Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

Host/microbiota interactions in health and diseases—Time for mucosal microbiology!

Noëmie Daniel, Emelyne Lécuyer, Benoit Chassaing

Mucosal Immunology · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s41385-021-00383-w

Abstract

During the last 20 years, a new field of research delineating the importance of the microbiota in health and diseases has emerged. Inappropriate host-microbiota interactions have been shown to trigger a wide range of chronic inflammatory diseases, and defining the exact mechanisms behind perturbations of such relationship, as well as ways by which these disturbances can lead to disease states, both remain to be fully elucidated. The mucosa-associated microbiota constitutes a recently studied microbial population closely linked with the promotion of chronic intestinal inflammation and associated disease states. This review will highlight seminal works that have brought into light the importance of the mucosa-associated microbiota in health and diseases, emphasizing the challenges and promises of expending the mucosal microbiology field of research.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The intestinal microbiota is a vast and complex community of microorganisms inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract, encompassing 1013 bacteria per intestine and about 100–500 different species per individual., Among its functions in numerous aspects of host physiology, the gut microbiota is essential to promote maturation of the intestinal immune system as well as digestion by providing extraction of calories and nutrients that would otherwise be excreted in feces. This beneficial equilibrium between the host and its microbiota, or symbiosis, can also turn detrimental and participate in the development and/or the worsening of chronic inflammatory diseases., Hence, efforts have been made toward characterization of gut microbiota composition and function in health and diseases. Numerous studies have reported microbiota alterations in both preclinical and clinical models of chronic inflammatory diseases. Although those alterations may, in part, be driven by the disease state, recent works have highlighted that an altered microbiota can also play a central role in driving the disease itself, with the observation that disease can be transferred to germ-free mice through microbiota transplantation.

Altogether, these findings suggest that the intestinal microbiota holds the potential for innovative therapeutic approaches, where microbiota modulations through fecal microbiota transplantation, diet, prebiotic or probiotic can be used to treat and/or prevent diseases. However, except for recurring Clostridium difficile infections, none of these approaches have demonstrated efficiency to restore host-microbiota homeostasis in chronic inflammatory disease patients. First, a great resilience is observed regarding human microbiota composition, so that its modulation is difficult to achieve and often only transient. Second, high interindividual variations, driven by genetic and environmental factors, are observed in human microbiota composition, suggesting the need for microbiota-based patient stratifications. Third, more work is still required to identify select microbiota alterations that are playing a role in disease progression, instead of simply being associated with it. Finally, the vast majority of the research performed on the intestinal microbiota is focusing on stool samples, while accumulating data demonstrate the importance of mucosa-associated microbiota in health and diseases. While some reviews previously elegantly described the role of host/microbiota interactions, they highlighted that these interactions are far from being characterized at the mucosal interface.– Hence, we will highlight here several works that demonstrate the importance of the mucosa-associated microbiota, and we will discuss the promises of expanding the mucosal microbiology field of research.

Longitudinal axis

As previously summarized by Donaldson et al., the lower gastrointestinal tract (i.e., the small intestine, the cecum, and the colon) harbors different habitats populated by specific bacterial communities, in a way that several microbial communities can be identified within the same individual and along a longitudinal axis. Each of these intestinal compartments is characterized by specific physiological, chemical, nutritional and immune conditions, which altogether shape region-specific communities. For example, and following the discovery of Helicobacter pylori, a limited microbiota comprising few genera (Propionibacterium, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus) was found in the stomach, while this organ was previously regarded as sterile. The small intestine harbors Lactobacillaceae (Firmicutes) and Enterobacteriaceae (Proteobacteria) facultative anaerobe families able to tolerate the acidic environment, as well as high levels of oxygen and antimicrobial molecules (e.g., bile acids)., Finally, the cecum and the colon are mainly intended for complex carbohydrate fermentation and contained a denser and more diversified population, composed of the following dominant bacterial phyla: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. This final part of the gastrointestinal tract is harboring what is considered the densest bacterial community on earth.

Transversal axis

The impact of the transversal axis on microbiota composition has been recently questioned. Work from several research teams revealed that several microenvironments exist and influence radial spatial distribution of bacterial communities.

From the lumen to the epithelium

It was for example demonstrated, in several mammal models (murine, swine, macaque or human), that the luminal and the mucosa-associated microbiota are significantly different in terms of composition (Table 1).– From 1965 to 1972, a series of histological studies reported that bacteria embedded in the mucous layers of the epithelium had a distinct fusiform shape compared to those present in the lumen.– Novel approaches, such as laser capture microdissection (LCM), further attempted to understand the impact of the transversal axis on microbiota composition. In the mouse ascending colon, Nava et al. notably demonstrated that the mucosa constitutes a specialized niche enriched in Firmicutes phylum (Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae families), while the luminal region is colonized by Bacteroidaceae, Enterococcaceae, and Lactobacillaceae families. In another interesting study, Liu et al. used the in vitro Twin Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (TWIN-SHIME) model to compare luminal and mucosal communities tropism. With such an approach, unique mucosa-associated and lumen-associated microbial communities were observed in each of the colonic regions tested (ascending, transverse, and descending). While multiple studies demonstrated the existence of a transversal axis influencing microbiota composition, crypts- and inner mucus-associated microbiota have recently gained a lot of attention.

Crypt-associated microbiota

While the distribution of the gut microbiota along a radial axis was unraveled, pioneering work from Sansonetti’s team, combining Whartin—Starry (silver/nitrate) staining and FISH with 16S rRNA probes, established the existence of a “crypt-specific core microbiota” (CSCM). This CSCM was composed of limited bacterial members, which exclusively colonized the cecum and the proximal part of the colon, while being absent in the duodenum, jejunum and distal colon. Using microdissection and sequencing approaches, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla were observed to be predominant in luminal crypts, while Bacteroidetes phylum was poorly represented. Interestingly, aerobic bacteria belonging to the Burkholderiales or Xanthomonadales groups dominated the CSCM, suggesting an oxygen-enrich environment close to the crypt. Follow-up studies demonstrated that Acinetobacter genera (Proteobacteria phylum, Moraxellaceae family) is more abundant in the crypts compared to the luminal environment, in both mice and humans., Besides Acinetobacter, the same group demonstrated that Delftia tsuruhatensis and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are also important members of the CSCM. Following monocolonization of germ-free mice, these bacteria were detected in the colonic crypts, while the small intestinal crypt remained sterile. Highlighting their impact on intestinal homeostasis, the study of these CSCM members revealed their ability to decrease proliferation of epithelial cells, hence suggesting a central role for this community in intestinal homeostasis. Using an organoids approach, it was reported that, compared to a sonicated sample of Gram-positive bacteria grown in vitro, purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from CSCM-associated species led to organoid hypotrophy and stimulation of goblet cell differentiation that associated with IL-33 and Muc2 upregulation. Hence, this research elegantly demonstrated that the intestinal crypt environment harbors a unique microbial community of central importance for the mutualistic relationship between the host and its microbiota.

Inner mucus layer-associated microbiota

Besides crypt-associated microbiota, the role of the inner-mucus layer-associated microbiota in health and diseases has recently gained attention. While studies focusing on mucosa-associated microbiota are using crude extract from colonic biopsies, encompassing outer mucus-, inner mucus-, epithelium- and crypt-associated bacteria,,,,,, more targeted approaches on microbiota members specifically colonizing the inner-mucus layer have demonstrated their association with detrimental outcomes in preclinical and clinical models. The importance of this mucus-associated microbial community in health and diseases will be described below (Chapter “Why is mucosa-associated microbiota important?”)

