No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
Glycosylation: mechanisms, biological functions and clinical implications
Mengyuan He, Xiangxiang Zhou, Xin Wang
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · 2024 · Review · CC BY
doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01886-1
Abstract
Protein post-translational modification (PTM) is a covalent process that occurs in proteins during or after translation through the addition or removal of one or more functional groups, and has a profound effect on protein function. Glycosylation is one of the most common PTMs, in which polysaccharides are transferred to specific amino acid residues in proteins by glycosyltransferases. A growing body of evidence suggests that glycosylation is essential for the unfolding of various functional activities in organisms, such as playing a key role in the regulation of protein function, cell adhesion and immune escape. Aberrant glycosylation is also closely associated with the development of various diseases. Abnormal glycosylation patterns are closely linked to the emergence of various health conditions, including cancer, inflammation, autoimmune disorders, and several other diseases. However, the underlying composition and structure of the glycosylated residues have not been determined. It is imperative to fully understand the internal structure and differential expression of glycosylation, and to incorporate advanced detection technologies to keep the knowledge advancing. Investigations on the clinical applications of glycosylation focused on sensitive and promising biomarkers, development of more effective small molecule targeted drugs and emerging vaccines. These studies provide a new area for novel therapeutic strategies based on glycosylation.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Protein post-translational modification (PTM) is a covalent alteration occurring during or after protein synthesis, often by adding or removing functional groups, profoundly impacting protein function. More than 300 different PTMs have been identified, including methylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, phosphorylation and glycosylation. Among them, glycosylation is one of the richest and most diverse PTMs, and there are many different types of PTMs in human body, mainly including N-glycosylation with asparagine (Asn) linkage, O-glycosylation with serine (Ser) and threonine (Thr) linkage, C-glycosylation with tryptophan (Trp) linkage, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored attachment, which shows great structural changes. The glycosylation process begins with the initial transfer of glycosyl in the cell’s endoplasmic reticulum (ER), followed by its entry into the Golgi apparatus, where a range of glycans are added to facilitate glycan maturation, involving numerous glycosyltransferases (GTs) and glycosidases in the process.
The glycosylation pathway produces different protein forms of modified proteins that play a role in many biological functions. Diverse cell adhesion molecules exhibit significant alterations in glycosylation is exhibited in cell adhesion molecules, which are vital for cancer progression, tumor metastasis, and immune evasion. The significance of glycosylation in signaling pathways, including the complex modulation of signal transduction within the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) pathway, cannot be understated. Abnormal glycosylation leads to protein malfunction and disruption of biological processes that can lead to serious diseases. Up-regulation of the glycosyltransferase β-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase leads to abnormal levels of programmed cell death molecule ligand 1 (PD-L1) glycosylation, which has been implicated in the development of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Blockade of N-glycosylation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein cleavage-activating protein improves epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) VIII-driven glioblastoma growth. The importance of glycosylation in normal physiological functions and diseases in the human body has revealed the need to explore its mechanisms in depth and investigate more effective and tolerable strategies to stop disease production and improve patient prognosis.
In recent years, glycosylation has been widely studied as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of diseases, and great progress has been made (Fig. 1). Glycans participate in various stages of tumor progression, and glycosylation provides new targets for cancer therapy through their involvement in biosynthetic pathways. Various assays to determine the structure and mechanism of action of glycosylation are also in full swing from research to clinical and scientific studies. The current focus is to utilize this knowledge and technological tools of glycosylation to develop more powerful and safer drugs that are truly applicable to patients in the clinic.
In this review, we briefly summarized the mechanisms of glycosylation, and their biological functions, and discussed the impact of glycosylation in various human diseases. We further presented the potential value of glycosylation that can be used as biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis, and summarized the current assays for glycosylation, briefly discussing the advantages and limitations of each. In addition, the targeted therapies related to glycosylation, a highly promising approach for the treatment of cancer, and challenges encountered in clinical development were discussed.
Mechanism of glycosylation
Protein is essential for life and involved in all cellular processes. Proteins undergo dynamic changes and various PTMs such as phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, and notably glycosylation. Glycosylation, being one of the known PTMs, is essential in the unfolding of various functional activities in living organisms. Glycosylation of proteins is the process of covalently binding oligosaccharides in the form of glycosides to certain amino acid residues on proteins. The amino acids and glycans are classified into four categories according to their linkage: O-glycosylation, N-glycosylation, C-glycosylation and GPI-anchored attachment, (Fig. 2). Among them, N-glycosylation and O-glycosylation are the most common types and they contain most glycosylation machinery associated with the pathogenesis and progression of disease.
N-glycosylation
N-glycosylation is a common glycosylation process facilitated by glycosyltransferases. It involves the binding of oligosaccharide N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to protein aspartate residues on the ER. This process results in three primary N-glycan subtypes, differentiated by their side chain branching into complex, mixed, and high mannose polysaccharides. N-glycans are conserved in the early synthesis of the ER, and their heterogeneity is seen in their subsequent processing. There is a common core structure for all N-glycans (asn-GlcNAc2Man3), which is even further extended by terminal glycan residues. These glycan residues, which mainly include GlcNAc, mannose, galactose, fucose and sialic acid (N-acetylneuraminic acid/Neu5Ac), could significantly affect the structure of N-glycan.
In the ER lumen, Asn-linked glycosylation (ALG) gene products assemble lipid-linked oligosaccharide precursors (Glc3Man9-GlcNAc2) onto dolpolypterpene phosphate (Dol-P) carriers. Key enzymes include GlcNAc-1-P transferase Alg7p (or GPT) with Alg13p/Alg14p uridine 5’-diphosphate-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) transferase, forming a linkage between N-glycan and the polypeptide chain. This assembly is followed by α-glucosidase I (GluI) and α-glucosidase II (GluII), which remove glucose residues, aiding in protein folding.
The glycan is subsequently trimmed by ER mannosidase I, which removes terminal mannose residues from the branches of N-linked oligosaccharides. This structure is then recognized by lectin mannose-binding 1 (LMAN1). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is a secreted glycoprotein protease that further trims glycosylation and secretes correctly folded proteins during the passage from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. LMAN1 can act as a lectin carrier protein to mediate the efficient secretion of MMP-9, which facilitates the loading of glycosylated proteins into the coat protein complex II (COPII). COPII then transports these proteins from ER to Golgi via the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment., In the Golgi, various glycosidases and GTs further process the majority of N-glycans into complex and/or hybrid form.
It was reported that aberrant expression of high mannose-type N-glycan structures is found in various malignancies, contributing to tumor proliferation, invasion, and migration through diverse mechanisms. However, the precise mechanism underlying the role of high mannose-based N-glycans in malignant tumor proliferation, immunosurveillance and tumor immunotherapy is still poorly understood and requires further investigation.
O-glycosylation
O-glycosylation is generally an oxygen linkage of glycans to the Ser or Thr residues, followed by a gradual addition of monosaccharides. Unlike N-glycosylation, which generally occurs in the ER and Golgi apparatus, O-glycosylation occurs mainly in the nucleus and cytoplasm. The two most common types of O-linked glycosylation are O-acetylgalactosamine (O-GalNAc) and O-linked-β-D-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc). O-GalNAc glycosylation is initiated by polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyl-transferase, GalNAc monosaccharides are attached to Ser or Thr residues of proteins by O-glycosidic bonds., This dense O-GalNAc glycosylation, also known as O-glycosylation mucins, is expressed in a variety of tumor types and plays a role in cell-cell interaction, and cell-matrix interactions. On the other hand, the process of O-GlcNAc glycosylation is primarily regulated by two enzymes, O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA). Glucose synthesizes UDP-GlcNAc is synthesized via the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway (HBP). Subsequently, UDP-GlcNAc is attached to Ser or Thr residues via β-O bonding, thereby enhancing the extent of protein O-GlcNAc glycosylation in the presence of OGT. OGA hydrolyzes and removes GlcNAc from proteins and reduces protein O-GlcNAc glycosylation.
Dysregulated expression levels of O-glycan enzymes are associated with tumor development, progression, invasion, and metastasis. It is shown that mucin-type O-glycan biosynthesis is an important pathway of colon carcinogenesis through single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Additionally, it has been reported that N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 7 (GALNT7) is upregulated in prostate cancer and can enhance its proliferation by regulating the O-glycosylation of prostate cancer cells.
C-glycosylation and GPI anchor
C-glycosylation, a rare phenomenon in living organisms, involves the attachment of a mannose molecule to the tryptophan indole ring at position C via a C-C bond. The process of GPI-anchored attachment entails the binding of a GPI anchor, comprising the glycan core, to the C-terminus of a protein, thereby attaching it to the cell membrane. The general structure of the GPI anchor is ethanolamine, glycan core, and inositoll. GPI anchoring occurs in the ER and is a reversible modification where phospholipases can detach the anchored proteins from the cell membrane.
Regulation of protein functions
Glycosylation has multiple biological functions and can affect protein folding, quality control, stability, and transportation (Fig. 3).
Protein folding
Protein function depends on its high-level structure, and correct protein folding plays an important role. Protein folding is the process by which a polypeptide chain folds into its natural three-dimensional structure of a biologically active protein, aligning functional groups for specificity and minimum energy. Protein folding is crucial for modulating biological activity, regulating cell growth and differentiation, and facilitating molecular transport. Misfolded proteins tend to denature and lose their structure and function, even leading to diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, which is caused by incorrect folding of the secondary beta-structure of fibrillar beta-amyloid proteins found in the brain. Protein folding is affected by a variety of factors, including electric and magnetic fields, temperature, pH, spatial confinement and molecular crowding, and it has been found that glycosylation also plays a role in protein folding. Glycosylation is also one of the factors affecting protein folding, which on the one hand helps directly by stabilizing polypeptide structures and on the other hand can help indirectly through interactions with lectins, glycosidases, and GTs as recognition “tags”.
In the ER, N-glycosylation directs the initial steps of protein folding and its quality control., N-glycosylation allows the newly synthesized glycoprotein to interact with the lectin-based chaperone system in the ER. In mammalian cells, calnexin, calreticulin, and related factors play a crucial role in facilitating the proper folding and oligomerization of numerous glycoproteins. They offer specialized quality control and chaperone functions tailored specifically for glycoproteins in the ER. Lectins could act as chaperones in glycoprotein folding. O-glycosylation stabilizes the folded protein domain and promotes protein secretion. The O-linked mannose structure is simpler and has recently been found to have a unique function in protein quality control that does not depend on the intricate structure of N-linked glycan.
Protein stability
Glycosylation is crucial in regulating protein stability. Glycosylation can enhance the stability and solubility of proteins, thereby improving their half-life and drug properties in vivo. A recent report indicated that the O-GlcNAcylation of hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (HGS), a critical protein in the EGFR trafficking pathway, could hasten the degradation of HGS protein in cells, thereby diminishing its stability. O-GlcNAcylation could stabilize PPM1K and promote dephosphorylation of BCKDHA, thereby promoting catabolism of branched-chain amino acid in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CD98 (SLC3A2) is a type II glycoprotein, which is a multifunctional protein, and mutations in its N-glycosylation site can severely affect stability and influence migration to the plasma membrane and various cellular processes.
Phase separation
Phase separation (or liquid-liquid phase separation, LLPS) refers to the phenomenon that biological macromolecules (such as proteins, RNA, etc.) form a temporary liquid-liquid phase separation state in the cell. Phase separation is a widespread liquid state in physical chemistry. In cells, phase separation plays a crucial role in maintaining the cellular complex structure, function and signal transmission. Recent studies have shown that O-glycosylation plays a crucial and multifaceted role in regulating amyloid protein aggregation and LLPS under physiological conditions. Lv et al. synthesized site-specific O-GlcNAc -modified SynGAP using a protein semi-synthesis strategy, and found that O-GlcNAcylation could modulate LLPS of SynGAP/PSD-95 complex. Furthermore, Chen et al. found that O-GlcNAcylation could attenuate the translation-promoting effect of YTHDF1 and YTHDF3 by inhibiting their associations with proteins involved in mRNA translation. The abundant O-GlcNAc modification of YTHDF1/3 enhanced its dynamic characteristics within the phase separation components and accelerated the depolymerization phase separation, low abundance O-GlcNAc modification of YTHDF1/3 maintained its stability in phase separation components. These results suggest that O-GlcNAc modification may act as a universal regulatory mechanism to regulate a variety of LLPS processes.
Regulation of cell adhesion
Proper cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix proteins (ECM) communications and interactions are essential to maintain healthy tissues, both structurally and functionally. These interactions are largely carried out by adhesion molecules, peripheral cell membrane proteins. Most of the proteins involved in cell adhesion are glycosylated. There are several groups of adhesions molecules on cell, including cadherin, selectin, sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs), and integrin family.
Different adhesion molecules apparently play different, although sometimes overlapped, roles. Cadherins, a group of transmembrane glycoproteins, are a class of Ca2+-dependent homophilic cell adhesion molecules responsible for facilitating cell-cell adhesion. There are multiple members, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and P-cadherin in the cadherin family with E-cadherin being studied the most. Evidence suggests that glycosylation can affect the adhesion function of the family E-cadherins. E-cadherins contain a single transmembrane structural domain, a cytoplasmic structural domain (C-terminus), and an extracellular domain, and the said extracellular domain consists of five repetitive structural domains (EC 1 to EC 5)., O-glycosylation of newly synthesized E-cadherin has been reported to impede cell-surface translocation, leading to decreased intercellular adhesion, which was suggested due to the impaired binding of E-cadherin to p120-catenin. In addition to phosphorylation, cytoplasmic O-glycosylation of E-cadherin becomes an alternative mechanism to regulate cell adhesion. The N-glycosylation sites of E-cadherin are located in the extracellular structural domains, with four sites clustered in the EC 4 to EC 5 region. It has been emphasized that reduced N-glycosylation of E-calmodulin promotes the establishment of a stable adherens-junction. However, excessive N-glycosylation of E-calmodulin weakens the adherens-junction., E-calmodulin N-glycosylation is mainly controlled by the GnT-III, GnT-V, and fucosyltransferase 8 (FUT8), which are involved in the regulation of cell-cell adhesion. Significant alterations in glycosylation have been observed for several cell adhesion molecules in the tumor microenvironment, predominantly cadherin, and selectins, becoming a common feature of cancer progression.
Selectins, a class of Ca2+-dependent heterophilic cell adhesion molecules, comprise three cell adhesion molecules: L-selectin expressed on leukocytes, E-selectin expressed on activated endothelial cells, and P-selectin expressed on activated platelets and endothelial cells.,, They could specifically recognize and adhere to specific glycosyl groups in oligosaccharide chains on the surface of other cells, and mediate the recognition and adhesion of leukocytes primarily to vascular endothelial cells or platelets, specializing in the capture of leukocytes from the bloodstream to the vessel wall. Selectins are single-transmembrane-penetrating glycoproteins with an intracellular region that binds to microfilaments via anchoring proteins. The extracellular region consists of three major structural domains: an N-terminal C lectin-like structural domain, an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like structural domain, and a structural domain that is homologous to complement regulatory protein. Among them, the C lectin-like structural domain is the active site that recognizes specific glycosyl groups and engages in selective adhesion.
Leukocytes move in a rolling fashion, mediated by selectins, by adhesion-detachment and re-adhesion-detachment with vascular endothelial cells in the vasculature at the site of inflammation. Selectins act as receptors that bind to glycoligands with structural modifications of sialyl-Lewisx(sLeX) or sialyl-Lewisa(sLea) at the end to regulate cell migration, and cell metastasis in cancer. The expression and adhesion function of sLeX on trophoblast cells and L-selectin on uterine epithelial cells mediate adhesion at the fetal-maternal interface. The key enzyme for the synthesis of sLeX is fucosyltransferase VII (FUT7), and when the expression of FUT7 was up-regulated, the synthesis of sLeX was increased, and the rate of adhesion of trophoblast cells to human uterine epithelial cells was significantly increased. There are at least 14 different Siglec receptors in human, which are predominantly found in immune cells. By binding to its ligands including sialoglycans, Siglec receptors modulate immune cell activity through recruiting SHP1 and SHP2 phosphatases. The Siglec-sialoglycan axis plays a strong role in regulating both the innate and adaptive immune responses and has been found to be strongly associated with tumor evasion which involves altered glycosylation., Integrins are a large family of heterodimeric alpha/beta receptors, bind to ECM so they are the molecules that “sense” the cellular environment. This binding is specific and highly regulated. The binding of integrin to specific ECM component could trigger the activation of intracellular signaling pathways, release growth factors and cytokines embedded in the ECM, and sensing the mechanic changes in the cellular environment, all of which can contribute to cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, and migration.– Under diseased conditions, such as cancer and immunological disorders, integrins have become attractive drug targets. In fact, certain integrins are clinically validated drug targets. Changes in glycosylation of integrins observed in tumors impact the intracellular signaling and cell adhesion activity. For example, cancer patients, such as breast cancer patients, with increased GlcNAc branching on the N-glycans showed poor prognosis. Core 1 β1,3-galactosyltransferase (C1GALT1) modifies the O-glycan on integrin β1, regulates its activity, and enhances the invasiveness of HCC. β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase 1 (ST6Gal-I) was identified as poor prognosis marker as hypersialylation on integrins in multiple cancers. It was found to link to increase of tumor migration in colon and ovarian cancer cells., Clearly glycosylation on adhesion molecules, including integrins, alters cell proliferation and function.
Immune evasion
Immune evasion refers to the development of many mechanisms by infectious organisms (including bacteria, viruses, parasites, etc.) and cancer cells that prevent the host’s immune system to respond and trigger their elimination from the host. Glycosylation plays a critical role in immune regulation under normal and pathogenic conditions, including immune evasion by pathogenic organisms and cancer cells, which is not surprising, since most of the key molecules that are involved in immune response, both innate and adaptive, are glycosylated. The products of protein glycosylation, glycans, and the glycosylated proteins, are all well-documented in immune modulation and immune evasions by pathogens. Specifically, three major glycan-binding proteins, galectins, Siglecs, C-type lectin family (CTLF) are known to play a role in immune evasion., Pathogenic organisms utilize host glycans or secret their own molecules as glycan mimicry as shield to avoid immune surveillance. Cancer cells could produce abnormal amount of glycans, glycan-binding proteins, and cell surface glycosylated proteins with structural changes. The quantity and qualitative changes in glycosylation and interaction of glycosylated proteins favor tumor cells to escape the host immune response. Among the best examples, sialic acids are rich in tumor environments and have been shown to be extensively involved in a variety of cancer cells for immune suppression. Removal of sialic acids was found to be associated with tumor inhibition in glioblastoma. The changes in glycosylation, quantitively or/and qualitatively, in cell surface glycans alter the interactions between cancer cells with host glycan binding proteins such as galectins, Siglecs, and CTLF. Cell-surface glycans usually end in sialic acid, a structure that binds to a variety of endogenous receptors, among which Siglecs have been associated with immune evasion in tumor cells. Siglecs are a series of sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins that modulate cellular functions in the innate and adaptive immune systems through glycan recognition. The extracellular portion of Siglecs contains an N-terminal carbohydrate-recognizing domain (CRD) and a C2 structural domain, and the intracellular portion contains immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) or ITIM-like structures that mediate immunosuppression. Several studies have found that increased sialic acid density leads to increased involvement of inhibitory Siglecs receptors on immune cells and modulates the immune response to cancer, which has been observed in lung cancer and melanoma samples. Many cancers show an increase in sialylated glycans which may be associated with sialyltransferases, and sialic acid synthesis genes. The hypersalivation Siglecs axis may be another way for tumor cells to escape immune surveillance. Siglec-7 is involved in remodeling the sialylation status of cancer cells and thereby affecting NK cell immunoevasion. Galectins binding to LacNAc-containing glycans has an important role in regulation T cell functions. The amount and the nature of the modification of galectins all affect immune cell activity. For example, high level of Galectin-1 expression is strongly associated with low T cell infiltration to tumor tissues in head-and-neck cancers. Similarly, Gal-3 and Gal-9 were found to play a role in the downregulation of immune response in other solid tumors.,
Modulation of signaling transduction
Glycosylation can regulate enzyme activity or its interaction with other proteins to participate in cell signaling and recognition processes.
Notch signaling
As a highly conserved signaling pathway, Notch signaling plays an important role in a variety of biological processes such as cell growth, development, and tissue repair. In mammals, Notch is activated by the binding of its extracellular domain to ligands (Delta and Jagged/Serrate) on the surface of apposed cells. Accumulating studies have confirmed that extracellular PTMs in the form of glycosylation are essential for the Notch signaling pathway.– Abnormal O-glycosylation of Notch receptors and their ligands leading to acquired functional mutations or signaling dysregulation of genes in the Notch signaling pathway is associated with several diseases. The extracellular domain of Notch is comprised of a series of EGF repeats, which can range up to 36 in number. Studies have shown that aberrant expression of Notch-modified glycosyltransferase, including protein O-glucosyltransferase 1 (POGLUT1) and protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 (POFUT1), can be found increased in several diseases, such as oral squamous cell carcinoma. POGLUT1 functions as a protein-O-glucosyltransferase, facilitating the transfer of glucose to the EGF-like domains found in Notch receptors and other signaling receptors. POGLUT1 O-glucosylation is mainly carried out by three POGLUTs (POGLUT1, 2, and 3) that use uridine diphosphate-Glc as a substrate for modification of the EGF repetitive sequences for their O-glucosylation activities., In a family with autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, a missense mutation was identified in the POGLUT1 gene. This mutation is known to induce decreased O-glucosyltransferase activity on Notch receptors, leading to impaired muscle development. POFUT1 is localized in the region of 20q11.21, which is heavily amplified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent findings indicate that POFUT1, the enzyme responsible for adding O-fucose to Notch receptors, may also play a role in quality control within the ER. Several studies have demonstrated that Fringe, a glycosyltransferase, operates within the Golgi complex to modify the glycosylation patterns of Notch receptors., The modulation of Jagged1-induced Notch signaling by Fringe requires the involvement of beta 4galactosyltransferase-1, which adds a galactose residue to GlcNAc beta 3Fuc. This suggests that beta 4GalT-1 may serve as a novel regulator of Notch signaling.
O-GlcNAcylation is a common PTM, which can be divided into OGT-catalyzed intracellular form and EGF-domain specific O-GlcNAc transferase (EOGT)-catalyzed extracellular form. Several studies have found that O-GlcNAcylation is regulated by the Notch signaling pathway and is involved in disease development. OGT directly interacts with Notch1 to catalyze the O-GlcNAcylation of the Notch TM/ICD fragment, promoting its binding to the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch and reducing degradation, which plays an important role in regulating mammalian neurogenesis and cognition. In addition, O-GlcNAcylation can also be catalyzed by EOGT, which augments Delta-like ligand-mediated Notch signaling and promotes human Adams-Oliver syndrome.
Investigations conducted by multiple groups have demonstrated the crucial role of O-fucosylation in ligand-mediated Notch signaling. The modification of the O-fucose saccharide structure, induced by Fringe, influences the response of Notch to its ligands. Zhou et al. reported that Notch-dependent signaling could control myelopoiesis, and fucosylation of Notch could regulate the ligand binding activity and efficiency of Notch signaling in myeloid progenitors. O-fucose site mutations have been found in anaplastic large cell lymphoma as two mutations in NOTCH1 (p.T311P and p.T349P) result in deletion of the O-fucose site in the eighth and ninth EGF repetitive sequences in the NOTCH1 ECD. Furthermore, certain O-fucose molecules are elongated through the activity of β-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases (β3GNTs) from the Fringe family. GCNT1, a glycosyltransferase, could mediate O-Glycosylation of the Sialomucin CD43, thereby act as an indicator of Notch signaling in T cells.
JAK-STAT signaling
The Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway is one of the central pathways for cellular function. A variety of cytokines and growth factors, such as hormones, interferons, and interleukins, have been identified to initiate this pathway. JAK-STAT pathway is involved in multiple processes such as immune adaptation, apoptosis, and inflammation. Deletion or mutation of JAK-STAT components is associated with a variety of diseases. The binding of cytokine to the receptor causes dimerization of the receptor, simultaneous tyrosine phosphorylation of the intracellular terminus of the receptor, and the phosphorylation of the two JAK kinase molecules that are recruited to the receptor. The phosphorylated receptor binds to the STAT protein, activating STAT phosphorylation and triggering downstream pathways.
The STAT protein family includes seven members, among which STAT5 plays an important function in the regulation of growth and development and tumor immunity. O-GlcNAcylation promotes oncogenic transcription by enhancing STAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation and oligomerization to drive myeloid transformation. It was found that O-GlcNAcylation, a modification necessary for STAT5-induced transcription, occurs at Thr at the N-terminal site 92 of the STAT5 protein. Defective or hyperactive STAT5 variants of O-GlcNAcylation differ greatly in oncogenic potential. In Burkitt lymphoma and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AID)-related lymphoma, this region of the T58 locus of the c-Myc protein is a hotspot for mutation. The study could observe that O-GlcNAcylation of Thr at the T58 site occurs with phosphorylation modification, which also serves as evidence that O-GlcNAcylation regulates gene transcription signaling in tumor cells. In addition, it was identified that the JAK/STAT1 pathway could act as a regulator of glycolysis, enhanced glucose turnover was associated with abundant STAT1-O-GlcNAcylation in mesenchymal stem cells. The above studies demonstrate the critical role of glycosylation in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and reveal the possible functions involved in glycosylation.
