Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 25, 2026.

Cryo-EM advances in RNA structure determination

Haiyun Ma, Xinyu Jia, Kaiming Zhang and 1 more

Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · 2022 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00916-0

Abstract

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has emerged as an unprecedented tool to resolve protein structures at atomic resolution. Structural insights of biological samples not accessible by conventional X-ray crystallography and NMR can be explored with cryo-EM because measurements are carried out under near-native crystal-free conditions, and large protein complexes with conformational and compositional heterogeneity are readily resolved. RNA has remained underexplored in cryo-EM, despite its essential role in various biological processes. This review highlights current challenges and recent progress in using cryo-EM single-particle analysis to determine protein-free RNA structures, enabled by improvement in sample preparation and integration of multiple structural and biochemical methods.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 25, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

The recent resolution revolution triggered by the development of direct electron detectors and other technical advances has allowed cryo-EM to break the previous resolution barrier(s) and led to exponential growth of near-atomic cryo-EM structures., More recently, several studies have achieved atomic-resolution cryo-EM reconstruction using either the next-generation hardware or the most up-to-date commercially available setup.– Aside from single-particle analysis (SPA) that has gained tremendous popularity, other cryo-EM approaches have also benefited from the revolution, such as cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET),, micro-electron diffraction (MicroED), and cryo-scanning transmission electron microscopy (cryo-STEM). Because cryo-EM SPA is featured by minimal amount of specimen under near-native crystal-free condition, automated data collection with continually increasing throughput, and comprehensive data processing pipelines capable of resolving structural heterogeneity, it has become a widely adopted structural biology technique for structural biologists whose portfolio used to have only X-ray crystallography and NMR. Whereas the above features make SPA particularly useful to determine structures of larger proteins and protein complexes (>200 kDa), additional technical advances, especially the development of Volta phase plate (VPP), have pushed the limit of protein molecular weight to as low as 52 kDa for structure determination by SPA. Readers interested in technical developments and current challenges in SPA are directed to a number of comprehensive reviews for further details.,–

RNA plays an essential role in various important biological processes by folding and sustaining a three-dimensional (3D) structure in order to perform functions such as catalysis and gene regulation.– It is estimated that about 85% of the human genome is transcribed into RNA, with more than 80% of the genome estimated to be biologically and functionally relevant, however, only 1.5 percent of the genome encodes proteins., In the Protein Data Bank (wwPDB), there are currently 183980 depositions of protein complexes, which has facilitated the development of accurate protein structure prediction algorithms. In contrast to our apparently better understanding of protein structures and functions, our knowledge of RNA structures remains scarce. There are currently 1569 protein-free RNA and 9790 protein-nucleic acid complex structures deposited in the PDB that accounts for only about 6% of the entire PDB deposition (Fig. 1a). The lack of RNA structures is most likely due to the intrinsic heterogeneity of RNAs caused by flexible ribose and phosphate backbone, weak long-range tertiary interactions, alternative conformations, and dynamics among multiple functional states, which pose great challenges to X-ray crystallography to obtain RNA crystals with high-resolution diffraction information, and to NMR to solve structures of RNAs larger than 100 nucleotides (100 nt)., Although cryo-EM SPA has extended our accessibility to more challenging biological structures and systems, protein-free RNA structures accrue at a much slower rate compared to proteins and protein-nucleic acid complexes in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB). To date, there are only three protein-free RNA cryo-EM structures determined at 4 Å or better resolution (Table 1), which accounts for 0.02% of the entire 17349 depositions in EMDB (Fig. 1b).

The scarcity of protein-free RNA cryo-EM structures may be attributed to the following reasons: (1) Effective approaches and/or pipelines are missing for obtaining properly folded RNAs with stable tertiary structures; (2) the majority of isolated functional RNAs are simply too small for facile visualization and reconstruction in standard SPA pipelines; (3) intrinsic heterogeneity in most RNA molecules greatly limits the attainable resolution by SPA. This review summarizes recent efforts that overcome these challenges and enrich the protein-free RNA cryo-EM structure repertoire, including new approaches to obtain stable RNA structures for cryo-EM SPA and integration of multiple techniques to facilitate structural analysis when resolution is moderate. Cryo-EM structures of RNAs in RNPs such as ribosome, spliceosome, telomerase, and CRISPR complexes will not be discussed, as they are reviewed elsewhere.– All RNA structures reviewed herein are cryo-EM structures of protein-free RNAs.

