Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

From mouse to man: safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of a candidate leishmaniasis vaccine LEISH‐F3+GLA‐SE

Rhea N Coler, Malcolm S Duthie, Kimberly A Hofmeyer and 17 more

Clinical & Translational Immunology · 2015 · Case report · CC BY

doi:10.1038/cti.2015.6

Abstract

Key antigens of Leishmania species identified in the context of host responses in Leishmania ‐exposed individuals from disease‐endemic areas were prioritized for the development of a subunit vaccine against visceral leishmaniasis (VL), the most deadly form of leishmaniasis. Two Leishmania proteins—nucleoside hydrolase and a sterol 24‐c‐methyltransferase, each of which are protective in animal models of VL when properly adjuvanted— were produced as a single recombinant fusion protein NS (LEISH‐F3) for ease of antigen production and broad coverage of a heterogeneous major histocompatibility complex population. When formulated with glucopyranosyl lipid A‐stable oil‐in‐water nanoemulsion (GLA‐SE), a Toll‐like receptor 4 T H 1 (T helper 1) promoting nanoemulsion adjuvant, the LEISH‐F3 polyprotein induced potent protection against both L. donovani and L. infantum in mice, measured as significant reductions in liver parasite burdens. A robust immune response to each component of the vaccine with polyfunctional CD4 T H 1 cell responses characterized by production of antigen‐specific interferon‐γ, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin‐2 (IL‐2), and low levels of IL‐5 and IL‐10 was induced in immunized mice. We also demonstrate that CD4 T cells, but not CD8 T cells, are sufficient for protection against L. donovani infection in immunized mice. Based on the sum of preclinical data, we prepared GMP materials and performed a phase 1 clinical study with LEISH‐F3+GLA‐SE in healthy, uninfected adults in the United States. The vaccine candidate was shown to be safe and induced a strong antigen‐specific immune response, as evidenced by cytokine and immunoglobulin subclass data. These data provide a strong rationale for additional trials in Leishmania ‐endemic countries in populations vulnerable to VL.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Leishmaniasis, a sandfly-transmitted series of poverty-related diseases caused by infection with Leishmania species parasites, threatens about 350 million people in 98 countries around the world. It has a wide range of clinical presentations that are dependent on the infecting strain and may cause cutaneous, mucosal or visceral leishmaniasis (CL, MCL or VL). VL, also known as kala-azar, is the most severe form of leishmaniasis, and is typically fatal if left untreated. VL in South Asia and East Africa are caused by infection with Leishmania donovani, whereas in the Mediterranean, the Middle East and Latin America, L. infantum is the causative agent. An estimated 200 000 to 400 000 VL cases are reported annually. Although various chemotherapies for VL exist (for example, antimonials, miltefosine, paramomycin and amprotericin B), they can be toxic, and as a result of repeated, long-term use, drug-resistant parasites are becoming more frequent in endemic areas. A VL elimination campaign has been initiated in India, Bangladesh and Nepal, which will focus on vector control, early diagnosis and drug treatment strategies,,, but it is likely that a vaccine will be needed for successful elimination.

The ability of Leishmania infection to generate life-long immunity offers promise for the development of a vaccine for VL. Computer simulation indicates that vaccination would be a cost-effective control measure, capable of providing long-term protection against disease as well as reducing anthroponotic transmission and persistent reservoirs of parasites. A limitation to an effective vaccine for leishmaniasis is the absence of information on immunological correlates of natural and vaccine-mediated protection in humans. Previous studies have shown the requirement of parasite-specific TH1 (T helper 1) responses, characterized by the production of interferon-γ (IFNγ), interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by polyfunctional CD4+ T cells, and the balance between immunoregulatory mechanisms of proinflammatory IFNγ/TNF-α and regulatory IL-10 cytokines.,,,,,

The use of drugs plus whole parasites or crude antigens adsorbed with alum plus bacillus Calmette–Guerin or appropriate adjuvants has demonstrated that vaccination against leishmaniasis is possible. However, difficulty in standardizing formulation and dosing of live vaccines or crude preparations makes these approaches impractical and inconsistent. A selection of defined antigens including LEISH-111f developed by our group has been studied as vaccine antigen candidates for leishmaniasis in animal models and clinical studies. Using a combination of reverse vaccinology and bioinformatics approaches, we previously identified 43 Leishmania proteins recognized by antibodies in the serum of Sudanese VL patients as potential vaccine antigen candidates. Our selection criteria for vaccine development included sequence conservation across Leishmania spp., a lack of sequence identity with human genes and protective efficacy in animal models. Two Leishmania proteins from our screen that met these criteria were nucleoside hydrolase (NH) and sterol 24-c-methyltransferase (SMT), which we have combined into the fusion antigen construct NS (hereafter referred to as LEISH-F3). NH is a 35 kDa glycoprotein and a main component of the highly antigenic fucose–mannose ligand complex of L. donovani, which induces strong immune responses and protects mice against experimental L. donovani, L. chagasi and L. mexicana infections. When formulated with QuilA saponin, NH also protects dogs against VL. L. infantum SMT is a 40 kDa enzyme with an amino-acid sequence that is highly conserved across many Leishmania species, but is absent in mammals. When appropriately formulated with a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) adjuvant, SMT provides protection against both L. infantum and L. major experimental infections.,,

In general, recombinant proteins are poorly immunogenic and require the addition of an adjuvant to elicit adaptive immune responses. To address this issue, we developed a synthetic TLR-4 ligand, glucopyranosyl lipid A (GLA)., When formulated in a stable oil-in-water nanoemulsion (SE), the GLA-SE adjuvant system induces antigen-specific TH1 immune responses that are associated with efficacy in several animal models of infection, including tuberculosis, malaria and influenza.,,,,,,,,,,,, Completed and ongoing clinical trials have shown our GLA-based formulations to be both safe and immunogenic in vaccine strategies for infectious diseases, allergy and cancer.,

Here we report recognition of NH and SMT in the sera of Leishmania-infected individuals from disease-endemic areas of Bangladesh and the development of a recombinant fusion antigen containing these two proteins, LEISH-F3. We characterized the immune responses induced by immunization of LEISH-F3 formulated with GLA-SE (LEISH-F3+GLA-SE), and demonstrate in mouse models of VL that prophylactic immunization confers protection against both causative strains of VL, L. donovani and L. infantum. We also report results for a first-in-human study that evaluated LEISH-F3+GLA-SE in healthy adults from a non-endemic region. As predicted by our preclinical studies, immunization with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE in a human clinical trial proved to be safe and highly immunogenic; in immunized subjects, we observe a substantial anti-LEISH-F3 serum antibody response and production of key protective cytokines by LEISH-F3-recalled peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which may be potent contributors to vaccine efficacy.