TGF-β signaling
TGF-β signaling plays crucial roles in the preservation of organismal integrity. TGF-β signaling governs the regulation of cell proliferation, phenotypic plasticity, metabolic adaptation, and immune surveillance in diverse cell types. Malfunctions in TGF-β signaling have the potential to disturb immune tolerance, induce inflammation, and contribute to the development of fibrosis and cancer.
Both core fucosylation and sialylation primarily act as stimulatory factors in TGF-β signaling during various biological processes, including fibrosis, migration, differentiation, and immune evasion. ALG3, one of ALG members, has been to promote radiation resistance in breast cancer by regulating glycosylation of TGF-β receptor II. Kim et al. demonstrated that the use of glycosylation inhibitors, such as tunicamycin and kifunenine, or mutations in the N-linked glycosylation site of TβRII attenuated ALG3 overexpression to varying degrees, could prevente the effective transport of TβRII protein to the cell surface, thereby reducing cell sensitivity to TGF-β. Core fucosylation catalyzed by FUT8 is important for signaling receptors. Upregulated expression of FUT8 induced high levels of core fucosylation of TGF-β type I and type II receptors, facilitating TGF-β binding and downstream targets, thereby promoting cell invasiveness of breast cancer cells.
Sialylation-mediated regulations on TGF-β signaling are linked with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). ST3Gal1, a key sialyltransferase, could mediate sialylation of vasorin to facilitate TGF-β1-mediated angiogenesis and progression of tumor. In addition, GalNAc-type O-glycosylation is initiated by polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases, is involved in TGF-β signaling regulation. Inhibition of breast cancer cell migration and invasion, specifically through the EMT process, could be achieved by targeting ppGalNAc-T4-catalyzed TGF-β receptor O-GalNAcylation. This suggests that focusing on ppGalNAc-T4 may hold promise as a therapeutic strategy for breast cancer. Together, these studies suggested the regulatory role of glycosylation in TGF-β signaling, more investigations are needed to better understand the process and its implications.
Wnt/β-catenin signaling
The Wnt signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in regulating cell-fate determination, cell migration, cell polarity, neural patterning, and organogenesis during embryonic development. Abnormal Wnt signaling can lead to developmental diseases or cancer. Wnt is a class of secreted protein molecules with glycosylation and fatty acidification modification. To date, 19 Wnt proteins have been identified in humans. Wnt pathway is commonly divided into β-catenin-dependent (canonical) and independent (non-canonical) signaling. Among the mechanisms that have been documented to affect Wnt/β-catenin activity, modification of N-glycans by L-fucose is the recently understood. Hong et al. revealed that increased α (1-3)-fucosylation of GlcNAc in the Galβ (1-4)-GlcNAc sequences of complex N-glycans could suppress the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling through elevates the endocytosis of lipid-raft-localized low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6). Conversely, Wnt suppression induced by cell-surface α (1-3)-fucosylation can be rescued by addition of free fucose. B3GnT2, a member of the β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (B3GnT) family, could promote the extension of polylactosamine chains on multiple N-glycans on LRP6, thereby enhancing LRP6 transport to the plasma membrane and promoting Wnt/β-catenin signaling.
In addition, β1,4-Galactosyltransferase V is engaged in embryogenesis and plays a crucial role in catalyzing the attachment of galactose to GlcNAcβ1-4Man residues located on N-glycans. This enzymatic process holds significance in regulating cell stemness through glycosylation mechanisms, leading to the stabilization of Frizzled-1 and activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway specifically in breast cancer. Overexpression of the polypeptide N-acetylgalactosamine-transferase 1 could activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling through modulating CD44 O-glycosylation in gastric cancer. Further validation of the regulatory mechanism of glycosylation will contribute to a better understanding of the function of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.
Regulation of metabolism
Recently, accumulating studies have demonstrated the importance of protein glycosylation in regulating lipid metabolism. N-glycosylation plays a regulatory role in proteins involved in lipid synthesis, packaging, and the clearance of lipoproteins. N-glycosylation in humans reduces low-density lipoprotein by enhancing low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expression, suggesting that N-glycosylation could act as a vital regulator of LDL metabolism. In addition, the specific glycan patterns of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-associated ApoE are intricately involved in the activity and functionality of HDL. The enzyme galNAc-T2, encoded by GALNT2, plays a crucial role in catalyzing the attachment of GalNAc in O-glycosylation processes. Genetic studies have demonstrated that the variants in GALNT2 could impact HDL and triglyceride levels in humans.
In terms of glutamine metabolism, a study on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma revealed that the cancer cells are highly dependent on a specific glutamine catabolic pathway, and malate dehydrogenase (MDH1) is a key enzyme in this pathway. Zhu et al. found that Ser189 was the glycosylation site of MDH1, and its O-GlcNAc glycosylation could promote Gln catabolism. Moreover, Ser189 O-GlcNAc could act as a “molecular glue” to stabilize the substrate binding pocket on the MDH1 monomer, improve substrate binding and stability, and ultimately promote the enzymatic activity of MDH1. Further determination of the mechanism by which protein glycosylation modifies metabolic reprogramming will open up novel insights for therapeutic intervention in metabolic diseases and tumors.
Abnormal glycosylation in human diseases
Glycans, together with proteins, nucleic acids and lipids, are important biomolecules in the human body. Protein glycosylation is widespread in living organisms and involves various processes such as cellular immunity, protein translation regulation, and signaling pathways. Abnormal glycosylation is associated with the onset and progression of various diseases (Fig. 4).
Glycosylation in hematologic malignancies
Hematological malignancies are a group of diseases with high heterogeneity in molecular and phenotypical characteristics. Increasing evidence suggests that protein glycosylation is involved in the pathogenesis and development of hematological malignancies, including lymphoma, leukemia, and plasma diseases.
Acute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly diverse malignancy originating from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), a receptor tyrosine kinase of type III, plays a critical role in regulating the growth and maturation of hematopoietic cells, is one of the commonly mutated genes in AML. Mutations in the FLT3 gene are detected in about 30% of adult AML patients, and the mutations are mainly in the FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) and FLT3-tyrosine kinase domain (FLT3-TKD), of which FLT3-ITD mutation is more common and suggests a poorer prognosis. FLT3 is synthesized in the ER as a 130 KD precursor of glycosylation-deficient or mannose-rich material, is transferred to the Golgi apparatus and then continues glycosylation to complete the complex 150 KD structure before transferring to the cell surface., If the progression of FLT3 in the Golgi is disrupted, FLT3 protein carrying immature glycosylation is then accumulated in the ER. This promotes apoptosis or initiates signaling pathways that are distinct from normal glycosylation. It has been illustrated that knockdown of FUT8 leads to the deletion of core fucosylation of FLT3, which results in sustained ligand-independent and autonomous activation of its downstream pathway and unlimited proliferation of tumor cells. 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) could induce cell death by inhibiting the N-glycosylation of FLT3 in FLT3-ITD-mutated AML, decreasing the cell surface expression of FTL3-ITD. 2DG is also effective in c-KIT-mutated AML cells. In the latter, O-glycosylation of Sp1 was modulated and c-KIT expression was decreased, triggering ER stress and activation of the unfolded protein response, which induced apoptosis.– Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) increase the surface level of FLT3 as well as FLT3-ITD and FLT3-D835Y mutants by upregulating their glycosylation. Statins such as lovastatin can reduce mutant FLT3 kinase activity by blocking complicated glycosylation at the receptor. This in turn contributes to changes in positioning and signaling, leading to cell apoptosis., Therefore, TKI combined with FLT3 immunotherapy, which attenuates the level of glycosylation, may benefit AML patients.
In addition, the interaction between AML and the bone marrow microenvironment is crucial in disease progression. In MDS/AML patients, a significant down-regulation of double-cross-sectioned GlcNAc structures was observed in bone marrow stromal cells, whereas enhanced expression of MCAM, a marker of bone marrow niche, further activates the ERK signaling pathway and promotes bone marrow cell growth. The membrane scaffold CD82 in the microenvironment undergoes N-glycosylation, and inhibition of its glycosylation increases the molecular accumulation of N-cadherin, promotes bone marrow homing of AML cells, and affects AML cell migration in vivo.
Studies have revealed that leukemia cells expressing CD43 are enriched with sialic acid glycosyl groups on their surface, while CD43 is a heavily O-glycosylated protein, and the glycosylation status of the CD43 protein was associated with cytotoxic T cell (CTL)-mediated cytolysis. Sialic acid residue epitopes on CD43 have been studied as targets for bispecific T cell-engaging antibodies, which have been shown to specifically induce CTL cells and mediate cytotoxicity in both in vivo and in vitro studies, providing evidence for the therapeutic potential of targeting the sialic acid residue epitope of CD43. The role of sialic acid modification on CD43 demonstrates the relevance of glycosylation in AML pathophysiology. At present, there are more emerging studies that have taken a deeper dive at glycan characterization. It can be concluded that glycosylation plays a major part in the development and treatment of leukemia. However, more comprehensive studies on their mechanisms are needed in order to provide a stronger rational for the development of new therapies for AML and new perspectives for targeted therapy.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by the uncontrolled growth and infiltration of immature lymphocytes in the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other organs including B-ALL and T-ALL. High levels of C-Myc expression promote leukemia cells to enhance self-renewal and be more insensitive to chemotherapy-induced differentiation. O-GlcNAcylation, plays a pivotal role in modulating the activity of nuclear proteins involved in gene expression, signal transduction, and cell growth. High expression of O-GlcNAcylation of c-Myc promotes rapid proliferation of pre-B cells. Evidence of decreased pre-B cell number was also observed in mice administered O-GlcNAc inhibitor. Oliveira et al. found that B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) cells with mixed lineage leukemia gene rearrangement exhibited increased core type 2 O-glycans and complex N-glycans, alongside significant changes in sialic acid and fucose glycosylation.
The role of glycosylation is also captured in T-ALL. CD95 (Fas/Apo-1), a type I transmembrane protein encoded by the Fas gene that binds to CD95L and induces apoptosis, through which virus-infected cells, damaged cells and cancer cells are eliminated. In a study treating cells with interferon-gamma, it was found that the high molecular weight form CD95, most of which is caused by N-linked glycosylation. SHIP-1 (SH2 (Src homology 2)-containing inositol 5’-phosphatase-1) is a negative regulator of the immune response, partially located in the ER, and promotes the glycosylation of CD95, resulting in its inability to oligomerize, leading to the formation of the death-inducing signaling complex and impaired downstream apoptotic cascades.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a mature B-lymphocyte clonal proliferative neoplasm, characterized by lymphocyte aggregation in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, spleen and lymph nodes. The B cell receptor (BCR) is an immunoglobulin expressed on the membrane surface of B lymphocytes during B lymphocyte development, and is a specific receptor for B lymphocytes to recognize and bind antigens. The structure of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) is critical for the function of BCR. After the development and maturation of B lymphocytes, the IGH is stimulated by antigen and undergoes somatic high-frequency mutation (SHM), which enhances the affinity of the BCR for the antigen. In CLL cells, the IGH of the BCR can be characteristically altered.
CD79 is a heterodimer molecule involved in signal transduction as a component of BCR. CD79 has two subunits, CD79a and CD79b (Igα and Igβ, respectively), and is highly expressed in CLL cells. A study showed that low levels of BCR expression in CLL cells was due to impaired glycosylation and folding of mu and CD79a. SHM frequently leads to the creation and/or disruption of N-glycosylation sites within the variable structural domains of the Ig H and L chains, which appears to be related to the natural history of CLL. In addition, the heavy chain constant region of the BCR in CLL cells carries a high level of mannosylation modification, which could relate to a more aggressive CLL.
Follicular lymphoma
Lymphoma is one of the first hematologic malignancies to be identified. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the most prevalent hematologic malignancy globally, responsible for approximately 3% of cancer cases and fatalities. Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a class of NHL originating from follicle-centered B-cells, with a typical immunophenotype of CD5-CD10 + CD19+ with t(14;18) (q32; q21), and whose BCR undergoes SHM to produce a high degree of tumor heterogeneity., FL cells undergo persistent somatic hypermutation in the variable region gene of their immunoglobulins. DNA sequences encoding Asn-X-Ser/Thr (N-glycosylation site) were introduced by sustained somatic hypermutation in the variable region., Following contact with calcium-dependent lectins exposed to tissue macrophages, the unique additional oligosaccharide activates the BCR signaling pathway. That route seemed to be crucial for tumor growth and proliferation.
N-glycosylation sites are introduced into the variable region of the BCR in FL and exhibit a high mannose type. Binding of these glycosylated groups to mannose-specific lectins triggers sustained BCR signaling activation, which is critical for tumor cell survival and proliferation. The introduction of N-glycosylation sites by SHM can occur in a variety of B-cell diseases, but has the highest prevalence in FL. Most of the neo-glycosylation sites are located in the complementary decision region in the variable region and less frequently in non-functional V(H) sequences. High throughput sequencing analysis revealed that sustained SHM could result in subclones with different amino acid compositions in different disease events, but a large majority of the resulting DNA sequences still encode an N-glycosylation site. In addition, a recurrent type of N-glycosylation, NX(S/T), was identified in mutations in the variable structural domain in FL. This study suggested that the opportunistic interactions occurred at BCR and cells containing mannose-binding lectins may contribute to the pathogenesis of FL.
Studies addressing differences in N-glycosylation patterns between FL subgroups with and without t(14;18) found a significant difference in the frequency of newly acquired N-glycosylation sites in t(14;18)-positive and t(14;18)-negative FL stage III/IV patients, which was not observed in FL stage I/II patients. In contrast, newly acquired N-glycosylation sites were significantly reduced in t(14;18)-negative advanced (stage III/IV) FL, suggesting that signaling in addition to the current BCR pathway. It has been found that N-glycosylation site-negative FL cells can also expand and may be more dependent on the energy metabolism pathway than the BCR signaling.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most prevalent type of NHL, which derived from mature B cells. Glycosylation in different proteins can regulate the development of DLBCL from multiple pathways. BCR signaling pathway plays an important role in the development of DLBCL. Inhibition of BCR glycosylation by oligosaccharyltransferase-B reduces BCR clustering and internalization, thereby attenuating PI3K and NF-κB activation. This finding suggests that agents against the oligosaccharyltransferase-B glycosylation pathway may be useful for the treatment of DLBCL.
CD45 is classified as a type 1 transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase, a glycoprotein of 180-220kDa. CD45 consists of two cytoplasmic domains, a transmembrane domain and an extracellular structural domain, and mature CD45 is highly O- and N-glycosylated. Gal-3 is a soluble beta-galactoside-binding protein that is widely distributed in various tissues and organs. Gal-3 binds to a variety of ligands on the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix, and plays an important role in apoptosis, adhesion, proliferation, migration, inflammatory response, and immune response. Gal-3 is overexpressed in DLBCL and binds mainly to CD45, which is regulated by C2GnT-1 glycosyltransferase. The activity of tyrosine phosphatase is regulated by the binding of gal-3 to CD45. Removal of gal-3 from CD45 on the cell surface with the multivalent glycan inhibitor GCS-100 increased the sensitivity of DLBCL cells to chemotherapeutic agents. This sheds light on the importance of specific glycosylation of CD45 in regulating gal-3 pathway signaling and implication in DLBCL chemotherapy treatment.
Tumor immune escape mediated by the programmed cell death molecule 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 signaling pathway is one of the important mechanisms of tumorigenesis and progression. PD-1 is mainly expressed on the surface of activated T cells, and its ligand PD-L1 is mainly exposed on the surface of tumor cells. The binding of PD-1 to its ligand PD-L1 affects the downstream signaling pathway through dephosphorylation of key molecules and inhibits T-cell receptor/CD28 signaling. Thus, it acts as a negative immune response regulator, leading to immune escapement of neoplastic cells., Immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs, anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies, have been developed and found to be efficacious in treating a variety of human cancers. Glycosyltransferase 1 domain-containing 1 (GLT1D1) was found to be highly up-regulated in early relapsed DLBCL. GLT1D1 transfers N-linked glycans to PD-L1, which was found to promote the immunosuppressive function of glycosylated PD-L1 and attenuates the cytotoxic function of T cells against lymphoma cells. Thus, inhibition of GLT1D1 activity may be a new therapeutic direction for DLBCL.
Multiple myeloma
Plasma cell disease is a heterogeneous group of diseases of plasma cell origin caused by the over-proliferation of clonal plasma cells or that produce immunoglobulins. Monoclonal immunoglobulins or their fragments (called M-proteins) are emitted in most cases in serum or urine, with some end-organ damage. The synthesis and secretion of excess, structurally homogeneous M-protein is a common feature of plasma cell disease. IgG is the most abundant in serum immunoglobulins. The decrease or deficiency of IgG makes individuals susceptible to repetitive infections, demonstrating its role in immune defense. Glycosylation is important for the functional realization of IgG. It was previously reported that IgG from selected myeloma patients had a high degree of fucosylation in the Fab fraction. Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with bone disease showed less galactose on IgG than patients without bone disease. Moreover, less sialic acid on IgG was found in MM patients, compared to healthy control. Fucosylation glycosylation-modified IgG could play a role in myeloma development. Compared to IgG, IgA subtypes in MM are relatively rare. The level of IgA could have value, but more studies are needed. A study that collected sera from 35 patients with monoclonal IgA, isolated and purified IgA, and found that patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) had less sialylated IgA than healthy volunteers.
In addition to exploring the mechanisms of plasma cell disease development, glycosylation can also be potentially valuable in its diagnosis and staging. For example, serum N-glycoprotein changes were significant in the pathologic findings of IgD-MM. Different N-glycans levels correspond to different peaks and can be used in the differential diagnosis of IgD-MM and light chain (LC)-MM.
Light-chain amyloidosis
Light-chain amyloidosis (AL) is caused by the misfolding of immunoglobulin LCs. A study using cryo-electron microscopy to demonstrate the structure of λ1-AL amyloid fibrils showed that N-glycosylation acts as a key regulator in fibrin misfolding. A study using MASS-FIX, an immunoenrichment-based matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, confirmed the LC N-glycosylation in 5% of MASS-FIX-positive patients with clinically significant rare monoclonal diseases including AL amyloidosis and cold agglutinin disease. In addition, Nevone et al. revealed the specific sequence and spatial pattern of N-glycosylation in amyloidogenic κ LCs, where the majority of N-glycosylation sites are located in framework region 3, specifically inside the E chain. Monoclonal LC N-glycosylation is a detrimental element for progression to AL amyloidosis, myeloma, and other plasma cell diseases, and it is hoped that these findings will yield an earlier diagnosis and minimize morbidity and mortality. Single-cell RNA sequencing presented the upregulation of transcriptional program of glycosylation-modified, tumor-associated plasma cells in AL, which may provide a new direction for understanding plasma cell development and transcriptional reorganization. Although important links between glycosylation and plasma cell disease have been identified, the precise functions and molecular mechanisms involved still require more detailed studies to be fully elucidated.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms
Typical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are classified as chronic myeloid leukemia, polycythaemia vera, primary thrombocytosis, and primary myelofibrosis. JAK2(V617F) point mutation is strongly associated with MPN. Cell surface type I cytokine receptors such as erythropoietin receptor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR), and thrombopoietin receptor are homodimers. When cytokines bind to their receptors, JAK2 forms a dimer and phosphorylates each other, which in turn activates STAT5 to exert transcription factor activity and ultimately causes the generation, proliferation and differentiation of the corresponding hematopoietic progenitor cells. JAK2, myeloproliferative leukemia protein (MPL), and CALR were found in close correlation with the development, progression and regression of MPN, and all of them were involved in glycosylation, and the activation of JAK-STAT may be the central link in the pathogenesis of MPN. Mutations in the CALR gene encoding the ER-resident chaperone protein calreticulin are associated with most MPN, and deletion and insertion of its exon 9 leads to the 21/12 transition. The mutated calreticulin activates MPL by binding to the N-glycosylation site of MPL through its new C-terminus, particularly the two Asn residues of N-117 and N-178, which in turn induces ligand-independent activation of the JAK2-STAT/ PI3K and MAPK pathways. In mutant CALR-transformed cells, genes that have undergone N-glycosylation are depleted to varying degrees. Chemical inhibition of N-glycosylation expression on the surface of MPL cells impairs the growth of mutant CALR-transformed cells.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a polypeptide chain of granulocyte growth factor that mobilizes a variety of bone marrow precursor cells by binding to the G-CSFR to promote the proliferation, differentiation and migration of granulocytes and enhance the function of mature granulocytes. CSF3R is the gene encoding G-CSFR, and acquired mutations in CSF3R have been associated with malignant events. Mutations in CSF3R are common in patients with chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) or atypical CML. CSF3R T618I mutation is a point mutation in the proximal extra-membrane structural region, as T618I is located at the O-glycosylation site, and glycosylation changes at this site are associated with tumorigenesis. There is also a rarer point mutation at N610 of CSF3R, as the Asn residue at N610 is N-linked. The mutation disrupts the N-glycan as part of the consensus glycosylation motif, losing its role in folding, transport and thermodynamic stabilization of the protein. These N610 mutants allow CSF3R to activate independently of its ligand G-CSF, promoting tumor cell expansion through the JAK-STAT signaling, with potent oncogenicity. Kinase inhibitors can prevent the growth of cells possessing this mutation., Point mutations in CSF3R T618I and CSF3R N610 hyperactivate CSF3R, resulting in cytokine-independent growth of leukemia cells. The above studies revealed the critical function of N-glycosylation in maintaining the normal function of CSF3R, and provide a basis for conducting studies on the regulation of glycans in receptors.
Glycosylation in solid malignancies
Glycosylation changes associated with cancer were first identified more than 50 years ago. Today, aberrant alterations in glycosylation are widely recognized in various cancers. These alterations include truncated O-glycans, altered N-glycan branching, and the incorporation of aberrant glycan chains., Tumor cells may experience aberrant glycosylation due to several factors, firstly, including the aberrant expression of GTs and hydrolases, changes to the peptide backbone or glycan chain backbone, and variability in substrates and donor availability.– Recognizing abnormal glycosylation as a hallmark of cancer has been pivotal. In-depth investigation into the mechanisms of glycosylation in cancer development is now a critical aspect of tumor biology research.,
Respiratory neoplasms
Lung cancer is a prevalent malignant tumor that is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. The role of glycosylation in lung cancer has been an area of significant research interest, and several important findings have been made in recent years. Studies have shown that lung cancer cells often exhibit altered glycosylation patterns compared to normal lung cells., These changes include variations in N-linked and O-linked glycosylation, which can affect the behavior of cancer cells, including their growth, invasion, and metastasis. For instance, changes in the glycosylation of adhesion molecules can influence the ability of cancer cells to detach from the primary tumor and spread to other parts of the body. Importantly, aberrant glycosylation in lung cancer can help the tumor evade immune detection and induce resistance to immunotherapy including ICIs. Glycosylation of PD-L1 is a major mechanism that induces its stabilization, reduces the detection by PD-L1 antibody and consequently results in immune escape. Removing the N-linked glycosylation significantly enhanced anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy efficacy. In addition, changes in glycosylation patterns in lung cancer cells also have potential as biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis. Certain glycan structures have been identified that are uniquely present or altered in lung cancer, which could aid in detecting the disease early and predicting patient outcomes., Ongoing studies continue to uncover more about how glycosylation influences lung cancer at the molecular level, which may shed light on new therapeutical targets and strategies.
Gastrointestinal tumor
As reported previously, the digestive system cancers often exhibit altered glycosylation patterns, which affect cell signaling, adhesion, and invasion, playing a crucial role in cancer development and progression.– For instance, increased sialylation and fucosylation of glycoproteins and glycolipids on cancer cells can enhance cell ability to detach, invade, and form metastases in colorectal cancer., Modified glycan structures on the surface of cancer cells can impair the immune system’s ability to recognize and target them, facilitating tumor growth and survival., Glycosylation in digestive system cancers also affects the tumor microenvironment, affecting tumor growth and response to therapy. The aberrant glycosylation pathways in digestive system cancers present new targets for therapeutic intervention.
Moreover, sialylation is mediated by sialyltransferases, and increased overall sialylation, particularly ST6Gal-I-mediated α2,6-linked sialylation is strongly associated with gastrointestinal tract cancers, as well as being a marker of poor prognosis., Further cellular and animal experiments have also shown that ST6Gal-I is associated with invasiveness and metastasis in gastrointestinal tumor., It was found that most hemagglutinins showed diminished binding to β-galactosides ending in α 2,6-sialic acid. ST6Gal-I adds an α2,6-sialic acid to the terminal galactose of the N-glycan, a modification that prevents binding of hemagglutinin to β-galactoside and resists galectin-mediated apoptosis.
sLeX is a ligand for selectin, a vascular cell adhesion molecule belonging to the family of C-type lectins. The production of the selectin-recognized sLeX and sLea tetrasaccharides induced by increased sialylation of the outer chains of the N-glycan branches may also be one of the mechanisms that enhance the progression of the cancer process. The high expression of sLeX and sLea in tumor cells correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. sLeX interacts with selectin to induce cancer cell adhesion to platelets and arrest on endothelial cells, regulating tumor cell metastasis in colorectal carcinoma. sLea, or carbohydrate antigen19-9 (CA19-9), is the commonly used biomarker for pancreatic cancer, and high expression is also detected in gastrointestinal tumors. The CA19-9 locus has now become one of the research targets for cancer therapy, and therapeutic strategies such as antibodies and vaccines, and CA19-9-guided nanoparticles are emerging.