New approaches to obtain stable RNA structures for SPA

RNA X-ray crystallography utilizes strategies that introduce proteins such as U1A and L7Ae to bind to specific RNA motifs to stabilize RNA crystal lattices., Group II introns are ribozymes with endogenous protein partners that stabilize the dynamic RNA structures and facilitate RNA catalysis., The analogous approach has been reported by Qu et al. in the cryo-EM structure of the Lactococcus lactis LtrB group II intron in complex with its intron-encoded protein LtrA at 3.8 Å (Fig. 2a), in which they utilize a 60 kDa RNA binding protein LtrA to stabilize the RNA structure and resolve 704 nt (216 kDa) of the 902 nt LtrB using cryo-EM SPA. Intriguingly, 3D classification yielded one minor class that resembled the LtrB intron alone with four times fewer particles than the LtrB-LtrA RNP, which generated a protein-free RNA structure at 4.5 Å. The disordered LtrA binding site in LtrA-depleted RNA structure validates the role of LtrA to assist folding and to enhance the stability of LtrB intron structure as previously described.,

Bonilla and colleagues used cryo-EM SPA to solve the viral tRNA-like structure (TLS) of bromo mosaic virus (BMV) at 4.3 Å resolution. Unexpectedly, the “tRNA-like” L-shape was not readily observed in protein-free BMV TLS. Comparison of the TLS alone with the complex structure of TLS and tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS) indicates that TLS undergoes drastic conformational changes to resemble “tRNA-like” shape in order to bind to TyrRS. This is a great example illustrating the importance of studying protein-free RNAs to provide insights of required conformational rearrangement upon protein binding.

Liu and coworkers recently reported a nanostructure assembly strategy called “RNA oligomerization-enabled cryo-EM via installing kissing-loops (ROCK)”, to obtain homomeric self-assembled dimers and trimers of protein-free RNAs for SPA at near-atomic to subnanometer resolutions. Self-assembly is achieved by insertions of kissing-loop sequence in the functionally non-essential peripheral stem loops, which makes the assembled RNA two- to three-times larger than the monomeric RNA (Fig. 2b). While this strategy could be potentially useful for RNAs too small for particle picking and orientation alignment in cryo-EM SPA, it may also have an artificial impact on RNA dynamics after oligomerization. Prior knowledge of RNA structure-function relationship is also required to guide insertions of kissing-loop sequences.

New workflow that accelerates the determination of RNA cryo-EM structures

Kappel et al. recently developed an accelerated RNA structure determination workflow, named “Ribosolve” (Fig. 3a), that integrates native gel analysis, mutate-and-map by next generation sequencing (M2-seq), cryo-EM SPA, and auto-DRRAFTER RNA modeling. In this workflow, native gel analysis enables quick identification of optimal RNA refolding conditions. RNAs that form sharp bands in native gels are subjected to M2-seq experiments, in which secondary structures are determined to both assess the homogeneity of folded RNA structures and to assist RNA modeling. Cryo-EM SPA allowed the rapid determination of 11 previously unknown RNA structures at resolution ranging from 4.7 to 10 Å, which revealed explicit RNA features of major and minor grooves. Seven structures were determined with VPP for contrast enhancement. Finally, auto-DRRAFTER was developed based on the previous DRRAFTER to utilize secondary structures determined by M2-seq to build 3D RNA models guided by cryo-EM density, because de novo RNA modeling can be very challenging under such resolution. The estimated coordinate root mean square deviation (RMSD) accuracy was between 3.3 and 6.3 Å as predicted by modeling convergence, which is sufficient for revealing RNA overall fold. This workflow enables accelerated RNA cryo-EM structure determinations by introducing methods to examine RNA folding and structural homogeneity, which can be used both to assist RNA modeling and to guide additional cryo-EM data collection for improved resolution.

A few applications of the “Ribosolve” workflow have been reported. SAM-IV riboswitch, a 40 kDa RNA that recognizes S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), was initially resolved to 7 Å resolution using cryo-EM SPA with VPP. Zhang et al. continued to collect additional cryo-EM data and achieved 3.7 Å resolution for the apo state and 4.1 Å for the SAM-bound state allowing unambiguous ligand recognition. The final data sets that generated cryo-EM structures of both states at near-atomic resolution were collected without VPP. This is likely because the stronger electron scattering of phosphate backbones has provided sufficient contrast for visualization of this small RNA. At 3.7 Å resolution, only a portion of the base pairs is resolved, indicating that higher resolution is required to allow de novo modeling. Nonetheless, this study has demonstrated the capability of cryo-EM SPA to facilitate structure determination at near-atomic resolution for RNA that is beyond the current molecular weight limit of 52 kDa for protein.

