Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

MYB oncoproteins: emerging players and potential therapeutic targets in human cancer

Ylenia Cicirò, Arturo Sala

Oncogenesis · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41389-021-00309-y

Abstract

MYB transcription factors are highly conserved from plants to vertebrates, indicating that their functions embrace fundamental mechanisms in the biology of cells and organisms. In humans, the MYB gene family is composed of three members: MYB , MYBL1 and MYBL2 , encoding the transcription factors MYB, MYBL1, and MYBL2 (also known as c-MYB, A-MYB, and B-MYB), respectively. A truncated version of MYB, the prototype member of the MYB family, was originally identified as the product of the retroviral oncogene v-myb , which causes leukaemia in birds. This led to the hypothesis that aberrant activation of vertebrate MYB could also cause cancer. Despite more than three decades have elapsed since the isolation of v-myb, only recently investigators were able to detect MYB genes rearrangements and mutations, smoking gun evidence of the involvement of MYB family members in human cancer. In this review, we will highlight studies linking the activity of MYB family members to human malignancies and experimental therapeutic interventions tailored for MYB -expressing cancers.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Vertebrate MYB genes encode transcription factors related to the v-myb oncogene, the transforming gene of avian retroviruses causing myelomas and lymphomas in birds,. AMV was originally identified as a virus that induces a disease in chickens similar to acute myelogenous leukaemia in humans. The v-mybAMV oncogene product, a 45 kDa protein, was proved to be a truncated version of vertebrate MYB, the 75 kDa product of the proto-oncogene MYB, mainly expressed in haematopoietic tissues,. The v-myb oncogene was also found fused to a second oncogene, v-ets, in the E26 retrovirus that cause avian erythroblastosis. Invertebrates carry only one MYB gene which, from a phylogenetical and functional point of view, is equivalent to vertebrate MYBL2, suggesting that this is the most ancient member of the family,. There is no homologue of the MYB gene in nematodes, although distantly related genes, such as Cdc5 and SNAPc, have been identified in Caenorhabditis elegans,.

In humans and other mammals, the transcription factor MYB (encoded by MYB) is the prototype member of the family, which includes MYBL1 (encoded by MYBL1) and MYBL2 (encoded by MYBL2). Although similar in structure, the different MYB proteins interact with unique co-factors and their expression is often nonoverlapping, suggesting that they might have distinct biological roles (Fig. 1)–.

MYB proteins structure and identification of target genes

MYB proteins contain a highly conserved helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding domain (DBD) at the N-terminus, encompassing three tandem repeated domains of ~50 amino acids containing tryptophan named R1, R2, and R3; a conserved C-terminal negative regulatory domain (NRD); a trans-activating domain (TAD) in the central portion of the protein. The latter includes an acidic region and a heptad leucine-zipper repeat only present in MYB and MYBL1 (Fig. 1).

All MYB family members recognise and bind the same DNA consensus sequence [PyAAC(G/T)G] to transactivate gene expression. This motif, firstly identified by the Klempnauer group using DNA footprinting assays, is known as the canonical MYB-binding site (MBS). The sequence was later confirmed to be present, and bound by v-myb, in the promoter region of the first MYB-target gene identified in vertebrates, mim-1. With the development of more advanced genomic technologies, different groups attempted the identification of MYB target genes at the global level. The Ness team found the c-MYB protein bound to over 10,000 promoters in the cancer breast cell line MCF-7, and validated known MYB target genes involved in the cell cycle, such as MYC and CCNB1, or identified new MYB target genes involved in stemness and transcription control such as JUN, KLF4, NANOG and SND1. Another study by the Gonda lab identified genes regulated by MYB in mouse myeloid progenitor cells. This study not only confirmed that MYB positively regulates promoters of key cell proliferation genes, such as Myc, but it can also work as a transcriptional repressor. Indeed, several key regulators of myeloid differentiation such as Runx1, Pu.1, Junb and Cebp were strongly suppressed by exogenous expression of MYB, suggesting a mechanism used by the transcription factor to suppress differentiation and promote self-renewal. A selection of MYB target genes that have been shown to mediate physiological functions in normal or disease contexts is shown in Table 1.

The transcriptional activity of MYB proteins is regulated either positively or negatively by co-factors; cellular proteins physically interacting with the different MYB family members are indicated under their protein structures in Fig. 1. Structure–function relationships have been largely inferred by studying the prototype member of the family, MYB (c-MYB). For example, the TAD domain confers transactivating activity to MYB by recruiting CREB-binding domain protein (CBP) and p300,. The CAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family member NF‐M cooperates with MYB in transcriptionally activating the mim‐1 promoter through an adjacent DNA-binding site and it is also co‐activated by CBP in a Ras‐dependent manner, suggesting that CBP might work by functionally linking MYB and NF-M. Indeed, NF-M has been shown to affect the MYB-C/EBP interaction by disrupting the N-terminal region within the repeat domain R1 (amino acids 47–71), enhancing MYB oncogenic activity.

MYB can cooperate, cross-regulate and compete with other transcription factors, such as members of the C/EBP family, the ETS family, and GATA1–. Recently, it has been shown that in ALL patients aberrant recruitment of the histone acetyl transferase CBP/p300 by MYB in the enhancer region of the protooncogene TAL1 occurs via the formation of de novo MYB-binding elements.

Alterations of MYB family genes in human cancer and experimental therapeutic approaches

MYB family members are often aberrantly expressed in human cancers, suggesting that they could be important for tumour initiation and/or maintenance. Since MYB proteins are essential for key cellular processes such as growth, differentiation and survival, it is likely that genomic mutations or alterations of gene expression might contribute to oncogenesis. Broadly expressed transcription factors are considered unsuitable therapeutic targets since their inactivation or downregulation could be detrimental to organism homoeostasis. Furthermore, it is inherently difficult to block the interaction of transcription factors with DNA using small molecules. Despite these caveats, therapeutic approaches aiming at inhibiting MYB oncoproteins, or their target genes, in cancer are under investigation in preclinical and clinical studies.

In the following paragraphs, we discuss studies in which MYB family members have been implicated in forms of human cancer. We also highlight laboratory experiments, or clinical trials, in which MYB, or MYB-regulated genes, have been targeted for therapeutic purposes.

MYB

Disruption of MYB causes embryonic lethality due to the failure of foetal hepatic haematopoiesis. The key role of the MYB gene product in mammalian haematopoiesis is also indicated by its ability to regulate the expression of foetal haemoglobin and requirement for the maturation of T and B lymphocytes–. Although prevalently expressed in haematopoietic cells, MYB expression is detected also in neural tissues, as well as in colonic crypts and breast cells–.

MYB, similarly to the ubiquitous member of the family MYBL2, regulates cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) expression and activity, essential for cell duplication,. MYB autoregulates its own expression and is engaged in positive and negative regulatory loops with cyclins and Cdks, in both the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle,–.

MYB alterations in cancer

Genetic mutations and augmented expression of MYB have been firstly noted in leukaemic cells, and only relatively recently in solid cancers. Overexpression of wild type MYB is insufficient for full transformation of human epithelial cells, supporting the hypothesis that it promotes tumourigenesis only in combination with additional genetic alterations.

The first recurrent genomic rearrangements of the MYB locus were evidenced in acute T cell leukaemia, in which MYB overexpression is caused by gene duplication or translocation, juxtaposing strong enhancers from other genomic locations. Summarising the information present in literature, it is possible to group MYB oncogenic alterations into three classes: overexpression, fusion with partner genes, and ectopic binding of the MYB oncoprotein to enhancer sequences caused by somatic mutations (i.e. TAL1 enhancer). MYB gene amplification and overexpression have been observed in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer,–. Fusion with partner genes is mainly observed in solid tumours, as discussed in detail in the following sections.

MYB genomic alterations have been detected in multiple forms of human cancer, suggesting a causative role. Therefore, numerous studies have been conducted in which inhibition of MYB, or of its downstream genes, has been used as a potential therapeutic strategy. Preclinical studies and actionable MYB target genes are summarised in Table 2.

MYB and leukaemia

In a cluster of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients, mutations of the TAL1 enhancer create ex-novo MYB-binding sites. The leukaemias arising in these patients show MYB-dependency consequential to the aberrant activation of the TAL1 oncogene by MYB. Through genomic screening of an independent set of 107 individuals with T cell ALL (T-ALL) and 12 T-ALL cell lines, Lahortiga et al. detected duplication of MYB in 9 of 107 (8.4%) cases and in five different cell lines. The flanking genes HBS1L and AHI1 were duplicated in some patients, but the commonly duplicated region covered only the MYB gene. The duplication is associated with a threefold increase in MYB expression, and its knockdown initiates T cell differentiation. Thus, MYB duplications may be leukaemogenic in a subset of T-ALL patients.

In acute basophilic leukaemia (ABL) the MYB locus is fused to another gene encoding the transcription factor GATA1. This rare subtype of acute myeloblastic leukaemia is characterised by the t(X;6)(p11;q23) translocation, leading to decrease or loss of GATA1 (located on chromosome X) expression. Mice transgenically expressing the MYB–GATA1 fusion develop myelodysplasia and leukaemia when endogenous, wild-type GATA1 expression is concurrently downregulated. Ducassou and co-workers showed that the fusion promotes not only haematopoietic progenitor cell self‐renewal, but also induces a bias toward granulocytic differentiation, consequently to sensitisation towards NGF- and IL-33-induced differentiation. The skewing towards basophilic differentiation was confirmed in primary human CD34‐positive stem/progenitor cells, where the basophilic markers CD203c and FcϵRI were activated after MYB–GATA1 expression. In vivo experiments using NSG mice led to conclusive evidence that basophilic differentiation is a direct consequence of MYB-GATA1 expression, rather than loss of endogenous GATA1. The increased responsiveness to IL-33 could contribute to the leukaemic phenotype, as previously observed in other myeloproliferative malignancies. Thus, MYB-GATA1 might promote cell growth, self-renewal and leukaemic transformation of basophilic progenitor cells.