Immune recognition of NH and SMT by individuals from a VL-endemic area in Bangladesh

To validate the use of the NH and SMT proteins as potential vaccine candidates, we first evaluated whether they were recognized by antibodies in sera from Leishmania-exposed individuals from a disease-endemic area in Bangladesh (Figure 1). Endemic area residents were defined as either having active VL or as asymptomatics, and compared with healthy individuals from a non-endemic area (USA). To determine if sera from Leishmania-exposed individuals recognize NH or SMT, we performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for total immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Figure 1a) and compared recognition of our antigens with recognition of L. donovani soluble lysate antigen (SLA). Both VL and asymptomatic individuals had significantly higher anti-NH, anti-SMT and anti-L. donovani SLA serum IgG compared with non-endemic individuals (Figure 1a). Asymptomatic individuals had lower anti-L. donovani SLA compared those with VL, but had higher anti-NH and anti-SMT serum IgG compared with VL (Figure 1a).

The antigenicity of NH and SMT was then evaluated by ex vivo stimulation of PBMCs collected from asymptomatic individuals. Cells were used to characterize CD4+ T cells producing IFNγ, TNF and IL-2, following stimulation with L. donovani SLA, NH and SMT. PBMCs from non-endemic US subjects were used as negative controls. As expected, CD4+ T-cell IFNγ, TNF and IL-2 cytokine responses were significantly higher in the asymptomatic individuals from a VL hyperendemic region when recalled with the antigens as compared with the non-endemic healthy controls (Figure 1b).

Generation and characterization of the LEISH-F3 fusion protein construct

Having demonstrated IgG and cell-mediated responses against NH and SMT in Leishmania-infected individuals, as well as immunogenicity and protection against L. donovani, a straightforward approach was to link in tandem the open reading frames of both genes such that the final construct would result in the generation of a single recombinant antigen, NS/LEISH-F3, comprising both antigens for evaluation as a VL vaccine candidate (Figure 2a). The L. donovani sequence for NH and the L. infantum sequence for SMT were used for the LEISH-F3 construct design. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of purified, scaled-up fermentation lots of LEISH-F3 revealed minor protein aggregation and a single major band at the expected molecular mass of 75 kDa. A similar band profile was observed for samples in reducing and nonreducing conditions, demonstrating the relative absence of protein aggregates (Figure 2b). The identity of the major band, relative absence of aggregates and large protein fragments were confirmed by immunoblotting with a mouse polyclonal serum raised against LEISH-F3 (Figure 2c). The anti-LEISH-F3 polyclonal antibody recognized multiple epitopes and therefore multiple forms of the proteins. As the higher-molecular-weight species is seen with the SMT protein, it suggests that this component of LEISH-F3 is responsible for the multimerization. Furthermore, the absence of bacterial by-products in the purified LEISH-F3 product was confirmed by immunoblotting with polyclonal antibody to Escherichia coli (Figure 2d). Finally, LEISH-F3 was recognized by monoclonal sera raised against a single epitope on each of the single components, confirming the presence of both NH and SMT within the fusion protein (Figure 2e). Based on high levels of homology in the sequence of the NH and SMT genes across additional Leishmania species (Table 1), it is reasonable to assume that these proteins are expressed and recognized during the infectious process of multiple Leishmania species.

The LEISH-F3+GLA-SE vaccine is immunogenic and generates an antigen-specific TH1 immune response in a preclinical mouse model

To determine the immunogenic potential of NH, SMT and LEISH-F3 as vaccines, we formulated the single components and the fusion antigen with the synthetic nanoemulsion GLA-SE for immunization. Mice received three immunizations at 3-week intervals and antigen-specific antibody and T-cell responses were measured 4 weeks after the final immunization and compared with saline or LEISH-F3-alone controls (Supplementary Figure S1). Compared with control immunizations, LEISH-F3+GLA-SE generated higher anti-LEISH-F3 IgG1 and IgG2a serum antibodies; LEISH-F3+GLA-SE generated significantly higher titers of IgG2a than IgG1 (Figure 3a). A positive IgG2a:IgG1 ratio is indicative of an IFNγ-dependent isotype switch in IgG subclasses typical of a TH1-biased immune response.

To demonstrate formally that antigen-specific TH1 responses had been induced in immunized mice, splenocytes were recalled with LEISH-F3 protein ex vivo. We observed a TH1-skewed memory response with IFNγ, but not IL-5, producing cells readily detected in LEISH-F3+GLA-SE-immunized mice (Figure 3b and Supplementary Figure S1). The inverse was observed upon recall of cells from mice immunized with LEISH-F3 alone, indicating the importance of the GLA-SE adjuvant to subvert a TH2 response in favor of TH1 (Figure 3b). This was also reflected in the amount of total cytokines produced by LEISH-F3-recalled splenocytes isolated from LEISH-F3+GLA-SE-immunized mice, which had enhanced production of key TH1 cytokines IFNγ, TNF-α and IL-2 and low levels of the TH2/Treg cytokines IL-5 and IL-10 (Figure 3c).

We further characterized the immune response generated following our immunization regimen with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE by analyzing the LEISH-F3-specific T-cell memory response using multiparameter flow cytometry and intracellular cytokine staining. Although LEISH-F3-specific CD8 T cells responses were not observed, LEISH-F3+GLA-SE immunization generated LEISH-F3-specific CD4 T cells as indicated by the higher percentage of these cells expressing CD154 (a ligand expressed by recently activated CD4 T cells) following ex vivo recall with LEISH-F3 (Figure 3d). LEISH-F3-specific CD4 T cells from LEISH-F3+GLA-SE mice proved to be TH1 skewed and polyfunctional (Figures 3e and f). Mice that received the LEISH-F3+GLA-SE vaccine showed a significant increase in the proportion of LEISH-F3-specific CD4 T cells producing all three of the key TH1 cytokines (IFNγ, IL-2 and TNF; 0.23% of CD4 T cells) or some combination of two (0.40% of CD4 T cells) compared with the untreated control; a total of 0.63% of CD4 T cells from LEISH-F3+GLA-SE mice were polyfunctional in contrast to 0.11% of the LEISH-F3-alone immunization. Thus, immunization of mice with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE induces polyfunctional antigen-specific TH1 responses, which are classically associated with protection against experimental Leishmania infection.

We also conducted CD4 T-cell epitope mapping of LEISH-F3- in the LEISH-F3+GLA-SE-immunized mice. A panel of 164 peptides, each 15-amino-acid long and overlapping by 11 residues, were organized into a two-dimensional matrix of 26 peptides pools, so that individual peptides were present in two independent pools. When a positive response was observed from a peptide in both peptide pools, it was further evaluated in follow-up splenocyte recalls to determine the actual individual peptide that induced positive responses., We found that BALB/c mice had several CD4 epitopes for LEISH-F3 in both the NH and SMT portions of the fusion antigen (Figure 3g).

