No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

TURBOMOLE: Today and Tomorrow

Yannick J. Franzke, Christof Holzer, Josefine H. Andersen and 36 more

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2023 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00347

Abstract

TURBOMOLE is a highly optimized software suite for large-scale quantum-chemical and materials science simulations of molecules, clusters, extended systems, and periodic solids. TURBOMOLE uses Gaussian basis sets and has been designed with robust and fast quantum-chemical applications in mind, ranging from homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis to inorganic and organic chemistry and various types of spectroscopy, light-matter interactions, and biochemistry. This Perspective briefly surveys TURBOMOLE's functionality and highlights recent developments that have taken place between 2020 and 2023, comprising new electronic structure methods for molecules and solids, previously unavailable molecular properties, embedding, and molecular dynamics approaches. Select features under development are reviewed to illustrate the continuous growth of the program suite, including nuclear electronic orbital methods, Hartree-Fock-based adiabatic connection models, simplified time-dependent density functional theory, relativistic effects and magnetic properties, and multiscale modeling of optical properties.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

1TURBOMOLE is a collaborative, multinational software development project aiming to provide highly efficient and stable computational tools for quantum-chemical simulations of molecules, clusters, periodic systems, and solutions. The software suite is optimized for widely available, inexpensive, and resource-efficient hardware, such as multicore workstations and medium-size compute clusters. TURBOMOLE specializes in electronic structure methods with an outstanding accuracy–cost ratio, such as density functional theory including the random phase approximation (RPA), GW-Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) methods, second-order Møller–Plesset (MP2) theory, and coupled-cluster (CC) methods. The code is based on Gaussian basis sets and has been pivotal for the development of many fast and low-scaling algorithms in the past three decades, such as integral-direct methods, the resolution-of-the-identity (RI) approximation, fast multipole methods, imaginary frequency integration, Laplace transform, and pair natural orbital methods.

2The development of TURBOMOLE was started in the late 1980s by Reinhart Ahlrichs and his group. Integral-direct algorithms and non-Abelian point group symmetry were among the first distinctive capabilities of TURBOMOLE, which initially focused on Hartree–Fock (HF) methods, with subsequent extensions for second-order MP2 perturbation theory− and time-dependent HF (TDHF) response properties. A major milestone was the relatively early adoption of density functional theory (DFT) using newly designed quadrature algorithms and that of time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) shortly afterward. With extensions to meta-GGA, RPA, and other fifth-rung methods,− as well as current density and local hybrid functionals,, critical performance improvements,− and a plethora of available analytical derivatives of ground- and excited-state energies,− TURBOMOLE has become one of the leading all-purpose molecular (TD)DFT codes. The development and implementation of the RI approximation for Coulomb (RI-J,) and exchange contributions, (RI-K,), as well as its generalization to post-HF theories such as MP2 and CC2− and its multipole-accelerated version for extended systems (MARI-J), were other critical innovations. The RI methods are still cornerstones in many modern implementations and outstanding features of the program suite.,,− More recent additions include explicitly correlated wave function methods up to CCSD(T) and BCCD(T),, efficient pair natural orbital (PNO) approaches,− solvation models and embedding,− two-component relativistic methods,− GW-BSE type methods,, real-time (RT) TDDFT, and nonadiabatic molecular dynamics.

3To ensure continuity and coordinate the development, maintenance, and distribution independent of individual developers or groups, TURBOMOLE GmbH, a limited liability company located in Karlsruhe, Germany, was founded in 2007. TURBOMOLE GmbH has adopted an irrevocable bylaw preventing the distribution of dividends to ensure that all profits are reinvested into the project. TURBOMOLE GmbH distributes fee-based end-user licenses itself and through partners, as well as free developer licenses and access to the source code based on project proposals.

4Here we focus on recent developments and provide illustrative applications to chemistry and materials science. For an overview of existing features, as well as development, licensing, and distribution, the reader is referred to refs and and the TURBOMOLE Web site.

Brief Feature Overview

5The program suite consists of a series of modules with a broad range of methods from universal force field to fast semiempirical methods, state-of-the-art DFT and MP2, and coupled-cluster and post-HF methods for ground and excited states. For convenience, the use of modules is facilitated by various tools such as the scripts woelfling, raman, vcd, and genetic.py for reaction path optimization, vibrational Raman spectra, vibrational circular dichroism spectra (VCD), and genetic algorithms, respectively. Moreover, the graphical user interface TmoleX is of great help for running calculations and visualizing results.

6Almost all time-consuming parts are parallelized for multicore systems or clusters using OpenMP for shared-memory parallelization (SMP),,− and the message-passing interface (MPI) for parallelization across multiple nodes,− as outlined in Table 1. The older Fork-SMP is available as a fallback for some modules. Starting with the latest release (V7.7), support for graphics processing units (GPUs) has become available.

7The list of parallelized HF/DFT modules includes those for molecular self-consistent field (SCF) energy (dscf and ridft) and gradient calculations (grad and rdgrad), response properties such as vibrational frequencies (aoforce), NMR/EPR spectra (mpshift), excited-state properties (escf, egrad), and electron transport properties (evib). For these modules, the OpenMP version is recommended for most calculations due to its cost–benefit ratio in terms of computer hardware. Accordingly, post-Kohn–Sham methods (rirpa) and calculations with periodic boundary conditions at the HF/DFT level (riper), as well as the CCSD and CCSD(T) program ccsdf12, are only parallelized with OpenMP. In contrast, the implementation of approximate CC methods in ricc2 and pnoccsd widely supports the OpenMP and MPI standard and combinations thereof for large-scale calculations on multiple nodes.

Local Hybrid Functionals for Strong Correlation and Range-Separated Local Hybrid Functionals

8Local hybrid functionals (LHs), with a position-dependent exact-exchange (EXX) admixture governed by a local mixing function (LMF) have been part of TURBOMOLE since release V7.2 and have since been extended in various ways over the past years. Using seminumerical integration techniques, such LHs have been implemented in an efficient way in the code, with functionalities that exceed by far those available in any other quantum-chemistry package that contains LHs. Beyond ground-state SCF and nuclear gradients, this now includes linear-response TDDFT energies, and excited-state gradients, frequency-dependent and frequency-independent polarizabilities,, NMR chemical shifts and spin–spin coupling constants,, EPR hyperfine couplings and g-tensors,, the related NMR shieldings of paramagnetic systems, magnetizabilities, and quasiparticle states based on GW. From the variety of possible applications and evaluations, many of which have been touched upon in the 2020 overview of TURBOMOLE and in a 2019 comprehensive review of local hybrids, we highlight in particular the outstanding performance of LHs for mixed-valence systems− and for phosphorescence spectra.− We also point to further recent LH publications and to reviews by other authors.,,,−

9Here, we focus on two recent extensions. Essentially, the aims of these works have been to conserve the established advantages of LHs and improve other aspects. We start with the fundamental goal to escape the often invoked “zero-sum game”, between reduced self-interaction errors and delocalization errors or “fractional-charge errors” (FCEs) on one side and minimizing static-correlation errors or “fractional-spin errors” (FSEs) on the other side. The enhanced EXX admixture usually helps minimize FCEs, and LHs have been shown to achieve this goal while retaining some of the important left–right correlation in bonding regions. On the other hand, larger EXX admixtures usually are detrimental in cases with large FSEs, such as dissociating or stretched bonds or many transition-metal systems with appreciable static correlation. Standard LHs so far have not been a way out of this dilemma, at least not to a larger extent. Relevant real-space approaches to reduced FSEs are Becke’s B13 functional and a modified approach by Kong and Proynov (KP16/B13), which have both been implemented self-consistently into a local developer’s version of TURBOMOLE.

10Circumventing the numerical difficulties and poor SCF convergence in many cases of the B13 and KP16/B13 functionals, the idea of a local strong-correlation factor has recently been transferred to the LH framework. Initial attempts were still based on relatively simple first-generation LHs but did already show that FSEs can be reduced when multiplying the LH term for nondynamical correlation (NDC) by a somewhat modified KP16/B13-type qAC factor. Most recently, the more advanced scLH22t functional has been constructed. It is based on the more recent and overall more accurate LH20t functional. Using a damping factor for smaller NDC contributions, an almost complete decoupling between the underlying LH20t and the added qAC factor could be obtained. That is, the optimized parameters of LH20t, as well as its excellent performance for weakly correlated situations (e.g., for GMTKN55 main-group energetics), are retained, but FSEs and the related spin-restricted dissociation curves of covalent bonds are dramatically improved. Notably, the qAC factor forms part of a new LMF (Figure 1).

11The second extension of LHs has been the implementation and construction of range-separated local hybrids (RSLHs), combining the ideas of local hybridization in real space and range-separated hybrids in interelectronic distance space., That is, instead of full-range semilocal exchange, short-range exchange is mixed in. This corresponds to the use of a long-range EXX admixture governed by a suitable range-separation parameter ω. Based on earlier work for locally range-separated hybrids, RSLHs have been implemented for ground-state SCF (modules dscf/ridft) and gradients (modules grad/rdgrad), as well as for linear-response TDDFT (module escf). Using this implementation, the ωLH22t RSLH has been constructed and optimized. It retains most of the good performance of LH20t for main-group and transition-metal energetics, as well as for core, Rydberg, and triplet valence excitations. At the same time, however, it decisively corrects errors for excitations with appreciable charge-transfer character and improves on the potential-energy curves of three-electron cations known to be affected strongly by self-interaction errors. Most recently, ωLH22t has been demonstrated to provide unprecedented accuracy in quasiparticle energies for applications in molecular electronics and organic photovoltaics, without the usual system-dependent tuning of range-separated hybrids.

Inclusion of the Current Density in DFT

12The kinetic energy density τ(r) is a commonly used ingredient in many functionals to detect iso-orbital regions or describe the inhomogeneity of the electron density ρ(r). For its extension τ(r,t), used in the time-dependent Kohn–Sham formalism (TDKS), it has been shown that this quantity is not invariant under a gauge transformation in the external potential. Substitution of τ by its generalization−, where jP is the paramagnetic current density, restores gauge invariance. This leads to additional terms in the magnetic orbital rotation Hessian in linear-response TDDFT calculations, accounting for the response of jP. While the original implementation of these terms in TURBOMOLE dates back to 2012 (release V6.4), we highlight four recent important updates.

13First, an incorrect prefactor 2 has been removed from the original implementation with V7.6., TDDFT calculations employing τ-dependent functionals performed with previous versions erroneously overcorrected for the effects of the current density response and should be reassessed, although average changes are on the order of 0.03 eV.

14Second, a recent investigation reveals that the effect restoring gauge invariance has on the final excitation energies can be significantly larger than previously assumed depending on the functional and type of excitation. In one particular investigation of d–d excitations in nickel(II) complexes, restoring gauge invariance shifts the excitation energies with the M06-2X functional by more than 0.4 eV closer to the experimental reference values, as shown in Figure 2.

15A broader analysis reveals that the importance of imposing gauge invariance can be linked to the derivative of the exchange energy integrand with respect to τ. Moreover, n → π* excitations are significantly more affected by restoring gauge invariance than most π → π* excitations with the exception of π → π⊥* excitations, where the dominantly contributing molecular orbitals (MOs) are perpendicular (⊥) to each other. These findings suggest that a reassessment of previously reported TDDFT results obtained with τ-dependent functionals is warranted, particularly for cases that are potentially more sensitive due to the choice of the functional, the type of excitation, or both. Gauge invariance is restored by default with τ-dependent functionals at moderate (nonhybrid functionals) or negligible (hybrid functionals) additional computational cost. Recently, excited-state gradients and quadratic response properties for τ̂-dependent meta-generalized gradient approximations (mGGAs) have been implemented, enabling gauge invariant computations of excited-state equilibrium structures, relaxed dipole moments, (dynamic) hyperpolarizabilities, and two-photon absorption cross sections. These developments will be available in a future TURBOMOLE release.

16Third, the inclusion of jP is required for gauge invariance of magnetic properties and implemented for magnetizabilities, NMR coupling constants, and NMR shifts of closed-shell, and open-shell systems, as well as EPR hyperfine coupling constants and g-tensors. Recent findings indeed hint at the inclusion of the current density response also being crucial for NMR and EPR properties.,, Especially for open-shell systems, neglecting the current density leads to large deviations, as shown in Figure 3.

17Finally, it was shown that the inclusion of the paramagnetic current is also crucial in relativistic two-component calculations. Contrary to all previous cases, the modifications outlined above must already be taken into account for the ground state in the presence of spin–orbit coupling (SOC). SOC gives rise to an internal magnetic field, inducing a paramagnetic current that already has a nonvanishing contribution at the energy-level. Accordingly, if properties such as light–matter interactions are targeted in the presence of SOC, the interplay of the ground- and excited-state paramagnetic currents must be taken into account. This gives rise to highly nonlinear jP-dependent terms, which have a profound impact on many properties., Current density functional theory (CDFT) for τ-based functionals is available for ground-state energies (module ridft) and gradients (module rdgrad) and linear response properties (modules escf and mpshift). Given the profound impact of jP, we therefore strongly recommend the exclusive use of the current-dependent forms.

Methods for Finite Magnetic Fields

18Quantum-chemical calculations are routinely carried out for various types of molecular properties in magnetic fields, including NMR, EPR, and magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) spectroscopy (see also sections 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, and 3.9.2 of this Review).− For these applications, the magnetic field is usually treated perturbatively, as it is orders of magnitude smaller than the electronic interactions responsible for the formation of a chemical bond.

19Other applications necessitate the use of a more general approach, particularly if the magnetic field becomes strong enough to compete with the electronic interactions within a molecule (>1000 T).− Such conditions may be found in the vicinity of interstellar objects like magnetic white dwarfs and cannot be reproduced in a laboratory.− Consequently, spectra obtained from such interstellar objects can only be interpreted using quantum-chemical calculations− In such extreme conditions, entirely new types of chemical bonding, spin-phase transitions, and other exotic phenomena have been shown to occur.,, The effects of arbitrarily weak or strong magnetic fields on atoms or molecules may be computed using the finite magnetic field approach, which is implemented for Hartree–Fock, CDFT,,GW/BSE,, RPA, and CC2. Through the calculation of electronic ground states, molecular gradients, and electronic excitations, a wide variety of applications for molecular spectroscopy in magnetic fields are now accessible.

20Due to the efficiency of our implementation, systems containing dozens of atoms can be routinely computed in explicit magnetic fields.,,, To highlight the capabilities of our approach, we calculated the MCD spectrum of ZnDiNTAP,, a zinc tetraazaporphyrin with two fused naphthalene units, Figure 4a, using CAM-B3LYP and a mixed def2-TZVP (Zn)/def2-SVP (all other atoms) basis set. Similarly to the experiment,Figure 4b, a magnetic field of 5 T was applied. The resulting spectrum is shown in Figure 4c. Minor differences can all be attributed to solvation effects and vibronic coupling, which were neglected in our calculation. Furthermore, the MCD spectrum of ZnDiNTAP in an explicit magnetic field of 1000 T is shown in Figure 4c. While some of the bands, particularly in the fingerprint region, are not affected by nonlinear effects induced via such a strong field, the two Q bands are significantly shifted (650 → 693 nm and 536 → 514 nm).

21Other applications of the finite magnetic field ansatz include higher-order properties such as magnetizabilites and hypermagnetizabilities through the use of numerical derivatives. Moreover, molecules that are naturally prone to exhibiting “magnetic” effects, such as aromatic compounds (see also section 3.7), may show a nonlinear response even to weak magnetic fields. This is not captured by a perturbative approach but can be routinely investigated using our implementation.

EPR Properties and Single-Molecule Magnets

22Over the past decade, TURBOMOLE has pioneered the in silico study of f-element chemistry. To provide accurate descriptions of compounds containing these heavy elements, robust DFT routines are leveraged to deliver a balanced treatment of dynamic correlation, static correlation, solvation, and relativistic effects. More recently, these developments have enabled the discovery of new species with novel chemistry, subsequently necessitating new and improved computational methods capable of describing them.

23For example, a series of recently discovered Ln-based single-molecule magnets (SMMs), [La(OAr*)3]−, [Lu(NR2)3]−, and [Lu(OAr*)3]− (OAr* = 2,6-Ad2-4-t-Bu-C6H2O, Ad = adamantyl, t-Bu= tert-butyl, R = SiMe3 with Me = methyl), were found to exhibit exotic EPR properties, with [Lu(OAr*)3]− producing hyperfine coupling (HFC) constants of unforeseen magnitude and furthermore demonstrating extended magnetic coherence facilitated by a hyperfine clock transition. A primary investigation of these species with nonrelativistic HFC operators attributed the large hyperfine coupling constants to a sizable Fermi contact contribution from the highest occupied MO (HOMO) of each system. However, the predictions of hyperfine coupling constants and g-tensor values themselves produced errors of roughly one order of magnitude, strongly suggesting the need for more rigorous methods.

24Such improved predictions of EPR spectra are possible with relativistic exact two-component (X2C) theory,, including spin–orbit effects up to the noncollinear two-component (2c) DFT framework.,, For meta-generalized gradient approximations and local hybrid functionals, this also includes the paramagnetic current density in the ground state (cf. section 3.2). This rigorous formulation can be truncated to the scalar-relativistic limit or a perturbative ansatz to study the individual contributions of each term to the EPR parameters. Gauge origin invariance of the g-tensor calculations is ensured by the gauge including atomic orbitals,,, which are crucial for systems with a spatially distributed spin density. These methods were implemented, and their performance is shown here for the aforementioned SMM [Lu(OAr*)3]− shown in Figure 5. The all-electron relativistic methods lead to good agreement with the experiment, as shown in Table 2. The HFC constant of [Lu(OAr*)3]− is dominated by the scalar-relativistic contribution due to the localization of the spin-density in the 6s/d HOMO producing a large Fermi contact interaction. The importance of the paramagnetic spin–orbit contribution increases with the number of unpaired electrons and the scalar formulation, as well as the spin–orbit perturbation theory (SOPT) break down for systems such as [TbPc2]− with six unpaired electrons, Pc = bis(phthalocyaninato).,,, The self-consistent 2c methods are thus pivotal.

25With the next release version, the EPR Euler transformations for the HFC, g-tensor, and electric-field gradient as well as the nuclear quadrupole interaction tensor will further become available for users.

