Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Chemoselective Covalent Modification of K-Ras(G12R) with a Small Molecule Electrophile

Ziyang Zhang, Johannes Morstein, Andrew K. Ecker and 2 more

Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022

doi:10.1021/jacs.2c05377

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide KRAS mutations are one of the most common oncogenic drivers in human cancer. While small molecule inhibitors for the G12C mutant have been successfully developed, allele-specific inhibition for other KRAS hotspot mutants remains challenging. Here we report the discovery of covalent chemical ligands for the common oncogenic mutant K-Ras(G12R). These ligands bind in the Switch II pocket and irreversibly react with the mutant arginine residue. An X-ray crystal structure reveals an imidazolium condensation product formed between the α,β-diketoamide ligand and the ε- and η-nitrogens of arginine 12. Our results show that arginine residues can be selectively targeted with small molecule electrophiles despite their weak nucleophilicity and provide the basis for the development of mutant-specific therapies for K-Ras(G12R)-driven cancer.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Somatic mutations of the KRAS proto-oncogene are the predominant oncogenic lesions in human cancer., Although KRAS was historically considered an “undruggable” target, the recent successful development of covalent K-Ras(G12C) ligands has demonstrated remarkable clinical benefits of direct, allele-specific K-Ras inhibition., These K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors exploit the strong nucleophilicity of the mutant cysteine and irreversibly bind in the Switch II region of K-Ras.− However, many frequently occurring somatic mutations of K-Ras do not yield cysteine residues, and selective targeting of these mutants remains an unmet challenge. One of such hot spot mutations, KRAS p.G12R, is found in 17% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients, accounting for more than 9,000 new cancer patients per year in the U.S. alone., We reasoned that covalent engagement of the acquired arginine (Arg12) could impart both potency and selectivity and enable the direct targeting of K-Ras(G12R).

Fully protonated at physiological pH (pKa3 = 12.5), the guanidium group of arginine is weakly nucleophilic. To achieve chemoselective targeting of the mutant arginine, we first considered functional groups privileged to react with guanidines or amidines. Following the discovery of the reaction between 2,3-butanedione and benzamidine by Diels and Schleich in 1916, a variety of vicinal dicarbonyl compounds− (e.g., phenylglyoxal, methylglyoxal,− 2,3-butanedione, 1,2-cyclohexadionone) have been found to selectively modify arginine residues on proteins. While these reagents have been employed to study protein glycation,,,− nonspecifically modify proteins,, and perform bioconjugation reactions,,− such reactivity has not been exploited in the design of targeted covalent ligands.

We asked whether a K-Ras Switch-II ligand, when equipped with a vicinal dicarbonyl system, would react with Arg12 in K-Ras(G12R). We synthesized compound 3 (Figure 1A) by acetoacetylation of piperazine 1 followed by α-oxidation of the resulting acetoacetamide 2 with Dess–Martin periodinane. Compound 3 possesses an α,β-diketoamide, a rare but naturally occurring function present in FK506 and rapamycin. Likely due to the strong electrophilicity of the α-ketone, compound 3 could only be isolated as a hydrate. Compound 3 was stable in aqueous buffers over a range of pH and did not react with common thiol-containing nucleophiles (2-mercaptoethanol, dithiothreitol, see Figure S2 for details). However, when we incubated 100 μM compound 3 (molecular weight = 674 Da) with recombinant K-Ras(G12R)·GDP (GDP = guanosine diphosphate) at pH 7.5 at 23 °C and monitored the reaction by intact protein mass spectrometry, we observed the formation of two new protein species with molecular weights consistent with a stoichiometric covalent adduct with the loss of one or two equivalents of water (+656 Da and +638 Da, respectively, Figure 1C). Such reactivity is unique to the α,β-diketoamide 3, as compound 2 did not form any detectable covalent adduct under the identical reaction conditions. We hypothesized that the products of this reaction included imidazoline adducts with Arg12 and their dehydration products (Figure 1B), although their chemical identity remained to be determined.