A case report described a Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (Ph-MPN) with an uncommonly rapid leukaemic progression, linked to JAK2V617F mutation. This primary myelofibrosis (PMF)-patient developed a peculiar chromosomal rearrangement resulting in a fusion involving EWSR1 and MYB. There are only a few cases reporting fusion of EWSR1 in leukaemia, whereas it is common in soft tissue sarcoma–. EWSR1 is a FET (FUS, EWS, TAF15) family member whose function is to regulate transcription and mRNA splicing. Therefore, it seems reasonable to speculate that the EWSR1-MYB fusion could lead to dysregulated MYB transcriptional activity. Indeed, expression of the MYB target gene BCL2 was deregulated in EWSR1-MYB positive PMF, suggesting that molecular alterations involving MYB could increase disease risk in PMF patients.

AML is the most common form of acute leukaemia in adults. Although recent advances in genomic characterisations have shed some light on the molecular patterns involved in this cancer, the 5-year survival rate is <70% in children and 35% in adults,.

AML is a heterogeneous disease, often characterised by the presence of gene fusions or recurrent mutations in a set of driver genes. Genomic rearrangements involving the MLL gene, such as MLL–AF4 t(4;11)(q21;q23); MLL–AF9; t(9;11)(p22;q23); MLL–ENL; t(11;19)(q23;p13.3); MLL–AF10 t(10;11)(p12;q23) or MLL–AF6 t(6;11)(q27;q23) are associated with a very aggressive form of leukaemia,. MYB has been shown to be a key downstream effector of MLL fusion oncoproteins, suggesting that it could be a target for therapeutic interventions. Since, as mentioned before, targeting transcription factors with small molecule inhibitors is difficult, the focus has been directed towards proteins that work as co-activators in the MYB network. p300 is a MYB transcriptional co-activator, required for leukaemogenesis. The small molecule inhibitor Celastrol, a triterpenoid, was used to disrupt the MYB/p300 interaction, therefore interrupting MYB signalling in leukaemic cells. Celastrol did not change MYB expression but inhibited the interaction of the transactivation domain of MYB with the KIX domain of p300. Accordingly, Celastrol strongly inhibited MYB-dependent transcriptional activation of target genes. Celastrol enhanced survival of mice transplanted with patient-derived HoxA9/Meis1-driven AML, confirming that targeting MYB transcription function could be an effective strategy in this leukaemia. Another compound used to disrupt the interaction between MYB and p300, Naphthol AS-E phosphate, inhibited the expression of the MYB gene itself, as well as that of several MYB-target genes, inducing myeloid differentiation and apoptosis. The negative effect of Naphthol AS-E phosphate on MYB gene expression could be a consequence of the block of MYB gene autoregulation. Nicolaides et al. showed that human MYB maintains high levels of its expression through an autoregulatory mechanism involving MYB-binding sites in the 5′ flanking region of the MYB gene itself.

The anti-helminth agent mebendazole exhibited anticancer activity in AML human cell lines by interfering with MYB activity. Short-term exposure to the drug induced changes in the expression level of MYB-regulated genes in cells expressing the MLL-AF9 fusion oncoprotein. Expression of the MYB oncoprotein was drastically reduced in the presence of low concentrations of the drug in all cell lines analysed, whereas MYB mRNA levels were only reduced after exposure to very high mebendazole concentrations, and only in a few of the cell lines. This suggested that the drug acts mainly at the protein level. Indeed, inhibition of the proteasome reversed MYB protein loss, demonstrating that mebendazole causes proteasomal degradation of MYB by interfering with the heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) chaperone system. Importantly, mebendazole impaired AML cancer progression in vivo.

5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone (also known as plumbagin) has been shown to target the transcriptional-activating domain (TAD) of MYB. By using the MYB TAD fused to the Gal4 DBD, the Klempnauer group observed that plumbagin inhibits transcription of a reporter gene containing GAL4-binding sites. Increasing the dosage of ectopically expressed p300, progressively antagonised the effect of plumbagin, demonstrating that the drug interfered with the p300–MYB interaction in AML cells.

Recently, a peptidomimetic approach to block the activity of MYB was developed by designing an inhibitory peptide called MYBMIM. The MYBMIM inhibitory effect is caused by its ability to disrupt the MYB:CBP/p300 complex. MYBMIM directly binds to the KIX domain of CBP with an affinity similar to the naïve complex, causing its disassembly and reduced MYB-dependent expression of genes whose enhancers are occupied by it. NOD-scid mice engrafted with leukaemia cells treated with the peptide showed significant reduction of cancer burden, which was caused by mitochondrial apoptosis. Furthermore, ChIP analysis revealed a marked loss of the epigenetic mark H3K27ac on super-enhancers regulated by acetylation driven by p300:CBP, and consequent reduced expression of key MYB-regulated genes such as MYC and BCL2.

MYB and paediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs)

PLGGs typically present gene fusions, especially related to component of the MAPK pathway, such as BRAF. MYB rearrangements have been recently discovered in the context of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and/or RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of 249 samples of PLGGs, leading to the identification of recurrent MYB-QKI fusions in angiocentric gliomas. MYB fused to the RNA-binding protein QKI confers oncogenic properties using three distinct mechanisms. Firstly, the alteration results in the translocation of a super enhancer located in the 3′ untranslated region of QKI upstream the MYB promoter, resulting in its activation. Secondly, the MYB-QKI fusion protein acts as transcription factor, binding and activating the MYB promoter through a positive feedback loop. Thirdly, hemizygous loss of QKI expression caused by the rearrangement of its locus contributes to oncogenesis since it functions as a tumour-suppressor gene–. Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that the expression of MYB-QKI fusion was associated with MYB signature genes. MYB protein structure and its modifications found in tumours are fundamental for its transforming ability. In fact, as already mentioned above, full-length MYB is not endowed with a strong oncogenic activity in vitro, whereas C-terminal truncations are required for its activation. MYB-QKI breakpoints in MYB intron 9–15 result in C-terminal truncation and oncogenic activation of MYB.

MYB and cancers of the gastrointestinal tract

80% of colorectal cancers are characterised by MYB overexpression, which is associated with tumour aggressiveness and poor prognosis,. MYB overexpression in colon cancer is a consequence of mutations in intron 1 regulatory sequence. Given the broad presence of the oncoprotein in this cancer, investigators in the Australian Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre engineered a vaccine against the MYB antigen called TetMYB. It is composed of an inactivated MYB protein flanked by the tetanus toxin T cell epitopes cloned into the pVAX1 plasmid vector. The immunotherapeutic role of the pVAX1-Tet-human MYB DNA vaccine was investigated in colon and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patients, also in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody BGB-A317 to assess safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in a first-in-human clinical trial. This approach should overcome limitations caused by epitope/MHC restriction when targeting an endogenous antigen, as its application will not depend upon a need to match the patient’s MHC subtype. The trial, if successful, could pave the way for vaccine treatment not only of colorectal cancers or ACC, but also other MYB-expressing cancers. This clinical trial is based upon preclinical studies of the same Australian group in mice transplanted with MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells expressing high levels of MYB. Breaking peripheral tolerance with the vaccine strategy enhanced anti-tumour immunity mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, without insurgence of autoimmunity, causing a significant suppression of MC38 cancer growth. MYB alterations have been also observed in pancreatic cancer, where it has been shown to interact with genes required for proliferation, survival and metastasis.

MYB and breast cancer

MYB has been found bound to more than 10,000 promoters in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and recognised as a key activator of downstream targets, including genes involved in cancer progression and metastasis, such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), BCL2, BCLXL, JUN, KLF4, NANOG, MYC, and CXCR4. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a clinical outcome strictly determined by molecular profiles,. Over 70% of human breast cancers are oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and express MYB. Gonda and colleagues reported for the first time that inhibition of MYB expression severely impairs the proliferation of ER+, but not ER−, breast cancer cell lines. The relationship between MYB and ER is also indicated by the expression of MYB in normal, ER+ murine mammary epithelial cells, suggesting a salient role of the MYB transcription factor in mammary cell proliferation and tumour development in the human and mouse systems,.

ER+ breast cancer benefits from endocrine therapy (ET), which can reduce local and distant cancer recurrence and mortality rate,. ET can be administrated as neoadjuvant, adjuvant or palliative treatment and includes aromatase inhibitors, selective ER modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen, and antagonists such as fulvestrant.

In ER+ve breast cancer patients, MYB expression is oestrogen-dependent, since it was observed that MYB mRNA levels were 5-fold higher 24 h after stimulating breast cancer cells with beta-estradiol, suggesting a strong correlation between the proto-oncogene expression and ER status in cancer. MYB expression in ER+ve breast cancer cells is regulated at the level of transcriptional elongation, leading to the hypothesis that CDK9 inhibitors could be used to indirectly target MYB in this cancer. Indeed, CDK9 inhibition resulted in apoptotic death of breast cancer cell lines, accompanied by dose-dependent inhibition of the MCL-1 gene and protein expression. CDK9 inhibitors also impaired cell proliferation and cell cycle progression, inducing arrest at both the G1/S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Moreover, this led to the downregulation of MYB target genes involved in cell cycle progression such as CCNB1 and CCNE1, which was reversed by ectopic expression of MYB.

Breast cancer patients often develop resistance to treatment. Activation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a mechanism by which breast cancer cells acquire resistance to targeted therapies. Micro-RNAs have been implicated in the EMT process, particularly the miR-200 family,. Following ectopic over expression of miR-200b/c in drug-resistant cells, MYB expression levels decreased, indicating that it is a target of miR-200s. After silencing MYB in an ER+ve breast cancer cell line refractory to tamoxifen therapy, the authors of the study observed that the EMT markers vimentin, ZEB1, and ZEB2 were downregulated, further supporting the hypothesis that MYB is involved in EMT and drug resistance in breast cancer. Indeed, as expected, breast cell line sensitivity to tamoxifen therapy was increased after inhibiting MYB expression.