NMR Coupling Constants Across the Periodic Table of Elements

26NMR spectroscopy is key to the analysis and structure determination not only for organic compounds but also for inorganic systems consisting of heavy elements. The NMR spin–spin coupling constant describes the splitting of the signals or peaks in the NMR spectra and is a characteristic property driven by the chemical environment. Formally, the coupling tensor is obtained as the mixed derivative of the energy with respect to the corresponding nuclear magnetic moments, which are introduced via the principle of minimal coupling. NMR couplings are available within a nonrelativistic scalar X2C and the spin–orbit X2C framework. All functional classes up to local hybrids are supported and include the current density for gauge invariance.,,

27For systems made up of light elements, the nonrelativistic treatment is sufficient. Here, the coupling constant is generally partitioned into the Fermi-contact (FC), spin–dipole (SD), paramagnetic spin–orbit (PSO), and diamagnetic spin–orbit (DSO) contributions. The FC, SD, and PSO terms necessitate the solution of the response equations, whereas the DSO term is computed with the ground-state density. Typically, the FC contribution is the leading term, and accurate coupling constants require large basis sets. Thus, a nuclear selection scheme and locally dense basis sets are often applied to large-scale calculations.

28Systems containing heavy elements such as Sn, Pb, Pd, and Pt require the inclusion of relativistic effects,,,,−i.e., methods based on the Dirac equation are introduced. For such methods, the FC, SD, and PSO terms are coupled due to spin–orbit interaction, and they come with drastically increased computational demands. Nevertheless, when using a local X2C ansatz,− large-scale calculations are possible, as illustrated in Figure 6 for the Karplus relationship of Me3Sn–CH2–CHR–SnMe3, where R is different substituents (Me = CH3). The relativistic DFT approach reproduces the experimental findings with fairly good agreement. Improvements are possible with the correlation kernel augmented BSE (cBSE) based on the Green’s function GW ansatz. Here, the DFT response equations are replaced with their BSE counter parts.,

29To demonstrate the efficiency, the calculation of the Sn–P coupling constants of [({SIDipp}P)2Sn] (SIDipp = 1,3-bis(2,6-di-isopropylphenyl)-imidazolidin-2-ylidene) with 137 atoms takes about 44 min (PBE) and 55 h (PBE0) using 12 OpenMP threads of an Intel Xeon Gold 6212U CPU (2.40 GHz). Notably, using a single NVIDIA A100 GPU, the PBE0 timing can be reduced to 3.5 h.

Paramagnetic NMR Shieldings and Shifts

30NMR spectroscopy is also an important technique for the characterization of open-shell chemical compounds. NMR shielding tensors and chemical shifts describe the positions of the peaks in NMR spectra. In the closed-shell case, only the temperature-independent orbital contribution is relevant to the calculation of the shielding tensor. Both a nonrelativistic treatment,, and a scalar-relativistic treatment, are available for the orbital contribution, including the response of the current density.,, The paramagnetic NMR (pNMR) shielding tensor σItot for a nucleus I readswith S denoting the spin, μe denoting the Bohr magneton, γI denoting the gyromagnetic ratio of nucleus I, kB denoting the Boltzmann constant, and T denoting the temperature. Here, the orbital contribution σorb is the straightforward open-shell generalization of the closed-shell limit., Additionally, a temperature-dependent contribution arises, which includes the HFC tensor AI of nucleus I and the g-tensor g already discussed in section 3.4. Both the HFC and the g-tensor depend on spin–orbit coupling. For the calculation of 1H/13C pNMR spectra of large molecules, a perturbative treatment of spin–orbit coupling is preferred over the 2c ansätze due to lower computational costs. The viability of the pertubative ansatz in the X2C framework is demonstrated for two negatively charged Ru(III) complexes in Figure 7, which depicts the good agreement between calculated results and the experimentally measured pNMR 1H and 13C shifts of the two compounds.

31The calculation of properties depending on the density in the vicinity of the nuclei requires additional tight basis functions. Thus, the pcJ, pcS, and pcH basis sets are recommended for nonrelativistic calculations. For relativistic calculations, the x2c-s basis sets were developed.,

32The efficiency of the pNMR implementation is similar to that of the closed-shell case, as shown in Figure 8. Coulomb integrals can be calculated with the RI-J/MARI-J approximations for the Coulomb contribution, and the seminumerical scheme for exchange integrals.,

Ring Currents of Heavy-Metal Clusters

33Aromatic compounds, such as benzene, show characteristic signals at 7 ppm in the 1H NMR spectra. This shift is a consequence of the cyclic electron delocalization associated with the π-orbitals, which deshield the nuclei due to an induced ring current. This magnetically induced current density may be calculated indirectly with the nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) or directly using TURBOMOLE’s interface to the GIMIC program, which was reworked for release V7.7 and now supports open-shell calculations.− The latter approach is more flexible and also applicable to complicated multicyclic systems.−

34The occurrence of ring currents and the concept of aromaticity are not restricted to cyclic conjugated hydrocarbons and related organic compounds. All-metal systems may also sustain a ring current, and these systems are therefore classified as all-metal aromatic compounds. For instance, the endohedral [Th@Bi12]4– cluster features a nonlocalizable π-orbital around the {Bi12} torus, which leads to a ring current.Figure 9 shows a streamlined representation of this ring current, whose strength amounts to about 25 nA/T.,

35Despite featuring only two delocalized π-electrons, almost the same ring current strength as that in porphine is induced. Here, the thorium atom in the torus center is only needed for stability and the synthesis, but it does not take part in the ring current. Furthermore, the open-shell variant [U@Bi12]3– shows a strong ring current, as the same π-orbital is occupied by two electrons., Moreover, prismatic {Bi6}-based clusters such as [(CpRu)3Bi6]− show ring currents of more than 25 nA/T. Therefore, all-metal clusters help to push the frontiers of aromaticity.

Characterization of Novel Electronic Configurations in f-Block Elements by DFT and RPA Methods

36Electronic structure calculations of large f-element complexes contain a great deal of complexity due to the competition between metal oxidation states, d- and f-shell occupations, spin coupling, and relativistic effects. Computational studies in these compounds have to scan a range of formal electronic occupations and apply a range of techniques to ensure convergence to the desired electronic configuration, including Fermi smearing with suitable parameters,, and a combination of damping, level shifting, and direct inversion in the iterative subspace (DIIS) extrapolation. Moreover, the stability of the ground-state reference is a concern in calculations of molecular properties, for example, electronic absorption spectra.

37DFT results helped characterize the structures and properties of nontraditional Ln2+ complexes possessing the 4fn5d1 configuration in the [Ln(C5H4SiMe3)3]− (Ln = Ce–Nd, Gd–Er),− [Ln{N(SiMe3)2}3]− (Ln = La, Gd),, and [Ln(CpiPr5)2] (Ln = Tb, Dy) series. The preference for the 4fn5d1 configuration relative to the traditional 4fn+1 occupation of Ln2+ results from the stabilization of the Ln 5dz2 orbital by the trigonal ligand environment or extremely bulky ligands. Nontraditional Ln2+ complexes show a characteristic intense absorption band in the visible range due to excitations from the occupied Ln 5d orbital. The prediction of UV–vis spectra of low-valent lanthanide complexes, in particular those with a nontraditional configuration, is improved by including diffuse augmentation in lanthanide basis sets. DFT and RPA methods were employed to examine the strong ferromagnetic coupling between the Ln3+ centers in [(C5Me5)2Ln(μ-S)2Mo(μ-S)2Ln(C5Me5)2]− (Ln = Y, Gd, Tb, Dy) and the Mo→Ln electronic excitations in the near-infrared spectral region. Excited-state studies of [Ln(C5Me5)2(C5Me4H)] and [Ln(C5Me5)2(η3-C3H4)] complexes (Ln = Y, Dy, Lu) using TDDFT elucidated their unexpected photochemical activation, which was used to reduce dinitrogen and sulfur and to polymerize isoprene.,

38Computational studies of neutral actinide complexes [An(CpiPr5)2] (An = Th, U, Pu, Am, Bk, No, Lr) (pentaisopropylcyclopentadienyl = CpiPr5) using DFT predicted ground states with a linear ligand arrangement of S10 symmetry and significant An 6d orbital occupation for An = Th, U, Lr. The calculations were carried out with the TPSS exchange–correlation functional, Stuttgart–Cologne scalar-relativistic small-core effective core potentials (ECPs), and the corresponding basis sets., Mixed 5f/6d occupation was predicted in the corresponding Pu complex, while the An = Am, Bk, No complexes were found to have 5fn+1 configurations. The Pu and Am complexes showed a slight deviation from the perfectly symmetric structure, with Cp–M–Cp bending angles of 11° and 12°, respectively. The simulated absorption spectra showed intense peaks in the UV–vis range due to the metal–ligand charge transfer excitations from the An 6d orbital shown in Figure 10. Comparisons with the previously experimentally known Ln analogs (Ln = Dy, Tb) suggested that the synthesis of the predicted actinocene complexes was thermodynamically feasible. The computational predictions received experimental confirmation for An = U while the results were still under review. Layfield and co-workers reported the synthesis of the linear S10-symmetric “second-generation” uranocene [U(CpiPr5)2]. The U–Cp centroid distance was determined from crystallographic studies as 2.504 Å, in good agreement with the computational result of 2.483 Å. The measured UV–vis spectra showed broad and intense absorption, as predicted by TDDFT calculations.

Damped Response Theory

39Assessing light–matter interactions in extended or exotic systems is an active field of development in TURBOMOLE.,,,,,, While root-by-root linear-response methods have been crucial for many applications, they are not suitable for spectrally dense systems or core excitation due to the high number of excited states (roots). Damped response theory,, or the equivalent complex polarization propagator approach, provides a convenient framework to formulate resonance convergent response functions, circumventing these problems. It provides a convenient route to directly compute a variety of absorptive and dispersive effects in both UV–vis and X-ray frequency regions, which is particularly advantageous for large systems, and in frequency regions with high densities of states, as it does not require to solve eigenvalue equations for all contributing states and individual transitions matrix elements between them. It also allows to compute nonlinear transition properties in the vicinity of additional resonances, e.g., the resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) transition amplitudes, as well as properties at imaginary frequencies, like the C6 dispersion coefficient.,−

40A number of implementations of damped response theory have been presented in the past two decades for time-dependent density functional theory and a variety of wavefunction methods.,,,−,− TURBOMOLE is, to the best of our knowledge, the only program to date that offers damped linear response functions at the RI-CC2 level of theory, (available since release V7.7).

Damped Response for Multiscale Modeling

41DFT-based damped response implementations in TURBOMOLE cover IR spectroscopy, VCD, and Raman spectroscopy, as well as absorption and electronic circular dichroism (ECD) in the visible and ultraviolet spectral range. Furthermore, this approach has recently been extended to the modern framework of the GW-BSE method, being especially useful for core excitations.,

42At a given complex frequency ωex = ω + iγ, where ω and γ are the real and imaginary parts of the external field, respectively, the coupled perturbed equation,is first solved. A and B are defined asεp marks orbital or quasiparticle energies, vpq,rs is a Coulomb integral, fpq,rs is the exchange-correlation kernel, if present, and Kpq,rs is a exchange integral. The precise kinds of fpq,rs and Kpq,rs depend on the chosen method.pν describes the external perturbation, e.g., an electric or magnetic field., The polarizability can then be calculated as

43Damped polarizabilities and the related magnetizabilities have further emerged as the quantum-chemical cornerstone of the transition matrix (T-matrix) based approach for multiscale modeling of light–matter interactions.,, This way, the functionalization of molecular structures within optical devices is possible. In that regard, optical cavities filled with molecular materials or metasurfaces of cylinders consisting of molecular materials can be designed. These devices exhibit tailored optical properties for a variety of applications, such as enhancing the circular dichroism of a chiral molecule. Through the multiscale approach depicted in Figure 11, the properties of a molecular unit and the macroscopic sample can be distinguished and combined to achieve a specific effect. Combining TURBOMOLE and, for example, the multilayered periodic general Mie method (mpGMM), simulations and predictions of the light–matter interactions of layer-structured materials ranging from a few to hundreds of nanometers are now routinely possible., To target molecular materials of arbitrary shape, the T-matrix approach was furthermore coupled with state-of-the-art homogenization techniques. Combining classical electrodynamics and quantum mechanics has proven to be a worthwhile approach in the field of light–matter interactions, and TURBOMOLE will remain at the forefront of these developments.

Damped Response Theory for One-Photon Absorption and CD Spectra with RI-CC2

44For RI-CC2, the equations for the damped response, of the cluster amplitudes are recast in a form that only involves effective matrices in the space of single excitations, avoiding the storage of parameters for the double excitation space.Subscripts Re and Im represent real and imaginary components, respectively. The effective matrices in the equations above arewhere ASS, ASD, and ADS are, respectively, the singles–singles, singles-doubles, and doubles-singles blocks of the CC2 Jacobi matrix. Δijab = εa – εi + εb – εj – ω are frequency-shifted orbital energy differences, and ω and γ are again the real and imaginary parts of the frequency of the external field, respectively. The effective right-hand sides arewhere ξSx and ξDx are the single and doubles parts of the right-hand sides in the nonpartitioned form, respectively., The partitioned formulation that avoids the need to store double excitation amplitudes and four-index integrals allows applications to system sizes otherwise not accessible at the CC2 level.

45As an illustrative application, we computed the UV–vis absorption spectrum and electronic circular dichroism spectrum of a donor–acceptor cyclophane shown in Figure 12. The absorption spectrum was obtained from calculations of the imaginary damped dipole polarizability and the ECD spectrum from the imaginary part of the optical rotation tensor in the velocity gauge. The asymmetric form of the damped linear response function was used in the calculations (the symmetric form is also available).

46Cyclophanes are well-studied examples of strained aromatic organic compounds (hydrocarbons) that exhibit planar chirality. The UV–vis spectrum is a typical example where the traditional state-wise approach converges only slowly with the number of states, as seen by the large difference between the results for 14 and 59 states that have been included for comparison. The problem does not appear in the damped response calculations.

47Ongoing work is concerned with extending the implementation to induced and nonlinear spectra like MCD and RIXS.

Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Spectroscopic Observables

48Many photophysical and photochemical processes involve multiple electronic excited states coupled by radiative and nonradiative transitions. Efficient simulations of these processes by nonadiabatic molecular dynamics (NAMD) have recently become possible with transition dipole moments and nonadiabatic couplings between excited states, computed within quadratic response TDDFT. The TURBOMOLE implementation of the multistate fewest-switches surface hopping (FSSH) algorithm enables simulations of molecular systems with 50–100 atoms and simulation times of >10 ps., In addition, time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) and transient absorption (TA) spectra can be simulated for comparison with experimental results.

49The simultaneous treatment of multiple electronic excited states enables the examination of Kasha’s rule. According to Kasha’s rule, singlet excited states energetically located above S1 undergo ultrafast decay to the S1 state and thus are not directly involved in fluorescence or photoactivated reactions. However, exceptions to Kasha’s rule are well-known in molecules in the gas phase, such as azulene and pyrene.

50In our recent study, we used the NAMD implementation in TURBOMOLE to investigate the dynamics of several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons including pyrene, azulene, and bicyclo[6.2.0]decapentaene (BCDP, an isomer of azulene) at the PBE0/def2-SVP, level. Azulene was found to exhibit non-Kasha behavior due to emission from the S2 state, in agreement with experiment. BCDP obeys Kasha’s rule and emits only from S1. Previous studies assigned the high-energy shoulder in the pyrene fluorescence spectrum to non-Kasha emission as a result of the reverse S1 → S2 internal conversion.,− Multistate NAMD simulations describe the non-Kasha behavior as a combination of S1 → S2 transitions and the change in the diabatic character of the S1 state from dark (Lb) to bright (La) at points of near degeneracy between the S1 and S2 states. The high-energy shoulder in the fluorescence spectrum of pyrene can be understood as originating from excited states with diabatic bright (La) character. The S2 lifetime in pyrene was computed by an exponential fit of the decay of the state population as 63 fs, in agreement with the experiment value of 85 fs in methanol. The S1 lifetime of azulene was computed to be 2.2 ps in comparison to the experimental result of 1.4 ps in cyclohexane. The computed lifetime of the S1 state of BCDP was found to be 0.8 ps.

51The NAMD trajectories were also used to obtain the TA spectrum of pyrene as an ensemble average of the Gaussian-broadened excited-state absorption and emission spectra (Figure 13). The experimental TA spectrum of pyrene shows an intense band at 580 nm and the growth of a steady state signal at around 450 nm corresponding to S2 → Sn transient absorption that decays rapidly and a S1 → Sn transition (n > 4), respectively., NAMD simulations predict S2 → S4 and S1 → S4 bands at 1500 and 800 nm, respectively. The time evolution of the S1 and S2 states is in good agreement with experiment, while the absorption maxima (λ(S2 → S4) = 1500 nm and λ(S1 → S4) = 800 nm) are red-shifted due to truncation of the electronic excitation space.

Generating Function Methods for Vibrationally Resolved Electronic Spectroscopy

52The vibrational structure of electronic spectra gives detailed information about molecular structure and excited-state phenomena such as internal conversion and intersystem crossing., In the case of conformationally flexible molecules, molecular dynamics sampling often allows the shape of electronic spectra to be accounted for.− However, this approach fails for rigid molecules with high vibrational frequencies. In this case, special care must be taken to include the quantum nature of nuclear vibrations. Efficient theoretical simulation of molecular vibrationally resolved electronic (i.e., vibronic) spectra has been advanced by switching from the time-independent approach, which requires a tedious sum-overstates evaluation of Franck–Condon overlaps, to the time-dependent formalism (generating function approach), where the spectrum is given by the Fourier transform of an appropriate time-correlation function.,− The radless module,, makes use of the generating function method to compute vibrationally resolved absorption and emission spectra, as well as photoelectron ionization spectra. Spectra can be computed within the global harmonic approximation, which only requires equilibrium geometries for initial and final structures as well as vibrational spectra of both structures. The method accounts for the full Duschinsky rotation, taking into account differences in initial and final state structures and vibrational modes. Due to its efficiency, the method can be applied to large molecules, such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons.,,,, An extension of the module further allows the computation of emission and absorption spectra arising from singly occupied vibrationally excited initial states, allowing the simulation of single vibronic level (SVL) fluorescence and vibrationally promoted electronic resonance (VIPER) spectra.