Reproductive cancers
The reproductive cancers, including cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers in women, and prostate cancer in men, exhibit varied incidence rates. The role of glycosylation in cancers of the reproductive system has been the subject of significant research, revealing critical insights into how these complex biochemical modifications influence the development, and treatment of these cancers.,
Endometrial cancer
Altered glycosylation patterns in endometrial cancer have been identified, with changes in N-linked and O-linked glycosylation affecting tumor growth and the potential to metastasize., These alterations in glycosylation patterns can also impact the immune system’s ability to recognize and respond to the tumor. Changes in glycosylation patterns in reproductive system cancers offer potential as biomarkers. For instance, certain glycosylation patterns in ovarian and endometrial cancers may aid in early diagnosis, monitor disease progression, and predict response to therapy.– Targeting specific glycosylation pathways and enzymes involved in glycosylation has shown promise in preclinical models, suggesting potential therapeutic strategies. It is also worth noticing that the altered glycosylation in these cancers not only contributes to tumor progression but also impacts the fertility and overall quality of life of patients, making it a critical area of research for patient-centric therapies.
Ovarian cancer
Aberrant glycosylation has been observed in ovarian cancer, particularly in the form of altered sialylation and fucosylation patterns. These changes in glycosylation affect cell adhesion, migration, and invasion, which are critical for tumor metastasis.,
Prostate cancer
In prostate cancer, changes in glycosylation, particularly in the forms of complex N-glycans, have been linked to tumor progression and metastasis. Specific glycan structures, such as increased branching and sialylation, have been associated with more aggressive diseases.,,
Breast cancer
Abnormal glycosylation in breast cancer impacts cell signaling, adhesion, and immune recognition, contributing to the cancer’s aggressiveness., Moreover, aberrant glycosylation enables breast cancer cells to evade immune detection, facilitating tumor progression., Current biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis and treatment still lack applicability and precision. Glycosylation patterns in breast cancer are potential biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring, with unique glycan structures identified in breast cancer cells. Targeted therapies aiming at these altered glycosylation pathways, such as inhibiting specific glycosylation enzymes, show promise in reducing tumor growth and enhancing treatment efficacy. Furthermore, research suggests glycosylation characteristics might vary among breast cancer subtypes, like TNBC indicating the possibility of subtype-specific treatment approaches.,
Basement membrane degradation and myoepithelial cell reduction are key features of breast cancer progression, and glycosylation plays a role in disrupting cell-cell adhesion and cell polarity, driving breast cancer progression., E-calmodulin is a cell surface glycoprotein that is essential in mammary cell development and epithelial cell dissemination. When E-calmodulin undergoes down-regulation of O-mannosylation and an increase in N-branched complex glycans, its signaling is aberrant and cell cycle progression is dysregulated. Breast cancer cells present upregulation of glycolysis, prompting some glucose to enter the HBP, increasing the level of O-GlcNAc and enhancing the expression of OGT, regulating cell metabolism, promoting tumor cell growth and accelerating cancer progression. Studies have shown that OGT can be inhibited by targeting the oncogenic transcription factor FoxM1, which is a potential new therapeutic target for breast cancer. These insights affirm glycosylation’s pivotal role in breast cancer pathophysiology.
The figure of glycosylation is very common in breast cancer cell metastasis and invasion. Matteo Rossi et al. found that deletion of phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) in breast cancer patients promotes metastatic spread of tumor cells. Low expression of PHGDH loses its interaction with phosphofructokinase, which activates the hexosamine-sialic acid pathway, and increases sialylation of integrin αvβ3, thus facilitating cancer cell migration and invasion. Paweł et al. found that podoplanin (PDPN) from a subpopulation of breast cancer tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) promotes cancer lymphangiogenesis and distant metastasis through attachment to lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). And this process is predicated on the presence of a large amount of O-glycosylation in the extracellular structural domain of PDPN. Klára et al. found metastatic site specificity of N-glycosylation in breast cancer metastasis. While high-mannose glycans were most frequently elevated in breast cancer metastases, it was the increase in core fucosylation that was more pronounced in bone metastases. This suggests the importance of glycosylation as a diagnostic marker for metastatic breast cancer.
Inhibition of glycosylation has potential in tumor immunosuppression. Li et al. found that targeting glycosylated PD-L1 and blocking PD-L1/PD-1 interactions promoted PD-L1 internalization and degradation, and was able to eradicate TNBC cells. Monoclonal antibodies targeting glycosylation have become another direction of immune checkpoint therapy. Targeting glycosylation may be a strategy to combat breast cancer drug resistance. Researchers have found that upregulation of dolichyl-phosphate N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (DPAGT1) maintains high levels of HER2 shedding, which produces trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. And this process relies on DPAGT1 to induce N-glycosylation levels of the shedding enzyme, ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 (ADAM10). Blocking the glycosylation level may be a new direction to combat trastuzumab resistance. Naoomi et al. found that by inhibiting the expression of ribophorin II (RPN2), the level of N-glycosylation of the tetraspanin CD63 could be reduced, leading to the localization of multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) to be moved out of the cell surface, and decreasing drug resistance in malignant breast cancer cells. Glycosylation plays a variety of roles in the process of breast cancer occurrence, progression and migration, and also provides a variety of new target directions for tumor therapy, which still requires in-depth study of its mechanism to explore its endless clinical potential in the future.
Central nervous system tumors
Aberrant glycosylation in central nervous system (CNS) tumors has been linked to tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. For instance, alterations in the glycosylation of cell surface proteins can influence the way cancer cells interact with their environment, facilitating invasion into surrounding brain tissue. Glycosylation can significantly impact the tumor microenvironment in the CNS. This includes altering interactions with immune cells, impacting the blood-brain barrier, and influencing the response to therapies. Glycosylation in CNS tumors also affects how these tumors interact with normal neural cells. For instance, altered glycosylation patterns in CNS tumors have potential as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, and also offer potential therapeutic targets. However, it’s worth noting that there is considerable heterogeneity in glycosylation patterns among different types of CNS tumors. This variability reflects the diverse origins and characteristics of these tumors and has implications for treatment and prognosis. The study of glycosylation in CNS tumors is complex due to the intricate nature of the brain and its environment.
Neuroendocrine neoplasms
Research on glycosylation in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) highlights its critical role in tumor behavior and patient outcomes. NENs display altered glycosylation patterns, including changes in N-linked and O-linked glycosylation, which influence tumor proliferation, differentiation, and metastasis. These glycosylation changes also present potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, and offer novel therapeutic targets, particularly in disrupting tumor growth and spread. Additionally, glycosylation in NENs intersects with hormonal pathways and regulating the immune response, impacting the efficacy of hormonal and immunotherapies. The heterogeneity in glycosylation patterns among different NENs further underscores its significance in the pathogenesis and treatment of these tumors.
Sarcoma
Investigation of the roles of glycosylation in sarcoma, including osteosarcoma, is an emerging field that has already provided key insights. Sarcoma, like other cancer types, often displays altered glycosylation patterns. These changes can significantly impact tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Specifically, modifications in the glycosylation of cell adhesion molecules may enhance sarcoma cells’ ability to metastasize by altering their interaction with the surrounding environment., Glycosylation also affects sarcoma cells’ interactions within the tumor microenvironment, influencing growth and therapeutic response., In osteosarcoma, glycosylation is believed to contribute to disease pathogenesis and progression, but the detailed mechanisms and effects are less clear compared to other cancers. The field is still evolving, and further research may provide novel diagnostic and treatment approaches for this disease.
Glycosylation in autoimmune diseases
Autoimmune diseases are caused by the immune response to autoantibodies, which resulting in damage to tissues. Immunoglobulin (Ig), the most abundant glycoprotein in serum, plays a crucial role in humoral immunity, and glycosylation can regulate the function of Ig-mediated cellular and humoral responses. These glycosylation changes can modify immunoglobulin G (IgG)’s binding affinity to Fcγ fragment receptors (FcγR) or C1q complement, thus influencing IgG’s role in regulating immune cell activities towards pro- or anti-inflammatory responses. Specifically, the IgG1 Fc segment at Asn-297, composed of GlcNAc and mannose, can undergo further glycan modifications. Such alterations in the Fc segment’s glycosylation can impact its affinity for FcγR, with reduced sialylation, for instance, enhancing pro-inflammatory FcγR activation.–
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a long-term autoimmune disorder that affects the joints, shows significant glycosylation alterations in IgG molecules, particularly in the Fc region, marked by reduced galactose and sialic acid. These changes enhance pro-inflammatory responses and are linked to RA’s severity. Additionally, these glycosylation variations, influenced by genetic and environmental factors, open avenues for personalized medicine in RA management. Compared with healthy controls, RA patients showed specific glycosylation patterns, such as lower galactosylation, lower sialylation, and higher IgG fucosylation., The first report on the abnormal N-glycosylation of serum IgG in patients with RA was published in 1985.
For diagnosing RA, rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated polypeptide antibodies are the most reliable autoantibodies. Despite being clinically manageable, RA lacks a cure, underscoring the need to investigate its pathogenesis. Low expression of N-glycosylated sialylation is a pathogenetic feature of immunoglobulin to in RA patients., A study comparing IgG glycosylation in RA patients and healthy individuals revealed that IgG RF with decreased sialylation correlates with heightened RF activity. Additionally, elevated serum C-reactive protein levels intensify arthritic symptoms. In contrast, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies exhibit abnormally low sialylated Fc glycans, promoting osteoclastogenesis and susceptibility to inflammatory bone loss., However, studies found no significant link between IgA glycosylation and RA activity.
The synovium, a specialized mesenchymal tissue in the joint cavity, is maintained by synovial fibroblasts (SFs), which preserve a homeostatic environment in healthy joints but become pro-inflammatory in RA. This transformation is linked to a decrease in the cytokine TNF-dependent glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I and α2-6 sialylation, altering glycosylation and turning the synovial membrane pro-inflammatory. The shift may be due to healthy SFs having high levels of core fucosylation or terminal sialylation, regulated by TNF. This results in reduced sialylation of CD90+ SFs in the sub synovial layer, contributing to the pathological changes observed in RA.
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is classified as an autoimmune disease involving innate and adaptive immunity, characterized by symptoms like rashes, nephritis, and arthritis, largely due to excessive autoantibodies and immune complexes, notably anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies., Despite its high mortality and relapse rates, specific preventive or therapeutic measures for SLE are lacking. Research into altered glycosylation in SLE seeks to understand its mechanisms. A study utilizing quantitative mass spectrometry for glycan chain analysis, along with cluster analysis and machine learning, assessed the link between glycosylation of anti-dsDNA IgG and SLE activity. A significant positive correlation was observed between the level of fucosylation in anti-dsDNA IgG1 and SLE disease activity.
Defects in N-glycosylation is associated with immune system dysregulation in SLE patients. The enzyme alpha-Mannosidase II, crucial for complex N-glycosylation through mannose residue removal, plays a key role. Mice deficient in alpha-Mannosidase II exhibit N-glycosylation anomalies, leading to an autoimmune disease resembling human SLE. Additionally, a study on lupus nephritis revealed that renal tissues from lupus nephritis patients are rich in mannosylation, a feature absent in other renal diseases. This is thought to result from inadequate complex N-glycosylation combined with mature O-glycosylation. Additional research suggests that complex N-glycosylation plays a protective role against autoimmune diseases like SLE by preventing endogenous non-autoimmune signals and reducing sterile inflammatory reactions.
Inflammatory bowel disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases characterized by a chronic and prolonged course, mediated by a combination of genetic, immune, and environmental factors, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). The development of IBD is associated with an elevated expression of truncated O-glycans and changes in the expression of terminal glycan structures. A study compared plasma N-glycosylation levels between IBD patients and healthy individuals. Plasma specimens from patients with IBD were found to be characterized by more macroglycans, reduced relative abundance of heterodimeric and high-mannose structures, lower fucosylation, lower galactosylation, and higher levels of sialic acidification. Elevated IgG agalactosylation (G0), decreased IgG monogalactosylation (G1) and digalactosylation (G2) were found in IBD patients., In a retrospective analysis of 3441 plasma samples from patients with IBD, it was found that CD patients showed an increase in core fucosylation of IgG1 and IgG2/3, while UC patients exhibited a decrease in core fucosylation of IgG2/3. The severity of colitis in chemical and T cell-transfer-induced IBD mouse models was found to be less pronounced in Fut8 knockout mice. This finding provides further evidence supporting the involvement of Ig fucosylation in the development of IBD. Sialylation is another possible Ig glycosylation pattern involved in IBD development. Decreased IgG sialylation levels were observed in both CD patients and UC patients.
In addition, there was a significant correlation between antibody glycosylation and disease activity in patients with IBD. For example, increased IgG2/3 agalactosylation, decreased IgG2/3 digalactosylation, or sialylation was associated with disease worsening in CD patients. Furthermore, elevated IgG1 agalactosylation or increased agalactosylated and fucosylated IgG to digalactosylation and fucosylated IgG ratio (G0F/G2F) associated with more extensive in CD patients., CD patients who received infliximab treatment exhibited a significant reduction in the agalactosylation of IgG.
Despite advances in understanding IBD, the role of T cells’ glycosylation-modified structures remains largely unexplored. In IBD, memory CD4+ T cells produce colitis-associated glycoprotein, featuring immature O-glycosylation. CAG aids in forming CD4+ T cell immune synapses, thus promoting memory CD4+ T cell expansion in the inflamed gut and intensifying intestinal inflammation. Additionally, a study in IBD mice found increased core fucosylation on T-cells, essential for signaling, inflammatory factor production, and intestinal inflammation induction. Disruption of glycosylation promotes inflammation by perturbing intestinal barrier function, gut microbiota, glycan-lectin interactions, as well as mucosal immunity in IBD. These findings suggest that both N- and O-glycosylation are crucial in IBD’s pathogenesis, highlighting potential therapeutic targets in glycosylation inhibition.
Autoimmune liver disease
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a parenchymal inflammation of the liver mediated by an autoimmune response against hepatocytes, including primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). AIH is characterized by serum autoantibody positivity, hyperimmunoglobulin G and/or gamma-globulinemia, and the presence of hepatic histology of interfacial hepatitis, with a variety of clinical manifestations., A site-specific glycomic analysis of Ig in patients with autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases demonstrated elevated levels of IgG1 agalactosylation and reduced levels of IgG1 galactosylation in both PBC and PSC patients. PSC patients exhibited higher levels of IgG2 fucosylation compared to PBC patients. Conversely, decreased glycosylation of IgG3/4 was observed in PBC patients. In addition, elevated IgA 1/2 bisecting glycoforms, declined IgA diantennary glycoforms, and increased IgA 1/2 asialylation levels were observed in PBC patients. The presence of IgG2 agalactosylation showed a positive correlation with various stages of PBC, indicating the potential significance of Ig glycoforms as biomarkers and for monitoring disease progression in autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases.
Another study revealed the regulatory role of glycosylation in the pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis by establishing an O-GlcNAc glycosylation-deficient rat model.
The severity of AIH is linked to the activity of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. While the exact role of glycosylation in AIH is unclear, recent studies have shed light on its significance. Research using an O-GlcNAc glycosylation-deficient rat model revealed that a lack of this glycosylation intensifies liver damage and prolongs recovery in AIH. This glycosylation deficit increases CD4+ T cell infiltration and impacts Treg differentiation, thus disrupting the Notch signaling in CD4+ T cells and accelerating AIH progression. Further, O-glycosylation inhibitors have been shown to worsen AIH, potentially due to altered cytokine levels and T-cell proliferation.
Myasthenia gravis
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that affects neuromuscular transmission. The most common subtype of MG is the production of autoantibodies directed against the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and is controlled primarily by the IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses., In addition to this, autoantibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) are also present in many patients. Unlike AChR MG, MuSK MG isoforms are most often associated with IgG4 subclass autoantibodies., The level of Fab glycosylation of IgG4 antibodies was significantly elevated in MuSK MG, but this change was not found in the IgG subclass of AChR MG. One study explains that it may be related to the fact that the MuSK antigen is positively charged and the AChR antigen has a negative charge.–
MG patients have an increased frequency of N-linked glycosylation of IgG V regions (IgG-VN-Glyc) which may be associated with biased use of V gene fragments and somatic hypermutation. However, it has been experimentally confirmed that the binding of MG autoantigen-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to autoantigens is not altered by glycosylation. One study evaluated for the first time the changes in IgG Fc N-glycosylation in MG, observing low levels of IgG2 galactosylation.
Nephropathy
IgG glycosylation plays an important role in the occurrence of kidney injury. Galactosylation, sialylation, and level of bisecting GlcNAc of the IgG glycans significantly correlate with renal function. One of the causative mechanisms of IgA nephropathy may be abnormal O-glycosylation of IgA1. The IgA1 O-glycosylation chain is truncated, resulting in increased terminal GalNAc and insufficient galactosylation. This overproduction and increased systemic presence of low O-glycosylated galactose-deficient IgA1 is recognized by anti-glycan autoantibodies, which form macromolecular IgA1 immune complexes that deposit in the glomerular mesangium, leading to renal inflammation and scarring.
Glycosylation in other diseases
In addition to the above alterations in glycosylation in tumors and autoimmune diseases, this PTM is increasingly being studied in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. For example, it has been found that patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus have a relatively low abundance of simple dual antennae N-glycan (NA2), while complex multibranched, galactosylated, and sialylated modifications are characterized by a higher relative abundance of N-glycans. In chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, the distribution of IgG galactosylation is closely associated with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, demonstrating the pro-inflammatory properties of IgG N-glycosylation. In summary, glycosylation is involved in the occurrence and development of a variety of diseases. Further exploration of the value of glycosylation in disease diagnosis and prognosis is expected to provide a new choice for treatment strategy.
Cardiovascular diseases
Glycosylation plays a role in transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, and energy metabolism, and is closely related to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Among them, the role of O-GlcNAcylation in CVD is very important, but the mechanism is still not completely clear. Several studies have suggested a potential role for O-GlcNAcylation in cardiomyopathy through regulation of mitochondrial energy, autophagy, or gene expression., Decreased activity and expression levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) when modified by O-GlcNAcylation and down-regulation of its expression in the myocardium may be involved in the formation of cardiac hypertrophy. Chen et al. also confirmed that the increase of O-GlcNAcylation in cardiomyocytes is related to myocardial hypertrophy, and hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia can lead to the enhancement of protein O-GlcNAcylation, thus suggesting the importance of dietary control in the treatment of myocardial hypertrophy. In addition to cardiomyopathy, O-GlcNAcylation has also been shown to be associated with coronary microvascular disease. Reduced degradation of P53 protein modified by O-GlcNAcylation induces coronary microvascular disease and impairment of myocardial contractility. O-GlcNAcylation-modified synaptosome-associated protein 29 interferes with autophagic responses and impairs myocardial diastolic function.
Changes in protein glycosylation could affect the interactions between blood cells and basement membranes or soluble plasma proteins, modulating blood viscosity, promoting local cell adhesion and inducing pro-inflammatory responses, leading to plasma cell extravasation, which is an important determinant of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction.– For example, the shear stress of sialidase affects cellular desialylation, leading to cell membrane stiffness and increased susceptibility to lysis and inflammation.
Glycosylation of IgG is also associated with the pathophysiology of myocardial infarction. Some analyses have shown decreased serum galactosylation and increased levels of sialylation, fucosylation, and N-acetylglucosamine in patients with myocardial infarction. Three IgG N-glycosylation types associated with CVD were identified in a prospective study, with gender-specific associations. In conclusion, N-glycosylation of IgG may affect the risk of CVD, which may be an additional therapeutic target.
The key to clinical intervention in CVDs, such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, is the application of thrombolytic enzymes in the acute phase to dissolve clots. Although drugs such as alteplase and urokinase are widely used today, they still suffer from insufficient clot dissolution rate and high risk of side effects. Glycosylation engineering could play a role in improving thrombolytic enzyme performance and resolving glycan covalent linkages. For example, tenecteplase, the most successful glycosylated engineered variant of alteplase, carries a total of six point-mutations in three different regions of the original base: Thr103Asn, Asn117Gln, and tetra-alanine substitution Lys296Ala+His297Ala+Arg298Ala+Arg299Ala. These glycosylation sites lead to a longer half-life of tenecteplase and significantly improved fibrin selectivity.,
Metabolic diseases
The incidence of metabolic diseases is increasing as a result of rapid economic development, population ageing and dietary adjustments. Metabolic diseases have a long course, affect the functioning of systemic systems, which means the prevention and control of these diseases will be of great benefit. Glycosylation, as one of the common types of PTMs, plays an important role in the development of metabolic diseases.
The EPIC-Potsdam study established a weighted score consisting of five IgG N-glycosylation characteristic glycans of type 2 diabetes and validated the association between the model and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. IgG N-glycosylation is strongly associated with the incidence of diabetes. O-GlcNAcylation regulates pancreatic β-cell survival and function and affects insulin secretion. Decreased total insulin content and impaired glucose tolerance were found in transgenic mice overexpressing OGA in pancreatic islet β-cells in young month-old mice. With increasing months of age, O-GlcNAcylation in pancreatic islets increased and β-cell function was gradually restored. This suggests an important effect of O-GlcNAcylation on pancreatic islet function. O-GlcNAcylation is also a nutrient-sensing response, and studies have shown that induced removal of OGT decreases O-GlcNAcylation levels of lipid droplet-associated perilipin 1, leading to enhanced visceral lipolysis. Targeting OGT emerges as a potential target for the treatment of obesity.
Glycosylation also plays a role in lipid metabolism. It has been found that apolipoproteins, one of the key HDL-associated proteins, contain seven mucin-type O-glycosylation sites that correlate with HDL functional capacity and are not affected by short-term diet. The GALNT2 gene has been identified as a plasma lipid-related locus that encodes GalNAc-T2, which catalyzes GalNAc linkage in O-glycosylation and is a regulator of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) metabolism. GALNT2 deficiency decreases the levels of HDL-C and phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP). Perhaps this suggests that GALNT2 affects HDL-C levels by regulating PLTP, which provides new therapeutic directions for dyslipidemia.
Neurodegenerative diseases
Normal brain function depends on protein homeostasis and high levels of glucose. The nutrient-sensitive O-GlcNAcylation pathway senses changes in glucose levels and utilizes glucose to convert and synthesize it into UDP-GlcNAc, which is added to proteins and completes PTM of proteins. This has been linked to the deposition of protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease(AD), Parkinson’s disease(PD), and Huntington’s diseases.
One of the characteristic changes in the brains of AD patients is that the microtubule-associated protein tau is abnormally hyperphosphorylated and aggregates into neurofibrillary tangles, and it has been found that this may be based on reduced levels of O-GlcNAcylation. A low glucose uptake-induced decrease in O-GlcNAcylation, which negatively regulates tau phosphorylation in a site-specific manner in vitro and in vivo, occurs in a mouse model mimicking AD, leading to excessively elevated levels of its phosphorylation. The OGA inhibitor Thiamet-G was also shown to block tau protein hyperphosphorylation in vivo. Another characteristic change in the brain of AD patients is the deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ) as neuritic plaques, and it was found that O-GlcNAcylation enzyme inhibitors could also inhibit this process. Kim et al. applied the O-GlcNAcylation enzyme inhibitor, NButGT, to AD mice, and analyzed that NButGT acted on the S708 residue of nicotinic acid proteins to reduce the activity of γ-secretase and decrease the production of Aβ. The above results suggest that O-GlcNAcylation may be a potential target for the treatment of AD.
However, data from different models of neurodegenerative diseases suggest that increased levels of O-GlcNAcylation can also have a negative effect on disease. For example, in a model of Caenorhabditis elegans models, the absence of OGT enzyme activity associated with increased O-GlcNAc levels attenuates proteotoxicity. The characteristic manifestation of PD is Lewy bodies, the formation of cytoplasmic perinuclear inclusion bodies in neurons, which are predominantly α-synuclein. O-GlcNAcylation may affect the degradation of α-synuclein. By inhibiting OGA enzyme activity associated with reduced O-GlcNAc levels, total α-synuclein levels are increased. In conclusion, O-GlcNAcylation has been associated with the progression of a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, and it is crucial to study its regulation in depth and to grasp the pathophysiological process of diseases caused by O-GlcNAcylation dysregulation.
