogenesis often necessitates consideration of numerous extracellular factors., Following the emergence of pathologic cells within an organism, their clearance is typically mediated by the immune system, with tissue repair conducted by stem-like cells.– In cases where the immune system fails to eliminate senescent cells, chronic inflammation can contribute to a range of age-related diseases, including but not limited to cancer,, through the persistent presence of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)., Additionally, intercellular communication and changes in the extracellular matrix significantly influence or activate relevant signaling pathways., The chronic inflammatory microenvironment is one of the critical inducers of diseases, where the activation of inflammatory signaling pathways can provoke the formation of an inflammatory milieu, accelerating the progression of diseases., Within these biological processes, redox signaling regulation can activate relevant pathways by modulating essential redox sensors, thereby promoting the onset and progression of diseases (Fig. 6).

Redox signaling regulates cellular senescence and stem cell exhaustion

47Cellular senescence, triggered by sudden or prolonged damage, leads to the buildup of aged cells in different body parts. It increases significantly (2–20 times) from young (<35 years) to old (>65 years) individuals.– Fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells are mainly impacted by this process, but all types of cells can undergo senescence as they age, which is frequently caused by the shortening of telomeres., The causes of the initial senescence process include oncogenic signaling, genotoxic harm, extremely short telomeres, malfunctioning mitochondria, infections, oxidative stress, nutrient imbalances, and physical stress. Furthermore, secondary senescence can occur due to inflammatory and fibrotic factors such as CCL2, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, and TGF-β., Primary and secondary senescence show biological differences, but their precise molecular differences are unclear. Cellular senescence is associated with a range of non-proliferative conditions, including lung fibrosis, kidney diseases, liver steatosis, metabolic syndrome related to obesity, type I and II diabetes, atherosclerosis, and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.– Senescence is believed to play a significant role in these conditions due to SASP.,

48Researchers are particularly interested in the biological function of cellular senescence, despite its connection to other diseases.– While primarily acting as a tumor suppressor, cellular senescence also plays a critical role in tissue repair, promoting localized fibrosis and immune cell recruitment to clear damaged and senescent cells.– This process can be viewed as a two-phase mechanism: initial senescence induction followed by immune-mediated clearance.– Senescence is a self-limiting response that, ideally, leads to beneficial outcomes. However, pathological effects emerge when immune clearance fails, leading to senescent cell accumulation and SASP-driven fibrosis in the tissue microenvironment., In this context, the redox signaling pathways play a crucial regulatory role, and their specific molecular mechanisms await further exploration.

49Aging diminishes tissue renewal and impairs repair across organs, each employing unique strategies.– Conversely, the skin epidermis features multiple stem cell niches, especially around hair follicles, facilitating high renewal rates and progeny generation. Upon injury, cells in these niches can adopt stem cell characteristics and overcome established boundaries. Conversely, the liver, lung, and pancreas usually have low regeneration rates under normal circumstances. Nevertheless, they can gain stem-like properties, including proliferation and multipotency, in response to injury. Tissue repair significantly depends on injury-induced cellular dedifferentiation and plasticity. Damage to the intestine, brain, and lungs causes non-stem cells to revert to an earlier state, activating genetic programs related to embryonic development and stem cell characteristics to facilitate repair flexibility., Recent multi-omics studies revealed that glutathione metabolism is a key determinant of bimodal patterns in stem cell exhaustion, indicating the essential role of redox state in stemness regulation. Maintaining a stem-like phenotype necessitates the activation of diverse signaling cascades, including the Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog pathways.– ROS help transport the FOXO transcription factor into the nucleus through phosphorylation by JNK or MST1. Subsequently, FOXO may interact with β-catenin, the pivotal regulator within the Wnt pathway, culminating in the transcriptional upregulation of genes associated with cell cycle arrest, antioxidative defense mechanisms, and DNA repair processes. Furthermore, the generation of ROS can activate NRF2, leading to the transcriptional activation of Notch1 and Sonic Hedgehog, which in turn stimulates the Notch and Hedgehog signaling pathways., This activation is predominantly mediated through the disruption of the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) - NRF2 interaction (oxidation of KEAP1 Cys151, Cys273, and Cys288), facilitating the translocation of NRF2 into the nucleus.

Role of extracellular matrix in redox regulation

50The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a ubiquitous three-dimensional, non-cellular structure found across various tissues, serving not only as physical support but also as a dynamic network. This network regulates a variety of functions including proliferation, migration, and differentiation through interactions with cells., Enhancing our understanding of how the ECM influences organ structure and functionality, as well as how ECM remodeling impacts disease progression, could aid in developing new therapeutic approaches., The ECM is particularly critical in the development of specific organs like the intestines, lungs, and mammary glands, and its remodeling also impacts their normal morphogenesis (Fig. 7).– Integrins are crucial transmembrane receptors that mediate the interaction between cells and the ECM, playing a vital role in cellular signaling and structural integrity., The relationship between integrins and the ECM is highly dynamic and regulated by several mechanisms, including conformational changes of integrins, which can switch between inactive and active states., Integrins bind to ECM components such as collagen and fibronectin in the active state, initiating intracellular signaling cascades., This activation often involves focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which is a critical mediator in transducing signals from integrins to promote cell cycle progression and proliferation through pathways like Ras-ERK/MAPK., Under oxidative stress conditions, integrins can form disulfide bonds (e.g., Cys560-Cys583 and Cys523-Cys544 in the β3 subunit) that lock them in an inactive, bent conformation, preventing them from engaging with the ECM. Moreover, the ECM itself, which includes components like collagen, laminin, and glycoproteins, is susceptible to oxidation.– Oxidative modifications can lead to structural and functional changes in these proteins, further impacting the integrin-ECM interaction and influencing cellular behavior.

51The increase in TGF-β and other growth factors, along with the activation of the transcription factors TAZ and YAP, contributes to the promotion of the expression of profibrotic genes, such as transglutaminase-2 and LOX., Increased ECM rigidity worsens the functions of senescent cells by boosting the secretion of matrix metalloproteases, intensifying ECM damage, and triggering pathways that promote senescence, fibrosis, and inflammation., Increased ECM stiffness enhances WNT signaling, leading to fibroblast activation and profibrotic gene expression., The pathway crosses paths with NOTCH, RAS, TGF-β/SMAD, and hedgehog/GLI, demonstrating the intricate interaction involved in the development of fibrosis., Additionally, matrix stiffness-induced mechanical changes impair oligodendrocyte progenitor cell function via the PIEZO1 ion channel. Studies have shown that the activation of TGF-β by ROS can effectively initiate the restructuring of the ECM. The oxidation of Met253 on the latency-associated peptide β (LAP-β) disrupts its interaction with TGF-β1, leading to the activation of latent TGF-β1 ligands.,

52The Hippo signaling pathway, which was initially identified through studies in Drosophila, is a critical regulator of organ size and tissue homeostasis in mammals., It regulates various cellular activities, including growth, cell death, and the ability of stem cells to reproduce themselves.– Recent research has expanded our understanding of the Hippo pathway, highlighting its role in regulating the ECM., YAP acts as a redox detector, identified by two regions rich in cysteine, the cysteine-rich domain at the end of the molecule (C-CRD) with redox-responsive Cys598, Cys620, and Cys629 and the cysteine-rich domain at the beginning of the molecule (N-CRD) with Cys303, Cys310, and Cys315. YAP can assume various oxidized states depending on the intensity and duration of oxidative stress. YAP quickly creates an intradomain disulfide bond between Cys310 and Cys315 (disulfide bond 1) within 10 s to 5 min under 0.5 mM H2O2 exposure. Subsequently, around the 5-min mark, YAP forms an interdomain disulfide bond (disulfide bond 2) and converts disulfide bond 1 into another interdomain disulfide bond 3. After prolonged treatment, YAP ultimately forms a fourth disulfide bond.

53The p38 MAPK pathway is an important controller of cellular functions and plays a key role in regulating the extracellular matrix., p38 MAPK is involved in fibrotic processes by promoting the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, which are central to wound healing and fibrosis. This differentiation is typically associated with increased synthesis of ECM components, which contributes to the stiffening and scarring of tissues. p38 MAPK activity leads to enhanced production of type I collagen by myofibroblasts, a key event in the development of fibrosis in organs such as the liver and lungs., Recent research has shown that the activity of p38 is influenced not only by the interplay of upstream regulatory kinases and phosphatases but also by the incorporation of redox modifications on p38α. These modifications allow dynamic modulation of the interactions between p38 and its upstream activator, MKK3. Specifically, oxidative modifications at several cysteine residues within p38, including Cys39, Cys119, Cys162, and Cys211, occur following exposure to oxidative stressors such as H2O2 or the ROS inducer prostaglandin J2. Notably, Cys119 and Cys162 have been identified as the principal sites for oxidation and significantly influence the regulatory dynamics of MKK3. The p38 signaling pathway is influenced by oxidative regulation, emphasizing the important connection between the cellular redox balance and related signaling pathways. Persistent oxidative stress and ROS play crucial roles in the onset of diseases.

54Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) catalyzes disulfide bond rearrangement and has been reported to exist on the cell surface and in the ECM, exhibiting dysregulated expression under pathological conditions.– The CGHC motif in its molecular structure allows it to reduce disulfide bonds in other proteins containing them. Studies have shown that PDI can modulate the oxidation-reduction modification of integrin αvβ3, thereby regulating its protein conformational changes., Another adhesion receptor, GPIbα, can also undergo reduction of its intramolecular disulfide bonds Cys4-Cys17 and Cys209-Cys248 by PDI. PDI can also directly regulate ECM proteins; for example, it can reduce the disulfide bonds Cys137-Cys161 and Cys274-Cys453 in vitronectin, thereby promoting its interaction with integrin β3.,

Chronic inflammation and redox imbalance

55The intricate interplay between redox signaling pathways and chronic inflammation is pivotal to understanding the pathogenesis of chronic diseases., This state of chronic, low-grade inflammation is strongly associated with various diseases and pathologies, including arteriosclerosis, neuroinflammation, osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc degeneration., Oxidative damage caused by inflammation can induce inflammatory reactions through the activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), a crucial transcription factor that controls the production of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6., Research indicates that the Cys62 residue of the p50 subunit of NF-κB can undergo glutathionylation, thereby impeding its binding to DNA and subsequent transcription., Moreover, increased levels of inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers, including CRP, along with elevated IL-6 in the bloodstream, can be used to predict overall mortality in older populations., Furthermore, oxidation-reduction modifications can directly facilitate the binding of IL-2 to its receptor by forming disulfide bonds at the Cys183-Cys232 site, thereby promoting subsequent T-cell proliferation. High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a nuclear protein released during tissue damage, and intriguingly, its biological functions are regulated by oxidation-reduction modifications.– When its Cys106 site is oxidized, it can interact with TLR4 to promote inflammatory responses. Conversely, when HMGB1 is fully reduced, it can facilitate tissue repair through CXCR4, suggesting the significant role of oxidation-reduction modifications in these processes. Increased inflammation is accompanied by decreased immune system effectiveness, which can be observed by analyzing myeloid and lymphoid cells in the blood of humans and mice., Age-associated T cells are exhausted memory cells, can exacerbate inflammation through granzyme K., Alterations in T-cell behavior result in heightened proinflammatory TH1 and TH17 responses, reduced immune monitoring affecting the elimination of infected or cancerous cells, diminished self-tolerance contributing to autoimmune conditions, and weakened natural defenses, ultimately fostering widespread inflammation.–

56Redox signaling pathways are central to the regulation of chronic inflammation., HIF-1α is a critical transcription factor that responds to changes in cellular oxygen levels. Under conditions of normal oxygen levels (normoxia), the activity of HIF-1α is suppressed via redox-dependent modifications. Specifically, prolyl-4-hydroxylases (PHDs) catalyze the oxidation of proline residues at positions 402 and 564 on HIF-1α., This oxidative modification facilitates the recruitment of the von Hippel-Lindau protein (pVHL), which targets the oxidized HIF-1α for polyubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation., Furthermore, the Factor Inhibiting HIF-1 (FIH-1) disrupts the association between HIF-1α and the p300/CBP complex. This interference occurs through the hydroxylation of the asparagine residue at position 803 on HIF-1α. In the context of the inflammatory microenvironment, HIF-1α has been shown to regulate the expression of inflammatory cytokines. It enhances the transcription of genes such as IL-6 and TNF-α, which are pivotal in the inflammatory response. However, HIF-1α also upregulates the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-10, creating a complex regulatory network that can either exacerbate or alleviate inflammation depending on the context. HIF-2α possesses a structure similar to HIF-1α, and its protein stability is also regulated by redox modifications and targeted for degradation by VHL. However, an evolutionarily conserved amino acid substitution at the binding site for VHL in HIF-2α results in a 2-3-fold decrease in its binding affinity compared to HIF-1α. Consequently, researchers believe that HIF-1α may serve as a mechanism for cells to rapidly respond to acute hypoxia, whereas HIF-2α may be more relevant in chronic hypoxic responses. Recent studies have found that the expression of HIF-2α may facilitate the maintenance of a pseudohypoxic state in cells, thereby promoting the onset and progression of diseases, including renal clear cell carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer.

57The balance between oxidative and antioxidative mechanisms determines the extent of inflammation, influencing the progression of diseases. Enhancing antioxidant defenses and modulating redox signaling may offer therapeutic potential to mitigate chronic inflammation and improve health outcomes in elderly people., Further research into specific redox mechanisms and their interactions with cellular senescence and immune regulation will be essential for developing targeted interventions against inflammation and its related pathologies.,

Clinical strategies targeting redox signaling in disease treatment

58Oxidative stress plays a significant role in the onset and progression of various diseases; thus, antioxidant therapy has shown efficacy in the treatment of specific conditions. In 1956, oxidative stress was closely linked to the aging process, and lifespan extension in mice was demonstrated by feeding them with radical scavengers. By 1980, radicals were proven to be a major cause of ischemic reperfusion injury. Consequently, antioxidant therapy has been effective in treating these conditions. However, further research has revealed that the development of some diseases is intricately regulated by redox signaling pathways (Table 1), suggesting that simplistic antioxidant therapy might exacerbate these conditions (Table 2). Redox signaling participates in various aspects of the pathogenesis, suggesting new strategies for treating human diseases.– As mentioned above, numerous redox sensors receive redox signals, and their function is altered by specific modifications. Due to their essential function, redox sensors can be developed as therapeutic targets for the clinical treatment of human diseases.– However, directly targeting redox sensors for oxidative modification could be challenging in the long term. With technological advancements, precision modulation of redox modifications is beginning to show promise, building on the foundation of broad-spectrum antioxidant treatment.

Antioxidant therapy

59The antioxidant system within organisms primarily relies on the catalytic action of antioxidant enzymes and the sufficient supply of their substrates., Enhancing the biological antioxidant system is a common strategy in antioxidant therapy., Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was the first antioxidant enzyme discovered and remains the only enzyme known to eliminate superoxide anion (O2•−) in mammals, playing a crucial role in combating oxidative stress. Orgotein, the first SOD mimic, exhibits significant anti-inflammatory effects and has shown therapeutic potential in animal studies. However, due to some side effects, it has not yet been approved for use in humans. Additionally, another SOD mimic, GC4419, has demonstrated good safety in phase II clinical trials among head and neck cancer patients suffering from severe oral mucositis induced by radiation and chemotherapy (NCT02508389).