53In addition, the newly implemented semiclassical thawed Gaussian approximation (TGA), offers an efficient way of evaluating the time-correlation function without resorting to the global harmonic approximation. The relation between vibronic spectroscopy and semiclassical dynamics stems from the wavepacket autocorrelation picture of the dipole time correlation function, first popularized by Heller. In TGA, an initial Gaussian wave function is evolved under an effective local harmonic potential constructed at each step about the center of the wavepacket. As a result, its Gaussian form is conserved; the center of the wavepacket follows a classical trajectory, while its width is adjusted according to the instantaneous Hessian of the potential energy surface (PES). Whereas in the original ab initio TGA− the Hessian of the potential energy is updated over time, in the single-Hessian version,− implemented in TURBOMOLE as part of the radless module, the Hessian is kept constant throughout the dynamics. Therefore, the overall additional cost compared to the conventional harmonic approximation is that of a single ab initio trajectory in the final electronic state, which is simulated using the frog module. Since the trajectory experiences the true anharmonic PES, the method can account for anharmonicity at least approximately, although it cannot describe more subtle quantum dynamics, such as wavepacket splitting or tunneling. The TGA approach has proven to be especially useful in systems with a large displacement between the ground- and excited-state minima and in systems with a double-well-shaped PES along a low-frequency mode in the final electronic state. In such molecules, the harmonic approach typically fails because the global harmonic PES constructed around one of the wells is not adequate. Moreover, in contrast to the global harmonic methods, the TGA results often depend weakly on the choice of the Hessian, as illustrated in Figure 14. Overall, the implementation in TURBOMOLE combines these advantages of TGA with accurate and efficient excited-state electronic structures, such as ADC(2) and CC2 methods.

Molecular Properties from Self-Consistent GKS-spRPA

54The generalized Kohn–Sham semicanonical projected random phase approximation (GKS-spRPA) provides a route for obtaining one-particle energies at the RPA level of theory. These one-particle energies provide accurate estimates of ionization potentials (IPs) and electron affinities due to a correct description of orbital correlation and relaxation effects. Its computational cost was reduced from to using well-known analytic continuation (AC) techniques.−

Applications to Nonvalence Anionic States and X-ray Emission Spectroscopy

55The AC version of GKS-spRPA retains a high accuracy across energy scales from valence to core-ionization energies. The versatility of the AC GKS-spRPA was shown by its application to problems involving very weakly bound anionic states and very strongly bound core-hole ionization energies.

56Nonvalence anionic states of molecules are weakly bound states where the excess electron occupies a diffuse orbital. The excess electron is bound by a combination of long-range electrostatic and correlation effects. When electrostatics are sufficient to bind an excess electron, the anionic states are referred to as nonvalence electrostatic-bound (NVEB), and when correlation effects are necessary the states are referred to as nonvalence correlation-bound (NVCB). Using a model water tetramer cluster, the GKS-spRPA approach was shown to provide electron affinities (EAs) from the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies that were within 10 meV of those provided by the EOM-CCSD(T)a* approach, see Figure 15. The high accuracy of the GKS-spRPA approach is due to the correct description of long-range correlation effects. The AC approach introduces errors of less than 5 meV for nonvalence states.

57The AC GKS-spRPA method can also be used for simulating nonresonant X-ray emission (XE) spectra using just the information from the one-particle eigenspectrum. XE energies, ΔE, computed by taking the difference between core and valence IPs and the oscillator strengths, fosc., are evaluated within a frozen orbital approximationwhere ϕc and ϕv are the core orbital and valence GKS-spRPA orbitals involved in the XE process, respectively. The AC GKS-spRPA approach was used in conjunction with the scalar-relativistic (SR) X2C approach and uncontracted basis sets to estimate highly accurate XE spectra for molecules containing second- and third-period elements, for example, see Figure 16. Using uncontracted basis sets, the XE energies were found to have MAEs of 0.7 eV for both second and third period-based XE. The X2C-based AC GKS-spRPA approach thus enables the simulation of nonresonant X-ray emission within a simple one-particle picture while avoiding the use of empirical shifts or core-hole reference states. The latter is an appealing aspect, since issues related to variational instability, which are present in core–hole reference based methods, are avoided.

Orbital Ordering in Quinacridone

58The accuracy of GKS-spRPA for ionization potentials (IPs) compared to nonselfconsistent RPA is due to partial satisfaction of functional self-consistency, which requires that the Kohn–Sham (KS) density equal the interacting density defined as the functional derivative of the ground-state energy with respect to the external potential., A comparison of the GKS-spRPA orbitals and orbital energies to experimental photoelectron spectra of quinacridone illustrates this point, see Figure 17. Within both the KS and the GKS approach, the HOMO energy equals the first IP and subsequent lower-lying orbital energies approximate higher principal IPs., However, this is often not true for semilocal density functional approximations. PBE predicts a HOMO(−1), HOMO(−2), and HOMO(−3) ordering inconsistent with the results of optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functional (OT-RSH) calculations, yielding an accurate description of experimental photoelectron spectra and G0W0 IPs., The canonical GKS-spRPA orbital ordering qualitatively agrees with the one OT-RSH one down to HOMO(−3), see Figure 17. Furthermore, the negative GKS-spRPA HOMO energy of 7.07 eV is close to the experimental IP of 7.23 eV, whereas the negative PBE HOMO energy of 4.92 eV is significantly too small.

Subquadratic-Scaling PNO-CCSD(T) and PNO-CCSD(T)-F12 Methods

59Since 2010, TURBOMOLE has supported accurate wave function methods for computing the ground-state energies of molecular configurations, and up to CCSD(T) and BCCD(T) are available, together with their explicitly correlated counterparts CCSD(T)(F12*) and BCCD(T)(F12*)., When combined with a sufficiently large basis set, these methods deliver ground-state energy differences for reaction or interaction energies and potential energy surfaces to an accuracy that enables a quantative comparison with experimental results. The characteristics of the TURBOMOLE implementation are low memory and disk requirements and shared-memory parallelization, which make calculations on systems with ∼20 atoms routinely possible on modern machines.

60To evaluate energies for larger molecules, the steep scaling of the costs with system size must be overcome. Local approximations based on the short-ranged nature of electron correlation in molecules provide a route to near-linear scaling of costs with the system size. The PNO approach uses an approximate MP2 pair density to construct the set of local virtual orbitals for each pair that is best suited to describing the correlation of that pair. This, in combination with screening and local density fitting approximations, among others, reduces the scaling from to in the asymptotic limit. For ground-state energies, PNO-MP2, PNO-CCSD, and PNO-CCSD(T) explicitly correlated variants PNO-MP2-F12, PNO-CCSD(F12*), and PNO-CCSD(T)(F12*) have been available since V7.6.−

61The efficiency of the implementation is greatly improved if the PNOs are expanded in projected atomic orbitals (PAOs) rather than directly in terms of atomic orbitals (AOs). This is known as domain-based local PNO theory (DLPNO). In TURBOMOLE, the PAO domains for each pair are determined also using the approximate MP2 density rather than by analyzing the MO coefficients and are consequently much more compact. The resulting domains are called principle domains. Very recently, the principle domain approach has been extended to F12 theory, where principle domains and PNOs are required for every subspace in the F12 strong orthogonality projector. In contrast to implementations in other software packages, we do not use the simplified “A” approximation for the MP2-F12 contributions. This has the benefit that the energies converging smoothly to both the canonical limit and the basis set limit can be extrapolated using PNO extrapolation techniques.

62To illustrate the characteristics of the TURBOMOLE implementation and what is now possible, we report timings of PNO-CCSD(T) and PNO-CCSD(T)(F12*) calculations on a sequence of alkane chains and rock salt crystal fragments in Figure 18. The default tight (10–7) PNO truncation threshold was used in all cases. The def2-TZVPP basis and def2-TZVP were used for CnH2n+2 and NanCln, respectively, and calculations were run on a 48 core Intel processor with 200 Gb of memory. For the linear systems, the observed scaling is subquadratic, with C128H256 taking 15 h to complete. For the globular systems, the observed scaling is subcubic, with Na50Cl50 taking 45 h to complete. The F12 calculations are 2–3× more costly than non-F12 calculations but provide energies close to the basis set limit without requiring basis sets with a large number of AOs per atom.

Real-Time TDDFT for Molecules

63While linear-response TDDFT can be used to study excitations under weak fields, a better understanding of nonlinear excited state dynamics at the femto- and sub-femtosecond time scales requires using RT-TDDFT.

64RT-TDDFT for molecular systems has been implemented within the riper module−,, using the Magnus propagator and the predictor-corrector scheme for time integration. The implementation utilizes density fitting and continuous fast multipole method (DF-CFMM) techniques to speed up the KS matrix evaluation and scales almost quadratically with system size. Previously, the implementation was used to simulate absorption spectra over a wide range of frequencies by perturbing the molecules with weak electric fields. Recently, the code has been extended to simulate high harmonic generation (HHG) spectra under intense laser pulses and was utilized to complement and analyze the pulse-induced electron dynamics in the organic semiconductor molecules tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) and zinc-tetraphenylporphyrin (ZnTPP).Figure 19 shows the good agreement of the experimental absorption and HHG spectra with the calculated ones. The difference in the first few harmonics is due to the fact that the experimental spectra contain contributions from the quartz substrate. Overall, the HHG and absorption spectra of both the porphyrins are quite similar due to the very similar electronic structure. Our simulations combined with experiments showed that π → π* excitation plays a major role in the harmonic generation process in porphyrins. It was also discovered that resonant excitation leads to an early onset of nonperturbative behavior for the fifth harmonic, and similar effects are expected in Brunel harmonic generation with other organic materials.

Frozen Density Embedding Implementation

65Environment effects on molecular systems beyond static Coulomb potentials can be treated in TURBOMOLE with the conductor-like screening model (COSMO), polarizable embedding (PE), or frozen density embedding (FDE). Developments on COSMO and PE in TURBOMOLE have been presented in the previous review. In contrast to the latter approaches, FDE is an atomistic QM/QM embedding model, which compared to QM/MM schemes uses a purely quantum-mechanical description of the total system and does not require any system-specific parametrizations prior to a calculation.

66The implementation of FDE in TURBOMOLE was until recently restricted to just two subsystems, limiting its applicability. It has now been extended to handle arbitrarily many subsystems and to an FDE variant free of intermediates evaluated on the supermolecular orbital basis. For the embedding potentials, the newly implemented approach uses only electron densities and electrostatic potentials of the subsystems, which are computed on an integration grid generated for the total system. It is available for HF and DFT within the dscf and ridft programs. In combination with the ricc2 program, it can be used to compute ground-state energies with MP2 and CC2 within the perturbation to the energy (PTE) or post-SCF reaction field coupling approaches. Excitation energies can be calculated within the frozen solvent approximations either with or without the kernel contributions. An important feature of the new implementation is the possibility to include pseudopotentials to improve the embedding potential. This allows for a more accurate description of the Pauli repulsion, which is particularly important for electronically excited states to prevent unphysical charge spill-out. Besides all of the new features in FDE, it should also be mentioned that the current implementation is still limited to closed-shell subsystems.

67To demonstrate its capabilities, we computed the first eight excitation energies of acetone at the CC2/aug-cc-pVDZ level embedded in 237 water molecules within the frozen solvent approximation. The active subsystem also includes two water molecules beside acetone and was treated with the HF method during the freeze and thaw (FaT) cycles, while the remaining water molecules were treated as separate subsystems using DFT with the PBE exchange correlation functional and a gridsize of 3., For the embedding potential, the PBE exchange correlation and the LC94 kinetic energy functional with a gridsize of 3 were used. A comparison of the spectrum of solvated acetone with that of isolated acetone is shown in Figure 20.

68Recently, another update scheme of the subsystem densities was implemented, where the densities of all subsystems are updated simultaneously at the end of a FaT cycle instead of successive updates immediately after each subsystem calculation. Thus, the updated densities of each subsystem only contribute to the embedding potentials in the next FaT cycle, offering the advantage that interim results no longer depend on the enumeration of the subsystems; this allows the subsystem calculations to be performed simultaneously to improve efficiency in parallel runs. In Table 3, the wall times for both update schemes are compared for an reduced example of the above system containing only 78 water molecules. The timings show that this kind of parallelization leads to a decrease of the wall time in the case of many small subsystems where it is inefficient to parallelize single subsystem calculations over many CPU cores.

69Future developments on the implementation of the FDE method aim to increase the applicability to systems containing large subsystems by combining it with PNO-based methods and to reduce further the computation time of the Coulomb contribution to the embedding potential.

FDE and Projection-Based Embedding for Molecules and Solids

70The FDE implementation described above is suitable for molecular and weakly interacting subsystems, as it employs embedding potentials based on approximate kinetic energy density functionals (KEDFs). Recently, a DFT-based embedding scheme that treats both molecular and periodic systems on equal footing has been implemented within the riper module. This implementation supports both FDE and projection-based embedding (PbE) via a level-shift projection operator (LSPO). PbE along with FaT cycles can be used to perform exact DFT-in-DFT embedding for molecules and solids and reproduce the exact total DFT energies, even for strongly interacting subsystems. Similar to the implementation in section 3.15.1, the embedding scheme is also coupled with correlated wave function (CW) methods and additionally with RT-TDDFT, enabling CW-in-DFT and RT-TDDFT-in-DFT calculations, respectively, on a cluster embedded in a molecular/periodic environment. However, here the CW-in-DFT calculations are performed only by adding the DFT-based embedding potential as a static term to the HF core potential of the active subsystem and obtaining the converged HF reference orbitals for post-SCF calculations. RT-TDDFT-in-DFT, on the other hand, does support updating a portion of the embedding potential during the time evolution in select cases.

71As an illustrative application of the work, Figure 21 and Table 4 show that the solvatochromic shift in the first excitation energy, calculated using the CC2-in-DFT method (molecule-in-periodic) for an acetone molecule (active) solvated with 113 water molecules (periodic environment) in a cubic box with 3D periodicity, is in remarkable agreement with the shifts calculated using standard CC2 for acetone + (H2O)20, acetone + (H2O)35, and acetone + (H2O)48 clusters at only a fraction of the computational cost. While beneficial, it is also important to acknowledge the limitations of the implementation as well, such as being restricted to only two closed-shell subsystems and using only LDA/GGA functionals for the embedding potential.

Periodic Hartree–Fock Exchange

72In ref, we have presented a robust implementation of the periodic Hartree–Fock exchange in TURBOMOLE’s riper module., Without precautions, exchange matrix elements may be divergent, arising from an artificial periodicity of the density matrix. This periodicity of the density matrix is introduced in practical calculations by the discretization of wavevectors. The finite k-mesh determines in turn the size of the Born–von Kármán supercell. We have demonstrated that a minimum image convention removes the divergence for discrete k-meshes. While calculations with periodic HF exchange may be unstable for small supercells, stable SCF calculations and convergence of total energies are typically achieved for sufficiently large sizes of the supercells. The size of the supercell or k-mesh that is required for a reliable energy depends on the locality of the density matrix and hence both the electronic structure of the studied material and the chosen basis set. For selected insulators and semiconductors, we have demonstrated that HF total energies converge exponentially with the number of k-points, see Figure 22.

73Through our implementation of periodic exchange, conventional Hartree–Fock calculations can be carried out with TURBOMOLE for periodic systems of any dimension. In addition, DFT calculations with hybrid functionals can now be performed routinely for semiconductors and insulators, and we showed successful applications of PBE0, and HSE06 hybrid and range-separated hybrid functionals. As the next important step, analytical gradients shall be added for structure optimization. Furthermore, the Hartree–Fock exchange infrastructure that is available may be used in the development of new electronic structure methods for periodic systems that require exchange.

Nuclear Electronic Orbital Method

74Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions are an important class of reactions that cannot be adequately described within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. A remedy to this problem is the nuclear electronic orbital (NEO) methods, which treat not only electrons but also the protons of selected hydrogen atoms quantum mechanically., This is of particular importance for reactions that include proton transfer, such as, for example, acid–base reactions. The corresponding effects become especially important when the proton transfer is coupled to the electronic structure, such as in photoacids and photobases. In an initial proof-of-principle implementation, nuclear electronic orbitals were made available for the Hartree–Fock method (NEO-HF) and second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (NEO-MP2) in a development version of TURBOMOLE. Furthermore, for the NEO-HF method, analytical gradients have since been implemented to allow for structure and basis set optimization.

75Figure 23a shows the nuclear orbitals of the trans-Zundel isomer H9O4+. The nuclear orbital energies, as calculated by the NEO-HF method, give an estimate of the binding energies of the protons. While the four outer ones have energies from −450 to −436 kcal/mol, the central one is the least stable with an energy of −417 kcal/mol. If the outer two water molecules are removed, the energies change to between −400.5 and −399.6 kcal/mol for the four outer protons and −371 kcal/mol for the central one. This hints at the ionic cluster being stabilized by the outer water molecules.

76The protons of the neutral glycine molecule in Figure 23b have orbital energies between −633 and −546 kcal/mol, with the least stable one being the one at the carboxyl group. The zwitterionic glycine structure in Figure 23c has been optimized as a positively charged system with six classical protons. A NEO-HF calculation with five protons resulted in proton orbital energies between −663 and −558 kcal/mol. This demonstrates that protonation and deprotonation at certain sites can be elegantly investigated by the ab initio occupation of nuclear orbitals at the respective sites instead of placing classical nuclei according to intuition.

77Implementing these methods in TURBOMOLE allows for the use of highly efficient schemes that already exist for purely electronic methods. The NEO methods can also use various existing programs to analyze the results. In future developments, NEO–DFT will be implemented for molecular and periodic systems.

