Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 25, 2026.

Smart and Multifunctional Materials Based on Electroactive Poly(vinylidene fluoride): Recent Advances and Opportunities in Sensors, Actuators, Energy, Environmental, and Biomedical Applications

Carlos M. Costa, Vanessa F. Cardoso, Pedro Martins and 8 more

Chemical Reviews · 2023 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00196

Abstract

From scientific and technological points of view, poly(vinylidene fluoride), PVDF, is one of the most exciting polymers due to its overall physicochemical characteristics. This polymer can crystalize into five crystalline phases and can be processed in the form of films, fibers, membranes, and specific microstructures, being the physical properties controllable over a wide range through appropriate chemical modifications. Moreover, PVDF-based materials are characterized by excellent chemical, mechanical, thermal, and radiation resistance, and for their outstanding electroactive properties, including high dielectric, piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and ferroelectric response, being the best among polymer systems and thus noteworthy for an increasing number of technologies. This review summarizes and critically discusses the latest advances in PVDF and its copolymers, composites, and blends, including their main characteristics and processability, together with their tailorability and implementation in areas including sensors, actuators, energy harvesting and storage devices, environmental membranes, microfluidic, tissue engineering, and antimicrobial applications. The main conclusions, challenges and future trends concerning materials and application areas are also presented.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 25, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

In the scope of the circular economy concept, aiming to combine sustainability and social development, a collaborative and interrelated society based on smart technologies is needed to address the urgent and relevant issues raised in the scope of the energy transition, reduction of the environmental impact, novel healthcare paradigms, sustainable mobility, and artificial intelligence, among others., The ongoing technological transitions require advanced, smart, and multifunctional materials to support the Internet of Things (IoT) concept, based on an increasing number of interconnected physical objects, sensors, and actuators, also leading to the Industry 4.0 paradigm, aiming to optimize materials, processes, and products, from concept to manufacturing.,

Many of the materials required for these technologies are based on polymer, as they present chemical stability, easy processability, tailorable properties, and low cost, some of them also showing electroactive properties such as piezoelectricity, pyroelectricity, and ferroelectricity. In particular, piezoelectric polymers can convert mechanical to electrical signals or vice versa, a characteristic that is taken to advantage in different areas such as sensors and actuators, biomedicine, energy generation, and storage, among others.,

Within smart polymer-based materials, poly(vinylidene fluoride), PVDF, and its copolymers, poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (poly(VDF-co-HFP)), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) (poly(VDF-co-TrFE)), and poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) (poly(VDF-co-CTFE)), stand out based on their high dielectric constant (ε′ up to 18), high piezoelectric coefficients (|d31| up to 30 pC·.N–1, |d33| up to 140 pC·N–1), high purity, excellent mechanical properties, high resistance against chemicals, suitable thermal resistance, tailorable surface properties and morphology, among others, that depend on the specific crystalline phase of the polymer.− Other polymers, such as odd-numbered Nylons, polylactic acid (PLLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and cellulose acetate (CA), have also emerged and been applied in various technological applications based on their reasonable electroactive properties combined with some other suitable properties including biocompatibility, biodegradability, natural origin, or other relevante characteristics.

The piezoelectric properties of PVDF were discovered by Kawai in 1961 and were attributed to the cooperative alignment of dipoles and charge trapping caused by the high polarization of this polymer in specific phases. Further, it was demonstrated that the piezoelectricity in PVDF also depends on the electrostriction constant, Poisson ratio, and crystal structure. In 1961, the first commercially produced PVDF grades were named Kynar of Pennwalt (nowadays Arkema) and were synthesized by the polymerization of vinylidene fluoride (VDF), mainly by aqueous emulsion and suspension polymerization technique.

PVDF and its copolymers are one of the most robust and multifunctional polymeric materials, demonstrating its applicability in a wide variety of applications, including sensors, electronic devices, piezoelectric generators, scaffolds for tissue engineering, and portable analytical devices, among others., The sustainability concerns of this fluorinated polymer are being addressed by its durability and multifunctionality in the applications. More environmentally friendly syntheses and efforts to recover and/or recycle and/or reuse them are also occurring.−

Considering its properties such as high mechanical strength and durability in harsh environmental conditions, PVDF is one of the most widely used fluoropolymers after poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE), with a market price around US $14/kg. Approximately 49% of the market share corresponds to HFP-modified PVDF, a monomer added to further increase polymer flexibility. Regarding other PVDF-based polymers and their applicability for advanced technological applications, the price will decrease with increasing production scale. Nevertheless, the price of these materials will not be as cheap as PVDF, taking into account the cost of other gas monomers and also the polymerization processes.

In 2021, its market reached a value of ∼880 million dollars, and taking into account the market growth in the electronics sector and the demand for lithium (Li)-ion batteries applied in electric vehicles where PVDF is used as a polymer binder for electrodes, its annual growth rate is expected to increase ∼7% by 2027.

This review focuses on the main properties and processing of PVDF, its copolymers, blends, and composites, together with their main application areas from sensors/actuators to biomedical applications, i.e, high value-added applications, with particular attention to the role of their electroactive properties.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride): Main Properties and Polymorphism

PVDF is a semicrystalline polymer that crystallizes radially into a spherulitic structure, with its chains being approximately plane-normal. It comprises of a repeating unit (CH2–CF2) with a spacing of 2.6 Å. Its dipole moment originates from the electronegative fluorine (δ−) to the electropositive hydrogen (δ+) and it is perpendicular to the polymer chains for the β-phase, while for the other phases, the dipole moment is not perpendicular to the polymer chain, as it will be described in the following.,

PVDF can crystallize in different crystalline phases, identified as α, β, γ, δ, and ε, depending on the processing conditions. The most relevant crystalline phases for applications are the α-phase, which is thermodynamically more stable when obtained by cooling from the melt, and the β-phase, which provides the highest electroactive properties: piezo-, pyro-, and ferroelectricity.

The α-phase is characterized by an orthorhombic unit cell with a P2cm space group, the polymer chains being organized in a trans-gauche (TGTG–) conformational structure, as shown in Figure 1a). The dipole moment of the conformation repeat unit is 4.0 × 10–28 cm·C. The β-phase is also organized in orthorhombic unit cells, but with a Cm2m space group. In this phase, the chain conformation is planar zigzag (all-trans), as shown in Figure 1b), with the dipolar moments of the chains parallel to the crystallographic b-axis. The conformation repeat unit of the β-phase shows a dipolar moment of 7.0 × 10–28 cm·C and polarization of 131 mC·m–2. The δ-phase of PVDF is the polar version of the α-phase by the application of a high electric field, resulting in the inversion of the dipole moments along the applied field. The chain conformation is similar to the α-phase, Figure 1a. PVDF in the γ-phase reveals an intermediate conformation between β- and α-phases (TTTG+TTTG–) (Figure 1c). Furthermore, the ε-phase is quite difficult to obtain and its conformation is similar to the γ-phase. Due to those conformational characteristics, the α- and the ε-phases are nonpolar, whereas the, β-, γ-, and δ-phases are polar.,

The identification of the different crystalline phases of PVDF is typically achieved by X-ray diffraction and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) techniques.

PVDF is characterized by a glass transition temperature at Tg −34 °C, a degree of crystallinity between 35 and 60%, and a melting temperature between 160 and 190 °C, depending on the processing conditions and crystalline phases. Furthermore, the thermal degradation temperature is between 400 to 450 °C independent of the crystalline phase, the degree of crystallinity, and the processing method. In addition, the number of head-to-head defects is between 6% and 9%, as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

PVDF is characterized by chemical, mechanical, radiation, and thermal resistance, due to the high electronegativity of the fluorine atoms in the chain and the high bond dissociation energy of the C–F bond.

Regarding the electrical properties, the ε′ of PVDF is between 7 and 13, depending on the crystalline phase, the crystalline phase content and the crystalline domain size. The dielectric constant of the β-phase is highest when compared to the α- and γ-phases due to the higher polarity of this phase. Another critical parameter that contributes to the dielectric properties is the interfaces between the amorphous and crystalline regions. Also, a region defined as oriented amorphous fraction (OAF) that connects mobile amorphous fraction and the lamellar crystal, participates in ferroelectric switching of PVDF and enhances its β-phase, dielectric, and ferroelectric properties.,

The processing annealing temperature and time allow tuning the dielectric and piezoelectric characteristics of PVDF, the dielectric and piezoelectric responses decreasing strongly in the first 4 h at temperatures above 80 °C.

The dielectric behavior as a function of frequency and temperature shows two main relaxation processes dominated by the β-relaxation that corresponds to the Tg, attributed to cooperative segmental movements of the main chains within the amorphous and amorphous/crystalline interface regions of the polymer. The other main relaxation process is identified as α- or αc-relaxation, it occurs at temperatures above 60 °C, and it is associated with cooperative molecular motions within the crystalline fraction. These relaxations can also be observed by dynamical mechanical analysis. The poling process, the application of an electric field to provide orientation to the dipolar moments, affects the dynamics of these relaxation processes.

The displacement (D)-electric field (E) hysteresis loops are also strongly dependent on crystal phase and crystallinity. They are affected by the processing conditions and thermal treatments, in particular in terms of maximum and remnant polarization. The irreversible polarization depends on the amorphous phase, as increasing amorphous phase content leads to more free space for the inversion of the crystalline domains.

PVDF is characterized by excellent mechanical properties with a Young modulus >1.5 GPa, and the poling process increases the mechanical response along the preferred microstructure orientation. Also, as the temperature increases, the poling effect on mechanical behavior is reduced due to increased molecular mobility. The mechanical properties are also determined by the polymer’s morphology and degree of crystallinity and, therefore, by the processing conditions.

The optical properties of PVDF are dependent on polymer microstructure. For a compact and dense morphology, the optical transmittance is between 80 and 90% in the visible spectrum with a refractive index between 1.39 and 1.47.,

Considering its excellent thermal, mechanical, electrical, and electroactive properties and also its tunability to be implemented in a wide range of application requirements, substantial efforts have been devoted to develop a variety of processing techniques and conditions with a focus on improving materials integration and device performance.

Processability

As referred previously, PVDF is a polymer with notable polymorphism, showing five main crystalline phases: α, β, γ, δ, and ε, depending on the processing conditions (mainly, processing temperature and time). From a technological point of view, the β-phase is the one with the highest piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and ferroelectric response, and it is the most implemented in applications where an electric response or a deformation (actuation) are required. In turn, the α-phase is the most stable thermodynamically when directly obtained from the melt.

Figure 2 shows the main processing treatments to obtain the different phases of PVDF.

When processed above the temperature of 110 °C, the predominant phase is the α-phase. The β-phase is obtained from solution processing with polar solvent at crystallization temperatures below 70 °C. The γ-phase is typically obtained by annealing and mechanical stretching processed from other polymer phases.

The β-phase can be induced from the α-phase through different processing strategies, such as mechanical stretching, annealing, cooling, pressing, the addition of different fillers and polymers, and electrical poling (Ep), among others.−

The merits of PVDF are not only based on their chemical, mechanical, and thermal stability, together with tunable electroactive properties but also on allowing it to be produced in a variety of designs and morphologies such as nonporous (dense) films, porous (membrane) films, fibers, microspheres, patterned/three-dimensional (3D) formats by processing techniques including extrusion, injection molding, electrospinning, phase separation processes, particulate leaching, freeze extraction, or printing technologies, among others. Thus, over the past decades, a large variety of processing methods have been developed to produce PVDF in specific shapes to meet specific application requirements, including sensors and actuators,, energy storage, filtration membranes, microfluidics, tissue engineering, or drug delivery, among others.

Together with the processing methods, the processing conditions, such as processing temperature, between 190 and 280 °C (230 to 290 °C for extrusion and 200 to 270 °C for injection molding) when processed from the melt and the solvent type and solvent evaporation temperature strongly affects polymer phase content, crystallinity, and morphology. With respect to solvent based processing, the selection of the solvent is essential because it affects the thermodynamic properties of the solution, the processing techniques that can be used, and the final physicochemical characteristics of the processed material. Figure 3 shows a schematic representation of characteristic processing techniques used to obtain PVDF in different morphologies, described below, from solvent-based solutions.

In addition to conventional processing techniques, PVDF has also been processed by additive manufacturing techniques (Figure 3) such as direct-ink-writing (DIW), roll-to-roll printing/coating processes, among others, which are of low fabrication cost.

Common solvents of PVDF are N,N-dimethyl acetaminde (DMA), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), tetrahydrofuran (THF), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), among others., However, from an environmental point of view, these solvents do not allow sustainable processing because of their toxicity. Thus, greener solvents are necessary to reduce the environmental impact of materials and processes. Thus, one of the main challenges in PVDF processing is to change the common solvents with environmentally friendlier ones. However, the challenge of green processing is not simple, still under strong development efforts. Nonetheless, 1, 3-dioxalane (DXL) and N,N′-dimethylpropyleneurea (DMPU) are promising alternatives for being environmentally friendly (toxicity index of 5 and 4, respectively, according to Hodge and Sterner scale).,

Various established solvent-based processing techniques have been applied to process PVDF in the electroactive β-phase and new ones have emerged in the past decades. In the scope of the present review, the most used ones to obtain a specific morphologies or structures will be briefly addressed in the following.

PVDF dense films with a controllable thickness, ranging from a few to hundreds of micrometers, are typically fabricated by doctor blade. The phase obtained can be tailored according to the solvent evaporation temperature, the β-phase being obtained at solvent evaporation temperatures below 70 °C. In contrast, α-phase films are obtained at higher temperatures or above the polymer’s melting temperature where rapid evaporation of the solvent occurs. A transition from α- to β-phase can be induced by mechanical stretching of the α-film at a specific temperature and electrical poling is applied to optimize the electroactive response by favoring the orientation of the dipoles along the direction of the applied field. For smaller thicknesses, from hundreds tens of nanometers to dozens of micrometers, spin-coating is applied to produce highly uniform films deposited directly on the desired substrates., Films and specific structures can be also achieved by using additive manufacturing technologies, such as inkjet-printing, screen-printing, and spray-printing. In this case, dense or porous morphologies can be obtained by specific postprocessing thermal treatments. Nanoscale films can be prepared using a monomolecular film assembly method: the Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) method., Moreover, nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) and temperature-induced phase separation (TIPS) are used to obtained porous films.

Further, techniques such as solvent casting particulate leaching and solvent casting 3D nylon template [144] are also used to obtain porous membranes with controllable pore size and interconnectivity. In turn, patterned and 3D PVDF dense and porous structures can be obtained by replica molding using molds featuring the inverse desired structure or by 3D printing. To obtain random or aligned PVDF fibers, electrospinning is the technique usually employed, as it allows to produce fibers with diameters from hundreds to dozens of nanometers by using static or rotating collectors to obtain randomly oriented or oriented fibers, respectively. In the electrospinning process, parameters such as the solvent evaporation temperature, the electric applied field and the stretching forces exercise during the process induce the crystallization of the PVDF fibers predominantly in the β-phase. Further, by controlling processing parameters such as solution viscosity, microspheres can also be obtained by electrospray, with diameters ranging from hundreds of nanometers to a few micrometers, in addition to other conventional techniques such as phase separation or precipitation, emulsion/solvent evaporation, and microfluidics. In addition to the previously mentioned procedures to obtain PVDF in the electroactive β-phase, a common strategy is the integration of fillers, such as cellulose, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), zeolites, and piezoelectric ceramics nanoparticles, into the polymer solution. These type of fillers and others featuring active properties, e.g., magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) and cobalt ferrites (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles, have been introduced to obtain composites with tuned physicochemical and multifunctional properties. In order to implement β-phase PVDF for technological applications by maximizing the electroactive response, a poling process is applied through static electric fields allowing to realign the dipole moments along the field direction.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Copolymers

The development of PVDF copolymers such as poly(VDF-co-TrFE), poly(VDF-co-HFP), and poly(VDF-co-CTFE) has allowed not only to obtain the polymer directly in the electroactive phase when processed from the melt but also to improve/adapt the degree of crystallinity and the electroactive response for specific technological demands. The structure of the main PVDF copolymers is represented in Figure 4.