60Another class of promising antioxidants consists of glutathione peroxidase mimetics, among which ebselen exhibits favorable oral tolerance and bioavailability., It has undergone several clinical trials for various conditions, including Meniere’s disease (Phase III, NCT04677972), bipolar disorder, complete middle cerebral artery occlusion, delayed neurological deficits following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and acute ischemic stroke. ALT-2074 (BXT-51072), a novel analog of ebselen, has completed Phase II clinical trials in the contexts of diabetes and coronary artery disease (NCT00491543).

61In addition to the development of enzyme mimetics, research has also focused on the substrates for antioxidant enzymes. NAC can provide GSH as a substrate for antioxidant redox reactions. NAC has been utilized to treat Parkinson’s disease (NCT02212678), type 2 diabetes mellitus (NCT00569465), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (NCT05589584), and heart failure (NCT00532688). Similarly, glutathione can attenuate oxidative stress, benefiting patients with Alzheimer’s disease (NCT04740580) and Parkinson’s disease (NCT01177319). However, its approval for clinical use has not been secured, potentially due to oxidative stress not being the primary causative factor in the diseases studied.

62Beyond antioxidant enzyme mimetics, another class of antioxidant therapeutic strategies involves activating the NRF2 antioxidant transcription factor., Extracts from dietary vegetables and fruits can activate the NRF2 signaling pathway and induce the expression of antioxidant enzymes, and some are currently being tested in clinical trials for disease treatment and prevention. For example, the natural product curcumin for treating Alzheimer’s disease (NCT00164749), type 2 diabetes mellitus (NCT01052597), and NAFLD (NCT04109742) has entered clinical trials. However, the use of NRF2 activators faces certain challenges that limit their approval for therapeutic use in humans. In addition to activating NRF2 and inducing antioxidant enzymes, some NRF2 activators may also affect other signaling pathways, potentially interfering with related biological processes. Moreover, the effects of NRF2 activation and antioxidant induction are not limited to specific cells or organs, which could result in systemic side effects.

63Additionally, certain dietary antioxidants can neutralize free radicals under conditions of oxidative stress or antioxidant deficiency, thereby preserving the structural integrity of cellular components. For example, vitamins such as vitamin C and vitamin E can donate electrons to reduce biologically significant macromolecules that have been oxidatively damaged. However, due to the limited capacity of small molecule antioxidants to neutralize free radicals effectively, their antioxidant capabilities are significantly inferior to those of antioxidant enzymes. Consequently, their effectiveness in clinical applications often falls short.

64Antioxidant therapy has demonstrated promising therapeutic effects in diseases where oxidative stress is a primary pathogenic factor and has entered clinical trials as an adjunct treatment method for various other diseases. However, in complex diseases such as cancer, the efficacy of antioxidant therapy is often controversial and may even promote disease progression. Consequently, current basic research is dedicated to identifying key regulatory proteins and critical redox modification sites involved in the pathogenesis and progression of diseases. This aims to facilitate personalized medicine and develop targeted small molecule drugs that are effective for specific populations.

Targeting specific redox modification

65As summarized above, redox signaling pathways are a regulatory mode of signal transduction that depends on redox modifications, controlling the biological functions of key proteins through reversible or irreversible redox modifications. Cysteine residues, where redox modifications commonly occur, are ubiquitously present in proteins, particularly enriched in the active sites of various enzymes. The redox modifications on these residues have potential regulatory implications for enzyme activity and protein structure, which are vital for life processes within organisms. Recognizing this potential, researchers have investigated cysteines with redox modification capabilities within organisms, conducting screenings under various model conditions and inducements, and identifying numerous candidate sites., However, due to technical limitations and the complexity of proteins in biological systems, research on these sites lacks systematic planning, making it challenging to form conclusive research outcomes. Recent studies have used big data to predict protein conformational changes post-redox modifications, assess cysteine sites with potential ligand-binding capabilities, and subsequently establish the DrugMap database. Through simulation, chemical probes targeting active cysteine sites in NF-κB and SOX10 have been identified, offering new potential strategies for specifically targeting active cysteine residues. Currently, several small molecule drugs targeting specific cysteine residues of redox sensors have been developed. For instance, Curcumin has been shown to covalently bind to the Cys151 residue of KEAP1, thereby stabilizing NRF2 and enhancing antioxidant effects. Building on this, researchers have further optimized the structure of curcumin to develop more efficient small molecules that covalently bind to KEAP1. Furthermore, BI-78D3 targets the Cys159 site on ERK2, thereby inhibiting ERK2 signal activation. This compound has been validated in mouse models for its potential to treat melanoma. Targeting the active cysteine sites of critical proteins in drug development promises to reduce the toxic side effects associated with off-target effects, while also providing more pronounced inhibitory effects. Validating the safety and biological functions of candidate drugs will aid their progression toward clinical trials and applications.

Concluding remarks

66In this review, we have summarized the mechanisms through which redox signaling pathways regulate human diseases as well as the current clinical potential of therapeutic strategies. However, when confronted with external stimuli, dysregulation often occurs, leading to the onset of diseases. Cells utilize oxidative stress signaling as a quick response mechanism to combat external triggers within the body. With recent advances in our understanding of the oxidative-reductive signaling network, it has been revealed that ROS are not only metabolic byproducts but also critical second messengers within cells that regulate the biological functions of numerous vital proteins. Redox signaling pathways can counteract the effects of external influences on the genome and epigenome by regulating DNA repair and vital epigenetic proteins. Furthermore, the protein degradation regulatory system is finely controlled by redox signals, thereby managing the degradation and recycling of damaged or misfolded proteins within cells. Cellular nutrient-sensing pathways and essential energy metabolism organelles, such as mitochondria, are also regulated by redox signaling pathways, which control cellular nutrient intake and metabolism. At the tissue level, redox signaling pathways also regulate changes in the extracellular matrix and microenvironment, promoting the timely clearance of senescent cells and preventing the onset of human diseases. Therefore, redox regulation is involved in the occurrence and progression of various diseases at multiple levels and is expected to become a key entry point for therapy.

67Antioxidant therapy has shown satisfied efficacy in diseases where oxidative stress is a primary pathological factor, including atherosclerosis, radiation-induced lung injury, and paraquat poisoning. It has also been widely applied in diseases caused by complex pathogenic factors, such as Alzheimer’s disease, NAFLD, and cancer. Since the rate at which antioxidant enzymes eliminate oxidative free radicals in biological systems far exceeds that of antioxidant small molecules, most current antioxidant therapies focus on the strategy of regulating antioxidant enzymes. For example, SOD, the only antioxidant enzyme that eliminates superoxide anions in mammals, has analogs that effectively inhibit redox damage to biological macromolecules. After multiple iterations and improvements, several analogs have progressed to clinical trials. Additionally, glutathione peroxidase mimetics have also entered clinical trials as analogs of antioxidant enzymes. Substrates of antioxidant enzymes, such as NAC, have demonstrated good therapeutic effects in the treatment of various diseases. Furthermore, numerous effective small molecules targeting NRF2, an important transcription factor that regulates antioxidant genes, have been developed and show promising therapeutic effects in multiple diseases. However, in diseases caused by complex pathogenic factors, antioxidant therapy is primarily approved to alleviate the toxic side effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy or to be used as an adjunctive treatment rather than as a primary therapeutic approach. Furthermore, some studies have found that antioxidant therapy may exacerbate disease progression, which may be attributed to the fact that redox processes do not play a singular role in disease development; instead, they can influence disease progression through their role as second messengers, modulating multiple pathways via redox modifications. Consequently, simple antioxidant therapy may yield counterproductive effects in the treatment of complex diseases. Therefore, when formulating treatment strategies for complex diseases, it is essential to fully consider the complexity of redox regulation and the biological functions of downstream redox sensors.

68With technological advances, numerous redox sensors have been detected and identified. However, due to the reversible and transient nature of redox signaling, dynamic monitoring and precise targeting remain significant challenges in current research. Currently, the analysis of the biological functions of reactive cysteine residues is still in its preliminary stages, lacking a systematic research framework, and there are relatively few comprehensive reviews focused on redox modifications. Therefore, systematically summarizing and promoting further research on the biological functions of redox sensors is of significant importance for a better understanding of the mechanisms by which redox regulation contributes to the occurrence and progression of diseases. There are already small molecule drugs targeting specific reactive cysteine residues in particular redox sensors that have shown promising therapeutic effects in preclinical studies. These precise targeting strategies can effectively reduce off-target effects and hold the potential for achieving precise redox regulation. However, relative to the vast array of redox-modified proteins, these studies remain insufficient. Additionally, screening small molecule drugs for each reactive cysteine residue site remains a time-consuming and labor-intensive endeavor. Therefore, the introduction of artificial intelligence-powered computer-aided drug design in this field may be an effective means to rapidly advance research and development.

