Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Unraveling the intricacies of osteoclast differentiation and maturation: insight into novel therapeutic strategies for bone-destructive diseases

Noriko Takegahara, Hyunsoo Kim, Yongwon Choi

Experimental & Molecular Medicine · 2024 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01157-7

Abstract

Osteoclasts are the principal cells that efficiently resorb bone. Numerous studies have attempted to reveal the molecular pathways leading to the differentiation and activation of osteoclasts to improve the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and other bone-destructive diseases. While the cumulative knowledge of osteoclast regulatory molecules, such as receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) and nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1), contributes to the understanding of the developmental progression of osteoclasts, little is known about how the discrete steps of osteoclastogenesis modify osteoclast status but not the absolute number of osteoclasts. The regulatory mechanisms involved in osteoclast maturation but not those involved in differentiation deserve special attention due to their potential use in establishing a more effective treatment strategy: targeting late-phase differentiation while preserving coupled bone formation. Recent studies have shed light on the molecules that govern late-phase osteoclast differentiation and maturation, as well as the metabolic changes needed to adapt to shifting metabolic demands. This review outlines the current understanding of the regulation of osteoclast differentiation, as well as osteoclast metabolic adaptation as a differentiation control mechanism. Additionally, this review introduces molecules that regulate the late-phase osteoclast differentiation and thus minimally impact coupled bone formation.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Skeletal bone is maintained by bone remodeling, in which old and damaged bone is replaced with new bone through continuous cellular processes that are mainly controlled by bone-resorbing osteoclasts and bone-forming osteoblasts,. During bone remodeling, osteoclast formation is initiated, and a tiny amount of bone is removed, which is then replaced by new bone formed by osteoblasts; after that, the new bone is mineralized. Bone remodeling takes place at sites known as basic multicellular units, which contain all bone cells, including osteoclasts and osteoblasts, and are asynchronously distributed throughout the skeleton,. Osteoblast-osteoclast interactions are necessary and must be coordinated in time and space to maintain the balance of focal bone remodeling. The communication mechanism by which bone formation follows bone resorption is known as coupling. Researchers have discovered several coupling mechanisms, such as (1) the release of osteoblast precursor recruitment factors and growth-promoting factors, which are stored in large amounts in the bone matrix through osteoclastic bone resorption–; (2) the secretion of coupling factors by osteoclasts–; (3) the expression of coupling factors on the osteoclast cell membrane–; and (4) the production of extracellular vesicles, which contain coupling factors synthesized by osteoclasts,. Through these mechanisms, osteoclasts signal osteoblast precursors to prepare for bone formation. A functional imbalance in osteoclasts and osteoblasts unbalances coupling, causing abnormal bone homeostasis.

Various diseases and metabolic abnormalities adversely affect bone health. Activation of osteoclastic bone resorption is a common factor in the pathogenesis of bone loss and fractures. Antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonate and anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) antibodies (denosumab) are used as treatments. Bisphosphonate specifically inhibits farnesyl diphosphate synthase, an enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway, in osteoclasts. This inhibition inactivates osteoclasts, decreases their formation, and increases their apoptosis,. Denosumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits RANKL, blocking osteoclast formation–. These osteoclast-targeting treatments are efficiently antiresorptive. However, their long-term use compromises bone strength because inhibiting osteoclast formation and activity also inhibits osteoclast-mediated release of coupling factors, thereby inhibiting osteoblast differentiation and not promoting bone formation,. Since bone health in the adult skeleton depends on the balance of bone remodeling, understanding the biology of osteoclast differentiation is crucial. Targeting only late-phase differentiation while preserving early osteoclast differentiation, which is necessary for coupled bone formation, would aid in establishing a more effective treatment strategy. Multiple studies have demonstrated that osteoclasts that fail to achieve multinucleation, which is a hallmark of osteoclast maturation, retain their osteoclastic phenotype; these osteoclasts continue expressing osteoclast-related markers such as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and cathepsin K and exhibit low levels of bone resorption–. The evidence indicates that targeting osteoclast maturation could selectively control bone destruction, circumventing the negative effects of general osteoblast suppression.

In this review, we will examine the updated regulatory mechanisms of osteoclast differentiation and focus on cell signaling and metabolic adaptation as key differentiation control mechanisms. Additionally, we will describe the molecules needed for osteoclast maturation, which are essential for the process but dispensable for coupled bone formation.

Osteoclast differentiation and signaling pathways

Osteoclasts are the primary bone-resorbing cells. These cells are highly specific, multinucleated, phagocytic cells of hematopoietic origin and are characterized by distinct features such as a ruffled border that facilitates demineralization and degradation of the bone matrix. Osteoclast differentiation requires two cytokines. The first is macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), which is produced by a variety of cells, including lymphocytes and monocytes, and is necessary for the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells into monocyte/macrophage lineages and the induction of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB (RANK)–. The other is RANKL, which is produced mainly by osteoblasts and osteocytes, and is essential for promoting and sustaining osteoclast differentiation. During osteoclast differentiation, an osteoclast undergoes various changes, including changes in gene expression patterns, morphology, and metabolic processes. The developmental progression of osteoclasts can be divided into roughly three phases: commitment, maturation, and resorption.

Commitment

The initiation of commitment to the osteoclast lineage from monocyte/macrophage lineage precursors is driven mainly by RANK trimerization and activation and the recruitment of adaptor proteins, including TNF receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6), through its intracellular binding sites for the adaptor protein TRAF,, thereby initiating the downstream signaling cascade. The recruitment of adaptors converges on kinase activation and promotes nuclear translocation and the activation of the critical transcription factors nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), and AP1 (consisting of a variety of dimers composed of Fos, Jun, and ATF)–, which contribute to the initial induction of nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1)–. NFATc1, NF-κB, and AP1 are the master regulators of osteoclast-specific transcriptional programs. Additional factors, including the noncanonical Wnt ligand Wnt5a, can enhance RANK expression in osteoclast precursors, thereby promoting RANKL-induced osteoclast formation. RANK signaling functions with costimulatory signals via immunoglobulin-like receptor/immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM)-motif-containing proteins, such as DNAX-activation protein 12 (DAP12) and Fc receptor gamma-chain (FcRγ), which associate with the cell surface receptors osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR), paired immunoglobulin-like receptor A (PIR-A), or triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM-2),. Activation of costimulatory molecules and tyrosine phosphorylation of ITAM form and activate a complex including spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk), Bruton’s tyrosine kinases (Btk)/Tek, adaptor molecules B-cell linker protein (BLNK), and Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76 kDa (SLP-76). This complex integrates both RANK and ITAM downstream signaling, thereby promoting phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ)-mediated Ca2+ signaling, which is essential for robust amplification of NFATc1 and its translocation to the nucleus. NFATc1, as well as the transcription factors c-Fos and NF-κB, activates the expression of genes critical to osteoclast activation, including TRAP, cathepsin K, calcitonin receptor, and c-myc. RANKL signaling also downregulates negative regulators of NFATc1, such as v-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family protein B (MafB), interferon regulatory factor-8 (IRF-8), and B-cell lymphoma 6 (Bcl6). Downregulation of these negative regulators is mediated by the transcriptional repressor B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 (Blimp1) and sirtuin 6 (Sirt6),, both of which are induced by RANKL signaling. The RANKL-RANK signaling pathway orchestrates the expression of these genes, leading committed osteoclasts to progress toward a maturation phase characterized by cell adhesion, fusion, motility, and actin ring formation (Fig. 1a, b).