Table 1 shows the main application fields of PVDF and its copolymers. For each application, the most used PVDF and copolymers are indicated.

The PVDF copolymer less used is poly(VDF-co-CTFE), being evaluated for applications such as Li-ion batteries, but still being little explored because it has similar properties to poly(VDF-co-HFP). The most used fluorinated polymers for Li-ion batteries are PVDF as polymer binder for electrodes and poly(VDF-co-HFP) for separator membranes and solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs).,

For applications that require the piezoelectric effect, the most used polymers are PVDF and poly(VDF-co-TrFE). In fact, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) is one of the most studied copolymers of PVDF. When the VDF content (ContentVDF) is <49 mol%, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) crystallizes into 3/1-helical phase and when 49 mol% ≤ ContentVDF ≤ 55 mol%, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) crystallizes into 3/1-helical phase and trans-planar phase. Moreover, when 55 mol% < ContentVDF < 80 mol%, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) crystallizes into trans-planar phase, independently of the processing conditions, once the addition of the third fluoride atom in the TrFE monomer unit leads to a significant steric hindrance that favors the all-trans polymer chain conformation and induces the ferroelectric β-phase independently of the processing method and conditions: melt or solution casting. Due to the intrinsic presence of chemical defects (TrFE units), randomly distributed among PVDF sequences, this copolymer typically has a reduced degree of crystallinity compared to the PVDF homopolymer. However, the crystallinity can be tuned between 35 and nearly 100% depending on the polymerization method and processing conductions. Those properties ensure high electric output, sensitivity, comprehensive frequency response, and flexibility, characteristics required for applications such as haptics, sensors, and artificial muscles. Moreover, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) has two phase transitions, depending on the crystallization conditions, thermal treatment and molar ratio. The copolymer poly(VDF-co-TrFE) in the molar ratio (VDF/TrFE) (75/25) shows a first-order ferroelectric–paraelectric (FE-PE) transition at 140 °C under heating and a PE-FE transition by cooling at 75 °C, showing therefore a large thermal hysteresis., For this copolymer, an emerging toroidal polar topology has been observed in poly(VDF-co-TrFE) with VDF content of 70 mol%. This consists of the effective alignment of the lamellar crystal with its interchain dipoles perpendicular to the polymer chains self-organizing into a concentric pattern.

In turn, poly(VDF-co-HFP), consisting of incorporating the amorphous phase of hexafluoropropylene (HFP) in the PVDF homopolymer, is a chemically inert copolymer, presenting a lower crystallinity when compared with PVDF due to the presence of the bulky CF3 groups. For such reasons, this polymer has been mainly used for applications in polymer electrolytes for rechargeable Li-ion batteries and for producing membranes for organophilic pervaporation. Poly(VDF-co-HFP) has the highest d31 piezoelectric constant (21 pC·N–1) among all PVDF’s copolymers.

In the case of poly(VDF-co-CTFE), the crystalline properties depend on the CTFE content, the semicrystalline state being only obtained for CTFE contents lower than 16 mol%, while an amorphous state is present for higher CTFE concentrations. The introduction of bulky CTFE makes the structure lose, resulting in an easier orientation of dipoles under an external electric field. Poly(VDF-co-CTFE) exhibits optimized piezoelectric properties (|d33| can reach values of 140 pC·N–1 when poled at a DC bias of 70 MV·m–1), higher electrostrictive strain response (5.5%), and higher ε′ of 13 when compared with PVDF. As a result, broader ferroelectric hysteresis loops are commonly observed in poly(VDF-co-CTFE) that are advantageous for energy storage applications, ensuring a high overall electric-energy density that can be charged/discharged in specific electronics applications.,

An interesting polymer in the PVDF family is poly(vinylidene fluoride-ter-trifluoroethylene-ter-chlorofluoroethylene) (poly(VDF-ter-TrFE-ter-CFE)) which is a ter-polymer with relaxor ferroelectric properties and high dielectric constant. This polymer has been used in electrocaloric devices with entropy changes of 37.5 J ·kg–1·K–1, actuators, bioMEMs, and microfluidic devices, among others. The addition of the third monomer affects the crystalline properties and consequently the dielectric properties. This terpolymer under 40 MV·m–1 shows an electromechanical coupling factor (k33) of 88% and a d33 > 1000 pC·V–1. Considering its properties, this ter-polymer has been also used as a polymer binder for electrodes in Li-ion batteries devices. In the future, it is expected to find application in other high-tech areas.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Composites

The exciting properties of PVDF have led to a high and growing interest, resulting in the combination with specific fillers for the development of high-performance and multifunctional PVDF-based composites with distinct morphologies and physicochemical properties. Thus, PVDF-based composites result from the combination of one or two different fillers with complementary characteristics to improve some specific properties or to induce new ones, such as electrical conductivity or magnetic properties. It has been reported that there are PVDF composites with more than 30 different fillers. Recently, the trend has been the development of PVDF composites with the addition of more than one filler with complementary properties to reduce the filler amount and enhance the functionality. The most representative and commonly used fillers in PVDF and its copolymers-based composites are magnetic nanoparticles (CoFe2O4 or Fe3O4),− CNTs,− ceramic particles, e.g., barium titanate (BaTiO3),, zinc oxide (ZnO),− titanium dioxide (TiO2),− zeolites, or clays,, among others, promoting the development of a wide range of multifunctional composites materials.

PVDF composites are interesting because their final properties can be fine-tuned by the proper selection of filler size, shape and content, dispersion, interface, and interaction between filler and polymer, together with the processing conditions., Moreover, the easy processability of PVDF composites allows its integration in various application areas, including sensors and actuators, energy generation and storage systems, environmental sensing and remediation, and biomedical applications, among others, as it will be shown in the following chapters in this review.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Blends

PVDF and copolymers are also widely used in blends with different types of polymers, including poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(o-methoxyaniline) (POMA), poly(aniline) (PANI), PLLA, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), poly(amide 11) (PA11), and poly(carbonate) (PC), among others, as well as with different ionic liquids (ILs). Those polymer blends allow to improve processability, nucleate specific crystalline phases, or tune optical and electrical properties, among others.

PVDF/PMMA is the most used blend in which the dynamic heterogeneity promotes the formation of the β-phase. Further, the piezoelectric effect increases with the addition of PMMA to PVDF. This blend has been applied in optical applications, separator membranes for Li-ion batteries, controllable wettability switching triggered by external electric field, pyroelectric application, as well as a coating for the conservation of historic structures exposed to atmospheric agents, among several other applications.

Another interesting blend is PLLA/PVDF, composed of two piezoelectric polymers and suitable for energy harvesting devices.

To enhance electrical properties, various blends of PVDF with conductive polymers (PANI), polypyrrole (PPy), and poly(3,4polyethylenedioxythiophene-polystyrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) have been produced for electrodes in sensors/actuators and biomedical applications.

Also, to improve dielectric strength and flexibility, blends of PVDF with poly(VDF-ter-TrFE-ter-CFE) have been developed, being suitable for dielectrics and energy storage applications, as the dielectric breakdown strength of this blend is improved due to increased modulus of elasticity and reduced mobility of the polymer chains.

More recently, PVDF blends with different ILs are being developed taking into account the tunability of ILs, leading to diverse applications from biomedicine to energy storage.,

Sustainability and Circular Economy Considerations

Considering the excellent properties and applicability of PVDF-based materials, leading to an increasing demand, sustainability, and end-of-life considerations are essential.

In terms of durability, PVDF polymer is highly durable as it can be reused and processed for up to five times, which is very important in advanced applications and in the scope of sustainability.

A life cycle assessment (LCA) has been carried out to assess the environmental impact of PVDF, in which an acceptable value for the global warming potential (GWP) has been obtained (55.8 kg CO2 equiv·kg–1 PVDF) due to the large demand for chlorine during its production.

With regard to processing and to increase sustainability, it has been demonstrated the suitability of replacing the conventional solvents with green solvents, including cyclic carbonate solvents and acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), among others.

To further reduce environmental impact, it is necessary to define more efficient processing and recycling routes, as this polymer starts to degrade at relatively low temperatures (>400 °C). Thermal degradation process such as thermolysis is used to reuse and recycle PVDF. Also, the decomposition of PVDF and its copolymers can be obtained by mineralization processes in subcritical water with the addition of KMnO4 as oxidizing agent.

One of the possible ways is mechanical recycling through remelting through extrusion. In the United States of America (USA) and Europe, several companies are specialized in recycling PVDF. Furthermore, considering that PVDF is a partially fluorinated polymer, more assessments of the toxicity and low carbon economy are important in the future.

In summary, considering its demand, two major producers (Solvay and Arkema) will expand its production capacity in the next year, being therefore urgent to reduce environmental impact all along the value chain of PVDF by implementing green chemistry, safe and recyclable by design concepts.

Applications

Initially, PVDF was used in wires, cables, and tubes, among others, based on its excellent mechanical properties, high thermal stability, and processability, but considering also its electroactive properties, it has been applied in high added-value applications such as sensors, actuators, energy harvesting, and storage systems, environmental, microfluidics, and biomedical applications, which is the focus of this review. Thus, in this review, the state-of-art and corresponding discussion are divided by application type.

Considering its wide range of applications, including sensors, actuators, energy harvesting, and storage, environmental monitoring and remediation and biomedicine (including microfluidics, portable analytical devices (point-of-care, POC)), Figure 5 shows the growing number of scientific articles published in recent years by focusing on PVDF and copolymers. The publications by application area are also stated.

Figure 5 shows the strong growth of works related to PVDF for various applications in recent years, focusing on the development and understanding of multifunctional composites, the development of advanced processing conditions and procedures, and the demonstration of their applicability in different areas.

In the following, the state of the art on the different application areas is presented, composed by a brief introduction, principal challenges, respective trends, and final remarks. A particular focus relies on the main functional, electroactive, and physicochemical properties of the developed materials, which as summarized in Figure 6, are also emphasized according to the application requirements.

The main property common to most applications is the piezoelectric effect, which is one of the main differential characteristics of PVDF-based polymers with respect to other polymers.

Furthermore, for many applications, the morphology of the samples plays a critical role, Figure 7 showing the main morphologies of PVDF-based materials required for the different applications.

Morphologies can be obtain through the different techniques previously discussed (section 2.1). Considering the different materials functional characteristics and morphologies, the state-of-art for each application area will be presented in the following.

Sensors

A sensor is a device that detects different stimuli and provides a specific response. Different types of sensors have been developed based on PVDF considering the specific stimulus, transduction mechanism, and materials morphology.

Over the past decades, PVDF-based sensors have experience a growing interest, as shown by the high number of published articles related to this subject (∼400) and the number of areas in which these materials had substantial impact ranging from engineering to medicine (Figure 8a).

Forty years separate the theoretical work of Lang et al. that introduced the idea of using PVDF stress sensors for biomedical piezoelectric palpation devices, and the very recent triboelectric sensor array for the IoT-based smart traffic monitoring and management system reported by Yan et al. that allows speed, overlapping, and overload detection as well as dynamic tidal flow regulation, under the framework of smart traffic control (Figure 8b). In this historical leap, the focus has shifted from the most fundamental studies (although there is still need for them) to the exploration of technological niches, to develop new technologies that respond to the requirements of modern cities and smart societies. The dramatic growth and densification in modern cities require smart solutions to address critical demands such as mobility, healthcare, energy, and civil infrastructure. In this context, the digitalization of the society and the economy, enabled by the IoT concept, is one of the most promising enabling technologies for tackling these challenges by creating interconnected physical objects, sensors, and networks. To ensure effective communication between all those objects/materials, smart materials, particularly piezoelectric, and pyroelectric ones, are needed; once these smart materials allow the development of sensors that can measure properties such as vibration, strain, temperature, and heat.

Even knowing that PVDF’s both piezoelectric and pyroelectric coefficients (including those found in its copolymers) are lower than those reported for ferroelectric ceramics, PVDF, its copolymers, and PVDF-based composites display relevant advantages for sensing applications such as softness and flexibility, lightweight, low electrical permittivity, small thermal conductivity, printability, and excellent impedance matching to both air and water.

For the above-mentioned characteristics, PVDF’s piezoelectric effect has been extensively used in technological applications that involve the detection of mechanical stimuli such as force, pressure, and strain (both compressive and tensile), tactile awareness, vibrational, acceleration, and acoustic. This widespread applicability is also intimately related to the PVDF’s broad frequency bandwidth, high sensitivity, robustness, easy processing, high environmental and chemical stability, and reliability. Also relevant is that PVDF-based sensing devices can be self-powered, only requiring a simple ground connection to one of their electrodes., This particular attribute is a pivotal milestone for sustainability, processability, and integrability in mobile, wearable and hard-to-access devices and objects, over competing sensing technologies., Additionally, the addition of fillers into the PVDF matrix, besides being able to increase the dielectric, pyroelectric, and piezoelectric responses of the polymeric matrix, also allows introduction of new functionalities/capabilities such as magnetic, ionic, or conductive, opening new application highways for other technological devices, such as magnetic sensors, moisture sensors or piezoresistive sensors.,

Important figures of merit (FOM) for PVDF-based sensors are the sensitivity (s) and electromechanical coupling coefficient (K), the sensitivity being highly dependent on the piezoelectric voltage coefficient (g). In practice, if the generated voltage signal is small, it has to be enhanced by an electronic amplifier. The electromechanical coupling coefficient k is usually used to describe such conversion efficiency between electrical and mechanical energy, according to eqs 1 and 2, where d refers to piezoelectric coefficient, ε′ refers to dielectric constant, ε0 refers to the permittivity of free space, and s refers to the compliance.

From the experimentally pioneer PVDF insole multisensor for pedobarography (study of the pressure distribution under the foot in standing and walking animals) developed by Pedotti et al., key innovations in the PVDF-sensing area are now related to the optimization of new structures or processing technologies for better performances (increasing electrical performance while maintaining flexibility), or new application scenarios that have rarely employed PVDF-based materials, such as piezotronics, spintronics, sensors based on luminescence (photo or mechano), steady-state sensors, and supersensitive cellular sensing devices.

This section highlights the use of PVDF in sensing technologies since the 1980s. It will focus on examples showcasing the use of PVDF-based materials on temperature, pH, gas, stress, biosensors/human health monitoring, and environmental sensing. In each of the examples, an emphasis will be given on detailing the polymer’s key feature to achieve the desired application and the reported FOM (sensitivity, selectivity, limit of detection, reproducibility, and stability) for the described sensing platforms.

Capacitive Sensors

In the 1960s, capacitive sensors started to be used to measure strains at high temperatures with good long-term stability., Capacitive sensors have some advantages such as low-power consumption (capacitive sensors do not consume DC currents), and the sensor output can be directly designed to digital output using energy-efficient capacitance-to-digital converter circuitry, avoiding nonidealities of voltage buffers and signal conditioning integrated circuits.

More recently, flexible pressure sensors have attracted much attention due to their ability to measure the local contact pressure and its spatial distribution with exceptional stability and repeatability. Such features are beneficial for a wide range of applications including prosthetics, health monitoring, or human–machine interaction. In this context, Luo et al. proposed a micropillar–PVDF device with high sensitivity (0.43 kPa–1) in the low-pressure regime (<1 kPa) and with a ΔC/C = 0.6 under a bending angle of 90°, suitable for capacitive pressure sensors on wearable devices and human-machine interactive tools.

PVDF has also been used in wearable applications for capacitive sensing in the form of fibers. The reported change in capacity in the PVDF sample reaches maximum values of ΔC/C = 0.38 for a pressure of 69.35 kPa. The introduction of TiO2 nanoparticles into the PVDF fiber composition increased the ΔC/C to the value of 0.47, which is appropriate for insole sensors in sports shoes. Still in composites, a (poly(VDF-co-HFP))/1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([EMIM][TFSI]) IL composite film (with a 6.5/3.5 weight ratio) has been proposed for textile-based capacitive pressure sensing. The proposed device exhibited a large value of ΔC/C (∼200) and a sensitivity of 9.51 kPa–1 for a pressure of 100 kPa. Additionally, a 3 × 3 pressure sensor array able to detect not only position but also weight and object types was discussed. In a different strategy and aiming the successful detection of harmful gases under the umbrella of wearable electronics, a bendable capacitive sensing device composed of UiO-66-NH2 and electrospun PVDF was also proposed. The ΔC/C = 0.01 allowed to detect small concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO2) (150 ppm), opening a new exciting application area in this type of polymer-based composites.