References 605

1.
Sies H, Mailloux RJ, Jakob U. Fundamentals of redox regulation in biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2024;25:701-719.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-024-00730-2
2.
Dai Y, et al. Interface of biomolecular condensates modulates redox reactions. Chem. 2023;9:1594-1609.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chempr.2023.04.001
3.
Tamirat AG, et al. Redox mediators as charge agents for changing electrochemical reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020;49:7454-7478.
Not in our library10.1039/d0cs00489h
4.
Greene J, Segaran A, Lord S. Targeting OXPHOS and the electron transport chain in cancer; molecular and therapeutic implications. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022;86:851-859.
Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.02.002
5.
Vercellino I, Sazanov LA. The assembly, regulation and function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:141-161.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-021-00415-0
6.
Fernández-Vizarra E, Ugalde C. Cooperative assembly of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2022;47:999-1008.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2022.07.005
7.
Bayona-Bafaluy MP, Montoya J, Ruiz-Pesini E. Oxidative phosphorylation system and cell culture media. Trends Cell Biol. 2021;31:618-620.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2021.05.003
8.
Wculek SK, et al. Oxidative phosphorylation selectively orchestrates tissue macrophage homeostasis. Immunity. 2023;56:516-530.e519.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2023.01.011
9.
Sies H, et al. Defining roles of specific reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cell biology and physiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:499-515.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00456-z
10.
Commoner B, Townsend J, Pake GE. Free radicals in biological materials. Nature. 1954;174:689-691.
Not in our library10.1038/174689a0
11.
Hinkle PC, Butow RA, Racker E, Chance B. Partial resolution of the enzymes catalyzing oxidative phosphorylation. XV. Reverse electron transfer in the flavin-cytochrome beta region of the respiratory chain of beef heart submitochondrial particles. J. Biol. Chem. 1967;242:5169-5173.
Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99410-x
12.
Briggs RT, Karnovsky ML, Karnovsky MJ. Hydrogen peroxide production in chronic granulomatous disease. A cytochemical study of reduced pyridine nucleotide oxidases. J. Clin. Invest. 1977;59:1088-1098.
Not in our library10.1172/jci108732
13.
Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Tew KD. Oxidative stress in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:167-197.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2020.06.001
14.
Zhou Z, Ni K, Deng H, Chen X. Dancing with reactive oxygen species generation and elimination in nanotheranostics for disease treatment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020;158:73-90.
Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.006
15.
Rojo de la Vega M, Chapman E, Zhang DD. NRF2 and the hallmarks of cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:21-43.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.022
16.
Raghunath A, et al. Antioxidant response elements: discovery, classes, regulation and potential applications. Redox Biol. 2018;17:297-314.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2018.05.002
17.
Halliwell B. Understanding mechanisms of antioxidant action in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2024;25:13-33.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-023-00645-4
18.
Zhang Y, et al. Dihydroartemisinin beneficially regulates splenic immune cell heterogeneity through the SOD3-JNK-AP-1 axis. Sci. China Life Sci. 2022;65:1636-1654.
Not in our library10.1007/s11427-021-2061-7
19.
Luo P, et al. Celastrol induces ferroptosis in activated HSCs to ameliorate hepatic fibrosis via targeting peroxiredoxins and HO-1. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2022;12:2300-2314.
Not in our library10.1016/j.apsb.2021.12.007
20.
Adinolfi S, et al. The KEAP1-NRF2 pathway: targets for therapy and role in cancer. Redox Biol. 2023;63:102726.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102726
21.
Moi P, et al. Isolation of NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a NF-E2-like basic leucine zipper transcriptional activator that binds to the tandem NF-E2/AP1 repeat of the beta-globin locus control region. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:9926-9930.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.91.21.9926
22.
Venugopal R, Jaiswal AK. Nrf1 and Nrf2 positively and c-Fos and Fra1 negatively regulate the human antioxidant response element-mediated expression of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase1 gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:14960-14965.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.93.25.14960
23.
Torrente L, DeNicola GM. Targeting NRF2 and its downstream processes: opportunities and challenges. Annu Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2022;62:279-300.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-052220-104025
24.
Forman HJ, Zhang H. Targeting oxidative stress in disease: promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021;20:689-709.
Not in our library10.1038/s41573-021-00233-1
25.
Kirby K, Hu J, Hilliker AJ, Phillips JP. RNA interference-mediated silencing of Sod2 in Drosophila leads to early adult-onset mortality and elevated endogenous oxidative stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:16162-16167.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.252342899
26.
Zhang C, et al. Modulatory effect of fructooligosaccharide against triphenyltin-induced oxidative stress and immune suppression in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021;212:111966.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111966
27.
McCord JM, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase. An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J. Biol. Chem. 1969;244:6049-6055.
Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(18)63504-5
28.
Dafre AL, et al. Methylglyoxal, the foe and friend of glyoxalase and Trx/TrxR systems in HT22 nerve cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015;89:8-19.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.07.005
29.
Yamamoto M, Kensler TW, Motohashi H. The KEAP1-NRF2 system: a thiol-based sensor-effector apparatus for maintaining redox homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 2018;98:1169-1203.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00023.2017
30.
Walker CL, Pomatto LCD, Tripathi DN, Davies KJA. Redox regulation of homeostasis and proteostasis in peroxisomes. Physiol. Rev. 2018;98:89-115.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00033.2016
31.
Sies H, Cadenas E. Oxidative stress: damage to intact cells and organs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1985;311:617-631.
Not in our library10.1098/rstb.1985.0168
32.
Oxidative eustress: On constant alert for redox homeostasis · 2021
No notice
33.
Robinson AR, et al. Spontaneous DNA damage to the nuclear genome promotes senescence, redox imbalance and aging. Redox Biol. 2018;17:259-273.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2018.04.007
34.
Bai R, et al. Oxidative stress: the core pathogenesis and mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;77:101619.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2022.101619
35.
Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:363-383.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3
36.
Cirino G, Szabo C, Papapetropoulos A. Physiological roles of hydrogen sulfide in mammalian cells, tissues, and organs. Physiol. Rev. 2023;103:31-276.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00028.2021
37.
Oxidants, antioxidants and the current incurability of metastatic cancers · 2013
No notice
38.
Ghezzi P. Redox regulation of immunity and the role of small molecular weight thiols. Redox Biol. 2021;44:102001.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2021.102001
39.
Pimkova K, et al. Quantitative analysis of redox proteome reveals oxidation-sensitive protein thiols acting in fundamental processes of developmental hematopoiesis. Redox Biol. 2022;53:102343.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102343
40.
Formation of protein cross-links by singlet oxygen-mediated disulfide oxidation · 2021
Not checked
41.
Schulte L, et al. Cysteine oxidation and disulfide formation in the ribosomal exit tunnel. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5569.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-020-19372-x
42.
Tischer A, Moon-Tasson L, Auton M. Removal of the vicinal disulfide enhances the platelet-capturing function of von Willebrand factor. Blood. 2023;141:1469-1473.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2022018803
43.
Zhou J, et al. A novel role for endoplasmic reticulum protein 46 (ERp46) in platelet function and arterial thrombosis in mice. Blood. 2022;139:2050-2065.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2021012055
44.
An extensive disulfide bond network prevents tail contraction in Agrobacterium tumefaciens phage Milano · 2024
Not checked
45.
Jones DP, Sies H. The redox code. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2015;23:734-746.
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2015.6247
46.
Liu ZY, et al. Crosstalk between oxidative stress and epigenetic marks: New roles and therapeutic implications in cardiac fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2023;65:102820.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102820
47.
Sato T, Greco CM. Expanding the link between circadian rhythms and redox metabolism of epigenetic control. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021;170:50-58.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.01.009
48.
Redox control of protein degradation · 2015
No notice
49.
Chouchani ET, et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature. 2014;515:431-435.
Not in our library10.1038/nature13909
50.
Ray S, et al. A mechanism for oxidative damage repair at gene regulatory elements. Nature. 2022;609:1038-1047.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-022-05217-8
51.
Bodnar Y, Lillig CH. Cysteinyl and methionyl redox switches: structural prerequisites and consequences. Redox Biol. 2023;65:102832.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102832
52.
Zhang Y, Murugesan P, Huang K, Cai H. NADPH oxidases and oxidase crosstalk in cardiovascular diseases: novel therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17:170-194.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-019-0260-8
53.
Liu T, et al. Multifaceted roles of a bioengineered nanoreactor in repressing radiation-induced lung injury. Biomaterials. 2021;277:121103.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121103
54.
Wang X, Wang X, Zhu Y, Chen X. ADME/T-based strategies for paraquat detoxification: transporters and enzymes. Environ. Pollut. 2021;291:118137.
Not in our library10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118137
55.
Yang IA, Jenkins CR, Salvi SS. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in never-smokers: risk factors, pathogenesis, and implications for prevention and treatment. Lancet Respir. Med. 2022;10:497-511.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00506-3
56.
Luo J, et al. SLC15A3 plays a crucial role in pulmonary fibrosis by regulating macrophage oxidative stress. Cell Death Differ. 2024;31:417-430.
Not in our library10.1038/s41418-024-01266-w
57.
Griendling KK, et al. Oxidative stress and hypertension. Circ. Res. 2021;128:993-1020.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.121.318063
58.
Apostolova N, et al. Mechanisms of action of metformin in type 2 diabetes: effects on mitochondria and leukocyte-endothelium interactions. Redox Biol. 2020;34:101517.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2020.101517
59.
Perluigi M, Di Domenico F, Butterfield DA. Oxidative damage in neurodegeneration: roles in the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer disease. Physiol. Rev. 2024;104:103-197.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00030.2022
60.
Martí-Chillón GJ, et al. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells in critical-care patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Clin. Transl. Med. 2023;13:e1163.
Not in our library10.1002/ctm2.1163
61.
Weerapana E, et al. Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes. Nature. 2010;468:790-795.
Not in our library10.1038/nature09472
62.
Shi Y, Carroll KS. Activity-based sensing for site-specific proteomic analysis of cysteine oxidation. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020;53:20-31.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00562
63.
Zhou H, et al. Cysteine thiol-based post-translational modification: what do we know about transcription factors? Trends Plant Sci. 2023;28:415-428.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2022.11.007
64.
Tossounian MA, et al. Low-molecular-weight thiol transferases in redox regulation and antioxidant defence. Redox Biol. 2024;71:103094.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2024.103094
65.
Lu X, et al. Natural antioxidant-based nanodrug for atherosclerosis treatment. Small. 2023;19:e2303459.
Not in our library10.1002/smll.202303459
66.
Wang L, et al. ROS-sensitive Crocin-loaded chitosan microspheres for lung targeting and attenuation of radiation-induced lung injury. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023;307:120628.
Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120628
67.
Tai W, et al. Rapamycin attenuates the paraquat-induced pulmonary fibrosis through activating Nrf2 pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2020;235:1759-1768.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.29094
68.
Hecht F, Zocchi M, Alimohammadi F, Harris IS. Regulation of antioxidants in cancer. Mol. Cell. 2024;84:23-33.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.001
69.
Caldecott KW. DNA single-strand break repair and human genetic disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2022;32:733-745.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2022.04.010
70.
Miller MB, et al. Somatic genomic changes in single Alzheimer’s disease neurons. Nature. 2022;604:714-722.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-022-04640-1
71.
Cimprich KA, et al. The crosstalk between DNA repair and immune responses. Mol. Cell. 2023;83:3582-3587.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2023.09.022
72.
Panier S, Wang S, Schumacher B. Genome instability and DNA repair in somatic and reproductive aging. Annu Rev. Pathol. 2024;19:261-290.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-051122-093128
73.
Zhao Y, Simon M, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V. DNA damage and repair in age-related inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023;23:75-89.
Not in our library10.1038/s41577-022-00751-y
74.
Post-translational modification of RNA m6A demethylase ALKBH5 regulates ROS-induced DNA damage response · 2021
No notice
75.
STING enhances cell death through regulation of reactive oxygen species and DNA damage · 2021
No notice
76.
Olivieri M, et al. A genetic map of the response to DNA damage in human Cells. Cell. 2020;182:481-496.e421.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.040
77.
Hong DC, et al. Genomic profiling of radiation-induced sarcomas reveals the immunologic characteristics and its response to immune checkpoint blockade. Clin. Cancer Res. 2023;29:2869-2884.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3567
78.
Schumacher B, Pothof J, Vijg J, Hoeijmakers JHJ. The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process. Nature. 2021;592:695-703.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7
79.
Pezone A, et al. Inflammation and DNA damage: cause, effect or both. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2023;19:200-211.
Not in our library10.1038/s41584-022-00905-1
80.
Hershberger KA, et al. Early-life mitochondrial DNA damage results in lifelong deficits in energy production mediated by redox signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Redox Biol. 2021;43:102000.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2021.102000
81.
Hussmann JA, et al. Mapping the genetic landscape of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell. 2021;184:5653-5669.e5625.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.002
82.
Dileep V, et al. Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2023;186:4404-4421.e4420.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.038
83.
Ramsden DA, Carvajal-Garcia J, Gupta GP. Mechanism, cellular functions and cancer roles of polymerase-theta-mediated DNA end joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:125-140.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-021-00405-2
84.
Lee JH, Paull TT. Cellular functions of the protein kinase ATM and their relevance to human disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021;22:796-814.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-021-00394-2
85.
Prasad A, Kanakkanthara A. An ATM D-compartmentalization in DNA damage response. Trends Cell Biol. 2024;34:173-175.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2023.12.003
86.
Li C, et al. A novel role for the ROS-ATM-Chk2 axis mediated metabolic and cell cycle reprogramming in the M1 macrophage polarization. Redox Biol. 2024;70:103059.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2024.103059
87.
Fu J, et al. ATM-ESCO2-SMC3 axis promotes 53BP1 recruitment in response to DNA damage and safeguards genome integrity by stabilizing cohesin complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:7376-7391.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkad533
88.
Aguado J, et al. The hallmarks of aging in Ataxia-Telangiectasia. Ageing Res. Rev. 2022;79:101653.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2022.101653
89.
Howes AC, Perisic O, Williams RL. Structural insights into the activation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated by oxidative stress. Sci. Adv. 2023;9:eadi8291.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.adi8291
90.
Garg M, Li L, Godbout R. Role of DDX1 in the oxidative response of ataxia telangiectasia patient-derived fibroblasts. Redox Biol. 2024;69:102988.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102988
91.
Chen WM, et al. DNA-PKcs and ATM modulate mitochondrial ADP-ATP exchange as an oxidative stress checkpoint mechanism. EMBO J. 2023;42:e112094.
Not in our library10.15252/embj.2022112094
92.
Mahata T, et al. Hepatic regulator of G protein signaling 6 (RGS6) drives non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by promoting oxidative stress and ATM-dependent cell death. Redox Biol. 2021;46:102105.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2021.102105
93.
Cirotti C, et al. Redox activation of ATM enhances GSNOR translation to sustain mitophagy and tolerance to oxidative stress. EMBO Rep. 2021;22:e50500.
Not in our library10.15252/embr.202050500
94.
Zhou J, et al. Full-coverage regulations of autophagy by ROS: from induction to maturation. Autophagy. 2022;18:1240-1255.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2021.1984656
95.
Cejka P, Symington LS. DNA end resection: mechanism and control. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2021;55:285-307.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-genet-071719-020312
96.
Tang L. Profiling double-strand break repair. Nat. Methods. 2021;18:1449.
Not in our library10.1038/s41592-021-01352-8
97.
Doig KD, Fellowes AP, Fox SB. Homologous recombination repair deficiency: an overview for pathologists. Mod. Pathol. 2023;36:100049.
Not in our library10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100049
98.
Davé A, et al. Homologous recombination repair intermediates promote efficient de novo telomere addition at DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:1271-1284.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkz1109
99.
Madru C, et al. DNA-binding mechanism and evolution of replication protein A. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:2326.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-38048-w
100.
Mishra G, Bigman LS, Levy Y. ssDNA diffuses along replication protein A via a reptation mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:1701-1714.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkz1202
101.
Skoko JJ, et al. Redox regulation of RAD51 Cys319 and homologous recombination by peroxiredoxin 1. Redox Biol. 2022;56:102443.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102443
102.
Mishra AP, et al. BRCA2-DSS1 interaction is dispensable for RAD51 recruitment at replication-induced and meiotic DNA double strand breaks. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1751.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-29409-y
103.
Compadre AJ, et al. RAD51 foci as a biomarker predictive of platinum chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2023;29:2466-2479.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3335
