Universal shape and pressure inside bubbles appearing in van der Waals heterostructures

Abstract

Trapped substances between a two-dimensional (2D) crystal and an atomically flat substrate lead to the formation of bubbles. Their size, shape and internal pressure are determined by the competition between van der Waals attraction of the crystal to the substrate and the elastic energy needed to deform it, allowing to use bubbles to study elastic properties of 2D crystals and conditions of confinement. Using atomic force microscopy, we analysed a variety of bubbles formed by monolayers of graphene, boron nitride and MoS 2 . Their shapes are found to exhibit universal scaling, in agreement with our analysis based on the theory of elasticity of membranes. We also measured the hydrostatic pressure induced by the confinement, which was found to reach tens of MPa inside submicron bubbles. This agrees with our theory estimates and suggests that for even smaller, sub-10 nm bubbles the pressure can be close to 1 GPa and may modify properties of a trapped material.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 43

1. 1.

   Geim A. K. & Grigorieva I. V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/nature12385

2. 2.

   Haigh S. J.. Cross-sectional imaging of individual layers and buried interfaces of graphene-based heterostructures and superlattices. Nat. Mater. 11, 764–767 (2012 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/nmat3386

3. 3.

   Kretinin A. V.. Electronic properties of graphene encapsulated with different two-dimensional atomic crystals. Nano Lett. 14, 3270–3276 (2014 ).

   Not in our library10.1021/nl5006542

4. 4.

   Nair R. R., Wu H. A., Jayaram P. N., Grigorieva I. V. & Geim A. K. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442–444 (2012 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1211694

5. 5.

   Holt J., Park H. & Wang Y. Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312, 1034–1038 (2006 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1126298

6. 6.

   Kolesnikov A. I.. Anomalously soft dynamics of water in a nanotube: a revelation of nanoscale confinement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 035503 (2004 ).

   Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.93.035503

7. 7.

   Yuk J. M.. High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science 336, 61–64 (2012 ).

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1217654

8. 8.

   Park J.. Direct observation of wet biological samples by graphene liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett. 15, 4737–4744 (2015 ).

   Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01636

9. 9.

   Wojcik M., Hauser M., Li W., Moon S. & Xu K. Graphene-enabled electron microscopy and correlated super-resolution microscopy of wet cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7384 (2015 ).

   Not in our library10.1038/ncomms8384

10. 10.

    Vasu K. S.. Van der Waals pressure and its effect on trapped interlayer molecules. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07106 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms12168

11. 11.

    Xu K., Cao P. & Heath J. R. Graphene visualizes the first water adlayers on mica at ambient conditions. Science 329, 1188–1191 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1192907

12. 12.

    Algara-Siller G.. Square ice in graphene nanocapillaries. Nature 519, 443–445 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14295

13. 13.

    Lim C. H. Y. X.. A hydrothermal anvil made of graphene nanobubbles on diamond. Nat. Commun. 4, 1556 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms2579

14. 14.

    Levy N.. Strain-induced pseudo-magnetic fields greater than 300 tesla in graphene nanobubbles. Science 329, 544–547 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1191700

15. 15.

    Guinea F., Katsnelson M. I. & Geim A. K. Energy gaps and a zero-field quantum Hall effect in graphene by strain engineering. Nat. Phys. 6, 30–33 (2010 ).

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Mayorov A. S.. Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature. Nano Lett. 11, 2396–2399 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/nl200758b

17. 17.

    Bertolazzi S., Brivio J. & Kis A. Stretching and breaking of ultrathin MoS2. ACS Nano 5, 9703–9709 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/nn203879f

18. 18.

    Peng Q. & De S. Outstanding mechanical properties of monolayer MoS2 and its application in elastic energy storage. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 19427–19437 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1039/c3cp52879k

19. 19.

    Yue K., Gao E., Huang R. & Liechti K. M. Analytical methods for the mechanics of graphene bubbles. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 083512 (2012 ).