Pyroelectric Sensors

Once PVDF has piezoelectric properties and a robust pyroelectric response (dipolar variations induced by heat variations), it can be used for pyroelectric sensing as demonstrated by S. Pullano et al., which presented a ferroelectric polymer-based temperature sensor designed and optimized for microfluidic devices (area that will be discussed in more detail in section 3.5) (Figure 9).

The reported performance of the PVDF pyroelectric sensor (∼0.3 V voltage variation for a temperature range between 25 and 65 °C) took advantage of the high compatibility between PVDF and PMMA in the fabrication of disposable devices. Such performance can be even further improved with the inclusion of electronic microsystems such as low-noise complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) charge amplifiers and filtering tools on silicon boards. In a similar approach, the successful integration of a ∼28 μm thick film of PVDF into a system-on-a-chip board was achieved, facilitating the fast monitoring of temperature in specific sites of the biological fluid and avoiding errors in the assessment of thermal evolution of the fluid during the study. Such PVDF-based pyroelectric sensor can detect the absolute temperature instead of the temperature gradient, with a ∼0.005 s response time in a temperature range of −40 to 65 °C and with a sensitivity of 5 mV·°C–1.

From a theoretical point of view, Jia et al. conceived a PVDF-based pyroelectric sensor at the circuit level, being the theoretical model optimized with the introduction of experimental details in the environment of Multisim so that the simulated data could be accurately compared with real data. The theoretical sensitivity of the device was found to be 0.1063 V·°C–1, very similar to the experimentally measured one (0.1068 V·°C–1). Additionally, it was stated that the key features to achieve consistent simulated results were the: (i) intensity of pulse current and (ii) width of the current pulse.

Aiming to mimic some of the functionalities of human skin, Lee et al. demonstrated that an ∼80 μm thick polymer-based film (composed of PVDF, ZnO nanostructures, and graphene (Gr) electrodes) was capable of simultaneously measuring pressure (∼10 Pa resolution by sensing the electrical resistance variation through the piezoresistance of the material) and temperature (in the 20–120 °C range with a sensitivity of ∼13 mΩ·°C–1). Such a technological platform exhibited a pressure detection limit 3 orders of magnitude higher than the required for artificial skin with a sensitivity of ∼11 mΩ.Pa–1, opening promising application potential in the area of biorobotics.

Still with respect to the e-skin concept, a similar PVDF film with a thickness of ∼110 μm, a piezoelectric response of 106 pC·(Vm)−1, an area of 10 cm2, a pyroelectric coefficient of 300 C·(m2 °C)−1, and an output voltage of about 3 mV has been reported by Yuji et al. to monitor temperature variations of the human skin. The sensitivity was found to be 2 mV·°C–1 in the 10–50 °C temperature range.

A novel, lightweight, low-cost, and high flexible triboelectric nanogenerator composed of PVDF (6 cm × 3 cm × 1 mm), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and copper foil as the electrode was used by Zhu et al. as a self-powered temperature sensor, exhibiting a detection range of 10–90 °C, 0.01 s response time, and a 3.5 s reset time. Humidity was found to be an essential factor in the output voltage of the sensor: at 20 °C, the output voltages were 42, 37, and 32 V for a relative humidity of 70, 80, and 90%, respectively, being the sensitivity maximized for the measurement at 70% relative humidity conditions (2.1 mV.°C–1), showing a promising application potential in the environmental, safety, and biomedical fields.

By adding BaTiO3 into a poly(VDF-co-TrFE) matrix, Gupta et al. was able to monitor temperatures in the 26–70 °C range with an almost linear response and a sensitivity of 15.34 mV·°C–1, opening new and exciting directions for temperature tactile sensing in robotic applications.

In the same “composite strategy,” Hernández-Rivera et al. produced a piezoelectric PVDF/Gr membrane through electrospinning, for respiratory rate and temperature sensing with a maximum sensitivity of ∼0.34 pC·°C–1. Such sensors can be applied to other areas such as moisture, light, and pressure sensing due to their optimized electroactive properties.

Knowing that temperature sensing ability is essential for successful robot perception (allowing biomimetic information acquisition), Sun et al. developed a soft robotic manipulator capable of temperature sensing. The structure of the PVDF-based sensor composed of a poled PVDF film, silver (Ag) electrodes on both surfaces of PVDF, and a PET thin film packing allowed a sensitivity of 0.478 V·°C–1. When coupled to the triboelectric nanogenerator tactile sensory data, such temperature data obtained from the PVDF-based sensor can allow shape recognition of objects and devices, offering great potential for IoT-related human-machine interfaces.

Changing the focus to near-infrared (NIR) sensing/manipulation, Liu et al. proposed a flexible battery-less implantable device composed of Gr and PVDF. Such a device was found to exhibit a good relationship between its response (temperature, temperature-change rate, output open-circuit, voltage, and short-circuit current) and the NIR irradiation stimulus. The maximum voltage and current were 2 V and 200 nA, respectively. Additionally, the harvested energy was able to light up 4 commercial LEDs, stimulate a live rat’s heart and actuate a frog’s nerve, opening possible applications in the bioelectronics field.

Because PVDF cannot be directly used to detect light because of its weak absorption in the visible and NIR zone, the incorporation of nanostructures such as gold (Au) nanocages has been proposed to develop PVDF-based composites able to convert light into heat and electricity. A voltage output of 7.2 V, a current of 28.1 nA, and a temperature variation of 50 °C were detected when the PVDF/Au composite was subjected to NIR cycles (808 nm diode laser with a power density of 0.2 W·cm–2). More recently, electrospun PVDF/cesium tungsten oxide composites were evaluated for NIR-triggered pyroelectric sensing and harvesting. For the sample with 7 wt % (weight percentage) of cesium tungsten oxide it was determined that an output of 4.36 V and 214 nA (for a NIR radiation with 2.26 kW·m–2) was high enough to power liquid crystal display (LCD) timers and 4 LEDs.

Piezoelectric Sensors

Due to the wide frequency response range, wide pressure range (up to 20 GPa), high sensitivity, good mechanical properties, and easy processing, PVDF is the most used material for polymer-based stress, strain, impact, and vibration sensors. This reputation came in the 80s of the last century when Domenici et al. produced a shear stress detection sensor composed of an elastic layer of PVDF sandwiched between two rubber layers and fixed to a rigid substrate. The experimentally obtained sensitivity (6 nC·N–1·m–1) was double than the one predicted analytically (3 nC·N–1·m–1), a substantial difference in the sensor output attributed to factors such as the presence of friction between PVDF and rubber layers. Two decades later, Kärki et al. developed a stress sensing device prototype composed of commercial PVDF with four separated sensor components. The reported sensitivities were found to be 12.6 mV·N–1 for the normal force, 223.9 mV·N–1 for the anterior–posterior shear force, and 55.2 mV·N–1 for the medial–lateral shear force. Despite such promising results, the proposed sensor is only an early prototype; further developments such as the development of a matrix sensor, electronic components, array-type solutions, and long-term evaluation are still needed.

Following a different strategy, a PVDF (22 mm × 18 mm × 0.3 mm) piezoelectric smart sensor (PVDF as a sensing element that is insulated and protected by PET layers to ensure good toughness, tensile strength, and impact resistance) was used to monitor impact (Figure 10). For that, the PVDF-based sensor was placed into a multilayer structure and successfully applied to study the internal stress of the concrete core of a concrete-filled steel tubular column under impact loads with a sensitivity of ∼1.32 MPa·V–1.

The authors stated that similar PVDF-based impact sensors could be embedded in the concrete-filled steel tubular structures in a distributed way to evaluate the internal stress distribution when the material structure is exposed to impact loads.

With the aim to measure the interfacial stress of a composite aluminum (Al) beam with a deposited ice layer, Akitegetse et al. embedded ∼25 μm thick PVDF strips, reporting good repeatability in the measurements (standard deviation of 4–8%), providing a new and creative tool for the accurate measure of ice’s adhesion strength on different substrates. The proposed PVDF-based sensing device directly measured (through the piezoelectric effect) the mechanical stresses (0.5 MPa for an ice thickness of 2.5 mm, 0.2 MPa for an ice thickness of 4 mm, and 0.05 MPa for an ice thickness of 10 mm) induced by mechanical stimulus at the substrate/ice interface.

Four years later, Cai et al. designed a PVDF (∼30 μm × 30 mm2× 30 mm2) stress sensor with fast response (ns), high sensibility (49.2 GN·C–1), and wide working range (0–5 cm) suitable for antiexplosion elements.

Still, in an explosive/ballistic perspective, Ma et al. designed a temperature compensation of a PVDF stress sensor to be used to evaluate gun propellant charge compression stress with a sensitivity of ∼53 pC·N–1. Additionally, the maximum relative error after temperature compensation in the −40 to 30 °C range was found to be less than 0.0134%, revealing that PVDF stress sensors can be accurately used on the compression stress test of a gun’s propellant charge.

More recently, and linking biomedicine with robotics, Li et al. developed a built-in sensor system for internal shear strain and stress distribution measurement by embedding PVDF within the artificial skin of soft robotics. The determined 50 pC·mm–1 sensitivity is suitable for application in soft material strain/stress measurements and in soft robotics development. Electrospun PVDF was also used for vibration measurement in a string. The proposed sensor (composed of 218 ± 53 nm fibers) exhibited a linear relationship (0.2 mV·με–1) between output voltage (0–600 mV) and strain (0–2300 με).

pH and Gas Sensors

The sensing of pH value is relevant in many areas, such as chemical engineering, environmental industry, and the biomedical field. Due to the combined effect of the variation in surface chemistry and the roughness of the PVDF structure, linked to its high mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and thermal stability, this ferroelectric polymer is often used in pH sensing applications.

In this context, a self-powered pH sensor based on a PVDF/ZnO hybrid composite nanogenerator was produced through a solution-casting technique by Saravanakumar et al. The proposed PVDF/ZnO hybrid composite revealed a maximum open-circuit voltage of 6.9 V and a short-circuit current of 0.96 μA, with an output power of 6.624 μW under uniaxial compression that powered the sensor with a sensitivity of 0.06 V per pH unit (pH–1).

A pH-sensitive porous membrane composed of PVDF and acrylic acid was successfully synthesized through molecular graft copolymerization of acrylic acid with ozone-preactivated PVDF backbone. The flux of the aqueous solution through the PVDF-based sensor induced a strong and reversible dependence on pH solution (the solution flux through the membrane decreased from ∼5 mL·cm–2·min–1 to ∼2 mL·cm2–·min–1 with increasing pH from 1 to 6), a fact that proved the pH-sensing capability of the device. Flow measurements and caffeine release experiments performed with a similar membrane composition (PVDF/acrylic acid) showed that the porous structures exhibited a pH-dependent behavior. The solution flux through the membrane decreased from ∼4 mL·cm–2·min–1 to ∼1 mL·cm–2·min–1 with increasing pH from 1 to 6.5. Other preliminary results reported in the same work, related to release experiments with caffeine as a model drug, suggested that it is possible to use similar pH-sensitive-PVDF membranes to induce pH-sensitive dissolution of drugs. Ju el al. presented the development of antifouling PVDF/poly(methyl methacrylate-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-acrylic acid) microfiltration composite membranes for pH-sensing applications. Such membranes were found to have excellent pH sensitivity (the solution flux through the membrane decreased from ∼1 mL·cm–2·min–1 to ∼0.7 mL·cm2–·min–1 with increasing pH from 2 to 11), pH reversibility response, and good protein antifouling properties.

More recently, Pastore et al. improved the pH determination of a PVDF-based colorimetric sensor by combining two acid–base indicators (tetrabromophenol blue and phenol Red), the resulting hue being detected with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. The reported inflection prediction error of the sensor was in the range of 0.01–0.16 pH unit, and the sensitivity (ΔH/ΔpH) of 1.01 is appropriate for pH colorimetric sensors.

Changing the focus to the biomedical area and knowing that detecting the pH value at the wound sites could monitor and support the wound healing process, Zhao et al. fabricated a PANI-modified PVDF yarn for pH sensing, being reported an 8.53 mV·pH–1 sensitivity in the pH range from 4.0 to 8.0. Such performance proved that the electrospun PANI-PVDF yarn has high potential application in smart surgery dressings.

PVDF has also been used in gas sensing devices due to its flexibility, mechanical strength, thermal stability, tailorable porosity, and superior adsorption and desorption characteristics. In this line, a PVDF/palladium (Pd) all-optical laser-intensity-amplitude-modulated hydrogen (H2) sensor has been produced by Mandelis et al. The detection range of this durable and robust sensor (0.2 −100% of hydrogen volume concentration) is suitable for sensitive monitoring of the explosive range (4% by volume of H2 in the air), the sensor’s output reflectivity varying from ∼0.273 to ∼0.250 when the H2 volume concentration increases from 0.2 to 100%. A solid-state sensor for detecting H2 gas concentrations as small as 0.075% in volume has been developed based on commercial PVDF pyroelectric films sputter-coated with Pd (or an aluminum-nickel (Al-Ni) double layer). The high resolution is related to the variation of the pyroelectric coefficient of the film due to electrostatic interactions of adsorbed H2 ions with the PVDF matrix upon hydrogenation and selective absorption by the metallic coating.

PVDF/iron vanadate (FeVO4) porous layers produced by a doctor blade have been successfully tested for oxygen (O2) sensing devices, being the best sensitivity (resistance of O2/resistance of nitrogen (N2)) of 0.29 ± 0.01 obtained at an optimal working temperature of 250 °C. The trapping of electrons can explain such high sensitivity to adsorbed O2 species and the resulting band bending that caused the measured resistance change.

The AC/DC electrical properties of Li and PVDF/titanium (Ti) codoped nickel oxide (NiO) composites were studied and optimized for their use as ammonia (NH3) sensors. It was discovered that the response time (decreasing from ∼250 s to ∼30 s with increasing temperature from 300 to 420 °C) and sensitivity (decreasing from ∼0.12 to ∼0 ppm–1 with increasing temperature from 300 to 420 °C) of the sensor was strongly dependent on temperature.

After proposing a new type of organic H2 gas sensor in which a β-PVDF film was coated with thin films of Pd on both sides with a sensitivity of ∼50 mV·L–1·min–1, Imai et al. (Figure 11a,b) tested the response characteristics of the sensors (response at H2 exposure ∼100%, detection sensitivity of ∼250 mV·L–1·min–1 and recovery time of ∼500 s), demonstrating that the characteristics of the sensor response depends on the PVDF’s microstructure.

In the field of resonators, a mechanical resonator made of a thin glass plate driven by ferroelectric PVDF polymer foils was optimized for N2-sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas flow and humidity measurements. The particular 2/0 mode vibrational deflection of the plate was selected, as it ensures high sensitivity (the resolution was in the order of 2% relative humidity and 0.2 m·s–1 gas flow), appropriate for the determination of both the density of gases and humidity in the air.

Chen et al. also applied a resonator composed of ZnO piezoelectric stack, a tungsten/silicon dioxide (W/SiO2) Bragg reflector, and a PVDF sensing material for the detection of nerve gas. The testing results revealed that the proposed resonator has high sensitivity (718 kHz·ppm–1), reversibility (15 min recovery), and reproducibility (over 30 days) in the sensing of nerve gas.

More recently, Xu et al. incorporated porous PVDF/Gr membranes on surface acoustic wave sensors to increase the sensor’s response time. The sensitivity of the dimethyl methyl phosphonate (DMMP) sensor reached the remarkable value of −1.407 kHz·ppm–1, the response time and recovery time of the sensor being improved 4.5 and 5.8 s, respectively, with the incorporation of the PVDF/Gr membranes. The much improved performance was explained through increased adsorption as a result of the electrostatic interaction between DMMP and PVDF chains.

