No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.
The sirtuin family in health and disease
Qi-Jun Wu, Tie-Ning Zhang, Huan-Huan Chen and 13 more
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · 2022 · Review · CC BY
doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01257-8
Abstract
Sirtuins (SIRTs) are nicotine adenine dinucleotide(+)-dependent histone deacetylases regulating critical signaling pathways in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and are involved in numerous biological processes. Currently, seven mammalian homologs of yeast Sir2 named SIRT1 to SIRT7 have been identified. Increasing evidence has suggested the vital roles of seven members of the SIRT family in health and disease conditions. Notably, this protein family plays a variety of important roles in cellular biology such as inflammation, metabolism, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, etc., thus, it is considered a potential therapeutic target for different kinds of pathologies including cancer, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and other conditions. Moreover, identification of SIRT modulators and exploring the functions of these different modulators have prompted increased efforts to discover new small molecules, which can modify SIRT activity. Furthermore, several randomized controlled trials have indicated that different interventions might affect the expression of SIRT protein in human samples, and supplementation of SIRT modulators might have diverse impact on physiological function in different participants. In this review, we introduce the history and structure of the SIRT protein family, discuss the molecular mechanisms and biological functions of seven members of the SIRT protein family, elaborate on the regulatory roles of SIRTs in human disease, summarize SIRT inhibitors and activators, and review related clinical studies.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The sirtuin (SIRT) protein family, which are conserved proteins belonging to class III histone deacetylases, comprises seven members. Notably, SIRTs share a nicotine adenine dinucleotide + (NAD) + -binding catalytic domain and may act specifically on different substrates depending on the biological processes in which they are involved. The sequence and length of SIRTs are different in both their N- and C-terminal domains, partially explaining their different localization and functions. Recently, more and more studies have shown their association with and involvement in different pathologies, such as (but not restricted to) cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).– Additionally, increasing evidence supported the potential use of SIRT modulators for the treatment of different kinds of diseases,– suggesting the critical roles of SIRTs in the diseases. Herein, to enhance our understanding of SIRTs, we provide a comprehensive summary of the roles of SIRTs in health and various diseases.
Historical review and structure of SIRT proteins
The history of SIRTs can be traced to founding member Sir2 nearly 40 years ago, which was first discovered in the budding Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and was originally known as mating-type regulator 1 protein. Subsequently, Sir2 has been found to function in transcriptional repression at ribosomal DNA loci, at silent mating-type loci and in telomeres, and this increasing knowledge has greatly improved exploration of its function. In the late 1990s, a study confirmed that Sir2 prolonged the lifespan of yeast by inhibiting genomic instability. Loss of Sir2 significantly shortened the lifespan of yeast, while an additional copy of Sir2 prolonged it by about 40%. Later evidence showed that Sir2 had NAD + -dependent HDAC enzymatic activity, which provided a molecular framework in which NAD-dependent histone deacetylation could be connected to genomic silencing and ageing in yeast, and possibly to higher eukaryotic metabolism as well, opening a new chapter of Sir2 enzymology. Sir2’s key role in the molecular mechanism of senescence in Caenorhabditis elegans was also later demonstrated. As Sir2 homologous genes have been successively isolated in bacteria, plants and mammals, the Sir2 homologous proteins in all species have been collectively referred to as SIRTs.,
Currently, seven mammalian homologs of yeast Sir2 named SIRT1 to SIRT7 have been identified, which are well-known as the β-NAD + or NAD + -dependent enzymes.– Figure 1 shows a historical timeline summarizing studies on milestones in SIRT family members. Regarding to the molecular structures, SIRT1-7 share a chemically and structurally conserved catalytic core in general and there may be subtle differences in the infrastructure of active site. In detail, X-ray crystalline diffraction reveals that the catalytic core includes two bilobed globular domains consisting of approximately 275 amino acids residues, characterized by their necessity for NAD as a cofactor. The different N- and C-terminals of SIRT proteins are fairly variable in length, chemical composition, susceptibility to post-translational modifications (PTMs) (typically phosphorylation), and enable them to bind substrates.,, The large structural domain is composed of an inverted classical open α/β Rossmann-fold structure, which is a parallel β-sheet nucleotide-binding fold typical of many NAD-utilizing enzymes such as dehydrogenases; in addition, a smaller domain contains a zinc ribbon motif. These two domains form a pocket in the middle where NAD and acetylated peptides bind.,
Differences among members of the SIRT protein family were initially attributed to their discrete pattern of subcellular localization. As far as we know, SIRT1 is mainly localized in the nucleus and shuttles to the cytosol under specific circumstances., SIRT2 is predominantly cytosolic but also exists in the nucleus in the G2 to M phase transition of the cell cycle. SIRT3-5 localize primarily to mitochondria, and have a mitochondrial targeting sequence.– Additionally, SIRT6 and SIRT7 are nuclear proteins. Of them, SIRT6 is principally located in the chromatin and SIRT7 is mostly found in the nucleolus., Additionally, the localization and subcellular shuttling of SIRTs depend on different kinds of cell types and cell cycle oscillation. For example, SIRT1 could be primarily located in the cytosol in some subsets of neurons, as well as expressed in both nucleus and cytosol in ependymal cells. Moreover, SIRT2 is in the cytosol during most phases of cell cycle, while SIRT2 is expressed in nucleus and associates with chromatin and deacetylates the histone H4K16 during G2/M transition and mitosis.
The catalytic activity level of SIRT protein family members is thought to be their second most significant difference. Of note, the regulation of catalytic activity of SIRTs involves multiple steps: (a) NAD + and acetyl lysine substrates binding; (b) the glycosidic bond cleavage; (c) acetyl transfer; and (d) O-acetyl-ADPR, nicotinamide, and deacetylated lysine products formation. Concretely, the initial reaction of NAD + glycosidic bond cleavage is proceeded through either an SN1-like mechanism, as supported by the structure of Hst2 bound to carba-NAD +, or an SN2-like mechanism, as supported by the structure of Sir2Tm bound to NAD+ and an acetyl lysine-containing peptide. Furthermore, available studies suggested a complex array of PTMs regulated by SIRTs. Initially, Sir2 was considered solely as a deacetylase enzyme. However, the functional range of enzymatic activities of SIRTs has been greatly expanded in mammals. SIRT1-3 sustain strong deacetylase activities. SIRT4 has ADP-ribose transferase activity and can down-regulate glutamate dehydrogenase activity in β cells, thereby reducing insulin secretion response. SIRT5 is involved in regulating protein post translational modifications such as lysine succinylation, malonylation, and glutarylation, etc., Moreover, SIRT6 can function as NAD + -dependent monoADP-ribosyl transferase and long-chain fatty acyl deacetylases., Meanwhile, SIRT7, the latest discovered SIRT family protein, has been relatively less studied, which was first found to be a β-NAD + -dependent deacetylase enzyme and is localized in nucleoli that govern the transcription of RNA polymerase I., Numerous target proteins, including histone and non-histone, have been shown to be modified by SIRTs, and participates in the regulation of multiple fundamental cellular functions including glucose, and lipid metabolism, mitochondrial biogenesis, DNA repair, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and inflammation. Hence, SIRTs are now recognized as a major regulator of cellular physiology. Nevertheless, the SIRT protein family still has multiple proven and unproven catalytic modification activities. Given our current limited understanding of the SIRT protein family, more investigation is warranted in this area.
The role of SIRTs in inflammation
Inflammation is an essential immune response that enables survival during infection or injury and maintains tissue homeostasis under a variety of noxious conditions. It comes at the cost of a transient decline in tissue function, which can in turn contribute to the pathogenesis of diseases involving altered homeostasis and a variety of physiological and pathological processes. The molecular process of inflammation is varied and depends on the type of inflamed cells and organs. The inflammatory response is composed of several inseparable pathways involving inflammatory cells, inflammatory mediators induced by sensor cells, inflammatory pathway components, and the target tissues that are affected by the inflammatory mediators. Recently, with greater in-depth understanding of the process of inflammation, numerous studies have successfully illustrated how the SIRT protein family has a close association with inflammation. In this section, we summarize the role of the SIRT family in the inflammatory response and the major signaling pathways (Fig. 2).
The effect of SIRTs in inflammatory cells
The cells involved in the inflammatory response include inflammatory cells such as macrophages, mast cells and endothelial cells. SIRTs, especially SIRT1 and SIRT6, can affect the secretion of inflammatory mediators and play a central role in regulating the differentiation of dendritic cells (DCs) and the activation of macrophages., For example, SIRT1 participates in mediating inflammatory signaling in DCs, consequentially modulating the balance of proinflammatory T helper type 1 cells and anti-inflammatory Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. SIRT1 knockout (KO) in DCs restrained the generation of regulatory T cells while driving T helper 1 cell development, resulting in enhanced T-cell-mediated inflammation against microbial responses. Moreover, SIRT6 deficiency in macrophages resulted in inflammation with increases in acetylation and greater stability of the forkhead box protein O1 (FoxO1). Conversely, the ectopic overexpression of SIRT6 in KO cells reduced the inflammatory response. Moreover, results from in vivo experiments demonstrated that SIRT3 overexpression in transfused macrophages not only induced M2 macrophage polarization, but also alleviated inflammation. Based on these current studies, the SIRT family may regulate the activation or differentiation of inflammatory cells, such as DCs and macrophages in the immune system.
The effect of SIRTs on inflammatory mediators
Inflammatory mediators are chemicals produced during inflammation that cause an inflammatory response. In response to the inflammatory process, inflammatory cells release specialized substances, including vasoactive amines and peptides, eicosanoids, proinflammatory cytokines and acute-phase proteins, which mediate the inflammatory process by preventing further tissue damage and ultimately resulting in healing and restoration of tissue function. Overexpressed or activated SIRTs, mainly SIRT1–3, can reduce the inflammatory response through anti-inflammatory effects, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), a multifunctional pro-inflammatory cytokine, which is produced by macrophages/monocytes during acute inflammation, and plays a critical role with orchestrating the cytokine cascade in various inflammatory diseases. For instance, increased SIRT1 protein expression can reduce acetylation of the nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) p65 subunit, which results in the suppression of TNF-α-induced NF-κB transcriptional activation and reduction of TNF-α secretion in a SIRT1-dependent manner., In addition, SIRT1 knockdown increased, while SIRT1 activator treatment decreased TNF-α secretion from macrophages. One recent study verified that SIRT6 suppressed inflammatory responses and downregulated the expression of inflammatory factors interleukin (IL)-6 and TNF-α via the NF-κB pathway. For example, both SIRT1 and SIRT6 inhibited TNF-α-induced inflammation of vascular adventitial fibroblasts through reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathway. SIRT1 exerted anti-inflammatory effects against IL-1β-mediated pro-inflammatory stress through the Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)/SIRT1/NF-κB pathway. SIRT1 deficiency increased microvascular inflammation in obese septic mice, while resveratrol treatment decreased leukocyte/platelet adhesion and E-selectin/intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) expression accompanied by increased SIRT1 expression and improved survival. In addition, SIRT1 and SIRT6 inhibited inflammation by decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-β, cytochrome oxidase subunit 2 and ICAM-1. Moreover, SIRT1 exerted anti-inflammatory effects against IL-1β-mediated pro-inflammatory stress through the TLR2/SIRT1/NF-κB pathway. SIRT1 deficiency increased microvascular inflammation in obese septic mice, while resveratrol treatment decreased leukocyte/platelet adhesion and E-selectin/ICAM-1 expression accompanied by increased SIRT1 expression and improved survival. Recently, SIRT2 as modulators have been shown to be effective in inhibiting lipopolysaccharide-stimulated production of TNF-α to suppress neuroinflammation., Moreover, Kurundkar et al. have determined that SIRT3 deficiency altered the proinflammatory responses of macrophages to lipopolysaccharides, with a greater increase in TNF-α production. Several studies have also shown an anti-inflammatory effect of SIRT3, which downregulates IL-1β and IL-18, inhibits inflammasomes and attenuates oxidative stress., SIRT3 KO mice have significantly increased inflammatory cell infiltration. These studies highlight the critical role of SIRT3 in the process of inflammation. In conclusion, then, as one of the most important pro-inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory mediators are closely regulated by the SIRT protein family and is widely involved in inflammation.
Currently, the SIRT family mainly exerts an anti-inflammatory effect in response to tissue stress or disease development, but there are exceptions. For example, early SIRT2 inhibition prevented neuroinflammation evidenced by reduced levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α and by increased levels of glutamate receptor subunits GluN2A, GluN2B and GluA1; however, SIRT2 inhibition was unable to reverse cognitive decline or neuroinflammation. In this case, SIRT2 exhibited a temporary proinflammatory effect. Furthermore, both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects have been attributed to SIRT2 and SIRT3. Single deficiency of SIRT2 or SIRT3 had minor or no impact on the antimicrobial innate immune responses, while SIRT2/3−/− macrophages secreted increased levels of both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. From these results, then, most SIRT proteins appear to play anti-inflammatory roles, but limited reports have found the opposite effect, as just described for SIRT2. These inconsistent results might be due to the specificity of SIRT2 mechanisms in the SIRT family, or may be temporary effects manifested at different stages of the disease process. Therefore, more research is needed to explore the reasons for these discrepancies.
Overall, SIRTs can act in concert or compensate each other for certain immune functions. It is also worth noting that the effects of various SIRTs may differ between diseases, or even have opposite effects. Therefore, research on SIRTs has left a number of gaps which require further exploration to pinpoint the role of the SIRT family in inflammatory responses and the underlying mechanisms of action, which may account for the different results.
The effect of SIRTs on inflammatory pathway components
The signaling pathway of inflammation is complex, but inflammatory pathway components have begun to be elucidated over the past several years. Currently, there are many studies on the mechanisms by which the SIRT family participates in inflammation, especially pathways involving NF-κB, TNF-α, and the NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome.
NF-κB is considered to be the central regulator of inflammation, which drives the expression of cytokines, chemokines, inflammasome components and adhesion molecules. It is mainly involved in immune and inflammatory responses and can induce the expression of downstream inflammatory cytokines., TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine mainly produced by macrophages and monocytes and is involved in normal inflammatory and immune responses. As an important component of innate immunity, the NLRP3 inflammasome plays an important role in the body’s immune response and inflammatory cell death (pyroptosis). In the following sections, we detail the role of the SIRT family as it affects three key inflammatory pathway components.Majority of SIRTs exert anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the NF-κB pathwayNF-κB exists in multiple forms, with the heterodimer of p65 (RelA, Rel associated protein) and p50 subunits (p65/p50) being the most prevalent species. In the absence of stimulation, NF-κB is normally present in the cytoplasm in an inactive form. Upon stimulation by various pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α), NF-κB rapidly translocates to the nucleus and regulates the transcription or expression of target genes., In addition, NF-κB activity can be modulated by PTMs of proteins, such as acetylation. Most members of the SIRT family are involved in regulation of the NF-κB pathway, primarily including SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT6, and SIRT7.Growing evidence suggests the significant role of SIRTs in the regulation of inflammation. SIRT1 has anti-inflammatory effects mediated by the deacetylation and inactivation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB. SIRT1 inhibits the transcriptional activity of NF-κB via deacetylation of the p65 (RelA) subunit at Ac-Lys310. Furthermore, the finding that lower SIRT1 activity levels may increase the expression of NF-κB, thus driving inflammation, also highlight the important role of SIRT1 during inflammation.Repression of NF-κB activity is responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect of SIRT6. For instance, SIRT6 attenuated NF-κB expression by deacetylating histone H3K9 in the promoters of NF-κB target genes, hence decreasing inflammation. Additionally, SIRT6 overexpression suppressed NF-κB-mediated inflammatory responses in OA development. Since nuclear SIRT1 and SIRT6 deacetylate RelA/p65 and support its degradation by the proteasome, decreases in both SIRT1 or SIRT6 levels/activity increase NF-κB activity and amplify pro-inflammatory gene expression during chronic inflammation.Evidence concerning the role of SIRT7 in inflammatory processes has been somewhat inconsistent. In terms of mediating an anti-inflammatory response, knockdown of SIRT7 promoted the translocation of NF-κB p-p65 to the nucleus and subsequently increased the secretion of downstream inflammatory cytokines, while SIRT7 overexpression had the opposite effect., However, evidence also suggested that loss of SIRT7 promoted the translocation of NF-κB p65 to the cytoplasm. Thus, the roles of SIRT7 in p65 translocation is controversial. In addition, the decline of SIRT7 upregulated the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and IL-6 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, while overexpression of SIRT7 effectively alleviated the inflammatory response. However, several studies have also revealed a pro-inflammatory role for SIRT7. For example, SIRT7-kidney-specific KO mice exhibited diminished inflammation with a reduction in the level of multiple inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, and suppression of nuclear NF-κB p65 accumulation. These contradictory results imply that the regulatory effects of SIRT7 on the inflammatory process may be variable under specific pathologies, which will need further study.SIRT2 also participates in inflammatory responses. Inhibition of SIRT2 enhanced microglial activation and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines via acetylation-dependent upregulation of NF-κB transcriptional activity. SIRT2 reduced the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and ameliorated the severity of arthritis by deacetylating the p65 subunit of NF-κB, further demonstrating the role of SIRT2 activation in suppression of the inflammatory response.In summary, SIRTs are found to interfere with the NF-κB signaling pathway by preventing NF-κB translocation, influencing its expression and regulating its interactions, thereby having an anti-inflammatory function. Understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of NF-κB pathway activation and its effects on inflammation may guide an approach to designing better pharmacological targets for alleviating inflammation and related therapies.The activation of NLRP3 aggravates inflammationNLRP3 is an important component of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex involved in inflammation., It is believed that activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome occurs in two sequential steps — first, it must be primed, and then it can be activated. When the body suffers from inflammatory disease, damage-associated molecules directly engage TLR4 and then quickly activate the NF-κB signaling pathway, resulting in augmented expression of NLRP3;– this in turn generates inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-18, TNF-α and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) which aggravate inflammation. Some studies have found that SIRTs, especially SIRT1 and SIRT3, act on NLRP3 to exert anti-inflammatory functions. For example, SIRT1 plays an important protective role in the inflammation mediated by the attenuation of NLRP3 activity, which is the best characterized inflammasome., Mechanistic studies of acute liver injury demonstrated activation of a pathway involving SIRT1 and multipotent mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-mediated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) α in macrophages, resulting in deacetylation of spliced X-box-binding protein 1 and subsequent inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome.It was reported that mitophagy/autophagy blockade leads to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria generating ROS, and this in turn activates the NLRP3 inflammasome. For instance, a study carried out by Zhao et al. suggested that the mechanism of action by which SIRT3 protects against tissue damage involved the attenuation of ROS production and reduction of NLRP3 activity, resulting in the inhibition of oxidative stress and the downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines. However, little information is available on the relationship between SIRT3 and NLRP3; thus, further research is necessary to determine whether SIRT3 has a direct effect on the NLRP3 inflammasome.The effect of SIRTs targeting noncoding RNAs on the inflammatory pathwayCurrent studies have mainly elucidated the role of the SIRT family in the inflammatory response. However, exploration of the molecular mechanism underlying how SIRTs affect inflammation is still limited, especially studies examining the interaction of SIRT1 with noncoding RNAs. For example, microRNAs (miRNAs) can negatively regulate inflammation by repressing SIRT1. Downregulation of miRNAs such as miR-217 and miR-543 mitigated the inflammatory response by regulating the SIRT1/AMPK/NF-κB signaling pathway. In the same way, miR-378 reduced SIRT1 activity and facilitated the inflammatory pathway involving NF-κB-TNFα by targeting 5'-AMPK subunit gamma-2. In addition, the RNase monocyte chemoattractant protein-induced protein 1 alleviated inflammatory responses by promoting the expression of SIRT1 mediated via miR-9. Furthermore, SIRT1 targets the p53/miR-22 axis to suppress inflammation, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression. These studies suggest that the regulation of SIRTs by noncoding RNAs may be a promising therapeutic strategy for inflammation-related diseases.
Majority of SIRTs exert anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway
NF-κB exists in multiple forms, with the heterodimer of p65 (RelA, Rel associated protein) and p50 subunits (p65/p50) being the most prevalent species. In the absence of stimulation, NF-κB is normally present in the cytoplasm in an inactive form. Upon stimulation by various pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α), NF-κB rapidly translocates to the nucleus and regulates the transcription or expression of target genes., In addition, NF-κB activity can be modulated by PTMs of proteins, such as acetylation. Most members of the SIRT family are involved in regulation of the NF-κB pathway, primarily including SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT6, and SIRT7.
Growing evidence suggests the significant role of SIRTs in the regulation of inflammation. SIRT1 has anti-inflammatory effects mediated by the deacetylation and inactivation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB. SIRT1 inhibits the transcriptional activity of NF-κB via deacetylation of the p65 (RelA) subunit at Ac-Lys310. Furthermore, the finding that lower SIRT1 activity levels may increase the expression of NF-κB, thus driving inflammation, also highlight the important role of SIRT1 during inflammation.
Repression of NF-κB activity is responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect of SIRT6. For instance, SIRT6 attenuated NF-κB expression by deacetylating histone H3K9 in the promoters of NF-κB target genes, hence decreasing inflammation. Additionally, SIRT6 overexpression suppressed NF-κB-mediated inflammatory responses in OA development. Since nuclear SIRT1 and SIRT6 deacetylate RelA/p65 and support its degradation by the proteasome, decreases in both SIRT1 or SIRT6 levels/activity increase NF-κB activity and amplify pro-inflammatory gene expression during chronic inflammation.
Evidence concerning the role of SIRT7 in inflammatory processes has been somewhat inconsistent. In terms of mediating an anti-inflammatory response, knockdown of SIRT7 promoted the translocation of NF-κB p-p65 to the nucleus and subsequently increased the secretion of downstream inflammatory cytokines, while SIRT7 overexpression had the opposite effect., However, evidence also suggested that loss of SIRT7 promoted the translocation of NF-κB p65 to the cytoplasm. Thus, the roles of SIRT7 in p65 translocation is controversial. In addition, the decline of SIRT7 upregulated the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and IL-6 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, while overexpression of SIRT7 effectively alleviated the inflammatory response. However, several studies have also revealed a pro-inflammatory role for SIRT7. For example, SIRT7-kidney-specific KO mice exhibited diminished inflammation with a reduction in the level of multiple inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, and suppression of nuclear NF-κB p65 accumulation. These contradictory results imply that the regulatory effects of SIRT7 on the inflammatory process may be variable under specific pathologies, which will need further study.
SIRT2 also participates in inflammatory responses. Inhibition of SIRT2 enhanced microglial activation and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines via acetylation-dependent upregulation of NF-κB transcriptional activity. SIRT2 reduced the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and ameliorated the severity of arthritis by deacetylating the p65 subunit of NF-κB, further demonstrating the role of SIRT2 activation in suppression of the inflammatory response.
In summary, SIRTs are found to interfere with the NF-κB signaling pathway by preventing NF-κB translocation, influencing its expression and regulating its interactions, thereby having an anti-inflammatory function. Understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of NF-κB pathway activation and its effects on inflammation may guide an approach to designing better pharmacological targets for alleviating inflammation and related therapies.
The activation of NLRP3 aggravates inflammation
NLRP3 is an important component of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex involved in inflammation., It is believed that activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome occurs in two sequential steps — first, it must be primed, and then it can be activated. When the body suffers from inflammatory disease, damage-associated molecules directly engage TLR4 and then quickly activate the NF-κB signaling pathway, resulting in augmented expression of NLRP3;– this in turn generates inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-18, TNF-α and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) which aggravate inflammation. Some studies have found that SIRTs, especially SIRT1 and SIRT3, act on NLRP3 to exert anti-inflammatory functions. For example, SIRT1 plays an important protective role in the inflammation mediated by the attenuation of NLRP3 activity, which is the best characterized inflammasome., Mechanistic studies of acute liver injury demonstrated activation of a pathway involving SIRT1 and multipotent mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-mediated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) α in macrophages, resulting in deacetylation of spliced X-box-binding protein 1 and subsequent inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome.
It was reported that mitophagy/autophagy blockade leads to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria generating ROS, and this in turn activates the NLRP3 inflammasome. For instance, a study carried out by Zhao et al. suggested that the mechanism of action by which SIRT3 protects against tissue damage involved the attenuation of ROS production and reduction of NLRP3 activity, resulting in the inhibition of oxidative stress and the downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines. However, little information is available on the relationship between SIRT3 and NLRP3; thus, further research is necessary to determine whether SIRT3 has a direct effect on the NLRP3 inflammasome.
The effect of SIRTs targeting noncoding RNAs on the inflammatory pathway
Current studies have mainly elucidated the role of the SIRT family in the inflammatory response. However, exploration of the molecular mechanism underlying how SIRTs affect inflammation is still limited, especially studies examining the interaction of SIRT1 with noncoding RNAs. For example, microRNAs (miRNAs) can negatively regulate inflammation by repressing SIRT1. Downregulation of miRNAs such as miR-217 and miR-543 mitigated the inflammatory response by regulating the SIRT1/AMPK/NF-κB signaling pathway. In the same way, miR-378 reduced SIRT1 activity and facilitated the inflammatory pathway involving NF-κB-TNFα by targeting 5'-AMPK subunit gamma-2. In addition, the RNase monocyte chemoattractant protein-induced protein 1 alleviated inflammatory responses by promoting the expression of SIRT1 mediated via miR-9. Furthermore, SIRT1 targets the p53/miR-22 axis to suppress inflammation, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression. These studies suggest that the regulation of SIRTs by noncoding RNAs may be a promising therapeutic strategy for inflammation-related diseases.
Conclusion
In summary, the SIRT family is involved in inflammation via various mechanisms. Although the details of SIRT-dependent regulation of inflammation are becoming clear, many unanswered questions remain. For example, further studies are needed to explore whether depletion of SIRTs is a common pathological change in the occurrence and development of inflammation-related diseases. Further attention is also needed to resolve some of the conflicting data and better understand the critical role of the SIRT family in the inflammatory response. The contradictory roles of the SIRT family in inflammation may result from their regulation of common signaling pathways under specific pathologic conditions. While determining what role the SIRT family plays in inflammation, researchers should also target its mechanism of action in order to lay the foundation for subsequent clinical translational studies. To summarize, we have focused on introducing relevant studies and the beneficial effects of the SIRT family through its regulation of inflammatory pathways, providing an important reference point for future studies.
The role of SIRTs in metabolism
Metabolism is the general term for a series of ordered chemical reactions that take place in the body to sustain life., These processes allow organisms to grow and reproduce, maintain their structure and respond to the external environment.– Metabolism mainly includes glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism., Many metabolic processes occur in the mitochondria where SIRT3–5 proteins are located. In addition, SIRT proteins located in the nucleus may participate in regulating several metabolism-related genes., In this section, we focus on the SIRT proteins and their roles in maintaining metabolic homeostasis by participating in the regulation of glucose, glutamine, and lipid metabolism (Fig. 3).
The effect of SIRTs on glucose metabolism
Glucose metabolism refers to a series of complex chemical reactions after glucose, glycogen and other substances enter the body, including anaerobic glycolysis of glucose, aerobic oxidation, synthesis and decomposition of glycogen, and gluconeogenesis., Abnormal glucose metabolism and insulin resistance might cause metabolic diseases such as diabetes.– The roles of SIRTs in glucose metabolism have been established. For example, SIRT1 is a key positive regulator of systemic insulin sensitivity and regulates pancreatic insulin secretion, thus contributing to increased systemic insulin sensitivity, which triggers glucose uptake and utilization.– Mechanistically, SIRT1 participates in the regulation of glucose metabolism by upregulating AMPK, and activation of AMPK can ameliorate the glucose metabolic imbalance., Upregulated SIRT1 may reverse the development of diabetes by targeting the AMPK/acetyl CoA carboxylase signaling pathway. Similarly, decreased levels of SIRT1 may lead to AMPK deficiency, thereby impairing the improvement in glucose tolerance. Meanwhile, there are an interdependent relationship between AMPK and SIRT1,, and activation of SIRT1 and its downstream signaling pathways could also be improperly triggered in AMPK-deficient states. Additionally, SIRT1 increases insulin sensitivity and lowers blood sugar by downregulating protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B, a key negative regulatory protein in the insulin signal transduction pathway. Thus, high expression of SIRT1 is benefit for maintaining blood sugar stability via the regulatory proteins of insulin signaling. However, the relationship between SIRT1 and other molecules (e.g., AMPK and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B) that are closely associated with blood glucose regulation is still worth further exploration.
SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 also participate in glucose metabolism. The limited whole-body benefit of increasing hepatic SIRT3 during the development of diet-induced insulin resistance, which can be considered a pre-diabetic state, has also been demonstrated. Mechanistically, SIRT3 negatively regulates aerobic glycolysis by inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α). SIRT6 takes part in the maintenance of glucose metabolic homeostasis in the whole body and in local tissues such as liver and skeletal muscle., For instance, SIRT6 in pancreatic β cells deacetylated FoxO1 and subsequently increased the expression of glucose-dependent transporter 2 to maintain the glucose-sensing ability of pancreatic β cells and systemic glucose tolerance. Improvement in SIRT6-mediated insulin signaling transduction has been reported in the liver of obese rats after exercise. Also, enhancement of insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle and liver by physiological overexpression of SIRT6 has been described, suggesting potential functions of SIRT6 in glucose metabolism.
Finally, direct and indirect involvement of SIRTs in glucose metabolism may provide new insights into therapeutic targets for the treatment of abnormal glucose metabolism in the future. This may help reduce the human disease burden related to glucose metabolism, where SIRT proteins may play an important role in overcoming glucose metabolic diseases at an earlier time point.
The effect of SIRTs on lipid metabolism
Lipid metabolism means that most of the fat ingested by the human body is emulsified into small particles by bile, and the lipase secreted in the pancreas and small intestine hydrolyzes the fatty acids in the fat into free fatty acids, after which hydrolyzed small molecules are absorbed by the small intestine into the bloodstream.,, Notably, the SIRT protein family is involved in lipid metabolism., For SIRT1, Qiang et al. found that SIRT1-dependent cAMP Response Element Binding protein (Creb) deacetylation regulates lipid metabolism. Mechanistically, Lys136 is a substrate for SIRT1-dependent deacetylation that affects Creb activity by preventing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent phosphorylation, leading to the promotion of hepatic lipid accumulation and secretion. Moreover, SIRT1 activates AMPK, which leads to lipid-lowering effects in vitro and in vivo. SIRT2 prevents liver steatosis and lipid metabolic disorders by deacetylation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α. Additionally, SIRT3 acts as a bridge in the lipid metabolism pathway. For example, pancreatic SIRT3 deficiency promoted hepatic steatosis by enhancing 5-hydroxytryptamine synthesis in mice with diet-induced obesity. In addition, roles for SIRT5 and SIRT6 were identified in lipid metabolism.– For instance, SIRT5 inhibited preadipocyte differentiation and lipid deposition by activating AMPK and repressing mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, which has been verified in obese mice. Compared with control wild-type mice, SIRT6-KO mice had a significant increase in both body weight and fat mass and exhibited glucose intolerance and insulin resistance. Mechanistically, SIRT6-KO decreased expression of the adiponectin gene and Akt in white adipose tissue, while expression of the thermogenic gene UCP1 was diminished in brown adipose tissue.
The effect of SIRTs on other metabolism
SIRT3 and SIRT4 have been found to play roles in regulating glutamine metabolism. In detail, Gonzalez-Herrera et al. reported that loss of SIRT3 promoted glutamine use in nucleotide biosynthesis. Conversely, SIRT4 inhibited glutamine metabolism in colorectal cancer cells, thereby acting as a tumor suppressor. In addition, SIRT3 affected mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming by activating the AMPK/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) pathway, thereby maintaining the stability of mitochondrial membrane potential as well as mitochondrial structure. Moreover, silencing SIRT6 influenced collagen metabolism in human dermal fibroblasts by affecting the synthesis and degradation of collagen.
Conclusion
As shown in the previous findings, SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 have been more frequently studied than other SIRTs in regulating human body metabolism, mainly through their effect on glucose and lipid metabolism. However, only a few studies have focused on the roles of other SIRT proteins, in particular SIRT2 and SIRT7. In the future, research should be focused on the role of these other SIRTs in regulating different metabolism subtypes. Overall, clarifying the various participating mechanisms of SIRTs in metabolism might provide future new ideas for research and novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of abnormal metabolism, thereby lessening the burden imposed on society by human lipid metabolism-related diseases.
The role of SIRTs in oxidative stress
Oxidative stress is considered to be an important factor in cell damage and is usually caused by the overproduction of ROS. Under physiological conditions, ROS are produced at low levels and are scavenged by the endogenous antioxidant system. When ROS exceed the scavenging capacity, however, cellular oxidative stress damage occurs. Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathological process of various diseases. Recently, accumulating studies have shown that the SIRT protein family participates in the process of oxidative stress. Notably, SIRT proteins contribute to cellular tolerance to oxidative stress by regulating many genes and their related signaling pathways (as shown in Fig. 4). Herein, we review the regulation of different target genes or proteins by SIRTs, with the aim of understanding their mechanistic effects in the process of antioxidant stress damage.
The interaction between SIRT1, SIRT3, SIRT6 and AMPK
AMPK, is a major regulator of metabolic homeostasis and is often activated under oxidative stress conditions such as ischemia and hypoxia. SIRT1 participates in regulating AMPK and its related pathways. For example, AMPK can be activated by liver kinase B1 (LKB1), the upstream regulator of AMPK, while activated AMPK reduces oxidative stress injury by promoting insulin sensitivity, fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial biosynthesis to generate ATP. SIRT1 overexpression leads to the deacetylation of LKB1, the translocation of LKB1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and the activation of AMPK to alleviate oxidative stress. Additionally, SIRT1 lowers LKB1 activation in the liver, which subsequently abrogates Thr172-AMPKα phosphorylation, thereby increasing oxidative stress in severe acute hypoxia. It can be seen that SIRT1 may activate AMPK by regulating LKB1, thereby resisting oxidative stress damage and promoting cell survival.
In addition to the role of SIRT1 on AMPK, SIRT3 and SIRT6 can also interact with AMPK to exert an anti-oxidative effect on stress injury. Deficiency of AMPKα resulted in elevated expression of SIRT3, which modulated oxidative stress in heart tissue both in vitro and in vivo. It has also been shown that the AMPK activated SIRT3, limited oxidative stress and improved mitochondrial DNA integrity and function. In addition, SIRT3 reduced ROS and lipid peroxidation by improving mitochondrial function via deacetylation of LKB1 and activation of AMPK. As previously mentioned, a feedback loop may exist between AMPK and SIRT3. SIRT6 also promoted AMPK expression, thus upregulating antioxidant-encoding gene expression of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and catalase (CAT), thereby suppressing oxidative stress. In brief, SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 act to counter oxidative stress by directly or indirectly interacting with AMPK. However, additional studies are required to clarify the relationship between other SIRT proteins and AMPK pathway under oxidative stress.
The effect of SIRT1, SIRT 2, and SIRT6 on Nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)
Nrf2 is a leucine transcription factor that plays extremely important roles in antioxidant response element (ARE)-dependent transcriptional regulation of defense genes. When stimulated, Nrf2 dissociates from suppressor protein Keap1 in the nucleus and interacts with AREs to regulate the expression of antioxidant genes, suggesting a close association between Nrf2 and oxidative stress. Notably, SIRTs including SIRT1, SIRT2 and SIRT6 can activate Nrf2, regulate antioxidant gene expression, and thus fight oxidative stress damage. For example, SIRT1 activated Nrf2 by changing the structure of Keap1, leading to Nrf2 nuclear transfer and promoting the expression of antioxidant genes, such as glutathione S transferase and glucuronyl transferase., In addition, SIRT2 was downregulated in the spinal cord after peripheral nerve injury, which subsequently inhibited Nrf2 activity, leading to increased oxidative stress. The overexpression of SIRT6 in the brain through in vivo gene transfer enhanced Nrf2 signaling and reduced oxidative stress., SIRT6 protected human lens epithelial cells from oxidative damage via activation of Nrf2 signaling. Furthermore, SIRT6 protects cells against hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress by promoting Nrf2/ARE signaling. Therefore, SIRTs can activate Nrf2, regulate antioxidant gene expression, and thus fight oxidative stress damage.
The effect of SIRT1 and SIRT3 on FoxOs
A family of SIRT targets are class O mammalian forkhead transcription factors (FoxO1, FoxO3, FoxO4 and FoxO6) which participate in regulating oxidative stress. FoxO1 can scavenge excessive ROS through the regulation of downstream target genes such as MnSOD and CAT, and thus reduce cellular oxidative stress damage. SIRT1 alleviates oxidative stress by controlling nuclear shuttling and transcriptional activity of FoxO1 and FoxO3a. For instance, SIRT1 induced the transfer of FoxO1 to the nucleus and increased the level of FoxO1 protein in adipocytes, reducing the production of ROS and oxidative stress. Moreover, SIRT1 promoted early-onset age-related hearing loss by suppressing FoxO3a-mediated oxidative stress resistance in vivo. Apart from SIRT1, SIRT3 has also been shown to participate in the regulation of oxidative stress via FoxO3., Mechanistically, SIRT3 activated FoxO3 gene expression, which increased transcription of MnSOD and CAT, enabling the elimination of ROS., The aforementioned studies show that SIRT1 and SIRT3 can interact with FoxOs to counteract oxidative stress.
The effect of SIRT1 and SIRT3 on PGC-1α
PGC-1α is a coactivator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, which can act to block oxidative stress damage by scavenging excess ROS, inducing antioxidant enzyme expression and maintaining mitochondrial function. SIRT1 can activate PGC-1α through deacetylation, scavenge ROS caused by oxidative stress, and alleviate oxidative stress injury. Activation of the SIRT1-PGC-1α axis implies activation of antioxidant defense mechanisms, alleviating mitochondrial oxidative stress.– Additionally, PGC-1α and SIRT3 can interact directly. PGC-1α increased respiratory capacity and reduced oxidative stress through SIRT3-mediated reduction of mitochondrial ROS., Furthermore, loss of SIRT3 resulted in the expression of PGC-1α, which produced a decrease in mitochondrial respiration. Inhibition of SIRT3 reduced PGC-1α expression and mitochondrial function, thereby lowering oxidative stress resistance., Thus, both SIRT1 and SIRT3 may interact with PGC-1α in order to resist oxidative stress damage.
The effect of SIRT1 and SIRT6 on p53
p53 is a stress response transcription factor and was the earliest discovered physiological substrate of SIRT1. p53 can promote oxidative stress injury by regulating different target proteins and further induce cellular responses. p53 exerted pro-oxidant activity and promoted oxidative damage by regulating its transcriptional targets, including p53-inducible gene 3, glutathione/NADH, p-FoxO3a and B-cell lymphoma -2-associated-X-protein (Bax). In contrast, p53 can act as an antioxidant factor to suppress oxidative stress by regulating several redox-related proteins, such as MnSOD, glutathione peroxidase 1, and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). When cells are under oxidative stress, multiple sites in the N-terminal of p53 are phosphorylated and multiple lysine sites in the C-terminal are acetylated. SIRT1 has a negative regulatory effect on p53; for example, depletion of SIRT1 abolished the increase in oxidative stress induced by p53 acetylation in THP-1 cells. SIRT1 activation also reversed p53 expression and accumulation brought on by H2O2-induced oxidative stress. The small molecule activator SRT2104 enhanced renal SIRT1 expression and activity and deacetylated p53, resulting in activation of antioxidant signaling. As for the role of SIRT6 in oxidative stress, relevant studies have been limited. For instance, SIRT6 protected cardiomyocytes by inhibiting p53/Fas-dependent cell death and augmenting endogenous antioxidant defense mechanisms. Hence, SIRT1 and SIRT6 can inhibit p53 activity through deacetylation and reduce oxidative factor expression, promoting resistance to oxidative stress injury.
The effect of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 on NF-κB
NF-κB is a nuclear transcription factor. Activated NF-κB factors promote the production of ROS that damage tissues and organs. When oxidative stress occurs, enhanced ROS activity can stimulate the activation of NF-κB and induce the expression of ICAM-1 and monocyte chemotactic factor 1, which further activate NF-κB and lead to oxidative stress. SIRTs inhibited transcription by deacetylating the NF-κB subunit Rel/p65, reducing the production of oxygen radicals. SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 inhibited the transcriptional activity of NF-κB through deacetylation, thereby resisting oxidative stress injury. For example, downregulation of SIRT1 protein levels by NF-κB led to oxidative stress. In addition, SIRT3 regulated ROS generation, causing suppression of NF-κB activation and oxygen radicals. Moreover, loss of SIRT6 in cutaneous wounds aggravated the proinflammatory response by increasing NF-κB activation and promoting oxidative stress. Therefore, SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 can block oxidative stress damage by inhibiting NF-κB activity.
The effect of SIRTs on oxidative stress through other pathways
Many molecules are upstream regulators of SIRTs and have a regulatory effect on them under oxidative stress. For example, the expression of SIRT1 and SIRT6 was decreased by oxidative stress-dependent miR-34a activation in epithelial cells. SIRT5 was upregulated by Krüppel-like factor (KLF) 6 silencing, thereby reducing oxidative stress. Meanwhile, SIRTs target many downstream factors, such as HIF-1α and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and then participate in regulating oxidative stress. Activation of HIF-1α is associated with oxidative stress and can regulate ROS formation through direct or indirect effects. For example, SIRT4 reduced the accumulation of ROS by inhibiting HIF-1α, which is also an important mechanism underlying SIRT4 activity in oxidative stress., In addition, eNOS dysfunction in an oxidative stress environment led to increased generation of ROS. SIRTs play important roles in regulating the activity of eNOS as well. For instance, upregulation of SIRT1 reduced eNOS acetylation (inactive state) and enhanced eNOS phosphorylation (active state). Activation of the SIRT1/eNOS pathway has been found to reduce ROS production by inhibiting NF-κB expression. In brief, the mechanisms by which SIRTs regulate oxidative stress are diverse, and there are many more regulatory pathways that need to be verified.
Conclusion
Together, these aforementioned studies reflect the importance of the SIRT protein family in oxidative stress and can be expected to stimulate future research in order to decipher the SIRT protein mechanisms. As summarized in Fig. 4, SIRTs are involved in the regulation of redox homeostasis and oxidative stress involving many key genes and molecules. Indeed, SIRTs play important roles in maintaining intracellular homeostasis which keeps cells healthy, making them ideal for redox regulation studies. Additionally, SIRTs enhance intracellular homeostasis by acting synergistically through different mechanisms.
Further in-depth studies are needed to identify and elucidate the exact role of each SIRT and to determine whether different SIRTs have functional redundancy or overlapping roles in homeostasis, which may be important for regulating oxidative stress in cells and important pathological manifestations. SIRTs should be developed as modulators of redox-related diseases, and may also provide a mechanistic basis for the development and discovery of antioxidants. Given the interest in SIRTs as drug targets and their redox importance, studies addressing these questions may also provide therapeutic opportunities for the treatment of metabolic, age-related and other redox-related diseases.
The role of SIRTs in cell apoptosis
Cell apoptosis is an active form of cell death that involves programmed cellular machineries leading to progressive self-destruction of the cell. As a type of programmed cell death, apoptosis is a basic cellular mechanism and may occur in numerous diseases. Notably, one of the most extensive biological functions regarding the SIRT protein family is participation in the process of cell apoptosis. The SIRT protein family has functions in both physiological conditions and diseases by regulating the acetylation modification and/or influencing various apoptosis-related proteins by pathway crosstalk, and thus takes part in the pathogenesis of many diseases including cancer, CVDs and others (Fig. 5).,
The effect of SIRTs as histone deacetylases on apoptosis
Histones are the major protein components of chromatin, serve as spools around which DNA is wound, and play roles in gene regulation. The SIRT family-dependent epigenetic regulation of histone acetylation is an important link in the regulation of apoptosis. For example, SIRT1 can reduce the acetylation levels of histones in the promoters of genes, e.g., AR, BReast-CAncer susceptibility gene 1(BRCA1), ERS1, ERS2, EZH2 and EP300, which ultimately affected cancer cell apoptosis. Additionally, SIRT6 links histone H3K9 deacetylation to NF-κB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span. At the molecular level, SIRT6 binds to the promoters of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1 and ERK2 genes, and deacetylates histone H3K9, thereby inhibiting ERK1/2 expression. Moreover, SIRT6 induced the expression of GATA binding protein 5 (GATA5) through inhibition of Nkx3.2 transcription by deacetylating histone H3K9, thereby regulating GATA5-mediated signaling pathways to prevent endothelial injury. These studies have demonstrated the critical role of the SIRT protein family in regulating apoptosis. However, additional studies have found that the SIRT protein family regulates other novel modification types of histones, for example, sumoylation and ubiquitination. Whether these new types of histone modification participate in cell apoptosis remains largely unknown, which may be a new direction for further research.
The effect of SIRT1 on apoptosis by targeting apoptosis-related proteins and pathways
Among the SIRT protein family, SIRT1 is the most widely studied protein, especially in regulating cell apoptosis. A variety of transcription factors, including p53, NF-κB and FoxO, which act downstream of SIRT1, are closely related to cell apoptosis.,– Therefore, we focus here on how SIRT1 participates in regulating these three proteins and their related pathways.SIRT1 mediates p53-dependent apoptosis by suppressing acetylated p53As first discovered with non-histone targets of SIRT1, p53 plays a central role in the prevalence of diseases related to apoptosis.– SIRT1 regulates p53 deacetylation, which is associated with the apoptosis-inhibiting signaling pathway, mainly including the p53-induced death domain protein Pidd, p21, Bax/Bad and caspases. For example, Zeng et al. reported that an extract of Anoectochilus roxburghii flavonoids reduced neuron apoptosis by positively regulating SIRT1 expression, thereby reducing expression of the apoptosis-related molecules p53, p21 and caspase-3, while increasing the ratio of B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2/Bax. SIRT1 also participated in the regulation of p53 protein through direct deacetylation. For example, SIRT1 deacetylating p53 at Lys379 inhibited p53-dependent apoptosis. In addition, SIRT1 can regulate the p53 signaling pathway by targeting proteins. The overexpression of SIRT1 resulted in markedly reduced mRNA and protein expression levels of p53 signaling pathway-related molecules (including p53 and Bax) in vitro, but increased Bcl mRNA and protein expression. p53 expression gradually decreased with increasing SIRT1 levels, thus indicating a gradual decrease in apoptosis. These findings thus show that SIRT1 inhibits apoptosis via inactivation of p53, suggesting a critical role for SIRT1 in regulating the p53 signaling pathway.The SIRT1/NF-κB pathway is mainly involved in inflammation-induced apoptosisRegarding the mechanism underlying SIRT1 involvement in apoptosis, NF-κB (p65) acetylation was significantly increased after inhibition/deletion of SIRT1. A large number of studies have shown that SIRT1 mediates NF-κB pathway modulation to mitigate inflammasome signaling and cellular apoptosis.,, For example, SIRT1 overexpression promoted mouse B lymphocytes cell proliferation, inhibited apoptosis, and upregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway. Additionally, activating the NF-κB signaling pathway could ultimately induce apoptosis through regulation of the inflammatory process. Silencing interferon regulatory factor 9 curbed activity of the NF-κB signaling pathway by upregulating SIRT1, which further inhibited TNF-α induced changes in inflammatory cytokine secretion and promoted apoptosis. Therefore, it appears to be a double-edged sword that SIRT1 regulates NF-κB signaling to affect cellular inflammatory activation and apoptosis in different spatiotemporal dependencies.SIRT1 regulates apoptosis by the regulation of FoxOsFoxO transcription factors can control cell survival by regulating the expression of genes involved in cell-cycle progression and promoting apoptosis. SIRT1 is a key regulator of cell defenses and survival in response to stress, which deacetylates and represses FoxO-dependent apoptosis., SIRT1 mediates cell apoptosis through the deacetylation of FoxO proteins including FoxO1, and upregulation of SIRT1 can inhibit apoptosis via the FoxO1/β-catenin pathway. Moreover, SIRT1, FoxO1, and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) may act as a pathway and play crucial roles in apoptosis. At both the protein and mRNA levels, SIRT1 and SREBP-1 were upregulated in progestin-resistant cells, while FoxO1 was downregulated. Interestingly, SIRT1 may be a potential target for cross-regulation of post-transcriptional modifications. For example, acetylation was required for FoxO3-induced apoptosis through phosphorylated-FoxO3 (p-FoxO3) formation, while expression or activation of SIRT1 blocked p-FoxO3 formation and apoptosis. Deacetylation of FoxO3 by SIRT1 resulted in S-phase kinase-associated protein 2-mediated FoxO3 ubiquitination and degradation. These fine-tuning mechanisms of FoxO3 regulation modulated by PTMs may be a new method to regulate apoptosis in a coordinated manner. In summary, then, SIRT1 can regulate the activity of FoxO, thereby modulating the balance between anti-apoptotic and apoptotic genes.miRNAs play important roles in the regulation of SIRT1miRNAs, a subtype of non-coding RNAs, are small endogenous RNAs which can inhibit protein translation in apoptosis. Moreover, SIRT1 has been revealed to be targeted by miRNAs such as miR-34a, miR-181, miR-128, miR-449 and miR-30a-5p. For example, Yamakuchi et al. demonstrated a negative correlation between the expression of miR-34a and SIRT1, suggesting SIRT1 was a target of miR-34a. In addition, SIRT1 is a key player in the protection provided by miR-34a-5p inhibition during apoptosis. The overexpression of miR-181d-5p inhibited cell apoptosis and renal fibrosis in a mouse model by downregulating the SIRT1/p53 pathway. Furthermore, miR-181a increased FoxO1 acetylation and promoted granulosa cell apoptosis via SIRT1 downregulation. The previous study also suggested that miR-128 promoted apoptosis in human cancers via the p53/Bak axis. Upregulation of miR-128 promoted apoptosis in an epilepsy model in vivo and in vitro through the SIRT1/p53/Bax/cytochrome c/caspase signaling pathway. Other miRNAs, such as miR-449, have been investigated in a model of acute kidney injury model by detecting expression of its target SIRT1 and downstream factors p53/Bax. Inhibition of miR-449 elevated SIRT1 expression and inhibited acetylated p53 and Bax protein levels. Finally, miR-30a-5p targeted SIRT1 to activate the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway, resulting in cardiomyocyte apoptosis. These studies all demonstrate how miRNAs play important roles in the regulation of SIRT1, which should be further studied in various diseases in the future.Other regulatory molecules or factors acting on SIRT1Upstream of SIRT1, in addition to miRNAs, a novel fibroblast growth factor 1 variant could counteract adriamycin-induced apoptosis by decreasing p53 activity via upregulation of SIRT1-mediated p53 deacetylation. There have also been a series of studies on the anti-apoptotic effect of melatonin which regulates SIRT1 in various physiological processes.– Additionally, some chemicals or drugs, like cambinol and ginsenoside Rc, have been shown to inhibit or activate SIRT1 to regulate the apoptotic process., Given that the above-mentioned molecules can regulate SIRT1-related signaling pathways, SIRT1 may be a potential therapeutic target in the apoptotic response.
SIRT1 mediates p53-dependent apoptosis by suppressing acetylated p53
As first discovered with non-histone targets of SIRT1, p53 plays a central role in the prevalence of diseases related to apoptosis.– SIRT1 regulates p53 deacetylation, which is associated with the apoptosis-inhibiting signaling pathway, mainly including the p53-induced death domain protein Pidd, p21, Bax/Bad and caspases. For example, Zeng et al. reported that an extract of Anoectochilus roxburghii flavonoids reduced neuron apoptosis by positively regulating SIRT1 expression, thereby reducing expression of the apoptosis-related molecules p53, p21 and caspase-3, while increasing the ratio of B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2/Bax. SIRT1 also participated in the regulation of p53 protein through direct deacetylation. For example, SIRT1 deacetylating p53 at Lys379 inhibited p53-dependent apoptosis. In addition, SIRT1 can regulate the p53 signaling pathway by targeting proteins. The overexpression of SIRT1 resulted in markedly reduced mRNA and protein expression levels of p53 signaling pathway-related molecules (including p53 and Bax) in vitro, but increased Bcl mRNA and protein expression. p53 expression gradually decreased with increasing SIRT1 levels, thus indicating a gradual decrease in apoptosis. These findings thus show that SIRT1 inhibits apoptosis via inactivation of p53, suggesting a critical role for SIRT1 in regulating the p53 signaling pathway.
The SIRT1/NF-κB pathway is mainly involved in inflammation-induced apoptosis
Regarding the mechanism underlying SIRT1 involvement in apoptosis, NF-κB (p65) acetylation was significantly increased after inhibition/deletion of SIRT1. A large number of studies have shown that SIRT1 mediates NF-κB pathway modulation to mitigate inflammasome signaling and cellular apoptosis.,, For example, SIRT1 overexpression promoted mouse B lymphocytes cell proliferation, inhibited apoptosis, and upregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway. Additionally, activating the NF-κB signaling pathway could ultimately induce apoptosis through regulation of the inflammatory process. Silencing interferon regulatory factor 9 curbed activity of the NF-κB signaling pathway by upregulating SIRT1, which further inhibited TNF-α induced changes in inflammatory cytokine secretion and promoted apoptosis. Therefore, it appears to be a double-edged sword that SIRT1 regulates NF-κB signaling to affect cellular inflammatory activation and apoptosis in different spatiotemporal dependencies.
SIRT1 regulates apoptosis by the regulation of FoxOs
FoxO transcription factors can control cell survival by regulating the expression of genes involved in cell-cycle progression and promoting apoptosis. SIRT1 is a key regulator of cell defenses and survival in response to stress, which deacetylates and represses FoxO-dependent apoptosis., SIRT1 mediates cell apoptosis through the deacetylation of FoxO proteins including FoxO1, and upregulation of SIRT1 can inhibit apoptosis via the FoxO1/β-catenin pathway. Moreover, SIRT1, FoxO1, and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) may act as a pathway and play crucial roles in apoptosis. At both the protein and mRNA levels, SIRT1 and SREBP-1 were upregulated in progestin-resistant cells, while FoxO1 was downregulated. Interestingly, SIRT1 may be a potential target for cross-regulation of post-transcriptional modifications. For example, acetylation was required for FoxO3-induced apoptosis through phosphorylated-FoxO3 (p-FoxO3) formation, while expression or activation of SIRT1 blocked p-FoxO3 formation and apoptosis. Deacetylation of FoxO3 by SIRT1 resulted in S-phase kinase-associated protein 2-mediated FoxO3 ubiquitination and degradation. These fine-tuning mechanisms of FoxO3 regulation modulated by PTMs may be a new method to regulate apoptosis in a coordinated manner. In summary, then, SIRT1 can regulate the activity of FoxO, thereby modulating the balance between anti-apoptotic and apoptotic genes.
miRNAs play important roles in the regulation of SIRT1
miRNAs, a subtype of non-coding RNAs, are small endogenous RNAs which can inhibit protein translation in apoptosis. Moreover, SIRT1 has been revealed to be targeted by miRNAs such as miR-34a, miR-181, miR-128, miR-449 and miR-30a-5p. For example, Yamakuchi et al. demonstrated a negative correlation between the expression of miR-34a and SIRT1, suggesting SIRT1 was a target of miR-34a. In addition, SIRT1 is a key player in the protection provided by miR-34a-5p inhibition during apoptosis. The overexpression of miR-181d-5p inhibited cell apoptosis and renal fibrosis in a mouse model by downregulating the SIRT1/p53 pathway. Furthermore, miR-181a increased FoxO1 acetylation and promoted granulosa cell apoptosis via SIRT1 downregulation. The previous study also suggested that miR-128 promoted apoptosis in human cancers via the p53/Bak axis. Upregulation of miR-128 promoted apoptosis in an epilepsy model in vivo and in vitro through the SIRT1/p53/Bax/cytochrome c/caspase signaling pathway. Other miRNAs, such as miR-449, have been investigated in a model of acute kidney injury model by detecting expression of its target SIRT1 and downstream factors p53/Bax. Inhibition of miR-449 elevated SIRT1 expression and inhibited acetylated p53 and Bax protein levels. Finally, miR-30a-5p targeted SIRT1 to activate the NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway, resulting in cardiomyocyte apoptosis. These studies all demonstrate how miRNAs play important roles in the regulation of SIRT1, which should be further studied in various diseases in the future.
Other regulatory molecules or factors acting on SIRT1
Upstream of SIRT1, in addition to miRNAs, a novel fibroblast growth factor 1 variant could counteract adriamycin-induced apoptosis by decreasing p53 activity via upregulation of SIRT1-mediated p53 deacetylation. There have also been a series of studies on the anti-apoptotic effect of melatonin which regulates SIRT1 in various physiological processes.– Additionally, some chemicals or drugs, like cambinol and ginsenoside Rc, have been shown to inhibit or activate SIRT1 to regulate the apoptotic process., Given that the above-mentioned molecules can regulate SIRT1-related signaling pathways, SIRT1 may be a potential therapeutic target in the apoptotic response.
The effect of SIRT2 on apoptosis
Several previous studies have suggested that SIRT2 has complex regulating mechanisms promoting or inhibiting apoptosis. In contrast to SIRT1, SIRT2 is predominantly a cytoplasmic protein and is able to deacetylate several cytoplasmic substrates, including p53, NF-κB, and FoxO3. In terms of its anti-apoptotic effects, SIRT2 downregulation alone is sufficient to cause apoptosis, and SIRT2 depletion leads to p53 accumulation causing activation of the p38 MAPK in cancer cell lines such as HeLa, but not in normal cells.
On the other hand, SIRT2 can promote apoptosis mediated by the caspase, Bcl2/Bax and FoxO pathways. For example, She et al. demonstrated that the SIRT2 inhibitor AGK2 effectively reduced the levels of phospho-JNK and FoxO3a. As JNK is a well-known regulator of apoptosis, protein downregulation will lead to attenuation of the subsequent signaling cascade involving Bim, and eventually leads to suppression of the caspase cascade. In addition, SIRT2 overexpression induces cellular apoptosis via upregulating cleaved caspase 3 and Bax and downregulating anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, suggesting the important role of SIRT2 in apoptosis. As for the FoxO-related pathway, FoxO3a, which is the immediate downstream target for SIRT2-driven deacetylation, is a promoter of apoptotic pathways in many diseases., SIRT2 activates FoxO3a by deacetylating it, which promotes the activation of the pro-apoptotic pathways Akt/FoxO3a and JNK, and thus increases apoptosis. Additionally, the administration of specific inhibitors of SIRT2 attenuates neuronal cell death under ischemic conditions in vitro and in vivo. The confusing role of SIRT2 in the process of apoptosis might thus be attributed to regulation of different pathways affected by different conditions, but more studies verifying SIRT2 functions in apoptosis will be needed in the future.
The effect of SIRT3-7 on apoptosis
The critical roles of SIRT3-5 in regulating cell apoptosis Three SIRT proteins, namely SIRT3–5, are localized to the mitochondrion, a dynamic organelle that functions as the primary site of endogenous apoptosis. Although mitochondrial SIRT proteins have not been as extensively studied as SIRT1, a growing body of studies have illustrated their importance in basic mitochondrial biology and apoptosis.SIRT3 plays a pro-apoptotic role in that glycogen synthase kinase-3 β (GSK-3β)/Bax, Bax/Bcl-2 and bad/Bcl-x/L ratios regulate apoptosis., SIRT3 overexpression promoted apoptosis by enhancing caspase 9 cleavage in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, and SIRT3 depletion downregulated cleaved caspase 3 levels in lung cancer (LC) cells. In contrast, several studies have found that SIRT3 has an anti-apoptotic effect. SIRT3 deficiency resulted in significantly increased apoptosis, increased Bax and caspase 3 mRNA levels, and decreased Bcl-2 mRNA levels in septic mice, and also significantly increased caspase 3 expression in SIRT3-KO mice. Thus, SIRT3 plays different roles in different diseases, both pro- and anti-apoptotic. A typical example is when SIRT3 expression inhibited the growth of cancer cells by promoting apoptosis and necroptosis. In a stress injury disease model, SIRT3 inhibited apoptosis and exerted a protective effect against various stressors. For example, SIRT3 deficiency produced more melanocyte apoptosis by inducing severe mitochondrial dysfunction and cytochrome c release into the cytoplasm. However, more research is needed in the future to determine whether SIRT3 promotes or inhibits apoptosis of the caspase 3 pathway in different types of diseases.FoxO transcription factors are downstream targets of the serine/threonine protein kinase B/Akt, which promotes apoptosis signaling by affecting multiple mitochondria-targeting proteins. SIRT3 acetylation modulated FoxO1 and exerted apoptotic effects. In addition, SIRT3 post-translationally upregulated FoxO3a activity through deacetylation, dephosphorylation and deubiquitination to regulate apoptosis. Meanwhile, non-coding RNAs act as upstream regulators of SIRT3 to regulate apoptosis. For example, the miR-297 antagomir affected apoptosis by targeting SIRT3 to reduce the extent of IκBα and NF-κB phosphorylation and prevent activation of NLRP3. A similar study confirmed that SIRT3 was also a target of miR-421. Studies of the upstream and downstream regulatory mechanisms of SIRT3 regulating apoptosis are few and more research will be required in this area.There are only limited studies on SIRT4 and cell apoptosis, but these few have indicated that SIRT4 prevents apoptosis by affecting the ratio of pro-caspase 9/caspase 9 or pro-caspase 3/caspase 3, and by altering Bax translocation., In addition, SIRT5 participates in the regulation of apoptosis as a deacetylated protein and may have an effect on apoptosis-related proteins. For example, SIRT5 deacetylated cytochrome c, a protein of the mitochondrial intermembrane space with a central function in oxidative metabolism as well as in apoptosis initiation. SIRT5 overexpression ameliorated cytochrome c leakage and activation of caspase 3 to alleviate apoptosis., Thus, these data implicate mitochondrial SIRTs as effective in protecting against pathological injury and apoptosis by inhibiting the cytochrome c/caspase 3 apoptosis pathway. Such research may form the basis for future treatment for apoptosis. However, the number of related studies on SIRT4 and SIRT5 is still limited and need to be expanded. The role of SIRT6 and SIRT7 during apoptosis At present, only a few studies have explored the role of SIRT6 and SIRT7, which could be a new research direction for the SIRT protein family. Both SIRT6 and SIRT7 mediate apoptosis by regulating p53., Furthermore, SIRT7 promoted cellular survival following genomic stress by attenuation of DNA damage and the p53 response. However, current studies on SIRT6 and SIRT7 are still in their infancy, and more research is needed in the future to explore their role in apoptosis.