Maturation

During maturation, osteoclasts undergo a pronounced morphological change known as multinucleation, which is a hallmark of their maturation. Osteoclasts that cannot achieve multinucleation exhibit diminished bone-resorbing activity, demonstrating the important role of multinucleation in osteoclast function. Multinucleation is a multistep process that is mainly mediated by cell‒cell fusion and repeated incomplete cytokinesis. Committed osteoclasts undergo proliferation,, migration, cellular adhesion, cytoskeletal rearrangement, and eventually cell‒cell fusion. The transient increase in proliferation induced by RANKL leads to incomplete cytokinesis, contributing to the formation of multinucleated cells,, which is regulated by Akt activation. The chemoattractant (C-C) ligand-2 (CCL2) and its receptor CCR2 are needed to form multinucleated osteoclasts,. Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), such as integrins and cadherins, are needed for committed osteoclasts to adhere to each other and establish close membrane contact and cytoskeletal organization,,. CAMs also coordinate RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation as signal transduction molecules,. Extensive cytoskeletal rearrangements occur during this phase. Eventually, committed osteoclasts undergo cell‒cell fusion. Several molecules have been shown to be involved in osteoclast fusion, including dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP),, osteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein (OC-STAMP), and v-ATPase subunit d2 (Atp6v0d2). NFATc1 and c-Fos, which is downstream of RANKL-RANK signaling, regulates the expression of these fusion-related molecules (Fig. 1c).

During maturation, osteoclasts adhere to the bone surface, and the resorptive machinery of osteoclasts polarizes toward the bone-cell interface. Signaling mediators, including Rho family small GTPases (RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42), regulate the extensive cytoskeletal rearrangement that occurs during this phase–. Integrin αvβ3 mediates the bone-cell interaction and recognizes the arginyl-glycyl-aspartic acid (RGD) sequence present in various bone matrix proteins, such as osteopontin, vitronectin, and bone sialoprotein. The binding of integrin αvβ3 to its ligands phosphorylates and activates c-Src, which phosphorylates Syk in an ITAM-containing protein (DAP12 and FcRγ)-dependent manner. Activated Syk regulates guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), including Vav3, which eventually activates Rho family small GTPases and regulates cytoskeletal organization. A mature osteoclast eventually forms F-actin-rich adhesive structures, which form a sealing zone (actin ring) on the ventral membranes in contact with the bone surface. This sealing is designed to release protons and proteases for demineralization and to break down the bone matrix. Syk and c-Src are critical for sealing zone formation and bone resorption,, (Fig. 1c).

Resorption

The functional resorption phase involves the formation of a ruffled border surrounded by the sealing zone. The ruffled border is a highly folded and invaginated membrane structure that increases the surface area of osteoclasts in contact with bone. Through this border, protons and hydrolases that solubilize and digest inorganic and organic bone matrix are transported, enabling mature osteoclasts to efficiently resorb bone. Initially, osteoclasts produce hydrochloric acid, which dissolves the bone mineral. The α3 subunit of v-ATPases, the Cl-/H+ antiporter chloride voltage-gated channel 7 (CLC-7), and its β-subunit osteopetrosis associated transmembrane protein 1 (OSTM1) localize to the lysosome and the ruffled border, where they acidify secretory lysosomes and the space between the ruffled border and the bone surface–. This local acidosis dissolves inorganic minerals such as calcium, exposing organic matrix components such as collagen in the connective bone tissue. The decalcified organic matrix is subsequently degraded by lysosomal proteases such as collagenases, cathepsin K, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs),. The secretory lysosome pathway, which delivers proteases, is regulated by Rab7, a small GTPase that regulates endosomal/lysosomal vesicle trafficking. Synaptotagmin VII, which is a member of the synaptotagmin family that mediates the Ca2+-triggered fusion of cytoplasmic/synaptic vesicles to the plasma membrane, mediates the fusion of secretory lysosomes with the ruffled border. The autophagy-related protein Atg5 also participates in the secretion of lysosomal contents by directing lysosomes to fuse with the plasma membrane. Mutations in genes involved in matrix demineralization and dissolution account for most human cases of osteopetrosis. The resorbed material is removed from the resorption pit by transcytosis through osteoclasts, (Fig. 1d).

Osteoclast differentiation and metabolic adaptation

The differentiation of osteoclasts and their bone-resorbing function are energy-intensive processes. Along with signaling pathways and osteoclast-specific gene expression programs, osteoclast differentiation activates metabolic programs. While our understanding of these pathways and gene expression programs during osteoclast differentiation has significantly advanced, the investigation of energy metabolism and its regulation in osteoclasts is in its infancy. However, recent evidence shows that osteoclasts display remarkable metabolic adaptation during differentiation, highlighting the importance of cell metabolism as a differentiation control mechanism (Table 1).

Oxidative phosphorylation and osteoclast numbers

Osteoclast differentiation is associated with a substantial increase in biomass. High metabolic activity and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production are required for these processes. The energy produced by a cell mainly depends on glucose. Glucose is used to produce ATP through the glycolysis pathway, which occurs in the cytoplasm, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) and oxidative phosphorylation, both of which occur in mitochondria. Several studies have suggested that both oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis are increased during osteoclast differentiation. When osteoclast precursors receive RANKL signals, mitochondrial biogenesis and, consequently, mitochondrial size and numbers increase,. The increase in oxidative phosphorylation is mediated at least in part by an increase in mitochondrial biogenesis orchestrated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g coactivator 1β (PGC1β). Mitochondrial DNA is critical for mitochondrial biogenesis, and disruptions in mitochondrial transcription factor A (Tfam) cause severe respiratory chain deficiency and reduced ATP production–. Tfam deficiency in osteoclasts significantly reduces osteoclast numbers. However, the prerequisite of mitochondrial biogenesis for osteoclast differentiation and activity remains in question, as osteoclast lineage-specific PGC1β-deficient mice have a normal bone phenotype, and Tfam-deficient osteoclasts have increased resorption activity and accelerated apoptosis despite the significant decrease in mitochondrial biogenesis levels,. Along with increased mitochondrial biogenesis, RANKL stimulation upregulates the expression of the genes involved in the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation,,. This accelerates mitochondrial respiration and produces high levels of ATP. Oxidative phosphorylation has been identified as the primary bioenergetic source for osteoclast formation. NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase iron-sulfur protein 4 (Ndufs4) is a subunit of mitochondrial membrane respiratory chain complex I. Ndufs4 deficiency suppresses mitochondrial complex I activity, inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and thereby increasing bone mass in vivo. The RANKL-induced increase in the expression of oxidative phosphorylation-involved genes and enhanced mitochondrial respiration depend on the Myc-ERRα signaling axis. In addition to oxidative phosphorylation, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-mediated DNA methylation by Dnmt3a regulates osteoclast differentiation via epigenetic repression of anti-osteoclastogenic genes, including IRF-8. Myc deficiency in osteoclasts severely impairs mitochondrial respiratory capacity and completely stops osteoclastogenesis, thereby increasing bone mass in vivo. These observations strongly indicate that oxidative phosphorylation is required for osteoclast differentiation. Moreover, disturbing oxidative phosphorylation in osteoclasts changes the bone phenotype, specifically by decreasing osteoclast numbers (Fig. 2a).

