Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Targeting TGFβ signal transduction for cancer therapy

Sijia Liu, Jiang Ren, Peter ten Dijke

Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00436-9

Abstract

Transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) family members are structurally and functionally related cytokines that have diverse effects on the regulation of cell fate during embryonic development and in the maintenance of adult tissue homeostasis. Dysregulation of TGFβ family signaling can lead to a plethora of developmental disorders and diseases, including cancer, immune dysfunction, and fibrosis. In this review, we focus on TGFβ, a well-characterized family member that has a dichotomous role in cancer progression, acting in early stages as a tumor suppressor and in late stages as a tumor promoter. The functions of TGFβ are not limited to the regulation of proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and metastasis of cancer cells. Recent reports have related TGFβ to effects on cells that are present in the tumor microenvironment through the stimulation of extracellular matrix deposition, promotion of angiogenesis, and suppression of the anti-tumor immune reaction. The pro-oncogenic roles of TGFβ have attracted considerable attention because their intervention provides a therapeutic approach for cancer patients. However, the critical function of TGFβ in maintaining tissue homeostasis makes targeting TGFβ a challenge. Here, we review the pleiotropic functions of TGFβ in cancer initiation and progression, summarize the recent clinical advancements regarding TGFβ signaling interventions for cancer treatment, and discuss the remaining challenges and opportunities related to targeting this pathway. We provide a perspective on synergistic therapies that combine anti-TGFβ therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) belongs to a family of multi-functional cytokines that includes TGFβs, bone morphogenetic proteins, activins, nodal, growth and differentiation factors, inhibins, lefty, and anti-Mullerian hormone. Members of this family are key regulators of embryonic development, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration, and their malfunction has been implicated in cancer, fibrosis, immune diseases, and many other pathologies.– In this review, we focus on TGFβ, which is the prototypical member of the family. There are three highly structurally related mammalian TGFβ isoforms, that is, TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3., In vitro studies showed that all three isoforms elicit similar biological effects, with differences in potency in certain cell types. Mouse studies in which each specific isoform was knocked out revealed strikingly different phenotypes, indicating nonredundant in vivo functions for these three TGFβ isoforms. TGFβ1-deficient mice either die of vascular defects during embryogenesis or autoimmune disease postnatally., Mice deficient in TGFβ2 have defects in cardiac septation and valve remodeling, and mice lacking TGFβ3 have pulmonary defects and cleft palate., TGFβ1 is the most abundant and studied isoform, and it is particularly highly enriched in platelets and bone.,

TGFβ signaling has attracted the interest of cancer biologists because of its numerous roles in regulating cancer cell functions, including cell cycle progression, apoptosis, adhesion, and differentiation., The biphasic functions of TGFβ during cancer progression on tumor cells and other cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are summarized in Fig. 1. In different cell types and/or conditions, TGFβ can have different, even opposite, effects. In normal and premalignant cells, TGFβ predominantly acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and maintaining genome stability. However, tumor cells can adapt to or selectively bypass the suppressive functions of TGFβ; they utilize TGFβ’s promotional roles to obtain a growth advantage and undergo processes, such as the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), that enable their migration, invasion, intravasation, and extravasation., Moreover, TGFβ can create a beneficial TME by acting in a paracrine manner to activate cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), promote angiogenesis, produce extracellular matrix (ECM), and suppress anti-tumor immune reaction to trigger cancer progression and promote metastasis.,,

Many preclinical results from in vitro cell models and in vivo animal models have shown the great potential of anti-tumor therapeutics with TGFβ-neutralizing antibodies and ligand traps that block the interaction of TGFβ with its receptors or selective small-molecule TGFβ receptor kinase inhibitors., However, rendering these pharmacological agents suitable for approved clinical use continues to be a challenge. Because TGFβ shows highly pleiotropic actions, in addition to the tumor itself, healthy tissues can be affected by the systemic inhibition of TGFβ, which can lead to unwanted side effects and safety concerns. Therefore, we need to better understand the underlying molecular mechanisms by which TGFβ signaling controls normal and malignant processes. Moreover, insight into stratifying tumor patients using biomarkers for selecting patients that may benefit from TGFβ targeting is urgently needed., In this review, we discuss recent clinical advancements and bottlenecks in anti-TGFβ cancer treatment, and provide perspectives of combined treatment to overcome chemo/targeted/radio-therapy resistance and increase the efficiency of immunotherapy responses in cancer patients.

Bioavailability and activation of TGFβ ligands

TGFβ is synthesized as a large precursor protein in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, it consists of a signal peptide, a large N-terminal pro-segment termed latency-associated peptide (LAP), and a short C-terminal mature peptide., The pro-peptide assembles into a homodimer in which the LAP portions link via two disulfide bonds and the mature TGFβ moieties’ interaction is stabilized through a disulfide bond. After cleavage of the precursor protein by the convertase furin in the Golgi complex, the LAP portions encircle the mature portions to form the small latent complex (SLC) and shield the mature TGFβ from binding to its receptors (Fig. 2).,