104.
Halder S, et al. Double-stranded DNA binding function of RAD51 in DNA protection and its regulation by BRCA2. Mol. Cell. 2022;82:3553-3565.e3555.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2022.08.014
105.
Matos-Rodrigues G, et al. In vivo reduction of RAD51-mediated homologous recombination triggers aging but impairs oncogenesis. EMBO J. 2023;42:e110844.
Not in our library10.15252/embj.2022110844
106.
Longo MA, et al. RAD51C-XRCC3 structure and cancer patient mutations define DNA replication roles. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:4445.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-40096-1
107.
Berti M, et al. Sequential role of RAD51 paralog complexes in replication fork remodeling and restart. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3531.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-020-17324-z
108.
Alnajjar KS, Sweasy JB. A new perspective on oxidation of DNA repair proteins and cancer. DNA Repair. 2019;76:60-69.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.02.006
109.
Guh CL, et al. RAD51 paralogs synergize with RAD51 to protect reversed forks from cellular nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:11717-11731.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkad856
110.
Zhao B, Rothenberg E, Ramsden DA, Lieber MR. The molecular basis and disease relevance of non-homologous DNA end joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:765-781.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-020-00297-8
111.
Audoynaud C, Vagner S, Lambert S. Non-homologous end-joining at challenged replication forks: an RNA connection? Trends Genet. 2021;37:973-985.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2021.06.010
112.
Stinson BM, Moreno AT, Walter JC, Loparo JJ. A mechanism to minimize errors during non-homologous end joining. Mol. Cell. 2020;77:1080-1091.e1088.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2019.11.018
113.
Moorefield B. Adding complexity to NHEJ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2021;28:703.
Not in our library10.1038/s41594-021-00664-9
114.
Kefala Stavridi A, et al. Structural and functional basis of inositol hexaphosphate stimulation of NHEJ through stabilization of Ku-XLF interaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:11732-11747.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkad863
115.
Schellenbauer A, et al. Phospho-Ku70 induced by DNA damage interacts with RNA Pol II and promotes the formation of phospho-53BP1 foci to ensure optimal cNHEJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:11728-11745.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab980
116.
Wang Y, et al. Cytoplasmic DNA sensing by KU complex in aged CD4(+) T cell potentiates T cell activation and aging-related autoimmune inflammation. Immunity. 2021;54:632-647.e639.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2021.02.003
117.
Head PE, et al. DNA-PK is activated by SIRT2 deacetylation to promote DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:7972-7987.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkad549
118.
Yosaatmadja Y, et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into the Artemis endonuclease and strategies for its inhibition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:9310-9326.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab693
119.
Watanabe G, Lieber MR. Dynamics of the Artemis and DNA-PKcs complex in the repair of double-strand breaks. J. Mol. Biol. 2022;434:167858.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167858
120.
Stinson BM, Carney SM, Walter JC, Loparo JJ. Structural role for DNA Ligase IV in promoting the fidelity of non-homologous end joining. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:1250.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-024-45553-z
121.
Kurosawa A, Kuboshima H, Adachi N. Complex genetic interactions between DNA polymerase β and the NHEJ ligase. FEBS J. 2020;287:377-385.
Not in our library10.1111/febs.15012
122.
Saha J, et al. Ablating putative Ku70 phosphorylation sites results in defective DNA damage repair and spontaneous induction of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:9836-9850.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab743
123.
Cai X, et al. Xrcc5/Ku80 is required for the repair of DNA damage in fully grown meiotically arrested mammalian oocytes. Cell death Dis. 2023;14:397.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-023-05886-x
124.
Singh JK, et al. Zinc finger protein ZNF384 is an adaptor of Ku to DNA during classical non-homologous end-joining. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:6560.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-021-26691-0
125.
Liang S, Blundell TL. Human DNA-dependent protein kinase activation mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2023;30:140-147.
Not in our library10.1038/s41594-022-00881-w
126.
Bennett SM, Neher TM, Shatilla A, Turchi JJ. Molecular analysis of Ku redox regulation. BMC Mol. Biol. 2009;10:86.
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2199-10-86
127.
Watanabe G, Lieber MR, Williams DR. Structural analysis of the basal state of the Artemis:DNA-PKcs complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:7697-7720.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkac564
128.
Dylgjeri E, Knudsen KE. DNA-PKcs: a targetable protumorigenic protein kinase. Cancer Res. 2022;82:523-533.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-1756
129.
Dibitetto D, et al. DNA-PKcs promotes fork reversal and chemoresistance. Mol. Cell. 2022;82:3932-3942.e3936.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2022.08.028
130.
Chen S, et al. Cryo-EM visualization of DNA-PKcs structural intermediates in NHEJ. Sci. Adv. 2023;9:eadg2838.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.adg2838
131.
Xu W, Liu L, Smith GC. & Charles l, G. Nitric oxide upregulates expression of DNA-PKcs to protect cells from DNA-damaging anti-tumour agents. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:339-345.
Not in our library10.1038/35014028
132.
Nieto Moreno N, Olthof AM, Svejstrup JQ. Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and the transcriptional response to UV-Induced DNA damage. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2023;92:81-113.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biochem-052621-091205
133.
Tang S, Stokasimov E, Cui Y, Pellman D. Breakage of cytoplasmic chromosomes by pathological DNA base excision repair. Nature. 2022;606:930-936.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-022-04767-1
134.
Desai RV, et al. A DNA repair pathway can regulate transcriptional noise to promote cell fate transitions. Science. 2021;373:eabc6506.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abc6506
135.
SenGupta T, et al. Base excision repair causes age-dependent accumulation of single-stranded DNA breaks that contribute to Parkinson disease pathology. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109668.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109668
136.
Adamowicz M, et al. XRCC1 protects transcription from toxic PARP1 activity during DNA base excision repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021;23:1287-1298.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-021-00792-w
137.
Geng A, et al. SIRT2 promotes base excision repair by transcriptionally activating OGG1 in an ATM/ATR-dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:5107-5120.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkae190
138.
Baik AH, et al. Oxygen toxicity causes cyclic damage by destabilizing specific Fe-S cluster-containing protein complexes. Mol. Cell. 2023;83:942-960.e949.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2023.02.013
139.
Mullins EA, Rodriguez AA, Bradley NP, Eichman BF. Emerging roles of DNA glycosylases and the base excision repair pathway. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2019;44:765-781.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2019.04.006
140.
Bakman AS, et al. The impact of human DNA glycosylases on the activity of DNA polymerase β toward various base excision repair intermediates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:9594.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms24119594
141.
Jang S, et al. Cooperative interaction between AAG and UV-DDB in the removal of modified bases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:12856-12871.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkac1145
142.
Zheng L, Tsai B, Gao N. Structural and mechanistic insights into the DNA glycosylase AAG-mediated base excision in nucleosome. Cell Discov. 2023;9:62.
Not in our library10.1038/s41421-023-00560-0
143.
Milano L, et al. A DNA repair-independent role for alkyladenine DNA glycosylase in alkylation-induced unfolded protein response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2111404119.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2111404119
144.
Parrish MC, et al. Nitric oxide induced S-nitrosation causes base excision repair imbalance. DNA Repair. 2018;68:25-33.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.04.008
145.
Michel M, et al. Small-molecule activation of OGG1 increases oxidative DNA damage repair by gaining a new function. Science. 2022;376:1471-1476.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abf8980
146.
Visnes T, et al. Targeting OGG1 arrests cancer cell proliferation by inducing replication stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:12234-12251.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkaa1048
147.
Benitéz-Buelga C, Helleday T, Michel M. Synthetic switches of OGG1 control initiation of base excision repair and offer new treatment strategies. Clin. Transl. Med. 2022;12:e1035.
Not in our library10.1002/ctm2.1035
148.
Pan L, et al. 8-Oxoguanine targeted by 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1) is central to fibrogenic gene activation upon lung injury. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:1087-1102.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkac1241
149.
HDAC1 modulates OGG1-initiated oxidative DNA damage repair in the aging brain and Alzheimer’s disease · 2020
No notice
150.
Lebraud E, et al. Chromatin recruitment of OGG1 requires cohesin and mediator and is essential for efficient 8-oxoG removal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:9082-9097.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkaa611
151.
Kahl VFS, et al. Role of PON1, SOD2, OGG1, XRCC1, and XRCC4 polymorphisms on modulation of DNA damage in workers occupationally exposed to pesticides. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018;159:164-171.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.052
152.
Nandi A, Chowdhuri DK. Cadmium mediated redox modulation in germline stem cells homeostasis affects reproductive health of Drosophila males. J. Hazard Mater. 2021;402:123737.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123737
153.
Zhu L, et al. Key factors and microscopic mechanisms controlling adsorption of cadmium by surface oxidized and aminated biochars. J. Hazard Mater. 2020;382:121002.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121002
154.
Pizzino G, et al. Oxidative stress and DNA repair and detoxification gene expression in adolescents exposed to heavy metals living in the Milazzo-Valle del Mela area (Sicily, Italy). Redox Biol. 2014;2:686-693.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2014.05.003
155.
Rizza S, Filomeni G. Exploiting S-nitrosylation for cancer therapy: facts and perspectives. Biochem. J. 2020;477:3649-3672.
Not in our library10.1042/bcj20200064
156.
Baptiste BA, et al. Enhanced mitochondrial DNA repair of the common disease-associated variant, Ser326Cys, of hOGG1 through small molecule intervention. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018;124:149-162.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.094
157.
Leu M, et al. 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) Cys326 variant: increased risk for worse outcome of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodal therapy. Cancers. 2021;13:2805.
Not in our library10.3390/cancers13112805
158.
Morreall J, et al. Inactivation of a common OGG1 variant by TNF-alpha in mammalian cells. DNA Repair. 2015;25:15-22.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.11.007
159.
Majumdar C, et al. FSHing for DNA damage: key features of MutY detection of 8-oxoguanine:adenine mismatches. Acc. Chem. Res. 2024;57:1019-1031.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00759
160.
Nelson SR, et al. Single molecule glycosylase studies with engineered 8-oxoguanine DNA damage sites show functional defects of a MUTYH polyposis variant. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:3058-3071.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkz045
161.
Nakamura T, et al. Structure of the mammalian adenine DNA glycosylase MUTYH: insights into the base excision repair pathway and cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:7154-7163.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab492
162.
Jang S, et al. Single molecule analysis indicates stimulation of MUTYH by UV-DDB through enzyme turnover. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:8177-8188.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab591
163.
Gautam A, et al. APE1-dependent base excision repair of DNA photodimers in human cells. Mol. Cell. 2023;83:3669-3678.e3667.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2023.09.013
164.
APE1 distinguishes DNA substrates in exonucleolytic cleavage by induced space-filling · 2021
Not checked
165.
Li J, Zhao H, McMahon A, Yan S. APE1 assembles biomolecular condensates to promote the ATR-Chk1 DNA damage response in nucleolus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:10503-10525.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkac853
166.
Yue R, et al. GSH/APE1 cascade-activated nanoplatform for imaging therapy resistance dynamics and enzyme-mediated adaptive ferroptosis. ACS Nano. 2023;17:13792-13810.
Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.3c03443
167.
Roychoudhury S, et al. Endogenous oxidized DNA bases and APE1 regulate the formation of G-quadruplex structures in the genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:11409-11420.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1912355117
168.
Xue Z, Demple B. Knockout and inhibition of Ape1: roles of Ape1 in base excision DNA repair and modulation of gene expression. Antioxidants. 2022;11:1817.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox11091817
169.
López DJ, Rodríguez JA, Bañuelos S. Molecular mechanisms regulating the DNA repair protein APE1: a focus on its flexible N-terminal tail domain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:6308.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms22126308
170.
Bakman AS, et al. Fluorescently labeled human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1 reveals effects of DNA polymerase β on the APE1-DNA interaction. DNA Repair. 2023;123:103450.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103450
171.
Chappidi N, et al. PARP1-DNA co-condensation drives DNA repair site assembly to prevent disjunction of broken DNA ends. Cell. 2024;187:945-961.e918.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.015
172.
Zhang N, et al. An unexpected role for BAG3 in regulating PARP1 ubiquitination in oxidative stress-related endothelial damage. Redox Biol. 2022;50:102238.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102238
173.
Zhang N, et al. Deacetylation-dependent regulation of PARP1 by SIRT2 dictates ubiquitination of PARP1 in oxidative stress-induced vascular injury. Redox Biol. 2021;47:102141.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2021.102141
174.
Ke Y, et al. The role of PARPs in inflammation-and metabolic-related diseases: molecular mechanisms and beyond. Cells. 2019;8:1047.
Not in our library10.3390/cells8091047
175.
Zhao K, et al. Enhancement of Xrcc1-mediated base excision repair improves the genetic stability and pluripotency of iPSCs. Sci. Bull. 2022;67:1126-1130.
Not in our library10.1016/j.scib.2022.04.003
176.
Vasil’eva IA, Moor NA, Lavrik OI. Effect of human XRCC1 protein oxidation on the functional activity of its complexes with the key enzymes of DNA base excision repair. Biochemistry. 2020;85:288-299.
Not in our library10.1134/s0006297920030049
177.
London RE. XRCC1 - Strategies for coordinating and assembling a versatile DNA damage response. DNA Repair. 2020;93:102917.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102917
178.
Schellenberg MJ, et al. Ubiquitin stimulated reversal of topoisomerase 2 DNA-protein crosslinks by TDP2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:6310-6325.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkaa318
179.
Prorok P, et al. Evolutionary origins of DNA repair pathways: role of oxygen catastrophe in the emergence of DNA glycosylases. Cells. 2021;10:1591.
Not in our library10.3390/cells10071591
180.
Pietrantonio F, et al. Capecitabine and temozolomide versus FOLFIRI in RAS-mutated, MGMT-methylated metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Re.s. 2020;26:1017-1024.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3024
181.
Stolar T, et al. DNA-specific selectivity in pairing of model nucleobases in the solid state. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:13524-13527.
Not in our library10.1039/d0cc03491f
182.
Farag N, et al. Folding-upon-repair DNA nanoswitches for monitoring the activity of DNA repair enzymes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021;60:7283-7289.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.202016223
183.
Chen SH, et al. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase modulates cisplatin-induced DNA double-strand breaks by targeting the homologous recombination pathway in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Biomed. Sci. 2021;28:2.
Not in our library10.1186/s12929-020-00699-y
184.
Rathkey D, et al. Sensitivity of mesothelioma Cells to PARP inhibitors is not dependent on BAP1 but is enhanced by temozolomide in cells with high-Schlafen 11 and low-O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020;15:843-859.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.012
185.
Wu S, et al. PARP-mediated PARylation of MGMT is critical to promote repair of temozolomide-induced O6-methylguanine DNA damage in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:920-931.
Not in our library10.1093/neuonc/noab003
186.
Paranjpe A, et al. Disulfiram is a direct and potent inhibitor of human O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in brain tumor cells and mouse brain and markedly increases the alkylating DNA damage. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:692-702.
Not in our library10.1093/carcin/bgt366
187.
Basak D, Srivenugopal KS. Redox-mediated inactivation of MGMT DNA repair through thiolation or nitrosylation of the active site cysteine145 sensitizes human gliomas to alkylating agents in vitro and in xenograft models. Cancer Res. 2017;77:1121-1121.
Not in our library10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-1121
188.
Rossiello F, Jurk D, Passos JF, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Telomere dysfunction in ageing and age-related diseases. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022;24:135-147.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-022-00842-x
189.
Cheng F, et al. Diabetes, metabolic disease, and telomere length. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:117-126.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30365-x
190.
Demanelis K, et al. Determinants of telomere length across human tissues. Science. 2020;369:eaaz6876.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aaz6876
191.
Shimamura A. Telomere biology disorders: ends and (genetic) means. Blood. 2022;139:1776-1777.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2021014855
192.
Revy P, Kannengiesser C, Bertuch AA. Genetics of human telomere biology disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2023;24:86-108.
Not in our library10.1038/s41576-022-00527-z
193.
Schneider CV, et al. Association of telomere length with risk of disease and mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182:291-300.
Not in our library10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7804
194.
Reilly CR, et al. The clinical and functional effects of TERT variants in myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2021;138:898-911.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2021011075
195.
Chun-On P, et al. TPP1 promoter mutations cooperate with TERT promoter mutations to lengthen telomeres in melanoma. Science. 2022;378:664-668.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abq0607
196.
Yang Y, et al. The association between polymorphisms in tankyrase gene and telomere length in omethoate-exposed workers. Chemosphere. 2020;238:124863.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124863
197.
Sanchez M, et al. Leukocyte telomere length, allelic variations in related genes and risk of coronary heart disease in people with long-standing type 1 diabetes. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2022;21:206.
