Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 2, 2026.

Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments

Karl M. O. Håkansson, Andreas B. Fall, Fredrik Lundell and 8 more

Nature Communications · 2014

doi:10.1038/ncomms5018

Abstract

Cellulose nanofibrils can be obtained from trees and have considerable potential as a building block for biobased materials. In order to achieve good properties of these materials, the nanostructure must be controlled. Here we present a process combining hydrodynamic alignment with a dispersion–gel transition that produces homogeneous and smooth filaments from a low-concentration dispersion of cellulose nanofibrils in water. The preferential fibril orientation along the filament direction can be controlled by the process parameters. The specific ultimate strength is considerably higher than previously reported filaments made of cellulose nanofibrils. The strength is even in line with the strongest cellulose pulp fibres extracted from wood with the same degree of fibril alignment. Successful nanoscale alignment before gelation demands a proper separation of the timescales involved. Somewhat surprisingly, the device must not be too small if this is to be achieved.

References 43

  1. 1.

    Page D. H., el Hosseiny F. & Winkler K. Behaviour of single wood fibres under axial tensile strain. Nature 229, 252–253 (1971 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/229252a0

  2. 2.

    Page D. H. & el Hosseiny F. The mechanical properties of single wood fibres. part vi. fibril angle and the shape of the stress-strain curve. J. Pulp. Paper. Sci 99–100 (1983 ).

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Vollrath F. & Knight D. P. Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410, 541–548 (2001 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/35069000

  4. 4.

    Eichhorn S. J.. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 45, 1–33 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-020-04961-4

  5. 5.

    Siró I. & Plackett D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17, 459–494 (2010 ).

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Olsson R. T.. Making flexible magnetic aerogels and stiff magnetic nanopaper using cellulose nanofibrils as templates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 584–588 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2010.155

  7. 7.

    Eichhorn S.. Review: current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 2107–2131 (2001 ).

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Reiterer A., Lichtenegger H., Tschegg S. & Fratzl P. Experimental evidence for a mechanical function of the cellulose microfibril angle in wood cell walls. Philos. Mag. A 79, 2173–2184 (1999 ).

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Burgert I., Keckes J., Fruhmann K., Fratzl P. & Tschegg S. E. A comparison of two techniques for wood fibre isolation - evaluation by tensile tests on single fibres with different microfibril angle. Plant Biol. 4, 9–12 (2002 ).

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Eder M., Arnould O., Dunlop J. W. C., Hornatowska J. & Salmén L. Experimental micromechanical characterisation of wood cell walls. Wood Sci. Technol. 47, 163–182 (2013 ).

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Turbak A., Snyder F. & Sandberg K. Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp. 37, 815–827 (1983 ).

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Pääkkö M.. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8, 1934–1941 (2007 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/bm061215p

  13. 13.

    Moon R. J., Martini A., Nairn J., Simonsen J. & Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3941–3994 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/c0cs00108b

  14. 14.

    Iwamoto S., Isogai A. & Iwata T. Structure and mechanical properties of wet-spun fibers made from natural cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 12, 831–836 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/bm101510r

  15. 15.

    Walther A., Timonen J. V. I., Diez I., Laukkanen A. & Ikkala O. Multifunctional high-performance biofibers based on wet-extrusion of renewable native cellulose nanofibrils. Adv. Mater. 23, 2924–2928 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201100580

  16. 16.

    Sehaqui H.. Cellulose nanofiber orientation in nanopaper and nanocomposites by cold drawing. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 1043–1049 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/am2016766

  17. 17.

    Knight J. B., Vishwanath A., Brody J. P. & Austin R. H. Hydrodynamic focusing on a silicon chip: mixing nanoliters in microseconds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3863–3866 (1998 ).

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Kenis P. J. A., Ismagilov R. F. & Whitesides G. M. Microfabrication inside capillaries using multiphase laminar flow patterning. Science 285, 83–85 (1999 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.285.5424.83

  19. 19.

    Anna S., Bontoux N. & Stone H. A. Formation of dispersions using ‘flow focusing’ in microchannels. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 364–366 (2003 ).

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Koster S., Evans H. M., Wong J. Y. & Pfohl T. An in situ study of collagen self-assembly processes. Biomacromolecules 9, 199–207 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/bm700973t

  21. 21.

    Trebbin M.. Anisotropic particles align perpendicular to the flow direction in narrow microchannels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6706–6711 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1219340110

  22. 22.

    Kinahan M. E.. Tunable silk: using microfluidics to fabricate silk fibers with controllable properties. Biomacromolecules 12, 1504–1511 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/bm1014624

  23. 23.

    Hearle J. W. S. High Performance Fibres Woodhead Publ. (2001 ).

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Northolt M.. The structure and properties of cellulose fibres spun from an anisotropic phosphoric acid solution. Polymer (Guildf) 42, 8249–8264 (2001 ).

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Henriksson M., Berglund L. A., Isaksson P., Lindström T. & Nishino T. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9, 1579–1585 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/bm800038n

  26. 26.

    Fall A. B., Lindström S. B., Sundman O., Ödberg L. & Wågberg L. Colloidal stability of aqueous nanofibrillated cellulose dispersions. Langmuir 27, 11332–11338 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/la201947x

  27. 27.

    Fall A. B., Lindström S. B., Sprakel J. & Wågberg L. A physical cross-linking process of cellulose nanofibril gels with shear-controlled fibril orientation. Soft Matter 9, 1852–1863 (2013 ).

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Jeffery G. B. The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102, 161–179 (1922 ).

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Vigolo B.. Macroscopic fibers and ribbons of oriented carbon nanotubes. Science 290, 1331–1334 (2000 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.290.5495.1331

  30. 30.

    Tao Y.-G., den Otter W. K. & Briels W. J. Kayaking and wagging of rods in shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237802 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.95.237802

  31. 31.

    Kiriya D., Kawano R., Onoe H. & Takeuchi S. Microfluidic control of the internal morphology in nanofiber-based macroscopic cables. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 7942–7947 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201202078

  32. 32.

    Cubaud T. & Mason T. G. Formation of miscible fluid microstructures by hydrodynamic focusing in plane geometries. Phys. Rev. E 78, 056308 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.78.056308

  33. 33.

    Tammisola O., Lundell F., Schlatter P., Wehrfritz A. & Söderberg L. D. Global linear and nonlinear stability of viscous confined plane wakes with co-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 675, 397–434 (2011 ).

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Doi M. & Edwards S. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics Oxford University Press Inc. (1986 ).

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Roth S., Burghammer M., Janotta A. & Riekel C. Rotational disorder in poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) fibers by X-ray diffraction with a 100 nm beam. Macromolecules 36, 1585–1593 (2003 ).

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Nishino T., Takano K. & Nakamae K. Elastic modulus of the crystalline regions of cellulose polymorphs. J. Polym. Sci. B 33, 1647–1651 (1995 ).

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Lu W., Zu M., Byun J.-H., Kim B.-S. & Chou T.-W. State of the art of carbon nanotube fibers: opportunities and challenges. Adv. Mater. 24, 1805–1833 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201104672

  38. 38.

    Wågberg L., Winter L., Ödberg L. & Lindström T. On the charge stoichiometry upon adsorption of a cationic polyelectrolyte on cellulosic materials. Colloids Surf. 27, 163–173 (1987 ).

    Not in our library

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Krywka C.. A two-dimensional waveguide beam for x-ray nanodiffraction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 85–92 (2012 ).

    Not in our library

All 43 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.