Potential diagnostic value of glycosylation as a biomarker
As mentioned above, abnormalities in glycosylation are crucial in several human diseases. Accumulating studies indicated the value of glycosylation in disease diagnosis and prognosis. A variety of glycoproteins have been used as tumor markers in clinical diagnoses and predictor activities, such as alpha-fetoprotein in liver cancer, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer, or glycol-residue-related markers, such as CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer.,
Combining serum IgG galactosylation with quantitative changes in CA125 may provide a more effective differential diagnosis for ovarian cancer, with the diagnostic specificity improved from 65.2% (CA125 test alone) to 84.6%. The large-sample-based analysis further confirmed that the distribution of IgG galactosylation could serve as a non-invasive pan-cancer biomarker for early cancer detection and cancer screening. The diagnostic and prognostic value of glycosyltransferase-related genes were evaluated in several tumors, which may also provide good biomarkers for individualized medicine.,
In addition, several studies have indicated the prognostic value and clinical relevance of ST6Gal-I. ST6Gal-I was demonstrated to enhance HIF-1α signaling, thereby protecting ovarian and pancreatic tumor cells against hypoxic stress. The glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I is upregulated in ovarian and pancreatic cancers and expressed at high levels in metastatic tumors. In addition, the glycosylation patterns of glycoproteins associated with circulating extracellular vesicles, as well as mucins, present potential targets for the development of detection methods. Detection of glycosylation cancer-associated mucin 1, mucin 16 and CD63 may contribute to the accurate and effective differentiation of primary breast cancer. Inadequate glycosylation of MUC1 leads to exposure to novel epitopes that can be used as specific targets for treatment and diagnosis. The subcellular localization of tumor-associated MUC1 is significantly different from that of normal cells. Alirezapour et al. synthesized 64Cu-DOTA-PR81, a tracer by combining 64Cu labeling with PR81(a high-affinity mAb to MUC1), and showed high sensitivity and specificity in tumor diagnosis.,
In addition to the detection of markers in serum, the specific glycoproteins contained in urine and saliva, which are non-invasive specimens, would simplify the screening and monitoring of pathologies., The combination of glycosylation detection and current diagnostic tools can better manage diseases and promote accurate diagnosis and treatment of diseases and efficacy monitoring.
Potential prognostic value of glycosylation
A variety of glycosylation-modifying proteins have been used for cancer-specific diagnosis, meanwhile, several studies have explored the prognostic value of GTs expression levels in cancer. Recently, a prognostic signature in HCC based on six GTs was established, which showed a good performance in predicting OS. Seventeen glycosyltransferases, which play a role in the initial stages of N- or O-glycosylation, as well as glycolipid biosynthesis and sialylation, were unequivocally identified as being associated with a poor prognosis in malignancy. Among them, ALG3, GALNT2, B4GALNT1, POFUT1, B4GALT5, B3GNT5 and ST3GAL2 as the most consistently malignancy-associated enzymes, compared to the published experimental data points.
In addition to glycosyltransferases, characteristic glycosylation of IgG can serve as a prognostic biomarker. Theodoratou et al. demonstrated that IgG with reduced galactosylation, reduced levels of sialylation, and increased bifurcated GlcNAc was strongly correlated with all-cause and colorectal cancer mortality, with a good predictive effect. FUTs are also considered as an essential biomarker for the detection and prediction of several types of cancer, because altered protein fucosylation is a characteristic of cancer. Overexpression of FUT3 is linked to reduced overall survival in TNBC patients. FUT8 was significantly associated with poor survival in non-small cell lung cancer.
In addition, the expression of glycosylation genes may be associated with cancer prognosis. Zhao et al. identified three subtypes of glycosylation-regulated genes that are highly compatible with the immunophenotypes of HCC and further constructed glycosylation-related model scores. Another study, also for HCC, used bioinformatics analysis to construct a five-gene signature that predicted the prognosis of patients with HCC and delineated risk stratification. In lung adenocarcinoma, a risk model based on differentially expressed GTs-related genes was conducted, which could predict the survival rate of patients. Both the use of GTs as effective prognostic markers for tumors and the construction of a genetic prognostic model for glycosylation exemplify the potential of glycosylation in assessing cancer prognosis. It is important to explore the potential of glycosylated proteins as biomarkers for human diseases (Table 1).
Targeting glycosylation for the treatment of diseases
Glycan-based therapies are approaches with great potential in the treatment of cancer, including protein glycosylation inhibitors, small molecule inhibitors of glycosyltransferases, glycosylation-modified mAbs, glycosylation-mediated targeted drug delivery, and vaccine design (Table 2). The choice between glycosylation-related targeted treatments and other targeted treatments depends on the specific molecular characteristics of the tumor, the general health status of patients, and the potential benefits and risks.
Inhibitors of protein glycosylation
Inhibitors of the glycosylation mechanism have been proved to be efficacy in cancer treatment. Among them, most are small-molecule proteins that are readily taken up by cells, thus providing an opportunity for researchers to design drugs. A variety of protein glycosylation inhibitors are currently under investigation or have been put into clinical use as effective strategies to block cancer progression. Per-O-acetylated GlcNAcbeta1,3Galbeta-O-naphthalenemethanol inhibits sLeX in tumor cells and inhibits hematogenous dissemination of mouse lung cancer cells.
Increased aerobic glycolysis characterizes cancer cells, and 2DG, as a glycolysis inhibitor, became an effective strategy to cause cancer cell death, yet not through direct inhibition of glycolytic processes. 2DG treatment of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus resulted in a dramatic reduction of pathogenic particles, which was further demonstrated to be done by inhibiting the N-glycosylation of viral glycoproteins. 2DG impairs the N-glycosylation of the key oncogenic receptors Axl and Met in SCC15 cells, an oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line, decreasing cell viability and colony-forming ability. Thus, 2DG could be used with other drugs to synergistically treat the disease. In addition, 2DG in combination with metformin inhibits protein N-glycosylation and induces an unfolded protein response, which combined with adequate energy stress results in mitochondrial enlargement and improved anti-tumor immunity.
Overexpression of mucin glycans is an important mechanism for cancer development, and inhibitors targeting mucin glycans would be very promising therapeutic directions. As an example, MUC1, which is currently the most well-characterized, expresses mainly O-glycosylation and N-glycosylation. Knockdown of O-glycosylation of MUC1 significantly restored chemosensitivity in wild-type WT breast cancer cells, whereas insertion of the O-glycosylation site increased drug resistance. MUC1-based antibodies, radiopharmaceuticals, vaccines and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy are continuously being developed. A mAb (TAB004) specifically targeting human MUC1 was developed, which binds to MUC1 to induce ER stress and anaerobic responses in PAAD cells and inhibit cell proliferation. Salouti et al. generated 99mTc-HYNIC-PR81 by radiolabeling PR81, an antibody specific for MUC1, with 99mTc, which improved the stability and immunoreactivity of PR81. DNA vaccine (pcDNA3.1-VNTR) controls tumor growth and extends survival time in mice by enhancing MUC1-induced CTL activity. Novel CAR-T cells targeting MUC1-Tn inhibit the growth of MUC1-Tn-positive cancer cells in leukemia and PAAD mouse models. In conclusion, targeted therapies based on inhibition of MUC1 glycosylation are promising, but further in-depth studies are needed to obtain more robust therapeutic responses.
Small molecule inhibitors of enzymes
Glycosidases and GTs are key enzymes in the glycosylation process, and their expression levels regulate the function, properties, stability, and localization of glycosylated proteins. Several studies of small molecule inhibitors targeting these enzymes have been conducted, which provide novel strategies for cancer treatment. Shi’s team found that knocking down the MAN2A1 gene, which encodes the N-glycan maturation enzyme, resulted in the deletion of MAN2a1 in cancer cells, but increased the infiltration of tumor cytotoxic T-cells under anti-PD-L1 treatment. It further demonstrated the utility of N-glycosylation in combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Pancreatic cancer ductal cells, referred to as Panc1 cells, express core 2 N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-M. When Panc1 cells are subjected to heat shock, the non-muscle myosin IIA-C2GnT-M complex is increased, as is the polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of C2GnT-M, which induces Golgi disruption.
Targeting the enzymes that play a role in angiogenesis and regulating the glycosylation process to achieve anti-angiogenesis, is also a new direction of glycosylation in cancer therapy. The α-glucosidase I inhibitor castanospermine converts high-mannose-type N-glycosylation to complex oligosaccharides, alters endothelial cell proliferation and attachment capacity, prevents angiogenesis, and inhibits tumor growth. The enzymatic activity of GnTs catalyzes the N-glycosylation pattern in proteins, thereby regulating the glycosylation status of key angiogenic factors such as VEGFR2 and Notch.
Glycosylation of mAbs
mAbs are biological agents that are widely used in various diseases and are highly regarded for their specificity, sensitivity and relatively low cross-reactivity. The structure and stability of glycosylation are crucial for the function of mAbs. Altering the Fc glycosylation structure enhances the antibody’s ability to attract innate immune responses. N-glycosylation is the most common form of glycosylation in mAb therapeutics. The CH2 domain of deglycosylated antibodies is less thermally stable, more susceptible to loss of higher structures in space and more susceptible to papain. Kayser’s team found that glycosylated mAbs are less stable and appear to improve solubility and stability, which may be important for long-term storage.
The addition of 2-fluoroperacetylated fucose, an inhibitor of FUT, to cell cultures or transfection of EG2-hFc-producing cells with the prokaryotic GDP- 6-deoxy-D-lyxo-4-hexanone glucose reductase (RMD) gene resulted in a reduction in the level of fucosylation of the antibody glycan in CHO cells in both methods. This alteration enhances antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, Fcγ receptor binding, and affects antibody effector function. Glycosylation in mAbs and common antigens require further research to control these components in vivo and to selectively utilize glycosylation targeting. Moreover, deletion of the intramembrane protease signaling peptide peptidase-like 3, which resides within the Golgi, leads to hyperglycosylation of CD19, an alteration that directly inhibits effector function and suppresses antitumor cytotoxicity in CAR-T cells. Dysregulation of this PTM of glycosylation of the leukocyte differentiation antigen CD19 might be one of the mechanisms of antigen escape from CAR T cell therapy.
Glycosylation-mediated targeted drug delivery
Glycosylated structures are an important part of the tumor cell membrane and selectively bind to the cell. Molecules such as mannose, galactose, and glucose are generally used to bind to the delivery system and are non-toxic, non-immunogenic, and have good histocompatibility. Therefore, targeted drug delivery systems based on glycosylated structures could control drug distribution, maximize therapeutic efficacy, and minimize unfavorable drug behavior. The lectin receptor is one of the targets of glycans, which is important in the immune system. For example, it establishes the first line of defense against microorganisms, recognizes self and non-self, and regulates inflammatory response processes. The lectin receptor and glucose transporter subtype I (GLUT1) are widely studied. Drug delivery systems and glycosidic ligands can form conjugates that selectively concentrate drugs at lesion sites. Lectin receptors exert their targeting properties through covalent binding to mannose and galactose. GLUT1-specific glycans bind to drug carriers to cross the blood-brain barrier for tumor-targeted drug delivery.
Nanoparticles receiving galactosylation or mannosylation modifications loaded with the tumor-specific antigen SIINFEKL peptide (OVA) rapidly enhanced antigen uptake and dendritic cell maturation, and were able to promote the toxic effects of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on lymphoma cells. A tobacco mosaic virus-based drug delivery system with a glycan structure (mannose or lactosylation modification) as the targeting ligand, loaded with the anticancer drug cisplatin, exhibited robust endocytosis and apoptosis in cell lines. The galactose-installed photo-crosslinked pH-sensitive degradable micelles system loaded with paclitaxel indexed significant tumor cell death with less damage to the liver and kidney. Targeting up-regulated glycan transporters in glioblastoma using glucose, mannose or galactose molecules as ligands conjugated to hydroxyl-terminated polyamidoamine dendrimers significantly improves targeting, specificity and aggregation kinetics of tumor macrophages in glioblastoma. Glycosylation-modified polymers are effective nanocarriers for loading anticancer drugs and have important cancer intervention implications. However glycosylated modified proteins may have multiple problems at the same time. For example, multiple recognition problems affect targeting efficiency. Conjugation strategies based on glycosylation may alter the characteristics of the delivery vehicle, such as surface charge or size. It may also produce off-target effects affecting other organs, etc., all of which require further in-depth studies.,
Novel vaccines based on glycosylation
Vaccines prevent various diseases by inducing humoral and/or cellular immunity, with carbohydrates on cell surfaces playing a key role in both innate and adaptive immunity, making them attractive antigens for vaccine development. Covalent linking of carbohydrates to immunogenic proteins enhances their immunogenicity. A study integrated the prostate cancer cell antigen carbohydrate molecule globo H hexasaccharide with keyhole grouper blood blue protein, together with the immune adjuvant QS-21, to patients who have recurred from radiation or surgery. Synthesis of two- or three-component antitumor vaccines with glycopeptides of the tumor-associated mucin MUC1, T-cell epitope peptides, and Pam(3)CSK(4) lipopeptides also produced a strong immune response that induced the killing of tumor cells. Despite numerous glycosylation-based vaccines reaching clinical trials, they predominantly remain in vitro, and none have yet met clinical application criteria. Identifying optimal immune components and assembling effective vaccines to prevent or halt disease progression remains a significant challenge
Glycoconjugate drugs
Despite the remarkable efficacy of most first-line anticancer drugs, the prevalence of “off-target” drug effects has led to the occurrence of serious adverse events such as alopecia, nausea, and vomiting, which have a significant influence on the patient’s quality of life and disease prognosis. To achieve better clinical efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs, glycan conjugation methods of drugs have been figured out. Covalent conjugation of glycan structures to drugs improves drug compatibility, reduces toxicity, and minimizes adverse effects. In 1995, the first glycoconjugate drug, glufosfamide, was reported to be better tolerated, less toxic, and more efficacious, and entered clinical trials. Chloramphenicol with the addition of glycosylated structures such as N-alkoxyamine- and N-acylhydrazine- exhibits a broader tumor specificity, as well as greater potency. Mikuni et al. found that the in vivo potency of galactose-conjugated docetaxel in a mouse leukemia tumor model was superior to paclitaxel in terms of antitumor activity. The addition of polysaccharides to common drugs also enhances the drug’s ability for action. The antacid-alginate combination (under the trade name Gaviscon) is a drug that effectively inhibits gastroesophageal reflux disease by forming a gel that floats on top of the stomach contents. Conjugation with a glycan base greatly reduces the adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to the gastric epithelial cells and improves drug action. Glycoconjugated drugs often improve the water solubility and stability of the drug and may enable selective targeting of tumor cells.
How to design specificity for targeting glycosylated drugs
To deliver therapeutic drugs to cancer cells more effectively while minimizing toxicity and off-target effects of the drugs on normal cells, maximizing the eradication of cancer cells, and improving the specificity of targeted drugs, dual or multiple targeting strategies can be adopted. Systemic administration using dual-targeted heterodimers significantly improves DNA sensing, DC cross-presentation, and anti-tumor T-cell responses, and tumor cell-specific dual-targeting enables better tumor control. Dual/multi-targeted drugs are favorable to solve the problems of limited efficacy, poor safety and drug resistance that a single target has. Based on a full understanding of the structural biology of glycosylation, rational use of bioinformatics tools and proteomic information provides the possibility of designing highly effective and safe multi-targeted anticancer drugs.
Novel detection methods for glycosylation
Glycosylation has emerged as a variety of assays over the course of several years of research, which are briefly summarized below.
Liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry
As mentioned earlier, biomarkers of glycosylation are of great value in tumor diagnosis and prognosis, and thus glycosylation analysis is a critical step. However, this is challenging because of the need to identify both glycosylation sites and glycan structures. Liquid chromatography (LC)is the most widely used technique in the separation of glycopeptides and released glycans., A study has revealed the high performance of three hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) columns for the separation of human IgG glycopeptides, as well as the successful separation of the isomeric A2G1F1 glycopeptide of IgG and the structural potential of the isomeric glycopeptide. Hernandez-Hernandez’s group used HILIC with reversed-phase liquid chromatography to isolate the O-glycopeptide structure of bovine casein myopeptide. Although LC is the most commonly used separation technique for glycoproteomics analysis, it has its limitations. For example, the use of multiple solvents as mobile phases results in higher analytical costs, complicated operation and environmental pollution.
Mass spectrometry (MS) is a method of ionizing molecules in a sample and separating the ions in a magnetic or electric field. It has become a powerful tool in the analysis of saccharides and glycomacroproteomics. A high-throughput matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) method based on microarray technology for the successful detection of N-glycosylated peptides of IgG1 produced during in vitro cell culture. Some studies have used MS to detect glycosylation of serum glycoprotein transferrin and used N-glycosylation levels to determine subtypes of congenital disorders of glycosylation. Kotsias’ research group detected multiple O-glycosylation compositions of in vitro cancer cell lines using ultra-high resolution MALDI-FT-ICR MS, enabling semi-automated, high-throughput glycan identification and quantitative analysis. Some studies have used porous graphitized carbon chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry to analyze the epitopes of N- and O-glycosylation in AML and to identify glycan profiles.
MS ionization is inefficient and MS alone does not always provide complete structural and quantitative information, and needs to be combined with other techniques. For example, the separation step prior to MS, which mainly consists of LC and capillary electrophoresis methods, can more reliably identify and quantify glycans and glycopeptides. In a study using LC-MS/MS for glycosylation analysis, increased expression levels of high mannose and α2,6-linked glycosylated complex N-glycans were observed in colorectal cancer cell lines and tissues. Determination of glycosylation in glycan-conjugated vaccines using solid-phase extraction coupled with LC was performed, and tandem mass spectrometry detected 14 and 12 glycosylation sites in the CRM197 vaccine and tetanus toxin-based vaccine, respectively, and was achieved with high sensitivity and a wide linear dynamic range. Naumann’s group performed high-throughput glycosylation analysis of intact mAbs based on LC and MS in combination with capillary electrophoresis, and efficiently determined the five major glycosylation patterns of the tested antibodies. In addition to this, MS is capable of combining various techniques, such as fluorimetry, electrospray ionization, and isotope-specific labeling, for qualitative and quantitative studies of glycosylation and in-depth characterization.–
Lectin-based techniques
In addition to the traditional approach of using LC to isolate and purify glycoproteins and then MS to identify glycans, a variety of lectin-based assays based on the interaction of glycans and glycan-binding proteins have been developed. For example, lectin microarrays, lectin chromatography and lectin immunosorbent assay are used to detect glycosylation patterns., The development of high-density lectin microarrays is critical for identifying lectins specific to disease-related protein glycosylation., Lectin microarrays enable rapid and simple analysis of glycosylation to determine the most appropriate lectin to enrich for glycoproteins. Although lectin microarrays provide data on lectin-glycoprotein interactions, they are unable to account for changes in glycosylation patterns of individual proteins or of glycoproteins as a whole and need to be combined with other techniques. Patwa et al. combined lectin microarrays with all-liquid-phase enrichment and pre-fractionation methods to discover differences in glycosylation between pancreatic cancer and normative human sera, particularly with respect to mannosylation and fucosylation. Early lectin detection techniques, such as tandem lectin affinity chromatography, did not meet the criteria for glycosylation analysis. Lectin microarrays and lectin immunosorbent assay, which analyze the structure of glycans in a comprehensive, high-throughput manner, are not only simple to perform, but also offer significant advantages in terms of sensitivity and reproducibility.
Electrophoresis
Conventional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was unable to meet the criteria for separating glycosylation patterns, and more advanced techniques were developed. Previous studies have confirmed that two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Which could analyze peptide mixtures, can be used for the analysis of glycosylated peptides. Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis is a new technique introduced based on gel electrophoresis method for detecting the levels and dynamics of O-GlcNAc. Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis can separate native O-GlcNAc proteins from their unmodified counterparts, does not require complex sample handling and advanced equipment beyond the electrophoresis apparatus, and has a high degree of specificity and affinity, making it particularly suitable for O-GlcNAc analysis. In addition, Liu et al. developed a new technique of supported molecular matrix electrophoresis to detect glycosylation patterns of Fut8+/+ and Fut8-/- mouse serum proteins, and further analyzed the N-glycosylation and O-glycosylation patterns in the isolated γ-bands by mass spectrometry. Supported molecular matrix electrophoresis is more economical in the amount of protein samples compared to SDS-PAGE, and the serum fractionation is simpler and faster, and the compatibility of glycoproteins with the separated bands.
Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) has been used in the past in conjunction with LC and MS as a method for the structural separation of oligosaccharides because of its high performance in separation, resolution, and sample handling. Combined with laser-induced fluorescence decolorization, the CGE-based method has become a highly efficient analytical technique for the characterization of glycosylation patterns, with high performance in terms of low cost of separation, robustness, speed of analysis, and sensitivity. Multiplexed CGE using laser-induced fluorescence detection was able to monitor the structural properties of N-glycosylated glycans. It is of great value in the ability to identify small differences in glycosylation composition and structure.
Radiolabelling
While MS is able to identify the glycopeptide composition and glycan structure, it cannot obtain the accurate stereo-structure of glycans, and at the same time, it cannot distinguish the types of glycan residues with the same molecular weight. Schubert’s team proposed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy experiments to analyze glycosylation patterns. Structural changes in the O-glycosylation of calcitonin derivatives have been reported using NMR analysis, which revealed localized residue lengthening at the O-glycosylation site, thus disturbing the original α-helical structure of calcitonin. NMR allows the detection of glycan stereochemistry, composition and type of linkage bonds and quality control of the produced proteins, regardless of molecular size and without isotopic labeling. It has the disadvantage of not being able to identify modification sites in the protein sequence.
On the other hand, Raman imaging was conducted to monitor the glycosylation metabolism in brain and breast cancers. The researchers identified Raman markers based on the vibrational characteristics of glycogen, glycans, etc., and combined them with chemometrics to distinguish protein glycosylation patterns in different tissues. The structure of the secreted polymeric gel MUC5B was analyzed by Raman imaging and found to be rich in O-glycosylation. Raman imaging is a powerful visualization method that is sensitive and specific, does not require staining, and has the spatial and spectral resolution to provide important information to help analyze the multiple components present in a cell and map the distribution of glycans in tissues. The disadvantage of Raman imaging is the inability to quantify glycosylation levels.
Molecular fluorescence
Fluorescence detection has been widely used in the identification of glycosylation structures because of its advantages of high sensitivity and direct observation. A series of fluorescent boron-dipyrromethene dyes can be incorporated and labeled with glycan groups during glycosylation structure synthesis, while relying on their chemical stability not to react with the glycan molecules. Meanwhile boron-dipyrromethene labeled glycans have high fluorescence efficiency in water. Zaro’s group has visualized the mucin-type O-glycosylation using in-gel fluorescence detection. However, there is also the problem that some fluorescent dyes are not sensitive to glycosylation patterns. Recently, imaging in combination with new techniques has been continuously applied. Haga et al. used azide-tagged GFP-labeled proteins to image cell-surface glycoproteins by Förster resonance energy transfer fluorescence microscopy. However, limited by the GFP protein, this method is unable to image endogenous glycoproteins. Belardi’s group has built on this foundation and achieved imaging of glycosylated forms of endogenous proteins using azidoglycan labeling and two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.
Since most protein molecules are similar in size to nanomaterials, nanomaterials can be used as a backbone for the assembly of glycosylated probes, and glycosylation-modified fluorescent probes have been created. Zhang’s team designed nano-based metal-organic framework fluorescent probes with Zr (IV) and boric acid as active centers. Specific glycosylation sites were identified and in situ fluorescence imaging was performed by structural modification of metal-organic framework and alizarin red modulated fluorescence. Together, fluorescent labeling is hopefully to be widely promoted in glycosylation pattern identification due to its unique advantages of direct visualization and simplified operation procedures.
Nanotechnology and other detection technologies
In addition to the common assays, there is a proliferation of novel techniques for the detection of glycosylation (Table 3). Maglia’s research group devised the nanopore method, which takes advantage of high ionic strength, and low pH environments and uses nanopores containing phenylalanine for identifying hydrophilic peptides and distinguishing between mono- and di-glycosylated peptides. The method enables qualitative detection and quantitative quantification of protein glycosylation.
In addition to the methods mentioned above, there are also several new platforms being established. Some researchers have developed a software tool called GlypID 2.0, which incorporates CID and HCD information to achieve accurate characterization of N-glycosylation sites. A simplified GlycoSense method utilizes carbohydrate sensing microspheres assembled into a multi-suspension array to achieve the goal of simultaneous detection of multiple orthogonal glycosylation profiles simultaneously using common instrumentation. Blöchl et al. integrated glycomics with transcriptomics from public databases to unearth distinct glycochemical profiles based on FAB system classification. An anti-Tn antibody microarray platform was recently established for the detection of Tn+ glycoproteins in detecting sub-nanogram levels, which are almost universally present in cancer patients.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Glycosylation is an extremely complex and the most abundant type of PTM, which not only greatly contributes to the expansion of protein diversity, but also has far-reaching effects on protein functions. Glycosylation in the form of multiple glycan residues brings considerable changes to the proteome, and the myriad forms of polysaccharides or oligosaccharides linked together are a source of stereostructural diversity in proteins. Glycosylation is closely related to protein solubility, stability, and activity. For example, in the ER, the composition of glycans in the chaperone proteins calnexin and calreticulin tracks the folding state of the nascent polypeptide. N-glycosylation is localized on the side of the conserved structural domains of hepcidin, which regulates calcineurin secretion and promotes hepcidin maturation. If N-glycosylation occurs elsewhere in hepcidin, it misfolds and accumulates with calnexin over time.