From birth to old age

Intestinal colonization by microorganisms starts at birth and undergoes significant changes during the first years of life., Fecal analyses have for example demonstrated that the Bacilli class is dominant after birth and subsequently decreases during the first 2 months, with concomitant increases in Clostridia and Gammaproteobacteria. Moreover, various perinatal parameters, encompassing health status of the mother, mode of delivery, antibiotic usage and type of feeding, are influencing bacterial colonization of the infant gut.– Bergström et al. reported that the intestinal microbiota is subjected to significant changes between 9 and 18 months of age, with cessation of breastfeeding and introduction of solid food being essential factors impacting its composition. Interestingly, such microbiota shifts around the weaning period are associated with profound impacts on the host immune system maturation and function., Al Nabhani et al. elegantly demonstrated that the intestinal immune system undergoes a strong “weaning reaction” in young mice during which the intestinal microbiota is a key actor for the development of a balanced immune system., Importantly, such weaning reaction is central to protect against numerous inflammatory diseases later in life, in part through the induction of RORγt + regulatory T cells.,

In adults, a core microbiota of around 40 species that account for more than 75% of the community can be detected per subject over a 1-year period, suggesting that some microbiota members may be residents for decades., In the elderly population, fecal microbiota appears enriched in Enterobacteriaceae and depleted in Clostridium cluster IV and XIVa as well as Bifidobacterium. While some links have been established between alterations in the intestinal microbiota composition and type 2 diabetes (T2D), cancer (see below) and Alzheimer’s disease, the exact impact of microbiota evolution on senescence and age-associated diseases remains to be fully elucidated.,

Circadian oscillations

The intestinal microbiota is also subjected to circadian oscillations. In humans, Kaczmarek et al. demonstrated that the intestinal microbiota composition fluctuates during the day. Moreover, elegant mouse studies bring into light the close relationship between microbiota and the light/dark cycle, as well reviewed by Parkar et al. Importantly, perturbations of these circadian oscillations can trigger microbiota perturbations and intestinal barrier dysfunction., Moreover, circadian oscillations of serum metabolites are a microbiota-dependent process, and the intestinal microbiota has been observed as a central actor in modulating the circadian liver transcriptome and detoxification ability. Altogether, these data demonstrate that numerous spatial and temporal factors act in concert to finely regulate the intestinal microbiota composition and function.

Metabolic disorders

The potential role played by mucosa-associated microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases was highlighted by multiple models of inflammation describing an “aggressive” microbiota able to penetrate the normally sterile inner mucus layer (Fig. 1). For example, consumption of synthetic dietary emulsifiers, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and polysorbate 80 (P80), altered mucosa-associated microbiota composition and function, leading to low-grade intestinal inflammation and metabolic disorders in mice (cf. details below). Importantly, it was also previously reported that microbiota encroachment is a feature of metabolic deregulations in humans, with the observation that microbiota-epithelium distance is inversely correlated with body mass index, fasting glucose levels, and hemoglobin A1C. Moreover, pioneering work by Cani et al. elegantly demonstrated that endotoxemia, referring to the elevation in circulating LPS, is associated with the promotion of metabolic disorders such as T2D and obesity. Such endotoxemia can occur following microbiota disturbance and/or increase in intestinal permeability, for example induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) regimen. Hence, these studies further illustrated the need for a well-controlled host/microbiota interaction at the mucosal surface.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)

IBD include Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) that are chronic idiopathic disorders causing inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. The etiology of these diseases has been linked to genetic factors and aberrant immune response to the gut microbiota.– Decreased microbiota diversity was repeatedly found in fecal, and mucosal, samples from IBD patients, with depletion in anaerobic bacteria such as Bacteroides, Eubacterium or Lactobacillus. For example, lower abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Firmicutes phylum) was observed in IBD patients, in a way that associates with a higher risk of relapse., Furthermore, investigating microbiota organization along the transversal intestinal axis appears of central importance in IBD, with the presence of adherent and invasive microbiota members. Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, such as the adherent invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) pathovar,, have an increased prevalence in the mucosa of IBD patients compared with healthy controls.– AIEC pathobionts are flagellated and express multiple virulence factors with unique regulation of their expression, such as the Vat mucinase that allows mucins degradation. Altogether, these factors enhance AIEC’s ability to penetrate the mucus layer and to adhere to and invade intestinal epithelial cells in a way that promotes chronic intestinal inflammation. Ongoing studies suggest that fecal screening of AIEC bacteria fails to properly identify people carrying such bacteria in their intestinal mucosa, highlighting the importance to characterize this specific microbial population in IBD patients. Supporting this concept, a recent study demonstrated that CD relapse following partial bowel resection can be predicted by mucosa-associated microbiota composition in the ileum.

IBS is a gastrointestinal disorder syndrome whose etiology remains unclear. The rectal mucosa-associated microbiota has been proposed as a potential predictor of small intestinal overgrowth, a common feature of IBS. Jabbar et al. recently analyzed mucus from sigmoid colon biopsies through metaproteomic approaches. They identified Brachyspira in 30–40% of IBS patients, suggesting a role for this bacterium in IBS, and further highlighting the importance of the mucosal microbiota in gastrointestinal disorders.

Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide and is associated with a high lethality rate. Alterations of fecal and tumor-associated microbiota composition have been described., Some bacterial strains have been associated with susceptibility to CRC and have focused particular attention during the past decade, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) and Escherichia coli expressing the polyketide synthase genomic island that enables colibactin expression.,– Efforts toward identification of CRC-associated microbiota have also highlighted the importance of mucosa-associated microbiota.,,– For example, Saffarian et al. characterized crypt-associated and mucosal communities in CRC. They identified Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in murine and human colonic crypts, as well as differential microbial signatures according to the colonic area. For example, Fusobacterium and Bacteroides fragilis were enriched in right-sided tumors, while Parvimonas micro abundance was elevated in left-sided tumors. However, the exact role played by such alterations in tumorigenesis remains to be fully characterized.

Are mucosa-associated bacteria always bad?

While, as highlighted above, mucosa-associated microbiota is involved in various disease states, it also appears as a critical factor influencing maturation of the intestinal immune system.

Segmented filamentous bacteria

The best example illustrating this concept is the work on Segmented Filamentous Bacteria (SFB), which is able to stimulate both innate and adaptive immune responses, notably Th17 (Fig. 1). This bacterium is adhering to the epithelium in the terminal region of the small intestine. It harbors a nipple-like appendage inserted into the epithelium, especially in the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patches, which forms an attachment site with pronounced actin rearrangements.– While adherence to the epithelium is a hallmark of enteropathogens, SFB are autochthonous bacteria found to play an essential role for the host immune system. SFB colonization is observed after weaning and for 2 months before declining in mice, while in humans, its presence is detected in the first 2 years of life.– Studies using SFB-monocolonized mice showed that SFB stimulate mouse intestinal and peripheral IgA responses with a potent activation of Peyer’s patches germinal centers, gut-associated lymphoid structures required for SFB-mediated intestinal IgA responses.– Gaboriau-Routhiau et al. demonstrated that SFB monocolonisation is sufficient to recapitulate both innate and adaptive immune priming with strong Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg responses compared to germ-free mice, and Ivanov et al. also demonstrated the central role played by SFB in Th17 responses. Associated with its strong immunostimulatory capacities, SFB has also been described to contribute to colonization resistance against several enteric pathogens such as Citrobacter rodentium and Salmonella enteritidis., More recently, Shi et al. reported that SFB colonization is sufficient to protect mice against rotavirus infection. Hence, while mucosa-associated bacteria can promote chronic inflammatory diseases, data on SFB demonstrate that this microbial community is also involved in central aspects of symbiosis. Modulation/inhibition of mucosa-associated bacteria should therefore be performed with extreme caution, and recent success in in vitro culture of SFB should bring important knowledge on such duality.