Recently, Su and colleagues solved the cryo-EM structures of full-length Tetrahymena ribozyme in both apo and substrate-bound states at 3.1 Å resolution. Group I self-splicing intron of Tetrahymena thermophila was discovered as the first ribozyme and has since become an unprecedented model system to study RNA catalysis and structure-function relationship. However, the full-length Tetrahymena ribozyme structure remains unknown for 40 years. After a 6.8 Å cryo-EM map of the apo L-21 Tetrahymena ribozyme map was obtained by “Ribosolve”, more data was collected to achieve a 3.1 Å cryo-EM structure, in which the complete peripheral region was explicitly resolved and two previously unforeseen tertiary interactions that allosterically regulate catalysis were identified. The substrate-bound state revealed catalytic mechanism, conformational changes of the internal guide sequence, and local shifts of phosphate, nucleobase, and metal ions upon substrate binding. This study provided a complete structural view of the Tetrahymena ribozyme and a great example of dissecting the RNA structure-function relationship by cryo-EM.

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, cryo-EM SPA has played essential roles in unveiling the structural basis of viral infection, replication, and other stages in the virus life cycle. Using “Ribosolve”, Zhang et al. resolved the 6.9 Å cryo-EM structure of the frameshifting stimulus elements (FSE), a highly conserved 88 nt RNA that is essential for the balanced expression of important viral proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 genome. It is also a potential candidate target for antiviral drugs such as small molecules and antisense oligonucleotides (ASO). Under the guidance of cryo-EM map, the RNA model was built with an estimated RMSD accuracy of 5.9 Å predicted by RNA modeling convergence following the “Ribosolve” pipeline. Subsequently, ASOs targeting FSE were designed and their antiviral activities were verified in vitro and at cellular level. This study features the smallest 28 kDa protein-free RNA studied by cryo-EM and resolving the tertiary structure of this key RNA element of SARS-CoV-2 potentially speeds up the development of new therapies for COVID-19.

Hybrid approaches to facilitate RNA structural analysis

Zhang et al. used cryo-EM SPA to resolve a 30 kDa HIV-1 dimer initiation site RNA (DIS) at 9 Å resolution. The cryo-EM map helps restraining NMR model refinement to derive atomic ensembles of this RNA duplex to identify a flipped-out nucleotide at both ends of the duplex. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of multiple time points on simulated cryo-EM data of DIS suggest that the intrinsic RNA structural heterogeneity limits cryo-EM SPA from achieving higher resolution for the DIS RNA.

Li et al. resolved a 4.9 Å cryo-EM structure of the full-length T-box-tRNAGly complex. Although the central tRNAGly is better resolved to 4.1 Å, featured by separated density of some phosphate and ribose groups, the outer T-box is only resolved to 6 Å. This moderate resolution poses great challenge for RNA modeling, especially in the newly identified 66 nt 3′-discriminator region with previously unknown structural features. They tackled this problem by determining a co-crystal structure of tRNAGly in complex with the 3′-discriminator from another bacterial species at 2.7 Å resolution. The final model of the full length T-box-tRNAGly complex was generated by combining the 3′-discriminator RNA model with the previously known crystal structure of tRNAGly and 5′-Stem I complex and refined into the cryo-EM density., Cryo-EM 3D classification indicated that structural heterogeneity of the T-box 5′-Stem I and 3′-discriminator regions may have limited the overall resolution.

In another study, Torabi et al. resolved cryo-EM maps of a double element for nuclear expression (dENE) before and after poly(A) binding at subnanometer resolution. The cryo-EM structures show an overall similar architecture compared to a previous high-resolution crystal structure except for an ~23° curvature at the end of one ENE, indicating that crystal packing may not reveal minor structural dynamics in solution. Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) reveals a global shape that is consistent with both cryo-EM and crystal structures.

In conclusion, these examples illustrate the combinations of different high-resolution structural biology techniques, such as X-ray crystallography and NMR, to facilitate the analysis of cryo-EM RNA structures at moderate resolution (Fig. 3b). According to MD simulations and SPA 3D classification, the intrinsic structural heterogeneity is the major factor that limits resolution in cryo-EM reconstructions of RNA molecules.

