Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Trifluoromethyl Thianthrenium Triflate: A Readily Available Trifluoromethylating Reagent with Formal CF 3 + , CF 3 • , and CF 3 – Reactivity

Hao Jia, Andreas P. Häring, Florian Berger and 2 more

Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021

doi:10.1021/jacs.1c02606

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Here we report the synthesis and application of trifluoromethyl thianthrenium triflate (TT-CF 3 + OTf – ) as a novel trifluoromethylating reagent, which is conveniently accessible in a single step from thianthrene and triflic anhydride. We demonstrate the use of TT-CF 3 + OTf – in electrophilic, radical, and nucleophilic trifluoromethylation reactions.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

More than 65 pharmaceuticals containing the trifluoromethyl substituent have been approved by the FDA so far. Because no known sources exist in nature, the trifluoromethyl group must be installed into designed molecules by humans. Depending on the desired chemical transformation, different reagents for electrophilic,− radical, or nucleophilic trifluoromethylation are employed. Given the broad interest in trifluoromethylation chemistry, we introduce here the new reagent trifluoromethyl thianthrenium triflate (1, TT-CF3+OTf–). In contrast to other sulfonium-based trifluoromethylating reagents such as the Umemoto reagent, TT-CF3+OTf– is readily accessible in a single step from inexpensive starting materials. It shows undiminished reactivity after storage for one year in ambient atmosphere. The new trifluoromethylating reagent engages in electrophilic, radical, and nucleophilic trifluoromethylation. Because of its simple preparation, handling, high reactivity, and broad tolerance of functional groups present in complex molecules, as well as its divergent reactivity, we anticipate that TT-CF3+OTf– will find widespread utility in future reaction chemistry development.

Syntheses of simple trifluoromethyl-substituted molecules often employ harsh reagents, such as HF, F2, or SF4, that typically install the fluorine atoms on a (functionalized) methyl group already present in the molecule. For the functionalization of more complex small molecules, the use of CF3 reagents of appropriate reactivity is more common and, depending on the reaction, can be accomplished by nucleophilic, electrophilic, or radical CF3 sources. The CF3 radical can be produced from diverse reagents, such as TMS-CF3,, trifluoroiodomethane, zinc triflinate, and sodium triflinate, via single-electron chemistry. Nucleophilic trifluoromethylating reagents function by transfer of the unstable CF3 anion.− Common CF3 anion precursors are borazine CF3–, PhSO2CF3, and TMS-CF3.− These species reversibly,, release CF3–, with some precursors requiring anionic activation by addition of alkoxide or fluoride. Electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents can often be used as both CF3+ and CF3 radical sources. Most electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents are based on hypervalent iodine or chalcogenide reagents.− The Togni reagents I and II and Umemoto reagent, (Scheme 1) are the most prominent representatives of these classes, now commercially available, and of large synthetic value. The main difference of TT-CF3+OTf– (1) when compared to most other sulfonium-based reagents is its simple one-step synthesis protocol; the practical synthesis for the classical Umemoto reagent requires nine steps, although other derivatives such as 2,8-difluoro- and 2,3,7,8-tetrafluoro-S-(trifluoromethyl) dibenzothiophenium salts, can be prepared by one-pot methods., The fundamental difference from the Togni reagents is the higher reduction potential of TT-CF3+OTf–, a consequence of the positive charge, which it shares with the Umemoto reagent, which can result in complementary reactivity in single-electron transfer reactions when compared to the λ3-iodane compounds.

Aryl thianthrenium salts can be employed as aryl radical precursors in photoredox reactions and perform well as electrophiles in cross-coupling reactions.− A lot of the unique reactivity of the thianthrene-based chemistry is a consequence of the stability of the persistent thianthrene radical cation, which may be the reason for yet another unusual and useful reactivity finding: We were surprised and then intrigued when we found that simple mixing of thianthrene with triflic anhydride in DCM under ambient conditions yields trifluoromethylated thianthrene (1, TT-CF3+OTf–). The reaction does not require an inert atmosphere and can be scaled up, and the product can be purified by washing with diethyl ether to deliver an easy to handle, free-flowing off-white powder that can be stored under ambient conditions in the absence of light without significant decomposition for at least a year (Scheme 2A). An analogous reaction of triflic anhydride with dibenzothiophene cannot be used for a practical synthesis of the Umemoto reagent. We rationalize the unanticipated reaction for the formation of TT-CF3+OTf– from triflic anhydride by a mechanism that can proceed with a low barrier due to the stability of the thianthrene radical cation (Scheme 2A): Nucleophilic attack of thianthrene to triflic anhydride results in S–S bond formation, which can cleave homolytically to release two radicals due to its low bond dissociation energy, computed at 11.1 kcal/mol. Sulfur dioxide expulsion results in formation of the trifluoromethyl radical, which can recombine with the persistent thianthrenium radical cation to form TT-CF3+OTf–. Control experiments support the presence of the thianthrenium radical cation (Scheme 2B) and the presence of the trifluoromethylsulfinyl radical and trifluoromethyl radical before the reagent is formed (Scheme 2C). Cyclic voltammetry measurements for thianthrene (TT, Eox = 0.86 V vs Cp2Fe) and triflic anhydride indicate that single-electron oxidation of thianthrene by triflic anhydride is unlikely (Scheme 2D).