For the activation of latent TGFβ, the mature TGFβ portions need to dissociate from the LAP portions. TGFβ can be activated in vitro upon heating or treating with a mild acid (pH 4.5) to dissociate the LAP portion from the mature protein., In addition, reactive oxygen species can activate TGFβ in vitro by destroying the ability of LAP to bind to mature TGFβ via oxidative modification.– Several ECM serine proteases (plasmin/plasma kallikrein/cathepsin D) and matrix metalloprotease 9/14 (MMP9/14) can release active TGFβ via the proteolytic cleavage of LAP in vivo (Fig. 2a).,, Thrombospondin (TSP) is another activator of latent TGFβ that is present in the ECM; upon direct binding to LAP, TSP can induce the release of active TGFβ. In addition, the latent TGFβ binding protein (LTBP) can covalently bind to LAP, which facilitates the deposition of the SLC in the ECM and forms the large latent complex (LLC)., LLC can form a covalent interaction with specific ECM proteins such as fibrillin and fibronectin via the N-terminal domain of LTBP (Fig. 2b)., Moreover, the latent TGFβ can also interact with the transmembrane glycoprotein A repetition predominant protein (GARP), which is expressed on the cell surface of regulatory T (Treg) cells, platelets, and endothelial cells to facilitate latent TGFβ activation (Fig. 2c). Finally, integrins, which are cell adhesion receptors that control cell proliferation, survival migration, and invasion, also have a pivotal role in the activation of latent TGFβ., Integrins comprise α and β heterodimeric subunits that are both type I transmembrane receptors and are expressed in a wide range of cells. Certain integrins have been demonstrated to interact with the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif of LAP and lead to the mechanical release of LAP by cellular contractions.–

Functions of TGFβ signaling pathways during tumor progression

Regarding the canonical TGFβ pathway, active TGFβ initially binds to the low-affinity accessory TGFβ type III receptor (TβRIII), also named betaglycan, which is abundant on the surface of many cell types (Fig. 3a). Betaglycan can present TGFβ to the TGFβ receptor complex, which is present at low levels but high affinity, thereby facilitating signaling. The TGFβ2 isoform is, in particular, dependent on TβRIII for signaling. Consistent with this notion, endothelial cells that do not express TβRIII show weak responsiveness to TGFβ2 compared with that of TGFβ1 and TGFβ3. The TGFβ receptors complex is a tetramer consisting of two paired transmembrane serine/threonine protein kinases: two TβRIs and two TβRIIs.– TGFβ binding triggers TβRII to transphosphorylate TβRI at specific serine/threonine residues that are located in the intracellular juxtamembrane region enriched with glycine and serine residues (the GS domain)., After the extracellular signal is successfully transduced across the plasma membrane, activated TβRI initiates intracellular signaling by phosphorylating SMAD2/3 at their two extreme C-terminal serine residues., Thereafter, phosphorylated SMAD2/3 dissociates promptly from TβRI and assemble into a heteromeric complex with SMAD4. Subsequently, the SMAD2/3–SMAD4 complex can translocate into the nucleus to activate or repress the expression of target genes., SMAD7 is a target gene induced by TGFβ that encodes for a negative regulator of the TGFβ/SMAD signaling pathway by associating with activated TβRI, thereby blocking the interaction, phosphorylation, and activation of SMAD2. Subsequent steps in SMAD signaling, including SMAD2–SMAD4 complex formation and its translocation to the nucleus are also inhibited by SMAD7.– SMAD7 can also antagonize TGFβ signaling in the nucleus by disrupting the formation of the functional SMAD–DNA complex., Moreover, SMAD7 recruits E3 ubiquitin ligases such as SMAD ubiquitination regulatory factor 1/2 (SMURF1/2), WW domain-containing protein 1 (WWP1), and neural precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated 4-2 (NEDD4-2) to TβRI, and thereby promotes its ubiquitination-mediated proteasomal and/or lysosomal degradation.– Naturally, the ubiquitination of TβRI can be reversed by a set of deubiquitinating enzymes, including ubiquitin-specific protease 4 (USP4), USP11, USP15, and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1.–

The target genes of the canonical TGFβ pathway that play key roles in regulating tumor progression are summarized in Fig. 3b. In the early stage of tumorigenesis, TGFβ promotes the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, including p15, p21, p57, and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), to induce cell cycle arrest.– TGFβ represses the expression of genes encoding several growth-promoting factors, such as cell division cycle 25a (CDC25A), E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) and C-MYC proto-oncogene, to induce an anti-mitogenic cellular response.– Inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (ID1) protein functions as a cell differentiation inhibitor and stimulator of cell proliferation, and long-term stimulation of cells by TGFβ can silence the ID1 promoter and thereby drive epithelial cells to enter into a cytostatic program. ID1 was also shown to mediate the escape of pancreatic cancer from TGFβ tumor suppression. TGFβ can increase the expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2)-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM), BCL2-modifying factor (BMF), FAS and death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) genes– and decrease the expression of BCL2 and BCL-extra large (BCL-XL) genes to induce cell apoptosis., In addition, TGFβ can suppress inflammation in the early stage of tumorigenesis by downregulating the expression of GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) and transcription factor T-box expressed in T cells (T-BET) genes to inhibit T cell differentiation., In the malignant stage, tumor cells can become non-responsive to the TGFβ-induced cytostatic and proapoptotic effects when genes that encode key components of the TGFβ pathway are mutated, and this results in the functional inactivation of their corresponding gene products. For example, TβRII mutations are frequently found in colorectal cancer (CRC), SMAD2 mutations have been reported in CRC, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and lung cancer,, and the deletion or mutation of SMAD4 is often identified in pancreatic cancer, CRC, and HCC., There are several advanced tumors that still retain an intact canonical TGFβ pathway, such as glioma, melanoma, and breast cancer. These cancer cells can avert TGFβ-induced cytostatic functions through the acquisition of activating mutations in oncogenes, for example, rat sarcoma (RAS) and MYC, and inactivating mutations in tumor suppressor genes, for example, p53 and retinoblastoma protein (Rb). TGFβ can increase forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) gene expression, and decrease interferon-γ (IFNγ), MHC class I-chain-related molecules A (MICA), granzyme A/B, natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D), natural cytotoxicity receptor 3 (NKP30), and Perforin gene expression to suppress immune function.– Besides, TGFβ upregulates interleukin-11 (IL11), parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP), and MMP9 to facilitate metastasis to specific organs.– Moreover, TGFβ can promote angiogenesis by upregulating connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and MMP2.,