Compound 3 did not modify wildtype (WT) K-Ras·GDP (Figure 2A) or other hotspot mutants including G12D, G12V, Q61R, Q61K and Q61L (Figure 2B) upon extended incubation at pH 7.5, confirming the specificity of its reaction with Arg12. Additionally, K-Ras contains several surface exposed arginines, which were not modified by compound 3, further supporting its selectivity for the mutant arginine. Consistent with the preference of this ligand scaffold for the GDP-bound state of the protein, compound 3 reacted much slower with K-Ras(G12R)·GppNHp, with <5% modification after 72 h (Figure 2A). The reaction was pH-dependent and proceeded at greatly reduced rate at pH 6. The reaction rate reached maximum at pH 8 and did not further increase at pH 9 (Figure 2C). The K-Ras(G12R)·GDP·3 adduct exhibited markedly increased thermostability compared to unmodified K-Ras(G12R)·GDP (Figure 2D), with an increase of melting temperature by 9.1 °C. The formation of this adduct also appeared irreversible: we did not observe any reversal to the unmodified protein after incubation of the purified K-Ras(G12R)·GDP·3 adduct at pH 7.5 for 7 days at 23 °C.

To understand the chemical nature of the adduct formed between Arg12 and α,β-diketoamides, we obtained a cocrystal of K-Ras(G12R)·GDP and compound 4 (a structural analog of compound 3, see Supporting Information Figure S3 for its biochemical characterization) in the space group P21, which diffracted to 1.7 Å (Figure 3A). Compound 4 was bound in the Switch II pocket of K-Ras, with well-defined electron density for the covalent bonds between the ligand and the protein (Figure 3A). Surprisingly, we observed an imidazolium structure where Arg12 participated in a “side-on” orientation with its ε and η nitrogens. Such an imidazolium adduct is consistent with the loss of two water molecules revealed by whole protein mass spectrometry (Figure 1C). The nucleophilic addition from the η nitrogen also appeared to be stereoselective, as the electron density clearly indicates the tertiary alcohol to be of S- configuration (Figure 3A,B). Compared with unliganded K-Ras(G12R)·GDP, the side chain of Arg12 moved closer to the Switch II region, and the Cβ-Cγ-Cδ-Nε dihedral angle shifted from anti to gauche (Figure 3C). These are likely energetically costly movements compensated by the reaction with the α,β-diketoamide and represent opportunities for future ligand optimization. The conformation of our adduct also differs from that seen with covalent K-Ras(G12C) ligands such as MRTX849 (Figure 3D): the adduct is formed further away from the protein surface, and the amide carbonyl in our structure did not participate in a hydrogen bond interaction with Lys16.

Asking whether the reaction between 3 and Arg12 confers functional inhibition of K-Ras(G12R), we tested the nucleotide exchange activity of unliganded and compound 3-bound K-Ras(G12R), where a fluorescent GDP analog (BODIPY-GDP) was exchanged for unlabeled GDP in the presence of son of sevenless (Sos) or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Figure 4A). Compound 3 inhibited Sos-mediated exchange and significantly reduced the rate of EDTA-mediated exchange, consistent with previous observation with G12C-targeted covalent ligands.

To probe the covalent modification of K-Ras by our arginine-targeted electrophile in a complex proteome, we took advantage of the molecular weight increase upon the reaction between K-Ras and 3, which is large enough to provide a direct visualization of target engagement on the anti-Ras immunoblot (Figure 4B). We treated the lysates of BaF3/K-Ras(G12R), a mouse cell line engineered to express the mutant form of K-Ras, with compound 3 and monitored the Ras molecular weight change. We did not detect any modification of the endogenous K-Ras(G12R). However, when we added recombinant K-Ras(G12R)·GDP to the lysate, we observed complete modification of this exogenous protein after 16 h of incubation (Figure 4B). The difference in reactivity suggested that compound 3 remained active in cell lysates but was unable to engage endogenous K-Ras(G12R). This was consistent with our observation that compounds 3 and 4 did not show cellular activity at concentrations below 100 μM (Supporting Information Figures S4 and S5). Unlike K-Ras(G12C), which has been successfully targeted by GDP-state selective ligands, K-Ras(G12R) is known to have severely compromised GTPase activity, preventing its conversion into the susceptible GDP-bound state. We hypothesized that endogenous K-Ras(G12R) may exist predominantly in the GTP-bound state and therefore is not susceptible to 3 engagement. To test this hypothesis, we preloaded BaF3/K-Ras(G12R) lysates with excess GDP and repeated our treatments as above. Under these conditions, we observed covalent modification of the endogenous K-Ras(G12R), as evidenced by the upward shift of the Ras band (Figure 4B), confirming that the predominant GTP nucleotide state of K-Ras(G12R) can be a limiting factor for its therapeutic targeting. This represents an opportunity for future optimization–either by identifying ligand scaffolds that recognize K-Ras in the GTP-bound state, or by shifting K-Ras to its GDP-bound state with agents targeting upstream signaling nodes (e.g., RTK, SHP2 or Sos inhibitors).