Glycolysis, osteoclast maturation and resorption

Glycolysis is the metabolic pathway that oxidizes glucose for energy production and anabolic processes such as protein, lipid, and nucleic acid synthesis and supports proliferation and growth–. RANKL stimulation induces the expression of glycolysis-involved genes, including hexokinase (HK), phosphofructokinase (PFK), and pyruvate kinase (PKM), which are rate-limiting enzymes that control the pace of glycolysis and the outflow from the glycolytic pathway to the TCA cycle. RANKL also induces lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which catalyzes the transformation of pyruvate into lactate, as well as the glucose transporter Glut1. During RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation, glucose consumption and lactate production are elevated, indicating an increase in glycolysis,. The importance of glycolysis for osteoclast differentiation has been demonstrated using specific inhibitors and/or activators. The molecule 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) is a modified glucose molecule with the 2-hydroxyl group replaced by hydrogen. This factor accumulates in the cell and inhibits glucose phosphorylation by HK, preventing further glycolysis. Treatment with 2-DG severely abrogates osteoclast differentiation,. PKM isoform 2 (PKM2) is a rate-limiting glycolysis enzyme whose activity can be negatively regulated,. PKM2 catalyzes the conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate. Active PKM2 contributes to glucose metabolism by directing it toward mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, thereby increasing ATP production through the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Conversely, when PKM2 is negatively regulated, glucose metabolism shifts toward aerobic glycolysis. Thus, glucose metabolites are increased and directed toward anabolic pathways,. Activation of PKM2 using the specific activator TEPP46 reduces glycolysis (i.e., shifts glucose metabolism toward oxidative phosphorylation) and inhibits the formation of large multinucleated osteoclasts, whereas PKM2 inhibition by the specific inhibitor shikonin enhances osteoclast differentiation. Phosphorylation of PKM2 at tyrosine 105 (Y105) can negatively regulate its enzymatic activity. Increased phosphorylation of PKM2 Y105 is observed during RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation, especially in the late phase (maturation). These results suggest that glycolysis plays a key role in osteoclast differentiation, especially during maturation. Glycolysis is also an influential factor in the bone resorption phase. Osteoclastic resorption is significantly decreased when osteoclasts are fueled by galactose instead of glucose, which forces cells to depend on oxidative phosphorylation to generate sufficient ATP by reducing the glycolysis rate. The impaired resorption activity in the presence of galactose can be restored with a nontoxic dose of rotenone, an inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I. These observations indicate that glycolysis is the preferred energetic pathway driving the resorption activity of mature osteoclasts. Notably, localization of the glycolysis-associated enzymes PKM2 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) has been detected in proximity to the sealing zones of mature osteoclasts. This observation supports the idea that glycolysis fuels the bone resorption process (Fig. 2a–c).

Oxygen tension is very low in bone, especially in resorption lacunae, where osteoclasts reside. Therefore, oxygen availability may dictate the metabolic profile and modulate osteoclast formation and activation. Hypoxia is a critical stimulator of osteoclast differentiation, although conflicting data exist. The hypoxia-inducible transcription factor HIF is the main regulator of the hypoxic response and plays a crucial role in osteoclast regulation. HIF is a heterodimer composed of an inducible alpha subunit (HIF-1α and HIF-2α) and a constitutively expressed beta subunit (HIF-1β). In hypoxic microenvironments, HIF proteins are stabilized, establishing an active transcriptional complex. Hypoxia stabilizes HIF-1α in osteoclasts–, and RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation increases HIF-1α expression,. HIF-1α activation induces the transcription of Glut1 and rate-limiting glycolytic enzymes such as lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and phosphofructokinase liver type (PFKL), thereby promoting glucose uptake and glycolysis in osteoclasts. Inhibiting HIF-1α significantly inhibits osteoclastic resorption despite enhancing the formation of large multinucleated osteoclasts. Hypoxia also augments osteoclast differentiation by increasing the glycolysis metabolic pathway by suppressing the negative regulator copper metabolism MURR1 domain-containing 1 (COMMD1). Importantly, osteoclast-specific HIF-1α deficiency or COMMD1 deficiency in mice or treatment with the HIF-1α inhibitor 2-methoxyestradiol results in little change in bone volume or osteoclast numbers on the bone surface under normal conditions,. However, under conditions of osteoclast activation, such as estrogen deficiency and inflammation, bone loss is prevented by suppressing osteoclast activation,. These observations indicate the important role of HIF-1α and COMMD1 (and possibly the molecule-dependent increase in glycolysis) under pathological rather than physiological conditions.

Alternative energy substrates that fuel osteoclast differentiation

Although glucose is a major nutrient for osteoclasts, limiting glycolysis by omitting glucose from the culture media or knocking down HIF-1α does not impair osteoclast formation, indicating alternative energy substrates that support the differentiation process. During osteoclast differentiation, osteoclasts take up a considerable amount of amino acids, including glutamine, arginine, serine, and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs). Glutamine is the most bountiful and flexible amino acid in the body. L-glutamine significantly impacts osteoclast differentiation, and its depletion abrogates the induction of osteoclast formation. Supplementation with L-glutamine during the later phase of differentiation has more impact than during the early phase, indicating its significant role in the later phase of differentiation. The high-affinity Na+-dependent L-glutamine transporter solute carrier family 1 member 5 (Slc1a5) mediates L-glutamine uptake, which is catalyzed to form glutamate by glutaminase (Gls1). RANKL stimulation induces both Slc1a5 and Gls1 in osteoclasts. Although the metabolism of glutamate in osteoclasts remains unclear, it is thought to be converted to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) and subsequently fuels other metabolic pathways, such as the TCA cycle, as a substrate of anaplerosis during osteoclast differentiation. Arginine, a conditionally essential amino acid, has been shown to control RANKL-induced osteoclast formation. Extracellular arginine supports TCA cycle activity and oxidative phosphorylation. Depletion of arginine by recombinant arginase 1 during differentiation decreases RANKL-induced expression of NFATc1 and Fos at an early timepoint and completely blocks osteoclastogenesis. BCAAs and branched-chain aminotransferase 1 (BCAT1) play important roles in osteoclast differentiation. BCAT1 is the cytoplasmic BCAT isoform that converts BCAAs into branched-chain ketoacids, generating glutamate from α-KG. BCAT1 deficiency in mice increases bone mass by decreasing osteoclast differentiation and resorption activity. Pharmacological inhibition of BCAT1 prevents osteoclast differentiation and inflammation-induced bone loss. The depletion of BCAAs during the later phase of differentiation significantly decreases osteoclast maturation, whereas depletion in the early phase has no effects on osteoclast differentiation or maturation, indicating the role of BCAAs in the relatively late phase of osteoclast differentiation. Moreover, conflicting data on the role of BCAAs in osteoclast differentiation arise from osteoclast-specific deletion of LAT1, an L-type amino acid transporter 1 that mediates the uptake of BCAAs (also known as Slc7a5), resulting in enhanced osteoclast differentiation and function, which are attributed to impaired mTOR signaling. Further studies are needed to clarify the impact of BCAA metabolism and BCAA uptake on osteoclast differentiation (Fig. 2a, b).