Not in our library10.1186/s12933-022-01635-0
198.
Miglani M, et al. Shorter telomere length, higher telomerase activity in association with tankyrase gene polymorphism contribute to high-altitude pulmonary edema. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020;29:3094-3106.
Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddaa205
199.
Jung M, et al. Poly-ADP ribosylation of p21 by tankyrases promotes p21 degradation and regulates cell cycle progression. Biochem. J. 2022;479:2379-2394.
Not in our library10.1042/bcj20220391
200.
Armstrong E, Boonekamp J. Does oxidative stress shorten telomeres in vivo? A meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;85:101854.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.101854
201.
Telomeric 8-oxo-guanine drives rapid premature senescence in the absence of telomere shortening · 2022
No notice
202.
Neutrophils induce paracrine telomere dysfunction and senescence in ROS‐dependent manner · 2021
No notice
203.
Gao Z, et al. Endothelial-specific telomerase inactivation causes telomere-independent cell senescence and multi-organ dysfunction characteristic of aging. Aging Cell. 2024;23:e14138.
Not in our library10.1111/acel.14138
204.
Inflammation, epigenetics, and metabolism converge to cell senescence and ageing: the regulation and intervention · 2021
No notice
205.
Tao L, et al. Epigenetic regulation in cancer therapy: from mechanisms to clinical advances. MedComm Oncol. 2024;3:e59.
Not in our library10.1002/mog2.59
206.
Cavalli G, Heard E. Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature. 2019;571:489-499.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1411-0
207.
Oh ES, Petronis A. Origins of human disease: the chrono-epigenetic perspective. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22:533-546.
Not in our library10.1038/s41576-021-00348-6
208.
Wu H, Eckhardt CM, Baccarelli AA. Molecular mechanisms of environmental exposures and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2023;24:332-344.
Not in our library10.1038/s41576-022-00569-3
209.
Feinberg AP, Levchenko A. Epigenetics as a mediator of plasticity in cancer. Science. 2023;379:eaaw3835.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aaw3835
210.
O’Donnell KJ, Meaney MJ. Epigenetics, development, and psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2020;16:327-350.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095530
211.
Baccarelli AA, Ordovás J. Epigenetics of early cardiometabolic disease: mechanisms and precision medicine. Circ. Res. 2023;132:1648-1662.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.123.322135
212.
Ling C, Rönn T. Epigenetics in human obesity and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 2019;29:1028-1044.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.009
213.
Agudelo Garcia PA, Berger SL. Genetics meets epigenetics in treg cells and autoimmunity. Immunity. 2020;52:897-899.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.009
214.
Kim TH, et al. Loss of HDAC3 results in nonreceptive endometrium and female infertility. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11:eaaf7533.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf7533
215.
Wu Z, Qu J, Zhang W, Liu GH. Stress, epigenetics, and aging: Unraveling the intricate crosstalk. Mol. Cell. 2024;84:34-54.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.006
216.
Xiao H, et al. A quantitative tissue-specific landscape of protein redox regulation during aging. Cell. 2020;180:968-983.e924.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.012
217.
Bazopoulou D, et al. Developmental ROS individualizes organismal stress resistance and lifespan. Nature. 2019;576:301-305.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1814-y
218.
Ling C, Bacos K, Rönn T. Epigenetics of type 2 diabetes mellitus and weight change - a tool for precision medicine? Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:433-448.
Not in our library10.1038/s41574-022-00671-w
219.
Jeremic D, Jiménez-Díaz L, Navarro-López JD. Targeting epigenetics: a novel promise for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;90:102003.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.102003
220.
Mattei AL, Bailly N, Meissner A. DNA methylation: a historical perspective. Trends Genet. 2022;38:676-707.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2022.03.010
221.
A DNA methylation atlas of normal human cell types · 2023
No notice
222.
Haghani A, et al. DNA methylation networks underlying mammalian traits. Science. 2023;381:eabq5693.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abq5693
223.
Saunderson EA, et al. Stress-induced gene expression and behavior are controlled by DNA methylation and methyl donor availability in the dentate gyrus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:4830-4835.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1524857113
224.
Lee YH, Ren D, Jeon B, Liu HW. S-Adenosylmethionine: more than just a methyl donor. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2023;40:1521-1549.
Not in our library10.1039/d2np00086e
225.
Li X, et al. NT-seq: a chemical-based sequencing method for genomic methylome profiling. Genome Biol. 2022;23:122.
Not in our library10.1186/s13059-022-02689-9
226.
Tse OYO, et al. Genome-wide detection of cytosine methylation by single molecule real-time sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2019768118.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2019768118
227.
Schmitz RJ, Lewis ZA, Goll MG. DNA methylation: shared and divergent features across eukaryotes. Trends Genet. 2019;35:818-827.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2019.07.007
228.
Hillary RF, et al. Blood-based epigenome-wide analyses of 19 common disease states: a longitudinal, population-based linked cohort study of 18,413 Scottish individuals. PLoS Med. 2023;20:e1004247.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pmed.1004247
229.
Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018;19:371-384.
Not in our library10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3
230.
DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations · 2019
No notice
231.
Seifermann M, Epe B. Oxidatively generated base modifications in DNA: Not only carcinogenic risk factor but also regulatory mark? Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;107:258-265.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.018
232.
Park H, Park SB. Label-free target identification reveals oxidative DNA damage as the mechanism of a selective cytotoxic agent. Chem. Sci. 2019;10:3449-3458.
Not in our library10.1039/c8sc05465g
233.
Yu Y, Cui Y, Niedernhofer LJ, Wang Y. Occurrence, biological consequences, and human health relevance of oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2016;29:2008-2039.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00265
234.
Cysewski P, Oliński R. Structural, electronic and energetic consequences of epigenetic cytosine modifications. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:19616-19624.
Not in our library10.1039/c5cp02188j
235.
Fedeles BI, et al. Intrinsic mutagenic properties of 5-chlorocytosine: a mechanistic connection between chronic inflammation and cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E4571-E4580.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1507709112
236.
Gorini F, et al. The genomic landscape of 8-oxodG reveals enrichment at specific inherently fragile promoters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:4309-4324.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkaa175
237.
Scala G, et al. 8-oxodG accumulation within super-enhancers marks fragile CTCF-mediated chromatin loops. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:3292-3306.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkac143
238.
8-oxoguanine and 8-oxodeoxyguanosine Biomarkers of Oxidative DNA Damage: A Review on HPLC–ECD Determination · 2022
No notice
239.
Mangerich A, et al. Chemistry meets biology in colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Free Radic. Res. 2013;47:958-986.
Not in our library10.3109/10715762.2013.832239
240.
Knutson CG, et al. Chemical and cytokine features of innate immunity characterize serum and tissue profiles in inflammatory bowel disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E2332-E2341.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1222669110
241.
Seddon AR, et al. Genome-wide impact of hydrogen peroxide on maintenance DNA methylation in replicating cells. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2021;14:17.
Not in our library10.1186/s13072-021-00388-6
242.
O’Connor KM, Das AB, Winterbourn CC, Hampton MB. Inhibition of DNA methylation in proliferating human lymphoma cells by immune cell oxidants. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:7839-7848.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra120.013092
243.
Sun Q, Huang M, Wei Y. Diversity of the reaction mechanisms of SAM-dependent enzymes. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2021;11:632-650.
Not in our library10.1016/j.apsb.2020.08.011
244.
Menke MJ, et al. A universal, continuous assay for SAM-dependent methyltransferases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023;62:e202313912.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.202313912
245.
Ye Q, et al. Brain iron loading impairs DNA methylation and alters GABAergic function in mice. FASEB J. 2019;33:2460-2471.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.201801116rr
246.
Zhao Y, et al. ROS promote hyper-methylation of NDRG2 promoters in a DNMTS-dependent manner: contributes to the progression of renal fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2023;62:102674.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102674
247.
Millán-Zambrano G, Burton A, Bannister AJ, Schneider R. Histone post-translational modifications - cause and consequence of genome function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022;23:563-580.
Not in our library10.1038/s41576-022-00468-7
248.
Chen Y, Wang Y. Mapping histone modification-dependent protein interactions with chemical proteomics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2022;47:189-193.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2021.11.002
249.
Gruhn WH, et al. Epigenetic resetting in the human germ line entails histone modification remodeling. Sci. Adv. 2023;9:eade1257.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.ade1257
250.
Michalak EM, Burr ML, Bannister AJ, Dawson MA. The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:573-589.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-019-0143-1
251.
Structural basis for PRC2 decoding of active histone methylation marks H3K36me2/3 · 2020
No notice
252.
Vitorakis N, Piperi C. Insights into the role of histone methylation in brain aging and potential therapeutic interventions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:17339.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms242417339
253.
Zhang W, Qu J, Liu GH, Belmonte JCI. The ageing epigenome and its rejuvenation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:137-150.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-019-0204-5
254.
Separovich RJ, Pang CNI, Wilkins MR. Controlling the controllers: regulation of histone methylation by phosphosignalling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2020;45:1035-1048.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2020.08.004
255.
Kato M, Natarajan R. Epigenetics and epigenomics in diabetic kidney disease and metabolic memory. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019;15:327-345.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-019-0135-6
256.
Maxwell S, et al. Set7 methyltransferase and phenotypic switch in diabetic glomerular endothelial cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephro. 2024;35:733-748.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.0000000000000345
257.
Arginine methylation of SKN-1 promotes oxidative stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans · 2019
Not checked
258.
Kang J, et al. Depletion of SAM leading to loss of heterochromatin drives muscle stem cell ageing. Nat. Metab. 2024;6:153-168.
Not in our library10.1038/s42255-023-00955-z
259.
Pham VN, et al. Formaldehyde regulates S-adenosylmethionine biosynthesis and one-carbon metabolism. Science. 2023;382:eabp9201.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abp9201
260.
Bignon E, et al. Computational structural biology of S-nitrosylation of cancer targets. Front. Oncol. 2018;8:272.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2018.00272
261.
Koenig MJ, et al. STK11/LKB1 loss of function is associated with global DNA hypomethylation and S-adenosyl-methionine depletion in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2021;81:4194-4204.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-3199
262.
Cui X, Dard A, Reichheld JP, Zhou DX. Multifaceted functions of histone deacetylases in stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2023;28:1245-1256.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2023.06.006
263.
de Diego I, Müller-Eigner A, Peleg S. The brain epigenome goes drunk: alcohol consumption alters histone acetylation and transcriptome. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2020;45:93-95.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2019.11.002
264.
Li X, et al. Astrocytic ApoE reprograms neuronal cholesterol metabolism and histone-acetylation-mediated memory. Neuron. 2021;109:957-970.e958.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.005
265.
Krause DS. The Fox(o) and the HDAC. Blood. 2020;135:1416-1417.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2020005291
266.
Ohzono H, et al. Targeting FoxO transcription factors with HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023;82:262-271.
Not in our library10.1136/ard-2021-221269
267.
Li P, Ge J, Li H. Lysine acetyltransferases and lysine deacetylases as targets for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17:96-115.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-019-0235-9
268.
Oka SI, et al. β-Hydroxybutyrate, a ketone body, potentiates the antioxidant defense via thioredoxin 1 upregulation in cardiomyocytes. Antioxidants. 2021;10:1153.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox10071153
269.
Ago T, et al. A redox-dependent pathway for regulating class II HDACs and cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 2008;133:978-993.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.041
270.
Ou Y, et al. TDP43/HDAC6/Prdx1 signaling pathway participated in the cognitive impairment of obstructive sleep apnea via regulating inflammation and oxidative stress. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024;127:111350.
Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111350
271.
Doyle K, Fitzpatrick FA. Redox signaling, alkylation (carbonylation) of conserved cysteines inactivates class I histone deacetylases 1, 2, and 3 and antagonizes their transcriptional repressor function. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:17417-17424.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.089250
272.
Jänsch N, et al. The enzyme activity of histone deacetylase 8 is modulated by a redox-switch. Redox Biol. 2019;20:60-67.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2018.09.013
273.
Shvedunova M, Akhtar A. Modulation of cellular processes by histone and non-histone protein acetylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:329-349.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-021-00441-y
274.
Jaffe IZ. Histone acetyltransferases in smooth muscle cell phenotype switching: redundant no longer. Circulation. 2022;145:1738-1740.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.122.060363
275.
Liao B, et al. Dysfunction of duplicated pair rice histone acetyltransferases causes segregation distortion and an interspecific reproductive barrier. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:996.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-024-45377-x
276.
Wrighton KH. p300/CBP keeps chromatin silent. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2022;29:1039.
Not in our library10.1038/s41594-022-00873-w
277.
Kikuchi M, et al. Epigenetic mechanisms to propagate histone acetylation by p300/CBP. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:4103.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-39735-4
278.
Kirfel P, Vilcinskas A, Skaljac M. Lysine acetyltransferase p300/CBP plays an important role in reproduction, embryogenesis and longevity of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insects. 2020;11:265.
Not in our library10.3390/insects11050265
279.
Chakraborty R, et al. Histone acetyltransferases p300 and CBP coordinate distinct chromatin remodeling programs in vascular smooth muscle plasticity. Circulation. 2022;145:1720-1737.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.121.057599
280.
Levine DC, et al. NAD(+) controls circadian reprogramming through PER2 nuclear translocation to counter aging. Mol. Cell. 2020;78:835-849.e837.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.010
281.
Lucky AB, et al. Plasmodium falciparum GCN5 plays a key role in regulating artemisinin resistance-related stress responses. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023;67:e0057723.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.00577-23
282.
Pathania AS, et al. The emerging role of non-coding RNAs in the epigenetic regulation of pediatric cancers. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022;83:227-241.
Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.04.015
283.
ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.
Not in our library10.1038/nature11247
284.
Zhang J, et al. o(8)G site-specifically modified tRF-1-AspGTC: a novel therapeutic target and biomarker for pulmonary hypertension. Circ. Res. 2024;135:76-92.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.124.324421
285.
Wang JX, et al. Oxidative modification of miR-184 enables it to target Bcl-xL and Bcl-w. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:50-61.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.003
286.
Seok H, et al. Position-specific oxidation of miR-1 encodes cardiac hypertrophy. Nature. 2020;584:279-285.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2586-0
287.
Eom S, et al. Widespread 8-oxoguanine modifications of miRNA seeds differentially regulate redox-dependent cancer development. Nat. Cell Biol. 2023;25:1369-1383.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-023-01209-6
288.
Hipp MS, Kasturi P, Hartl FU. The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:421-435.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-019-0101-y
289.
Hussain AA, Lee Y, Marshall J. Understanding the complexity of the matrix metalloproteinase system and its relevance to age-related diseases: Age-related macular degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 2020;74:100775.
Not in our library10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.100775
290.
Ming H, et al. Protein degradation: expanding the toolbox to restrain cancer drug resistance. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2023;16:6.
Not in our library10.1186/s13045-023-01398-5
291.
Webster BM, Gildea HK, Dillin A. Protein homeostasis from the outside in. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020;22:911-912.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-020-0534-8
292.
Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:421-438.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-020-0250-z
293.
Sun-Wang JL, Ivanova S, Zorzano A. The dialogue between the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy: implications in ageing. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020;64:101203.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2020.101203
294.
Pla-Prats C, Thomä NH. Quality control of protein complex assembly by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Trends Cell Biol. 2022;32:696-706.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2022.02.005
295.
Hsieh YC, et al. Person-specific differences in ubiquitin-proteasome mediated proteostasis in human neurons. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20:2952-2967.
Not in our library10.1002/alz.13680
296.
Barghout SH, Schimmer AD. E1 enzymes as therapeutic targets in cancer. Pharmacol. Rev. 2021;73:1-58.
Not in our library10.1124/pharmrev.120.000053
297.
Sosič I, Bricelj A, Steinebach C. E3 ligase ligand chemistries: from building blocks to protein degraders. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51:3487-3534.
Not in our library10.1039/d2cs00148a
298.
Cruz Walma DA, Chen Z, Bullock AN, Yamada KM. Ubiquitin ligases: guardians of mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:350-367.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-021-00448-5
299.
Kim J, et al. Targeted protein degradation directly engaging lysosomes or proteasomes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024;53:3253-3272.
Not in our library10.1039/d3cs00344b
300.
Cowan AD, Ciulli A. Driving E3 ligase substrate specificity for targeted protein degradation: lessons from nature and the laboratory. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2022;91:295-319.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biochem-032620-104421