MYB and ACC

Stenman and colleagues discovered the translocation t(6;9)(q23;p23) as a genomic hallmark of ACC. The translocation results in the fusion of the carboxyl-terminus of the MYB oncoprotein to five amino acids (SWYLG) encoded by the last exon of NFIB (Fig. 2),. ACC is characterised by the presence of the MYB-NFIB fusion gene in 30–86% of cases, depending on the study,. An important consequence of chromosomal rearrangements in ACC is the translocation of strong enhancers near the MYB, or MYBL1, locus, which activates their transcription. Rearrangements of the MYB locus have been observed in ACCs of the breast, lungs or glands in different body locations and in cylindromas, suggesting that MYB activation is frequent in exocrine gland tumours,–. Another consequence of the chromosomal translocations detected in ACC and other gland tumours is, in some cases, loss of genetic material. In this regard, Mitani and colleagues theorised that two genetic events drive ACC pathogenesis: one involves the generation of fusion genes resulting from reciprocal translocation between chromosome 6q and 9p or other partners, and the other event constitutes a loss of genetic material, denoting the presence of one or more tumour suppressor genes. Most ACCs do not acquire a large number of genetic changes, typical of other carcinomas. Over half of ACC cases present chromosome 6 deletions, suggesting an important selection for these alterations in the molecular aetiology of these neoplasms. However, efforts to identify a tumour suppressor gene at these loci in ACC have been unsuccessful to date,.

MYB-NFIB is a putative oncoprotein, which has been shown to control ACC tumour cell proliferation and spherogenesis. Intriguingly, the fusion gene is regulated by AKT-dependent signalling downstream of the IGF1 receptor and its expression can be downregulated by IGF1R-inhibition with linsitinib. Furthermore, EGFR and MET signalling also promote growth of ACC cells. In line with these findings, evidence in patients or xenograft models indicate that monoclonal antibodies targeting IGF1 or EGF receptors could be effective drugs in ACCs expressing the fusion oncoprotein–. To investigate the implication of the MYB-NFIB fusion gene in ACC, Mitani and co-workers analysed a cohort of 123 salivary carcinomas, including primary ACCs of the salivary gland, metastatic ACCs, non-ACC salivary carcinomas, and normal salivary gland tissues. Using RT-PCR, validated by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis, they found that among 89 ACC cases (72 primary ACCs and 17 metastatic), 26 were positive for expression of the MYB-NFIB fusion transcript. Interestingly, none of the 34 non-ACC carcinomas were positive. In addition, 14 different fusion transcripts involving multiple exons of MYB and NFIB were identified. To provide further insights on the role of MYB in this cancer, expression of the wild type or fusion MYB transcripts was quantified. Unsurprisingly, MYB expression was elevated in MYB-NFIB fusion positive ACCs, probably caused by loss of the negative regulatory sequence at the 3′ untranslated region of MYB. Interestingly, the expression of wild type MYB was elevated >40-fold in fusion-negative ACCs compared to non-ACC carcinomas, and only 2-fold lower than fusion-positive ACCs. The authors concluded that whereas genomic rearrangement must be causative of MYB overexpression in fusion positive ACCs, alternative mechanisms may be responsible for MYB overexpression in fusion negative ACCs. Thus, MYB overexpression is a frequent consequence of the MYB-NFIB fusion in glandular tumours, but can also occur via other mechanisms.

The polyether ionophore monensin was recently identified as a MYB inhibitor using a luciferase-based screen and tested on ACC cell lines derived from ACC patients. These cells were more sensitive to the anti-cancer agent than MYB-expression negative, control cell lines. Monensin suppressed both MYB-NFIB mRNA and protein levels. Moreover, the compound, and related polyether ionophores, also induced differentiation and promoted apoptosis of leukaemic cell lines, suggesting that MYB inhibitors can be effective against solid and liquid malignancies. Using a chemical screen in Zebrafish, the group of Leonard Zon have demonstrated that retinoic acid is a suppressor of MYB in ACC. All trans retinoic acid (ATRA) treatment of mice bearing patient-derived ACC tumours showed reduced expression of MYB and binding of MYB at translocated enhancers. Importantly, ATRA inhibited the expression of cell cycle related, MYB-target genes. ATRA is used in the clinic for the treatment of promyelocytic leukaemia and has a known safety profile, suggesting that it will be soon used in the context of a clinical trial in ACC patients.

Identification of actionable target genes downstream of MYB can be a reasonable alternative to avoid negative consequences caused by inactivation of the wild-type MYB transcription factor. Indeed, the potential haematologic toxicity of anti-MYB therapies could be further exacerbated in patients under regimens of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. An important gene axis regulated by MYB is the insulin growth factor and its receptor. Interestingly, insulin growth factor receptor (IGFR) signalling positively regulates MYB-NFIB in ACC, suggesting that MYB and IGFR are engaged in a feed forward loop in cancer,. Accordingly, it has been shown that the small molecule inhibitor Linsitinib or the therapeutic antibody Figitumumab reduce the growth of ACC tumours in mouse models and in patients, suggesting that targeting IGFR signalling could be an effective strategy in MYB overexpressing cancers,. In an effort to identify new MYB target genes in ACC, our group has generated retroviral vectors expressing wild-type MYB or two MYB-NFIB variants derived from ACC patients. The different MYB isoforms were ectopically expressed in immortalised breast MCF10A cells, and genes up or downregulated were identified by microarrays. GSEA revealed that ATR/BRCA was the top activated downstream pathway, with a significant upregulation of ATR gene expression. ATR mRNA levels were increased in primary ACCs compared to normal salivary glands. Accordingly, the clinical ATR kinase inhibitor VX-970 caused apoptosis of primary ACC cells in vitro and significant shrinkage of ACC patient-derived xenografts. These results support the theory that acting on downstream target genes/proteins might be a worthy—and even safer—alternative to directly targeting the MYB gene itself.

Surgery is the first line treatment for ACC, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy as adjuvant treatments to avoid recurrence. Unfortunately, standard treatments only provide limited benefit in advanced disease, which is usually lethal, with a high rate of recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, new and more effective treatments are urgently needed for these high-risk patients. Previous clinical trials have led to the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for the treatment of aggressive forms of solid malignancies, such as thyroid cancer refractory to radio therapy and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma,. Most of the targeted tyrosine kinases are also MYB regulated, such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs), the stem cell factor receptor KIT (c-KIT), FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs), and the proto-oncogene RET,–. Persson and co-workers have recently shown that VEGFA, FGF2, KIT and other genes encoding receptor tyrosine kinases are commonly overexpressed in ACC samples, leading to consider TKIs as credible candidates for the treatment of relapsed/metastatic ACC patients. However, it has been observed an overall poor response in therapies against these targets in ACC, suggesting that other, more relevant MYB downstream genes should be clinically exploited in this tumour.

MYBL1

MYBL1 is predominantly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS), germinal B-lymphocytes, mammary gland ductal epithelium, and in the testis,. It has a key role in spermatogenesis, particularly in cell cycle progression of germ cells through pachynema,. MYBL1-null mice are viable, but exhibit growth abnormalities as well as defects in spermatogenesis and female breast development.

MYBL1 alterations in cancer

MYBL1 rearrangements are a hallmark of low-grade gliomas (LGGs), the commonest paediatric CNS neoplasm, arising in children and adolescents,. Recent molecular characterisations through WGS have led to the identification of new genetic alterations in LGGs. These studies have identified activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway caused by the duplication of the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) of the FGFR1 gene and frequent rearrangements of the MYB family members MYB and MYBL1 in diffuse cerebral LGGs. 8q13.1 gain was observed as a significant recurrent event in diffuse astrocytoma grade IIs. This leads to a duplication of MYBL1 and truncation of its C-terminal NRD, resulting in anchorage-independent growth of NIH-3T3 cells and tumour formation in nude mice. MYBL1 gene amplification is a distinct alteration of the subtype IDH-wt/H3-wt of diffuse gliomas, together with TERT and BRAF mutations, EGFR and FGFR1 alterations, and other chromosomal aberrations. Although these alterations are rare, sequencing analysis of uncommon low-grade neuro-epithelial tumours revealed that these pathogenic mutations occur at a high frequency (78%) in this cohort.

Patients with isomorphic diffuse glioma or astrocytoma can harbour copy number alterations of MYBL1 or MYB (13 out of 25 samples, 52%), as assessed with RNA sequencing. Gene fusions accounted for 50% of cases.

ACC is characterised by the chromosomal translocation t(6;9), leading to the expression of the MYB-NFIB fusion gene. Although MYB is the MYB family member most often involved in this cancer, it was recently demonstrated that a subset of ACCs contains the t(8;9) chromosomal translocation. This results in the creation of a MYBL1-NFIB gene fusion, which probably functions in a manner similar to MYB-NFIB, given the structural analogies between MYBL1 and MYB. Indeed, tumours with MYB and MYBL1 translocations display overlapping gene expression profiles and clinical outcome, suggesting that the related MYB proteins are interchangeable oncogenic drivers in ACC. The research group that identified the translocation t(8;9), also highlighted a t(8;14) translocation, leading to the fusion of MYBL1 to the RAD51B gene.

In MYB or MYB-NFIB negative subsets of breast ACC tumours, alternative genetic mechanisms of MYB activation have been demonstrated. RNA and WGS unveiled that these cancers could harbour MYBL1 rearrangements, including those between MYBL1-ACTN1 and MYBL1-NFIB. In these rare triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), the histological pattern was identical to the MYB-NFIB-positive, salivary gland ACCs. The MYBL1 rearrangements were confirmed at genomic level by the FISH technique. The translocation results in an in-frame chimeric transcript containing the DNA-binding and transactivating domains, encoded by exons 1–14, of MYBL1 fused to the exon 9 of NFIB. In addition, another in-frame fusion between MYBL1-ACTN1 was also detected for the first time in ACC samples. The fusion leads to loss of the C-terminus region of MYBL1 due to the fusion of exons 1–8 of MYBL1 with exons 10–21 of ACTN1.

Another organ in which ACC neoplasms can originate is the lung. Primary tracheobronchial ACC is one of the rarest types of lung cancer, accounting for <1% of cases. Pei et al. analysed 7 lung ACCs, documenting that 7 out of 7 cases presented MYB or MYBL1 genes fused with NFIB or, less frequently, with RAD51B. Primary cutaneous ACCs display a genetic landscape similar to those of salivary glands, showing fusions of either MYB or MYBL1 with the common partner NFIB.