The critical roles of SIRT3-5 in regulating cell apoptosis
Three SIRT proteins, namely SIRT3–5, are localized to the mitochondrion, a dynamic organelle that functions as the primary site of endogenous apoptosis. Although mitochondrial SIRT proteins have not been as extensively studied as SIRT1, a growing body of studies have illustrated their importance in basic mitochondrial biology and apoptosis.
SIRT3 plays a pro-apoptotic role in that glycogen synthase kinase-3 β (GSK-3β)/Bax, Bax/Bcl-2 and bad/Bcl-x/L ratios regulate apoptosis., SIRT3 overexpression promoted apoptosis by enhancing caspase 9 cleavage in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, and SIRT3 depletion downregulated cleaved caspase 3 levels in lung cancer (LC) cells. In contrast, several studies have found that SIRT3 has an anti-apoptotic effect. SIRT3 deficiency resulted in significantly increased apoptosis, increased Bax and caspase 3 mRNA levels, and decreased Bcl-2 mRNA levels in septic mice, and also significantly increased caspase 3 expression in SIRT3-KO mice. Thus, SIRT3 plays different roles in different diseases, both pro- and anti-apoptotic. A typical example is when SIRT3 expression inhibited the growth of cancer cells by promoting apoptosis and necroptosis. In a stress injury disease model, SIRT3 inhibited apoptosis and exerted a protective effect against various stressors. For example, SIRT3 deficiency produced more melanocyte apoptosis by inducing severe mitochondrial dysfunction and cytochrome c release into the cytoplasm. However, more research is needed in the future to determine whether SIRT3 promotes or inhibits apoptosis of the caspase 3 pathway in different types of diseases.
FoxO transcription factors are downstream targets of the serine/threonine protein kinase B/Akt, which promotes apoptosis signaling by affecting multiple mitochondria-targeting proteins. SIRT3 acetylation modulated FoxO1 and exerted apoptotic effects. In addition, SIRT3 post-translationally upregulated FoxO3a activity through deacetylation, dephosphorylation and deubiquitination to regulate apoptosis. Meanwhile, non-coding RNAs act as upstream regulators of SIRT3 to regulate apoptosis. For example, the miR-297 antagomir affected apoptosis by targeting SIRT3 to reduce the extent of IκBα and NF-κB phosphorylation and prevent activation of NLRP3. A similar study confirmed that SIRT3 was also a target of miR-421. Studies of the upstream and downstream regulatory mechanisms of SIRT3 regulating apoptosis are few and more research will be required in this area.
There are only limited studies on SIRT4 and cell apoptosis, but these few have indicated that SIRT4 prevents apoptosis by affecting the ratio of pro-caspase 9/caspase 9 or pro-caspase 3/caspase 3, and by altering Bax translocation., In addition, SIRT5 participates in the regulation of apoptosis as a deacetylated protein and may have an effect on apoptosis-related proteins. For example, SIRT5 deacetylated cytochrome c, a protein of the mitochondrial intermembrane space with a central function in oxidative metabolism as well as in apoptosis initiation. SIRT5 overexpression ameliorated cytochrome c leakage and activation of caspase 3 to alleviate apoptosis., Thus, these data implicate mitochondrial SIRTs as effective in protecting against pathological injury and apoptosis by inhibiting the cytochrome c/caspase 3 apoptosis pathway. Such research may form the basis for future treatment for apoptosis. However, the number of related studies on SIRT4 and SIRT5 is still limited and need to be expanded.
The role of SIRT6 and SIRT7 during apoptosis
At present, only a few studies have explored the role of SIRT6 and SIRT7, which could be a new research direction for the SIRT protein family. Both SIRT6 and SIRT7 mediate apoptosis by regulating p53., Furthermore, SIRT7 promoted cellular survival following genomic stress by attenuation of DNA damage and the p53 response. However, current studies on SIRT6 and SIRT7 are still in their infancy, and more research is needed in the future to explore their role in apoptosis.
Conclusion
In conclusion, one of the most extensive biological functions of the SIRT protein family is to participate in the process of apoptosis. As a family of bidirectional regulatory proteins, the function of SIRTs appears to be reversible depending on the cellular state. However, our current knowledge of SIRTs in apoptosis and its regulation is far from complete. More studies are needed in the future to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of how the SIRT protein family is regulated in pathophysiological processes.
The role of SIRTs in autophagy
Autophagy is a cell self-digestion process via lysosomes that clears cellular waste, including aberrantly modified proteins or protein aggregates and damaged organelles. Recent studies have illustrated the important roles of the SIRT protein family in the autophagic process. Therefore, in this section, we aim to review recent research on the relationship between the SIRT protein family and autophagy, and discuss possible regulatory roles of SIRT proteins in autophagy, as well as the conditions under which they participate in autophagy in a positive or negative manner (Fig. 6).
The effect of SIRT1 on autophagy
SIRT1 regulates autophagy through deacetylation SIRT proteins affect protein acetylation level, and this modification is closely involved in autophagy. There are complex roles for SIRT1-related deacetylation in the regulation of autophagy., For example, SIRT1 deacetylates autophagy-related proteins (such as Beclin-1 and microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3)) to promote autophagy. Deacetylation of Beclin-1 lysine residue by SIRT1 impairs autophagic flux; thus, autophagosome fusion with lysosomes is compromised., SIRT1 promotes autophagy of cancer cells by reducing acetylation of LC3. LC3 and autophagy related (Atg)7 deacetylation is disrupted in germ-cell-specific SIRT1 KO mice, which affects the redistribution of LC3 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and activation of autophagy. Suppression of SIRT1 enhances acetylation level of unc-51 like kinase 1 (ULK1) and induces ROS-dependent autophagy. Therefore, SIRT1 could directly regulate autophagy through deacetylation of autophagic proteins.SIRT1 regulates autophagy via deacetylation of autophagy-related proteins as well as through deacetylation of mitochondrial proteins. Mitochondrial proteins participate in the process of mitophagy; a selective autophagic process that is critical for cellular homeostasis and eliminates dysfunctional mitochondria. For example, induction of autophagy by SIRT1/HIF-1α activation is a novel therapeutic option for peripheral nerve injury. SIRT1 activity is involved in mitochondrial biogenesis through PGC-1α and participates in the balance of autophagy regulatory proteins. Mitofusins2 (MFN2) is a mitochondrial fusion factor and increasing evidence has shown that it is involved in the regulation of autophagy. For example, MFN2 is deacetylated by SIRT1, and loss of SIRT1 causes a sequential chain of defective autophagy in an MFN2-dependent manner. Mechanistically, SIRT1 deacetylates K655 and K662 residues at the C terminus of MFN2, leading to autophagy activation.In conclusion, SIRT1 acts on autophagy-related proteins and transcriptional factors mainly through modification of acetylation, and affects the occurrence or degradation of autophagosomes. However, there have been limited studies on other PTMs of SIRT1, and more research is needed to explore the regulatory mechanism of SIRT1 in the future. Upstream and downstream signaling pathway of SIRT1 in autophagy AMPK is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine-protein kinase. Under various physiological and pathological conditions, AMPK acts as an activator of SIRT1 and is involved in the regulation of autophagy. For example, inositol polyphosphate multi kinase enhances autophagy-related transcription by stimulating AMPK-dependent SIRT1 activation. AMPK can also be activated as a downstream molecule of SIRT1. SIRT1 promoted autophagy via AMPK activation. Autophagy impairment is mediated by downregulation of SIRT1/FoxO3a/AMPK/ peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors (PPAR)-α signaling. The SIRT1 activator resveratrol increases cAMP content, expression of protein kinase A, as well as the activity of AMPK. Besides, resveratrol pretreatment reduces tumor necrosis factor α-induced inflammation and increases LC3B expression and sequestosome 1(SQSTM1)/p62 degradation in a concentration-dependent manner. Activation of the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway alleviates cell damage and promotes autophagic flux via downregulation of p62. Therefore, SIRT1 recognizes resveratrol-induced autophagy in vitro and in vivo via the cAMP/phosphorylated protein kinase A (PRKA)/AMPK/SIRT1 signaling pathway., AMPK acts as an upstream molecule to regulate expression of SIRT1 active agent. SIRT1 affects autophagy by binding to molecules directly. SIRT1 forms a molecular complex with Atg5, Atg7 and Atg8, and transiently increased expression of SIRT1 is sufficient to stimulate basal rates of autophagy. SIRT1 interacts with the Cullin 4B-Ring E3 ligase complex, which promotes autophagy of cancer cells. In conclusion, these molecules play important roles as the upstream or downstream of SIRT1 in the process of autophagy, and affect the occurrence and development of diseases. Noncoding RNAs in SIRT1-regulated autophagy A variety of miRNAs have been found to affect autophagy by directly regulating expression of SIRT1. For example, miR-124 and miR-142 represses autophagy via targeting SIRT1 in cancer cells. Silencing of miR-150-5p increases autophagy by targeting the SIRT1/p53/AMPK pathway. miR-138-5p affects insulin resistance through inducing autophagy in HepG2 cells by regulating SIRT1, and overexpression of SIRT1 increases Beclin-1 and LC3 II/I levels, and the number of green fluorescent protein-LC3 dots, and decreases p62 level. miR-145 inhibition upregulates SIRT1 and attenuates autophagy via NF-κB-dependent Beclin-1.Both long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) modulate autophagy associated with SIRT1. For instance, lncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 enhances ox- low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-induced autophagy through the SIRT1/MAPK/NF-κB pathway. lncRNA growth arrest specific 5 inhibits macroautophagy and forms a negative feedback regulatory loop with the miR-34a/SIRT1/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway.In conclusion, SIRT1 is a key regulator of the autophagic process. Through its deacetylase activity, SIRT1 is involved in the regulation of different autophagic proteins from initiation to degradation. The level and function of SIRT1 are also regulated by many signaling pathways, such as AMPK. Some studies have shown the regulation of SIRT1 by ncRNAs. SIRT1-mediated autophagic dysregulation leads to progression of various diseases. In the future, we need more research evidence to improve and supplement the mechanism of SIRT1.
SIRT1 regulates autophagy through deacetylation
SIRT proteins affect protein acetylation level, and this modification is closely involved in autophagy. There are complex roles for SIRT1-related deacetylation in the regulation of autophagy., For example, SIRT1 deacetylates autophagy-related proteins (such as Beclin-1 and microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3)) to promote autophagy. Deacetylation of Beclin-1 lysine residue by SIRT1 impairs autophagic flux; thus, autophagosome fusion with lysosomes is compromised., SIRT1 promotes autophagy of cancer cells by reducing acetylation of LC3. LC3 and autophagy related (Atg)7 deacetylation is disrupted in germ-cell-specific SIRT1 KO mice, which affects the redistribution of LC3 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and activation of autophagy. Suppression of SIRT1 enhances acetylation level of unc-51 like kinase 1 (ULK1) and induces ROS-dependent autophagy. Therefore, SIRT1 could directly regulate autophagy through deacetylation of autophagic proteins.
SIRT1 regulates autophagy via deacetylation of autophagy-related proteins as well as through deacetylation of mitochondrial proteins. Mitochondrial proteins participate in the process of mitophagy; a selective autophagic process that is critical for cellular homeostasis and eliminates dysfunctional mitochondria. For example, induction of autophagy by SIRT1/HIF-1α activation is a novel therapeutic option for peripheral nerve injury. SIRT1 activity is involved in mitochondrial biogenesis through PGC-1α and participates in the balance of autophagy regulatory proteins. Mitofusins2 (MFN2) is a mitochondrial fusion factor and increasing evidence has shown that it is involved in the regulation of autophagy. For example, MFN2 is deacetylated by SIRT1, and loss of SIRT1 causes a sequential chain of defective autophagy in an MFN2-dependent manner. Mechanistically, SIRT1 deacetylates K655 and K662 residues at the C terminus of MFN2, leading to autophagy activation.
In conclusion, SIRT1 acts on autophagy-related proteins and transcriptional factors mainly through modification of acetylation, and affects the occurrence or degradation of autophagosomes. However, there have been limited studies on other PTMs of SIRT1, and more research is needed to explore the regulatory mechanism of SIRT1 in the future.
Upstream and downstream signaling pathway of SIRT1 in autophagy
AMPK is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine-protein kinase. Under various physiological and pathological conditions, AMPK acts as an activator of SIRT1 and is involved in the regulation of autophagy. For example, inositol polyphosphate multi kinase enhances autophagy-related transcription by stimulating AMPK-dependent SIRT1 activation. AMPK can also be activated as a downstream molecule of SIRT1. SIRT1 promoted autophagy via AMPK activation. Autophagy impairment is mediated by downregulation of SIRT1/FoxO3a/AMPK/ peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors (PPAR)-α signaling. The SIRT1 activator resveratrol increases cAMP content, expression of protein kinase A, as well as the activity of AMPK. Besides, resveratrol pretreatment reduces tumor necrosis factor α-induced inflammation and increases LC3B expression and sequestosome 1(SQSTM1)/p62 degradation in a concentration-dependent manner. Activation of the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway alleviates cell damage and promotes autophagic flux via downregulation of p62. Therefore, SIRT1 recognizes resveratrol-induced autophagy in vitro and in vivo via the cAMP/phosphorylated protein kinase A (PRKA)/AMPK/SIRT1 signaling pathway., AMPK acts as an upstream molecule to regulate expression of SIRT1 active agent. SIRT1 affects autophagy by binding to molecules directly. SIRT1 forms a molecular complex with Atg5, Atg7 and Atg8, and transiently increased expression of SIRT1 is sufficient to stimulate basal rates of autophagy. SIRT1 interacts with the Cullin 4B-Ring E3 ligase complex, which promotes autophagy of cancer cells. In conclusion, these molecules play important roles as the upstream or downstream of SIRT1 in the process of autophagy, and affect the occurrence and development of diseases.
Noncoding RNAs in SIRT1-regulated autophagy
A variety of miRNAs have been found to affect autophagy by directly regulating expression of SIRT1. For example, miR-124 and miR-142 represses autophagy via targeting SIRT1 in cancer cells. Silencing of miR-150-5p increases autophagy by targeting the SIRT1/p53/AMPK pathway. miR-138-5p affects insulin resistance through inducing autophagy in HepG2 cells by regulating SIRT1, and overexpression of SIRT1 increases Beclin-1 and LC3 II/I levels, and the number of green fluorescent protein-LC3 dots, and decreases p62 level. miR-145 inhibition upregulates SIRT1 and attenuates autophagy via NF-κB-dependent Beclin-1.
Both long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) modulate autophagy associated with SIRT1. For instance, lncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 enhances ox- low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-induced autophagy through the SIRT1/MAPK/NF-κB pathway. lncRNA growth arrest specific 5 inhibits macroautophagy and forms a negative feedback regulatory loop with the miR-34a/SIRT1/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway.
In conclusion, SIRT1 is a key regulator of the autophagic process. Through its deacetylase activity, SIRT1 is involved in the regulation of different autophagic proteins from initiation to degradation. The level and function of SIRT1 are also regulated by many signaling pathways, such as AMPK. Some studies have shown the regulation of SIRT1 by ncRNAs. SIRT1-mediated autophagic dysregulation leads to progression of various diseases. In the future, we need more research evidence to improve and supplement the mechanism of SIRT1.
Effect of SIRT2 on autophagy
It has been indicated that SIRT2 controls the functional ability of the autophagic system through acetylation. Genetic manipulation of SIRT2 levels in vitro and in vivo modulates the levels of α-synuclein acetylation, its aggregation, and autophagy. SIRT2 loss of function either with AK1 (a specific SIRT2 inhibitor) or by SIRT2 KO recovers microtubule stabilization and improves autophagy. Additionally, SIRT2 directly binds to the 3'UTR of transcription factor EB and facilitates its mRNA stability. Transcription factor EB is a key transcription factor involved in the regulation of many lysosome-related genes and plays a critical role in the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, indicating that SIRT2 modulates autophagic components. Although the precise mechanism is unresolved, SIRT2 plays a key role in regulating autophagy in certain diseases, and more research is needed.
Effect of SIRT3–5 on autophagy
As mitochondrial SIRTs (mtSIRTs) members, SIRT3–5 are all involved in regulating energy metabolism and metabolic homeostasis through regulation of mitophagy., SIRT3 regulates autophagy by activating different downstream signaling pathways. For example, overexpression of SIRT3 activates macroautophagy through activating the AMPK/ULK1 pathway. SIRT3 promotes expression of autophagic proteins Beclin-1 and LC3II via downregulation of the Notch-1/Hes-1 pathway. Functional studies showed that SIRT3 reversed Bnip3 expression and promoted Bnip3-required mitophagy activity via the ERK-CREB signaling pathway. SIRT3 is involved in the regulation of autophagy; however, its role as an autophagy regulator, particularly the molecular mechanism, remains poorly understood. One recent study found that SIRT3 was directly inhibited by miR-874-5p and promoted autophagy, while depletion of miR-874-5p inhibited autophagy. A related study indicated that SIRT3 regulated the LKB1/AMPK/mTOR autophagic signaling pathway through the lncRNA DYNLRB2-2/miR-298/SIRT3 axis. Compared with SIRT1, the studies related to autophagy in SIRT3 are still lacking.
Mitochondria represent a major source of ROS that affect mitochondrial function, resulting in autophagic clearance of damaged mitochondria. Localized in the mitochondria, SIRT4 regulates proteins involved in metabolic reactions, antioxidant pathways and autophagy, thus maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis. Overexpression of SIRT4 inhibits ROS production and autophagy by activating the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Furthermore, the SIRT4/optic atrophy 1 axis is causally linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and altered mitochondrial dynamics that translates into aging-associated decreased mitophagy. So far, there are few relevant studies on SIRT4 regulation of autophagy. Further studies need to explore the role of SIRT4 as an mtSIRT in mitochondrial processes, such as autophagy (mitophagy).
Unlike SIRT4, which inhibits autophagy, the role of SIRT5 in regulating autophagy is contradictory. In the case of inhibition of autophagy by SIRT5, mitochondrial size is increased and mitophagy decreased upon SIRT5 overexpression, whereas the opposite effect is observed in SIRT5-silenced cells or upon treatment with the SIRT5 inhibitor MC3482. However, SIRT5 could enhance autophagy in gastric cancer (GC) cells via the AMPK/mTOR pathway. Additionally, SIRT5-induced deacetylation of lactate dehydrogenase B triggers hyperactivation of autophagy; a key event in tumorigenesis. Succinyl-proteomics in brown adipose tissue of normal and SIRT5 KO mice. Overacylation due to SIRT5 deficiency leads to defective autophagy/mitophagy. Besides their functions in energy metabolism and mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes, all three mtSIRTs participate in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology/dynamics. They seem to promote mitochondrial fusion and/or inhibit fission, and thus might attenuate mitophagic clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria. At present, the mechanism of action of mtSIRTs on autophagy is still unclear.
Effect of SIRT6 on autophagy is mainly through inhibition of Akt-related pathway
SIRT6 is essential for the regulation of autophagy in cells. For example, overexpression of the SIRT6 gene could inhibit apoptosis and induce autophagy, which might be involved in repairing kidney damage caused by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Autophagy controls cellular senescence by eliminating damaged cellular components and is negatively regulated by Akt signaling through mTOR. SIRT6 overexpression induces autophagy via attenuation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/Akt/mTOR signaling. Lu et al. revealed that SIRT6 positively regulates autophagy in cardiomyocytes. Mechanistically, SIRT6 promotes nuclear retention of FoxO3 transcription factor via attenuating Akt signaling, which is responsible for autophagic activation. SIRT6 can be inhibited by upstream miR-122, resulting in a significant reduction in the levels of elabela, thereby preventing angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated loss of autophagy. However, the mechanism of SIRT6 promotion of autophagy needs further study.
Effect of SIRT7 on autophagy needs further investigation
There are few studies about the effects of SIRT7 in autophagy. For example, silencing forkhead box M1 promotes apoptosis and autophagy through the SIRT7/mTOR/IGF2 pathway in GC cells. SIRT7 protects against chondrocyte degeneration in OA via autophagic activation. SIRT7 depletion significantly inhibits androgen-induced autophagy in LNCap and 22Rv1 cells (in vitro). SIRT7 plays an important role in tumor growth and metastases and immunohistochemical analysis of 93 specimens and bioinformatic analysis revealed that SIRT7 expression was positively associated with androgen receptor (AR) (in vivo). SIRT7 promotes prostate cancer autophagy indirectly via the AR signaling pathway. These results suggest that SIRT7 plays a positive role in promoting apoptosis. However, the number of studies on SIRT7 is still limited and further research is needed.
Conclusion
Autophagy is a highly conserved catabolic process and a major cellular pathway for the degradation of long-lived proteins and cytoplasmic organelles. Growing evidence has suggested that the SIRT protein family plays an important role in pathophysiology by mediating autophagy, maintaining cellular homeostasis, integrating cellular energy metabolism, and clearing damaged and waste cells. Although there is still a lot of work to be done, based on the current research, it is confident that the SIRT family might become a target for future research on autophagy. Investigating the exact mechanism of SIRT-mediated autophagy in different diseases is a new field to be explored in the future. Further studies should focus on the biological mechanism of SIRT co-regulating autophagy with various molecular signals and its role in different subcellular localization. Moreover, autophagy modulators of SIRTs may also provide new pharmacological targets.
Role of SIRTs in cell proliferation
Cell proliferation is the process by which a cell grows and divides to produce two daughter cells.– Cell proliferation leads to an exponential increase in cell number and is, therefore, a rapid mechanism of tissue growth., Cell proliferation requires both cell growth and division to occur at the same time, which is the basis of organismal growth, development, reproduction and inheritance (Fig. 7).–
Effect of SIRT1 on cell proliferation
SIRT1 is involved in regulating cell proliferation in a bilateral way by regulating protein expression and acetylation., The opposite effects of SIRT1 on cell proliferation have been observed among different cell types or the regulation of different downstream molecules. For example, SIRT1 promotes cell proliferation by regulating LC3 and retinoblastoma (Rb) acetylation. At the molecular level, SIRT1 promotes the proliferation of endometrial cancer (EC) cells by reducing acetylation of LC3. SIRT1 deacetylates Rb protein in the Rb/ E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) complex, leading to dissociation of E2F1 and enhanced oligodendrocyte progenitor cell proliferation. SIRT1 directly regulates expression of transcription factor proteins, such as E2F1 and p53, subsequently promoting macrophage and HCC cell proliferation, respectively.,
However, SIRT1 can have an antiproliferative role via regulating expression of key proteins related to cell proliferation, such as AMPK and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). For instance, SIRT1 exerts antiproliferative effects via the AMPK/mTOR pathway in the context of mutant p53 in HCC cells. SIRT1 overexpression inhibits the proliferation of renal cancer cells, while inhibition of SIRT1 expression has the opposite effects. SIRT1 might serve an anticancer role in cancer cells by upregulating expression of downstream AMPK. SIRT1 also inhibits GC cell proliferation via the STAT3/matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 signaling pathway. SIRT1 has both promotive and inhibitory effects on proliferation in different cells. However, more studies are still needed to elucidate the mechanisms and establish under which conditions SIRT1 promotes or inhibits cell proliferation.
Effect of SIRT2 on cell proliferation
Participation of SIRT2 in cell proliferation was identified by a series of studies.– At the molecular level, SIRT2 regulates Myc and results in promotion of cell proliferation. For example, SIRT2 enhances N-Myc and c-Myc protein stability and promotes cancer cell proliferation. On the contrary, SIRT2 functions as an HDAC and inhibits proliferation of neuroblastoma cells, renal podocytes, and neuroblastoma cells. SIRT2 upregulation reduces cell proliferation in renal podocytes under high-glucose conditions. The opposite effect of SIRT2 on cell proliferation might be due to the different cell types, which might be the direction for future studies.
Effect of SIRT3 on cell proliferation
SIRT3, the major deacetylase in mitochondria, also plays a bilateral role in regulating cell proliferation. For instance, SIRT3 is responsible for hydroxymethyl-transferase 2 (SHMT2) deacetylation, and the conversion of serine and glycine accomplished by SHMT2 deacetylation in mitochondria is significantly upregulated to support cell proliferation. Chen et al. found that increased activity of SIRT3 contributed to decreased ROS levels and increased cell proliferation. Conversely, the expression of SIRT3 is upregulated by Profilin-1, and subsequently negatively regulates HIF-1α protein levels and suppresses cell proliferation.
Effect of SIRT4 on cell proliferation
SIRT4 inhibits proliferation of several types of cancer cells. For example, SIRT4 inhibits the proliferation of cancer cells by inhibiting glutamine metabolism., In addition, cell proliferation due to repression of SIRT4 by the mTORC1 pathway has been identified. Moreover, SIRT4 is the molecular switch mediating cellular proliferation through glutaminase (GLS)-mediated activation of the Akt/GSK3β/CyclinD1 pathway; mechanically, SIRT4 suppression activates glutaminase, thereby initiating Akt activation.
Effect of SIRT5 on cell proliferation
SIRT5 promotes cell proliferation in most conditions by regulating activity of signaling proteins or protein PTM. For instance, SIRT5 promotes cell proliferation by increasing activity of the MAPK pathway through acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 1., Moreover, citrate synthase desuccinylation by SIRT5 promotes cancer cell proliferation. Similarly, SHMT2 desuccinylation by SIRT5 drives cell proliferation. In addition, SIRT5 regulates cell proliferation directly or indirectly by influencing expression of transcription factors, such as E2F1 and pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1). However, SIRT5 suppresses the proliferation of pancreatic β-cells in vitro by downregulating transcription of PDX1 by deacetylating H4K16. In conclusion, SIRT5 has dual functions in regulating proliferation of different cell types. However, the distinct mechanism for the bilateral roles of SIRT5 is worth further exploration.
Effect of SIRT6 on cell proliferation
SIRT6 is also reported to regulate cell proliferation in a bilateral manner via influencing downstream molecules, such as AMPK, ERK, Wnt signaling and the MAPK pathway. SIRT6 promotes expression of COX-2 by repressing AMPK signaling, thereby increasing cell proliferation. Moreover, overexpression of SIRT6 promotes cell proliferation via upregulating he phosphorylation of ERK. In addition, SIRT6 deletion promotes hematopoietic stem cell proliferation through aberrant activation of Wnt signaling. Using genetic and biochemical studies in vitro and in human multiple myeloma xenograft models, Cea et al. found that SIRT6 depletion enhanced cell proliferation via upregulating expression of MAPK. In conclusion, SIRT6 has both promotive and inhibitory effects on cell proliferation. The different results of SIRT6 in regulating cell proliferation need further study.
Effect of SIRT7 on cell proliferation
Previous studies have shown that SIRT7 has a positive role in regulating cell proliferation. Upregulation of SIRT7 protects against the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in atherosclerosis. Similarly, SIRT7 deficiency attenuates VSMC proliferation, thus attenuating neointimal formation following vascular injury. Moreover, SIRT7 depletion inhibits cancer cell proliferation by suppressing AR signaling and activating p38MAPK.,
Conclusion
The direct and indirect involvement of SIRTs in proliferation could provide new ideas and evidence in support of potential research and as therapeutic targets. This might be meaningful for the treatment of abnormal proliferation in the future, thereby reducing the human disease burden related to proliferation. However, at present, research is still focused on the effect of SIRTs on carcinoma, and other molecular mechanisms of proliferation is less researched. Therefore, research on other molecular mechanisms of proliferation should be increased in the future. More evidence from in vitro and in vivo models for different kinds of diseases to confirm undefined molecular mechanisms of proliferation as yet is awaited.
Roles of SIRTs in cell migration and invasion
Migration and invasion are vital phenotypes both in physiological and pathological status. They allow normal cells to change position within tissues during embryonic morphogenesis, wound healing, and immune-cell trafficking., Specifically, in human cancers, they allow neoplastic cells to enter lymphatic and blood vessels for undergoing metastatic growth in distant organs., An increasing number of studies have shown that SIRTs play important roles in the molecular mechanisms of cell migration and invasion, such as regulation of TGF-β signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)., Since these two phenotypes are hallmarks during tumor progression, we introduced the potential roles of SIRT protein family in cell migration and invasion, mainly depending on cancers (Fig. 8).
Effect of SIRT1 on cell migration and invasion
SIRT1 deacetylates many key proteins, which also contain transcription factors, mainly involved in EMT and integrin adhesion, thereby regulating cell migration and invasion., EMT is the most well-established example of changes in cell–cell adhesion, which refers to nonepithelial cells that are loosely embedded in an extracellular matrix (ECM). Integrin adhesion activates pathways including TGF-β, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, and AMPK signaling pathways.
Several studies have shown that SIRT1 protein levels are lower in lesion tissues than in adjacent tumor tissues or normal tissues of patients with cancer.– This phenomenon is also observed in autoimmune disorders, which indicates that SIRT1 plays important roles in regulating cell migration and invasion. SIRT1, as a deacetylase, influences the biological functions of proteins via regulating protein deacetylation, such as deacetylation of Beclin-1. In melanoma cells, SIRT1 deacetylates Beclin-1 and then accelerates autophagic degradation of the epithelial marker E-cadherin, finally promoting EMT. Additionally, SIRT1 could regulate the expression levels of several proteins that participate in cell migration and invasion, resulting in promotion of EMT. Both in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that expression of SIRT1 in chondrosarcoma cells could effectively take part in the metastatic plasticity of the cells by inducing EMT, via enhancing expression of Twist protein, which is a critical transcriptional factor of EMT. Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 is an E-cadherin‐related transcription factor. Yu et al. have reported that there is positive feedback between SIRT1 and Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1, which enhances EMT of osteosarcoma. SIRT1 induces deacetylation of Beclin-1 and then accelerates autophagic degradation of the epithelial marker E-cadherin, further promoting EMT in melanoma cells. Epidermal SIRT1 plays a role in wound repair. SIRT1 knockdown inhibits EMT, cell migration, and TGF-β signaling in keratinocytes. Furthermore, SIRT1 activates downstream PI3K/Akt and Notch signaling pathways, which alleviates H9c2 cell injury induced by hypoxia, via promoting cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and by inhibiting apoptosis. In non-small cell LC (NSCLC), the SIRT1-mediated AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway could promote A549 and H1299 cell proliferation, invasion and apoptosis.
Expression of SIRT1 can be regulated by ncRNAs, which further influence its effects in regulating cell migration and invasion. For instance, in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, downregulation of SIRT1, by miR-34a transfection, increases the level of acetylated-p53 and inhibits cell migration and invasion. This situation is also found in HCC. Expression of SIRT1 can also be regulated by lncRNAs or circRNAs in a ceRNA-dependent manner. For example, SIRT1 promotes cell migration and invasion in HCC. Expression of SIRT1 is upregulated by lncRNA MALAT1 via sponging miR-204, which might have a pivotal role in treatment and prognosis. Furthermore, SIRT1 promotes the migration of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis, which providing new insight into SIRT1 during RA progression. Mechanistically, SIRT1 is positively regulated by circ0088036 via sponging miR-140−3p.
Effect of SIRT2 on cell migration and invasion
SIRT2 participates in regulating cell migration and invasion through deacetylating target proteins. STAT3 is an important protein for regulating cell invasion and migration., STAT3 has been shown to affect EMT in several cancers. Previous studies have shown that SIRT2 can deacetylate Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C1 (AKR1C1), which is a member of the human aldo-keto reductase protein family that catalyzes NADP + -dependent reduction. AKR1C1 deacetylation further inhibits the transactivation of STAT3 target genes, thus suppressing migration in NSCLC cells and xenograft models. It has been reported that isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) affects cell migration in malignant tumors, such as glioblastoma. In human CRC, SIRT2-dependent IDH1 deacetylation represses CRC cell migration and invasion both in vitro and in vivo.
Effect of SIRT3-5 on cell migration and invasion
SIRT3-5 are three main deacetylases that are located in mitochondria, which appear to be suppressors of cell migration and invasion. Previous studies have demonstrated that SIRT3 and SIRT4 negatively regulate EMT. For instance, transplantation of sh-SIRT3 cells in nude mice resulted in rapid tumor growth and larger tumors. At the molecular level, SIRT3 depletion inhibits EMT by lower E-cadherin expression, leading to tumor suppression. Sun et al. suggested that SIRT4 suppressed EMT through promoting E-cadherin expression in GC cells. Li et al. reported that SIRT3 was involved in the inhibitory effect of nicotinic alpha7 subtype of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on platelet-derived growth factor-BB, an angiogenic factor, induced VSMC migration. Activation of alpha7 subtype of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors attenuates migration in platelet-derived growth factor-BB-treated VSMCs via a mitochondrial SIRT3-dependent manner.
SIRT5 regulates cell migration and invasion in several cancer cells. For example, Dang et al. found that SIRT5 promoted migration and invasion of HCC cells. The opposite findings were reported by Yao et al. in that the inhibition of SIRT5 increased migration and invasion of HCC in hypoxic microenvironments. This inconsistent phenomenon might be attributed to the hypoxic status of tumor microenvironments. However, further studies are required for illustrating its deeper regulatory mechanisms.
Effect of SIRT6 and SIRT7 on cell migration and invasion
SIRT6 and SIRT7 are the least studied of the seven SIRTs to date, which are both located in the nucleus. Both of them have been found to play a role in cell migration and invasion via regulating EMT and/or MMP expression. For example, in human HCC, SIRT6 promotes N-cadherin and vimentin expression via deacetylating FoxO3a in HCC cells. SIRT6 upregulates expression of MMP9 probably through the MAPK/ERK1/2 pathway, with increased migration and invasion of OS cells. Liu et al. found that forced expression of SIRT6 attenuated EMT by suppressing the TGF-β1/ small mothers against decapentaplegic protein (Smad)3 pathway and N-terminal kinase (c-Jun) in rat models of asthma. A recent study has shown that SIRT7 promotes CRC cell invasion through the inhibition of E‐cadherin, which is the most important protein in EMT. Furthermore, SIRT7 is overexpressed in EC cells compared with normal endometrial cells. SIRT7 downregulation inhibits the invasiveness of EC cells.
Conclusion
Taken together, the above-discussed findings suggest that SIRT proteins are involved in regulating cell migration and invasion during physiological processes and the development of human cancers. However, current research mainly focuses on the function of SIRT1 in regulating cell migration and invasion. Much work is still needed to pinpoint the precise molecular mechanisms governing the functions of other SIRTs, especially SIRT6 and SIRT7, under those conditions. It is meaningful to continue to explore the role of SIRT proteins in other diseases, which might provide future beneficial alternatives against those devastating diseases.
SIRTs and cancer
Cancer is currently the second most common contributor to premature mortality worldwide. Since an early diagnosis and effective treatment for patients with cancer are critical, the identification and application of effective biomarkers and novel drug targets are urgently required. Recent evidence reveals that aberrant expression of SIRTs occurs in almost all cancer types with different mechanisms, including those involved in cancer metabolism, genome stability, and the tumor microenvironment. The functions of SIRTs in the tumor process are characterized as tumor suppressor and/or oncogene, depending on genetic context and tumor type and stage. Moreover, SIRTs could exert regulatory roles in the response of the tumor to chemotherapy. These unique features suggest that SIRTs serve as potentially targetable markers and play important roles in cancer therapy. In this section, we summarize the recent studies of SIRTs in diverse cancers, which is shown in Fig. 9.
Breast cancer (BC)
BC is the most common malignancy throughout the world and is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. SIRT2 and SIRT4 are downregulated,, while SIRT1 and SIRT7 are upregulated in BC tissues compared to adjacent tissues or normal tissues., Besides, increased SIRT2 and SIRT4 expression is correlated with longer overall survival,, whereas increased SIRT1 and SIRT7 expression predicts a poor prognosis in patients with BC., These disparities might be in respect to the different roles of them in BC progression.
Regarding BC development, SIRTs are generally considered as tumor suppressors but might act as tumor promoters as well. SIRT1 has been extensively explored in comparison to other SIRTs for their roles in BC, and may influence BC progression by regulating many processes, especially EMT. SIRT1 plays a critical role in regulating EMT-associated programming and thus, consequently, eliciting BC invasion and metastasis in patients with triple-negative BC. SIRT1 expression suppresses BC metastasis by reducing EMT, and invasiveness in nude mice. The effect of SIRT1 modulation on EMT in breast cancer-related cancer stem cells has also been observed. This study indicates that loss of SIRT1 destabilizes EMT inducer paired related homeobox 1, disinhibits KLF4, and activates transcription of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, which encourages cancer stem cells, resulting in metastatic reversion. In addition to its tumor suppressive roles in BC, SIRT1 overexpression, altered EMT programming, and a decrease in tumor-suppressive miR-200a may be consistently involved in BC development and subsequent distant metastasis. The plausible explanation of the contradictory functions of SIRT1-mediated BC regulation might be due to tumor grade, tumor stage of BC, and the use of animal or human samples with a different pathological subtype.
Additionally, many other non-EMT factors that are known to function in other cellular processes in BC development could also be regulated by SIRT1. For example, the estrogen receptor (ER) and AR could mediate induction of estrogen- and androgen-responsive genes respectively and stimulate cell proliferation, and SIRT1 represses the transcriptional and proliferative response of BC cells to estrogens via an Erα-dependent mechanism. DNA polymerase delta1, the gene coding for DNA polymerase δ catalytic subunit p125, is upregulated by SIRT1, thus promoting proliferation and migration of BC cell line MCF-7. Metadherin, an oncogenic protein, has been implicated in promoting cancer progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance in BC. Activation of AMPK has been reported to reduce the expression of metadherin through enhanced SIRT1 activity along with GSK-3β in an independent manner in triple-negative BC.
In addition to SIRT1, SIRT2 functions in a binary manner, as a tumor suppressor or promoter. SIRT2 acts as a tumor suppressor in BC by regulating mitosis and genome integrity. Evidence has shown that SIRT2 promotes BRCA1-BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1) heterodimerization through deacetylation, thereby facilitating homologous recombination and tumor suppression. Additionally, in cancer biology, Slug, an EMT transcription factor, promotes tumor progression and metastasis. In basal-like BC, SIRT2 maintains Slug protein stability by deacetylation, which contributes to basal-like BC’s robust tumorigenic activity, along with enhanced invasive and metastatic capabilities. SIRT3, SIRT4 and SIRT7 illustrate different functions in BC progression. SIRT3 has been found to affect p53 by disruption of the ERα–p53 interaction, and decrease proliferation, colony formation, and migration in BC cells. Notably, SIRT4 could exert its tumor-suppressive activity in BC though negatively regulating SIRT1 expression via repressing glutamine metabolism, which suggests a novel crosstalk between mitochondrial and nuclear SIRT proteins in BC progression. SIRT7 depletion inhibits tumor growth via activating p38/MAPK signaling.
Additionally, SIRT proteins can affect the sensitivity of BC cells to several drugs, including tamoxifen, paclitaxel and doxorubicin. For example, SIRT1 causes tamoxifen resistance in ER-α-positive BC cells through upregulation of multidrug resistance protein 2 by mediating deacetylation of FoxO1 protein. Subsequently, SIRT1 inhibition impairs nuclear FoxO1 and multidrug resistance protein 2 expression and augments the cytotoxic effect of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in tamoxifen-resistant BC cells. SIRT3 overexpression in BC cell line MTR-3 reduces the sensitivity of the resistant cells to tamoxifen., On the contrary, SIRT4 enhances the tamoxifen sensitivity of BC cells via inhibiting the STAT3 signaling pathway.
These findings indicate unique mechanisms of SIRT1 mediate BC regulation and its contribution to tumor development and resistance, which suggests that SIRTs are promising therapeutic targets in BC, and provides clinical strategy for overcoming drug resistance. However, the exact molecular mechanism is still uncertain and needs further investigation.
LC
LC is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, with NSCLC being the most common type. Significant differences in SIRT expression between NSCLC tissues and nontumor lung tissue or adjacent tissue have been observed, which indicates that SIRTs are promising biomarkers in the diagnosis of LC.– Notably, serum SIRT3 distinguished LC patients from healthy individuals with an area under the curve of 0.918 and optimal cutoff value of 3.12, reaching sensitivity of 86.4% and specificity of 94%. SIRTs could be potential prognostic factors for NSCLC.,, For example, high SIRT1-3 expression is associated with poor survival in patients with NSCLC.,
Evidence has suggested that SIRTs are key factors involved in tumor development and treatment in LC., Regarding LC progression, the SIRTs play conflicting roles. SIRT1 upregulated by SNHG10 suppresses NSCLC cell proliferation, as a tumor suppressor. Overexpression of SIRT1 protects NSCLC cells against osteopontin-induced NF-κB p65 acetylation and EMT, thus attenuating OPN-induced cell proliferation, migration and invasion. However, SIRT1 upregulated by circ_0001946, could promote cell growth in lung adenocarcinoma by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. SIRT2 and SIRT6 have been shown to exert both pro- and anticarcinogenic effects in the process of LC. For example, SIRT2 suppressed the migration of NSCLC cells by deacetylating AKR1C1, and inhibiting transactivation of STAT3 target genes. In addition, SIRT2 deacetylates the K100 residue of glycolytic enzyme phosphoglycerate mutase and facilitates its activation, resulting in enhanced NADPH production and accelerated tumor growth in NSCLC cells. Similarly, SIRT6 illustrates opposite functions in the promotion of LC development, as tumor suppressor and promoter., For instance, SIRT6 can coordinate with chromatin remodeler chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding 4 to promote chromatin relaxation and DNA repair, thereby exerting an anticarcinogenic role in LC. In contrast, SIRT6 can also drive EMT and metastasis in NSCLC via snail-dependent transrepression of KLF4. This dual action of these SIRTs might depend upon the cellular context, tumor types, cancer stage, and their involvement in various cellular pathways,, and further studies are needed to explore the exact mechanisms underlying their dual roles in LC.
Expression of SIRTs could have an influence on the chemoresistance and radioresistance of LC. SIRT1 promotes cisplatin resistance of NSCLC cells by elevating vascular endothelial growth factor A expression. SIRT1 is upregulated in cisplatin-resistant NSCLC tissues and cells compared to cisplatin-sensitive groups. SIRT1 silencing enhances the cisplatin sensitivity of H1299/cisplatin cells via suppressing autophagy. Upregulation of SIRT2 in NSCLC cells increases the sensitivity to cisplatin treatment while SIRT3 promotion reduces cisplatin resistance in LC by modulating the FoxO3/Cdc10-dependent transcript 1 protein axis., In relation to LC radioresistance, SIRT3 promotes DNA damage repair and radioresistance through ataxia telangiectasia mutated–Chk2 in NSCLC cells. SIRTs can affect radioresistance in LC through the regulation of tumor metabolism. Overexpression of SIRT6 inhibits key-enzyme generation in A549 cells to inhibit glycolysis and enhance radiosensitivity.
In LC, SIRTs are involved in tumor development, chemoresistance and radioresistance, and exert regulatory functions by targeting different target proteins. Thus, SIRTs represent promising therapeutic targets in the perspective of precision medicine and provide new insights into therapeutic strategies for LC.
Gastrointestinal cancer
HCC HCC, the most common type of primary liver cancer with a relatively high mortality, is the sixth most common cancer and the third-leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Several bioinformatics studies have reinforced that nonmitochondrial and mitochondrial SIRTs are differentially expressed in HCC. For example, nonmitochondrial SIRT1, SIRT2 and SIRT6 are expressed at higher levels,– while mitochondrial SIRT3-5 are expressed at lower levels in HCC tissues compared with normal liver or surrounding tumor tissue.– SIRTs could be prognostic markers for patients with HCC. For instance, high expression of SIRT1 and SIRT7 is highly associated with poor survival, whereas low tumor levels of SIRT4 predicts a decreased survival time in HCC patients.–Recent studies have suggested that SIRTs could play regulatory roles in HCC development by regulating the metabolic state of the cancer cells. Referring to mitochondrial SIRTs, SIRT4 exerts a tumor-suppressive function in HCC by inhibiting glutamine metabolism. SIRT5 prevents tumor immune evasion and suppresses HCC development by orchestrating bile acid metabolism. However, SIRT5 also exerts a tumor-promoting function as a metabolic regulator. The activation of mitochondrial SIRT5 contributes to the promotion of growth and metastasis of HCC cells via glucose metabolism reprogramming from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis. The possible explanation for the dual role of SIRT5 in HCC could be related to its involvement in different metabolic processes, including glucose and lipid metabolism, which might result in opposite effects on tumor progression. In addition to mitochondrial SIRTs, the nonmitochondrial SIRTs can influence HCC by regulating cancer-related metabolism, especially glucose metabolism. SIRT1 and SIRT6 deacetylate hnRNP A1 to suppress glycolysis and growth in HCC. SIRT6, stabilized by ubiquitin-specific peptidase 48, attenuates HCC glycolysis and impedes metabolic reprogramming, thereby hampering HCC malignancy. SIRTs can also play roles in modulation of the cell cycle in HCC, which are essential for tumor development. Evidence has shown that SIRT4 upregulates cell-cycle governing genes p16 and p21 expression, suppresses CyclinB1/Cdc2 and Cdc25c, which normally induce cell-cycle progression, and suppresses survival to induce apoptosis in HCC cells.Therapeutic advances targeting SIRTs are currently being explored as it is suggested that modulating SIRT3 abundance via cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibition might enhance HCC therapy when combined with sorafenib. SIRT3 downregulates the mRNA and protein levels of glutathione S-transferase π1, a phase II detoxification enzyme involved in metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents, and SIRT3 overexpression promotes chemotherapeutic-agent-induced or sorafenib-induced apoptosis, thereby enhancing the drug sensitivity of HCC cells. Aside from mitochondrially directed deacetylase activity, SIRT6 depletion is reported to downregulate multidrug resistance protein 1 expression through the suppression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein, promoting enhanced HCC chemosensitivity. Colorectal cancer CRC ranks third in terms of cancer incidence worldwide and is the second most common cause of cancer deaths. Previous studies have shown that SIRT1 and SIRT7 are increased,, whereas SIRT2, SIRT4 and SIRT6 are decreased in human CRC tissues compared to normal tissue, which suggests that SIRTs are potential diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.– SIRTs are potential prognostic factors for CRC. For instance, overexpression of SIRT5 is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with CRC, while SIRT6 expression is related to improved survival., However, there still a need for further studies that make more clear analyses to verify the roles of SIRTs as biomarkers of CRC, such as receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity and specificity analyses.The pleiotropic roles of SIRTs in the regulation of tumor cell metabolism and cell death are strongly linked to the progression of CRC. SIRT1 has been found to affect CRC in a dose-dependent manner by regulating glutamine metabolism and apoptotic pathways. Heterozygous deletion of SIRT1 induces c-Myc expression, enhancing glutamine metabolism and subsequent proliferation, autophagy and cancer formation. In contrast, homozygous deletion of SIRT1 triggers apoptotic pathways, increases cell death, diminishes autophagy, and reduces cancer formation. The dose-dependent regulation of cellular metabolism and apoptosis by SIRT1 mechanistically contributes to the observed dual roles of SIRT1 in tumorigenesis. SIRTs have an anticarcinogenic action via modulation of CRC-related metabolism. SIRT2-dependent IDH1 deacetylation regulates cellular metabolism and inhibits liver metastasis of CRC. SIRT4 upregulates E-cadherin expression and suppresses proliferation, migration and invasion through inhibition of glutamine metabolism in CRC cells. In addition to the anticarcinogenic effects of SIRTs, SIRT5 contributes to colorectal carcinogenesis by enhancing glutaminolysis in a deglutarylation-dependent manner. SIRTs exert their regulatory function in CRC development through the modulation of several autophagy-related pathways. In particular, SIRT5 can deacetylate lactate dehydrogenase B, thus promoting hyperactivation of autophagy and tumorigenesis in CRC.Recent evidence highlights that SIRTs are involved in various tumor processes related to chemoresistance and radioresistance in CRC. For example, overexpression of SIRT3 improves anticancer drug resistance of CRC cells through superoxide dismutase (SOD) 2 and PGC-1α regulation. In addition, SIRT4 increases the sensitivity of CRC cells to chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil by inhibiting the cell cycle. Regarding radioresistance of CRC, FoxQ1-mediated SIRT1 upregulation augments expression and nuclear translocation of β-catenin and benefits CRC-related intestinal pathological bacteria, thereby enhancing the radioresistance of CRC cells.SIRTs play a role in regulating CRC progression, which indicates that SIRT-small-molecule-activator/inhibitor-based therapy strategies is a rescue strategy for patients with CRC. However, there have been a limited number of studies of the molecular mechanisms of SIRTs in regulating CRC progression. Gastric cancer GC is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer with an incidence rate of 5.6%, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death with a mortality rate of 7.7% worldwide. During the past decades, SIRTs have been considered as potential druggable targets in the clinical treatment of GC. SIRT1 is upregulated in GC tissues and SIRT1 depletion promotes GC progression through activation of STAT3/MMP-13 signaling. SIRT4 and SIRT6 are downregulated in GC tissues, and their low expression is negatively correlated with tumor size and pathological grade, which predicts poor prognosis., Mechanistically, SIRT4 inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in GC via regulating EMT. SIRT6 inhibits the Janus kinase 2/STAT3 pathway, thereby suppressing the growth of GC. Regarding tumor resistance, SIRT6 silencing can overcome sorafenib resistance by promoting ferroptosis. Thus, SIRTs could act as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets of GC. Pancreatic cancer (PC) PC has high mortality and ranks as the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. PC is also affected by SIRT activity and expression. SIRT5 expression is directly correlated with favorable prognosis, as its loss promotes glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 acetylation, thus promoting cell proliferation by enhancing glutamine and glutathione metabolism. Upregulation of SIRT6 by tumor suppressor KLF10 activity influences glycolysis, EMT, and distant metastasis of PC. SIRTs are associated with drug resistance of PC. SIRT1 can facilitate chemoresistance of PC cells by regulating adaptive response to chemotherapy-induced stress.Collectively, SIRTs play important roles in tumor progression, chemoresistance and radioresistance in gastrointestinal cancer by regulating multiple cellular and physiological processes, including metabolism, cell cycle, cell death, and tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the potential selective modulation of SIRT protein family members represents a promising area in gastrointestinal cancer treatment. However, given the contribution of gastrointestinal cancer to worldwide morbidity and mortality, further research is needed to understand the exact mechanisms underlying the involvement of SIRTs in these cancers, especially for GC and PC.
HCC
HCC, the most common type of primary liver cancer with a relatively high mortality, is the sixth most common cancer and the third-leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Several bioinformatics studies have reinforced that nonmitochondrial and mitochondrial SIRTs are differentially expressed in HCC. For example, nonmitochondrial SIRT1, SIRT2 and SIRT6 are expressed at higher levels,– while mitochondrial SIRT3-5 are expressed at lower levels in HCC tissues compared with normal liver or surrounding tumor tissue.– SIRTs could be prognostic markers for patients with HCC. For instance, high expression of SIRT1 and SIRT7 is highly associated with poor survival, whereas low tumor levels of SIRT4 predicts a decreased survival time in HCC patients.–
Recent studies have suggested that SIRTs could play regulatory roles in HCC development by regulating the metabolic state of the cancer cells. Referring to mitochondrial SIRTs, SIRT4 exerts a tumor-suppressive function in HCC by inhibiting glutamine metabolism. SIRT5 prevents tumor immune evasion and suppresses HCC development by orchestrating bile acid metabolism. However, SIRT5 also exerts a tumor-promoting function as a metabolic regulator. The activation of mitochondrial SIRT5 contributes to the promotion of growth and metastasis of HCC cells via glucose metabolism reprogramming from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis. The possible explanation for the dual role of SIRT5 in HCC could be related to its involvement in different metabolic processes, including glucose and lipid metabolism, which might result in opposite effects on tumor progression. In addition to mitochondrial SIRTs, the nonmitochondrial SIRTs can influence HCC by regulating cancer-related metabolism, especially glucose metabolism. SIRT1 and SIRT6 deacetylate hnRNP A1 to suppress glycolysis and growth in HCC. SIRT6, stabilized by ubiquitin-specific peptidase 48, attenuates HCC glycolysis and impedes metabolic reprogramming, thereby hampering HCC malignancy. SIRTs can also play roles in modulation of the cell cycle in HCC, which are essential for tumor development. Evidence has shown that SIRT4 upregulates cell-cycle governing genes p16 and p21 expression, suppresses CyclinB1/Cdc2 and Cdc25c, which normally induce cell-cycle progression, and suppresses survival to induce apoptosis in HCC cells.
Therapeutic advances targeting SIRTs are currently being explored as it is suggested that modulating SIRT3 abundance via cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibition might enhance HCC therapy when combined with sorafenib. SIRT3 downregulates the mRNA and protein levels of glutathione S-transferase π1, a phase II detoxification enzyme involved in metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents, and SIRT3 overexpression promotes chemotherapeutic-agent-induced or sorafenib-induced apoptosis, thereby enhancing the drug sensitivity of HCC cells. Aside from mitochondrially directed deacetylase activity, SIRT6 depletion is reported to downregulate multidrug resistance protein 1 expression through the suppression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein, promoting enhanced HCC chemosensitivity.
Colorectal cancer
CRC ranks third in terms of cancer incidence worldwide and is the second most common cause of cancer deaths. Previous studies have shown that SIRT1 and SIRT7 are increased,, whereas SIRT2, SIRT4 and SIRT6 are decreased in human CRC tissues compared to normal tissue, which suggests that SIRTs are potential diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.– SIRTs are potential prognostic factors for CRC. For instance, overexpression of SIRT5 is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with CRC, while SIRT6 expression is related to improved survival., However, there still a need for further studies that make more clear analyses to verify the roles of SIRTs as biomarkers of CRC, such as receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity and specificity analyses.
The pleiotropic roles of SIRTs in the regulation of tumor cell metabolism and cell death are strongly linked to the progression of CRC. SIRT1 has been found to affect CRC in a dose-dependent manner by regulating glutamine metabolism and apoptotic pathways. Heterozygous deletion of SIRT1 induces c-Myc expression, enhancing glutamine metabolism and subsequent proliferation, autophagy and cancer formation. In contrast, homozygous deletion of SIRT1 triggers apoptotic pathways, increases cell death, diminishes autophagy, and reduces cancer formation. The dose-dependent regulation of cellular metabolism and apoptosis by SIRT1 mechanistically contributes to the observed dual roles of SIRT1 in tumorigenesis. SIRTs have an anticarcinogenic action via modulation of CRC-related metabolism. SIRT2-dependent IDH1 deacetylation regulates cellular metabolism and inhibits liver metastasis of CRC. SIRT4 upregulates E-cadherin expression and suppresses proliferation, migration and invasion through inhibition of glutamine metabolism in CRC cells. In addition to the anticarcinogenic effects of SIRTs, SIRT5 contributes to colorectal carcinogenesis by enhancing glutaminolysis in a deglutarylation-dependent manner. SIRTs exert their regulatory function in CRC development through the modulation of several autophagy-related pathways. In particular, SIRT5 can deacetylate lactate dehydrogenase B, thus promoting hyperactivation of autophagy and tumorigenesis in CRC.
Recent evidence highlights that SIRTs are involved in various tumor processes related to chemoresistance and radioresistance in CRC. For example, overexpression of SIRT3 improves anticancer drug resistance of CRC cells through superoxide dismutase (SOD) 2 and PGC-1α regulation. In addition, SIRT4 increases the sensitivity of CRC cells to chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil by inhibiting the cell cycle. Regarding radioresistance of CRC, FoxQ1-mediated SIRT1 upregulation augments expression and nuclear translocation of β-catenin and benefits CRC-related intestinal pathological bacteria, thereby enhancing the radioresistance of CRC cells.
SIRTs play a role in regulating CRC progression, which indicates that SIRT-small-molecule-activator/inhibitor-based therapy strategies is a rescue strategy for patients with CRC. However, there have been a limited number of studies of the molecular mechanisms of SIRTs in regulating CRC progression.
Gastric cancer
GC is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer with an incidence rate of 5.6%, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death with a mortality rate of 7.7% worldwide. During the past decades, SIRTs have been considered as potential druggable targets in the clinical treatment of GC. SIRT1 is upregulated in GC tissues and SIRT1 depletion promotes GC progression through activation of STAT3/MMP-13 signaling. SIRT4 and SIRT6 are downregulated in GC tissues, and their low expression is negatively correlated with tumor size and pathological grade, which predicts poor prognosis., Mechanistically, SIRT4 inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in GC via regulating EMT. SIRT6 inhibits the Janus kinase 2/STAT3 pathway, thereby suppressing the growth of GC. Regarding tumor resistance, SIRT6 silencing can overcome sorafenib resistance by promoting ferroptosis. Thus, SIRTs could act as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets of GC.
Pancreatic cancer (PC)
PC has high mortality and ranks as the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. PC is also affected by SIRT activity and expression. SIRT5 expression is directly correlated with favorable prognosis, as its loss promotes glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 acetylation, thus promoting cell proliferation by enhancing glutamine and glutathione metabolism. Upregulation of SIRT6 by tumor suppressor KLF10 activity influences glycolysis, EMT, and distant metastasis of PC. SIRTs are associated with drug resistance of PC. SIRT1 can facilitate chemoresistance of PC cells by regulating adaptive response to chemotherapy-induced stress.
Collectively, SIRTs play important roles in tumor progression, chemoresistance and radioresistance in gastrointestinal cancer by regulating multiple cellular and physiological processes, including metabolism, cell cycle, cell death, and tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the potential selective modulation of SIRT protein family members represents a promising area in gastrointestinal cancer treatment. However, given the contribution of gastrointestinal cancer to worldwide morbidity and mortality, further research is needed to understand the exact mechanisms underlying the involvement of SIRTs in these cancers, especially for GC and PC.
Gynecological cancer
Ovarian cancer (OC) OC is one of the most aggressive female malignancies, with poor prognosis. SIRT1-3 and SIRT6 are significantly decreased, while SIRT5 is significantly increased in OC tissues compared to normal or adjacent tissues.– High expression of SIRT2 and SIRT5-7 is correlated with favorable survival, while high expression of SIRT1 and SIRT4 is associated with poor survival, suggesting that SIRTs could serve as novel prognostic biomarkers. SIRTs are implicated in the development and treatment of OC. For example, SIRT1 expression suppresses high motility group box-1 protein expression and acetylation, thus inhibiting OC migration, invasion and angiogenesis. However, MHY2245, a new SIRT1 inhibitor, exert antitumor activity against OC cells by blocking the pyruvate kinase M2/mTOR pathway. In addition to SIRT1, overexpression of SIRT3 dramatically suppresses OC cell metastatic capability by inhibiting EMT via downregulation of Twist. Regarding OC treatment, cisplatin has been a pivotal drug, however, cisplatin resistance hinders the prognosis of patients. Overexpression of SIRT2 significantly enhances the sensitivity of cisplatin-resistant counterpart cells to cisplatin in OC. In addition, SIRT5 can promote cisplatin resistance in OC by suppressing DNA damage in a ROS-dependent manner via regulation of the Nrf2/Heme Oxgenase-1 pathway. EC EC is the most common gynecological cancer in high-income countries and its incidence is rising globally. Recent studies have shown that SIRTs participate in the development and progression of EC. For example, SIRT1 is elevated in EC cell lines and tissues and SIRT1 promotes autophagy and proliferation of EC cells by reducing acetylation of LC3. The expression of SIRT2 is increased in most human EC cell lines and SIRT2 overexpression promotes EC cell proliferation but inhibits apoptosis. In contrast to SIRT1 and SIRT2, SIRT6 might function as a tumor suppressor of EC cells. SIRT6 negatively affects the proliferation of AN3CA and KLE EC cells by repressing expression of the antiapoptotic protein surviving. Chemotherapy is crucial for postoperative adjuvant therapy of EC. SIRT1 promotes the growth and cisplatin resistance of EC cells. SIRT2 has been shown to promote cell stemness and activate the MEK/ERK signaling pathway while repressing chemosensitivity in EC. Cervical cancer (CC) CC is one of the most severe and prevalent female malignancies and a global health issue. Abnormal expression of SIRTs in CC tissue may be related to disease progression. For instance, the expression of SIRT2 is decreased in CC tissue compared with paired adjacent tissue, and SIRT2 expression in tumor tissue is negatively correlated with tumor size, and lymph node metastasis, which predicts favorable survival. For mechanistic studies, SIRT1 has been found to be overexpressed in HPV-infected CC cells and SIRT1 expression is correlated with poor clinical outcomes in CC. SIRT1 enables HPV-infected CC cells to continue growing by nullifying absent in melanoma 2 inflammasome-mediated immunity. Moreover, SIRT3 contributes to the reprogramming of fatty acid synthesis by upregulating acetyl-coA carboxylase 1 to promote de novo lipogenesis by SIRT3 deacetylation, thereby promoting the invasion and metastasis of CC cells.SIRTs are implicated in tumor development and chemotherapy resistance in gynecological cancer including OC, EC, and CC, thus SIRTs might serve as indicators of prognosis and as promising therapeutic targets for gynecological cancer. However, evidence about the roles of SIRTs in gynecological cancer is still limited, so more studies are needed to further explore the underlying molecular mechanism by which SIRTs regulate tumor processes in these cancers.