Molecules regulating late-phase osteoclast differentiation with minimal impacts on coupled bone formation

Studies have identified molecules whose functional disturbance causes defective osteoclastic bone resorption without affecting osteoblastic bone formation. These molecules can be promising targets to aid in establishing a more effective treatment strategy for late-phase osteoclast differentiation while preserving coupled bone formation (Table 2).

Btk and Tec are critical signaling molecules for osteoclast differentiation

The tyrosine kinases BTK and Tec are critical for integrating RANK and ITAM downstream signaling and promoting PLCγ-mediated Ca2+ signaling. Osteoclasts derived from Xid mice, which possess a natural mutation in the BTK gene, exhibit impaired multinucleated osteoclast formation in vitro due to impaired fusion of preosteoclasts, although no significant defects were detected in BTK-deficient mice in terms of osteoclast numbers, resorption activity, and osteoblastic bone formation. However, Tec and BTK double-deficient mice exhibit striking defects in osteoclast numbers and bone resorption. Notably, osteoblastic bone formation remains intact in double-deficient mice. Local administration of the Tec kinase inhibitor LFM-A13 attenuates inflammation-induced bone loss or RANKL-induced bone loss by decreasing osteoclast numbers on the bone surface but does not affect inflammatory responses. These observations suggest that targeting Tec family kinases can suppress osteoclastogenesis while preserving coupled bone formation in vivo.

PKN3 is a signaling mediator of the Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling pathway

Cytoskeletal reorganization in osteoclasts to form sealing zones is imperative for the attachment of these cells to bone and the resorption of bone matrices. Wnt5a and receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 (Ror2) signaling promote osteoclast differentiation by enhancing the expression of RANK in osteoclast precursors by activating c-Jun N-terminal kinase (Jnk). Additionally, Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling enhances osteoclastic bone-resorbing activity in mature osteoclasts through protein kinase N3 (Pkn3). Mechanistically, the engagement of Wnt5a with Ror2 stimulates the small GTPase Rho and its effector kinase Pkn3 and eventually enhances c-Src activity. Osteoclasts that lack Ror2 and/or Pkn3 expression have impaired actin ring formation. Heterozygous mutations in Ror2 increase bone volume due to decreased numbers of osteoclasts on the bone surface, and osteoblastic bone formation is normal. Pkn3 deficiency in mice increases bone mass due to impaired osteoclastic bone resorption activity, which is characterized by decreases in the eroded surface and erosion depth on the bone surface, but not by osteoclast differentiation, as the number of osteoclasts on the bone surface is comparable to that in control mice. Osteoblastic bone formation is intact in the absence of Pkn3. These results suggest that Ror2 is required for osteoclast differentiation, whereas Pkn3 is dispensable for osteoclast differentiation but essential for the maturation and resorption activity of osteoclasts. Of note, both Ror2 and Pkn3 are dispensable for coupled osteoblastic bone formation,. Recently, the Pkn3 inhibitor SB202190 has been shown to inhibit osteoclast activity but not osteoclast differentiation and coupled bone formation in vivo, thereby preventing ovariectomy-induced bone loss. These findings indicate that targeting Pkn3 with SB202190 can be a promising treatment. These findings also suggest that the signaling pathway that regulates the formation of a sealing zone can be a target of a novel anti-bone resorption therapy.

Pcdh7 is a signal transduction molecule for the activation of small GTPases

Osteoclast differentiation requires costimulatory molecules in addition to the signals of RANKL. Protocadherin-7 (Pcdh7) is a member of the protocadherin family, which is a subgroup of the cadherin superfamily. This factor acts as a signaling receptor for osteoclast differentiation,,. Mechanistically, Pcdh7 ligation, which is thought to occur through homophilic interactions, activates protein phosphatase 2 A (PP2A) during RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation. PP2A dephosphorylates and activates GSK3β, which, in turn, activates small GTPases, including RhoA, inducing osteoclast differentiation and multinucleation. Pcdh7 deficiency in mice reduces osteoclast numbers, thereby increasing bone mass. Pcdh7 deficiency does not affect coupled bone formation. Of note, Pcdh7 deficiency impairs the formation of large multinucleated osteoclasts, although it does not affect the expression of differentiation markers such as Acp5 and Cathepsin K or osteoclastic resorption functions. Pcdh7 may be required during the osteoclast maturation phase to form large multinucleated osteoclasts. These findings suggest that multinucleation is a potential target for regulating osteoclastic bone resorption without affecting coupled bone formation.

IgSF11 and PKM2 regulate glycolysis

Glucose metabolism, including glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, is accelerated during osteoclast differentiation, and it exhibits potential as a target for the regulation of osteoclastic bone resorption. The glycolysis rate-limiting enzyme PKM2 regulates osteoclast differentiation as a signal mediator that is downstream of immunoglobulin superfamily 11 (IgSF11),. Stimulation of IgSF11, which is mediated by homophilic interactions, phosphorylates PKM2 at Y105 through multiple src family kinases, including c-Src, thereby inhibiting PKM2 activity. RANKL stimulation induces expression of IgSF11, which peaks during the late phase of differentiation, and tyrosine phosphorylation of PKM2 also peaks during the late phase of differentiation. PKM2 phosphorylation and lactate production during osteoclast differentiation are decreased in the absence of IgSF11, suggesting IgSF11-mediated regulation of PKM2 activity and, thereby, glycolysis. IgSF11 deficiency impairs osteoclast differentiation and resorption activity without affecting early-phase signaling pathways. Consistently, IgSF11 deficiency increases bone mass due to decreased numbers of osteoclasts on the bone surface. Additionally, systemic administration of the PKM2 activator TEPP46 increases bone mass due to decreased numbers and sizes of osteoclasts on the bone surface. IgSF11 deficiency and/or the administration of TEPP46 do not affect coupled bone formation,. Notably, the inhibitory effect of TEPP46 on osteoclast differentiation is more prominent under inflammatory conditions and do not affect inflammation or coupled bone formation. These findings indicate that IgSF11-PKM2 signaling axis-mediated regulation of glucose metabolism is a promising target for selectively inhibiting bone loss. More importantly, metabolic adaptation is a mechanism controlling osteoclast differentiation and has potential as a target for the treatment and prevention of bone-destructive diseases.