In addition to the canonical SMAD pathway, TGFβ can also initiate multiple noncanonical signaling pathways downstream of TGFβ receptors (Fig. 3c). For example, TβRI activates RHO small GTPases and then regulates the activity of RHO-associated protein kinase and LIM kinase to phosphorylate cofilin, leading to actin cytoskeleton reorganization that regulates cell adhesion, motility, and growth. TβRII can directly phosphorylate the cell polarity regulator PAR6 that regulates tight junctions and cell migration. TGFβ also induces the activation of TGFβ-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) to stimulate c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor κ-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathways. These responses are mediated by tumor necrosis factor-associated factor 4 (TRAF4) and TRAF6 that interact with TGFβ receptors.– Serine/threonine kinase protein kinase B (AKT) signaling can also be activated by TGFβ in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent manner. Besides, TGFβ can induce the phosphorylation of Src homology domain 2-containing protein (SHC) and then recruit growth factor receptor-binding protein 2 (GRB2) and son of sevenless (SOS) to activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway through the RAS, RAF, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) pathways. A recent study discovered that the RAS-responsive element-binding protein 1 (RREB1) provides a molecular link between RAS and TGFβ pathways for coordinated induction of a developmental and fibrogenic EMT pathway. These non-SMAD signaling pathways are not unique to TGFβ; some are tightly regulated by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and crosstalk with the canonical SMAD signaling pathway. Moreover, TGFβ can also indirectly activate these pathways by inducing the expression of secreted growth factors, for example, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), which then acts in an autocrine or paracrine manner via specific receptors endowed with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity.–

Furthermore, TGFβ plays an important role in inducing the metastatic capacity of tumor cells by promoting the EMT through the upregulation of transcription factors such as SNAIL, SLUG, TWIST, and ZEB1/2 through either SMAD- or non-SMAD-dependent pathways.– Accompanying the increase of TGFβ levels, EMT leads epithelial tumor cells to lose the capability of adhesion, polarity, and tight junctions by decreasing levels of tight-junction proteins zona occludence-1 (ZO-1), E-cadherin, and occludin, and acquire a highly migratory and invasive mesenchymal phenotype by the increased levels of fibronectin, vimentin, and N-cadherin (Fig. 4a). EMT has diverse phenotypic manifestations with intermediate epithelial/mesenchymal states and is a reversible process. This has been referred to as epithelial cell plasticity (EMP). TGFβ can induce different states of EMP and the cellular response to TGFβ is context-dependent; inflammatory factors, Wnt, Notch, Hippo, and Hedgehog interplay with TGFβ to orchestrate the EMP response. In Fig. 4b, we show that TGFβ promotes the EMT in non-transformed mouse mammary gland (NMuMG) epithelial cells. The NMuMG cell line is a frequently used model system to investigate TGFβ-induced EMT., The ability of TGFβ to promote the migration of the human mesenchymal triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) MDA-MB-231 cells is shown in Fig. 4c. MDA-MB-231 is highly aggressive and its metastasis to bone occurs in a TGFβ/SMAD-dependent manner.,,

Functions of TGFβ in the TME

The TME consists of ECM, cytokines, and a large population of different cell types, including resident and infiltrating CAFs, immune-related cells, endothelial cells, and adipocytes that surround the tumor cells. The multipronged effects of TGFβ on tumor stroma cells built the TME, including its capacity to stimulate ECM production, activate CAFs, suppress the immune system, and promote angiogenesis. Notably, tumor stromal cells are also the main sources of inflammatory factors, including TGFβ. Reciprocally, the TME exerts profound effects on tumor growth and progression. In this section, we summarize the functions of TGFβ in the TME (Fig. 5).

TGFβ and CAFs in the TME

CAFs are key components of the TME and play roles in providing a favorable environment to support tumor progression by producing ECM and cytokines, stimulating immune evasion, and promoting angiogenesis.– Next to tumor-promoting CAFs, also tumor-suppressive CAFs have been identified. Within a tumor, the CAF population can be highly heterogeneous. For example in breast tumors, at least four distinct CAF subpopulations, that is, vascular CAFs, matrix CAFs, cycling CAFs, and developmental CAFs (dCAFs), were defined. In pancreatic tumors, CAFs have been classified into inflammatory CAFs, which are found distant from tumor foci with high IL6 and low α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression, and myofibroblastic CAFs that are located adjacent to tumor foci with high α-SMA expression and that demonstrate a strong TGFβ responsiveness.– The characterization of molecular markers and mechanistic insights of different CAF subtypes may provide opportunities for their precise targeting in cancer therapy.