Ovarian cancer (OC)
OC is one of the most aggressive female malignancies, with poor prognosis. SIRT1-3 and SIRT6 are significantly decreased, while SIRT5 is significantly increased in OC tissues compared to normal or adjacent tissues.– High expression of SIRT2 and SIRT5-7 is correlated with favorable survival, while high expression of SIRT1 and SIRT4 is associated with poor survival, suggesting that SIRTs could serve as novel prognostic biomarkers. SIRTs are implicated in the development and treatment of OC. For example, SIRT1 expression suppresses high motility group box-1 protein expression and acetylation, thus inhibiting OC migration, invasion and angiogenesis. However, MHY2245, a new SIRT1 inhibitor, exert antitumor activity against OC cells by blocking the pyruvate kinase M2/mTOR pathway. In addition to SIRT1, overexpression of SIRT3 dramatically suppresses OC cell metastatic capability by inhibiting EMT via downregulation of Twist. Regarding OC treatment, cisplatin has been a pivotal drug, however, cisplatin resistance hinders the prognosis of patients. Overexpression of SIRT2 significantly enhances the sensitivity of cisplatin-resistant counterpart cells to cisplatin in OC. In addition, SIRT5 can promote cisplatin resistance in OC by suppressing DNA damage in a ROS-dependent manner via regulation of the Nrf2/Heme Oxgenase-1 pathway.
EC
EC is the most common gynecological cancer in high-income countries and its incidence is rising globally. Recent studies have shown that SIRTs participate in the development and progression of EC. For example, SIRT1 is elevated in EC cell lines and tissues and SIRT1 promotes autophagy and proliferation of EC cells by reducing acetylation of LC3. The expression of SIRT2 is increased in most human EC cell lines and SIRT2 overexpression promotes EC cell proliferation but inhibits apoptosis. In contrast to SIRT1 and SIRT2, SIRT6 might function as a tumor suppressor of EC cells. SIRT6 negatively affects the proliferation of AN3CA and KLE EC cells by repressing expression of the antiapoptotic protein surviving. Chemotherapy is crucial for postoperative adjuvant therapy of EC. SIRT1 promotes the growth and cisplatin resistance of EC cells. SIRT2 has been shown to promote cell stemness and activate the MEK/ERK signaling pathway while repressing chemosensitivity in EC.
Cervical cancer (CC)
CC is one of the most severe and prevalent female malignancies and a global health issue. Abnormal expression of SIRTs in CC tissue may be related to disease progression. For instance, the expression of SIRT2 is decreased in CC tissue compared with paired adjacent tissue, and SIRT2 expression in tumor tissue is negatively correlated with tumor size, and lymph node metastasis, which predicts favorable survival. For mechanistic studies, SIRT1 has been found to be overexpressed in HPV-infected CC cells and SIRT1 expression is correlated with poor clinical outcomes in CC. SIRT1 enables HPV-infected CC cells to continue growing by nullifying absent in melanoma 2 inflammasome-mediated immunity. Moreover, SIRT3 contributes to the reprogramming of fatty acid synthesis by upregulating acetyl-coA carboxylase 1 to promote de novo lipogenesis by SIRT3 deacetylation, thereby promoting the invasion and metastasis of CC cells.
SIRTs are implicated in tumor development and chemotherapy resistance in gynecological cancer including OC, EC, and CC, thus SIRTs might serve as indicators of prognosis and as promising therapeutic targets for gynecological cancer. However, evidence about the roles of SIRTs in gynecological cancer is still limited, so more studies are needed to further explore the underlying molecular mechanism by which SIRTs regulate tumor processes in these cancers.
Glioma
Glioma is the most common and malignant primary tumor of the central nervous system, with a poor prognosis, especially glioblastoma. SIRT1 and SIRT7 are upregulated,, while SIRT3 and SIRT6 are downregulated in glioma tissues compared with normal or adjacent brain tissues., Glioma patients with higher SIRT1 or SIRT3 expression exhibit worse prognosis, whereas downregulation of SIRT5 is significantly correlated with shorter survival time in glioblastoma. These situations have suggested that SIRTs are promising prognostic biomarkers of glioma and might be involved in tumor progression.,,
SIRT1 and SIRT6 exert a tumor suppressor effect in glioma. SIRT1-mediated p21-Activated kinase 1-deacetylation at K420 hinders autophagy and glioblastoma growth. Besides, SIRT6 suppresses glioma cell growth via induction of apoptosis, inhibition of oxidative stress, and inhibition of the activation of the Janus kinase 2/STAT3 signaling pathway. On the contrary, SIRT3 and SIRT7 are reported to play positive roles in the development of glioma. SIRT3 can stabilize Ku70–Bax interaction to enhance glioma cell viability. Moreover, SIRT7 affects the malignancy of glioma cells mainly by promoting glioma proliferation and invasion through ERK and STAT3 signaling. Evidence also suggests that SIRTs participate in the transformation of chemoresistance and radioresistance in glioma. For instance, SIRT1 inhibition increases the sensitivity of glioma cells for temozolomide via facilitation of intracellular ROS generation. In addition, CDK1-mediated SIRT3 activation could enhance mitochondrial function and contribute to adaptive radioresistance in glioma cells. Therefore, SIRTs are potential biomarkers for the prognosis and diagnosis of glioma and promising therapeutic targets.
Leukemia
Leukemia is a malignant clonal disease of hematopoietic stem cells, and most leukemias are sporadic and their specific etiology remains elusive. SIRTs participate in the development and therapeutic resistance of leukemia. SIRT1 promotes T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progression by regulating the phosphorylation and degradation of p27 through deacetylating cyclin-dependent kinase 2. SIRT2 is overexpressed in primary acute myeloid leukemia blasts, and SIRT2 activation by nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) reduces proliferation and induces apoptosis in human acute myeloid leukemia, possibly via the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway. Inhibition of SIRT2 suppresses the in vitro growth and in vivo engraftment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells via diminished LIM domain only 2 (LMO2) deacetylation. This dual action in tumor development of SIRT2 might be due to different types of leukemia.
Regarding leukemia treatment, the combination of chemotherapeutics with SIRT modulators could provide a novel therapeutic strategy. For example, pharmacological targeting or RNAi-mediated knockdown of SIRT1 inhibits cell growth and sensitizes AML cells to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Moreover, shSIRT6-induced DNA repair deficiencies are potently synergistic with NAMPT targeting in acute myeloid leukemia treatment, which shows promising in vivo efficacy compared with monotherapy. SIRT7 expression increases with the positive response to treatment, but shows reduction when patients progress or relapse, which suggests that SIRT7 potentially serves as a general biomarker for monitoring treatment response in myeloid stem cell disorders. Accordingly, these results suggest that targeting SIRTs represents an attractive therapeutic strategy and provides a rationale for the novel combination-based treatments for leukemia.
Conclusion
We have reviewed the role of different SIRTs in diverse cancers, focusing on them as new anticancer therapeutic targets. Various investigations have indicated that different SIRTs show differential patterns of expression depending upon the pathological subtype, tumor grade and stage. It could be concluded that SIRTs serve as prognostic factors/biomarkers in patients with cancer. The discrepancy in the role of SIRTs in tumor progression and tumor chemoresistance or radioresistance might be attributed to various tumor types, stages, microenvironment, and their involvement in various tumor processes, such as cellular metabolism, cell death, cell cycle, and DNA damage/repair. Notably, several SIRTs exert a dual action in cancer. Thus, figuring out the underlying mechanisms and conditions that enable their opposing roles in cancer might be one of the main challenges and of great therapeutic significance. Collectively, SIRTs could be utilized as promising target molecules to be used as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with cancer. A variety of available SIRT modulators could be developed and further utilized to promote treatment efficacy of various cancers by themselves or, more likely, in combination with different anticancer drugs.
SIRTs and CVDs
Over the past decades, the incidence of CVDs, such as heart failure, atherosclerosis, and hypertension, has been increasing. CVDs are the major cause of mortality worldwide., According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, prevalent cases of total CVDs have increased from 271 million to 523 million in 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2019. The number of CVD deaths has also increased from 12.1 million to 18.6 million. Epigenetic modification plays a critical role in the occurrence and development of CVD and regulates the function and expression level of CVD-related genes through DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA mechanism. Therefore, SIRT protein family has received much attention in CVD research due to its crucial role in regulating histone deacetylation. In addition to HDAC function, SIRTs also have multiple non-histone deacetylase and mono-ADP-ribosyl transferase activities. These functions also play an important role in CVDs (Fig. 10). SIRTs regulate crucial pathological processes, such as cell proliferation, cell senescence, DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, and cell metabolism, thereby influencing the occurrence and development of CVDs.,
Cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis
Cardiac hypertrophy is an adaptive and compensatory mechanism for maintaining cardiac output during physiological and pathological stimuli. However, some detrimental processes, such as pressure or volume overload, can lead to pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiac fibrosis induces fibroblast proliferation and excessive deposition of extracellular proteins. Pathological cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis are the main characteristics of cardiac remodeling. It is crucial to reveal the molecular mechanisms associated with cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, as there are currently no effective treatments for cardiac remodeling. Therefore, SIRT proteins, which have been reported to play important roles in the occurrence and development of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, have received extensive attention, especially SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6.Cardiac hypertrophyThe impact of SIRT1 on cardiac hypertrophy is inconsistent, with both alleviating and exacerbating effects having been reported. Some in vivo studies have suggested that SIRT1 overexpression can alleviate Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy by reducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis and promoting autophagy., In addition, SIRT1 overexpression can ameliorate cardiac hypertrophy induced by phenylephrine by inhibiting protein kinase C (PKC)‐ζ activation. However, some studies have shown the opposite effect. For example, SIRT1 exacerbated cardiac hypertrophy by promoting membrane localization and activation of Akt and phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1, while impaired Akt activation in the hearts of SIRT1-deficient mice was related to decreased cardiac hypertrophy in response to physical exercise and Ang II. These opposite effects might be dependent on the degree of SIRT1 expression. For instance, the low (2.5-fold) or moderate (7.5-fold) overexpression of SIRT1 in the hearts of transgenic mice attenuated cardiac hypertrophy. However, a high overexpression (12.5-fold) level of SIRT1 increased cardiac hypertrophy. These conflicting effects imply that SIRT1 has different effects on cardiac hypertrophy in different contexts and models. Therefore, more studies are needed to further explore the complex effects of SIRT1 on cardiac hypertrophy.SIRT3 has a protective role in cardiac hypertrophy. Its expression was reduced in the hearts of Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophic mice and in Ang II-treated cardiomyocytes. In addition, SIRT3 overexpression protects myocytes from hypertrophy, whereas SIRT3 silencing exacerbates Ang II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Resveratrol can be used to activate SIRT3 with protective effects on hypertrophy through activation of SIRT3 and subsequent autophagy. However, the protective effects of resveratrol have not been observed after the addition of siRNA-SIRT3. SIRT3 promotes autophagy in Ang II-induced myocardial hypertrophy via deacetylation of FoxO1, blocks the cardiac hypertrophic response by augmenting FoxO3a-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms in mice, and exerts protective effects against cardiac hypertrophy by reducing the level of acetylation and activity of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.SIRT6 also protects against cardiac hypertrophy. Both in vivo and in vitro studies have revealed that SIRT6 inhibits isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy via activation of autophagy. Specifically, SIRT6 promotes nuclear retention of FoxO3 transcription factor, possibly by attenuating Akt signaling, which is responsible for autophagy activation. In addition, SIRT6 protects cardiomyocytes from hypertrophy by decreasing the protein level of p300 and subsequently the acetylation and transcriptional activity of NF-κB p65 subunit. It also blocks IGF-Akt signaling and cardiac hypertrophy development by targeting c-Jun. Moreover, STAT3 suppression has been reported to be involved in the protective effect of SIRT6 against cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.In addition, SIRT2, SIRT5, and SIRT7 have protective effects on cardiac hypertrophy, while SIRT4 appears to have the opposite effect. The protein level of SIRT2 is reduced in cardiac hypertrophy, and SIRT2 overexpression attenuates agonist-induced cardiac hypertrophy in a cell-autonomous manner. On a molecular level, SIRT2 binds to and deacetylates the nuclear factor of activated T-cell c2 transcription factor, thereby regulating nuclear factor of activated T-cell c2 transcription activity and exerting protective effects on cardiac hypertrophy. In contrast, loss of SIRT2 has been reported to reduce AMPK activation, thereby promoting aging-related and Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and blunting metformin-mediated cardioprotective effects. These findings have suggested that SIRT2 might be a potential target for the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy. In addition, SIRT5 prevents age-related cardiac hypertrophy, while SIRT7 also ameliorates stress-induced cardiac hypertrophy by interacting with and deacetylating GATA4. Interestingly, SIRT4 seems to have an adverse effect on cardiac hypertrophy. For instance, an in vivo study has revealed that SIRT4 overexpression aggravates Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy by inhibiting MnSOD activity. However, further studies are needed to confirm this result.Cardiac fibrosisIn cardiac fibrosis, TGF-β is a key profibrotic cytokine that exerts profibrotic effects. TGF-β is involved in the protective effect of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 on cardiac fibrosis by regulating the activity of Smad family transcription factors.– For instance, activation of both SIRT1 and SIRT3 by resveratrol attenuates cardiac fibrosis in mice by inhibiting the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway, and systematic SIRT6 KO induces cardiac fibrosis in mice by activating the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway. On a molecular level, the study has also shown that SIRT3 overexpression partially prevents the inflammatory and profibrotic effects by modulating the FOS/activator protein-1 pathway in human and rat cardiomyocytes. SIRT6 prevents Ang II-mediated cardiac fibrosis and injury by targeting AMPK-Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 signaling.In addition, other SIRTs affect cardiac fibrosis. For example, SIRT2 overexpression protects against Ang II-induced cardiac fibrosis and rescues cardiac function. This protective effect of SIRT2 is associated with the promotion of AMPK activation by deacetylating the kinase LKB1. SIRT5 KO mice have shown increased fibrosis compared to age-matched wild-type mice, although relevant mechanisms need to be further explored. However, SIRT4 appears to contribute to cardiac fibrosis, and global SIRT4 KO in mice confers resistance to Ang II infusion by significantly suppressing fibrosis deposition. Similarly, enhanced expression and phosphorylation of SIRT7 plays a role in promoting cardiac fibrosis via activation of Smad2 and ERK signaling pathways. However, SIRT7 KO in mice has been reported to result in cardiac fibrosis.Overall, SIRTs play an important role in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 might protect against cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by affecting important biological processes and regulating downstream signaling pathways, such as autophagy and TGF-β/Smad3 pathways. Of note, SIRT1 might have bidirectional effects on cardiac hypertrophy, which might be dependent on the degree of SIRT1 expression. Furthermore, SIRT2 and SIRT5 might also have protective effects on cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. In contrast, SIRT4 might exacerbate cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Evidence has suggested that SIRT7 has a protective effect on cardiac hypertrophy, but its effect on cardiac fibrosis is inconsistent. Considering that there are few studies on SIRT7 in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, further research is needed in the future.
Cardiac hypertrophy
The impact of SIRT1 on cardiac hypertrophy is inconsistent, with both alleviating and exacerbating effects having been reported. Some in vivo studies have suggested that SIRT1 overexpression can alleviate Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy by reducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis and promoting autophagy., In addition, SIRT1 overexpression can ameliorate cardiac hypertrophy induced by phenylephrine by inhibiting protein kinase C (PKC)‐ζ activation. However, some studies have shown the opposite effect. For example, SIRT1 exacerbated cardiac hypertrophy by promoting membrane localization and activation of Akt and phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1, while impaired Akt activation in the hearts of SIRT1-deficient mice was related to decreased cardiac hypertrophy in response to physical exercise and Ang II. These opposite effects might be dependent on the degree of SIRT1 expression. For instance, the low (2.5-fold) or moderate (7.5-fold) overexpression of SIRT1 in the hearts of transgenic mice attenuated cardiac hypertrophy. However, a high overexpression (12.5-fold) level of SIRT1 increased cardiac hypertrophy. These conflicting effects imply that SIRT1 has different effects on cardiac hypertrophy in different contexts and models. Therefore, more studies are needed to further explore the complex effects of SIRT1 on cardiac hypertrophy.
SIRT3 has a protective role in cardiac hypertrophy. Its expression was reduced in the hearts of Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophic mice and in Ang II-treated cardiomyocytes. In addition, SIRT3 overexpression protects myocytes from hypertrophy, whereas SIRT3 silencing exacerbates Ang II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Resveratrol can be used to activate SIRT3 with protective effects on hypertrophy through activation of SIRT3 and subsequent autophagy. However, the protective effects of resveratrol have not been observed after the addition of siRNA-SIRT3. SIRT3 promotes autophagy in Ang II-induced myocardial hypertrophy via deacetylation of FoxO1, blocks the cardiac hypertrophic response by augmenting FoxO3a-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms in mice, and exerts protective effects against cardiac hypertrophy by reducing the level of acetylation and activity of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.
SIRT6 also protects against cardiac hypertrophy. Both in vivo and in vitro studies have revealed that SIRT6 inhibits isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy via activation of autophagy. Specifically, SIRT6 promotes nuclear retention of FoxO3 transcription factor, possibly by attenuating Akt signaling, which is responsible for autophagy activation. In addition, SIRT6 protects cardiomyocytes from hypertrophy by decreasing the protein level of p300 and subsequently the acetylation and transcriptional activity of NF-κB p65 subunit. It also blocks IGF-Akt signaling and cardiac hypertrophy development by targeting c-Jun. Moreover, STAT3 suppression has been reported to be involved in the protective effect of SIRT6 against cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
In addition, SIRT2, SIRT5, and SIRT7 have protective effects on cardiac hypertrophy, while SIRT4 appears to have the opposite effect. The protein level of SIRT2 is reduced in cardiac hypertrophy, and SIRT2 overexpression attenuates agonist-induced cardiac hypertrophy in a cell-autonomous manner. On a molecular level, SIRT2 binds to and deacetylates the nuclear factor of activated T-cell c2 transcription factor, thereby regulating nuclear factor of activated T-cell c2 transcription activity and exerting protective effects on cardiac hypertrophy. In contrast, loss of SIRT2 has been reported to reduce AMPK activation, thereby promoting aging-related and Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and blunting metformin-mediated cardioprotective effects. These findings have suggested that SIRT2 might be a potential target for the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy. In addition, SIRT5 prevents age-related cardiac hypertrophy, while SIRT7 also ameliorates stress-induced cardiac hypertrophy by interacting with and deacetylating GATA4. Interestingly, SIRT4 seems to have an adverse effect on cardiac hypertrophy. For instance, an in vivo study has revealed that SIRT4 overexpression aggravates Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy by inhibiting MnSOD activity. However, further studies are needed to confirm this result.
Cardiac fibrosis
In cardiac fibrosis, TGF-β is a key profibrotic cytokine that exerts profibrotic effects. TGF-β is involved in the protective effect of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 on cardiac fibrosis by regulating the activity of Smad family transcription factors.– For instance, activation of both SIRT1 and SIRT3 by resveratrol attenuates cardiac fibrosis in mice by inhibiting the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway, and systematic SIRT6 KO induces cardiac fibrosis in mice by activating the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway. On a molecular level, the study has also shown that SIRT3 overexpression partially prevents the inflammatory and profibrotic effects by modulating the FOS/activator protein-1 pathway in human and rat cardiomyocytes. SIRT6 prevents Ang II-mediated cardiac fibrosis and injury by targeting AMPK-Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 signaling.
In addition, other SIRTs affect cardiac fibrosis. For example, SIRT2 overexpression protects against Ang II-induced cardiac fibrosis and rescues cardiac function. This protective effect of SIRT2 is associated with the promotion of AMPK activation by deacetylating the kinase LKB1. SIRT5 KO mice have shown increased fibrosis compared to age-matched wild-type mice, although relevant mechanisms need to be further explored. However, SIRT4 appears to contribute to cardiac fibrosis, and global SIRT4 KO in mice confers resistance to Ang II infusion by significantly suppressing fibrosis deposition. Similarly, enhanced expression and phosphorylation of SIRT7 plays a role in promoting cardiac fibrosis via activation of Smad2 and ERK signaling pathways. However, SIRT7 KO in mice has been reported to result in cardiac fibrosis.
Overall, SIRTs play an important role in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 might protect against cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by affecting important biological processes and regulating downstream signaling pathways, such as autophagy and TGF-β/Smad3 pathways. Of note, SIRT1 might have bidirectional effects on cardiac hypertrophy, which might be dependent on the degree of SIRT1 expression. Furthermore, SIRT2 and SIRT5 might also have protective effects on cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. In contrast, SIRT4 might exacerbate cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Evidence has suggested that SIRT7 has a protective effect on cardiac hypertrophy, but its effect on cardiac fibrosis is inconsistent. Considering that there are few studies on SIRT7 in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, further research is needed in the future.
Heart failure
Heart failure is the most common endpoint of most CVDs, affecting an estimated 64.3 million people worldwide., It is a complex disease and involves various molecular and cellular alterations that affect the cardiac structure and impair the contractile function. However, the underlying mechanisms of heart failure remain not fully understood. Recently, growing evidence has suggested that SIRTs play key roles during the process of heart failure. The following section summarizes this evidence.
SIRT1 has beneficial effects on the development of heart failure. The expression of SIRT1 is decreased in the hearts of advanced heart failure patients and rat models., Heart failure is closely related to some biological processes, such as oxidative stress and cell apoptosis., SIRT1 might attenuate oxidative stress and protect cells from oxidative damage and apoptosis through several mechanisms. For example, levels of MnSOD, thioredoxin1, and Bcl-xL (an anti-apoptotic molecule) are significantly decreased in cardiomyocytes from individuals with advanced heart failure. The low expression of SIRT1 might downregulate antioxidants and upregulate pro-apoptotic molecules by increasing p53 acetylation and decreasing FoxO1 translocation in the nucleus. In addition, an in vivo study has suggested that SIRT1 overexpression reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis through the NF-κB p65/miR-155/brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling pathway, thereby alleviating heart failure in rats. Furthermore, reduced level and activity of sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2a) are major features of heart failure, and SIRT1 KO elevated the acetylation of SERCA2a, which in turn leads to SERCA2a dysfunction and cardiac defects in a failing heart. In contrast, the pharmacological activation of SIRT1 restores SERCA2a activity via deacetylation at K492. Overall, the above evidence has indicated that SIRT1 is involved in the occurrence and development of heart failure and might be a promising therapeutic target for heart failure treatment.
In addition, mitochondrial energy metabolism disorder contributes to the progression of heart failure. Myocardial acetylproteomics demonstrates that there is extensive mitochondrial protein lysine hyperacetylation in mouse models of early-stage heart failure and in end-stage failing human hearts. As a mitochondrial deacetylase, SIRT3 plays an important role in maintaining the mitochondrial function, and provides a protective effect during heart failure. SIRT3 deficiency might impair cardiac mitochondrial function and aggravate heart failure during aging. In addition, SIRT3 is involved in the regulation of endothelial metabolism and angiogenesis, thereby affecting the occurrence and development of heart failure., For instance, an in vivo study has suggested that the endothelial‐specific SIRT3 KO disrupts glucose transport from endothelial cells to cardiomyocytes, decreases cardiomyocyte glucose utilization via apelin in a paracrine manner, and sensitizes pressure overload-induced heart failure.
Similar protective effects during heart failure have also been observed in SIRT6. SIRT6 expression is significantly decreased in the hearts of patients with chronic heart failure as well as animal models of heart failure. SIRT6 overexpression increases the survival of transverse aortic constriction-induced heart failure mice, which might be associated with telomerase upregulation, such as telomerase reverse transcriptase and telomeric repeat binding factor 1.
Compared to SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6, studies on SIRT2, SIRT4, SIRT5, and SIRT7 in heart failure are limited. SIRTs might play important roles in the occurrence and development of heart failure and their further exploration is needed in the future. Studies on SIRT2, SIRT4, SIRT5, and SIRT7 might reveal promising research directions for the treatment of heart failure.
Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that results from a series of events, including increased levels of LDL cholesterol in the plasma, dysfunctional endothelial cells, inflammation with immune cell infiltration, and ultimately plaque formation., SIRTs have been reported to directly affect atherogenesis and plaque stability by preventing endothelial cell dysfunction, VSMC senescence, and macrophage foam cell formation via regulation of key biological processes, such as DNA damage repair and anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammatory pathways.
SIRT1 has a protective effect on atherosclerosis. A prior in vivo study has shown that endothelial cell-specific overexpression of SIRT1 protects against atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E KO mice, which was associated with inhibited endothelial cell apoptosis via eNOS expression activation. In addition, SIRT1 activation by SRT1720 in aging mice ameliorates endothelial dysfunction by increasing COX-2 signaling and reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. On VSMC level, SIRT1 protects against DNA damage and inhibits atherosclerosis partly by activating the repair protein Nijmegen breakage syndrome-1. Moreover, macrophage foam cell formation is a key initiation event in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. SIRT1 activation reduces Lox-1-mediated foam cell formation via suppression of the NF-κB signaling pathway. In contrast, suppression of the SIRT1 signaling pathway by mTOR signaling promotes foam cell formation and inhibits foam cell egress. Several miRNAs have been revealed to have a key role in atherosclerosis by regulating the expression of SIRT1., For example, miR-217 downregulation might alleviate atherosclerosis via inhibition of macrophage apoptosis and inflammatory response. SIRT1 is a direct target of miR-217. SIRT1 silencing can eliminate the effects of miR-217 downregulation. The above evidence has suggested that SIRT1 is associated with the occurrence and development of atherosclerosis and might be a promising therapeutic target for atherosclerosis treatment.
Compared to SIRT1, a relatively limited number of studies have explored the roles of other SIRTs in atherosclerosis. SIRT2 decreases atherosclerotic plaque formation in LDL receptor-deficient mice by regulating macrophage polarization. SIRT3 gene expression is associated with endothelial cell apoptosis in atherosclerosis rats, and SIRT3/SOD2 signaling can be activated by circ_0,003,423, thereby protecting human umbilical vein endothelial cells from oxLDL-induced dysfunction. SIRT4 suppresses the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway and relieves oxLDL-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells injury. SIRT6 protects against endothelial dysfunction, VSMC senescence, and atherosclerosis in mice.,, In addition, SIRT6 overexpression reduces oxLDL uptake in RAW macrophages, and SIRT6 knockdown enhances it and increases the expression of macrophage scavenger receptor 1. Finally, SIRT7 has been reported to regulate the VSMC proliferation and migration via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which provides a promising therapeutic strategy for anti-atherosclerosis.
In conclusion, the role of SIRT1 in atherosclerosis has received extensive attention. SIRT1 deficiency in endothelial cells, VSMCs, and monocytes/macrophages promotes atherosclerosis. Therefore, SIRT1 might be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Other SIRTs might also have protective effects on atherosclerosis. However, due to a relatively low number of studies, the relevant mechanisms need to be further explored in the future.
Coronary artery disease (CAD)
CAD is the result of atherosclerotic plaque development in the walls of coronary arteries. It is one of the most common causes of death in the developed countries and is responsible for about one in every five deaths. Current studies on the role of SIRTs in CAD mainly focus on SIRT1, which has a protective effect on CAD by regulating some crucial biological processes, such as oxidative stress, inflammation, cell apoptosis, and cell proliferation.
Epidemiological studies have suggested that genetic SIRT1 polymorphisms are associated with the risk of CAD, while the expression level of SIRT1 is reduced in CAD patients. SIRT1 inhibition causes oxidative stress and inflammation in CAD patients. On a molecular level, expression of downregulated SIRT1 in human CAD monocytes is related to the enhanced acetylated p53 expression levels. In contrast, SIRT1 overexpression in human CAD monocytes mitigates pro-apoptotic events and attenuates some proinflammatory events, such as upregulating expression of NF-κB and iNOS and NO concentrations. SIRT1 has been reported to be involved in the regulation of CAD via noncoding RNAs., For example, promoted expression of SIRT1 by elevated expression of lncRNA C2dat1 and subsequent suppressed miR-34a expression increases VSMC proliferation and migration in CAD.
Except for SIRT1, epidemiological studies also suggest that genetic polymorphisms of SIRT3 and SIRT6 are associated with the risk of CAD, but the related mechanism needs to be further explored. Given the protective role of SIRT1 in CAD, other SIRTs might also be potential therapeutic targets for CAD. Therefore, exploring the roles of other SIRTs in CAD might be a promising research direction in the future.
Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (MI/R) injury
In recent years, the morbidity and mortality of ischemic cardiac diseases, such as myocardial infarction, have shown an upward trend. With the development of recanalization technology, the treatment of myocardial infarction has made remarkable progress. However, MI/R injury can be induced as the treatments progress. MI/R injury is closely related to oxidative stress and apoptosis, and SIRTs play crucial roles in MI/R by controlling the above biological processes.
SIRT1 has a protective effect on MI/R injury and reduces the infarct area of the heart., Cardiac-specific SIRT1 KO mice have shown a significantly increased myocardial infarction area size. In contrast, cardiac-specific SIRT1 overexpression was significantly reduced in the myocardial infarction area. As for its potential mechanism, overexpression of SIRT1 leads to upregulation of antioxidant pathways mediated by FoxO1 and MnSOD and downregulation of pro-apoptotic pathways mediated by caspase-3 and Bax, thereby protecting the heart from MI/R injury. In addition, SIRT1 overexpression has been shown to be involved in ameliorating miRNA inhibition associated with MI/R injury., For example, upregulated SIRT1 expression resulting from miR-132 inhibition might ameliorate MI/R injury by inhibiting oxidative stress and pyroptosis through activation of PGC-1α/Nrf2 signaling. The SIRT1/AMPK/PGC-1α pathway is involved in the process by which lncRNA Oip5-as1 attenuates MI/R injury by sponging miR-29a. Like SIRT1, nuclear deacetylase SIRT6 also has a protective effect on MI/R injury. On a molecular level, SIRT6 protects against MI/R injury by increasing FoxO3α-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms and attenuating aging-related charged multivesicular body protein 2B accumulation.
In addition, the protective effects of mitochondrial SIRT3-5 have been observed in MI/R injury. An in vivo study has revealed that SIRT3 deficiency exacerbates MI/R injury. Both in vitro and in vivo models have shown that SIRT4 is downregulated in cardiomyocytes after MI/R injury, and that SIRT4 overexpression decreases myocardial infarct size. This protective effect of SIRT4 against MI/R injury has been reported to be associated with preserved mitochondrial function and reduced myocardial apoptosis. Similarly, a prior in vivo study has demonstrated that SIRT5 loss increased myocardial infarct size and MI/R injury, which might be associated with the effect of SIRT5 on modulating protein succinylation in the heart.
This evidence suggests that SIRT1-6 might play critical roles in alleviating myocardial infarction and M/IR by regulating some important biological processes, such as oxidative stress and apoptosis. However, relevant molecular mechanisms behind these processes need to be further explored. Moreover, few studies have focused on the roles of SIRT2 and SIRT7 in M/IR injury, and further research is needed in the future.
Hypertension
Hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure of ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥ 90 mmHg, is the risk factor for other CVDs, affecting an estimated 1.39 billion people worldwide in 2010. Its prevalence is still rising globally. In recent years, increasing studies have focused on the protective effects of SIRT1 and SIRT3 on hypertension., In vivo studies have shown that SIRT1 overexpression in VSMCs attenuates Ang II-induced hypertension in mice. Similarly, SIRT3 overexpression attenuates Ang II and deoxycorticosterone acetate salt-induced hypertension in transgenic mice. Both SIRT1 and SIRT3 have been reported to be involved in the regulation of oxidative stress in hypertension.– For example, SIRT1 activation attenuates Klotho deficiency-induced arterial stiffness and hypertension by increasing AMPKα and eNOS activity. SIRT1 overexpression mediated by NAMPT alleviates Ang II-mediated ROS production. In addition, diminished SIRT3 expression and redox inactivation of SIRT3 leads to SOD2 inactivation and contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension.
SIRTs also play important roles in the complications of hypertension. For example, decreased urinary levels of SIRT1 can be seen as a non-invasive biomarker of early renal damage in hypertension. SIRT3 alleviates the development of hypertensive renal injury by suppressing EMT. Endothelial-specific deletion of SIRT6 significantly enhances blood pressure and exacerbates endothelial dysfunction and cardiorenal injury in experimental hypertension by targeting Nkx3.2-GATA5 signaling.
These findings indicate that SIRTs have protective effects on the occurrence and development of hypertension and might be valuable predictive biomarkers as well as promising therapeutic targets for hypertension complications. However, relevant mechanisms still need to be further explored, especially for SIRT2, SIRT4, SIRT5, and SIRT7, which have not been extensively investigated.
Conclusion
This section summarized the effects of SIRTs on CVDs. The effects of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 have received extensive attention. Most studies have shown that they have a protective effect on CVDs, such as cardiac fibrosis, heart failure, atherosclerosis, and M/IR injury. Compared to SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6, studies on SIRT2, SIRT4, SIRT5, and SIRT7 are relatively limited, even though they play important roles in CVDs. The protective effects of SIRT2, SIRT5, and SIRT7 in several CVDs (e.g., hypertrophy) have been observed. Of note, SIRT4 might aggravate cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Overall, SIRTs are promising therapeutic targets, and the pharmacological modulation of SIRTs can be used in the prevention and treatment of CVDs.
SIRTs and respiratory system diseases
Respiratory diseases are one of the biggest threats to human health. Common respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung fibrosis (LF), coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and other lung injures, seriously affect physical and mental health. SIRTs have received considerable attention due to their important effects on respiratory diseases. Herein, we summarize the related studies in several common respiratory system diseases (Fig. 11).
COPD
COPD is a common disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and progressive airflow obstruction. Most chronic respiratory disease-attributable deaths are due to COPD, which is the fourth leading cause of death worldwide and considered to be a global public health challenge.– Oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis are the most important influencing factors for COPD occurrence and are closely related to SIRT family. Cigarette smoking (CS) is a causative factor for COPD. The level of SIRT1 is substantially decreased in lungs of patients with COPD/emphysema, as well as in lungs of rodents exposed to CS. Moreover, SIRT1 has been found to have anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and antioxidant roles in the pathogenesis of COPD. For example, SIRT1 plays a pivotal role in regulating NF-κB-dependent proinflammatory mediators in lungs of smokers and patients with COPD. Apart from NF-κB regulation, SIRT1 also mediates COPD via deacetylation of the FoxO3 transcription factor and tumor suppressor p53 involved in lung cell senescence and oxidative stress-induced cellular apoptosis., Moreover, the SIRT1 activator SRT1720 might be able to inhibit LPS-induced cytokine release from cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with COPD. Thus, pharmacological activation of SIRT1 might have considerable potential as a novel form of chronopharmacology in COPD.
SIRT6 plays an important role in the regulation of autophagy in COPD. For example, reduced SIRT6 expression level is associated with COPD development through enhancement of cellular senescence created by insufficient autophagy during CS exposure. SIRT6 overexpression weakens autophagy via IGF–Akt–mTOR signaling. Similar to SIRT1, reduced SIRT6 level is also implicated in COPD. Therefore, SIRT6 deficiency might contribute to the development of COPD.
SIRT3 is a mitochondrial deacetylase regulating mitochondrial function, and its role in the pathogenesis of COPD has also been mentioned. For instance, SIRT3 inhibits airway epithelial mitochondrial oxidative stress, thereby contributing to attenuating the progression of COPD. Therefore, activating the SIRT3 signaling pathway might present a novel therapeutic target to slow or prevent the pathogenesis of COPD.
With the understanding of the positive roles of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 in COPD, their pharmacological activation by specific agents might be a promising strategy against COPD. However, other SIRT family members have not yet been studied in the respiratory system. SIRTs mainly mediate this disease via inflammation- or autophagy-related pathways., In addition, COPD is commonly thought to be associated with other chronic diseases, especially those where accelerated aging is involved. Therefore, the defection of anti-aging molecules, such as SIRTs, has been proposed as a mechanism for accelerated lung aging in COPD. Given the severity and complexity of COPD, further studies are necessary to validate the exact roles of SIRTs.
LF
LF is a leading cause of death in the industrialized world, which significantly increases with age. An epidemiological study has shown that approximately 45% of global deaths have been attributed to fibrosis. The pathogenesis of LF is complex and involves environmental influences and microorganisms. Recent developments in the field of LF have pointed towards the pivotal role of SIRTs in regulating disease progression, thereby qualifying as potential anti-fibrotic drug targets. Four of the seven SIRTs (SIRT1, SIRT3, SIRT6, and SIRT7) have been investigated in LF, while the functional roles of the remaining SIRTs (SIRT2, SIRT4, and SIRT5) remain elusive.
SIRT1 loss might be involved in the pathogenesis of LF. Thus, its activation might be an effective treatment for LF. SIRT1 plays an important role in regulating alveolar epithelial cell 2 progenitor renewal and LF. Mechanistically, SIRT1 activation promotes self-renewal and differentiation of alveolar epithelial cell 2 in lung tissues of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients and aged mice. However, the opposite results have been reported for SIRT1 changes in LF. According to the study performed by Zeng et al., SIRT1 expression was significantly increased in lungs from patients with IPF, as well as in lungs from bleomycin-induced LF mouse models. Nevertheless, SIRT1 activation or overexpression attenuates LF through regulation of canonical TGF-β1/p300 signaling. In addition, SIRT1 activation has been used in aging-related LF prevention and therapy. As the expression of SIRT1 in LF is controversial, more studies are needed to explore this notion in the future.
Due to the preferential mitochondrial association with extended life span in humans, SIRT3 is a protein of particular interest in age-related diseases, including LF. For example, there is a SIRT3 deficiency within the murine aging lung, which promotes the fibrotic response mediated by TGF-β1. TGF-β1 is a major multifunctional cytokine that is known as a mediator implicated in LF pathogenesis. In addition, SIRT3 deficiency promotes LF by augmenting alveolar epithelial cell mitochondrial DNA damage and apoptosis. Cheresh et al. have suggested that SIRT3 overexpression can ameliorate asbestos-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Thus, improvement in SIRT3 expression might be a novel therapeutic focus for managing patients with IF.
It is possible that SIRT6 participates in the inhibition of cellular fibrosis by regulating the TGF-β1 signaling pathway. SIRT6 can also be an ambitious target molecule for understanding the pathogenesis of IPF through the inhibitory role in TGF-β-induced cellular senescence. Additionally, Chen et al. have shown that targeting SIRT6 is a potential novel therapeutic strategy for pulmonary fibrosis that involves inactivating the TGF-β1/Smad2 signaling pathway. Furthermore, SIRT6 prevents TGF-β1-induced lung myofibroblast differentiation by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad2 and NF-κB signaling pathways. SIRT6 also inhibits EMT during IPF by inactivating TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling, highlighting the critical role of SIRT6 in LF. Moreover, all SIRTs show a tendency to be expressed at lower levels in fibroblasts from patients compared to controls, but the greatest decrease is observed with SIRT7. Furthermore, the decline in SIRT7 in LF has a profibrotic effect, which is mediated by changes in Smad3 levels.
The above evidence shows that SIRT1, SIRT3, SIRT6, and SIRT7 are beneficial for preventing and improving the pathogenesis of LF. However, the modulatory roles of other SIRT members remain unclear. Mazumder et al. have reviewed the regulatory roles of under-reported SIRTs (mainly SIRT2, SIRT4, and SIRT5, which lack direct reported associations with LF) in basic cellular and mitochondrial metabolic pathways critical to LF. Overall, they have suggested that SIRTs appear to exert a protective action in LF, except SIRT2, which might have a pro-fibrotic action given its proinflammatory effects observed in asthma. In summary, studies on the function of SIRTs in regulating LF have potential.
Asthma
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that is characterized by cough, breathlessness, and episodic wheezing caused by airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. It is estimated to influence about 300 million people all over the world, with a significantly increasing prevalence., Asthma affects all age groups, but particularly children SIRT1-targeting approach has been shown to be a potentially effective new strategy for the treatment of asthma., For example, SIRT1 protein levels are decreased in patients with severe asthma. SIRT1 exerts an anti-inflammatory effect on airway diseases, including asthma. Tang et al. have investigated the potential role of SIRT1 in regulating inflammation through modulation of IL-6 expression in an Akt-dependent manner during allergic asthma. Similarly, SIRT1 regulates IL-6 level via the Akt pathway, thereby affecting pulmonary function in asthma patients. In addition, SIRT1 inhibits the differentiation of IL-9-producing CD4+ T cells that are associated with allergic airway inflammation via mTOR-HIF-1α-dependent signaling coupled with glycolytic pathway. In addition, a study performed by Liu et al. has shown that anthocyanin inhibits airway inflammation by blocking the NF-κB pathway via the miR-138-5p/SIRT1 axis in asthmatic mice. All of these studies have demonstrated that SIRT1 suppresses the allergic airway inflammation that occurs in asthma and suggested that SIRT1 activation might represent a therapeutic strategy for asthma.
In addition to SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT3, SIRT6, and SIRT7 have also been reported to be involved in asthma. For example, SIRT2 enhances allergic asthmatic inflammation, while pharmacologic SIRT2 ablation attenuates and genetic SIRT2 overexpression exaggerates the allergic asthmatic phenotype. Moreover, SIRT2 aggravates asthmatic inflammation by upregulating T-helper type 2 responses and macrophage polarization. In contrast, upregulation of SIRT3 expression reduces apoptosis in the bronchial epithelium and airway inflammation in asthma. Allergic asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease involving airway remodeling that severely limits airflow in the lungs. SIRT6 and SIRT7 expression levels have been found to be increased in human bronchial epithelial cells isolated from patients with asthma. Upregulated SIRT6 ameliorates airway remodeling through regulation of EMT in asthma. In contrast, upregulated SIRT7 promotes airway remodeling in asthma by regulating TGF-β1-induced airway smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, indicating a different SIRT6 role during airway remodeling.
Asthma is a complex respiratory disease with an increasing incidence worldwide. Individuals with asthma need to receive emergency treatment if their symptoms become severe. However, there is currently no effective cure. Therefore, the pathological mechanism of asthma needs to be investigated further. Accumulating evidence shows that asthma is caused by chronic inflammation and that SIRTs have important effects on regulating chronic inflammatory responses. Future exploration of the molecular mechanisms of SIRT-mediated inflammatory response will provide more information for the development of novel therapeutic targets in asthma.
Lung injury
Acute lung injury (ALI) is a potentially life threatening and devastating disease with an extremely high rate of mortality. It is a clinical syndrome associated with respiratory dysfunction and is often a complication of sepsis. Additionally, ALI can develop into acute respiratory distress syndrome in more serious injuries, which lacks novel and efficient therapies., Inflammation and oxidative stresses are essential for the progression of ALI. However, the molecular mechanisms of sepsis-induced lung inflammatory injury are yet to be determined. SIRT1 has been widely reported to exert its anti-inflammatory function by regulating the production of proinflammatory cytokines., For instance, overall SIRT1 KO mice are highly susceptible to sepsis-induced inflammatory lung injury due to activation of proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB. In addition, resveratrol is a potent SIRT1 activator that reduces ALI in an LPS-induced sepsis mouse model via activation of SIRT1. On the contrary, SIRT1 inhibitor EX-527 suppresses mTOR activation and alleviates ALI in mice with endotoxemia. This finding suggests that SIRT1 might be a detrimental factor under certain pathological conditions.
Evidence also shows that SIRT3 and SIRT6 have positive effects on ALI. SIRT3 promotes the expression of MnSOD, and this regulation is crucial for the protective effect of SIRT3 on hyperoxia-induced ALI. SIRT3 can also diminish inflammation and mitigate endotoxin-induced ALI. Kurundkar et al. have shown that SIRT3-deficient mice (SIRT3−/−) develop more severe ALI compared to wild-type controls (SIRT3+/+). Macrophages obtained from SIRT3−/− mice show significant alterations in mitochondrial bioenergetic and redox homeostasis in association with proinflammatory phenotype characterized by NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Similarly, SIRT6 regulates macrophage polarization to alleviate sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome via dual mechanisms both dependent on and independent of autophagy.
Apart from the above-mentioned LPS and endotoxin, other external factors, such as ventilator and paraquat, also cause lung damage., Mechanical ventilation contributes to excessive mechanical stress and impaired physiological and structural lung integrity. HDAC inhibited by SIRT1-silencing RNA attenuates NAMPT expression in ventilator-induced lung injury. Paraquat, which is a highly toxic herbicide and primary lung attacker, results in severe ALI. A recent study has demonstrated that resveratrol reduces paraquat-induced lung injury by upregulating SIRT1 mRNA and protein expression in combination with the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway. Therefore, SIRT1 activation can effectively alleviate lung injury.
These results suggest that SIRT protein family plays an important role in maintaining normal homeostasis and protective mechanisms in the lung. SIRTs regulate lung injury by inhibiting the expression of inflammatory factors, although specific mechanisms require further investigation.
Coronavirus disease 2019
In December of 2019, a new strain of coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2, was first identified and called COVID-19. The disease has been recognized as pandemic by the World Health Organization. A dysregulated inflammatory profile plays an important role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. It has been reported that the SIRT family has a part in this mechanism. The unbalanced p53/SIRT1 axis might impact lymphocyte homeostasis in COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 can be characterized not only by an increase in p53 transcription in circulating lymphocytes, but also by a persistently activated p53 form, possibly due to the low level of SIRT1. Therefore, increased SIRT1 expression might help to alleviate the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Additionally, serum SIRT3 levels are associated with the clinical outcome and prognosis of COVID-19 patients. SIRT3 levels are markedly lower in severe patients compared to those in the mild/moderate patients, indicating a positive role of SIRT3 in alleviating COVID-19.
In conclusion, SIRTs are involved in COVID-19 and may provide a new therapeutic strategy. However, the impact of SIRTs on regulation of inflammatory homeostasis in severe and mild cases of COVID-19 remains to be determined.
Conclusion
This section discusses how the SIRT family plays a vital role in various molecular pathways in the respiratory system. SIRTs might be targets for respiratory system-related adverse health events. Increased activity of individual SIRTs often has beneficial effects in pathophysiological conditions, whereas reduced activity is usually associated with disease conditions. This also seems to apply to the respiratory system diseases. In addition, epigenetic alteration is implied in the occurrence and development of various respiratory diseases. Since SIRTs are NAD-dependent deacetylases, their deacetylation activity via epigenetics might be a new research strategy. However, detailed epigenetic roles of SIRTs in the respiratory system still need to be further explored.
SIRTs and digestive system diseases
Digestive system diseases, including fatty liver diseases (FLDs), liver and intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), hepatitis B virus (HBV), pancreas diseases, and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), are the most common clinical diseases., Increasing evidence has suggested that changes in SIRT activity and expression are associated with etiology of various digestive diseases., As discussed below, SIRTs play an important role in maintaining the homeostasis of digestive system function and participating in the occurrence and development of digestive diseases (Fig. 12).
Liver diseases
FLDs The disease spectrum of FLDs, with high-fat/high-calorie diets, heavy alcohol consumption, and/or other causes of metabolic disorders, ranges from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and, ultimately, cirrhosis and carcinoma., Notably, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease, with a worldwide prevalence of 25%. About 2 billion people consume alcohol worldwide and upwards of 75 million are at risk of alcohol-associated liver diseases., The accumulated evidence has shown that SIRTs have complex effects on the FLD. The dual effects of SIRT1-4 have been explored, while SIRT6 might only have a protective role. However, limited studies have investigated the roles of SIRT5 and SIRT7.SIRTs might play a protective role in FLD, except for SIRT7. Decreased expression of SIRT1-3, SIRT5, and SIRT6 in patients with NAFLD or fibrosis have been observed in several studies.– Molecular mechanism studies have also demonstrated this protective effect. For example, SIRT1 and SIRT6 deacetylate the carbohydrate response element-binding protein and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c, which are two major transcription factors responsible for the coordinated induction of glycolytic and lipogenic genes, thereby maintaining lipid homeostasis in the liver.,,, In addition, SIRT1 and SIRT6 antagonize liver fibrosis by blocking the activation of hepatic stellate cells via the deacetylation function in a mouse model., Notably, SIRT1 might act as a key metabolic/energy sensor, which directly regulates transcriptional activity and/or gene expression of several crucial transcription factors and transcription co-activators that are involved in lipid metabolic homeostasis to play a protective role in FLD.– These include PPAR-α, PPAR-γ co-activator 1 alpha, and NF-κB.– Moreover, liver fibrosis, oxidative stress, and related gene expression are significantly elevated in hepatocyte-specific SIRT6-KO mice with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.,The beneficial effects of SIRT2-5 on FLD might also be mediated by various biological mechanisms. Although related studies on SIRT2 are limited, it has been demonstrated that SIRT2 prevented NAFLD by deacetylation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α, a master regulator of gene expression for bile acid, lipids, and glucose metabolism. SIRT3 and SIRT5 improve mitochondrial function and increase mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation to relieve hepatic steatosis., For example, hepatic overexpression of SIRT3 improves mitochondrial function by deacetylation of mitochondrial trifunctional proteins and long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase., In systematic SIRT5 KO mice, impaired mitochondrial medium-chain fatty acid oxidation drove periportal macrovascular steatosis. Results from in vitro models have shown that SIRT4 upregulation might inhibit high fat diet-induced lipid accumulation, inflammation, and fibrogenesis through the SIRT4/Smad4 axis. It can also inhibit hepatic stellate cell activation.,Although SIRTs are involved in FLD as protective factors in most studies, the high expression of SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT4, and SIRT7 in patients with alcoholic hepatitis or NAFLD and upregulation of SIRT3 after chronic alcohol exposure in mouse liver might highlight their harmful effects.,,, Results from in vitro studies have suggested that elevated monocyte SIRT1 and SIRT7 levels can prevent p-FoxO3 formation and cause a defect in apoptosis in alcoholic hepatitis. Although hepatocyte apoptosis is related to disease severity, proinflammatory hepatic macrophages also undergo apoptosis in response to alcohol. Therefore, apoptosis serves as a mechanism that suppresses the inflammatory response in alcoholic liver disease. These results suggest that high SIRT1 and SIRT7 levels in myeloid cells could be a primary event leading to enhanced inflammation, possibly owing to the deleterious consequence of apoptosis. Intestinal SIRT1 also exerted a partially harmful effect on alcoholic liver disease by intensifying hepatic ferroptosis and inflammation due to the imbalance of gut microbiota. Thus, it is logical to speculate that intestinal SIRT1 might act as a proinflammatory factor. SIRT2 appears to have a deleterious effect on hepatic fibrosis via the SIRT2/ERK/c-Myc axis. Moreover, in both NAFLD and alcoholic fatty liver disease mouse models, liver-specific SIRT3 knockdown alleviated alcoholic feeding-induced liver injury and lipid accumulation, which was associated with improved autophagy induction., In addition, SIRT4 might have harmful effects on NAFLD, and its molecular mechanism may be partly associated with deacetylating and destabilizing mitochondrial trifunctional protein-α.Overall, the above findings demonstrate the complex role of SIRTs in FLD. Choosing to develop different SIRT agonists or inhibitors might be a new target for the control of FLD occurrence and development in a clinical setting. Liver IRI IRI is a major complication of hemorrhagic shock, resection, and transplantation. It is characterized by aseptic inflammation and liver cell death and acts as a risk factor involved in acute and chronic rejection. Current studies have mostly focused on the effect of SIRT1-3, which plays different roles via multiple molecular pathways in liver IRI.SIRT1 and SIRT3 might have a beneficial effect against damage. SIRT1 was markedly decreased after IRI in human and mouse livers. High SIRT1 levels improved hepatocellular function and resulted in superior survival in human liver transplants. The results from in vivo studies showed that SIRT1 suppressed mitochondrial dysfunction of ischemic mouse livers in a mitofusin 2-dependent manner. Moreover, overexpression of SIRT1 alleviated autophagy depletion and inflammation to partially mitigate hepatocellular injury during IRI.,, In addition, SIRT3 expression was suppressed in systematic KO of Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 in mice, thus leading to a proinflammatory response in macrophages, which significantly exacerbated liver injury and inflammatory response.Unlike SIRT1 and SIRT3, with an increasing expression in IRI liver tissues, SIRT2 potentially has a detrimental effect on liver IRI. SIRT2 deacetylates MAPK phosphatase‐1 and activates the MAPK signaling pathways during liver IRI, thereby augmenting inflammatory responses and enhancing cell death in a mouse model. Pharmacologic and genetic suppression of SIRT2 also provided additional evidence supporting this observation.Overall, SIRT1 and SIRT3 have protective effects on liver IRI, while SIRT2 might be harmful. Studies on the role of SIRT4-7 in this disease are lacking. Future research should clarify the role of SIRTs in liver IRI, including the exact molecular mechanisms. HBV infection HBV infection affects over 250 million chronic carriers, causing more than 800,000 deaths annually, although a safe and effective vaccine is available. Notably, current evidence shows that the expression of SIRTs might make a difference during HBV infection.SIRT3, SIRT4, and SIRT6 are downregulated in patients who tested positive for HBV antigens or the cell for HBV replication.,, SIRT3 and SIRT6 inhibit HBV replication via epigenetic regulation., SIRT3 and SIRT6 induce a decrease in H3K9 acetylation on viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), serving as a template for all viral transcripts., Specifically, stable HBV X protein transfection suppresses SIRT4 expression, which demonstrates the interaction between HBV and SIRT4 in the context of HCC.However, slightly elevated mRNA levels of SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT5, and SIRT7 in HBV-infected hepatocytes lead to global histone hypoacetylation signatures, which contribute to HBV-induced pathomechanism in non-transformed hepatocytes. Pharmaceutical agonists of SIRT1, such as resveratrol, activated HBV transcription, while small-molecule inhibitors of SIRT1, including sirtinol and Ex527, exhibited anti-HBV activity, showing that SIRTs might be an anti-HBV target. SIRT7 also has a protective function in cccDNA via desuccinylation. SIRT7 restricts HBV transcription and replication by catalyzing desuccinylation of histone H3 associated with cccDNA minichromosome.The exact molecular mechanisms underlying the alteration in SIRT expression are still not fully elucidated due to limited research, especially the conflicting roles of SIRT7 in HBV infection. Therefore, it is crucial to further examine the functions and molecular mechanisms of SIRTs in regulating the development of HBV infection and HBV-induced diseases. Other liver diseases SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 might have effects on other liver diseases, including acute liver failure, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, autoimmune liver diseases, cholestasis diseases, and liver injury induced by a variety of causes.–In the acute liver failure induced by D-galactosamine/LPS, a dramatic decrease in SIRT1 levels has been documented in a rat model. SIRT1 might have a protective effect by inducing HIF-1α deacetylation to reduce the ROS levels in mice. The treatment by SITR1-activating compounds, including quercetin (natural polyphenol) and SRT1720 (synthetic SIRT1 activator), might also support the beneficial role of SIRT1 in acute liver failure.SIRT1 plays an important role in the process of HCV infection. For example, the related study showed that elevated SIRT1 at protein level had an anti-aging effect on senescent CD4+ T cells during HCV infection. In addition, HCV core protein could induce dysfunction of liver sinusoidal endothelial cell by down-regulation of SIRT1. Interesting, an in vivo study showed that HCV core protein 1b-induced hepatic steatosis could be alleviated in liver-specific SIRT1 KO mice by downregulation of PPAR-γ2 expression. Therefore, the role of SIRT1 in the process of HCV infection should be further studied.Additionally, SIRT1 may have beneficial effects on autoimmune hepatitis. For instance, an in vivo study showed that SIRT1-null mice developed an autoimmune-like disease related with the accumulation of immune complexes in the liver. Meanwhile, evidence also suggested that the activation of SIRT1 by resveratrol could protected against concanavalin A-induced autoimmune hepatitis in aged mice by repressing the expression of p66shc. Interestingly, pregnancy induces a state of immune tolerance, which can lead to spontaneous improvement of clinical symptoms of autoimmune hepatitis. As for mechanism, this may be associated with the activation of SIRT1 by chorionic gonadotropin signaling.Moreover, SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 may play important roles in cirrhosis.,, The study suggested that SIRT1 and SIRT6 were decreased at protein level in the livers of patients with cirrhosis., Besides, an in vivo study also suggested that enhanced expression of SIRT3 by curcumin had protective effects on cirrhosis. However, the exact molecular mechanism regarding cirrhosis should be further explored.SIRT1 and SIRT6 show protective effects in drug-induced liver injury. Suppressing SIRT1 by miR-128-3p aggravated doxorubicin-induced liver injury by promoting oxidative stress. Upregulated SIRT1 pathway by quercetin attenuated NLRP3 inflammasome activation and apoptosis to protect isoniazid-induced liver injury, while SIRT1 inhibitor EX527 reversed the protective effect. Moreover, overexpression or pharmacological SIRT6 activation enhanced glutathione and decreased N-acetyl-p-benzo-quinoneimine, thus alleviating acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity via normalization of liver damage, inflammatory infiltration, and oxidative stress in a mouse model.Interestingly, hepatocyte SIRT1 might be a detrimental rather than protective factor in the setting of endotoxemic liver injury. Mechanistically, SIRT1-deacetylated p65 and compromised NF-κB activity in hepatocytes leads to increased susceptibility to endotoxemic injury when confronted with LPS/TNF-α stimulation. However, the evidence points to a dual role by which SIRT1 overexpression might contribute to cholestasis disease progression. Based on a mouse model of cholestatic liver disease, intestine-specific deletion of SIRT1 impaired systemic bile acid homeostasis., In an in vivo model of cholestatic disease, SIRT1-overexpressing myeloid cells with macrophage activation contributed to liver injury and fibrosis by activating the inflammasome and attenuating autophagy. Therefore, the role of SIRTs might be varied in different liver diseases. In addition, a loss or decrease in levels of SIRT3 could be an underlying factor and contributor to a damage-permissive phenotype in radiation-induced long-term persistent liver injury.Collectively, SIRTs play complex roles in liver disease. SIRTs might act as a double-edged sword and might be related to a specific disease mechanism and cellular type of action. More studies are needed to explore the role of proinflammatory SIRT effects in liver disease.
FLDs
The disease spectrum of FLDs, with high-fat/high-calorie diets, heavy alcohol consumption, and/or other causes of metabolic disorders, ranges from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and, ultimately, cirrhosis and carcinoma., Notably, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease, with a worldwide prevalence of 25%. About 2 billion people consume alcohol worldwide and upwards of 75 million are at risk of alcohol-associated liver diseases., The accumulated evidence has shown that SIRTs have complex effects on the FLD. The dual effects of SIRT1-4 have been explored, while SIRT6 might only have a protective role. However, limited studies have investigated the roles of SIRT5 and SIRT7.