301.
Mathien S, Tesnière C, Meloche S. Regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and its pharmacological potential. Pharmacol. Rev. 2021;73:263-296.
Not in our library10.1124/pharmrev.120.000170
302.
Silwal P, et al. Chemical mimetics of the N-degron pathway alleviate systemic inflammation by activating mitophagy and immunometabolic remodeling. Exp. Mol. Med. 2023;55:333-346.
Not in our library10.1038/s12276-023-00929-x
303.
Pan M, et al. Structural insights into Ubr1-mediated N-degron polyubiquitination. Nature. 2021;600:334-338.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-04097-8
304.
Vu TTM, Mitchell DC, Gygi SP, Varshavsky A. The Arg/N-degron pathway targets transcription factors and regulates specific genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:31094-31104.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2020124117
305.
Oh JH, Hyun JY, Chen SJ, Varshavsky A. Five enzymes of the Arg/N-degron pathway form a targeting complex: the concept of superchanneling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:10778-10788.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2003043117
306.
Leboeuf D, et al. Downregulation of the Arg/N-degron pathway sensitizes cancer cells to chemotherapy in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2020;28:1092-1104.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.01.021
307.
Heo AJ, et al. The N-terminal cysteine is a dual sensor of oxygen and oxidative stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2107993118.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2107993118
308.
Kim BH, et al. Crystal structure of the Ate1 arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase and arginylation of N-degron substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2209597119.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2209597119
309.
Shim SM, et al. The Cys-N-degron pathway modulates pexophagy through the N-terminal oxidation and arginylation of ACAD10. Autophagy. 2023;19:1642-1661.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2022.2126617
310.
Heo AJ, Kim SB, Kwon YT, Ji CH. The N-degron pathway: from basic science to therapeutic applications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2023;1866:194934.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagrm.2023.194934
311.
Oxygen-dependent proteolysis regulates the stability of angiosperm polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit VERNALIZATION 2 · 2018
No notice
312.
Weits DA, et al. Plant cysteine oxidases control the oxygen-dependent branch of the N-end-rule pathway. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3425.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms4425
313.
Plant cysteine oxidases are dioxygenases that directly enable arginyl transferase-catalysed arginylation of N-end rule targets · 2017
No notice
314.
Gasch P, et al. Redundant ERF-VII transcription factors bind to an evolutionarily conserved cis-motif to regulate hypoxia-responsive gene expression in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2016;28:160-180.
Not in our library10.1105/tpc.15.00866
315.
Masson N, et al. Conserved N-terminal cysteine dioxygenases transduce responses to hypoxia in animals and plants. Science. 2019;365:65-69.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aaw0112
316.
Finkbeiner S. The autophagy lysosomal pathway and neurodegeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2020;12:a033993.
Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a033993
317.
Debnath J, Gammoh N, Ryan KM. Autophagy and autophagy-related pathways in cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:560-575.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-023-00585-z
318.
Vargas JNS, et al. The mechanisms and roles of selective autophagy in mammals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:167-185.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00542-2
319.
Kitada M, Koya D. Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:647-661.
Not in our library10.1038/s41574-021-00551-9
320.
Aman Y, et al. Autophagy in healthy aging and disease. Nat. Aging. 2021;1:634-650.
Not in our library10.1038/s43587-021-00098-4
321.
Yamamoto H, Zhang S, Mizushima N. Autophagy genes in biology and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2023;24:382-400.
Not in our library10.1038/s41576-022-00562-w
322.
Wang L, Klionsky DJ, Shen HM. The emerging mechanisms and functions of microautophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:186-203.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00529-z
323.
Qiao L, et al. Deficient chaperone-mediated autophagy promotes inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2021;129:1141-1157.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.121.318908
324.
Kaushik S, et al. Autophagy and the hallmarks of aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021;72:101468.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2021.101468
325.
Varshavsky A. N-degron and C-degron pathways of protein degradation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:358-366.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1816596116
326.
Heo AJ, Ji CH, Kwon YT. The Cys/N-degron pathway in the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33:247-259.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2022.07.005
327.
Murley A, Dillin A. Macroautophagy in quiescent and senescent cells: a pathway to longevity? Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33:495-504.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2022.10.004
328.
Bourdenx M, et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy prevents collapse of the neuronal metastable proteome. Cell. 2021;184:2696-2714.e2625.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.048
329.
Griffey CJ, Yamamoto A. Macroautophagy in CNS health and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2022;23:411-427.
Not in our library10.1038/s41583-022-00588-3
330.
Autophagy in major human diseases · 2021
No notice
331.
Yin Z, Klionsky DJ. Intermittent time-restricted feeding promotes longevity through circadian autophagy. Autophagy. 2022;18:471-472.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2022.2039524
332.
Nieto-Torres JL, Hansen M. Macroautophagy and aging: the impact of cellular recycling on health and longevity. Mol. Asp. Med. 2021;82:101020.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mam.2021.101020
333.
Wang H, et al. Oxidation of multiple MiT/TFE transcription factors links oxidative stress to transcriptional control of autophagy and lysosome biogenesis. Autophagy. 2020;16:1683-1696.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2019.1704104
334.
Wilson N, et al. The autophagy-NAD axis in longevity and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33:788-802.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2023.02.004
335.
Hypoxia ameliorates intestinal inflammation through NLRP3/mTOR downregulation and autophagy activation · 2017
No notice
336.
Miceli C, Leri M, Stefani M, Bucciantini M. Autophagy-related proteins: Potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of aging-related diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;89:101967.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.101967
337.
Kaarniranta K, et al. Autophagy in age-related macular degeneration. Autophagy. 2023;19:388-400.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2022.2069437
338.
Zheng X, et al. The protease activity of human ATG4B is regulated by reversible oxidative modification. Autophagy. 2020;16:1838-1850.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2019.1709763
339.
Oxidation of Atg3 and Atg7 mediates inhibition of autophagy · 2018
No notice
340.
Liu X, et al. Reprogramming lipid metabolism prevents effector T cell senescence and enhances tumor immunotherapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13:eaaz6314.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz6314
341.
Yu H, et al. Metabolic reprogramming and polarization of microglia in Parkinson’s disease: role of inflammasome and iron. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;90:102032.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.102032
342.
Genome-wide characterization of circulating metabolic biomarkers · 2024
No notice
343.
Watanuki, S. et al. SDHAF1 confers metabolic resilience to aging hematopoietic stem cells by promoting mitochondrial ATP production. Cell Stem Cell (2024).
Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2024.04.023
344.
Warburg-like metabolic transformation underlies neuronal degeneration in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease · 2022
No notice
345.
Bueno M, Calyeca J, Rojas M, Mora AL. Mitochondria dysfunction and metabolic reprogramming as drivers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2020;33:101509.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2020.101509
346.
Chen W, et al. Nutrient-sensing AgRP neurons relay control of liver autophagy during energy deprivation. Cell Metab. 2023;35:786-806.e713.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2023.03.019
347.
Le Couteur DG, et al. Nutritional reprogramming of mouse liver proteome is dampened by metformin, resveratrol, and rapamycin. Cell Metab. 2021;33:2367-2379.e2364.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2021.10.016
348.
Pokharel MD, et al. Metabolic reprogramming, oxidative stress, and pulmonary hypertension. Redox Biol. 2023;64:102797.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102797
349.
Peñuelas-Haro I, et al. The NADPH oxidase NOX4 regulates redox and metabolic homeostasis preventing HCC progression. Hepatology. 2023;78:416-433.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.32702
350.
Amorim JA, et al. Mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction in ageing and age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:243-258.
Not in our library10.1038/s41574-021-00626-7
351.
Harrington JS, et al. Mitochondria in health, disease, and aging. Physiol. Rev. 2023;103:2349-2422.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00058.2021
352.
Zhang R, et al. Maternal aging increases offspring adult body size via transmission of donut-shaped mitochondria. Cell Res. 2023;33:821-834.
Not in our library10.1038/s41422-023-00854-8
353.
Ferrucci L, Zampino M. A mitochondrial root to accelerated ageing and frailty. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:133-134.
Not in our library10.1038/s41574-020-0319-y
354.
Wang CL, et al. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response regulates hippocampal neural stem cell aging. Cell Metab. 2023;35:996-1008.e1007.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2023.04.012
355.
Badrasawi M, et al. Efficacy of L-carnitine supplementation on frailty status and its biomarkers, nutritional status, and physical and cognitive function among prefrail older adults: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin. Inter. Aging. 2016;11:1675-1686.
Not in our library10.2147/cia.s113287
356.
Dang X, et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel thiazole-derivatives as mitochondrial targeting inhibitors of cancer cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2021;114:105015.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105015
357.
Kulkarni AS, Gubbi S, Barzilai N. Benefits of Metformin in Attenuating the Hallmarks of Aging. Cell Metab. 2020;32:15-30.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.001
358.
Metformin in aging and aging-related diseases: clinical applications and relevant mechanisms · 2022
No notice
359.
Stein KC, et al. Ageing exacerbates ribosome pausing to disrupt cotranslational proteostasis. Nature. 2022;601:637-642.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-04295-4
360.
Joazeiro CAP. Mechanisms and functions of ribosome-associated protein quality control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:368-383.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-019-0118-2
361.
Troussicot L, et al. Disulfide-bond-induced structural frustration and dynamic disorder in a peroxiredoxin from MAS NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:10700-10711.
Not in our library10.1021/jacs.3c01200
362.
Narayan M. Revisiting the formation of a native disulfide bond: consequences for protein regeneration and beyond. Molecules. 2020;25:5337.
Not in our library10.3390/molecules25225337
363.
O2 affects mitochondrial functionality ex vivo · 2019
Not checked
364.
Meyer AJ, Riemer J, Rouhier N. Oxidative protein folding: state-of-the-art and current avenues of research in plants. N. Phytol. 2019;221:1230-1246.
Not in our library10.1111/nph.15436
365.
Formosa LE, et al. Mitochondrial COA7 is a heme-binding protein with disulfide reductase activity, which acts in the early stages of complex IV assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2110357119.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2110357119
366.
Salscheider SL, et al. AIFM1 is a component of the mitochondrial disulfide relay that drives complex I assembly through efficient import of NDUFS5. EMBO J. 2022;41:e110784.
Not in our library10.15252/embj.2022110784
367.
Backes S, et al. Development of the Mitochondrial Intermembrane Space Disulfide Relay Represents a Critical Step in Eukaryotic Evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019;36:742-756.
Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msz011
368.
Erdogan AJ, et al. The mitochondrial oxidoreductase CHCHD4 is present in a semi-oxidized state in vivo. Redox Biol. 2018;17:200-206.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2018.03.014
369.
Specht S, et al. A single-cysteine mutant and chimeras of essential Leishmania Erv can complement the loss of Erv1 but not of Mia40 in yeast. Redox Biol. 2018;15:363-374.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2017.12.010
370.
Ceh-Pavia E, et al. Redox characterisation of Erv1, a key component for protein import and folding in yeast mitochondria. FEBS J. 2020;287:2281-2291.
Not in our library10.1111/febs.15136
371.
Peker E, Erdogan AJ, Volkov AN, Riemer J. Erv1 and cytochrome c mediate rapid electron transfer via A collision-type interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 2021;433:167045.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167045
372.
Mesecke N, et al. The zinc-binding protein Hot13 promotes oxidation of the mitochondrial import receptor Mia40. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:1107-1113.
Not in our library10.1038/embor.2008.173
373.
Zheng S, et al. Calcium homeostasis and cancer: insights from endoplasmic reticulum-centered organelle communications. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33:312-323.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2022.07.004
374.
Petersen OH, et al. The roles of calcium and ATP in the physiology and pathology of the exocrine pancreas. Physiol. Rev. 2021;101:1691-1744.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00003.2021
375.
Garbincius JF, Elrod JW. Mitochondrial calcium exchange in physiology and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2022;102:893-992.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00041.2020
376.
Fan M, et al. Structure and mechanism of the mitochondrial Ca(2+) uniporter holocomplex. Nature. 2020;582:129-133.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2309-6
377.
Seegren PV, et al. Reduced mitochondrial calcium uptake in macrophages is a major driver of inflammaging. Nat. Aging. 2023;3:796-812.
Not in our library10.1038/s43587-023-00436-8
378.
Calcium channel ITPR2 and mitochondria–ER contacts promote cellular senescence and aging · 2021
No notice
379.
Patron M, et al. MICU3 is a tissue-specific enhancer of mitochondrial calcium uptake. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:179-195.
Not in our library10.1038/s41418-018-0113-8
380.
Zhang Z, Zhong Z, Xiong Y. Sailing in complex nutrient signaling networks: Where I am, where to go, and how to go? Mol. Plant. 2023;16:1635-1660.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molp.2023.09.012
381.
Green CL, Lamming DW, Fontana L. Molecular mechanisms of dietary restriction promoting health and longevity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:56-73.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-021-00411-4
382.
Matysek A, et al. Targeting impaired nutrient sensing via the sirtuin pathway with novel compounds to prevent or treat dementia: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;90:102029.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.102029
383.
Baker SA, Rutter J. Metabolites as signalling molecules. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:355-374.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00572-w
384.
Yang K, et al. Lifestyle effects on aging and CVD: A spotlight on the nutrient-sensing network. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;92:102121.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.102121
385.
Steinberg GR, Hardie DG. New insights into activation and function of the AMPK. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:255-272.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00547-x
386.
Yan Y, et al. Structure of an AMPK complex in an inactive, ATP-bound state. Science. 2021;373:413-419.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abe7565
387.
Malik N, et al. Induction of lysosomal and mitochondrial biogenesis by AMPK phosphorylation of FNIP1. Science. 2023;380:eabj5559.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abj5559
388.
Huynh C, et al. Nutrient-sensing mTORC1 and AMPK pathways in chronic kidney diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2023;19:102-122.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-022-00648-y
389.
Li Y, et al. Microglial lipid droplet accumulation in tauopathy brain is regulated by neuronal AMPK. Cell Metab. 2024;36:1351-1370.e1358.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2024.03.014
390.
Shao D, et al. A redox-dependent mechanism for regulation of AMPK activation by Thioredoxin1 during energy starvation. Cell Metab. 2014;19:232-245.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2013.12.013
391.
Ren Y, Shen HM. Critical role of AMPK in redox regulation under glucose starvation. Redox Biol. 2019;25:101154.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2019.101154
392.
Liu GY, Sabatini DM. mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:183-203.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-019-0199-y
393.
Mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes in neurodegeneration · 2021
No notice
394.
González A, Hall MN, Lin SC, Hardie DG. AMPK and TOR: the yin and yang of cellular nutrient sensing and growth control. Cell Metab. 2020;31:472-492.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2020.01.015
395.
Multifaceted role of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling pathway in human health and disease · 2023
No notice
396.
Zhang Y, et al. Cancer cells co-opt nociceptive nerves to thrive in nutrient-poor environments and upon nutrient-starvation therapies. Cell Metab. 2022;34:1999-2017.e1910.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2022.10.012
397.
Grande de França NA, Rolland Y, Guyonnet S, de Souto Barreto P. The role of dietary strategies in the modulation of hallmarks of aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;87:101908.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.101908
398.
Castillo-Quan JI, et al. A triple drug combination targeting components of the nutrient-sensing network maximizes longevity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:20817-20819.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1913212116
399.
Oka S, Watanabe T, Chin A, Sadoshima J. Oxidative stress inhibits mTOR through intermolecular disulfide bond formation with deptor in cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 2018;138:A14119-A14119.
Not in our library
400.
Surve S, Watkins SC, Sorkin A. EGFR-RAS-MAPK signaling is confined to the plasma membrane and associated endorecycling protrusions. J. Cell Biol. 2021;220:e202107103.
Not in our library10.1083/jcb.202107103
401.
Lavoie H, Gagnon J, Therrien M. ERK signalling: a master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:607-632.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-020-0255-7
402.
Kim JE, et al. Fyn is a redox sensor involved in solar ultraviolet light-induced signal transduction in skin carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2016;35:4091-4101.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2015.471
403.
Yang L, Zheng L, Chng WJ, Ding JL. Comprehensive analysis of ERK1/2 substrates for potential combination immunotherapies. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;40:897-910.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tips.2019.09.005
404.
Keyes JD, et al. Endogenous, regulatory cysteine sulfenylation of ERK kinases in response to proliferative signals. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;112:534-543.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.08.018
405.