Immunization with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE induces protection against experimental VL infection with both L. donovani and L. infantum

To evaluate the protective potential of immunization with NH, SMT or LEISH-F3, each formulated with GLA-SE, BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were immunized and experimentally infected with L. donovani or L. infantum 4 weeks after the final immunization. Control mice received saline injections, as our prior experience demonstrated that injection with GLA-SE alone in the same regimen does not change infection relative to treatment with saline (data not shown). Parasite burdens in livers were quantified 4 weeks after infection. A significant reduction of L. donovani parasites was observed in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice immunized with NH, SMT or LEISH-F3 formulated with GLA-SE compared with mice given the control preparations (Figures 4a and b and Supplementary Figure S1). Owing to the high cross-Leishmania species homology of NH and SMT (Table 1), we evaluated if immunization with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE could also reduce parasite burdens in mice infected with the other causative strain of VL, L. infantum. We found that the LEISH-F3+GLA-SE-immunized mice had significantly reduced L. infantum parasite burdens (Figure 4c). The importance of memory CD4 T cells generated by LEISH-F3+GLA-SE immunization in protection against L. donovani infection was examined by depleting either CD4 or CD8 T cells in mice subjected to the standard immunization regimen before infection with L. donovani. In LEISH-F3+GLA-SE-immunized mice, depletion of CD4 T cells, but not CD8 T cells, resulted in the loss of protection and parasite liver burdens comparable to the unprotected saline-immunized mice (Figure 4d).

Clinical characterization of subjects vaccinated with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE

Having demonstrated protection against the causative strains of VL, L. donovani and L. infantum, with prophylactic immunization in preclinical mouse models, the LEISH-F3+GLA-SE vaccine was advanced to clinical trials to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the vaccine. Thirty-six volunteers were randomized, enrolled and received at least one study injection; 12 subjects received the vaccine 20 μg LEISH-F3+2 μg GLA-SE, 12 subjects received the vaccine 20 μg LEISH-F3+5 μg GLA-SE and 12 received 20 μg LEISH-F3 protein alone (see Supplementary Table 1). Each volunteer received three intramuscular injections, administered at 28 -day intervals. Eight of 12 subjects in the 20 μg LEISH-F3+2 μg GLA-SE group, 10 of 12 in the 20 μg LEISH-F3+5 μg GLA-SE group and 9 of 12 subjects in the 20 μg LEISH-F3-alone group completed the final day 421 visit. The remainders withdrew consent or were lost to follow-up before completing the study (Figure 5).

Safety evaluation

The vaccine was safe and well tolerated in healthy adults, with no serious adverse events (AEs), no AE of special interest and no AE of grade 3 or grade 4 toxicity observed in any of the study groups. The most frequent local reactogenicity AE was tenderness/pain, which occurred in 95.8% of vaccine recipients and 41.7% of antigen-only recipients (Table 2a). The most frequent systemic reactogenicity AE was fatigue, which occurred in +50.0% of vaccine recipients and 33.3% of antigen-only recipients (Table 2b). The most common AE were injection site tenderness/pain, fatigue and decreased hemoglobin (Table 2c). Injection site tenderness/pain was the only AE found to have a statistically significant difference in frequency between the groups that received the vaccine and antigen alone (P<0.001). There were no clinically significant changes in clinical chemistry or hematology values. These data indicate that the vaccine was safe and well tolerated at either dose level.

Vaccine-induced immune responses

The antigen-specific immune responses of volunteers who received all three study injections were evaluated. In terms of both the humoral and cellular responses to LEISH-F3 (Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure S2), the vaccine was immunogenic at both 2 and 5 μg of GLA-SE doses. Although subjects vaccinated with the LEISH-F3 protein alone did not develop antigen-specific antibody responses, subjects vaccinated with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE had significant levels of antigen-specific IgG antibodies in their serum. These elevations were evident at day 35 of observation and were maintained up to the last study time point of day 168 (Figures 6a and b). An assessment of IgG subclasses revealed a preferential increase in IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses in the GLA-SE-containing groups (Figure 6a). Antigen-specific IgE was not detected at any time nor in any group (Figure 6a). As the induction of IgG1 is IFNγ-dependent and IgG4 is dependent on IL-4, a preferential induction of isotypes supported by TH1-like cytokines, is indicative of a TH1 response driven by the addition of GLA-SE.,

Whole blood assay (WBA) of subjects injected with protein alone did not demonstrate any antigen-specific cytokine responses at any time point. However, at day 35, the secretion of IFNγ, TNF and IL-2 in response to antigen was observed by WBA of subjects injected with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE. Secretion of these cytokines was further elevated at days 63 and 84, indicating that additional immunizations boosted the cellular response (Figure 6c). Responses were still detected at day 168, although they were lower than those measured at day 84 for IFNγ and TNF, indicating a slight waning of the response over time. IL-2 cytokine responses alternatively remained consistently high through the last time point tested at day 168. Unlike observations in immunized mice, secretion of IL-5 and IL-10 was observed by WBA of subjects injected with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE (Figure 6c). However, IL-10 responses showed a marked decrease after the peak response following day 63. Additionally, in the GLA-SE-containing groups, a significant difference was observed in the group that received 5 μg GLA-SE in terms of increased TNF production at days 63 and 84 and day 168 for IL-2 when compared with the 2 μg GLA-SE group. Furthermore, we evaluated the cytokine responses of PBMC from LEISH-F3-vaccinated subjects when recalled with the LEISH-F3 components (Supplementary Figure S2). As expected, subjects immunized with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE had significant levels of antigen-specific IgG antibodies to both the NH and SMT components compared with the antigen-alone group. No differences were observed in the antibody responses to the components between the 2 and 5 μg adjuvant dose groups of GLA-SE. The cytokine responses to the components reflected the pattern seen with the fusion protein LEISH-F3. An increased TH1 and TH2 cytokine response profile to the LEISH-F3 components were seen for the adjuvanted groups compared with antigen alone at day 63, and this was further characterized at day 168 by a decrease in IL-10 and IL-5 and a persistence of IL-2 (against NH and SMT) and TNF (against NH) responses (Supplementary Figure S2). Taken together, these data indicate that LEISH-F3+GLA-SE vaccination is safe in humans and induces antigen-specific cellular responses that could protect against Leishmania infection.

DISCUSSION

Strategic framework to eliminate VL in South-East Asia by 2015 has reported a decline in incidence of ~35% owing to implementation of single dose AmBisome and indoor residual spraying of insecticides. Coordinated efforts to improve active case searches as well as early detection and diagnostics services have also reported declining incidences in East Africa (http://www.unitingtocombatNTDs.org). Nevertheless, resistance to affordable first-line treatment options such as pentavalent antimonials has developed, and vector control efforts on disease incidence and transmission have yielded varied results.,,,, Control of leishmaniasis could be achieved by developing new vaccines or less toxic drugs. Regardless of the strategies adopted for elimination, we believe that, based on the intransigent nature of VL, it is important to develop tools to ensure that elimination is complete. To date, no disease has been eliminated without an effective vaccine.

We designed the subunit vaccine candidate, LEISH-F3+GLA-SE, to be a cost-effective measure against VL, and performed preclinical analyses of its immunogenicity, safety, toxicity and efficacy against challenge with L. donovani and L. infantum. LEISH-F3 consists of the fusion of two antigens each of which were recognized by humans and were previously shown to confer partial protection in mouse models.,, LEISH-F3+GLA-SE immunization induced antigen-specific antibody and T-cell immune responses in mice and humans. Induction of predominantly TH1-type CD4 T-cell responses was associated with reduced parasite burdens in the livers of vaccinated mice. Furthermore, we demonstrated that immunization with LEISH-F3+GLA-SE in mouse models was protective against both of the causative species of VL, L. donovani and L. infantum.