SIRTs might play a protective role in FLD, except for SIRT7. Decreased expression of SIRT1-3, SIRT5, and SIRT6 in patients with NAFLD or fibrosis have been observed in several studies.– Molecular mechanism studies have also demonstrated this protective effect. For example, SIRT1 and SIRT6 deacetylate the carbohydrate response element-binding protein and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c, which are two major transcription factors responsible for the coordinated induction of glycolytic and lipogenic genes, thereby maintaining lipid homeostasis in the liver.,,, In addition, SIRT1 and SIRT6 antagonize liver fibrosis by blocking the activation of hepatic stellate cells via the deacetylation function in a mouse model., Notably, SIRT1 might act as a key metabolic/energy sensor, which directly regulates transcriptional activity and/or gene expression of several crucial transcription factors and transcription co-activators that are involved in lipid metabolic homeostasis to play a protective role in FLD.– These include PPAR-α, PPAR-γ co-activator 1 alpha, and NF-κB.– Moreover, liver fibrosis, oxidative stress, and related gene expression are significantly elevated in hepatocyte-specific SIRT6-KO mice with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.,
The beneficial effects of SIRT2-5 on FLD might also be mediated by various biological mechanisms. Although related studies on SIRT2 are limited, it has been demonstrated that SIRT2 prevented NAFLD by deacetylation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α, a master regulator of gene expression for bile acid, lipids, and glucose metabolism. SIRT3 and SIRT5 improve mitochondrial function and increase mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation to relieve hepatic steatosis., For example, hepatic overexpression of SIRT3 improves mitochondrial function by deacetylation of mitochondrial trifunctional proteins and long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase., In systematic SIRT5 KO mice, impaired mitochondrial medium-chain fatty acid oxidation drove periportal macrovascular steatosis. Results from in vitro models have shown that SIRT4 upregulation might inhibit high fat diet-induced lipid accumulation, inflammation, and fibrogenesis through the SIRT4/Smad4 axis. It can also inhibit hepatic stellate cell activation.,
Although SIRTs are involved in FLD as protective factors in most studies, the high expression of SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT4, and SIRT7 in patients with alcoholic hepatitis or NAFLD and upregulation of SIRT3 after chronic alcohol exposure in mouse liver might highlight their harmful effects.,,, Results from in vitro studies have suggested that elevated monocyte SIRT1 and SIRT7 levels can prevent p-FoxO3 formation and cause a defect in apoptosis in alcoholic hepatitis. Although hepatocyte apoptosis is related to disease severity, proinflammatory hepatic macrophages also undergo apoptosis in response to alcohol. Therefore, apoptosis serves as a mechanism that suppresses the inflammatory response in alcoholic liver disease. These results suggest that high SIRT1 and SIRT7 levels in myeloid cells could be a primary event leading to enhanced inflammation, possibly owing to the deleterious consequence of apoptosis. Intestinal SIRT1 also exerted a partially harmful effect on alcoholic liver disease by intensifying hepatic ferroptosis and inflammation due to the imbalance of gut microbiota. Thus, it is logical to speculate that intestinal SIRT1 might act as a proinflammatory factor. SIRT2 appears to have a deleterious effect on hepatic fibrosis via the SIRT2/ERK/c-Myc axis. Moreover, in both NAFLD and alcoholic fatty liver disease mouse models, liver-specific SIRT3 knockdown alleviated alcoholic feeding-induced liver injury and lipid accumulation, which was associated with improved autophagy induction., In addition, SIRT4 might have harmful effects on NAFLD, and its molecular mechanism may be partly associated with deacetylating and destabilizing mitochondrial trifunctional protein-α.
Overall, the above findings demonstrate the complex role of SIRTs in FLD. Choosing to develop different SIRT agonists or inhibitors might be a new target for the control of FLD occurrence and development in a clinical setting.
Liver IRI
IRI is a major complication of hemorrhagic shock, resection, and transplantation. It is characterized by aseptic inflammation and liver cell death and acts as a risk factor involved in acute and chronic rejection. Current studies have mostly focused on the effect of SIRT1-3, which plays different roles via multiple molecular pathways in liver IRI.
SIRT1 and SIRT3 might have a beneficial effect against damage. SIRT1 was markedly decreased after IRI in human and mouse livers. High SIRT1 levels improved hepatocellular function and resulted in superior survival in human liver transplants. The results from in vivo studies showed that SIRT1 suppressed mitochondrial dysfunction of ischemic mouse livers in a mitofusin 2-dependent manner. Moreover, overexpression of SIRT1 alleviated autophagy depletion and inflammation to partially mitigate hepatocellular injury during IRI.,, In addition, SIRT3 expression was suppressed in systematic KO of Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 in mice, thus leading to a proinflammatory response in macrophages, which significantly exacerbated liver injury and inflammatory response.
Unlike SIRT1 and SIRT3, with an increasing expression in IRI liver tissues, SIRT2 potentially has a detrimental effect on liver IRI. SIRT2 deacetylates MAPK phosphatase‐1 and activates the MAPK signaling pathways during liver IRI, thereby augmenting inflammatory responses and enhancing cell death in a mouse model. Pharmacologic and genetic suppression of SIRT2 also provided additional evidence supporting this observation.
Overall, SIRT1 and SIRT3 have protective effects on liver IRI, while SIRT2 might be harmful. Studies on the role of SIRT4-7 in this disease are lacking. Future research should clarify the role of SIRTs in liver IRI, including the exact molecular mechanisms.
HBV infection
HBV infection affects over 250 million chronic carriers, causing more than 800,000 deaths annually, although a safe and effective vaccine is available. Notably, current evidence shows that the expression of SIRTs might make a difference during HBV infection.
SIRT3, SIRT4, and SIRT6 are downregulated in patients who tested positive for HBV antigens or the cell for HBV replication.,, SIRT3 and SIRT6 inhibit HBV replication via epigenetic regulation., SIRT3 and SIRT6 induce a decrease in H3K9 acetylation on viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), serving as a template for all viral transcripts., Specifically, stable HBV X protein transfection suppresses SIRT4 expression, which demonstrates the interaction between HBV and SIRT4 in the context of HCC.
However, slightly elevated mRNA levels of SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT5, and SIRT7 in HBV-infected hepatocytes lead to global histone hypoacetylation signatures, which contribute to HBV-induced pathomechanism in non-transformed hepatocytes. Pharmaceutical agonists of SIRT1, such as resveratrol, activated HBV transcription, while small-molecule inhibitors of SIRT1, including sirtinol and Ex527, exhibited anti-HBV activity, showing that SIRTs might be an anti-HBV target. SIRT7 also has a protective function in cccDNA via desuccinylation. SIRT7 restricts HBV transcription and replication by catalyzing desuccinylation of histone H3 associated with cccDNA minichromosome.
The exact molecular mechanisms underlying the alteration in SIRT expression are still not fully elucidated due to limited research, especially the conflicting roles of SIRT7 in HBV infection. Therefore, it is crucial to further examine the functions and molecular mechanisms of SIRTs in regulating the development of HBV infection and HBV-induced diseases.
Other liver diseases
SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 might have effects on other liver diseases, including acute liver failure, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, autoimmune liver diseases, cholestasis diseases, and liver injury induced by a variety of causes.–
In the acute liver failure induced by D-galactosamine/LPS, a dramatic decrease in SIRT1 levels has been documented in a rat model. SIRT1 might have a protective effect by inducing HIF-1α deacetylation to reduce the ROS levels in mice. The treatment by SITR1-activating compounds, including quercetin (natural polyphenol) and SRT1720 (synthetic SIRT1 activator), might also support the beneficial role of SIRT1 in acute liver failure.
SIRT1 plays an important role in the process of HCV infection. For example, the related study showed that elevated SIRT1 at protein level had an anti-aging effect on senescent CD4+ T cells during HCV infection. In addition, HCV core protein could induce dysfunction of liver sinusoidal endothelial cell by down-regulation of SIRT1. Interesting, an in vivo study showed that HCV core protein 1b-induced hepatic steatosis could be alleviated in liver-specific SIRT1 KO mice by downregulation of PPAR-γ2 expression. Therefore, the role of SIRT1 in the process of HCV infection should be further studied.
Additionally, SIRT1 may have beneficial effects on autoimmune hepatitis. For instance, an in vivo study showed that SIRT1-null mice developed an autoimmune-like disease related with the accumulation of immune complexes in the liver. Meanwhile, evidence also suggested that the activation of SIRT1 by resveratrol could protected against concanavalin A-induced autoimmune hepatitis in aged mice by repressing the expression of p66shc. Interestingly, pregnancy induces a state of immune tolerance, which can lead to spontaneous improvement of clinical symptoms of autoimmune hepatitis. As for mechanism, this may be associated with the activation of SIRT1 by chorionic gonadotropin signaling.
Moreover, SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 may play important roles in cirrhosis.,, The study suggested that SIRT1 and SIRT6 were decreased at protein level in the livers of patients with cirrhosis., Besides, an in vivo study also suggested that enhanced expression of SIRT3 by curcumin had protective effects on cirrhosis. However, the exact molecular mechanism regarding cirrhosis should be further explored.
SIRT1 and SIRT6 show protective effects in drug-induced liver injury. Suppressing SIRT1 by miR-128-3p aggravated doxorubicin-induced liver injury by promoting oxidative stress. Upregulated SIRT1 pathway by quercetin attenuated NLRP3 inflammasome activation and apoptosis to protect isoniazid-induced liver injury, while SIRT1 inhibitor EX527 reversed the protective effect. Moreover, overexpression or pharmacological SIRT6 activation enhanced glutathione and decreased N-acetyl-p-benzo-quinoneimine, thus alleviating acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity via normalization of liver damage, inflammatory infiltration, and oxidative stress in a mouse model.
Interestingly, hepatocyte SIRT1 might be a detrimental rather than protective factor in the setting of endotoxemic liver injury. Mechanistically, SIRT1-deacetylated p65 and compromised NF-κB activity in hepatocytes leads to increased susceptibility to endotoxemic injury when confronted with LPS/TNF-α stimulation. However, the evidence points to a dual role by which SIRT1 overexpression might contribute to cholestasis disease progression. Based on a mouse model of cholestatic liver disease, intestine-specific deletion of SIRT1 impaired systemic bile acid homeostasis., In an in vivo model of cholestatic disease, SIRT1-overexpressing myeloid cells with macrophage activation contributed to liver injury and fibrosis by activating the inflammasome and attenuating autophagy. Therefore, the role of SIRTs might be varied in different liver diseases. In addition, a loss or decrease in levels of SIRT3 could be an underlying factor and contributor to a damage-permissive phenotype in radiation-induced long-term persistent liver injury.
Collectively, SIRTs play complex roles in liver disease. SIRTs might act as a double-edged sword and might be related to a specific disease mechanism and cellular type of action. More studies are needed to explore the role of proinflammatory SIRT effects in liver disease.
Pancreatic diseases
The incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) has increased globally to approximately 34 cases per 100,000 persons annually with an increased risk of death. Currently, few studies have explored the effects of SIRTs on AP. SIRT1 has been reported to have a low expression in a rat model and has shown a protective effect. Resveratrol protects against acute necrotizing pancreatitis in mice by enhancing SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of p53 and heat shock factor 1.,
However, SIRT1 has an opposing effect on chronic pancreatitis compared to AP. A related study has shown that SIRT1 was significantly upregulated in chronic pancreatitis and PC and in the absence of SIRT1 expression inhibition by miR-278 contributed to inflammation-induced EMT. The conflicting roles of SIRT1 in these studies imply a potentially different effect of SIRT1 on pancreatitis. Overall, further studies are needed to verify the exact role of SIRTs in this disease.
Intestinal diseases
IBDs IBDs are lifelong and incurable chronic inflammatory diseases affecting 6.8 million people worldwide. Most SIRTs can alleviate IBD.SIRT2 and SIRT6 are downregulated in IBD patients and their deletion promotes inflammatory responses by regulating the NF-κB pathway activation, which highlights their protective roles.– In addition, SIRT2 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling to maintain gut homeostasis. Evidence also supports the role of SIRT6 in the resistance of intestinal epithelium to injury, at least in part by preserving the expression of Rspo1, a critical growth factor in intestinal epithelial cells. Limited research has shown that systematic SIRT3, SIRT5, and SIRT7 KO mice were susceptible to colitis.–However, the dual role of SIRT1 in IBD has been observed in several studies. There is a significant downregulation in mRNA and protein expression of SIRT1 in patients suffering from IBD. A decrease in SIRT1 with an increase in age has been shown to aggravate colitis and cause other impairments in a mouse model. SIRT1 deficiency induced the activation of paneth and goblet cells, increased NF-κB activity, and elevated the levels of proinflammatory genes and antimicrobial proteins in the small intestine. In addition, SIRT1 activation reduced apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells via suppression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis-associated molecules CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein and caspase-12 in both in vivo and in vitro models. Compared to the studies showing that a decreased expression of SIRT1 might be important in the pathogenesis of IBD, a decrease in SIRT1 might be protective in IBD. SIRT1 deletion might be useful in the improvement of disease conditions in colitis via induction of Foxp3 + T-regulatory cells, which are important for intestinal homeostasis., The loss of SIRT1 in thymic–derived natural Tregs did not affect rescue from autoimmune colitis, although it promoted Foxp3+ development from conventional T cell formation and attenuated autoimmune colitis. These conclusions suggest that the deleterious role of SIRT1 in immune-related diseases might be related to different T cell sources. Therefore, further studies are needed to verify the association between SIRT1 and more immune cells and to explore the role of SIRT4, which has not been well characterized based on current studies. Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury Studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 on intestinal IRI exerted by adjusting ROS generation and massive epithelial apoptosis in a mouse model, which are critical in the pathogenesis of intestinal IRI injury.,, For instance, SIRT1 suppressed epithelial ROS accumulation and apoptosis to attenuate intestinal IRI after miR-34a-5p systematic knockdown. Resveratrol protected intestinal subacute IRI via the SIRT1-NF-κB pathway in an iNOS-NO-inhibited manner. This might represent a novel prophylactic approach to intestinal IRI. SIRT3 alleviated intestinal IRI-induced mitochondrial oxidative damage and apoptosis through peroxiredoxin 3 deacetylation, a key protective factor in intestinal IRI. Moreover, based on both mouse and rat models, downregulating SIRT6 by miR-351-5p aggravated intestinal IRI by promoting oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. There have been limited research studies exploring the effect of other SIRTs on intestinal IRI. Other intestinal diseases In other intestinal diseases, including hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis and necrotizing enterocolitis, SIRT1 was downregulated and involved in inflammation., SIRT1 can be suppressed via miR-132 and miR-212 or downregulated retinoid-related orphan receptor α by exosomal miR-18a-5p and then activate the NF-κB signaling pathway, NLRP3 inflammasome, and caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis, thereby encouraging the inflammatory response in Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis mice., Similarly, SIRT1 activation might decrease the damage caused by necrotizing enterocolitis by decreasing proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress proteins and by increasing the anti‑inflammatory cytokine pathway., SIRT1 alleviated the inflammatory response and intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction by regulating the expression and inactivation of HIF-1α.In conclusion, current studies on intestinal system diseases have mostly focused on IBD. There are limited studies on other SIRTs, except SIRT1, which is a field worthy of further development. In addition, both protective and deleterious effects of SIRT1 have been explored in intestinal diseases. The proinflammatory effects of SIRT1 and regulation of different immune cells might play an important role in aggravating intestinal diseases. As SIRTs have various biological functions in intestinal diseases, they and their underlying mechanisms are promising novel targets for studying the development of intestinal diseases.
IBDs
IBDs are lifelong and incurable chronic inflammatory diseases affecting 6.8 million people worldwide. Most SIRTs can alleviate IBD.
SIRT2 and SIRT6 are downregulated in IBD patients and their deletion promotes inflammatory responses by regulating the NF-κB pathway activation, which highlights their protective roles.– In addition, SIRT2 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling to maintain gut homeostasis. Evidence also supports the role of SIRT6 in the resistance of intestinal epithelium to injury, at least in part by preserving the expression of Rspo1, a critical growth factor in intestinal epithelial cells. Limited research has shown that systematic SIRT3, SIRT5, and SIRT7 KO mice were susceptible to colitis.–
However, the dual role of SIRT1 in IBD has been observed in several studies. There is a significant downregulation in mRNA and protein expression of SIRT1 in patients suffering from IBD. A decrease in SIRT1 with an increase in age has been shown to aggravate colitis and cause other impairments in a mouse model. SIRT1 deficiency induced the activation of paneth and goblet cells, increased NF-κB activity, and elevated the levels of proinflammatory genes and antimicrobial proteins in the small intestine. In addition, SIRT1 activation reduced apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells via suppression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis-associated molecules CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein and caspase-12 in both in vivo and in vitro models. Compared to the studies showing that a decreased expression of SIRT1 might be important in the pathogenesis of IBD, a decrease in SIRT1 might be protective in IBD. SIRT1 deletion might be useful in the improvement of disease conditions in colitis via induction of Foxp3 + T-regulatory cells, which are important for intestinal homeostasis., The loss of SIRT1 in thymic–derived natural Tregs did not affect rescue from autoimmune colitis, although it promoted Foxp3+ development from conventional T cell formation and attenuated autoimmune colitis. These conclusions suggest that the deleterious role of SIRT1 in immune-related diseases might be related to different T cell sources. Therefore, further studies are needed to verify the association between SIRT1 and more immune cells and to explore the role of SIRT4, which has not been well characterized based on current studies.
Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury
Studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 on intestinal IRI exerted by adjusting ROS generation and massive epithelial apoptosis in a mouse model, which are critical in the pathogenesis of intestinal IRI injury.,, For instance, SIRT1 suppressed epithelial ROS accumulation and apoptosis to attenuate intestinal IRI after miR-34a-5p systematic knockdown. Resveratrol protected intestinal subacute IRI via the SIRT1-NF-κB pathway in an iNOS-NO-inhibited manner. This might represent a novel prophylactic approach to intestinal IRI. SIRT3 alleviated intestinal IRI-induced mitochondrial oxidative damage and apoptosis through peroxiredoxin 3 deacetylation, a key protective factor in intestinal IRI. Moreover, based on both mouse and rat models, downregulating SIRT6 by miR-351-5p aggravated intestinal IRI by promoting oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. There have been limited research studies exploring the effect of other SIRTs on intestinal IRI.
Other intestinal diseases
In other intestinal diseases, including hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis and necrotizing enterocolitis, SIRT1 was downregulated and involved in inflammation., SIRT1 can be suppressed via miR-132 and miR-212 or downregulated retinoid-related orphan receptor α by exosomal miR-18a-5p and then activate the NF-κB signaling pathway, NLRP3 inflammasome, and caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis, thereby encouraging the inflammatory response in Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis mice., Similarly, SIRT1 activation might decrease the damage caused by necrotizing enterocolitis by decreasing proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress proteins and by increasing the anti‑inflammatory cytokine pathway., SIRT1 alleviated the inflammatory response and intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction by regulating the expression and inactivation of HIF-1α.
In conclusion, current studies on intestinal system diseases have mostly focused on IBD. There are limited studies on other SIRTs, except SIRT1, which is a field worthy of further development. In addition, both protective and deleterious effects of SIRT1 have been explored in intestinal diseases. The proinflammatory effects of SIRT1 and regulation of different immune cells might play an important role in aggravating intestinal diseases. As SIRTs have various biological functions in intestinal diseases, they and their underlying mechanisms are promising novel targets for studying the development of intestinal diseases.
Conclusions
Most studies on the association between SIRTs and digestive system diseases have been completed in animal models, while the numbers of human studies are increasing. The current evidence demonstrates the role for SIRTs in digestive system diseases and identifies exciting opportunities to adjust SIRT activity to treat or prevent these diseases. Many questions remain unanswered, however, and more research needs to be done, especially on SIRT2, SIRT4, SIRT5, and SIRT7. The potentially divergent roles of different SIRTs in these diseases are not well verified, especially the conflicting roles.
Additionally, SIRT1, the most widely studied SIRT, might have opposing roles in different diseases, particularly in the inflammatory response. The proinflammatory effect of SIRT1 on digestive diseases contrasts with anti-inflammatory effects reported by most studies. These findings are essential because unraveling the less common negative effects of SIRT1 might contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of its generally accepted positive function.
Thus, in the future, more studies on a molecular level and in clinical populations are needed to confirm the role of SIRTs in digestive diseases.
SIRTs and nervous system diseases
Nervous system diseases directly affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people worldwide, and one in every nine people dies due to a disorder of the nervous system. Recently, there has been a gradual increase in research on the role of SIRTs in neurological diseases. An understanding of the latest progress and potential molecular mechanisms of SIRTs in neurological diseases will benefit further studies on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of these diseases. Therefore, this review mainly summarizes the current research progress on the role of SIRTs in neurological diseases (Fig. 13).
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
AD is the most common neurodegenerative disorder that is associated with memory deficit and global cognitive decline., It is a brain disorder associated with gradual weakening of neurocognitive functions, neuroinflammation, and impaired signaling pathways. The SIRT proteins associated with AD mainly include SIRT1, although mitochondrial SIRTs represented by SIRT3 have also been the focus of research, as well as SIRT6 and SIRT2 that are located in the nucleus and cytosol, respectively.
Amyloid beta (Aβ) is a normal and soluble product of neuronal metabolism, and Aβ-mediated extracellular senile plaque is regarded as one of the major pathological lesions of AD. Previous evidence has suggested that SIRTs played important roles in the regulation of Aβ. For example, in vitro study has shown that overexpression of SIRT1 could reduce Aβ-induced senescence and mitochondrial dysfunctions, and related mechanism studies have suggested that SIRT1 could regulate Rho-associated kinase 1 or inflammation to attenuate the accumulation of Aβ.– Similarly, SIRT3 also protects neurons against Aβ pathology and excitotoxicity. In contrast, SIRT2 may have adverse effect on Aβ pathology, and in vivo study has revealed that the suppression of SIRT2 deacetylase activity could alleviate Aβ pathology and cognitive deficits in the AD mouse model. As for the molecular mechanism, SIRT2 could influence the β‐secretase 1 by directly deacetylates reticulon 4B protein, thereby affecting the production of Aβ and ultimately promoting the development of AD.
Tau is the major microtubule-associated protein of a mature neuron, and it is a central molecule in the pathogenesis of AD. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of PTMs (e.g., O-GlcNAcylation, phosphorylation, and acetylation) of Tau in AD.– For example, the level of O-GlcNAcylation of tau in AD brain is reduced, and SIRT1 reduces O-GlcNAcylation of tau through CREB. Moreover, SIRT2 affects tau phosphorylation and autophagic flux in AD. There is evidence that tau acetylation occurs in AD brain at early stages of the disorder and that this phenomenon is involved in regulating the early accumulation of tau in AD brain. SIRT3 might play a role in tau acetylation and could be a potential target for developing novel therapies to alleviate tau accumulation. Collectively, these studies suggest that SIRT1-3 might play a role in PTMs of tau and could be potential targets for designing novel therapies to alleviate tau accumulation in AD brain.
In the healthy brain, high levels of H4K16ac and low levels of SIRT2 coexist with Fzd1 and Fzd7 promoters. A recent study reported a novel role of nuclear SIRT2 in regulating Fzd receptors in AD, wherein nuclear SIRT2 was hyperactivated in AD and FoxO1 recruited SIRT2 to Fzd1 and Fzd7 promoters, leading to a reduction in H4K16ac deacetylation. These findings suggest that SIRT2 inhibition is an attractive target for ameliorating the pathological effects of AD.
Several studies have shown that autophagy deficits occur in the early stage of AD, which contribute to the process of AD. SIRT-regulated autophagy impairment plays a key role in the neurodegenerative process of AD. Beclin-1 acetylation impairs the autophagic flux, which contributes to neurodegeneration in AD. Another study showed that SIRT1 enhances the deacetylation of Beclin-1, thus suggesting the beneficial role of SIRT1 in promoting autophagy in AD neurodegeneration. The loss of function of SIRT2 either through AK1 (a specific SIRT2 inhibitor) or through SIRT2 KO recovers microtubule stabilization and improves autophagy.
AD is manifested through regional cerebral hypometabolism. SIRT3 has emerged as a key regulator of mammalian transcription in response to cellular metabolic state and stress. Recent studies have shown that SIRT3 dysfunction leads to mitochondrial and neuronal damage in AD, suggesting that SIRT3 has a protective role in hippocampal neurons. Intermittent food deprivation also reduces neuronal network hyperexcitability and ameliorates deficits in hippocampal synaptic plasticity in a SIRT3-dependent manner in animal models of AD. Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide, a neurotrophin, stimulates mitochondrial SIRT3 production. Knockdown of SIRT3 compromises the neuroprotective effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide in AD, and this effect was reversed by overexpression of SIRT3. SIRT3 expression mirrors the spatiotemporal deposition of Aβ in an AD mouse model and is also upregulated in the temporal neocortex of patients with AD.
In clinical research, an inverse relationship was observed between serum levels of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 and AD. Measurement of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 levels in saliva could be used as an additional method for intravital noninvasive diagnosis of AD in advanced age patients. The SIRT protein family constitutes a unique molecular link between aging and human neurodegenerative diseases and offers a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention. However, the mechanisms of action of SIRTs in chronic neurodegenerative diseases in vivo remain unclear. Hence, further studies on the role and mechanism of the SIRT family in AD are required, which could provide promising avenues for therapeutic intervention.
Parkinson’s disease (PD)
PD is the most common movement disorder associated with older adults, and currently, there is no effective treatment or prevention methods other than symptomatic treatment. A previous study investigated the possible association of nine SIRT1 and SIRT2 SNPs with the risk of PD through a clinical case-control investigation in Chinese Han population. Further functional assays suggested that rs2015 might influence the expression of SIRT2 by affecting the binding of miR-8061 to the 3ʹ-UTR of SIRT2, eventually contributing to the risk of PD. Therefore, the SIRT family is involved in the pathology of PD. However, considering that an epidemiological investigation showed that variations in the SIRT genes do not affect the risk for PD, the association between SIRT gene polymorphisms and PD risk remains elusive and needs further studies to clarify.
The accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein in dopaminergic neurons is the leading cause of PD. Activated SIRT1 ameliorated LC3 deacetylation-mediated autophagic degradation of α-synuclein and improved motor defects and pathological changes in PD mice. Moreover, pharmacologically increased levels of SIRT3 could counteract αsyn-induced mitochondrial dysfunction by reducing αsyn oligomers and normalizing mitochondrial bioenergetics, thus supporting a protective role of SIRT3 in PD-associated pathways. Mitochondrial dysfunction is the main cause of dopaminergic (DAergic) neuronal loss in PD, and SIRT3 plays a key role in regulating mitochondrial function. The age-dependent elevation of mitochondrial oxidative stress is widely recognized as a major factor in the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta in PD, and this process is associated with a decrease in SIRT3 protective function.
SIRT2 also appears to play a different role in PD from other SIRT family members. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that SIRT2 mediates exacerbation of alpha-synuclein toxicity in models of PD. NAD + metabolism is altered in sporadic PD patient-derived cells, which contributes to SIRT2 activation and subsequent decrease in the levels of acetylated α-tubulin. These results suggest that SIRT2 deletion was protective in PD models.
Collectively, these data support a protective role of SIRT1 and SIRT3 in PD-associated pathways, while SIRT2 might show different functions from the former two. Thus, further studies are required to investigate the role of SIRT2 in PD.
Huntington’s disease (HD)
HD is an incurable neurodegenerative disorder characterized by movement disorder, psychiatric symptoms, and cognitive decline. Brain-specific KO of SIRT1 results in exacerbation of brain pathology in a mouse model of HD, whereas overexpression of SIRT1 improves survival, neuropathology, and expression of BDNF in HD mice. Mechanistically, mutant huntingtin protein interferes with the CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1-CREB interaction to repress BDNF transcription, and SIRT1 rescues this defect in vitro and in vivo; this finding suggests a key role of SIRT1 in transcriptional networks in HD brain and offers an opportunity for therapeutic development.
HD has a complex pathogenesis mechanism, including protein aggregation and metabolic dysfunction. SIRT1 expression is increased in HD-affected brain regions, and metabolic pathways are altered in the hypothalamus of individuals with HD. An important finding is that the manipulation of sterol biosynthesis at the transcriptional level mimics SIRT2 inhibition, which demonstrates that the metabolic effects of SIRT2 inhibition are sufficient to diminish mutant huntingtin toxicity. This study demonstrated that inhibition of SIRT2 achieves neuroprotection in cellular and invertebrate models of HD. Therefore, both SIRT1 and SIRT2 play an important role in HD, and hence, the effect of SIRTs on HD needs to be further investigated.
Brain injury such as IRI and stroke
Brain injury, such as IRI and stroke, is a neurological disorder with high morbidity, high probability of mortality, and poor neurological outcome. The SIRT family is a highly potent therapeutic target to decrease IRI. SIRT1 plays an important role in neuroprotection against brain injury through oxidative, inflammatory, autophagy and apoptotic pathways.,, The regulation of autophagy proteins LC3-II and Beclin-1 by NAMPT was abolished in cultured SIRT1-KO neurons, thus suggesting that NAMPT promotes neuronal survival by inducing autophagy in a SIRT1-dependent manner during cerebral ischemia. SIRT1 deacetylates the RNA-binding protein quaking 6 and activates the transcription factor PGC-1α through post-transcriptional regulation of PPAR-γ expression, which significantly affects the synthesis of triglycerides in neurons of the cerebral IRI rat model, thereby inhibiting neuronal apoptosis.
Several studies have also shown the protective effects of mitochondrial SIRT3 and SIRT5 in IRI. Mitochondrial SIRT3 acts as a prosurvival factor to protect neurons from excitotoxic injury and exerts a protective role in ischemic stroke by regulating the HIF-1α/ vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway in astrocytes., Additionally, SIRT3 was found to be downregulated in response to cerebral IRI; therefore, strategies to enhance SIRT3 activity and activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway could be therapeutic targets for treating cerebral IRI. SIRT5 has also been shown to mediate IR-induced brain damage by increasing the permeability of blood-brain barrier through degradation of the tight junction protein occluding.
Notably, SIRT2 appears to have detrimental roles in an array of neurological disorders such as PD and HD. The current study demonstrated the neuroprotective effects of SIRT2 inhibition in ischemic stroke and identified the downregulation of the Akt/FoxO3a and MAPK pathways as intermediary mechanisms that might contribute to the reduction in apoptotic cell death by SIRT2 inhibition. In clinical practice, SIRT2 might serve as a marker of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) risk and prognosis. Serum SIRT2 expression was increased in patients with AIS as compared to that in non-AIS patients with high stroke risk factors. This finding supports the role of SIRT2 in facilitating disease monitoring and prognosis in patients with AIS.
In conclusion, previous studies report the protective roles of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT5 in IRI, while there is also evidence that SIRT2 appears to play a different role in IRI. More studies are required to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms and functional implications of the SIRT family in brain injury.
Other diseases
Multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune-mediated neurodegenerative disease with characteristic foci of inflammatory demyelination in the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves. ALS is also a neurodegenerative disease characterized by degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons, which results in muscle weakness and eventual paralysis, and it is also known as motor neuron disease., To date, ALS remains as an incurable and devastating disease. Drug development efforts are mostly based on SOD1 gene -G93A mice that present a very strong and early phenotype, allowing only a short time window for intervention. An increased expression of SIRT1 was observed in the cerebral cortex, hippocampal formation, thalamus, and spinal cord of symptomatic SOD1 (G93A) transgenic mice, but the mechanisms and functional implications of increased SIRT1 expression require elucidation. In human postmortem tissue, increased mRNA and protein levels of SIRT3 were found in the spinal cord in patients with ALS. Moreover, enhanced SIRT6 activity abrogates the neurotoxic phenotype of astrocytes expressing ALS-linked mutant SOD1, thus indicating that SIRT6 could serve as a potential therapeutic target to prevent astrocyte-mediated motor neuron death in ALS. These studies illustrated the potential beneficial role of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 in ALS. Epilepsy Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by brain hyperexcitability and manifests as seizure. SIRT1 might represent a useful therapeutic target to rescue the expression of circadian rhythm genes and sleep patterns in patients with epilepsy. SIRT5 deficiency strikingly increased the mortality rate and severity of response to epileptic seizures, thus indicating that SIRT5 has a neuroprotective role in epileptic seizures and neurodegeneration. Mechanistically, SIRT1 protein expression could be inhibited by miR-128, and treatment with the SIRT1 agonist CAY10602 exerts neuroprotective effects on epilepsy. Similarly, SIRT3 could also protect neurons from kainic acid-induced excitotoxicity by mediating mitochondrial function with enhanced expression by inhibiting miR-134-5p. Overall, SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT5 appear to have a neuroprotective role in epilepsy. More molecular and clinical studies are required in the future to verify the effects of SIRTs on epilepsy. Cognitive deficits Cognitive deficits are common in patients with conditions such as PD, epilepsy, and psychotic depression.– SIRT1 is a recognized longevity gene and has been shown to be associated with aging and its related diseases. SIRT1 is an important protective gene against hippocampal atrophy and its induced cognitive impairment during aging. Surgery-induced downregulation of hippocampal SIRT1 participates in cognitive impairment after surgery by inhibiting the autophagy process and activating apoptosis. Additionally, exposure to fluoride could lead to cognitive impairment, and the underlying mechanisms might be related to oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Chronic long-term exposure to fluoride causes neural/synaptic damage and cognitive impairment through mitochondrial dysfunction and its associated oxidative stress, which is mediated at least in part by SIRT3 inhibition in mouse brain. The natural bisphenol compound honokiol upregulated the expression of SIRT3 protein in vivo and in vitro, and its protective effect against oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction could be abrogated by SIRT3 shRNA. To date, few studies have been conducted on the relationship between SIRTs and cognitive deficits, and more research is required to explore this association. Spinal cord injury (SCI) SCI is a devastating condition with few effective treatments. Because posttraumatic inflammation contributes to the progression of neuronal degeneration, attenuating inflammation is important for reducing neural degeneration. The anti-inflammatory effect of SIRT1 has been reported to be involved in SCI. SIRT1 might have a neuroprotective effect by suppressing microglial activation and increasing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines following SCI. After the trauma, spinal cord neurons were apparently damaged. Regulation of autophagy by the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway could restrain the damage of spinal cord neurons, which might be a potential intervention for SCI. SIRT6 might also play a vital role in the pathogenesis of SCI. Mechanistically, the upregulation of SIRT6 alleviated inflammation and oxidative stress and inhibited cell apoptosis in SCI. In terms of mechanism, multiple miRNAs such as miR-138-5p, miR-324-5p, and miR-30c have been reported to be involved in SCI by targeting SIRT1., These studies provide a promising biomarker of prognosis and therapy for spinal cord diseases. Neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain Diverse causes of neuropathic pain are associated with excessive inflammation in both the peripheral and central nervous system, which might contribute to the initiation and maintenance of persistent pain. SIRTs might serve as a potential therapeutic target for treating neuropathic pain. SIRT1 and SIRT2 deacetylases are reported to exert neuroprotective effects on neuroinflammation. SIRT1 activation attenuated Mn-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in adult mice. Overexpression of SIRT2 alleviates neuropathic pain and neuroinflammation. The SIRT2 inhibitor AK-7 exacerbates traumatic brain injury through a potential mechanism involving increased acetylation and nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65, resulting in the upregulation of NF-κB target genes and proinflammatory cytokines. Another study suggested a key protective role of microglial SIRT2 in amnesic deficits associated with neuroinflammation. SIRT2-deficient mice (SIRT2(−/−)) showed morphological changes in microglia and an increase in proinflammatory cytokines upon intracortical injection of LPS. SIRT3 also regulates mitochondrial oxidative stress response and neuroinflammation. SIRT3-induced Mst1-JNK-SRV2 signaling pathway protected against neuroinflammation-mediated cell damage in BV-2 microglia. LPS induces oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in BV2 cells, which might be mediated in part by the downregulation of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 and SIRT3. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 overexpression ameliorates LPS-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation by enhancing SIRT3 function through NAD +. Here, SIRT1-3 show anti-neuroinflammatory effects. More research is required to elucidate whether these SIRTs affect neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain through the same or different mechanisms.
Multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune-mediated neurodegenerative disease with characteristic foci of inflammatory demyelination in the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves. ALS is also a neurodegenerative disease characterized by degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons, which results in muscle weakness and eventual paralysis, and it is also known as motor neuron disease., To date, ALS remains as an incurable and devastating disease. Drug development efforts are mostly based on SOD1 gene -G93A mice that present a very strong and early phenotype, allowing only a short time window for intervention. An increased expression of SIRT1 was observed in the cerebral cortex, hippocampal formation, thalamus, and spinal cord of symptomatic SOD1 (G93A) transgenic mice, but the mechanisms and functional implications of increased SIRT1 expression require elucidation. In human postmortem tissue, increased mRNA and protein levels of SIRT3 were found in the spinal cord in patients with ALS. Moreover, enhanced SIRT6 activity abrogates the neurotoxic phenotype of astrocytes expressing ALS-linked mutant SOD1, thus indicating that SIRT6 could serve as a potential therapeutic target to prevent astrocyte-mediated motor neuron death in ALS. These studies illustrated the potential beneficial role of SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 in ALS.
Epilepsy
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by brain hyperexcitability and manifests as seizure. SIRT1 might represent a useful therapeutic target to rescue the expression of circadian rhythm genes and sleep patterns in patients with epilepsy. SIRT5 deficiency strikingly increased the mortality rate and severity of response to epileptic seizures, thus indicating that SIRT5 has a neuroprotective role in epileptic seizures and neurodegeneration. Mechanistically, SIRT1 protein expression could be inhibited by miR-128, and treatment with the SIRT1 agonist CAY10602 exerts neuroprotective effects on epilepsy. Similarly, SIRT3 could also protect neurons from kainic acid-induced excitotoxicity by mediating mitochondrial function with enhanced expression by inhibiting miR-134-5p. Overall, SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT5 appear to have a neuroprotective role in epilepsy. More molecular and clinical studies are required in the future to verify the effects of SIRTs on epilepsy.
Cognitive deficits
Cognitive deficits are common in patients with conditions such as PD, epilepsy, and psychotic depression.– SIRT1 is a recognized longevity gene and has been shown to be associated with aging and its related diseases. SIRT1 is an important protective gene against hippocampal atrophy and its induced cognitive impairment during aging. Surgery-induced downregulation of hippocampal SIRT1 participates in cognitive impairment after surgery by inhibiting the autophagy process and activating apoptosis. Additionally, exposure to fluoride could lead to cognitive impairment, and the underlying mechanisms might be related to oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Chronic long-term exposure to fluoride causes neural/synaptic damage and cognitive impairment through mitochondrial dysfunction and its associated oxidative stress, which is mediated at least in part by SIRT3 inhibition in mouse brain. The natural bisphenol compound honokiol upregulated the expression of SIRT3 protein in vivo and in vitro, and its protective effect against oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction could be abrogated by SIRT3 shRNA. To date, few studies have been conducted on the relationship between SIRTs and cognitive deficits, and more research is required to explore this association.
Spinal cord injury (SCI)
SCI is a devastating condition with few effective treatments. Because posttraumatic inflammation contributes to the progression of neuronal degeneration, attenuating inflammation is important for reducing neural degeneration. The anti-inflammatory effect of SIRT1 has been reported to be involved in SCI. SIRT1 might have a neuroprotective effect by suppressing microglial activation and increasing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines following SCI. After the trauma, spinal cord neurons were apparently damaged. Regulation of autophagy by the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway could restrain the damage of spinal cord neurons, which might be a potential intervention for SCI. SIRT6 might also play a vital role in the pathogenesis of SCI. Mechanistically, the upregulation of SIRT6 alleviated inflammation and oxidative stress and inhibited cell apoptosis in SCI. In terms of mechanism, multiple miRNAs such as miR-138-5p, miR-324-5p, and miR-30c have been reported to be involved in SCI by targeting SIRT1., These studies provide a promising biomarker of prognosis and therapy for spinal cord diseases.
Neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain
Diverse causes of neuropathic pain are associated with excessive inflammation in both the peripheral and central nervous system, which might contribute to the initiation and maintenance of persistent pain. SIRTs might serve as a potential therapeutic target for treating neuropathic pain. SIRT1 and SIRT2 deacetylases are reported to exert neuroprotective effects on neuroinflammation. SIRT1 activation attenuated Mn-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in adult mice. Overexpression of SIRT2 alleviates neuropathic pain and neuroinflammation. The SIRT2 inhibitor AK-7 exacerbates traumatic brain injury through a potential mechanism involving increased acetylation and nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65, resulting in the upregulation of NF-κB target genes and proinflammatory cytokines. Another study suggested a key protective role of microglial SIRT2 in amnesic deficits associated with neuroinflammation. SIRT2-deficient mice (SIRT2(−/−)) showed morphological changes in microglia and an increase in proinflammatory cytokines upon intracortical injection of LPS. SIRT3 also regulates mitochondrial oxidative stress response and neuroinflammation. SIRT3-induced Mst1-JNK-SRV2 signaling pathway protected against neuroinflammation-mediated cell damage in BV-2 microglia. LPS induces oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in BV2 cells, which might be mediated in part by the downregulation of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 and SIRT3. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 overexpression ameliorates LPS-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation by enhancing SIRT3 function through NAD +. Here, SIRT1-3 show anti-neuroinflammatory effects. More research is required to elucidate whether these SIRTs affect neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain through the same or different mechanisms.
Conclusion
An increasing number of studies predict that the effects of various SIRTs on neurological diseases might be different or even contrasting. However, it is worth noting that positive intervention of SIRT activity, such as through upregulation of SIRTs-activating molecules, might have profound therapeutic benefits on various nervous system diseases. The long-term effects of decreased SIRT levels per se or in chronic neurodegenerative conditions is an important question for future studies. Therefore, in the research process, we should discover new mechanisms of action to elucidate the different results. Additionally, research should be based not only on cellular and animal models but also on the relationship between inflammatory SIRTs and diseases from human epidemiology.
SIRTs and endocrine system diseases
Endocrine system regulation is important for the maintenance of homeostasis, and it controls hormonal functions under physiological conditions and behaviors as well as adaptations to social environments. Endocrine system disorders lead to various diseases such as diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and metabolic syndrome, which causes heavy disease burden worldwide. The activation of SIRT proteins enhances metabolic efficiency and upregulates mitochondrial oxidative metabolism, which are important for metabolic balance of human body. A growing number of studies have shown that SIRTs exert vital effects on maintaining metabolic health and controlling the occurrence and development of endocrine system diseases such as DM (Fig. 14),, diabetic complication (Fig. 14),– obesity, and metabolic syndrome.
DM
Globally, more than 425 million people are living with DM, and its prevalence is expected to increase at least 50% by 2045. Worldwide, DM is the leading cause of blindness, nontraumatic lower extremity amputations, peripheral neuropathy, and end-stage kidney diseas.– Numerous reports have suggested that SIRTs, especially SIRT1-3, SIRT5, and SIRT6, are associated with biological processes that participate in the development and progression of diabetes, such as glucose metabolism, mitochondrial function, and resistance against cellular stress.,, The expression of SIRTs in patients with DM has been reported inconsistently. The expression of SIRT1-3 is reduced in patients with DM,– while the expression of SIRT5 and SIRT6 is elevated., Thus, the altered expression of SIRT proteins might affect the progression of DM.
SIRT proteins play important roles in the occurrence and development of DM by regulating glucose metabolism and maintaining insulin homeostasis. SIRT1 and SIRT2 have been found to have dual function in the development of DM, which might be due to the biological process occurring in the cells from different types of tissues or organs. For instance, SIRT1 overexpression could improve insulin sensitivity and reduce insulin resistance,, while the downregulation of SIRT1 inhibits insulin-stimulated glucose transport in adipocytes in particular by inhibiting insulin signaling. Conversely, hepatic SIRT1 knockdown prevented fasting hyperglycemia by decreasing hepatic glucose production and increasing hepatic insulin responsiveness. SIRT2 could also promote glucose-dependent hepatic glucose uptake by deacetylating K126 of glucokinase regulatory protein. In contrast, the downregulation of SIRT2 ameliorated the reduced activity of Akt and increased insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in insulin-resistant neuro-2a cells. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms of these bilateral roles remain unclear and need further investigation.
SIRT3, SIRT4, and SIRT6 have been proven to exert a protective effect on DM. For example, SIRT3 KO severely impaired insulin-stimulated muscle glucose uptake, which further aggravated insulin resistance. Likewise, SIRT4 overexpression led to dyslipidemia, lipogenesis, and decreased fatty acid oxidation; this might be because SIRT4 can deactivate AMPK as well as directly inhibit insulin secretion at the cellular level. Moreover, SIRT6 induced PGC-1α acetylation and suppressed hepatic glucose production, and SIRT6 cooperated with p53 to deacetylate FoxO1 and transport FoxO1 from the nucleus to the cytosol, and suppressed the expression of gluconeogenic genes, all of which could alleviate diabetic hyperglycemia. Conversely, SIRT5 can promote the progression of DM. Experiments in two pancreatic β-cell lines (MIN6 and INS-1) suggest that SIRT5 inhibition facilitated pancreatic β-cell proliferation and insulin secretion. Moreover, SIRT5 negatively regulates the transcription of PDX1 through its deacetylase activity, and subsequently, the downregulation of PDX1 expression aggravates DM., These studies suggest that high expression of SIRT3, SIRT4, and SIRT6 and low expression of SIRT5 might exert protective effects on the development of DM.
In conclusion, there is limited research on the relationship between SIRT proteins and DM; most studies have shown that SIRT1-4 and SIRT6 exert protective effects on the development of DM, while SIRT5 promotes the progression of DM. However, other studies have found the downregulation of SIRT1 and SIRT2 contributes to improve DM. The difference in the effect of SIRT1 and SIRT2 on DM might be attributed to cells from different types of tissues or organs and required to be further clarified. Additionally, future studies could pay more attention to the role of SIRT proteins, especially SIRT7, in the development and progression of DM.
DM-related organ damage
The global epidemic of DM has led to a corresponding epidemic of complications of these disorders. Devastating macrovascular complications CVD and microvascular complications [such as diabetic kidney disease (DKD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic neuropathy (DN)] lead to increased mortality, blindness, kidney failure, and an overall decreased quality of life in individuals with DM. SIRTs have been shown to have protective effects on the target organ damage caused by DM, such as diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), DKD,, DR, and DN.DKDDKD is recognized as a severe complication of DM and a dominant pathogeny of end-stage kidney disease, which causes severe health problems and large financial burden worldwide. During the past two decades, the morbidity and mortality of DKD have been rising rapidly worldwide, and the age-standardized prevalence of DKD in men and women was 15.48/1000 and 16.50/1000, respectively, in 2017. SIRT1 shows a protective role in the development of DKD. In detail, high expression of SIRT1 effectively protects the kidney and slows down the progression of DKD., On the one hand, increased SIRT1 activity protects against DM-induced podocyte injury and effectively mitigates the progression of DKD. On the other hand, stimulation of SIRT1 expression and signaling in DM protects the kidney against oxidative stress and nephropathy. Mechanistically, SIRT1 exhibited its renal protective effects through deacetylation of the transcription factor p53 and activation of the transcription factors FoxO3a and Nrf2., For example, SIRT1 attenuated nephropathy progression in diabetic mice by downregulating acetylated p53 expression and upregulating FoxO3a expression. Moreover, increasing SIRT1 activation by resveratrol in both in vivo and in vitro studies promoted resistance to diabetic renal fibrosis by activating Nrf2, a leucine transcription factor. SIRT1 can effectively reduce the damage caused by DKD and slow down the progression of DKD., Therefore, SIRT1 might become a potential target for the clinical treatment of DKD.DNDN is the most prevalent diabetic complication, and at least 50% of individuals with diabetes develop DN over time. It substantially affects patients by increasing falls, thereby causing pain and reducing the quality of life. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that SIRT1 modulates neuronal viability, neuronal differentiation, and synaptic plasticity, all of which are key factors largely linked to cognitive improvement. SIRT1 has also been proved to alleviate symptoms related to DN, including cognitive decline, neuropathic pain, and peripheral neuropathy. For instance, SIRT1 expression was decreased in the hippocampus of diabetic rats, which reduced dendritic length and spine densities and decreased TORC1, p-CREB, and BDNF protein levels, resulting in diabetes-related cognitive decline. Moreover, the upregulation of spinal SIRT1 relieved pain behavior, inhibited enhanced structural synaptic plasticity in diabetic rats and mice with diabetic neuropathic pain, and decreased the levels of synapse-associated proteins in diabetic neuropathic pain rats, diabetic mice, and high glucose-cultured spinal neurons. SIRT1 also regulated mitochondrial function in the peripheral nerve through PGC-1α, and the failure of the SIRT1-PGC-1α-mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) signaling axis might result in the suppression of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and development of peripheral neuropathy. Collectively, an understanding of the regulatory roles of SIRT1 proteins might help to develop them as promising therapeutic targets in DN treatment. However, recent studies mainly focus on SIRT1, and the molecular mechanisms of other SIRT proteins in regulating DN are still unclear and need further investigation.DR and DCMDR is a common and specific microvascular complication of DM and remains the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-aged people. It is identified in one third of patients with DM and is associated with increased risk of life-threatening systemic vascular complications, including stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. Current studies have shown that SIRT1 can alleviate DR; however, related studies are still limited. Previous studies have revealed that overexpression of SIRT1 prevents the increase in capillary cell apoptosis and formation of degenerative capillaries, reduces DM-induced inflammation in the retina, and improves DM-induced visual function impairment.DCM is also a distinct form of heart disease that represents a major cause of death and disability in patients with diabetes, particularly in the more prevalent type 2 diabetes patient population. The activation of SIRT1 and SIRT3 contributes to inhibit the development of DCM. For example, SIRT1 activation inhibits ROS generation-induced oxidative stress and fibrosis, thereby attenuating DCM. The activation of SIRT3 also regulates fibrosis, inflammation, apoptosis, and oxidative stress in diabetic myocardial tissue and attenuates DCM through the reduction in p53 acetylation and TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator expression together with upregulation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase isoform 3, which are the key regulators of phosphofructokinase and glycolysis. In contrast, SIRT3 deficiency aggravated hyperglycemic mitochondrial damage, increased ROS accumulation, promoted necroptosis, possibly activated the NLRP3 inflammasome, and finally exacerbated DCM in mice.Therefore, SIRT1 and SIRT3 show positive effects in a variety of diabetic complications, including DKD, DN, DR, and DCM, which indicated that these two SIRTs could serve as promising therapeutic targets in the clinical treatment of DM-related target organ damage. However, the molecular mechanisms of other SIRTs in regulating diabetic complications are not fully understood and require further studies.
DKD
DKD is recognized as a severe complication of DM and a dominant pathogeny of end-stage kidney disease, which causes severe health problems and large financial burden worldwide. During the past two decades, the morbidity and mortality of DKD have been rising rapidly worldwide, and the age-standardized prevalence of DKD in men and women was 15.48/1000 and 16.50/1000, respectively, in 2017. SIRT1 shows a protective role in the development of DKD. In detail, high expression of SIRT1 effectively protects the kidney and slows down the progression of DKD., On the one hand, increased SIRT1 activity protects against DM-induced podocyte injury and effectively mitigates the progression of DKD. On the other hand, stimulation of SIRT1 expression and signaling in DM protects the kidney against oxidative stress and nephropathy. Mechanistically, SIRT1 exhibited its renal protective effects through deacetylation of the transcription factor p53 and activation of the transcription factors FoxO3a and Nrf2., For example, SIRT1 attenuated nephropathy progression in diabetic mice by downregulating acetylated p53 expression and upregulating FoxO3a expression. Moreover, increasing SIRT1 activation by resveratrol in both in vivo and in vitro studies promoted resistance to diabetic renal fibrosis by activating Nrf2, a leucine transcription factor. SIRT1 can effectively reduce the damage caused by DKD and slow down the progression of DKD., Therefore, SIRT1 might become a potential target for the clinical treatment of DKD.
DN
DN is the most prevalent diabetic complication, and at least 50% of individuals with diabetes develop DN over time. It substantially affects patients by increasing falls, thereby causing pain and reducing the quality of life. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that SIRT1 modulates neuronal viability, neuronal differentiation, and synaptic plasticity, all of which are key factors largely linked to cognitive improvement. SIRT1 has also been proved to alleviate symptoms related to DN, including cognitive decline, neuropathic pain, and peripheral neuropathy. For instance, SIRT1 expression was decreased in the hippocampus of diabetic rats, which reduced dendritic length and spine densities and decreased TORC1, p-CREB, and BDNF protein levels, resulting in diabetes-related cognitive decline. Moreover, the upregulation of spinal SIRT1 relieved pain behavior, inhibited enhanced structural synaptic plasticity in diabetic rats and mice with diabetic neuropathic pain, and decreased the levels of synapse-associated proteins in diabetic neuropathic pain rats, diabetic mice, and high glucose-cultured spinal neurons. SIRT1 also regulated mitochondrial function in the peripheral nerve through PGC-1α, and the failure of the SIRT1-PGC-1α-mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) signaling axis might result in the suppression of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and development of peripheral neuropathy. Collectively, an understanding of the regulatory roles of SIRT1 proteins might help to develop them as promising therapeutic targets in DN treatment. However, recent studies mainly focus on SIRT1, and the molecular mechanisms of other SIRT proteins in regulating DN are still unclear and need further investigation.
DR and DCM
DR is a common and specific microvascular complication of DM and remains the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-aged people. It is identified in one third of patients with DM and is associated with increased risk of life-threatening systemic vascular complications, including stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. Current studies have shown that SIRT1 can alleviate DR; however, related studies are still limited. Previous studies have revealed that overexpression of SIRT1 prevents the increase in capillary cell apoptosis and formation of degenerative capillaries, reduces DM-induced inflammation in the retina, and improves DM-induced visual function impairment.
DCM is also a distinct form of heart disease that represents a major cause of death and disability in patients with diabetes, particularly in the more prevalent type 2 diabetes patient population. The activation of SIRT1 and SIRT3 contributes to inhibit the development of DCM. For example, SIRT1 activation inhibits ROS generation-induced oxidative stress and fibrosis, thereby attenuating DCM. The activation of SIRT3 also regulates fibrosis, inflammation, apoptosis, and oxidative stress in diabetic myocardial tissue and attenuates DCM through the reduction in p53 acetylation and TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator expression together with upregulation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase isoform 3, which are the key regulators of phosphofructokinase and glycolysis. In contrast, SIRT3 deficiency aggravated hyperglycemic mitochondrial damage, increased ROS accumulation, promoted necroptosis, possibly activated the NLRP3 inflammasome, and finally exacerbated DCM in mice.
Therefore, SIRT1 and SIRT3 show positive effects in a variety of diabetic complications, including DKD, DN, DR, and DCM, which indicated that these two SIRTs could serve as promising therapeutic targets in the clinical treatment of DM-related target organ damage. However, the molecular mechanisms of other SIRTs in regulating diabetic complications are not fully understood and require further studies.
Obesity
The Global Burden of Disease Obesity Collaborators have estimated that more than 603.7 million adult individuals are obese. Elevated body mass index values were responsible for 4 million deaths in 2015. Severe obesity is associated with a state of chronic inflammation, which results in an increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes, CVD, hepatic steatosis, airway disease, neurodegeneration, biliary disease, and certain cancers. These obesity-associated disorders are subsequently linked to reduced life expectancy and premature death. SIRTs act as deacetylases that could affect a variety of metabolic and inflammatory pathways, potentially improving health and extending lifespan. Therefore, SIRT proteins might play an important role in controlling obesity and reducing other diseases caused by obesity.
Accumulated evidence suggests that SIRT1 and SIRT3 could suppress obesity by inhibiting adipogenesis and stimulating energy expenditure.– The 3ʹ-UTR of SIRT1 mRNA binds directly to miR-146b and promotes adipogenesis through SIRT1 downregulation, while inhibition of hypothalamic SIRT1 enhanced the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, which stimulated energy expenditure. Moreover, high expression of SIRT1 and PGC-1α activated by AMPK subsequently increased citrate synthase activity and improved muscle mitochondrial respiration on a fatty acid-derived substrate. The increased expression of SIRT1 similarly reduced acetylation of PGC-1α and FoxO1, which was associated with attenuation of high fat diet-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, insulin resistance, and obesity. Additionally, overexpression of SIRT3 activated macroautophagy by activating the AMPK-ULK1 pathway, leading to smaller lipid droplet size and reduced lipid accumulation. Similarly, SIRT3 overexpression induced the formation of perilipin-1-heat shock cognate 71-kDa protein-lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 complex to activate chaperone-mediated autophagy and cause instability of lipid droplets in adipocytes.
In contrast, SIRT2 and SIRT6 promote the occurrence and development of obesity. The SIRT2- PGC-1α regulatory axis is negatively regulated by HIF-1α, which negates the intrinsic pathways of fatty acid catabolism in adipocytes and creates a metabolic state that supports the development of obesity. SIRT6 overexpression was found to exacerbate diet-induced obesity by decreasing STAT3 acetylation and lowering pro-opiomelanocortin expression in the hypothalamus.
Overall, these findings suggest that high expression of SIRT1 and SIRT3 and low expression of SIRT2 and SIRT6 produced a metabolic state that inhibited the development of obesity, thereby reducing the occurrence of obesity. Therefore, the strategy of developing SIRT activators/inhibitors has important clinical significance to prevent obesity and control the occurrence and development of obesity and related diseases.
Other metabolic disorders
SIRT proteins are correlated with the occurrence and development of other metabolic diseases. The expression of SIRT1 and SIRT6 is downregulated in lipid metabolism-related diseases,, and the expression of SIRT1 is downregulated in metabolic syndrome, which exerts an adverse effect on metabolic health.
SIRT1 and SIRT6 exert a crucial effect on lipid metabolism and are involved in the improvement of hepatic steatosis and hypercholesterolemia by inhibiting inflammation and promoting histone deacetylation., For instance, modest overexpression of SIRT1 shows lower lipid-induced inflammation and almost entirely protects from hepatic steatosis by induction of antioxidant proteins MnSOD and Nrf1, possibly through stimulation of PGC-1α and lower activation of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 through downregulation of NF-κB activity. SIRT6 overexpression improves hypercholesterolemia in diet-induced or genetically obese mice, and the underlying biological mechanism might be due to the recruitment of SIRT6 by FoxO3 to the SREBP2 gene promoter where SIRT6 deacetylates histone H3 at lysine 9 and 56, thereby promoting a repressive chromatin state.
Moreover, SIRT1 could confront metabolic syndrome by inhibiting inflammation. Mechanistically, post-transcriptional stabilization of SIRT1 by HuR repressed inflammation and hyperglycemia and induced E-selectin release and endothelial cell activation to counter metabolic syndrome. These findings show the protective roles of SIRT1 and SIRT6 in the development of various metabolic disorders. Although limited studies have been conducted on this topic, the modulation of SIRT proteins is thought to play a crucial role in the development and progression of metabolic disorders and is expected to be a therapeutic strategy of metabolic disorders.
Conclusion
In this section, we have reviewed the role of different SIRT proteins in diverse endocrine system diseases, and current studies are mainly focused on SIRT1-3 and SIRT6. Generally, SIRTs play protective roles in the occurrence and progression of a variety of endocrine system diseases. Of note, SIRT1 and SIRT2 exert a dual effect on the progression of DM, while SIRT6 overexpression exacerbates diet-induced obesity. Therefore, clarifying the specific mechanism of SIRT1 and SIRT2 in DM or revealing the mechanisms underlying their different effects might be of great significance for the clinical treatment of DM. Overall, SIRT proteins are promising therapeutic targets, and the pharmacological modulation of SIRTs could be used to prevent and treat endocrine system diseases.
SIRTs and urogenital system diseases
Urogenital system diseases include both urinary system diseases and genital system diseases which can contribute to the loss of some physiological functions, including reabsorption of nutrients, regulation of the balance of electrolytes and fluid, maintenance of acid–base homeostasis, and sexual reproduction., Thus, urogenital system diseases impose a serious economic and health burden on human development. Increasing evidence suggests that SIRT protein family activity and expression are associated with the occurrence and progression of various urogenital system diseases.– Kidney disease is the most common urinary system disease, and can be divided into acute kidney disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to the disease state. Therefore, in this section, we focus on the associations between the SIRT protein family and AKI, CKD, and genital system diseases (Fig. 15).
Acute kidney injury (AKI)
AKI is defined by a sudden loss of excretory function, in which slow deterioration of kidney function or persistent kidney dysfunction is associated with an irreversible loss of kidney cells and nephrons, which could lead to CKD., AKI mostly occurs as a complication of a single disease with a pooled incidence and mortality rate of 21%, respectively, and the incidence of AKI in intensive care units has increased in world regions over the past decades due to aging populations.– Therefore, it is important to determine the molecular biological mechanisms of AKI.
Growing evidence has suggested that mitochondrial dysfunction is a major contributor to AKI.,,– SIRT3-5 proteins, which are expressed in mitochondria, seem to play an important protective role in AKI. Among these, the protective role of SIRT3 has been reported to be related to improving mitochondrial function and ultimately improving apoptosis and eliminating ROS.,,– For example, a sepsis-induced AKI model was constructed in wild-type and SIRT3 systematic KO mice. The results suggest that SIRT3 deficiency exacerbated histopathological and mitochondrial damage to the proximal tubules of the kidney. In addition, systematic KO of SIRT3 resulted in a significant increase in the apoptosis of kidney tubular epithelial cells, increased mRNA levels of Bax and Caspase-3, and decreased mRNA levels of Bcl-2. A previous study also demonstrated similar results, as SIRT3 deletion aggravated fatty acid oxidation dysfunction, resulting in increased apoptosis of kidney tissues and aggravated renal injury. Also, the activation of SIRT3 by honokiol increased ATP production, and reduced ROS and lipid peroxidation by improving mitochondrial function. Moreover, the overexpression of SIRT3 improved kidney function, modulated oxidative injury, repressed inflammatory damage, and reduced tubular epithelial cell apoptosis. SIRT3 overexpression attenuated ischemia-reperfusion-induced mitochondrial damage in renal tubular epithelial cells, as evidenced by decreased ROS production, increased antioxidant-sustained mitochondrial membrane potential, and inactivated mitochondria-initiated death signaling.