Abnormal or disturbed glycosylation cause human diseases. Congenital disorders of glycosylation are genetic disorders marked by hypoglycosylation of proteins and lipids, were first described in 1980 and are characterized by mutations in the gene encoding phosphomannanase., In addition, altered protein glycosylation is considered a hallmark of cancer. Glycosyltransferase GALNT7 alters O-glycosylation in prostate cancer cells and facilitates tumor growth. Unraveling glycan-based mechanisms in cancer can help decipher the molecular mechanisms of cancer biology.
New approaches are needed for early diagnosis, risk prediction and treatment of cancer, and glycans can be used to develop new non-invasive biomarkers. Some of the most commonly used serum biomarkers in clinical practice for cancer diagnosis and monitoring prognosis are glycoproteins. These include PSA, a major biomarker widely used in prostate cancer patients, CA125 in ovarian cancer patients, CEA in colon cancer patients, and CA199 in pancreatic cancer patients.,, Unfortunately, these glycoproteins are not exclusively found in one cancer type or not exclusively in one stage of the tumor. Finding the most specific and sensitive assay for detecting cancer then becomes a topic for research. For example, serum PSA testing for prostate disease has been around for a long time, but has led to problems of overdiagnosis and treatment. Researchers have studied the glycosylation patterns of PSA and found that a significant increase in core fucosylation with sialylation is more representative of prostate cancer.
Combined protein binding and glycosylation pattern detection may provide better diagnostic and prognostic performance, but how one can accurately detects alterations in glycosylation sites and expression levels in clinic settings has become a major challenge. Advancement of detection methods for glycosylation patterns has been constantly pursued, from the initial MS and electrophoretic analysis to visualization imaging such as fluorescence and NMR, to the current gene detection technology and sophisticated data analysis platform. Increasingly, the latest advances in glycomics, proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics data gathering and analysis are being used to better, understand how glycosylation regulates protein biological functions, and how new therapies can be developed by targeting glycosylation. Whether they are small molecule inhibitors targeting enzymes in the glycosylation process, or glycosylation-modified mAbs and novel vaccines, these modalities show the great potential to target glycosylation for therapy development. In conclusion, glycosylation serves as molecular “switches” to provide proteins or lipids with more diverse functions and play crucial roles in various aspects of life. Targeted therapies at glycosylation, either alone or in combination with more conventional therapeutics, have the potential to provide cancer patients and patients with diseases with better treatment options.
References 537
- 1.
Walsh CT, Garneau-Tsodikova S, Gatto GJ. Protein posttranslational modifications: the chemistry of proteome diversifications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2005;44:7342-7372.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.200501023
- 2.
Schjoldager KT, Narimatsu Y, Joshi HJ, Clausen H. Global view of human protein glycosylation pathways and functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:729-749.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-020-00294-x
- 3.
Stanley, P. Golgi glycosylation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol3, a005199 (2011).
Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a005199
- 4.
- 5.
Chen Z, et al. Mutual regulation between glycosylation and transforming growth factor-beta isoforms signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;236:123818.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123818
- 6.
Caval T, Alisson-Silva F, Schwarz F. Roles of glycosylation at the cancer cell surface: opportunities for large scale glycoproteomics. Theranostics. 2023;13:2605-2615.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.81760
- 7.
Cheng C, et al. Glucose-mediated N-glycosylation of SCAP is essential for SREBP-1 activation and tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:569-581.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.021
- 8.
Kuehnel K. Glycosylation: gluing on glycans. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018;14:199.
Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.2579
- 9.
Oliveira-Ferrer L, Legler K, Milde-Langosch K. Role of protein glycosylation in cancer metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;44:141-152.
Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.03.002
- 10.
Hirabayashi J, Arata Y, Kasai K. Glycome project: concept, strategy and preliminary application to Caenorhabditis elegans. Proteomics. 2001;1:295-303.
Not in our library10.1002/1615-9861(200102)1:2<295::aid-prot295>3.0.co;2-c
- 11.
Wiederschain, G. Y. Wiederschain, G. Y. Glycobiology: progress, problems, and perspectives. Biochemistry78, 679–696 (2013).
Not in our library10.1134/s0006297913070018
- 12.
Schwarz F, Aebi M. Mechanisms and principles of N-linked protein glycosylation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2011;21:576-582.
Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2011.08.005
- 13.
Medzihradszky KF, Kaasik K, Chalkley RJ. Tissue-specific glycosylation at the glycopeptide level. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2015;14:2103-2110.
Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m115.050393
- 14.
Kelleher DJ, Banerjee S, Cura AJ, Samuelson J, Gilmore R. Dolichol-linked oligosaccharide selection by the oligosaccharyltransferase in protist and fungal organisms. J. Cell Biol. 2007;177:29-37.
Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200611079
- 15.
Bickel T, Lehle L, Schwarz M, Aebi M, Jakob CA. Biosynthesis of lipid-linked oligosaccharides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Alg13p and Alg14p form a complex required for the formation of GlcNAc(2)-PP-dolichol. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:34500-34506.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m506358200
- 16.
Tu HC, et al. Up-regulation of Golgi alpha-mannosidase IA and down-regulation of Golgi alpha-mannosidase IC activates unfolded protein response during hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatol. Commun. 2017;1:230-247.
Not in our library10.1002/hep4.1032
- 17.
Duellman T, Burnett J, Shin A, Yang J. LMAN1 (ERGIC-53) is a potential carrier protein for matrix metalloproteinase-9 glycoprotein secretion. Biochem Biophys. Res Commun. 2015;464:685-691.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.164
- 18.
Zeyen, L., Doring, T. & Prange, R. Hepatitis B virus exploits ERGIC-53 in conjunction with COPII to exit cells. Cells9, 9081889 (2020).
Not in our library10.3390/cells9081889
- 19.
Aebi M. N-linked protein glycosylation in the ER. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2013;1833:2430-2437.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.001
- 20.
Mendoza L, Olaso E, Anasagasti MJ, Fuentes AM, Vidal-Vanaclocha F. Mannose receptor-mediated endothelial cell activation contributes to B16 melanoma cell adhesion and metastasis in liver. J. Cell Physiol. 1998;174:322-330.
Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-4652(199803)174:3<322::aid-jcp6>3.0.co;2-q
- 21.
Steentoft C, et al. Mining the O-glycoproteome using zinc-finger nuclease-glycoengineered SimpleCell lines. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:977-982.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1731
- 22.
Brockhausen, I., Wandall, H. H., Hagen, K. G. T. & Stanley, P. in Essentials of Glycobiology (eds A. Varki et al.) 117–128 (2022).
Not in our library
- 23.
Ten Hagen KG, Fritz TA, Tabak LA. All in the family: the UDP-GalNAc:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases. Glycobiology. 2003;13:1R-16R.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwg007
- 24.
Bennett EP, et al. Control of mucin-type O-glycosylation: a classification of the polypeptide GalNAc-transferase gene family. Glycobiology. 2012;22:736-756.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwr182
- 25.
Brockhausen I. Biosynthesis and functions of O-glycans and regulation of mucin antigen expression in cancer. Biochem Soc. Trans. 1997;25:871-874.
Not in our library10.1042/bst0250871
- 26.
- 27.
Sun R, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of normal and pathological tissues from the same patient uncovers colon cancer progression. Cell Biosci. 2023;13:62.
Not in our library10.1186/s13578-023-01002-w
- 28.
Scott E, et al. Upregulation of GALNT7 in prostate cancer modifies O-glycosylation and promotes tumour growth. Oncogene. 2023;42:926-937.
Not in our library10.1038/s41388-023-02604-x
- 29.
Li J, Richards JC. Functional glycomics and glycobiology: an overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;600:1-8.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-60761-454-8_1
- 30.
Jing W, et al. Clostridium septicum alpha-toxin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome by engaging GPI-anchored proteins. Sci. Immunol. 2022;7:eabm1803.
Not in our library10.1126/sciimmunol.abm1803
- 31.
DeToma AS, Salamekh S, Ramamoorthy A, Lim MH. Misfolded proteins in Alzheimer’s disease and type II diabetes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:608-621.
Not in our library10.1039/c1cs15112f
- 32.
Helenius A, Aebi M. Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2004;73:1019-1049.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073752
- 33.
Jayaprakash NG, Surolia A. Role of glycosylation in nucleating protein folding and stability. Biochem J. 2017;474:2333-2347.
Not in our library10.1042/bcj20170111
- 34.
Trombetta ES, Helenius A. Lectins as chaperones in glycoprotein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1998;8:587-592.
Not in our library10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80148-6
- 35.
Xu C, Ng DT. Glycosylation-directed quality control of protein folding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;16:742-752.
Not in our library10.1038/nrm4073
- 36.
Wu L, et al. O-GlcNAcylation regulates epidermal growth factor receptor intracellular trafficking and signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2107453119.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2107453119
- 37.
Yang D, et al. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism breaks glutamine addiction to sustain hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111691.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111691
- 38.
- 39.
Tsang B, Pritisanac I, Scherer SW, Moses AM, Forman-Kay JD. Phase Separation as a Missing Mechanism for Interpretation of Disease Mutations. Cell. 2020;183:1742-1756.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.050
- 40.
Gu X, et al. Phase separation drives tumor pathogenesis and evolution: all roads lead to Rome. Oncogene. 2022;41:1527-1535.
Not in our library10.1038/s41388-022-02195-z
- 41.
Li X, Pinou L, Du Y, Chen X, Liu C. Emerging roles of O-glycosylation in regulating protein aggregation, phase separation, and functions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2023;75:102314.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2023.102314
- 42.
Lv P, et al. O-GlcNAcylation modulates liquid-liquid phase separation of SynGAP/PSD-95. Nat. Chem. 2022;14:831-840.
Not in our library10.1038/s41557-022-00946-9
- 43.
Chen Y, et al. O-GlcNAcylation determines the translational regulation and phase separation of YTHDF proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2023;25:1676-1690.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-023-01258-x
- 44.
Mui KL, Chen CS, Assoian RK. The mechanical regulation of integrin-cadherin crosstalk organizes cells, signaling and forces. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:1093-1100.
Not in our library10.1242/jcs.183699
- 45.
Moh MC, Shen S. The roles of cell adhesion molecules in tumor suppression and cell migration: a new paradox. Cell Adh Migr. 2009;3:334-336.
Not in our library10.4161/cam.3.4.9246
- 46.
Makrilia N, Kollias A, Manolopoulos L, Syrigos K. Cell adhesion molecules: role and clinical significance in cancer. Cancer Invest. 2009;27:1023-1037.
Not in our library10.3109/07357900902769749
- 47.
Zhu W, Leber B, Andrews DW. Cytoplasmic O-glycosylation prevents cell surface transport of E-cadherin during apoptosis. EMBO J. 2001;20:5999-6007.
Not in our library10.1093/emboj/20.21.5999
- 48.
Zhao H, et al. N-glycosylation affects the adhesive function of E-Cadherin through modifying the composition of adherens junctions (AJs) in human breast carcinoma cell line MDA-MB-435. J. Cell Biochem. 2008;104:162-175.
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.21608
- 49.
Liwosz A, Lei T, Kukuruzinska MA. N-glycosylation affects the molecular organization and stability of E-cadherin junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:23138-23149.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m512621200
- 50.
Pinho SS, et al. Modulation of E-cadherin function and dysfunction by N-glycosylation. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2011;68:1011-1020.
Not in our library10.1007/s00018-010-0595-0
- 51.
Vestweber D, Blanks JE. Mechanisms that regulate the function of the selectins and their ligands. Physiol. Rev. 1999;79:181-213.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.181
- 52.
McEver RP. Selectins: lectins that initiate cell adhesion under flow. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002;14:581-586.
Not in our library10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00367-8
- 53.
Ley K. The role of selectins in inflammation and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2003;9:263-268.
Not in our library10.1016/s1471-4914(03)00071-6
- 54.
Sladek V, Smak P, Tvaroska I. How E-, L-, and P-Selectins Bind to sLe(x) and PSGL-1: a quantification of critical residue interactions. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023;63:5604-5618.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00704
- 55.
Weis WI, Taylor ME, Drickamer K. The C-type lectin superfamily in the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 1998;163:19-34.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-065x.1998.tb01185.x
- 56.
Cappenberg, A., Kardell, M. & Zarbock, A. Selectin-mediated signaling-shedding light on the regulation of integrin activity in neutrophils. Cells11, 11081310 (2022).
Not in our library10.3390/cells11081310
- 57.
Liu S, Yang X, Liu Y, Wang X, Yan Q. sLeX/L-selectin mediates adhesion in vitro implantation model. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2011;350:185-192.
Not in our library10.1007/s11010-010-0697-x
- 58.
Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:255-266.
Not in our library10.1038/nri2056
- 59.
Stanczak MA, et al. Self-associated molecular patterns mediate cancer immune evasion by engaging Siglecs on T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:4912-4923.
Not in our library10.1172/jci120612
- 60.
Beatson R, et al. The mucin MUC1 modulates the tumor immunological microenvironment through engagement of the lectin Siglec-9. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:1273-1281.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.3552
- 61.
Seguin L, Desgrosellier JS, Weis SM, Cheresh DA. Integrins and cancer: regulators of cancer stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:234-240.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2014.12.006
- 62.
Desgrosellier JS, Cheresh DA. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2010;10:9-22.
Not in our library10.1038/nrc2748
- 63.
Aoudjit F, Vuori K. Integrin signaling inhibits paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2001;20:4995-5004.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1204554
- 64.
Marsico G, Russo L, Quondamatteo F, Pandit A. Glycosylation and integrin regulation in cancer. Trends Cancer. 2018;4:537-552.
Not in our library10.1016/j.trecan.2018.05.009
- 65.
de-Souza-Ferreira M, Ferreira EE, de-Freitas-Junior JCM. Aberrant N-glycosylation in cancer: MGAT5 and beta1,6-GlcNAc branched N-glycans as critical regulators of tumor development and progression. Cell Oncol. (Dordr.). 2023;46:481-501.
Not in our library10.1007/s13402-023-00770-4
- 66.
Liu CH, et al. C1GALT1 promotes invasive phenotypes of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by modulating integrin beta1 glycosylation and activity. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94995.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0094995
- 67.
Pinho SS, Reis CA. Glycosylation in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:540-555.
Not in our library10.1038/nrc3982
- 68.
Seales EC, et al. Hypersialylation of beta1 integrins, observed in colon adenocarcinoma, may contribute to cancer progression by up-regulating cell motility. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4645-4652.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-3117
- 69.
Smith BAH, Bertozzi CR. The clinical impact of glycobiology: targeting selectins, Siglecs and mammalian glycans. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021;20:217-243.
Not in our library10.1038/s41573-020-00093-1
- 70.
Rudd PM, Elliott T, Cresswell P, Wilson IA, Dwek RA. Glycosylation and the immune system. Science. 2001;291:2370-2376.
Not in our library10.1126/science.291.5512.2370
- 71.
Macauley MS, Crocker PR, Paulson JC. Siglec-mediated regulation of immune cell function in disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:653-666.
Not in our library10.1038/nri3737
- 72.
Rabinovich GA, Croci DO. Regulatory circuits mediated by lectin-glycan interactions in autoimmunity and cancer. Immunity. 2012;36:322-335.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.004
- 73.
van Kooyk Y, Rabinovich GA. Protein-glycan interactions in the control of innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:593-601.
Not in our library10.1038/ni.f.203
- 74.
- 75.
van de Wall S, Santegoets KCM, van Houtum EJH, Bull C, Adema GJ. Sialoglycans and siglecs can shape the tumor immune microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:274-285.
Not in our library10.1016/j.it.2020.02.001
- 76.
Kuliesiute U, et al. Sialic acid metabolism orchestrates transcellular connectivity and signaling in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2023;25:1963-1975.
Not in our library10.1093/neuonc/noad101
- 77.
- 78.
Bochner BS, Zimmermann N. Role of siglecs and related glycan-binding proteins in immune responses and immunoregulation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015;135:598-608.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2014.11.031
- 79.
Moreira RS, et al. Siglec 15 as a biomarker or a druggable molecule for non-small cell lung cancer. J. Cancer Res Clin. Oncol. 2023;149:17651-17661.
Not in our library10.1007/s00432-023-05437-z
- 80.
Hudak JE, Canham SM, Bertozzi CR. Glycocalyx engineering reveals a Siglec-based mechanism for NK cell immunoevasion. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:69-75.
Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1388
- 81.
Antonopoulos A, et al. Loss of effector function of human cytolytic T lymphocytes is accompanied by major alterations in N- and O-glycosylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:11240-11251.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111.320820
- 82.
Nambiar DK, et al. Galectin-1-driven T cell exclusion in the tumor endothelium promotes immunotherapy resistance. J. Clin. Invest. 2019;129:5553-5567.
Not in our library10.1172/jci129025
- 83.
Caputo S, et al. Galectin-3 in prostate cancer stem-like cells is immunosuppressive and drives early metastasis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1820.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2020.01820
- 84.
Wiersma VR, de Bruyn M, Helfrich W, Bremer E. Therapeutic potential of Galectin-9 in human disease. Med Res Rev. 2013;33(Suppl 1):E102-E126.
Not in our library10.1002/med.20249
- 85.
- 86.
Kopan R, Ilagan MX. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell. 2009;137:216-233.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.045
- 87.
Haines N, Irvine KD. Glycosylation regulates Notch signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:786-797.
Not in our library10.1038/nrm1228
- 88.
Rampal R, Luther KB, Haltiwanger RS. Notch signaling in normal and disease states: possible therapies related to glycosylation. Curr. Mol. Med. 2007;7:427-445.
Not in our library10.2174/156652407780831593
- 89.
Takeuchi H, Haltiwanger RS. Role of glycosylation of Notch in development. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2010;21:638-645.
Not in our library10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.03.003
- 90.
Blochl, C. et al. Integrated N- and O-Glycomics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Cell Lines. Cells10, 10113058 (2021).
Not in our library10.3390/cells10113058
- 91.
Yokota S, et al. Protein O-fucosyltransferase 1: a potential diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for human oral cancer. Int J. Oncol. 2013;43:1864-1870.
Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2013.2110
- 92.
Takeuchi H, et al. Two novel protein O-glucosyltransferases that modify sites distinct from POGLUT1 and affect Notch trafficking and signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E8395-E8402.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1804005115
- 93.
Shao L, Luo Y, Moloney DJ, Haltiwanger R. O-glycosylation of EGF repeats: identification and initial characterization of a UDP-glucose: protein O-glucosyltransferase. Glycobiology. 2002;12:763-770.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwf085
- 94.
Servian-Morilla E, et al. A POGLUT1 mutation causes a muscular dystrophy with reduced Notch signaling and satellite cell loss. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016;8:1289-1309.
Not in our library10.15252/emmm.201505815
- 95.
Mackinnon RN, et al. The paradox of 20q11.21 amplification in a subset of cases of myeloid malignancy with chromosome 20 deletion. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010;49:998-1013.
Not in our library10.1002/gcc.20806
- 96.
Blair SS. Notch signaling: Fringe really is a glycosyltransferase. Curr. Biol. 2000;10:R608-R612.
Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00633-3
- 97.
Moloney DJ, et al. Fringe is a glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch. Nature. 2000;406:369-375.
Not in our library10.1038/35019000
- 98.
Chen J, Moloney DJ, Stanley P. Fringe modulation of Jagged1-induced Notch signaling requires the action of beta 4galactosyltransferase-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:13716-13721.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.241398098
- 99.
Ogawa M, Sawaguchi S, Kamemura K, Okajima T. Intracellular and extracellular O-linked N-acetylglucosamine in the nervous system. Exp. Neurol. 2015;274:166-174.
Not in our library10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.08.009
- 100.
Chen J, et al. Ogt controls neural stem/progenitor cell pool and adult neurogenesis through modulating Notch signaling. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108905.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108905
- 101.
Ogawa M, Okajima T. Structure and function of extracellular O-GlcNAc. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2019;56:72-77.
Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2018.12.002
- 102.
Zhou L, et al. Notch-dependent control of myelopoiesis is regulated by fucosylation. Blood. 2008;112:308-319.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2007-11-115204
- 103.
Larose H, et al. Whole Exome Sequencing reveals NOTCH1 mutations in anaplastic large cell lymphoma and points to Notch both as a key pathway and a potential therapeutic target. Haematologica. 2021;106:1693-1704.
Not in our library10.3324/haematol.2019.238766
- 104.
Perkey E, et al. GCNT1-Mediated O-Glycosylation of the Sialomucin CD43 Is a Sensitive Indicator of Notch Signaling in Activated T Cells. J. Immunol. 2020;204:1674-1688.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1901194
- 105.
- 106.
Liu KD, Gaffen SL, Goldsmith MA. JAK/STAT signaling by cytokine receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1998;10:271-278.
Not in our library10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80165-9
- 107.
Gatzka M, Piekorz R, Moriggl R, Rawlings J, Ihle JN. A role for STAT5A/B in protection of peripheral T-lymphocytes from postactivation apoptosis: insights from gene expression profiling. Cytokine. 2006;34:143-154.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2006.04.003
- 108.
Freund P, et al. O-GlcNAcylation of STAT5 controls tyrosine phosphorylation and oncogenic transcription in STAT5-dependent malignancies. Leukemia. 2017;31:2132-2142.
Not in our library10.1038/leu.2017.4
- 109.
Gewinner C, et al. The coactivator of transcription CREB-binding protein interacts preferentially with the glycosylated form of Stat5. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:3563-3572.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m306449200
- 110.
- 111.
Jitschin R, et al. Inflammation-induced glycolytic switch controls suppressivity of mesenchymal stem cells via STAT1 glycosylation. Leukemia. 2019;33:1783-1796.
Not in our library10.1038/s41375-018-0376-6
- 112.
Massague J, Sheppard D. TGF-beta signaling in health and disease. Cell. 2023;186:4007-4037.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.036
- 113.
Sun X, et al. ALG3 contributes to stemness and radioresistance through regulating glycosylation of TGF-beta receptor II in breast cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;40:149.
Not in our library10.1186/s13046-021-01932-8
- 114.
Kim YW, Park J, Lee HJ, Lee SY, Kim SJ. TGF-beta sensitivity is determined by N-linked glycosylation of the type II TGF-beta receptor. Biochem J. 2012;445:403-411.
Not in our library10.1042/bj20111923
- 115.
- 116.
Lu J, et al. beta-Galactoside alpha2,6-sialyltranferase 1 promotes transforming growth factor-beta-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:34627-34641.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m114.593392
- 117.
Yeo HL, et al. Sialylation of vasorin by ST3Gal1 facilitates TGF-beta1-mediated tumor angiogenesis and progression. Int J. Cancer. 2019;144:1996-2007.
Not in our library10.1002/ijc.31891
- 118.
Wu Q, et al. ppGalNAc-T4-catalyzed O-Glycosylation of TGF-beta type II receptor regulates breast cancer cells metastasis potential. J. Biol. Chem. 2021;296:100119.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra120.016345
- 119.
Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/beta-Catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169:985-999.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016
- 120.
Flanagan DJ, Vincan E, Phesse TJ. Wnt signaling in cancer: not a binary ON:OFF Switch. Cancer Res. 2019;79:5901-5906.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-1362
- 121.
Hong S, et al. In Situ Fucosylation of the Wnt Co-receptor LRP6 increases its endocytosis and reduces Wnt/beta-Catenin signaling. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020;27:1140-1150.e1144.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.06.015
- 122.
Xu, R. et al. N-Glycosylation of LRP6 by B3GnT2 promotes Wnt/beta-Catenin signalling. Cells12, 12060863 (2023).
Not in our library10.3390/cells12060863
- 123.
Tang W, Li M, Qi X, Li J. beta1,4-Galactosyltransferase V modulates breast cancer stem cells through Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020;52:1084-1102.
Not in our library10.4143/crt.2020.093
- 124.
Zhang J, et al. GALNT1 enhances malignant phenotype of gastric cancer via modulating CD44 glycosylation to activate the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022;18:6068-6083.
Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.73431
- 125.
- 126.
van den Boogert MAW, et al. N-Glycosylation defects in humans lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol through increased low-density lipoprotein receptor expression. Circulation. 2019;140:280-292.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.118.036484
- 127.
Kathiresan S, et al. Common variants at 30 loci contribute to polygenic dyslipidemia. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:56-65.
Not in our library10.1038/ng.291
- 128.
Wang YP, et al. Arginine methylation of MDH1 by CARM1 inhibits glutamine metabolism and suppresses pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cell. 2016;64:673-687.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.028
- 129.
Zhu Q, et al. O-GlcNAcylation promotes pancreatic tumor growth by regulating malate dehydrogenase 1. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2022;18:1087-1095.
Not in our library10.1038/s41589-022-01085-5
- 130.
Pang X, Li H, Guan F, Li X. Multiple roles of glycans in hematological malignancies. Front Oncol. 2018;8:364.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2018.00364
- 131.