Bacteroides fragilis

Works from Mazmanian et al. bring into light the central role of Bacteroides fragilis at the mucosal surface. After observing that this bacterium can bind to the mucus layer, they demonstrated that B. fragilis possesses a unique genetic locus of commensal colonization factors, referred to as the CCF system, enabling this bacterium to reside within the mucosal surface. It was also observed that, at steady state, the immune system tolerates B. fragilis despite its mucosal localization, with a mechanism that involves intestinal IgA. Moreover, B. fragilis is an obligate anaerobe but can nonetheless tolerate the oxidative stress caused by the epithelium through the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, suggesting that this bacterium is well equipped for a mucosal niche colonization. Importantly, through the expression of its polysaccharide (PSA), B. fragilis can modulate T cell responses and cytokine production. Mechanistically, B. fragilis delivers its PSA to dendritic cells through outer membrane vesicles recognized by TLR2, which subsequently trigger immunomodulatory effects. In several models, including colitis, CRC and viral encephalitis, this bacterium was observed to be highly protective, further demonstrating the ability of select mucus-associated microbiota members to promote health.–

The oxygen hypothesis

The gut microbiota is influenced by several environmental factors, including oxygen concentration. As mentioned previously, the CSCM niche is mainly dominated by aerobic genera (e.g., Acinetobacter, strictly aerobic), suggesting an oxygen-enriched environment in the proximity of the epithelium. Combining an intraluminal probe with a phosphorescent quenching method, Albenberg et al. assessed oxygen distribution along the radial axis of the mouse intestine and demonstrated that it diffuses from epithelial cells to the lumen. In humans, the analysis of mucosal biopsies showed that adherent bacteria (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria) were more aerotolerant than luminal bacteria and preferentially metabolize proteins instead of carbohydrates as substrates. Moreover, fecal microbiota composition is altered following hyperbaric oxygen therapy in mice, suggesting the impact of oxygen on the transversal microbiota compartmentalization.

Several observations indicate that alteration in this radial oxygen distribution may lead to opportunistic pathogens invasion and disease development.,, Expansion of the aerobic zone is notably suspected of playing a role in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Indeed, IBD-associated dysbiosis is characterized by a decreased proportion of strict anaerobes (Faecalibacterium prausnitzii) in combination with the overgrowth of facultative aerobes, particularly the Enterobacteriaceae family (AIEC).–,,,,, Rigottier-Gois assimilated this dysbiosis to dysanaerobiosis, creating a favorable environment for the growth and invasion of aerotolerant bacteria that can enhance inflammation.

The oxygen hypothesis was further consolidated by works from Baümler et al. exploring mechanisms lowering colonization resistance against Enterobacteriaceae, which demonstrated that antibiotic treatment promotes the shift from anaerobe to aerobe bacteria through various mechanisms. Streptomycin was reported to disrupt gut microbiota composition, depleting Clostridia class.,, Yet, Clostridia are important producers of short-chain fatty acids, such as butyrate, which is used as an energy source by mature colonocytes., Butyrate metabolization requires substantial quantities of oxygen, promoting a hypoxic environment close to the epithelium and avoiding aerobic bacteria colonization., In the absence of butyrate, colonocytes switch to glucose fermentation to obtain ATP. Hence, streptomycin, by reducing Clostridia, indirectly favors Enterobacteriaceae bacteria by generating an aerobic niche., In addition, streptomycin was reported to promote synthesis of the inducible nitric oxide synthase and subsequent production of nitric oxide, a reactive nitrogen species suggested to catalyze monosaccharide oxidation, leading to an increase in resources critical for pathogens (e.g., glucarate and galactarate that constitute a nutrient niche for species like E. coli and S. typhimurium). These studies elegantly indicate that controlling oxygen concentration at the epithelium surface may represent a possible mechanism to shape bacterial colonization of this specific intestinal niche. Interestingly, recent work from Bäumler’s team demonstrated that Citrobacter rodentium pathogen is able to intimately attach to the intestinal epithelium and grow through hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) respiration in the non-inflamed gut, with a central role played by the NAPDH oxidase NOX1. These data suggest that H2O2 can also be an important player in the regulation of the mucosa-associated microbiota.

Dietary factors

Among factors modulating bacterial colonization at the mucosal side, diet is certainly one of the most important. As highlighted below, several dietary factors may alter mucosa-associated microbiota in a way that promotes chronic intestinal inflammation.

Western diet

Western Diet (WD) is characterized by an increased fat intake, refined sugars/sweeteners and animal proteins, and a decreased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. WD consumption is strongly associated with metabolic disorders, such as obesity, T2D, and non-alcoholic liver disease. Over the last decades, the role of the host/microbiota relationship was demonstrated in several WD-induced pathologies (reviewed in,). It was for example shown that HFD shifts commensal bacterial composition, increasing Proteobacteria, while decreasing Bacteroidetes relative abundance. Interestingly, Schroeder et al. reported that WD affects the growth rate and penetrability of the colonic mucus layer compared to a control fiber-rich diet. Moreover, WD-fed mice displayed reduced inner mucus layer thickness and slower mucus growth. They also observed increased mucus penetrability of pathogens, as well as goblet cells hypertrophy and Muc2 and Dmbt1 overproduction, likely reflecting host compensatory mechanisms. Fructose is another nutrient part or the WD, and Montrose et al. recently demonstrated, in both Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis and IL10−/− models, that a high fructose diet is sufficient to worsen intestinal inflammation and damage the integrity of the gut barrier. A reduction of the mucus layer thickness associated with bacterial colonization was observed, demonstrating that numerous dietary factors are acting in combination to regulate the host/microbiota interactions at the mucosal surface.

Fiber-free diet

Studies indeed demonstrated that a fiber-depleted diet participates in chronic inflammatory diseases through modulation of microbiota composition and function., For example, mice fed a low-fat low-fiber diet exhibit increased body weight and altered metabolism compared to mice fed a fiber-rich diet. Other studies demonstrated that supplementation with oligofructose, a chicory inulin-type fructan, is sufficient to improve metabolic parameters altered by a HFD.–

Desai et al. elegantly demonstrated that fiber deprivation altered the intestinal microbiota in a way that promoted degradation of the colonic mucus barrier and enhanced pathogen expansion, exacerbating susceptibility to colitis. Using a synthetic minimal microbiota, they demonstrated that, in the absence of fiber, the gut microbiota shifted towards mucin degraders to fulfill its nutritional needs. Consequently, bacteria such as A. muciniphila or B. thetaiotaomicron, erode the colonic mucus barrier, hence enabling epithelium colonization by pathogenic bacteria, as demonstrated using the Citrobacter rodentium infection model. In 2016, Sonnenburg et al. demonstrated, in a mouse model, that dysbiosis and associated disorders induced by a fiber-deprived diet are reversible within a generation, but became non-reversible after multiple generations. Hence, a fiber-rich diet appears as an effective way to reinforce the intestinal barrier via its beneficial impact on mucosa-associated microbiota.

