Measurement of the cleavage energy of graphite

Abstract

The basal plane cleavage energy (CE) of graphite is a key material parameter for understanding many of the unusual properties of graphite, graphene and carbon nanotubes. Nonetheless, a wide range of values for the CE has been reported and no consensus has yet emerged. Here we report the first direct, accurate experimental measurement of the CE of graphite using a novel method based on the self-retraction phenomenon in graphite. The measured value, 0.37±0.01 J m −2 for the incommensurate state of bicrystal graphite, is nearly invariant with respect to temperature (22 °C≤ T ≤198 °C) and bicrystal twist angle, and insensitive to impurities from the atmosphere. The CE for the ideal ABAB graphite stacking, 0.39±0.02 J m −2 , is calculated based on a combination of the measured CE and a theoretical calculation. These experimental measurements are also ideal for use in evaluating the efficacy of competing theoretical approaches.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 50

1. 1.

   Novoselov K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1102896

2. 2.

   Geim A. K. & Novoselov K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/nmat1849

3. 3.

   Novoselov K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/nature04233

4. 4.

   Lee C., Wei X., Kysar J. W. & Hone J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1157996

5. 5.

   Grantab R., Shenoy V. B. & Ruoff R. S. Anomalous strength characteristics of tilt grain boundaries in graphene. Science 330, 946–948 (2010 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1196893

6. 6.

   Liu F., Ming P. & Li J. Ab initio calculation of ideal strength and phonon instability of graphene under tension. Phys. Rev. B 76, (2007 ).

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Nair R. et al. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science 320, 1308–1308 (2008 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1156965

8. 8.

   Berber S., Kwon Y.-K. & Tomanek D. Unusually high thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4613 (2000 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.84.4613

9. 9.

   Balandin A. A. et al. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 8, 902–907 (2008 ).

   Not in our library10.1021/nl0731872

10. 10.

    Wang L.-F. & Zheng Q.-S. Extreme anisotropy of graphite and single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 153113 (2007 ).

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Kim Y. et al. Breakdown of the interlayer coherence in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 096602 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.110.096602

12. 12.

    Charlier J.-C., Gonze X. & Michenaud J.-P. Graphite interplanar bonding: electronic delocalization and van der Waals interaction. Europhys. Lett. 28, 403 (1994 ).

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Benedict L. X. et al. Microscopic determination of the interlayer binding energy in graphite. Chem. Phys. Lett. 286, 490–496 (1998 ).

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Palser A. H. Interlayer interactions in graphite and carbon nanotubes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 4459–4464 (1999 ).

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Rydberg H. et al. van der Waals density functional for layered structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 126402 (2003 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.91.126402

16. 16.

    Hasegawa M. & Nishidate K. Semiempirical approach to the energetics of interlayer binding in graphite. Phys. Rev. B 70, 205431 (2004 ).

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Zacharia R., Ulbricht H. & Hertel T. Interlayer cohesive energy of graphite from thermal desorption of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Phys. Rev. B 69, 155406 (2004 ).

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Ortmann F., Bechstedt F. & Schmidt W. Semiempirical van der Waals correction to the density functional description of solids and molecular structures. Phys. Rev. B 73, 205101 (2006 ).

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Lebègue S. et al. Cohesive properties and asymptotics of the dispersion interaction in graphite by the random phase approximation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 196401 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.105.196401

20. 20.

    Roenbeck M. R. et al. In situ scanning electron microscope peeling to quantify surface energy between multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphene. ACS Nano 8, 124–138 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/nn402485n

21. 21.

    Stone A. The Theory of Intermolecular Forces Oxford University Press (2013 ).

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Grimme S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20495

23. 23.

    Lee K., Murray É. D., Kong L., Lundqvist B. I. & Langreth D. C. Higher-accuracy van der Waals density functional. Phys. Rev. B 82, 081101 (2010 ).

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Sun J. et al. Semilocal and hybrid meta-generalized gradient approximations based on the understanding of the kinetic-energy-density dependence. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 044113 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/1.4789414

25. 25.

    Langreth D. C. & Perdew J. P. Theory of nonuniform electronic systems. I. Analysis of the gradient approximation and a generalization that works. Phys. Rev. B 21, 5469 (1980 ).