Biomedical Sensors

The capability of transforming electrical stimuli into mechanical response, and mechanical stimuli to electrical response, in combination with the excellent physical, chemical, and mechanical characteristics of PVDF and its copolymers, have been increasingly applied in the biomedical field to develop biosensors and tools for health monitoring.

One of the most cited work on the use of PVDF-based biosensors is the one from Manesh et al., regarding the evaluation of electrospun PVDF/poly(aminophenylboronic acid) (PAPBA) composite nanofibrous membranes as a glucose sensor. The sensor worked on the 1–15 mM glucose concentration range with a sensitivity of 2.3 μA·mM–1, linearity of 0.997, and a response time of less than 6 s, all those features being stable over 50 days. Such work opened the way for the electrospinning technology to be extended to the fabrication of other sensors through judicious loading of sensing materials into the polymer-based fibrous matrix.

A similar strategy was followed by Zhang et al. by adding multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and platinum (Pt) nanoparticles to PVDF. After electrospinning, polymer-based nanofibrous membranes were obtained with highly stable biosensing properties (with selective detection of both hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and glucose with a sensitivity of −0.2 μA·mM–1). Such composite structures can be easily used in other technological applications such as energy storage, cytology, and tissue engineering.

Tanaka et al. designed a haptic finger using PVDF piezopolymer films as a sensory receptor. The suitability of the proposed sensor to monitor human skin conditions was investigated after sliding the sensor over skin surfaces from 30 people, being found that the two parameters (index of roughness and hardness) generated using such haptic finger displayed good agreement with subjective/clinical assessments of the tested skin conditions. PVDF sensor output from 0 to ∼30 mV allowed conclusion that from all 30 persons who participated in the study, 5 exhibited xerosis, 7 atopic dermatitis, and 2 psoriases. Such results were encouraging for looking at the suitability of similar devices in other fields, such as the cosmetic area, where the variations of skin properties are more subtle and more challenging to be detected.

Knowing that problematic and recurrent sleep apnea upsets the sleep of humans and that it can lead to sleep disorders such as severe snoring, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and systemic hypertension, Hwang et al. presented a sleep apnea monitoring method based on PVDF sensors (4 × 1 array with ∼1.1 mm thick) for continuous and accurate monitoring of apneic events that occurred during sleep. The correlation coefficient of the sensors for the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) values was determined to be 0.94. The areas under the receiver operating curves at three AHI threshold levels (>5, >15, and >20) for sleep apnea diagnosis were 0.98, 0.99, and 0.98, respectively, and most importantly, for minute-by-minute apnea detection, the method classified sleep apnea with an average sensitivity of 72.9%, specificity of 90.6%, accuracy of 85.5% and kappa statistic of 0.60. All of these experimental results validate the PVDF sensor system for the monitoring/detection of sleep apnea in both home and ambulatory environments.

Being the continuous glucose sensing with reliable in vivo performance expected to improve glucose concentration regulation and thus reduce the number of complications related to diabetes mellitus, PVDF-Nafion nanomembranes coated microneedles were produced for in vivo transcutaneous implantable glucose sensing (Figure 12).

The obtained porous structure with a nanosphere top layer fabricated using one-time deposition avoided multiple dipping and subsequent loss of enzyme activity, leading to high selectivity, low response time (30 s), high sensitivity (∼0.23 μA.mM–1), and high linearity (R2 = 0.998) in the 0–20 mmol·L–1 range. Additionally, reliable in vivo test results in mice were reported.

Aiming also to detect glucose, Xing et al. introduced nickel(II) hydroxide (Ni(OH)2) and CNTs into a PVDF matrix, obtaining a highly stable sensing material whose stability was confirmed by cyclic voltammetry measurements in sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH) (0.50 M, scan rate 100 mV·s–1). The PVDF-based composite films maintained the electrocatalytic activity of the nano-Ni(OH)2 and, for such reason, was used to fabricate a nonenzymatic biosensors for electrochemical detection of glucose. Amperometric measurements revealed that the proposed sensor exhibited good anti-interference properties toward some substances (maltose, fructose, urea, and AA), with a reported detection limit of 0.023 mM and a wide linear range from 0.25 to 39.26 mM (R2 = 0.998), which are comparable with commercially available blood glucose sensors. The calculated sensitivity was 0.65 μA·mM–1 with a deviation of less than 5%.

Another glucose sensing device was developed using a capacitive biosensor based on PVDF thin film, consisting of a PVDF film sandwiched between two Ag electrodes. The sensor was evaluated for glucose concentrations in the 0.013–5.85 M range and various glucose oxidase (GOx) enzyme concentrations between 4882.8 and 2.5 million units·L–1, reported that the device output increased from 0 to ∼5.5 μV with increasing glucose concentration up to 5.85 M, showing a detection limit of 1.3 × 10–2 M.

Regarding antigen sensing, Sanguino et al. reported the use of PVDF Immobilon-P as a sensitive layer coupled with a transducer to function as affinity immunosensors, able to distinguish phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer and antigen horseradish peroxidase (HRP) solutions, based on the capacitance variations (PBS, 0 to −0.6 pF; and HRP, 0 to 0.1 pF). Such measurements could be taken at a fixed frequency, making the sensor instrumentation particularly simple and easily scalable for practical applications such as clinical diagnosis, food monitoring, industrial controls, and environmental measurements.

Once nucleic acid testing (NAT) represents stable, safe, selective, and specific detection of infectious and inherited diseases, a new diaphragm mass biosensor based on PVDF piezoelectric film was developed for detecting nucleic acids. Experimental results showed that the mass sensitivity was 0.185 kHz·μg–1, obtained for a diaphragm with a diameter of 5 mm. Additionally, the value of frequency shift was found to be directly proportional to the content of the target solution. Such performance validated the PVDF-based sensor for low-cost real-time fabrication of NAT tools.

With respect to electrochromic sensing, Santiago-Malagón et al. used a PVDF-based ion-gel electrolyte (poly(VDF-co-HFP), IL 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate, EMIM-Tf, and potassium triflate) to protect the cathode display and to provide an adequate chemical environment for the operation of a skin-patch electrochromic lactate biosensor. Such a protection layer avoided the bleaching of the cathode by acids (ascorbic and uric). The sensor was found to work with lactate concentrations in the range of 0–10 mM with a contrast ratio of 1.43, up to 24 min response time, and 85% of the color change displayed within 10 min. The skin-patch electrochromic lactate biosensor represents a promising route for controlling target molecules that are exerted through perspiration.

Environmental Sensors

Among several materials used for the fabrication of polymer-based environmental sensors, PVDF is one of the most commonly used due not only to its excellent mechanical strength and high thermal and chemical resistance but also because this polymer withstands chlorine disinfection.

Aiming to evaluate random environmental vibrations (such as wind flow, waterfall, or transportation of vehicles), a large area, highly sensitive, and flexible pressure sensor has been produced based on electrospun Ce3+/PVDF/Gr composite nanofibers. The developed Ce3+/PVDF/Gr composite sensing device could detect pressure as low as ∼2 Pa with high sensitivity (30 mV·Pa–1). Furthermore, the Ce3+/PVDF/Gr composite sensor could also be used as an effective nanogenerator as it can generate an output voltage of 11 V with a current density of ∼6 nA·cm–2 upon repetitive application of mechanical stress, making this device self-powered.

Also, from a “self-powered device” perspective, Guo et al. developed a stretchable sensor fabricated by serpentine PVDF film for multiple dynamic monitoring, which can efficiently detect various mechanical stimuli relevant to specific environmental or biological species. The serpentine device, composed of three layers, with two aluminum layers coated on a piezoelectric PVDF film, exhibited a sensitivity of 6mV·stretch–1 and a maximum voltage of 350 mV at a frequency of 10 Hz.

Once humidity sensors are widely required in agriculture, environmental conservation, and climatology, PVDF/Gr membranes were evaluated as capacitive humidity sensors (Figure 13).

PVDF blended with Gr was developed to improve the PVDF electrical properties, allowing the use of PVDF/Gr membranes as capacitive humidity sensors. The observed good response time (18 s), high sensitivity (0.0463 pF/% of relative humidity), repeatability, linearity (R2 = 0.993), and low noise of the PVDF/Gr composite membrane sensors open other possible applications such as filtration, growth of living tissues, and prosthetics applications.

To explore underwater environments and operate in underwater missions, sensing the surrounding environment is an essential topic for developing innovative underwater robots. Once this issue is particularly sensitive on robotic fish, a PVDF pressure sensor was developed and integrated with a small water-proofed charge amplifier. The pressure PVDF-based sensor was optimized in a water tank, reporting a sensitivity of 0.071 Pa·mV–1. This sensor can be used to study other fishes and their actions/reactions in real-time.

Other environmental stimuli, such as light or pressure, can also be monitored by using both piezoelectricity and pyroelectricity of PVDF. Multipiezo/pyroelectric sensors with transparent electrodes (Ag nanowires and PEDOT:PSS) exhibit a pressure and light sensitivity of 80 mV·Pa–1 and 42 V·cm2·W–1, respectively. These values are favorably compared to the ones of Al-based electrodes, with the advantage of defining the electrodes directly on the sensitive foil. The reported optimized sensors reach root-mean-square powers for the piezoelectric effect and pyroelectric effect of ∼1 μW and ∼0.42 μW, respectively, for an active PVDF area of 8 cm2. This strategy makes it easy to detect and quantify all kinds of environmental properties such as humidity, pressure, heat, light, or vibration.

More recently, Jang et al. developed PVDF/ZnO-based hydrazine sensors. As a working principle, ZnO was previously functionalized with poly(VDF-co-HFP) to expose the polymeric chains to hydrazine, allowing physical H2 bonding/interactions that induced a change in the charge transfer properties of the ZnO films and improved the sensing behavior of the device. Hydrazine is regarded as a toxic and carcinogenic chemical that damages the liver, lungs, kidneys, and central nervous system (CNS), and for such reason, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has limited the threshold in drinking water to less than 10 ppb (∼0.3 μmol·L–1). Thus, the study reported by Jang et al. is in line with the need to define suitable sensing strategies of the toxic hydrazine. The PVDF/ZnO-based sensor exhibited hydrazine detection limits up to 0.01 nM (sub-ppt level) and reproducibility over 96%.

Magnetic Sensors

Besides the nucleation of the electroactive phases of PVDF (such as β or γ), the addition of fillers induces additional effects that bring added value to the use of PVDF-based nanocomposites for technological applications. As an essential family of PVDF-based nanocomposites, magnetic nanocomposites with magnetically responsive features have attracted increasing attention because of their magnetic functionality and wireless activation.,

Despite PVDF-based magnetic composites find many major applications as actuators, vibration control, ultrasonic transducers, batteries, filters, chemical warfare protection, and in the biological field, their impact with respect to magnetoelectric sensing applications are particularly interesting. For example, the addition of magnetostrictive fillers into the PVDF matrix allows the production of all-printed multilayer magnetic-responsive materials with improved magnetoelectric response suitable for sensing devices, transparent magnetoelectric materials for advanced invisible sensing applications, and anisotropic magnetoelectric sensors with good linearity (R2 = 0.995) with application potential on digital compasses, global positioning system (GPS) devices, and biomedical sensing.

It has been reported that the introduction of different nanoparticles into a poly(VDF-co-TrFE) matrix, such as Zn0.2Mn0.8Fe2O4 (ZMFO), CoFe2O4, and Fe3O4, do not change the piezoelectric response of the polymer matrix (∼−28 pC·N–1) but leads to distinct magnetoelectric responses, such as 6.5 mV·cm–1·Oe–1, at an optimum magnetic field of 0.26 T, and 0.8 mV·cm–1·Oe–1, at an optimum magnetic field of 0.15T, for poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/CoFe2O4 and poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/Fe3O4 composites, respectively. In contrast, the magnetoelectric response of poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/ZMFO showed no hysteresis and high dependence on the ZMFO filler content. Such findings allow further tailoring of the magnetoelectric sensing properties for specific magnetic environments.

Regarding laminated composites, the combination of PVDF and Vitrovac 4040 materials on trilayered and bilayered magnetoelectric flexible composite structures of varying geometries and sizes allowed to optimize the magnetic sensitivity of polymer-based magnetic sensors (Figure 14).

From the magnetoelectric measurements, it was confirmed that trilayered composite structures, i.e., MPM type, revealed a higher magnetoelectric response (75 V·cm–1·Oe–1) than the bilayer structure (66 V·cm–1·.Oe–1). Additionally, the magnetoelectric voltage coefficient decreased with an increasing longitudinal aspect ratio between PVDF and Vitrovac layers (from 1.1 to 4.3), with a maximum magnetoelectric voltage coefficient of 66 V·cm–1·Oe–1.

A PVDF/carbonyl magnetic composite film was produced to be used as magnetic field and deformation bisensor. It was reported that when the magnetic field varied from 0 to 600 mT, the generated magnetoelectric charges of PVDF/carbonyl film increased from 0 to 676 pC (sensitivity of ∼1.13 pC·mT–1). The quantitative relationship between the magnetic field and magnetoelectric charges was obtained by the polynomial fitting method, and the correlation coefficient was up to ∼0.97. Additionally, and experimentally proving the bisensing properties, the piezoelectric charges under 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm bending displacement were 3.0, 9.6, 14.9, 18.6, and 24.6 pC, respectively. Due to the optimized piezoelectricity, excellent stability, lightweight, and high flexibility, PVDF/carbonyl magnetic composite films showed promising applications in deformation sensors and magnetic field sensors.

A different magnetoelectric coupling/sensing technology was introduced by Brito-Pereira et al., where a poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/wax/CoFe2O4 magnetic sensing device was screen printed, revealing a R2 of 0.9991 and a sensitivity of 30 V·T–1. The device was able to harvest magnetic energy with a maximum output power density of 9.7 mW·cm–3, demonstrating self-powered sensing capability. Contrary to the traditional magnetoelectric effect on composites (piezoelectric effect coupled to magnetostrictive effect through mechanical interactions) in the magnetoelectric effect reported in this study, the piezoelectric poly(VDF-co-TrFE) is mechanically activated through the movement of a coupled layer rich in magnetic components (wax/CoFe2O4), which in turn was activated by the magnetic force of an approaching magnet. Such magnetoelectric coupling and sensing/harvesting performance allied to Bluetooth connectivity offers excellent potential for incorporation in IoT-related applications.

In an environmentally friendlier approach, and knowing that due to its highest piezoelectric response among polymers and capability to crystalize into the piezoelectric β-phase, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) is the most suitable polymer for polymer-based magnetoelectric sensing materials (with over 80% of the total reports), Lima et al. evaluated the possibility to change the traditionally used DMF solvent (a toxic chemical) by greener ones, demonstrating that poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites can be successfully prepared from solution using environmentally friendlier solvents (DMSO, DMPU, and triethyl phosphate (TEO)). It was shown that the prepared composite films, with a maximum magnetoelectric voltage coefficient of 35 mV cm–1·Oe–1 and a maximum sensitivity of 2.2 mV·T–1 are suitable for applications, highlighting the path for a new generation of more sustainable magnetoelectric sensors.

Other Sensors and Materials

Due to the already mentioned outstanding properties such as excellent chemical resistance, thermal stability, small acoustic impedances, high electrical insulation, high flexibility, and membrane forming features, PVDF-based sensors are effectively used in a vast variety of other application areas.

More recently, PVDF-based materials have gained considerable attention in electromagnetic shielding. Due to the ever-increasing use of electronic devices and wireless technologies, electromagnetic interference (EMI) has become a significant concern in the framework of the digitalization of society. PVDF shows great potential as an effective EMI shielding material in the form of composites, that have already demonstrated excellent EMI shielding performance through the ability to block or absorb electromagnetic waves, and to protect sensitive electronic components from environmental interference.,

These composites have been produced from various fillers, such as conductive (carbonaceous), magnetic (ferrite), and ceramic (ZnO) particles, among others, where the morphology and size of the fillers, their dispersion and other parameters such as the thickness of the composite play an important role in the electromagnetic shielding performance. To improve its performance, it is essential to further understand and tune the interfaces established between the fillers and the PVDF matrix.