A considerable number of Leishmania antigens including TSA, LmSTI1, A2, LeIF, Leish-111f, KMP-11, KSAC, CPB, HbR, H2A/H2B, p36/LACK and ORFF have been tested as subunit protein or nucleic acid vaccine candidates against VL and have had variable or unreproducible success in inducing protection.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, As demonstrated for both leishmaniasis and tuberculosis, combining multiple antigens in recombinant fusion proteins such as LEISH-F2/LEISH-111f, Mtb72f, ID93, H56, Ag85B-ESAT6, ESAT6-TB10.4, CSU-F36 and Ag85B-TB10 leads to increased vaccine efficacy.,,,,,,,,, Of these, the multicomponent vaccine LEISH-F2/LEISH-111f+MPL-SE was the first defined vaccine candidate to progress to human clinical trials in healthy volunteers in CL and ML patients in Brazil and Peru and healthy subjects in India.,,,, Because of their low intrinsic immunogenicity, protein-based vaccines need suitable adjuvant systems for the induction of strong in vivo immune responses. Several of the most advanced subunit vaccine candidates against non-viral disease targets currently in human clinical trials, RTS, S (malaria vaccine), ID93, Mtb72F, H56 (TB vaccine,, ), are based on liposomal (AS01, CAF01) or oil-in-water (GLA-SE, MPL-SE) formulations, some of which contain the TLR-4 agonist GLA or MPL. Our selection of GLA-SE was based on its ability to activate dendritic cells in a TLR-4-dependent manner and potentiate TH1-type CD4 T-cell responses,,, which are critical for controlling intracellular infections.

Three doses of the LEISH-F3+GLA-SE vaccine induced antigen-specific TH1 responses in mice and humans. Increased production of IFNγ:IL-5 ratios were observed in BALB/c mice. IFNγ, TNF and IL-2 are involved in protection against VL,,, and TNF has been shown to synergize with IFNγ to kill Leishmania parasites. Therefore, induction of LEISH-F3-specific T cells capable of producing multiple cytokines upon antigen recall might be beneficial for control of Leishmania infection, and such induction may be a good indicator of whether a vaccine will be protective against leishmaniasis. In mice, the ability of LEISH-F3+GLA-SE to induce polyfunctional T-cell responses was associated with a statistically significant reduction in liver parasite burden after infection with L. donovani, in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse models, or L. infantum in BALB/c mice.

Given that the two antigens comprising LEISH-F3 each provide robust protection against challenge with multiple Leishmania species,,,,,, lack homology with mammalian proteins and are conserved among multiple Old and New World species, we suggest that LEISH-F3 may prove to be a superior vaccine candidate for the spectrum of leishmaniasis diseases. The LEISH-F3-specific cytokine response in vaccinated clinical trial subjects was a complex mixture of TH1- and TH2-type responses, a phenotype consistent with observed T-cell memory responses in successful vaccine regimens, such as for yellow fever. Without a definitive correlate of protective immunity against leishmaniasis, vaccine development has had to rely on screening a range of cytokines to estimate the balance between TH1 and TH2 responses and this balance has been shown to be involved in the outcome of human leishmaniasis. We showed that, in addition to its TH1 response-inducing activity, LEISH-F3 induces IL-10 in vaccinated individuals. Although a balanced response that includes IL-10 may prevent the development of pathology associated with an excessively robust proinflammatory immune response, the induction of IL-10 is a potential concern that will be monitored in future leishmaniasis clinical trials. In conclusion, these results support the advancement of the LEISH-F3+GLA-SE leishmaniasis vaccine and plans for additional phase 1 clinical trials in endemic countries are underway.

Recombinant proteins

Recombinant proteins were cloned and expressed in E. coli as described previously.,, The LEISH-F3 fusion protein was constructed by aligning the individual gene sequences for NH and SMT as a single product. Proteins were quantified using the BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) and were all <100 endotoxin units per mg protein as measured by Limulus Amebocyte Lysate QCL-1000 assay (Lonza Inc., Basel, Switzerland). LEISH-F3 (2 μg per lane) was analyzed by reducing and nonreducing sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). LEISH-F3, NH, SMT (100 ng per lane) or L. donovani whole-cell lysate (27 μg per lane) were immunoblotted with rabbit polyclonal antibody to LEISH-F3 and with mouse monoclonal antibody against NH or SMT. To demonstrate the absence of host cell proteins, LEISH-F3 (2 μg per lane) was immunoblotted with rabbit polyclonal antibody to HMS174 E. coli, with HMS174 E. coli lysate as a positive control.

Recognition of NH and SMT in samples from individuals from a Leishmania-endemic area

Sera were obtained from residents of a Leishmania-endemic area of Bangladesh (VL patients and asymptomatics) or the United States (non-endemic normal). Written informed consent for study participation was obtained from each participant before screening. Subjects were defined according to parameters set by the Kala-Azar Elimination Program as follows: VL, a person with clinical symptoms of VL (fever for more than 2 weeks duration and splenomegaly) and a positive rK39 RDT result; asymptomatic individual, a person from an endemic area with no present or past clinical symptoms of VL but with a DAT titer >600; non-endemic, healthy individuals living out with endemic regions reporting no history of VL. ELISA was conducted as previously described with the sera at a 1:400 dilution.

Intracellular cytokine staining: PBMCs were isolated from peripheral blood of the subjects following the standard Ficoll procedure. PBMCs were stimulated with NH and SMT, phosphate-buffered saline, with costimulatory antibodies CD28 and CD49d (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), in complete RPMI at 37 °C. Cells were then stained for membrane expression of CD3 (clone UCHT1; Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA, USA), CD4 (OKT4) and CD8 (HIT8a) (BD Bioscience). Cells were fixed and permeabilized in Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions and stained for intracellular expression of IFN-γ (4S.B3), TNF (MAb11) and IL-2 (MQ1-17H12) (BD Bioscience). Events were acquired using a BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). For analyses, the cells were first gated at CD3 to identify CD4 and CD8 T cells, and then gated for IFNγ, TNF and IL-2. Responses are shown as background (phosphate-buffered saline)-subtracted percent antigen-specific T cells producing the indicated cytokines.

Mouse treatments

All animal procedures were approved by the IDRI institutional animal care and use committee. Female C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions in the animal facilities of the IDRI and entered experiments at 6–8 weeks of age. Mice were immunized three times at 3-week intervals by injection at the base of the tail. Immunizations were made in a volume of 100 μl per dose as follows: 5 μg per dose of LEISH-F3; 5 μg of GLA in stable nanoemulsion (SE) of 2% oil (GLA-SE).

CD4 or CD8 T cells were depleted by intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 mg of either CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD8 (clone 53-6.72) or a rat IgG2a isotype control (Bio X Cell, West Lebanon, NH, USA) on 3 consecutive days. Depletion was confirmed by flow cytometry analysis of blood. Three weeks after depletion, mice were infected with L. donovani.