Perspective

Cryo-EM SPA can readily attain near-atomic resolution (between 2 and 4 Å) for proteins and protein complexes on a regular basis, which is sufficient to enable de novo model building. In contrast, RNA cryo-EM structures at near-atomic resolution are rare. The recent progress in RNA cryo-EM SPA has generated most RNA structures at a moderate resolution ranging from 4 to 10 Å, which are challenging for de novo modeling. Multiple strategies have been used synergistically to assist structural analysis of these RNA cryo-EM structures, including hybrid approaches combining RNA modeling, NMR, and X-ray crystallography. In order to facilitate structural analysis based on cryo-EM structures, it is critical to identify and overcome the major factors that limit cryo-EM SPA to attain RNA structures at near-atomic resolution.

In cryo-EM SPA, an overall temperature factor, or B-factor, derived from the correlation between the number of particles used for reconstruction and the achieved resolution, is used to evaluate the quality of the cryo-EM data (i.e. low B-factor indicates high data quality because fewer particles are required to achieve certain resolution). The B-factor values calculated for RNAs between 40 and 125 kDa are all greater than 200 Å2 (Table 1), whereas sub-2 Å cryo-EM structures of proteins normally have a B-factor around 60 Å2,. Interestingly, B-factor values seem much larger for RNA structures reconstructed from cryo-EM data with VPP than those without VPP, indicating that VPP does not seem to help reducing the B-factor for RNA cryo-EM structures, albeit it significantly improves image contrast.

Biological samples are susceptible to radiation damage and limited electron exposure is used in Cryo-EM that leads to low contrast and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which will deteriorate the accuracy of particle alignment in SPA., The optimal exposure of cryo-EM SPA for protein has been determined to be ~20 e−/Å2, although higher dose could be used when exposure filtering is applied to enhance SNR at lower spatial frequencies in order to minimize alignment errors of particle orientations. Fujiyoshi et al. have previously found that tRNA crystals embedded in glycerol are at least 4 times less susceptible to radiation damage compared to protein crystals in glycerol based on the critical dose curve when exposed to electrons at room temperature. The radiation damage effect on RNAs embedded in vitrified ice under cryogenic temperature has not been characterized in detail. As more RNA cryo-EM structures are determined with continuously improving resolution, radiation damage and optimal exposure on RNA cryo-EM structures need to be assessed in order to guide optimal electron dose in cryo-EM data collection. For example, if RNA is less susceptible to radiation damage, higher total electron doses could be used in RNA cryo-EM SPA to enhance image contrast and SNR which will lead to attenuation of alignment errors. This may reduce the B-factor since small particles like RNAs are particularly sensitive to alignment errors.

A number of other factors may have an impact on the B-factor, such as ice thickness, beam-induced motion (BIM), and intrinsic heterogeneity of the RNA molecules. To eliminate ice thickness variations, in which thicker ice will lead to decreased image contrast and SNR, novel sample preparation instruments have been developed and are currently optimized to reproducibly generate thin ice. For example, “Spotiton” can deliver as little as a few nanoliters of samples onto the grid while it plunges. The reduced time window between spotting and plunging also attenuates the air-water interface problem, which causes other issues in SPA such as preferred orientation and sample denaturation (reviewed elsewhere).

BIM has been previously shown to be drastically reduced by the implementation of various supporting films and foils. In particular, the amorphous nickel-titanium alloy (ANTA) film has been developed to reduce BIM. More recently, BIM has been minimized utilizing ultrastable gold foils on gold grids with specific hole diameter that ameliorate stress in the vitrified ice, named HexAuFoil., The drastic translational and rotational motions discovered in the first few frames that carry the highest resolution information can also be ameliorated by finer intervals (i.e. more frames) to improve motion correction accuracy. The resulting lower contrast and SNR of each frame can be potentially compensated by VPP or weighted denoising algorithms that should theoretically enhance SNR at low spatial frequencies.,