Emulsifiers

Select food additives appear to play an important role in regulating mucus-associated microbiota composition and function. It has been hypothesized that emulsifiers, which are added to most processed foods to improve texture and extend shelf life, might have contributed to the rapid post–mid-20th century increase in the incidence of chronic inflammatory diseases., Investigation of this hypothesis demonstrated that dietary emulsifiers can indeed detrimentally impact the intestinal microbiota in a way that drives chronic inflammatory diseases. In wild-type mice, bacteria were only rarely observed within 10 µm of the epithelium, and the average closest bacteria detected over multiple high-powered fields was about 25 µm from the epithelium. In contrast, in mice fed with dietary emulsifying agents CMC and P80, bacteria could be found in direct contact with the epithelium, and the average distance of the closest bacteria per field was <10 µm. Such effects of emulsifier exposure on the microbiota were associated with the development of chronic colitis in susceptible mice, while wild-type mice developed chronic low-grade intestinal inflammation and metabolic deregulations. Importantly, microbiota/epithelium distance inversely correlated with the extent of intestinal inflammation, supporting the central and direct role played by mucus penetrating bacteria in emulsifier-induced promotion of chronic intestinal inflammation. It was also reported that in gnotobiotic mice colonized with a highly restricted microbiota comprised of only eight bacteria (namely “Altered Schaedler Flora”, ASF), emulsifier consumption was not sufficient to induce microbiota encroachment, intestinal inflammation, nor metabolism alteration. This thus suggested that a complex microbiota containing specific species infiltrating the mucus layer is required for the detrimental effect of emulsifiers. In more recent work, pathobiont colonization of ASF mice was observed to be sufficient to make the animals susceptible to microbiota encroachment and chronic intestinal inflammation induced by emulsifier consumption. Hence, this demonstrates that select bacteria are needed to mediate the detrimental effect of emulsifier exposure through their encroachment within the mucus layer and subsequent promotion of chronic intestinal inflammation. Further research is now warranted to identify these mucus invaders in both animal and human models.

Mucosa-associated Microbiota—Opening of therapeutic avenues?

As detailed above, there is now evidence that mucosa-associated microbiota is crucial for host-bacteria interactions, which may open the door for therapeutic strategies in the coming years. On one hand, some commensals, such as Akkermansia muciniphila, may help to maintain mucosal integrity through a probiotic-type mechanism. On another hand, microbiota encroachment was reported to associate with an array of poor health outcomes, with the observation that a reduced epithelium-microbiota distance correlates with the severity of intestinal inflammation in mice and dysglycemia in human., While any causal link between microbiota encroachment and chronic inflammatory diseases remains to be studied, this underscores the need for novel approaches to target and inhibit encroachment of deleterious bacteria (Fig. 1).

Probiotic approach: the example of Akkermansia muciniphila

Isolated in 2004 by Derrien et al., A. muciniphila is a mucin-degrading bacterium and one of the most described commensal bacterium residing in the intestinal mucus layer., Its abundance is positively associated with metabolic health, as elegantly demonstrated by the work of De Vos’ and Cani’s teams.– Everard et al. for example reported that mucus thickness is reduced by half in diet-induced obese mice, a phenomenon that can be prevented by A. muciniphila treatment. It was also reported that this bacterium can increase the number of regulatory T cells and goblet cells, as well as the expression of the antimicrobial Reg3 γ peptide, in the intestine.– In vitro, A. muciniphila adheres to the intestinal epithelium and strengthens enterocyte monolayer integrity. More recently, a single protein, called Amuc_1100, was sufficient to improve gut barrier and partly recapitulate the previously observed beneficial effects in vivo., Moreover, it was reported that treatment with A. muciniphila-derived extracellular vesicles could enhance intestinal tight junction function, reduce body weight gain and improve glucose homeostasis in obese mice. Plovier et al. demonstrated that pasteurization of this bacterium did not affect its beneficial effects, but even potentiated it., Finally, in a human pilot study, pasteurized A. muciniphila tended to decrease fat-mass gain and hip circumference, as well as improved insulin sensitivity, total cholesterol and blood markers of liver dysfunction, inflammation and endotoxemia in a cohort of overweight human volunteers. Altogether, these data elegantly support the therapeutic interest of this bacterium able to colonize the mucosa.,,

Interleukine-33 (IL-33)

IL-33 belongs to the IL-1 cytokine family, binds the ST2 receptor, and is involved in various cellular pathways, including cytokine secretion, epithelial repair process and cell replication and survival.– IL-33 appears as a crucial amplifier of the mucosal and systemic innate and acquired immune response., Interestingly, IL-33−/− mice displayed a dysbiosis and a decrease in Paneth and goblet cells that associated with an increased susceptibility to colitis.– In a mouse model of chronic colitis, IL-33 administration led to disease improvement and increased mucin production.,,– Several publications demonstrated that IL-33 plays a role in preventing encroachment by pathogens such as helminths,– Clostridium difficile, Salmonella Typhimurium and H. pylori. Thus, IL-33 emerges as a central actor in regulating the host/microbiota interactions at the mucosal surface. However, caution appears warranted, as some studies reported a colitogenic impact of IL-33. In the DSS-induced colitis model, IL-33 administration was found to exacerbate intestinal inflammation, while IL-33KO mice were protected against colitis.– Hence, while this cytokine could be a therapeutic tool to prevent microbiota encroachment, its exact role in modulating the host/microbiota relationship remains to be fully elucidated.

Mucosal immunization

It was recently hypothesized that the mucosal adaptive immune system, in close contact with the microbiota at the mucosal side, can be used to prevent microbiota encroachment by excluding motile bacteria from the mucus layer through targeted anti-flagellin response. This idea stemmed from a study revealing that flagellum appendage is central to the ability of bacteria to penetrate the colonic mucus layer, and from recent observations indicating that purified anti-flagellin antibody can rapidly shut down flagellin expression, and thereby bacterial motility. Based on these findings, it was speculated that flagellin immunization might result in lower levels of bioactive flagellin in a way that will prevent microbiota encroachment. Mice immunized with purified flagellin displayed strong fecal anti-flagellin IgG and IgA responses that associate with reduced expression of flagellin by the intestinal microbiota. Moreover, flagellin immunization was sufficient to increase the distance separating the microbiota from the epithelium in a way that correlated with protection against colitis and diet-induced obesity. Overall, these data support the concept that vaccination strategies aiming to prevent microbiota encroachment might protect against, or perhaps even treat, chronic inflammatory diseases with a microbiota component.

Conclusion

Multiple lines of evidence point to the importance of mucosa-associated microbiota in health and diseases. Additional research is warranted to characterize this “hidden” ecosystem, and uncover mechanisms by which it can promote health as well as inflammatory and metabolic disorders. To date, most microbiota studies have relied on analyzing microbiota composition via 16S rRNA gene sequencing of fecal material. While the mucosa-associated microbiota is of central importance, its study requires access to intestinal biopsies combined with molecular/culturomic approaches. Moreover, the causal link between microbiota encroachment and the promotion of chronic inflammatory diseases remains to be fully elucidated. Recently developed approaches allowing to specifically study mucus-associated microbiota should help in this endeavor., Besides its composition, identification of gene expression by this specific community also appears warranted in order to understand mechanisms by which select microbiota members colonize this unique niche in a way that induce chronic intestinal inflammation. Hence, while this mucosal microbiology field of research is just emerging, it holds exciting promises for the prevention and/or treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases!

References 191

  1. 1.

    Qin J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59-65.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08821

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Chassaing, B., Aitken, J. D., Gewirtz, A. T. & Vijay-Kumar, M. Chapter Three - Gut Microbiota Drives Metabolic Disease in Immunologically Altered Mice. in Advances in Immunology (Alt, F. W.) 116, 93–112 (Academic Press, 2012).

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-394300-2.00003-x

  4. 4.

    Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121-141.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011

  5. 5.

    Nagao-Kitamoto H, et al. Functional Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease–Associated Gut Dysbiosis in Gnotobiotic Mice. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;2:468-481.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.02.003

  6. 6.