Antibody analyses

Antigen-specific serum antibodies were measured by ELISA. End-point titers were calculated using the optical density >0.1 as a cutoff value with GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). End-point titers of samples were recorded as <100 if optical density values of the samples were lower than the cutoff value at 1:100 dilution.

Cell preparations and antigen stimulation assays

Four weeks after the final immunization, spleens were removed and single-cell suspensions were prepared. Splenocytes were enumerated using a ViaCount assay with a PCA system (Guava Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), and then incubated with media only or 10 μg ml−1 antigen.

ELISPOT assays: IFNγ and IL-5 ELISPOTs (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Spot images were collected using ImmunoCapture 6.4 and analyzed with ImmunoSpot 5.0 on an automated ELISPOT plate reader (C.T.L. Seri3A Analyzer; Cellular Technology, Shaker Heights, OH, USA).

Secreted cytokines detection

Culture supernatants were collected after 72 h, and IFNγ, TNF, IL-2, IL-5 and IL-10 were determined using bead-based multiplex assay with BD Biosciences' cytometric bead array (CBA) flex set according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences).

Intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry

Splenocytes were cultured with antigen plus 1 μg ml−1 each of the costimulatory antibodies anti-mouse CD28 and CD49d (BD Biosciences), and then stained for membrane expression of CD90.2 (30-H12), CD4 (GK1.5) and CD8 (53-6.7 (BD Biosciences). Cells were then fixed and permeabilized in Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions and stained for intracellular expression of CD154 (MR1; eBioscience), IFNγ (XMG1.2), TNF (MP6-XT22) and IL-2 (JES6-5H4) (BD Bioscience). Events were acquired using a BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star Inc.), Pestle and SPICE (NIAID, NIH (BCBB, Bethesda, MD, USA)). Cells were gated through CD90.2+ T cells to analyze CD4 and CD8 T cells. Intracellular molecules were analyzed after gating through CD4+CD8− T cells. For CD4 epitope mapping analysis, cells were gated and analyzed for CD154 expression.

Infection and parasite quantification

L. donovani (MHOM/SD/00/1S-2D) and L. infantum (MHOM/BR/82/BA-2) were routinely passed through Syrian golden hamsters to generate virulent amastigote and promastigote stocks in the M199 medium. Mice were challenged by retro-orbital intravenous injection with either 1 × 106 L. donovani or 5 × 106 L. infantum parasites. Three or four weeks after infection, livers were harvested and DNA was extracted from homogenate using QIAmp DNA Mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA was quantified using Nanodrop UV-Vis spectrophotometer (ND-1000). L. donovani DNA was detected using primers for L42486 (forward, 5′-GCGACGTCCGTGGAAAGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGCGGGTACACATTAGCAGAA-3′) with a FAM reporter sequence (5′- CAACGCGTATTCCC-3′), which detects a 203- bp genomic repeat region specific to Leishmania species (NCBI Blastn). L. infantum primers used were described previously. Mouse Gapdh FAM (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as an internal reference control. Cp's of samples were fitted to a standard curve to determine number of parasite per μl of DNA. Final parasite burdens are expressed in the number of Leishmania parasites per organ.

Statistical methods

Data for human ELISA were compared by analyses of non-endemic normals vs VL patients or asymptomatics. Data for intracellular cytokine staining were compared by analyses of non-endemic vs asymptomatics. Statistics were calculated by a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test using GraphPad Prism Version 6.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

For data generated using mouse samples, statistics was determined by one- or two-way ANOVA (GraphPad Prism). Significance was considered when the P-values were <0.05.

Clinical methods

Trial design: The safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of LEISH-F3+GLA-SE was evaluated in a first-in-man phase 1, randomized, dose-escalation study. A total of 36 healthy adults (male and female adults with no history of travel to Leishmania-endemic areas) were recruited after signing the informed consent form, and then randomly assigned to receive injections with 20 μg LEISH-F3 in combination with either nothing, 2 μg GLA-SE or 5 μg GLA-SE (12 per group) at 28-day intervals (days 0, 28 and 56). The treatment randomization list was generated using SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The study biostatistician filled a set of individual, opaque, sealed envelopes, each labeled with a unique subject/participant identification number and containing the corresponding treatment assignment. Only the designated pharmacist(s) responsible for study injection preparation had access to the randomization assignment envelopes. All study injections were 0.5 ml in volume and were prepared no more than 2 h before administration. The investigators who evaluated study subjects for reactogenicity and AEs were blinded to study treatment assignments (only the study pharmacists were unblinded).

Twenty-four subjects were granted Medical Monitor approval for laboratory eligibility criteria deemed not clinically significant. In addition, the day 421 follow-up telephone visit for subjects was performed ~4 months early due to closure of the study site.

Out of 36 subjects who were randomized to injection, seven subjects withdrew consent or were lost to follow-up before receiving all three injections (three in the 2 μg GLA-SE group, two in the 5 μg GLA-SE group and two in the LEISH-F3-alone group), one subject (in the LEISH-F3 alone group) missed the day 56 evaluation and did not receive a third injection, and one subject (in the 2 μg GLA-SE group) was lost to follow-up before day 84. Thus, nine subjects were excluded from the per-protocol population immunology summaries resulting in evaluable groups for the ELISA (against LEISH-F3, NH and SMT) and WBA (against LEISH-F3) as follows: 2 μg GLA-SE (n=8), 5 μg GLA-SE (n=10) and LEISH-F3 alone (n=9). Final resulting evaluable groups for PBMC luminex (against NH and SMT) were: 2 μg GLA-SE (n=6), 5 μg GLA-SE (n=9) and LEISH-F3 alone (n=7).

Safety evaluations

The primary safety end points were the proportion of subjects with AEs, serious AEs, AEs of special interest, local injection site reactions and specific systemic reactions to the study injections from days 0 to 84. The occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AEs of special interest was monitored from the time of the first study injection at day 0 through day 421, and the investigator assessed their relation to study injections and severity based on the Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adults Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials, 2007. AE grades for laboratory parameters were set based on normal laboratory values. For non-laboratory conditions, AEs that were mild and did not limit activity were considered grade 1; those that were moderate and interfered with function, but not with activities of daily living, grade 2; those that were severe and interfered with activities of daily living, grade 3; and those that were life-threatening or disabling, grade 4. Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were considered life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, or resulted in persistent or significant disability, or resulted in a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a study patient. AEs of special interest were those that met the Food and Drug Administration list for specific AEs. The occurrence of local injection site reactions was assessed at 30 min, 2 days and 7 days following each study injection. The occurrence of the specific systemic reactions headache, anorexia, malaise/fatigue, muscle pain, fever, hives, rash and chills was evaluated in the 7 days following each study injection. Blood samples were collected for measurement of hematology and serum chemistry parameters at screening and on days 7, 35 and 63. Vital signs were collected at every study visit and before and 30 min after study injection on days 0, 28, and 56.

