The comparative immunology of wild and laboratory mice, Mus musculus domesticus

Abstract

The laboratory mouse is the workhorse of immunology, used as a model of mammalian immune function, but how well immune responses of laboratory mice reflect those of free-living animals is unknown. Here we comprehensively characterize serological, cellular and functional immune parameters of wild mice and compare them with laboratory mice, finding that wild mouse cellular immune systems are, comparatively, in a highly activated (primed) state. Associations between immune parameters and infection suggest that high level pathogen exposure drives this activation. Moreover, wild mice have a population of highly activated myeloid cells not present in laboratory mice. By contrast, in vitro cytokine responses to pathogen-associated ligands are generally lower in cells from wild mice, probably reflecting the importance of maintaining immune homeostasis in the face of intense antigenic challenge in the wild. These data provide a comprehensive basis for validating (or not) laboratory mice as a useful and relevant immunological model system.

Cited by papers we hold 8

• L-arginine metabolism as pivotal interface of mutual host–microbe interactions in the gut · 2023
  No notice
• Use of Precision-Cut Tissue Slices as a Translational Model to Study Host-Pathogen Interaction · 2021
  Not checked
• Rapid environmental effects on gut nematode susceptibility in rewilded mice · 2018
  No notice
• Feeding Immunity: Physiological and Behavioral Responses to Infection and Resource Limitation · 2018
  Not checked
• Parasite-Microbiota Interactions With the Vertebrate Gut: Synthesis Through an Ecological Lens · 2018
  No notice
• Natural Killer Cells: Development, Maturation, and Clinical Utilization · 2018
  No notice
• The Influence of Parasite Infections on Host Immunity to Co-infection With Other Pathogens · 2018
  No notice
• Therapeutic Potential of the Gut Microbiota in the Prevention and Treatment of Sepsis · 2018
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.