Hartree–Fock-Based Adiabatic Connection Models

78MP2 is one of the most used approaches for wavefunction-based correlation energies, as well as being used in the double-hybrid (DH) DFT., Nevertheless, the MP2 method shows several limitations, e.g., it overestimates the correlation energy in large systems and diverges for systems with a vanishing gap. For this reason, several regularized and/or scaled MP2 methods have been developed.−

79Another more recent path in this direction is the Møller–Plesset or Hartree–Fock adiabatic connection (HFAC) method. In the HFAC approach, the correlation energy Ec is given as a nonlinear function of EMP2, ExHF (the HF exchange energy), and two semilocal functionals of the HF density (Wc = Wc[ρHF] and Wc′ = Wc′[ρHF]). The latter are derived from the strong-correlation regime,, and we haveThe HFAC method de facto includes an infinite-order resummation of the MP correlation series thanks to the interpolation with the strong-correlation limit, as in the more conventional AC based on DFT. The nonlinear function F can be approximated by modeling the HFAC curve at various coupling strengths using known exact asymptotic conditions., Consequently, F satisfies two important limits:where G is a nonlinear function whose form depends on the choice of F. For well-behaving approximations of F, the condition in eq 11b yields a finite energy whenever EMP2 → – ∞, thus removing one main limitation of MP2 and DH functionals for systems with a vanishing gap. The condition (eq 11a) is an exact condition, which is violated in all the regularized MP2 methods., Thus, the HFAC method allows us to overcome the main drawbacks of the MP2 approach within a well-defined theoretical framework at the small extra cost of a post-HF semilocal DFT calculation.

80Some working approximations of F have been proposed (e.g., ISI,, RevISI, and MPACF1), and they have been implemented in TURBOMOLE together with the currently available DFT approximations for Wc and Wc′., Note that eq 10 is not size-consistent for systems composed of different species of fragments (as F is a nonlinear function). However, a size-consistent correction (SCC) can be readily computed with TURBOMOLE at no additional costs, allowing the calculation of dissociation curves.

81Two examples of applications where MP2 and DH functionals fail whereas the HFAC implementation can be readily used are displayed in Figure 24.

82Figure 24a shows the dissociation curve for the coronene dimer, a prototype for a wide class of problems that are hardly tractable with high-level correlated wave function methods but are poorly described by MP2 because of the lack of high-order correlation contributions. In constrast, HFACM methods are very close to the available reference data at the equilibrium geometry. The MPACF1 functional has been tuned on dispersion complexes and on average exhibits an error 2–5× smaller than MP2.

83Figure 24b shows the H2 dissociation in a restricted formalism, a prototype of a strongly correlated system.−,, All methods work well close to the equilibrium geometry. However, for a larger separation where the energy-gap closes, MP2 and DH functionals rapidly diverge. HFAC methods, however, remain well behaved, yielding a finite interaction energy, see eq 11b. The exact result is not reproduced, as the available HFAC functionals are approximated and do not take into account the recent theory developments. Further development and testing are thus required, and the HFAC implementation in TURBOMOLE represents an efficient platform to this end.

Approximate TDDFT Approaches

84Time-dependent density functional theory is still the most-used approach for the calculation of excitation energies of molecular and extended systems, thanks to its favorable accuracy/computational-cost ratio. Nevertheless, the computational cost of first-principles TDDFT calculations limits routine calculations to systems with a few hundreds of atoms, depending on the choice of the exchange-correlation (XC) functional. Different methods and algorithms have been developed in order to increase the TDDFT efficiency,− most prominently the RI-J technique.− Another efficient, though approximated, path is to perform a semiempirical tight-binding linear-response (TBLR) approximation,− using first-principles KS orbitals and eigenvalues. TBLR methods speed up the TDDFT calculation by about two orders of magnitude. TBLR is accompanied by a loss in accuracy of about 0.1–0.2 eV, which is comparable to the overall TDDFT accuracy., More recently, it has been shown that, for semilocal XC functionals, the TBLR approaches can be considered as an approximation of the RI-TDDFT scheme with only one s-type Gaussian basis function per atom in the RI auxiliary basis set (TDDFT-as) and with the three index RI integrals replaced with a Löwdin approximation.− Instead, in the TDDFT-as method, the latter approximation is not employed and, moreover, the calculation of the semilocal XC kernel contribution on the grid is not required, as it can be modeled/approximated by the same exponent α of the s-type Gaussian auxiliary basis function. However, the exponent α needs to be optimized for each atom type separately.

85Here, we shortly report on results for two computationally expensive cases using the PBE functional. First, a 120 atom silver nanoparticle, Ag120, with Td symmetry calculated using the def-SVP basis set. Second, a fullerene with C1 symmetry calculated using the def2-TZVP basis set. Both systems contain only a single type of atom. We optimized α by minimizing the root-mean square (RMS) averaged excitation energy error Eavg, avoiding state flipping, and considering 400 t2 (600 a) excited states for the silver nanoparticle (fullerene). The optimization yields αAg = 0.036 with Eavg = 5 meV and αC = 0.18 with Eavg = 12 meV for Ag120 and C60, respectively, as reported in Table 5. The amazing accuracy is also retained when the maximum error on all excitation energies Emax, including many optically dark states in C60, is considered. This is demonstrated in Table 5 and Figure 25, where we report the absorption spectra of the two systems considered. The TDDFT-as absorption spectra in Figure 25, reported on a log scale to also highlight states with low oscillator strengths, can be hardly distinguished from the reference TDDFT results in a wide energy range for both systems investigated. Compared to TBLR approaches, the accuracy of TDDFT-as is therefore increased by an order of magnitude, showing that it is a highly competitive approach.

86The computational speed up of the TDDFT-as method is shown in Table 5. The XC part is completely neglected, and the RI-Coulomb part is reduced by a factor of 50–70 due to the strongly reduced dimension of the auxiliary basis set.

87More recently, TDDFT-as was extended to hybrid functionals and defined across the periodic table, forming the TDDFT-ris model. Using the PBE0 hybrid functional on a test set comprising small-to-large organic molecules, TDDFT-ris has an average error of Eavg = 60 meV compared to an average error of Eavg = 240 meV for sTDDFT., Thus, the TDDFT-as and TDDFT-ris methods, both fully available in the next release, are efficient and accurate approximations of standard TDDFT, providing a significantly less empirical alternative to TBLR approaches. Thanks to the flexible and efficient implementation, accurate simulations of the absorption spectra of large nanoparticles and organic molecules are available at a fraction of the computational cost of standard TDDFT.

Multiscale Modeling Extensions for the Nonlinear Optical Response of Molecular Materials

88Further ongoing work concerning multiscale modeling of optical molecular materials is envisaged in the direction of integrating the automatic construction of T-matrices, as used in the multiscale approach in section 3.9.1. These T-matrices or effective material parameters derived thereof are often used in scattering codes and finite-element method-based programs. Examples for such codes are the multilayered periodic general Mie method code (mpGMM), JCMsuite, and COMSOL Multiphysics, which describe light–matter interactions of complex optical devices made form novel materials. In the foreseeable future, the current developments and implementations will be converted into a fully fledged workflow for optical material simulations. This will make the ab initio-based T-matrix approach available to a broader scientific community interested in a bottom-up approach of simulating complex artificial molecular materials and photonic devices. Future work will be dedicated to nonlinear optical properties, as this topic is currently seeing increasing interest in the scientific community. The change in the molecular dipole moment Δμi (polarization) upon exposure to the oscillating external electric field Ei at the excitation frequencies is often expressed as a power series of the incident field E.

89In eq 12, αij denotes the polarizability, βijk denotes the first hyperpolarizability, γijkl denotes the second hyperpolarizability and so on. Currently, optical multiscale studies are limited to linear response, taking into account αij., To take into account nonlinear effects, i.e., βijk and/or γijkl, the additionally arising quadratic (and/or cubic) response terms of eq 12 need to be taken into account. While TURBOMOLE already allows calculation of the first hyperpolarizabilities βijk for real frequencies, ongoing work is dedicated to expanding this toward general complex frequencies. Ultimately, this will allow not only studies of the nonlinear light–matter interactions on the individual molecular level but also the construction of “hyper-T-matrices”. The latter can be used to investigate for example second-harmonic generation (SHG) efficiencies, macroscopic second-order susceptibilities, and two-photon absorption of photonic devices made from molecular materials.

Relativistic Effects and Magnetic Properties of Periodic Systems

90As is evident from the many sections in this Review focusing on molecules, TURBOMOLE was initially developed to study finite molecular systems. However, the code infrastructure was extended to support calculations with periodic boundary conditions almost 15 years ago, and developments for molecular systems can be transferred to the periodic code. Recently, a two-component DFT framework was implemented for ground-state calculations, supporting energies and various plotting options for bands and the electron density on a grid. The reason to use such a framework for periodic systems is twofold. First, it allows for the inclusion of spin–orbit coupling in a variational ansatz for relativistic effects. Second, the 2c formalism is necessary to study magnetic properties and arbitrary spin alignments, i.e., ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and noncollinear spin textures.

91A pilot application to the band gaps of AgI is shown in Table 6. Here, relativistic effects substantially affect the band energies. That is, the nonrelativistic approach shows a large deviation toward the four-component (4c) ansatz directly based on the Dirac equation. In contrast, the scalar 1c approach yields substantial improvement. The spin–orbit 2c approach, employing ECPs, further improves upon these results and is in good agreement with the four-component reference. This shows that the 2c framework serves as an excellent approximation with drastically reduced computational demands. Here, a Kramers-restricted (time-reversal symmetric) approach is available for closed-shell systems, whereas a Kramers-unrestricted approach (breakdown of time-reversal symmetry) is used for open-shell systems. For the latter, a noncollinear treatment of the electron spin is applied.

92Current endeavors cover the extension of the 2c formalism to energy gradients and the stress tensor, as well as the inclusion of the current density, see section 3.2. This will allow us to perform structure optimizations and sophisticated studies with τ-dependent functionals, as the current density is of crucial importance for materials such as Weyl semimetals and magnetic Hopfions. Another strong point of the 1c implementation for periodic systems is the availability of HF exchange, which can be applied at a reasonable cost as localized basis functions are used. This allows for the use of generally all available global and range-separated hybrid functionals in a stable and convergent framework. Extension of this feature to the 2c framework will allow for a more precise description of band gaps and other properties. For example, for magnetic properties it was shown that the amount of HF exchange incorporated is crucial. Therefore, a robust implementation of 2c HF exchange in the periodic framework will be useful in determining related quantities also for materials in the solid state and nanostructures.

Outlook

93The quality of a code strongly correlates with the health and functioning of its developers’ community. TURBOMOLE developers are organized in small units pursuing their own scientific agendas, as illustrated by this Review. While this is a typical and, to a degree, necessary modus operandi for large scientific coding projects, the need to secure original authorship and demonstrate scientific independence often conflicts with sharing plans and code, taking collective responsibility, and avoiding “technical debt”. As a result, TURBOMOLE has historically not been particularly easy to use, contribute to, or interface with other codes. TURBOMOLE GmbH was founded precisely to address these issues and has provided a framework to advance common goals and improve code quality. Nevertheless, incentives to collaborate and adopt sustainable coding practices remain few and far between. The future of the TURBOMOLE project will vitally depend on whether the conditions set by the environment, i.e., academic institutions, funding agencies, reviewers, the developers, and not least the users, foster a thriving and collaborative community, which incentivizes continued investment in the code base.