Tan DQ, Suda T. Reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial homeostasis as regulators of stem cell fate and function. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018;29:149-168.
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2017.7273
406.
Jin L, et al. Effects of ERK1/2 S-nitrosylation on ERK1/2 phosphorylation and cell survival in glioma cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018;41:1339-1348.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2017.3334
407.
Kim JH, et al. Mitochondrial ROS-derived PTEN oxidation activates PI3K pathway for mTOR-induced myogenic autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:1921-1937.
Not in our library10.1038/s41418-018-0165-9
408.
Drosten M, Barbacid M. Targeting the MAPK pathway in KRAS-driven tumors. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:543-550.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.013
409.
Xu K, et al. Glycolysis fuels phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling to bolster T cell immunity. Science. 2021;371:405-410.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abb2683
410.
Aging Atlas Consortium. Aging Atlas: a multi-omics database for aging biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D825-D830.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkaa894
411.
Lionetti V, Barile L. Fndc5/irisin-enriched extracellular vesicles: a new hormonal relay in the regular race against vascular ageing. Eur. Heart J. 2022;43:4596-4598.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehac517
412.
de Morree A, Rando TA. Regulation of adult stem cell quiescence and its functions in the maintenance of tissue integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:334-354.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00568-6
413.
Cai Y, et al. Decoding aging-dependent regenerative decline across tissues at single-cell resolution. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30:1674-1691.e1678.
Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2023.09.014
414.
Yousefzadeh MJ, et al. An aged immune system drives senescence and ageing of solid organs. Nature. 2021;594:100-105.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03547-7
415.
Mavrogonatou E, Pratsinis H, Kletsas D. The role of senescence in cancer development. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020;62:182-191.
Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.06.018
416.
Gilson E, Soubeyran P, Solary E. Targeting senescence for next-generation cancer treatments. Cancer Discov. 2024;14:635-638.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0089
417.
Huang D, et al. A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of primate testicular aging reveals exhaustion of the spermatogonial stem cell reservoir and loss of Sertoli cell homeostasis. Protein Cell. 2023;14:888-907.
Not in our library10.1093/procel/pwac057
418.
Zhu Y, et al. Application of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for aging frailty: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Theranostics. 2021;11:5675-5685.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.46436
419.
Nguyen PT, et al. Microglial remodeling of the extracellular matrix promotes synapse plasticity. Cell. 2020;182:388-403.e315.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.050
420.
Zhang H, et al. Melatonin improves the quality of maternally aged oocytes by maintaining intercellular communication and antioxidant metabolite supply. Redox Biol. 2022;49:102215.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2021.102215
421.
Senescence atlas reveals an aged-like inflamed niche that blunts muscle regeneration · 2022
Corrected
422.
Jaiswal S, Libby P. Clonal haematopoiesis: connecting ageing and inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17:137-144.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-019-0247-5
423.
Di Micco R, Krizhanovsky V, Baker D, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence in ageing: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021;22:75-95.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-020-00314-w
424.
Bloom SI, Islam MT, Lesniewski LA, Donato AJ. Mechanisms and consequences of endothelial cell senescence. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2023;20:38-51.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-022-00739-0
425.
Huang W, et al. Cellular senescence: the good, the bad and the unknown. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022;18:611-627.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-022-00601-z
426.
Cohn RL, Gasek NS, Kuchel GA, Xu M. The heterogeneity of cellular senescence: insights at the single-cell level. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33:9-17.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2022.04.011
427.
Khosla S, Farr JN, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL. The role of cellular senescence in ageing and endocrine disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:263-275.
Not in our library10.1038/s41574-020-0335-y
428.
Lucas V, Cavadas C, Aveleira CA. Cellular senescence: from mechanisms to current biomarkers and senotherapies. Pharmacol. Rev. 2023;75:675-713.
Not in our library10.1124/pharmrev.122.000622
429.
Chou LY, Ho CT, Hung SC. Paracrine senescence of mesenchymal stromal cells involves inflammatory cytokines and the NF-κB pathway. Cells. 2022;11:3324.
Not in our library10.3390/cells11203324
430.
Raviola S, et al. Human cytomegalovirus infection triggers a paracrine senescence loop in renal epithelial cells. Commun. Biol. 2024;7:292.
Not in our library10.1038/s42003-024-05957-5
431.
Admasu TD, Rae M, Stolzing A. Dissecting primary and secondary senescence to enable new senotherapeutic strategies. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021;70:101412.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2021.101412
432.
Yashaswini CN, et al. Phenotypes and ontogeny of senescent hepatic stellate cells in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2024;81:207-217.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2024.03.014
433.
Lin Y, Xu Z. Fibroblast senescence in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:593283.
Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2020.593283
434.
Baker DJ, Petersen RC. Cellular senescence in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases: evidence and perspectives. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:1208-1216.
Not in our library10.1172/jci95145
435.
Iron accumulation drives fibrosis, senescence and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype · 2023
No notice
436.
Apoptotic stress causes mtDNA release during senescence and drives the SASP · 2023
Corrected
437.
Cellular aging beyond cellular senescence: Markers of senescence prior to cell cycle arrest in vitro and in vivo · 2021
No notice
438.
Varela-Eirín M, Demaria M. Cellular senescence. Curr. Biol. 2022;32:R448-r452.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.003
439.
Evangelou K, et al. Cellular senescence and cardiovascular diseases: moving to the “heart” of the problem. Physiol. Rev. 2023;103:609-647.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00007.2022
440.
Cellular senescence in cancer: clinical detection and prognostic implications · 2022
Not checked
441.
Schmitt CA, Wang B, Demaria M. Senescence and cancer - role and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022;19:619-636.
Not in our library10.1038/s41571-022-00668-4
442.
Wang L, Lankhorst L, Bernards R. Exploiting senescence for the treatment of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2022;22:340-355.
Not in our library10.1038/s41568-022-00450-9
443.
Marin I, et al. Cellular senescence is immunogenic and promotes antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 2023;13:410-431.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0523
444.
Zhang X, et al. Rejuvenation of the aged brain immune cell landscape in mice through p16-positive senescent cell clearance. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5671.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-33226-8
445.
Xu L, et al. IL-33 induces thymic involution-associated naive T cell aging and impairs host control of severe infection. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:6881.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-34660-4
446.
Chen HA, et al. Senescence rewires microenvironment sensing to facilitate antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 2023;13:432-453.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0528
447.
Guccini I, et al. Senescence reprogramming by TIMP1 deficiency promotes prostate cancer metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:68-82.e69.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.012
448.
Amor C, et al. Senolytic CAR T cells reverse senescence-associated pathologies. Nature. 2020;583:127-132.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2403-9
449.
Ancel S, Stuelsatz P, Feige JN. Muscle stem cell quiescence: controlling stemness by staying asleep. Trends Cell Biol. 2021;31:556-568.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2021.02.006
450.
Brunet A, Goodell MA, Rando TA. Ageing and rejuvenation of tissue stem cells and their niches. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:45-62.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00510-w
451.
Paul R, Dorsey JF, Fan Y. Cell plasticity, senescence, and quiescence in cancer stem cells: biological and therapeutic implications. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022;231:107985.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107985
452.
Zou Z, et al. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of human skin aging. Dev. Cell. 2021;56:383-397.e388.
Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2020.11.002
453.
Victorelli S, et al. Senescent human melanocytes drive skin ageing via paracrine telomere dysfunction. EMBO J. 2019;38:e101982.
Not in our library10.15252/embj.2019101982
454.
Johnson NM, Lengner CJ. MTORC1 and the rebirth of stemness. Dev. Cell. 2020;55:113-115.
Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.001
455.
Talbott HE, et al. Wound healing, fibroblast heterogeneity, and fibrosis. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29:1161-1180.
Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2022.07.006
456.
Wang Z, et al. FUT2-dependent fucosylation of HYOU1 protects intestinal stem cells against inflammatory injury by regulating unfolded protein response. Redox Biol. 2023;60:102618.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102618
457.
Yu F, et al. Enhanced adipose-derived stem cells with IGF-1-modified mRNA promote wound healing following corneal injury. Mol. Ther. 2023;31:2454-2471.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.05.002
458.
Benjamin DI, et al. Multiomics reveals glutathione metabolism as a driver of bimodality during stem cell aging. Cell Metab. 2023;35:472-486.e476.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2023.02.001
459.
Nabhan AN, et al. Single-cell Wnt signaling niches maintain stemness of alveolar type 2 cells. Science. 2018;359:1118-1123.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aam6603
460.
Capulli M, et al. Notch2 pathway mediates breast cancer cellular dormancy and mobilisation in bone and contributes to haematopoietic stem cell mimicry. Br. J. Cancer. 2019;121:157-171.
Not in our library10.1038/s41416-019-0501-y
461.
Zhang Y, Beachy PA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:668-687.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-023-00591-1
462.
Romay MC, et al. Age-related loss of Notch3 underlies brain vascular contractility deficiencies, glymphatic dysfunction, and neurodegeneration in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2024;134:e166134.
Not in our library10.1172/jci166134
463.
Ma X, et al. The roles of FoxO transcription factors in regulation of bone cells function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:692.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms21030692
464.
Ludikhuize MC, et al. Mitochondria define intestinal stem cell differentiation downstream of a FOXO/Notch Axis. Cell Metab. 2020;32:889-900.e887.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2020.10.005
465.
Wakabayashi N, Chartoumpekis DV, Kensler TW. Crosstalk between Nrf2 and Notch signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015;88:158-167.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.017
466.
Leung HW, et al. NRF2/SHH signaling cascade promotes tumor-initiating cell lineage and drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2020;476:48-56.
Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.008
467.
Saraswathibhatla A, Indana D, Chaudhuri O. Cell-extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:495-516.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1
468.
Schweiger PJ, et al. Extracellular matrix interactions provide tumor cells with an escape mechanism for commitment to differentiation. Gastroenterology. 2022;163:1688-1690.e1683.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.036
469.
Fu Y, et al. Extracellular matrix interactome in modulating vascular homeostasis and remodeling. Circ. Res. 2024;134:931-949.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.123.324055
470.
Leask A, Naik A, Stratton RJ. Back to the future: targeting the extracellular matrix to treat systemic sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2023;19:713-723.
Not in our library10.1038/s41584-023-01032-1
471.
Targeting extracellular matrix stiffness and mechanotransducers to improve cancer therapy · 2022
No notice
472.
Fane M, Weeraratna AT. How the ageing microenvironment influences tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2020;20:89-106.
Not in our library10.1038/s41568-019-0222-9
473.
Aged bone matrix-derived extracellular vesicles as a messenger for calcification paradox · 2022
Retracted
474.
Teuscher AC, et al. Longevity interventions modulate mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis in C. elegans. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:276.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-44409-2
475.
Kanchanawong P, Calderwood DA. Organization, dynamics and mechanoregulation of integrin-mediated cell-ECM adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:142-161.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00531-5
476.
Mast cell migration and organization in tissues depend on integrin-ECM interactions. Nat. Immunol. 24, 899–900 (2023).
Not in our library10.1038/s41590-023-01494-1
477.
Slack RJ, et al. Emerging therapeutic opportunities for integrin inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022;21:60-78.
Not in our library10.1038/s41573-021-00284-4
478.
Sawant M, et al. Ablation of integrin-mediated cell-collagen communication alleviates fibrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023;82:1474-1486.
Not in our library10.1136/ard-2023-224129
479.
Targeting integrin pathways: mechanisms and advances in therapy · 2023
No notice
480.
Chen S, et al. Roles of focal adhesion proteins in skeleton and diseases. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2023;13:998-1013.
Not in our library10.1016/j.apsb.2022.09.020
481.
Bibli SI, et al. Mapping the endothelial cell S-sulfhydrome highlights the crucial role of integrin sulfhydration in vascular function. Circulation. 2021;143:935-948.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.120.051877
482.
Rubio K, et al. Non-canonical integrin signaling activates EGFR and RAS-MAPK-ERK signaling in small cell lung cancer. Theranostics. 2023;13:2384-2407.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.79493
483.
Rosenberg N, et al. Integrin-mediated cell adhesion requires extracellular disulfide exchange regulated by protein disulfide isomerase. Exp. Cell Res. 2019;381:77-85.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.04.017
484.
Liu G, et al. Redox signaling-mediated tumor extracellular matrix remodeling: pleiotropic regulatory mechanisms. Cell Oncol. 2024;47:429-445.
Not in our library10.1007/s13402-023-00884-9
485.
Romani P, et al. Mitochondrial fission links ECM mechanotransduction to metabolic redox homeostasis and metastatic chemotherapy resistance. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022;24:168-180.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-022-00843-w
486.
Powers JA, Chio IIC. Softening redox homeostasis in cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022;24:133-134.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-022-00845-8
487.
Sladitschek-Martens HL, et al. YAP/TAZ activity in stromal cells prevents ageing by controlling cGAS-STING. Nature. 2022;607:790-798.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-022-04924-6
488.
Mousset A, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps formed during chemotherapy confer treatment resistance via TGF-β activation. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:757-775.e710.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2023.03.008
489.
Rahmati M, Nalesso G, Mobasheri A, Mozafari M. Aging and osteoarthritis: Central role of the extracellular matrix. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017;40:20-30.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2017.07.004
490.
Faleeva M, et al. Sox9 accelerates vascular aging by regulating extracellular matrix composition and stiffness. Circ. Res. 2024;134:307-324.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.123.323365
491.
Giguelay A, et al. The landscape of cancer-associated fibroblasts in colorectal cancer liver metastases. Theranostics. 2022;12:7624-7639.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.72853
492.
Xu X, et al. Substrate stiffness drives epithelial to mesenchymal transition and proliferation through the NEAT1-Wnt/β-catenin pathway in liver cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:12066.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms222112066
493.
Macrophage to myofibroblast transition contributes to subretinal fibrosis secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration · 2020
No notice
494.
Aksit MA, et al. Pleiotropic modifiers of age-related diabetes and neonatal intestinal obstruction in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2022;109:1894-1908.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.09.004
495.
Nakamichi R, et al. The mechanosensitive ion channel PIEZO1 is expressed in tendons and regulates physical performance. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022;14:eabj5557.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.abj5557
496.
Zhang D, et al. High glucose intake exacerbates autoimmunity through reactive-oxygen-species-mediated TGF-β cytokine activation. Immunity. 2019;51:671-681.e675.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.001
497.
Richter K, et al. Redox-fibrosis: Impact of TGFβ1 on ROS generators, mediators and functional consequences. Redox Biol. 2015;6:344-352.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.015
498.
Russell JO, Camargo FD. Hippo signalling in the liver: role in development, regeneration and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:297-312.
Not in our library10.1038/s41575-021-00571-w
499.
The Hippo signalling pathway and its implications in human health and diseases · 2022
Corrected
500.
Xiong YX, et al. Collagen I-DDR1 signaling promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell stemness via Hippo signaling repression. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30:1648-1665.
Not in our library10.1038/s41418-023-01166-5
501.
Li X, et al. YAP antagonizes TEAD-mediated AR signaling and prostate cancer growth. EMBO J. 2023;42:e112184.
Not in our library10.15252/embj.2022112184
502.
Seo G, et al. The Hippo pathway noncanonically drives autophagy and cell survival in response to energy stress. Mol. Cell. 2023;83:3155-3170.e3158.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.019
503.
Sun K, et al. The roles of the Hippo-YAP signalling pathway in cartilage and osteoarthritis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;90:102015.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.102015
504.
Kim KM, et al. Taz protects hematopoietic stem cells from an aging-dependent decrease in PU.1 activity. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5187.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-32970-1
505.
Hydrogen peroxide sensing, signaling and regulation of transcription factors · 2014
No notice
506.
Gandhirajan RK, et al. Cysteine S-glutathionylation promotes stability and activation of the Hippo downstream effector transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding Motif (TAZ). J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:11596-11607.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.712539
507.
Okazaki S, et al. Multistep disulfide bond formation in Yap1 is required for sensing and transduction of H2O2 stress signal. Mol. Cell. 2007;27:675-688.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.035
508.
Gut stem cell aging is driven by mTORC1 via a p38 MAPK-p53 pathway · 2020
No notice
509.