Total IgG antibody assay

High-binding 384-well ELISA plates (Corning, Tewksbury, MA, USA) were coated with recombinant protein, and then serial dilutions of the plasma samples and positive control and a single dilution of negative control were prepared in serum diluent. After incubation, peroxidase-labeled anti-human IgG, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 and IgE (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in serum diluent was added. End-point titer was determined by Graph Prism Nonlinear regression (curve fit) sigmoidal dose response (variable slope) to interpolate unknowns from the last optical density value greater than a threshold determined by sera from normal human plasma pool.

Antigen-specific cell stimulations

Cells or blood were incubated with recombinant protein (10 μg ml−1), phosphate-buffered saline or a positive control mitogen (phytohemaglutinin, 10 μg ml−1). PBMCs were isolated from peripheral blood of the vaccinated subjects following the standard Ficoll procedure. Alternatively, for whole blood assay, unfractionated peripheral blood from vaccinated subjects was incubated within 2 h of collection. Cytokine (IL-2, IL-5, IL-10, IFNγ and TNF) concentrations in the supernatants were measured with a Milliplex Multiplexed Bead Array Kit (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) as per the manufacturer's instructions, with the exception that a nine-point standard curve was applied to provide higher statistical power for curve-fitting regressions (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Data were collected and analyzed on Luminex 200 instrument (Millipore) using Masterplex software (MiraiBio, South San Francisco, CA, USA).

References 84

  1. 1.

    Kedzierski L Sakthianandeswaren A Curtis JM Andrews PC Junk PC Kedzierska K Leishmaniasis: current treatment and prospects for new drugs and vaccinesCurr Med Chem2009 16599614

    Not in our library10.2174/092986709787458489

  2. 2.

    World Health OrganizationControl of the leishmaniasesWorld Health Organ Tech Rep Ser2010 7931158

    Not in our library

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Joshi AB Banjara MR Pokhrel S Jimba M Singhasivanon P Ashford RW Elimination of visceral leishmaniasis in Nepal: pipe-dreams and possibilitiesKathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)2006 4488496

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Kumar V Kesari S Dinesh DS Tiwari AK Kumar AJ Kumar R A report on the indoor residual spraying (IRS) in the control of Phlebotomus argentipes, the vector of visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar (India): an initiative towards total elimination targeting 2015 (Series-1)J Vector Borne Dis2009 46225229

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Bhattacharya SK Sur D Sinha PK Karbwang J Elimination of leishmaniasis (kala-azar) from the Indian subcontinent is technically feasible & operationally achievableIndian J Med Res2006 123195196

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Das VN Dinesh DS Verma N Kar SK A case report on self-cure of visceral leishmaniasisJ Commun Dis2002 34302303

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Lee BY Bacon KM Shah M Kitchen SB Connor DL Slayton RB The economic value of a visceral leishmaniasis vaccine in Bihar state, IndiaAm J Trop Med Hyg2012 86417425

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.2012.10-0415

  9. 9.

    Carvalho EM Badaro R Reed SG Jones TC Johnson WD Jr Absence of gamma interferon and interleukin 2 production during active visceral leishmaniasisJ Clin Invest1985 7620662069

    Not in our library10.1172/jci112209

  10. 10.

    Carvalho EM Johnson WD Barreto E Marsden PD Costa JL Reed S Cell mediated immunity in American cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasisJ Immunol1985 13541444148

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Kaye PM Aebischer T Visceral leishmaniasis: immunology and prospects for a vaccineClin Microbiol Infect2011 1714621470

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03610.x

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Nylen S Maurya R Eidsmo L Manandhar KD Sundar S Sacks D Splenic accumulation of IL-10 mRNA in T cells distinct from CD4+CD25+ (Foxp3) regulatory T cells in human visceral leishmaniasisJ Exp Med2007 204805817

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20061141

  14. 14.

    Goto Y Coler RN Guderian J Mohamath R Reed SG Cloning, characterization, and serodiagnostic evaluation of Leishmania infantum tandem repeat proteinsInfect Immun2006 7439393945

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.00101-06

  15. 15.

    Paraguai de Souza E Bernardo RR Palatnik M Palatnik de Sousa CB Vaccination of Balb/c mice against experimental visceral leishmaniasis with the GP36 glycoprotein antigen of Leishmania donovaniVaccine2001 1931043115

    Not in our library10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00031-7

  16. 16.

    Aguilar-Be I da Silva Zardo R Paraguai de Souza E Borja-Cabrera GP Rosado-Vallado M Mut-Martin M Cross-protective efficacy of a prophylactic Leishmania donovani DNA vaccine against visceral and cutaneous murine leishmaniasisInfect Immun2005 73812819

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.73.2.812-819.2005

  17. 17.

    Borja-Cabrera GP Correia Pontes NN da Silva VO Paraguai de Souza E Santos WR Gomes EM Long lasting protection against canine kala-azar using the FML-QuilA saponin vaccine in an endemic area of Brazil (Sao Goncalo do Amarante, RN)Vaccine2002 2032773284

    Not in our library10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00294-3

  18. 18.

    Goto Y Bogatzki LY Bertholet S Coler RN Reed SG Protective immunization against visceral leishmaniasis using Leishmania sterol 24-c-methyltransferase formulated in adjuvantVaccine2007 2574507458

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.001

  19. 19.

    Goto Y Bhatia A Raman VS Vidal SE Bertholet S Coler RN Leishmania infantum sterol 24-c-methyltransferase formulated with MPL-SE induces cross-protection against L. major infectionVaccine2009 2728842890

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.079

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Anderson RC Fox CB Dutill TS Shaverdian N Evers TL Poshusta GR Physicochemical characterization and biological activity of synthetic TLR4 agonist formulationsColloids Surf B2010 75123132

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.022

  22. 22.

    Bertholet S Ireton GC Ordway DJ Windish HP Pine SO Kahn M A defined tuberculosis vaccine candidate boosts BCG and protects against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosisSci Transl Med2010 253ra74

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3001094

  23. 23.

    Wiley SR Raman VS Desbien A Bailor HR Bhardwaj R Shakri AR Targeting TLRs expands the antibody repertoire in response to a malaria vaccineSci Transl Med2011 393ra69

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3002135

  24. 24.

    Baldwin SL Fox CB Pallansch MA Coler RN Reed SG Friede M Increased potency of an inactivated trivalent polio vaccine with oil-in-water emulsionsVaccine2011 29644649

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.043

  25. 25.

    Bertholet S Goto Y Carter L Bhatia A Howard RF Carter D Optimized subunit vaccine protects against experimental leishmaniasisVaccine2009 2770367045

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.066

  26. 26.

    Fox CB Anderson RC Dutill TS Goto Y Reed SG Vedvick TS Monitoring the effects of component structure and source on formulation stability and adjuvant activity of oil-in-water emulsionsColloids Surf2008 6598105

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.03.003

  27. 27.

    Fox CB Baldwin SL Duthie MS Reed SG Vedvick TS Immunomodulatory and physical effects of oil composition in vaccine adjuvant emulsionsVaccine2011 2995639572

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.089

  28. 28.