Shimony S, Stahl M, Stone RM. Acute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2023;98:502-526.
Not in our library10.1002/ajh.26822
- 132.
- 133.
Choudhary C, et al. AML-associated Flt3 kinase domain mutations show signal transduction differences compared with Flt3 ITD mutations. Blood. 2005;106:265-273.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2004-07-2942
- 134.
Schmidt-Arras DE, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates maturation of receptor tyrosine kinases. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;25:3690-3703.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.25.9.3690-3703.2005
- 135.
Schmidt-Arras D, et al. Anchoring of FLT3 in the endoplasmic reticulum alters signaling quality. Blood. 2009;113:3568-3576.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2007-10-121426
- 136.
Williams AB, et al. Fluvastatin inhibits FLT3 glycosylation in human and murine cells and prolongs survival of mice with FLT3/ITD leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:3069-3079.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2012-01-403493
- 137.
Radomska HS, et al. Targeting CDK1 promotes FLT3-activated acute myeloid leukemia differentiation through C/EBPalpha. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:2955-2966.
Not in our library10.1172/jci43354
- 138.
Larrue C, et al. Antileukemic activity of 2-Deoxy-d-Glucose through Inhibition of N-linked glycosylation in acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD or c-KIT mutations. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2364-2373.
Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0163
- 139.
Parodi AJ. Protein glucosylation and its role in protein folding. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2000;69:69-93.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.69
- 140.
Andresen L, et al. 2-deoxy D-glucose prevents cell surface expression of NKG2D ligands through inhibition of N-linked glycosylation. J. Immunol. 2012;188:1847-1855.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1004085
- 141.
Reiter K, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibition increases the cell surface localization of FLT3-ITD and enhances FLT3-directed immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2018;32:313-322.
Not in our library10.1038/leu.2017.257
- 142.
Hamadmad SN, Hohl RJ. Lovastatin suppresses erythropoietin receptor surface expression through dual inhibition of glycosylation and geranylgeranylation. Biochem Pharm. 2007;74:590-600.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2007.04.028
- 143.
Kumar B, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia transforms the bone marrow niche into a leukemia-permissive microenvironment through exosome secretion. Leukemia. 2018;32:575-587.
Not in our library10.1038/leu.2017.259
- 144.
Feng J, et al. Loss of bisecting GlcNAcylation on MCAM of bone marrow stoma determined pro-tumoral niche in MDS/AML. Leukemia. 2023;37:113-121.
Not in our library10.1038/s41375-022-01748-1
- 145.
Marjon KD, et al. Tetraspanin CD82 regulates bone marrow homing of acute myeloid leukemia by modulating the molecular organization of N-cadherin. Oncogene. 2016;35:4132-4140.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2015.449
- 146.
Hasegawa K, et al. Glycosylation status of CD43 protein is associated with resistance of leukemia cells to CTL-mediated cytolysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152326.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0152326
- 147.
Bartels L, et al. A chemo-enzymatically linked bispecific antibody retargets T cells to a sialylated epitope on CD43 in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res. 2019;79:3372-3382.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-0189
- 148.
Tomita N. BCL2 and MYC dual-hit lymphoma/leukemia. J. Clin. Exp. Hematop. 2011;51:7-12.
Not in our library10.3960/jslrt.51.7
- 149.
Bond MR, Hanover JA. O-GlcNAc cycling: a link between metabolism and chronic disease. Annu Rev. Nutr. 2013;33:205-229.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-nutr-071812-161240
- 150.
Lee, D. H. et al. Increased O-GlcNAcylation of c-Myc promotes pre-B cell proliferation. Cells9, 9010158 (2020).
Not in our library10.3390/cells9010158
- 151.
Oliveira T, et al. Glycoproteome remodeling in MLL-rearranged B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Theranostics. 2021;11:9519-9537.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.65398
- 152.
Haymour L, Jean M, Smulski C, Legembre P. CD95 (Fas) and CD95L (FasL)-mediated non-canonical signaling pathways. Biochim Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2023;1878:189004.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.189004
- 153.
Dorrie J, Sapala K, Zunino SJ. Interferon-gamma increases the expression of glycosylated CD95 in B-leukemic cells: an inducible model to study the role of glycosylation in CD95-signalling and trafficking. Cytokine. 2002;18:98-107.
Not in our library10.1006/cyto.2002.1030
- 154.
Charlier E, et al. SHIP-1 inhibits CD95/APO-1/Fas-induced apoptosis in primary T lymphocytes and T leukemic cells by promoting CD95 glycosylation independently of its phosphatase activity. Leukemia. 2010;24:821-832.
Not in our library10.1038/leu.2010.9
- 155.
Rai KR, Jain P. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-Then and now. Am. J. Hematol. 2016;91:330-340.
Not in our library10.1002/ajh.24282
- 156.
Burger JA, Wiestner A. Targeting B cell receptor signalling in cancer: preclinical and clinical advances. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:148-167.
Not in our library10.1038/nrc.2017.121
- 157.
Kostareli E, Gounari M, Agathangelidis A, Stamatopoulos K. Immunoglobulin gene repertoire in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: insight into antigen selection and microenvironmental interactions. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2012;4:e2012052.
Not in our library10.4084/mjhid.2012.052
- 158.
Wienands J, Engels N. Multitasking of Ig-alpha and Ig-beta to regulate B cell antigen receptor function. Int Rev. Immunol. 2001;20:679-696.
Not in our library10.3109/08830180109045585
- 159.
Vuillier F, et al. Lower levels of surface B-cell-receptor expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia are associated with glycosylation and folding defects of the mu and CD79a chains. Blood. 2005;105:2933-2940.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2004-09-3643
- 160.
Iatrou A, et al. N-Glycosylation of the Ig receptors shapes the antigen reactivity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia subset #201. J. Immunol. 2023;211:743-754.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.2300330
- 161.
Hollander N, Haimovich J. Altered N-linked glycosylation in follicular lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: involvement in pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targeting. Front Immunol. 2017;8:912.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2017.00912
- 162.
Roman E, Smith AG. Epidemiology of lymphomas. Histopathology. 2011;58:4-14.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03696.x
- 163.
Tomonaga M. Outline and direction of revised WHO classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2009;50:1401-1406.
Not in our library
- 164.
Vitolo U, Ferreri AJ, Montoto S. Follicular lymphomas. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2008;66:248-261.
Not in our library10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.01.014
- 165.
Carlotti E, et al. High throughput sequencing analysis of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene from flow-sorted B cell sub-populations define the dynamics of follicular lymphoma clonal evolution. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134833.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0134833
- 166.
Zhu D, et al. Acquisition of potential N-glycosylation sites in the immunoglobulin variable region by somatic mutation is a distinctive feature of follicular lymphoma. Blood. 2002;99:2562-2568.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.v99.7.2562
- 167.
Odabashian M, et al. IGHV sequencing reveals acquired N-glycosylation sites as a clonal and stable event during follicular lymphoma evolution. Blood. 2020;135:834-844.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2019002279
- 168.
Mamessier E, et al. Contiguous follicular lymphoma and follicular lymphoma in situ harboring N-glycosylated sites. Haematologica. 2015;100:e155-e157.
Not in our library10.3324/haematol.2014.115782
- 169.
Radcliffe CM, et al. Human follicular lymphoma cells contain oligomannose glycans in the antigen-binding site of the B-cell receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:7405-7415.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m602690200
- 170.
Leich E, et al. Follicular lymphoma subgroups with and without t(14;18) differ in their N-glycosylation pattern and IGHV usage. Blood Adv. 2021;5:4890-4900.
Not in our library10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005081
- 171.
Haebe S, et al. Follicular lymphoma evolves with a surmountable dependency on acquired glycosylation motifs in the B-cell receptor. Blood. 2023;142:2296-2304.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2023020360
- 172.
A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma classification project. Blood. 1997;89:3909-3918.
Not in our library
- 173.
Scheich S, et al. Targeting N-linked glycosylation for the therapy of aggressive lymphomas. Cancer Discov. 2023;13:1862-1883.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-1401
- 174.
Chen IJ, Chen HL, Demetriou M. Lateral compartmentalization of T cell receptor versus CD45 by galectin-N-glycan binding and microfilaments coordinate basal and activation signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:35361-35372.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m706923200
- 175.
Pulido R, Sanchez-Madrid F. Glycosylation of CD45: carbohydrate composition and its role in acquisition of CD45R0 and CD45RB T cell maturation-related antigen specificities during biosynthesis. Eur. J. Immunol. 1990;20:2667-2671.
Not in our library10.1002/eji.1830201221
- 176.
Dumic J, Dabelic S, Flogel M. Galectin-3: an open-ended story. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2006;1760:616-635.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.12.020
- 177.
Hoyer KK, et al. An anti-apoptotic role for galectin-3 in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Am. J. Pathol. 2004;164:893-902.
Not in our library10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63177-x
- 178.
Clark MC, et al. Galectin-3 binds to CD45 on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells to regulate susceptibility to cell death. Blood. 2012;120:4635-4644.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2012-06-438234
- 179.
Wang M, et al. Identification of a monoclonal antibody that targets PD-1 in a manner requiring PD-1 Asn58 glycosylation. Commun. Biol. 2019;2:392.
Not in our library10.1038/s42003-019-0642-9
- 180.
Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. Int Immunol. 2007;19:813-824.
Not in our library10.1093/intimm/dxm057
- 181.
Li CW, et al. Eradication of triple-negative breast cancer cells by targeting glycosylated PD-L1. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:187-201.e110.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.009
- 182.
- 183.
Liu X, et al. Overexpression of GLT1D1 induces immunosuppression through glycosylation of PD-L1 and predicts poor prognosis in B-cell lymphoma. Mol. Oncol. 2020;14:1028-1044.
Not in our library10.1002/1878-0261.12664
- 184.
Gupta N, Sharma A, Sharma A. Emerging biomarkers in multiple myeloma: a review. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2020;503:45-53.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cca.2019.12.026
- 185.
Bergon E, Miravalles E. Retrospective study of monoclonal gammopathies detected in the clinical laboratory of a Spanish healthcare district: 14-year series. Clin. Chem. Lab Med. 2007;45:190-196.
Not in our library10.1515/cclm.2007.029
- 186.
Nimmerjahn, F. & Ravetch, J. V. Four keys to unlock IgG. J. Exp. Med.218, 20201753 (2021).
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20201753
- 187.
Kinoshita N, et al. Glycosylation at the Fab portion of myeloma immunoglobulin G and increased fucosylated biantennary sugar chains: structural analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography and antibody-lectin enzyme immunoassay using Lens culinaris agglutinin. Cancer Res. 1991;51:5888-5892.
Not in our library
- 188.
Westhrin M, et al. Monoclonal immunoglobulins promote bone loss in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2020;136:2656-2666.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2020006045
- 189.
Visram A, et al. Disease monitoring with quantitative serum IgA levels provides a more reliable response assessment in multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia. 2021;35:1428-1437.
Not in our library10.1038/s41375-021-01180-x
- 190.
Bosseboeuf A, et al. Analysis of the targets and glycosylation of monoclonal IgAs From MGUS and myeloma patients. Front Immunol. 2020;11:854.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2020.00854
- 191.
- 192.
- 193.
Mellors PW, et al. MASS-FIX for the detection of monoclonal proteins and light chain N-glycosylation in routine clinical practice: a cross-sectional study of 6315 patients. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:50.
Not in our library10.1038/s41408-021-00444-0
- 194.
Nevone A, et al. An N-glycosylation hotspot in immunoglobulin kappa light chains is associated with AL amyloidosis. Leukemia. 2022;36:2076-2085.
Not in our library10.1038/s41375-022-01599-w
- 195.
Dispenzieri A, et al. N-glycosylation of monoclonal light chains on routine MASS-FIX testing is a risk factor for MGUS progression. Leukemia. 2020;34:2749-2753.
Not in our library10.1038/s41375-020-0940-8
- 196.
Alameda D, et al. Tumor cells in light-chain amyloidosis and myeloma show distinct transcriptional rewiring of normal plasma cell development. Blood. 2021;138:1583-1589.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2020009754
- 197.
Greenfield G, McMullin MF, Mills K. Molecular pathogenesis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021;14:103.
Not in our library10.1186/s13045-021-01116-z
- 198.
Venugopal S, Mascarenhas J. Novel therapeutics in myeloproliferative neoplasms. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020;13:162.
Not in our library10.1186/s13045-020-00995-y
- 199.
Vainchenker W, Constantinescu SN. JAK/STAT signaling in hematological malignancies. Oncogene. 2013;32:2601-2613.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2012.347
- 200.
How J, Hobbs GS, Mullally A. Mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2019;134:2242-2248.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2019000622
- 201.
Araki M, et al. Activation of the thrombopoietin receptor by mutant calreticulin in CALR-mutant myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127:1307-1316.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2015-09-671172
- 202.
Jutzi JS, et al. Whole-genome CRISPR screening identifies N-glycosylation as a genetic and therapeutic vulnerability in CALR-mutant MPNs. Blood. 2022;140:1291-1304.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2022015629
- 203.
de Figueiredo LL, de Abreu e Lima RS, Rego EM. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and leukemogenesis. Mediators Inflamm. 2004;13:145-150.
Not in our library10.1080/09511920410001713574
- 204.
Skokowa J, Dale DC, Touw IP, Zeidler C, Welte K. Severe congenital neutropenias. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3:17032.
Not in our library10.1038/nrdp.2017.32
- 205.
Maxson JE, et al. Oncogenic CSF3R mutations in chronic neutrophilic leukemia and atypical CML. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1781-1790.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1214514
- 206.
Maxson JE, et al. Ligand independence of the T618I mutation in the colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) protein results from loss of O-linked glycosylation and increased receptor dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:5820-5827.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m113.508440
- 207.
Price A, et al. T618I CSF3R mutations in chronic neutrophilic leukemia induce oncogenic signals through aberrant trafficking and constitutive phosphorylation of the O-glycosylated receptor form. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;523:208-213.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.030
- 208.
Spiciarich DR, et al. A novel germline variant in CSF3R reduces N-Glycosylation and exerts potent oncogenic effects in leukemia. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6762-6770.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-1638
- 209.
Hakomori SI, Murakami WT. Glycolipids of hamster fibroblasts and derived malignant-transformed cell lines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1968;59:254-261.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.59.1.254
- 210.
Gill DJ, et al. Initiation of GalNAc-type O-glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum promotes cancer cell invasiveness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E3152-E3161.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1305269110
- 211.
- 212.
Kannagi R, Yin J, Miyazaki K, Izawa M. Current relevance of incomplete synthesis and neo-synthesis for cancer-associated alteration of carbohydrate determinants-Hakomori’s concepts revisited. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2008;1780:525-531.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.10.007
- 213.
Kakugawa Y, et al. Up-regulation of plasma membrane-associated ganglioside sialidase (Neu3) in human colon cancer and its involvement in apoptosis suppression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:10718-10723.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.152597199
- 214.
Kumamoto K, et al. Increased expression of UDP-galactose transporter messenger RNA in human colon cancer tissues and its implication in synthesis of Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen and sialyl Lewis A/X determinants. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4620-4627.
Not in our library
- 215.
Schietinger A, et al. A mutant chaperone converts a wild-type protein into a tumor-specific antigen. Science. 2006;314:304-308.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1129200
- 216.
Hakomori S. Glycosylation defining cancer malignancy: new wine in an old bottle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:10231-10233.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.172380699
- 217.
Zhang Y, et al. Global variations in lung cancer incidence by histological subtype in 2020: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:1206-1218.
Not in our library10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00444-8
- 218.
Lastwika KJ, et al. Posttranslational modifications induce autoantibodies with risk prediction capability in patients with small cell lung cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 2023;15:eadd8469.
Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.add8469
- 219.
Kondo K, et al. Identification of distinct N-glycosylation patterns on extracellular vesicles from small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2022;298:101950.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101950
- 220.
Saitou A, et al. N-glycosylation regulates MET processing and signaling. Cancer Sci. 2022;113:1292-1304.
Not in our library10.1111/cas.15278
- 221.
Reticker-Flynn NE, Bhatia SN. Aberrant glycosylation promotes lung cancer metastasis through adhesion to galectins in the metastatic niche. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:168-181.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0760
- 222.
Cui Y, et al. B4GALT1 promotes immune escape by regulating the expression of PD-L1 at multiple levels in lung adenocarcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2023;42:146.
Not in our library10.1186/s13046-023-02711-3
- 223.
Lee HH, et al. Removal of N-linked glycosylation enhances PD-L1 detection and predicts anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic efficacy. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:168-178.e164.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2019.06.008
- 224.
Wang Y, et al. Comprehensive serum N-glycan profiling identifies a biomarker panel for early diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Proteomics. 2023;23:e2300140.
Not in our library10.1002/pmic.202300140
- 225.
Alvarez, M. R. et al. Glycomic, glycoproteomic, and proteomic profiling of philippine lung cancer and peritumoral tissues: case series study of patients Stages I-III. Cancers (Basel)15, 15051559 (2023).
Not in our library10.3390/cancers15051559
- 226.
Mun DG, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human early-onset gastric cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;35:111-124.e110.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2018.12.003
- 227.
Pinho SS, et al. Gastric cancer: adding glycosylation to the equation. Trends Mol. Med. 2013;19:664-676.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2013.07.003
- 228.
Krug J, et al. N-glycosylation regulates intrinsic IFN-gamma resistance in colorectal cancer: implications for immunotherapy. Gastroenterology. 2023;164:392-406.e395.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2022.11.018
- 229.
He L, Guo Z, Wang W, Tian S, Lin R. FUT2 inhibits the EMT and metastasis of colorectal cancer by increasing LRP1 fucosylation. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023;21:63.
Not in our library10.1186/s12964-023-01060-0
- 230.
Irimura T, et al. Colorectal cancer metastasis determined by carbohydrate-mediated cell adhesion: role of sialyl-LeX antigens. Semin Cancer Biol. 1993;4:319-324.
Not in our library
- 231.
Li J, et al. The ligation between ERMAP, galectin-9 and dectin-2 promotes Kupffer cell phagocytosis and antitumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2023;24:1813-1824.
Not in our library10.1038/s41590-023-01634-7
- 232.
Liang Y, et al. Systemic delivery of glycosylated-PEG-masked oncolytic virus enhances targeting of antitumor immuno-virotherapy and modulates T and NK cell infiltration. Theranostics. 2023;13:5452-5468.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.87498
- 233.
Dall’Olio F, Chiricolo M. Sialyltransferases in cancer. Glycoconj. J. 2001;18:841-850.
Not in our library10.1023/a:1022288022969
- 234.
Lise M, et al. Clinical correlations of alpha2,6-sialyltransferase expression in colorectal cancer patients. Hybridoma. 2000;19:281-286.
Not in our library10.1089/027245700429828
- 235.
Bresalier RS, Rockwell RW, Dahiya R, Duh QY, Kim YS. Cell surface sialoprotein alterations in metastatic murine colon cancer cell lines selected in an animal model for colon cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 1990;50:1299-1307.
Not in our library
- 236.
Leppanen A, Stowell S, Blixt O, Cummings RD. Dimeric galectin-1 binds with high affinity to alpha2,3-sialylated and non-sialylated terminal N-acetyllactosamine units on surface-bound extended glycans. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:5549-5562.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m412019200
- 237.
Zhuo Y, Bellis SL. Emerging role of alpha2,6-sialic acid as a negative regulator of galectin binding and function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:5935-5941.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.r110.191429
- 238.
Trinchera, M., Aronica, A. & Dall’Olio, F. Selectin ligands Sialyl-Lewis a and Sialyl-Lewis x in gastrointestinal cancers. Biology (Basel)6, 6010016 (2017).
Not in our library10.3390/biology6010016
- 239.
Nakamori S, et al. Increased expression of sialyl Lewisx antigen correlates with poor survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Cancer Res. 1993;53:3632-3637.
Not in our library
- 240.
Marrelli D, et al. Preoperative positivity of serum tumor markers is a strong predictor of hematogenous recurrence of gastric cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2001;78:253-258.
Not in our library10.1002/jso.1163
- 241.
Luo G, et al. Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: biomarker, predictor and promoter. Biochim Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2021;1875:188409.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188409
- 242.
- 243.
Shen, H., Lee, C. Y. & Chen, C. H. Protein glycosylation as biomarkers in gynecologic cancers. Diagnostics (Basel)12, 12123177 (2022).
Not in our library10.3390/diagnostics12123177
- 244.
Wu J, et al. Glycosyltransferase-related prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. Comput Biol. Med. 2023;163:107164.
Not in our library10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107164
- 245.
Mittal P, et al. Altered N-linked glycosylation in endometrial cancer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2021;413:2721-2733.
Not in our library10.1007/s00216-020-03039-z
- 246.
Yang Y, Zhu G, Yang L, Yang Y. Targeting CD24 as a novel immunotherapy for solid cancers. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023;21:312.
Not in our library10.1186/s12964-023-01315-w
- 247.
Payne KK, et al. BTN3A1 governs antitumor responses by coordinating alphabeta and gammadelta T cells. Science. 2020;369:942-949.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aay2767
- 248.
Gautam, S. K. et al. Mucins as potential biomarkers for early detection of cancer. Cancers (Basel)15, 15061640 (2023).
Not in our library10.3390/cancers15061640
- 249.
Memarzadeh S, et al. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: prognostic biomarker for endometrial cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:10647-10652.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.152127499
- 250.
Kacperczyk, M., Kmieciak, A. & Kratz, E. M. The role of ApoE expression and variability of its glycosylation in human reproductive health in the light of current information. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 22137197 (2021).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms22137197
- 251.
Cao K, et al. Attenuation of sialylation augments antitumor immunity and improves response to immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2023;83:2171-2186.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-3260
- 252.
Thompson S, Dargan E, Turner GA. Increased fucosylation and other carbohydrate changes in haptoglobin in ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 1992;66:43-48.
Not in our library10.1016/0304-3835(92)90278-4
- 253.
Scott E, et al. ST6GAL1-mediated aberrant sialylation promotes prostate cancer progression. J. Pathol. 2023;261:71-84.
Not in our library10.1002/path.6152
- 254.
Hatano K, et al. Simultaneous analysis of serum alpha2,3-linked sialylation and core-type fucosylation of prostate-specific antigen for the detection of high-grade prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2022;126:764-770.
Not in our library10.1038/s41416-021-01637-x
- 255.
Liang D, et al. Glycosylation in breast cancer progression and mammary development: molecular connections and malignant transformations. Life Sci. 2023;326:121781.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121781
- 256.
Gupta R, Ponangi R, Indresh KG. Role of glycosylation in breast cancer progression and metastasis: implications for miRNA, EMT and multidrug resistance. Glycobiology. 2023;33:545-555.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwad046
- 257.
Chang X, et al. Glycosylated proteins with abnormal glycosylation changes are potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Int J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;236:123855.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123855
- 258.
- 259.
Taifour T, et al. The tumor-derived cytokine Chi3l1 induces neutrophil extracellular traps that promote T cell exclusion in triple-negative breast cancer. Immunity. 2023;56:2755-2772.e2758.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2023.11.002
- 260.
Polyak K. Breast cancer: origins and evolution. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:3155-3163.
Not in our library10.1172/jci33295
- 261.
Berx G, van Roy F. Involvement of members of the cadherin superfamily in cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009;1:a003129.
Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a003129
- 262.
Valla, S. et al. Syndecan-1 depletion has a differential impact on hyaluronic acid metabolism and tumor cell behavior in luminal and triple-negative breast cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 22115874 (2021).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms22115874
- 263.
Ma Z, Vosseller K. Cancer metabolism and elevated O-GlcNAc in oncogenic signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:34457-34465.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.r114.577718
- 264.
Caldwell SA, et al. Nutrient sensor O-GlcNAc transferase regulates breast cancer tumorigenesis through targeting of the oncogenic transcription factor FoxM1. Oncogene. 2010;29:2831-2842.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2010.41
- 265.
Rossi M, et al. PHGDH heterogeneity potentiates cancer cell dissemination and metastasis. Nature. 2022;605:747-753.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-022-04758-2
- 266.
Bieniasz-Krzywiec P, et al. Podoplanin-expressing macrophages promote lymphangiogenesis and lymphoinvasion in breast cancer. Cell Metab. 2019;30:917-936.e910.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.07.015
- 267.
Scupakova, K. et al. Clinical importance of high-mannose, fucosylated, and complex N-glycans in breast cancer metastasis. JCI Insight6, 146945 (2021).
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.146945
- 268.
Yang, M. et al. Inhibition of DPAGT1 suppresses HER2 shedding and trastuzumab resistance in human breast cancer. J. Clin. Invest.133, 164428 (2023).
Not in our library10.1172/jci164428
- 269.
Tominaga N, et al. RPN2-mediated glycosylation of tetraspanin CD63 regulates breast cancer cell malignancy. Mol. Cancer. 2014;13:134.
Not in our library10.1186/1476-4598-13-134
- 270.
Ho WL, Hsu WM, Huang MC, Kadomatsu K, Nakagawara A. Protein glycosylation in cancers and its potential therapeutic applications in neuroblastoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2016;9:100.
Not in our library10.1186/s13045-016-0334-6
- 271.