Conclusions

In this review, we provided an overview of cell signaling and metabolic adaptations as regulatory mechanisms of osteoclast differentiation and specifically focused on understanding these mechanisms in the context of the osteoclast differentiation phases. Through the use of gene-edited mice, we have gained valuable insights into the phases of osteoclast differentiation and identified regulatory molecules that can modulate osteoclast-mediated bone resorption without affecting coupled bone formation. These include (1) the multinucleation process, as characterized by gene deletion of Pcdh7; (2) sealing zone (actin ring) formation, as characterized by Pkn3 deficiency; and (3) RANKL-induced glycolysis, as characterized by the modulation of PKM2 activity. Note that caution should be exercised due to the potential involvement of these molecules in other tissues. Indeed, in mice, Pkn3 deficiency could impact angiogenesis, and bioinformatic analysis identified Pcdh7 as a key gene related to the development of sarcopenia and osteoporosis. Understanding the molecular intricacies underlying late-phase osteoclast differentiation, in addition to its physiological roles, will assist in improving the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and other bone-destructive diseases.

It is important to acknowledge that while many studies have explored the impact of gene functions on osteoclast differentiation and activity, they mainly focused on the role of genes in intrinsic cell functions. As the coupling between osteoclasts and osteoblasts can only be observed in vivo, some molecules that can potentially impact late-phase osteoclast differentiation (i.e., maturation) without affecting osteoblastic bone formation might have been overlooked. To gain a comprehensive understanding, future studies should reinvestigate the function of these molecules from the perspective of their involvement in coupling mechanisms. This will pave the way for further advancements in the field and potentially unveil novel therapeutic targets for bone-destructive diseases.

References 147

  1. 1.

    Sims NA, Martin TJ. Osteoclasts provide coupling signals to osteoblast lineage cells through multiple mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2020;82:507-529.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034425

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Tang Y, et al. TGF-beta1-induced migration of bone mesenchymal stem cells couples bone resorption with formation. Nat. Med. 2009;15:757-765.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.1979

  4. 4.

    Xian L, et al. Matrix IGF-1 maintains bone mass by activation of mTOR in mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1095-1101.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2793

  5. 5.

    Centrella M, Canalis E. Local regulators of skeletal growth: a perspective. Endocr. Rev. 1985;6:544-551.

    Not in our library10.1210/edrv-6-4-544

  6. 6.

    Hock JM, Canalis E. Platelet-derived growth factor enhances bone cell replication, but not differentiated function of osteoblasts. Endocrinology. 1994;134:1423-1428.

    Not in our library10.1210/endo.134.3.8119182

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    Mitlak BH, et al. The effect of systemically administered PDGF-BB on the rodent skeleton. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1996;11:238-247.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.5650110213

  9. 9.

    Oreffo RO, Mundy GR, Seyedin SM, Bonewald LF. Activation of the bone-derived latent TGF beta complex by isolated osteoclasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1989;158:817-823.

    Not in our library10.1016/0006-291x(89)92795-2

  10. 10.

    Fiedler J, Roderer G, Gunther KP, Brenner RE. BMP-2, BMP-4, and PDGF-bb stimulate chemotactic migration of primary human mesenchymal progenitor cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2002;87:305-312.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.10309

  11. 11.

    Rickard DJ, Sullivan TA, Shenker BJ, Leboy PS, Kazhdan I. Induction of rapid osteoblast differentiation in rat bone marrow stromal cell cultures by dexamethasone and BMP-2. Dev. Biol. 1994;161:218-228.

    Not in our library10.1006/dbio.1994.1022

  12. 12.

    Robey PG, et al. Osteoblasts synthesize and respond to transforming growth factor-type beta (TGF-beta) in vitro. J. Cell. Biol. 1987;105:457-463.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.105.1.457

  13. 13.

    Hock JM, Canalis E, Centrella M. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates bone matrix apposition and bone cell replication in cultured fetal rat calvariae. Endocrinology. 1990;126:421-426.

    Not in our library10.1210/endo-126-1-421

  14. 14.

    Pederson L, Ruan M, Westendorf JJ, Khosla S, Oursler MJ. Regulation of bone formation by osteoclasts involves Wnt/BMP signaling and the chemokine sphingosine-1-phosphate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:20764-20769.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0805133106

  15. 15.

    Walker EC, et al. Cardiotrophin-1 is an osteoclast-derived stimulus of bone formation required for normal bone remodeling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008;23:2025-2032.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.080706

  16. 16.

    Takeshita S, et al. Osteoclast-secreted CTHRC1 in the coupling of bone resorption to formation. J. Clin. Investig. 2013;123:3914-3924.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci69493

  17. 17.

    Garimella R, et al. Expression and synthesis of bone morphogenetic proteins by osteoclasts: a possible path to anabolic bone remodeling. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2008;56:569-577.

    Not in our library10.1369/jhc.2008.950394

  18. 18.

    Matsuoka K, Park KA, Ito M, Ikeda K, Takeshita S. Osteoclast-derived complement component 3a stimulates osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:1522-1530.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.2187

  19. 19.

    Kim BJ, et al. Osteoclast-secreted SLIT3 coordinates bone resorption and formation. J. Clin. Investig. 2018;128:1429-1441.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci91086

  20. 20.

    Ota K, et al. Transforming growth factor beta 1 induces CXCL16 and leukemia inhibitory factor expression in osteoclasts to modulate migration of osteoblast progenitors. Bone. 2013;57:68-75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.023

  21. 21.

    Zhao C, et al. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2006;4:111-121.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.012

  22. 22.

    Negishi-Koga T, et al. Suppression of bone formation by osteoclastic expression of semaphorin 4D. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1473-1480.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2489

  23. 23.

    Tonna S, et al. EphrinB2 signaling in osteoblasts promotes bone mineralization by preventing apoptosis. FASEB J. 2014;28:4482-4496.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.14-254300

  24. 24.

    Ikebuchi Y, et al. Coupling of bone resorption and formation by RANKL reverse signalling. Nature. 2018;561:195-200.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0482-7

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Reszka AA, Rodan GA. Bisphosphonate mechanism of action. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2003;5:65-74.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11926-003-0085-6

  27. 27.

    Drake MT, Clarke BL, Khosla S. Bisphosphonates: mechanism of action and role in clinical practice. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2008;83:1032-1045.

    Not in our library10.4065/83.9.1032

  28. 28.

    Takegahara N, Kim H, Choi Y. RANKL biology. Bone. 2022;159:116353.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2022.116353

  29. 29.

    Miyazaki T, Tokimura F, Tanaka S. A review of denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis. Patient Prefer. Adher. 2014;8:463-471.