During the formation of CAFs, TGFβ is a major driver in activating resident quiescent fibroblasts, and differentiating bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and adipose tissue-derived stem cells into CAFs (Fig. 5a).– The activation of the TGFβ signaling pathway can also induce epithelial cancer cells into myofibroblasts via EMT, and differentiate endothelial cells into fibroblast-like cells by endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) (Fig. 5a)., In turn, CAFs autocrine TGFβ can serve as an attractant to recruit more fibroblasts into the TME around the tumor invasion front and promote metastasis., CAFs surround and throughout the tumor often restrict the accessibility of anti-cancer drugs to tumor cells since the dense CAFs with stiff surrounding matrix can reduce the density of blood vessels and form a physical barrier surrounding the tumor cells. In hypoxic TME, CAF-secreted TGFβ2 can cooperate with hypoxia-inducible factor to increase stemness phenotype and induce robust chemotherapy of cancer cells. Radiation-induced TGFβ signaling can activate CAFs in the TME, which enhances the invasiveness of the associated tumor cells via promoting EMT. One recent study in which TβRII-mutant pancreatic cancer was investigated, found that the anti-tumor efficacy of TβRII blockade is due to the inhibition of the TGFβ signaling in CAFs. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies reported that the overactive TGFβ signaling in CAFs is a major reason of immunotherapy failure. Analysis of the single-cell landscape of CAFs in pancreatic cancer identified a TGFβ-driven CAF population expressing leucine-rich repeat-containing 15 (LRRC15). This transmembrane protein is associated with poor outcome in immunotherapy trial data. It will be interesting to explore if the targeting of LRRC15+ CAF in the TME will boost the response of cancer patients towards immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

TGFβ and endothelial cells in the TME

Endothelial cells are located at the surface of blood and lymphatic vessels. Blood vessels nourish tumors by delivering blood/oxygen/nutrients, removing waste products, and mediating the entry and exit of immune cells and other substances.– A positive correlation between the TGFβ level and microvessel density was observed in various types of tumors. Endothelial cells express two TβRIs (activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) and TβRI/ALK5). The TGFβ–ALK5 signaling axis can directly mediate inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and migration (Fig. 5b)., Indirectly, the expression of some key angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, CTGF, and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), can be induced by the TGFβ–ALK5 signaling axis.– In the presence of endoglin, the TGFβ-ALK1 signaling axis can directly promote endothelial cell proliferation and migration., Moreover, the JNK pathway also mediates the proangiogenic response of TGFβ in endothelial cells. A recent study showed that TGFβ can promote VEGF-C production in tubular epithelial cells, macrophages, and mesothelial cells to induce lymphangiogenesis in renal and peritoneal fibrosis. However, the function of TGFβ in the formation of the cancer-associated lymphatic system is not well understood.

TGFβ and immune-related cells in the TME

There are a variety of innate and adaptive immune cells dispersed throughout the TME (Fig. 5c). During tumorigenesis, myeloid cells (including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), macrophages, neutrophils) typically accumulate in the early stage of tumor outgrowth to suppress the T cell response and sustain an immunosuppressive environment. Dendritic cells (DCs) deliver tumor antigens to T cells and natural killer (NK) cells that exert antitumor cytotoxic effects. However, antitumor immune reactions often become suppressed during tumor development; TGFβ can exhibit pivotal immunosuppressive effects on the intrinsic antitumor potential of DCs and NK cells in the TME (Fig. 5c). At an early stage of cancer, TGFβ mitigates myeloid proliferation and differentiation by repressing the expression of cytokine IFNγ., Progressively, myeloid cells in advanced-stage cancer produce TGFβ and MMPs that further inhibit antitumor immune reactions and promote tumor metastasis.– Indeed, experimentally induced inactivation of TGFβ signaling in myeloid cells can lead to an increase in antitumor activity., TGFβ blocks the activation of NK cells and suppresses their cytotoxic potential by inhibiting C-type lectin receptor NKG2D expression directly and indirectly. IL1 receptor-associated kinase M (IRAK-M) is a potent negative regulator of Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and is predominantly expressed in macrophages. By inducing IRAK-M expression and antagonizing TLR signaling, TGFβ protects tumors from the potential TLR-mediated antitumor activities of macrophages.

TGFβ suppresses adaptive immunity during cancer progression mainly by inhibiting the activation, proliferation, differentiation, and migration of T cells. TGFβ can suppress the differentiation of naive CD4+ helper T cells into distinct effector subtypes. However, it induces the conversion of naive T cells into Treg cells (previously known as suppressor T cells) that suppress the immune response. A recent study showed that depletion of TβRII in CD4+ T cells suppresses cancer progression as a result of tissue healing and remodeling of the blood vasculature, causing cancer hypoxia and death in distant avascular regions. TGFβ can block the activation and maturation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells by repressing the tumor antigen processing and presentation of DCs and inhibit CD8+ T cell proliferation through suppressing the expression of IFNγ and IL2.,– TGFβ promotes antigen-induced programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) expression in CD8+ T cells, which causes T cell exhaustion. Recently, researchers found that the TGFβ signal maintains the immune-suppressive identity of CD8+ Treg cells. Transcription factor Eomesodermin (Eomes) controls the follicular location of CD8+ Treg cells. Both TGFβ and Eomes coordinate to promote the homeostasis of CD8+ Treg cells. TGFβ can regulate the activation, proliferation, apoptosis of B cells, and stimulate the antibody switching in B cells. However, its function on B cell-mediated antitumor immunity is not well investigated.–

Pharmacological interventions of TGFβ in cancer therapy

There are numerous anti-cancer pharmacological interventions that target specific mediators of TGFβ signaling pathway or TGFβ activators, which have been tested in human clinical trials or that displayed very promising results in pre-clinical animal models (Fig. 6). In this section, we introduce the recent advancements and bottlenecks of the main anti-TGFβ strategies, including neutralizing antibodies, ligand traps, small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotides (AONs), and summarize the pharmacological interventions that have been or are currently being studied in clinical trials (Table 1).