References 394

1.
Ahlrichs R.; Bär M.; Häser M.; Horn H.; Kölmel C. Electronic structure calculations on workstation computers: The program system TURBOMOLE. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 162, 165–169..
Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8
2.
Häser M.; Ahlrichs R. Improvements on the direct SCF method. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 104–111..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.540100111
3.
Häser M.; Ahlrichs R.; Baron H. P.; Weis P.; Horn H. Direct computation of second-order SCF properties of large molecules on workstation computers with an application to large carbon clusters. Theor. Chim. Acta 1992, 83, 455–470..
Not in our library10.1007/bf01113068
4.
Haase F.; Ahlrichs R. Semidirect MP2 gradient evaluation on workstation computers: The MPGRAD program. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 907–912..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.540140805
5.
Brode S.; Horn H.; Ehrig M.; Moldrup D.; Rice J. E.; Ahlrichs R. Parallel Direct SCF and Gradient Program For Workstation Clusters. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1142–1148..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.540141004
6.
Kollwitz M.; Gauss J. A direct implementation of the GIAO-MBPT(2) method for calculating NMR chemical shifts. Application to the naphthalenium and anthracenium ions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 260, 639–646..
Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(96)00897-4
7.
Kollwitz M.; Häser M.; Gauss J. Non-Abelian point group symmetry in direct second-order many-body perturbation theory calculations of NMR chemical shifts. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 8295–8301..
Not in our library10.1063/1.476258
8.
Weiss H.; Ahlrichs R.; Häser M. A direct algorithm for self-consistent-field linear-response theory and application to C60-excitation-energies, oscillator-strengths, and frequency-dependent polarizabilities. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 1262–1270..
Not in our library10.1063/1.465370
9.
Treutler O.; Ahlrichs R. Efficient molecular numerical integration schemes. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 346–354..
Not in our library10.1063/1.469408
10.
Bauernschmitt R.; Ahlrichs R. Treatment of electronic excitations within the adiabatic approximation of time dependent density functional theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 454–464..
Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(96)00440-x
11.
Furche F.; Perdew J. P. The performance of semi-local and hybrid density functionals in 3d transition metal chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 044103.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2162161
12.
Furche F. Molecular tests of the random phase approximation to the exchange-correlation energy functional. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 195120.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.64.195120
13.
Bates J. E.; Furche F. Communication: Random phase approximation renormalized many-body perturbation theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 171103.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4827254
14.
Chen G. P.; Voora V. K.; Agee M. M.; Balasubramani S. G.; Furche F. Random-phase approximation methods. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2017, 68, 421–445..
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112308
15.
Chen G. P.; Agee M. M.; Furche F. Performance and scope of perturbative corrections to random-phase approximation energies. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 5701–5714..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00777
16.
Voora V. K.; Balasubramani S. G.; Furche F. Variational generalized Kohn-Sham approach combining the random-phase-approximation and Green’s-function methods. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 99, 012518.
Not in our library10.1103/physreva.99.012518
17.
Bates J. E.; Furche F. Harnessing the meta-generalized gradient approximation for time-dependent density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 137, 164105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4759080
18.
Plessow P.; Weigend F. Seminumerical calculation of the Hartree-Fock exchange matrix: Application to two-component procedures and efficient evaluation of local hybrid density functionals. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 810–816..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.22901
19.
Maier T. M.; Bahmann H.; Kaupp M. Efficient Semi-numerical Implementation of Global and Local Hybrid Functionals for Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 4226–4237..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00624
20.
Furche F.; Ahlrichs R.; Wachsmann C.; Weber E.; Sobanski A.; Vögtle F.; Grimme S. Circular dichroism of helicenes investigated by time-dependent density functional theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1717–1724..
Not in our library10.1021/ja991960s
21.
Furche F.; Rappoport D. Density functional methods for excited states: equilibrium structure and electronic spectra In Computational Photochemistry; Olivucci M., Ed.; Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, Vol. 16; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp 93–128.
Not in our library
22.
Kattannek M. Entwicklung und Implementierung optimierter Algorithmen für molekulare Hartree-Fock- und Dichtefunktional-Rechnungen. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Germany, 2006.
Not in our library
23.
Eshuis H.; Yarkony J.; Furche F. Fast computation of molecular random phase approximation correlation energies using resolution of the identity and imaginary frequency integration. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 234114.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3442749
24.
Furche F.; Krull B. T.; Nguyen B. D.; Kwon J. Accelerating molecular property calculations with nonorthonormal Krylov space methods. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 174105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4947245
25.
Deglmann P.; Furche F.; Ahlrichs R. An efficient implementation of second analytical derivatives for density functional methods. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 362, 511–518..
Not in our library10.1016/s0009-2614(02)01084-9
26.
Grimme S.; Furche F.; Ahlrichs R. An improved method for density functional calculations of the frequency-dependent optical rotation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 361, 321–328..
Not in our library10.1016/s0009-2614(02)00975-2
27.
Deglmann P.; May K.; Furche F.; Ahlrichs R. Nuclear second analytical derivative calculations using auxiliary basis set expansions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 384, 103–107..
Not in our library10.1016/j.cplett.2003.11.080
28.
Rappoport D.; Furche F. Analytical time-dependent density functional derivative methods within the RI-J approximation, an approach to excited states of large molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 064105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.1844492
29.
Rappoport D.; Furche F. Lagrangian approach to molecular vibrational Raman intensities using time-dependent hybrid density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 201104.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2744026
30.
Send R.; Furche F. First-order nonadiabatic couplings from time-dependent hybrid density functional response theory: Consistent formalism, implementation, and performance. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 044107.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3292571
31.
Burow A. M.; Bates J. E.; Furche F.; Eshuis H. Analytical first-order molecular properties and forces within the adiabatic connection random phase approximation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 180–194..
Not in our library10.1021/ct4008553
32.
Ou Q.; Bellchambers G. D.; Furche F.; Subotnik J. E. First-order derivative couplings between excited states from adiabatic TDDFT response theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 064114.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4906941
33.
Klawohn S.; Bahmann H.; Kaupp M. Implementation of Molecular Gradients for Local Hybrid Density Functionals Using Seminumerical Integration Techniques. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 4254–4262..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00486
34.
Parker S. M.; Rappoport D.; Furche F. Quadratic Response Properties from TDDFT: Trials and Tribulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 807–819..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01008
35.
Grotjahn R.; Furche F.; Kaupp M. Development and Implementation of Excited-State Gradients for Local Hybrid Functionals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 5508–5522..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00659
36.
Franzke Y. J.; Weigend F. NMR Shielding Tensors and Chemical Shifts in Scalar-Relativistic Local Exact Two-Component Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 1028–1043..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01084
37.
Wodyński A.; Kaupp M. Density Functional Calculations of EPR g- and Hyperfine-Coupling Tensors Using the Exact Two-Component (X2C) Transformation and Efficient Approximations to the Two-Electron Spin-Orbit Terms. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 5660–5672..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.9b03979
38.
Franzke Y. J.; Yu J. M. Hyperfine Coupling Constants in Local Exact Two-Component Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 323–343..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01027
39.
Franzke Y. J.; Yu J. M. Quasi-Relativistic Calculation of EPR g Tensors with Derivatives of the Decoupling Transformation, Gauge-Including Atomic Orbitals, and Magnetic Balance. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 2246–2266..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01175
40.
Eichkorn K.; Treutler O.; Öhm H.; Häser M.; Ahlrichs R. Auxiliary Basis Sets to Approximate Coulomb Potentials. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 283–290..
Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(95)00621-a
41.
Eichkorn K.; Weigend F.; Treutler O.; Ahlrichs R. Auxiliary basis sets for main row atoms and transition metals and their use to approximate Coulomb potentials. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1997, 97, 119–124..
Not in our library10.1007/s002140050244
42.
Weigend F. A fully direct RI-HF algorithm: Implementation, optimized auxiliary basis sets, demonstration of accuracy and efficiency. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 4285–4291..
Not in our library10.1039/b204199p
43.
Weigend F. Hartree–Fock exchange fitting basis sets for H to Rn. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 167–175..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20702
44.
Weigend F.; Häser M.; Patzelt H.; Ahlrichs R. RI-MP2: optimized auxiliary basis sets and demonstration of efficiency. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 294, 143–152..
Not in our library10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00862-8
45.
Weigend F.; Häser M. RI-MP2: first derivatives and global consistency. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1997, 97, 331–340..
Not in our library10.1007/s002140050269
46.
Hättig C.; Weigend F. CC2 excitation energy calculations on large molecules using the resolution of the identity approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 5154–5161..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1290013
47.
Sierka M.; Hogekamp A.; Ahlrichs R. Fast evaluation of the Coulomb potential for electron densities using multipole accelerated resolution of identity approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 9136–9148..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1567253
48.
Armbruster M. K.; Weigend F.; van Wüllen C.; Klopper W. Self-consistent treatment of spin-orbit interactions with efficient Hartree-Fock and density functional methods. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 1748–1756..
Not in our library10.1039/b717719d
49.
Baldes A.; Weigend F. Efficient two-component self-consistent field procedures and gradients: implementation in TURBOMOLE and application to Au20–. Mol. Phys. 2013, 111, 2617–2624..
Not in our library10.1080/00268976.2013.802037
50.
Kühn M. Correlation Energies from the Two-Component Random Phase Approximation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 623–633..
Not in our library10.1021/ct400994x
51.
Krause K.; Klopper W. Implementation of the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the TURBOMOLE program. J. Comput. Chem. 2017, 38, 383–388..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.24688
52.
Gui X.; Holzer C.; Klopper W. Accuracy Assessment of GW Starting Points for Calculating Molecular Excitation Energies Using the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 2127–2136..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00014
53.
Holzer C.; Klopper W. Ionized, electron-attached, and excited states of molecular systems with spin–orbit coupling: Two-component GW and Bethe–Salpeter implementations. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 204116.
Not in our library10.1063/1.5094244
54.
Kühn M.; Weigend F. Two-component hybrid time-dependent density functional theory within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 034116.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4905829
55.
Burow A. M.; Sierka M.; Mohamed F. Resolution of identity approximation for the Coulomb term in molecular and periodic systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 214101–1–214101–6..
Not in our library10.1063/1.3267858
56.
Łazarski R.; Burow A. M.; Sierka M. Density functional theory for molecular and periodic systems using density fitting and continuous fast multipole methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3029–3041..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00252
57.
Łazarski R.; Burow A. M.; Grajciar L.; Sierka M. Density functional theory for molecular and periodic systems using density fitting and continuous fast multipole method: Analytical gradients. J. Comput. Chem. 2016, 37, 2518–2526..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.24477
58.
Grajciar L. Low-memory Iterative Density Fitting. J. Comput. Chem. 2015, 36, 1521–1535..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.23961
59.
Becker M.; Sierka M. Density functional theory for molecular and periodic systems using density fitting and continuous fast multipole method: Stress tensor. J. Comput. Chem. 2019, 40, 2563–2570..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.26033
60.
Mack F.; Schattenberg C. J.; Kaupp M.; Weigend F. Nuclear Spin–Spin Couplings: Efficient Evaluation of Exact Exchange and Extension to Local Hybrid Functionals. J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124, 8529–8539..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.0c06897
61.
Franzke Y. J.; Holzer C.; Mack F. NMR Coupling Constants Based on the Bethe–Salpeter Equation in the GW Approximation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 1030–1045..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00999
62.
Reiter K.; Mack F.; Weigend F. Calculation of Magnetic Shielding Constants with meta-GGA Functionals Employing the Multipole-Accelerated Resolution of the Identity: Implementation and Assessment of Accuracy and Efficiency. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 191–197..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01115
63.
Gillhuber S.; Franzke Y. J.; Weigend F. Paramagnetic NMR Shielding Tensors and Ring Currents: Efficient Implementation and Application to Heavy Element Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 9707–9723..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.1c07793
64.
Friese D. H.; Hättig C.; Ruud K. Calculation of two-photon absorption strengths with the approximate coupled cluster singles and doubles model CC2 using the resolution-of-identity approximation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 1175–1184..
Not in our library10.1039/c1cp23045j
65.
Friese D. H.; Hättig C.; Rizzo A. Origin-independent two-photon circular dichroism calculations in coupled cluster theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 13683–13692..
Not in our library10.1039/c6cp01653g
66.
Winter N. O. C.; Hättig C. Scaled opposite-spin CC2 for ground and excited states with fourth order scaling computational costs. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 184101.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3584177
67.
Winter N. O. C.; Hättig C. Quartic scaling analytical gradients of scaled opposite-spin CC2. Chem. Phys. 2012, 401, 217–227..
Not in our library10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.10.002
68.
Hättig C.; Tew D. P.; Köhn A. Communications: Accurate and efficient approximations to explicitly correlated coupled-cluster singles and doubles, CCSD-F12. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 231102.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3442368
69.
Tew D. P. Explicitly correlated coupled-cluster theory with Brueckner orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 074103.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4960655
70.
Schmitz G.; Hättig C.; Tew D. P. Explicitly Correlated PNO-MP2 and PNO-CCSD and their Application to the S66 Set and Large Molecular Systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 22167–22178..
Not in our library10.1039/c4cp03502j
71.
Schmitz G.; Hättig C. Perturbative triples correction for local pair natural orbital based explicitly correlated CCSD(F12*) using Laplace transformation techniques. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 234107.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4972001
72.
Frank M. S.; Schmitz G.; Hättig C. The PNO–MP2 gradient and its application to molecular geometry optimizations. Mol. Phys. 2017, 115, 343–356..
Not in our library10.1080/00268976.2016.1263762
73.
Schmitz G.; Hättig C. Accuracy of Explicitly Correlated Local PNO-CCSD(T). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 2623–2633..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00180
74.
Laricchia S.; Fabiano E.; Della Sala F. Frozen density embedding with hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 164111.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3494537
75.
Bachorz R. A.; Bischoff F. A.; Glöß A.; Hättig C.; Höfener S.; Klopper W.; Tew D. P. The MP2-F12 method in the TURBOMOLE program package. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 2492–2513..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21825
76.
Schwabe T.; Sneskov K.; Haugaard Olsen J. M.; Kongsted J.; Christiansen O.; Hättig C. PERI-CC2: A Polarizable Embedded RI-CC2 Method. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3274–3283..
Not in our library10.1021/ct3003749
77.
Höfener S. Coupled-cluster frozen-density embedding using resolution of the identity methods. J. Comput. Chem. 2014, 35, 1716–1724..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.23679
78.
Klamt A.; Diedenhofen M. Calculation of Solvation Free Energies with DCOSMO-RS. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 5439–5445..
Not in our library10.1021/jp511158y
79.
Hršak D.; Marefat Khah A.; Christiansen O.; Hättig C. Polarizable Embedded RI-CC2 Method for Two-Photon Absorption Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3669–3678..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00496
80.
Reinholdt P.; Nørby M. S.; Kongsted J. Modeling of Magnetic Circular Dichroism and UV/Vis Absorption Spectra Using Fluctuating Charges or Polarizable Embedding within a Resonant-Convergent Response Theory Formalism. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 6391–6404..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00660
81.
Marefat Khah A.; Karbalaei Khani S.; Hättig C. Analytic Excited State Gradients for the QM/MM Polarizable Embedded Second-Order Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction for the Polarization Propagator PE-ADC(2). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 4640–4650..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00396
82.
Sharma M.; Sierka M. Efficient Implementation of Density Functional Theory Based Embedding for Molecular and Periodic Systems Using Gaussian Basis Functions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 6892–6904..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00380
83.
Treß R. S.; Hättig C.; Höfener S. Employing Pseudopotentials to Tackle Excited-State Electron Spill-Out in Frozen Density Embedding Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 1737–1747..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00732
84.
Peng D.; Middendorf N.; Weigend F.; Reiher M. An efficient implementation of two-component relativistic exact-decoupling methods for large molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 184105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4803693
85.
Franzke Y. J.; Middendorf N.; Weigend F. Efficient implementation of one- and two-component analytical energy gradients in exact two-component theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 104110.
Not in our library10.1063/1.5022153
86.
Franzke Y. J.; Mack F.; Weigend F. NMR Indirect Spin-Spin Coupling Constants in a Modern Quasirelativistic Density Functional Framework. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 3974–3994..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00167
87.
van Setten M. J.; Weigend F.; Evers F. The GW-Method for Quantum Chemistry Applications: Theory and Implementation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 232–246..
Not in our library10.1021/ct300648t
88.
Kaplan F.; Harding M. E.; Seiler C.; Weigend F.; Evers F.; van Setten M. J. Quasi-Particle Self-Consistent GW for Molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 2528–2541..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01238
89.
Müller C.; Sharma M.; Sierka M. Real-time time-dependent density functional theory using density fitting and the continuous fast multipole method. J. Comput. Chem. 2020, 41, 2573–2582..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.26412
90.
Tapavicza E.; Bellchambers G.; Vincent J. C.; Furche F. Ab initio non-adiabatic dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 18336–18348..
Not in our library10.1039/c3cp51514a
91.
TURBOMOLE. https://www.turbomole.org (accessed 2022-12-01).
Not in our library
92.
TURBOMOLE: Modular program suite for ab initio quantum-chemical and condensed-matter simulations · 2020
No notice
93.
Furche F.; Ahlrichs R.; Hättig C.; Klopper W.; Sierka M.; Weigend F. Turbomole. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 91–100..
Not in our library10.1002/wcms.1162
94.
van Wüllen C. Shared-memory parallelization of the TURBOMOLE programs AOFORCE, ESCF, and EGRAD: How to quickly parallelize legacy code. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1195–1201..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21692
95.
Bachorz R. A.; Bischoff F. A.; Glöß A.; Hättig C.; Höfener S.; Klopper W.; Tew D. P. The MP2-F12 Method in the TURBOMOLE Program Package. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 2492–2513..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21825
96.
Almaraz E. P.; Furche F. Initial OpenMP version of aoforce and escf, released with TURBOMOLE V6.3; TURBOMOLE GmbH: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2011.
Not in our library
97.
Holzer C.; Franzke Y. J. OpenMP version of ridft, rdgrad, and egrad with contributions to mpshift, dscf, and grad; improved OpenMP version of aoforce and escf, released with TURBOMOLE V7.4 and further improved in TURBOMOLE V7.5; TURBOMOLE GmbH: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2020.
Not in our library
98.
Hättig C.; Hellweg A.; Köhn A. Distributed memory parallel implementation of energies and gradients for second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory with the resolution-of-the-identity approximation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 1159–1169..
Not in our library10.1039/b515355g
99.
Müller T. Global Array toolkit based distributed shared memory version of ridft and rdgrad, released with TURBOMOLE V6.0; TURBOMOLE GmbH: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2011.