    Not in our library10.2147/ppa.s46192

  30. 30.

    Lacey DL, et al. Bench to bedside: elucidation of the OPG-RANK-RANKL pathway and the development of denosumab. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012;11:401-419.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd3705

  31. 31.

    Seeman E, Martin TJ. Antiresorptive and anabolic agents in the prevention and reversal of bone fragility. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2019;15:225-236.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41584-019-0172-3

  32. 32.

    Sims NA, Ng KW. Implications of osteoblast-osteoclast interactions in the management of osteoporosis by antiresorptive agents denosumab and odanacatib. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2014;12:98-106.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11914-014-0196-1

  33. 33.

    Dou C, et al. Graphene-based MicroRNA transfection blocks preosteoclast fusion to increase bone formation and vascularization. Adv. Sci. 2018;5:1700578.

    Not in our library10.1002/advs.201700578

  34. 34.

    Chiu YH, et al. Dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP) regulates osteoclast differentiation via the Ca(2+) /NFATc1 Axis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017;232:2538-2549.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.25638

  35. 35.

    Witwicka H, et al. Studies of OC-STAMP in osteoclast fusion: a new knockout mouse model, rescue of cell fusion, and transmembrane topology. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0128275.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0128275

  36. 36.

    Miyamoto H, et al. Osteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein and dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein cooperatively modulate cell-cell fusion to form osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012;27:1289-1297.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.1575

  37. 37.

    Yang M, et al. Osteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein (OC-STAMP), a novel protein induced by RANKL that promotes osteoclast differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2008;215:497-505.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.21331

  38. 38.

    Yagi M, et al. DC-STAMP is essential for cell-cell fusion in osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J. Exp. Med. 2005;202:345-351.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20050645

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Ross FP. M-CSF, c-Fms, and signaling in osteoclasts and their precursors. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 2006;1068:110-116.

    Not in our library10.1196/annals.1346.014

  41. 41.

    Hamilton JA. Colony-stimulating factors in inflammation and autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:533-544.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri2356

  42. 42.

    Ross FP, Teitelbaum S. L. alphavbeta3 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor: partners in osteoclast biology. Immunol. Rev. 2005;208:88-105.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00331.x

  43. 43.

    Pixley FJ, Stanley ER. CSF-1 regulation of the wandering macrophage: complexity in action. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:628-638.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2004.09.016

  44. 44.

    Arai F, et al. Commitment and differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells by the sequential expression of c-Fms and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB (RANK) receptors. J. Exp. Med. 1999;190:1741-1754.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.190.12.1741

  45. 45.

    Nakashima T, et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1231-1234.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2452

  46. 46.

    Xiong J, et al. Matrix-embedded cells control osteoclast formation. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1235-1241.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2448

  47. 47.

    Boyce BF. Advances in the regulation of osteoclasts and osteoclast functions. J. Dent. Res. 2013;92:860-867.

    Not in our library10.1177/0022034513500306

  48. 48.

    Kanazawa K, Kudo A. Self-assembled RANK induces osteoclastogenesis ligand-independently. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:2053-2060.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.050706

  49. 49.

    Wong BR, et al. The TRAF family of signal transducers mediates NF-kappaB activation by the TRANCE receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:28355-28359.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.273.43.28355

  50. 50.

    Kobayashi N, et al. Segregation of TRAF6-mediated signaling pathways clarifies its role in osteoclastogenesis. EMBO J. 2001;20:1271-1280.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/20.6.1271

  51. 51.

    Abu-Amer Y. NF-kappaB signaling and bone resorption. Osteoporos. Int. 2013;24:2377-2386.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00198-013-2313-x

  52. 52.

    Franzoso G, et al. Requirement for NF-kappaB in osteoclast and B-cell development. Genes Dev. 1997;11:3482-3496.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.11.24.3482

  53. 53.

    Matsuo K, et al. Fosl1 is a transcriptional target of c-Fos during osteoclast differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2000;24:184-187.

    Not in our library10.1038/72855

  54. 54.

    Wagner EF. Functions of AP1 (Fos/Jun) in bone development. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2002;61:ii40-ii42.

    Not in our library10.1136/ard.61.suppl_2.ii40

  55. 55.

    Grigoriadis AE, et al. c-Fos: a key regulator of osteoclast-macrophage lineage determination and bone remodeling. Science. 1994;266:443-448.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.7939685

  56. 56.

    Kim K, Lee SH, Ha Kim J, Choi Y, Kim N. NFATc1 induces osteoclast fusion via up-regulation of Atp6v0d2 and the dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP). Mol. Endocrinol. 2008;22:176-185.

    Not in our library10.1210/me.2007-0237

  57. 57.

    Ishida N, et al. Large scale gene expression analysis of osteoclastogenesis in vitro and elucidation of NFAT2 as a key regulator. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:41147-41156.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m205063200

  58. 58.

    Takayanagi H, et al. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev. Cell. 2002;3:889-901.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00369-6

  59. 59.

    Asagiri M, et al. Autoamplification of NFATc1 expression determines its essential role in bone homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 2005;202:1261-1269.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20051150

  60. 60.

    Yamashita T, et al. NF-kappaB p50 and p52 regulate receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) and tumor necrosis factor-induced osteoclast precursor differentiation by activating c-Fos and NFATc1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:18245-18253.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m610701200

  61. 61.

    Maeda K, et al. Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling between osteoblast-lineage cells and osteoclast precursors enhances osteoclastogenesis. Nat. Med. 2012;18:405-412.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2653

  62. 62.

    Koga T, et al. Costimulatory signals mediated by the ITAM motif cooperate with RANKL for bone homeostasis. Nature. 2004;428:758-763.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02444

  63. 63.

    Kim N, Takami M, Rho J, Josien R, Choi Y. A novel member of the leukocyte receptor complex regulates osteoclast differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:201-209.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20011681

  64. 64.

    Humphrey MB, et al. TREM2, a DAP12-associated receptor, regulates osteoclast differentiation and function. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006;21:237-245.

    Not in our library10.1359/jbmr.051016

  65. 65.

    Cella M, et al. Impaired differentiation of osteoclasts in TREM-2-deficient individuals. J. Exp. Med. 2003;198:645-651.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20022220

  66. 66.

    Shinohara M, et al. Tyrosine kinases Btk and Tec regulate osteoclast differentiation by linking RANK and ITAM signals. Cell. 2008;132:794-806.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.037

  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Kim K, et al. MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation. Blood. 2007;109:3253-3259.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2006-09-048249

  69. 69.

    Zhao B, et al. Interferon regulatory factor-8 regulates bone metabolism by suppressing osteoclastogenesis. Nat. Med. 2009;15:1066-1071.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2007

  70. 70.

    Miyauchi Y, et al. The Blimp1-Bcl6 axis is critical to regulate osteoclast differentiation and bone homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:751-762.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20091957

  71. 71.

