Imaging with a small number of photons

Abstract

Low-light-level imaging techniques have application in many diverse fields, ranging from biological sciences to security. A high-quality digital camera based on a multi-megapixel array will typically record an image by collecting of order 10 5 photons per pixel, but by how much could this photon flux be reduced? In this work we demonstrate a single-photon imaging system based on a time-gated intensified camera from which the image of an object can be inferred from very few detected photons. We show that a ghost-imaging configuration, where the image is obtained from photons that have never interacted with the object, is a useful approach for obtaining images with high signal-to-noise ratios. The use of heralded single photons ensures that the background counts can be virtually eliminated from the recorded images. By applying principles of image compression and associated image reconstruction, we obtain high-quality images of objects from raw data formed from an average of fewer than one detected photon per image pixel.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 24

1. 1.

   Llull P.. Coded aperture compressive temporal imaging. Opt. Express 21, 10526–10545 (2013 ).

   Not in our library10.1364/oe.21.010526

2. 2.

   Strekalov D. V., Sergienko A. V., Klyshko D. N. & Shih Y. H. Observation of two-photon “ghost” interference and diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600–3603 (1995 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.74.3600

3. 3.

   Walborn S. P., Lemelle D. S., Almeida M. P. & Souto Ribeiro P. H. Quantum key distribution with higher-order alphabets using spatially encoded qudits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 9 (2006 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.96.090501

4. 4.

   Dixon P. B., Howland G. A., Schneeloch J. & Howell J. C. Quantum mutual information capacity for high-dimensional entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 14 (2012 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.108.143603

5. 5.

   Walborn S. P., Monken C. H., Padua S. & Souto Ribeiro P. H. Spatial correlations in parametric downconversion. Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010 ).

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Pittman T. B., Shih Y. H., Strekalov D. V. & Sergienko A. V. Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 52, R3429–R3432 (1995 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physreva.52.r3429

7. 7.

   Lemos G. B.. Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature 512, 409–412 (2014 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/nature13586

8. 8.

   Gatti A., Brambilla E. & Lugiato L. A. Entangled imaging and wave-particle duality: from the microscopic to the macroscopic realm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 13 (2003 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.90.133603

9. 9.

   Bennink R. S., Bentley S. J., Boyd R. W. & Howell J. C. Quantum and classical coincidence imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033601 (2004 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.92.033601

10. 10.

    Edgar M. P.. Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera. Nat. Commun. 3, 984 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms1988

11. 11.

    Brida G., Genovese M. & Berchera I. R. Experimental realization of sub-shot noise quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics 4, 227–230 (2010 ).

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Fickler R., Krenn M., Lapkiewicz R., Ramelow S. & Zeilinger. A. Real-time imaging of quantum entanglement. Sci. Rep. 3, 1914 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/srep01914

13. 13.

    Aspden R. S., Tasca D. S., Boyd R. W. & Padgett M. J. EPR-based ghost imaging using a single-photon-sensitive camera. New J. Phys. 15, 7 (2013 ).

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Tasca D. S.. The influence of non-imaging detector design on heralded ghost-imaging and ghost-diffraction examined using a triggered ICCD camera. Opt. Express 21, 30460–30473 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1364/oe.21.030460

15. 15.

    Shapiro J. H. & Boyd. R. W. The physics of ghost imaging. Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 949–993 (2012 ).

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Morris G. M. Image correlation at low light levels: a computer simulation. Appl. Optics 23, 3152–3159 (1984 ).

    Not in our library10.1364/ao.23.003152

17. 17.

    Candès E. J. & Wakin. M. B. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 25, 21–30 (2008 ).

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Romberg J. Imaging via compressive sampling [introduction to compressive sampling and recovery via convex programming]. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 25, 14–20 (2008 ).

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Donoho D. L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 1289–1306 (2006 ).

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Shechtman Y., Eldar Y. C., Szameit A. & Segev M. Sparsity based sub-wavelength imaging with partially incoherent light via quadratic compressed sensing. Opt. Express 19, 14807–14822 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1364/oe.19.014807

21. 21.

    Shabani A.. Efficient measurement of quantum dynamics via compressive sensing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 10 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.106.100401

22. 22.

    Zerom P., Chan K. W. C., Howell J. C. & Boyd R. W. Entangled-photon compressive ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. A 84, 6 (2011 ).

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Magaña-Loaiza O. S., Howland G. A., Malik M., Howell J. C. & Boyd R. W. Compressive object tracking using entangled photons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 23 (2013 ).

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Jack B.. Holographic ghost imaging and the violation of a Bell inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 8 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.103.083602

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Inertial measurement with solid-state spins of nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond · 2022
  Not checked
• Deep-learning-based ghost imaging · 2017
  Corrected

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.