    Palleja A, et al. Recovery of gut microbiota of healthy adults following antibiotic exposure. Nat. Microbiol. 2018;3:1255.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41564-018-0257-9

  7. 7.

    Rothschild, D. et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature10.1038/nature25973 (2018).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature25973

  8. 8.

    Bunker JJ, Bendelac A. IgA Responses to Microbiota. Immunity. 2018;49:211-224.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.011

  9. 9.

    Stange EF, Schroeder BO. Microbiota and mucosal defense in IBD: an update. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;13:963-976.

    Not in our library10.1080/17474124.2019.1671822

  10. 10.

    Etienne-Mesmin L, et al. Experimental models to study intestinal microbes–mucus interactions in health and disease. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019;43:457-489.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsre/fuz013

  11. 11.

    Ahern PP, Maloy KJ. Understanding immune–microbiota interactions in the intestine. Immunology. 2020;159:4-14.

    Not in our library10.1111/imm.13150

  12. 12.

    Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:20-32.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3552

  13. 13.

    Delgado S, Cabrera-Rubio R, Mira A, Suárez A, Mayo B. Microbiological Survey of the Human Gastric Ecosystem Using Culturing and Pyrosequencing Methods. Micro. Ecol. 2013;65:763-772.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00248-013-0192-5

  14. 14.

    Zoetendal EG, et al. The human small intestinal microbiota is driven by rapid uptake and conversion of simple carbohydrates. ISME J. 2012;6:1415-1426.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2011.212

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Dubos R, Schaedler RW, Costello R, Hoet P. Indigenous, normal, and autochthonous flora of the gastrointestinal tract. J. Exp. Med. 1965;122:67-76.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.122.1.67

  17. 17.

    Savage DC, Dubos R, Schaedler RW. The gastrointestinal epithelium and its autochthonous bacterial flora. J. Exp. Med. 1968;127:67-76.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.127.1.67

  18. 18.

    Davis CP, Mulcahy D, Takeuchi A, Savage DC. Location and Description of Spiral-Shaped Microorganisms in the Normal Rat Cecum. Infect. Immun. 1972;6:184-192.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.6.2.184-192.1972

  19. 19.

    Galley JD, et al. The structures of the colonic mucosa-associated and luminal microbial communities are distinct and differentially affected by a prolonged murine stressor. Gut Microbes. 2014;5:748-760.

    Not in our library10.4161/19490976.2014.972241

  20. 20.

    Yasuda K, et al. Biogeography of the Intestinal Mucosal and Lumenal Microbiome in the Rhesus Macaque. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:385-391.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.015

  21. 21.

    Adhikari B, Kim SW, Kwon YM. Characterization of Microbiota Associated with Digesta and Mucosa in Different Regions of Gastrointestinal Tract of Nursery Pigs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1630.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms20071630

  22. 22.

    Nava GM, Friedrichsen HJ, Stappenbeck TS. Spatial organization of intestinal microbiota in the mouse ascending colon. ISME J. 2011;5:627-638.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2010.161

  23. 23.

    Liu L, et al. Establishing a mucosal gut microbial community in vitro using an artificial simulator. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0197692.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0197692

  24. 24.

    Stedman A, Brunner K, Nigro G. Decrypting the communication between microbes and the intestinal mucosa—A brief review on Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire’s latest research. Cell. Microbiol. 2019;0:e13118.

    Not in our library10.1111/cmi.13118

  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Naito T, et al. Lipopolysaccharide from Crypt-Specific Core Microbiota Modulates the Colonic Epithelial Proliferation-to-Differentiation Balance. mBio. 2017;8:e01680-17.

    Not in our library10.1128/mbio.01680-17

  28. 28.

    Milani C, et al. The First Microbial Colonizers of the Human Gut: composition, Activities, and Health Implications of the Infant Gut Microbiota. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017;81:e00036-17.

    Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00036-17

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    La Rosa PS, et al. Patterned progression of bacterial populations in the premature infant gut. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:12522-12527.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1409497111

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Dominguez-Bello MG, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. PNAS. 2010;107:11971-11975.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002601107

  33. 33.

    Selma-Royo M, et al. Perinatal environment shapes microbiota colonization and infant growth: impact on host response and intestinal function. Microbiome. 2020;8:167.

    Not in our library10.1186/s40168-020-00940-8

  34. 34.

    Bergström A, et al. Establishment of Intestinal Microbiota during Early Life: a Longitudinal, Explorative Study of a Large Cohort of Danish Infants. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80:2889-2900.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.00342-14

  35. 35.

    Tanaka M, Nakayama J. Development of the gut microbiota in infancy and its impact on health in later life. Allergol. Int. 2017;66:515-522.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.alit.2017.07.010

  36. 36.
  37. 37.

    Al Nabhani Z, et al. A Weaning Reaction to Microbiota Is Required for Resistance to Immunopathologies in the Adult. Immunity. 2019;50:1276-1288.e5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2019.02.014

  38. 38.

    Al Nabhani Z, Eberl G. Imprinting of the immune system by the microbiota early in life. Mucosal. Immunol. 2020;13:183-189.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41385-020-0257-y

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Faith JJ, et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science. 2013;341:1237439.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1237439

  41. 41.

    Quercia S, et al. Gut microbiome response to short-term dietary interventions in reactive hypoglycemia subjects. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2017;33:e2927.

    Not in our library10.1002/dmrr.2927

  42. 42.

    Jiang C, Li G, Huang P, Liu Z, Zhao B. The Gut Microbiota and Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;58:1-15.

    Not in our library10.3233/jad-161141

  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    Biver E, et al. Gut microbiota and osteoarthritis management: An expert consensus of the European society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO). Ageing Res. Rev. 2019;55:100946.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2019.100946

  45. 45.

    Kaczmarek, J. L., Musaad, S. M. & Holscher, H. D. Time of day and eating behaviors are associated with the composition and function of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. ajcn156380 10.3945/ajcn.117.156380 (2017).

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.117.156380

  46. 46.
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
  49. 49.

    Thaiss CA, et al. Microbiota Diurnal Rhythmicity Programs Host Transcriptome Oscillations. Cell. 2016;167:1495-1510.e12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.003

  50. 50.

    Chassaing B, et al. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2015;519:92-96.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14232

  51. 51.
  52. 52.

    Cani PD, et al. Metabolic Endotoxemia Initiates Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Diabetes. 2007;56:1761-1772.

    Not in our library10.2337/db06-1491

  53. 53.

    Cani PD, et al. Changes in Gut Microbiota Control Metabolic Endotoxemia-Induced Inflammation in High-Fat Diet–Induced Obesity and Diabetes in Mice. Diabetes. 2008;57:1470-1481.

    Not in our library10.2337/db07-1403

  54. 54.

    Ng SC, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet. 2017;390:2769-2778.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32448-0

  55. 55.

    Kostic AD, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. The Microbiome in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: current Status and the Future Ahead. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1489-1499.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.009

  56. 56.

    Libertucci, J. et al. Inflammation-related differences in mucosa-associated microbiota and intestinal barrier function in colonic Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Physiol-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.10.1152/ajpgi.00411.2017 (2018).

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00411.2017

  57. 57.

    Britton GJ, et al. Microbiotas from Humans with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Alter the Balance of Gut Th17 and RORγt+ Regulatory T Cells and Exacerbate Colitis in Mice. Immunity. 2019;50:212-224.e4.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.015

  58. 58.

    Zhong W, et al. Distinct Microbial Populations Exist in the Mucosa-associated Microbiota of Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Ulcerative Colitis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2019;53:660-672.