Hall, M. K. et al. Limited N-glycan processing impacts chaperone expression patterns, cell growth and cell invasiveness in neuroblastoma. Biology (Basel)12, 12020293 (2023).
Not in our library10.3390/biology12020293
- 272.
Stip, M. C. et al. IgA antibody immunotherapy targeting GD2 is effective in preclinical neuroblastoma models. J. Immunother Cancer11, 006948 (2023).
Not in our library10.1136/jitc-2023-006948
- 273.
Qin W, et al. Serum protein N-Glycosylation signatures of neuroblastoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:603417.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2021.603417
- 274.
Xiao Z, et al. EGFR is a potential therapeutic target for highly glycosylated and aggressive pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Int. J. Cancer. 2023;153:164-172.
Not in our library10.1002/ijc.34499
- 275.
Liu Z, et al. Detecting tumor antigen-specific T cells via interaction-dependent fucosyl-biotinylation. Cell. 2020;183:1117-1133.e1119.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.048
- 276.
Dela Cruz CS, et al. N-linked glycosylation is required for optimal function of Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus-encoded, but not cellular, interleukin 6. J. Exp. Med. 2004;199:503-514.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20031205
- 277.
- 278.
Darzi M, Gorgin S, Majidzadeh AK, Esmaeili R. Gene co-expression network analysis reveals immune cell infiltration as a favorable prognostic marker in non-uterine leiomyosarcoma. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:2339.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-021-81952-8
- 279.
Wahren-Herlenius M, Dorner T. Immunopathogenic mechanisms of systemic autoimmune disease. Lancet. 2013;382:819-831.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60954-x
- 280.
Aoyama M, et al. Effects of terminal galactose residues in mannose alpha1-6 arm of Fc-glycan on the effector functions of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. MAbs. 2019;11:826-836.
Not in our library10.1080/19420862.2019.1608143
- 281.
Scallon BJ, Tam SH, McCarthy SG, Cai AN, Raju TS. Higher levels of sialylated Fc glycans in immunoglobulin G molecules can adversely impact functionality. Mol. Immunol. 2007;44:1524-1534.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molimm.2006.09.005
- 282.
Anthony RM, et al. Recapitulation of IVIG anti-inflammatory activity with a recombinant IgG Fc. Science. 2008;320:373-376.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1154315
- 283.
Zhou X, et al. Antibody glycosylation in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021;20:102804.
Not in our library10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102804
- 284.
Su, Z., Xie, Q., Wang, Y. & Li, Y. Abberant Immunoglobulin G Glycosylation in Rheumatoid Arthritis by LTQ-ESI-MS. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 21062045 (2020).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms21062045
- 285.
Huang C, Liu Y, Wu H, Sun D, Li Y. Characterization of IgG glycosylation in rheumatoid arthritis patients by MALDI-TOF-MS(n) and capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017;409:3731-3739.
Not in our library10.1007/s00216-017-0302-1
- 286.
Parekh RB, et al. Association of rheumatoid arthritis and primary osteoarthritis with changes in the glycosylation pattern of total serum IgG. Nature. 1985;316:452-457.
Not in our library10.1038/316452a0
- 287.
Kaneko Y, Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from Fc sialylation. Science. 2006;313:670-673.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1129594
- 288.
Matsumoto A, Shikata K, Takeuchi F, Kojima N, Mizuochi T. Autoantibody activity of IgG rheumatoid factor increases with decreasing levels of galactosylation and sialylation. J. Biochem. 2000;128:621-628.
Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022794
- 289.
- 290.
Bernard NJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: changes in ACPA Fc glycosylation patterns prior to RA onset. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2013;9:697.
Not in our library10.1038/nrrheum.2013.162
- 291.
Bondt A, et al. IgA N- and O-glycosylation profiling reveals no association with the pregnancy-related improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017;19:160.
Not in our library10.1186/s13075-017-1367-0
- 292.
Orr C, et al. Synovial tissue research: a state-of-the-art review. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017;13:463-475.
Not in our library10.1038/nrrheum.2017.115
- 293.
Xu Z, et al. Integrative proteomics and N-glycoproteomics analyses of rheumatoid arthritis synovium reveal immune-associated glycopeptides. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2023;22:100540.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100540
- 294.
- 295.
Kiriakidou M, Ching CL. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Intern Med. 2020;172:ITC81-ITC96.
Not in our library10.7326/aitc202006020
- 296.
- 297.
Han J, et al. Fucosylation of anti-dsDNA IgG1 correlates with disease activity of treatment-naive systemic lupus erythematosus patients. EBioMedicine. 2022;77:103883.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103883
- 298.
- 299.
Alves I, et al. Protein mannosylation as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of lupus nephritis: an unusual glycan neoepitope in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73:2069-2077.
Not in our library10.1002/art.41768
- 300.
Green RS, et al. Mammalian N-glycan branching protects against innate immune self-recognition and inflammation in autoimmune disease pathogenesis. Immunity. 2007;27:308-320.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2007.06.008
- 301.
Bruner LP, White AM, Proksell S. Inflammatory bowel disease. Prim. Care. 2023;50:411-427.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pop.2023.03.009
- 302.
Kudelka MR, Stowell SR, Cummings RD, Neish AS. Intestinal epithelial glycosylation in homeostasis and gut microbiota interactions in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;17:597-617.
Not in our library10.1038/s41575-020-0331-7
- 303.
Clerc F, et al. Plasma N-Glycan signatures are associated with features of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:829-843.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.030
- 304.
Trbojevic Akmacic I, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease associates with proinflammatory potential of the immunoglobulin G glycome. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015;21:1237-1247.
Not in our library10.1097/mib.0000000000000372
- 305.
Simurina M, et al. Glycosylation of immunoglobulin G associates with clinical features of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1320-1333.e1310.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.002
- 306.
Fujii H, et al. Core fucosylation on T cells, required for activation of T-cell receptor signaling and induction of colitis in mice, is increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1620-1632.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.002
- 307.
Shinzaki S, et al. IgG oligosaccharide alterations are a novel diagnostic marker for disease activity and the clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1173-1181.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01699.x
- 308.
Shinzaki S, et al. Lectin-based immunoassay for aberrant IgG glycosylation as the biomarker for Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013;19:321-331.
Not in our library10.1097/mib.0b013e318280eade
- 309.
Muller S, et al. Galectin-3 modulates T cell activity and is reduced in the inflamed intestinal epithelium in IBD. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2006;12:588-597.
Not in our library10.1097/01.mib.0000225341.37226.7c
- 310.
Nishida A, et al. Inducible colitis-associated glycome capable of stimulating the proliferation of memory CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:2383-2394.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20112631
- 311.
Li Y, Tang R, Leung PSC, Gershwin ME, Ma X. Bile acids and intestinal microbiota in autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2017;16:885-896.
Not in our library10.1016/j.autrev.2017.07.002
- 312.
Lohse AW, Mieli-Vergani G. Autoimmune hepatitis. J. Hepatol. 2011;55:171-182.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.012
- 313.
Muratori L, Lohse AW, Lenzi M. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. BMJ. 2023;380:e070201.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj-2022-070201
- 314.
Zhou X, et al. Glycomic analysis of antibody indicates distinctive glycosylation profile in patients with autoimmune cholangitis. J. Autoimmun. 2020;113:102503.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102503
- 315.
Hardtke-Wolenski M, et al. Genetic predisposition and environmental danger signals initiate chronic autoimmune hepatitis driven by CD4+ T cells. Hepatology. 2013;58:718-728.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.26380
- 316.
Hao X, et al. Deficient O-GlcNAc glycosylation impairs regulatory T cell differentiation and notch signaling in autoimmune hepatitis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2089.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.02089
- 317.
Hao X, et al. Deficiency of O-linked-glycosylation regulates activation of T cells and aggravates Concanavalin A-induced liver injury. Toxicology. 2020;433-434:152411.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tox.2020.152411
- 318.
Vincent A. Unravelling the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:797-804.
Not in our library10.1038/nri916
- 319.
Rodgaard A, Nielsen FC, Djurup R, Somnier F, Gammeltoft S. Acetylcholine receptor antibody in myasthenia gravis: predominance of IgG subclasses 1 and 3. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1987;67:82-88.
Not in our library
- 320.
Hoch W, et al. Auto-antibodies to the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK in patients with myasthenia gravis without acetylcholine receptor antibodies. Nat. Med. 2001;7:365-368.
Not in our library10.1038/85520
- 321.
- 322.
Huijbers MG, et al. MuSK myasthenia gravis monoclonal antibodies: Valency dictates pathogenicity. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2019;6:e547.
Not in our library10.1212/nxi.0000000000000547
- 323.
Koers J, et al. Differences in IgG autoantibody Fab glycosylation across autoimmune diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2023;151:1646-1654.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2022.10.035
- 324.
Meltzer RH, et al. Electrostatic steering at acetylcholine binding sites. Biophys. J. 2006;91:1302-1314.
Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.106.081463
- 325.
Fichtner, M. L. et al. Affinity maturation is required for pathogenic monovalent IgG4 autoantibody development in myasthenia gravis. J. Exp. Med.217, 20200513 (2020).
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20200513
- 326.
Mandel-Brehm C, et al. Elevated N-linked glycosylation of IgG V regions in myasthenia gravis disease subtypes. J. Immunol. 2021;207:2005-2014.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.2100225
- 327.
Selman MH, et al. IgG fc N-glycosylation changes in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and myasthenia gravis. J. Proteome Res. 2011;10:143-152.
Not in our library10.1021/pr1004373
- 328.
Barrios C, et al. Glycosylation profile of IgG in moderate kidney dysfunction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;27:933-941.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.2015010109
- 329.
Allen AC, Bailey EM, Barratt J, Buck KS, Feehally J. Analysis of IgA1 O-glycans in IgA nephropathy by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999;10:1763-1771.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.v1081763
- 330.
Stamellou E, et al. IgA nephropathy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2023;9:67.
Not in our library10.1038/s41572-023-00476-9
- 331.
Nemcic M, et al. N-glycosylation of serum proteins in adult type 1 diabetes mellitus exposes further changes compared to children at the disease onset. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2023;543:117298.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cca.2023.117298
- 332.
Zhang ZJ, et al. Human plasma IgG N-Glycome profiles reveal a proinflammatory phenotype in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Hypertension. 2023;80:1929-1939.
Not in our library10.1161/hypertensionaha.123.21408
- 333.
Cvetko, A. et al. Plasma N-glycome shows continuous deterioration as the diagnosis of insulin resistance approaches. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care9, 002263 (2021).
Not in our library10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002263
- 334.
Wang HF, et al. Protein O-GlcNAcylation in cardiovascular diseases. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2023;44:8-18.
Not in our library10.1038/s41401-022-00934-2
- 335.
Arany Z, et al. Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1 alpha controls the energy state and contractile function of cardiac muscle. Cell Metab. 2005;1:259-271.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2005.03.002
- 336.
Yu H, Wen L, Mu Y. O-GlcNAcylation is essential for autophagy in cardiomyocytes. Oxid. Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:5602396.
Not in our library10.1155/2020/5602396
- 337.
Brainard RE, Facundo HT. Cardiac hypertrophy drives PGC-1alpha suppression associated with enhanced O-glycosylation. Biochim Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2021;1867:166080.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166080
- 338.
Chen X, et al. Increased O-GlcNAcylation induces myocardial hypertrophy. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2020;56:735-743.
Not in our library10.1007/s11626-020-00503-z
- 339.
Si R, et al. Overexpression of p53 due to excess protein O-GlcNAcylation is associated with coronary microvascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116:1186-1198.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvz216
- 340.
Yang WH, et al. Modification of p53 with O-linked N-acetylglucosamine regulates p53 activity and stability. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:1074-1083.
Not in our library10.1038/ncb1470
- 341.
Huang L, et al. O-GlcNAc-modified SNAP29 inhibits autophagy-mediated degradation via the disturbed SNAP29-STX17-VAMP8 complex and exacerbates myocardial injury in type I diabetic rats. Int J. Mol. Med. 2018;42:3278-3290.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2018.3866
- 342.
Ferro F, et al. Glycosylation of blood cells during the onset and progression of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. Trends Mol. Med. 2024;30:178-196.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2023.11.013
- 343.
Bottcher M, et al. Extracorporeal blood circulation in the unanesthetized free-moving rabbit-an animal model for biocompatibility studies. Z. Exp. Chir. Transpl. Kunstliche Organe. 1988;21:139-144.
Not in our library
- 344.
Eckardt V, Weber C, von Hundelshausen P. Glycans and Glycan-Binding Proteins in Atherosclerosis. Thromb. Haemost. 2019;119:1265-1273.
Not in our library10.1055/s-0039-1692720
- 345.
Mironov, A. A. & Beznoussenko, G. V. Opinion: On the way towards the new paradigm of atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 23042152 (2022).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms23042152
- 346.
Lim SY, et al. N-glycan profiles of acute myocardial infarction patients reveal potential biomarkers for diagnosis, severity assessment and treatment monitoring. Glycobiology. 2022;32:469-482.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwab129
- 347.
Birukov A, et al. Immunoglobulin G N-glycosylation signatures in incident type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2022;45:2729-2736.
Not in our library10.2337/dc22-0833
- 348.
Mican J, Toul M, Bednar D, Damborsky J. Structural biology and protein engineering of thrombolytics. Comput Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2019;17:917-938.
Not in our library10.1016/j.csbj.2019.06.023
- 349.
Toul M, et al. Identification, characterization, and engineering of glycosylation in thrombolytics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023;66:108174.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108174
- 350.
Keyt BA, et al. A faster-acting and more potent form of tissue plasminogen activator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:3670-3674.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.91.9.3670
- 351.
Paoni NF, et al. Involvement of residues 296-299 in the enzymatic activity of tissue-type plasminogen activator. Protein Eng. 1992;5:259-266.
Not in our library10.1093/protein/5.3.259
- 352.
Refino CJ, et al. A variant of t-PA (T103N, KHRR 296-299 AAAA) that, by bolus, has increased potency and decreased systemic activation of plasminogen. Thromb. Haemost. 1993;70:313-319.
Not in our library10.1055/s-0038-1649572
- 353.
Soesanto Y, et al. Pleiotropic and age-dependent effects of decreased protein modification by O-linked N-acetylglucosamine on pancreatic beta-cell function and vascularization. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:26118-26126.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111.249508
- 354.
- 355.
Zhu C, et al. Site-specific glycoprofiles of HDL-associated apoe are correlated with HDL functional capacity and unaffected by short-term diet. J. Proteome Res. 2019;18:3977-3984.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00450
- 356.
Teslovich TM, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010;466:707-713.
Not in our library10.1038/nature09270
- 357.
Khetarpal SA, et al. Loss of function of GALNT2 lowers high-density lipoproteins in humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents. Cell Metab. 2016;24:234-245.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2016.07.012
- 358.
Bouche C, Serdy S, Kahn CR, Goldfine AB. The cellular fate of glucose and its relevance in type 2 diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 2004;25:807-830.
Not in our library10.1210/er.2003-0026
- 359.
Chatham JC, Zhang J, Wende AR. Role of O-linked N-acetylglucosamine protein modification in cellular (Patho)Physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2021;101:427-493.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00043.2019
- 360.
Grundke-Iqbal I, et al. Microtubule-associated protein tau. A component of Alzheimer paired helical filaments. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:6084-6089.
Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38495-8
- 361.
Liu F, Iqbal K, Grundke-Iqbal I, Hart GW, Gong CX. O-GlcNAcylation regulates phosphorylation of tau: a mechanism involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:10804-10809.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0400348101
- 362.
Yuzwa SA, et al. A potent mechanism-inspired O-GlcNAcase inhibitor that blocks phosphorylation of tau in vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008;4:483-490.
Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.96
- 363.
Kim C, et al. O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase inhibitor attenuates beta-amyloid plaque and rescues memory impairment. Neurobiol. Aging. 2013;34:275-285.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.001
- 364.
Wang P, et al. O-GlcNAc cycling mutants modulate proteotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans models of human neurodegenerative diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:17669-17674.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1205748109
- 365.
Ross CA, Poirier MA. Opinion: What is the role of protein aggregation in neurodegeneration? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;6:891-898.
Not in our library10.1038/nrm1742
- 366.
Wani WY, et al. O-GlcNAc regulation of autophagy and alpha-synuclein homeostasis; implications for Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Brain. 2017;10:32.
Not in our library10.1186/s13041-017-0311-1
- 367.
Reily C, Stewart TJ, Renfrow MB, Novak J. Glycosylation in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019;15:346-366.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-019-0129-4
- 368.
Gilgunn S, Conroy PJ, Saldova R, Rudd PM, O’Kennedy RJ. Aberrant PSA glycosylation-a sweet predictor of prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2013;10:99-107.
Not in our library10.1038/nrurol.2012.258
- 369.
Qian Y, et al. Quantitative analysis of serum IgG galactosylation assists differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer. J. Proteome Res. 2013;12:4046-4055.
Not in our library10.1021/pr4003992
- 370.
Ren S, et al. Distribution of IgG galactosylation as a promising biomarker for cancer screening in multiple cancer types. Cell Res. 2016;26:963-966.
Not in our library10.1038/cr.2016.83
- 371.
Xu X, et al. A signature based on glycosyltransferase genes provides a promising tool for the prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy responsiveness in ovarian cancer. J. Ovarian Res. 2023;16:5.
Not in our library10.1186/s13048-022-01088-9
- 372.
Jones RB, Dorsett KA, Hjelmeland AB, Bellis SL. The ST6Gal-I sialyltransferase protects tumor cells against hypoxia by enhancing HIF-1alpha signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:5659-5667.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra117.001194
- 373.
Schultz MJ, et al. The tumor-associated glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I regulates stem cell transcription factors and confers a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3978-3988.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2834
- 374.
Terava J, et al. Primary breast cancer biomarkers based on glycosylation and extracellular vesicles detected from human serum. Cancer Rep. (Hoboken). 2022;5:e1540.
Not in our library10.1002/cnr2.1540
- 375.
Qing L, Li Q, Dong Z. MUC1: an emerging target in cancer treatment and diagnosis. Bull. Cancer. 2022;109:1202-1216.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.08.001
- 376.
Alirezapour B, et al. Development of [(6)(4)Cu]-DOTA-PR81 radioimmunoconjugate for MUC-1 positive PET imaging. Nucl. Med Biol. 2016;43:73-80.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.07.012
- 377.
Xu M, et al. Protein glycosylation in urine as a biomarker of diseases. Transl. Res. 2023;253:95-107.
Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2022.08.001
- 378.
Ragusa, A. et al. Differential glycosylation levels in saliva from patients with lung or breast cancer: a preliminary assessment for early diagnostic purposes. Metabolites11, 11090566 (2021).
Not in our library10.3390/metabo11090566
- 379.
Zhou Z, et al. Identification of a novel glycosyltransferase prognostic signature in hepatocellular carcinoma based on LASSO algorithm. Front Genet. 2022;13:823728.
Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2022.823728
- 380.
Pucci, M., Duca, M., Malagolini, N. & Dall’Olio, F. Glycosyltransferases in cancer: prognostic biomarkers of survival in patient cohorts and impact on malignancy in experimental models. Cancers (Basel)14, 14092128 (2022).
Not in our library10.3390/cancers14092128
- 381.
Theodoratou E, et al. Glycosylation of plasma IgG in colorectal cancer prognosis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:28098.
Not in our library10.1038/srep28098
- 382.
do Nascimento JCF, Beltrao EIC, Rocha CRC. High FUT3 expression is a marker of lower overall survival of breast cancer patients. Glycoconj. J. 2020;37:263-275.
Not in our library10.1007/s10719-020-09914-2
- 383.
Honma R, et al. Expression of fucosyltransferase 8 is associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancers. Oncology. 2015;88:298-308.
Not in our library10.1159/000369495
- 384.
Peric, L. et al. Glycosylation alterations in cancer cells, prognostic value of glycan biomarkers and their potential as novel therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Biomedicines10, 10123265 (2022).
Not in our library10.3390/biomedicines10123265
- 385.
- 386.
Shi Y, et al. Glycosylation-related molecular subtypes and risk score of hepatocellular carcinoma: Novel insights to clinical decision-making. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2022;13:1090324.
Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2022.1090324
- 387.
Liang JX, et al. A novel glycosylation-related gene signature predicts survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. BMC Bioinforma. 2022;23:562.
Not in our library10.1186/s12859-022-05109-8
- 388.
Thomas D, Rathinavel AK, Radhakrishnan P. Altered glycosylation in cancer: a promising target for biomarkers and therapeutics. Biochim Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2021;1875:188464.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188464
- 389.
Brown JR, et al. A disaccharide-based inhibitor of glycosylation attenuates metastatic tumor cell dissemination. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:2894-2901.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-2745
- 390.
Badurova L, et al. 2-Deoxy-D-glucose inhibits lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus propagation by targeting glycoprotein N-glycosylation. Virol. J. 2023;20:108.
Not in our library10.1186/s12985-023-02082-3
- 391.
Lee, N., Jang, W. J., Seo, J. H., Lee, S. & Jeong, C. H. 2-Deoxy-d-Glucose-Induced metabolic alteration in human oral squamous SCC15 cells: involvement of N-Glycosylation of Axl and Met. Metabolites9, 9090188 (2019).
Not in our library10.3390/metabo9090188
- 392.
Repas, J. et al. Dual effect of combined metformin and 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose treatment on mitochondrial biogenesis and PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Cancers (Basel)14, 14051343 (2022).
Not in our library10.3390/cancers14051343
- 393.
Julien S, et al. Sialyl-Tn vaccine induces antibody-mediated tumour protection in a relevant murine model. Br. J. Cancer. 2009;100:1746-1754.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.bjc.6605083
- 394.
Chugh S, et al. Pathobiological implications of mucin glycans in cancer: Sweet poison and novel targets. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2015;1856:211-225.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.08.003
- 395.
Xi X, et al. Glycosylated modification of MUC1 maybe a new target to promote drug sensitivity and efficacy for breast cancer chemotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:708.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-022-05110-2
- 396.
Bose M, et al. Targeting tumor-associated MUC1 overcomes anoikis-resistance in pancreatic cancer. Transl. Res. 2023;253:41-56.
Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2022.08.010
- 397.
Salouti M, Rajabi H, Babaei MH, Rasaee MJ. Breast tumor targeting with (99m)Tc-HYNIC-PR81 complex as a new biologic radiopharmaceutical. Nucl. Med Biol. 2008;35:763-768.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.07.002
- 398.
Rong Y, et al. Induction of protective and therapeutic anti-pancreatic cancer immunity using a reconstructed MUC1 DNA vaccine. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:191.
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2407-9-191
- 399.
Posey AD, et al. Engineered CAR T cells targeting the cancer-associated Tn-glycoform of the membrane mucin MUC1 control adenocarcinoma. Immunity. 2016;44:1444-1454.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.014
- 400.
Gerber-Lemaire S, Juillerat-Jeanneret L. Glycosylation pathways as drug targets for cancer: glycosidase inhibitors. Mini Rev. Med Chem. 2006;6:1043-1052.
Not in our library10.2174/138955706778195162
- 401.
Shi S, et al. Inhibition of MAN2A1 enhances the immune response to Anti-PD-L1 in human tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:5990-6002.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0778
- 402.
Petrosyan A, Cheng PW. Golgi fragmentation induced by heat shock or inhibition of heat shock proteins is mediated by non-muscle myosin IIA via its interaction with glycosyltransferases. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2014;19:241-254.
Not in our library10.1007/s12192-013-0450-y
- 403.
Pili R, et al. The alpha-glucosidase I inhibitor castanospermine alters endothelial cell glycosylation, prevents angiogenesis, and inhibits tumor growth. Cancer Res. 1995;55:2920-2926.
Not in our library
- 404.
Bousseau S, et al. Glycosylation as new pharmacological strategies for diseases associated with excessive angiogenesis. Pharm. Ther. 2018;191:92-122.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.06.003
- 405.
Goede V, et al. Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:1101-1110.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1313984
- 406.
Zhang Z, Pan H, Chen X. Mass spectrometry for structural characterization of therapeutic antibodies. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2009;28:147-176.
Not in our library10.1002/mas.20190
- 407.
Zheng K, Bantog C, Bayer R. The impact of glycosylation on monoclonal antibody conformation and stability. MAbs. 2011;3:568-576.
Not in our library10.4161/mabs.3.6.17922
- 408.
Kayser V, et al. Glycosylation influences on the aggregation propensity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Biotechnol. J. 2011;6:38-44.
Not in our library10.1002/biot.201000091
- 409.
Mishra N, Spearman M, Donald L, Perreault H, Butler M. Comparison of two glycoengineering strategies to control the fucosylation of a monoclonal antibody. J. Biotechnol. 2020;324S:100015.
Not in our library10.1016/j.btecx.2020.100015
- 410.
Heard A, et al. Antigen glycosylation regulates efficacy of CAR T cells targeting CD19. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:3367.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-31035-7
- 411.
Chen F, Huang G, Huang H. Sugar ligand-mediated drug delivery. Future Med Chem. 2020;12:161-171.
Not in our library10.4155/fmc-2019-0114
- 412.