MYBL2

MYBL2, encoding the transcription factor MYBL2, is ubiquitous and often co-expressed with other MYB members. It has been shown to regulate cell cycle progression, cell survival and differentiation being an essential component of the DREAM complex–. It is also a promoter of cell survival by activating antiapoptotic genes such as BIRC5 (survivin), CLU (ApoJ/clusterin) and BCL2–. MYBL2 has been shown to aid repair of DNA double-strand breaks, supporting genome stability in haematopoietic and pluripotent stem cells,. Expression of MYBL2 is important for both normal and transformed cell homoeostasis. This concept is supported by the early embryonic lethal phenotype of MYBL2 knockout mice, due to impaired inner cell mass formation, or suppression of cell cycle progression and cell survival in oesophageal, hepatic, colorectal, and sympathetic nervous system cancer cells in which the expression of MYBL2 has been downregulated–. The activity of MYBL2 is highly regulated at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Cyclins and their catalytic partners, the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), function as key regulators of the cell cycle. Cyclin D1 with Cdk4 or Cdk6 has been shown to play an important role at the ‘restriction point’ in the G1 phase of the cell cycle before cells enter into the mitotic cycle, whereas, for the transition from G1 to S phase, cyclin E–Cdk2 complexes are the most critical, and cyclin A–Cdk2 complexes are required during S phase. MYBL2 is regulated by the transcription factor E2F and required for the expression of cyclin B and cdc2 in G2/M–. When overexpressed, the tumour suppressor protein p53 induces Waf1/Cip1/p21 protein-dependent cell-cycle arrest and activation of MYBL2 allows cells to escape this block, suggesting that MYBL2 acts at a later stage than Waf1/Cip1/p21 during cell-cycle progression,. MYBL2 is a substrate for cyclin A/E–Cdk2 kinase activity and its transcriptional activity is regulated by phosphorylation,.

Genes involved in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle are activated by MYBL2 switching from the repressive DREAM to the MuvB (MMB) complex,,. MYBL2 is transcriptionally repressed in G1, activated by cyclin A/Cdk2-mediated phosphorylation during S-phase, and subsequently degraded in late G2 in a ubiquitin-dependent manner,,,. Phosphorylation of MYBL2 occurs at Serine or Threonine residues followed by Proline. Pin1 isomerase recognises the pSer/pThr-Pro residues altering functions of the MYBL2 protein by inducing conformation changes. Cdk-dependent phosphorylation and Pin1 isomerization induce Plk1 kinase binding to MYBL2. Plk1 phosphorylates the region of MYBL2 containing the transcriptional activation domain (TAD), suggesting that PLK1-induced modification of MYBL2 is crucially required for transcriptional activation of pro-mitotic genes. Consistent with an important role in cell cycle progression, down-regulation of MYBL2 leads to spindle and centrosome defects, arrest in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, failure in cytokinesis, polyploidy and apoptosis,.

MYBL2 alterations in cancer

The DREAM complex [DP, RB-like, E2F4 and MuvB (synMuv genes, class B)] is a master coordinator of cell cycle-dependent gene expression and the balance between repressive DREAM and activating MYB-MuvB (MMB) complexes is frequently perturbed in cancer–. Increased expression of several components of the MMB complex, including MYBL2 and FOXM1, correlates with aggressive tumour features and poor prognosis,. To investigate the clinical relevance of the MYBL2/FOXM1/CDK/PLK1 axis, Werwein et al. used a pan-cancer resource of expression signatures that correlate cancer gene expression and clinical prognosis data, called PRECOG. Interestingly, among the 50 genes (and their products) analysed, 44 (including MYBL2, FOXM1, CCNA2, and PLK1) were found to be targets of DREAM-mediated repression, while 29 of them were also targets of MMB activation. Overexpression of MYBL2 disturbs myeloid differentiation and promotes the progression of solid cancers where it is also an indicator of poor prognosis,,–. MYBL2 is frequently overexpressed in malignancies including breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), AML, colorectal cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and neuroblastoma–.

The molecular mechanisms causing increased expression of MYBL2 in multiple human cancers are still not fully elucidated.

MYBL2 and breast cancer

Alterations of gene expression might be caused by amplification of the MYBL2 locus located in chromosome 20q13–. 20q13 amplification or copy gains are common in breast cancer and are usually associated with poor prognosis. Notably, a MYBL2 germline polymorphism causing the Serine-to-Glycine amino acid change S427G is correlated to a high risk of basal-like breast cancer. Moreover, MYBL2 overexpression was noted in HER2+/ER− and luminal B breast cancer samples, but not in luminal A or normal breast tissue, strongly suggesting a correlation between MYBL2 expression and aggressiveness of breast cancer. A recent review explains the molecular mechanisms of MYBL2 amplification and new therapeutic opportunities in breast cancers.

MYBL2, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and NSCLC

ccRCC is the most frequent renal malignancy. MYBL2 expression could be used as a biomarker to predict patients’ prognosis in this cancer. MYBL2 was found upregulated in a cohort of 530 ccRCC patients compared to healthy tissues. Of note, upregulated MYBL2 was significantly associated with age and sex of cancer patients, advanced T stage, lymph node and distant metastases, clinical stage and histological grade. Moreover, a significant correlation between high MYBL2 expression and worse prognosis was established by Kaplan–Meier analysis, indicating that MYBL2 expression is an independent biomarker of progression in ccRCC.

Another neoplasia characterised by deregulation of MYBL2 is non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Analysis of MCODE clusters highlighted genes involved in “driver networks” for NSCLC, which include the transcription factors FOXM1, TFDP1, E2F4, SIN3, and MYBL2. A further study confirmed the potential oncogenic role of MYBL2 in NSCLC. Through chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, researchers identified a direct binding between MYBL2 and the gene Non-SMC CondensinIComplex Subunit H (NCAPH), well-known to have oncogenic properties in lung cancer. A significant correlation between high NCAPH expression and poor prognosis was confirmed, suggesting that targeting the MYBL2-regulated gene could be of potential therapeutic value in this setting.

MYBL2 and leukaemia

MYBL2 overexpression is a prognostic factor in AML, defining a subset of patients with poor prognosis,. This could be linked to the reduced expression of miR-30a, miR-30b and miR-30c, involved in the regulation of haematopoiesis and cell differentiation, which were shown to be expressed at lower levels in MYBL2high AML samples,,. The strong correlation between overexpression of MYBL2 and downregulation of the miR-30 cluster suggests that the micro-RNAs antagonise the expression of MYBL2, or that the latter suppresses miRNAs expression in AML.

A recent study published in Cell revealed a link between MYBL2 and the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in leukaemia. Morita and co-workers identified a class of small molecule that they called iHAPs—improved heterocyclic activators of PP2A—able to activate a PP2A complex, which suppresses tumour progression. PP2A is an enzyme formed by different subunits; among them, PPP2R1A, PPP2CA, and PPP2R5E are strictly required for antitumor activity. Using isotope-labelled amino acids (SILAC) and mass spectrometry analysis, substrates dephosphorylated by PP2A in the presence or absence of iHAPs were identified, among which MYBL2. The researchers were able to activate the PP2A complex, usually present in an inactive form in cancers due to the overexpression of inhibitory proteins, and observe dephosphorylation of MYBL2 on Ser241, required for transactivation of cell cycle-related genes, resulting in an irreversible growth arrest of multiple cancer cells. Thus, MYBL2 is centrally involved in cancer cell proliferation and can be indirectly targeted by small molecule-mediated reactivation of the PP2A tumour suppressor protein.

Conclusions

The MYB transcription factors are a point of convergence of numerous signalling pathways essential for multiple cellular functions, and their deregulation has been associated with aggressive behaviour of cancer cells. Reflecting the high similarity of protein structures, MYBL1, MYBL2, and MYB are all involved in the control of cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. One could hypothesise that spatio-temporal differences in gene expression during organogenesis and in pathological conditions may determine specific MYB requirements in cells. The ever-expanding number of studies reporting deregulation of MYB family members in the pathogenesis of human cancers is instigating researchers to find new and more efficient methods to target these transcription factors. Direct pharmacological inhibition of MYB or its product MYB, is emerging as a potential therapeutic strategy for both liquid and solid malignancies. Nevertheless, inhibiting MYB could potentially lead to haematopoietic toxicity, indicating that targeting downstream target genes and coactivator molecules might make more clinical sense. Further studies will be required to develop effective therapeutic interventions aiming at suppressing MYB signalling in tumours while minimising risks to patients.

References 218

  1. 1.

    Lipsick JS, Wang DM. Transformation by v-Myb. Oncogene. 1999;18:3047-3055.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1202745

  2. 2.

    Roussel M, et al. Three new types of viral oncogene of cellular origin specific for haematopoietic cell transformation. Nature. 1979;281:452-455.

    Not in our library10.1038/281452a0

  3. 3.

    Hall WJ, Bean CW, Pollard M. Transmission of fowl leukosis through chick embryos and young chicks. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1941;2:272-279.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Boyle WJ, Lipsick JS, Reddy EP, Baluda MA. Identification of the leukemogenic protein of avian myeloblastosis virus and of its normal cellular homologue. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1983;80:2834-2838.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.80.10.2834

  5. 5.

    Westin EH, et al. Differential expression of the amv gene in human hematopoietic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1982;79:2194-2198.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.79.7.2194

  6. 6.

    Nunn MF, Seeburg PH, Moscovici C, Duesberg PH. Tripartite structure of the avian erythroblastosis virus E26 transforming gene. Nature. 1983;306:391-395.

    Not in our library10.1038/306391a0

  7. 7.

    Davidson CJ, Tirouvanziam R, Herzenberg LA, Lipsick JS. Functional evolution of the vertebrate Myb gene family: B-Myb, but neither A-Myb nor c-Myb, complements Drosophila Myb in hemocytes. Genetics. 2005;169:215-229.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.104.034132

  8. 8.