RNA may naturally adopt higher B-factor than protein due to its intrinsic heterogeneity and dynamics. Structural study is primarily facilitated by the identification of RNAs with conformational homogeneity and stable 3D structures, as demonstrated by native gel analysis and M2-seq in the “Ribosolve” workflow. Additional information from computational analysis, such as phylogenetic analysis and predictions of long-range tertiary interactions (e.g. pseudoknot formations, minor-groove interactions, etc.) will further enable the identification of conformational homogeneous RNAs with stable 3D structures., It is noteworthy that cryo-EM provides the unique opportunity of resolving conformational heterogeneity. Recent advance in automated data collection strategies that uses beam-shift instead of mechanical stage movement for each exposure, combined with image processing algorithm that compensates the aberrations caused by beam-shift, enable significantly increased throughput of data collection. As more particles are collected within the same time frame, classification of multiple conformations become realistic using existing algorithms such as Relion multibody refinement, cryoSPARC 3D variability analysis, and the emerging neural network-based 3D heterogeneity analysis, to eventually resolve RNA structures and their intrinsic heterogeneity and dynamics.

We are in an exciting era for structural biology, in which the emerging deep learning structure prediction algorithms have enabled reliable structure predictions of proteins and protein complexes in eukaryotes including human.,– However, these algorithms rely heavily on the plentifulness of experimental data. Although a recent study has reported a scoring system trained by very few existing RNA structures using machine learning algorithm to improve RNA structure prediction accuracy, the lack of experimental RNA structures remains to be the major barrier for precise RNA structure prediction. Recent progress in the field of RNA cryo-EM demonstrates how cryo-EM SPA complements X-ray crystallography and NMR to provide insightful structural information. Continued advances in technical and experimental developments of cryo-EM will allow accelerated structural findings previously not accessible by X-ray crystallography and NMR, and generate RNA structures at near-atomic resolution on a more regular basis. This will provide structural insights to deepen our understanding of RNA structure-function relationships as well as facilitating precise RNA structure predictions in the near future.

References 77

  1. 1.

    Faruqi AR, Henderson R. Electronic detectors for electron microscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007;17:549-555.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.014

  2. 2.

    Kuhlbrandt W. Biochemistry. The resolution revolution. Science. 2014;343:1443-1444.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1251652

  3. 3.

    Nakane T, et al. Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution. Nature. 2020;587:152-156.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2829-0

  4. 4.

    Yip KM, Fischer N, Paknia E, Chari A, Stark H. Atomic-resolution protein structure determination by cryo-EM. Nature. 2020;587:157-161.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2833-4

  5. 5.

    Zhang K, Pintilie GD, Li S, Schmid MF, Chiu W. Resolving individual atoms of protein complex by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell Res. 2020;30:1136-1139.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41422-020-00432-2

  6. 6.

    Doerr A. Cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:34-34.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Koning RI, Koster AJ, Sharp TH. Advances in cryo-electron tomography for biology and medicine. Ann. Anat. 2018;217:82-96.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.aanat.2018.02.004

  8. 8.

    Nannenga BL, Gonen T. The cryo-EM method microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED). Nat. Methods. 2019;16:369-379.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-019-0395-x

  9. 9.

    Wolf SG, Elbaum M. CryoSTEM tomography in biology. Methods Cell Biol. 2019;152:197-215.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.mcb.2019.04.001

  10. 10.

    Tan YZ, Cheng A, Potter CS, Carragher B. Automated data collection in single particle electron microscopy. Microscopy. 2015;65:43-56.

    Not in our library10.1093/jmicro/dfv369

  11. 11.

    Danev R, Yanagisawa H, Kikkawa M. Cryo-electron microscopy methodology: Current aspects and future directions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2019;44:837-848.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2019.04.008

  12. 12.

    Danev R, Buijsse B, Khoshouei M, Plitzko JM, Baumeister W. Volta potential phase plate for in-focus phase contrast transmission electron microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:15635-15640.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1418377111

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Lyumkis D. Challenges and opportunities in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:5181-5197.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.rev118.005602

  15. 15.

    Vinothkumar KR, Henderson R. Single particle electron cryomicroscopy: Trends, issues, and future perspective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2016;49:e13.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0033583516000068

  16. 16.

    Glaeser RM. How good can single-particle cryo-EM become? What remains before it approaches its physical limits? Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2019;48:45-61.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biophys-070317-032828

  17. 17.

    Miao Z, Westhof E. RNA structure: Advances and assessment of 3D structure prediction. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2017;46:483-503.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-034125

  18. 18.

    Cech TR. The RNA worlds in context. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012;4:a006742.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a006742

  19. 19.

