Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications

Abstract

Quantum communications promises reliable transmission of quantum information, efficient distribution of entanglement and generation of completely secure keys. For all these tasks, we need to determine the optimal point-to-point rates that are achievable by two remote parties at the ends of a quantum channel, without restrictions on their local operations and classical communication, which can be unlimited and two-way. These two-way assisted capacities represent the ultimate rates that are reachable without quantum repeaters. Here, by constructing an upper bound based on the relative entropy of entanglement and devising a dimension-independent technique dubbed ‘teleportation stretching’, we establish these capacities for many fundamental channels, namely bosonic lossy channels, quantum-limited amplifiers, dephasing and erasure channels in arbitrary dimension. In particular, we exactly determine the fundamental rate-loss tradeoff affecting any protocol of quantum key distribution. Our findings set the limits of point-to-point quantum communications and provide precise and general benchmarks for quantum repeaters.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 69

1. 1.

   Nielsen M. A. & Chuang I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Cambridge Univ. Press (2000 ).

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Weedbrook C.. Gaussian quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621–669 (2012 ).

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Holevo A. in Quantum Systems, Channels, Information: A Mathematical Introduction De Gruyter (2012 ).

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Bennett C. H. & Brassard G. in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, 175–179 (Bangalore, India, 1984).

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Gisin N., Ribordy G., Tittel W. & Zbinden H. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145–196 (2002 ).

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Scarani V.. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301–1350 (2009 ).

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Kimble H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/nature07127

8. 8.

   Pirandola S. & Braunstein S. L. Unite to build a quantum internet. Nature 532, 169–171 (2016 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/532169a

9. 9.

   Pirandola S.. Advances in quantum teleportation. Nat. Photon. 9, 641–652 (2015 ).

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Andersen U. L., Neergaard-Nielsen J. S., van Loock P. & Furusawa A. Hybrid discrete- and continuous-variable quantum information. Nat. Phys. 11, 713–719 (2015 ).

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Briegel H.-J., Dür W., Cirac J. I. & Zoller P. Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998 ).

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Bennett C. H., DiVincenzo D. P. & Smolin J. A. Capacities of quantum erasure channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3217–3220 (1997 ).

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Grosshans F.. Quantum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states. Nature 421, 238–241 (2003 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature01289

14. 14.

    Garca-Patrón R., Pirandola S., Lloyd S. & Shapiro J. H. Reverse coherent information. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 210501 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.102.210501

15. 15.

    Devetak I. The private classical capacity and quantum capacity of a quantum channel. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory 51, 44–55 (2005 ).

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Devetak I. & Winter A. Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states. Proc. R. Soc. A 461, 207–235 (2005 ).

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Pirandola S., Garca-Patrón R., Braunstein S. L. & Lloyd S. Direct and reverse secret-key capacities of a quantum channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 050503 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.102.050503

18. 18.

    Takeoka M., Guha S. & Wilde M. M. Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution. Nat. Commun. 5, 5235 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms6235

19. 19.

    Christandl M. The Structure of Bipartite Quantum States: Insights from Group Theory and Cryptography (PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2006).

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Pirandola S.. High-rate measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography. Nat. Photon. 9, 397–402 (2015 ).

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Vedral V., Plenio M. B., Rippin M. A. & Knight P. L. Quantifying Entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275–2279 (1997 ).

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Vedral V. & Plenio M. B. Entanglement measures and purification procedures. Phys. Rev. A 57, 1619–1633 (1998 ).

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Vedral V. The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 197–234 (2002 ).

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Bennett C. H.. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895

25. 25.

    Braunstein S. L. & Kimble H. J. Teleportation of continuous quantum variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 869–872 (1998 ).

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Braunstein S. L., D'Ariano G. M., Milburn G. J. & Sacchi M. F. Universal teleportation with a twist. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3486–3489 (2000 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.84.3486

27. 27.

    Horodecki K., Horodecki M., Horodecki P. & Oppenheim J. Secure key from bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 160502 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.94.160502

28. 28.

    Schumacher B. & Nielsen M. A. Quantum data processing and error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 2629–2635 (1996 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreva.54.2629

29. 29.

    Lloyd S. Capacity of the noisy quantum channel. Phys. Rev. A 55, 1613–1622 (1997 ).

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Christiandl M., Schuch N. & Winter A. Entanglement of the antisymmetric state. Commun. Math. Phys. 311, 397–422 (2012 ).

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Bennett C. H., DiVincenzo D. P., Smolin J. A. & Wootters W. K. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824–3851 (1996 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreva.54.3824

32. 32.

    Horodecki M., Horodecki P. & Horodecki R. General teleportation channel, singlet fraction, and quasidistillation. Phys. Rev. A 99, 1888–1898 (1999 ).

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Bowen G. & Bose S. Teleportation as a depolarizing quantum channel, relative entropy and classical capacity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 267901 (2001 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.87.267901

34. 34.

    Albeverio S., Fei S.-M. & Yang W.-L. Optimal teleportation based on Bell measurements. Phys. Rev. A 66, 012301 (2002 ).

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Müller-Hermes A. Transposition in Quantum Information Theory (MSc Thesis, Technische Universität München, 2012).

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Leung D. & Matthews W. On the power of ppt-preserving and nonsignalling codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 61, 4486–4499 (2015 ).

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Werner R. F. All teleportation and dense coding schemes. J. Phys. A 34, 7081–7094 (2001 ).

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Niset J., Fiurasek J. & Cerf N. J. No-go theorem for Gaussian quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 120501 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.102.120501

39. 39.

    Ji Z., Wang G., Duan R., Feng Y. & Ying M. Parameter estimation of quantum channels. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 54, 5172–5185 (2008 ).

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Nielsen M. A. & Chuang I. L. Programmable quantum gate arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 321–324 (1997 ).

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 3

• Asymmetric Protocols for Mode Pairing Quantum Key Distribution with Finite-Key Analysis · 2025
  Not checked
• Composable end-to-end security of Gaussian quantum networks with untrusted relays · 2022
  Not checked
• Parameter regimes for surpassing the PLOB bound with error-corrected qudit repeaters · 2019
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.