    Lipsick JS. The C-MYB story-is it definitive? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:17067-17068.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1012402107

  9. 9.

    Lipsick JS, et al. Functional evolution of the Myb oncogene family. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2001;27:456-458.

    Not in our library10.1006/bcmd.2001.0404

  10. 10.

    Ohi R, et al. Myb-related Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc5p is structurally and functionally conserved in eukaryotes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;18:4097-4108.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.18.7.4097

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Nomura N, et al. Isolation of human cDNA clones of myb-related genes, A-myb and B-myb. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:11075-11089.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/16.23.11075

  13. 13.

    Gewirtz AM, Calabretta B. A c-myb antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibits normal human hematopoiesis in vitro. Science. 1988;242:1303-1306.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.2461588

  14. 14.

    O’Rourke JP, Ness SA. Alternative RNA splicing produces multiple forms of c-Myb with unique transcriptional activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008;28:2091-2101.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01870-07

  15. 15.

    Ramsay RG, Gonda TJ. MYB function in normal and cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008;8:523-534.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc2439

  16. 16.

    Ogata K, et al. Solution structure of a DNA-binding unit of Myb: a helix-turn-helix-related motif with conserved tryptophans forming a hydrophobic core. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:6428-6432.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.89.14.6428

  17. 17.

    Biedenkapp H, Borgmeyer U, Sippel AE, Klempnauer KH. Viral myb oncogene encodes a sequence-specific DNA-binding activity. Nature. 1988;335:835-837.

    Not in our library10.1038/335835a0

  18. 18.

    Ness SA, Marknell A, Graf T. The v-myb oncogene product binds to and activates the promyelocyte-specific mim-1 gene. Cell. 1989;59:1115-1125.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(89)90767-8

  19. 19.

    Quintana AM, Liu F, O’Rourke JP, Ness SA. Identification and regulation of c-Myb target genes in MCF-7 cells. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:30.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2407-11-30

  20. 20.

    Zhao L, et al. Integrated genome-wide chromatin occupancy and expression analyses identify key myeloid pro-differentiation transcription factors repressed by Myb. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:4664-4679.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkr024

  21. 21.

    Dai P, et al. CBP as a transcriptional coactivator of c-Myb. Genes Dev. 1996;10:528-540.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.10.5.528

  22. 22.

    Oelgeschlager M, Janknecht R, Krieg J, Schreek S, Luscher B. Interaction of the co-activator CBP with Myb proteins: effects on Myb-specific transactivation and on the cooperativity with NF-M. EMBO J. 1996;15:2771-2780.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00637.x

  23. 23.

    Oelgeschlager M, Kowenz-Leutz E, Schreek S, Leutz A, Luscher B. Tumorigenic N-terminal deletions of c-Myb modulate DNA binding, transactivation, and cooperativity with C/EBP. Oncogene. 2001;20:7420-7424.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1204922

  24. 24.

    Mink S, Kerber U, Klempnauer KH. Interaction of C/EBPbeta and v-Myb is required for synergistic activation of the mim-1 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996;16:1316-1325.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.16.4.1316

  25. 25.

    Shapiro LH. Myb and Ets proteins cooperate to transactivate an early myeloid gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:8763-8771.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.270.15.8763

  26. 26.

    Bartunek P, Kralova J, Blendinger G, Dvorak M, Zenke M. GATA-1 and c-myb crosstalk during red blood cell differentiation through GATA-1 binding sites in the c-myb promoter. Oncogene. 2003;22:1927-1935.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1206281

  27. 27.

    Mansour MR, et al. Oncogene regulation. An oncogenic super-enhancer formed through somatic mutation of a noncoding intergenic element. Science. 2014;346:1373-1377.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1259037

  28. 28.

    Mucenski ML, et al. A functional c-myb gene is required for normal murine fetal hepatic hematopoiesis. Cell. 1991;65:677-689.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(91)90099-k

  29. 29.

    Stadhouders R, et al. HBS1L-MYB intergenic variants modulate fetal hemoglobin via long-range MYB enhancers. J. Clin. Investig. 2014;124:1699-1710.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci71520

  30. 30.

    Jiang J, et al. cMYB is involved in the regulation of fetal hemoglobin production in adults. Blood. 2006;108:1077-1083.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2006-01-008912

  31. 31.

    Gautam S, et al. The transcription factor c-Myb regulates CD8(+) T cell stemness and antitumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:337-349.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41590-018-0311-z

  32. 32.

    Thomas MD, Kremer CS, Ravichandran KS, Rajewsky K, Bender TP. c-Myb is critical for B cell development and maintenance of follicular B cells. Immunity. 2005;23:275-286.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2005.08.005

  33. 33.

    Kastan MB, Slamon DJ, Civin CI. Expression of protooncogene c-myb in normal human hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1989;73:1444-1451.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood.v73.6.1444.1444

  34. 34.

    Ess KC, Witte DP, Bascomb CP, Aronow BJ. Diverse developing mouse lineages exhibit high-level c-Myb expression in immature cells and loss of expression upon differentiation. Oncogene. 1999;18:1103-1111.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1202387

  35. 35.

    Malaterre J, et al. c-Myb is required for neural progenitor cell proliferation and maintenance of the neural stem cell niche in adult brain. Stem Cells. 2008;26:173-181.

    Not in our library10.1634/stemcells.2007-0293

  36. 36.

    Malaterre J, et al. c-Myb is required for progenitor cell homeostasis in colonic crypts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:3829-3834.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0610055104

  37. 37.

    Drabsch Y, et al. Mechanism of and requirement for estrogen-regulated MYB expression in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:13762-13767.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0700104104

  38. 38.

    Nakata Y, et al. c-Myb contributes to G2/M cell cycle transition in human hematopoietic cells by direct regulation of cyclin B1 expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007;27:2048-2058.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01100-06

  39. 39.

    Pilkinton M, Sandoval R, Song J, Ness SA, Colamonici OR. Mip/LIN-9 regulates the expression of B-Myb and the induction of cyclin A, cyclin B, and CDK1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:168-175.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m609924200

  40. 40.

    Lei W, Liu F, Ness SA. Positive and negative regulation of c-Myb by cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinases, and p27 Kip1. Blood. 2005;105:3855-3861.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2004-08-3342

  41. 41.

    Nicolaides NC, Gualdi R, Casadevall C, Manzella L, Calabretta B. Positive autoregulation of c-myb expression via Myb binding sites in the 5’ flanking region of the human c-myb gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991;11:6166-6176.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.11.12.6166

  42. 42.

    Ku DH, et al. c-myb transactivates cdc2 expression via Myb binding sites in the 5’-flanking region of the human cdc2 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:2255-2259.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53990-9

  43. 43.

    Andersson MK, et al. ATR is a MYB regulated gene and potential therapeutic target in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oncogenesis. 2020;9:5.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41389-020-0194-3

  44. 44.

    Clappier E, et al. The C-MYB locus is involved in chromosomal translocation and genomic duplications in human T-cell acute leukemia (T-ALL), the translocation defining a new T-ALL subtype in very young children. Blood. 2007;110:1251-1261.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2006-12-064683

  45. 45.

    Okada M, et al. c-myb gene analysis in T-cell malignancies with del(6q). Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1990;48:229-236.

    Not in our library10.1016/0165-4608(90)90125-t

  46. 46.

    Torelli G, et al. Expression of c-myb protooncogene and other cell cycle-related genes in normal and neoplastic human colonic mucosa. Cancer Res. 1987;47:5266-5269.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Thompson MA, Flegg R, Westin EH, Ramsay RG. Microsatellite deletions in the c-myb transcriptional attenuator region associated with over-expression in colon tumour cell lines. Oncogene. 1997;14:1715-1723.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1201007

  48. 48.

    Li Y, et al. c-Myb enhances breast cancer invasion and metastasis through the Wnt/beta-Catenin/Axin2 pathway. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3364-3375.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2302

  49. 49.

    Lahortiga I, et al. Duplication of the MYB oncogene in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2007;39:593-595.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng2025

  50. 50.

    Quelen C, et al. Identification of a transforming MYB-GATA1 fusion gene in acute basophilic leukemia: a new entity in male infants. Blood. 2011;117:5719-5722.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2011-01-333013

  51. 51.

    Belloni E, et al. In vivo expression of an aberrant MYB-GATA1 fusion induces leukemia in the presence of GATA1 reduced levels. Leukemia. 2011;25:733-736.

    Not in our library10.1038/leu.2010.317

  52. 52.

    Ducassou S, et al. MYB-GATA1 fusion promotes basophilic leukaemia: involvement of interleukin-33 and nerve growth factor receptors. J. Pathol. 2017;242:347-357.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.4908

  53. 53.

    Mager LF, et al. IL-33 signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:2579-2591.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci77347

  54. 54.

    Bailly RA, et al. DNA-binding and transcriptional activation properties of the EWS-FLI-1 fusion protein resulting from the t(11;22) translocation in Ewing sarcoma. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994;14:3230-3241.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.14.5.3230

  55. 55.

    Eliazer S, Spencer J, Ye D, Olson E, Ilaria RL. Alteration of mesodermal cell differentiation by EWS/FLI-1, the oncogene implicated in Ewing’s sarcoma. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;23:482-492.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.23.2.482-492.2003

  56. 56.

    Schoch C, et al. Twenty-three cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with translocation t(4;11)(q21;q23): the implication of additional chromosomal aberrations. Ann. Hematol. 1995;70:195-201.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01700375

  57. 57.

    Schwartz JC, Cech TR, Parker RR. Biochemical properties and biological functions of FET proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015;84:355-379.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034325

  58. 58.

    Pierini T, et al. MYB deregulation from a EWSR1-MYB fusion at leukemic evolution of a JAK2 (V617F) positive primary myelofibrosis. Mol. Cytogenet. 2016;9:68.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13039-016-0277-1

  59. 59.

    Yamamoto JF, Goodman MT. Patterns of leukemia incidence in the United States by subtype and demographic characteristics, 1997–2002. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:379-390.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10552-007-9097-2

  60. 60.