Neutralizing antibodies

Neutralizing antibodies can be selectively directed against critical domains of native ligands and extracellular domains of receptors to block their biological activity. Fresolimumab (GC1008), a human IgG4κ monoclonal antibody that neutralizes TGFβ1, 2, and 3, demonstrated acceptable safety and antitumor activity in a phase 1 clinical trial for patients with malignant melanoma or renal carcinoma. Phase 2 clinical trials of this antibody have been conducted for patients with glioma, metastatic breast cancer, or relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma, which showed good toleration.– The phase 2 clinical evaluation of this antibody for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still ongoing (NCT02581787). LY3022859 is an anti-TβRII IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking TGFβ binding to the ectodomain of TβRII that showed significant antitumor function against primary tumor growth and metastasis in several mice tumor models. When tested for use in the treatment of advanced solid tumors in a phase 1 clinical trial, the maximum-tolerated dose for this antibody was not determined since the patients suffered from uncontrolled cytokine release despite prophylaxis.

Integrins are major activators of TGFβ ligand, including αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8.,– An increase number of studies showed that integrin-induced TGFβ signaling pathway modulates the tumor stroma and in particular the immune microenvironment. Thus, besides their role to promote cell proliferation, survival, and migration, the ability of αv integrins to stimulate TGFβ activation contributes to cancer progression., Thus, integrins can be pharmacological targets for cancer treatment, and their targeting may enhance the efficacy of immune therapies. For example, previous research found that αvβ8 integrin-expressing tumor cells can evade host immunity by upregulating TGFβ signaling in immune cells. The engineered antibody against αvβ8 integrin can block the release of active TGFβ by cancer cells and promote the anti-tumor immune reaction in pre-clinical mice models of colon carcinoma and lung cancer. A recent study showed that αvβ6-neutralizing antibody 264RAD can suppress TGFβ signaling and significantly reduce tumor growth in αvβ6-positive human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) xenografts mice model and immunocompetent transgenic mice bearing αvβ6-positive PDAC tumors. Although most studies showed that anti-αvβ integrin therapy has promise in cancer treatment, an opposite finding was reported for antibody-mediated inhibition of αvβ6 that while leading to a strong decreased TGFβ signaling, it promoted pancreatic cancer progression.

Ligand traps

TGFβ ligand traps are TGFβ receptor ectodomain-based chimeric fusion proteins that are rationally designed to prevent TGFβs from binding to their receptors. AVID200 is a selective trap of TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 that showed the capacity to enhance the anti-tumor efficacy by inhibiting the growth of syngeneic 4T1 TNBC homograft in immunocompetent host mice. A phase I clinical trial of AVID200 revealed that it was safe and well tolerated for patients with advanced solid tumors.,

Small-molecule inhibitors

Small-molecule kinase inhibitors of TβR kinases are undergoing intensively clinical trials for anti-TGFβ signaling in cancer treatment. Galunisertib (LY2157299) is an orally available small-molecule inhibitor that selectively binds to TβRI (and weakly to TβRII) and inhibits its kinase activity. It showed favorable preclinical results for antitumor growth, for example, in Calu6 and EMT6-LM2 mouse tumor models. In phase 1 clinical trials, this inhibitor exhibited acceptable safety and dose tolerability for patients with HCC/metastatic pancreatic cancer/malignant glioma/advanced solid tumors.– Phase 1/2 clinical trials of this inhibitor for patients with metastatic prostate cancer/TNBC/advanced HCC/rectal cancer/recurrent glioblastoma are ongoing.,, A phase 2 study of this inhibitor for patients with advanced HCC showed acceptable safety and prolonged overall survival. However, in a phase 2 study of patients with recurrent glioblastoma, this inhibitor failed to improve the overall survival. Vactosertib (TEW-7197) is another orally bioavailable kinase inhibitor of TβRI that revealed promising antitumor function in a mouse model of myeloma. This inhibitor displayed a favorable safety profile and antitumor efficacy in phase 1 clinical trials for patients with advanced solid tumors or desmoid tumors., Phase 1 clinical trial investigation of this inhibitor for patients with refractory multiple myeloma/metastatic CRC/metastatic PDAC and phase 2 study for patients with metastatic gastric cancer/CRC/urothelial carcinoma/ NSCLC/myeloproliferative neoplasm/advanced desmoid tumors are ongoing.– LY3200882 is a next-generation highly selective potent ATP-competitive TβRI inhibitor that showed antitumor efficacy in a preclinical mouse model of TNBC cancer. The phase 1 clinical trial results showed that LY3200882 had a tolerable safety profile and early signs of antitumor efficacy for patients with advanced or metastatic cancers (NCT04031872). PF06952229 is a selective and orally available TβRI inhibitor that is being studied in phase 1 clinical trials for patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer/castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT03685591).