Not in our library
100.
Müller T. Parallel DFT in Turbomole, Linear Algebra. In High Performance Computing in Chemistry; Grotendorst J., Ed.; NIC Series, Vol. 25; John von Neumann Institute for Computing: Jülich, Germany, 2005; pp 83–107.
Not in our library
101.
Müller T. MPI based version of ridft and rdgrad with native distributed shared memory support, released with TURBOMOLE V7.2; TURBOMOLE GmbH: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2017.
Not in our library
102.
van Wüllen C. Hybrid OpenMP/MPI parallelization of dscf, grad, and aoforce, released with TURBOMOLE V7.2; TURBOMOLE GmbH: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2017.
Not in our library
103.
Plessow P. Reaction Path Optimization without NEB Springs or Interpolation Algorithms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 1305–1310..
Not in our library10.1021/ct300951j
104.
Reiter K.; Kühn M.; Weigend F. Vibrational circular dichroism spectra for large molecules and molecules with heavy elements. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 054102.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4974897
105.
Sierka M.; Döbler J.; Sauer J.; Santambrogio G.; Brümmer M.; Wöste L.; Janssens E.; Meijer G.; Asmis K. Unexpected Structures of Aluminum Oxide Clusters in the Gas Phase. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3372–3375..
Not in our library10.1002/anie.200604823
106.
Steffen C.; Thomas K.; Huniar U.; Hellweg A.; Rubner O.; Schroer A. TmoleX – A graphical user interface for TURBOMOLE. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 2967–2970..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21576
107.
OpenMP. https://www.openmp.org (accessed 2022-12-05).
Not in our library
108.
MPI Forum. https://www.mpi-forum.org (accessed 2022-12-05).
Not in our library
109.
Holzer C. An improved seminumerical Coulomb and exchange algorithm for properties and excited states in modern density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 184115.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0022755
110.
Maier T. M.; Arbuznikov A. V.; Kaupp M. Local hybrid functionals: Theory, implementation, and performance of an emerging new tool in quantum chemistry and beyond. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2019, 9, e1378.
Not in our library10.1002/wcms.1378
111.
Janesko B. G. Replacing hybrid density functional theory: motivation and recent advances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8470–8495..
Not in our library10.1039/d0cs01074j
112.
Bahmann H.; Kaupp M. Efficient Self-Consistent Implementation of Local Hybrid Functionals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 1540–1548..
Not in our library10.1021/ct501137x
113.
Kehry M.; Franzke Y. J.; Holzer C.; Klopper W. Quasirelativistic two-component core excitations and polarisabilities from a damped-response formulation of the Bethe-Salpeter equation. Mol. Phys. 2020, 118, e1755064.
Not in our library10.1080/00268976.2020.1755064
114.
Grotjahn R.; Lauter G. J.; Haasler M.; Kaupp M. Evaluation of Local Hybrid Functionals for Electric Properties: Dipole Moments and Static and Dynamic Polarizabilities. J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124, 8346–8358..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.0c06939
115.
Schattenberg C. J.; Reiter K.; Weigend F.; Kaupp M. An Efficient Coupled-Perturbed Kohn-Sham Implementation of NMR Chemical Shift Computations with Local Hybrid Functionals and Gauge-Including Atomic Orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 931–943..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00944
116.
Wodyński A.; Kaupp M. Noncollinear Relativistic Two-Component X2C Calculations of Hyperfine Couplings Using Local Hybrid Functionals. Importance of the High-Density Coordinate Scaling Limit. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 314–325..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00911
117.
Holzer C.; Franzke Y. J. A Local Hybrid Exchange Functional Approximation from First Principles. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 034108.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0100439
118.
Franzke Y. J.; Holzer C. Impact of the current density on paramagnetic NMR properties. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 031102.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0103898
119.
Holzer C.; Franzke Y. J.; Kehry M. Assessing the Accuracy of Local Hybrid Density Functional Approximations for Molecular Response Properties. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 2928–2947..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00203
120.
Haasler M.; Maier T. M.; Grotjahn R.; Gückel S.; Arbuznikov A. V.; Kaupp M. A Local Hybrid Functional with Wide Applicability and Good Balance between (De)Localization and Left–Right Correlation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 5645–5657..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00498
121.
Harrison D. P.; Grotjahn R.; Naher M.; Ghazvini S. M. B. H.; Mazzucato D. M.; Korb M.; Moggach S. A.; Lambert C.; Kaupp M.; Low P. J. Quantum Interference in Mixed-Valence Complexes: Tuning Electronic Coupling Through Substituent Effects. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202211000.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.202211000
122.
Gückel S.; Safari P.; Bagher Hosseini Ghazvini S. M.; Hall M. R.; Gluyas J. B. G.; Kaupp M.; Low P. J. Iron Versus Ruthenium: Evidence for the Distinct Differences in the Electronic Structures of Hexa-1,3,5-triyn-1,6-diyl-bridged Complexes [Cp* (dppe){M}{μ-(C≡C)3}{M(dppe)Cp*}]+ (M = Fe, Ru). Organometallics 2021, 40, 346–357..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00681
123.
Grotjahn R.; Kaupp M. Reliable TDDFT Protocol Based on a Local Hybrid Functional for the Prediction of Vibronic Phosphorescence Spectra Applied to Tris(2,2′-bipyridine)-Metal Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 7099–7110..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.1c05101
124.
Grotjahn R.; Kaupp M. Validation of Local Hybrid Functionals for Excited States: Structures, Fluorescence, Phosphorescence, and Vibronic Spectra. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 5821–5834..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00520
125.
Grotjahn R.; Kaupp M. Assessment of hybrid functionals for singlet and triplet excitations: Why do some local hybrid functionals perform so well for triplet excitation energies?. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155, 124108.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0063751
126.
Grotjahn R.; Kaupp M. A Look at Real-World Transition-Metal Thermochemistry and Kinetics with Local Hybrid Functionals. Isr. J. Chem. 2022, e202200021.
Not in our library10.1002/ijch.202200021
127.
Schattenberg C. J.; Kaupp M. Extended Benchmark Set of Main-Group Nuclear Shielding Constants and NMR Chemical Shifts and Its Use to Evaluate Modern DFT Methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 7602–7621..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00919
128.
Schattenberg C. J.; Lehmann M.; Bühl M.; Kaupp M. Systematic Evaluation of Modern Density Functional Methods for the Computation of NMR Shifts of 3d Transition-Metal Nuclei. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 273–292..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00964
129.
Mori-Sánchez P.; Cohen A. J. The derivative discontinuity of the exchange–correlation functional. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 14378–14387..
Not in our library10.1039/c4cp01170h
130.
Janesko B. G.; Proynov E.; Kong J.; Scalmani G.; Frisch M. J. Practical Density Functionals beyond the Overdelocalization–Underbinding Zero-Sum Game. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 4314–4318..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02023
131.
Mori-Sánchez P.; Cohen A. J.; Yang W. Discontinuous Nature of the Exchange-Correlation Functional in Strongly Correlated Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 066403.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.102.066403
132.
Becke A. D. Density functionals for static, dynamical, and strong correlation. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 074109.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4790598
133.
Kong J.; Proynov E. Density Functional Model for Nondynamic and Strong Correlation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 133–143..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00801
134.
Wodyński A.; Arbuznikov A. V.; Kaupp M. Local hybrid functionals augmented by a strong-correlation model. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155, 144101.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0058917
135.
Wodyński A.; Kaupp M. Local Hybrid Functional Applicable to Weakly and Strongly Correlated Systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 6111–6123..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00795
136.
Haunschild R.; Scuseria G. E. Range-separated local hybrids. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 224106.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3451078
137.
Janesko B. G.; Krukau A. V.; Scuseria G. E. Self-consistent generalized Kohn-Sham local hybrid functionals of screened exchange: Combining local and range-separated hybridization. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 124110.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2980056
138.
Klawohn S.; Bahmann H. Self-Consistent Implementation of Hybrid Functionals with Local Range Separation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 953–963..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01015
139.
Fürst S.; Haasler M.; Grotjahn R.; Kaupp M. Full Implementation, Optimization, and Evaluation of a Range-Separated Local Hybrid Functional with Wide Accuracy for Ground and Excited States. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 488–502..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00782
140.
Fürst S.; Kaupp M. Accurate Ionization Potentials, Electron Affinities, and Band Gaps from the ωLH22t Range-Separated Local Hybrid Functional: No Tuning Required. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19 (11), 3146–3158..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00173
141.
Dobson J. F. Alternative expressions for the Fermi hole curvature. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 8870–8872..
Not in our library10.1063/1.464444
142.
Becke A. D. Current density in exchange-correlation functionals: Application to atomic states. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 6935–6938..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1503772
143.
Tao J. Explicit inclusion of paramagnetic current density in the exchange-correlation functionals of current-density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 205107.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.71.205107
144.
Bates J. E.; Heiche M. C.; Liang J.; Furche F. Erratum: “Harnessing the meta-generalized gradient approximation for time-dependent density functional theory” [J. Chem. Phys. 137, 164105 (2012)]. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156, 159902.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0088123
145.
Grotjahn R.; Furche F.; Kaupp M. Importance of imposing gauge invariance in time-dependent density functional theory calculations with meta-generalized gradient approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 111102.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0113083
146.
Sciortino G.; Lihi N.; Czine T.; Maréchal J.-D.; Lledós A.; Garribba E. Accurate prediction of vertical electronic transitions of Ni(II) coordination compounds via time dependent density functional theory. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2018, 118, e25655.
Not in our library10.1002/qua.25655
147.
Grotjahn R.; Furche F. Gauge-Invariant Excited-State Linear and Quadratic Response Properties within the Meta-Generalized Gradient Approximation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023,.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00259
148.
Schattenberg C. J.; Kaupp M. Effect of the current dependence of tau-dependent exchange-correlation functionals on nuclear shielding calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 1469–1479..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01223
149.
Bruder F.; Franzke Y. J.; Weigend F. Paramagnetic NMR Shielding Tensors Based on Scalar Exact Two-Component and Spin-Orbit Perturbation Theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 5050–5069..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.2c03579
150.
Maximoff S. N.; Scuseria G. E. Nuclear magnetic resonance shielding tensors calculated with kinetic energy density-dependent exchange-correlation functionals. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 390, 408–412..
Not in our library10.1016/j.cplett.2004.04.049
151.
Holzer C.; Franzke Y. J.; Pausch A. Current density functional framework for spin–orbit coupling. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 204102.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0122394
152.
Pausch A.; Holzer C. Linear Response of Current-Dependent Density Functional Approximations in Magnetic Fields. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 4335–4341..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01082
153.
Helgaker T.; Jaszuński M.; Ruud K. Ab initio methods for the calculation of NMR shielding and indirect spin-spin coupling constants. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 293–352..
Not in our library10.1021/cr960017t
154.
Vaara J. Theory and computation of nuclear magnetic resonance parameters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 5399–5148..
Not in our library10.1039/b706135h
155.
Kjærgaard T.; Coriani S.; Ruud K. Ab initio calculation of magnetic circular dichroism. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 443–455..
Not in our library10.1002/wcms.1091
156.
Tellgren E. I.; Soncini A.; Helgaker T. Nonperturbative ab initio calculations in strong magnetic fields using London orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 154114.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2996525
157.
Stopkowicz S.; Gauss J.; Lange K. K.; Tellgren E. I.; Helgaker T. Coupled-cluster theory for atoms and molecules in strong magnetic fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 074110.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4928056
158.
Irons T. J. P.; Zemen J.; Teale A. M. Efficient Calculation of Molecular Integrals over London Atomic Orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 3636–3649..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00540
159.
Sun S.; Williams-Young D. B.; Stetina T. F.; Li X. Generalized Hartree-Fock with Nonperturbative Treatment of Strong Magnetic Fields: Application to Molecular Spin Phase Transitions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 348–356..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01140
160.
Pausch A.; Gebele M.; Klopper W. Molecular point groups and symmetry in external magnetic fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155, 201101.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0069859
161.
David G.; Irons T. J. P.; Fouda A. E. A.; Furness J. W.; Teale A. M. Self-Consistent Field Methods for Excited States in Strong Magnetic Fields: a Comparison between Energy- and Variance-Based Approaches. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 5492–5508..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00236
162.
Stetina T. F.; Sun S.; Williams-Young D. B.; Li X. Modeling Magneto-Photoabsorption Using Time-Dependent Complex Generalized Hartree-Fock. ChemPhotoChem. 2019, 3, 739–746..
Not in our library10.1002/cptc.201900161
163.
Monzel L.; Pausch A.; Peters L. D. M.; Tellgren E. I.; Helgaker T.; Klopper W. Molecular Dynamics of Linear Molecules in Strong Magnetic Fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 054106.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0097800
164.
Ferrario L.; de Martino D.; Gänsicke B. T. Magnetic white dwarfs. Space Sci. Rev. 2015, 191, 111–169..
Not in our library10.1007/s11214-015-0152-0
165.
Mereghetti S.; Pons J. A.; Melatos A. Magnetars: properties, origin and evolution. Space Sci. Rev. 2015, 191, 315–338..
Not in our library10.1007/s11214-015-0146-y
166.
Liebert J.; Ferrario L.; Wickramasinghe D. T.; Smith P. S. Enigmas from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 Kleinman White Dwarf Catalog. Astrophys. J. 2015, 804, 93.
Not in our library10.1088/0004-637x/804/2/93
167.
Ferrario L.; Wickramasinghe D.; Kawka A. Magnetic fields in isolated and interacting white dwarfs. Adv. Space Res. 2020, 66, 1025–1056..
Not in our library10.1016/j.asr.2019.11.012
168.
Stopkowicz S. Perspective: Coupled cluster theory for atoms and molecules in strong magnetic fields. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2018, 118, e25391.
Not in our library10.1002/qua.25391
169.
Hall P. B.; Maxwell A. J. C2 in Peculiar DQ White Dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 2008, 678, 1292.
Not in our library10.1086/586889
170.
Kowalski P. M. The origin of peculiar molecular bands in cool DQ white dwarfs. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 519, L8.
Not in our library10.1051/0004-6361/201015238
171.
Berdyugina S. V.; Berdyugin A. V.; Piirola V. Molecular Magnetic Dichroism in Spectra of White Dwarfs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 091101.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.99.091101
172.
Vornanen T.; Berdyugina S. V.; Berdyugin A. V.; Piirola V. GJ 841B—The Second DQ White Dwarf With Polarized CH Molecular Bands. Astrophys. J. 2010, 720, L52–L55..
Not in our library10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/l52
173.
Lange K. K.; Tellgren E. I.; Hoffmann M.; Helgaker T. A paramagnetic bonding mechanism for diatomics in strong magnetic fields. Science 2012, 337, 327–331..
Not in our library10.1126/science.1219703
174.
Tellgren E. I.; Fliegl H. Non-perturbative treatment of molecules in linear magnetic fields: Calculation of anapole susceptibilities. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 164118.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4826578
175.
Pausch A.; Klopper W. Efficient evaluation of three-centre two-electron integrals over London orbitals. Mol. Phys. 2020, 118, e1736675.
Not in our library10.1080/00268976.2020.1736675
176.
Pausch A.; Holzer C.; Klopper W. Efficient Calculation of Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Spin-Noncollinear Linear-Response Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory in Finite Magnetic Fields. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 3747–3758..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00232
177.
Holzer C.; Teale A. M.; Hampe F.; Stopkowicz S.; Helgaker T.; Klopper W. GW quasiparticle energies of atoms in strong magnetic fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 214112.
Not in our library10.1063/1.5093396
178.
Holzer C.; Pausch A.; Klopper W. The GW/BSE Method in Magnetic Fields. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 746162.
Not in our library10.3389/fchem.2021.746162
179.
Holzer C. Practical Post-Kohn–Sham Methods for Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking References. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 9 (11), 3131–3145..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00156
180.
Kobayashi N.; Nakai K. Applications of magnetic circular dichroism spectroscopy to porphyrins and phthalocyanines. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4077–4092..
Not in our library10.1039/b704991a
181.
Kundu K.; White J. R. K.; Moehring S. A.; Yu J. M.; Ziller J. W.; Furche F.; Evans W. J.; Hill S. A 9.2-GHz clock transition in a Lu(II) molecular spin qubit arising from a 3,467-MHz hyperfine interaction. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 392–397..
Not in our library10.1038/s41557-022-00894-4
182.
Ishikawa N.; Sugita M.; Wernsdorfer W. Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization in Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets: Bis(phthalocyaninato)terbium and Bis(phthalocyaninato)dysprosium Anions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2931–2935..
Not in our library10.1002/anie.200462638
183.
Franzke Y. J. Reducing Exact Two-Component Theory for NMR Couplings to a One-Component Approach: Efficiency and Accuracy. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 2010–2028..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01248
184.
Mitchell T. N.; Kowall B. Karplus-type dihedral angle dependence for the coupling constants 3J(119Sn--C--C--119Sn) and 3J(119Sn--C--C--29Si). Magn. Reson. Chem. 1995, 33, 325–328..
Not in our library10.1002/mrc.1260330502
185.
Krätschmer F.; Sun X.; Gillhuber S.; Kucher H.; Franzke Y. J.; Weigend F.; Roesky P. Fully tin coated coinage metal ions: A pincer type bis-stannylene ligand for exclusive tetrahedral complexation. Chem. Eur. J. 2023, 29, e202203583.
Not in our library10.1002/chem.202203583
186.
Peters B.; Stuhrmann G.; Mack F.; Weigend F.; Dehnen S. Highly Soluble Supertetrahedra upon Selective Partial Butylation of Chalcogenido Metalate Clusters in Ionic Liquids. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 17622–17628..
Not in our library10.1002/anie.202104867
187.
Balmer M.; Franzke Y. J.; Weigend F.; von Hänisch C. Low valent group 14 phosphinidenide complexes [(SIDippP)2M] exhibit P-M pπ-pπ interaction (M = Ge, Sn, Pb). Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 192–197..
Not in our library10.1002/chem.201905061
188.
Huniar U. Berechnung der chemischen Verschiebung der NMR mit Methoden der Dichtefunktionaltheorie (DFT) Diploma Thesis, University of Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Germany, 1999.
Not in our library
189.
Novotný J.; Sojka M.; Komorovsky S.; Nečas M.; Marek R. Interpreting the Paramagnetic NMR Spectra of Potential Ru(III) Metallodrugs: Synergy between Experiment and Relativistic DFT Calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8432–8445..
Not in our library10.1021/jacs.6b02749
190.
Jensen F. The Basis Set Convergence of Spin–Spin Coupling Constants Calculated by Density Functional Methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 1360–1369..
Not in our library10.1021/ct600166u
191.
Jensen F. Basis Set Convergence of Nuclear Magnetic Shielding Constants Calculated by Density Functional Methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 719–727..
Not in our library10.1021/ct800013z
192.
Jakobsen P.; Jensen F. Probing basis set requirements for calculating hyperfine coupling constants. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 174107.
Not in our library10.1063/1.5128286
193.
Franzke Y. J.; Treß R.; Pazdera T. M.; Weigend F. Error-consistent segmented contracted all-electron relativistic basis sets of double- and triple-zeta quality for NMR shielding constants. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 16658–16664..
Not in our library10.1039/c9cp02382h
194.
Franzke Y. J.; Spiske L.; Pollak P.; Weigend F. Segmented Contracted Error-Consistent Basis Sets of Quadruple-ζ Valence Quality for One- and Two-Component Relativistic All-Electron Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 5658–5674..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00546
195.
Sundholm D.; Fliegl H.; Berger R. J. F. Calculations of magnetically induced current densities: Theory and applications. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2016, 6, 639–678..
Not in our library10.1002/wcms.1270
196.
von Ragué Schleyer P.; Maerker C.; Dransfeld A.; Jiao H.; van Eikema Hommes N. J. R. Nucleus-independent chemical shifts: A simple and efficient aromaticity probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6317–6318..
Not in our library10.1021/ja960582d
197.
GIMIC, ver. 2.1.4 (merge 4bce2c9). GitHub, 2022. https://github.com/qmcurrents/gimic (accessed 2022-11-23).
Not in our library
198.
Jusélius J.; Sundholm D.; Gauss J. Calculation of current densities using gauge-including atomic orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 3952–3963..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1773136
199.
Taubert S.; Sundholm D.; Jusélius J. Calculation of spin-current densities using gauge-including atomic orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 054123.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3549567
200.