    Rowe JM. Will new agents impact survival in AML? Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2019;32:101094.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.beha.2019.101094

  61. 61.

    Taga T, Tomizawa D, Takahashi H, Adachi S. Acute myeloid leukemia in children: current status and future directions. Pediatr. Int. 2016;58:71-80.

    Not in our library10.1111/ped.12865

  62. 62.

    Estey EH. Acute myeloid leukemia: 2019 update on risk-stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2018;93:1267-1291.

    Not in our library10.1002/ajh.25214

  63. 63.

    Huret JL, Dessen P, Bernheim A. An atlas of chromosomes in hematological malignancies. Example: 11q23 and MLL partners. Leukemia. 2001;15:987-989.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.leu.2402135

  64. 64.

    Meyer C, et al. The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias. Leukemia. 2006;20:777-784.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.leu.2404150

  65. 65.

    Hess JL, et al. c-Myb is an essential downstream target for homeobox-mediated transformation of hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2006;108:297-304.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2005-12-5014

  66. 66.

    Pattabiraman DR, et al. Interaction of c-Myb with p300 is required for the induction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by human AML oncogenes. Blood. 2014;123:2682-2690.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2012-02-413187

  67. 67.

    Uttarkar S, et al. Targeting acute myeloid leukemia with a small molecule inhibitor of the Myb/p300 interaction. Blood. 2016;127:1173-1182.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2015-09-668632

  68. 68.

    Uttarkar S, et al. Naphthol AS-E phosphate inhibits the activity of the transcription factor Myb by blocking the interaction with the KIX domain of the coactivator p300. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015;14:1276-p1285.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-14-0662

  69. 69.

    Walf-Vorderwulbecke V, et al. Targeting acute myeloid leukemia by drug-induced c-MYB degradation. Leukemia. 2018;32:882-889.

    Not in our library10.1038/leu.2017.317

  70. 70.

    Uttarkar S, et al. Small-molecule disruption of the Myb/p300 cooperation targets acute myeloid leukemia cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016;15:2905-2915.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0185

  71. 71.

    Ramaswamy K, et al. Peptidomimetic blockade of MYB in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:110.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-017-02618-6

  72. 72.

    Pfister S, et al. BRAF gene duplication constitutes a mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in low-grade astrocytomas. J. Clin. Investig. 2008;118:1739-1749.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci33656

  73. 73.

    Bandopadhayay P, et al. MYB-QKI rearrangements in angiocentric glioma drive tumorigenicity through a tripartite mechanism. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:273-282.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3500

  74. 74.

    Yang G, et al. RNA-binding protein quaking, a critical regulator of colon epithelial differentiation and a suppressor of colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:231-240 e231-235.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.001

  75. 75.

    Mulholland PJ, et al. Genomic profiling identifies discrete deletions associated with translocations in glioblastoma multiforme. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:783-791.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.5.7.2631

  76. 76.

    Ichimura K, et al. Small regions of overlapping deletions on 6q26 in human astrocytic tumours identified using chromosome 6 tile path array-CGH. Oncogene. 2006;25:1261-1271.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1209156

  77. 77.

    Gonda TJ, Buckmaster C, Ramsay RG. Activation of c-myb by carboxy-terminal truncation: relationship to transformation of murine haemopoietic cells in vitro. EMBO J. 1989;8:1777-1783.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03571.x

  78. 78.

    Williams BB, et al. Induction of T cell-mediated immunity using a c-Myb DNA vaccine in a mouse model of colon cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008;57:1635-1645.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00262-008-0497-2

  79. 79.

    Ramsay RG, et al. Myb expression is higher in malignant human colonic carcinoma and premalignant adenomatous polyps than in normal mucosa. Cell Growth Differ. 1992;3:723-730.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    Hugo H, et al. Mutations in the MYB intron I regulatory sequence increase transcription in colon cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006;45:1143-1154.

    Not in our library10.1002/gcc.20378

  81. 81.

    Pham T, et al. First-in-human phase I clinical trial of a combined immune modulatory approach using TetMYB vaccine and Anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with advanced solid cancer including colorectal or adenoid cystic carcinoma: The MYPHISMO study protocol (NCT03287427). Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2019;16:100409.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100409

  82. 82.

    Srivastava SK, et al. MYB is a novel regulator of pancreatic tumour growth and metastasis. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;113:1694-1703.

    Not in our library10.1038/bjc.2015.400

  83. 83.

    Vuong D, Simpson PT, Green B, Cummings MC, Lakhani SR. Molecular classification of breast cancer. Virchows Arch. 2014;465:1-14.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00428-014-1593-7

  84. 84.

    Goldhirsch A, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann. Oncol. 2013;24:2206-2223.

    Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mdt303

  85. 85.

    Yang RM, et al. MYB regulates the DNA damage response and components of the homology-directed repair pathway in human estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2019;38:5239-5249.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41388-019-0789-3

  86. 86.

    Miao RY, et al. MYB is essential for mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:7029-7037.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1015

  87. 87.

    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G., et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:771-784.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60993-8

  88. 88.

    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687-1717.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0

  89. 89.

    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;386:1341-1352.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(15)61074-1

  90. 90.

    Mitra P, Yang RM, Sutton J, Ramsay RG, Gonda TJ. CDK9 inhibitors selectively target estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells through combined inhibition of MYB and MCL-1 expression. Oncotarget. 2016;7:9069-9083.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.6997

  91. 91.

    Ward A, et al. Re-expression of microRNA-375 reverses both tamoxifen resistance and accompanying EMT-like properties in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32:1173-1182.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2012.128

  92. 92.

    Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:14910-14914.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.c800074200

  93. 93.

    Park SM, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, Peter ME. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008;22:894-907.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1640608

  94. 94.

    Gao Y, Zhang W, Liu C, Li G. miR-200 affects tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells through regulation of MYB. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:18844.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-54289-6

  95. 95.

    Persson M, et al. Recurrent fusion of MYB and NFIB transcription factor genes in carcinomas of the breast and head and neck. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:18740-18744.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0909114106

  96. 96.

    Brill LB, et al. Analysis of MYB expression and MYB-NFIB gene fusions in adenoid cystic carcinoma and other salivary neoplasms. Mod. Pathol. 2011;24:1169-1176.

    Not in our library10.1038/modpathol.2011.86

  97. 97.

    Togashi Y, et al. MYB and MYBL1 in adenoid cystic carcinoma: diversity in the mode of genomic rearrangement and transcripts. Mod. Pathol. 2018;31:934-946.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41379-018-0008-8

  98. 98.

    Magers MJ, et al. MYB-NFIB gene fusion in prostatic basal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic correlates and comparison with basal cell adenoma and florid basal cell hyperplasia. Mod. Pathol. 2019;32:1666-1674.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41379-019-0297-6

  99. 99.

    Drier Y, et al. An oncogenic MYB feedback loop drives alternate cell fates in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:265-272.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3502

  100. 100.

    Fehr A, et al. The MYB-NFIB gene fusion-a novel genetic link between adenoid cystic carcinoma and dermal cylindroma. J. Pathol. 2011;224:322-327.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.2909

  101. 101.

    Pei J, et al. Detecting MYB and MYBL1 fusion genes in tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma by targeted RNA-sequencing. Mod. Pathol. 2019;32:1416-1420.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41379-019-0277-x

  102. 102.

    Kim J, et al. MYBL1 rearrangements and MYB amplification in breast adenoid cystic carcinomas lacking the MYB-NFIB fusion gene. J. Pathol. 2018;244:143-150.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.5006

  103. 103.

    Mitani Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the MYB-NFIB gene fusion in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma: Incidence, variability, and clinicopathologic significance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;16:4722-4731.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-0463

  104. 104.

    Ho AS, et al. The mutational landscape of adenoid cystic carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:791-798.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2643

  105. 105.

    Rutherford S, Yu Y, Rumpel CA, Frierson HF, Moskaluk CA. Chromosome 6 deletion and candidate tumor suppressor genes in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2006;236:309-317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2005.05.049

  106. 106.

    Andersson M. K., Afshari M. K., Andren Y., Wick M. J., & Stenman G. Targeting the oncogenic transcriptional regulator MYB in adenoid cystic carcinoma by inhibition of IGF1R/AKT signaling. J. Natl Cancer Inst.109, (2017).

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/djx017

  107. 107.

    Morelli MP, et al. Prioritizing phase I treatment options through preclinical testing on personalized tumorgraft. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:e45-e48.

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.2011.36.9678

  108. 108.

    Mahadevan D, et al. Phase 1b study of safety, tolerability and efficacy of R1507, a monoclonal antibody to IGF-1R in combination with multiple standard oncology regimens in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 2014;73:467-473.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00280-013-2372-x

  109. 109.

    Calvo E, et al. A Phase I clinical trial and independent patient-derived xenograft study of combined targeted treatment with dacomitinib and figitumumab in advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:1177-1185.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2301

  110. 110.

    Yusenko MV, et al. Monensin, a novel potent MYB inhibitor, suppresses proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia and adenoid cystic carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2020;479:61-70.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2020.01.039

  111. 111.

    Mandelbaum J, et al. Zebrafish blastomere screen identifies retinoic acid suppression of <ovid:i>MYB</ovid:i> in adenoid cystic carcinoma. J. Exp. Med. 2018;215:2673-2685.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20180939

  112. 112.

    Andersson KM, Afshari MK, Andrén Y, Wick MJ, Stenman G. Targeting the oncogenic transcriptional regulator MYB in adenoid cystic carcinoma by inhibition of IGF1R/AKT signaling. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:djx017.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/djx017

  113. 113.

    Reiss K, et al. The protooncogene c-myb increases the expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor messenger RNAs by a transcriptional mechanism. Cancer Res. 1991;51:5997-6000.

    Not in our library

  114. 114.

    Qaddoumi I, et al. Genetic alterations in uncommon low-grade neuroepithelial tumors: BRAF, FGFR1, and MYB mutations occur at high frequency and align with morphology. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:833-845.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00401-016-1539-z

  115. 115.