    Cech TR, Steitz JA. The noncoding RNA revolution-trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell. 2014;157:77-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.008

  20. 20.

    Djebali S, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012;489:101-108.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11233

  21. 21.

    Lander ES, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409:860-921.

    Not in our library10.1038/35057062

  22. 22.

    Birney E, et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799-816.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05874

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Zhang H, Keane SC. Advances that facilitate the study of large RNA structure and dynamics by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: RNA. 2019;10:e1541.

    Not in our library10.1002/wrna.1541

  25. 25.

    Zhang J, Ferre-D’Amare AR. New molecular engineering approaches for crystallographic studies of large RNAs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2014;26:9-15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2014.02.001

  26. 26.

    Feigon J, Chan H, Jiang J. Integrative structural biology of Tetrahymena telomerase—insights into catalytic mechanism and interaction at telomeres. FEBS J. 2016;283:2044-2050.

    Not in our library10.1111/febs.13691

  27. 27.

    Fica SM, Nagai K. Cryo-electron microscopy snapshots of the spliceosome: structural insights into a dynamic ribonucleoprotein machine. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017;24:791-799.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.3463

  28. 28.

    Jiang F, Doudna JA. The structural biology of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015;30:100-111.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2015.02.002

  29. 29.

    von Loeffelholz O, et al. Focused classification and refinement in high-resolution cryo-EM structural analysis of ribosome complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2017;46:140-148.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2017.07.007

  30. 30.

    Ferre-D’Amare AR, Zhou K, Doudna JA. A general module for RNA crystallization. J. Mol. Biol. 1998;279:621-631.

    Not in our library10.1006/jmbi.1998.1789

  31. 31.

    Huang L, Lilley DM. The molecular recognition of kink-turn structure by the L7Ae class of proteins. RNA. 2013;19:1703-1710.

    Not in our library10.1261/rna.041517.113

  32. 32.

    Lambowitz AM, Zimmerly S. Group II introns: Mobile ribozymes that invade DNA. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011;3:a003616.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a003616

  33. 33.

    Haack DB, et al. Cryo-EM structures of a group II intron reverse splicing into DNA. Cell. 2019;178:612-623 e612.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.035

  34. 34.

    Qu G, et al. Structure of a group II intron in complex with its reverse transcriptase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016;23:549.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.3220

  35. 35.

    Noah JW, Lambowitz AM. Effects of maturase binding and Mg2+ concentration on group II intron RNA folding investigated by UV cross-linking. Biochemistry. 2003;42:12466-12480.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi035339n

  36. 36.

    Bonilla SL, Sherlock ME, MacFadden A, Kieft JS. A viral RNA hijacks host machinery using dynamic conformational changes of a tRNA-like structure. Science. 2021;374:955-960.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abe8526

  37. 37.

    Liu, D., Thélot, F. A., Piccirilli, J. A., Liao, M. & Yin, P. Sub-3 Å cryo-EM structure of RNA enabled by engineered homomeric self-assembly. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2021.08.11.455951 (2021).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-022-01455-w

  38. 38.

    Kappel K, et al. Accelerated cryo-EM-guided determination of three-dimensional RNA-only structures. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:699-707.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-020-0878-9

  39. 39.

    Cheng CY, Kladwang W, Yesselman JD, Das R. RNA structure inference through chemical mapping after accidental or intentional mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:9876-9881.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1619897114

  40. 40.

    Kappel K, et al. De novo computational RNA modeling into cryo-EM maps of large ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Methods. 2018;15:947-954.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-018-0172-2

  41. 41.

    Weinberg Z, et al. Identification of 22 candidate structured RNAs in bacteria using the CMfinder comparative genomics pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:4809-4819.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkm487

  42. 42.
  43. 43.

    Su Z, et al. Cryo-EM structures of full-length Tetrahymena ribozyme at 3.1 A resolution. Nature. 2021;596:603-607.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03803-w

  44. 44.

    Leigh KE, Modis Y. Imaging and visualizing SARS-CoV-2 in a new era for structural biology. Interface Focus. 2021;11:20210019.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsfs.2021.0019

  45. 45.

    Zhang K, et al. Cryo-electron Microscopy and exploratory antisense targeting of the 28?kDa frameshift stimulation element from the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2021;28:747-754.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41594-021-00653-y

  46. 46.