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Wang P., Gao W., Cao Z., Liechti K. M. & Huang R. Numerical analysis of circular graphene bubbles. J. Appl. Mechanics 80, 040905 (2013 ).

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Landau L. D. & Lifschitz E. M. Theory of Elasticity Pergamon Press (1970 ).

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Nelson D. R., Piran T., Weinberg S. eds Statistical Properties Of Membranes And Surfaces World Scientific (2004 ).

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    King H., Schroll R. D., Davidovitch B. & Menon N. Elastic sheet on a liquid drop reveals wrinkling and crumpling as distinct symmetry-breaking instabilities. PNAS 109, 9716–9720 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1201201109

24. 24.

    Koenig S. P., Boddeti N. G., Dunn M. L. & Bunch J. S. Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 543–546 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2011.123

25. 25.

    Björkman T., Gulans A., Krasheninnikov A. V. & Nieminen R. M. Van der Waals bonding in layered compounds from advanced density-functional first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 1–5 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.108.235502

26. 26.

    Sachs B., Wehling T. O., Katsnelson M. I. & Lichtenstein A. I. Adhesion and electronic structure of graphene on hexagonal boron nitride substrates. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195414 (2011 ).

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Peng Q. J. i. & De W. S. Mechanical properties of the hexagonal boron nitride monolayer: Ab initio study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 56, 11–17 (2012 ).

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Castellanos-Gomez A.. Elastic properties of freely suspended MoS2 nanosheets. Adv. Mater. 24, 772–775 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201103965

29. 29.

    Nicholl R. J.. The effect of intrinsic crumpling on the mechanics of free-standing graphene. Nature Commun. 6, 8789 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms9789

30. 30.

    Eckmann A.. Raman fingerprint of aligned graphene/h-BN superlattices. Nano Lett. 13, 5242–5246 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/nl402679b

31. 31.

    Gibertini M., Tomadin A., Guinea F., Katsnelson M. I. & Polini M. Electron-hole puddles in the absence of charged impurities. Phys. Rev. B 85, 201405 (2012 ).

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Roos W. H., Bruinsma R. & Wuite G. J. L. Physical virology. Nat. Phys. 6, 733–743 (2010 ).

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Vella D., Ajdari A., Vaziri A. & Boudaoud A. The indentation of pressurized elastic shells: from polymeric capsules to yeast cells. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 448–455 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2011.0352

34. 34.

    Orssengo G. J. & Pye D. C. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 551–572 (1999 ).

    Not in our library10.1006/bulm.1999.0102

35. 35.

    Lee C., Wei X. D., Kysar J. W. & Hone J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1157996

36. 36.

    López-Polín G.. Strain dependent elastic modulus of graphene. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05521 (2015 ).

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Los J. H., Fasolino A. & Katsnelson M. I. Scaling behavior and strain dependence of in-plane elastic properties of graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 015901 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.116.015901

38. 38.

    Butt H. J., Cappella B. & Kappl M. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: Technique, interpretation and applications. Surf. Sci. Rep. 59, 1–152 (2005 ).

    Not in our library

39. 39.

    Dokukin M. E. & Sokolov I. On the measurements of rigidity modulus of soft materials in nanoindentation experiments at small depth. Macromolecules 45, 4277–4288 (2012 ).

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Sokolov I.. AFM study of forces between silica, silicon nitride and polyurethane pads. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 300, 475–481 (2006 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2006.04.023

41. 41.

    Hua Y. PeakForce-QNM advanced applications training. Available at http://mmrc.caltech.edu/AFMDimensionIcon/BrukerTraining (2014 ).

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Sader J. E., Larson I., Mulvaney P. & White L. R. Method for the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 3789–3798 (1995 ).

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    López-Polín G.. Increasing the elastic modulus of graphene by controlled defect creation. Nat. Phys. 11, 26–31 (2014 ).

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Cleaning interfaces in layered materials heterostructures · 2018
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.