Sundholm D.; Dimitrova M.; Berger R. J. F. Current density and molecular magnetic properties. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 12362–12378..
Not in our library10.1039/d1cc03350f
201.
Franzke Y. J.; Sundholm D.; Weigend F. Calculations of current densities and aromatic pathways in cyclic porphyrin and isoporphyrin arrays. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 12794–12803..
Not in our library10.1039/c7cp00624a
202.
Reiter K.; Weigend F.; Wirz L. N.; Dimitrova M.; Sundholm D. Magnetically Induced Current Densities in Toroidal Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 15354–15365..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03769
203.
Eulenstein A. R.; Franzke Y. J.; Bügel P.; Massa W.; Weigend F.; Dehnen S. Stabilizing a metalloid {Zn12} unit within a polymetallide environment in [K2Zn20Bi16]6–. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5122.
Not in our library10.1038/s41467-020-18799-6
204.
Mahmood A.; Dimitrova M.; Wirz L. N.; Sundholm D. Magnetically Induced Current Densities in π-Conjugated Porphyrin Nanoballs. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 7864–7873..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.2c04856
205.
Eulenstein A. R.; Franzke Y. J.; Lichtenberger N.; Wilson R. J.; Deubner H. L.; Kraus F.; Clérac R.; Weigend F.; Dehnen S. Substantial π-aromaticity of the anionic heavy-metal cluster [Th@Bi12]4–. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 149–155..
Not in our library10.1038/s41557-020-00592-z
206.
Lichtenberger N.; Wilson R. J.; Eulenstein A. R.; Massa W.; Clérac R.; Weigend F.; Dehnen S. Main Group Metal–Actinide Magnetic Coupling and Structural Response Upon U4+ Inclusion Into Bi, Tl/Bi, or Pb/Bi Cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9033–9036..
Not in our library10.1021/jacs.6b04363
207.
Peerless B.; Schmidt A.; Franzke Y. J.; Dehnen S. φ-Aromaticity in prismatic {Bi6}-based clusters. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15, 347–356..
Not in our library10.1038/s41557-022-01099-5
208.
Computational Methods in Lanthanide and Actinide Chemistry; Dolg M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 2015.
Not in our library
209.
Rabuck A. D.; Scuseria G. E. Improving self-consistent field convergence by varying occupation numbers. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 695–700..
Not in our library10.1063/1.478177
210.
Nava P.; Sierka M.; Ahlrichs R. Density functional study of palladium clusters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 3372–3381..
Not in our library10.1039/b303347c
211.
Saunders V.; Hillier I. A “Level–Shifting” method for converging closed shell Hartree–Fock wave functions. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1973, 7, 699–705..
Not in our library10.1002/qua.560070407
212.
Pulay P. Convergence acceleration of iterative sequences. The case of SCF iteration. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980, 73, 393–398..
Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(80)80396-4
213.
Chung A. B.; Rappoport D.; Ziller J. W.; Cramer R. E.; Furche F.; Evans W. J. Solid-State End-On to Side-On Isomerization of (N = N)2– in {[(R2N)3Nd]2N2}2– (R = SiMe3) Connects In Situ LnIII(NR2)3/K and Isolated [LnII(NR2)3]1– Dinitrogen Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 17064–17074..
Not in our library10.1021/jacs.2c06716
214.
MacDonald M. R.; Bates J. E.; Fieser M. E.; Ziller J. W.; Furche F.; Evans W. J. Expanding rare-earth oxidation state chemistry to molecular complexes of holmium (II) and erbium (II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8420–8423..
Not in our library10.1021/ja303357w
215.
MacDonald M. R.; Bates J. E.; Ziller J. W.; Furche F.; Evans W. J. Completing the series of + 2 ions for the lanthanide elements: synthesis of molecular complexes of Pr2+, Gd2+, Tb2+, and Lu2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9857–9868..
Not in our library10.1021/ja403753j
216.
Fieser M. E.; MacDonald M. R.; Krull B. T.; Bates J. E.; Ziller J. W.; Furche F.; Evans W. J. Structural, spectroscopic, and theoretical comparison of traditional vs recently discovered Ln2+ ions in the [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][(C5H4SiMe3)3Ln] complexes: the variable nature of Dy2+ and Nd2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 369–382..
Not in our library10.1021/ja510831n
217.
Woen D. H.; Evans W. J. Expanding the + 2 Oxidation State of the Rare-Earth Metals, Uranium, and Thorium in Molecular Complexes In Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Vol. 50; Bünzli J.-C. G., Pecharsky V. K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp 337–394.
Not in our library
218.
Ryan A. J.; Darago L. E.; Balasubramani S. G.; Chen G. P.; Ziller J. W.; Furche F.; Long J. R.; Evans W. J. Synthesis, structure, and magnetism of tris(amide)[Ln{N(SiMe3)2}3]1– complexes of the non-traditional + 2 lanthanide ions. Chem.: Eur. J. 2018, 24, 7702–7709..
Not in our library10.1002/chem.201800610
219.
Moore W. N.; White J. R.; Wedal J. C.; Furche F.; Evans W. J. Reduction of Rare-Earth Metal Complexes Induced by γ Irradiation. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 17713–17718..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02857
220.
Gould C. A.; McClain K. R.; Yu J. M.; Groshens T. J.; Furche F.; Harvey B. G.; Long J. R. Synthesis and Magnetism of Neutral, Linear Metallocene Complexes of Terbium(II) and Dysprosium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12967–12973..
Not in our library10.1021/jacs.9b05816
221.
Rappoport D. Property-optimized Gaussian basis sets for lanthanides. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155, 124102.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0065611
222.
Darago L. E.; Boshart M. D.; Nguyen B. D.; Perlt E.; Ziller J. W.; Lukens W. W.; Furche F.; Evans W. J.; Long J. R. Strong Ferromagnetic Exchange Coupling and Single-Molecule Magnetism in MoS43––Bridged Dilanthanide Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 8465–8475..
Not in our library10.1021/jacs.1c03098
223.
Fieser M. E.; Bates J. E.; Ziller J. W.; Furche F.; Evans W. J. Dinitrogen reduction via photochemical activation of heteroleptic tris (cyclopentadienyl) rare-earth complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3804–3807..
Not in our library10.1021/ja400664s
224.
Fieser M. E.; Johnson C. W.; Bates J. E.; Ziller J. W.; Furche F.; Evans W. J. Dinitrogen reduction, sulfur reduction, and isoprene polymerization via photochemical activation of trivalent bis (cyclopentadienyl) rare-earth-metal allyl complexes. Organometallics 2015, 34, 4387–4393..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00613
225.
Yu J. M.; Furche F. Theoretical Study of Divalent Bis(Pentaisopropylcyclopentadienyl) Actinocenes. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 16004–16010..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02505
226.
Tao J.; Perdew J. P.; Staroverov V. N.; Scuseria G. E. Climbing the Density Functional Ladder: Nonempirical Meta–Generalized Gradient Approximation Designed for Molecules and Solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 146401.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.91.146401
227.
Dolg M.; Cao X. Accurate Relativistic Small-Core Pseudopotentials for Actinides. Energy Adjustment for Uranium and First Applications to Uranium Hydride. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 12573–12581..
Not in our library10.1021/jp9044594
228.
Cao X.; Dolg M.; Stoll H. Valence basis sets for relativistic energy-consistent small-core actinide pseudopotentials. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 487–496..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1521431
229.
Cao X.; Dolg M. Segmented contraction scheme for small-core actinide pseudopotential basis sets. J. Mol. Struc. (THEOCHEM) 2004, 673, 203–209..
Not in our library10.1016/j.theochem.2003.12.015
230.
Guo F.-S.; Tsoureas N.; Huang G.-Z.; Tong M.-L.; Mansikkamäki A.; Layfield R. A. Isolation of a Perfectly Linear Uranium(II) Metallocene. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2299–2303..
Not in our library10.1002/anie.201912663
231.
Holzer C.; Klopper W. Communication: A hybrid Bethe-Salpeter/time-dependent density-functional-theory approach for excitation energies. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 149, 101101.
Not in our library10.1063/1.5051028
232.
Fedotov D. A.; Coriani S.; Hättig C. Damped (linear) response theory within the resolution-of-identity coupled cluster singles and approximate doubles (RI-CC2) method. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 124110.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0042759
233.
Kristensen K.; Kauczor J.; Kjaergaard T.; Jørgensen P. Quasienergy formulation of damped response theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 044112.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3173828
234.
Helgaker T.; Coriani S.; Jørgensen P.; Kristensen K.; Olsen J.; Ruud K. Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular Property Calculations. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 543–631..
Not in our library10.1021/cr2002239
235.
Norman P. A perspective on nonresonant and resonant electronic response theory for time-dependent molecular properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 20519–20535..
Not in our library10.1039/c1cp21951k
236.
Kauczor J.; Norman P. Efficient Calculations of Molecular Linear Response Properties for Spectral Regions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 2449–2455..
Not in our library10.1021/ct500114m
237.
Faber R.; Coriani S. Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering and Nonesonant X-ray Emission Spectra from Coupled-Cluster (Damped) Response Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 520–528..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01020
238.
Hättig C.; Heß B. A. Correlated Frequency-dependent Polarizabilities and Dispersion Coefficients in the Time-dependent Second-order Møller-Plesset Approximation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 233, 359–370..
Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(94)01487-g
239.
Hättig C.; Heß B. A. TDMP2 calculation of dynamic multipole polarizabilities and dispersion coefficients for the halogen anions F–, Cl–, Br– and I–. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 3863–3870..
Not in our library10.1063/1.475789
240.
Kauczor J.; Norman P.; Saidi W. A. Non-additivity of polarizabilities and van der Waals C6 coefficients of fullerenes. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 114107.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4795158
241.
Norman P.; Bishop D. M.; Jensen H. J. A.; Oddershede J. Near-resonant absorption in the time-dependent self-consistent field and multiconfigurational self-consistent field approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 10323–10334..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1415081
242.
Norman P.; Bishop D. M.; Jensen H. J. A.; Oddershede J. Nonlinear response theory with relaxation: The first-order hyperpolarizability. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 194103.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2107627
243.
Jensen L.; Autschbach J.; Schatz G. C. Finite lifetime effects on the polarizability within time-dependent density-functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 224115.
Not in our library10.1063/1.1929740
244.
Ekström U.; Norman P.; Carravetta V.; Ågren H. Polarization Propagator for X-Ray Spectra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 143001.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.97.143001
245.
Ekström U.; Norman P. X-ray absorption spectra from the resonant-convergent first-order polarization propagator approach. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 74, 042722.
Not in our library10.1103/physreva.74.042722
246.
Fahleson T.; Ågren H.; Norman P. A Polarization Propagator for Nonlinear X-ray Spectroscopies. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 1991–1995..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00750
247.
Cukras J.; Kauczor J.; Norman P.; Rizzo A.; Rikken G. L. J. A.; Coriani S. A complex-polarization-propagator protocol for magneto-chiral axial dichroism and birefringence dispersion. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 13267–13279..
Not in our library10.1039/c6cp01465h
248.
Coriani S.; Fransson T.; Christiansen O.; Norman P. Asymmetric-Lanczos-Chain-Driven Implementation of Electronic Resonance Convergent Coupled-Cluster Linear Response Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1616–1628..
Not in our library10.1021/ct200919e
249.
Coriani S.; Christiansen O.; Fransson T.; Norman P. Coupled-cluster response theory for near-edge x-ray-absorption fine structure of atoms and molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 85, 022507.
Not in our library10.1103/physreva.85.022507
250.
Rehn D. R.; Dreuw A.; Norman P. Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering Amplitudes and Cross Sections in the Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction/Intermediate State Representation (ADC/ISR) Approach. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 5552–5559..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00636
251.
Nørby M.; Coriani S.; Kongsted J. Modeling magnetic circular dichroism within the polarizable embedding approach. Theor. Chem. Acta. 2018, 137, 49.
Not in our library10.1007/s00214-018-2220-5
252.
Vaara J.; Rizzo A.; Kauczor J.; Norman P.; Coriani S. Nuclear spin circular dichroism. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 134103.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4869849
253.
Andersen J. H.; Coriani S.; Hättig C. Damped quadratic response within the resolution-of-identity coupled cluster singles and approximate doubles (RI-CC2) method. ChemRxiv 2023,.
Not in our library10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-dgbdz
254.
Zerulla B.; Krstić M.; Beutel D.; Holzer C.; Wöll C.; Rockstuhl C.; Fernandez-Corbaton I. A Multi-Scale Approach for Modeling the Optical Response of Molecular Materials Inside Cavities. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2200350.
Not in our library10.1002/adma.202200350
255.
Feuerstein W.; Holzer C.; Gui X.; Neumeier L.; Klopper W.; Breher F. Synthesis of New Donor-Substituted Biphenyls: Pre-ligands for Highly Luminescent (ĈĈD) Gold(III) Pincer Complexes. Eur. J. Chem. 2020, 26, 17156–17164..
Not in our library10.1002/chem.202003271
256.
Parker S. M.; Roy S.; Furche F. Unphysical divergences in response theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 134105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4963749
257.
Müller M. M.; Perdana N.; Rockstuhl C.; Holzer C. Modeling and measuring plasmonic excitations in hollow spherical gold nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156, 094103.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0078230
258.
Perdana N.; Holzer C.; Rockstuhl C. Multiscale Modeling of Broadband Perfect Absorbers Based on Gold Metallic Molecules. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 19337–19346..
Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.2c00911
259.
Beutel D.; Groner A.; Rockstuhl C.; Fernandez-Corbaton I. Efficient simulation of biperiodic, layered structures based on the T-matrix method. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2021, 38, 1782–1791..
Not in our library10.1364/josab.419645
260.
Zerulla B.; Li C.; Beutel D.; Oßwald S.; Holzer C.; Bürck J.; Bräse S.; Wöll C.; Fernandez-Corbaton I.; Heinke L.; Rockstuhl C.; Krstić M. Exploring Functional Photonic Devices made from a Chiral MetalOrganic Framework Material by a Multiscale Computational Method. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 2301093.
Not in our library10.1002/adfm.202301093
261.
Zerulla B.; Venkitakrishnan R.; Beutel D.; Krstić M.; Holzer C.; Rockstuhl C.; Fernandez-Corbaton I. A T-Matrix Based Approach to Homogenize Artificial Materials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2201564.
Not in our library10.1002/adom.202201564
262.
Kauczor J.; Norman P.; Christiansen O.; Coriani S. Communication: A reduced-space algorithm for the solution of the complex linear response equations used in coupled cluster damped response theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 211102.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4840275
263.
Mori T.; Inoue Y.; Grimme S. Quantum Chemical Study on the Circular Dichroism Spectra and Specific Rotation of Donor-Acceptor Cyclophanes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 7995–8006..
Not in our library10.1021/jp073596m
264.
Li Z.; Liu W. First-order nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements between excited states: A Lagrangian formulation at the CIS, RPA, TD-HF, and TD-DFT levels. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 014110.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4885817
265.
Parker S. M.; Roy S.; Furche F. Multistate hybrid time-dependent density functional theory with surface hopping accurately captures ultrafast thymine photodeactivation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 18999–19010..
Not in our library10.1039/c9cp03127h
266.
Roy S.; Furche F. Quinonile Photobasicity is Mediated by Hole Injection. In Bulletin of the American Physical Society, APS March Meeting 2018, Vol. 63, Los Angeles, CA, March 5–9, 2018; American Physical Society, 2018; Paper V03.00007
Not in our library
267.
Kasha M. Characterization of electronic transitions in complex molecules. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1950, 9, 14–19..
Not in our library10.1039/df9500900014
268.
Itoh T. Fluorescence and Phosphorescence from Higher Excited States of Organic Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4541–4568..
Not in our library10.1021/cr200166m
269.
Perdew J. P.; Ernzerhof M.; Burke K. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 9982–9985..
Not in our library10.1063/1.472933
270.
Weigend F.; Ahlrichs R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–3305..
Not in our library10.1039/b508541a
271.
Viswanath G.; Kasha M. Confirmation of the anomalous fluorescence of azulene. J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 24, 574–577..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1742548
272.
Geldof P.; Rettschnick R.; Hoytink G. Fluorescence from the second excited singlets of pyrene and 3,4-benzpyrene. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1969, 4, 59–61..
Not in our library10.1016/0009-2614(69)85066-9
273.
Baba H.; Nakajima A.; Aoi M.; Chihara K. Fluorescence from the second excited singlet state and radiationless processes in pyrene vapor. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 2433–2438..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1676429
274.
Chihara K.; Baba H. Effects of foreign gases on dual fluorescences of pyrene vapor. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1975, 48, 3093–3100..
Not in our library10.1246/bcsj.48.3093
275.
Braun G.; Borges I. Jr; Aquino A. J.; Lischka H.; Plasser F.; Do Monte S. A.; Ventura E.; Mukherjee S.; Barbatti M. Non-Kasha fluorescence of pyrene emerges from a dynamic equilibrium between excited states. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 154305.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0113908
276.
Borrego-Varillas R.; Ganzer L.; Cerullo G.; Manzoni C. Ultraviolet transient absorption spectrometer with Sub-20-fs time resolution. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 989.
Not in our library10.3390/app8060989
277.
Foggi P.; Neuwahl F. V.; Moroni L.; Salvi P. R. Absorption of Azulene: Femtosecond Transient Spectra and Excited State Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 1689–1696..
Not in our library10.1021/jp021313e
278.
Neuwahl F. V.; Foggi P. Direct observation of s2-s1 internal conversion in pyrene by femtosecond transient absorption. Laser Chem. 1999, 19, 375–379..
Not in our library10.1155/1999/37692
279.
Hollas J. M. Determination of molecular conformation from large amplitude vibrations in electronic spectra of organic molecules in a supersonic jet. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 371–382..
Not in our library10.1039/cs9932200371
280.
Villa E.; Amirav A.; Lim E. C. Single-vibronic-level and excitation-energy dependence of radiative and nonradiative transitions in jet-cooled S1 pyridine. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 5393–5397..
Not in our library10.1021/j100330a015
281.
Diau E. W.-G.; De Feyter S.; Zewail A. H. Direct observation of the femtosecond nonradiative dynamics of azulene in a molecular beam: The anomalous behavior in the isolated molecule. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 9785.
Not in our library10.1063/1.478031
282.
Cisneros C.; Thompson T.; Baluyot N.; Smith A. C.; Tapavicza E. The role of tachysterol in vitamin D photosynthesis - a non-adiabatic molecular dynamics study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 5763–5777..
Not in our library10.1039/c6cp08064b
283.
Tapavicza E.; Thompson T.; Redd K.; Kim D. Tuning the photoreactivity of Z-hexatriene photoswitches by substituents - a non-adiabatic molecular dynamics study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 24807–24820..
Not in our library10.1039/c8cp05181j
284.
Thompson T.; Tapavicza E. First-Principles Prediction of Wavelength-Dependent Product Quantum Yields. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 4758–4764..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02048
285.
Grathwol C. W.; Wössner N.; Swyter S.; Smith A. C.; Tapavicza E.; Hofstetter R. K.; Bodtke A.; Jung M.; Link A. Azologization and repurposing of a hetero-stilbene-based kinase inhibitor: towards the design of photoswitchable sirtuin inhibitors. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 2170–2183..
Not in our library10.3762/bjoc.15.214
286.
Sofferman D. L.; Konar A.; Mastron J. N.; Spears K. G.; Cisneros C.; Smith A. C.; Tapavicza E.; Sension R. J. Probing the Formation and Conformational Relaxation of Previtamin D3 and Analogues in Solution and in Lipid Bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 10085–10096..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c04376
287.
Tapavicza E. Conformationally controlled photochemistry studied by trajectory surface hopping In Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory; Zhu C., Ed.; Jenny Stanford Publishing: Singapore, China, 2022; pp 141–197.
Not in our library
288.
Tapavicza E.; Furche F.; Sundholm D. Importance of vibronic effects in the UV-Vis spectrum of the 7, 7, 8, 8-tetracyanoquinodimethane anion. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 5058–5066..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00720
289.
Santoro F.; Improta R.; Lami A.; Bloino J.; Barone V. Effective method to compute Franck-Condon integrals for optical spectra of large molecules in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 084509.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2437197
290.
Heller E. J. The semiclassical way to molecular spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 368–375..
Not in our library10.1021/ar00072a002
291.
Heller E. J. The semiclassical way to dynamics and spectroscopy; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2018.
Not in our library
292.
Baiardi A.; Bloino J.; Barone V. General time dependent approach to vibronic spectroscopy including Franck-Condon, Herzberg–Teller, and Duschinsky effects. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4097–4115..
Not in our library10.1021/ct400450k
293.
Tapavicza E. Generating Function Approach to Single Vibronic Level Fluorescence Spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 6003–6009..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02273
294.
Begušić T.; Tapavicza E.; Vaníček J. Applicability of the Thawed Gaussian Wavepacket Dynamics to the Calculation of Vibronic Spectra of Molecules with Double-Well Potential Energy Surfaces. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 3065–3074..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00030
295.
Duschinsky F. The importance of the electron spectrum in multi atomic molecules. Concerning the Franck-Condon principle. Acta Physicochim. URSS 1937, 7, 551–566.
Not in our library
296.
Benkyi I.; Tapavicza E.; Fliegl H.; Sundholm D. Calculation of vibrationally resolved absorption spectra of acenes and pyrene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 21094–21103..