    Zhang K, et al. Structure of the 30 kDa HIV-1 RNA dimerization signal by a hybrid cryo-EM, NMR, and molecular dynamics approach. Structure. 2018;26:490-498 e493.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2018.01.001

  47. 47.

    Li S, et al. Structural basis of amino acid surveillance by higher-order tRNA-mRNA interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019;26:1094-1105.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41594-019-0326-7

  48. 48.

    Grigg JC, Ke A. Structural determinants for geometry and information decoding of tRNA by T box leader RNA. Structure. 2013;21:2025-2032.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2013.09.001

  49. 49.

    Zhang J, Ferre-D’Amare AR. Co-crystal structure of a T-box riboswitch stem I domain in complex with its cognate tRNA. Nature. 2013;500:363-366.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12440

  50. 50.

    Torabi SF, et al. Structural analyses of an RNA stability element interacting with poly(A). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2026656118.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2026656118

  51. 51.

    Rosenthal PB, Henderson R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;333:721-745.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013

  52. 52.

    Tan YZ, et al. Sub-2 A Ewald curvature corrected structure of an AAV2 capsid variant. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3628.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-018-06076-6

  53. 53.

    Glaeser RM. Limitations to significant information in biological electron microscopy as a result of radiation damage. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1971;36:466-482.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-5320(71)80118-1

  54. 54.

    Henderson R. The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons, and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1995;28:171-193.

    Not in our library10.1017/s003358350000305x

  55. 55.
  56. 56.

    Fujiyoshi Y, Uyeda N, Morikawa K, Yamagishi H. Electron microscopy of tRNA crystals. II. 4 A resolution diffraction pattern and substantial stability to radiation damage. J. Mol. Biol. 1984;172:347-354.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2836(84)80031-5

  57. 57.
  58. 58.

    Jain T, Sheehan P, Crum J, Carragher B, Potter CS. Spotiton: A prototype for an integrated inkjet dispense and vitrification system for cryo-TEM. J. Struct. Biol. 2012;179:68-75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2012.04.020

  59. 59.

    Noble AJ, et al. Reducing effects of particle adsorption to the air-water interface in cryo-EM. Nat. Methods. 2018;15:793-795.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-018-0139-3

  60. 60.

    Glaeser RM. Proteins, interfaces, and cryo-Em grids. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;34:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cocis.2017.12.009

  61. 61.

    Russo CJ, Passmore LA. Progress towards an optimal specimen support for electron cryomicroscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016;37:81-89.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2015.12.007

  62. 62.

    Huang X, et al. Reprint of “Amorphous nickel titanium alloy film: A new choice for cryo electron microscopy sample preparation”. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2021;160:5-15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.02.001

  63. 63.

    Russo CJ, Passmore LA. Electron microscopy: Ultrastable gold substrates for electron cryomicroscopy. Science. 2014;346:1377-1380.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1259530

  64. 64.

    Naydenova K, Jia P, Russo CJ. Cryo-EM with sub-1 A specimen movement. Science. 2020;370:223-226.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb7927

  65. 65.

    Bhamre T, Zhang T, Singer A. Denoising and covariance estimation of single particle cryo-EM images. J. Struct. Biol. 2016;195:72-81.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2016.04.013

  66. 66.
  67. 67.

    Ponce-Salvatierra, A. et al. Computational modeling of RNA 3D structure based on experimental data. Biosci. Rep. 39, BSR20180430 (2019).

    Not in our library10.1042/bsr20180430

  68. 68.

    Cheng A, et al. High resolution single particle cryo-electron microscopy using beam-image shift. J. Struct. Biol. 2018;204:270-275.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2018.07.015

  69. 69.
  70. 70.

    Scheres SH. Processing of structurally heterogeneous cryo-EM data in RELION. Methods Enzymol. 2016;579:125-157.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.mie.2016.04.012

  71. 71.

    Punjani A, Fleet DJ. 3D variability analysis: Resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 2021;213:107702.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2021.107702

  72. 72.

    Zhong ED, Bepler T, Berger B, Davis JH. CryoDRGN: Reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. Nat. Methods. 2021;18:176-185.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-020-01049-4

  73. 73.

    Humphreys IR, et al. Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes. Science. 2021;374:eabm4805.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abm4805

  74. 74.
  75. 75.
  76. 76.

    Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2021).

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Townshend RJL, et al. Geometric deep learning of RNA structure. Science. 2021;373:1047-1051.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abe5650

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.