Compared with the effects of SIRT3, although several studies have suggested the protective effect of SIRT1,– the potential molecular mechanism regarding SIRT1 was inconsistent. More studies focused on different signaling pathways related to SIRT1 (such as the JNK signaling pathway and SIRT1/p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis/FoxO3a) rather than specific pathways. For example, a study suggested that, in vitro, SIRT1 attenuated the stress response by modulating the JNK signaling pathway, probably via deacetylation of the JNK phosphatase, DUSP16 of AKI. A previous study found that SIRT1/p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis/FoxO3a deacetylation by depleting miR-183-3p could improve renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis after AKI. Furthermore, kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury, which is a major cause of AKI, is associated with decreased AMPK phosphorylation and a five-fold increase in kidney SIRT1 expression. Activators of kidney AMPK might thus represent a novel therapeutic approach in patients susceptible to AKI. Moreover, the protection of NAD + in AKI is associated with SIRT1 expression and acts in a SIRT1-dependent manner. The NAD + /SIRT1/glycogen synthase kinase-3β/Nrf2 axis is an important mechanism that could protect against AKI and might be a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of AKI.
There have been limited studies carried out on the associations between SIRT2, SIRT5-7 and AKI. Acetylation of MAPK phosphatase-1 was significantly increased in SIRT2-knockdown cells and decreased in SIRT2-overexpressed cells after cisplatin stimulation. SIRT2 systematic KO mice and SIRT2 transgenic mice showed amelioration and aggravation of renal injury, apoptosis, necroptosis, and inflammation induced by cisplatin. In addition, overexpression of SIRT5 and SIRT6 can repair kidney damage. For example, SIRT5 regulates the balance of mitochondrial versus peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation in proximal tubular epithelial cells to protect against AKI, and SIRT6 overexpression inhibited apoptosis induced by LPS and promoted autophagy in HK-2 cells. Previous studies found that SIRT7 deficient mice were protected against AKI, suggesting that this HDAC promotes tubular damage and kidney inflammation.
In conclusion, the SIRT protein family could play an important role in AKI by regulating multiple cellular and physiologic processes including, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function. Therefore, exploring treatment strategies using the SIRT protein family in AKI is a promising area.
Chronic kidney disease
CKD is characterized by progressive kidney dysfunction of at least three months duration, it affects about 10% of adults worldwide, and is ranked fourteenth in the list of leading causes of death.– According to the World Health Organization estimates, 864,226 deaths (or 1.5% of deaths worldwide) were attributable to CKD in 2012. CKD arises from many heterogeneous disease pathways that alter the function and structure of the kidney irreversibly, over months or years. Diabetes and hypertension are the main causes of CKD in all high-income and middle-income countries, and many low-income countries. We describe details of associations between the SIRT protein family and both diabetic nephropathy and hypertensive nephropathy in the sections on endocrine system disease and cardiovascular system disease, respectively. In this section, we introduce the effects of the SIRT protein family on other types of CKD, including kidney fibrosis, kidney stones, aging-induced kidney injury, and vascular calcification (VC) in the kidney.Kidney fibrosisRegardless of the initial cause of disease, kidney fibrosis is the final common pathway in the evolution of virtually all types of CKD, which could contribute to loss of kidney functions (such as filtering and a reabsorbing).,, Thus, kidney fibrosis remains an important clinical problem in both developed countries and developing nations. In 2001, more than 400,000 patients were receiving treatment for chronic kidney failure in the United States, and the cost of treating this problem was approximately $22.8 billion. Therefore, we discuss the functions and molecular mechanisms of the SIRT protein family in kidney fibrosis to prevent and reduce the disease burden.Among the mechanisms responsible for kidney fibrogenesis, the TGF-β signaling pathway is known to play a pivotal role in kidney tubulointerstitial fibrosis, which stimulates autocrine and paracrine released connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)., Previous studies reported the effects of the SIRT protein family on TGF-β signaling pathway in kidney fibrosis.– For example, overexpression of SIRT1 abolished TGF-β1-induced cell apoptosis and fibrosis, and suppressed CTGF expression via stimulation by TGF-β1 in mouse kidneys with unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). Similarly, a previous study also investigated the role of the SIRT1 activator, SRT1720, in UUO-induced tubulointerstitial fibrosis. The administration of SRT1720 increased SIRT1 levels and partially attenuated UUO-induced kidney fibrosis and apoptosis, and inhibited the levels of TGF-β1/CTGF. Moreover, genetic knockdown and chemical inhibition of SIRT2 attenuated TGF-β1-induced fibroblast activation and mouse double minute 2 protein expression. Furthermore, SIRT3 KO mice were susceptible to hyper-acetylated mitochondrial proteins and to severe kidney fibrosis. Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1α, which is the primary link between glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle, is hyper-acetylated at lysine 385 in tubular epithelial cells after TGF-β1 stimulation and is regulated by SIRT3. With regard to SIRT6, a study investigated the effect of proximal tubule-specific SIRT6 KO on UUO-induced kidney tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis which suggested that the SIRT6 activator MDL-800 mitigated UUO-induced kidney tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis. In an in vitro experiment, MDL-800 decreased the TGF-β1-induced activation of myofibroblasts and ECM production by regulating SIRT6-dependent β-catenin acetylation and the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway. The identification of strategies to prevent and/or treat fibrotic CKD is a daunting challenge, and no treatment is specifically targeted at kidney fibrosis. The effects of the SIRT protein family on the TGF-β signaling pathway may identify new targets for therapeutic intervention in kidney fibrosis.In addition, apart from the TGF-β signaling pathway, other molecular mechanisms of kidney fibrosis regarding the effects of the SIRT protein family were also investigated. For example, SIRT1 attenuated kidney fibrosis by repressing HIF-2α; Endothelial SIRT1 deficiency induced nephrosclerosis through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-14, and restoration of matrix metalloproteinase-14 expression in SIRT1-depeleted mice improved the angiogenic and matrilytic functions of the endothelium, prevented kidney dysfunction, and attenuated nephrosclerosis; SIRT1 inhibited Ang II type 1 receptor and NF-κB expression in kidney fibroblasts and these mechanisms might play roles in alleviating UUO-induced damage.It is worth noting that downregulation of SIRT1 and SIRT2 might inhibit kidney interstitial fibroblast activation and attenuate kidney interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. SIRT1/2 activity may contribute to kidney fibroblast activation and proliferation as well as kidney fibrogenesis through activation of epidermal growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β signaling. Blocking SIRT1/2 activation might have therapeutic potential for the treatment of CKD.Collectively, most studies showed that SIRT1-3 and SIRT6 were protective in the development of kidney fibrosis. However, one study showed that the downregulation of SIRT1 and SIRT2 contributed to improving this disease. The specific mechanism of these different effects of SIRT1 and SIRT2 on kidney fibrosis requires further clarification by more intensive studies.Other chronic kidney injuriesWith regard to other chronic kidney injuries, a previous study mainly focused on the effects of the SIRT protein family on kidney stones, aging-induced kidney injury, and VC in the kidney.Limited studies have indicated that kidney stones showed downregulated expression of SIRT3 and SIRT1. Human peripheral blood monocytes from patients with kidney stones showed decreased SIRT3 expression, but increased FoxO1 acetylation compared with the normal controls, and the protective effect of SIRT3 could be mediated by activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor/heme oxygenase-1 pathway. A previous study suggested that suppressing SIRT1 expression promoted calcium oxalate monohydrate-induced crystal-cell adhesion and exacerbated cell injury.Evidence of the effect SIRT1 and SIRT6 on aging-induced kidney injury is limited. SIRT1-induced deacetylation of HIF-1α might have protective effects against tubulointerstitial damage in aged kidney. A previous study found that reduction of podocyte SIRT1 led to aggravated aging-induced glomerulosclerosis and albuminuria. At the molecular level, knockdown of SIRT1 in podocytes was associated with reduced activation of the transcription factors PGC-1α/PPARγ, FoxO3, FoxO4, and p65 NF-κB, through SIRT1-mediated deacetylation. Moreover, SIRT6-deficient mice exhibited kidney hypertrophy with glomerular enlargement and proteinuria. In vitro, knockdown of SIRT6 in cultured primary murine podocytes induced shape changes with loss of process formation and cell apoptosis.VC is common in CKD and contributes to CVD. At the molecular level, soluble epoxide hydrolase interacted with SIRT3, which might destabilize SIRT3 and accelerate the degradation of SIRT3. Deletion of soluble epoxide hydrolase might preserve the expression of SIRT3, and thus maintain mitochondrial ATP synthesis and morphology, significantly suppressing calcification of VSMCs. In addition, SIRT6 is markedly downregulated in patients with CKD and VC. At the molecular level, SIRT6 suppressed the osteogenic transdifferentiation of VSMCs via regulation of runt-related transcription factor 2. A previous study also indicated that bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes inhibited high phosphate-induced aortic calcification and ameliorated renal function via the SIRT6-high mobility group box 1 deacetylation pathway.The pathophysiology of CKD is complex and the etiologies diverse. There are still various unexplored associations between the SIRT protein family (such as SIRT2, SIRT4, SIRT5, and SIRT7) and different CKDs. Thus, these associations require more in-depth investigation. It could be implied that SIRT1 is an important survival factor and a potential therapeutic target in CKD.
Kidney fibrosis
Regardless of the initial cause of disease, kidney fibrosis is the final common pathway in the evolution of virtually all types of CKD, which could contribute to loss of kidney functions (such as filtering and a reabsorbing).,, Thus, kidney fibrosis remains an important clinical problem in both developed countries and developing nations. In 2001, more than 400,000 patients were receiving treatment for chronic kidney failure in the United States, and the cost of treating this problem was approximately $22.8 billion. Therefore, we discuss the functions and molecular mechanisms of the SIRT protein family in kidney fibrosis to prevent and reduce the disease burden.
Among the mechanisms responsible for kidney fibrogenesis, the TGF-β signaling pathway is known to play a pivotal role in kidney tubulointerstitial fibrosis, which stimulates autocrine and paracrine released connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)., Previous studies reported the effects of the SIRT protein family on TGF-β signaling pathway in kidney fibrosis.– For example, overexpression of SIRT1 abolished TGF-β1-induced cell apoptosis and fibrosis, and suppressed CTGF expression via stimulation by TGF-β1 in mouse kidneys with unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). Similarly, a previous study also investigated the role of the SIRT1 activator, SRT1720, in UUO-induced tubulointerstitial fibrosis. The administration of SRT1720 increased SIRT1 levels and partially attenuated UUO-induced kidney fibrosis and apoptosis, and inhibited the levels of TGF-β1/CTGF. Moreover, genetic knockdown and chemical inhibition of SIRT2 attenuated TGF-β1-induced fibroblast activation and mouse double minute 2 protein expression. Furthermore, SIRT3 KO mice were susceptible to hyper-acetylated mitochondrial proteins and to severe kidney fibrosis. Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1α, which is the primary link between glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle, is hyper-acetylated at lysine 385 in tubular epithelial cells after TGF-β1 stimulation and is regulated by SIRT3. With regard to SIRT6, a study investigated the effect of proximal tubule-specific SIRT6 KO on UUO-induced kidney tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis which suggested that the SIRT6 activator MDL-800 mitigated UUO-induced kidney tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis. In an in vitro experiment, MDL-800 decreased the TGF-β1-induced activation of myofibroblasts and ECM production by regulating SIRT6-dependent β-catenin acetylation and the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway. The identification of strategies to prevent and/or treat fibrotic CKD is a daunting challenge, and no treatment is specifically targeted at kidney fibrosis. The effects of the SIRT protein family on the TGF-β signaling pathway may identify new targets for therapeutic intervention in kidney fibrosis.
In addition, apart from the TGF-β signaling pathway, other molecular mechanisms of kidney fibrosis regarding the effects of the SIRT protein family were also investigated. For example, SIRT1 attenuated kidney fibrosis by repressing HIF-2α; Endothelial SIRT1 deficiency induced nephrosclerosis through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-14, and restoration of matrix metalloproteinase-14 expression in SIRT1-depeleted mice improved the angiogenic and matrilytic functions of the endothelium, prevented kidney dysfunction, and attenuated nephrosclerosis; SIRT1 inhibited Ang II type 1 receptor and NF-κB expression in kidney fibroblasts and these mechanisms might play roles in alleviating UUO-induced damage.
It is worth noting that downregulation of SIRT1 and SIRT2 might inhibit kidney interstitial fibroblast activation and attenuate kidney interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. SIRT1/2 activity may contribute to kidney fibroblast activation and proliferation as well as kidney fibrogenesis through activation of epidermal growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β signaling. Blocking SIRT1/2 activation might have therapeutic potential for the treatment of CKD.
Collectively, most studies showed that SIRT1-3 and SIRT6 were protective in the development of kidney fibrosis. However, one study showed that the downregulation of SIRT1 and SIRT2 contributed to improving this disease. The specific mechanism of these different effects of SIRT1 and SIRT2 on kidney fibrosis requires further clarification by more intensive studies.
Other chronic kidney injuries
With regard to other chronic kidney injuries, a previous study mainly focused on the effects of the SIRT protein family on kidney stones, aging-induced kidney injury, and VC in the kidney.
Limited studies have indicated that kidney stones showed downregulated expression of SIRT3 and SIRT1. Human peripheral blood monocytes from patients with kidney stones showed decreased SIRT3 expression, but increased FoxO1 acetylation compared with the normal controls, and the protective effect of SIRT3 could be mediated by activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor/heme oxygenase-1 pathway. A previous study suggested that suppressing SIRT1 expression promoted calcium oxalate monohydrate-induced crystal-cell adhesion and exacerbated cell injury.
Evidence of the effect SIRT1 and SIRT6 on aging-induced kidney injury is limited. SIRT1-induced deacetylation of HIF-1α might have protective effects against tubulointerstitial damage in aged kidney. A previous study found that reduction of podocyte SIRT1 led to aggravated aging-induced glomerulosclerosis and albuminuria. At the molecular level, knockdown of SIRT1 in podocytes was associated with reduced activation of the transcription factors PGC-1α/PPARγ, FoxO3, FoxO4, and p65 NF-κB, through SIRT1-mediated deacetylation. Moreover, SIRT6-deficient mice exhibited kidney hypertrophy with glomerular enlargement and proteinuria. In vitro, knockdown of SIRT6 in cultured primary murine podocytes induced shape changes with loss of process formation and cell apoptosis.
VC is common in CKD and contributes to CVD. At the molecular level, soluble epoxide hydrolase interacted with SIRT3, which might destabilize SIRT3 and accelerate the degradation of SIRT3. Deletion of soluble epoxide hydrolase might preserve the expression of SIRT3, and thus maintain mitochondrial ATP synthesis and morphology, significantly suppressing calcification of VSMCs. In addition, SIRT6 is markedly downregulated in patients with CKD and VC. At the molecular level, SIRT6 suppressed the osteogenic transdifferentiation of VSMCs via regulation of runt-related transcription factor 2. A previous study also indicated that bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes inhibited high phosphate-induced aortic calcification and ameliorated renal function via the SIRT6-high mobility group box 1 deacetylation pathway.
The pathophysiology of CKD is complex and the etiologies diverse. There are still various unexplored associations between the SIRT protein family (such as SIRT2, SIRT4, SIRT5, and SIRT7) and different CKDs. Thus, these associations require more in-depth investigation. It could be implied that SIRT1 is an important survival factor and a potential therapeutic target in CKD.
Genital system diseases
To date, only a few studies have explored the SIRT protein family and genital system diseases. Two studies have emphasized the protective effect of resveratrol in erectile function and reproductive damage (caused by nicotine), which could positively modulate SIRT1., Moreover, through an improved level of SIRT1, polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation attenuates oxidative damage in testis by reinforcing the antioxidant defense system. In addition, to investigate SIRT1 regarding adjuvant strategies in the treatment of male infertility, dysregulation of SIRT1 and mitochondrial SIRT (SIRT3-5) genes were associated with human male infertility., In female genital system disease, a limited number of studies have paid attention to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis. PCOS patients had higher SIRT1 levels than healthy controls and involvement of the SIRT1/AMPK axis in autophagy activation in PCOS. SIRT3 deficiency in granulosa cells of PCOS patients might potentially induce impaired oocytes in PCOS. Furthermore, previous studies only explored the association between SIRT1 and endometriosis. For example, one study suggested that SIRT1 was over-expressed in eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis and likely participates in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Another two studies demonstrated that resveratrol has therapeutic potential and miRNA-34a might provide a potential biomarker for endometriosis therapeutics.
In summary, current studies on the SIRT protein family and genital system disease are still in their infancy, and more research is needed in the future to explore these associations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, current studies have successfully highlighted the critical role of SIRT1 in urogenital and genital system diseases. However, at the molecular level, previous studies did not concentrate on certain pathways; thus, the mechanism of the effect of SIRT1 was inconsistent between different studies. Furthermore, although other SIRT proteins have not been as extensively studied as SIRT1, the important effect of these proteins in urogenital disease should not be ignored. The association between the SIRT protein family and urogenital disease could still be a new direction for further research.
SIRTs and motor system diseases
Diseases of the motor system focus on abnormal bone metabolism and diseases resulting from skeletal muscle dysfunction, mainly including OA, osteoporosis, intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) and skeletal muscle atrophy. In addition to the body’s own self-regulatory mechanisms, exogenous factors such as aging, mechanical stimulation, estrogen, and obesity are involved in the process of bone metabolism and skeletal muscle function. SIRTs are considered promising regulatory genes for bone and skeletal muscle metabolism, involved in processes such as differentiation of bone marrow MSCs, osteoblast viability, skeletal muscle fiber type conversion, endoplasmic reticulum stress and atrophy. Therefore, in this section, we focus on the functions of SIRTs in diseases of the locomotor system and the regulatory roles.
OA
OA is the most common joint disease, and is a type of degenerative disease. Chondrocyte senescence and apoptosis, ECM degradation with synovial inflammation, and dysfunction of the subchondral bone are the core pathological changes in OA. SIRTs may have different roles in influencing chondrocyte activity. Notably, SIRT1 is the best studied SIRT in OA, and negatively regulates important cellular biological processes impairing chondrocytes activity, including apoptosis and ECM degradation. For example, SIRT1 may reduce apoptosis and ECM degradation in OA chondrocytes via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to counteract aging-induced OA. Furthermore, SIRT1 is regulated by the circ0001103/miR-375 axis, which attenuates IL-1β-induced chondrocyte apoptosis and ECM degradation. In addition, SIRT1 can influence mitochondrial function, defense oxidative stress and inhibit senescence of chondrocytes. SIRT1 can reverse homocysteine-induced deleterious changes in chondrocytes that lead to OA via the SIRT1/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ cascade, including mitochondrial dysfunction and accumulation of oxidative stress., SIRT1 also improves the resistance of cartilage to oxidative stress by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor ubiquitination, thereby alleviating OA. Moreover, although there are many mechanisms affecting cellular senescence, SIRT1 can inhibit chondrocyte senescence and OA by negatively regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.
SIRT2, SIRT3, and SIRT6 are also involved in the development of OA. Similar to SIRT1, SIRT2 and SIRT6 also play protective roles in disease progression. For instance, SIRT2 protects against the progression of OA by inhibiting degradation of the ECM by preventing the acetylation of p65. Moreover, SIRT6 can inhibit the senescence of chondrocytes by negatively regulating the NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response. However, SIRT3 was shown to have dual roles in disease progression. In detail, SIRT3 inhibited chondrocyte degeneration by maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis. SIRT3 alleviated OA by improving the resistance of cartilage to oxidative stress. Mechanistically, SIRT3 restored acetylation-dependent SOD2 activity in human OA cartilage. On the contrary, SIRT3 overexpression promoted OA chondrocyte apoptosis and reduced cell proliferation, finally resulting in OA progression. The molecular mechanism of the opposite effect of SIRT3 on OA is unclear, and is worth further study.
Overall, SIRT1-3, and SIRT6 have different effects on the viability and function of chondrocytes, and they play important roles in the occurrence and development of OA. Given that their complex mechanisms are not fully understood, more in-depth studies are needed on the interaction of SIRTs with cartilage, synovium, bones and joints. In particular, SIRT1 has an important role in the development of OA and is expected to be a therapeutic target for the treatment of OA in the future.
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and deterioration of bone tissue microarchitecture, which increases bone fragility and fracture susceptibility. Bone exhibits continuous self-renewal, with replacement of old bone by new bone through osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and osteoblast-mediated bone formation, thereby repairing microstructural damage to bone, a process called bone reconstruction. In dynamic bone reconstruction, SIRTs not only promote osteoblast differentiation and inhibit osteoclast differentiation, but also inhibit osteoclast bone resorption, ensuring a positive balance between bone metabolism and increased bone mass through multiple pathways. SIRT1 KO mice have a low bone mass phenotype. Therefore, due to the confluence of cellular aging, energy metabolism and bone metabolism, SIRTs are of great significance in the study of osteoporosis pathogenesis.
Oxidative stress and aging are important factors that regulate the osteogenic differentiation process, and these can also be regulated by SIRT1 and thus are anti-osteoporosis. For instance, SIRT1 overexpression increased osteoblast osteogenesis through FoxO3a deacetylation and oxidative stress inhibition. Overexpression of SIRT1 might also reduce oxidative stress through the FoxO1 and β-catenin signaling pathways. In addition, SIRT1 plays a protective role in osteoporosis by regulating bone metabolism. For example, SIRT1 is regulated by the HIF-1α signaling pathway, which deacetylates sclerostin and activates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, leading to increased bone anabolism in osteoporosis. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, SIRT6 has been found to inhibit age-related bone loss by stabilizing ER alpha in preosteoblastic cells. Moreover, SIRTs not only regulate oxidative stress and aging signaling pathways to resist osteoporosis, but can also be activated by small molecule drugs such as resveratrol to affect bone metabolism. In osteoporosis, SIRT1 is activated by resveratrol and subsequently restores the levels of serum markers alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway, which has a protective effect against osteoporosis.,
In brief, SIRT1 and SIRT6 can inhibit the development and progression of osteoporosis by resisting oxidative stress, aging and regulating bone metabolism. However, more in-depth and detailed studies are still needed to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of other SIRTs on osteoporosis and to explore their clinical application value in the future.
IDD
IDD is an important pathological basis for degenerative spinal diseases, which manifests as increased degradation of the central nucleus pulposus matrix, thickening of the peripheral annulus fibrosus, and thinning and calcification of the cartilage endplates. SIRTs can inhibit the pathological process of IDD by inhibiting inflammation, cellular senescence, oxidative stress, and maintaining mitochondrial function. mRNA and protein expression levels of SIRT1 in degenerative nucleus pulposus tissues of intervertebral discs were reduced compared with control tissues and decreased with increasing disease severity. This suggests that there might be a protective effect of SIRT1 on IDD progression. Mechanistically, SIRT1 can resist the inflammatory response during IDD by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of NF-κB. Moreover, SIRT1 might inhibit disc degeneration by suppressing phosphorylation of activin 1 subunits c-Fos and c-Jun. It seems that SIRT1 might become a biological target for the treatment of IDD.
Furthermore, SIRT2, SIRT3, and SIRT6 have protective roles in the development of IDD. For example, SIRT2 reversed the action of IL-1β by inhibiting the p53/p21 pathway, inhibited oxidative stress and cellular senescence, and thus prevented the degradation of nuclear myeloid cells in IDD. It was also found that SIRT3 maintains nucleus pulposus cell homeostasis to prevent IDD mainly by regulating mitochondrial oxidative stress levels., In addition, SIRT6 mainly inhibits the inflammatory response and cellular senescence during IDD by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of NF-κB pathways.
In conclusion, SIRTs, including SIRT1-3, and SIRT6, are involved in negative regulation of disease progression in IDD; however, the number of studies are limited. With the continuous discovery of acting molecules and the identification of deep molecular mechanisms, SIRTs are expected to become important targets in the prevention and treatment of IDD.
Skeletal muscle atrophy
Skeletal muscle atrophy, which is the accelerated degradation of skeletal muscle proteins, mainly involves a variety of chronic diseases, aging, and long-term muscle inactivity. SIRTs inhibit skeletal muscle atrophy and are associated with mechanisms such as mitochondrial dysfunction, autophagy and metabolism. For example, SIRT1 inhibited drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and thus alleviated skeletal muscle atrophy by activating its downstream signaling PGC-1α. Moreover, SIRT2 effectively inhibited the autophagic flux, thus maintaining protein metabolism homeostasis in skeletal muscle. SIRT3-mediated cellular metabolism has an inhibitory effect in skeletal muscle atrophy. Ang II caused skeletal muscle atrophy, and SIRT3 deficiency enhanced Ang II-induced fiber type transformation and mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming, exacerbating skeletal muscle atrophy. The incidence of skeletal muscle atrophy and sarcopenia is increasing year by year. As the research on SIRTs in skeletal muscle physiological and pathological processes continues to advance, SIRTs could be used as targets for the prevention and treatment of skeletal muscle-related diseases.
Conclusion
SIRTs are key nodes in several degenerative diseases of aging, including OA, osteoporosis, and IDD. SIRTs play a key role in bone homeostasis and can maintain the balance between bone formation and resorption by regulating the ratio of osteoblasts to osteoclasts. SIRTs enhance the viability of osteoblasts under unfavorable conditions by resisting senescence, inhibiting apoptosis and promoting autophagy. Therefore, given the critical role of the SIRTs pathway in bone homeostasis, it is likely to be a potential therapeutic target, laying a solid foundation for further studies in the future.
SIRTs and aging
Aging is associated with impaired adaptive and homeostatic mechanisms, leading to susceptibility to environmental or internal stresses with degeneration of multiple organ systems. Extensive studies have clearly revealed that SIRTs are important regulators of aging, which involves several biological processes, such as cellular senescence, metabolic regulation, genome fidelity, nutrient sensing, and circadian rhythms.
It has long been known that mammalian aging is associated with cellular senescence, and SIRTs could play key roles in antagonism of aging and cellular senescence. For example, the activation of SIRT1 by La Ribonucleoprotein 7, a 7SK RNA binding protein, could ameliorate cellular senescence and aging through dampening p53 and NF-κB (p65) transcriptional activity. Besides, SIRT6 inhibition shortened human VSMC lifespan and induced senescence, associated with telomeric histone H3K9 hyperacetylation and p53 binding protein 1 binding, while SIRT6 overexpression preserved telomere integrity, delayed cellular senescence. Additionally, SIRTs could exert regulatory effects on aging by regulating cellular homeostasis in fundamental pathways such as genomic stability, nutrient sensing, and protein homeostasis. For instance, SIRT1 redistribution on chromatin induced by DNA damage, could promote DNA repair, enhance genomic stability, and suppress age-dependent transcriptional changes. SIRT3 deficiency resulted in the detachment of genomic lamina-associated domains from the nuclear lamina, increased chromatin accessibility and aberrant repetitive sequence transcription, and thereby leading to senescence phenotypes of human mesenchymal stem cells. Moreover, SIRT6 promoted resistance to DNA damage, suppressed genomic instability in mouse cells via deacetylation of Polβ, a base excision repair factor, and prevent the development of several progeroid pathologies. In addition to genomic stability, nutrient sensing is also known to be an important factor affecting aging. Evidence suggested that SIRT1 could control the gluconeogenic/glycolytic pathways in liver in response to fasting signals and modulate aging. The SIRTs-related roles in aging are also associated with the regulation of protein homeostasis. The related studies showed that the SIRT-activating compounds-resveratrol could attenuate copper-induced senescence by improving cellular proteostasis. Furthermore, the involvement of SIRTs in aging could be mediated by their roles in circadian rhythms. For instance, SIRT1 constituted a reciprocal negative regulation loop with the periodic gene, Period 2, and thus modulated circadian-clock maintenance and aging gene expression. SIRT6 deacetylated Period 2 and thus regulated circadian rhythms which were associated with aging and age-related diseases.
Therefore, SIRTs have very important regulatory roles in aging through participating in diverse biological processes. Moreover, growing evidence has shown that SIRTs might be attractive anti-aging molecules involved in improving health, although it is still under debate and has not been fully defined. From this perspective, further studies are needed to uncover the exact roles and mechanisms of SIRTs in the aging process.
SIRT modulators
In view of the dual involvement of SIRTs in many biological processes, many laboratories have developed both SIRT inhibitors and activators, which might act as tools for studying SIRT function and potentially as treatments for different conditions and diseases. Generally, activators have better therapeutic potential than inhibitors. This might partly be attributed to higher target specificity in the enzyme family and fewer side effects. However, compared to inhibitors, the number of activators is small. The following sections describe in detail the most relevant SIRT inhibitors and activators identified so far.
SIRT activators
SIRT activators are mainly classified into natural polyphenols and nonrelated synthetic SIRT activators (Supplementary Table 1). The structures of these activators are shown in Fig. 16. Among them, resveratrol, a polyphenol commonly found in grapes and red wine, was the first SIRT1 activator identified in 2003. Resveratrol as an allosteric activator of SIRT1 can increase its activity by 50% (EC1.5) at 46.2 μM and extend the lifespan of many organisms, ranging from yeast to mammals. Evidence showed that resveratrol supplementation could help to reduce fasting glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance, increase high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and total antioxidant capacity, and upregulate PPAR-γ and SIRT1 in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of type 2 DM patients with coronary heart disease. Several other polyphenols, structurally related to resveratrol, were also found to activate SIRTs, including the chalcones butein and isoliquiritigenin, the flavones fisetin and quercetin, and the stilbene piceatannol. The compounds fistein and butein increased lifespan length in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by 33% and 5%, respectively, whereas quercetin increased the lifespan of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans grown in 200 mM by approximately 20%. In addition, butein was reported to attenuate sepsis-induced brain injury through alleviation of cerebral inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis by SIRT1 signaling activation. Although piceatannol and isoliquiritigenin did not produce significant effects on lifespan, they were believed to activate prolonged survival. Isoliquiritigenin repressed the proliferation, migration, and invasion of NSCLC cells in vitro. Furthermore, in experimental diabetic neuropathy, isoliquiritigenin could reduce oxidative damage and alleviate mitochondrial impairment by SIRT1 activation.
As natural compounds did not show high activity on SIRT1, more potent compounds with a greater substrate-binding affinity for SIRT1 have been synthesized. SRT compounds, such as SRT1460 (EC1.5 = 2.9 μM), SRT1720 (EC1.5 = 0.16 μM), SRT2104 (EC1.5 = 0.43 μM), SRT2183 (EC1.5 = 0.36 μM), and SRT3025 (EC1.5 < 1 μM),, were identified in 2007 as selective SIRT1 activators, which were more potent than resveratrol. They played important roles in the treatment of physiological and pathological conditions.,, For example, employment of SRT compounds in diet-induced and genetically obese mice improved insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis, and regulated lipid metabolism, thus had beneficial effects on weight loss. Due to these promising activities, some SRT compounds have been evaluated in various clinical trials for the treatment of different conditions and diseases. SRT2104 was the most common intervention for healthy participants and type 2 diabetes patients in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).,,
The development of SIRT6 activators was initially stimulated by early studies showing that free fatty acids containing 14–18 carbons acted as weak SIRT6 activators. UBCS039 is a pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline reported as the first synthetic activator of SIRT6 deacetylase activity (EC50 = 38 μM). Evidence shows that UBCS039 induced a time-dependent activation of autophagy and induced deacetylation of SIRT6-targeted histone in several human tumor cell lines. The bis benzenesulfonamide-based prodrug MDL-800 is also reported to be a potent and selective SIRT6 activator with an EC50 value of 10.3 μM. MDL-800 decreased both H3K9ac and H3K56ac at a concentration of 10 µM and showed a dose-dependent effect in Bel7405, PLC/PRF/5, and Bel7402 cell lines at 24 h and 48 h. Additionally, MDL-800 decreased TGF-β1-induced activation of myofibroblast and ECM production by regulating SIRT6-dependent β-catenin acetylation and the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway.
SIRT inhibitors
Compared to SIRT activators, more studies have been conducted on SIRT inhibitors. A range of potent inhibitors were identified through a variety of development strategies, such as mechanism/structure based, or simply by virtual screening. Most studies focused on the inhibition of human SIRT1 and/or SIRT2. These available inhibitors are divided into several structural groups based on their mechanism of action and structural features (Supplementary Table 2). Figure 17 shows the structures of these inhibitors.
Nicotinamide and its analogs
Nicotinamide riboside (NR) and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) are important precursors of NAD, in that NAD biosynthesis involves the conversion of nicotinamide to NMN and subsequent conversion of NMN to NAD. And the production of NMN is the key rate-limiting factor in mammalian NAD biosynthesis. Thus, NR and NMN might affect SIRT activity mainly by affecting the synthesis of NAD. Nicotinamide and its analog, AK-7, are reported to be SIRT inhibitors. Of these, nicotinamide is the endogenous inhibitor of SIRTs, which is formed from NAD + during catalysis. Nicotinamide inhibits SIRT1 and SIRT2 with IC50 values of approximately 120 μM and 100 μM for SIRT1 and SIRT2, respectively., Nicotinamide can inhibit the growth and viability of human prostate cancer cells through inhibition of SIRT1. In addition, it blocks proliferation and induces apoptosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. AK-7, a benzamide (a nicotinamide mimic)-containing compound, shows selective SIRT2 inhibition. An in vivo study showed that AK-7 improved behavioral and neuropathological phenotypes, prolonged survival, and improved HD neuropathology in R6/2 HD mice. Furthermore, AK-7 limited the ability of adoptively transferred antigen-specific CD4 + T cells to cause autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice and limited disease in lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice. This might support the development of SIRT2 inhibitors as potential therapeutics for these diseases.
β-naphthol-containing inhibitors
β-naphthol acts as a key group for several SIRT inhibitors, including splitomicin, sirtinol, salermide, HR-73, and cambinol. Both sirtinol and splitomicin were identified through cell-based screens of more than 1000 compounds in yeast., Splitomicin inhibits human SIRT1 and SIRT2 with an IC50 value of 96 μM and 113 μM in vitro, respectively. Treatment with this molecule reduces deacetylase activity, enhances tissue factor mRNA expression in stimulated endothelial cells, and enhances NF-kB/p65 nuclear translocation. In addition, evidence showed that splitomicin could reversed both ischemic preconditioning-mediated lysine deacetylation and ischemic preconditioning-induced cardioprotection. Sirtinol (SIRT1 IC50 = 131 μM; SIRT2 IC50 = 38-58 μM,) has been shown to induce apoptotic and autophagic cell death in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Sirtinol induced senescence-like growth arrest in human LC H1299 cells and induced senescence-like growth arrest as well as apoptotic and autophagic cell death breast cancer MCF-7 cells., Structure-activity relationship studies on sirtinol resulted in improved analogs such as salermide, which has a greater inhibitory effect on SIRT1 and SIRT2 than sirtinol. Salermide was reported to induce the reactivation of proapoptotic genes that were aberrantly repressed in cancer cells by SIRT1-mediated H4K16 deacetylation. Also, salermide had potent antiproliferative on human leukemia MOLT4 cell lines, human breast MDA-MB-231, and colon RKO cancer cell lines and played an inhibitory role in colorectal carcinoma cancer stem cells. HR-73 was identified as a splitomicin derivative, which inhibits the activity of SIRT1 in vitro with an IC50 lower than 5 μM. It can decrease human immunodeficiency virus transcription through Tat acetylation. Cambinol, a β-naphthol derivative, is the most promising SIRT inhibitor in this class of compounds. It inhibits human SIRT1 and SIRT2 with IC50 values of 56 and 59 μM in vitro, respectively, and reduces the expression of poorly differentiated markers α-fetoprotein and glypican, and impairs cell migration in a dose-dependent manner. It was also reported to reduce the expression of N-Myc protein and up-regulate the expression of the other SIRT1 target genes including early growth response 1, Kv channel interacting protein 4, and phospholipase C beta 1.
Indole derivatives
Large-scale fluorescence screening led to the emergence of pure indole Sir2 inhibitors in 2005, which are the only series of compounds with a simple indole as the scaffold identified to date. These compounds include EX-527, AC-93253, inauhzin, and Ro31–8220. They act as inhibitors of SIRT1, which enhance cell survival and p53 acetylation. EX-527, also called Selisistat, is the first known selective (over SIRT2/3) and cell-permeable SIRT1 (IC50 = 0.098 μM) inhibitor. Evidence showed that EX-527 decreased tumor growth in endometrial and LC cells xenografted mice., Additionally, EX-527 could decrease the viability of control HHUA cells and the survival of HEC151 cells and reduce cisplatin resistance in HEC1B cells with mutated and non-functional p53. AC-93253, a compound containing a modified indole ring, preferentially inhibits SIRT2 (IC50 = 6 μM) and triggers the downregulation of melanoma progression markers and the inhibition of melanoma cell proliferation. Another indole derivative, inauhzin, inhibits the deacetylase activity of SIRT1 with an IC50 value of 0.7-2 μM. Inauhzin has potent anticancer activity and represses the growth of xenograft tumors derived from human LC H460 and colon cancer HCT116 cells harboring p53. Also, inauhzin was found to induce ribosomal stress and the RPL11/RPL5- murine double minute 2 (MDM2) interaction, activating p53, and suppress cancer cell growth by dually targeting SIRT1 and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 2. SIRTs use NAD as a co-substrate, whereas kinases use ATP as a co-substrate. Given that both NAD and ATP contain an adenosine moiety, kinase inhibitors might inhibit SIRTs. For example, a nM PKC inhibitor, Ro31–8220, shows inhibitory activity against SIRT1 and SIRT2, with IC50 values of 3.5 μM against SIRT1 and 0.8 μM against SIRT2. In a human neuroblastoma cell line, Ro31–8220 was found to reduce PKC activity and the tau phosphorylation pattern.
SIRT-rearranging ligands (SirReals)
A family of aminothiazoles, basically known as SirReals, was found to act as a potent selective inhibitor of SIRT2. Of these, SirReal2 is a potent SIRT2 inhibitor (IC50 = 0.14 μM) with minimal effects on SIRT1 and SIRT3. According to X-ray crystallography, SirReal2 exerts its potency and selectivity based on a ligand-induced structural rearrangement of the SIRT2 active site and interacts with residues in an unknown binding pocket located near the zinc-binding domain, known as the “selective pocket”. The SIRT2 inhibition capability of SirReal2 has been confirmed in chondrocytes by the induction of several acetylations of H3. SirReal2 was reported to increase the levels of phosphorylated Cx43 on S368 and the levels of acetylated MEK1/2, decrease the membrane localization of Cx43 between cumulus cells, and increase the Cx43 acetylation levels of cumulus-oocyte complexes.
Tenovins
Through phenotypic screening of 30,000 drug-like small molecules able to activate p53 and decrease tumor growth, Lain et al. discovered two compounds that were SIRT1 inhibitors: tenovin-1 and its more water soluble analog tenovin-6. The poor water solubility of tenovin-1 prevents the accurate determination of an IC50 value, whereas IC50 values of tenovin-6 with better water solubility have been reported as follows: SIRT1 IC50 = 21 μM; SIRT2 IC50 = 10 μM; SIRT3 IC50 = 67 μM. Both compounds decrease tumor growth in vitro at one-digit micromolar concentrations, and delay tumor growth in vivo without significant general toxicity. In the BL2 and ARN8 mouse xenograft model, tenovin-1 could reduce tumor growth, while tenovin-6 was found to delay the growth of xenograft tumors derived from ARN8 cells.
Other SIRT inhibitors
Many other types of compounds have been reported as SIRT inhibitors. Some of them are worth mentioning. Suramin, a polyanionic urea derivative, was originally used as an adenosine receptor antagonist for the treatment of trypanosomiasis and has antiviral and anticancer activity. It was later found to be a potent SIRT inhibitor with an IC50 of 297 nM, 1150 nM, and 22 μM for SIRT1, SIRT2, and SIRT5, respectively., Suramin has multiple biological effects, such as protection against disc degeneration, perturbation of mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP levels., Aristoforin, a phloroglucinol derivative, was shown to inhibit SIRT1 (IC50 = 7 μM) and SIRT2 (IC50 = 21 μM). AGK2 is a selective SIRT2 inhibitor (IC50 = 3.5 μM) identified from a concentrated compound library. The design of MC2494 is inspired by AGK2, in which the 2,5-dichlorophenyl-substituted furan ring is replaced by a pyrrole bearing a 2-chlorobenzoyl moiety at the C4 position. MC2494 has been reported as a micromolar pan-SIRT inhibitor and regulated mitochondrial function in a leukemia cell line. As the result of cambinol manipulation, MC2141 was identified in 2010 and was the prototype of a class of benzodeazaoxaflavins that inhibited SIRT1/2 in the low micromolar range. Tripos 360702 showed SIRT2 inhibitory activity with IC50 values of 51 μM in a test, and could be considered a novel inhibitor of SIRT2.
Conclusion
After summarizing the activators and inhibitors of the SIRT protein family described above, we find that a substantial amount of progress has been made in past decades. However, as research on different types of SIRT modulators has been unbalanced and the clinical potential of these modulators in treating different diseases has been insufficient, there is still progress to be made. Currently, inhibitors of SIRT1/2 are relatively adequate, whereas there are no good inhibitors of SIRT3-7 to date, especially SIRT4 and SIRT7. Additionally, with regard to SIRT activators, a great deal of work has been conducted in the identification of molecules targeting SIRT1. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate activators and inhibitors of other SIRTs rather than SIRT1, which will eventually unlock the full therapeutic potential of SIRT molecules. We believe that SIRT modulators are a field worthy of research, the SIRT protein family will eventually pay off.
RCTs of SIRT proteins
We conducted an electronic search of relevant RCTs in PubMed (up to June 23, 2022) without restrictions. Additionally, relevant clinical trial registration sites were comprehensively examined, such as ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN registry, EU Clinical Trials Register, and Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. Literature retrieval was performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. A total of 63 published RCTs were included, of which 43 studies mainly examined the effects of different interventions on SIRT protein expression in human samples, and 20 studies focused on the impact of SIRT activators (resveratrol and SRT2104) and SIRT inhibitor (nicotinamide) on physiological function in different participants. The characteristics of these studies are shown in Fig. 18 and listed in detail in Tables 1–2.
RCTs have been conducted on all continents, with Asia having the largest number of studies (n = 23), followed by Europe (n = 20) and North America (n = 12). Iran (n = 18), Italy (n = 5), and the United States (n = 12) ranked first in Asia, Europe, and North America, respectively. However, only one RCT was conducted in Oceania (Australia) and Africa (Egypt), respectively. These studies recruited from 2005 to 2019 and were published between 2012 and 2022. The peak years of study recruitment ranged from 2015 to 2016, whereas the majority of the studies were published between 2015 and 2020. Most studies examined SIRT protein expression in human samples, where blood samples (n = 40, 74.1%) were mostly used. Fat (n = 6, 11.1%) and muscle (n = 8, 14.8%) tissues were also used in several studies. Regardless of the tissue type, SIRT1 was the protein most focused on among the SIRT protein family. Some researchers evaluated SIRT3 protein expression in blood samples and adipose tissue.
Sixty-three RCTs included participants with more than 10 different diseases and conditions. Among them, the largest number of studies included participants with metabolic diseases (n = 30, 42.9%), including type 2 diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, followed by studies that recruited healthy participants (n = 17, 24.3%) such as healthy elderly participants, healthy employees, and healthy volunteers. A limited number of studies recruited participants with other diseases. For example, only three studies investigated a gynecological disease (polycystic ovarian syndrome), skin disease (systemic lupus erythematosus), and cancer (lymphoma), respectively.
With regard to the intervention/comparison in the study, about half of the studies (n = 34, 47.9%) focused on dietary interventions such as vitamin D and caloric restriction, with a few studies focusing on exercise interventions (n = 11, 15.5%) as well as drug and surgical treatments (n = 6, 8.5%). For example, supplementation of crocin or crocetin effectively improved gene expression of SIRT1 in coronary artery disease patients compared with the placebo., However, curcumin, administered to 67 overweight or obese patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome, led to a non-significant increase in SIRT1 expression, after 12 weeks compared to placebo. With regard to exercise intervention, three RCTs in India highlighted that a yoga-based lifestyle intervention led to a significant increase in SIRT1.– On the contrary, among 70 rheumatoid arthritis patients, the mRNA expression levels of SIRT1 were not found to be statistically different in the yoga vs. non-yoga group. As for medical treatment, three RCTs demonstrated that treatment with sildenafil, metformin, fenofibrate alone or in combination with pioglitazone up-regulated SIRT1 gene expression.– In addition, after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the expression of SIRT1 and SIRT3 increased compared to the baseline in 13 obese, non-diabetic patients.
Only 23.9% (n = 17) of published RCTs explored the effects of SIRT activators on physiological function. As a well-known SIRT activator, resveratrol (n = 10, 14.1%) received more attention compared with SRT2104 (n = 7, 9.9%) in these studies. Several RCTs showed that resveratrol supplementation could effectively increase the expression or concentration of SIRT1.,– Moreover, resveratrol performed important physiological functions by activating SIRT1, such as beneficial effects on neuro-inflammation and adaptive immunity. Similarly, SRT2014 played an important role by activating SIRT1, such as reduction in endotoxin-induced cytokine release and coagulation activation. However, some intervention studies reported that resveratrol did not affect its putative molecular target.– For example, a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study conducted in the Netherlands suggested that the muscle mitochondrial biogenesis regulator SIRT1 was not improved by resveratrol. A few studies suggested that significant clinical activities were not observed after supplementation with resveratrol and SRT2014.–
As shown in Table 2, three RCTs (4.2%) focused on the impact of nicotinamide, a known SIRT inhibitor, on physiological function in different patients.– However, all three studies suggested that nicotinamide might not act through its putative molecular target. For example, findings from a long-term human clinical trial reported that NR supplementation did not affect SIRT activity in human skeletal muscle. In addition, a clinical study evaluating the pharmacodynamics efficacy of nicotinamide as an inhibitor of SIRT revealed that over 12 months of nicotinamide treatment, no sustained inhibitions of SIRT activity were detected. This might be attributed to the small sample size and short intervention duration in these three RCTs. Thus, further studies are needed to explore nicotinamide as a clinical therapeutic method by inhibiting SIRT activity.
Although several published RCTs have shown inconsistent findings, most studies have suggested that dietary, exercise, and drug interventions can enhance SIRT signaling, and SIRT activators played an important role in physiological functions by activating SIRTs. Given the important impact of the SIRT protein family on health and disease, the relatively small number of trials, study limitations and single study sites, further larger sample, longer intervention period, and multicenter RCTs are needed.
Conclusion
Since the discovery of the SIRT family members, the understanding of this protein family has become increasingly comprehensive and profound. The studies summarized herein provide strong evidence that SIRTs play important roles in the body. Considering that the roles of SIRTs vary in different types of biological processes and human diseases, it will be of great significance to focus attention on the mechanisms regarding the seven SIRTs under different conditions and the specific function of each SIRT. Recent advances in technology (e.g., development of omics, gene KO and knockin) may facilitate elucidation of the specific molecular mechanisms of SIRTs, providing new perspectives for the pathogenesis of human diseases and targets for treatments. Clinical trials to verify the biomarkers and therapeutic potential of SIRTs are still lacking and are warranted in the future. Thus, this review has systematically highlighted the recent advances with respect to the role of SIRTs, which may aid the design of future research, and thereby reveal the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of SIRTs.
Future directions
To further clarify the biological regulation mechanism of SIRTs in different kinds of diseases and health conditions, and the interaction relationship between different kinds of SIRTs.To validate SIRTs as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for specific diseases at a large population level.To develop and validate more specific agonists and inhibitors of different kinds of SIRTs, and to explore and confirm their efficacy and safety in disease prevention and treatment in basic and clinical studies.SIRTs, such as SIRT7, which has been studied finitely, should be the focus of future research.Studies incorporating a multidisciplinary perspective provide a more comprehensive understanding of the roles of SIRTs.
To further clarify the biological regulation mechanism of SIRTs in different kinds of diseases and health conditions, and the interaction relationship between different kinds of SIRTs.
To validate SIRTs as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for specific diseases at a large population level.
To develop and validate more specific agonists and inhibitors of different kinds of SIRTs, and to explore and confirm their efficacy and safety in disease prevention and treatment in basic and clinical studies.
SIRTs, such as SIRT7, which has been studied finitely, should be the focus of future research.
Studies incorporating a multidisciplinary perspective provide a more comprehensive understanding of the roles of SIRTs.
References 1098
- 1.
North BJ, Verdin E. Sirtuins: Sir2-related NAD-dependent protein deacetylases. Genome Biol. 2004;5:224.
Not in our library10.1186/gb-2004-5-5-224
- 2.
Min J, Landry J, Sternglanz R, Xu RM. Crystal structure of a SIR2 homolog-NAD complex. Cell. 2001;105:269-279.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00317-8
- 3.
Chalkiadaki A, Guarente L. The multifaceted functions of sirtuins in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:608-624.
Not in our library10.1038/nrc3985
- 4.
Kane AE, Sinclair DA. Sirtuins and NAD(+) in the development and treatment of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Circ. Res. 2018;123:868-885.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.118.312498
- 5.
Wang RH, Li C, Deng CX. Liver steatosis and increased ChREBP expression in mice carrying a liver specific SIRT1 null mutation under a normal feeding condition. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2010;6:682-690.
Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.6.682
- 6.
Yang T, Fu M, Pestell R, Sauve AA. SIRT1 and endocrine signaling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2006;17:186-191.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tem.2006.04.002
- 7.
- 8.
Venkatasubramanian S, et al. Cardiovascular effects of a novel SIRT1 activator, SRT2104, in otherwise healthy cigarette smokers. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000042.
Not in our library10.1161/jaha.113.000042
- 9.
Pasco MY, et al. Characterization of sirtuin inhibitors in nematodes expressing a muscular dystrophy protein reveals muscle cell and behavioral protection by specific sirtinol analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2010;53:1407-1411.
Not in our library10.1021/jm9013345
- 10.
Liu ZM, et al. Suramin attenuates intervertebral disc degeneration by inhibiting NF-kappaB signalling pathway. Bone Jt. Res. 2021;10:498-513.
Not in our library10.1302/2046-3758.108.bjr-2020-0041.r3
- 11.
Outeiro TF, et al. Sirtuin 2 inhibitors rescue alpha-synuclein-mediated toxicity in models of Parkinson’s disease. Science. 2007;317:516-519.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1143780
- 12.
Rine J, Strathern JN, Hicks JB, Herskowitz I. A suppressor of mating-type locus mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for and identification of cryptic mating-type loci. Genetics. 1979;93:877-901.
Not in our library10.1093/genetics/93.4.877
- 13.
Gottlieb S, Esposito RE. A new role for a yeast transcriptional silencer gene, SIR2, in regulation of recombination in ribosomal DNA. Cell. 1989;56:771-776.
Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(89)90681-8
- 14.
Braunstein M, Rose AB, Holmes SG, Allis CD, Broach JR. Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation. Genes Dev. 1993;7:592-604.
Not in our library10.1101/gad.7.4.592
- 15.
Gottschling DE, Aparicio OM, Billington BL, Zakian VA. Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of Pol II transcription. Cell. 1990;63:751-762.
Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(90)90141-z
- 16.
Kaeberlein M, McVey M, Guarente L. The SIR2/3/4 complex and SIR2 alone promote longevity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by two different mechanisms. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2570-2580.
Not in our library10.1101/gad.13.19.2570
- 17.
Imai S, Armstrong CM, Kaeberlein M, Guarente L. Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature. 2000;403:795-800.
Not in our library10.1038/35001622
- 18.
Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2001;410:227-230.
Not in our library10.1038/35065638
- 19.
Brachmann CB, et al. The SIR2 gene family, conserved from bacteria to humans, functions in silencing, cell cycle progression, and chromosome stability. Genes Dev. 1995;9:2888-2902.
Not in our library10.1101/gad.9.23.2888
- 20.
Afshar G, Murnane JP. Characterization of a human gene with sequence homology to Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIR2. Gene. 1999;234:161-168.
Not in our library10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00162-6
- 21.
- 22.
Frye RA. Characterization of five human cDNAs with homology to the yeast SIR2 gene: Sir2-like proteins (sirtuins) metabolize NAD and may have protein ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;260:273-279.
Not in our library10.1006/bbrc.1999.0897
- 23.
Frye RA. Phylogenetic classification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic Sir2-like proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000;273:793-798.
Not in our library10.1006/bbrc.2000.3000
- 24.
Yuan H, Marmorstein R. Structural basis for sirtuin activity and inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:42428-42435.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.r112.372300
- 25.
Chen B, et al. The chemical biology of sirtuins. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:5246-5264.
Not in our library10.1039/c4cs00373j
- 26.
Michan S, Sinclair D. Sirtuins in mammals: insights into their biological function. Biochem. J. 2007;404:1-13.
Not in our library10.1042/bj20070140
- 27.
Finnin MS, Donigian JR, Pavletich NP. Structure of the histone deacetylase SIRT2. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001;8:621-625.
Not in our library10.1038/89668
- 28.
Canto C, Sauve AA, Bai P. Crosstalk between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and sirtuin enzymes. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013;34:1168-1201.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mam.2013.01.004
- 29.
Michishita E, Park JY, Burneskis JM, Barrett JC, Horikawa I. Evolutionarily conserved and nonconserved cellular localizations and functions of human SIRT proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:4623-4635.
Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e05-01-0033
- 30.
Tanno M, Sakamoto J, Miura T, Shimamoto K, Horio Y. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase SIRT1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:6823-6832.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m609554200
- 31.
Vaquero A, et al. SirT2 is a histone deacetylase with preference for histone H4 Lys 16 during mitosis. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1256-1261.
Not in our library10.1101/gad.1412706
- 32.
Schwer B, North BJ, Frye RA, Ott M, Verdin E. The human silent information regulator (Sir)2 homologue hSIRT3 is a mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent deacetylase. J. Cell Biol. 2002;158:647-657.
Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200205057
- 33.
Haigis MC, et al. SIRT4 inhibits glutamate dehydrogenase and opposes the effects of calorie restriction in pancreatic beta cells. Cell. 2006;126:941-954.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.057
- 34.
Nakagawa T, Lomb DJ, Haigis MC, Guarente L. SIRT5 Deacetylates carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 and regulates the urea cycle. Cell. 2009;137:560-570.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.026
- 35.
Mostoslavsky R, et al. Genomic instability and aging-like phenotype in the absence of mammalian SIRT6. Cell. 2006;124:315-329.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.044
- 36.
Emmons M, Boulware D, Sullivan DM, Hazlehurst LA. Topoisomerase II beta levels are a determinant of melphalan-induced DNA crosslinks and sensitivity to cell death. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006;72:11-18.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2006.03.017
- 37.
Buler M, Andersson U, Hakkola J. Who watches the watchmen? Regulation of the expression and activity of sirtuins. FASEB J. 2016;30:3942-3960.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.201600410rr
- 38.
Zhao K, Harshaw R, Chai X, Marmorstein R. Structural basis for nicotinamide cleavage and ADP-ribose transfer by NAD(+)-dependent Sir2 histone/protein deacetylases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:8563-8568.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0401057101
- 39.
Hoff KG, Avalos JL, Sens K, Wolberger C. Insights into the sirtuin mechanism from ternary complexes containing NAD+ and acetylated peptide. Structure. 2006;14:1231-1240.
Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2006.06.006
- 40.
Rardin MJ, et al. SIRT5 regulates the mitochondrial lysine succinylome and metabolic networks. Cell Metab. 2013;18:920-933.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.013
- 41.
Du J, et al. Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science. 2011;334:806-809.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1207861
- 42.
Jiang H, et al. SIRT6 regulates TNF-alpha secretion through hydrolysis of long-chain fatty acyl lysine. Nature. 2013;496:110-113.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12038
- 43.
Chang AR, Ferrer CM, Mostoslavsky R. SIRT6, a Mammalian deacylase with multitasking abilities. Phys. Rev. 2020;100:145-169.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00030.2018
- 44.
Barber MF, et al. SIRT7 links H3K18 deacetylation to maintenance of oncogenic transformation. Nature. 2012;487:114-118.
Not in our library10.1038/nature11043
- 45.
Pande, S. & Raisuddin, S. Molecular and cellular regulatory roles of sirtuin protein. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1-19 (2022) 10.1080/10408398.2022.2070722.
Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2022.2070722
- 46.
Haigis MC, Sinclair DA. Mammalian sirtuins: biological insights and disease relevance. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2010;5:253-295.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092250
- 47.
Medzhitov R. Inflammation 2010: new adventures of an old flame. Cell. 2010;140:771-776.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.006
- 48.
Medzhitov R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:428-435.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07201
- 49.
Liu G, et al. Dendritic cell SIRT1-HIF1alpha axis programs the differentiation of CD4+ T cells through IL-12 and TGF-beta1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E957-E965.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1420419112
- 50.
Woo SJ, et al. Myeloid sirtuin 6 deficiency accelerates experimental rheumatoid arthritis by enhancing macrophage activation and infiltration into synovium. EBioMedicine. 2018;38:228-237.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.11.005
- 51.
Xi J, et al. Sirtuin 3 suppresses the formation of renal calcium oxalate crystals through promoting M2 polarization of macrophages. J. Cell Phys. 2019;234:11463-11473.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.27803
- 52.
- 53.
Wu L, et al. MiR-128-3p mediates TNF-alpha-induced inflammatory responses by regulating Sirt1 expression in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;521:98-105.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.10.083
- 54.
- 55.
Jung YJ, et al. SIRT1 overexpression decreases cisplatin-induced acetylation of NF-kappaB p65 subunit and cytotoxicity in renal proximal tubule cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012;419:206-210.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.01.148
- 56.
Jiang X, et al. MDL-800, the SIRT6 activator, suppresses inflammation via the NF-kappaB Pathway and Promotes Angiogenesis to Accelerate Cutaneous Wound Healing in Mice. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2022;2022:1619651.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/1619651
- 57.
He Y, et al. SIRT6 inhibits TNF-alpha-induced inflammation of vascular adventitial fibroblasts through ROS and Akt signaling pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2017;357:88-97.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.05.001
- 58.
Shen J, et al. SIRT1 Inhibits the Catabolic Effect of IL-1beta Through TLR2/SIRT1/NF-kappaB Pathway in Human Degenerative Nucleus Pulposus Cells. Pain. Phys. 2016;19:E215-E226.
Not in our library
- 59.
Wang X, Buechler NL, Yoza BK, McCall CE, Vachharajani VT. Resveratrol attenuates microvascular inflammation in sepsis via SIRT-1-Induced modulation of adhesion molecules in ob/ob mice. Obes. (Silver Spring). 2015;23:1209-1217.
Not in our library10.1002/oby.21086
- 60.
- 61.
Zhang Y, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Mallik SB, Davey AK. SIRT1 and SIRT2 modulators reduce LPS-induced inflammation in HAPI microglial cells and protect SH-SY5Y neuronal cells in vitro. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna). 2021;128:631-644.
Not in our library10.1007/s00702-021-02331-1
- 62.
Wang B, et al. SIRT2 plays significant roles in lipopolysaccharides-induced neuroinflammation and brain injury in mice. Neurochem Res. 2016;41:2490-2500.
Not in our library10.1007/s11064-016-1981-2
- 63.
Kurundkar D, et al. SIRT3 diminishes inflammation and mitigates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e120722.
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.120722
- 64.
Zhao WY, Zhang L, Sui MX, Zhu YH, Zeng L. Protective effects of sirtuin 3 in a murine model of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33201.
Not in our library10.1038/srep33201
- 65.
- 66.
Kim D, et al. Absence of Sirt3 aggravates cisplatin nephrotoxicity via enhanced renal tubular apoptosis and inflammation. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;18:3665-3672.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2018.9350
- 67.
Diaz-Perdigon T, et al. Early sirtuin 2 inhibition prevents age-related cognitive decline in a senescence-accelerated mouse model. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45:347-357.
Not in our library10.1038/s41386-019-0503-8
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
Koch L, et al. LPS- and LTA-induced expression of IL-6 and TNF-alpha in neonatal and adult blood: role of MAPKs and NF-kappaB. Med. Inflamm. 2014;2014:283126.
Not in our library10.1155/2014/283126
- 71.
Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JP. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19:477-489.
Not in our library10.1038/s41577-019-0165-0
- 72.
Chen G, Goeddel DV. TNF-R1 signaling: a beautiful pathway. Science. 2002;296:1634-1635.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1071924
- 73.
Sharma BR, Kanneganti TD. NLRP3 inflammasome in cancer and metabolic diseases. Nat. Immunol. 2021;22:550-559.
Not in our library10.1038/s41590-021-00886-5
- 74.
Fernando KKM, Wijayasinghe YS. Sirtuins as potential therapeutic targets for mitigating neuroinflammation associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:746631.
Not in our library10.3389/fncel.2021.746631
- 75.
He L, Wang J, Yang Y, Li J, Tu H. Mitochondrial sirtuins in Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem. Res. 2022;47:1491-1502.
Not in our library10.1007/s11064-022-03560-w
- 76.
Lawrence T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009;1:a001651.
Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a001651
- 77.
Huang B, Yang XD, Lamb A, Chen LF. Posttranslational modifications of NF-kappaB: another layer of regulation for NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Cell Signal. 2010;22:1282-1290.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.03.017
- 78.
Yeung F, et al. Modulation of NF-kappaB-dependent transcription and cell survival by the SIRT1 deacetylase. EMBO J. 2004;23:2369-2380.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7600244
- 79.
Li G, et al. SIRT1 inhibits rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocyte aggressiveness and inflammatory response via suppressing NF-kappaB pathway. Biosci. Rep. 2018;38:BSR20180541.
Not in our library10.1042/bsr20180541
- 80.
Kawahara TL, et al. SIRT6 links histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylation to NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span. Cell. 2009;136:62-74.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.052
- 81.