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Harl J. & Kresse G. Cohesive energy curves for noble gas solids calculated by adiabatic connection fluctuation-dissipation theory. Phys. Rev. B 77, 045136 (2008 ).

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Drummond N. & Needs R. van der Waals interactions between thin metallic wires and layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 166401 (2007 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.99.166401

28. 28.

    Sorella S., Casula M. & Rocca D. Weak binding between two aromatic rings: feeling the van der Waals attraction by quantum Monte Carlo methods. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 014105 (2007 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2746035

29. 29.

    Zheng Q. et al. Self-retracting motion of graphite microflakes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 067205 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.100.067205

30. 30.

    Dienwiebel M. et al. Superlubricity of graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126101 (2004 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.92.126101

31. 31.

    Liu Z. et al. Observation of microscale superlubricity in graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 205503 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.108.205503

32. 32.

    Yang J. et al. Observation of high-speed microscale superlubricity in graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 255504 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.110.255504

33. 33.

    Zhang R. et al. Superlubricity in centimetres-long double-walled carbon nanotubes under ambient conditions. Nat. Nano 8, 912–916 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2013.217

34. 34.

    Park S., Floresca H. C., Suh Y. & Kim M. J. Electron microscopy analyses of natural and highly oriented pyrolytic graphites and the mechanically exfoliated graphenes produced from them. Carbon 48, 797–804 (2010 ).

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Hill T. L. Theory of physical adsorption. Adv. Catal. 4, 1 (1952 ).

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Liu Z. et al. A graphite nanoeraser. Nanotechnology 22, 265706 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1088/0957-4484/22/26/265706

37. 37.

    Hirano M. & Shinjo K. Atomistic locking and friction. Phys. Rev. B 41, 11837–11851 (1990 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.41.11837

38. 38.

    Shinjo K. & Hirano M. Dynamics of friction: superlubric state. Surf. Sci. 283, 473–478 (1993 ).

    Not in our library

39. 39.

    Sørensen M. R., Jacobsen K. W. & Stoltze P. Simulations of atomic-scale sliding friction. Phys. Rev. B 53, 2101–2113 (1996 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.53.2101

40. 40.

    Peierls R. The size of a dislocation. Proc. Phys. Soc. 52, 34 (1940 ).

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    Nabarro F. Dislocations in a simple cubic lattice. Proc. Phys. Soc. 59, 256 (1947 ).

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Hirth J. & Lothe J. Theory of Dislocations 2nd. Ed. John Willey & Sons (1982 ).

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    Xiang Y., Wei H. & Ming P. A generalized Peierls–Nabarro model for curved dislocations and core structures of dislocation loops in Al and Cu. Acta Mater. 56, 1447–1460 (2008 ).

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    Dai S., Xiang Y. & Srolovitz D. J. Structure and energy of (111) low-angle twist boundaries in Al, Cu and Ni. Acta Mater. 61, 1327–1337 (2013 ).

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    Dai S., Xiang Y. & Srolovitz D. J. Atomistic, generalized Peierls–Nabarro and analytical models for (111) twist boundaries in Al, Cu and Ni for all twist angles. Acta Mater. 69, 162–174 (2014 ).

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    Garbarz J., Lacaze E., Faivre G., Gauthier S. & Schott M. Dislocation networks in graphite: a scanning tunnelling microscopy study. Philos. Mag. A 65, 853–861 (1992 ).

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    Gould T. et al. Binding and interlayer force in the near-contact region of two graphite slabs: experiment and theory. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 224704 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1063/1.4839615

48. 48.

    Li Q., Kim K. S. & Rydberg A. Lateral force calibration of an atomic force microscope with a diamagnetic levitation spring system. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 065105 (2006 ).

    Not in our library

49. 49.

    Vítek V. Intrinsic stacking faults in body-centred cubic crystals. Philos. Mag. 18, 773–786 (1968 ).

    Not in our library

50. 50.

    Cousins C. & Heggie M. Elasticity of carbon allotropes. III. Hexagonal graphite: review of data, previous calculations, and a fit to a modified anharmonic Keating model. Phys. Rev. B 67, 024109 (2003 ).

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Mechanical testing of two-dimensional materials: a brief review · 2020
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.