Previous studies showed that genetically and pharmacologically inhibition of αvβ integrin can inhibit TGFβ signaling and suppress metastasis., For example, the cyclic RGD pentapeptide cilengitide (EMD121974) is a potent and selective inhibitor of integrin αvβ3/5 that showed a reduction of TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression, SMAD2 phosphorylation, and TGFβ-mediated reporter gene activity in most glioma cells. The intracranial LN-308 glioma xenograft mice model also displayed decreased SMAD2 phosphorylation in response to cilengitide. This inhibitor has been evaluated in phase 1 clinical trials for patients with brain tumors/lung cancer/advanced solid tumor/lymphoma/HIV-related Kaposi’s sarcoma;– in phase 2 clinical trials for patients with NSCLC/prostate cancer/metastatic melanoma/acute myeloid leukemia/head neck squamous cell carcinoma;– and in phase 3 for patients with glioblastoma. The clinical trials of cilengitide were terminated for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, acute myeloid leukemia, or HIV-related Kaposi’s sarcoma since it neither exhibited antitumor efficacy nor improved overall survival. However, the phase 3 clinical study of cilengitide in glioblastoma patients showed well toleration and single-agent activity.,

Antisense oligonucleotides

AONs are short oligonucleotides designed to suppress the expression of specific genes by blocking their translation. Trabedersen (AP12009) is a phosphonothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotide that specifically targets TGFβ2 mRNA. Trabedersen was evaluated in the phase 1 clinical studies in patients with melanoma/pancreatic cancer/CRC, and showed good safety and encouraging survival results. The phase 2 clinical trials’ evaluation of this AON for patients with glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma enabled the determination of the optimal dose for further clinical development. However, the phase 3 clinical trial of trabedersen for patients with glioblastoma was terminated because of the lack of patient recruitment.– Lucanix (belagenpumatucel-L) is a vaccine expressing AON TGFβ2 RNA that was evaluated in clinical trial studies for NSCLC patients., This vaccine did not meet its survival endpoint in a phase 3 clinical trial for NSCLC patients; however, it improved the overall survival of patients who had completed chemotherapy within the previous 12 weeks.

Overcoming the adverse effects of anti-TGFβ therapies

Cancer patients who were treated with blockers of TGFβ signaling can experience side effects if the function of TGFβ in physiological processes is compromised. For example, some TβRI kinase inhibitors showed therapeutic effects in cancer patients, but their cardiac toxicity at high doses (hemorrhagic, degenerative, and inflammatory lesions in heart valves) and skin toxicity (eruptive keratoacanthomas, hyperkeratosis, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas, and basal cell carcinoma) limits their safe therapy window. These adverse effects have (and continue to) challenge the clinical application of many other anti-TGFβ therapies. Careful dosing of TGFβ inhibitors to cancer patients may attenuate toxicity. Moreover, the adverse effects may be mitigated by pulsatile therapy, in which the patient has so-called “drug holidays” during the dosing period. Galunisertib (LY2157299) has been applied as a therapy regimen of 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off drug treatment to reduce the (cardiac) side effects. In addition, predictive biomarkers may aid in selecting patients who benefit most from treatment with anti-TGFβ agents. Transcriptional profiling of samples from patients with many different cancer types, including glioblastoma, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, CRC, and NSCLC, revealed that cancer patients with mesenchymal subtypes have high expression of TGFβ target genes and that this correlates with poor prognosis. Therefore, subgroups of patients with cancers that carry a mesenchymal phenotype may particularly benefit from anti-TGFβ therapies.–

Perspectives on the synergy of combination therapies

Increased TGFβ activity has been implicated in the resistance to various anticancer therapies, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Therefore, combining anti-TGFβ therapy with these established strategies may dampen therapy resistance (Fig. 7). A future opportunity and challenge are to identify the optimal combination of a synergistic therapy regimen for each individual patient.

Anti-TGFβ therapy with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy

Chemotherapy is a frequent standard first-line cancer therapy regimen consisting of one or more anticancer chemicals designed to stop and kill rapidly proliferating cancer cells. However, chemotherapy has strong side effects due to its toxicity to normal cells. Targeted therapy is performed by using small molecules that interfere with specific signaling pathways that promote cancer cell proliferation and survival. Examples of such small-molecule compounds are selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Selective small-molecule inhibitors have less severe side effects than standard chemotherapy, but both types of therapy can lead to therapy resistance and relapse, as some cells within the heterogeneous tumor population survive and proliferate after an initial beneficial anticancer response. TGFβ-induced cancer cell acquisition of a mesenchymal phenotype has emerged as a key mechanism that confers the therapy-resistant and stemness phenotype to cancer cells. Blocking TGFβ may kill two birds with one stone by impairing metastasis and preventing resistance against anticancer treatments.

TβRI kinase inhibitors, such as galunisertib (LY2157299), have been combined with multiple chemotherapies, including paclitaxel, sorafenib, or gemcitabine in patients with TNBC, glioblastoma, HCC, or PDAC to improve antitumor efficacy.,,– LY3200882 is combined with gemcitabine/paclitaxel/cisplatin in an ongoing phase 1 trial for the treatment of patients with solid tumors (NCT02937272), or is tested in combination with capecitabine for patients with resistant metastatic CRC (NCT04031872). The efficacy of a combination of vactosertib (TEW-7197) and paclitaxel is explored in an ongoing phase 1/2 clinical trial for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer (NCT03698825). NIS793 is a pan anti-TGFβ-neutralizing antibody that is currently being tested in a phase 2 clinical trial for patients with metastatic PDAC in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy (NCT04390763). TβRI kinase inhibitors have also been combined with targeted therapies to overcome drug resistance in pre-clinical cancer models. For example, downregulation of mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12) leads to resistance to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors in multiple cancer cells. Mechanistically, MED12 depletion was found to increase TβRII protein levels, mediate MEK/ERK activation, and induce the expression of mesenchymal markers. Treatment with the TβRI kinase inhibitor galunisertib (LY2157299) sensitized the therapeutic response of metastatic non-small cell lung cancers with downregulated MED12 to RTK inhibitors.

