Comparative analysis of the transcriptome across distant species

Abstract

Uniform processing and detailed annotation of human, worm and fly RNA-sequencing data reveal ancient, conserved features of the transcriptome, shared co-expression modules (many enriched in developmental genes), matched expression patterns across development and similar extent of non-canonical, non-coding transcription; furthermore, the data are used to create a single, universal model to predict gene-expression levels for all three organisms from chromatin features at the promoter. In this paper the modENCODE consortium reports on a comparative analysis of transcriptome data for human, worm and fly, revealing ancient, conserved features such as shared co-expression modules enriched in developmental genes. Expression patterns are used to align the stages in worm and fly development. Gene expression levels, both coding and non-coding, in all three organisms can be quantitatively predicted from chromatin features at the promoter using a model based on a single set of organism-independent parameters. The transcriptome is the readout of the genome. Identifying common features in it across distant species can reveal fundamental principles. To this end, the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have generated large amounts of matched RNA-sequencing data for human, worm and fly. Uniform processing and comprehensive annotation of these data allow comparison across metazoan phyla, extending beyond earlier within-phylum transcriptome comparisons and revealing ancient, conserved features1,2,3,4,5,6. Specifically, we discover co-expression modules shared across animals, many of which are enriched in developmental genes. Moreover, we use expression patterns to align the stages in worm and fly development and find a novel pairing between worm embryo and fly pupae, in addition to the embryo-to-embryo and larvae-to-larvae pairings. Furthermore, we find that the extent of non-canonical, non-coding transcription is similar in each organism, per base pair. Finally, we find in all three organisms that the gene-expression levels, both coding and non-coding, can be quantitatively predicted from chromatin features at the promoter using a ‘universal model’ based on a single set of organism-independent parameters.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 20

1. 1.

   Brawand D, et al. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature. 2011;478:343-8.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature10532

2. 2.

   Merkin J, Russell C, Chen P, Burge CB. Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues. Science. 2012;338:1593-9.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1228186

3. 3.

   Barbosa-Morais NL, et al. The evolutionary landscape of alternative splicing in vertebrate species. Science. 2012;338:1587-93.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1230612

4. 4.

   Levin M, Hashimshony T, Wagner F, Yanai I. Developmental milestones punctuate gene expression in the Caenorhabditis embryo. Dev Cell. 2012;22:1101-8.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2012.04.004

5. 5.

   Kalinka AT, et al. Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature. 2010;468:811-4.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature09634

6. 6.

   Simola DF, Francis C, Sniegowski PD, Kim J. Heterochronic evolution reveals modular timing changes in budding yeast transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R105.

   Not in our library10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r105

7. 7.

   Talerico M, Berget SM. Intron definition in splicing of small Drosophila introns. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:3434-45.

   Not in our library10.1128/mcb.14.5.3434-3445.1994

8. 8.

   Djebali S, et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature. 2012;489:101-8.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature11233

9. 9.

   Lu ZJ, et al. Prediction and characterization of noncoding RNAs in C. elegans by integrating conservation, secondary structure, and high-throughput sequencing and array data. Genome Res. 2011;21:276-85.

   Not in our library10.1101/gr.110189.110

10. 10.

    Boyle AP, et al. Comparative analysis of regulatory information and circuits across distant species. Nature.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13668

11. 11.

    Gerstein MB. Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science. 2010;330:1775-1787.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1196914

12. 12.

    Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science. 2010;330:1787-97.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1198374

13. 13.

    Ho JWK, et al. modENCODE and ENCODE resources for analysis of metazoan chromatin organization. Nature.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science. 2003;302:249-55.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1087447

15. 15.

    Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 1983;220:671-80.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.220.4598.671

16. 16.

    Reichardt J, Bornholdt S. Detecting fuzzy community structures in complex networks with a Potts model. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;93:218701.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.93.218701

17. 17.

    Domazet-Lošo T, Tautz D. A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature. 2010;468:815-8.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09632

18. 18.

    Karlić R, Chung H-R, Lasserre J, Vlahovicek K, Vingron M. Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:2926-31.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0909344107

19. 19.

    An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11247

20. 20.

    Graveley BR, et al. The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 2011;471:473-9.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09715

Cited by papers we hold 15

• Going circular: history, present, and future of circRNAs in cancer · 2023
  No notice
• Multi-species annotation of transcriptome and chromatin structure in domesticated animals · 2019
  No notice
• Islands of retroelements are major components of Drosophila centromeres · 2019
  No notice
• Co-expression and Transcriptome Analysis of Marchantia polymorpha Transcription Factors Supports Class C ARFs as Independent Actors of an Ancient Auxin Regulatory Module · 2018
  Not checked
• Amphioxus functional genomics and the origins of vertebrate gene regulation · 2018
  No notice
• Chromatin accessibility dynamics across C. elegans development and ageing · 2018
  No notice
• A high-resolution mRNA expression time course of embryonic development in zebrafish · 2017
  No notice
• Chromatin accessibility dynamics reveal novel functional enhancers in C. elegans · 2017
  No notice
• Recurrently deregulated lncRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma · 2017
  No notice
• SeqPlots - Interactive software for exploratory data analyses, pattern discovery and visualization in genomics · 2016
  No notice
• DREISS: Using State-Space Models to Infer the Dynamics of Gene Expression Driven by External and Internal Regulatory Networks. · 2016
  Not checked
• Single-cell triple omics sequencing reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas · 2016
  No notice
• The time-resolved transcriptome of C. elegans · 2016
  No notice
• ENCODE data at the ENCODE portal · 2015
  No notice
• Chromerid genomes reveal the evolutionary path from photosynthetic algae to obligate intracellular parasites · 2015
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.