Quality of life following a false positive mammogram

To assess how women regard having had a false positive mammogram screening exam, and the influence that this had on their quality of life, 126 such women were interviewed. Their responses were compared to those of 152 women randomly selected among screenees with a negative exam. Eighteen months after the screening the reported prevalence of anxiety about breast cancer was 29% among women with a false positive and 13% among women with a negative screening mammogram (P = 0.001). Of 30 women biopsied, 8 (27%) had pain in the breast and 10 (33%) had reduced sexual sensitivity. A false positive mammogram was described by 7 (5%) of the women as the worst thing they ever had experienced. However, most women with a false positive result regarded this experience, in retrospect, as but one of many minor stressful experiences creating a temporary decrease in quality of life. They report the same quality of life today as women with negative screening results and 98% would attend another screening. Even so, false positive results are a matter of concern, and efforts should be made to minimise this cost whenever a screening programme is conducted.

Abstract licence: CC BY

1. 1.

   Baines C. J., To T., Wall C. Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study. A questionnaire survey. Cancer. 1990;65(7):1663-1669.

   Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(19900401)65:7<1663::aid-cncr2820650735>3.0.co;2-a (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.

   Collette H. J., Day N. E., Rombach J. J., de Waard F. Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet. 1984;1(8388):1224-1226.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91704-5 (opens in a new tab)

3. 3.

   Dean C., Roberts M. M., French K., Robinson S. Psychiatric morbidity after screening for breast cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986;40(1):71-75.

   Not in our library10.1136/jech.40.1.71 (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Devitt J. E. False alarms of breast cancer. Lancet. 1989;2(8674):1257-1258.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91860-6 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.

   Eddy D. M., Hasselblad V., McGivney W., Hendee W. The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years. JAMA. 1988;259(10):1512-1519.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancer · 1989

7. 7.

   Gram I. T., Lund-Larsen P. G., Rosenlund A. F., Størmer J. Mammografiscreening i Tromsø. Gjennomføring og resultat av den første mammografiscreening i Norge. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989;109(10):1040-1042.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Palli D., Del Turco M. R., Buiatti E., Carli S., Ciatto S., Toscani L., Maltoni G. A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy). Int J Cancer. 1986;38(4):501-504.

   Not in our library10.1002/ijc.2910380408 (opens in a new tab)

9. 9.

   Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P., Venet L., Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982;69(2):349-355.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Skrabanek P. False premises and false promises of breast cancer screening. Lancet. 1985;2(8450):316-320.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90362-9 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Skrabanek P. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case against. BMJ. 1988;297(6654):971-972.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.297.6654.971 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Tabar L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S. W., Day N. E. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989;43(2):107-114.

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.43.2.107 (opens in a new tab)

13. 13.

    Tabár L., Fagerberg C. J., Gad A., Baldetorp L., Holmberg L. H., Gröntoft O., Ljungquist U., Lundström B., Månson J. C., Eklund G. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985;1(8433):829-832.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4 (opens in a new tab)

14. 14.

    Verbeek A. L., Hendriks J. H., Holland R., Mravunac M., Sturmans F., Day N. E. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981. Lancet. 1984;1(8388):1222-1224.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91703-3 (opens in a new tab)

15. 15.

    Wright C. J. Breast cancer screening: a different look at the evidence. Surgery. 1986;100(4):594-598.

    Not in our library

• Views of elderly people on living wills: interview study · 2000

  Not checked

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.