Pressure sensors are an increasingly popular application area of PVDF-based materials, the work of A. Shirinov et al. being an excellent example of this, once it reported a pressure sensor with a PVDF foil that is a low-cost alternative for the measurement of pressure changes (∼3 V output for a ∼200 kPa input) in chemically aggressive media with a limited need for accuracy. This type of sensor can be used in the biomedical area, namely in endoscopic graspers with high sensitivity (50 V·N–1), an extensive dynamic range (near static up to a few MHz), and a high signal-to-noise ratio.

In the cases that sensors are required to measure small deformations, such as wearable cardiorespiratory signal sensor devices for monitoring sleep conditions, electronic components (amplifiers) can magnify the signal to a certain level. The applicability range of PVDF sensors for vital signal measurements was increased by Y. Wang et al., opening new directions such as sensing garment pressure, blood pressure, heartbeat rate, respiration rate, and accidental impacts on the human body. PVDF nanofibrous fabrics were prepared by electrospinning with excellent sensitivity (42 mV·N–1) and high response to external mechanical forces (∼4 N).

By adding 2 wt % of functionalized Gr into PVDF, Eswaraiah et al. optimized the strain sensing performance under tensile loads, useful for applications such as advanced aerospace, mechanical, bionics, and medical technologies. With the use of different carbonaceous nanofillers (few-layer graphene (FLG), graphene nanoplatelets (G-NPL), graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNH)), Costa et al. increased the electrical conductivity 9 orders of magnitude, from σ ∼5 × 10–11 S·m–1 from pure PVDF to σ ∼1 × 10–2 S·m–1 for rGO/PVDF composites, with 5 wt % nanofillers, reaching high linearity and significant piezoresistive gauge factors of ∼11 for deformations between 0.5 and 2 mm, very useful for strain sensing applications.

Table 2 summarizes the application area, materials, and FOM for the different sensor types discussed in this section.

Considering the applicability of PVDF-based materials in different sensors types and all the promising advances summarized in Table 2, the time ahead is even more challenging and encouraging for the development of low-cost, low-waste, low-energy sensors, with improved performance, microstructures, and integration into both rigid and flexible substrates.

Actuators

PVDF and its copolymers have been extensively studied and applied in the field of actuators, commonly defined as systems able to convert an energy from an external source into a mechanical energy in a controllable way. Particularly, actuators based on smart materials present the ability to modify their shape when environmental changes occur (e.g., pH, electrical signals, magnetic inputs, temperature variations, among others) by transducing the specific input into motion.

Actuators have been attracted significant attention for applications owing to their strong potential in different fields, including microelectronics and fabrication, soft robotics, haptics, microfluidic systems, and medical devices.

Different types of actuators have been developed based on different types of materials, such as shape memory alloys (SMA), piezoelectric, electroactive polymers (electronic and ionic), electrostatic, magnetoactive, and ferrofluids. Among them, polymer-based actuators have gained special attention mainly due to their tunable physical and chemical properties, easy processability in different morphologies and shapes, and the wide range of physicochemical inputs promoting conformation variations, and the broad range of stress and strain outputs. The actuation mechanism of polymer-based actuators is classified attending to the input stimulus: electric field, magnetic field, ionic, pneumatic, and thermal, electromechanical polymer-based actuators being the most extensively studied.

Significant efforts have been devoted to develop electromechanical actuators with rapid responses at low applied voltages and controllable displacement and frequency. Additionally, increased attention has been devoted to fabricating actuators with reduced size and a wide range of performance., Different materials such as electroactive and shape memory polymers, SMA, and pressurized fluids are commonly employed in the development of actuators. Among all the above-mentioned materials, electromechanical actuators based on electroactive polymers (EAP) represent one of the most suitable approaches mainly due to their flexibility, lightweight, low-cost, and the ability to achieve higher actuation strains, typically over 300–400%. Advanced EAP materials have been developed since the beginning of the 1990s and can induce large strains, 2 orders of magnitude higher than electroactive ceramics (EAC) and with a faster response speed, improved resilience, and lower density in comparison with SMA as represented in Table 3. Due to their intrinsic characteristics, such as piezoelectric responsiveness, PVDF and its copolymers are the electroactive polymers most studied in the field of EAPs actuators. Further, when compared with inorganic piezoelectric materials (e.g., lead zirconate titanate or zinc oxide, among others) these polymers presents large advantages like their high polarity, dielectric constant, easy processing, mechanical robustness and flexibility, and low price. It is noticeable that PVDF and its copolymers can be also easily combined with different materials namely ILs, GO, or magnetic nanoparticles, among others, aiming to the implementation of novel functionalities in the actuators, including self-sensing characteristics.

Depending on the actuation mechanism, EAP-based actuators are classified into two distinct types: electronic or ionic EAP-based actuators. The principle of both electronic and ionic EAP-based actuators is activated through the application of an electrical potential, with the main difference relying on the energy transference mechanism. In electronic EAP actuators, the transference of energy is governed by the electronic and/or dipolar structure, while in ionic EAP actuators the energy transference occurs by ions. The difference in the mechanism transference process between both types of the above-mentioned actuators determine different advantages and disadvantages, specifically associated with the actuation force variation and applied voltage.

Among these types of materials, ionic electroactive materials have gained particular attention due to their ability to operate at low driving voltages, their flexibility, lightweight, and low-cost, overcoming the high voltages required to achieve large actuation strains by electronic electroactive materials.Table 4 summarizes the main advantages of electronic and ionic EAP.

Electronic Electroactive Polymers-Based Actuators

Within electronic actuators, piezoelectric polymers have been extensively explored as soft actuators instead of piezoceramics due to their higher stretchability, lower density, and shape adaptability. In fact, piezoelectric polymers can be easily processed into different morphologies and shapes with an ordered crystalline phase and high-density dipole moments. Besides the low piezoelectricity of polymers compared to piezoelectric crystals and ceramics, their unique mechanical properties expand the interest and application of piezoelectric materials as actuators.

The working principle of EAP-based actuators developed by using piezoelectric polymers relies on the electrical field induced mechanical variations or mechanically induced electrical variations related to dipolar variations. They are characterized by a rapid response time, high applied driving fields, large operation forces, and low displacements in both directions. Another type of electronic EAP occurs in dielectric elastomers (DE) and rely on the Maxwell stress as actuator principle: when the energy is applied to the polymer of electronic EAP and transferred through the electrodes (covering the material on either side). The resulted Maxwell stress created by the applied electric field leads to the shape material deformation of the polymeric material. However, it is difficult to establish a precise relationship between the voltage and actuator displacement due to the creep phenomena, vibration, and hysteresis.

Several advantages associated to dielectric elastomer actuators are their actuation under a DC applied voltage, their workability in dry conditions, allowing a long-term actuation. Further, they present a fast response time and a deformation maintenance under the application of a constant DC voltage. Additionally, they also presents a high density of mechanical energy and large operation forces comparatively to ionic EAP actuators. However, the deformation only occurs in one direction and high operation voltages of approximately 150 MV·m–1 are required to the deformation process, leading to the necessity of use special circuits.

By comparing piezoelectric actuators with electromagnetic actuators, piezoelectric ones are the most promising developed microactuators due to their easy fabrication, compact size, fast response, low noise, and lightweight/cost-effectiveness enabling electromechanical devices. Further, the integration of multiple piezoelectric stages leads to the enhancement of the functionality of piezoelectric actuators and promotes the achievement of multiple degrees of freedom motion by stepping piezoelectric actuators or direct actuation from traditional actuators.

This type of actuator has been applied in different fields, such as soft robotics, artificial muscles, and electronic devices, leading to a considerable market demand resulting in new piezoelectric materials and devices every year.

The piezoelectric actuator configuration depends on the application, being the critical specifications related to the actuator’s force, displacement, and operating voltage. Other important factors that strongly affect the actuator performance are the material stiffness, capacitance (function of the excitation voltage frequency), and resonant frequency (frequency response to the maximum output amplitude actuator response). Specifically to piezoelectric actuators, the critical parameter is the force needed to promote the elongation of the device, usually in terms of N·μm–1.

Among all piezoelectric polymers, PVDF and its copolymers are the most widely exploited in developing piezoelectric actuators due to its lightweight, easy processability, high flexibility, and presence of a polar β-phase responsible for its piezoelectric properties, with the dipole aligned in the same direction. The combination of PVDF’s higher flexibility with a most significant amount of β-phase leads to the development of actuators without needing an additional postprocessing method. Poly(VDF-co-TrFE) copolymer developed a high strain of 4% compared to piezoelectric ceramics (∼0.2%).

PVDF-based actuators have been applied in different fields, such as controlled displays, acoustic emission monitoring tools, artificial muscles, and robots. Ultrasonic PVDF-based actuators were developed for the first time in 1972, being the first electro-acoustic actuators commercialized in 1975.

Self-Sensing and Shape Memory Bending Actuators

The principle of self-sensing bending actuators is based on the applied voltage and current, the actuator deflection detected from the electrical driving voltage. Also, the high-frequency detection concerning the electrical impedance deformation-dependence on the actuator, including resistance and capacitance, enables a self-sensing actuator. The piezoelectric element can also be used as an actuator and sensor (time-sharing approach). This type of actuator is generally used on dynamic unloaded operations, allowing the control of a cantilever without load at the tip.

PVDF has been explored for self-sensing actuators development. As an example, it has been used in the design of an integrated sensory actuator in which PVDF films were bonded to an ionic polymer–metal composite (IPMC), and a differential charge sensing circuit was used to provide feedback on displacement and force outputs of the IPMC actuator (Figure 15a). Differential configurations for sensing were used, eliminating sensing signals by thermal drift or feedthrough signal actuation. The developed system well-captured interaction forces as low as μN.

PVDF/PZT composites with a significantly increase in the d33 value have been developed by extrusion casting and their electromechanical strain properties evaluated. An increase in the mechanical strain with the electrical field intensity occurs, reaching 0.8 μm at an applied electric field of 200 kV·mm–1. PZT/PVDF film reached a |d33| value of 35 pC·N–1 and an electromecanical actuation of 1.6% (higher than a piezoelectric ceramic).

PVDF has been also combined with indium tin oxide (ITO) (ITO/PVDF) and with CNTs for self-sensing and microactuator applications in order to explore the induced displacement under applied voltage and varying frequency using a laser displacement sensor. The CNT/PVDF nanocomposites exhibited better performance as self-sensors and microactuators (∼0.1% under an applied voltage of 10 V at 0.5 Hz).

Another interesting class of actuators relies on shape memory piezoelectric materials being the operation of this type of actuator based on the application of small pulsed voltages, leading to small consumption operation (Figure 15b). This type of actuator presents substantial advantages when compared with piezoelectric actuators, namely when applied as a mechanical relay switch, requiring the operation of a continuous voltage to maintain “on” and “off” conditions. Further, piezoelectric actuators require a large DC voltage to be applied for a stable, specific actuator position, implying the use of large electric amplifiers. Contrarily to piezoelectric actuators, shape piezoelectric actuators allow an actuator stable position, concerning the modes “on” and “off” of the actuator, without an applying electrical field, being the actuator stable in the two positions. The actuator polarization is reversed after an applied voltage. With the switch changing from “on” to “off” by applying a pulsed voltage, a reverse of the polarization occurs, the electrical source being able to be disconnected, leading to reduced energy consumption. It is noticeable that the actuator voltage shape can be conducted by a pulsed shape voltage generated by combining a small voltage source with transformers and capacitors. The charge accumulation to the capacitor allows the shape memory actuator operation as a pulsed voltage (through the transformer).

As a piezoelectric polymer, PVDF has been used to develop shape memory piezoelectric actuators. To achieve a maximum bending of a cantilever actuator, a PVDF-based unimorph actuator was integrated with a shape memory polymer (poly(urethane) (PU) (Scotch tape-PVDF-SMP). A simulation study was performed being observed that the heat generated by the piezoelectric PVDF layer contributed to the total actuator deformation. Further, the generated heat can be used to increase the maximum bending of the actuator. The shape memory polymer layer length and mounting location influence the bending motion of the actuator, and the use of an equal layer of PVDF at the center of the actuator results in a bending angle increase to 40° when compared to the bending resulting from the piezo bending (4°) at 20 V.μm–1. Different cantilever PVDF-based actuators have also been developed, displaying the Scotch tape-PVDF-SMP layer-based actuator the highest bending performance, as summarized in Table 5.

PVDF films have also been combined with SMA to develop gripper actuators with force improvement performance and control of the position. Despite the shape memory actuator advantages (simple structure and high energy density), it is challenging to control the output force. The combination of both types of materials is of great interest for the tactile control of the force feedback of the driven gripper, allowing an accurate grasping control and a rapid response.

Electrospun PVDF fibers also present potential for actuation, increasing the actuation performance with the introduction of MWCNTs, reaching deformations up to 24 μm under an applied electric field of 4 V·μm–1 (Figure 16).

Table 6 summarizes studies concerning the development of electrospun actuators based on PVDF nanofibers.

Ionic Electroactive Polymer-Based Actuators

With respect to ionic EAP actuators, significant efforts have been performed, especially based on the combination of PVDF with conducting polymers, CNTs or ILs commonly defined as salts entirely composed by cations and anions. The later are receiving increasing attention based on the large bending actuations at low driving voltages. ILs have unique characteristics such as high ionic conductivity and an excellent electrochemical and chemical stability. The incorporation of ILs within a fluorinated matrix allows tailoring the bending response of the actuator and moreover, the physicochemical properties and improve the electroactive response of PVDF.

Electromechanical Ionic Actuation Mechanism

Electromechanical ionic actuators allow to convert the electrical signals into the development of a mechanical force, resulting in a displacement. In general, there are composed by a separator and two electrode layers. The principle of actuation mechanism of ionic EAP actuators is based on the transference of the applied energy by ions, with the ions movement occurring between two electrodes. The ions movement leads to an imbalance of ions distribution within a material, resulting in a pressure gradient that induces a mechanical deformation.

The actuation displacement mechanism is controlled by the applied frequency and the applied current–voltage. The displacement results from an applied AC or DC voltage, and it is evaluated by the movement of the actuator using eq 3, attending to electrode area and the strain of the sample through the thickness of the actuator (d), the developed displacement along the x axes (δ) and the sample free length (L):

As briefly reported, in electronic EAP actuators, commonly based on piezoelectric polymers, DE, electrostrictive and ferroelectric polymers, and liquid crystal elastomers, the actuation mechanism is observed upon the application of high voltages in order to achieve large actuation strains. These limitations can be overcome by ionic EAPs, including IPMC, conductive polymers, and CNTs. In the last years, much attention have been paid in the development of ionic EAP actuators combining an ionic conductive filler, commonly ILs, and a polymer matrix, in which the actuation mechanism involves the ion’s diffusion and mobility into the polymer matrix., An ionic current is generated in the separator when an applied voltage is applied between the two electrode layers., The lowest potential barrier between the electrode and the separator layer promotes the ion migration of the charges of the positive ions (cations) and negative charges (anions) to the negative and positive side, respectively, close to the electrodes, as schematized in Figure 17a). Further, additional advantages of ionic EAP-based actuators rely on the low voltage operation, high flexibility, lightweight, and capability of working in bot dry and aqueous media.

Actuator Bending Performance

PVDF based materials combining conductive polymers have been developed to obtain IPMCs actuators. An ionic polymer metal composite membrane based on PVDF sulfonated GO composite membranes coated with Ppy and Pt metal with enhanced electromechanical properties has been developed. The observed displacement results from the applied voltage to the membrane electrodes, which produces an electric field that activates the actuator. Both PVDF/SG/Pt and PVDF/SGO/PPy/Pt IPMC membranes reach a maximum displacement of 10 and 14 mm, respectively, mainly due to the presence of the conductive polymer (Figure 17b).

The IPMC actuators based on PVDF/SGO/PPy/Pt, demonstrated potential for robotic applications by handling small objects. The composite membrane PVDF/SGO/PPy/Pt actuator was used as the flexible joint, and other two IPMC joints were integrated at the end of flexible links (Figure 17c). The bidirectional bending of the link manipulator allowed the manipulation of objects, holding the object between two positions under an applied DC voltage of 5 V.