Nahar M, et al. Functional polymeric nanoparticles: an efficient and promising tool for active delivery of bioactives. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 2006;23:259-318.
Not in our library10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v23.i4.10
- 413.
Peterslund NA, Koch C, Jensenius JC, Thiel S. Association between deficiency of mannose-binding lectin and severe infections after chemotherapy. Lancet. 2001;358:637-638.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05785-3
- 414.
Sun Y, et al. Galactose-containing polymer-DOX conjugates for targeting drug delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;18:749-758.
Not in our library10.1208/s12249-016-0557-4
- 415.
Qu B, et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of multivalent glucosides with high affinity as ligands for brain targeting liposomes. Eur. J. Med Chem. 2014;72:110-118.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.10.007
- 416.
Chou PY, et al. Glycosylation of OVA antigen-loaded PLGA nanoparticles enhances DC-targeting for cancer vaccination. J. Control Release. 2022;351:970-988.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.002
- 417.
Liu X, et al. Glyco-decorated tobacco mosaic virus as a vector for cisplatin delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2017;5:2078-2085.
Not in our library10.1039/c7tb00100b
- 418.
Zou Y, Yang W, Meng F, Zhong Z. Targeted hepatoma chemotherapy in vivo using galactose-decorated crosslinked pH-sensitive degradable micelles. J. Control Release. 2015;213:e125-e126.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.05.212
- 419.
Sharma R, et al. Glycosylation of PAMAM dendrimers significantly improves tumor macrophage targeting and specificity in glioblastoma. J. Control Release. 2021;337:179-192.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.018
- 420.
Auriti C, et al. Mannose-binding lectin: biologic characteristics and role in the susceptibility to infections and ischemia-reperfusion related injury in critically Ill neonates. J. Immunol. Res. 2017;2017:7045630.
Not in our library10.1155/2017/7045630
- 421.
Yu W, Zhang N, Li C. Saccharide modified pharmaceutical nanocarriers for targeted drug and gene delivery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009;15:3826-3836.
Not in our library10.2174/138161209789649547
- 422.
Buskas T, Li Y, Boons GJ. The immunogenicity of the tumor-associated antigen Lewis(y) may be suppressed by a bifunctional cross-linker required for coupling to a carrier protein. Chemistry. 2004;10:3517-3524.
Not in our library10.1002/chem.200400074
- 423.
Slovin SF, et al. Carbohydrate vaccines in cancer: immunogenicity of a fully synthetic globo H hexasaccharide conjugate in man. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:5710-5715.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.10.5710
- 424.
Cai H, et al. Fully synthetic self-adjuvanting thioether-conjugated glycopeptide-lipopeptide antitumor vaccines for the induction of complement-dependent cytotoxicity against tumor cells. Chemistry. 2013;19:1962-1970.
Not in our library10.1002/chem.201203709
- 425.
- 426.
Pohl J, et al. D-19575-a sugar-linked isophosphoramide mustard derivative exploiting transmembrane glucose transport. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 1995;35:364-370.
Not in our library10.1007/s002800050248
- 427.
Goff RD, Thorson JS. Assessment of chemoselective neoglycosylation methods using chlorambucil as a model. J. Med Chem. 2010;53:8129-8139.
Not in our library10.1021/jm101024j
- 428.
Mikuni K, et al. In vivo antitumor activity of novel water-soluble taxoids. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008;31:1155-1158.
Not in our library10.1248/bpb.31.1155
- 429.
Moayedi S, et al. Sugar codes conjugated alginate: an innovative platform to make a strategic breakthrough in simultaneous prophylaxis of GERD and helicobacter pylori infection. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2020;14:2405-2412.
Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s255611
- 430.
Calvaresi EC, Hergenrother PJ. Glucose conjugation for the specific targeting and treatment of cancer. Chem. Sci. 2013;4:2319-2333.
Not in our library10.1039/c3sc22205e
- 431.
Liu X, et al. Dual targeting of innate and adaptive checkpoints on tumor cells limits immune evasion. Cell Rep. 2018;24:2101-2111.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.062
- 432.
Raghavendra NM, Pingili D, Kadasi S, Mettu A, Prasad S. Dual or multi-targeting inhibitors: the next generation anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med Chem. 2018;143:1277-1300.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.10.021
- 433.
Liu Z, et al. Recent development in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography stationary materials for glycopeptide analysis. Anal. Methods. 2022;14:4437-4448.
Not in our library10.1039/d2ay01369j
- 434.
Kozlik P, Goldman R, Sanda M. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in the separation of glycopeptides and their isomers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018;410:5001-5008.
Not in our library10.1007/s00216-018-1150-3
- 435.
van der Burgt YEM, Siliakus KM, Cobbaert CM, Ruhaak LR. HILIC-MRM-MS for linkage-specific separation of sialylated glycopeptides to quantify prostate-specific antigen proteoforms. J. Proteome Res. 2020;19:2708-2716.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00050
- 436.
Molnarova K, Duris A, Jecmen T, Kozlik P. Comparison of human IgG glycopeptides separation using mixed-mode hydrophilic interaction/ion-exchange liquid chromatography and reversed-phase mode. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2021;413:4321-4328.
Not in our library10.1007/s00216-021-03388-3
- 437.
Hernandez-Hernandez O, Quintanilla-Lopez JE, Lebron-Aguilar R, Sanz ML, Moreno FJ. Characterization of post-translationally modified peptides by hydrophilic interaction and reverse phase liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2016;1428:202-211.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.096
- 438.
Illiano, A. et al. Protein glycosylation investigated by mass spectrometry: an overview. Cells9, 9091986 (2020).
Not in our library10.3390/cells9091986
- 439.
Hajduk J, et al. Monitoring of antibody glycosylation pattern based on microarray MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J. Biotechnol. 2019;302:77-84.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.06.306
- 440.
O’Brien, J. F., Lacey, J. M. & Bergen, H. R., 3rd. Detection of hypo-N-glycosylation using mass spectrometry of transferrin. Curr Protoc. Hum. Genet Chapter 17, Unit 17 14 (2007).
Not in our library10.1002/0471142905.hg1704s54
- 441.
Kotsias M, et al. A semi-automated, high throughput approach for O-glycosylation profiling of in vitro established cancer cell lines by MALDI-FT-ICR MS. Glycoconj. J. 2021;38:747-756.
Not in our library10.1007/s10719-021-10003-1
- 442.
Sethi MK, Hancock WS, Fanayan S. Identifying N-Glycan biomarkers in colorectal cancer by mass spectrometry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016;49:2099-2106.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00193
- 443.
Long Z, et al. Determination of glycosylation degree for glycoconjugate vaccines using a solid-phase extraction combined with liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry method. J. Sep Sci. 2020;43:2880-2888.
Not in our library10.1002/jssc.202000075
- 444.
Naumann L, et al. High-throughput glycosylation analysis of intact monoclonal antibodies by mass spectrometry coupled with capillary electrophoresis and liquid chromatography. J. Sep Sci. 2022;45:2034-2044.
Not in our library10.1002/jssc.202100865
- 445.
Moran AB, et al. Profiling the proteoforms of urinary prostate-specific antigen by capillary electrophoresis—mass spectrometry. J. Proteom. 2021;238:104148.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104148
- 446.
Gardner RA, Urbanowicz PA, Spencer DIR. N-glycan characterization by liquid chromatography coupled with fluorimetry and mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022;2370:267-280.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-0716-1685-7_13
- 447.
Wu, C. C. et al. Identification of fucosylated SERPINA1 as a novel plasma marker for pancreatic cancer using lectin affinity capture coupled with iTRAQ-based quantitative glycoproteomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 22116079 (2021).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms22116079
- 448.
Li Y, Tao SC, Zhu H, Schneck JP. High-throughput lectin microarray-based analysis of live cell surface glycosylation. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2011;12:12 19 11-12 19 17.
Not in our library10.1002/0471140864.ps1209s63
- 449.
Li Y, et al. Detection and verification of glycosylation patterns of glycoproteins from clinical specimens using lectin microarrays and lectin-based immunosorbent assays. Anal. Chem. 2011;83:8509-8516.
Not in our library10.1021/ac201452f
- 450.
Tao SC, et al. Lectin microarrays identify cell-specific and functionally significant cell surface glycan markers. Glycobiology. 2008;18:761-769.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwn063
- 451.
Kuno A, et al. Focused differential glycan analysis with the platform antibody-assisted lectin profiling for glycan-related biomarker verification. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2009;8:99-108.
Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m800308-mcp200
- 452.
Hsu KL, Mahal LK. A lectin microarray approach for the rapid analysis of bacterial glycans. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:543-549.
Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2006.76
- 453.
Zhao J, Patwa TH, Lubman DM, Simeone DM. Protein biomarkers in cancer: natural glycoprotein microarray approaches. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2008;10:602-610.
Not in our library
- 454.
Patwa TH, Zhao J, Anderson MA, Simeone DM, Lubman DM. Screening of glycosylation patterns in serum using natural glycoprotein microarrays and multi-lectin fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:6411-6421.
Not in our library10.1021/ac060726z
- 455.
Hirabayashi J. Lectin-based glycomics: how and when was the technology born? Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1200:225-242.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4939-1292-6_20
- 456.
Loster K, Kannicht C. 2-dimensional electrophoresis: detection of glycosylation and influence on spot pattern. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008;446:199-214.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-60327-084-7_14
- 457.
Fu C, van Aalten DMF. Native detection of protein O-GlcNAcylation by gel electrophoresis. Analyst. 2020;145:6826-6830.
Not in our library10.1039/c9an02506e
- 458.
Liu D, et al. Rapid glycosylation analysis of mouse serum glycoproteins separated by supported molecular matrix electrophoresis. J. Proteom. 2021;234:104098.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jprot.2020.104098
- 459.
Khatri K, et al. Microfluidic capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for analysis of monosaccharides, oligosaccharides, and glycopeptides. Anal. Chem. 2017;89:6645-6655.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00875
- 460.
Guttman A, Pritchett T. Capillary gel electrophoresis separation of high-mannose type oligosaccharides derivatized by 1-aminopyrene-3,6,8-trisulfonic acid. Electrophoresis. 1995;16:1906-1911.
Not in our library10.1002/elps.11501601314
- 461.
Yamane-Ohnuki N, et al. Establishment of FUT8 knockout Chinese hamster ovary cells: an ideal host cell line for producing completely defucosylated antibodies with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004;87:614-622.
Not in our library10.1002/bit.20151
- 462.
Cajic S, Hennig R, Burock R, Rapp E. Capillary (Gel) electrophoresis-based methods for immunoglobulin (G) glycosylation analysis. Exp. Suppl. 2021;112:137-172.
Not in our library10.1007/978-3-030-76912-3_4
- 463.
Silva AMN, Vitorino R, Domingues MRM, Spickett CM, Domingues P. Post-translational modifications and mass spectrometry detection. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013;65:925-941.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.08.184
- 464.
Schubert M, Walczak MJ, Aebi M, Wider G. Posttranslational modifications of intact proteins detected by NMR spectroscopy: application to glycosylation. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 2015;54:7096-7100.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.201502093
- 465.
Tagashira M, Iijima H, Toma K. An NMR study of O-glycosylation induced structural changes in the alpha-helix of calcitonin. Glycoconj. J. 2002;19:43-52.
Not in our library10.1023/a:1022532930708
- 466.
Fan TW, Lane AN. Applications of NMR spectroscopy to systems biochemistry. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson Spectrosc. 2016;92-93:18-53.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pnmrs.2016.01.005
- 467.
Kopec M, Imiela A, Abramczyk H. Monitoring glycosylation metabolism in brain and breast cancer by Raman imaging. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:166.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-36622-7
- 468.
Davies HS, et al. Secondary structure and glycosylation of mucus glycoproteins by Raman spectroscopies. Anal. Chem. 2016;88:11609-11615.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03095
- 469.
Uriel C, et al. BODIPYs as chemically stable fluorescent tags for synthetic glycosylation strategies towards fluorescently labeled saccharides. Chemistry. 2020;26:5388-5399.
Not in our library10.1002/chem.201905780
- 470.
Zaro BW, Bateman LA, Pratt MR. Robust in-gel fluorescence detection of mucin-type O-linked glycosylation. Bioorg. Med Chem. Lett. 2011;21:5062-5066.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.04.038
- 471.
Haga Y, et al. Visualizing specific protein glycoforms by transmembrane fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:907.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms1906
- 472.
Belardi B, et al. Imaging the glycosylation state of cell surface glycoproteins by two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013;52:14045-14049.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.201307512
- 473.
de la Fuente JM, Penades S. Glyconanoparticles: types, synthesis and applications in glycoscience, biomedicine and material science. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2006;1760:636-651.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.12.001
- 474.
Zhang W, et al. In situ fluorescence imaging of the levels of glycosylation and phosphorylation by a MOF-based nanoprobe in depressed mice. Anal. Chem. 2020;92:3716-3721.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04878
- 475.
Versloot RCA, et al. Quantification of protein glycosylation using nanopores. Nano Lett. 2022;22:5357-5364.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01338
- 476.
Mayampurath AM, Wu Y, Segu ZM, Mechref Y, Tang H. Improving confidence in detection and characterization of protein N-glycosylation sites and microheterogeneity. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2011;25:2007-2019.
Not in our library10.1002/rcm.5059
- 477.
Saunders MJ, Woods RJ, Yang L. Simplifying the detection and monitoring of protein glycosylation during in vitro glycoengineering. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:567.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-023-27634-z
- 478.
Blochl C, Wang D, Mayboroda OA, Lageveen-Kammeijer GSM, Wuhrer M. Transcriptionally imprinted glycomic signatures of acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Biosci. 2023;13:31.
Not in our library10.1186/s13578-023-00981-0
- 479.
Kudelka MR, et al. Targeting altered glycosylation in secreted tumor glycoproteins for broad cancer detection. Glycobiology. 2023;33:567-578.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwad035
- 480.
Bergeron JJM, Thomas DY. N-glycosylation mediated folding and quality control in serine proteases of the hepsin family. FEBS J. 2023;290:3963-3965.
Not in our library10.1111/febs.16779
- 481.
Ondruskova N, Cechova A, Hansikova H, Honzik T, Jaeken J. Congenital disorders of glycosylation: Still “hot” in 2020. Biochim Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2021;1865:129751.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129751
- 482.
Matthijs G, et al. Mutations in PMM2, a phosphomannomutase gene on chromosome 16p13, in carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein type I syndrome (Jaeken syndrome). Nat. Genet. 1997;16:88-92.
Not in our library10.1038/ng0597-88
- 483.
Zurawski VR, Orjaseter H, Andersen A, Jellum E. Elevated serum CA 125 levels prior to diagnosis of ovarian neoplasia: relevance for early detection of ovarian cancer. Int J. Cancer. 1988;42:677-680.
Not in our library10.1002/ijc.2910420507
- 484.
Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:338-351.
Not in our library10.1081/cnv-58878
- 485.
Saldova R, Fan Y, Fitzpatrick JM, Watson RW, Rudd PM. Core fucosylation and alpha2-3 sialylation in serum N-glycome is significantly increased in prostate cancer comparing to benign prostate hyperplasia. Glycobiology. 2011;21:195-205.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwq147
- 486.
Zhao T, et al. Heterogeneities of site-specific N-glycosylation in HCC tumors with low and high AFP concentrations. Front Oncol. 2020;10:496.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2020.00496
- 487.
Bast RC, et al. A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983;309:883-887.
Not in our library10.1056/nejm198310133091503
- 488.
Saldova R, et al. Exploring the glycosylation of serum CA125. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:15636-15654.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms140815636
- 489.
Kandylis K, et al. Diagnostic significance of the tumour markers CEA, CA 15-3 and CA 125 in malignant effusions in breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 1990;1:435-438.
Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057798
- 490.
Choi JW, et al. Use of CA15‑3 for screening breast cancer: an antibody‑lectin sandwich assay for detecting glycosylation of CA15‑3 in sera. Oncol. Rep. 2018;40:145-154.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2018.6433
- 491.
Coelho, R. et al. Mucins and truncated O-glycans unveil phenotypic discrepancies between serous ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumours. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19, 19072045 (2018).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms19072045
- 492.
Engle DD, et al. The glycan CA19-9 promotes pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in mice. Science. 2019;364:1156-1162.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aaw3145
- 493.
Han C, et al. A novel multiple biomarker panel for the early detection of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 2018;149:585-591.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.050
- 494.
Thomsen M, et al. Prognostic role of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in metastatic colorectal cancer: a BRAF-mutant subset with high CA 19-9 level and poor outcome. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;118:1609-1616.
Not in our library10.1038/s41416-018-0115-9
- 495.
Kambara Y, et al. CA19-9 is a significant prognostic marker of patients with stage III gastric cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020;46:1918-1924.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.003
- 496.
- 497.
Tang S, et al. CEA in breast ductal secretions as a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:813-819.
Not in our library10.1007/s12282-016-0680-9
- 498.
van Manen L, et al. Elevated CEA and CA19-9 serum levels independently predict advanced pancreatic cancer at diagnosis. Biomarkers. 2020;25:186-193.
Not in our library10.1080/1354750x.2020.1725786
- 499.
Pont L, et al. Site-specific N-linked glycosylation analysis of human carcinoembryonic antigen by sheathless capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2021;20:1666-1675.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00875
- 500.
Cramer DAT, Franc V, Caval T, Heck AJR. Charting the proteoform landscape of serum proteins in individual donors by high-resolution native mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2022;94:12732-12741.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02215
- 501.
Lin Y, et al. A fucosylated glycopeptide as a candidate biomarker for early diagnosis of NASH hepatocellular carcinoma using a stepped HCD method and PRM evaluation. Front Oncol. 2022;12:818001.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2022.818001
- 502.
Gimenez E, et al. Quantitative analysis of N-glycans from human alfa-acid-glycoprotein using stable isotope labeling and zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography electrospray mass spectrometry as tool for pancreatic disease diagnosis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2015;866:59-68.
Not in our library10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.008
- 503.
Zhu J, et al. Analysis of serum haptoglobin fucosylation in hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis of different etiologies. J. Proteome Res. 2014;13:2986-2997.
Not in our library10.1021/pr500128t
- 504.
Zhang Y, et al. ESI-LC-MS method for haptoglobin fucosylation analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis. J. Proteome Res. 2015;14:5388-5395.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00792
- 505.
Jin W, et al. Glycoqueuing: Isomer-Specific Quantification for Sialylation-Focused Glycomics. Anal. Chem. 2019;91:10492-10500.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01393
- 506.
Ruhaak LR, et al. The Serum Immunoglobulin G Glycosylation Signature of Gastric Cancer. EuPA Open Proteom. 2015;6:1-9.
Not in our library10.1016/j.euprot.2014.11.002
- 507.
Komaromy A, Reider B, Jarvas G, Guttman A. Glycoprotein biomarkers and analysis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer with special focus on serum immunoglobulin G. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2020;506:204-213.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.041
- 508.
Gu Y, et al. Serum IgG N-glycans enable early detection and early relapse prediction of colorectal cancer. Int J. Cancer. 2023;152:536-547.
Not in our library10.1002/ijc.34298
- 509.
Chen Z, Gulzar ZG, St Hill CA, Walcheck B, Brooks JD. Increased expression of GCNT1 is associated with altered O-glycosylation of PSA, PAP, and MUC1 in human prostate cancers. Prostate. 2014;74:1059-1067.
Not in our library10.1002/pros.22826
- 510.
Barrabes S, et al. Glycosylation of serum ribonuclease 1 indicates a major endothelial origin and reveals an increase in core fucosylation in pancreatic cancer. Glycobiology. 2007;17:388-400.
Not in our library10.1093/glycob/cwm002
- 511.
Zhang S, Jiang K, Zhang Q, Guo K, Liu Y. Serum fucosylated paraoxonase 1 as a potential glycobiomarker for clinical diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma using ELISA Index. Glycoconj. J. 2015;32:119-125.
Not in our library10.1007/s10719-015-9576-8
- 512.
Rodriguez-Tomas, E. et al. Serum paraoxonase-1-related variables and lipoprotein profile in patients with lung or head and neck cancer: effect of radiotherapy. Antioxidants (Basel)8, 8070213 (2019).
Not in our library10.3390/antiox8070213
- 513.
Arnold JN, et al. Novel glycan biomarkers for the detection of lung cancer. J. Proteome Res. 2011;10:1755-1764.
Not in our library10.1021/pr101034t
- 514.
Cohen EN, et al. Elevated serum levels of sialyl Lewis X (sLe(X)) and inflammatory mediators in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019;176:545-556.
Not in our library10.1007/s10549-019-05258-0
- 515.
Mizuguchi S, et al. Serum Sialyl Lewis x and cytokeratin 19 fragment as predictive factors for recurrence in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007;58:369-375.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.002
- 516.
Freitas D, et al. O-glycans truncation modulates gastric cancer cell signaling and transcription leading to a more aggressive phenotype. EBioMedicine. 2019;40:349-362.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.017
- 517.
Blanchard V, et al. N-glycosylation and biological activity of recombinant human alpha1-antitrypsin expressed in a novel human neuronal cell line. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108:2118-2128.
Not in our library10.1002/bit.23158
- 518.
Yang P, et al. Alpha1-antitrypsin and neutrophil elastase imbalance and lung cancer risk. Chest. 2005;128:445-452.
Not in our library10.1378/chest.128.1.445
- 519.
Liu L, Qin H, Ye M. Recent advances in glycopeptide enrichment and mass spectrometry data interpretation approaches for glycoproteomics analyses. Se Pu. 2021;39:1045-1054.
Not in our library10.3724/sp.j.1123.2021.06011
- 520.
Trinidad JC, Schoepfer R, Burlingame AL, Medzihradszky KF. N- and O-glycosylation in the murine synaptosome. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2013;12:3474-3488.
Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m113.030007
- 521.
Tsai, I. J., Su, E. C., Tsai, I. L. & Lin, C. Y. Clinical assay for the early detection of colorectal cancer using mass spectrometric wheat germ agglutinin multiple reaction monitoring. Cancers (Basel)13, 13092190 (2021).
Not in our library10.3390/cancers13092190
- 522.
Gbormittah FO, et al. Characterization of glycoproteins in pancreatic cyst fluid using a high-performance multiple lectin affinity chromatography platform. J. Proteome Res. 2014;13:289-299.
Not in our library10.1021/pr400813u
- 523.
Gao C, et al. Unique binding specificities of proteins toward isomeric asparagine-linked glycans. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019;26:535-547.e534.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.002
- 524.
Tian Y, Zhou Y, Elliott S, Aebersold R, Zhang H. Solid-phase extraction of N-linked glycopeptides. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:334-339.
Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2007.42
- 525.
McCalley DV. Understanding and manipulating the separation in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2017;1523:49-71.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chroma.2017.06.026
- 526.
Zhang Q, Yang FQ, Ge L, Hu YJ, Xia ZN. Recent applications of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in pharmaceutical analysis. J. Sep Sci. 2017;40:49-80.
Not in our library10.1002/jssc.201600843
- 527.
Buszewski B, Noga S. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)-a powerful separation technique. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012;402:231-247.
Not in our library10.1007/s00216-011-5308-5
- 528.
Cheung RC, Wong JH, Ng TB. Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography: a review on its applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96:1411-1420.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-012-4507-0
- 529.
Zhang L, et al. Boronic acid functionalized core-satellite composite nanoparticles for advanced enrichment of glycopeptides and glycoproteins. Chemistry. 2009;15:10158-10166.
Not in our library10.1002/chem.200901347
- 530.
Xie Y, Liu Q, Li Y, Deng C. Core-shell structured magnetic metal-organic framework composites for highly selective detection of N-glycopeptides based on boronic acid affinity chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2018;1540:87-93.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chroma.2018.02.013
- 531.
Liu L, Jin S, Mei P, Zhou P. Preparation of cotton wool modified with boric acid functionalized titania for selective enrichment of glycopeptides. Talanta. 2019;203:58-64.
Not in our library10.1016/j.talanta.2019.05.050
- 532.
Zhang L, et al. Site-specific, covalent immobilization of PNGase F on magnetic particles mediated by microbial transglutaminase. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2023;1250:340972.
Not in our library10.1016/j.aca.2023.340972
- 533.
Zhang W, et al. PNGase F-mediated incorporation of (18)O into glycans for relative glycan quantitation. Analyst. 2015;140:1082-1089.
Not in our library10.1039/c4an02073a
- 534.
Marchetti R, et al. Rules of engagement” of protein-glycoconjugate interactions: a molecular view achievable by using NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling. ChemistryOpen. 2016;5:274-296.
Not in our library10.1002/open.201600024
- 535.
Arda A, Jimenez-Barbero J. The recognition of glycans by protein receptors. Insights from NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. (Camb.). 2018;54:4761-4769.
Not in our library10.1039/c8cc01444b
- 536.
Shen Y, Hu F, Min W. Raman imaging of small biomolecules. Annu Rev. Biophys. 2019;48:347-369.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115500
- 537.
Mohamed Abd-El-Halim Y, et al. A glycosyltransferase gene signature to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with poor prognosis. EBioMedicine. 2021;71:103541.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103541
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.