- 82.
- 83.
Chen KL, et al. SIRT7 regulates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory injury by suppressing the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2019;2019:3187972.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/3187972
- 84.
Li XT, Zhang YP, Zhang MW, Zhang ZZ, Zhong JC. Sirtuin 7 serves as a promising therapeutic target for cardiorenal diseases. Eur. J. Pharm. 2022;925:174977.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174977
- 85.
Sobuz SU, et al. SIRT7 regulates the nuclear export of NF-kappaB p65 by deacetylating Ran. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2019;1866:1355-1367.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.05.001
- 86.
Sun S, et al. Vascular endothelium-targeted Sirt7 gene therapy rejuvenates blood vessels and extends life span in a Hutchinson-Gilford progeria model. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaay5556.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aay5556
- 87.
Miyasato Y, et al. Sirtuin 7 deficiency ameliorates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury through regulation of the inflammatory response. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5927.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-24257-7
- 88.
Yuan F, et al. SIRT2 inhibition exacerbates neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption in experimental traumatic brain injury by enhancing NF-kappaB p65 acetylation and activation. J. Neurochem. 2016;136:581-593.
Not in our library10.1111/jnc.13423
- 89.
Lin J, Sun B, Jiang C, Hong H, Zheng Y. Sirt2 suppresses inflammatory responses in collagen-induced arthritis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;441:897-903.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.153
- 90.
Meng XF, et al. Inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome provides neuroprotection in rats following amygdala kindling-induced status epilepticus. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014;11:212.
Not in our library10.1186/s12974-014-0212-5
- 91.
Cassel SL, Sutterwala FS. Sterile inflammatory responses mediated by the NLRP3 inflammasome. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010;40:607-611.
Not in our library10.1002/eji.200940207
- 92.
Jin X, et al. Dietary fatty acid regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome via the TLR4/NF-kappaB signaling pathway affects chondrocyte pyroptosis. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2022;2022:3711371.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/3711371
- 93.
Bauernfeind FG, et al. Cutting edge: NF-kappaB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J. Immunol. 2009;183:787-791.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0901363
- 94.
Xie N, et al. Rhodiola crenulate alleviates hypobaric hypoxia-induced brain injury via adjusting NF-kappaB/NLRP3-mediated inflammation. Phytomedicine. 2022;103:154240.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154240
- 95.
Yamaguchi K, et al. Indoxyl sulfate activates NLRP3 inflammasome to induce cardiac contractile dysfunction accompanied by myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2022;22:365-377.
Not in our library10.1007/s12012-021-09718-2
- 96.
Zou P, Liu X, Li G, Wang Y. Resveratrol pretreatment attenuates traumatic brain injury in rats by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation via SIRT1. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:3212-3217.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2017.8241
- 97.
Anders HJ, Muruve DA. The inflammasomes in kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011;22:1007-1018.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.2010080798
- 98.
Yu M, et al. Notch-activated mesenchymal stromal/stem cells enhance the protective effect against acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury by activating AMPK/SIRT1 pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022;13:318.
Not in our library10.1186/s13287-022-02999-6
- 99.
Zhou R, Yazdi AS, Menu P, Tschopp J. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2011;469:221-225.
Not in our library10.1038/nature09663
- 100.
Xia K, Zhang Y, Sun D. miR217 and miR543 downregulation mitigates inflammatory response and myocardial injury in children with viral myocarditis by regulating the SIRT1/AMPK/NFkappaB signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020;45:634-646.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2019.4442
- 101.
Zhang T, et al. MicroRNA-378 promotes hepatic inflammation and fibrosis via modulation of the NF-kappaB-TNFalpha pathway. J. Hepatol. 2019;70:87-96.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2018.08.026
- 102.
Han S, et al. MCPIP1 alleviated lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury by regulating SIRT1 via modulation of microRNA-9. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:22450-22462.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28809
- 103.
Lu H, Wang B. SIRT1 exerts neuroprotective effects by attenuating cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury via targeting p53/microRNA-22. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017;39:208-216.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2016.2806
- 104.
DeBerardinis RJ, Keshari KR. Metabolic analysis as a driver for discovery, diagnosis, and therapy. Cell. 2022;185:2678-2689.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.029
- 105.
Noda-Garcia L, Liebermeister W, Tawfik DS. Metabolite-enzyme coevolution: from single enzymes to metabolic pathways and networks. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2018;87:187-216.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012023
- 106.
Li X, et al. Navigating metabolic pathways to enhance antitumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019;16:425-441.
Not in our library10.1038/s41571-019-0203-7
- 107.
Martinez-Reyes I, Chandel NS. Cancer metabolism: looking forward. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2021;21:669-680.
Not in our library10.1038/s41568-021-00378-6
- 108.
Meacham CE, DeVilbiss AW, Morrison SJ. Metabolic regulation of somatic stem cells in vivo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:428-443.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-022-00462-1
- 109.
Brown KA. Metabolic pathways in obesity-related breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:350-363.
Not in our library10.1038/s41574-021-00487-0
- 110.
Menezes LF, Germino GG. The pathobiology of polycystic kidney disease from a metabolic viewpoint. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019;15:735-749.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-019-0183-y
- 111.
Mulukutla BC, Yongky A, Le T, Mashek DG, Hu WS. Regulation of glucose metabolism - a perspective from cell bioprocessing. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:638-651.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.012
- 112.
Lunt SY, Vander Heiden MG. Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011;27:441-464.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154237
- 113.
Dey P, Kimmelman AC, DePinho RA. Metabolic codependencies in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Disco. 2021;11:1067-1081.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1211
- 114.
Han X. Lipidomics for studying metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016;12:668-679.
Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2016.98
- 115.
Cappel DA, et al. Pyruvate-carboxylase-mediated anaplerosis promotes antioxidant capacity by sustaining TCA cycle and redox metabolism in liver. Cell Metab. 2019;29:1291-1305.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.014
- 116.
Peng Y, et al. Does LKB1 mediate activation of hepatic AMP-protein kinase (AMPK) and sirtuin1 (SIRT1) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese rats? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010;14:221-228.
Not in our library10.1007/s11605-009-1102-5
- 117.
Zhang Y, Ma Y, Gu M, Peng Y. lncRNA TUG1 promotes the brown remodeling of white adipose tissue by regulating miR204targeted SIRT1 in diabetic mice. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020;46:2225-2234.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2020.4741
- 118.
Gouranton E, et al. Visfatin is involved in TNFalpha-mediated insulin resistance via an NAD(+)/Sirt1/PTP1B pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Adipocyte. 2014;3:180-189.
Not in our library10.4161/adip.28729
- 119.
Silvestre MF, et al. The AMPK-SIRT signaling network regulates glucose tolerance under calorie restriction conditions. Life Sci. 2014;100:55-60.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2014.01.080
- 120.
Canto C, et al. AMPK regulates energy expenditure by modulating NAD+ metabolism and SIRT1 activity. Nature. 2009;458:1056-1060.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07813
- 121.
Canto C, et al. Interdependence of AMPK and SIRT1 for metabolic adaptation to fasting and exercise in skeletal muscle. Cell Metab. 2010;11:213-219.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2010.02.006
- 122.
Osborne B, et al. Liver-specific overexpression of SIRT3 enhances oxidative metabolism, but does not impact metabolic defects induced by high fat feeding in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022;607:131-137.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.03.088
- 123.
Chang H, et al. TFB2M activates aerobic glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the NAD(+) /SIRT3/HIF-1alpha signaling. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;36:2978-2988.
Not in our library10.1111/jgh.15548
- 124.
Khan D, et al. SIRT6 deacetylase transcriptionally regulates glucose metabolism in heart. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:5478-5489.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.26434
- 125.
Cui X, et al. SIRT6 regulates metabolic homeostasis in skeletal muscle through activation of AMPK. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;313:E493-E505.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.00122.2017
- 126.
Song MY, Wang J, Ka SO, Bae EJ, Park BH. Insulin secretion impairment in Sirt6 knockout pancreatic beta cells is mediated by suppression of the FoxO1-Pdx1-Glut2 pathway. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30321.
Not in our library10.1038/srep30321
- 127.
Zhang Y, et al. Exercise ameliorates insulin resistance and improves SIRT6-mediated insulin signaling transduction in liver of obese rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2021;99:506-511.
Not in our library10.1139/cjpp-2020-0083
- 128.
Anderson JG, et al. Enhanced insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle and liver by physiological overexpression of SIRT6. Mol. Metab. 2015;4:846-856.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2015.09.003
- 129.
Hammer SS, et al. Fasting and fasting-mimicking treatment activate SIRT1/LXRalpha and alleviate diabetes-induced systemic and microvascular dysfunction. Diabetologia. 2021;64:1674-1689.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-021-05431-5
- 130.
Jiang Z, et al. The adiponectin-SIRT1-AMPK pathway in alcoholic fatty liver disease in the rat. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2015;39:424-433.
Not in our library10.1111/acer.12641
- 131.
Qiang L, et al. Proatherogenic abnormalities of lipid metabolism in SirT1 transgenic mice are mediated through Creb deacetylation. Cell Metab. 2011;14:758-767.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2011.10.007
- 132.
Chen WL, Kang CH, Wang SG, Lee H. M. alpha-Lipoic acid regulates lipid metabolism through induction of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Diabetologia. 2012;55:1824-1835.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-012-2530-4
- 133.
Ren H, et al. Sirtuin 2 prevents liver steatosis and metabolic disorders by deacetylation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha. Hepatology. 2021;74:723-740.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.31773
- 134.
Ming X, et al. Pancreatic sirtuin 3 deficiency promotes hepatic steatosis by enhancing 5-hydroxytryptamine synthesis in mice with diet-induced obesity. Diabetes. 2021;70:119-131.
Not in our library10.2337/db20-0339
- 135.
Hong J, et al. SIRT5 inhibits bovine preadipocyte differentiation and lipid deposition by activating AMPK and repressing MAPK signal pathways. Genomics. 2020;112:1065-1076.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.12.004
- 136.
Zhu C, et al. SIRT6 controls hepatic lipogenesis by suppressing LXR, ChREBP, and SREBP1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2021;1867:166249.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166249
- 137.
Masri S, et al. Partitioning circadian transcription by SIRT6 leads to segregated control of cellular metabolism. Cell. 2014;158:659-672.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.050
- 138.
Xiong X, et al. Fabp4-Cre-mediated Sirt6 deletion impairs adipose tissue function and metabolic homeostasis in mice. J. Endocrinol. 2017;233:307-314.
Not in our library10.1530/joe-17-0033
- 139.
Gonzalez Herrera KN, et al. Small-molecule screen identifies de novo nucleotide synthesis as a vulnerability of cells lacking SIRT3. Cell Rep. 2018;22:1945-1955.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.076
- 140.
Miyo M, et al. Tumour-suppressive function of SIRT4 in human colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;113:492-499.
Not in our library10.1038/bjc.2015.226
- 141.
Li Y, et al. SIRT3 affects mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming via the AMPK-PGC-1alpha axis in the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate. 2021;81:1135-1148.
Not in our library10.1002/pros.24208
- 142.
Baohua Y, Li L. Effects of SIRT6 silencing on collagen metabolism in human dermal fibroblasts. Cell Biol. Int. 2012;36:105-108.
Not in our library10.1042/cbi20110268
- 143.
- 144.
Maiese K, Chong ZZ, Li F, Shang YC. Erythropoietin: elucidating new cellular targets that broaden therapeutic strategies. Prog. Neurobiol. 2008;85:194-213.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.02.002
- 145.
Lan F, Cacicedo JM, Ruderman N, Ido Y. SIRT1 modulation of the acetylation status, cytosolic localization, and activity of LKB1. Possible role in AMP-activated protein kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:27628-27635.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m805711200
- 146.
Galdieri L, Gatla H, Vancurova I, Vancura A. Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by metformin induces protein acetylation in prostate and ovarian cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:25154-25166.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m116.742247
- 147.
Vancura A, et al. Reciprocal regulation of AMPK/SNF1 and protein acetylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:3314.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms19113314
- 148.
Morales-Alamo D, et al. Increased oxidative stress and anaerobic energy release, but blunted Thr172-AMPKalpha phosphorylation, in response to sprint exercise in severe acute hypoxia in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985). 2012;113:917-928.
Not in our library10.1152/japplphysiol.00415.2012
- 149.
Guo Z, et al. Neuraminidase 1 deficiency attenuates cardiac dysfunction, oxidative stress, fibrosis, inflammatory via AMPK-SIRT3 pathway in diabetic cardiomyopathy mice. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022;18:826-840.
Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.65938
- 150.
Chen LY, Wang Y, Terkeltaub R, Liu-Bryan R. Activation of AMPK-SIRT3 signaling is chondroprotective by preserving mitochondrial DNA integrity and function. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2018;26:1539-1550.
Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2018.07.004
- 151.
- 152.
Wang XX, et al. SIRT6 protects cardiomyocytes against ischemia/reperfusion injury by augmenting FoxO3alpha-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2016;111:13.
Not in our library10.1007/s00395-016-0531-z
- 153.
Tang W, Jiang YF, Ponnusamy M, Diallo M. Role of Nrf2 in chronic liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13079-13087.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13079
- 154.
Zhang YK, Wu KC, Klaassen CD. Genetic activation of Nrf2 protects against fasting-induced oxidative stress in livers of mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59122.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0059122
- 155.
Chen Z, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition improves endothelial senescence by activating AMPK/SIRT1/Nrf2 signaling pathway. Biochem. Pharm. 2020;177:113951.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113951
- 156.
Zhao M, et al. Sirt2 in the spinal cord regulates chronic neuropathic pain through Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress pathway in rats. Front Pharm. 2021;12:646477.
Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2021.646477
- 157.
Zhang W, Wei R, Zhang L, Tan Y, Qian C. Sirtuin 6 protects the brain from cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury through NRF2 activation. Neuroscience. 2017;366:95-104.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.035
- 158.
Ka SO, Bang IH, Bae EJ, Park BH. Hepatocyte-specific sirtuin 6 deletion predisposes to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by up-regulation of Bach1, an Nrf2 repressor. FASEB J. 2017;31:3999-4010.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.201700098rr
- 159.
Sun GL, Huang D, Li KR, Jiang Q. microRNA-4532 inhibition protects human lens epithelial cells from ultra-violet-induced oxidative injury via activating SIRT6-Nrf2 signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;514:777-784.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.026
- 160.
Yu J, et al. SIRT6 protects retinal ganglion cells against hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis and oxidative stress by promoting Nrf2/ARE signaling via inhibition of Bach1. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019;300:151-158.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cbi.2019.01.018
- 161.
Subauste AR, Burant CF. Role of FoxO1 in FFA-induced oxidative stress in adipocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;293:E159-E164.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.00629.2006
- 162.
Han C, et al. Sirt1 deficiency protects cochlear cells and delays the early onset of age-related hearing loss in C57BL/6 mice. Neurobiol. Aging. 2016;43:58-71.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.023
- 163.
Rangarajan P, Karthikeyan A, Lu J, Ling EA, Dheen ST. Sirtuin 3 regulates Foxo3a-mediated antioxidant pathway in microglia. Neuroscience. 2015;311:398-414.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.10.048
- 164.
Sundaresan NR, et al. Sirt3 blocks the cardiac hypertrophic response by augmenting Foxo3a-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2009;119:2758-2771.
Not in our library10.1172/jci39162
- 165.
Kwon DN, Park WJ, Choi YJ, Gurunathan S, Kim JH. Oxidative stress and ROS metabolism via down-regulation of sirtuin 3 expression in Cmah-null mice affect hearing loss. Aging (Albany NY). 2015;7:579-594.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.100800
- 166.
Yang Y, et al. Activation of SIRT3 attenuates triptolide-induced toxicity through closing mitochondrial permeability transition pore in cardiomyocytes. Toxicol. Vitr. 2016;34:128-137.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tiv.2016.03.020
- 167.
- 168.
Waldman M, et al. PARP-1 inhibition protects the diabetic heart through activation of SIRT1-PGC-1alpha axis. Exp. Cell Res. 2018;373:112-118.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.10.003
- 169.
Zhu H, et al. PARP-1 and SIRT-1 are interacted in diabetic nephropathy by activating AMPK/PGC-1alpha signaling pathway. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2021;14:355-366.
Not in our library10.2147/dmso.s291314
- 170.
Wang SJ, et al. Sirtuin 1 activation enhances the PGC-1alpha/mitochondrial antioxidant system pathway in status epilepticus. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015;11:521-526.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2014.2724
- 171.
Rato L, et al. Pre-diabetes alters testicular PGC1-alpha/SIRT3 axis modulating mitochondrial bioenergetics and oxidative stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1837:335-344.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.12.008
- 172.
Zhang K, Cheng H, Song L, Wei W. Inhibition of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1alpha)/Sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) pathway aggravates oxidative stress after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020;26:e923688.
Not in our library10.12659/msm.923688
- 173.
Chen J, et al. Sirtuin 3 deficiency exacerbates age-related periodontal disease. J. Periodontal Res. 2021;56:1163-1173.
Not in our library10.1111/jre.12930
- 174.
Paku M, et al. SIRT3-mediated SOD2 and PGC-1alpha contribute to chemoresistance in colorectal cancer cells. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021;28:4720-4732.
Not in our library10.1245/s10434-020-09373-x
- 175.
Yuan Y, et al. P53 contributes to cisplatin induced renal oxidative damage via regulating P66shc and MnSOD. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2015;37:1240-1256.
Not in our library10.1159/000430247
- 176.
Liu X, Fan L, Lu C, Yin S, Hu H. Functional role of p53 in the regulation of chemical-induced oxidative stress. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020;2020:6039769.
Not in our library10.1155/2020/6039769
- 177.
Gu W, Roeder RG. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell. 1997;90:595-606.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80521-8
- 178.
de Kreutzenberg SV, et al. Downregulation of the longevity-associated protein sirtuin 1 in insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome: potential biochemical mechanisms. Diabetes. 2010;59:1006-1015.
Not in our library10.2337/db09-1187
- 179.
Kim HJ, et al. Carbon monoxide protects against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury by modulating the miR-34a/SIRT1 pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1852:1550-1559.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.04.017
- 180.
Ma F, et al. P53/NRF2 mediates SIRT1’s protective effect on diabetic nephropathy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2019;1866:1272-1281.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.04.006
- 181.
Wu, S. et al. Sirt6 protects cardiomyocytes against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by inhibiting P53/Fas-dependent cell death and augmenting endogenous antioxidant defense mechanisms. Cell Biol. Toxicol (2021).
Not in our library10.1007/s10565-021-09649-2
- 182.
Mulero MC, et al. DNA-binding affinity and transcriptional activity of the RelA homodimer of nuclear factor kappaB are not correlated. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:18821-18830.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m117.813980
- 183.
Sies H, Berndt C, Jones DP. Oxidative stress. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:715-748.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045037
- 184.
Rada P, et al. SIRT1 controls acetaminophen hepatotoxicity by modulating inflammation and oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018;28:1187-1208.
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2017.7373
- 185.
Chen IC, Huang HH, Chen PF, Chiang HC. Sirtuin 3 protects against urban particulate matter-induced autophagy in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol. Sci. 2016;152:113-127.
Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/kfw073
- 186.
Thandavarayan RA, et al. Sirtuin-6 deficiency exacerbates diabetes-induced impairment of wound healing. Exp. Dermatol. 2015;24:773-778.
Not in our library10.1111/exd.12762
- 187.
- 188.
- 189.
Stuart JA, Aibueku O, Bagshaw O, Moradi F. Hypoxia inducible factors as mediators of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species homeostasis in physiological normoxia. Med. Hypotheses. 2019;129:109249.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109249
- 190.
- 191.
Shi JX, Wang QJ, Li H, Huang Q. SIRT4 overexpression protects against diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting podocyte apoptosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;13:342-348.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2016.3938
- 192.
Ding M, et al. SIRT1 protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via activating eNOS in diabetic rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:143.
Not in our library10.1186/s12933-015-0299-8
- 193.
Li D, et al. Cardioprotection of CAPE-oNO2 against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion induced ROS generation via regulating the SIRT1/eNOS/NF-kappaB pathway in vivo and in vitro. Redox Biol. 2018;15:62-73.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2017.11.023
- 194.
- 195.
Verdin E, Hirschey MD, Finley LW, Haigis MC. Sirtuin regulation of mitochondria: energy production, apoptosis, and signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010;35:669-675.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2010.07.003
- 196.
Nikoletopoulou V, Markaki M, Palikaras K, Tavernarakis N. Crosstalk between apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1833:3448-3459.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.001
- 197.
Rifai K, et al. SIRT1-dependent epigenetic regulation of H3 and H4 histone acetylation in human breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9:30661-30678.
Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.25771
- 198.
Li Z, et al. Overexpressed SIRT6 attenuates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by inhibiting ERK1/2 signaling. Kidney Int. 2018;93:881-892.
Not in our library10.1016/j.kint.2017.10.021
- 199.
Yu W, et al. Effects of resveratrol on H(2)O(2)-induced apoptosis and expression of SIRTs in H9c2 cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2009;107:741-747.
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.22169
- 200.
Han X, et al. HDAC4 stabilizes SIRT1 via sumoylation SIRT1 to delay cellular senescence. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2016;43:41-46.
Not in our library10.1111/1440-1681.12496
- 201.
- 202.
Sauve AA, Wolberger C, Schramm VL, Boeke JD. The biochemistry of sirtuins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006;75:435-465.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133500
- 203.
Sarmah D, et al. Sirtuin-1 - mediated NF-kappaB pathway modulation to mitigate inflammasome signaling and cellular apoptosis is one of the neuroprotective effects of intra-arterial mesenchymal stem cell therapy following ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2022;18:821-838.
Not in our library10.1007/s12015-021-10315-7
- 204.
Brunet A, et al. Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science. 2004;303:2011-2015.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1094637
- 205.
Yi J, Luo J. SIRT1 and p53, effect on cancer, senescence and beyond. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1804:1684-1689.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.05.002
- 206.
Sun P, Yu H, Zhang WQ, Hu M, Lv R. Lentivirus-mediated siRNA targeting VEGF inhibits gastric cancer growth in vivo. Oncol. Rep. 2012;28:1687-1692.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2012.1966
- 207.
Yarahmadi S, et al. Inhibition of sirtuin 1 deacetylase by miR-211-5p provides a mechanism for the induction of cell death in breast cancer cells. Gene. 2019;711:143939.
Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2019.06.029
- 208.
Lin Y, Ma W, Benchimol S. Pidd, a new death-domain-containing protein, is induced by p53 and promotes apoptosis. Nat. Genet. 2000;26:122-127.
Not in our library10.1038/79102
- 209.
Ghosh A, et al. A novel SIRT1 inhibitor, 4bb induces apoptosis in HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells partially by activating p53. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017;488:562-p569.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.05.089
- 210.
Zeng Z, et al. Anoectochilus roxburghii flavonoids extract ameliorated the memory decline and reduced neuron apoptosis via modulating SIRT1 signaling pathway in senescent mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022;296:115361.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jep.2022.115361
- 211.
Vaziri H, et al. hSIR2(SIRT1) functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell. 2001;107:149-159.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00527-x
- 212.
Wei X, Tan J, Gao H. Role of sirtuin 1 in the brain development in congenital hypothyroidism rats via the regulation of p53 signaling pathway. Bioengineered. 2022;13:9455-9466.
Not in our library10.1080/21655979.2022.2060626
- 213.
Bi X, et al. The miRNA-34a/Sirt1/p53 pathway in a rat model of lens regeneration. Ann. Transl. Med. 2022;10:636.
Not in our library10.21037/atm-22-2099
- 214.
Hernandez-Jimenez M, et al. Silent information regulator 1 protects the brain against cerebral ischemic damage. Stroke. 2013;44:2333-2337.
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.113.001715
- 215.
Lin B, et al. Sirt1 improves heart failure through modulating the NF-kappaB p65/microRNA-155/BNDF signaling cascade. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;13:14482-14498.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.103640
- 216.
Wang Q, et al. Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) overexpression in BaF3 cells contributes to cell proliferation promotion, apoptosis resistance and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017;23:1477-1482.
Not in our library10.12659/msm.900754
- 217.
Harari OA, Liao JK. NF-kappaB and innate immunity in ischemic stroke. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2010;1207:32-40.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05735.x
- 218.
Jiang F, Zhou HY, Zhou LF, Zeng W, Zhao LH. IRF9 affects the TNF-induced phenotype of rheumatoid-arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes via regulation of the SIRT-1/NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Cells Tissues Organs. 2020;209:110-119.
Not in our library10.1159/000508405
- 219.
Marfe G, et al. Involvement of FOXO transcription factors, TRAIL-FasL/Fas, and sirtuin proteins family in canine coronavirus type II-induced apoptosis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27313.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0027313
- 220.
Motta MC, et al. Mammalian SIRT1 represses forkhead transcription factors. Cell. 2004;116:551-563.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00126-6
- 221.
Yu SL, et al. SIRT1 suppresses in vitro decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells through the downregulation of forkhead box O1 expression. Reprod. Biol. 2022;22:100672.
Not in our library10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100672
- 222.
Yao H, Yao Z, Zhang S, Zhang W, Zhou W. Upregulation of SIRT1 inhibits H2O2induced osteoblast apoptosis via FoxO1/betacatenin pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:6681-6690.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2018.8657
- 223.
Wang Y, et al. Roles of SIRT1/FoxO1/SREBP-1 in the development of progestin resistance in endometrial cancer. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018;298:961-969.
Not in our library10.1007/s00404-018-4893-3
- 224.
Li Z, Bridges B, Olson J, Weinman SA. The interaction between acetylation and serine-574 phosphorylation regulates the apoptotic function of FOXO3. Oncogene. 2017;36:1887-1898.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2016.359
- 225.
Wang F, et al. Deacetylation of FOXO3 by SIRT1 or SIRT2 leads to Skp2-mediated FOXO3 ubiquitination and degradation. Oncogene. 2012;31:1546-1557.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2011.347
- 226.
Frampton G, et al. The novel growth factor, progranulin, stimulates mouse cholangiocyte proliferation via sirtuin-1-mediated inactivation of FOXO1. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012;303:G1202-G1211.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00104.2012
- 227.
Wu, Y. X., Xu, R. Y., Jiang, L., Chen, X. Y. & Xiao, X. J. MicroRNA-30a-5p promotes chronic heart failure in rats by targeting sirtuin-1 to activate the nuclear factor-kappaB/NOD-like receptor 3 signaling pathway. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (2022).
Not in our library10.1007/s10557-021-07304-w
- 228.
Yamakuchi M, Ferlito M, Lowenstein C. J. miR-34a repression of SIRT1 regulates apoptosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:13421-13426.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0801613105
- 229.
Wang G, et al. miR-34a-5p inhibition alleviates intestinal ischemia/reperfusion-induced reactive oxygen species accumulation and apoptosis via activation of SIRT1 signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016;24:961-973.
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2015.6492
- 230.
Fan X, Yin X, Zhao Q, Yang Y. Hsa_circRNA_0045861 promotes renal injury in ureteropelvic junction obstruction via the microRNA-181d-5p/sirtuin 1 signaling axis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021;9:1571.
Not in our library10.21037/atm-21-5060
- 231.
- 232.
Adlakha YK, Saini N. miR-128 exerts pro-apoptotic effect in a p53 transcription-dependent and -independent manner via PUMA-Bak axis. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e542.
Not in our library10.1038/cddis.2013.46
- 233.
Chen DZ, et al. miR128 is upregulated in epilepsy and promotes apoptosis through the SIRT1 cascade. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019;44:694-704.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2019.4223
- 234.
Qin W, Xie W, Yang X, Xia N, Yang K. Inhibiting microRNA-449 attenuates cisplatin-induced injury in NRK-52E cells possibly via regulating the SIRT1/P53/BAX pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016;22:818-823.
Not in our library10.12659/msm.897187
- 235.
- 236.
Zhao L, et al. Melatonin alleviates brain injury in mice subjected to cecal ligation and puncture via attenuating inflammation, apoptosis, and oxidative stress: the role of SIRT1 signaling. J. Pineal Res. 2015;59:230-239.
Not in our library10.1111/jpi.12254
- 237.
Hu, J. et al. Melatonin alleviates postinfarction cardiac remodeling and dysfunction by inhibiting Mst1. J. Pineal Res. 62 (2017).
Not in our library10.1111/jpi.12368
- 238.
Han D, et al. Melatonin facilitates adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells to repair the murine infarcted heart via the SIRT1 signaling pathway. J. Pineal Res. 2016;60:178-192.
Not in our library10.1111/jpi.12299
- 239.
Yang Y, et al. Melatonin prevents cell death and mitochondrial dysfunction via a SIRT1-dependent mechanism during ischemic-stroke in mice. J. Pineal Res. 2015;58:61-70.
Not in our library10.1111/jpi.12193
- 240.
Heltweg B, et al. Antitumor activity of a small-molecule inhibitor of human silent information regulator 2 enzymes. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4368-4377.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3617
- 241.
Huang Q, et al. A SIRT1 activator, ginsenoside Rc, promotes energy metabolism in cardiomyocytes and neurons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:1416-1427.
Not in our library10.1021/jacs.0c10836
- 242.
- 243.
Peck B, et al. SIRT inhibitors induce cell death and p53 acetylation through targeting both SIRT1 and SIRT2. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010;9:844-855.
Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-0971
- 244.
Hoffmann G, Breitenbucher F, Schuler M, Ehrenhofer-Murray AE. A novel sirtuin 2 (SIRT2) inhibitor with p53-dependent pro-apoptotic activity in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:5208-5216.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m113.487736
- 245.
Li Y, et al. Sirt2 suppresses glioma cell growth through targeting NF-kappaB-miR-21 axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;441:661-667.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.077
- 246.
Keskin-Aktan A, Akbulut KG, Abdi S, Akbulut H. SIRT2 and FOXO3a expressions in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of young and aged male rats: antioxidant and anti-apoptotic effects of melatonin. Biol. Futur. 2022;73:71-85.
Not in our library10.1007/s42977-021-00102-3
- 247.
Li Y, et al. SIRT2 down-regulation in HeLa can induce p53 accumulation via p38 MAPK activation-dependent p300 decrease, eventually leading to apoptosis. Genes Cells. 2011;16:34-45.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01460.x
- 248.
She DT, Wong LJ, Baik SH, Arumugam TV. SIRT2 inhibition confers neuroprotection by downregulation of FOXO3a and MAPK signaling pathways in ischemic stroke. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018;55:9188-9203.
Not in our library10.1007/s12035-018-1058-0
- 249.
Wang Y, et al. SIRT2-mediated FOXO3a deacetylation drives its nuclear translocation triggering FasL-induced cell apoptosis during renal ischemia reperfusion. Apoptosis. 2017;22:519-530.
Not in our library10.1007/s10495-016-1341-3
- 250.
Song CL, et al. Sirtuin 3 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth through the glycogen synthase kinase-3beta/BCL2-associated X protein-dependent apoptotic pathway. Oncogene. 2016;35:631-641.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2015.121
- 251.
Xiao K, et al. Sirt3 is a tumor suppressor in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2013;30:1323-1328.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2013.2604
- 252.
Tao NN, et al. Sirtuin 3 enhanced drug sensitivity of human hepatoma cells through glutathione S-transferase pi 1/JNK signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7:50117-50130.
Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.10319
- 253.
Cao Y, Li P, Wang H, Li L, Li Q. SIRT3 promotion reduces resistance to cisplatin in lung cancer by modulating the FOXO3/CDT1 axis. Cancer Med. 2021;10:1394-1404.
Not in our library10.1002/cam4.3728
- 254.
- 255.
Yi X, et al. SIRT3-dependent mitochondrial dynamics remodeling contributes to oxidative stress-induced melanocyte degeneration in vitiligo. Theranostics. 2019;9:1614-1633.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.30398
- 256.
Zhang X, Tang N, Hadden TJ, Rishi AK. Akt, FoxO and regulation of apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1813;1978–1986:2011.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.010
- 257.
Peng Y, et al. Sirt3 suppresses calcium oxalate-induced renal tubular epithelial cell injury via modification of FoxO3a-mediated autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:34.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-018-1169-6
- 258.
Yue Y, Du Z, Tao J, Shi L. Inhibition of microRNA-297 alleviates THLE-2 cell injury induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation via sirtuin 3. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2022;100:125-133.
Not in our library10.1139/cjpp-2021-0287
- 259.
Liu Y, Qian XM, He QC, Weng JK. MiR-421 inhibition protects H9c2 cells against hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis by targeting Sirt3. Perfusion. 2020;35:255-262.
Not in our library10.1177/0267659119870725
- 260.
Liu B, et al. SIRT4 prevents hypoxia-induced apoptosis in H9c2 cardiomyoblast cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2013;32:655-662.
Not in our library10.1159/000354469
- 261.
Schlicker C, et al. Substrates and regulation mechanisms for the human mitochondrial sirtuins Sirt3 and Sirt5. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;382:790-801.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.048
- 262.
Yang CN, et al. The possible role of sirtuin 5 in the pathogenesis of apical periodontitis. Oral. Dis. 2021;27:1766-1774.
Not in our library10.1111/odi.13723
- 263.
Li W, Yang Y, Li Y, Zhao Y, Jiang H. Sirt5 attenuates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury through regulation of Nrf2/HO-1 and Bcl-2. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019;2019:4745132.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/4745132
- 264.
Wood M, Rymarchyk S, Zheng S, Cen Y. Trichostatin A inhibits deacetylation of histone H3 and p53 by SIRT6. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018;638:8-17.
Not in our library10.1016/j.abb.2017.12.009
- 265.
Vakhrusheva O, et al. Sirt7 increases stress resistance of cardiomyocytes and prevents apoptosis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy in mice. Circ. Res. 2008;102:703-710.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.107.164558
- 266.
Kiran S, Oddi V, Ramakrishna G. Sirtuin 7 promotes cellular survival following genomic stress by attenuation of DNA damage, SAPK activation and p53 response. Exp. Cell Res. 2015;331:123-141.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.11.001
- 267.
Glick D, Barth S, Macleod KF. Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Pathol. 2010;221:3-12.
Not in our library10.1002/path.2697
- 268.
Hamai A, Codogno P. New targets for acetylation in autophagy. Sci. Signal. 2012;5:pe29.
Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.2003187
- 269.
Yi C, Yu L. How does acetylation regulate autophagy? Autophagy. 2012;8:1529-1530.
Not in our library10.4161/auto.21156
- 270.
Esteves AR, Filipe F, Magalhaes JD, Silva DF, Cardoso SM. The role of beclin-1 acetylation on autophagic flux in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019;56:5654-5670.
Not in our library10.1007/s12035-019-1483-8
- 271.
Sun T, Jiao L, Wang Y, Yu Y, Ming L. SIRT1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition by promoting autophagic degradation of E-cadherin in melanoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:136.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-017-0167-4
- 272.
Huang S, et al. Sirtuin 1 promotes autophagy and proliferation of endometrial cancer cells by reducing acetylation level of LC3. Cell Biol. Int. 2021;45:1050-1059.
Not in our library10.1002/cbin.11549
- 273.
Liu C, et al. Sirt1 regulates acrosome biogenesis by modulating autophagic flux during spermiogenesis in mice. Development. 2017;144:441-451.
Not in our library10.1242/dev.147074
- 274.
Islam A, et al. Capsaicin exerts therapeutic effects by targeting tNOX-SIRT1 axis and augmenting ROS-dependent autophagy in melanoma cancer cells. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021;11:4199-4219.
Not in our library
- 275.
Cho JH, et al. Downregulation of SIRT1 signaling underlies hepatic autophagy impairment in glycogen storage disease type Ia. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006819.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1006819
- 276.
- 277.
Romeo-Guitart D, Leiva-Rodriguez T, Fores J, Casas C. Improved motor nerve regeneration by SIRT1/Hif1a-mediated autophagy. Cells. 2019;8:1354.
Not in our library10.3390/cells8111354
- 278.
Jiang Y, et al. Elucidation of SIRT-1/PGC-1alpha-associated mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20:40.
Not in our library10.1186/s12944-021-01461-5
- 279.
Schrepfer E, Scorrano L. Mitofusins, from mitochondria to metabolism. Mol. Cell. 2016;61:683-694.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.022
- 280.
Biel TG, et al. Sirtuin 1 suppresses mitochondrial dysfunction of ischemic mouse livers in a mitofusin 2-dependent manner. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:279-290.
Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2015.96
- 281.
Chun SK, et al. Loss of sirtuin 1 and mitofusin 2 contributes to enhanced ischemia/reperfusion injury in aged livers. Aging Cell. 2018;17:e12761.
Not in our library10.1111/acel.12761
- 282.
Guha P, et al. IPMK mediates activation of ULK signaling and transcriptional regulation of autophagy linked to liver inflammation and regeneration. Cell Rep. 2019;26:2692-2703.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.013
- 283.
Luo G, et al. Sirt1 promotes autophagy and inhibits apoptosis to protect cardiomyocytes from hypoxic stress. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019;43:2033-2043.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2019.4125
- 284.
Gautam S, et al. The signaling pathways implicated in impairment of hepatic autophagy in glycogen storage disease type Ia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020;29:834-844.
Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddaa007
- 285.
Chen ML, et al. Resveratrol attenuates vascular endothelial inflammation by inducing autophagy through the cAMP signaling pathway. Autophagy. 2013;9:2033-2045.
Not in our library10.4161/auto.26336
- 286.
Yan P, et al. Regulation of autophagy by AMP-activated protein kinase/sirtuin 1 pathway reduces spinal cord neurons damage. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2017;20:1029-1036.
Not in our library10.22038/ijbms.2017.9272
- 287.
Zhang Y, et al. Resveratrol improves hepatic steatosis by inducing autophagy through the cAMP signaling pathway. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015;59:1443-1457.
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201500016
- 288.
Guo H, Chen Y, Liao L, Wu W. Resveratrol protects HUVECs from oxidized-LDL induced oxidative damage by autophagy upregulation via the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2013;27:189-198.
Not in our library10.1007/s10557-013-6442-4
- 289.
Lee IH, et al. A role for the NAD-dependent deacetylase Sirt1 in the regulation of autophagy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:3374-3379.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0712145105
- 290.
Leng S, et al. SIRT1 coordinates with the CRL4B complex to regulate pancreatic cancer stem cells to promote tumorigenesis. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:3329-3343.
Not in our library10.1038/s41418-021-00821-z
- 291.
Song X, et al. miR-124 and miR-142 enhance cisplatin sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells through repressing autophagy via directly targeting SIRT1. RSC Adv. 2019;9:5234-5243.
Not in our library10.1039/c8ra09914f
- 292.
Dong W, Zhang H, Zhao C, Luo Y, Chen Y. Silencing of miR-150-5p Ameliorates Diabetic Nephropathy by Targeting SIRT1/p53/AMPK Pathway. Front Physiol. 2021;12:624989.
Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2021.624989
- 293.
Luan B, Sun C. MiR-138-5p affects insulin resistance to regulate type 2 diabetes progression through inducing autophagy in HepG2 cells by regulating SIRT1. Nutr. Res. 2018;59:90-98.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nutres.2018.05.001
- 294.
Dai SH, et al. microRNA-145 Inhibition Upregulates SIRT1 and Attenuates Autophagy in a Mouse Model of Lung Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via NF-kappaB-dependent Beclin 1. Transplantation. 2021;105:529-539.
Not in our library10.1097/tp.0000000000003435
- 295.
Yang J, et al. LncRNA MALAT1 enhances ox-LDL-induced autophagy through the SIRT1/MAPK/NF-kappaB pathway in macrophages. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2020;18:652-662.
Not in our library10.2174/1570161118666200317153124
- 296.
Zhang HG, Wang FJ, Wang Y, Zhao ZX, Qiao PF. lncRNA GAS5 inhibits malignant progression by regulating macroautophagy and forms a negative feedback regulatory loop with the miR34a/mTOR/SIRT1 pathway in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2021;45:202-216.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2020.7825
- 297.
Esteves AR, et al. Mitochondrial metabolism regulates microtubule acetylome and autophagy trough sirtuin-2: impact for Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018;55:1440-1462.
Not in our library10.1007/s12035-017-0420-y
- 298.
- 299.
Silva DF, Esteves AR, Oliveira CR, Cardoso SM. Mitochondrial metabolism power SIRT2-dependent deficient traffic causing Alzheimer’s-disease related pathology. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;54:4021-4040.
Not in our library10.1007/s12035-016-9951-x
- 300.
Wang L, et al. Down regulation of SIRT2 reduced ASS induced NSCLC apoptosis through the release of autophagy components via exosomes. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:601953.
Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2020.601953
- 301.
Lang A, et al. SIRT4 interacts with OPA1 and regulates mitochondrial quality control and mitophagy. Aging (Albany NY). 2017;9:2163-2189.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.101307
- 302.
Polletta L, et al. SIRT5 regulation of ammonia-induced autophagy and mitophagy. Autophagy. 2015;11:253-270.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2015.1009778
- 303.
Wang Y, Chang J, Wang ZQ, Li Y. Sirt3 promotes the autophagy of HK2 human proximal tubular epithelial cells via the inhibition of Notch1/Hes1 signaling. Mol. Med. Rep. 2021;24:634.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2021.12273
- 304.
- 305.
Zhang L, et al. MicroRNA-874-5p regulates autophagy and proliferation in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells by targeting Sirtuin 3. Eur. J. Pharm. 2020;888:173485.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173485
- 306.
Li, Y., Sun, T., Shen, S., Wang, L. & Yan, J. LncRNA DYNLRB2-2 inhibits THP-1 macrophage foam cell formation by enhancing autophagy. Biol Chem (2019).
Not in our library10.1515/hsz-2018-0461
- 307.
Zullo A, Guida R, Sciarrillo R, Mancini FP. Redox homeostasis in cardiovascular disease: the role of mitochondrial sirtuins. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2022;13:858330.
Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2022.858330
- 308.
He L, et al. SIRT4 suppresses doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by regulating the AKT/mTOR/autophagy pathway. Toxicology. 2022;469:153119.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tox.2022.153119
- 309.
- 310.
- 311.
Wang G, et al. Regulation of UCP1 and mitochondrial metabolism in brown adipose tissue by reversible succinylation. Mol. Cell. 2019;74:844-857.e847.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.021
- 312.
Zhang Y, Wang L, Meng L, Cao G, Wu Y. Sirtuin 6 overexpression relieves sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by promoting autophagy. Cell Cycle. 2019;18:425-436.
Not in our library10.1080/15384101.2019.1568746
- 313.
Takasaka N, et al. Autophagy induction by SIRT6 through attenuation of insulin-like growth factor signaling is involved in the regulation of human bronchial epithelial cell senescence. J. Immunol. 2014;192:958-968.
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1302341
- 314.
Lu J, et al. SIRT6 suppresses isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy through activation of autophagy. Transl. Res. 2016;172:96-112.e116.
Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2016.03.002
- 315.
Song JJ, et al. MicroRNA-122 aggravates angiotensin II-mediated apoptosis and autophagy imbalance in rat aortic adventitial fibroblasts via the modulation of SIRT6-elabela-ACE2 signaling. Eur. J. Pharm. 2020;883:173374.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173374
- 316.
Yu W, et al. Silencing forkhead box M1 promotes apoptosis and autophagy through SIRT7/mTOR/IGF2 pathway in gastric cancer cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2018;119:9090-9098.
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.27168
- 317.
Wu SY, Du YC, Yue CF. Sirt7 protects chondrocytes degeneration in osteoarthritis via autophagy activation. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:9246-9255.
Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_202009_23006
- 318.
- 319.
Conlon I, Raff M. Size control in animal development. Cell. 1999;96:235-244.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80563-2
- 320.
Neufeld TP, de la Cruz AF, Johnston LA, Edgar BA. Coordination of growth and cell division in the Drosophila wing. Cell. 1998;93:1183-1193.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81462-2
- 321.
Thompson BJ. Developmental control of cell growth and division in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010;22:788-794.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2010.08.018
- 322.
Gaglia G, et al. Temporal and spatial topography of cell proliferation in cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022;24:316-326.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-022-00860-9
- 323.
Cordero-Espinoza L, et al. Dynamic cell contacts between periportal mesenchyme and ductal epithelium act as a rheostat for liver cell proliferation. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:1907-1921.e1908.
Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2021.07.002
- 324.
Wang J, et al. Tumor-derived adenosine promotes macrophage proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2021;74:627-637.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2020.10.021
- 325.
Wang X, et al. Role of SIRT1/AMPK signaling in the proliferation, migration and invasion of renal cell carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2021;45:109.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2021.8060
- 326.
- 327.
Imperatore F, et al. SIRT1 regulates macrophage self-renewal. EMBO J. 2017;36:2353-2372.
Not in our library10.15252/embj.201695737
- 328.
Lin XL, Li K, Yang Z, Chen B, Zhang T. Dulcitol suppresses proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma via regulating SIRT1/p53 pathway. Phytomedicine. 2020;66:153112.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153112
- 329.
Zhang ZY, et al. SIRT1 regulates oncogenesis via a mutant p53-dependent pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2015;62:121-130.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2014.08.007
- 330.
Valente S, et al. 1,4-dihydropyridines active on the SIRT1/AMPK pathway ameliorate skin repair and mitochondrial function and exhibit inhibition of proliferation in cancer cells. J. Med Chem. 2016;59:1471-1491.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01117
- 331.
Zhang S, et al. SIRT1 inhibits gastric cancer proliferation and metastasis via STAT3/MMP-13 signaling. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:15395-15406.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28186
- 332.
Liu PY, et al. The histone deacetylase SIRT2 stabilizes Myc oncoproteins. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:503-514.
Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2012.147
- 333.
Li C, et al. SIRT2 contributes to the regulation of intestinal cell proliferation and differentiation. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;10:43-57.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.01.004
- 334.
Hao C, et al. SIRT2 regulates proliferation and chemotherapy response of MLL-ENL-driven acute myeloid leukemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022;596:36-42.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.01.081
- 335.
Dan L, et al. The role of sirtuin 2 activation by nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase in the aberrant proliferation and survival of myeloid leukemia cells. Haematologica. 2012;97:551-559.
Not in our library10.3324/haematol.2011.055236
- 336.
- 337.
Liu S, Gao X, Fan Z, Wang Q. SIRT2 affects cell proliferation and apoptosis by suppressing the level of autophagy in renal podocytes. Dis. Markers. 2022;2022:4586198.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/4586198
- 338.
- 339.
Chen IC, Chiang WF, Liu SY, Chen PF, Chiang HC. Role of SIRT3 in the regulation of redox balance during oral carcinogenesis. Mol. Cancer. 2013;12:68.
Not in our library10.1186/1476-4598-12-68
- 340.
Yao W, et al. Profilin-1 suppresses tumorigenicity in pancreatic cancer through regulation of the SIRT3-HIF1alpha axis. Mol. Cancer. 2014;13:187.
Not in our library10.1186/1476-4598-13-187
- 341.
Chen Z, et al. SIRT4 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of thyroid cancer cells by inhibiting glutamine metabolism. Onco. Targets Ther. 2019;12:2397-2408.
Not in our library10.2147/ott.s189536
- 342.
Wang C, et al. Mammalian SIRT4 is a tumor suppressor of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by inhibiting cancer proliferation, migration and invasion. Cancer Biomark. 2020;29:453-462.
Not in our library10.3233/cbm-191253
- 343.
Csibi A, et al. The mTORC1 pathway stimulates glutamine metabolism and cell proliferation by repressing SIRT4. Cell. 2021;184:2256.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.059
- 344.
Cui Y, et al. SIRT4 is the molecular switch mediating cellular proliferation in colorectal cancer through GLS mediated activation of AKT/GSK3beta/CyclinD1 pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2021;42:481-492.
Not in our library10.1093/carcin/bgaa134
- 345.
He S, Jia Q, Zhou L, Wang Z, Li M. SIRT5 is involved in the proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer by promoting aerobic glycolysis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2022;235:153943.
Not in our library10.1016/j.prp.2022.153943
- 346.
Guan J, et al. Sirtuin 5 regulates the proliferation, invasion and migration of prostate cancer cells through acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 1. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020;24:14039-14049.
Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.16016
- 347.
Ren M, et al. Citrate synthase desuccinylation by SIRT5 promotes colon cancer cell proliferation and migration. Biol. Chem. 2020;401:1031-1039.
Not in our library10.1515/hsz-2020-0118
- 348.
Yang X, et al. SHMT2 desuccinylation by SIRT5 drives cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2018;78:372-386.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1912
- 349.
Chang L, et al. SIRT5 promotes cell proliferation and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting E2F1. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:342-349.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2017.7875
- 350.
Ma Y, Fei X. SIRT5 regulates pancreatic beta-cell proliferation and insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018;16:1417-1425.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2018.6301
- 351.
Ming M, et al. SIRT6 promotes COX-2 expression and acts as an oncogene in skin cancer. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5925-5933.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-1308
- 352.
Zhang C, Yu Y, Huang Q, Tang K. SIRT6 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma via the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;20:1575-1582.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2019.10398
- 353.
Wang H, et al. SIRT6 controls hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis through epigenetic regulation of Wnt signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:495-507.
Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.005
- 354.
Cea M, et al. Evidence for a role of the histone deacetylase SIRT6 in DNA damage response of multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2016;127:1138-1150.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2015-06-649970
- 355.
Wang H, et al. p53-dependent LincRNA-p21 protects against proliferation and anti-apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis by upregulating SIRT7 via MicroRNA-17-5p. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2021;14:426-440.
Not in our library10.1007/s12265-020-10074-9
- 356.
Kimura Y, et al. Sirt7 deficiency attenuates neointimal formation following vascular injury by modulating vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circ. J. 2021;85:2232-2240.
Not in our library10.1253/circj.cj-20-0936
- 357.
Chen KL, et al. SIRT7 depletion inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and increases drug sensitivity by activating p38MAPK in breast cancer cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:6767-6778.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.26398
- 358.
Friedl P, Brocker EB. The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2000;57:41-64.
Not in our library10.1007/s000180050498
- 359.
Trepat X, Chen Z, Jacobson K. Cell migration. Compr. Physiol. 2012;2:2369-2392.
Not in our library10.1002/cphy.c110012
- 360.
Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:563-572.
Not in our library10.1038/nrc865
- 361.
Hamidi H, Ivaska J. Every step of the way: integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:533-548.
Not in our library10.1038/s41568-018-0038-z
- 362.
Liu F, Shang YX. Sirtuin 6 attenuates epithelial-mesenchymal transition by suppressing the TGF-beta1/Smad3 pathway and c-Jun in asthma models. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;82:106333.
Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106333
- 363.
Feng H, et al. The expression of SIRT1 regulates the metastaticplasticity of chondrosarcoma cells by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41203.
Not in our library10.1038/srep41203
- 364.
Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:442-454.
Not in our library10.1038/nrc822
- 365.
Yuan Z, et al. Suppressive effect of microRNA-138 on the proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells via targeting SIRT1. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;13:3417-3423.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2017.4426
- 366.
Miranda-Goncalves V, et al. Lactate increases renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness through sirtuin 1-dependent epithelial mesenchymal transition axis regulation. Cells. 2020;9:1053.
Not in our library10.3390/cells9041053
- 367.
Latifkar A, et al. Loss of sirtuin 1 alters the secretome of breast cancer cells by impairing lysosomal integrity. Dev. Cell. 2019;49:393-408.e397.
Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.011
- 368.
Zhong S, et al. Hsa_circ_0088036 promotes the proliferation and migration of fibroblast-like synoviocytes by sponging miR-140-3p and upregulating SIRT 1 expression in rheumatoid arthritis. Mol. Immunol. 2020;125:131-139.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molimm.2020.07.004
- 369.
Yu XJ, et al. SIRT1-ZEB1-positive feedback promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition process and metastasis of osteosarcoma. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:3727-3735.
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.27653
- 370.
Qiang L, Sample A, Liu H, Wu X, He YY. Epidermal SIRT1 regulates inflammation, cell migration, and wound healing. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14110.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-14371-3
- 371.
Yao Y, Fan X, Yu B, Li T, Zhang Y. Knockdown of long noncoding RNA Malat1 aggravates hypoxia-induced cardiomyocyte injury by targeting miR-217. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019;28:719-728.
Not in our library10.17219/acem/93878
- 372.
Li G, Zhong S. MicroRNA-217 inhibits the proliferation and invasion, and promotes apoptosis of non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting sirtuin 1. Oncol. Lett. 2021;21:386.
Not in our library10.3892/ol.2021.12647
- 373.
Lai M, et al. MiR-34a inhibits migration and invasion by regulating the SIRT1/p53 pathway in human SW480 cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015;11:3301-3307.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2015.3182
- 374.
Zhou J, et al. microRNA-34a overexpression inhibits cell migration and invasion via regulating SIRT1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2017;14:6950-6954.
Not in our library10.3892/ol.2017.7090
- 375.
Liang Y, et al. A novel long non-coding RNA-PRLB acts as a tumor promoter through regulating miR-4766-5p/SIRT1 axis in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:563.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-018-0582-1
- 376.
Zhong Z, Wen Z, Darnell JE. Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science. 1994;264:95-98.
Not in our library10.1126/science.8140422
- 377.
Stark GR, Darnell JE. The JAK-STAT pathway at twenty. Immunity. 2012;36:503-514.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.013
- 378.
Wang B, et al. STAT3 aggravates TGF-beta1-induced hepatic epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migration. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;98:214-221.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.035
- 379.
Zhu H, et al. The SIRT2-mediated deacetylation of AKR1C1 is required for suppressing its pro-metastasis function in non-small cell lung cancer. Theranostics. 2020;10:2188-2200.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.39151
- 380.
Shen X, et al. Wildtype IDH1 affects cell migration by modulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in primary glioblastoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020;22:1949-1957.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2020.11250
- 381.
Wang B, et al. SIRT2-dependent IDH1 deacetylation inhibits colorectal cancer and liver metastases. EMBO Rep. 2020;21:e48183.
Not in our library10.15252/embr.201948183
- 382.
Liu L, et al. SIRT3 inhibits gallbladder cancer by induction of AKT-dependent ferroptosis and blockade of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Lett. 2021;510:93-104.
Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2021.04.007
- 383.
Sun H, et al. SIRT4 acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer by inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Onco. Targets Ther. 2018;11:3959-3968.
Not in our library10.2147/ott.s156143
- 384.
Li DJ, et al. Nicotinic ACh receptor alpha7 inhibits PDGF-induced migration of vascular smooth muscle cells by activating mitochondrial deacetylase sirtuin 3. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019;176:4388-4401.
Not in our library10.1111/bph.14506
- 385.
Dang S, et al. MiR-299-3p functions as a tumor suppressor via targeting Sirtuin 5 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;106:966-975.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2018.06.042
- 386.
Yao B, et al. Hypoxia-induced miR-3677-3p promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by suppressing SIRT5. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020;24:8718-8731.
Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.15503
- 387.
Han LL, Jia L, Wu F, Huang C. Sirtuin6 (SIRT6) promotes the EMT of hepatocellular carcinoma by stimulating autophagic degradation of E-cadherin. Mol. Cancer Res. 2019;17:2267-2280.
Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-19-0321
- 388.
Lin H, Hao Y, Zhao Z, Tong Y. Sirtuin 6 contributes to migration and invasion of osteosarcoma cells via the ERK1/2/MMP9 pathway. FEBS Open Bio. 2017;7:1291-1301.
Not in our library10.1002/2211-5463.12265
- 389.
Deng Z, et al. Sirtuin 7 promotes colorectal carcinoma proliferation and invasion through the inhibition of E-cadherin. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018;15:2333-2342.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2017.5673
- 390.
Mao S, Ma J, Yu H. Sirtuin-7 knockdown inhibits the growth of endometrial cancer cells by inducing apoptosis via the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2019;17:937-943.
Not in our library10.3892/ol.2018.9698
- 391.
- 392.
- 393.
Olmos Y, Brosens JJ, Lam EW. Interplay between SIRT proteins and tumour suppressor transcription factors in chemotherapeutic resistance of cancer. Drug Resist Updat. 2011;14:35-44.
Not in our library10.1016/j.drup.2010.12.001
- 394.
Sung H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209-249.
Not in our library10.3322/caac.21660
- 395.
Shi P, Zhou M, Yang Y. Upregulated tumor sirtuin 2 expression correlates with reduced TNM stage and better overall survival in surgical breast cancer patients. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2020;189:83-89.
Not in our library10.1007/s11845-019-02071-y
- 396.
Shi Q, et al. Decreased sirtuin 4 expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with invasive breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2016;12:2606-2612.
Not in our library10.3892/ol.2016.5021
- 397.
Xu Y, Qin Q, Chen R, Wei C, Mo Q. SIRT1 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cell line MCF-7 by upregulating DNA polymerase delta1 (POLD1). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;502:351-357.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.164
- 398.
Geng Q, Peng H, Chen F, Luo R, Li R. High expression of Sirt7 served as a predictor of adverse outcome in breast cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8:1938-1945.
Not in our library
- 399.
Wu M, et al. Expression of SIRT1 is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in both operable triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer. Med. Oncol. 2012;29:3240-3249.
Not in our library10.1007/s12032-012-0260-6
- 400.
Sinha S, Sharma S, Vora J, Shrivastava N. Emerging role of sirtuins in breast cancer metastasis and multidrug resistance: Implication for novel therapeutic strategies targeting sirtuins. Pharm. Res. 2020;158:104880.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104880
- 401.
Jin MS, et al. SIRT1 induces tumor invasion by targeting epithelial mesenchymal transition-related pathway and is a prognostic marker in triple negative breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:4743-4753.
Not in our library10.1007/s13277-015-4231-3
- 402.
Simic P, et al. SIRT1 suppresses the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis and organ fibrosis. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1175-1186.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.019
- 403.
Shi L, et al. A SIRT1-centered circuitry regulates breast cancer stemness and metastasis. Oncogene. 2018;37:6299-6315.
Not in our library10.1038/s41388-018-0370-5
- 404.
Eades G, et al. miR-200a regulates SIRT1 expression and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like transformation in mammary epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:25992-26002.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111.229401
- 405.
Moore RL, Faller DV. SIRT1 represses estrogen-signaling, ligand-independent ERα-mediated transcription, and cell proliferation in estrogen-responsive breast cells. J. Endocrinol. 2013;216:273-285.
Not in our library10.1530/joe-12-0102
- 406.
Gollavilli PN, et al. AMPK inhibits MTDH expression via GSK3β and SIRT1 activation: potential role in triple negative breast cancer cell proliferation. Febs J. 2015;282:3971-3985.
Not in our library10.1111/febs.13391
- 407.
- 408.
Sterneck E, Poria DK, Balamurugan K. Slug and E-cadherin: stealth accomplices? Front Mol. Biosci. 2020;7:138.
Not in our library10.3389/fmolb.2020.00138
- 409.
Zhou W, et al. The SIRT2 deacetylase stabilizes slug to control malignancy of basal-like breast cancer. Cell Rep. 2016;17:1302-1317.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.006
- 410.
Pinterić M, et al. Sirt3 exerts its tumor-suppressive role by increasing p53 and attenuating response to estrogen in MCF-7 Cells. Antioxid. (Basel). 2020;9:294.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox9040294
- 411.
Du L, et al. Loss of SIRT4 promotes the self-renewal of breast cancer stem cells. Theranostics. 2020;10:9458-9476.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.44688
- 412.
Choi HK, et al. SIRT1-mediated FoxO1 deacetylation is essential for multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 expression in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Mol. Pharm. 2013;10:2517-2527.
Not in our library10.1021/mp400287p
- 413.
Xing J, et al. SIRT4 enhances the sensitivity of ER-positive breast cancer to tamoxifen by inhibiting the IL-6/STAT3 signal pathway. Cancer Med. 2019;8:7086-7097.
Not in our library10.1002/cam4.2557
- 414.
- 415.
Yang GC, et al. The expression and related clinical significance of SIRT3 in non-small-cell lung cancer. Dis. Markers. 2017;2017:8241953.
Not in our library10.1155/2017/8241953
- 416.
Tao F, et al. SIRT3 acts as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of lung cancer: A retrospective study. Med. (Baltim.). 2021;100:e26580.
Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000026580
- 417.
Azuma Y, et al. SIRT6 expression is associated with poor prognosis and chemosensitivity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;112:231-237.
Not in our library10.1002/jso.23975
- 418.
Palmirotta R, et al. Sirtuins and cancer: role in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016;2016:3031459.
Not in our library10.1155/2016/3031459
- 419.
Yuan H, Su L, Chen WY. The emerging and diverse roles of sirtuins in cancer: a clinical perspective. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:1399-1416.
Not in our library10.2147/ott.s37750
- 420.
Zhang Z, et al. Long noncoding RNA SNHG10 sponges miR-543 to upregulate tumor suppressive SIRT1 in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2020;35:771-775.
Not in our library10.1089/cbr.2019.3334
- 421.
Li X, Jiang Z, Li X, Zhang X. SIRT1 overexpression protects non-small cell lung cancer cells against osteopontin-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by suppressing NF-κB signaling. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:1157-1171.
Not in our library10.2147/ott.s137146
- 422.