In conclusion, we have identified the first mutant-selective covalent ligands of K-Ras(G12R) using α,β-diketoamides as a privileged arginine-reactive functional group. We found that these ligands give rise to stable imidazolium adducts with K-Ras(G12R) and directly observed the structure of one such adduct using X-ray crystallography. While the reaction between vicinal dicarbonyl compounds and amidines/guanidines has been known since 1916, we show that this reactivity can be utilized in the design of targeted covalent ligands that engage weakly nucleophilic arginine residues in a complex proteome. An important limitation of our current work is that these unoptimized compounds do not show activity in KRAS G12R mutant cells. This is likely due to a combination of (1) suboptimal electrophile positioning of our compounds and (2) the preponderance of the GTP-bound form of K-Ras(G12R) in cells. However, our work presents an important first step in targeting this oncogene, and future medicinal chemistry optimization could yield more potent ligands that target the GTP-bound form. This has recently been shown with other mutants for K-Ras., Our discovery expands our ability to selectively target a recurrent oncogenic mutant, K-Ras(G12R), for which no direct inhibitors have been reported. The chemistry reported here may also serve as the basis for the therapeutic targeting of other acquired arginine residues in human diseases.

References 39

  1. 1.

    Simanshu D. K.; Nissley D. V.; McCormick F. RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease. Cell 2017, 170 (1), 17–33..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009

  2. 2.

    Prior I. A.; Hood F. E.; Hartley J. L. The Frequency of Ras Mutations in Cancer. Cancer Res. 2020, 80 (14), 2969–2974..

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-3682

  3. 3.

    Ostrem J. M. L.; Shokat K. M. Direct Small-Molecule Inhibitors of KRAS: From Structural Insights to Mechanism-Based Design. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2016, 15 (11), 771–785..

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2016.139

  4. 4.

    Moore A. R.; Rosenberg S. C.; McCormick F.; Malek S. RAS-Targeted Therapies: Is the Undruggable Drugged?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2020, 19, 533–552..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41573-020-0068-6

  5. 5.

    Ostrem J. M.; Peters U.; Sos M. L.; Wells J. A.; Shokat K. M. K-Ras(G12C) Inhibitors Allosterically Control GTP Affinity and Effector Interactions. Nature 2013, 503 (7477), 548–551..

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12796

  6. 6.

    Patricelli M. P.; Janes M. R.; Li L. S.; Hansen R.; Peters U.; Kessler L. V.; Chen Y.; Kucharski J. M.; Feng J.; Ely T.; Chen J. H.; Firdaus S. J.; Babbar A.; Ren P.; Liu Y. Selective Inhibition of Oncogenic KRAS Output with Small Molecules Targeting the Inactive State. Cancer Discovery 2016, 6 (3), 316–329..

    Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-1105

  7. 7.

    Hansen R.; Peters U.; Babbar A.; Chen Y.; Feng J.; Janes M. R.; Li L. S.; Ren P.; Liu Y.; Zarrinkar P. P. The Reactivity-Driven Biochemical Mechanism of Covalent KRAS G12C Inhibitors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25 (6), 454–462..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41594-018-0061-5

  8. 8.