    Locati LD, et al. A phase II study of sorafenib in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland carcinomas: translational analyses and clinical impact. Eur. J. Cancer. 2016;69:158-165.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.022

  116. 116.

    Tchekmedyian V, et al. Phase II study of lenvatinib in patients with progressive, recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:1529-1537.

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.18.01859

  117. 117.

    Okamoto K, et al. Antitumor activities of the targeted multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib (E7080) against RET gene fusion-driven tumor models. Cancer Lett. 2013;340:97-103.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2013.07.007

  118. 118.

    Lutwyche JK, Keough RA, Hunter J, Coles LS, Gonda TJ. DNA binding-independent transcriptional activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene (VEGF) by the Myb oncoprotein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006;344:1300-1307.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.045

  119. 119.

    Ferrao P, Gonda TJ, Ashman LK. Expression of constitutively activated human c-Kit in Myb transformed early myeloid cells leads to factor independence, histiocytic differentiation, and tumorigenicity. Blood. 1997;90:4539-4552.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood.v90.11.4539

  120. 120.

    Toscani A, et al. Arrest of spermatogenesis and defective breast development in mice lacking A-myb. Nature. 1997;386:713-717.

    Not in our library10.1038/386713a0

  121. 121.

    Mettus RV, et al. Murine A-myb: evidence for differential splicing and tissue-specific expression. Oncogene. 1994;9:3077-3086.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    Bolcun-Filas E, et al. A-MYB (MYBL1) transcription factor is a master regulator of male meiosis. Development. 2011;138:3319-3330.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.067645

  123. 123.

    Armstrong GT, et al. Survival and long-term health and cognitive outcomes after low-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13:223-234.

    Not in our library10.1093/neuonc/noq178

  124. 124.

    Zhang J, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies genetic alterations in pediatric low-grade gliomas. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:602-612.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2735

  125. 125.

    Ramkissoon LA, et al. Genomic analysis of diffuse pediatric low-grade gliomas identifies recurrent oncogenic truncating rearrangements in the transcription factor MYBL1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:8188-8193.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1300252110

  126. 126.

    Ellison DW, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 4: diffuse gliomas characterized by MYB, MYBL1, or FGFR1 alterations or BRAF(V600E) mutation. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;137:683-687.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00401-019-01987-0

  127. 127.

    Wefers AK, et al. Isomorphic diffuse glioma is a morphologically and molecularly distinct tumour entity with recurrent gene fusions of MYBL1 or MYB and a benign disease course. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;139:193-209.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00401-019-02078-w

  128. 128.

    Brayer KJ, Frerich CA, Kang H, Ness SA. Recurrent fusions in MYB and MYBL1 define a common, transcription factor-driven oncogenic pathway in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:176-187.

    Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0859

  129. 129.

    Kyrpychova L, et al. Small subset of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the skin is associated with alterations of the MYBL1 gene similar to their extracutaneous counterparts. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2018;40:721-726.

    Not in our library10.1097/dad.0000000000001091

  130. 130.

    Iness AN, et al. The cell cycle regulatory DREAM complex is disrupted by high expression of oncogenic B-Myb. Oncogene. 2019;38:1080-1092.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41388-018-0490-y

  131. 131.

    Sala A, Calabretta B. Regulation of BALB/c 3T3 fibroblast proliferation by B-myb is accompanied by selective activation of cdc2 and cyclin D1 expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:10415-10419.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.89.21.10415

  132. 132.

    Santilli G, et al. Temperature-dependent modification and activation of B-MYB: implications for cell survival. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:15628-15634.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m411747200

  133. 133.

    Thorner AR, et al. In vitro and in vivo analysis of B-Myb in basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene. 2009;28:742-751.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2008.430

  134. 134.

    Cervellera M, et al. Direct transactivation of the anti-apoptotic gene apolipoprotein J (clusterin) by B-MYB. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:21055-21060.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m002055200

  135. 135.

    Lang G, Gombert WM, Gould HJ. A transcriptional regulatory element in the coding sequence of the human Bcl-2 gene. Immunology. 2005;114:25-36.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.02073.x

  136. 136.

    Knight AS, Notaridou M, Watson RJ. A Lin-9 complex is recruited by B-Myb to activate transcription of G2/M genes in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2009;28:1737-1747.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2009.22

  137. 137.

    Grassilli E, Salomoni P, Perrotti D, Franceschi C, Calabretta B. Resistance to apoptosis in CTLL-2 cells overexpressing B-Myb is associated with B-Myb-dependent bcl-2 induction. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2451-2456.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    Lorvellec M, et al. B-Myb is critical for proper DNA duplication during an unperturbed S phase in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1751-1759.

    Not in our library10.1002/stem.496

  139. 139.

    Garcia P, Frampton J. The transcription factor B-Myb is essential for S-phase progression and genomic stability in diploid and polyploid megakaryocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2006;119:1483-1493.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.02870

  140. 140.

    Tanaka Y, Patestos NP, Maekawa T, Ishii S. B-myb is required for inner cell mass formation at an early stage of development. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:28067-28070.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.274.40.28067

  141. 141.

    Gualdrini F, et al. Addiction of MYCN amplified tumours to B-MYB underscores a reciprocal regulatory loop. Oncotarget. 2010;1:278-288.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.138

  142. 142.

    Qin H, et al. Prognostic implications and oncogenic roles of MYBL2 protein expression in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:1917-1927.

    Not in our library10.2147/ott.s190145

  143. 143.

    Calvisi DF, et al. Activation of v-Myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog-like2 (MYBL2)-LIN9 complex contributes to human hepatocarcinogenesis and identifies a subset of hepatocellular carcinoma with mutant p53. Hepatology. 2011;53:1226-1236.

    Not in our library10.1002/hep.24174

  144. 144.

    Wei T, et al. YAP-dependent induction of UHMK1 supports nuclear enrichment of the oncogene MYBL2 and proliferation in liver cancer cells. Oncogene. 2019;38:5541-5550.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41388-019-0801-y

  145. 145.

    Lee YJ, et al. Ginkgetin induces G2-phase arrest in HCT116 colon cancer cells through the modulation of bMyb and miRNA34a expression. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;51:1331-1342.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2017.4116

  146. 146.

    MacLachlan TK, Sang N, Giordano A. Cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases and cdk inhibitors: implications in cell cycle control and cancer. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 1995;5:127-156.

    Not in our library10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v5.i2.20

  147. 147.

    Lam EW, Watson RJ. An E2F-binding site mediates cell-cycle regulated repression of mouse B-myb transcription. EMBO J. 1993;12:2705-2713.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05932.x

  148. 148.
  149. 149.

    Zhu W, Giangrande PH, Nevins JR. E2Fs link the control of G1/S and G2/M transcription. EMBO J. 2004;23:4615-4626.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7600459

  150. 150.

    Ziebold U, Bartsch O, Marais R, Ferrari S, Klempnauer KH. Phosphorylation and activation of B-Myb by cyclin A-Cdk2. Curr. Biol. 1997;7:253-260.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00121-7

  151. 151.

    Lin D, et al. Constitutive expression of B-myb can bypass p53-induced Waf1/Cip1-mediated G1 arrest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:10079-10083.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.91.21.10079

  152. 152.

    Litovchick L, et al. Evolutionarily conserved multisubunit RBL2/p130 and E2F4 protein complex represses human cell cycle-dependent genes in quiescence. Mol. Cell. 2007;26:539-551.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.015

  153. 153.

    Schmit F, et al. LINC, a human complex that is related to pRB-containing complexes in invertebrates regulates the expression of G2/M genes. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:1903-1913.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.6.15.4512

  154. 154.

    Zwicker J, Liu N, Engeland K, Lucibello FC, Muller R. Cell cycle regulation of E2F site occupation in vivo. Science. 1996;271:1595-1597.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.271.5255.1595

  155. 155.

    Robinson C, et al. Cell-cycle regulation of B-Myb protein expression: specific phosphorylation during the S phase of the cell cycle. Oncogene. 1996;12:1855-1864.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    Bartsch O, Horstmann S, Toprak K, Klempnauer KH, Ferrari S. Identification of cyclin A/Cdk2 phosphorylation sites in B-Myb. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999;260:384-391.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00191.x

  157. 157.

    Werwein E, Cibis H, Hess D, Klempnauer KH. Activation of the oncogenic transcription factor B-Myb via multisite phosphorylation and prolyl cis/trans isomerization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:103-121.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gky935

  158. 158.

    Tarasov KV, et al. B-MYB is essential for normal cell cycle progression and chromosomal stability of embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2478.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0002478

  159. 159.

    Sadasivam S, Duan S, DeCaprio JA. The MuvB complex sequentially recruits B-Myb and FoxM1 to promote mitotic gene expression. Genes Dev. 2012;26:474-489.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.181933.111

  160. 160.

    Wolter P, Hanselmann S, Pattschull G, Schruf E, Gaubatz S. Central spindle proteins and mitotic kinesins are direct transcriptional targets of MuvB, B-MYB and FOXM1 in breast cancer cell lines and are potential targets for therapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8:11160-11172.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.14466

  161. 161.

    Fischer M, Müller GA. Cell cycle transcription control: DREAM/MuvB and RB-E2F complexes. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017;52:638-662.

    Not in our library10.1080/10409238.2017.1360836

  162. 162.

    Iness AN, Litovchick L. MuvB: a key to cell cycle control in ovarian cancer. Front. Oncol. 2018;8:223.

    Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2018.00223

  163. 163.
  164. 164.

    Engelhard A, Campbell K, Calabretta B. B-myb alters the response of myeloid precursor cells to G-CSF. Exp. Cell Res. 2000;254:153-162.

    Not in our library10.1006/excr.1999.4742

  165. 165.

    Guan Z, Cheng W, Huang D, Wei A. High MYBL2 expression and transcription regulatory activity is associated with poor overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr. Res. Transl. Med. 2018;66:27-32.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.retram.2017.11.002

  166. 166.