    Not in our library10.1097/mcg.0000000000000961

  59. 59.

    Manichanh C, et al. Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut. 2006;55:205-211.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2005.073817

  60. 60.

    Sokol H, et al. Low Counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in Colitis Microbiota. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1183-1189.

    Not in our library10.1002/ibd.20903

  61. 61.

    Ott SJ, et al. Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2004;53:685-693.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2003.025403

  62. 62.

    Sokol H, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2008;105:16731-16736.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0804812105

  63. 63.

    Zhao, H. et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Alteration in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Online ahead of print.

    Not in our library10.1111/jgh.15222

  64. 64.

    Swidsinski A, Loening–Baucke V, Verstraelen H, Osowska S, Doerffel Y. Biostructure of Fecal Microbiota in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Diarrhea. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:568-579.e2.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.017

  65. 65.

    Shaler CR, Elhenawy W, Coombes BK. The Unique Lifestyle of Crohn’s Disease-Associated Adherent-Invasive Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2019;431:2970-2981.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.023

  66. 66.

    Darfeuille-Michaud A, et al. High prevalence of adherent-invasive Escherichia coli associated with ileal mucosa in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:412-421.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.061

  67. 67.

    Baumgart M, et al. Culture independent analysis of ileal mucosa reveals a selective increase in invasive Escherichia coli of novel phylogeny relative to depletion of Clostridiales in Crohn’s disease involving the ileum. ISME J. 2007;1:403-418.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2007.52

  68. 68.

    Kotlowski R, Bernstein CN, Sepehri S, Krause DO. High prevalence of Escherichia coli belonging to the B2+D phylogenetic group in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2007;56:669-675.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2006.099796

  69. 69.

    Lupp C, et al. Host-Mediated Inflammation Disrupts the Intestinal Microbiota and Promotes the Overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2:119-129.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2007.06.010

  70. 70.

    Gibold L, et al. The Vat-AIEC protease promotes crossing of the intestinal mucus layer by Crohn’s disease-associated Escherichia coli. Cell. Microbiol. 2016;18:617-631.

    Not in our library10.1111/cmi.12539

  71. 71.

    Sevrin G, et al. Adaptation of adherent-invasive E. coli to gut environment: Impact on flagellum expression and bacterial colonization ability. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:364-380.

    Not in our library10.1080/19490976.2017.1421886

  72. 72.

    Sokol H, et al. Prominence of ileal mucosa-associated microbiota to predict postoperative endoscopic recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2020;69:462-472.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318719

  73. 73.

    Yang M, et al. Duodenal and rectal mucosal microbiota related to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;35:795-805.

    Not in our library10.1111/jgh.14910

  74. 74.

    Jabbar KS, et al. Association between Brachyspira and irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Gut. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321466

  75. 75.

    World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer Cancer today. at http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Gagnaire A, Nadel B, Raoult D, Neefjes J, Gorvel J-P. Collateral damage: insights into bacterial mechanisms that predispose host cells to cancer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;15:109-128.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro.2016.171

  77. 77.
  78. 78.

    Cuevas-Ramos G, et al. Escherichia coli induces DNA damage in vivo and triggers genomic instability in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:11537-11542.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1001261107

  79. 79.

    Arthur JC, et al. Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota. Science. 2012;338:120-123.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1224820

  80. 80.

    Castellarin M, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 2012;22:299-306.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.126516.111

  81. 81.

    Dejea CM, et al. Microbiota organization is a distinct feature of proximal colorectal cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:18321-18326.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1406199111

  82. 82.

    Pleguezuelos-Manzano C, et al. Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks + E. coli. Nature. 2020;580:269-273.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2080-8

  83. 83.
  84. 84.

    Gao R, et al. Mucosa-associated microbiota signature in colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017;36:2073-2083.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10096-017-3026-4

  85. 85.

    Tomkovich S, et al. Locoregional effects of microbiota in a preclinical model of colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2620-2632.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3472

  86. 86.

    Tomkovich S, et al. Human colon mucosal biofilms from healthy or colon cancer hosts are carcinogenic. J. Clin. Investig. 2019;129:1699-1712.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci124196

  87. 87.

    Tomkovich S, et al. Human Colon Mucosal Biofilms and Murine Host Communicate via Altered mRNA and microRNA Expression during Cancer. mSystems. 2020;5:e00451-19.

    Not in our library10.1128/msystems.00451-19

  88. 88.

    Caselli M, Holton J, Boldrini P, Vaira D, Calò G. Morphology of segmented filamentous bacteria and their patterns of contact with the follicle-associated epithelium of the mouse terminal ileum: implications for the relationship with the immune system. Gut Microbes. 2010;1:367-372.

    Not in our library10.4161/gmic.1.6.14390

  89. 89.

    Davis CP, Savage DC. Habitat, Succession, Attachment, and Morphology of Segmented, Filamentous Microbes Indigenous to the Murine Gastrointestinal Tract. Infect. Immun. 1974;10:948-956.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.10.4.948-956.1974

  90. 90.

    Chase DG, Erlandsen SL. Evidence for a complex life cycle and endospore formation in the attached, filamentous, segmented bacterium from murine ileum. J. Bacteriol. 1976;127:572-583.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.127.1.572-583.1976

  91. 91.

    Jepson MA, Clark MA, Simmons NL, Hirst BH. Actin accumulation at sites of attachment of indigenous apathogenic segmented filamentous bacteria to mouse ileal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 1993;61:4001-4004.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.61.9.4001-4004.1993

  92. 92.

    Yin Y, et al. Comparative analysis of the distribution of segmented filamentous bacteria in humans, mice and chickens. ISME J. 2013;7:615-621.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2012.128

  93. 93.

    Klaasen HLBM, Koopman JP, Scholten PM, Brink MEVD, Theeuwes AGM. Effect of Preventing Coprophagy on Colonisation by Segmented Filamentous Bacteria in the Small Bowel of Mice. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 1990;3:99-103.

    Not in our library

  94. 94.

    Snel J, et al. Interactions between gut-associated lymphoid tissue and colonization levels of indigenous, segmented, filamentous bacteria in the small intestine of mice. Can. J. Microbiol. 1998;44:1177-1182.

    Not in our library10.1139/w98-122

  95. 95.

    Schnupf P, Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Cerf-Bensussan N. Host interactions with Segmented Filamentous Bacteria: An unusual trade-off that drives the post-natal maturation of the gut immune system. Semin. Immunol. 2013;25:342-351.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2013.09.001

  96. 96.

    Klaasen HL, et al. Apathogenic, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria stimulate the mucosal immune system of mice. Infect. Immun. 1993;61:303-306.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.61.1.303-306.1993

  97. 97.

    Talham GL, Jiang H-Q, Bos NA, Cebra JJ. Segmented Filamentous Bacteria Are Potent Stimuli of a Physiologically Normal State of the Murine Gut Mucosal Immune System. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:1992-2000.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.67.4.1992-2000.1999

  98. 98.

    Lécuyer E, et al. Segmented Filamentous Bacterium Uses Secondary and Tertiary Lymphoid Tissues to Induce Gut IgA and Specific T Helper 17 Cell Responses. Immunity. 2014;40:608-620.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2014.03.009

  99. 99.

    Gaboriau-Routhiau V, et al. The Key Role of Segmented Filamentous Bacteria in the Coordinated Maturation of Gut Helper T Cell Responses. Immunity. 2009;31:677-689.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.020

  100. 100.

    Ivanov II, et al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell. 2009;139:485-498.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.033

  101. 101.