After recrystallization, translucent prismatic TT-CF3+OTf– crystals could be obtained and analyzed by single-crystal X-ray crystallography (Figure 1). The S-CF3 bond distance of TT-CF3+OTf– (1.89 Å) is similar to the analogous distance in the Umemoto reagent (1.87 Å). According to differential scanning calorimetry/thermogravimetric analysis (DSC-TGA), crystalline TT-CF3+OTf– starts to decompose at 142 °C under melting, which is in the same range as Togni’s and Umemoto’s reagents (Table 1). The Togni reagents decompose exothermically,− while decomposition of the Umemoto reagent and TT-CF3+OTf– (1) releases less energy upon decomposition, which attests to the desirable safety profile for 1. For a detailed analysis of the various transitions upon heating, see the DSC-TGA analysis in the Supporting Information (Figures S15–S17). In addition, we further characterized the electrochemical properties of TT-CF3+OTf–. Cyclic voltammetry of TT-CF3+OTf– shows an irreversible reduction wave with a cathodic peak potential of −0.99 V vs Cp2Fe. Therefore, TT-CF3+OTf– is a stronger outer-sphere oxidant than both Togni reagents, which is anticipated due to its cationic charge.

We have established that TT-CF3+OTf– is a competent electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagent. For example, copper(0)-mediated cross-coupling with arylboronic acids proceeds well (Scheme 4A), as does electrophilic trifluoromethylation of deprotonated 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds (Scheme 4D). As expected, TT-CF3+OTf– can also perform in radical trifluoromethylation as shown in Scheme 4B, and E. Unlike other electrophilic trifluoromethylation reagents, we have shown that TT-CF3+OTf– is useful for nucleophilic trifluoromethylation (Scheme 4C) through umpolung with silanolate as nucleophile. We explain this reactivity by formal expulsion of a trifluoromethyl anion with thianthrene oxide as a side product upon addition of silanolate to the reagent to form a metastable sulfurane (Scheme 3A).

To evaluate TT-CF3+OTf– in a transformation that has not already been disclosed with other trifluoromethylating reagents, we explored the hydrotrifluoromethylation of olefins in the absence of catalyst. Hydrotrifluoromethylation with conventional trifluoromethylating reagents is known but only with catalysts, for example photoredox catalysts.− We show here that hydrotrifluoromethylation of olefins can be accomplished by simply adding olefin and TT-CF3+OTf– in the presence of 1,2-benzenedithiol as hydrogen atom donor (Scheme 4F). The substrate scope of the hydrotrifluoromethylation and the functional group tolerance of the new reagent are large: esters, ethers, nitrogen heterocycles, and amides, as well as complex small molecules, are all tolerated. Moreover, styrene derivatives, which often engage in unproductive polymerization, isomerization, and dimerization,, are tolerated in the transformation. The reaction proceeds well with monosubstituted as well as 1,1- and 1,2-disubstituted olefins, while trisubstituted olefins did not participate. Counterion effects seem to play a limited role: hydrotrifluoromethylation of styrene proceeded in virtually identical yields with both triflate and tetrafluoroborate counterions of the TT-CF3+ reagent. On the basis of the observed regioselectivity and radical clock cyclization product (Scheme 3B), we propose that the transformation proceeds by radical trifluoromethylation of the olefin followed by hydrogen atom abstraction of the intermediate secondary carbon radical from the hydrogen donor.

In conclusion, we have developed a new trifluoromethylating reagent, trifluoromethyl thianthrenium triflate (1, TT-CF3+OTf–), which is easily accessible from commercial starting materials in a single step. The new reagent can engage in electrophilic, nucleophilic, and radical reactions and promises to be of synthetic utility.

References 58

  1. 1.

    Wishart D. S.; Feunang Y. D.; Guo A. C.; Lo E. J.; Marcu A.; Grant J. R.; Sajed T.; Johnson D.; Li C.; Sayeeda Z.; Assempour N.; Iynkkaran I.; Liu Y.; Maciejewski A.; Gale N.; Wilson A.; Chin L.; Cummings R.; Le D.; Pon A.; Knox C.; Wilson M. DrugBank 5.0: A Major Update to The DrugBank Database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D1074–D1082..

