A Total Energy Error Analysis of Dynamical Cores and Physics‐Dynamics Coupling in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)
Peter H. Lauritzen, David L. Williamson
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · 2019
doi:10.1029/2018ms001549 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Abstract A closed total energy (TE) budget is of utmost importance in coupled climate system modeling; in particular, the dynamical core or physics‐dynamics coupling should ideally not lead to spurious TE sources/sinks. To assess this in a global climate model, a detailed analysis of the spurious sources/sinks of TE in National Center for Atmospheric Research's Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) is given. This includes spurious sources/sinks associated with the parameterization suite, the dynamical core, TE definition discrepancies, and physics‐dynamics coupling. The latter leads to a detailed discussion of the pros and cons of various physics‐dynamics coupling methods commonly used in climate/weather modeling.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.