    Garland CD, Lee A, Dickson MR. Segmented filamentous bacteria in the rodent small intestine: Their colonization of growing animals and possible role in host resistance toSalmonella. Micro. Ecol. 1982;8:181-190.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02010451

  102. 102.

    Shi Z, et al. Segmented Filamentous Bacteria Prevent and Cure Rotavirus Infection. Cell. 2019;179:644-658.e13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.028

  103. 103.

    Schnupf P, et al. Growth and host interaction of mouse Segmented Filamentous Bacteria in vitro. Nature. 2015;520:99-103.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14027

  104. 104.

    Huang JY, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. The human commensal Bacteroides fragilis binds intestinal mucin. Anaerobe. 2011;17:137-141.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.05.017

  105. 105.

    Lee SM, et al. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature. 2013;501:426-429.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12447

  106. 106.

    Donaldson GP, et al. Gut microbiota utilize immunoglobulin A for mucosal colonization. Science. 2018;360:795-800.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaq0926

  107. 107.

    Donaldson GP, et al. Spatially distinct physiology of Bacteroides fragilis within the proximal colon of gnotobiotic mice. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:746-756.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41564-020-0683-3

  108. 108.

    Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, Kasper DL. An Immunomodulatory Molecule of Symbiotic Bacteria Directs Maturation of the Host Immune System. Cell. 2005;122:107-118.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007

  109. 109.

    Shen Y, et al. Outer Membrane Vesicles of a Human Commensal Mediate Immune Regulation and Disease Protection. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:509-520.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.004

  110. 110.

    Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature. 2008;453:620-625.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07008

  111. 111.

    Lee YK, et al. The Protective Role of Bacteroides fragilis in a Murine Model of Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. mSphere. 2018;3:e00587-18.

    Not in our library10.1128/msphere.00587-18

  112. 112.
  113. 113.

    Rigottier-Gois L. Dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel diseases: the oxygen hypothesis. ISME J. 2013;7:1256-1261.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2013.80

  114. 114.

    Albenberg L, et al. Correlation Between Intraluminal Oxygen Gradient and Radial Partitioning of Intestinal Microbiota. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:1055-1063.e8.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.020

  115. 115.

    Marteyn B, et al. Modulation of Shigella virulence in response to available oxygen in vivo. Nature. 2010;465:355-358.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08970

  116. 116.

    Rivera-Chávez F, Lopez CA, Bäumler AJ. Oxygen as a driver of gut dysbiosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;105:93-101.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.09.022

  117. 117.

    Manichanh C, et al. Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut. 2006;55:205-211.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2005.073817

  118. 118.

    Frank DN, et al. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:13780-13785.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0706625104

  119. 119.

    Godinez I, et al. T Cells Help To Amplify Inflammatory Responses Induced by Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium in the Intestinal Mucosa. Infect. Immun. 2008;76:2008-2017.

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.01691-07

  120. 120.

    Rivera-Chávez F, et al. Depletion of Butyrate-Producing Clostridia from the Gut Microbiota Drives an Aerobic Luminal Expansion of Salmonella. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:443-454.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.004

  121. 121.

    Atarashi K, et al. T reg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota. Nature. 2013;500:232-236.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12331

  122. 122.

    Donohoe DR, et al. The Microbiome and Butyrate Regulate Energy Metabolism and Autophagy in the Mammalian Colon. Cell Metab. 2011;13:517-526.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2011.02.018

  123. 123.

    Velázquez, O. C., Lederer, H. M. & Rombeau, J. L. Butyrate and the Colonocyte. in Dietary Fiber in Health and Disease (Kritchevsky, D. & Bonfield, C.) 123–134 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1997). 10.1007/978-1-4615-5967-2_14.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    Furuta GT, et al. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1–Dependent Induction of Intestinal Trefoil Factor Protects Barrier Function during Hypoxia. J. Exp. Med. 2001;193:1027-1034.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.193.9.1027

  125. 125.

    Faber F, et al. Host-mediated sugar oxidation promotes post-antibiotic pathogen expansion. Nature. 2016;534:697-699.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature18597

  126. 126.

    Miller BM, et al. Anaerobic Respiration of NOX1-Derived Hydrogen Peroxide Licenses Bacterial Growth at the Colonic Surface. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:789-797.e5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2020.10.009

  127. 127.

    Popkin BM. Nutrition Transition and the Global Diabetes Epidemic. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2015;15:64.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11892-015-0631-4

  128. 128.

    Zhao L. The gut microbiota and obesity: from correlation to causality. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:639-647.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3089

  129. 129.

    Sonnenburg JL, Bäckhed F. Diet–microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature. 2016;535:56-64.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature18846

  130. 130.

    Tomas J, et al. High-fat diet modifies the PPAR-γ pathway leading to disruption of microbial and physiological ecosystem in murine small intestine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2016;113:E5934-E5943.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1612559113

  131. 131.

    Schroeder BO, et al. Bifidobacteria or Fiber Protects against Diet-Induced Microbiota-Mediated Colonic Mucus Deterioration. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:27-40.e7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2017.11.004

  132. 132.

    Montrose DC, et al. Dietary Fructose Alters the Composition, Localization, and Metabolism of Gut Microbiota in Association With Worsening Colitis. Cellular Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;11:525-550.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.09.008

  133. 133.

    Veronese N, et al. Dietary fiber and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018;107:436-444.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/nqx082

  134. 134.

    Sonnenburg ED, Sonnenburg JL. Starving our Microbial Self: The Deleterious Consequences of a Diet Deficient in Microbiota-Accessible Carbohydrates. Cell Metab. 2014;20:779-786.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.003

  135. 135.
  136. 136.

    Cani PD, et al. Selective increases of bifidobacteria in gut microflora improve high-fat-diet-induced diabetes in mice through a mechanism associated with endotoxaemia. Diabetologia. 2007;50:2374-2383.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00125-007-0791-0

  137. 137.

    Delzenne NM, Cani PD, Neyrinck AM. Modulation of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 and Energy Metabolism by Inulin and Oligofructose: Experimental Data. J. Nutr. 2007;137:2547S-2551S.

    Not in our library10.1093/jn/137.11.2547s

  138. 138.

    Everard A, et al. Responses of Gut Microbiota and Glucose and Lipid Metabolism to Prebiotics in Genetic Obese and Diet-Induced Leptin-Resistant Mice. Diabetes. 2011;60:2775-2786.

    Not in our library10.2337/db11-0227

  139. 139.

    Everard A, et al. Microbiome of prebiotic-treated mice reveals novel targets involved in host response during obesity. ISME J. 2014;8:2116-2130.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2014.45

  140. 140.

    Desai MS, et al. A Dietary Fiber-Deprived Gut Microbiota Degrades the Colonic Mucus Barrier and Enhances Pathogen Susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167:1339-1353.e21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043

  141. 141.

    Sonnenburg ED, et al. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature. 2016;529:212-215.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature16504

  142. 142.

    Swidsinski A, et al. Bacterial Overgrowth and Inflammation of Small Intestine After Carboxymethylcellulose Ingestion in Genetically Susceptible Mice. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009;15:359-364.

    Not in our library10.1002/ibd.20763

  143. 143.

    Roberts CL, Rushworth SL, Richman E, Rhodes JM. Hypothesis: increased consumption of emulsifiers as an explanation for the rising incidence of Crohn’s disease. J. Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7:338-341.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.crohns.2013.01.004

  144. 144.

    Chassaing B, Van de Wiele T, De Bodt J, Marzorati M, Gewirtz AT. Dietary emulsifiers directly alter human microbiota composition and gene expression ex vivo potentiating intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2017;66:1414-1427.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313099

  145. 145.
  146. 146.