Electromechanical actuators based on ILs have been emerging as an exciting approach in the last years. ILs have gained a particular interest in the actuators field due to their high ionic conductivity, electrochemical stability window between 4 and 6 V, and excellent chemical stability., Additionally, ILs are considered green, nonflammable, and nonvolatile solvents.

Apart from the high ILs conductivity, the inclusion of these salts into a polymer matrix induces a material plasticizing effect, promoting a decrease in Tg.,, The conjugation of those properties and the ability to tailor cations and anions size, type, and chain length, and ILs concentration into the polymer matrix allows the development of high conductive ionic EAP actuators with high performance., Incorporating high conductive ILs into different fluorinated polymer matrices results in the development of high ionic conductive matrixes with strong potential for actuators.

Different types of ILs have been incorporated within the PVDF and PVDF copolymers matrixes aiming the development of actuators with a high bending response at low applied voltages. The influence of PVDF and its copolymers poly(VDF-co-HFP), poly(VDF-co-TrFE), and poly(VDF-co-CTFE) in the actuator performance was evaluated by the incorporation of different contents of the IL 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide ([Emim][TFSI]). Independently of the fluorinated matrix type, the IL incorporation promotes the β-phase nucleation, the decrease in the crystallinity degree, the Young modulus decrease and an increase in the electrical conductivity and dielectric constant (Figure 17d).

Among all fluorinated matrixes, PVDF/ILs and poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/ILs achieved the highest bending response (∼3 and 3.5 mm, respectively) for the maximum ILs content, as a result of higher polar β-phase contents which favors ionic mobility to allows switching bending direction. Thus, bending response and in this sense the actuator performance is influenced by the polymer chain free rotation. Bulk chemical groups in poly(VDF-co-CTFE) and ion–dipole interactions between the IL and poly(VDF-co-HFP), decrease the flexibility of the polymer chain, and hinders the ion mobility, leading to lower displacements (∼1.7 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively), the bending actuation being favored by the higher amorphous state of the IL/poly(VDF-co-CTFE) composite (Figure 17e).

The bending performance of composites based on different ILs (N,N,N-trimethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl) ammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([N1112(OH)][TFSI]) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethylsulfate ([Emim][C2SO4]) and PVDF were evaluated at different voltages (2, 5, and 10 V) at 10 mHz and with different ILs contents. The bending response is more dependent on the IL content, developing the [N1112(OH)][TFSI]/PVDF at 5 V the highest bending strain (10.5 mm). The nontoxicity of the [Emim][C2SO4]/PVDF composites demonstrated the suitability of these composites for biomedical applications.

The bending performance is also cation/anion type and chain length dependent, increasing the bending strain with increasing cation size. The incorporation of different IL alkyl side cation chains of a variable family type (pyridinium, imidazolium, and ammonium ions) and chain length sharing the same anion [TFSI]− revealed a decrease of the electrical conductivity with increasing cation alkyl chain size. Furthermore, larger cation size promotes a higher bending response as a result of the strong ion–dipole interactions between the IL and polymer, and a decrease of the Young modulus, increasing the ions movement within the polymer matrix and in this sense the bending actuation. The composites propylimidazolium ([Pmim])[TFSI]/PVDF and propylmethylpiperidinium ([Pmpip]) [TFSI] developed the highest bending strains (5.7 and 6.0 mm), respectively, at 5 V and 100 mHz (Figure 18a,b).

PVDF incorporating ILs comprising different anion types, [TFSI]− and chloride ([Cl]−)), and the same cation, hexyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C6mim]+), revealed a anion type and IL content influence in the actuator performance. A maximum bending response of 0.53% at an applied voltage of 10 V was obtained for the [C6mim][Cl]/PVDF composites containing 40 wt % of the IL.

Other conductive fillers have been also used in combination with ILs to increase the actuator performance. The performance of ionic fluoropolymer (nafion) and nonionic poly(VDF-co-HFP)/IL gel hybrid actuators based on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) (Nafion-poly(VDF-co-HFP)-IL-SWCNT gel) were compared with actuators based on poly(VDF-co-HFP)-IL-SWCNT gel electrolytes. Due to the high ionic conductivity of the Nafion-poly(VDF-co-HFP)-IL gel electrolyte, this actuator presents the highest strain, being approximately 1.6 and 1.5 times higher, respectively, than the corresponding values for the poly(VDF-co-HFP)-SWCNT-IL actuator (Figure 18c). The involved actuation mechanism results from the IL cations and anions movement. Other studies also report the incorporation of IĹs into the poly(VDF-co-HFP) as electrolyte actuators with potential in the development of wearable and energy-conversion devices.

PVDF/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) IPMC actuator films with enhanced inner channels were developed using an IL, the 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([Emim][BF4]), as a sacrificial porogen to promote either water- or IL-driven ion-exchange and by coating Gr/PVDF flexible electrodes on PVDF/PVP films. With an applied AC field, a continuous electromechanical response was achieved with maximum swing angles of ±36.5 and ± 75.4°, as shown in Figure 18d. These flexible IL-driven IPMCs actuators can find applications in the design of artificial muscles and displacement/vibration sensors.

Nowadays, printing technologies have gained particular attention in the scientific field and, more recently, in developing electromechanical actuators. I. Põldsalu et al. developed actuators by printing electrodes based on PEDOT:PSS and PEDOT:PSS-carbon aerogel (ACA) with different thickness on both sides of IL 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate ([Emim][TfO])-saturated hydrophilic PVDF membranes to evaluate the thickness influence into the electromechanical actuation (Figure 18e). The deposition of 20 printed electrode layers results in a linear correlation between the electromechanical parameters: surface electrode resistance, electromechanical strain, and the blocking force of the actuator.

The equivalent bending elastic modulus upon electromechanical actuation decreases with the addition of PEDOT:PSS (P5, P10, P20) printed layers to the electrode. A relation between the electrode layer thickness of the actuators and the strain to charge ratio revealed that for PEDOT:PSS actuators, the strain to charge ratio increases with increasing electrode layer thickness, decreasing the ratio with electrode layer thickness for DOT:PSS-ACA actuators.

The efficiency of printed PVDF/IL electromechanical actuators obtained by direct ink printing comparatively to PVDF/IL films obtained by a solvent casting procedure was also studied through the development of printed and solvent casted PVDF-based materials incorporating the ILs 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide [Bmim][N(CN)2] and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanate [Bmim][SCN]. The efficiency and suitability of the printing technologies instead of the solvent casting method for the development of high-performance soft actuators is demonstrated by [Bmim][N(CN)2]/PVDF high displacement (7.5 mm) for an applied voltage of 4 Vpp at a frequency of 0.1 Hz (Figure 19a).

The implementation of PVDF/IL printable materials in soft robotics was demonstrated by developing a printed micro gripper. [Bmim][SCN]/PVDF developed the highest bending displacement (1 mm) at an applied voltage of 4 V in DC mode, and the PVDF/IL implementation as a micro gripper is shown in Figure 19b). Upon an applied voltage of −5 V to the [Bmim][N(CN2)]/PVDF film, a current of ∼−2.6 mA is generated as a result of ionic charge from IL movement close to the electrodes, resulting in a micro gripper closing. The current values decrease due to the lower sample mobility after a few seconds. After applying 5 V, the micro gripper moves to the open position.

Table 7 summarizes PVDF-based polymer composites as advanced functional materials for electromechanical actuators. High-performing actuators have been achieved by varying the cation and anion type, cation chain length, and IL type. Further, the combination of different polymer matrixes with PVDF, such as PEDOT:PSS, among others, has also been explored.

Besides the high interest on developing electromechanical actuators (electronic and ionic), several relevant issues are still to be addressed. Drawbacks associated with the actuator cycling stability, durability over time, and the generated actuator force must be overcome. Efforts must also be devoted to the development of printable actuators to improve device integration.

Energy Harvesting and Storage

Energy harvesting and storage are essential challenges to be addressed in the scope of the current energy and digital transitions to improve sustainability. The harvesting of unused and wasted energy from various sources at reasonable costs are continuously researched based on a variety of physical principles. Energy harvesting technologies such as piezoelectric, pyroelectric, or triboelectric nanogenerators, electromagnetic or thermoelectric devices, have been developed to harvest otherwise lost kinetic or thermal energy in the form of electricity to charge low-power devices or to store in batteries. Since 2006, polymer-based piezoelectric energy harvesting systems have been increasingly developed. Pyroelectric and triboelectric devices were proposed in 2012. Since then, several research groups and companies have been exploring this field, focusing on energy conversion efficiency and the implementation in practical applications. Among polymers, PVDF and its copolymers are the most investigated for the development of energy harvesting systems, due to their electroactive properties, mainly in the polar β-phase, with the largest piezoelectric coefficients and dieletric constant. The most used PVDF copolymers for energy harvesting is poly(VDF-co-TrFE), due to its improved piezoelectric and dieletric properties.

Energy storage devices have been widely used to convert chemical into electrical energy, and include Li-ion batteries that have been commercialized since the 1990s. Battery main components are anode, cathode, and separator. Different materials and material combinations have been explored for these individual components of the battery to improve battery capacity and energy efficiency. In particular, polymer-based materials have been extensively researched for Li batteries using several filler types, geometry, and preparation techniques. PVDF-based composites processed by solvent casting and electrospinning techniques are among the most studied materials to improve separator battery performance. Electrodes are based on different active materials with large filler content and PVDF as a binder material. Compatibilization between fillers and binder and parameters optimization such processing temperature, or polymers microstructure, have been continuously improved. Polymer blends promote improved adhesion and mechanical characteristics to the electrodes.

SPEs are safer, environmental friendlier, but up to now show lower performance than conventional separator membranes for Li-ion batteries. Different studies focus on the development of specific polymers and filler combinations to improve ionic conductivity, ion diffusion, and electrolyte stability. PVDF-based polymer reinforced with Li-based materials are among the most used materials in composites development for high-performance SPEs materials.

Energy Harvesting

Polymer-based materials are capable of generating energy using different intrinsic phenomena: piezoelectricity,,, pyroelectricity,− triboelectricity,− thermoelectricity,, and electromagnetics., Although ceramics and single crystals can present enhanced electroactive properties, polymers have unique mechanical properties, including high tensile stress and low weight. With flexible polymers, such as PVDF and its copolymers, energy harvesters can be easily be implemented into a variety of systems, including wearables and self-power sensors. Thus, PVDF and copolymers and the respective composites are nowadays the most studied and employed polymers in energy harvesting systems development,− using mechanical energy and thermal gradients from the surrounding environment.

In particular, polymer composites have been extensively explored to improve the performance of energy harvesting systems, mostly based on ceramics, single crystals, and conductive particles, as the most used fillers.,, PVDF microstructure has been also tailored for energy harvesting technologies, including in the form of homogeneous and porous films, nano- or microfibers, and two-dimensional (2D)/3D structures.

In the following, the main PVDF based energy harvesting systems are presented.

Mechanical Devices

Piezoelectric materials generate an electrical voltage when a mechanical stress is applied (direct effect). The direct effect is therefore intensively studied for energy harvesting, combining reinforcing fillers with high piezoelectric coefficients (d31 and d33) with ferroelectric polymers.

Fillers used to improve the energy harvesting properties of PVDF-based generators are typically ceramics or single crystals,,, as well as some carbonaceous materials, as shown in Figure 20. Ceramics are the most used materials due to the high dielectric and piezoelectric responses. PZT presents outstanding piezoelectric properties (d33 ∼304 pC·N–1), and it is most commonly used in commercial applications. Nevertheless, due to the toxicity of lead, a wide range of ceramics have been studied for lead-free applications, such as, BaTiO3, (d33 ∼150 pC·N–1) or ZnO (d33 ∼15–23 pC·N–1), among other ceramics materials with significant lower d33 coefficient.,,

The piezoelectric harvested energy (E) of a material can be determined by eq 4:where the d is the piezoelectric charge coefficient, ε′ is the dielectric constant, and σ is the stress.,

Piezoelectric harvesters based on PVDF have been developed by a variety of techniques, including solution casting, electrospinning, electrohydrodynamic, spin-coating, template-assisted method, and additive manufacturing, among others.,,

Another mechano-electrical energy harvesting system, triboelectricity, relies on contact electrification between two distinct materials., Mechanical energy is converted into electrical energy, using four types of contact modes (Figure 21). Vertical contact-separation (VCSTENG) mode is the most used and the one with enhanced performance compared with sliding (LSTENG), single-electrode (SETENG), and free-standing modes. Placing in contact two different materials and due to their intrinsic surface properties, a potential is generated, known as electrification by contact., Van de Graaff generators are the most famous triboelectric devices using electrostatic electrical energy. Polarity, electron affinity, or surface potential are some parameters that influence the triboelectricity between two materials.,, In particular, the triboelectric effect depends on the polarity of the induced charge of the two distinct materials when subjected to frictional contact with one another, depending on the triboelectric series., Almost all metals and insulator pair materials show a relevant triboelectric effect, so there are a wide range of materials to be used in triboelectric devices.

The triboelectric effect can be maximized using appropriate microfabrication technologies (lithography, etching, or deposition methods), novel materials or by tailoring their properties (shape, structure, and surface roughness). Triboelectric devices are governed by eq 5:where VTE is the voltage generated between materials, Q and C are the transferred charges and capacitance between electrodes, and the Voc is the open circuit voltage.

Magnetoelectric Devices

The magnetoelectric effect can be also used for energy harvesting based on the coupling of the magnetostrictive and piezoelectric phases of particulate or laminated composites. As illustrated in Figure 22, when the magnetic field induces a mechanical change in the magnetic materials due to magnetostriction, the mechanical variation is transduced to the piezoelectric material, leading to the development of a voltage due to the piezoelectric response of the PVDF-based materials. Thus, applying a magnetic field, the magnetic material suffers a strain that will generate an electrical voltage in the piezoelectric phase (magnetoelectric effect). The energy harvesting generated by these type of systems is very low, with some nano- to μW of power., For their lower power compared with other energy harvesting systems, magnetoelectric laminates and composites are more used as sensors. Commercial magnetostrictive materials typically used for this application are Vitrovac (Fe39Ni39Mo4Si6B12), Terfenol-D (Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.9–2), and Metglas (Fe81B13.5Si3.5C2), which are usually used with a piezoelectric polymer, most often PVDF and copolymers., The magnetoelectric effect is quantified by the magnetoelectric coefficient (aME) described in eq 6:where VME is the induced magnetoelectric voltage, tp is the thickness of the piezoelectric material, and HAC is the applied magnetic field.

Thermoelectric and Pyroelectric Devices

Thermoelectric materials are capable of converting heat into electrical energy, physical phenomenon known as the Seebeck effect (S), that depends on the temperature gradient S = ΔV/ΔT. This process involves charge and heat transport, the phonons and electrons being the main carriers. Their overall efficiency depends on the FOM (eq 7), which depends on the electrical conductivity, the Seebeck effect, and thermal conductivity.

Polymers doped with p-type and n-type nanofillers are used as thermoelectric materials. Thermoelectric devices are typically reinforced with one-dimensional (1D) metallic or carbon nanomaterials and semiconductor telluride-based materials, such as bismuth (Bi2Te3), animonium (Sb2Te3), and lead telluride (PbTe). Also, conductive polymers forming n-type or p-type materials are used, typically based on modified coordination polymers.,

The FOM of the thermoelectric materials is represented by T, known as the power factor of the device, described in eq 7:where S is the Seebeck effect, σ and k are the electrical and thermal conductivity, respectively, and T is the absolute temperature. The power factor (PF) of the materials is defined as PF = S2σ. Ceramics and conductive polymers are the most commonly used materials for thermoelectric generation due to their thermoelectric properties,, but PVDF-based materials can also present interesting thermoelectric properties., Conductive polymers with different post-treatments, different solvents, or organic solutions of inorganic salts, allow improvement of the T values, leading to power factors larger than 300 μW·m–1·K–2, much higher than pristine conductive polymers, showing 5 to 6 orders of magnitude lower. The goal of thermoelectric materials is to reach T of ∼2, which can be approached with nanostructured materials. Tailored nanomaterials with high-performance thermoelectric output possess power factor values between 0.8 and 2.5 W m–1·K–1. Human body energy harvesting is the most common application in literature (Figure 23).