    Janes M. R.; Zhang J.; Li L.-S.; Hansen R.; Peters U.; Guo X.; Chen Y.; Babbar A.; Firdaus S. J.; Darjania L.; Feng J.; Chen J. H.; Li S.; Li S.; Long Y. O.; Thach C.; Liu Y.; Zarieh A.; Ely T.; Kucharski J. M.; Kessler L. V.; Wu T.; Yu K.; Wang Y.; Yao Y.; Deng X.; Zarrinkar P. P.; Brehmer D.; Dhanak D.; Lorenzi M. V.; Hu-Lowe D.; Patricelli M. P.; Ren P.; Liu Y. Targeting KRAS Mutant Cancers with a Covalent G12C-Specific Inhibitor. Cell 2018, 172 (3), 578–589. e17.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.006

  9. 9.

    Fell J. B.; Fischer J. P.; Baer B. R.; Blake J. F.; Bouhana K.; Briere D. M.; Brown K. D.; Burgess L. E.; Burns A. C.; Burkard M. R.; Chiang H.; Chicarelli M. J.; Cook A. W.; Gaudino J. J.; Hallin J.; Hanson L.; Hartley D. P.; Hicken E. J.; Hingorani G. P.; Hinklin R. J.; Mejia M. J.; Olson P.; Otten J. N.; Rhodes S. P.; Rodriguez M. E.; Savechenkov P.; Smith D. J.; Sudhakar N.; Sullivan F. X.; Tang T. P.; Vigers G. P.; Wollenberg L.; Christensen J. G.; Marx M. A. Identification of the Clinical Development Candidate MRTX849, a Covalent KRASG12CInhibitor for the Treatment of Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63 (13), 6679–6693..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02052

  10. 10.

    Lanman B. A.; Allen J. R.; Allen J. G.; Amegadzie A. K.; Ashton K. S.; Booker S. K.; Chen J. J.; Chen N.; Frohn M. J.; Goodman G.; Kopecky D. J.; Liu L.; Lopez P.; Low J. D.; Ma V.; Minatti A. E.; Nguyen T. T.; Nishimura N.; Pickrell A. J.; Reed A. B.; Shin Y.; Siegmund A. C.; Tamayo N. A.; Tegley C. M.; Walton M. C.; Wang H. L.; Wurz R. P.; Xue M.; Yang K. C.; Achanta P.; Bartberger M. D.; Canon J.; Hollis L. S.; McCarter J. D.; Mohr C.; Rex K.; Saiki A. Y.; San Miguel T.; Volak L. P.; Wang K. H.; Whittington D. A.; Zech S. G.; Lipford J. R.; Cee V. J. Discovery of a Covalent Inhibitor of KRASG12C (AMG 510) for the Treatment of Solid Tumors. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63 (1), 52–65..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01180

  11. 11.
    The path to the clinic: a comprehensive review on direct KRASG12C inhibitors · 2022
    No notice
  12. 12.

    Hobbs G. A.; Baker N. M.; Miermont A. M.; Thurman R. D.; Pierobon M.; Tran T. H.; Anderson A. O.; Waters A. M.; Diehl J. N.; Papke B.; Hodge R. G.; Klomp J. E.; Goodwin C. M.; DeLiberty J. M.; Wang J.; Ng R. W. S.; Gautam P.; Bryant K. L.; Esposito D.; Campbell S. L.; Petricoin E. F.; Simanshu D. K.; Aguirre A. J.; Wolpin B. M.; Wennerberg K.; Rudloff U.; Cox A. D.; Der C. J. Atypical KRASG12R Mutant Is Impaired in PI3K Signaling and Macropinocytosis in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discovery 2020, 10 (1), 104–123..

    Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1006

  13. 13.

    Diels O.; Schleich K. Über Bildung Und Eigenschaften Der Aus 1.2-Diketonen Entstehenden Verbindungen. I., Diacetyl Und Benzamidin. Berichte der Dtsch. Chem. Gesellschaft 1916, 49 (2), 1711–1721..

    Not in our library10.1002/cber.19160490229

  14. 14.

    Takahashi K. The Reaction of Phenylglyoxal with Arginine Residues in Proteins The Reaction of Phenylglyoxal Residues in Proteins with Arginine. J. Biol. Chem. 1968, 243 (23), 6171–6179..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(18)94475-3

  15. 15.