Yao Y, Hua Q, Zhou Y, Shen H. CircRNA has_circ_0001946 promotes cell growth in lung adenocarcinoma by regulating miR-135a-5p/SIRT1 axis and activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;111:1367-1375.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.120
- 423.
Xu Y, et al. Oxidative stress activates SIRT2 to deacetylate and stimulate phosphoglycerate mutase. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3630-3642.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3615
- 424.
Hou T, et al. SIRT6 coordinates with CHD4 to promote chromatin relaxation and DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:2982-3000.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkaa006
- 425.
Li Z, et al. SIRT6 drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer via snail-dependent transrepression of KLF4. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;37:323.
Not in our library10.1186/s13046-018-0984-z
- 426.
Wei J, et al. MicroRNA-326 impairs chemotherapy resistance in non small cell lung cancer by suppressing histone deacetylase SIRT1-mediated HIF1α and elevating VEGFA. Bioengineered. 2022;13:5685-5699.
Not in our library10.1080/21655979.2021.1993718
- 427.
Li Z, Xie QR, Chen Z, Lu S, Xia W. Regulation of SIRT2 levels for human non-small cell lung cancer therapy. Lung Cancer. 2013;82:9-15.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.05.013
- 428.
Cao K, et al. Sirt3 promoted DNA damage repair and radioresistance through ATM-Chk2 in non-small cell lung cancer cells. J. Cancer. 2021;12:5464-5472.
Not in our library10.7150/jca.53173
- 429.
Wen X, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 22/silent information regulator 1 axis plays a pivotal role in the prognosis and 5-fluorouracil resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020;65:1064-1073.
Not in our library10.1007/s10620-019-05844-8
- 430.
Xu J, et al. In-depth profiling and quantification of the lysine acetylome in hepatocellular carcinoma with a trapped ion mobility mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2022;21:100255.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100255
- 431.
Lee N, et al. SIRT6 depletion suppresses tumor growth by promoting cellular senescence induced by DNA damage in HCC. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165835.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0165835
- 432.
Wang JX, et al. Down-regulation of sirtuin 3 is associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:297.
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2407-14-297
- 433.
Guo, D. et al. Vimentin acetylation is involved in SIRT5-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma migration. Am. J. Cancer Res. 8, 2453–2466.
Not in our library
- 434.
Wang YS, et al. Sirtuin 4 depletion promotes hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis through regulating adenosine-monophosphate-activated protein kinase alpha/mammalian target of rapamycin axis in mice. Hepatology. 2019;69:1614-1631.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.30421
- 435.
Liu L, et al. SIRT1-mediated transcriptional regulation of SOX2 is important for self-renewal of liver cancer stem cells. Hepatology. 2016;64:814-827.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.28690
- 436.
Zhao J, et al. SIRT7 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma response to therapy by altering the p53-dependent cell death pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:252.
Not in our library10.1186/s13046-019-1246-4
- 437.
McGinnis CD, Jennings EQ, Harris PS, Galligan JJ, Fritz KS. Biochemical mechanisms of sirtuin-directed protein acylation in hepatic pathologies of mitochondrial dysfunction. Cells. 2022;11:2045.
Not in our library10.3390/cells11132045
- 438.
Sun R, et al. Loss of SIRT5 promotes bile acid-induced immunosuppressive microenvironment and hepatocarcinogenesis. J. Hepatol. 2022;77:453-466.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2022.02.030
- 439.
Bai L, et al. Overexpression of SLC25A51 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by driving aerobic glycolysis through activation of SIRT5. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022;182:11-22.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.02.014
- 440.
Yang H, et al. Sirtuin-mediated deacetylation of hnRNP A1 suppresses glycolysis and growth in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2019;38:4915-4931.
Not in our library10.1038/s41388-019-0764-z
- 441.
Du L, et al. USP48 Is Upregulated by Mettl14 to Attenuate Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Regulating SIRT6 Stabilization. Cancer Res. 2021;81:3822-3834.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-4163
- 442.
Huang FY, et al. Tumor suppressive role of mitochondrial sirtuin 4 in induction of G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Disco. 2021;7:88.
Not in our library10.1038/s41420-021-00470-8
- 443.
- 444.
Xia YQ, et al. SIRT6 depletion sensitizes human hepatoma cells to chemotherapeutics by downregulating MDR1 expression. Front Pharm. 2018;9:194.
Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2018.00194
- 445.
Jiang K, et al. Overexpression of SIRT1 is a poor prognostic factor for advanced colorectal cancer. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.). 2014;127:2021-2024.
Not in our library
- 446.
Du F, et al. SIRT2, a direct target of miR-212-5p, suppresses the proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020;24:9985-9998.
Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.15603
- 447.
Huang G, et al. Clinical and therapeutic significance of sirtuin-4 expression in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2016;35:2801-2810.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2016.4685
- 448.
Zhang Y, et al. SIRT6, a novel direct transcriptional target of FoxO3a, mediates colon cancer therapy. Theranostics. 2019;9:2380-2394.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.29724
- 449.
- 450.
Ren NSX, et al. Haploinsufficiency of SIRT1 enhances glutamine metabolism and promotes cancer development. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:483-494.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.047
- 451.
Paku M, et al. SIRT3-mediated SOD2 and PGC-1α contribute to chemoresistance in colorectal cancer cells. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021;28:4720-4732.
Not in our library10.1245/s10434-020-09373-x
- 452.
Yang M, et al. FOXQ1-mediated SIRT1 upregulation enhances stemness and radio-resistance of colorectal cancer cells and restores intestinal microbiota function by promoting β-catenin nuclear translocation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022;41:70.
Not in our library10.1186/s13046-021-02239-4
- 453.
Zhou J, Wu A, Yu X, Zhu J, Dai H. SIRT6 inhibits growth of gastric cancer by inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2017;38:1059-1066.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2017.5753
- 454.
Cai S, et al. SIRT6 silencing overcomes resistance to sorafenib by promoting ferroptosis in gastric cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;577:158-164.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.08.080
- 455.
Hu T, et al. Metabolic rewiring by loss of sirt5 promotes kras-induced pancreatic cancer progression. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:1584-1600.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.045
- 456.
Tsai YC, et al. Upregulating sirtuin 6 ameliorates glycolysis, EMT and distant metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with krüppel-like factor 10 deficiency. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021;53:1623-1635.
Not in our library10.1038/s12276-021-00687-8
- 457.
Zhang JG, et al. Sirtuin 1 facilitates chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer cells by regulating adaptive response to chemotherapy-induced stress. Cancer Sci. 2014;105:445-454.
Not in our library10.1111/cas.12364
- 458.
Zeng Z, et al. Gene expression and prognosis of sirtuin family members in ovarian cancer. Med. (Baltim.). 2020;99:e20685.
Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000020685
- 459.
Zhang J, et al. The histone deacetylase SIRT6 inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation via down-regulation of Notch 3 expression. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2015;19:818-824.
Not in our library
- 460.
Sun X, et al. SIRT5 promotes cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer by suppressing DNA damage in a ROS-dependent manner via regulation of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Front Oncol. 2019;9:754.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2019.00754
- 461.
Jiang W, Jiang P, Yang R, Liu DF. Functional role of SIRT1-induced HMGB1 expression and acetylation in migration, invasion and angiogenesis of ovarian cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;22:4431-4439.
Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_201807_15494
- 462.
Tae IH, et al. A new SIRT1 inhibitor, MHY2245, induces autophagy and inhibits energy metabolism via PKM2/mTOR pathway in human ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1901-1916.
Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.44343
- 463.
Dong XC, Jing LM, Wang WX, Gao YX. Down-regulation of SIRT3 promotes ovarian carcinoma metastasis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;475:245-250.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.098
- 464.
- 465.
Wang W, et al. ROS-induced SIRT2 upregulation contributes to cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer. Antioxid. (Basel). 2020;9:1137.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox9111137
- 466.
Crosbie EJ, et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2022;399:1412-1428.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00323-3
- 467.
Guo Y, Zhao N, Zhou J, Dong J, Wang X. Sirtuin 2 in endometrial cancer: a potential regulator for cell proliferation, apoptosis and RAS/ERK pathway. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020;19:1533033820980781.
Not in our library10.1177/1533033820980781
- 468.
Fukuda T, et al. Putative tumor suppression function of SIRT6 in endometrial cancer. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:2274-2281.
Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2015.06.043
- 469.
Asaka R, et al. Sirtuin 1 promotes the growth and cisplatin resistance of endometrial carcinoma cells: a novel therapeutic target. Lab. Invest. 2015;95:1363-1373.
Not in our library10.1038/labinvest.2015.119
- 470.
Zhao N, Guo Y, Liu P, Chen Y, Wang Y. Sirtuin 2 promotes cell stemness and MEK/ERK signaling pathway while reduces chemosensitivity in endometrial cancer. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2022;305:693-701.
Not in our library10.1007/s00404-021-06216-2
- 471.
Yang LP, et al. SIRT2 expression exhibits potential to serve as a biomarker for disease surveillance and prognosis in the management of cervical cancer patients. Med. (Baltim.). 2020;99:e18668.
Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000018668
- 472.
So D, et al. Cervical cancer is addicted to SIRT1 disarming the AIM2 antiviral defense. Oncogene. 2018;37:5191-5204.
Not in our library10.1038/s41388-018-0339-4
- 473.
Xu LX, Hao LJ, Ma JQ, Liu JK, Hasim A. SIRT3 promotes the invasion and metastasis of cervical cancer cells by regulating fatty acid synthase. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2020;464:11-20.
Not in our library10.1007/s11010-019-03644-2
- 474.
- 475.
Chen H, et al. Sirtuin 1 knockdown inhibits glioma cell proliferation and potentiates temozolomide toxicity via facilitation of reactive oxygen species generation. Oncol. Lett. 2019;17:5343-5350.
Not in our library10.3892/ol.2019.10235
- 476.
Mu P, et al. Sirtuin 7 promotes glioma proliferation and invasion through activation of the ERK/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2019;17:1445-1452.
Not in our library10.3892/ol.2018.9800
- 477.
Luo K, Huang W, Tang S. Sirt3 enhances glioma cell viability by stabilizing Ku70-BAX interaction. Onco. Targets Ther. 2018;11:7559-7567.
Not in our library10.2147/ott.s172672
- 478.
Feng J, et al. SIRT6 suppresses glioma cell growth via induction of apoptosis, inhibition of oxidative stress and suppression of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway activation. Oncol. Rep. 2016;35:1395-1402.
Not in our library10.3892/or.2015.4477
- 479.
Chen X, et al. SIRT5 downregulation is associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma. Cancer Biomark. 2019;24:449-459.
Not in our library10.3233/cbm-182197
- 480.
Feng X, et al. Hypoxia-induced acetylation of PAK1 enhances autophagy and promotes brain tumorigenesis via phosphorylating ATG5. Autophagy. 2021;17:723-742.
Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2020.1731266
- 481.
Liu R, et al. CDK1-mediated SIRT3 activation enhances mitochondrial function and tumor radioresistance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2090-2102.
Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0017
- 482.
Bispo JAB, Pinheiro PS, Kobetz EK. Epidemiology and etiology of leukemia and lymphoma. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2020;10:a034819.
Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a034819
- 483.
Wang F, et al. SIRT1 regulates the phosphorylation and degradation of P27 by deacetylating CDK2 to promote T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progression. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;40:259.
Not in our library10.1186/s13046-021-02071-w
- 484.
Morishima T, et al. LMO2 activation by deacetylation is indispensable for hematopoiesis and T-ALL leukemogenesis. Blood. 2019;134:1159-1175.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.2019000095
- 485.
Sasca D, et al. SIRT1 prevents genotoxic stress-induced p53 activation in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2014;124:121-133.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2013-11-538819
- 486.
Zhang P, et al. Targeting DNA damage repair functions of two histone deacetylases, HDAC8 and SIRT6, sensitizes acute myeloid leukemia to NAMPT inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;27:2352-2366.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3724
- 487.
Kaiser A, et al. SIRT7: an influence factor in healthy aging and the development of age-dependent myeloid stem-cell disorders. Leukemia. 2020;34:2206-2216.
Not in our library10.1038/s41375-020-0803-3
- 488.
- 489.
Abdelsayed M, Kort EJ, Jovinge S, Mercola M. Repurposing drugs to treat cardiovascular disease in the era of precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022;19:751-764.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-022-00717-6
- 490.
Heimlich JB, Bick AG. Somatic mutations in cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 2022;130:149-161.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.121.319809
- 491.
- 492.
Xu S, et al. Targeting epigenetics and non-coding RNAs in atherosclerosis: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Pharm. Ther. 2019;196:15-43.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.11.003
- 493.
Grootaert MOJ, Bennett MR. Sirtuins in atherosclerosis: guardians of healthspan and therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022;19:668-683.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-022-00685-x
- 494.
Winnik S, Auwerx J, Sinclair DA, Matter CM. Protective effects of sirtuins in cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:3404-3412.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehv290
- 495.
- 496.
Papait R, Serio S, Condorelli G. Role of the epigenome in heart failure. Physiol. Rev. 2020;100:1753-1777.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00037.2019
- 497.
- 498.
Wang W, et al. Circ-SIRT1 inhibits cardiac hypertrophy via activating SIRT1 to promote autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:1069.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-021-04059-y
- 499.
Shen T, et al. SIRT1 functions as an important regulator of estrogen-mediated cardiomyocyte protection in angiotensin II-induced heart hypertrophy. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2014;2014:713894.
Not in our library10.1155/2014/713894
- 500.
Li J, et al. Sirtuin 1 represses PKC-ζ activity through regulating interplay of acetylation and phosphorylation in cardiac hypertrophy. Br. J. Pharm. 2019;176:416-435.
Not in our library10.1111/bph.14538
- 501.
Sundaresan NR, et al. The deacetylase SIRT1 promotes membrane localization and activation of Akt and PDK1 during tumorigenesis and cardiac hypertrophy. Sci. Signal. 2011;4:ra46.
Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.2001465
- 502.
Alcendor RR, et al. Sirt1 regulates aging and resistance to oxidative stress in the heart. Circ. Res. 2007;100:1512-1521.
Not in our library10.1161/01.res.0000267723.65696.4a
- 503.
Sadria M, Layton AT. Interactions among mTORC, AMPK and SIRT: a computational model for cell energy balance and metabolism. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021;19:57.
Not in our library10.1186/s12964-021-00706-1
- 504.
Ding YQ, et al. MicroRNA-214 contributes to Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy by targeting SIRT3 to provoke mitochondrial malfunction. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2021;42:1422-1436.
Not in our library10.1038/s41401-020-00563-7
- 505.
Yue Z, et al. NMNAT3 is involved in the protective effect of SIRT3 in Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Exp. Cell Res. 2016;347:261-273.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.07.006
- 506.
Wang HN, et al. Effects of Sirt3-autophagy and resveratrol activation on myocardial hypertrophy and energy metabolism. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020;22:1342-1350.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2020.11195
- 507.
Li J, et al. Mouse Sirt3 promotes autophagy in AngII-induced myocardial hypertrophy through the deacetylation of FoxO1. Oncotarget. 2016;7:86648-86659.
Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.13429
- 508.
Feng X, et al. SIRT3 inhibits cardiac hypertrophy by regulating PARP-1 activity. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:4178-4192.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.102862
- 509.
Pillai VB, Samant S, Hund S, Gupta M, Gupta MP. The nuclear sirtuin SIRT6 protects the heart from developing aging-associated myocyte senescence and cardiac hypertrophy. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13:12334-12358.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.203027
- 510.
Shen P, et al. SIRT6 suppresses phenylephrine-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy though inhibiting p300. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016;132:31-40.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jphs.2016.03.013
- 511.
Sundaresan NR, et al. The sirtuin SIRT6 blocks IGF-Akt signaling and development of cardiac hypertrophy by targeting c-Jun. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1643-1650.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.2961
- 512.
Zhang X, et al. STAT3 suppression is involved in the protective effect of SIRT6 against cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Cardiovasc. Pharm. 2016;68:204-214.
Not in our library10.1097/fjc.0000000000000404
- 513.
Sarikhani M, et al. SIRT2 deacetylase represses NFAT transcription factor to maintain cardiac homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:5281-5294.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra117.000915
- 514.
Tang X, et al. SIRT2 acts as a cardioprotective deacetylase in pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation. 2017;136:2051-2067.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.117.028728
- 515.
Sadhukhan S, et al. Metabolomics-assisted proteomics identifies succinylation and SIRT5 as important regulators of cardiac function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:4320-4325.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1519858113
- 516.
Yamamura S, et al. Cardiomyocyte sirt (sirtuin) 7 ameliorates stress-induced cardiac hypertrophy by interacting with and deacetylating GATA4. Hypertension. 2020;75:98-108.
Not in our library10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.13357
- 517.
Luo YX, et al. SIRT4 accelerates Ang II-induced pathological cardiac hypertrophy by inhibiting manganese superoxide dismutase activity. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:1389-1398.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehw138
- 518.
Edgley AJ, Krum H, Kelly DJ. Targeting fibrosis for the treatment of heart failure: a role for transforming growth factor-β. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2012;30:e30-e40.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00228.x
- 519.
Liu ZH, et al. SIRT1 activation attenuates cardiac fibrosis by endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;118:109227.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109227
- 520.
Chen T, et al. Activation of SIRT3 by resveratrol ameliorates cardiac fibrosis and improves cardiac function via the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2015;308:H424-H434.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.00454.2014
- 521.
Maity S, et al. Sirtuin 6 deficiency transcriptionally up-regulates TGF-β signaling and induces fibrosis in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:415-434.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra118.007212
- 522.
Zhang ZZ, et al. The sirtuin 6 prevents angiotensin II-mediated myocardial fibrosis and injury by targeting AMPK-ACE2 signaling. Oncotarget. 2017;8:72302-72314.
Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.20305
- 523.
Wang H, et al. Enhanced expression and phosphorylation of Sirt7 activates smad2 and ERK signaling and promotes the cardiac fibrosis differentiation upon angiotensin-II stimulation. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178530.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0178530
- 524.
Lüscher TF. Risk factors for and management of heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:2267-2269.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehv348
- 525.
Groenewegen A, Rutten FH, Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Epidemiology of heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2020;22:1342-1356.
Not in our library10.1002/ejhf.1858
- 526.
Chen J, Chen S, Zhang B, Liu J. SIRT3 as a potential therapeutic target for heart failure. Pharm. Res. 2021;165:105432.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105432
- 527.
Saiyang X, Deng W, Qizhu T. Sirtuin 6: A potential therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases. Pharm. Res. 2021;163:105214.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105214
- 528.
Lu TM, et al. Downregulation of Sirt1 as aging change in advanced heart failure. J. Biomed. Sci. 2014;21:57.
Not in our library10.1186/1423-0127-21-57
- 529.
Wu, Y. X., Xu, R. Y., Jiang, L., Chen, X. Y. & Xiao, X. J. MicroRNA-30a-5p promotes chronic heart failure in rats by targeting sirtuin-1 to activate the nuclear factor-κB/NOD-like receptor 3 signaling pathway. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (2022).
Not in our library10.1007/s10557-021-07304-w
- 530.
Akkafa F, et al. Reduced SIRT1 expression correlates with enhanced oxidative stress in compensated and decompensated heart failure. Redox Biol. 2015;6:169-173.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.011
- 531.
Sun S, Wang C, Weng J. MicroRNA-138-5p drives the progression of heart failure via inhibiting sirtuin 1 signaling. Mol. Med. Rep. 2021;23:276.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2021.11915
- 532.
Lin B, et al. Sirt1 improves heart failure through modulating the NF-κB p65/microRNA-155/BNDF signaling cascade. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;13:14482-14498.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.103640
- 533.
Gorski PA, et al. Role of SIRT1 in modulating acetylation of the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase in heart failure. Circ. Res. 2019;124:e63-e80.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.118.313865
- 534.
Horton JL, et al. Mitochondrial protein hyperacetylation in the failing heart. JCI Insight. 2016;2:e84897.
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.84897
- 535.
Zhang X, et al. MicroRNA-195 regulates metabolism in failing myocardium via alterations in sirtuin 3 expression and mitochondrial protein acetylation. Circulation. 2018;137:2052-2067.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.117.030486
- 536.
Tong D, et al. NAD(+) repletion reverses heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ. Res. 2021;128:1629-1641.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.120.317046
- 537.
Benigni A, et al. Sirt3 deficiency shortens life span and impairs cardiac mitochondrial function rescued by Opa1 gene transfer. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019;31:1255-1271.
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2018.7703
- 538.
Zeng H, He X, Chen JX. Endothelial sirtuin 3 dictates glucose transport to cardiomyocyte and sensitizes pressure overload-induced heart failure. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e015895.
Not in our library10.1161/jaha.120.015895
- 539.
He X, Zeng H, Chen JX. Emerging role of SIRT3 in endothelial metabolism, angiogenesis, and cardiovascular disease. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:2252-2265.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.27200
- 540.
Li Y, et al. Cardioprotective effects of SIRT6 in a mouse model of transverse aortic constriction-induced heart failure. Front Physiol. 2017;8:394.
Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2017.00394
- 541.
Walker MA, et al. Acetylation of muscle creatine kinase negatively impacts high-energy phosphotransfer in heart failure. JCI Insight. 2021;6:e144301.
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.144301
- 542.
Chang X, et al. SIRT5-related desuccinylation modification contributes to quercetin-induced protection against heart failure and high-glucose-prompted cardiomyocytes injured through regulation of mitochondrial quality surveillance. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021;2021:5876841.
Not in our library10.1155/2021/5876841
- 543.
Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:1685-1695.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmra043430
- 544.
Gorenne I, et al. Vascular smooth muscle cell sirtuin 1 protects against DNA damage and inhibits atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2013;127:386-396.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.112.124404
- 545.
Zhang QJ, et al. Endothelium-specific overexpression of class III deacetylase SIRT1 decreases atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;80:191-199.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvn224
- 546.
Gano LB, et al. The SIRT1 activator SRT1720 reverses vascular endothelial dysfunction, excessive superoxide production, and inflammation with aging in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2014;307:H1754-H1763.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.00377.2014
- 547.
Miao H, Zeng H, Gong H. microRNA-212 promotes lipid accumulation and attenuates cholesterol efflux in THP-1 human macrophages by targeting SIRT1. Gene. 2018;643:55-60.
Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2017.11.058
- 548.
Stein S, et al. SIRT1 decreases Lox-1-mediated foam cell formation in atherogenesis. Eur. Heart J. 2010;31:2301-2309.
Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehq107
- 549.
Zheng H, et al. mTOR signaling promotes foam cell formation and inhibits foam cell egress through suppressing the SIRT1 signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:3315-3323.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2017.7032
- 550.
Zhang L, et al. MicroRNA-217 is involved in the progression of atherosclerosis through regulating inflammatory responses by targeting sirtuin 1. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;20:3182-3190.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2019.10581
- 551.
Yang J, et al. LncRNA MALAT1 enhances ox-LDL-induced autophagy through the SIRT1/MAPK/NF-κB pathway in macrophages. Curr. Vasc. Pharm. 2020;18:652-662.
Not in our library10.2174/1570161118666200317153124
- 552.
Zhang B, Ma Y, Xiang C. SIRT2 decreases atherosclerotic plaque formation in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice by modulating macrophage polarization. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;97:1238-1242.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.061
- 553.
Jing SH, Yu B, Qiao H. Correlation between endothelial cell apoptosis and SIRT3 gene expression in atherosclerosis rats. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2019;23:9033-9040.
Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_201910_19305
- 554.
Wang P, Zhang H, Wang Y. Circ_0003423 alleviates oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced endothelial cell injury by sponging miR-142-3p and activating sirtuin 3/Superoxide dismutase 2 pathway. J. Surg. Res. 2022;277:384-397.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.006
- 555.
Tao Y, et al. SIRT4 suppresses the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway and attenuates HUVEC injury induced by oxLDL. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;19:4973-4979.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2019.10161
- 556.
Xu S, et al. SIRT6 protects against endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis in mice. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8:1064-1082.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.100975
- 557.
Liu Z, Wang J, Huang X, Li Z, Liu P. Deletion of sirtuin 6 accelerates endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Transl. Res. 2016;172:18-29.e12.
Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2016.02.005
- 558.
Arsiwala T, et al. Sirt6 deletion in bone marrow-derived cells increases atherosclerosis - Central role of macrophage scavenger receptor 1. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2020;139:24-32.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.01.002
- 559.
Zheng J, et al. SIRT7 regulates the vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation and migration via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018;2018:4769596.
Not in our library10.1155/2018/4769596
- 560.
- 561.
Zhang Y, et al. MicroRNAs or long noncoding RNAs in diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Aging Dis. 2019;10:353-366.
Not in our library10.14336/ad.2018.0617
- 562.
Cassar A, Holmes DR, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ. Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2009;84:1130-1146.
Not in our library10.4065/mcp.2009.0391
- 563.
Song X, et al. Association of sirtuin gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to coronary artery disease in a North Chinese population. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022;2022:4294008.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/4294008
- 564.
Heidari, L. et al. Reverse expression pattern of sirtuin-1 and histone deacetylase-9 in coronary artery disease. Arch. Physiol. Biochem., 1-8 (2020).
Not in our library10.1080/13813455.2020.1797100
- 565.
Chan SH, et al. SIRT1 inhibition causes oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease. Redox Biol. 2017;13:301-309.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2017.05.027
- 566.
Du S, Shen S, Ding S, Wang L. Suppression of microRNA-323-3p restrains vascular endothelial cell apoptosis via promoting sirtuin-1 expression in coronary heart disease. Life Sci. 2021;270:119065.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119065
- 567.
Wang H, et al. Long noncoding RNAs C2dat1 enhances vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration by targeting MiR-34a-5p. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:3001-3008.
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.27070
- 568.
Yang M, Xi N, Gao M, Yu Y. Sitagliptin mitigates hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-induced injury in cardiomyocytes by mediating sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) and autophagy. Bioengineered. 2022;13:13162-13173.
Not in our library10.1080/21655979.2022.2074109
- 569.
Herr DJ, Singh T, Dhammu T, Menick DR. Regulation of metabolism by mitochondrial enzyme acetylation in cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020;1866:165728.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165728
- 570.
Zhao S, Yu L. Sirtuin 1 activated by SRT1460 protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2021;78:271-281.
Not in our library10.3233/ch-201061
- 571.
Du JK, et al. Upregulation of microRNA-22 contributes to myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by interfering with the mitochondrial function. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016;96:406-417.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.05.006
- 572.
Hsu CP, et al. Silent information regulator 1 protects the heart from ischemia/reperfusion. Circulation. 2010;122:2170-2182.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.110.958033
- 573.
Zhou Y, Li KS, Liu L, Li SL. MicroRNA-132 promotes oxidative stress-induced pyroptosis by targeting sirtuin 1 in myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020;45:1942-1950.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2020.4557
- 574.
Niu X, et al. lncRNA Oip5-as1 attenuates myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury by sponging miR-29a to activate the SIRT1/AMPK/PGC1α pathway. Cell Prolif. 2020;53:e12818.
Not in our library10.1111/cpr.12818
- 575.
Wang XX, et al. SIRT6 protects cardiomyocytes against ischemia/reperfusion injury by augmenting FoxO3α-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2016;111:13.
Not in our library10.1007/s00395-016-0531-z
- 576.
Li X, et al. SIRT6 Protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by attenuating aging-related CHMP2B accumulation. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2022;15:740-753.
Not in our library10.1007/s12265-021-10184-y
- 577.
Porter GA, Urciuoli WR, Brookes PS, Nadtochiy SM. SIRT3 deficiency exacerbates ischemia-reperfusion injury: implication for aged hearts. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2014;306:H1602-H1609.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.00027.2014
- 578.
Zeng G, Liu H, Wang H. Amelioration of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by SIRT4 involves mitochondrial protection and reduced apoptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;502:15-21.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.113
- 579.
Boylston JA, et al. Characterization of the cardiac succinylome and its role in ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2015;88:73-81.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.09.005
- 580.
Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021;18:785-802.
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8
- 581.
Mills KT, et al. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation. 2016;134:441-450.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.115.018912
- 582.
Gao P, et al. Overexpression of SIRT1 in vascular smooth muscle cells attenuates angiotensin II-induced vascular remodeling and hypertension in mice. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.). 2014;92:347-357.
Not in our library10.1007/s00109-013-1111-4
- 583.
Dikalova AE, et al. Mitochondrial deacetylase sirt3 reduces vascular dysfunction and hypertension while sirt3 depletion in essential hypertension is linked to vascular inflammation and oxidative stress. Circ. Res. 2020;126:439-452.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.119.315767
- 584.
Gao D, et al. Activation of SIRT1 attenuates klotho deficiency-induced arterial stiffness and hypertension by enhancing AMP-activated protein kinase activity. Hypertension. 2016;68:1191-1199.
Not in our library10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.07709
- 585.
Zhou L, et al. NAMPT/SIRT1 attenuate Ang II-induced vascular remodeling and vulnerability to hypertension by inhibiting the ROS/MAPK pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020;2020:1974265.
Not in our library10.1155/2020/1974265
- 586.
Dikalova AE, et al. Sirt3 Impairment and SOD2 hyperacetylation in vascular oxidative stress and hypertension. Circ. Res. 2017;121:564-574.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.117.310933
- 587.
Martinez-Arroyo O, et al. Decreased urinary levels of SIRT1 as non-invasive biomarker of early renal damage in hypertension. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6390.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms21176390
- 588.
Lin JR, et al. Suppression of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition by sirt (sirtuin) 3 alleviated the development of hypertensive renal injury. Hypertension. 2018;72:350-360.
Not in our library10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.10482
- 589.
Guo J, et al. Endothelial SIRT6 is vital to prevent hypertension and associated cardiorenal injury through targeting Nkx3.2-GATA5 signaling. Circ. Res. 2019;124:1448-1461.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.118.314032
- 590.
Zhou Y, Zhang F, Ding J. As a modulator, multitasking roles of SIRT1 in respiratory diseases. Immune Netw. 2022;22:e21.
Not in our library10.4110/in.2022.22.e21
- 591.
Chun P. Role of sirtuins in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2015;38:1-10.
Not in our library10.1007/s12272-014-0494-2
- 592.
Labaki WW, Rosenberg SR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020;173:Itc17-itc32.
Not in our library10.7326/aitc202008040
- 593.
Zhang XY, et al. Roles of sirtuin family members in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir. Res. 2022;23:66.
Not in our library10.1186/s12931-022-01986-y
- 594.
- 595.
Gu C, et al. Therapeutic effects of SRT2104 on lung injury in rats with emphysema via reduction of type II alveolar epithelial cell senescence. Copd. 2020;17:444-451.
Not in our library10.1080/15412555.2020.1797657
- 596.
Barnes PJ. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Chest. Med. 2014;35:71-86.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccm.2013.10.004
- 597.
Yao H, et al. SIRT1 protects against emphysema via FOXO3-mediated reduction of premature senescence in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:2032-2045.
Not in our library10.1172/jci60132
- 598.
Zhang L, et al. SIRT1 attenuates endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in rat models of COPD. Growth Factors. 2020;38:94-104.
Not in our library10.1080/08977194.2020.1810029
- 599.
Rajendrasozhan S, Yang SR, Kinnula VL, Rahman I. SIRT1, an antiinflammatory and antiaging protein, is decreased in lungs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:861-870.
Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200708-1269oc
- 600.
Yao H, et al. Disruption of sirtuin 1-mediated control of circadian molecular clock and inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015;53:782-792.
Not in our library10.1165/rcmb.2014-0474oc
- 601.
Taguchi A, et al. Resveratrol suppresses inflammatory responses in endometrial stromal cells derived from endometriosis: a possible role of the sirtuin 1 pathway. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2014;40:770-778.
Not in our library10.1111/jog.12252
- 602.
Barnes PJ. Mechanisms of development of multimorbidity in the elderly. Eur. Respir. J. 2015;45:790-806.
Not in our library10.1183/09031936.00229714
- 603.
Zhang M, et al. Sirtuin 3 inhibits airway epithelial mitochondrial oxidative stress in cigarette smoke-induced COPD. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020;2020:7582980.
Not in our library10.1155/2020/7582980
- 604.
Hwang JW, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced autophagy is regulated by SIRT1-PARP-1-dependent mechanism: implication in pathogenesis of COPD. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010;500:203-209.
Not in our library10.1016/j.abb.2010.05.013
- 605.
Jin Y, et al. Double deletion of tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 in mice leads to a syndrome resembling accelerated aging. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5145.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-23338-x
- 606.
Barnes PJ. Senescence in COPD and its comorbidities. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2017;79:517-539.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034314
- 607.
Mazumder S, Barman M, Bandyopadhyay U, Bindu S. Sirtuins as endogenous regulators of lung fibrosis: A current perspective. Life Sci. 2020;258:118201.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118201
- 608.
Varone F, et al. Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: diagnosis and management. Lung. 2020;198:429-440.
Not in our library10.1007/s00408-020-00360-3
- 609.
Liang J, et al. The ZIP8/SIRT1 axis regulates alveolar progenitor cell renewal in aging and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132:e157338.
Not in our library10.1172/jci157338
- 610.
Zeng Z, et al. Activation and overexpression of Sirt1 attenuates lung fibrosis via P300. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017;486:1021-P1026.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.155
- 611.
Han X, et al. Targeting Sirtuin1 to treat aging-related tissue fibrosis: From prevention to therapy. Pharm. Ther. 2022;229:107983.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107983
- 612.
Sosulski ML, Gongora R, Feghali-Bostwick C, Lasky JA, Sanchez CG. Sirtuin 3 deregulation promotes pulmonary fibrosis. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2017;72:595-602.
Not in our library10.1093/gerona/glw151
- 613.
Sime PJ, Xing Z, Graham FL, Csaky KG, Gauldie J. Adenovector-mediated gene transfer of active transforming growth factor-beta1 induces prolonged severe fibrosis in rat lung. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;100:768-776.
Not in our library10.1172/jci119590
- 614.
Jablonski RP, et al. SIRT3 deficiency promotes lung fibrosis by augmenting alveolar epithelial cell mitochondrial DNA damage and apoptosis. Faseb J. 2017;31:2520-2532.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.201601077r
- 615.
Cheresh P, et al. SIRT3 overexpression ameliorates asbestos-induced pulmonary fibrosis, mt-DNA damage, and lung fibrogenic monocyte recruitment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:6856.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms22136856
- 616.
Minagawa S, et al. Accelerated epithelial cell senescence in IPF and the inhibitory role of SIRT6 in TGF-β-induced senescence of human bronchial epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2011;300:L391-L401.
Not in our library10.1152/ajplung.00097.2010
- 617.
Chen P, et al. Sirtuin 6 inhibits MWCNTs-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human bronchial epithelial cells via inactivating TGF-β1/Smad2 signaling pathway. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2019;374:1-10.
Not in our library10.1016/j.taap.2019.04.013
- 618.
Zhang Q, et al. Sirtuin 6 inhibits myofibroblast differentiation via inactivating transforming growth factor-β1/Smad2 and nuclear factor-κB signaling pathways in human fetal lung fibroblasts. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:93-104.
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.27128
- 619.
Tian K, et al. Sirtuin 6 inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition during idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis via inactivating TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling. Oncotarget. 2017;8:61011-61024.
Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.17723
- 620.
Wyman AE, et al. Sirtuin 7 is decreased in pulmonary fibrosis and regulates the fibrotic phenotype of lung fibroblasts. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2017;312:L945-l958.
Not in our library10.1152/ajplung.00473.2016
- 621.
Liu Y, et al. Anthocyanins inhibit airway inflammation by downregulating the NF-κB pathway via the miR-138-5p/SIRT1 axis in asthmatic mice. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2022;183:539-551.
Not in our library10.1159/000520645
- 622.
Kaur R, Chupp G. Phenotypes and endotypes of adult asthma: Moving toward precision medicine. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019;144:1-12.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.031
- 623.
Luo Y, Wang M, Tian Y. Trends and age-period-cohort effects on incidence and mortality of asthma in Sichuan Province, China, 1990-2019. BMC Pulm. Med. 2022;22:298.
Not in our library10.1186/s12890-022-02059-y
- 624.
Fukuda Y, et al. Virus-induced asthma exacerbations: SIRT1 targeted approach. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:2623.
Not in our library10.3390/jcm9082623
- 625.
Colley T, et al. Defective sirtuin-1 increases IL-4 expression through acetylation of GATA-3 in patients with severe asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016;137:1595-1597.e1597.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.013
- 626.
Tang L, et al. Suppression of sirtuin-1 increases IL-6 expression by activation of the Akt pathway during allergic asthma. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017;43:1950-1960.
Not in our library10.1159/000484119
- 627.
Zhang YZ, et al. Effects of SIRT1/Akt pathway on chronic inflammatory response and lung function in patients with asthma. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2019;23:4948-4953.
Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_201906_18085
- 628.
Wang Y, et al. Histone deacetylase SIRT1 negatively regulates the differentiation of interleukin-9-producing CD4(+) T cells. Immunity. 2016;44:1337-1349.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.009
- 629.
Lee YG, et al. Sirtuin 2 enhances allergic asthmatic inflammation. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e124710.
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.124710
- 630.
Kim YY, et al. AGK2 ameliorates mast cell-mediated allergic airway inflammation and fibrosis by inhibiting FcεRI/TGF-β signaling pathway. Pharm. Res. 2020;159:105027.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105027
- 631.
Song J, Wang J. SIRT3 regulates bronchial epithelium apoptosis and aggravates airway inflammation in asthma. Mol. Med. Rep. 2022;25:144.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2022.12660
- 632.
Elias JA. Airway remodeling in asthma unanswered questions. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;161:S168-S171.
Not in our library10.1164/ajrccm.161.supplement_2.a1q4-4
- 633.
Wawrzyniak P, et al. Regulation of bronchial epithelial barrier integrity by type 2 cytokines and histone deacetylases in asthmatic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;139:93-103.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.050
- 634.
Liu F, Shang YX. Sirtuin 6 attenuates epithelial-mesenchymal transition by suppressing the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway and c-Jun in asthma models. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;82:106333.
Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106333
- 635.
Fang P, et al. SIRT7 regulates the TGF-β1-induced proliferation and migration of mouse airway smooth muscle cells by modulating the expression of TGF-β receptor I. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;104:781-787.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.060
- 636.
Qu L, et al. Caveolin-1 identified as a key mediator of acute lung injury using bioinformatics and functional research. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:686.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-022-05134-8
- 637.
Li T, et al. Resveratrol reduces acute lung injury in a LPS-induced sepsis mouse model via activation of Sirt1. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013;7:1889-1895.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2013.1444
- 638.
Matthay MA, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019;5:18.
Not in our library10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0
- 639.
Weng C, et al. Nanoscale porphyrin metal-organic frameworks deliver siRNA for alleviating early pulmonary fibrosis in acute lung injury. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:939312.
Not in our library10.3389/fbioe.2022.939312
- 640.
Yang F, et al. MicroRNA-499-5p targets SIRT1 to aggravate lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Free Radic. Res. 2021;55:71-82.
Not in our library10.1080/10715762.2020.1863393
- 641.
Gao R, et al. Sirt1 restrains lung inflammasome activation in a murine model of sepsis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2015;308:L847-L853.
Not in our library10.1152/ajplung.00274.2014
- 642.
Huang J, et al. The SIRT1 inhibitor EX-527 suppresses mTOR activation and alleviates acute lung injury in mice with endotoxiemia. Innate Immun. 2017;23:678-686.
Not in our library10.1177/1753425917733531
- 643.
Tian YG, Zhang J. Protective effect of SIRT3 on acute lung injury by increasing manganese superoxide dismutase-mediated antioxidation. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:5557-5565.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2018.8469
- 644.
Wang QL, et al. Sirtuin 6 regulates macrophage polarization to alleviate sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome via dual mechanisms dependent on and independent of autophagy. Cytotherapy. 2022;24:149-160.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.09.001
- 645.
Elangovan VR, et al. Endotoxin- and mechanical stress-induced epigenetic changes in the regulation of the nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase promoter. Pulm. Circ. 2016;6:539-544.
Not in our library10.1086/688761
- 646.
Li S, et al. Resveratrol protects mice from paraquat-induced lung injury: The important role of SIRT1 and NRF2 antioxidant pathways. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016;13:1833-1838.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2015.4710
- 647.
Zhang R, et al. Ginkgolide C alleviates acute lung injury caused by paraquat poisoning via regulating the Nrf2 and NF-κB signaling pathways. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2022;2022:7832983.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/7832983
- 648.
Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science. 2020;368:473-474.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abb8925
- 649.
Bordoni V, et al. The unbalanced p53/SIRT1 axis may impact lymphocyte homeostasis in COVID-19 patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;105:49-53.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.019
- 650.
Zhang P, Zhao T, Zhou W. The clinical significance of SIRT3 in COVID-19 patients: a single center retrospective analysis. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2021;51:686-693.
Not in our library
- 651.
Georgieva AM, et al. Inactivation of Sirt6 ameliorates muscular dystrophy in mdx mice by releasing suppression of utrophin expression. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4184.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-31798-z
- 652.
- 653.
Chen HY, et al. Artificial intelligence: Emerging player in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022;28:2152-2162.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v28.i20.2152
- 654.
Mathews SC, et al. Prevalence and financial burden of digestive diseases in a commercially insured population. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;20:1480-1487.e1487.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.047
- 655.
Zhang J, et al. Sirt6 alleviated liver fibrosis by deacetylating conserved lysine 54 on Smad2 in hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2021;73:1140-1157.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.31418
- 656.
- 657.
Younossi Z, Henry L. Contribution of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to the burden of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1778-1785.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.005
- 658.
Cotter TG, Rinella M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 2020: the state of the disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1851-1864.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.052
- 659.
Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J. Hepatol. 2019;70:151-171.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.014
- 660.
Guo L, et al. Acetylation of mitochondrial trifunctional protein α-subunit enhances its stability to promote fatty acid oxidation and is decreased in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;36:2553-2567.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00227-16
- 661.
Wu T, Liu YH, Fu YC, Liu XM, Zhou XH. Direct evidence of sirtuin downregulation in the liver of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2014;44:410-418.
Not in our library
- 662.
Kundu A, et al. EX-527 Prevents the progression of high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis and fibrosis by upregulating SIRT4 in Zucker rats. Cells. 2020;9:1101.
Not in our library10.3390/cells9051101
- 663.
- 664.
Ponugoti B, et al. SIRT1 deacetylates and inhibits SREBP-1C activity in regulation of hepatic lipid metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:33959-33970.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.122978
- 665.
Li M, et al. SIRT1 antagonizes liver fibrosis by blocking hepatic stellate cell activation in mice. Faseb J. 2018;32:500-511.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.201700612r
- 666.
Derdak Z, et al. Inhibition of p53 attenuates steatosis and liver injury in a mouse model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2013;58:785-791.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2012.11.042
- 667.
Yin H, et al. Deletion of SIRT1 from hepatocytes in mice disrupts lipin-1 signaling and aggravates alcoholic fatty liver. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:801-811.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.008
- 668.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC. Changing patterns of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in hemophilia patients-United States. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1985;34:241-243.
Not in our library
- 669.
Kim HG, et al. The epigenetic regulator SIRT6 protects the liver from alcohol-induced tissue injury by reducing oxidative stress in mice. J. Hepatol. 2019;71:960-969.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.019
- 670.
Ren H, et al. Sirtuin 2 prevents liver steatosis and metabolic disorders by deacetylation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α. Hepatology. 2021;74:723-740.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.31773
- 671.
Liu Y, et al. Retinol-binding protein 4 induces hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction and promotes hepatic steatosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;101:4338-4348.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2016-1320
- 672.
Nassir F, Arndt JJ, Johnson SA, Ibdah JA. Regulation of mitochondrial trifunctional protein modulates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. J. Lipid Res. 2018;59:967-973.
Not in our library10.1194/jlr.m080952
- 673.
Goetzman ES, et al. Impaired mitochondrial medium-chain fatty acid oxidation drives periportal macrovesicular steatosis in sirtuin-5 knockout mice. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:18367.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-75615-3
- 674.
Wang H, et al. miRNA-130b-5p promotes hepatic stellate cell activation and the development of liver fibrosis by suppressing SIRT4 expression. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021;25:7381-7394.
Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.16766
- 675.
Arteaga M, et al. Inhibition of SIRT2 suppresses hepatic fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2016;310:G1155-G1168.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00271.2015
- 676.
- 677.
Roychowdhury S, et al. An early complement-dependent and TLR-4-independent phase in the pathogenesis of ethanol-induced liver injury in mice. Hepatology. 2009;49:1326-1334.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.22776
- 678.
Zhou Z, et al. Intestinal SIRT1 deficiency protects mice from ethanol-induced liver injury by mitigating ferroptosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2020;190:82-92.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.09.012
- 679.
Li S, et al. Sirtuin 3 acts as a negative regulator of autophagy dictating hepatocyte susceptibility to lipotoxicity. Hepatology. 2017;66:936-952.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.29229
- 680.
Zhai Y, Petrowsky H, Hong JC, Busuttil RW, Kupiec-Weglinski JW. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury in liver transplantation-from bench to bedside. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013;10:79-89.
Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2012.225
- 681.
Nakamura K, et al. Sirtuin 1 attenuates inflammation and hepatocellular damage in liver transplant ischemia/Reperfusion: From mouse to human. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:1282-1293.
Not in our library10.1002/lt.24821
- 682.
Nakamura K, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 regulates sirtuin-1-autophagy pathway in liver transplantation: From mouse to human. Am. J. Transpl. 2018;18:1110-1121.
Not in our library10.1111/ajt.14586
- 683.
Kadono K, et al. Myeloid Ikaros-SIRT1 signaling axis regulates hepatic inflammation and pyroptosis in ischemia-stressed mouse and human liver. J. Hepatol. 2022;76:896-909.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.026
- 684.
Wang Q, et al. TGR5 deficiency aggravates hepatic ischemic/reperfusion injury via inhibiting SIRT3/FOXO3/HIF-1ɑ pathway. Cell Death Disco. 2020;6:116.
Not in our library10.1038/s41420-020-00347-2
- 685.
Wang J, et al. Sirtuin 2 aggravates postischemic liver injury by deacetylating mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1. Hepatology. 2017;65:225-236.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.28777
- 686.
Prifti GM, et al. Recent advances in hepatitis B treatment. Pharm. (Basel). 2021;14:417.
Not in our library10.3390/ph14050417
- 687.
Ren JH, et al. SIRT3 restricts hepatitis B virus transcription and replication through epigenetic regulation of covalently closed circular DNA involving suppressor of variegation 3-9 homolog 1 and SET domain containing 1A histone methyltransferases. Hepatology. 2018;68:1260-1276.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.29912
- 688.
Yuan S, et al. Multiomics interrogation into HBV (Hepatitis B virus)-host interaction reveals novel coding potential in human genome, and identifies canonical and non-canonical proteins as host restriction factors against HBV. Cell Disco. 2021;7:105.
Not in our library10.1038/s41421-021-00337-3
- 689.
Jenke AC, et al. Restitution of gene expression and histone acetylation signatures altered by hepatitis B virus through antiviral microRNA-like molecules in nontransformed murine hepatocytes. Clin. Epigenetics. 2014;6:26.
Not in our library10.1186/1868-7083-6-26
- 690.
Deng JJ, et al. Interplay between SIRT1 and hepatitis B virus X protein in the activation of viral transcription. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2017;1860:491-501.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagrm.2017.02.007
- 691.
Yu HB, et al. SIRT7 restricts HBV transcription and replication through catalyzing desuccinylation of histone H3 associated with cccDNA minichromosome. Clin. Sci. (Lond.). 2021;135:1505-1522.
Not in our library10.1042/cs20210392
- 692.
Cao P, Chen Q, Shi CX, Wang LW, Gong ZJ. Sirtuin1 attenuates acute liver failure by reducing reactive oxygen species via hypoxia inducible factor 1α. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022;28:1798-1813.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v28.i17.1798
- 693.
Zhao X, et al. MicroRNA-128-3p aggravates doxorubicin-induced liver injury by promoting oxidative stress via targeting Sirtuin-1. Pharm. Res. 2019;146:104276.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104276
- 694.
LoBianco FV, et al. The role of sirtuin 3 in radiation-induced long-term persistent liver injury. Antioxid. (Basel). 2020;9:409.
Not in our library10.3390/antiox9050409
- 695.
Kemelo MK, Wojnarová L, Kutinová Canová N, Farghali H. D-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatotoxicity downregulates sirtuin 1 in rat liver: role of sirtuin 1 modulation in hepatoprotection. Physiol. Res. 2014;63:615-623.
Not in our library10.33549/physiolres.932761
- 696.
Kemelo MK, Kutinová Canová N, Horinek A, Farghali H. Sirtuin-activating compounds (STACs) alleviate D-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatotoxicity in rats: involvement of sirtuin 1 and heme oxygenase 1. Physiol. Res. 2017;66:497-505.
Not in our library10.33549/physiolres.933488
- 697.
Zhou Y, et al. Protection of CD4+ T cells from hepatitis C virus infection-associated senescence via DeltaNp63-miR-181a-Sirt1 pathway. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016;100:1201-1211.
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.5a0316-119rr
- 698.
Sun LJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus core protein induces dysfunction of liver sinusoidal endothelial cell by down-regulation of silent information regulator 1. J. Med. Virol. 2018;90:926-935.
Not in our library10.1002/jmv.25034
- 699.
Zhang C, et al. Hepatitis C virus core protein induces hepatic steatosis via Sirt1-dependent pathway. Liver Int. 2018;38:803-812.
Not in our library10.1111/liv.13581
- 700.
Mohamed GA, et al. Cucurbitacin E glucoside alleviates concanavalin A-induced hepatitis through enhancing SIRT1/Nrf2/HO-1 and inhibiting NF-kB/NLRP3 signaling pathways. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022;292:115223.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jep.2022.115223
- 701.
Huang TH, Chen CC, Liu HM, Lee TY, Shieh SH. Resveratrol pretreatment attenuates concanavalin a-induced hepatitis through reverse of aberration in the immune response and regenerative capacity in aged mice. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:2705.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-02881-z
- 702.
Steinmetz C, et al. Activation of silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 1 by human chorionic gonadotropin exerts a therapeutic effect on hepatic injury and inflammation. Hepatology. 2017;65:2074-2089.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.29072
- 703.
- 704.
Zhang Y, et al. Quercetin attenuates NLRP3 inflammasome activation and apoptosis to protect INH-induced liver injury via regulating SIRT1 pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;85:106634.
Not in our library10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106634
- 705.
Liu C, et al. Hepatic SIRT6 modulates transcriptional activities of FXR to alleviate acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;14:271-293.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.04.011
- 706.
Cui X, et al. Inactivation of Sirt1 in mouse livers protects against endotoxemic liver injury by acetylating and activating NF-κB. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2403.
Not in our library10.1038/cddis.2016.270
- 707.
Kazgan N, et al. Intestine-specific deletion of SIRT1 in mice impairs DCoH2-HNF-1α-FXR signaling and alters systemic bile acid homeostasis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1006-1016.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.029
- 708.
Yu L, et al. Protective effects of SRT1720 via the HNF1α/FXR signalling pathway and anti-inflammatory mechanisms in mice with estrogen-induced cholestatic liver injury. Toxicol. Lett. 2016;264:1-11.
Not in our library10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.10.016
- 709.
Isaacs-Ten A, et al. MetaBolic Regulation Of Macrophages by SIRT1 determines activation during cholestatic liver disease in mice. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;13:1019-1039.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.12.010
- 710.
Petrov MS, Yadav D. Global epidemiology and holistic prevention of pancreatitis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16:175-184.
Not in our library10.1038/s41575-018-0087-5
- 711.
Liu Y, Sun Y, Xue BH, Wang XD, Yu WL. Negative regulation of SIRT1 by IRF9 involved in hyperlipidemia acute pancreatitis associated with kidney injury. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021;66:1063-1071.
Not in our library10.1007/s10620-020-06331-1
- 712.
Wang N, et al. Resveratrol protects against L-arginine-induced acute necrotizing pancreatitis in mice by enhancing SIRT1-mediated deacetylation of p53 and heat shock factor 1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017;40:427-437.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2017.3012
- 713.
Deng S, et al. Chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer demonstrate active epithelial-mesenchymal transition profile, regulated by miR-217-SIRT1 pathway. Cancer Lett. 2014;355:184-191.
Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2014.08.007
- 714.
- 715.
Liu F, et al. Sirtuin-6 preserves R-spondin-1 expression and increases resistance of intestinal epithelium to injury in mice. Mol. Med. 2017;23:272-284.
Not in our library10.2119/molmed.2017.00085
- 716.
- 717.
Xu K, et al. Protective effects of SIRT6 overexpression against DSS-induced Colitis in mice. Cells. 2020;9:1513.
Not in our library10.3390/cells9061513
- 718.
Zhang Y, et al. Crosstalk between gut microbiota and Sirtuin-3 in colonic inflammation and tumorigenesis. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50:1-11.
Not in our library10.1038/s12276-017-0002-0
- 719.
Wang F, et al. SIRT5 desuccinylates and activates pyruvate kinase M2 to block macrophage IL-1β production and to prevent DSS-induced Colitis in mice. Cell Rep. 2017;19:2331-2344.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.065
- 720.
Liu X, Li C, Li Q, Chang HC, Tang YC. SIRT7 facilitates CENP-A nucleosome assembly and suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis. iScience. 2020;23:101461.
Not in our library10.1016/j.isci.2020.101461
- 721.
Caruso R, et al. Defective expression of SIRT1 contributes to sustain inflammatory pathways in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:1467-1479.
Not in our library10.1038/mi.2014.35
- 722.
Wellman AS, et al. Intestinal epithelial sirtuin 1 regulates intestinal inflammation during aging in mice by altering the intestinal microbiota. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:772-786.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.022
- 723.
Ren MT, et al. Sirtuin 1 alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells in ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019;25:5800-5813.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v25.i38.5800
- 724.
Akimova T, et al. Targeting sirtuin-1 alleviates experimental autoimmune colitis by induction of Foxp3+ T-regulatory cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:1209-1220.
Not in our library10.1038/mi.2014.10
- 725.
Bennett CL, et al. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:20-21.
Not in our library10.1038/83713
- 726.
Hu Y, et al. MicroRNA-351-5p aggravates intestinal ischaemia/reperfusion injury through the targeting of MAPK13 and Sirtuin-6. Br. J. Pharm. 2018;175:3594-3609.
Not in our library10.1111/bph.14428
- 727.
- 728.
Dong W, et al. Resveratrol ameliorates subacute intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Surg. Res. 2013;185:182-189.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.013
- 729.
Li H, et al. Lipopolysaccharide upregulates miR-132/212 in Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, facilitating pyroptosis by activating NLRP3 inflammasome via targeting Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1). Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:18588-18602.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.103852
- 730.
Bai M, et al. SIRT1 relieves Necrotizing Enterocolitis through inactivation of Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1a. Cell Cycle. 2020;19:2018-2027.
Not in our library10.1080/15384101.2020.1788251
- 731.
Chen Y, et al. Circulating exosomal microRNA-18a-5p accentuates intestinal inflammation in Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis by targeting RORA. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021;13:4182-4196.
Not in our library
- 732.
Zhu H, Lin Y, Liu Y. miR34a increases inflammation and oxidative stress levels in patients with necrotizing enterocolitis by downregulating SIRT1 expression. Mol. Med. Rep. 2021;24:664.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2021.12303
- 733.
Scheijen EEM, Wilson DM. genome integrity and neurological disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:4142.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms23084142
- 734.
Bergen DC, Silberberg D. Nervous system disorders: a global epidemic. Arch. Neurol. 2002;59:1194-1196.
Not in our library10.1001/archneur.59.7.1194
- 735.
Soria Lopez JA, Gonzalez HM, Leger GC. Alzheimer’s disease. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019;167:231-255.
Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-804766-8.00013-3
- 736.
Scheltens P, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2021;397:1577-1590.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32205-4
- 737.
Abozaid OAR, et al. Resveratrol-selenium nanoparticles alleviate neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease by regulating Sirt1/miRNA-134/GSK3beta expression. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022;200:5104-5114.
Not in our library10.1007/s12011-021-03073-7
- 738.
Fagiani F, Lanni C, Racchi M, Govoni S. (Dys)regulation of synaptic activity and neurotransmitter release by beta-amyloid: a look beyond Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2021;14:635880.
Not in our library10.3389/fnmol.2021.635880
- 739.
Guo J, Cheng J, North BJ, Wei W. Functional analyses of major cancer-related signaling pathways in Alzheimer’s disease etiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2017;1868:341-358.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.07.001
- 740.
An Y, Li Y, Hou Y, Huang S, Pei G. Alzheimer’s amyloid-beta accelerates cell senescence and suppresses the SIRT1/NRF2 pathway in human microglial cells. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2022;2022:3086010.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/3086010
- 741.
Cao L, Liu C, Wang F, Wang H. SIRT1 negatively regulates amyloid-beta-induced inflammation via the NF-kappaB pathway. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2013;46:659-669.
Not in our library10.1590/1414-431x20132903
- 742.
- 743.
Perone, I. et al. Mitochondrial SIRT3 deficiency results in neuronal network hyperexcitability, accelerates age-related abeta pathology, and renders neurons vulnerable to abeta toxicity. Neuromolecular Med (2022).
Not in our library10.1007/s12017-022-08713-2
- 744.
Wang Y, et al. RTN4B-mediated suppression of Sirtuin 2 activity ameliorates beta-amyloid pathology and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Aging Cell. 2020;19:e13194.
Not in our library10.1111/acel.13194
- 745.
Gu JL, Liu F. Tau in Alzheimer’s disease: pathological alterations and an attractive therapeutic target. Curr. Med Sci. 2020;40:1009-1021.
Not in our library10.1007/s11596-020-2282-1
- 746.
- 747.
Wesseling H, et al. Tau PTM profiles identify patient heterogeneity and stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2020;183:1699-1713.e1613.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.029
- 748.
Carroll T, Guha S, Nehrke K, Johnson GVW. Tau post-translational modifications: potentiators of selective vulnerability in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. (Basel). 2021;10:1047.
Not in our library10.3390/biology10101047
- 749.
Lu S, et al. SIRT1 regulates O-GlcNAcylation of tau through OGT. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:7042-7055.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.103062
- 750.
Esteves AR, et al. Acetylation as a major determinant to microtubule-dependent autophagy: Relevance to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson disease pathology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2019;1865:2008-2023.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.11.014
- 751.
Li S, et al. Sirtuin 3 mediates tau deacetylation. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69:355-362.
Not in our library10.3233/jad-190014
- 752.
Palomer E, et al. Epigenetic repression of Wnt receptors in AD: a role for Sirtuin2-induced H4K16ac deacetylation of Frizzled1 and Frizzled7 promoters. Mol. Psychiatry. 2022;27:3024-3033.
Not in our library10.1038/s41380-022-01492-z
- 753.
Li Q, Liu Y, Sun M. Autophagy and Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;37:377-388.
Not in our library10.1007/s10571-016-0386-8
- 754.
Ruankham W, et al. Sesamin and sesamol attenuate H2O2-induced oxidative stress on human neuronal cells via the SIRT1-SIRT3-FOXO3a signaling pathway. Nutr. Neurosci. 2021;24:90-101.
Not in our library10.1080/1028415x.2019.1596613
- 755.
- 756.
- 757.
Han P, et al. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide protects against beta-amyloid toxicity. Neurobiol. Aging. 2014;35:2064-2071.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.022
- 758.
Weir HJ, et al. CNS SIRT3 expression is altered by reactive oxygen species and in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48225.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0048225
- 759.
Pradhan R, et al. Blood circulatory level of seven sirtuins in Alzheimer’s disease: potent biomarker based on translational research. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022;59:1440-1451.
Not in our library10.1007/s12035-021-02671-9
- 760.
Pukhalskaia AE, et al. Sirtuins as possible predictors of aging and Alzheimer’s disease development: verification in the hippocampus and saliva. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2020;169:821-824.
Not in our library10.1007/s10517-020-04986-4
- 761.
Chen X, et al. Rs2015 Polymorphism in miRNA Target Site of Sirtuin2 gene is associated with the risk of Parkinson’s disease in Chinese Han population. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019;2019:1498034.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/1498034
- 762.
Jesus S, et al. Genetic association of sirtuin genes and Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. 2013;260:2237-2241.
Not in our library10.1007/s00415-013-6970-7
- 763.
Guo YJ, et al. Resveratrol alleviates MPTP-induced motor impairments and pathological changes by autophagic degradation of alpha-synuclein via SIRT1-deacetylated LC3. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016;60:2161-2175.
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201600111
- 764.
- 765.
Zhang X, et al. PGC-1alpha/ERRalpha-Sirt3 pathway regulates DAergic neuronal death by directly deacetylating SOD2 and ATP synthase beta. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016;24:312-328.
Not in our library10.1089/ars.2015.6403
- 766.
Shi H, et al. Sirt3 protects dopaminergic neurons from mitochondrial oxidative stress. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017;26:1915-1926.
Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddx100
- 767.
Jeong H, et al. Sirt1 mediates neuroprotection from mutant huntingtin by activation of the TORC1 and CREB transcriptional pathway. Nat. Med. 2011;18:159-165.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.2559
- 768.
Baldo B, et al. SIRT1 is increased in affected brain regions and hypothalamic metabolic pathways are altered in Huntington disease. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2019;45:361-379.