Yuan W, et al. Modulating p38 MAPK signaling by proteostasis mechanisms supports tissue integrity during growth and aging. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:4543.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-023-40317-7
510.
Bugg D, et al. Infarct collagen topography regulates fibroblast fate via p38-yes-associated protein transcriptional enhanced associate domain signals. Circ. Res. 2020;127:1306-1322.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.119.316162
511.
Jeon S, et al. Ablation of CRBN induces loss of type I collagen and SCH in mouse skin by fibroblast senescence via the p38 MAPK pathway. Aging. 2021;13:6406-6419.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.202744
512.
Kim SI, et al. TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 and TAK1-binding protein 1 cooperate to mediate TGF-beta1-induced MKK3-p38 MAPK activation and stimulation of type I collagen. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2007;292:F1471-1478,.
Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00485.2006
513.
Cao M, et al. A peroxiredoxin-P38 MAPK scaffold increases MAPK activity by MAP3K-independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell. 2023;83:3140-3154.e3147.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.018
514.
Chiang C, et al. Therapeutic potential of targeting MKK3-p38 axis with capsaicin for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Theranostics. 2020;10:7906-7920.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.45191
515.
Bassi R, et al. Redox-dependent dimerization of p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:16161-16173.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m117.785410
516.
Xu X, Chiu J, Chen S, Fang C. Pathophysiological roles of cell surface and extracellular protein disulfide isomerase and their molecular mechanisms. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2021;178:2911-2930.
Not in our library10.1111/bph.15493
517.
Xiong B, Jha V, Min JK, Cho J. Protein disulfide isomerase in cardiovascular disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020;52:390-399.
Not in our library10.1038/s12276-020-0401-5
518.
Li X, et al. Protein disulfide isomerase PDI-6 regulates Wnt secretion to coordinate inter-tissue UPR(mt) activation and lifespan extension in C. elegans. Cell Rep. 2022;39:110931.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110931
519.
Gong FX, et al. De-dimerization of PTB is catalyzed by PDI and is involved in the regulation of p53 translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:9342-9352.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab708
520.
Bowley SR, et al. Protein disulfide isomerase secretion following vascular injury initiates a regulatory pathway for thrombus formation. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14151.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms14151
521.
Swiatkowska M, Szymański J, Padula G, Cierniewski CS. Interaction and functional association of protein disulfide isomerase with alphaVbeta3 integrin on endothelial cells. FEBS J. 2008;275:1813-1823,.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06339.x
522.
Li J, et al. Platelet protein disulfide isomerase promotes glycoprotein ibα-mediated platelet-neutrophil interactions under thromboinflammatory conditions. Circulation. 2019;139:1300-1319.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.118.036323
523.
Khan AB, et al. Protein disulfide isomerase uses thrombin-antithrombin complex as a template to bind its target protein and alter the blood coagulation rates. Biosci. Rep. 2024;44:BSR20231540.
Not in our library10.1042/bsr20231540
524.
Franceschi C, et al. Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018;14:576-590.
Not in our library10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4
525.
Di Giosia P, et al. The role of nutrition in inflammaging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2022;77:101596.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2022.101596
526.
Evans LW, Stratton MS, Ferguson BS. Dietary natural products as epigenetic modifiers in aging-associated inflammation and disease. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020;37:653-676.
Not in our library10.1039/c9np00057g
527.
Liberale L, et al. Inflammation, aging, and cardiovascular disease: JACC review topic of the week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;79:837-847.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.017
528.
Protease-activated receptor 2 induces ROS-mediated inflammation through Akt-mediated NF-κB and FoxO6 modulation during skin photoaging · 2021
No notice
529.
Wu J, et al. Self-amplifying loop of NF-κB and periostin initiated by PIEZO1 accelerates mechano-induced senescence of nucleus pulposus cells and intervertebral disc degeneration. Mol. Ther. 2022;30:3241-3256.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.05.021
530.
Hopkins BL, Neumann CA. Redoxins as gatekeepers of the transcriptional oxidative stress response. Redox Biol. 2019;21:101104.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2019.101104
531.
Powers SK, Schrager M. Redox signaling regulates skeletal muscle remodeling in response to exercise and prolonged inactivity. Redox Biol. 2022;54:102374.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102374
532.
Tyrrell DJ, Goldstein DR. Ageing and atherosclerosis: vascular intrinsic and extrinsic factors and potential role of IL-6. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021;18:58-68.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-020-0431-7
533.
Tuttle CSL, Thang LAN, Maier AB. Markers of inflammation and their association with muscle strength and mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020;64:101185.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2020.101185
534.
Metcalfe C, Cresswell P, Barclay AN. Interleukin-2 signalling is modulated by a labile disulfide bond in the CD132 chain of its receptor. Open Biol. 2012;2:110036.
Not in our library10.1098/rsob.110036
535.
HMGB1 in inflammation and cancer · 2020
No notice
536.
Fu Y, et al. The STAT1/HMGB1/NF-κB pathway in chronic inflammation and kidney injury after cisplatin exposure. Theranostics. 2023;13:2757-2773.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.81406
537.
Dulmovits BM, et al. HMGB1-mediated restriction of EPO signaling contributes to anemia of inflammation. Blood. 2022;139:3181-3193.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2021012048
538.
Tirone M, et al. High mobility group box 1 orchestrates tissue regeneration via CXCR4. J. Exp. Med. 2018;215:303-318.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20160217
539.
Zeller J, et al. Transitional changes in the structure of C-reactive protein create highly pro-inflammatory molecules: Therapeutic implications for cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022;235:108165.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108165
540.
Del Giudice M, Gangestad SW. Rethinking IL-6 and CRP: why they are more than inflammatory biomarkers, and why it matters. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018;70:61-75.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2018.02.013
541.
Carrasco E, et al. The role of T cells in age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022;22:97-111.
Not in our library10.1038/s41577-021-00557-4
542.
Goplen NP, et al. Tissue-resident CD8(+) T cells drive age-associated chronic lung sequelae after viral pneumonia. Sci. Immunol. 2020;5:eabc4557.
Not in our library10.1126/sciimmunol.abc4557
543.
Han S, et al. Age-associated remodeling of T cell immunity and metabolism. Cell Metab. 2023;35:36-55.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2022.11.005
544.
Goto M, et al. Age-associated CD4(+) T cells with B cell-promoting functions are regulated by ZEB2 in autoimmunity. Sci. Immunol. 2024;9:eadk1643.
Not in our library10.1126/sciimmunol.adk1643
545.
Hasegawa T, et al. Cytotoxic CD4(+) T cells eliminate senescent cells by targeting cytomegalovirus antigen. Cell. 2023;186:1417-1431.e1420.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2023.02.033
546.
Wang T, et al. Mechanism of oxidized phospholipid-related inflammatory response in vascular ageing. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;86:101888.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2023.101888
547.
Aleksandrova K, Koelman L, Rodrigues CE. Dietary patterns and biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation: A systematic review of observational and intervention studies. Redox Biol. 2021;42:101869.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2021.101869
548.
McGettrick AF, O’Neill LAJ. The role of HIF in immunity and inflammation. Cell Metab. 2020;32:524-536.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.002
549.
Tan Z, et al. Hypoxia: a barricade to conquer the pancreatic cancer. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020;77:3077-3083.
Not in our library10.1007/s00018-019-03444-3
550.
Su X, et al. HIF-α activation by the prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat suppresses chemoresistant glioblastoma growth by inducing ferroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:861.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-022-05304-8
551.
Baik AH, Jain IH. Turning the oxygen dial: balancing the highs and lows. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30:516-536.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2020.04.005
552.
Martínez-Torres I, et al. The protective role of pVHL in imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:5226.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms23095226
553.
Wang N, et al. P300/CBP regulates HIF-1-dependent sympathetic activation and hypertension by intermittent hypoxia. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2024;70:110-118.
Not in our library10.1165/rcmb.2022-0481oc
554.
Chen T, et al. Factor inhibiting HIF1α (FIH-1) functions as a tumor suppressor in human colorectal cancer by repressing HIF1α pathway. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2015;16:244-252.
Not in our library10.1080/15384047.2014.1002346
555.
Cowman SJ, Koh MY. Revisiting the HIF switch in the tumor and its immune microenvironment. Trends Cancer. 2022;8:28-42.
Not in our library10.1016/j.trecan.2021.10.004
556.
Evolution of metazoan oxygen-sensing involved a conserved divergence of VHL affinity for HIF1α and HIF2α · 2019
Not checked
557.
Hallis SP, Kim SK, Lee JH, Kwak MK. Association of NRF2 with HIF-2α-induced cancer stem cell phenotypes in chronic hypoxic condition. Redox Biol. 2023;60:102632.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102632
558.
HIF-1α and HIF-2α differently regulate tumour development and inflammation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in mice · 2020
No notice
559.
Garcia Garcia CJ, et al. Stromal HIF2 regulates immune suppression in the pancreatic cancer microenvironment. Gastroenterology. 2022;162:2018-2031.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2022.02.024
560.
Yan Y, et al. A novel HIF-2α targeted inhibitor suppresses hypoxia-induced breast cancer stemness via SOD2-mtROS-PDI/GPR78-UPR(ER) axis. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:1769-1789.
Not in our library10.1038/s41418-022-00963-8
561.
Crunkhorn S. Reversing inflammaging. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020;19:168.
Not in our library10.1038/d41573-020-00019-x
562.
Brandt A, et al. Impairments of intestinal arginine and NO metabolisms trigger aging-associated intestinal barrier dysfunction and ‘inflammaging. Redox Biol. 2022;58:102528.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102528
563.
Timóteo-Ferreira F, et al. Redox imbalance in age-related ovarian dysfunction and perspectives for its prevention. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021;68:101345.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2021.101345
564.
Schulz C, Massberg S. Inflammaging aggravates stroke pathology. Nat. Immunol. 2023;24:887-888.
Not in our library10.1038/s41590-023-01516-y
565.
Liberale L, et al. Inflamm-ageing: the role of inflammation in age-dependent cardiovascular disease. Eur. Heart J. 2020;41:2974-2982.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehz961
566.
Chen YR, Jarosz DF. Both ROSy and grim: the landscape of protein redox during aging. Cell Metab. 2020;31:662-663.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2020.03.016
567.
Madreiter-Sokolowski CT, Thomas C, Ristow M. Interrelation between ROS and Ca(2+) in aging and age-related diseases. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101678.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2020.101678
568.
Zhang Y, et al. Methionine restriction - association with redox homeostasis and implications on aging and diseases. Redox Biol. 2022;57:102464.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102464
569.
Guarente L, Sinclair DA, Kroemer G. Human trials exploring anti-aging medicines. Cell Metab. 2024;36:354-376.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2023.12.007
570.
Ngoi NY, et al. The redox-senescence axis and its therapeutic targeting. Redox Biol. 2021;45:102032.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2021.102032
571.
Schiuma, G. et al. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide: the redox sensor in aging-related disorders. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 10.1089/ars.2023.0375 (2024).
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2023.0375
572.
Mansilla S, et al. Redox sensitive human mitochondrial aconitase and its interaction with frataxin: In vitro and in silico studies confirm that it takes two to tango. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2023;197:71-84.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.01.028
573.
Landeta C, et al. Compounds targeting disulfide bond forming enzyme DsbB of Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11:292-298.
Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1752
574.
Liang J, et al. Reactive oxygen species and ovarian diseases: aAntioxidant strategies. Redox Biol. 2023;62:102659.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2023.102659
575.
Modulating antioxidant systems as a therapeutic approach to retinal degeneration · 2022
Not checked
576.
Singh N, Sherin GR, Mugesh G. Antioxidant and prooxidant nanozymes: from cellular redox regulation to next-generation Therapeutics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023;62:e202301232.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.202301232
577.
Guan Q, Du C. Antioxidant nanozymes for prevention of diseased kidney from failure. Kidney Int. 2022;102:961-963.
Not in our library10.1016/j.kint.2022.08.003
578.
Yan Z, Spaulding HR. Extracellular superoxide dismutase, a molecular transducer of health benefits of exercise. Redox Biol. 2020;32:101508.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2020.101508
579.
Donovan RL, et al. Effects of recurrent intra-articular corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis at 3 months and beyond: a systematic review and meta-analysis in comparison to other injectables. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2022;30:1658-1669.
Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2022.07.011
580.
Sishc BJ, et al. Avasopasem manganese synergizes with hypofractionated radiation to ablate tumors through the generation of hydrogen peroxide. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13:eabb3768.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.abb3768
581.
McMillan JDR, et al. Unexpected formation and potent antioxidant activity of macrocyclic dimers containing disulfide and selenide groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022;61:e202213744.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.202213744
582.
Inhibition mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 main protease by ebselen and its derivatives · 2021
No notice
583.
Pedre B, Barayeu U, Ezeriņa D, Dick TP. The mechanism of action of N-acetylcysteine (NAC): The emerging role of H(2)S and sulfane sulfur species. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021;228:107916.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107916
584.
Coles LD, et al. Repeated-dose oral N-acetylcysteine in parkinson’s disease: pharmacokinetics and effect on brain glutathione and oxidative stress. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018;58:158-167.
Not in our library10.1002/jcph.1008
585.
Shum HCE, Wu K, Vadgama J, Wu Y. Potential therapies targeting the metabolic reprogramming of diabetes-associated breast cancer. J. Pers. Med. 2023;13:157.
Not in our library10.3390/jpm13010157
586.
Alonso-Peña M, et al. Innovative therapeutic approaches in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: when knowing your patient is key. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:10718.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms241310718
587.
Camuglia AC, et al. Impact of N-acetylcysteine on endothelial function, B-type natriuretic peptide and renal function in patients with the cardiorenal syndrome: a pilot cross over randomised controlled trial. Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22:256-259.
Not in our library10.1016/j.hlc.2012.10.012
588.
Lanznaster D, et al. Metabolomics as a crucial tool to develop new therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative diseases. Metabolites. 2022;12:864.
Not in our library10.3390/metabo12090864
589.
Jiang X, et al. Novel druggable mechanism of Parkinson’s disease: Potential therapeutics and underlying pathogenesis based on ferroptosis. Med. Res. Rev. 2023;43:872-896.
Not in our library10.1002/med.21939
590.
Weiss-Sadan T, et al. NRF2 activation induces NADH-reductive stress, providing a metabolic vulnerability in lung cancer. Cell Metab. 2023;35:487-503.e487.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2023.01.012
591.
Dong Y, et al. A clinical-stage Nrf2 activator suppresses osteoclast differentiation via the iron-ornithine axis. Cell Metab. 2024;36:1679-1695.e1676.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2024.03.005
592.
Wang Y, et al. Citrus flavonoids and their antioxidant evaluation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022;62:3833-3854.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2020.1870035
593.
Adami R, Bottai D. Curcumin and neurological diseases. Nutr. Neurosci. 2022;25:441-461.
Not in our library10.1080/1028415x.2020.1760531
594.
Chuengsamarn S, et al. Reduction of atherogenic risk in patients with type 2 diabetes by curcuminoid extract: a randomized controlled trial. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2014;25:144-150.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.09.013
595.
Trifylli EM, et al. The emerging role of extracellular vesicles and autophagy machinery in NASH-future horizons in NASH management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:12185.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms232012185
596.
Mason SA, Trewin AJ, Parker L, Wadley GD. Antioxidant supplements and endurance exercise: current evidence and mechanistic insights. Redox Biol. 2020;35:101471.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2020.101471
597.
Blaner WS, Shmarakov IO, Traber MG. Vitamin A and vitamin E: will the real antioxidant please stand up? Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2021;41:105-131.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124228
598.
Lopes C, et al. Mitochondrial and redox modifications in early stages of Huntington’s disease. Redox Biol. 2022;56:102424.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2022.102424
599.
Wensien M, et al. A lysine-cysteine redox switch with an NOS bridge regulates enzyme function. Nature. 2021;593:460-464.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03513-3
600.
Giannone C, et al. Biogenesis of secretory immunoglobulin M requires intermediate non-native disulfide bonds and engagement of the protein disulfide isomerase ERp44. EMBO J. 2022;41:e108518.
Not in our library10.15252/embj.2021108518
601.
Fu L, et al. A quantitative thiol reactivity profiling platform to analyze redox and electrophile reactive cysteine proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 2020;15:2891-2919.
Not in our library10.1038/s41596-020-0352-2
602.
Takahashi M, et al. DrugMap: a quantitative pan-cancer analysis of cysteine ligandability. Cell. 2024;187:2536-2556.e2530.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.027
603.
Shin JW, et al. Curcumin induces stabilization of Nrf2 protein through Keap1 cysteine modification. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020;173:113820.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113820
604.
Liu XF, et al. Developing dietary curcumin mono-carbonyl piperidinone analogs as Nrf2-dependent cytoprotectors against oxidative damage: Structure-activity relationship and mechanisms. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022;186:66-75.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.05.009
605.
Kaoud TS, et al. Modulating multi-functional ERK complexes by covalent targeting of a recruitment site in vivo. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5232.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-019-12996-8

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.