    Yankeelov J. A.; Mitchell C. D.; Crawford T. H. A Simple Trimerization of 2,3-Butanedione Yielding a Selective Reagent for the Modification of Arginine in Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 1664–1666..

    Not in our library10.1021/ja01008a056

  16. 16.
    Reversible histone glycation is associated with disease-related changes in chromatin architecture · 2019
    No notice
  17. 17.

    Huang W. Y.; Tang J. Modification of an Arginyl Residue in Pepsin by 2,3-Butanedione. J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247 (9), 2704–2710..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(19)45268-x

  18. 18.

    Thompson D. A.; Ng R.; Dawson P. E. Arginine Selective Reagents for Ligation to Peptides and Proteins. J. Pept. Sci. 2016, 22 (5), 311–319..

    Not in our library10.1002/psc.2867

  19. 19.

    Jones A. X.; Cao Y.; Tang Y. L.; Wang J. H.; Ding Y. H.; Tan H.; Chen Z. L.; Fang R. Q.; Yin J.; Chen R. C.; Zhu X.; She Y.; Huang N.; Shao F.; Ye K.; Sun R. X.; He S. M.; Lei X.; Dong M. Q. Improving Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Structures with Arginine-Selective Chemical Cross-Linkers. Nat. Commun.2019, 10, Article number: 3911..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-019-11917-z

  20. 20.

    Oya T.; Hattori N.; Mizuno Y.; Miyata S.; Maeda S.; Osawa T.; Uchida K. Methylglyoxal Modification of Protein. Chemical and Immunochemical Characterization of Methylglyoxal-Arginine Adducts. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274 (26), 18492–18502..

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.274.26.18492

  21. 21.

    Takahashi K. Further Studies on the Reactions of Phenylglyoxal and Related Reagents with Proteins. J. Biochem. 1977, 81 (2), 403–414..

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131472

  22. 22.

    Lo T.; Westwood M.; McLellan A.; Selwood T.; Thornalley P. Binding and Modification of Proteins by Methylglyoxal under Physiological Conditions. A Kinetic and Mechanistic Study with N Alpha-Acetylarginine, N Alpha-acetylcysteine, and N alpha-acetyllysine, and bovine serum albumin. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 32299–32305..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(18)31635-1

  23. 23.

    Suckau D.; Mak M.; Przybylski M. Protein Surface Topology-Probing by Selective Chemical Modification and Mass Spectrometric Peptide Mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89 (12), 5630–5634..

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.89.12.5630

  24. 24.

    Ahmed N.; Thornalley P. J. Peptide Mapping of Human Serum Albumin Modified Minimally by Methylglyoxal in Vitro and in Vivo. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1043, 260–266..

    Not in our library10.1196/annals.1333.031

  25. 25.

    Mostafa A. A.; Randell E. W.; Vasdev S. C.; Gill V. D.; Han Y.; Gadag V.; Raouf A. A.; El Said H. Plasma Protein Advanced Glycation End Products, Carboxymethyl Cysteine, and Carboxyethyl Cysteine, Are Elevated and Related to Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 302 (1–2), 35–42..

    Not in our library10.1007/s11010-007-9422-9

  26. 26.

    Gao Y.; Wang Y. Site-Selective Modifications of Arginine Residues in Human Hemoglobin Induced by Methylglyoxal. Biochemistry 2006, 45 (51), 15654–15660..

    Not in our library10.1021/bi061410o

  27. 27.

    Chumsae C.; Gifford K.; Lian W.; Liu H.; Radziejewski C. H.; Zhou Z. S. Arginine Modifications by Methylglyoxal: Discovery in a Recombinant Monoclonal Antibody and Contribution to Acidic Species. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85 (23), 11401–11409..

    Not in our library10.1021/ac402384y

  28. 28.

    Galligan J. J.; Wepy J. A.; Streeter M. D.; Kingsley P. J.; Mitchener M. M.; Wauchope O. R.; Beavers W. N.; Rose K. L.; Wang T.; Spiegel D. A.; Marnett L. J. Methylglyoxal-Derived Posttranslational Arginine Modifications Are Abundant Histone Marks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115 (37), 9228–9233..

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1802901115

  29. 29.

