A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae

References 31

1. 1.

   Burt A. Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270:921-928.

   Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2002.2319

2. 2.

   Windbichler N, et al. A synthetic homing endonuclease-based gene drive system in the human malaria mosquito. Nature. 2011;473:212-215.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature09937

3. 3.

   Simoni A, et al. Development of synthetic selfish elements based on modular nucleases in Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:7461-7472.

   Not in our library10.1093/nar/gku387

4. 4.

   Fu Y, Sander JD, Reyon D, Cascio VM, Joung JK. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:279-284.

   Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2808

5. 5.

   Hsu PD, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:827-832.

   Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2647

6. 6.

   Jinek M, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816-821.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1225829

7. 7.
   Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations · 2014

   No notice
8. 8.

   DiCarlo JE, Chavez A, Dietz SL, Esvelt KM, Church GM. Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. 2015.

   Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3412

9. 9.

   Gantz VM, Bier E. Genome editing. The mutagenic chain reaction: a method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science. 2015;348:442-444.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.aaa5945

10. 10.

    Deredec A, Burt A, Godfray HC. The population genetics of using homing endonuclease genes in vector and pest management. Genetics. 2008;179:2013-2026.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.108.089037

11. 11.
    A comprehensive gene expression atlas of sex- and tissue-specificity in the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae · 2011

    No notice
12. 12.
    VectorBase: an updated bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vectors and other organisms related with human diseases · 2014

    No notice
13. 13.

    Claycomb JM, Benasutti M, Bosco G, Fenger DD, Orr-Weaver TL. Gene amplification as a developmental strategy: isolation of two developmental amplicons in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2004;6:145-155.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00398-8

14. 14.

    Hong CC, Hashimoto C. The maternal nudel protein of Drosophila has two distinct roles important for embryogenesis. Genetics. 1996;143:1653-1661.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/143.4.1653

15. 15.

    Bateman JR, Lee AM, Wu CT. Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via phiC31 integrase-mediated cassette exchange. Genetics. 2006;173:769-777.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.106.056945

16. 16.

    Papathanos PA, Windbichler N, Menichelli M, Burt A, Crisanti A. The vasa regulatory region mediates germline expression and maternal transmission of proteins in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae: a versatile tool for genetic control strategies. BMC Mol Biol. 2009;10:65.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2199-10-65

17. 17.

    Konet DS, et al. Short-hairpin RNA expressed from polymerase III promoters mediates RNA interference in mosquito cells. Insect Mol Biol. 2007;16:199-206.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00714.x

18. 18.

    Akbari OS, et al. BIOSAFETY. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory. Science. 2015;349:927-929.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aac7932

19. 19.

    Bae S, Kweon J, Kim HS, Kim JS. Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nature methods. 2014;11:705-706.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3015

20. 20.

    Port F, Chen HM, Lee T, Bullock SL. Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E2967-2976.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1405500111

21. 21.

    Thomas DD, Donnelly CA, Wood RJ, Alphey LS. Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system. Science. 2000;287:2474-2476.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.287.5462.2474

22. 22.

    Deredec A, Godfray HC, Burt A. Requirements for effective malaria control with homing endonuclease genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:E874-880.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1110717108

23. 23.

    Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JA. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat Genet. 2007;39:715-720.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng2049

24. 24.

    Yanai I, et al. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:650-659.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bti042

25. 25.

    Drysdale RA, Crosby MA, FlyBase C. FlyBase: genes and gene models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:D390-395.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gki046

26. 26.

    Hwang WY, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:227-229.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2501

27. 27.

    Carlson DF, et al. Efficient TALEN-mediated gene knockout in livestock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:17382-17387.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1211446109

28. 28.

    Fuchs S, Nolan T, Crisanti A. Mosquito transgenic technologies to reduce Plasmodium transmission. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;923:601-622.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-62703-026-7_41

29. 29.

    Volohonsky G, et al. Tools for Anopheles gambiae Transgenesis. G3 (Bethesda). 2015;5:1151-1163.

    Not in our library10.1534/g3.115.016808

30. 30.

    Scott TW. Containment of arthropod disease vectors. ILAR J. 2005;46:53-61.

    Not in our library10.1093/ilar.46.1.53

31. 31.

    Thailayil J, Magnusson K, Godfray HC, Crisanti A, Catteruccia F. Spermless males elicit large-scale female responses to mating in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:13677-13681.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1104738108

Cited by papers we hold 26

• Monitoring Needs for Gene Drive Mosquito Projects: Lessons From Vector Control Field Trials and Invasive Species · 2022
  Not checked
• Combating mosquito-borne diseases using genetic control technologies · 2021
  No notice
• Gene-drive suppression of mosquito populations in large cages as a bridge between lab and field · 2021
  No notice
• Regulating the expression of gene drives is key to increasing their invasive potential and the mitigation of resistance · 2021
  No notice
• Efficient population modification gene-drive rescue system in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi · 2020
  No notice
• A toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive system for regional population modification · 2020
  No notice
• Development of a confinable gene drive system in the human disease vector Aedes aegypti · 2020
  No notice
• A male-biased sex-distorter gene drive for the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae · 2020
  Corrected
• The need for new vector control approaches targeting outdoor biting anopheline malaria vector communities · 2020
  No notice
• Daisy-chain gene drives for the alteration of local populations · 2019
  No notice
• Transforming insect population control with precision guided sterile males with demonstration in flies · 2019
  No notice
• Anti-CRISPR-mediated control of gene editing and synthetic circuits in eukaryotic cells · 2019
  No notice
• Alternative strategies for mosquito-borne arbovirus control · 2019
  Corrected
• Strengthening regulatory capacity for gene drives in Africa: leveraging NEPAD’s experience in establishing regulatory systems for medicines and GM crops in Africa · 2018
  Not checked
• The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond · 2018
  No notice
• Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group † · 2018
  No notice
• A CRISPR–Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes · 2018
  No notice
• CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated gene knockout of Anopheles gambiae FREP1 suppresses malaria parasite infection · 2018
  No notice
• Salivary gland maturation and duct formation in the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae · 2017
  Not checked
• Overcoming evolved resistance to population-suppressing homing-based gene drives · 2017
  No notice

and 6 more

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.