Pyroelectric materials can also generate electrical energy when subjected to temperature variations due to their intrinsic spontaneous polarization. Pyroelectric noncentrosymmetric polar crystals present a coupling between electrical polarization and temperature, implying that a change in temperature causes a change in the electrical dipole moment. Pyroelectric devices based on PVDF have been investigated. Pyroelectric material converts heat into electrical energy and pyroelectric output is optimized by a material with high pyroelectric and thermal coefficients, low electric and dielectric properties, and low specific heat. PVDF, copolymers and composites reinforced with ceramics including PZT, BaTiO3, and related ceramics have been used for pyroelectric device development based on the higher pyroelectric coefficient (γ) compared to polymers, having the polymers improved mechanical properties for device applications. The pyroelectric coefficient of polymers and polymer composites is typically lower than 1 C·m–2·K–1, whereas for ceramics the values range from 3 to 18 C·m–2·K–1. Thus the development of suitable polymer/ceramic composites is still the main way to optimize the overall performance of this type of energy harvesting devices.

The voltage and current generated by a pyroelectric energy harvesting device (VPyEand iPyE, respectively) can be determined by eq 8 and 9:where d and A are thickness and electrodes area, ΔT is the temperature change, dT/dt is the temperature variation rate, and the εr′ and ε0 are the permittivity of the material and vacuum, respectively.

Pyroelectricity can be generated from any heat gradient source, increasing for large and rapid temperature changing sources such as human breath, as represented in Figure 24.

The most relevant PVDF based energy harvesting systems are summarized in Table 8, classified after the energy harvesting principle and the indication of the conversion FOM.

Table 8 shows that the output power/energy of PVDF-based energy harvesting generators is enhanced with the reinforcement of the host matrix with ceramic, crystalline, carbon nano- or microparticles.,, The applications of PVDF-based energy harvesters is focused on low-power consumption devices, self-powered sensors or actuators and biomedical systems. Piezoelectric materials can generate power density from some μW per unit area in PVDF composites,, to some mW per area,,,,, or even 16 W·m–2 in roadway application. Roadway applications generate higher output voltages due to larger impact/forces, depending on vehicles speed and weight, increasing the energy generated with both parameters. Further, the generated energy is larger in bending than in pressure modes. The energy generated critically depends on the harvester geometry, processing, stimulus, and efficiency, among other parameters such as the optimization of the electronic circuit of the harvester device. Composite materials with high-dieletric ceramics allow improvement of the generated output energy.

Triboelectrics can generates up to near 1.5 mW·cm–2 in optimized PVDF fibers. Morphology, effective area and surface potential are critical parameters to improve harvesting performance, together with the opposite charges of the electrodes. Pyroelectric output power density can reach some μW·cm–2., As example, the pyroelectric solar radiation energy harvesting can generate 1 μW·cm–2. With respect to flexible thermoelectric generator, the output power can be improved by increasing the number of p–n junction pairs. In turn, magnetoelectric devices can generate a few μW of power in prototype systems.,

The different energy harvesting phenomena can be also combined into a single device, maximizing the output power given by a unique external stimulus applied to the device., Piezoelectric–triboelectric is the most studied combination typically based on PVDF as piezoelectric material and, at the same time, as one of the triboelectric elements. Typically, the piezoelectric devices generate a larger output current and the triboelectric generate larger output voltages, and their combination maximizes the generated power.,, Additionally, using transparent materials, it is possible to combine solar energy harvesters with piezo- and pyroelectric energy harvesters. PVDF-based material combined with a flexible solar cell fully charges a Li-ion battery of 1.5 V in a few hours. The electromagnetic–triboelectric effect is another hybrid effect that can generate up to 500 mW·m–2.

In summary, piezoelectric energy harvesting is the most used phenomena for powering low-power energy devices, as it is the most simple to implement, is able to harvest ubiquitous mechanical energy in a simple configuration and can typically generate a power of μW, reaching to mW or even larger power outputs in specific applications such as road harvesting systems.

Applicability Considerations for Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Energy Harvesting Systems

Piezoelectric materials, in particular PVDF and its copolymers, are widely studied polymer materials to be integrated as a generator element, given their high piezoelectric response and being flexible materials with high resistance to force application and deformation, which can generate energy based on different physical phenomena, or a combination of them.

Due to strong research in this area, the energy generated by piezo- and triboelectric NG and triboelectric NG has been increased from the order of μW to the order of several mW or higher,, using distinct mechanical environmental or human stimuli, as shown in Figure 25, mainly in oscillation/bending and force/pressure stimulus.

The maximization of the energetic transduction efficiency (from mechanical, thermal, or magnetic to electrical energy) is based on optimizing the intrinsic properties of PVDF, copolymers, and composites, as well as on-device building factors such as resonance frequency, structural configuration, and resonance tension. Based on the adjustment of these parameters, transduction between the generator and the power source can be optimized, which reduces system losses. Depending on the application, the frequency and acceleration may present different values, hence there is a need to adjust the generator to a power source or to ensure that the generator has the broadest possible response range, for systems where these values are quite dynamic, as shown in Table 9. It is noticeable that frequency critically influences the energy per unit of time, whereas acceleration influences the energy per stimulus.

At an early stage in the development of piezoelectric NG solutions, they were typically based on the traditional single element cantilever format, although new architectures have been developed that allow the optimization of the generated energy, such as stacked cantilevers, circular diaphragms, cymbal configurations, and capillary format, among others.

Based on advanced materials manufacturing processes, including the processing of nanofibers and nanospheres, it is possible to obtain an increase in energy efficiency, where it is already possible to verify responses in the order of 2.6 mW·cm–2 of power density.Table 10 shows a summary of the generated power according to the stimuli, to the materials morphology and to the harvesting method.

Piezo- and triboelectric based energy harvesters are the most common NGs in the literature and, more important, those that generate more power output on the order of few W·m–2. Besides, both stimuli can be combined in a contact-separation or bending modes, enhancing the energy generated.

With respect to PVDF-based triboelectric NGs, several approaches have been adopted to improve performance, such as work function, dielectric constant, surface resistivity, and carrier density, among others.

The performance of a triboelectric harvester is strongly dependent on material selection, based on the experimental “triboelectric series” tables, preferably being selected materials pairs from the opposite ends of the table, such as the case of polyamides, wool, or Al for positive tribopolarity materials and the case of Teflon, polyvinyl chloride, polyimide, or PVDF for negative tribopolarity materials. There are two main representative operating modes in the triboelectric NGs, vertical separation and side sliding contacts. Instantaneous power density is reported on the order of tens of mW·cm–2, similar to enhanced piezoelectric NGs. However, a good energy transduction efficiency has not been demonstrated, a large input energy in the system being necessary when compared with the output energy, hence the weak or nonexistent current applicability. Similar to piezoelectric NGs, to increase transduction efficiency, the materials manufacturing process has been optimized, increasing the surface area with the insertion of nanopores or nonsurface structures, as well as a surface coatings based on PVDF nanofibers,, where power outputs in the order of 10 mW·cm–2 have been obtained., Thus, morphology and surface properties are critical for improving output performance of the triboelectric NGs and piezoelectric NGs.

Pyroelectric generators have been researched as a promising technology for IoT applications, where polymer-based solutions are the focus of study., Despite the several approaches, high-performance systems are related to generators based on pristine PVDF in a film topology, although micropatterned structures, nanowire structures, and fiber structures have also been reported, as shown in Table 10. Despite the exciting results in the order of 1.1 W·cm–3 generated power densities, its applicability is conditioned by the need to guarantee a long cycle of thermal stability and solar radiation, as well as to guarantee that the energy collection substrate or electrode maintains the mechanical properties under heat and sun irradiation, and/or there is not induced damage by the light.

Thermoelectric generators have some similarities when compared to pyroelectric generators, but their method of operation is based on the collection of electrical energy from the residual heat by the Seebeck effect, so it is necessary to implement bimaterial solutions (similar to the triboelectric systems), that is, p-type and n-type thermoelectric materials. In this way, organic thermoelectric materials have attracted attention due to possible applications in flexible thermoelectric generators processed by solution, where it is possible to obtain bimaterial fibers capable of generating power on the order of 0.38 mW·m–1·K–2, as shown in Table 10. Although the output performance is lower when compared to other solutions, their processing method is opening unexplored fields of application. On the other hand, its applicability is also very dependent on ensuring a long cycle of thermal stability and solar radiation, as well as ensuring that the substrates, electrodes, or energy collection fibers maintain their mechanical properties under heat.

The magnetoelectric effect provides an innovative energy generation solution. Although the energy sources are not abundant, it may allow the supply of energy to inaccessible or remote zones, as it is possible to generate/transmit noncontact energy into devices by exposure to AC magnetic fields.

With the fast evolution of organic materials, the magnetoelectric coefficients obtained are in the same order of magnitude as the best obtained in inorganic magnetoelectric materials. Despite the great potential of these solutions, only a few studies have been dedicated to capturing energy from magnetoelectric materials based on polymers, as shown in Table 10, where power outputs on the order of 1.5 mW·cm–3 have been reported. The evolution of these devices in the IoT area has been stagnating based on the complexity of the developed systems and the specific needs of the required excitation fields.

On the other hand, this solution presents promising results in the biological area as it allows supplying energy in a controlled way in difficult to access otherwise biological environments.

Electronic Circuits for Energy Harvesting Systems

The fast development of CMOS technology and printing electronic circuits, coupled with the high-level integration capacity,, is allowing reduction of the power consumption of the devices and the size of the systems, as shown in Figure 26.

Considering the emergence of hybrid solutions such as photonic and CMOS technology that allows high communication rates between subsystems, new highly efficient devices are being developed, with nA to μA consumptions (depending on microcontroller system execution state), faster and highly miniaturized.

As represented in Figure 26, to respond to the energetic needs of IoT, it is necessary to incorporate energy generators capable of supplying up to some mW for systems operating in real-time, depending on the communication parameters.

On the other hand, systems in standby/sleep mode with wake up by low power timer, are increasingly optimized, allowing implementation of energy harvesting generators for lower power systems, including energy storage, sensors, and/or communication of information.

All of these combined developments have led to a reduction in the energy requirements of sensing, microactuation, and communication devices, and these correspond to basic solutions for the implementation of IoT systems in the areas of medicine, defense, interactivity, aeronautics, smart industry, and smart agriculture.

Currently, it is possible to find functional examples of application prototypes of complete energy harvesting systems. In Zhang et al., a system is presented that allows feeding a monochrome LCD solely with the movement of the palm or foot, based on the output power of 14.8 W·m–2, as shown in Figure 27.

The application optimized the generated voltage and current, in order of 1 kV and 150 μA (Figure 27b,c), presenting excellent harvesting performance when coupled to the load circuit.

In the biomedical area, there are also some examples for the application of these energy harvesting solutions, in particular for implantable medical devices.

Despite these examples of application, the power supplies of these devices remain a major challenge for the scientific community and the industry itself, making numerous applications impracticable, considering the minimum voltage value required for the rectification circuit (typically superior to 0.5 V) and the high minimum power for charging/storage circuit (typically >3 μW) as observed in available commercial applications, considering the low currents produced.

A device without batteries, which draws energy directly from its surroundings, is a promising way to provide continuous and inexhaustible power. The power source may be solar radiation, thermal gradient, and mechanical motion. Much research focuses on mechanical movement, especially vibration, as vibration is widely available in objects and the environment.

Over the past decade, there has been an exponential growth of triboelectric NGs and piezoelectric NGs architectures. Still, one of the biggest challenges for the true technological revolution in the area of self-power sensors and self-power devices is the energy storage circuit and its ability to acquire power from the generator/transductor. Currently, six main circuit topologies are the focus of investigation, as shown in Table 11.

However, it is important to note that despite the good results already achieved in laboratory conditions; when these systems are subjected to a real application environment, the generated voltages and currents are reduced, which makes coupling of the electronic harvesting circuit very difficult. Given the minimum operating conditions of the electronic components, this is a major challenge in the widespread implementation of this technology.

In conclusion, triboelectric NGs and piezoelectric NGs can be used as standalone and portable power sources for low power electronic devices such as sensors, low power, communication, and micro- or nanoactuation systems, with particular focus on implantable sensors and actuators, accuracy agriculture, self-predictive monitoring in industrial, medical, and automotive/aeronautic maintenance systems. Pyro-, thermo-, and magnetoelectric systems must be continuously developed, as the power generation is still insufficient for these types of devices. On the other hand, given the multifunctional characteristics of the materials used, such as the ones of PVDF, they can have a dual function and can be also used as motion, acceleration, or voltage sensors, among others. The increase in output power and the technological advancement of electronics will improve the applicability of these solutions, allowing meeting of the great challenges of the IoT and industry 4.0 era in a near future.

Energy Storage Systems

Energy production and storage are particularly relevant topics in recent years, mainly due to the increasing energy demand from population, new lifestyles with increased mobility, and the need of an energy transition toward cleaner energy production. Once clean energy production is mainly based on intermittent energy resources, it is essential to associate energy storage systems capable of storing the generated energy to be used whenever required. According to this, energy storage systems, such as Li-ion batteries, the best and most used electrochemical energy storage system nowadays, electrochemical capacitors (supercapacitors), and electrostatic capacitors represent a research, development, and application priority. The major storage capability difference between batteries and capacitors is the higher energy storage capacity per unit weight from the battery systems and higher power capacity from capacitors. Also, battery systems are more applied to long-time operation, whereas capacitors are more suitable to provide high power in a short-time period. The increased society mobility, the ubiquitous use of portable electronic devices and, more recently, the implementation on electric vehicles, exponentially increase the demand of these systems.

Figure 28 shows a schematic representation of the main energy storage systems components for Li-ion batteries, electrochemical capacitors, and electrostatic capacitors. PVDF based materials are widely used at these systems in different components, including cathode, anode, separator/SPEs for Li-ion batteries and electrochemical capacitors, and in the capacity layer for electrostatic capacitors.

Typically, in the Li-ion batteries and electrochemical capacitors, electrodes are composed by a polymer binder, a conductive additive, and an active material, which differs depending on whether the electrode is the anode or the cathode (Figure 28). PVDF is the most used polymer binder that holds together the active material and the conductive additive of the electrode, improves the mechanical stability/flexibility of the electrode, and ensure the good cohesion between particles and current collector. The main characteristics of PVDF as a polymer binder are the easy processability, high adhesion to the current collector, high voltage stability window at 5 V, degradation temperature above 400 °C, excellent mechanical properties, and good compatibility with the most used electrolyte solution, among others. Despite being used in a small percentage (0–15 wt %) with respect to the electrode overall composition, the polymer binder represents a relevant contribution in the battery performance, stability and electrochemical behavior.

The separator/electrolyte structure can be categorized mainly in liquid and solid electrolytes (polymeric, inorganic, and composite). In conventional batteries the separator is typically a porous membrane soaked with electrolyte solution (liquid electrolyte) or a SPEs in solid-state batteries, typically based on embedded fillers dispersed in the polymer matrix in the latter case. It should be an electronic insulator and ionic conductor, with the main function promoting a medium for ions transfer, determining the cell kinetics between the electrodes in the charging, and discharging mechanisms.

In addition, PVDF and copolymers are also used for battery separator/electrolyte applications due to their processability by a wide range of techniques from solvent casting to electrospinning, allowing tailoring of porosity/pore size and degree of crystallinity, by the dimensional stability with temperature variation, excellent mechanical properties, and high voltage stability.

In this context, the main advances in PVDF and copolymers as polymer binders for electrodes and polymer for separator/SPEs in Li-ion batteries/electrochemical capacitors applications and a capacitive layer in electrostatic capacitors are described in the following.

Electrodes

As mentioned before, PVDF is widely used as polymer binder in electrodes composite for battery and capacitor applications due to its properties of binding the active and conductive materials, essential for the electrical, mechanical and thermal stability of the systems as well as for the ionic conduction process in the electrodes.