In radiotherapy, ionizing radiation is used to kill or control the growth of malignant cells. Some types of cancer are notably radioresistant, such as glioblastoma, which produces abundant TGFβ in the microenvironment that leads to the radioresistance of glioma-initiating cells. Radiation can also cause normal tissues to become more fibrotic by inducing the expression and release of active TGFβ. Therefore, the combination of anti-TGFβ therapy with radiotherapy may improve treatment by enhancing tumor cell radiosensitivity and protecting normal tissues., In a phase 2 clinical trial, the TGFβ-blocking antibody fresolimumab (GC1008) was combined with focal irradiation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and it was found to prolong median overall survival and demonstrated a favorable systemic immune response., In addition, fresolimumab (GC1008) combined with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is in a phase 2 clinical trial for early-stage NSCLC treatment (NCT02581787). The combination of the TβRI kinase inhibitor LY3200882 with intensity-modulated radiotherapy is currently being tested in a phase 1 clinical trial of patients with solid tumors (NCT02937272).

Anti-TGFβ therapy with immunotherapy

Immune checkpoints are crucial regulators in the process of the immune response. Two types of immune checkpoint signals have been described. Costimulatory signals are mediated by CD27, CD28, CD40, CD134, CD137, and so on, for cytotoxic effector T cell proliferation and their migration toward the tumor., Coinhibitory signals increase T cell exhaustion and dysfunction, and this process engages coinhibitory molecules, such as PD-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain 3 (TIM3), and sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectin 7 (SIGLEC7). Normal physiological context balance costimulatory and coinhibitory signals for maintaining self-tolerance and preventing autoimmunity. However, this balance is perturbed in the TME; coinhibitory signals are used by tumor cells to evade an immune attack. Therefore, costimulatory signal agonists and coinhibitory signal antagonists have been applied in cancer immunotherapy, of which CTLA4, PD-1, and its partner programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the most studied. PD-L1 is a transmembrane ligand expressed on the surface of cancer cells, tumor-infiltrating DCs and macrophages, and binds to PD-1 receptor located in the plasma membrane of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells to suppress effector T cell antitumor function. CTLA4 is a receptor expressed on Treg cells and downregulates immune responses. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently at the forefront of cancer therapy, as they display successful long-lasting antitumor efficacy, even for certain metastatic cancers. However, only 15% of patients respond to immunotherapy. Anti-PD-1 therapy not only initiates a tumor rejection program, but also induces a competing TGFβ-driven immunosuppressive program. TGFβ has also been found to drive immune response evasion and attenuate the tumor response to anti-PD-L1 therapy by contributing to the exclusion of CD8+ effector T cells., In addition, the unsuccessful antitumor activity of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been attributed in part to TGFβ-induced immunosuppression. Because of these insights into TGFβ’s immunosuppressive function, the combination of anti-TGFβ therapy and immunotherapy is under intensive investigation.

Many preclinical studies have shown a great success in the combination of immunotherapy with anti-TGFβ therapy (Fig. 6). For example, the TβRI kinase inhibitor galunisertib (LY2157299) has been combined with anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer in a mouse model. The combined treatment showed an efficient antitumor immunity, leading to more persistent and complete responses. The anti-CTLA4-TβRII chimera has been studied in preclinical melanoma and TNBC tumor xenograft mouse models and demonstrated superior results with respect to antitumor efficacy than treatment with anti-CTLA4 antibody alone. The TGFβ ligand trap AVID200 combined with ICIs showed enhanced antitumor immunity in TNBC homograft models. Recently, researchers engineered a bispecific receptor decoy named CD4 TGFβ Trap that selectively blocks TGF-β signaling in CD4+ T cells and promotes reorganization of tumor vasculature and cancer cell death in a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter-driven Polyoma middle T-antigen transgenic mouse model of breast cancer. SRK-181-mIgG1 is a fully human antibody that selectively binds to latent TGFβ1 and inhibits its activation, which avoided toxicities observed with pan-TGFβ inhibitors. The coadministration of SRK-181-mIgG1 together with anti-PD-1 inhibitors has been applied in the treatment of checkpoint blockade-resistant syngeneic mouse tumors that displayed an increased influx of intratumoral CD8+ T cells and a lower level of immunosuppressive myeloid cells. Researchers designed pH-responsive clustered nanoparticles that can deliver TβRI kinase inhibitor galunisertib (LY2157299) and small interfering RNA targeting PD-L1 to the PDAC stroma microenvironment, and this regimen showed significant antitumor efficiency by both provoking antitumor immunity and suppressing tumor growth in PDAC mouse models. However, despite these highly encouraging results mentioned above, we like to provide a note of caution as different tumor models with different immunogenicity can exhibit totally different, sometimes even opposite, results.