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkx1037

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Macé Y.; Magnier E. The New Age of Electrophilic Perfluoroalkylation Reactions. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 2479–2494..

    Not in our library10.1002/ejoc.201101535

  4. 4.

    Li M.; Xue X.-S.; Guo J.; Wang Y.; Cheng J.-P. An Energetic Guide for Estimating Trifluoromethyl Cation Donor Abilities of Electrophilic Trifluoromethylating Reagents: Computations of X–CF3 Bond Heterolytic Dissociation Enthalpies. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 3119–3126..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.joc.5b02821

  5. 5.

    Studer A. A. ″Renaissance″ in Radical Trifluoromethylation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8950–8958..

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201202624

  6. 6.

    Liu X.; Xu C.; Wang M.; Liu Q. Trifluoromethyltrimethylsilane: Nucleophilic Trifluoro-methylation and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 683–730..

    Not in our library10.1021/cr400473a

  7. 7.

    Umemoto T.; Ishihara S. Power-variable Trifluoromethylating Agents, (trifluoromethyl)dibenzothio- and -selenophenium Salt System. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3579–3582..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0040-4039(00)94447-2

  8. 8.

    Caron S. Where Does The Fluorine Come From? A Review on The Challenges Associated with The Synthesis of Organofluorine Compounds. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020, 24, 470–480..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00030

  9. 9.

    Chu L.; Qing F.-L. Oxidative Trifluoromethylation and Trifluoromethylthiolation Reactions Using (Trifluoromethyl)Trimethylsilane as a Nucleophilic CF3 Source. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1513–1522..

    Not in our library10.1021/ar4003202

  10. 10.

    Krishnamurti V.; Munoz S. B.; Ispizua-Rodriguez X.; Vickerman J.; Mathew T.; Prakash G. K. S. C(sp2)–H Trifluoromethylation of Enamides Using TMSCF3: Access to Trifluoromethylated Isoindolinones, Isoquinolinones, 2-Pyridinones and Other Heterocycles. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 10574–10577..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8cc04907f

  11. 11.

    Kino T.; Nagase Y.; Ohtsuka Y.; Yamamoto K.; Uraguchi D.; Tokuhisa K.; Yamakawa T. Trifluoromethylation of Various Aromatic Compounds by CF3I in the Presence of Fe(II) Compound, H2O2 and Dimethylsulfoxide. J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131, 98–105..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfluchem.2009.09.007

  12. 12.

    Fujiwara Y.; Dixon J. A.; O’Hara F.; Funder E. D.; Dixon D. D.; Rodriguez R. A.; Baxter R. D.; Herlé B.; Sach N.; Collins M. R.; Ishihara Y.; Baran P. S. Practical and Innate Carbon-hydrogen Functionalization of Heterocycles. Nature 2012, 492, 95–99..

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11680

  13. 13.

    Langlois B. R.; Laurent E.; Roidot N. Trifluoromethylation of Aromatic Compounds with Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfinate under Oxidative Conditions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7525–7528..

    Not in our library10.1016/0040-4039(91)80524-a

  14. 14.

    Langlois B. R.; Billard T.; Roussel S. Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylation: Some Recent Reagents and Their Stereoselective Aspects. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126, 173–179..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.11.007

  15. 15.

    Prakash G. K. S.; Jog P. V.; Batamack P. T. D.; Olah G. A. Taming of Fluoroform: Direct Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylation of Si, B, S, and C Centers. Science 2012, 338, 1324–1327..

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1227859

  16. 16.

    Garcia-Dominguez A.; West T. H.; Primozic J. J.; Grant K. M.; Johnston C. P.; Cumming G. G.; Leach A. G.; Lloyd-Jones G. C. Difluorocarbene Generation from TMSCF3: Kinetics and Mechanism of NaI-Mediated and Si-Induced Anionic Chain Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 14649–14663..

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.0c06751

  17. 17.

    Geri J. B.; Wade Wolfe M. M.; Szymczak N. K. Borazine-CF3– Adducts for Rapid, Room Temperature, and Broad Scope Trifluoromethylation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1381–1385..

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201711316

  18. 18.

    Prakash G. K.; Hu J.; Olah G. A. Alkoxide- and Hydroxide-Induced Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylation Using Trifluoromethyl Sulfone or Sulfoxide. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3253–3256..

    Not in our library10.1021/ol035045u

  19. 19.

    Ruppert I.; Schlich K.; Volbach W. Die Ersten CF3-substituierten Organyl(chlor)silane. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2195–2198..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0040-4039(01)80208-2

  20. 20.

    Prakash G. K. S.; Mandal M. Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylation Tamed. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 112, 123–131..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-1139(01)00477-8

  21. 21.

    Krishnamurti R.; Bellew D. R.; Prakash G. K. S. Preparation of Trifluoromethyl and Other Perfluoroalkyl Compounds with (Perfluoroalkyl)Trimethylsilanes. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 984–989..