    Park SJ, et al. Sirt6 cooperates with Blimp1 to positively regulate osteoclast differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26186.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep26186

  72. 72.

    Takegahara, N. Osteoclast Cytokinesis. In: Zaidi, M (ed.) Encyclopedia of Bone Biology. Oxford: Academic Press; 2020. Vol. 1 p. 221–235.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    Takegahara N, et al. Involvement of receptor activator of nuclear Factor-kappaB Ligand (RANKL)-induced incomplete cytokinesis in the polyploidization of osteoclasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:3439-3454.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.677427

  74. 74.

    Kikuta J, Ishii M. Osteoclast migration, differentiation and function: novel therapeutic targets for rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 2013;52:226-234.

    Not in our library10.1093/rheumatology/kes259

  75. 75.

    Pereira M, et al. Common signalling pathways in macrophage and osteoclast multinucleation. J. Cell. Sci. 2018;131:jcs216267.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.216267

  76. 76.

    Khan UA, Hashimi SM, Bakr MM, Forwood MR, Morrison NA. CCL2 and CCR2 are essential for the formation of osteoclasts and foreign body giant cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2016;117:382-389.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.25282

  77. 77.

    Sul OJ, et al. Absence of MCP-1 leads to elevated bone mass via impaired actin ring formation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012;227:1619-1627.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.22879

  78. 78.

    McHugh KP, et al. Mice lacking beta3 integrins are osteosclerotic because of dysfunctional osteoclasts. J. Clin. Investig. 2000;105:433-440.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci8905

  79. 79.

    Fiorino C, Harrison RE. E-cadherin is important for cell differentiation during osteoclastogenesis. Bone. 2016;86:106-118.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bone.2016.03.004

  80. 80.

    Kim H, et al. IgSF11 regulates osteoclast differentiation through association with the scaffold protein PSD-95. Bone Res. 2020;8:5.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-019-0080-9

  81. 81.

    Kim H, Takegahara N, Choi Y. Protocadherin-7 regulates osteoclast differentiation through intracellular SET-binding domain-mediated RhoA and Rac1 activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:13117.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms222313117

  82. 82.

    Kukita T, et al. RANKL-induced DC-STAMP is essential for osteoclastogenesis. J. Exp. Med. 2004;200:941-946.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20040518

  83. 83.

    Lee SH, et al. v-ATPase V0 subunit d2-deficient mice exhibit impaired osteoclast fusion and increased bone formation. Nat. Med. 2006;12:1403-1409.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm1514

  84. 84.

    Feng X, Teitelbaum SL. Osteoclasts: new Insights. Bone Res. 2013;1:11-26.

    Not in our library10.4248/br201301003

  85. 85.

    Weivoda MM, Oursler MJ. The roles of small GTPases in osteoclast biology. Orthop. Muscular Syst. 2014;3:1000161.

    Not in our library10.4172/2161-0533.1000161

  86. 86.

    Croke M, et al. Rac deletion in osteoclasts causes severe osteopetrosis. J. Cell. Sci. 2011;124:3811-3821.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.086280

  87. 87.

    Razzouk S, Lieberherr M, Cournot G. Rac-GTPase, osteoclast cytoskeleton and bone resorption. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1999;78:249-255.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0171-9335(99)80058-2

  88. 88.

    Duong LT, Lakkakorpi P, Nakamura I, Rodan GA. Integrins and signaling in osteoclast function. Matrix Biol. 2000;19:97-105.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0945-053x(00)00051-2

  89. 89.

    Zou W, et al. Syk, c-Src, the alphavbeta3 integrin, and ITAM immunoreceptors, in concert, regulate osteoclastic bone resorption. J. Cell. Biol. 2007;176:877-888.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200611083

  90. 90.

    Faccio R, et al. Vav3 regulates osteoclast function and bone mass. Nat. Med. 2005;11:284-290.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm1194

  91. 91.

    Novack DV, Teitelbaum SL. The osteoclast: friend or foe? Annu Rev. Pathol. 2008;3:457-484.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151431

  92. 92.

    Boyce BF, Yoneda T, Lowe C, Soriano P, Mundy GR. Requirement of pp60c-src expression for osteoclasts to form ruffled borders and resorb bone in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 1992;90:1622-1627.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci116032

  93. 93.

    Miyazaki T, et al. Src kinase activity is essential for osteoclast function. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:17660-17666.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m311032200

  94. 94.

    Vacher J, Bruccoleri M, Pata M. Ostm1 from mouse to human: insights into osteoclast maturation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5600.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms21165600

  95. 95.

    Neutzsky-Wulff AV, et al. Severe developmental bone phenotype in ClC-7 deficient mice. Dev. Biol. 2010;344:1001-1010.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.06.018

  96. 96.

    Kornak U, et al. Mutations in the a3 subunit of the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase cause infantile malignant osteopetrosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000;9:2059-2063.

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/9.13.2059

  97. 97.

    Kornak U, et al. Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell. 2001;104:205-215.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00206-9

  98. 98.

    Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP. Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003;4:638-649.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg1122

  99. 99.

    Takayanagi H. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Clin. Calcium. 2007;17:484-492.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    Roy M, Roux S. Rab GTPases in osteoclastic bone resorption and autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:7655.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms21207655

  101. 101.

    Zhao H, et al. Synaptotagmin VII regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoclast and osteoblast secretion. Dev. Cell. 2008;14:914-925.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.022

  102. 102.

    DeSelm CJ, et al. Autophagy proteins regulate the secretory component of osteoclastic bone resorption. Dev. Cell. 2011;21:966-974.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.016

  103. 103.

    Sobacchi C, Schulz A, Coxon FP, Villa A, Helfrich MH. Osteopetrosis: genetics, treatment and new insights into osteoclast function. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013;9:522-536.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2013.137

  104. 104.

    Nesbitt SA, Horton MA. Trafficking of matrix collagens through bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Science. 1997;276:266-269.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.276.5310.266

  105. 105.

    Salo J, Lehenkari P, Mulari M, Metsikko K, Vaananen HK. Removal of osteoclast bone resorption products by transcytosis. Science. 1997;276:270-273.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.276.5310.270

  106. 106.

    Indo Y, et al. Metabolic regulation of osteoclast differentiation and function. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013;28:2392-2399.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbmr.1976

  107. 107.

    Ishii KA, et al. Coordination of PGC-1beta and iron uptake in mitochondrial biogenesis and osteoclast activation. Nat. Med. 2009;15:259-266.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.1910

  108. 108.

    Lemma S, et al. Energy metabolism in osteoclast formation and activity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016;79:168-180.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2016.08.034

  109. 109.

    Jeng JY, et al. Maintenance of mitochondrial DNA copy number and expression are essential for preservation of mitochondrial function and cell growth. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008;103:347-357.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.21625

  110. 110.

    Larsson NG, et al. Mitochondrial transcription factor A is necessary for mtDNA maintenance and embryogenesis in mice. Nat. Genet. 1998;18:231-236.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng0398-231

  111. 111.