    Fox CB Friede M Reed SG Ireton GC Synthetic and natural TLR4 agonists as safe and effective vaccine adjuvantsSubcell Biochem2010 53303321

    Not in our library10.1007/978-90-481-9078-2_14

  29. 29.

    Clegg CH Roque R Perrone LA Rininger JA Bowen R Reed SG GLA-AF, an emulsion-free vaccine adjuvant for pandemic influenzaPLoS ONE2014 9e88979

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0088979

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Schneider LP Schoonderwoerd AJ Moutaftsi M Howard RF Reed SG de Jong EC Intradermally administered TLR4 agonist GLA-SE enhances the capacity of human skin DCs to activate T cells and promotes emigration of Langerhans cellsVaccine2012 3042164224

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.051

  32. 32.

    Behzad H Huckriede AL Haynes L Gentleman B Coyle K Wilschut JC GLA-SE, a synthetic toll-like receptor 4 agonist, enhances T-cell responses to influenza vaccine in older adultsJ Infect Dis2012 205466473

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jir769

  33. 33.

    Zhang W Ahmad G Le L Rojo JU Karmakar S Tillery KA Longevity of Sm-p80-specific antibody responses following vaccination with Sm-p80 vaccine in mice and baboons and transplacental transfer of Sm-p80-specific antibodies in a baboonParasitol Res2014 11322392250

    Not in our library10.1007/s00436-014-3879-8

  34. 34.

    Karmakar S Zhang W Ahmad G Torben W Alam MU Le L Cross-species protection: Schistosoma mansoni Sm-p80 vaccine confers protection against Schistosoma haematobium in hamsters and baboonsVaccine2014 3212961303

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.057

  35. 35.

    Goto Y Bhatia A Raman VS Liang H Mohamath R Picone AF KSAC, the first defined polyprotein vaccine candidate for visceral leishmaniasisClin Vaccine Immunol2011 1811181124

    Not in our library10.1128/cvi.05024-11

  36. 36.

    Reed SG Orr MT Fox CB Key roles of adjuvants in modern vaccinesNat Med2013 1915971608

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3409

  37. 37.

    Treanor JJ Essink B Hull S Reed S Izikson R Patriarca P Evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of recombinant influenza hemagglutinin (H5/Indonesia/05/2005) formulated with and without a stable oil-in-water emulsion containing glucopyranosyl-lipid A (SE+GLA) adjuvantVaccine2013 3157605765

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.064

  38. 38.

    Darrah PA Patel DT De Luca PM Lindsay RW Davey DF Flynn BJ Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania majorNat Med2007 13843850

    Not in our library10.1038/nm1592

  39. 39.

    Li Pira G Ivaldi F Moretti P Manca F High throughput T epitope mapping and vaccine developmentJ Biomed Biotechnol2010 2010325720

    Not in our library10.1155/2010/325720

  40. 40.

    Hoffmeister B Kiecker F Tesfa L Volk HD Picker LJ Kern F Mapping T cell epitopes by flow cytometryMethods2003 29270281

    Not in our library10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00349-3

  41. 41.

    Gascan H Gauchat JF Roncarolo MG Yssel H Spits H de Vries JE. Human B cell clones can be induced to proliferate and to switch to IgE and IgG4 synthesis by interleukin 4 and a signal provided by activated CD4+ T cell clonesJ Exp Med1991 173747750

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.173.3.747

  42. 42.

    Kitani A Strober W Regulation of C gamma subclass germ-line transcripts in human peripheral blood B cellsJ Immunol1993 15134783488

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    Sundar S More DK Singh MK Singh VP Sharma S Makharia A Failure of pentavalent antimony in visceral leishmaniasis in India: report from the center of the Indian epidemicClin Infect Dis2000 3111041107

    Not in our library10.1086/318121

  44. 44.

    Vanlerberghe V Diap G Guerin PJ Meheus F Gerstl S Van der Stuyft P Drug policy for visceral leishmaniasis: a cost-effectiveness analysisTrop Med Int Health2007 12274283

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01782.x

  45. 45.

    Berman J ABLE: a new and improved amphotericin B for visceral leishmaniasisAm J Trop Med Hyg2009 80689690

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    Stager S Smith DF Kaye PM Immunization with a recombinant stage-regulated surface protein from Leishmania donovani induces protection against visceral leishmaniasisJ Immunol2000 16570647071

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.7064

  47. 47.

    Ghosh A Zhang WW Matlashewski G Immunization with A2 protein results in a mixed Th1/Th2 and a humoral response which protects mice against Leishmania donovani infectionsVaccine2001 205966

    Not in our library10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00322-x

  48. 48.

    Basu R Bhaumik S Basu JM Naskar K De T Roy S Kinetoplastid membrane protein-11 DNA vaccination induces complete protection against both pentavalent antimonial-sensitive and -resistant strains of Leishmania donovani that correlates with inducible nitric oxide synthase activity and IL-4 generation: evidence for mixed Th1- and Th2-like responses in visceral leishmaniasisJ Immunol2005 17471607171

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.7160

  49. 49.

    Rafati S Zahedifard F Nazgouee F Prime-boost vaccination using cysteine proteinases type I and II of Leishmania infantum confers protective immunity in murine visceral leishmaniasisVaccine2006 2421692175

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.11.011

  50. 50.

    Duthie MS Raman VS Piazza FM Reed SG The development and clinical evaluation of second-generation leishmaniasis vaccinesVaccine2012 30134141

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.005

  51. 51.

    Singh B Sundar S Leishmaniasis: vaccine candidates and perspectivesVaccine2012 3038343842

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.068

  52. 52.

    Melby PC Yang J Zhao W Perez LE Cheng J Leishmania donovani p36(LACK) DNA vaccine is highly immunogenic but not protective against experimental visceral leishmaniasisInfect Immun2001 6947194725

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.69.8.4719-4725.2001

  53. 53.

    Sukumaran B Tewary P Saxena S Madhubala R Vaccination with DNA encoding ORFF antigen confers protective immunity in mice infected with Leishmania donovaniVaccine2003 2112921299

    Not in our library10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00352-3

  54. 54.

    Gupta R Kushawaha PK Tripathi CD Sundar S Dube A A novel recombinant Leishmania donovani p45, a partial coding region of methionine aminopeptidase, generates protective immunity by inducing a Th1 stimulatory response against experimental visceral leishmaniasisInt J Parasitol2012 42429435

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.02.013

  55. 55.

    Kushawaha PK Gupta R Tripathi CD Khare P Jaiswal AK Sundar S Leishmania donovani triose phosphate isomerase: a potential vaccine target against visceral leishmaniasisPLoS ONE2012 7e45766

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0045766

  56. 56.

    Kushawaha PK Gupta R Tripathi CD Sundar S Dube A Evaluation of Leishmania donovani protein disulfide isomerase as a potential immunogenic protein/vaccine candidate against visceral leishmaniasisPLoS ONE2012 7e35670

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0035670

  57. 57.