Some therapies in which anti-TGFβ and immunotherapy are combined have entered clinical evaluations with patients (Table 1). For example, the TβRI kinase inhibitor vactosertib (TEW-7197) was combined with the anti-PD-L1/PD-1 monoclonal antibody durvalumab in a phase 2 clinical trial for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or NSCLC (NCT03732274), and with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in a phase 1/2 clinical evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal or gastric cancer (NCT03724851). The combination therapies showed a good safety profile and antitumor activity in both trials., SAR439459 is a pan-TGFβ ligand-neutralizing antibody, and the combination of SAR439459 and anti-PD1 antibody lead to tumor regression in the MC38 tumor-bearing mice model. SAR439459 in combination with the anti-PD1 antibody cemiplimab is now being tested in a phase 1 clinical trials for patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03192345). NIS793 is a monoclonal antibody blocking TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 and is being tested in combination with the anti-PD1 antibody PDR001 in a phase 1 clinical trial of patients with advanced malignancies (NCT02947165). M7824 is a bifunctional fusion protein consisting of the ectodomain of TβRII, which serves as a TGFβ ligand trap, and a human monoclonal antibody against PD-L1. The fusion protein can target both TGFβ- and PD-L1-mediated signaling pathways, and it displayed promising results by eliciting antitumor activity in multiple mouse cancer models. M7824 showed a manageable safety profile and encouraging clinical efficacy in phase 1 clinical trials, including patients with advanced solid tumors, NSCLCs, recurrent glioblastoma, cervical cancer, metastatic TNBC, heavily pretreated CRC, or human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers.– M7824 is now being evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial for patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer, gallbladder cancer, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, thymoma, CRC, head and neck squamous cell cancer, advanced pancreas cancer, or recurrent prostate cancer. Moreover, the evaluation of M7824 for patients with advanced NSCLC or biliary tract cancer is now under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials., A recent study discovered that an anti-GARP:TGFβ1 mAb (ABBV151), which selectively blocks TGFβ1 production by Treg cells, can induce the regression of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy-resistant tumors in a mouse cancer model., The phase 1 clinical trial of an anti-GARP:TGFβ1 mAb (ABBV151) as monotherapy and in combination with the anti-PD1 mAb budigalimab (ABBV-181) were recently initiated for the evaluation of their safety and tolerability for patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03821935).

CAR T cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable success by utilizing engineered T cells with tumor antigens that lead to the recognition and attack of tumor cells in blood cancers; however, this method still remains a big challenge for treating solid tumors partially due to TGFβ-mediated immunosuppression. Inhibiting TGFβ signaling in CART cells can boost their antitumor efficacy in solid tumors., Other strategies also reported overcoming CART cell repression by interfering with TGFβ signaling, such as coexpression of the dominant-negative TβRII, coexpression of TβRII-41BB to switch the TGFβ-suppressive signal to a 41BB stimulatory signal, coexpression of TGFβ binding single-chain variable fragment, and constitutively active AKT.

Anti-TGFβ therapy can also be combined with cancer vaccines to enhance treatment efficacy. Vaccination against the EMT transcription factor TWIST1 can induce effector T cell responses and suppress murine tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis. The combination of an adenovirus cancer vaccine encoding tumor-associated antigen TWIST1 (Ad-TWIST) and bifunctional fusion protein M7824 that targets both TGFβ and PD-L1 displayed superior improvement of the antitumor efficacy as compared to Ad-TWIST monotherapy in multiple murine models of human solid tumors. In addition, a phase 2 clinical trial study of combination therapies with M7824 and therapeutic Tri-Ad (ETBX-011, ETBX-051, and ETBX-061) vaccine for patients with head and neck neoplasms is ongoing (NCT04247282). M7824 has also been combined with the HPV vaccine PRGN-2009 in phase 1/2 clinical trials for subjects with HPV-associated cancers (NCT04432597) and combined with cancer vaccines that target the EMT driver transcription factor brachyury in phase 1/2 clinical trials for patients with advanced breast cancer (NCT04296942) or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT03493945).,,

Concluding remarks

TGFβ was discovered in the late 1970s/early 1980s,, and its role as a multifunctional regulator of normal and cancer cell growth became apparent shortly thereafter. The purification of TGFβ and cloning of its complementary DNA, as well as the identification of TGFβ receptors, paved the way for in vitro and in vivo studies on its mechanism of action and revealed the pleiotropic roles of TGFβ in controlling pathophysiological processes.–,,,– Moreover, these advances allowed the pharmacological interference of key pathways with neutralizing antibodies against TGFβ or TGFβ receptor kinase inhibitors., While preclinical studies in mouse models have shown great promise for TGFβ pharmacological agents, the role of TGFβ as a tumor suppressor and critical role in maintaining tissue homeostasis have made its clinical translation demanding and prevented TGFβ targeting strategies from reaching clinical approval for the treatment of cancer patients. Significant progress has been made to (potentially) make treatment with TGFβ-targeting agents more safer and effective. For example, by performing intermittent dosing strategies bypassing cardiovascular toxicity,, by specifically inhibiting only the TGFβ1 isoform that has the strongest link with cancer progression, or by selecting cancer patients for treatment with a mesenchymal phenotype and high TGFβ activity that are likely to benefit most from the TGFβ targeting.,

We now know that cancer cells frequently escape from the TGFβ-induced cytostatic response and that TGFβ drives the EMT of cancer cells. Mesenchymal cancer cells have been linked to metastasis and chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy resistance. As most cancer patients die of metastasis and demonstrate relapse after chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy, the combination of these therapies with TGFβ inhibitors are being tested. Moreover, TGFβ strongly promotes cancer progression by acting on the TME, activating CAFs, stimulating angiogenesis, and eluding the immune system. How TGFβ inhibitors elicit their anticancer effect in patients is frequently unclear, but its reversal of immunosuppressive activity in the TME might be of key importance. Moreover, as the clinical failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment has been linked to overactive TGFβ signaling activity (at least under some circumstances), we are witnessing a profound renewed interest in TGFβ as a target for cancer therapy. Thus, by combining chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy with TGFβ-targeting drugs, treatments can be made more efficient by improving antitumor efficacy and reducing therapy resistance. One aspect remains of key importance, finding reliable biomarkers that enable clinicians to select the best (combinatorial) treatment for each individual cancer patient.

References 330

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

All 330 references

Cited by papers we hold 14

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.