Not in our library10.1039/c9cp04178h
297.
De Queiroz T. B.; De Figueroa E. R.; Coutinho-Neto M. D.; Maciel C. D.; Tapavicza E.; Hashemi Z.; Leppert L. First principles theoretical spectroscopy of methylene blue: Between limitations of time-dependent density functional theory approximations and its realistic description in the solvent. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 044106.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0029727
298.
von Cosel J.; Cerezo J.; Kern-Michler D.; Neumann C.; van Wilderen L. J.; Bredenbeck J.; Santoro F.; Burghardt I. Vibrationally resolved electronic spectra including vibrational pre-excitation: Theory and application to VIPER spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 164116.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4999455
299.
Heller E. J. Time-dependent approach to semiclassical dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 1544–1555..
Not in our library10.1063/1.430620
300.
Wehrle M.; Šulc M.; Vaníček J. On-the-fly Ab Initio Semiclassical Dynamics: Identifying Degrees of Freedom Essential for Emission Spectra of Oligothiophenes. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 244114.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4884718
301.
Wehrle M.; Oberli S.; Vaníček J. On-the-fly ab initio semiclassical dynamics of floppy molecules: Absorption and photoelectron spectra of ammonia. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 5685.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpca.5b03907
302.
Begušić T.; Patoz A.; Šulc M.; Vaníček J. On-the-fly ab initio three thawed Gaussians approximation: a semiclassical approach to Herzberg-Teller spectra. Chem. Phys. 2018, 515, 152–163..
Not in our library10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.08.003
303.
Vaníček J.; Begušić T. Ab Initio Semiclassical Evaluation of Vibrationally Resolved Electronic Spectra With Thawed Gaussians. In Molecular Spectroscopy and Quantum Dynamics; Marquardt R., Quack M., Eds.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, 2021; pp 199–229.
Not in our library
304.
Begušić T.; Cordova M.; Vaníček J. Single-Hessian thawed Gaussian approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 154117.
Not in our library10.1063/1.5090122
305.
Prlj A.; Begušić T.; Zhang Z. T.; Fish G. C.; Wehrle M.; Zimmermann T.; Choi S.; Roulet J.; Moser J.-E.; Vaníček J. Semiclassical Approach to Photophysics Beyond Kasha’s Rule and Vibronic Spectroscopy Beyond the Condon Approximation. The Case of Azulene. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 2617–2626..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00079
306.
Begušić T.; Vaníček J. Efficient semiclassical dynamics for vibronic spectroscopy beyond harmonic, Condon, and zero-temperature approximations. Chimia 2021, 75, 261.
Not in our library10.2533/chimia.2021.261
307.
Vidberg H. J.; Serene J. W. Solving the Eliashberg equations by means of N-point Padé approximants. J. Low Temp. Phys. 1977, 29, 179–192..
Not in our library10.1007/bf00655090
308.
Rojas H. N.; Godby R. W.; Needs R. J. Space-Time Method for Ab Initio Calculations of Self-Energies and Dielectric Response Functions of Solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 74, 1827–1830..
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.74.1827
309.
Voora V. K. Molecular Electron Affinities Using the Generalized Kohn-Sham Semicanonical Projected Random Phase Approximation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 433–439..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03362
310.
Samal B.; Voora V. K. Modeling Nonresonant X-ray Emission of Second- and Third-Period Elements without Core-Hole Reference States and Empirical Parameters. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 7272–7285..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00647
311.
Sugiura C. Kβ X-Ray Emission and K X-Ray Absorption Spectra of Sulfur in Sulfate Compounds. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 32, 3509–3514..
Not in our library10.1143/jjap.32.3509
312.
Qureshi M.; Nowak S. H.; Vogt L. I.; Cotelesage J. J. H.; Dolgova N. V.; Sharifi S.; Kroll T.; Nordlund D.; Alonso-Mori R.; Weng T.-C.; Pickering I. J.; George G. N.; Sokaras D. Sulfur Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopy: comparison with sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy for speciation of organosulfur compounds. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 4500–4508..
Not in our library10.1039/d0cp05323f
313.
Perdew J. P.; Burke K.; Ernzerhof M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868..
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865
314.
Grimme S.; Antony J.; Ehrlich S.; Krieg H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3382344
315.
Grimme S.; Ehrlich S.; Goerigk L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456–1465..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.21759
316.
Dunning T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007–1023..
Not in our library10.1063/1.456153
317.
Yu J. M.; Nguyen B. D.; Tsai J.; Hernandez D. J.; Furche F. Selfconsistent random phase approximation methods. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155, 040902.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0056565
318.
Perdew J. P.; Yang W.; Burke K.; Yang Z.; Gross E. K. U.; Scheffler M.; Scuseria G. E.; Henderson T. M.; Zhang I. Y.; Ruzsinszky A.; Peng H.; Sun J.; Trushin E.; Görling A. Understanding band gaps of solids in generalized Kohn–Sham theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017, 114, 2801–2806..
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1621352114
319.
Baerends E. J.; Gritsenko O. V.; van Meer R. The Kohn-Sham gap, the fundamental gap and the optical gap: the physical meaning of occupied and virtual Kohn-Sham orbital energies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 16408–16425..
Not in our library10.1039/c3cp52547c
320.
Kronik L.; Stein T.; Refaely-Abramson S.; Baer R. Excitation Gaps of Finite-Sized Systems from Optimally Tuned Range-Separated Hybrid Functionals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1515–1531..
Not in our library10.1021/ct2009363
321.
Lüftner D.; Refaely-Abramson S.; Pachler M.; Resel R.; Ramsey M. G.; Kronik L.; Puschnig P. Experimental and theoretical electronic structure of quinacridone. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 075204.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.90.075204
322.
Slattery D. K.; Linkous C. A.; Gruhn N. E.; Baum J. Semiempirical MO and voltammetric estimation of ionization potentials of organic pigments. Comparison to gas phase ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy. Dyes Pgm. 2001, 49, 21–27..
Not in our library10.1016/s0143-7208(01)00009-2
323.
Tew D. P. Principal Domains in Local Correlation Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 6597–6606..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00619
324.
Tew D. P. Principal domains in F12 explicitly correlated theory. In New Electron Correlation Methods and their Applications, and Use of Atomic Orbitals with Exponential Asymptotes; Musial M., Hoggan P. E., Eds.; Advances in Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 83; Academic Press, 2021; pp 83–106.
Not in our library
325.
Sorathia K.; Tew D. P. Basis set extrapolation in pair natural orbital theories. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 174112.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0022077
326.
Li W.; Saleh A.; Sharma M.; Hunecke C.; Sierka M.; Neuhaus M.; Hedewig L.; Bergues B.; Alharbi M.; ALQahtani H.; Azzeer A. M.; Gräfe S.; Kling M. F.; Alharbi A. F.; Wang Z. Resonance effects in Brunel harmonic generation in thin film organic semiconductors. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 2203070.
Not in our library10.1002/adom.202203070
327.
Burow A. M.; Sierka M. Linear scaling hierarchical integration scheme for the exchange-correlation term in molecular and periodic systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 3097–3104..
Not in our library10.1021/ct200412r
328.
Irmler A.; Burow A. M.; Pauly F. Robust Periodic Fock Exchange with Atom-Centered Gaussian Basis Sets. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 4567–4580..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00122
329.
Blanes S.; Casas F.; Oteo J.; Ros J. The Magnus expansion and some of its applications. Phys. Rep 2009, 470, 151–238..
Not in our library10.1016/j.physrep.2008.11.001
330.
Cheng C.-L.; Evans J. S.; Van Voorhis T. Simulating molecular conductance using real-time density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 155112.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.74.155112
331.
Treutler O. Entwicklung und Anwendung von Dichtefunktionalmethoden. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe, Germany, 1995.
Not in our library
332.
Lembarki A.; Chermette H. Obtaining a gradient-corrected kinetic-energy functional from the Perdew-Wang exchange functional. Phys. Rev. A 1994, 50, 5328–5331..
Not in our library10.1103/physreva.50.5328
333.
Treß R. S.; Liu J.; Hättig C.; Höfener S. Pushing the limits: efficient wavefunction methods for excited states in complex systems using frozen-density embedding. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 157, 204101.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0100393
334.
Wesolowski T. A.; Warshel A. Frozen density functional approach for ab initio calculations of solvated molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 97, 8050–8053..
Not in our library10.1021/j100132a040
335.
Lee S. J. R.; Welborn M.; Manby F. R.; Miller T. F. I. Projection-Based Wavefunction-in-DFT Embedding. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 1359–1368..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00672
336.
Manby F. R.; Stella M.; Goodpaster J. D.; Miller T. F. I. A Simple, Exact Density-Functional-Theory Embedding Scheme. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 2564–2568..
Not in our library10.1021/ct300544e
337.
Sharma M.; Mishra D. CrysX: crystallographic tools for the Android platform. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2019, 52, 1449–1454..
Not in our library10.1107/s1600576719013682
338.
Tymczak C. J.; Weber V. T.; Schwegler E.; Challacombe M. Linear scaling computation of the Fock matrix. VIII. Periodic boundaries for exact exchange at the Γ point. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 124105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.1869470
339.
Guidon M.; Hutter J.; VandeVondele J. Robust Periodic Hartree–Fock Exchange for Large-Scale Simulations Using Gaussian Basis Sets. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 3010–3021..
Not in our library10.1021/ct900494g
340.
Paier J.; Diaconu C. V.; Scuseria G. E.; Guidon M.; VandeVondele J.; Hutter J. Accurate Hartree-Fock energy of extended systems using large Gaussian basis sets. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 174114.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.80.174114
341.
Paier J.; Marsman M.; Hummer K.; Kresse G.; Gerber I. C.; Ángyán J. G. Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 154709.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2187006
342.
Peintinger M. F.; Oliveira D. V.; Bredow T. Consistent Gaussian basis sets of triple-zeta valence with polarization quality for solid-state calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 451–459..
Not in our library10.1002/jcc.23153
343.
Schäfer A.; Horn H.; Ahlrichs R. Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 2571–2577..
Not in our library10.1063/1.463096
344.
Adamo C.; Barone V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158–6170..
Not in our library10.1063/1.478522
345.
Krukau A. V.; Vydrov O. A.; Izmaylov A. F.; Scuseria G. E. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 224106.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2404663
346.
Warburton R. E.; Soudackov A. V.; Hammes-Schiffer S. Theoretical Modeling of Electrochemical Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 10599–10650..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00929
347.
Hammes-Schiffer S. Nuclear–electronic orbital methods: Foundations and prospects. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155, 030901.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0053576
348.
Webb S. P.; Iordanov T.; Hammes-Schiffer S. Multiconfigurational nuclear-electronic orbital approach: Incorporation of nuclear quantum effects in electronic structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 4106–4118..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1494980
349.
Zundel G. Hydration Structure and Intermolecular Interaction in Polyelectrolytes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 499–509..
Not in our library10.1002/anie.196904991
350.
Sirjoosingh A.; Pak M. V.; Hammes-Schiffer S. Multicomponent density functional theory study of the interplay between electron-electron and electron-proton correlation. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 174114.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4709609
351.
Xu J.; Zhou R.; Tao Z.; Malbon C.; Blum V.; Hammes-Schiffer S.; Kanai Y. Nuclear–electronic orbital approach to quantization of protons in periodic electronic structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156, 224111.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0088427
352.
Cremer D. Møller–Plesset perturbation theory: from small molecule methods to methods for thousands of atoms. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2011, 1, 509–530..
Not in our library10.1002/wcms.58
353.
Grimme S. Semiempirical hybrid density functional with perturbative second-order correlation. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 034108.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2148954
354.
Goerigk L.; Grimme S. Double-hybrid density functionals. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 576–600..
Not in our library10.1002/wcms.1193
355.
Nguyen B. D.; Chen G. P.; Agee M. M.; Burow A. M.; Tang M. P.; Furche F. Divergence of Many-Body Perturbation Theory for Noncovalent Interactions of Large Molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 2258–2273..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01176
356.
Shee J.; Loipersberger M.; Rettig A.; Lee J.; Head-Gordon M. Regularized Second-Order Møller-Plesset Theory: A More Accurate Alternative to Conventional MP2 for Noncovalent Interactions and Transition Metal Thermochemistry for the Same Computational Cost. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 12084–12097..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03468
357.
Cohen A. J.; Mori-Sánchez P.; Yang W. Second-Order Perturbation Theory with Fractional Charges and Fractional Spins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 786–792..
Not in our library10.1021/ct8005419
358.
Grimme S. Improved second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory by separate scaling of parallel- and antiparallel-spin pair correlation energies. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 9095–9102..
Not in our library10.1063/1.1569242
359.
Seidl M.; Giarrusso S.; Vuckovic S.; Fabiano E.; Gori-Giorgi P. Communication: Strong-interaction limit of an adiabatic connection in Hartree-Fock theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 149, 241101.
Not in our library10.1063/1.5078565
360.
Seidl M.; Perdew J. P.; Kurth S. Density functionals for the strong-interaction limit. Phys. Rev. A 2000, 62, 012502.
Not in our library10.1103/physreva.62.012502
361.
Daas T. J.; Kooi D. P.; Grooteman A. J. A. F.; Seidl M.; Gori-Giorgi P. Gradient Expansions for the Large-Coupling Strength Limit of the Møller-Plesset Adiabatic Connection. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 1584–1594..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01206
362.
Seidl M.; Perdew J. P.; Kurth S. Simulation of All-Order Density-Functional Perturbation Theory, Using the Second Order and the Strong-Correlation Limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 5070–5073..
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.84.5070
363.
Daas T. J.; Fabiano E.; Della Sala F.; Gori-Giorgi P.; Vuckovic S. Noncovalent Interactions from Models for the Møller–Plesset Adiabatic Connection. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 4867–4875..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01157
364.
Fabiano E.; Gori-Giorgi P.; Seidl M.; Della Sala F. Interaction-Strength Interpolation Method for Main-Group Chemistry: Benchmarking, Limitations, and Perspectives. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 4885–4896..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00713
365.
Gori-Giorgi P.; Vignale G.; Seidl M. Electronic Zero-Point Oscillations in the Strong-Interaction Limit of Density Functional Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 743–753..
Not in our library10.1021/ct8005248
366.
Śmiga S.; Della Sala F.; Gori-Giorgi P.; Fabiano E. Self-Consistent Implementation of Kohn-Sham Adiabatic Connection Models with Improved Treatment of the Strong-Interaction Limit. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 5936–5947..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00352
367.
Vuckovic S.; Gori-Giorgi P.; Della Sala F.; Fabiano E. Restoring Size Consistency of Approximate Functionals Constructed from the Adiabatic Connection. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 3137–3142..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01054
368.
Sedlak R.; Janowski T.; Pitoňák M.; Řezáč J.; Pulay P.; Hobza P. Accuracy of Quantum Chemical Methods for Large Noncovalent Complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3364–3374..
Not in our library10.1021/ct400036b
369.
Ballesteros F.; Dunivan S.; Lao K. U. Coupled cluster benchmarks of large noncovalent complexes: The L7 dataset as well as DNA-ellipticine and buckycatcher-fullerene. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 154104.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0042906
370.
Rocca D.; Gebauer R.; Saad Y.; Baroni S. Turbo charging time-dependent density-functional theory with Lanczos chains. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 154105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.2899649
371.
Zuehlsdorff T. J.; Hine N. D. M.; Spencer J. S.; Harrison N. M.; Riley D. J.; Haynes P. D. Linear-scaling time-dependent density-functional theory in the linear response formalism. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 064104.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4817330
372.
Gao Y.; Neuhauser D.; Baer R.; Rabani E. Sublinear scaling for time-dependent stochastic density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 034106.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4905568
373.
Baseggio O.; Fronzoni G.; Stener M. A new time dependent density functional algorithm for large systems and plasmons in metal clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 024106.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4923368
374.
Bauernschmitt R.; Häser M.; Treutler O.; Ahlrichs R. Calculation of excitation energies within time-dependent density functional theory using auxiliary basis set expansions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 264, 573–578..
Not in our library10.1016/s0009-2614(96)01343-7
375.
Heinze H. H.; Görling A.; Rösch N. An efficient method for calculating molecular excitation energies by time-dependent density-functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 2088.
Not in our library10.1063/1.482020
376.
Weigend F. Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 1057–1065..
Not in our library10.1039/b515623h
377.
Weigend F.; Kattannek M.; Ahlrichs R. Approximated electron repulsion integrals: Cholesky decomposition versus resolution of the identity methods. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 164106.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3116103
378.
Grimme S. A Simplified Tamm-Dancoff Density Functional Approach for the Electronic Excitation Spectra of Very Large Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 244104.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4811331
379.
Bannwarth C.; Grimme S. A simplified time-dependent density functional theory approach for electronic ultraviolet and circular dichroism spectra of very large molecules. Comput. Theoret. Chem. 2014, 1040–1041, 45.
Not in our library10.1016/j.comptc.2014.02.023
380.
Rüger R.; van Lenthe E.; Heine T.; Visscher L. Tight-binding approximations to time-dependent density functional theory A fast approach for the calculation of electronically excited states. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 184103.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4948647
381.
Jacquemin D.; Wathelet V.; Perpète E. A.; Adamo C. Extensive TD-DFT Benchmark: Singlet-Excited States of Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 2420–2435..
Not in our library10.1021/ct900298e
382.
Liang J.; Feng X.; Hait D.; Head-Gordon M. Revisiting the Performance of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Electronic Excitations: Assessment of 43 Popular and Recently Developed Functionals from Rungs One to Four. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 3460–3473..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00160
383.
Giannone G.; Della Sala F. Minimal Auxiliary Basis Set for Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory and Comparison with Tight-Binding Approximations: Application to Silver Nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 084110.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0020545
384.
Zhou Z.; Della Sala F.; Parker S. M. Minimal auxiliary basis set approach for the electronic excitation spectra of organic molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 1968–1976..
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03698
385.
Franzke Y. J.; Schosser W. M.; Pauly F. Self-consistent and efficient treatment of relativistic effects with periodic density functional methods: Energies, Gradients, and Stress TensorsarXiv (Physics.Chemical Physics), May 20, 2023, 2305.03817, ver. 2..
Not in our library10.48550/arxiv.2305.03817
386.
Zhao R.; Zhang Y.; Xiao Y.; Liu W. Exact two-component relativistic energy band theory and application. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 044105.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4940140
387.
Ahlrichs R.; May K. Contracted all-electron Gaussian basis sets for atoms Rb to Xe. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 943–945..
Not in our library10.1039/a908859h
388.
Weigend F.; Baldes A. Segmented contracted basis sets for one- and two-component Dirac-Fock effective core potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 174102.
Not in our library10.1063/1.3495681
389.
Kadek M.; Repisky M.; Ruud K. All-electron fully relativistic Kohn-Sham theory for solids based on the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian and Gaussian-type functions. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 205103.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.99.205103
390.
Dyall K. G. Relativistic Quadruple-Zeta Triple-Zeta and Revised and Double-Zeta Basis Sets for the 4p, 5p, and 6p Elements. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2006, 115, 441–447..
Not in our library10.1007/s00214-006-0126-0
391.
Dyall K. G. Relativistic double-zeta, triple-zeta, and quadruple-zeta basis sets for the 4d elements Y-Cd. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2007, 117, 483–489..
Not in our library10.1007/s00214-006-0174-5
392.
Bodo F.; Desmarais J. K.; Erba A. Spin current density functional theory of Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 125108.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.105.125108
393.
Desmarais J. K.; Flament J.-P.; Erba A. Spin-orbit coupling in periodic systems with broken time-reversal symmetry: Formal and computational aspects. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 235142.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.101.235142
394.
Lyman I. Code quality: a concern for businesses, bottom lines, and empathetic programmers. The Overflow, October 18, 2021. https://stackoverflow.blog/2021/10/18/code-quality-a-concern-for-businesses-bottom-lines-and-empathetic-programmers/ (accessed 2023-03-20).
Not in our library

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.