    Coler RN Goto Y Bogatzki L Raman V Reed SG Leish-111f, a recombinant polyprotein vaccine that protects against visceral leishmaniasis by elicitation of CD4+ T cellsInfect Immun2007 7546484654

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.00394-07

  58. 58.

    Coler RN Skeiky YA Bernards K Greeson K Carter D Cornellison CD Immunization with a polyprotein vaccine consisting of the T-Cell antigens thiol-specific antioxidant, Leishmania major stress-inducible protein 1, and Leishmania elongation initiation factor protects against leishmaniasisInfect Immun2002 7042154225

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.70.8.4215-4225.2002

  59. 59.

    Wang Y Chen Y Xin L Beverley SM Carlsen ED Popov V Differential microbicidal effects of human histone proteins H2A and H2B on Leishmania promastigotes and amastigotesInfect Immun2011 7911241133

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.00658-10

  60. 60.

    Reed SG Coler RN Dalemans W Tan EV DeLa Cruz EC Basaraba RJ Defined tuberculosis vaccine, Mtb72F/AS02A, evidence of protection in cynomolgus monkeysProc Natl Acad Sci USA2009 10623012306

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0712077106

  61. 61.

    Baldwin SL Bertholet S Kahn M Zharkikh I Ireton GC Vedvick TS Intradermal immunization improves protective efficacy of a novel TB vaccine candidateVaccine2009 2730633071

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.018

  62. 62.

    Weinrich Olsen A van Pinxteren LA Meng Okkels L Birk Rasmussen P Andersen P Protection of mice with a tuberculosis subunit vaccine based on a fusion protein of antigen 85b and esat-6Infect Immun2001 6927732778

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.69.5.2773-2778.2001

  63. 63.

    Wang B Henao-Tamayo M Harton M Ordway D Shanley C Basaraba RJ A Toll-like receptor-2-directed fusion protein vaccine against tuberculosisClin Vaccine Immunol2007 14902906

    Not in our library10.1128/cvi.00077-07

  64. 64.

    Dietrich J Aagaard C Leah R Olsen AW Stryhn A Doherty TM Exchanging ESAT6 with TB10.4 in an Ag85B fusion molecule-based tuberculosis subunit vaccine: efficient protection and ESAT6-based sensitive monitoring of vaccine efficacyJ Immunol2005 17463326339

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6332

  65. 65.

    Aagaard C Hoang T Dietrich J Cardona PJ Izzo A Dolganov G A multistage tuberculosis vaccine that confers efficient protection before and after exposureNat Med2011 17189194

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2285

  66. 66.

    Hoang T Aagaard C Dietrich J Cassidy JP Dolganov G Schoolnik GK ESAT-6 (EsxA) and TB10.4 (EsxH) based vaccines for pre- and post-exposure tuberculosis vaccinationPLoS ONE2013 8e80579

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0080579

  67. 67.

    Skeiky YA Alderson MR Ovendale PJ Guderian JA Brandt L Dillon DC Differential immune responses and protective efficacy induced by components of a tuberculosis polyprotein vaccine, Mtb72F, delivered as naked DNA or recombinant proteinJ Immunol2004 17276187628

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.172.12.7618

  68. 68.

    Chakravarty J Kumar S Trivedi S Rai VK Singh A Ashman JA A clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the LEISH-F1+MPL-SE vaccine for use in the prevention of visceral leishmaniasisVaccine2011 2935313537

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.096

  69. 69.

    Llanos-Cuentas A Calderon W Cruz M Ashman JA Alves FP Coler RN A clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the LEISH-F1+MPL-SE vaccine when used in combination with sodium stibogluconate for the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasisVaccine2010 2874277435

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.08.092

  70. 70.

    Nascimento E Fernandes DF Vieira EP Campos-Neto A Ashman JA Alves FP A clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the LEISH-F1+MPL-SE vaccine when used in combination with meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasisVaccine2010 2865816587

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.07.063

  71. 71.

    Velez ID Gilchrist K Martinez S Ramirez-Pineda JR Ashman JA Alves FP Safety and immunogenicity of a defined vaccine for the prevention of cutaneous leishmaniasisVaccine2009 28329337

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.045

  72. 72.
  73. 73.

    Von Eschen K Morrison R Braun M Ofori-Anyinam O De Kock E Pavithran P The candidate tuberculosis vaccine Mtb72F/AS02A: Tolerability and immunogenicity in humansHum Vaccines2009 5475482

    Not in our library10.4161/hv.8570

  74. 74.

    Murray HW Jungbluth A Ritter E Montelibano C Marino MW Visceral leishmaniasis in mice devoid of tumor necrosis factor and response to treatmentInfect Immun2000 6862896293

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.68.11.6289-6293.2000

  75. 75.

    Squires KE Schreiber RD McElrath MJ Rubin BY Anderson SL Murray HW Experimental visceral leishmaniasis: role of endogenous IFN-gamma in host defense and tissue granulomatous responseJ Immunol1989 14342444249

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Murray HW Miralles GD Stoeckle MY McDermott DF Role and effect of IL-2 in experimental visceral leishmaniasisJ Immunol1993 151929938

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Liew FY Li Y Millott S Tumor necrosis factor-alpha synergizes with IFN-gamma in mediating killing of Leishmania major through the induction of nitric oxideJ Immunol1990 14543064310

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    Gaucher D Therrien R Kettaf N Angermann BR Boucher G Filali-Mouhim A Yellow fever vaccine induces integrated multilineage and polyfunctional immune responsesJ Exp Med2008 20531193131

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20082292

  79. 79.

    Singh OP Stober CB Singh AK Blackwell JM Sundar S Cytokine responses to novel antigens in an Indian population living in an area endemic for visceral leishmaniasisPLoS Negl Trop Dis2012 6e1874

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0001874

  80. 80.

    Duthie MS Goto W Ireton GC Reece ST Cardoso LP Martelli CM Use of protein antigens for early serological diagnosis of leprosyClin Vaccine Immunol2007 1414001408

    Not in our library10.1128/cvi.00299-07

  81. 81.

    Duthie MS Goto W Ireton GC Reece ST Sampaio LH Grassi AB Antigen-specific T-cell responses of leprosy patientsClin Vaccine Immunol2008 1516591665

    Not in our library10.1128/cvi.00234-08

  82. 82.

    Vallur AC Duthie MS Reinhart C Tutterrow Y Hamano S Bhaskar KR Biomarkers for intracellular pathogens: establishing tools as vaccine and therapeutic endpoints for visceral leishmaniasisClin Microbiol Infect2014 20374383

    Not in our library10.1111/1469-0691.12421

  83. 83.

    Rolao N Cortes S Rodrigues OR Campino L Quantification of Leishmania infantum parasites in tissue biopsies by real-time polymerase chain reaction and polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assayJ Parasitol2004 9011501154

    Not in our library10.1645/ge-264r1

  84. 84.

    ICSSC. Monitoring and Reporting Adverse Events: Appendix VII www Resource Links 2003. Available at:: http://www.icssc.org/Documents/Resources/AEManual2003AppendicesFebruary_06_2003%20final.pdf (updated 6 February 2003; last accessed 6 April 2009).

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.