    Derrien M, Vaughan EE, Plugge CM, Vos WM. de Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 2004;54:1469-1476.

    Not in our library10.1099/ijs.0.02873-0

  147. 147.

    Berry D, et al. Host-compound foraging by intestinal microbiota revealed by single-cell stable isotope probing. PNAS. 2013;110:4720-4725.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1219247110

  148. 148.
  149. 149.

    Everard A, et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:9066-9071.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1219451110

  150. 150.

    Dao MC, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut. 2016;65:426-436.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778

  151. 151.

    Dao, M. C. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila abundance is lower in severe obesity but its increased level after bariatric surgery is not associated with metabolic health improvement. Am. J. Physiol-Endocrinol. Metab. (2019). 10.1152/ajpendo.00140.2019

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.00140.2019

  152. 152.

    Shin N-R, et al. An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice. Gut. 2014;63:727-735.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303839

  153. 153.

    Shin J, et al. Elucidation of Akkermansia muciniphila Probiotic Traits Driven by Mucin Depletion. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1137.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2019.01137

  154. 154.

    Hänninen A, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila induces gut microbiota remodelling and controls islet autoimmunity in NOD mice. Gut. 2018;67:1445-1453.

    Not in our library10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314508

  155. 155.

    Reunanen J, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila Adheres to Enterocytes and Strengthens the Integrity of the Epithelial Cell Layer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:3655-3662.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.04050-14

  156. 156.

    Ottman N, et al. Genome-Scale Model and Omics Analysis of Metabolic Capacities of Akkermansia muciniphila Reveal a Preferential Mucin-Degrading Lifestyle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83:e01014-e01017.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01014-17

  157. 157.

    Plovier H, et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat. Med. 2017;23:107-113.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.4236

  158. 158.

    Chelakkot C, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila -derived extracellular vesicles influence gut permeability through the regulation of tight junctions. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50:e450-e450.

    Not in our library10.1038/emm.2017.282

  159. 159.
  160. 160.

    Druart, C. et al. Toxicological safety evaluation of pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila. J. Appl. Toxicol.10.1002/jat.4044 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1002/jat.4044

  161. 161.

    Depommier C, et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: a proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1096.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2

  162. 162.

    Liew FY, Pitman NI, McInnes IB. Disease-associated functions of IL-33: the new kid in the IL-1 family. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010;10:103-110.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri2692

  163. 163.

    Monticelli LA, et al. IL-33 promotes an innate immune pathway of intestinal tissue protection dependent on amphiregulin–EGFR interactions. PNAS. 2015;112:10762-10767.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1509070112

  164. 164.

    Hodzic Z, Schill EM, Bolock AM, Good M. IL-33 and the intestine: the good, the bad, and the inflammatory. Cytokine. 2017;100:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2017.06.017

  165. 165.

    Lopetuso LR, et al. IL-33 promotes recovery from acute colitis by inducing miR-320 to stimulate epithelial restitution and repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E9362-E9370.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1803613115

  166. 166.
  167. 167.

    Oboki K, et al. IL-33 is a crucial amplifier of innate rather than acquired immunity. PNAS. 2010;107:18581-18586.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1003059107

  168. 168.

    Waddell A, et al. IL-33 signaling protects from murine oxazolone colitis by supporting intestinal epithelial function. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015;21:2737-2746.

    Not in our library10.1097/mib.0000000000000532

  169. 169.

    Malik A, et al. IL-33 regulates the IgA-microbiota axis to restrain IL-1α–dependent colitis and tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2016;126:4469-4481.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci88625

  170. 170.

    Hodzic Z, Schill EM, Bolock AM, Good M. IL-33 and the intestine: the good, the bad, and the inflammatory. Cytokine. 2017;100:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2017.06.017

  171. 171.

    Schmitz J, et al. IL-33, an Interleukin-1-like Cytokine that Signals via the IL-1 Receptor-Related Protein ST2 and Induces T Helper Type 2-Associated Cytokines. Immunity. 2005;23:479-490.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015

  172. 172.

    Groβ P, Doser K, Falk W, Obermeier F, Hofmann C. IL-33 Attenuates Development and Perpetuation of Chronic Intestinal Inflammation. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1900-1909.

    Not in our library10.1002/ibd.22900

  173. 173.

    Waddell A, Vallance JE, Hummel A, Alenghat T, Rosen MJ. IL-33 Induces Murine Intestinal Goblet Cell Differentiation Indirectly via Innate Lymphoid Cell IL-13 Secretion. J. Immunol. 2019;202:598-607.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1800292

  174. 174.
  175. 175.

    Neill DR, et al. Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature. 2010;464:1367-1370.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08900

  176. 176.

    Moro K, et al. Innate production of T H 2 cytokines by adipose tissue-associated c-Kit + Sca-1 + lymphoid cells. Nature. 2010;463:540-544.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08636

  177. 177.

    Hoyler T, et al. The transcription factor GATA3 controls cell fate and maintenance of type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. 2012;37:634-648.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.020

  178. 178.

    Shimokawa C, et al. Mast Cells Are Crucial for Induction of Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells and Clearance of Helminth Infections. Immunity. 2017;46:863-874.e4.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.017

  179. 179.

    Mahapatro M, et al. Programming of Intestinal Epithelial Differentiation by IL-33 Derived from Pericryptal Fibroblasts in Response to Systemic Infection. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1743-1756.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.049

  180. 180.

    Satoh-Takayama N, et al. Bacteria-Induced Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in the Stomach Provide Immune Protection through Induction of IgA. Immunity. 2020;52:635-649.e4.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.002

  181. 181.

    Pushparaj PN, et al. Interleukin-33 exacerbates acute colitis via interleukin-4 in mice. Immunology. 2013;140:70-77.

    Not in our library10.1111/imm.12111

  182. 182.

    Qiu X, Qi C, Li X, Fang D, Fang M. IL-33 deficiency protects mice from DSS-induced experimental colitis by suppressing ILC2 and Th17 cell responses. Inflamm. Res. 2020;69:1111-1122.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00011-020-01384-4

  183. 183.

    Mishima Y, et al. Interleukin-33 delays recovery of mucosal inflammation via downregulation of homeostatic ABCG5/8 in the colon. Lab. Investig. 2020;100:491-502.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41374-019-0329-3

  184. 184.

    Cullender TC, et al. Innate and adaptive immunity interact to quench microbiome flagellar motility in the gut. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:571-581.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2013.10.009

  185. 185.

    Chassaing B, Gewirtz AT. Identification of Inner Mucus-Associated Bacteria by Laser Capture Microdissection. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018;7:157-160.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.09.009

  186. 186.

    Wang Y, et al. Laser capture microdissection and metagenomic analysis of intact mucosa-associated microbial communities of human colon. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;88:1333-1342.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-010-2921-8

  187. 187.

    Nava GM, Stappenbeck TS. Diversity of the autochthonous colonic microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2011;2:99-104.

    Not in our library10.4161/gmic.2.2.15416

  188. 188.
  189. 189.

    Rossi O, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Strain HTF-F and Its Extracellular Polymeric Matrix Attenuate Clinical Parameters in DSS-Induced Colitis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0123013.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0123013

  190. 190.

    Martín R, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Langella P. Searching for the Bacterial Effector: the Example of the Multi-Skilled Commensal Bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:346.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2018.00346

  191. 191.

    Gibold L, et al. The Vat-AIEC protease promotes crossing of the intestinal mucus layer by Crohn’s disease-associated Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:617-631.

    Not in our library10.1111/cmi.12539

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.