    Vanoni M. A.; Pilone Simonetta M.; Curti B.; Negri A.; Ronchi S. Phenylglyoxal Modification of Arginines in Mammalian D-Amino-Acid Oxidase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1987, 167 (2), 261–267..

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13332.x

  30. 30.

    Stipani I.; Mangiullo G.; Stipani V.; Daddabbo L.; Natuzzi D.; Palmieri F. Inhibition of the Reconstituted Mitochondrial Oxoglutarate Carrier by Arginine-Specific Reagents. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 331 (1), 48–54..

    Not in our library10.1006/abbi.1996.0281

  31. 31.

    Gauthier M. A.; Klok H. A. Arginine-Specific Modification of Proteins with Polyethylene Glycol. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12 (2), 482–493..

    Not in our library10.1021/bm101272g

  32. 32.

    Thompson D. A.; Ng R.; Dawson P. E. Arginine Selective Reagents for Ligation to Peptides and Proteins. J. Pept. Sci. 2016, 22 (5), 311–319..

    Not in our library10.1002/psc.2867

  33. 33.

    Dovgan I.; Erb S.; Hessmann S.; Ursuegui S.; Michel C.; Muller C.; Chaubet G.; Cianférani S.; Wagner A. Arginine-Selective Bioconjugation with 4-Azidophenyl Glyoxal: Application to the Single and Dual Functionalisation of Native Antibodies. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16 (8), 1305–1311..

    Not in our library10.1039/c7ob02844j

  34. 34.

    Batchelor M. J.; Gillespie R. J.; Golec J. M. C.; Hedgecock C. J. R. A Novel Application of the Dess-Martin Reagent to the Synthesis of an FK506 Analogue and Other Tricarbonyl Compounds. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34 (1), 167–170..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0040-4039(00)60085-0

  35. 35.

    Mathews J. M.; Watson S. L.; Snyder R. W.; Burgess J. P.; Morgan D. L. Reaction of the Butter Flavorant Diacetyl (2,3-Butanedione) with N-α-Acetylarginine: A Model for Epitope Formation with Pulmonary Proteins in the Etiology of Obliterative Bronchiolitis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58 (24), 12761–12768..

    Not in our library10.1021/jf103251w

  36. 36.

    Hunter J. C.; Manandhar A.; Carrasco M. A.; Gurbani D.; Gondi S.; Westover K. D. Biochemical and Structural Analysis of Common Cancer-Associated KRAS Mutations. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015, 13 (9), 1325–1335..

    Not in our library10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-15-0203

  37. 37.

    Lou K.; Steri V.; Ge A. Y.; Hwang Y. C.; Yogodzinski C. H.; Shkedi A. R.; Choi A. L. M.; Mitchell D. C.; Swaney D. L.; Hann B.; Gordan J. D.; Shokat K. M.; Gilbert L. A. KRASG12C Inhibition Produces a Driver-Limited State Revealing Collateral Dependencies. Sci. Signal.2019, 12, 583, Article number: eaaw9450..

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aaw9450

  38. 38.

    Vasta J. D.; Peacock D. M.; Zheng Q.; Walker J. A.; Zhang Z.; Zimprich C. A.; Thomas M. R.; Beck M. T.; Binkowski B. F.; Corona C. R.; Robers M. B.; Shokat K. M. KRAS Is Vulnerable to Reversible Switch-II Pocket Engagement in Cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2022, 18 (6), 596–604..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41589-022-00985-w

  39. 39.

    Wang X.; Allen S.; Blake J. F.; Bowcut V.; Briere D. M.; Calinisan A.; Dahlke J. R.; Fell J. B.; Fischer J. P.; Gunn R. J.; Hallin J.; Laguer J.; Lawson J. D.; Medwid J.; Newhouse B.; Nguyen P.; O’Leary J. M.; Olson P.; Pajk S.; Rahbaek L.; Rodriguez M.; Smith C. R.; Tang T. P.; Thomas N. C.; Vanderpool D.; Vigers G. P.; Christensen J. G.; Marx M. A. Identification of MRTX1133, a Noncovalent, Potent, and Selective KRAS G12D Inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65 (4), 3123–3133..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01688

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.