    Not in our library10.1021/jo00003a017

  22. 22.

    Johnston C. P.; West T. H.; Dooley R. E.; Reid M.; Jones A. B.; King E. J.; Leach A. G.; Lloyd-Jones G. C. Anion-Initiated Trifluoromethylation by TMSCF3: Deconvolution of the Siliconate-Carbanion Dichotomy by Stopped-Flow NMR/IR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11112–11124..

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.8b06777

  23. 23.

    Umemoto T. Development of Electrophilic Trifluoromethy-lating Reagents; Academic Press Ltd-Elsevier Science Ltd: London, 2017; Vol. 3, pp 265–287.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Charpentier J.; Fruh N.; Togni A. Electrophilic Trifluoro-methylation by Use of Hypervalent Iodine Reagents. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 650–682..

    Not in our library10.1021/cr500223h

  25. 25.

    Umemoto T.; Ishihara S. Effective Methods for Preparing S-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzothiophenium Salts. J. Fluorine Chem. 1998, 92, 181–187..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-1139(98)00276-0

  26. 26.

    Umemoto T.; Ishihara S. Effective Methods for Preparing S-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzothiophenium Salts. J. Flu. Chem. 1999, 98, 75–81..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-1139(99)00087-1

  27. 27.

    Steiner H. Synthesis of Aromatic Trifluoromethyl Compounds: The Potential for Large Scale Application. Chim. Oggi 2015, 33, 26–37.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Umemoto T.; Zhang B.; Zhu T.; Zhou X.; Zhang P.; Hu S.; Li Y. Powerful, Thermally Stable, One-Pot-Preparable, and Recyclable Electrophilic Trifluoromethylating Agents: 2,8-Difluoro- and 2,3,7,8-Tetrafluoro-S-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzothio-phenium Salts. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 7708–7719..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.joc.7b00669

  29. 29.

    Umemoto T.; Zhou X.; Li Y. A New Version of Umemoto’s reagents: A Three-step One-pot Preparation of 2,3,7,8-Tetrafluoro-S-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzothiophenium Triflate. J. Fluorine Chem. 2019, 226, 109347.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfluchem.2019.109347

  30. 30.

    Mizuta S.; Verhoog S.; Wang X.; Shibata N.; Gouverneur V.; Médebielle M. Redox Chemistry of Trifluoromethyl Sulfonium Salts as CF3 Radical Sources. J. Fluorine Chem. 2013, 155, 124–131..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.07.006

  31. 31.

    Berger F.; Plutschack M. B.; Riegger J.; Yu W.; Speicher S.; Ho M.; Frank N.; Ritter T. Site-selective and Versatile aromatic C-H Functionalization by Thianthrenation. Nature 2019, 567, 223–228..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-0982-0

  32. 32.
  33. 33.

    Engl P. S.; Häring A. P.; Berger F.; Berger G.; Pérez-Bitrián A.; Ritter T. C-N Cross-Couplings for Site-Selective Late-Stage Diversification via Aryl Sulfonium Salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13346–13351..

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.9b07323

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Wu J.; Wang Z.; Chen X.-Y.; Wu Y.; Wang D.; Peng Q.; Wang P. Para-selective Borylation of Monosubstituted Benzenes using a Transient Mediator. Sci. China: Chem. 2020, 63, 336–340..

    Not in our library10.1007/s11426-019-9652-x

  36. 36.

    Li J.; Chen J.; Sang R.; Ham W.-S.; Plutschack M. B.; Berger F.; Chabbra S.; Schnegg A.; Genicot C.; Ritter T. Photoredox Catalysis with Aryl Sulfonium Salts Enables Site-selective Late-stage Fluorination. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 56–62..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41557-019-0353-3

  37. 37.

    Cheng Q.; Chen J.; Lin S.; Ritter T. Allylic Amination of Alkenes with Iminothianthrenes to Afford Alkyl Allylamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 17287–17293..

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.0c08248

  38. 38.

    Chen J.; Li J.; Plutschack M. B.; Berger F.; Ritter T. Regio- and Stereoselective Thianthrenation of Olefins To Access Versatile Alkenyl Electrophiles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5616–5620..

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201914215

  39. 39.

    Alvarez E. M.; Plutschack M. B.; Berger F.; Ritter T. Site-Selective C-H Functionalization-Sulfination Sequence to Access Aryl Sulfonamides. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 4593–4596..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00982

  40. 40.

    Berger F.; Alvarez E. M.; Frank N.; Bohdan K.; Kondratiuk M.; Torkowski L.; Engl P. S.; Barletta J.; Ritter T. Cine-Substitutions at Five-Membered Hetarenes Enabled by Sulfonium Salts. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 5671–5674..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02067

All 58 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.