Not in our library10.1111/nan.12514
- 769.
Luthi-Carter R, et al. SIRT2 inhibition achieves neuroprotection by decreasing sterol biosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:7927-7932.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002924107
- 770.
Enzmann G, Kargaran S, Engelhardt B. Ischemia-reperfusion injury in stroke: impact of the brain barriers and brain immune privilege on neutrophil function. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2018;11:1756286418794184.
Not in our library10.1177/1756286418794184
- 771.
Pantazi E, et al. Role of sirtuins in ischemia-reperfusion injury. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7594-7602.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7594
- 772.
- 773.
Liu R, et al. QKI 6 ameliorates CIRI through promoting synthesis of triglyceride in neuron and inhibiting neuronal apoptosis associated with SIRT1-PPARgamma-PGC-1alpha axis. Brain Behav. 2021;11:e2271.
Not in our library10.1002/brb3.2271
- 774.
Wang P, et al. Induction of autophagy contributes to the neuroprotection of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase in cerebral ischemia. Autophagy. 2012;8:77-87.
Not in our library10.4161/auto.8.1.18274
- 775.
- 776.
Yang X, et al. Sirt3 protects against ischemic stroke injury by regulating HIF-1alpha/VEGF signaling and blood-brain barrier integrity. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2021;41:1203-1215.
Not in our library10.1007/s10571-020-00889-0
- 777.
Zhao H, et al. Sirt3 inhibits cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury through normalizing Wnt/beta-catenin pathway and blocking mitochondrial fission. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2018;23:1079-1092.
Not in our library10.1007/s12192-018-0917-y
- 778.
Diaz-Canestro C, et al. Sirtuin 5 as a novel target to blunt blood-brain barrier damage induced by cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018;260:148-155.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.060
- 779.
Zhang Y, Yan Q, Zhang Y. Overexpression of sirtuin 2 and its association with prognosis in acute ischemic stroke patients. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2021;35:e23707.
Not in our library10.1002/jcla.23707
- 780.
Pennisi G, et al. Redox regulation of cellular stress response in multiple sclerosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011;82:1490-1499.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.092
- 781.
De-Bernardi-Ojuel L, Torres-Collado L, Garcia-de-la-Hera M. Occupational therapy interventions in adults with multiple sclerosis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:1432.
Not in our library10.3390/ijerph18041432
- 782.
Deeb O, Nabulsi M. Exploring multiple sclerosis (MS) and amyotrophic lateral scler osis (ALS) as neurodegenerative diseases and their treatments: a review study. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020;20:2391-2403.
Not in our library10.2174/1568026620666200924114827
- 783.
- 784.
Lee JC, et al. Region-specific changes in the immunoreactivity of SIRT1 expression in the central nervous system of SOD1(G93A) transgenic mice as an in vivo model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Res. 2012;1433:20-28.
Not in our library10.1016/j.brainres.2011.11.019
- 785.
- 786.
Harlan BA, Pehar M, Killoy KM, Vargas MR. Enhanced SIRT6 activity abrogates the neurotoxic phenotype of astrocytes expressing ALS-linked mutant SOD1. FASEB J. 2019;33:7084-7091.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.201802752r
- 787.
Yuen AWC, Keezer MR, Sander JW. Epilepsy is a neurological and a systemic disorder. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;78:57-61.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.10.010
- 788.
Wallace E, et al. Altered circadian rhythms and oscillation of clock genes and sirtuin 1 in a model of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2018;59:1527-1539.
Not in our library10.1111/epi.14513
- 789.
Li F, Liu L. SIRT5 deficiency enhances susceptibility to kainate-induced seizures and exacerbates hippocampal neurodegeneration not through mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme SOD2. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:171.
Not in our library10.3389/fncel.2016.00171
- 790.
Lin W, et al. Inhibition of miR-134-5p protects against kainic acid-induced excitotoxicity through Sirt3-mediated preservation of mitochondrial function. Epilepsy Res. 2021;176:106722.
Not in our library10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106722
- 791.
Jester DJ, Lee S, Molinari V, Volicer L. Cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease with excessive daytime sleepiness: a systematic review. Aging Ment. Health. 2020;24:1769-1780.
Not in our library10.1080/13607863.2019.1660852
- 792.
Vinter K, Callesen MB, Kristensen TE, Jakobsen AV. [Cognitive deficits in epilepsy]. Ugeskr. Laege. 2022;184:V01220071.
Not in our library
- 793.
Vermeulen T, et al. Cognitive deficits in older adults with psychotic depression: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2019;27:1334-1344.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jagp.2019.07.011
- 794.
Sun Z, Zhao S, Suo X, Dou Y. Sirt1 protects against hippocampal atrophy and its induced cognitive impairment in middle-aged mice. BMC Neurosci. 2022;23:33.
Not in our library10.1186/s12868-022-00718-8
- 795.
Fang QJ, et al. Surgery-induced downregulation of hippocampal sirtuin-1 contributes to cognitive dysfunction by inhibiting autophagy and activating apoptosis in aged mice. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020;12:8111-8122.
Not in our library
- 796.
Wang D, et al. Sirt3-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in fluoride-induced cognitive deficits. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021;158:112665.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2021.112665
- 797.
Wang D, et al. Mitigation of honokiol on fluoride-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cognitive deficits through activating AMPK/PGC-1alpha/Sirt3. J. Hazard Mater. 2022;437:129381.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129381
- 798.
Zhu K, Xu W, Han D, Mei X. Effect of Sirtuin-1 and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in rat model of spinal cord injury. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022;2022:1799607.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/1799607
- 799.
Lu P, et al. Effects of Sirtuin 1 on microglia in spinal cord injury: involvement of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Neuroreport. 2019;30:867-874.
Not in our library10.1097/wnr.0000000000001293
- 800.
Zhaohui C, Shuihua W. Protective effects of SIRT6 against inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell apoptosis in spinal cord injury. Inflammation. 2020;43:1751-1758.
Not in our library10.1007/s10753-020-01249-2
- 801.
Chen J, Qin R. MicroRNA1385p regulates the development of spinal cord injury by targeting SIRT1. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020;22:328-336.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2020.11071
- 802.
Wang X, et al. MicroRNA-30c abrogation protects against spinal cord ischemia reperfusion injury through modulating SIRT1. Eur. J. Pharm. 2019;851:80-87.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.02.027
- 803.
Ellis A, Bennett DL. Neuroinflammation and the generation of neuropathic pain. Br. J. Anaesth. 2013;111:26-37.
Not in our library10.1093/bja/aet128
- 804.
Cong L, et al. Resveratrol attenuates manganese-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation through SIRT1 signaling in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021;153:112283.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2021.112283
- 805.
Zhang Y, Chi D. Overexpression of SIRT2 alleviates neuropathic pain and neuroinflammation through deacetylation of transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B. Inflammation. 2018;41:569-578.
Not in our library10.1007/s10753-017-0713-3
- 806.
Sa de Almeida J, et al. Microglial sirtuin 2 shapes long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:614.
Not in our library10.3389/fnins.2020.00614
- 807.
Pais TF, et al. The NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 2 is a suppressor of microglial activation and brain inflammation. EMBO J. 2013;32:2603-2616.
Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2013.200
- 808.
Zhou D, Jiang Y. Sirtuin 3 attenuates neuroinflammation-induced apoptosis in BV-2 microglia. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11:9075-9089.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.102375
- 809.
Li H, et al. TREM2 ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced oxidative stress response and neuroinflammation by promoting sirtuin3 in BV2 cells. Neurotox. Res. 2022;40:56-65.
Not in our library10.1007/s12640-021-00459-2
- 810.
Kikusui T, Nagasawa M, Nomoto K, Kuse-Arata S, Mogi K. Endocrine regulations in human-dog coexistence through domestication. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;30:793-806.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tem.2019.09.002
- 811.
Estes C, et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016-2030. J. Hepatol. 2018;69:896-904.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.036
- 812.
Lantier L, et al. SIRT3 is crucial for maintaining skeletal muscle insulin action and protects against severe insulin resistance in high-fat-fed mice. Diabetes. 2015;64:3081-3092.
Not in our library10.2337/db14-1810
- 813.
Li P, et al. SIRT1 attenuates renal fibrosis by repressing HIF-2alpha. Cell Death Disco. 2021;7:59.
Not in our library10.1038/s41420-021-00443-x
- 814.
Hong Q, et al. Increased podocyte Sirtuin-1 function attenuates diabetic kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2018;93:1330-1343.
Not in our library10.1016/j.kint.2017.12.008
- 815.
Lo CS, et al. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein f stimulates sirtuin-1 gene expression and attenuates nephropathy progression in diabetic mice. Diabetes. 2017;66:1964-1978.
Not in our library10.2337/db16-1588
- 816.
Moschen AR, et al. Adipose tissue and liver expression of SIRT1, 3, and 6 increase after extensive weight loss in morbid obesity. J. Hepatol. 2013;59:1315-1322.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2013.07.027
- 817.
Ceolotto G, et al. Sirtuin 1 stabilization by HuR represses TNF-alpha- and glucose-induced E-selectin release and endothelial cell adhesiveness in vitro: relevance to human metabolic syndrome. Clin. Sci. (Lond.). 2014;127:449-461.
Not in our library10.1042/cs20130439
- 818.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. IDF, 2017 World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes. (2016).
Not in our library
- 819.
Bourne RR, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2013;1:e339-e349.
Not in our library10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70113-x
- 820.
Moxey PW, et al. Lower extremity amputations-a review of global variability in incidence. Diabet. Med. 2011;28:1144-1153.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03279.x
- 821.
Dyck PJ, et al. The prevalence by staged severity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy in a population-based cohort: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. Neurology. 1993;43:817-824.
Not in our library10.1212/wnl.43.4.817
- 822.
United States Renal Data System. International Comparisons. In:United States Renal Data System. 2014 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 188-210 (2014).
Not in our library
- 823.
Guarente L, Franklin H. Epstein Lecture: Sirtuins, aging, and medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:2235-2244.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmra1100831
- 824.
Gomes P, Fleming Outeiro T, Cavadas C. Emerging role of Sirtuin 2 in the regulation of Mammalian metabolism. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2015;36:756-768.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tips.2015.08.001
- 825.
Cui Y, et al. Isoliquiritigenin inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression via m(6)A/IGF2BP3-dependent TWIST1 mRNA stabilization. Phytomedicine. 2022;104:154299.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154299
- 826.
Calabrese V, et al. Oxidative stress, glutathione status, sirtuin and cellular stress response in type 2 diabetes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1822:729-736.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.12.003
- 827.
Gui J, et al. Gestational diabetes induces alterations of sirtuins in fetal endothelial cells. Pediatr. Res. 2016;79:788-798.
Not in our library10.1038/pr.2015.269
- 828.
Bian C, et al. Association of SIRT6 circulating levels with urinary and glycometabolic markers in pre-diabetes and diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2021;58:1551-1562.
Not in our library10.1007/s00592-021-01759-x
- 829.
Cote CD, et al. Resveratrol activates duodenal Sirt1 to reverse insulin resistance in rats through a neuronal network. Nat. Med. 2015;21:498-505.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.3821
- 830.
Jimenez-Gomez Y, et al. Resveratrol improves adipose insulin signaling and reduces the inflammatory response in adipose tissue of rhesus monkeys on high-fat, high-sugar diet. Cell Metab. 2013;18:533-545.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2013.09.004
- 831.
Cornejo, P. J. et al. The Stress-Responsive microRNA-34a alters insulin signaling and actions in adipocytes through induction of the tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B. Cells11 (2022).
Not in our library10.3390/cells11162581
- 832.
Erion DM, et al. SirT1 knockdown in liver decreases basal hepatic glucose production and increases hepatic insulin responsiveness in diabetic rats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:11288-11293.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0812931106
- 833.
- 834.
Arora A, Dey CS. SIRT2 regulates insulin sensitivity in insulin resistant neuronal cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;474:747-752.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.029
- 835.
Choubey SK, Prabhu D, Nachiappan M, Biswal J, Jeyakanthan J. Molecular modeling, dynamics studies and density functional theory approaches to identify potential inhibitors of SIRT4 protein from Homo sapiens: a novel target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2017;35:3316-3329.
Not in our library10.1080/07391102.2016.1254117
- 836.
Dominy JE, et al. The deacetylase Sirt6 activates the acetyltransferase GCN5 and suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis. Mol. Cell. 2012;48:900-913.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.030
- 837.
Zhang P, et al. Tumor suppressor p53 cooperates with SIRT6 to regulate gluconeogenesis by promoting FoxO1 nuclear exclusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:10684-10689.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1411026111
- 838.
Spaeth JM, et al. Defining a novel role for the Pdx1 transcription factor in islet beta-cell maturation and proliferation during weaning. Diabetes. 2017;66:2830-2839.
Not in our library10.2337/db16-1516
- 839.
Fujitani Y. Transcriptional regulation of pancreas development and beta-cell function [Review]. Endocr. J. 2017;64:477-486.
Not in our library10.1507/endocrj.ej17-0098
- 840.
Feldman EL, et al. Diabetic neuropathy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019;5:42.
Not in our library10.1038/s41572-019-0097-9
- 841.
Cole JB, Florez JC. Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020;16:377-390.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-020-0278-5
- 842.
Li L, Zeng H, He X, Chen JX. Sirtuin 3 alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy by regulating TIGAR and cardiomyocyte metabolism. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e018913.
Not in our library10.1161/jaha.120.018913
- 843.
Yang H, et al. Hippocampal insulin resistance and the Sirtuin 1 signaling pathway in diabetes-induced cognitive dysfunction. Neural Regen. Res. 2021;16:2465-2474.
Not in our library10.4103/1673-5374.313051
- 844.
Tang G, et al. Clinical efficacies, underlying mechanisms and molecular targets of Chinese medicines for diabetic nephropathy treatment and management. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2021;11:2749-2767.
Not in our library10.1016/j.apsb.2020.12.020
- 845.
Heerspink HJL, et al. Atrasentan and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (SONAR): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1937-1947.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30772-x
- 846.
Thomas B. The global burden of diabetic kidney disease: time trends and gender gaps. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2019;19:18.
Not in our library10.1007/s11892-019-1133-6
- 847.
Huang K, et al. Sirt1 resists advanced glycation end products-induced expressions of fibronectin and TGF-beta1 by activating the Nrf2/ARE pathway in glomerular mesangial cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013;65:528-540.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.029
- 848.
Pop-Busui R, et al. Diabetic neuropathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:136-154.
Not in our library10.2337/dc16-2042
- 849.
Cheng XR, Zhou WX, Zhang YX. The behavioral, pathological and therapeutic features of the senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8 strain as an Alzheimer’s disease animal model. Ageing Res. Rev. 2014;13:13-37.
Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2013.10.002
- 850.
Nagao K, Jinnouchi T, Kai S, Yanagita T. Pterostilbene, a dimethylated analog of resveratrol, promotes energy metabolism in obese rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017;43:151-155.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.02.009
- 851.
Zhang Z, et al. Sirtuin 1 alleviates diabetic neuropathic pain by regulating synaptic plasticity of spinal dorsal horn neurons. Pain. 2019;160:1082-1092.
Not in our library10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001489
- 852.
Chandrasekaran K, et al. Overexpression of Sirtuin 1 protein in neurons prevents and reverses experimental diabetic neuropathy. Brain. 2019;142:3737-3752.
Not in our library10.1093/brain/awz324
- 853.
Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376:124-136.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62124-3
- 854.
Mishra M, Duraisamy AJ, Kowluru RA. Sirt1: a guardian of the development of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes. 2018;67:745-754.
Not in our library10.2337/db17-0996
- 855.
Prakoso D, et al. Gene therapy targeting cardiac phosphoinositide 3-kinase (p110alpha) attenuates cardiac remodeling in type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020;318:H840-H852.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.00632.2019
- 856.
Li K, et al. Tetrahydrocurcumin ameliorates diabetic cardiomyopathy by attenuating high glucose-induced oxidative stress and fibrosis via activating the SIRT1 Pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2019;2019:6746907.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/6746907
- 857.
Song S, et al. Sirtuin 3 deficiency exacerbates diabetic cardiomyopathy via necroptosis enhancement and NLRP3 activation. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2021;42:230-241.
Not in our library10.1038/s41401-020-0490-7
- 858.
- 859.
Deng T, Lyon CJ, Bergin S, Caligiuri MA, Hsueh WA. Obesity, inflammation, and cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2016;11:421-449.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044359
- 860.
Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. 2006;444:860-867.
Not in our library10.1038/nature05485
- 861.
Gregor MF, Hotamisligil GS. Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011;29:415-445.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101322
- 862.
- 863.
Cyr NE, et al. Central Sirt1 regulates body weight and energy expenditure along with the POMC-derived peptide alpha-MSH and the processing enzyme CPE production in diet-induced obese male rats. Endocrinology. 2015;156:961-974.
Not in our library10.1210/en.2014-1970
- 864.
Zhang, T., Liu, J., Tong, Q. & Lin, L. SIRT3 acts as a positive autophagy regulator to promote lipid mobilization in adipocytes via activating AMPK. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (2020).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms21020372
- 865.
Timmers S, et al. Calorie restriction-like effects of 30 days of resveratrol supplementation on energy metabolism and metabolic profile in obese humans. Cell Metab. 2011;14:612-622.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2011.10.002
- 866.
Li H, Xu M, Lee J, He C, Xie Z. Leucine supplementation increases SIRT1 expression and prevents mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic disorders in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;303:E1234-E1244.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.00198.2012
- 867.
Krishnan J, et al. Dietary obesity-associated Hif1alpha activation in adipocytes restricts fatty acid oxidation and energy expenditure via suppression of the Sirt2-NAD+ system. Genes Dev. 2012;26:259-270.
Not in our library10.1101/gad.180406.111
- 868.
Tang Q, et al. Sirtuin 6 supra-physiological overexpression in hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin neurons promotes obesity via the hypothalamus-adipose axis. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21408.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.202002607
- 869.
Pfluger PT, Herranz D, Velasco-Miguel S, Serrano M, Tschop MH. Sirt1 protects against high-fat diet-induced metabolic damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:9793-9798.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0802917105
- 870.
- 871.
Bhargava P, Schnellmann RG. Mitochondrial energetics in the kidney. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017;13:629-646.
Not in our library10.1038/nrneph.2017.107
- 872.
Wang R, et al. Potential adverse effects of nanoparticles on the reproductive system. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018;13:8487-8506.
Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s170723
- 873.
Li H, et al. Depleting microRNA-183-3p improves renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis after acute kidney injury via SIRT1/PUMA/FOXO3a deacetylation. Life Sci. 2021;269:119017.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119017
- 874.
Li L, Fu H, Liu Y. The fibrogenic niche in kidney fibrosis: components and mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022;18:545-557.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-022-00590-z
- 875.
- 876.
Castillo RL, et al. Protective effects of polyunsatutared fatty acids supplementation against testicular damage induced by intermittent hypobaric hypoxia in rats. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015;22:8.
Not in our library10.1186/s12929-015-0112-8
- 877.
Levey AS, Titan SM, Powe NR, Coresh J, Inker LA. Kidney disease, race, and GFR estimation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020;15:1203-1212.
Not in our library10.2215/cjn.12791019
- 878.
Kellum JA, et al. Acute kidney injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2021;7:52.
Not in our library10.1038/s41572-021-00284-z
- 879.
Meersch M, Schmidt C, Zarbock A. Perioperative acute kidney injury: an under-recognized problem. Anesth. Analg. 2017;125:1223-1232.
Not in our library10.1213/ane.0000000000002369
- 880.
Susantitaphong P, et al. World incidence of AKI: a meta-analysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013;8:1482-1493.
Not in our library10.2215/cjn.00710113
- 881.
Hoste EAJ, et al. Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018;14:607-625.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0
- 882.
Mehta RL, et al. International Society of Nephrology’s 0by25 initiative for acute kidney injury (zero preventable deaths by 2025): a human rights case for nephrology. Lancet. 2015;385:2616-2643.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60126-x
- 883.
Shen H, et al. Sirtuin-3 mediates sex differences in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Transl. Res. 2021;235:15-31.
Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2021.03.015
- 884.
Morigi M, et al. Sirtuin 3-dependent mitochondrial dynamic improvements protect against acute kidney injury. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:715-726.
Not in our library10.1172/jci77632
- 885.
Wang Q, et al. Sirt3 modulate renal ischemia-reperfusion injury through enhancing mitochondrial fusion and activating the ERK-OPA1 signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:23495-23506.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28918
- 886.
Emma F, Montini G, Parikh SM, Salviati L. Mitochondrial dysfunction in inherited renal disease and acute kidney injury. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016;12:267-280.
Not in our library10.1038/nrneph.2015.214
- 887.
Guan Y, et al. Nicotinamide mononucleotide, an NAD(+) precursor, rescues age-associated susceptibility to AKI in a sirtuin 1-dependent manner. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;28:2337-2352.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.2016040385
- 888.
Fan H, et al. The histone deacetylase, SIRT1, contributes to the resistance of young mice to ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2013;83:404-413.
Not in our library10.1038/ki.2012.394
- 889.
Lempiainen J, Finckenberg P, Levijoki J, Mervaala E. AMPK activator AICAR ameliorates ischaemia reperfusion injury in the rat kidney. Br. J. Pharm. 2012;166:1905-1915.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01895.x
- 890.
He S, et al. NAD(+) ameliorates endotoxin-induced acute kidney injury in a sirtuin1-dependent manner via GSK-3beta/Nrf2 signalling pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2022;26:1979-1993.
Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.17222
- 891.
Jung YJ, Park W, Kang KP, Kim W. SIRT2 is involved in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury through regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2020;35:1145-1156.
Not in our library10.1093/ndt/gfaa042
- 892.
Chiba T, et al. Sirtuin 5 regulates proximal tubule fatty acid oxidation to protect against AKI. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019;30:2384-2398.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.2019020163
- 893.
Sanchez-Navarro A, et al. Sirtuin 7 deficiency reduces inflammation and tubular damage induced by an episode of acute kidney injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:2573.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms23052573
- 894.
Ping H, Zhang X, Xing N. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China. Lancet. 2012;380:216.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61213-6
- 895.
Levin A, et al. Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy. Lancet. 2017;390:1888-1917.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30788-2
- 896.
Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389:1238-1252.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32064-5
- 897.
Duffield JS. Cellular and molecular mechanisms in kidney fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124:2299-2306.
Not in our library10.1172/jci72267
- 898.
Djudjaj S, Boor P. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of kidney fibrosis. Mol. Asp. Med. 2019;65:16-36.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mam.2018.06.002
- 899.
Schnaper HW. Renal fibrosis. Methods Mol. Med. 2005;117:45-68.
Not in our library10.1385/1-59259-940-0:045
- 900.
United States Renal Data System 2003 Annual Data Report. Division of Kidney, Urologic and Hematologic Diseases, NIDDK/NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD (2003).
Not in our library
- 901.
- 902.
Leask A, Abraham DJ. TGF-beta signaling and the fibrotic response. FASEB J. 2004;18:816-827.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.03-1273rev
- 903.
Ren Y, et al. CTGF siRNA ameliorates tubular cell apoptosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis in obstructed mouse kidneys in a Sirt1-independent manner. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2015;9:4155-4171.
Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s86748
- 904.
Ren Y, et al. The Sirt1 activator, SRT1720, attenuates renal fibrosis by inhibiting CTGF and oxidative stress. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017;39:1317-1324.
Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2017.2931
- 905.
He FF, et al. Inhibition of SIRT2 alleviates fibroblast activation and renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis via MDM2. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;46:451-460.
Not in our library10.1159/000488613
- 906.
Zhang Y, et al. Sirtuin 3 regulates mitochondrial protein acetylation and metabolism in tubular epithelial cells during renal fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:847.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-021-04134-4
- 907.
Jin J, et al. Loss of proximal tubular sirtuin 6 aggravates unilateral ureteral obstruction-induced tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis by regulation of beta-catenin acetylation. Cells. 2022;11:1477.
Not in our library10.3390/cells11091477
- 908.
Ruiz-Ortega M, Rayego-Mateos S, Lamas S, Ortiz A, Rodrigues-Diez RR. Targeting the progression of chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020;16:269-288.
Not in our library10.1038/s41581-019-0248-y
- 909.
Vasko R, et al. Endothelial sirtuin 1 deficiency perpetrates nephrosclerosis through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-14: relevance to fibrosis of vascular senescence. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014;25:276-291.
Not in our library10.1681/asn.2013010069
- 910.
Yang SY, et al. Downregulation of angiotensin type 1 receptor and nuclear factor-kappaB by sirtuin 1 contributes to renoprotection in unilateral ureteral obstruction. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33705.
Not in our library10.1038/srep33705
- 911.
Ponnusamy M, et al. Blocking sirtuin 1 and 2 inhibits renal interstitial fibroblast activation and attenuates renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2014;350:243-256.
Not in our library10.1124/jpet.113.212076
- 912.
Xi, J. et al. SIRT3 inhibited the formation of calcium oxalate-induced kidney stones through regulating NRF2/HO-1 signaling pathway. J Cell Biochem (2018).
Not in our library10.1002/jcb.28109
- 913.
Ye QL, et al. Sirt1 inhibits kidney stones formation by attenuating calcium oxalate-induced cell injury. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2021;347:109605.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109605
- 914.
- 915.
Chuang PY, et al. Reduction in podocyte SIRT1 accelerates kidney injury in aging mice. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2017;313:F621-F628.
Not in our library10.1152/ajprenal.00255.2017
- 916.
Huang W, et al. Sirt6 deficiency results in progression of glomerular injury in the kidney. Aging (Albany NY). 2017;9:1069-1083.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.101214
- 917.
- 918.
Wei W, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell exosomes suppress phosphate-induced aortic calcification via SIRT6-HMGB1 deacetylation. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:235.
Not in our library10.1186/s13287-021-02307-8
- 919.
Sener TE, et al. Resveratrol treatment may preserve the erectile function after radiotherapy by restoring antioxidant defence mechanisms, SIRT1 and NOS protein expressions. Int. J. Impot Res. 2018;30:179-188.
Not in our library10.1038/s41443-018-0042-6
- 920.
Francisco CM, et al. Resveratrol reverses male reproductive damage in rats exposed to nicotine during the intrauterine phase and breastfeeding. Andrology. 2022;10:951-972.
Not in our library10.1111/andr.13183
- 921.
Iniesta-Cuerda M, Havrankova J, Rimnacova H, Garcia-Alvarez O, Nevoral J. Male SIRT1 insufficiency leads to sperm with decreased ability to hyperactivate and fertilize. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2022;57:72-77.
Not in our library10.1111/rda.14172
- 922.
Bello JH, et al. Dysregulation of mitochondrial sirtuin genes is associated with human male infertility. Andrologia. 2022;54:e14274.
Not in our library10.1111/and.14274
- 923.
Kiyak Caglayan E, Engin-Ustun Y, Gocmen AY, Polat MF, Aktulay A. Serum sirtuin 1 levels in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015;35:608-611.
Not in our library10.3109/01443615.2014.990428
- 924.
Emidio GD, et al. Methylglyoxal-dependent glycative stress and deregulation of SIRT1 functional network in the ovary of PCOS mice. Cells. 2020;9:209.
Not in our library10.3390/cells9010209
- 925.
Zhang Q, et al. Mitochondrial and glucose metabolic dysfunctions in granulosa cells induce impaired oocytes of polycystic ovary syndrome through Sirtuin 3. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022;187:1-16.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.05.010
- 926.
- 927.
Rezk NA, Lashin MB, Sabbah NA. MiRNA 34-a regulate SIRT-1 and Foxo-1 expression in endometriosis. Noncoding RNA Res. 2021;6:35-41.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ncrna.2021.02.002
- 928.
Giorgio I, et al. On mechanically driven biological stimulus for bone remodeling as a diffusive phenomenon. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 2019;18:1639-1663.
Not in our library10.1007/s10237-019-01166-w
- 929.
Chen Y, et al. SIRT1, a promising regulator of bone homeostasis. Life Sci. 2021;269:119041.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119041
- 930.
- 931.
Sulzbacher I. Osteoarthritis: histology and pathogenesis. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2013;163:212-219.
Not in our library10.1007/s10354-012-0168-y
- 932.
Liu S, Yang H, Hu B, Zhang M. Sirt1 regulates apoptosis and extracellular matrix degradation in resveratrol-treated osteoarthritis chondrocytes via the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathways. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;14:5057-5062.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2017.5165
- 933.
Zhang M, Mou L, Liu S, Sun F, Gong M. Circ_0001103 alleviates IL-1beta-induced chondrocyte cell injuries by upregulating SIRT1 via targeting miR-375. Clin. Immunol. 2021;227:108718.
Not in our library10.1016/j.clim.2021.108718
- 934.
- 935.
Wang Y, Zhao X, Lotz M, Terkeltaub R, Liu-Bryan R. Mitochondrial biogenesis is impaired in osteoarthritis chondrocytes but reversible via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:2141-2153.
Not in our library10.1002/art.39182
- 936.
Lu Q, et al. SIRT1 restoration enhances chondrocyte autophagy in osteoarthritis through PTEN-mediated EGFR ubiquitination. Cell Death Disco. 2022;8:203.
Not in our library10.1038/s41420-022-00896-8
- 937.
Li W, Xiong Y, Chen W, Wu L. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling may induce senescence of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020;20:2631-2638.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2020.9022
- 938.
Wang J, et al. SIRT3 activation by dihydromyricetin suppresses chondrocytes degeneration via maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018;14:1873-1882.
Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.27746
- 939.
Fu Y, et al. Aging promotes sirtuin 3-dependent cartilage superoxide dismutase 2 acetylation and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1887-1898.
Not in our library10.1002/art.39618
- 940.
Zhang C, Lu Y, Yuan F, Jiang S. Circular RNA CCDC66 regulates osteoarthritis progression by targeting miR-3622b-5p. Gerontology. 2022;68:431-441.
Not in our library10.1159/000520325
- 941.
Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med. 94, 646-650 (1993).
Not in our library10.1016/0002-9343(93)90218-e
- 942.
Martin T, Gooi JH, Sims NA. Molecular mechanisms in coupling of bone formation to resorption. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2009;19:73-88.
Not in our library10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v19.i1.40
- 943.
Chang HC, Guarente L. SIRT1 mediates central circadian control in the SCN by a mechanism that decays with aging. Cell. 2013;153:1448-1460.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.027
- 944.
- 945.
Barbour KE, et al. Inflammatory markers and risk of hip fracture in older white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:2057-2064.
Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2245
- 946.
Sun W, et al. Overexpression of Sirt1 in mesenchymal stem cells protects against bone loss in mice by FOXO3a deacetylation and oxidative stress inhibition. Metabolism. 2018;88:61-71.
Not in our library10.1016/j.metabol.2018.06.006
- 947.
- 948.
Moon YJ, et al. Sirtuin 6 in preosteoclasts suppresses age- and estrogen deficiency-related bone loss by stabilizing estrogen receptor alpha. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:2358-2370.
Not in our library10.1038/s41418-019-0306-9
- 949.
Feng J, et al. Protective effects of resveratrol on postmenopausal osteoporosis: regulation of SIRT1-NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Acta Biochim Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai). 2014;46:1024-1033.
Not in our library10.1093/abbs/gmu103
- 950.
Wang X, Chen L, Peng W. Protective effects of resveratrol on osteoporosis via activation of the SIRT1-NF-kappaB signaling pathway in rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;14:5032-5038.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2017.5147
- 951.
Dowdell J, et al. Intervertebral disk degeneration and repair. Neurosurgery. 2017;80:S46-S54.
Not in our library10.1093/neuros/nyw078
- 952.
Shi Q, Xu L, Zeng X. Sirtuin 1 participates in intervertebral disc degeneration via the nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase/nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide/sirtuin 1 pathway responsible for regulating autophagy of nucleus pulposus cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 2022;23:267.
Not in our library10.3892/etm.2022.11193
- 953.
Cai WT, Guan P, Lin MX, Fu B, Wu B. Sirt1 suppresses MCP-1 production during the intervertebral disc degeneration by inactivating AP-1 subunits c-Fos/c-Jun. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:5895-5904.
Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_202006_21482
- 954.
Yang M, et al. Sirtuin 2 expression suppresses oxidative stress and senescence of nucleus pulposus cells through inhibition of the p53/p21 pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;513:616-622.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.03.200
- 955.
Song Y, et al. Sirtuin 3-dependent mitochondrial redox homeostasis protects against AGEs-induced intervertebral disc degeneration. Redox Biol. 2018;19:339-353.
Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2018.09.006
- 956.
Wang J, et al. Small molecule natural compound agonist of SIRT3 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50:1-14.
Not in our library10.1038/s12276-018-0173-3
- 957.
Kang L, Hu J, Weng Y, Jia J, Zhang Y. Sirtuin 6 prevents matrix degradation through inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway in intervertebral disc degeneration. Exp. Cell Res. 2017;352:322-332.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.02.023
- 958.
Zhang Y, et al. The autophagic-lysosomal and ubiquitin proteasome systems are simultaneously activated in the skeletal muscle of gastric cancer patients with cachexia. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020;111:570-579.
Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/nqz347
- 959.
- 960.
Han Z, et al. Role of SIRT2 in regulating the dexamethasone-activated autophagy pathway in skeletal muscle atrophy. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2021;99:562-569.
Not in our library10.1139/bcb-2020-0445
- 961.
Zheng J, et al. Sirtuin 3 deficiency accelerates Angiotensin II-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Connect Tissue Res. 2020;61:586-593.
Not in our library10.1080/03008207.2019.1648443
- 962.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412-423.
Not in our library10.1093/ageing/afq034
- 963.
Lopez-Otin C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153:1194-1217.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
- 964.
Wu X, Cao N, Fenech M, Wang X. Role of sirtuins in maintenance of genomic stability: relevance to cancer and healthy aging. DNA Cell Biol. 2016;35:542-575.
Not in our library10.1089/dna.2016.3280
- 965.
Wang T, et al. Research progress on sirtuins family members and cell senescence. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020;193:112207.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112207
- 966.
Yan P, et al. LARP7 ameliorates cellular senescence and aging by allosterically enhancing SIRT1 deacetylase activity. Cell Rep. 2021;37:110038.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110038
- 967.
Oberdoerffer P, et al. SIRT1 redistribution on chromatin promotes genomic stability but alters gene expression during aging. Cell. 2008;135:907-918.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.025
- 968.
Diao Z, et al. SIRT3 consolidates heterochromatin and counteracts senescence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:4203-4219.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkab161
- 969.
Green CL, Lamming DW, Fontana L. Molecular mechanisms of dietary restriction promoting health and longevity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23:56-73.
Not in our library10.1038/s41580-021-00411-4
- 970.
Rodgers JT, et al. Nutrient control of glucose homeostasis through a complex of PGC-1alpha and SIRT1. Nature. 2005;434:113-118.
Not in our library10.1038/nature03354
- 971.
Peterson C. Semantic and pragmatic uses of ‘but’. J. Child Lang. 1986;13:583-590.
Not in our library10.1017/s0305000900006905
- 972.
Jung-Hynes B, Reiter RJ, Ahmad N. Sirtuins, melatonin and circadian rhythms: building a bridge between aging and cancer. J. Pineal Res. 2010;48:9-19.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-079x.2009.00729.x
- 973.
Wang RH, et al. Negative reciprocal regulation between Sirt1 and Per2 modulates the circadian clock and aging. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:28633.
Not in our library10.1038/srep28633
- 974.
Sun S, et al. Sirt6 deacetylase activity regulates circadian rhythms via Per2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;511:234-238.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.01.143
- 975.
Lee SH, Lee JH, Lee HY, Min KJ. Sirtuin signaling in cellular senescence and aging. BMB Rep. 2019;52:24-34.
Not in our library10.5483/bmbrep.2019.52.1.290
- 976.
Wang Y, et al. An overview of Sirtuins as potential therapeutic target: Structure, function and modulators. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019;161:48-77.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.10.028
- 977.
Howitz KT, et al. Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan. Nature. 2003;425:191-196.
Not in our library10.1038/nature01960
- 978.
Hoseini A, et al. The effects of resveratrol on metabolic status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. Food Funct. 2019;10:6042-6051.
Not in our library10.1039/c9fo01075k
- 979.
Saul N, Pietsch K, Menzel R, Steinberg CE. Quercetin-mediated longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans: is DAF-16 involved? Mech. Ageing Dev. 2008;129:611-613.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mad.2008.07.001
- 980.
Zhu Y, et al. SIRT1 activation by butein attenuates sepsis-induced brain injury in mice subjected to cecal ligation and puncture via alleviating inflammatory and oxidative stress. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2019;363:34-46.
Not in our library10.1016/j.taap.2018.10.013
- 981.
Wolter F, Clausnitzer A, Akoglu B, Stein J. Piceatannol, a natural analog of resveratrol, inhibits progression through the S phase of the cell cycle in colorectal cancer cell lines. J. Nutr. 2002;132:298-302.
Not in our library10.1093/jn/132.2.298
- 982.
Yerra VG, Kalvala AK, Kumar A. Isoliquiritigenin reduces oxidative damage and alleviates mitochondrial impairment by SIRT1 activation in experimental diabetic neuropathy. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017;47:41-52.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.05.001
- 983.
Milne JC, et al. Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2007;450:712-716.
Not in our library10.1038/nature06261
- 984.
Yee Ng,P, et al. The identification of the SIRT1 activator SRT2104 as a clinical candidate. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2013;10:793-797.
Not in our library10.2174/15701808113100990021
- 985.
US8343997B2 Sirtris Pharmaceuticals Inc. (2013).
Not in our library
- 986.
Chini CC, et al. SIRT1-activating compounds (STAC) negatively regulate pancreatic cancer cell growth and viability through a SIRT1 lysosomal-dependent pathway. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:2496-2507.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1760
- 987.
Minor RK, et al. SRT1720 improves survival and healthspan of obese mice. Sci. Rep. 2011;1:70.
Not in our library10.1038/srep00070
- 988.
Hubbard BP, Sinclair DA. Small molecule SIRT1 activators for the treatment of aging and age-related diseases. Trends Pharm. Sci. 2014;35:146-154.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tips.2013.12.004
- 989.
Dai H, Sinclair DA, Ellis JL, Steegborn C. Sirtuin activators and inhibitors: Promises, achievements, and challenges. Pharm. Ther. 2018;188:140-154.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.03.004
- 990.
Noh RM, et al. Cardiometabolic effects of a novel SIRT1 activator, SRT2104, in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Open Heart. 2017;4:e000647.
Not in our library10.1136/openhrt-2017-000647
- 991.
Venkatasubramanian S, et al. Effects of the small molecule SIRT1 activator, SRT2104 on arterial stiffness in otherwise healthy cigarette smokers and subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Open Heart. 2016;3:e000402.
Not in our library10.1136/openhrt-2016-000402
- 992.
Feldman JL, Baeza J, Denu JM. Activation of the protein deacetylase SIRT6 by long-chain fatty acids and widespread deacylation by mammalian sirtuins. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:31350-31356.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.c113.511261
- 993.
You W, et al. Structural basis of sirtuin 6 activation by synthetic small. Mol. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017;56:1007-1011.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.201610082
- 994.
Iachettini S, et al. Pharmacological activation of SIRT6 triggers lethal autophagy in human cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:996.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-018-1065-0
- 995.
Huang Z, et al. Identification of a cellularly active SIRT6 allosteric activator. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018;14:1118-1126.
Not in our library10.1038/s41589-018-0150-0
- 996.
Yoshino M, et al. Nicotinamide mononucleotide increases muscle insulin sensitivity in prediabetic women. Science. 2021;372:1224-1229.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abe9985
- 997.
Yuan H, et al. Activation of stress response gene SIRT1 by BCR-ABL promotes leukemogenesis. Blood. 2012;119:1904-1914.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2011-06-361691
- 998.
Tervo AJ, et al. An in silico approach to discovering novel inhibitors of human sirtuin type 2. J. Med. Chem. 2004;47:6292-6298.
Not in our library10.1021/jm049933m
- 999.
Jung-Hynes B, Nihal M, Zhong W, Ahmad N. Role of sirtuin histone deacetylase SIRT1 in prostate cancer. A target for prostate cancer management via its inhibition? J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:3823-3832.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m807869200
- 1000.
Audrito V, et al. Nicotinamide blocks proliferation and induces apoptosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through activation of the p53/miR-34a/SIRT1 tumor suppressor network. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4473-4483.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-4452
- 1001.
Taylor DM, et al. A brain-permeable small molecule reduces neuronal cholesterol by inhibiting activity of sirtuin 2 deacetylase. ACS Chem. Biol. 2011;6:540-546.
Not in our library10.1021/cb100376q
- 1002.
Chopra V, et al. The sirtuin 2 inhibitor AK-7 is neuroprotective in Huntington’s disease mouse models. Cell Rep. 2012;2:1492-1497.
Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.001
- 1003.
Hisada R, et al. The deacetylase SIRT2 contributes to autoimmune disease pathogenesis by modulating IL-17A and IL-2 transcription. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2022;19:738-750.
Not in our library10.1038/s41423-022-00874-1
- 1004.
Bedalov A, Gatbonton T, Irvine WP, Gottschling DE, Simon JA. Identification of a small molecule inhibitor of Sir2p. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:15113-15118.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.261574398
- 1005.
Grozinger CM, Chao ED, Blackwell HE, Moazed D, Schreiber SL. Identification of a class of small molecule inhibitors of the sirtuin family of NAD-dependent deacetylases by phenotypic screening. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:38837-38843.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m106779200
- 1006.
Breitenstein A, et al. Sirt1 inhibition promotes in vivo arterial thrombosis and tissue factor expression in stimulated cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89:464-472.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvq339
- 1007.
Nadtochiy SM, Redman E, Rahman I, Brookes PS. Lysine deacetylation in ischaemic preconditioning: the role of SIRT1. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89:643-649.
Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvq287
- 1008.
Mai A, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of sirtinol analogues as class III histone/protein deacetylase (Sirtuin) inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:7789-7795.
Not in our library10.1021/jm050100l
- 1009.
Wang J, et al. Sirtinol, a class III HDAC inhibitor, induces apoptotic and autophagic cell death in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2012;41:1101-1109.
Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2012.1534
- 1010.
Ota H, et al. Sirt1 inhibitor, Sirtinol, induces senescence-like growth arrest with attenuated Ras-MAPK signaling in human cancer cells. Oncogene. 2006;25:176-185.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1209049
- 1011.
Lara E, et al. Salermide, a Sirtuin inhibitor with a strong cancer-specific proapoptotic effect. Oncogene. 2009;28:781-791.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2008.436
- 1012.
Rotili D, et al. Discovery of salermide-related sirtuin inhibitors: binding mode studies and antiproliferative effects in cancer cells including cancer stem cells. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:10937-10947.
Not in our library10.1021/jm3011614
- 1013.
- 1014.
Garg G, Singh AK, Singh S, Rizvi SI. Promising drug discovery strategies for sirtuin modulators: what lessons have we learnt? Expert Opin. Drug Disco. 2021;16:915-927.
Not in our library10.1080/17460441.2021.1915980
- 1015.
Portmann S, et al. Antitumor effect of SIRT1 inhibition in human HCC tumor models in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013;12:499-508.
Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-0700
- 1016.
- 1017.
Napper AD, et al. Discovery of indoles as potent and selective inhibitors of the deacetylase SIRT1. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:8045-8054.
Not in our library10.1021/jm050522v
- 1018.
Solomon JM, et al. Inhibition of SIRT1 catalytic activity increases p53 acetylation but does not alter cell survival following DNA damage. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;26:28-38.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.26.1.28-38.2006
- 1019.
Broussy S, Laaroussi H, Vidal M. Biochemical mechanism and biological effects of the inhibition of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) by EX-527 (SEN0014196 or selisistat). J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020;35:1124-1136.
Not in our library10.1080/14756366.2020.1758691
- 1020.
Chen G, et al. Suppression of Sirt1 sensitizes lung cancer cells to WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775-induced DNA damage and apoptosis. Oncogene. 2017;36:6863-6872.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2017.297
- 1021.
Zhang Y, et al. Identification of a small molecule SIRT2 inhibitor with selective tumor cytotoxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;386:729-733.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.06.113
- 1022.
Karwaciak I, et al. AC-93253 triggers the downregulation of melanoma progression markers and the inhibition of melanoma cell proliferation. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2015;236:9-18.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cbi.2015.04.016
- 1023.
Zhang Q, et al. A small molecule Inauhzin inhibits SIRT1 activity and suppresses tumour growth through activation of p53. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012;4:298-p312.
Not in our library10.1002/emmm.201100211
- 1024.
Zhang Q, et al. The role of IMP dehydrogenase 2 in Inauhzin-induced ribosomal stress. Elife. 2014;3:e03077.
Not in our library10.7554/elife.03077
- 1025.
Trapp J, et al. Adenosine mimetics as inhibitors of NAD+-dependent histone deacetylases, from kinase to sirtuin inhibition. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:7307-7316.
Not in our library10.1021/jm060118b
- 1026.
Shim KH, et al. Small-molecule drug screening identifies drug Ro 31-8220 that reduces toxic phosphorylated tau in Drosophila melanogaster. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019;130:104519.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104519
- 1027.
- 1028.
Qu ZA, et al. SIRT2 inhibits oxidative stress and inflammatory response in diabetic osteoarthritis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:2855-2864.
Not in our library10.26355/eurrev_202003_20649
- 1029.
Xu D, He H, Liu D, Geng G, Li Q. A novel role of SIRT2 in regulating gap junction communications via connexin-43 in bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes. J. Cell Physiol. 2020;235:7332-7343.
Not in our library10.1002/jcp.29634
- 1030.
Lain S, et al. Discovery, in vivo activity, and mechanism of action of a small-molecule p53 activator. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:454-463.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2008.03.004
- 1031.
Voogd TE, Vansterkenburg EL, Wilting J, Janssen LH. Recent research on the biological activity of suramin. Pharm. Rev. 1993;45:177-203.
Not in our library
- 1032.
Trapp J, et al. Structure-activity studies on suramin analogues as inhibitors of NAD+-dependent histone deacetylases (sirtuins). Chem. Med. Chem. 2007;2:1419-1431.
Not in our library10.1002/cmdc.200700003
- 1033.
Schuetz A, et al. Structural basis of inhibition of the human NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT5 by suramin. Structure. 2007;15:377-389.
Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2007.02.002
- 1034.
Zoltner M, et al. Suramin exposure alters cellular metabolism and mitochondrial energy production in African trypanosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:8331-8347.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra120.012355
- 1035.
Gey C, et al. Phloroglucinol derivatives guttiferone G, aristoforin, and hyperforin: inhibitors of human sirtuins SIRT1 and SIRT2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007;46:5219-5222.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.200605207
- 1036.
Kim YY, et al. AGK2 ameliorates mast cell-mediated allergic airway inflammation and fibrosis by inhibiting FcepsilonRI/TGF-beta signaling pathway. Pharm. Res. 2020;159:105027.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105027
- 1037.
Carafa V, et al. The Pan-Sirtuin inhibitor MC2494 regulates mitochondrial function in a leukemia cell line. Front Oncol. 2020;10:820.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2020.00820
- 1038.
Rotili D, et al. Benzodeazaoxaflavins as sirtuin inhibitors with antiproliferative properties in cancer stem cells. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:8193-8197.
Not in our library10.1021/jm301115r
- 1039.
Tervo AJ, et al. Discovering inhibitors of human sirtuin type 2: novel structural scaffolds. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:7239-7241.
Not in our library10.1021/jm060686r
- 1040.
Abedimanesh N, et al. Effects of crocin and saffron aqueous extract on gene expression of SIRT1, AMPK, LOX1, NF-kappaB, and MCP-1 in patients with coronary artery disease: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Phytother. Res. 2020;34:1114-1122.
Not in our library10.1002/ptr.6580
- 1041.
Abedimanesh S, Bathaie SZ, Ostadrahimi A, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Taban Sadeghi M. The effect of crocetin supplementation on markers of atherogenic risk in patients with coronary artery disease: a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Food Funct. 2019;10:7461-7475.
Not in our library10.1039/c9fo01166h
- 1042.
Heshmati J, et al. The effects of curcumin supplementation on oxidative stress, Sirtuin-1 and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha gene expression in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020;14:77-82.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dsx.2020.01.002
- 1043.
Gautam S, Kumar M, Kumar U, Dada R. Effect of an 8-week yoga-based lifestyle intervention on psycho-neuro-immune axis, disease activity, and perceived quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2259.
Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02259
- 1044.
Bisht S, Chawla B, Tolahunase M, Mishra R, Dada R. Impact of yoga based lifestyle intervention on psychological stress and quality of life in the parents of children with retinoblastoma. Ann. Neurosci. 2019;26:66-74.
Not in our library10.5214/ans.0972.7531.260206
- 1045.
Tolahunase MR, Sagar R, Faiq M, Dada R. Yoga- and meditation-based lifestyle intervention increases neuroplasticity and reduces severity of major depressive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2018;36:423-442.
Not in our library10.3233/rnn-170810
- 1046.
Gautam S, Kumar U, Kumar M, Rana D, Dada R. Yoga improves mitochondrial health and reduces severity of autoimmune inflammatory arthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Mitochondrion. 2021;58:147-159.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mito.2021.03.004
- 1047.
Fiore D, et al. PDE5 inhibition ameliorates visceral adiposity targeting the miR-22/SIRT1 pathway: Evidence from the CECSID trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;101:1525-1534.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2015-4252
- 1048.
de Kreutzenberg SV, et al. Metformin improves putative longevity effectors in peripheral mononuclear cells from subjects with prediabetes. A randomized controlled trial. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015;25:686-693.
Not in our library10.1016/j.numecd.2015.03.007
- 1049.
Noureldein MH, Abd El-Razek RS, El-Hefnawy MH, El-Mesallamy HO. Fenofibrate reduces inflammation in obese patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus via sirtuin 1/fetuin A axis. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2015;109:513-520.
Not in our library10.1016/j.diabres.2015.05.043
- 1050.
Ferraz-Bannitz R, et al. Bariatric surgery can acutely modulate ER-stress and inflammation on subcutaneous adipose tissue in non-diabetic patients with obesity. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2021;13:19.
Not in our library10.1186/s13098-021-00623-w
- 1051.
Fiorentino F, et al. Sirtuin modulators: past, present, and future perspectives. Fut. Med. Chem. 2022;14:915-939.
Not in our library10.4155/fmc-2022-0031
- 1052.
Roggerio A, et al. Gene expression of sirtuin-1 and endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products in healthy and slightly overweight subjects after caloric restriction and resveratrol administration. Nutrients. 2018;10:937.
Not in our library10.3390/nu10070937
- 1053.
Mansur AP, et al. Serum concentrations and gene expression of sirtuin 1 in healthy and slightly overweight subjects after caloric restriction or resveratrol supplementation: A randomized trial. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017;227:788-794.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.058
- 1054.
Bo S, et al. Impact of sirtuin-1 expression on H3K56 acetylation and oxidative stress: a double-blind randomized controlled trial with resveratrol supplementation. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55:331-340.
Not in our library10.1007/s00592-017-1097-4
- 1055.
van der Meer AJ, et al. The selective sirtuin 1 activator SRT2104 reduces endotoxin-induced cytokine release and coagulation activation in humans. Crit. Care Med. 2015;43:e199-e202.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000000949
- 1056.
Beijers RJ, et al. Resveratrol and metabolic health in COPD: A proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. Clin. Nutr. 2020;39:2989-2997.
Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2020.01.002
- 1057.
Yoshino J, et al. Resveratrol supplementation does not improve metabolic function in nonobese women with normal glucose tolerance. Cell Metab. 2012;16:658-664.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2012.09.015
- 1058.
Asghari S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Somi MH, Ghavami SM, Rafraf M. Comparison of calorie-restricted diet and resveratrol supplementation on anthropometric indices, metabolic parameters, and serum sirtuin-1 levels in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2018;37:223-233.
Not in our library10.1080/07315724.2017.1392264
- 1059.
Clasen BF, et al. Growth hormone signaling in muscle and adipose tissue of obese human subjects: associations with measures of body composition and interaction with resveratrol treatment. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:E2565-E2573.
Not in our library10.1210/jc.2014-2215
- 1060.
Poulsen MM, et al. High-dose resveratrol supplementation in obese men: an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of substrate metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and body composition. Diabetes. 2013;62:1186-1195.
Not in our library10.2337/db12-0975
- 1061.
Sands BE, et al. Assessing colonic exposure, safety, and clinical activity of SRT2104, a novel oral SIRT1 activator, in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016;22:607-614.
Not in our library10.1097/mib.0000000000000597
- 1062.
Wu J, et al. Boosting NAD+ blunts TLR4-induced type I IFN in control and systemic lupus erythematosus monocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132:e139828.
Not in our library10.1172/jci139828
- 1063.
El Ters M, et al. Biological efficacy and safety of niacinamide in patients with ADPKD. Kidney Int. Rep. 2020;5:1271-1279.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ekir.2020.06.002
- 1064.
Dollerup OL, et al. Nicotinamide riboside does not alter mitochondrial respiration, content or morphology in skeletal muscle from obese and insulin-resistant men. J. Physiol. 2020;598:731-754.
Not in our library10.1113/jp278752
- 1065.
De Jong NP, et al. Short-term adaptations in skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity and metabolic pathways to breaking up sedentary behaviors in overweight or obese adults. Nutrients. 2022;14:454.
Not in our library10.3390/nu14030454
- 1066.
Kalhori A, Rafraf M, Navekar R, Ghaffari A, Jafarabadi MA. Effect of turmeric supplementation on blood pressure and serum levels of sirtuin 1 and adiponectin in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2022;27:37-44.
Not in our library10.3746/pnf.2022.27.1.37
- 1067.
Goncalinho GHF, et al. Effects of coffee on sirtuin-1, homocysteine, and cholesterol of healthy adults: does the coffee powder matter? J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:2985.
Not in our library10.3390/jcm11112985
- 1068.
Deus LA, et al. Metabolic and hormonal responses to chronic blood-flow restricted resistance training in chronic kidney disease: a randomized trial. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2022;47:183-194.
Not in our library10.1139/apnm-2021-0409
- 1069.
Opstad TB, Sundfor T, Tonstad S, Seljeflot I. Effect of intermittent and continuous caloric restriction on Sirtuin1 concentration depends on sex and body mass index. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021;31:1871-1878.
Not in our library10.1016/j.numecd.2021.03.005
- 1070.
Wasserfurth P, et al. Impact of dietary modifications on plasma sirtuins 1, 3 and 5 in older overweight individuals undergoing 12-weeks of circuit training. Nutrients. 2021;13:3824.
Not in our library10.3390/nu13113824
- 1071.
Abiri B, Sarbakhsh P, Vafa M. Randomized study of the effects of vitamin D and/or magnesium supplementation on mood, serum levels of BDNF, inflammation, and SIRT1 in obese women with mild to moderate depressive symptoms. Nutr. Neurosci. 2021;25:2123-2135.
Not in our library10.1080/1028415x.2021.1945859
- 1072.
Ghadimi M, et al. Decreased insulin resistance in diabetic patients by influencing Sirtuin1 and Fetuin-A following supplementation with ellagic acid: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2021;13:16.
Not in our library10.1186/s13098-021-00633-8
- 1073.
Safarpour P, et al. Vitamin D supplementation improves SIRT1, Irisin, and glucose indices in overweight or obese type 2 diabetic patients: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMC Fam. Pr. 2020;21:26.
Not in our library10.1186/s12875-020-1096-3
- 1074.
- 1075.
Aslani MR, et al. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on serum levels of interleukin-6 and sirtuin 1 in COPD patients. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2020;10:305-315.
Not in our library
- 1076.
Mohammadshahi M, Zakizadeh E, Ahmadi-Angali K, Ravanbakhsh M, Helli B. The synergic effects of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation and electrical isotonic contraction on anthropometric measurements and the serum levels of VEGF, NO, sirtuin-1, and PGC1-alpha in obese people undergoing a weight loss diet. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2020;128:1195-1201.
Not in our library10.1080/13813455.2020.1762660
- 1077.
Khazdouz M, et al. Effect of selenium supplementation on expression of SIRT1 and PGC-1alpha genes in ulcerative colitis patients: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Clin. Nutr. Res. 2020;9:284-295.
Not in our library10.7762/cnr.2020.9.4.284
- 1078.
Aghasi M, et al. Beneficial effects of green cardamom on serum SIRT1, glycemic indices and triglyceride levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019;99:3933-3940.
Not in our library10.1002/jsfa.9617
- 1079.
- 1080.
Alayon AN, Ortega Avila JG, Echeverri Jimenez I. Carbohydrate metabolism and gene expression of sirtuin 1 in healthy subjects after Sacha inchi oil supplementation: a randomized trial. Food Funct. 2018;9:1570-1577.
Not in our library10.1039/c7fo01956d
- 1081.
Lopez-Domenech S, et al. Pinitol alleviates systemic inflammatory cytokines in human obesity by a mechanism involving unfolded protein response and sirtuin 1. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37:2036-2044.
Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.015
- 1082.
Sardu C, et al. Inflammatory cytokines and SIRT1 levels in subcutaneous abdominal fat: relationship with cardiac performance in overweight pre-diabetics patients. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1030.
Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2018.01030
- 1083.
Daneshi-Maskooni M, et al. Green cardamom increases Sirtuin-1 and reduces inflammation in overweight or obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Nutr. Metab. (Lond.). 2018;15:63.
Not in our library10.1186/s12986-018-0297-4
- 1084.
Sohrab G, Nasrollahzadeh J, Tohidi M, Zand H, Nikpayam O. Pomegranate juice increases sirtuin1 protein in peripheral blood mononuclear cell from patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2018;16:446-451.
Not in our library10.1089/met.2017.0146
- 1085.
Margolis LM, Murphy NE, Carrigan CT, McClung HL, Pasiakos SM. Ingesting a combined carbohydrate and essential amino acid supplement compared to a non-nutritive placebo blunts mitochondrial biogenesis-related gene expression after aerobic exercise. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2017;1:e000893.
Not in our library10.3945/cdn.117.000893
- 1086.
Jakubowicz D, et al. Influences of breakfast on clock gene expression and postprandial glycemia in healthy individuals and individuals with diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1573-1579.
Not in our library10.2337/dc16-2753
- 1087.
Krumpolec P, et al. Aerobic-strength exercise improves metabolism and clinical state in parkinson’s disease patients. Front Neurol. 2017;8:698.
Not in our library10.3389/fneur.2017.00698
- 1088.
Mazaherioun M, et al. Beneficial effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on adiponectin levels and AdipoR gene expression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Arch. Med. Sci. 2017;13:716-724.
Not in our library10.5114/aoms.2016.62139
- 1089.
Lopez-Moreno, J. et al. Dietary fat quantity and quality modifies advanced glycation end products metabolism in patients with metabolic syndrome. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61 (2017).
Not in our library10.1002/mnfr.201601029
- 1090.
Vlassara H, et al. Oral AGE restriction ameliorates insulin resistance in obese individuals with the metabolic syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2016;59:2181-2192.
Not in our library10.1007/s00125-016-4053-x
- 1091.
Wegman MP, et al. Practicality of intermittent fasting in humans and its effect on oxidative stress and genes related to aging and metabolism. Rejuvenation Res. 2015;18:162-172.
Not in our library10.1089/rej.2014.1624
- 1092.
Saboori S, et al. Beneficial effects of omega-3 and vitamin E coadministration on gene expression of SIRT1 and PGC1alpha and serum antioxidant enzymes in patients with coronary artery disease. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26:489-494.
Not in our library10.1016/j.numecd.2015.11.013
- 1093.
Traba J, et al. Fasting and refeeding differentially regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human subjects. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:4592-4600.
Not in our library10.1172/jci83260
- 1094.
Mendham AE, et al. Rugby-specific small-sided games training is an effective alternative to stationary cycling at reducing clinical risk factors associated with the development of type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127548.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0127548
- 1095.
Di Renzo L, et al. Intake of red wine in different meals modulates oxidized LDL level, oxidative and inflammatory gene expression in healthy people: a randomized crossover trial. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2014;2014:681318.
Not in our library10.1155/2014/681318
- 1096.
Amengual JE, et al. Sirtuin and pan-class I/II deacetylase (DAC) inhibition is synergistic in preclinical models and clinical studies of lymphoma. Blood. 2013;122:2104-2113.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2013-02-485441
- 1097.
Krueger JG, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of SRT2104, a SIRT1 activator, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142081.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0142081
- 1098.
Baksi A, et al. A phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-dose study of SRT2104, a SIRT1 activator, in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Br. J. Clin. Pharm. 2014;78:69-77.
Not in our library10.1111/bcp.12327
Cited by papers we hold 7
- Energy metabolism in health and diseases · 2025No notice
- Antiageing strategy for neurodegenerative diseases: from mechanisms to clinical advances · 2025No notice
- Crossing epigenetic frontiers: the intersection of novel histone modifications and diseases · 2024No notice
- Glycolysis: A multifaceted metabolic pathway and signaling hub · 2024No notice
- Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges · 2024No notice
- Cellular Senescence in Intervertebral Disc Aging and Degeneration: Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Opportunities · 2023No notice
- α-myosin heavy chain lactylation maintains sarcomeric structure and function and alleviates the development of heart failure · 2023No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.