    Pattschull G, et al. The Myb-MuvB complex is required for YAP-dependent transcription of mitotic genes. Cell Rep. 2019;27:3533-3546 e3537.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.071

  167. 167.

    Chen J, Chen X. MYBL2 is targeted by miR-143-3p and regulates breast cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. Oncol. Res. 2018;26:913-922.

    Not in our library10.3727/096504017x15135941182107

  168. 168.

    Jin Y, et al. B-Myb is up-regulated and promotes cell growth and motility in non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:860.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms18060860

  169. 169.

    Xiong YC, Wang J, Cheng Y, Zhang XY, Ye XQ. Overexpression of MYBL2 promotes proliferation and migration of non-small-cell lung cancer via upregulating NCAPH. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2020;468:185-193.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11010-020-03721-x

  170. 170.

    Fuster O, et al. Adverse prognostic value of MYBL2 overexpression and association with microRNA-30 family in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leuk. Res. 2013;37:1690-1696.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.leukres.2013.09.015

  171. 171.

    Heinrichs S, et al. MYBL2 is a sub-haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene in myeloid malignancy. Elife. 2013;2:e00825.

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.00825

  172. 172.

    Ren F, et al. MYBL2 is an independent prognostic marker that has tumor-promoting functions in colorectal cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015;5:1542-1552.

    Not in our library

  173. 173.

    Yu R, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications of MYBL2 protein expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2017;213:964-968.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prp.2017.04.024

  174. 174.

    Raschella G, et al. Expression of B-myb in neuroblastoma tumors is a poor prognostic factor independent from MYCN amplification. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3365-3368.

    Not in our library

  175. 175.

    Raschella G, et al. Requirement of b-myb function for survival and differentiative potential of human neuroblastoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:8540-8545.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.270.15.8540

  176. 176.

    Shi H, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the 20q13 amplicon genes in relation to breast cancer risk and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011;130:905-916.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10549-011-1600-5

  177. 177.

    Tanner MM, et al. Frequent amplification of chromosomal region 20q12-q13 in ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:1833-1839.

    Not in our library

  178. 178.

    Forozan F, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 38 breast cancer cell lines: a basis for interpreting complementary DNA microarray data. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4519-4525.

    Not in our library

  179. 179.

    Bayley R, Ward C, Garcia P. MYBL2 amplification in breast cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2020;1874:188407.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188407

  180. 180.

    Ljungberg B, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur. Urol. 2019;75:799-810.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011

  181. 181.

    Sun SS, Fu Y, Lin JY. Upregulation of MYBL2 independently predicts a poorer prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2020;19:2765-2772.

    Not in our library10.3892/ol.2020.11408

  182. 182.

    Ahmed F. Integrated network analysis reveals FOXM1 and MYBL2 as key regulators of cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:1011.

    Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2019.01011

  183. 183.

    Clarke M, et al. MYBL2 haploinsufficiency increases susceptibility to age-related haematopoietic neoplasia. Leukemia. 2013;27:661-670.

    Not in our library10.1038/leu.2012.241

  184. 184.

    Chen CZ, Li L, Lodish HF, Bartel DP. MicroRNAs modulate hematopoietic lineage differentiation. Science. 2004;303:83-86.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1091903

  185. 185.

    Cammarata G, et al. Differential expression of specific microRNA and their targets in acute myeloid leukemia. Am. J. Hematol. 2010;85:331-339.

    Not in our library10.1002/ajh.21667

  186. 186.

    Morita K, et al. Allosteric activators of protein phosphatase 2A display broad antitumor activity mediated by dephosphorylation of MYBL2. Cell. 2020;181:702-715.e720.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.051

  187. 187.

    Leverson JD, Ness SA. Point mutations in v-Myb disrupt a cyclophilin-catalyzed negative regulatory mechanism. Mol. Cell. 1998;1:203-211.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80021-0

  188. 188.

    Introna M, et al. Mutations in v-myb alter the differentiation of myelomonocytic cells transformed by the oncogene. Cell. 1990;63:1289-1297.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(90)90424-d

  189. 189.

    Takahashi T, et al. Inhibitory interaction of c-Myb and GATA-1 via transcriptional co-activator CBP. Oncogene. 2000;19:134-140.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1203228

  190. 190.

    Rushton JJ, Ness SA. The conserved DNA binding domain mediates similar regulatory interactions for A-Myb, B-Myb, and c-Myb transcription factors. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2001;27:459-463.

    Not in our library10.1006/bcmd.2001.0405

  191. 191.

    Bergholtz S, et al. The highly conserved DNA-binding domains of A-, B- and c-Myb differ with respect to DNA-binding, phosphorylation and redox properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:3546-3556.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/29.17.3546

  192. 192.

    Luscher B, Christenson E, Litchfield DW, Krebs EG, Eisenman RN. Myb DNA binding inhibited by phosphorylation at a site deleted during oncogenic activation. Nature. 1990;344:517-522.

    Not in our library10.1038/344517a0

  193. 193.

    Cervellera MN, Sala A. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a B-MYB coactivator. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:10692-10696.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.275.14.10692

  194. 194.

    Bies J, Markus J, Wolff L. Covalent attachment of the SUMO-1 protein to the negative regulatory domain of the c-Myb transcription factor modifies its stability and transactivation capacity. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:8999-9009.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110453200

  195. 195.

    Sano Y, Ishii S. Increased affinity of c-Myb for CREB-binding protein (CBP) after CBP-induced acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:3674-3682.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m006896200

  196. 196.

    Aziz N, et al. Modulation of c-Myb-induced transcription activation by a phosphorylation site near the negative regulatory domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:6429-6433.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.14.6429

  197. 197.

    Tomita A, et al. c-Myb acetylation at the carboxyl-terminal conserved domain by transcriptional co-activator p300. Oncogene. 2000;19:444-p451.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1203329

  198. 198.

    Frampton J, Ramqvist T, Graf T. v-Myb of E26 leukemia virus up-regulates bcl-2 and suppresses apoptosis in myeloid cells. Genes Dev. 1996;10:2720-2731.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.10.21.2720

  199. 199.
  200. 200.

    Zhou F, Zhang L, van Laar T, van Dam H, Ten Dijke P. GSK3beta inactivation induces apoptosis of leukemia cells by repressing the function of c-Myb. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2011;22:3533-3540.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e11-06-0483

  201. 201.

    Down CF, Millour J, Lam EW, Watson RJ. Binding of FoxM1 to G2/M gene promoters is dependent upon B-Myb. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1819:855-862.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.03.008

  202. 202.

    Osterloh L, et al. The human synMuv-like protein LIN-9 is required for transcription of G2/M genes and for entry into mitosis. EMBO J. 2007;26:144-157.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7601478

  203. 203.

    Okada M, Akimaru H, Hou DX, Takahashi T, Ishii S. Myb controls G(2)/M progression by inducing cyclin B expression in the Drosophila eye imaginal disc. EMBO J. 2002;21:675-684.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/21.4.675

  204. 204.

    Bartusel T, Schubert S, Klempnauer KH. Regulation of the cyclin D1 and cyclin A1 promoters by B-Myb is mediated by Sp1 binding sites. Gene. 2005;351:171-180.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2005.03.035

  205. 205.

    Srivastava SK, et al. Myb overexpression overrides androgen depletion-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in prostate cancer cells, and confers aggressive malignant traits: potential role in castration resistance. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1149-1157.

    Not in our library10.1093/carcin/bgs134

  206. 206.

    Cheasley D, et al. Defective Myb function ablates cyclin E1 expression and perturbs intestinal carcinogenesis. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015;13:1185-1196.

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-15-0014

  207. 207.

    Siu G, Wurster AL, Lipsick JS, Hedrick SM. Expression of the CD4 gene requires a Myb transcription factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1992;12:1592-1604.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.12.4.1592

  208. 208.

    Melotti P, Ku DH, Calabretta B. Regulation of the expression of the hematopoietic stem cell antigen CD34: role of c-myb. J. Exp. Med. 1994;179:1023-1028.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.179.3.1023

  209. 209.

    Ma XP, Calabretta B. DNA binding and transactivation activity of A-myb, a c-myb-related gene. Cancer Res. 1994;54:6512-6516.

    Not in our library

  210. 210.

    Papetti M, Augenlicht LH. MYBL2, a link between proliferation and differentiation in maturing colon epithelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011;226:785-791.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.22399

  211. 211.

    De Dominici M, et al. Targeting CDK6 and BCL2 Exploits the “MYB Addiction” of Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2018;78:1097-1109.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-2644

  212. 212.

    Frau M, et al. Mybl2 expression is under genetic control and contributes to determine a hepatocellular carcinoma susceptible phenotype. J. Hepatol. 2011;55:111-119.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.031

  213. 213.

    Liu F, Lei W, O’Rourke JP, Ness SA. Oncogenic mutations cause dramatic, qualitative changes in the transcriptional activity of c-Myb. Oncogene. 2006;25:795-805.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1209105

  214. 214.

    Hogg A, et al. Inactivation of a c-Myb/estrogen receptor fusion protein in transformed primary cells leads to granulocyte/macrophage differentiation and down regulation of c-kit but not c-myc or cdc2. Oncogene. 1997;15:2885-2898.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1201472

  215. 215.

    Ratajczak MZ, et al. Myb and ets proteins are candidate regulators of c-kit expression in human hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1998;91:1934-1946.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood.v91.6.1934

  216. 216.

    Dudek H, Tantravahi RV, Rao VN, Reddy ES, Reddy EP. Myb and Ets proteins cooperate in transcriptional activation of the mim-1 promoter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:1291-1295.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.89.4.1291

  217. 217.

    Wilczek C, Chayka O, Plachetka A, Klempnauer KH. Myb-induced chromatin remodeling at a dual enhancer/promoter element involves non-coding rna transcription and is disrupted by oncogenic mutations of v-myb. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:35314-35324.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.066175

  218. 218.

    Nakagoshi H, Kanei-Ishii C, Sawazaki T, Mizuguchi G, Ishii S. Transcriptional activation of the c-myc gene by the c-myb and B-myb gene products. Oncogene. 1992;7:1233-1240.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.