    Wang J, et al. Dilated cardiomyopathy and atrioventricular conduction blocks induced by heart-specific inactivation of mitochondrial DNA gene expression. Nat. Genet. 1999;21:133-137.

    Not in our library10.1038/5089

  112. 112.
  113. 113.

    Miyazaki T, et al. Intracellular and extracellular ATP coordinately regulate the inverse correlation between osteoclast survival and bone resorption. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:37808-37823.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.385369

  114. 114.

    Wei W, et al. PGC1beta mediates PPARgamma activation of osteoclastogenesis and rosiglitazone-induced bone loss. Cell Metab. 2010;11:503-516.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.015

  115. 115.

    Nishikawa K, et al. DNA methyltransferase 3a regulates osteoclast differentiation by coupling to an S-adenosylmethionine-producing metabolic pathway. Nat. Med. 2015;21:281-287.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3774

  116. 116.

    Bae S, et al. MYC-dependent oxidative metabolism regulates osteoclastogenesis via nuclear receptor ERRalpha. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127:2555-2568.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci89935

  117. 117.

    Jin Z, Wei W, Yang M, Du Y, Wan Y. Mitochondrial complex I activity suppresses inflammation and enhances bone resorption by shifting macrophage-osteoclast polarization. Cell Metab. 2014;20:483-498.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.011

  118. 118.

    Christofk HR, Vander Heiden MG, Wu N, Asara JM, Cantley LC. Pyruvate kinase M2 is a phosphotyrosine-binding protein. Nature. 2008;452:181-186.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06667

  119. 119.

    Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016;41:211-218.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.001

  120. 120.

    Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg Effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029-1033.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1160809

  121. 121.

    Ahn H, et al. Accelerated lactate dehydrogenase activity potentiates osteoclastogenesis via NFATc1 signaling. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153886.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0153886

  122. 122.

    Kim JM, et al. Osteoclast precursors display dynamic metabolic shifts toward accelerated glucose metabolism at an early stage of RANKL-stimulated osteoclast differentiation. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2007;20:935-946.

    Not in our library10.1159/000110454

  123. 123.

    Kim H, Takegahara N, Choi Y. IgSF11-mediated phosphorylation of pyruvate kinase M2 regulates osteoclast differentiation and prevents pathological bone loss. Bone Res. 2023;11:17.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41413-023-00251-2

  124. 124.

    Murata K, et al. Hypoxia-Sensitive COMMD1 integrates signaling and cellular metabolism in human macrophages and suppresses osteoclastogenesis. Immunity. 2017;47:66-79.e65.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.018

  125. 125.

    Hitosugi T, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation inhibits PKM2 to promote the Warburg effect and tumor growth. Sci. Signal. 2009;2:ra73.

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.2000431

  126. 126.

    Ward PS, Thompson CB. Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:297-308.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014

  127. 127.

    Nishikawa K, et al. Osteoclasts adapt to physioxia perturbation through DNA demethylation. EMBO Rep. 2021;22:e53035.

    Not in our library10.15252/embr.202153035

  128. 128.

    Utting JC, Flanagan AM, Brandao-Burch A, Orriss IR, Arnett TR. Hypoxia stimulates osteoclast formation from human peripheral blood. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2010;28:374-380.

    Not in our library10.1002/cbf.1660

  129. 129.

    Knowles HJ, Athanasou NA. Acute hypoxia and osteoclast activity: a balance between enhanced resorption and increased apoptosis. J. Pathol. 2009;218:256-264.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.2534

  130. 130.

    Knowles HJ, Cleton-Jansen AM, Korsching E, Athanasou NA. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates osteoclast-mediated bone resorption: role of angiopoietin-like 4. FASEB J. 2010;24:4648-4659.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.10-162230

  131. 131.

    Morten KJ, Badder L, Knowles HJ. Differential regulation of HIF-mediated pathways increases mitochondrial metabolism and ATP production in hypoxic osteoclasts. J. Pathol. 2013;229:755-764.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.4159

  132. 132.

    Knowles HJ, Athanasou NA. Hypoxia-inducible factor is expressed in giant cell tumour of bone and mediates paracrine effects of hypoxia on monocyte-osteoclast differentiation via induction of VEGF. J. Pathol. 2008;215:56-66.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.2319

  133. 133.

    Miyauchi Y, et al. HIF1alpha is required for osteoclast activation by estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:16568-16573.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1308755110

  134. 134.

    Devignes CS, Carmeliet G, Stegen S. Amino acid metabolism in skeletal cells. Bone Rep. 2022;17:101620.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101620

  135. 135.

    DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008;7:11-20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002

  136. 136.

    Brunner JS, et al. Environmental arginine controls multinuclear giant cell metabolism and formation. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:431.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-020-14285-1

  137. 137.

    Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME. Branched-chain amino acids: enzyme and substrate regulation. J. Nutr. 2006;136:207S-211S.

    Not in our library10.1093/jn/136.1.207s

  138. 138.

    Pereira M, et al. A trans-eQTL network regulates osteoclast multinucleation and bone mass. Elife. 2020;9:e55549.

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.55549

  139. 139.

    Go M, et al. BCAT1 promotes osteoclast maturation by regulating branched-chain amino acid metabolism. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022;54:825-833.

    Not in our library10.1038/s12276-022-00775-3

  140. 140.

    Ozaki K, et al. The L-type amino acid transporter LAT1 inhibits osteoclastogenesis and maintains bone homeostasis through the mTORC1 pathway. Sci. Signal. 2019;12:eaaw3921.

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aaw3921

  141. 141.

    Lee SH, Kim T, Jeong D, Kim N, Choi Y. The tec family tyrosine kinase Btk Regulates RANKL-induced osteoclast maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:11526-11534.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m708935200

  142. 142.

    Uehara S, et al. Protein kinase N3 promotes bone resorption by osteoclasts in response to Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling. Sci. Signal. 2017;10:eaan0023.

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aan0023

  143. 143.

    Uehara S, et al. Inhibitor of protein kinase N3 suppresses excessive bone resorption in ovariectomized mice. J. Bone Min. Metab. 2022;40:251-261.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00774-021-01296-1

  144. 144.

    Kim H, et al. Protocadherin-7 contributes to maintenance of bone homeostasis through regulation of osteoclast multinucleation. Bmb Rep. 2020;53:472-477.

    Not in our library10.5483/bmbrep.2020.53.9.050

  145. 145.

    Kim H, Takegahara N, Choi Y. PP2A-Mediated GSK3β Dephosphorylation Is Required for Protocadherin-7-dependent regulation of small GTPase RhoA in Osteoclasts. Cells. 2023;12:1967.

    Not in our library10.3390/cells12151967

  146. 146.

    Mukai H, et al. PKN3 is the major regulator of angiogenesis and tumor metastasis in mice. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:18979.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep18979

  147. 147.

    Liu M, et al. PCDH7 as the key gene related to the co-occurrence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis. Front. Genet. 2023;14:1163162.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2023.1163162

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.