Electrode components composition affects battery performance in distinct aspects. Different active material influences the battery capacity due to its theoretical discharge/charge capacity. Also, different ratios of active material, carbon black as conductive material, and PVDF binder on the cathode electrode has been evaluated, showing high performance when obtained with 90% active material and a carbon black/PVDF binder ratio of 0.8. In fact, it has been shown that the rate capability of the electrode is improved for a PVDF/conductive material ratio of 5:4.

PVDF have also been studied in electrochemical capacitors as polymer binder, and the performance of PVDF has been compared with other polymers as PTFE and Nafion for active carbon active material electrodes. Higher specific capacitance value (160.6 F·g–1) was obtained for PVDF polymer binder with only 5 wt % compared to the PTFE and Nafion that require 10 wt % in the electrode slurry, to obtain similar response (156.6 and 131.3 F·g–1, respectively). Despite the 100% rate capability at 20 mV·s–1 from PTFE, PVDF retain a capacitance for about 79.7% after 2000 cycles with only 5 wt % of material.

An important electrode property evaluated during its manufacturing is the rheological behavior of the electrode slurry. In this property, PVDF content have a great influence, where rheological measurements demonstrate that increasing its amount mainly increases matrix viscosity in the suspension without affecting the microstructure formed by active and conductive materials particles. Tuning this property opens the possibility to apply the electrode slurry in different manufacturing and additive manufacturing processes as doctor blade, screen-printing, DIW, and others, improving the battery quality and performance.

Furthermore, the mechanical failure in the electrodes is dependent on the polymer binder where PVDF polymer plays an essential role in successfully addressing this issue, based on its excellent particle/binder and binder/current collector interfaces. Further, PVDF is essential for controlling the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) thickness.

The role of PVDF binder in Si/graphite composite anodes for Li-ion batteries has been analyzed, showing that PVDF binder decomposes to form lithium fluoride (LiF) on the electrode surface during cycling, without affecting battery performance due to the good chemical interaction with both graphite and silicon.

Another important parameter that influences the electrode properties is the specific solvent used and the solvent evaporation rate to dissolve the PVDF binder., The optimal solvent evaporation temperature has been determined between 80 and 100 °C, as this process strongly influences the polymer binder distribution and the polar phase content of the polymer (Figure 29a). Also, for electrochemical capacitors, electrodes with oxygen-functionalized few-layer Gr as active material, PVDF as polymer binder and NMP as solvent, the solvent evaporation temperature that promotes the higher maximum specific capacitance (318 F·g–1, at 0.5 A·g–1) was at 170 °C when compared with 100 and 190 °C.

Different fluoropolymer binders have been evaluated for Li-ion batteries, as shown in Figure 29b, mainly based on the different polarity of the materials. It was demonstrated that the polarity of the fluoropolymers, determined by the chain structure, number of fluorine atoms, and molecular weight, significantly affects cathode performance.

Combining excellent battery performance and environmental concerns, a new aqueous PVDF latex binder was produced, demonstrating good cycling stability. Approaches including the combination of different polymer binders and addition of particles to improve electrode quality and performance have also been studied.

To improve the PVDF binder performance, PVDF blends based on polyethylene-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (PE-PEG) copolymer and poly(propylene carbonates) (PPCs) were developed in order to improve structural uniformity, the addition of the second polymer reduces PVDF crystallinity and improves distribution of the conductive fillers, leading to better delivered capacity at different C-rates of the electrodes compared to neat PVDF binder at temperatures below 60 °C.

Further, PVDF blends with styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) has been developed to improve the mechanical stability of Li metal. PVDF-grafted-BaTiO3 nanocomposites and PVDF blends with PEO and terpene resin (TX) were also applied as a polymer binder in Li-ion batteries to improve the fillers dispersion, adhesion to the current collector, and, consequently, overall battery performance.

PVDF polymer binder has been aslo implemented to improve active material’s electrochemical capacitors performance in MnO2,, NiS, and MXene based electrodes.

Another issue that can be addressed through proper selection of the polymer binder is the heat generation during battery operation. Thus, thermally sensitive binders (TSB) based on PVDF and poly(VDF-co-HFP) have been developed, allowing reduction of the peak temperature associated with the internal short circuit without affecting battery performance. Furthermore, the nail penetration can be reduced by 20% to 40% by using the aforementioned binders, attributed to the softening of TSB at ∼80 °C.

Considering its active role as a binder, the effect of the different crystalline phases of PVDF for high-rate Li-ions diffusion was determined, observing that the highly polar β-phase facilitates the diffusion of Li-ions and maintains the concentrations of Li-ions at the surface of the active electrode, resulting in much-improved capacity with lower cell resistance compared to α-phase PVDF as binder, as represented in Figure 29c. Further, the effect of β-PVDF as a promising artificial solid-electrolyte interphase coating on Cu and Li metal anodes was evaluated. Figure 29d shows a schematic representation of this effect, that leads to dendrite-free Li deposition/stripping and improved cycling performance. In the same way, PVDF polymer binder also has an active influence on the ionic transport pathways after percolation threshold, where the excess of binder in the electrode formulation increases the pathways and create an ion-blocking effect.

With respect to printed Li-ion batteries, the polymer binder has an important role on electrode slurry due to its influence on rheological behavior allowing to tune this property to a desired printing technique. A new cathode ink was developed for screen-printing with suitable rheological and electrochemical properties. Taking into account the environmental issues for this battery, the conventionally used solvent for PVDF, NMP, was replaced by the “green solvent” DMPU, allowing the production of more environmentally friendly batteries.

Furthermore, the substitution of NMP by DMF has been shown to benefit printed batteries at an industrial level by reducing cell manufacturing energy consumption by ∼30%.

Considering the toxicity and cost from NMP solvent, efforts are being devoted to substitute it by DMSO solvent in Li-ion battery and electrochemical capacitors applications, once the latter is safer and eco-friendlier, although an additional washing step with ethanol is necessary.

Poly(VDF-ter-TrFE-ter-CFE) ter-polymer has been also used as a polymer binder for cathode printed electrodes by DIW, showing suitable rate battery performance, as shown in Figure 29e. In fact, different PVDF copolymers have been also evaluated for Li-sulfur battery development (Figure 29f), poly(VDF-co-TrFE) showing improved performance with respect to PVDF and poly(VDF-co-CTFE) due to the strong chemical interaction with polysulfides based on its high molecular polarity.

The influence of PVDF binders on the porosity of composite electrodes for lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries was also addressed, the highest battery performance being observed for poly(VDF-co-HFP). In addition to Li-S batteries, PVDF has been used as cathode binder in Li-O2 batteries.

Taking into account the recycling process for end-of-life batteries, recycling of the PVDF binder in batteries has been addressed, determining that LiOH·H2O reacts with this polymer binder, avoiding Li removal and the doping of the cathode material, mitigating the effects of its disposal. Also, the peel-off efficiency to delaminate cathode active materials has been evaluated, showing 98.5% of efficiency for lithium acetate–lithium nitrate (LiOAc-LiNO3) eutectic system (molar ratio of 3:2). Compared with single salts systems, this system demonstrates reduced energy consumption. LiNO3 also facilitates the PVDF decomposition, demonstrating that the proposed process is an environmentally friendly alternative when compared to direct calcination for cathode active material recycling.

Separator Membranes

PVDF-based separator membranes have been extensively studied, and Figure 30 shows some relevant milestones in this field over the years.

The first milestone in PVDF based separators was achieved by Tarascon et al. by developing the first battery with poly(VDF-co-HFP) as a separator membrane. Regarding PVDF, it was only in 1999 that a separator was produced by phase inversion, where the porous membrane was filled and swollen by the electrolyte solution, showing high ionic conductivity and good thermal stability.

As a consequence of this result, the conduction mechanism of PVDF as separators was addressed, showing that the swollen gel dominates the ionic conduction process due to the interaction between the polymer and the electrolyte solution, which improves the mobility and content of the carrier.

In the following years, the first poly(VDF-co-HFP) blends and poly(VDF-co-HFP) composites were applied in separator membranes, as shown in Figure 30.

Considering these scientific results, several blends and polymer composites have been developed, aiming to improve the thermal and mechanical properties, as well as the ionic conductivity of the separators.

The first poly(VDF-co-CTFE) and poly(VDF-co-TrFE) separators were developed in 2011 and 2012 and applied in batteries of LiFePO4 and Sn–C half-cells, respectively.

Nanoscale Li diffusion and transport have been studied by electrochemical strain microscopy (ESM) in PVDF membranes, as shown in Figure 31a–d. The high strain observed was explained by the electroosmotic flow in the porous PVDF, which depends on the separator parameters: porosity, pore size, and electrolyte affinity.

The effect of PVDF crystalline phase in battery separator performance was studied in 2017, demonstrating the high interaction between Li-ions and the polar β-phase (Figure 31e), the capacity retention increasing with increasing β-phase, resulting in faster migration of Li-ions within the membrane (Figure 31f).

The intensive work and scientific advances on PVDF-based separators has been summarized in different reviews.,,

Nowadays, PVDF and its copolymers are being implemented in all separator types, including microporous membranes, electrospun membranes, composites, polymer blends, and membranes with surface modification. Further, they are being implemented as separators for electrochemical capacitors, mainly due to PVDF strong C-F electron-withdrawing characteristics and high dielectric constant.

Table 12 shows the most relevant works published on PVDF separators in the last years.

With respect to microporous membranes, PVDF membranes have been prepared by the NIPS method in which the NMP/acetone mixture was used as solvent and ethanol/deionized water as nonsolvent. It was verified that the use of ethanol as a nonsolvent results in more uniform membranes with higher porosity, all produced membranes showing good electrochemical stability and cycling.

PVDF membranes with different pore sizes and pore size distributions have been developed by melt blowing, electrospinning, and shear spinning. It was verified that shear spinning is a suitable emerging method to manufacture nanofibrous materials with morphology control from fibrous-like to nanosheet-like membranes, allowing tailoring of electrochemical cell response.

Considering that electrospinning is one of the most used methods for obtaining porous membranes, electrospun PVDF membranes have been produced by combining electrospinning and TIPS techniques through the DMF/acetone solvent system in order to further tune membrane microstructure. The highest discharge capacity value being obtained for PVDF membranes prepared with the DMF/acetone (4:6) solvent system, leading to a highly interconnected porous morphology.

Electrospun PVDF membranes have been optimized by using different polymer concentration (18 wt %, 21 wt %, 24 wt %, and 27 wt %) in solution with DMA, the PVDF solution concentrations of 24 wt % showing improved electrochemical properties. Moreover, PVDF fiber mats prepared with a polymer concentration of 20 wt % are demonstrated to be more suitable for supercapacitor applications. It has been also demonstrated that the addition of TiO2 particles increases the stability of the supercapacitors from 2.5 to 2.99 V. The addition of montmorillonite to poly(VDF-co-HFP) fibers (400 nm) leads to higher thermal stability and mechanical strength. Further, 5 wt % higher porosity (88.1%) than the prostine fiber mats and an ionic conductivity of 2.330 × 10–3 S·cm–1 allows obtaining of a specific capacitance of the Li-ion capacitor of 149.2 F·g–1 at a current density of 1 A·g–1 and a retention of 90% of the initial capacitance after 2000 cycles.

To increase thermal stability and electrolyte wettability, ethyl cyanoacrylate (ECA) has been incorporated into a PVDF membranes, as ECA shows strong interaction with the organic solvents in the electrolyte solution, leading to superior capability for electrolyte uptake.

For PVDF, composites have been produced with 2D nickel hydroxide nanosheets (NHNs), the composite showing high β-phase content, which benefits the ionic conductivity and electrochemical battery performance. Also, PVDF composites with vermiculite (V) and laponite nanoparticles have been developed, leading to lower interfacial impedance and excellent Coulombic efficiency.

Another strategy in this separator type is the fabrication of multilayers with high porosity and lamellar structure, obtained by a combination of evaporation-induced phase separation and selective solvent etching methods that benefit the mechanical and electrochemical properties.

To develop devices based on environmentally friendlier processes, such as additive manufacturing techniques, PVDF, and poly(VDF-co-HFP) membranes, have been prepared by DIW varying solvent evaporation temperature and fill density percentage. The highest ionic conductivity value of 3.8 mS·cm–1 was obtained for poly(VDF-co-HFP) membrane prepared with a fill density of 100.

Due to its low degree of crystallinity, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) is ideal for separator membranes. For this polymer, membranes with surface pillar microstructures have been developed for battery separator applications, varying pillar diameter, height, and bulk thickness. Through the combination of experimental and theoretical work (Figure 32a), it has been shown that the parameter that most influences battery performance is the bulk thickness.

In addition, to improve sustainability and wettability, electrospun poly(VDF-co-TrFE) membrane with PEO/lignocellulose coating has been produced, as presented in Figure 32b. This membrane exhibits superior properties when compared to commercial Celgard separators. A coating of polyvinyl butyral (PVB) with SiO2 nanoparticles has been also applied to the surface of PVDF separators. This separator structure leading to improved cycling performance and higher discharge capacity rate capability when compared to the neat PVDF separator.

In order to improve the thermal stability and electrolyte affinity of commercial separators, the coating of poly(VDF-co-HFP) with ceramic particles (Al2O3 and TiO2) was carried out, as shown in Figure 32c, the coating improving the thermal stability and leading to batteries with excellent capacity retention. Further, the wettability of commercial separators can be improved by electrospinning or drop-casting of PVDF polymer solutions containing GO.

With respect to composite membranes, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are being explored as fillers. ZIF-8@MXene has been found to provide ion transport channels to improve Li+ transport. Different MOFs (MOF-808, MIL-125 and UiO-66-NH2) have been used to improve battery performance by reducing the resistivity of the batteries, the best performance being achieved for UiO-66-NH2 due to the low half-cell resistivity value.

In order to suppress Li dendrites and fire retardance, a novel separator based on poly(VDF-co-HFP) with MXenes was developed, leading to a homogeneous growth rate of Li dendrites and thus forming a smoother SEI layer during cyclings. In addition, composites based on poly(VDF-co-HFP)/Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 and silicon nitride (Si3N4) whiskers have been produced to improve battery cycling performance.

For Li-S batteries, electrospun membranes based on MOFs@PVDF have been developed to facilitate uniform Li deposition and reduce the generation of Li dendrites.

Further, new blends based on PVDF with poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) (PMIA), PU, and polyacrylonitrile/vermiculite nanosheets (PAN/VNs) have been fabricated to improve wettability and thermal stability. Similarly, blends based on poly(VDF-co-HFP) with PMMA and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) allow improvement of thermal stability and electrochemical stability. A different concept of a self-charging electrochemical capacitors with porous PVDF and ionic-liquid electrolyte has been reported. In this study, the separator is placed between two Gr electrodes and its performance as capacitor and energy harvesting evaluated. It is shown that 4–11 V were generated with compressive forces between 5 and 20 N, respectively, and a specific capacitance of 28.46 F·g–1 was obtained for the device. The results provide new insights toward new generation all-in-one energy conversion/storage devices.

Solid Polymer Electrolytes

Considering that the electrolyte solution used in the separator membrane is typically toxic and easily leaked, its elimination is important and essential for the next generation of safer and environmental friendlier solid-state batteries, where SPEs play an essential role. The SPEs is basically composed of one or two polymer matrices with one or more fillers and must be characterized by improved mechanical and thermal stability and large ionic conductivity.

The polymer matrices in SPEs are responsible for the thermal and mechanical stability, while providing electronic insulation. In the case of fillers, they are responsible for the ionic conductivity value and Li transference number.

In the case of PVDF for SPEs applications, there are different combinations, such as a polymer with one filler, a polymer with two fillers, and composites with more than three components.

The fillers used in SPEs development for improving ionic conductivity are basically based on different Li salts and ILs. Table 13 shows the recent advances in PVDF-based SPEs

Li salts increase the ionic conductivity of the SPE, as a result of increasing the number and mobility of free charges in the system. Concerning ILs, there are two contributions: the increase in ionic conductivity through the introduction of specific anions and cations and also the reduction of crystalline domains, which promotes the conduction process in the amorphous component of the polymer matrix.

For redox flow batteries, a new SPE composite membrane based on PVDF and Li1.4Al0.4Ge0.2Ti1.4(PO4)3 (LAGTP) has been investigated with a high ionic conductivity value of 0.27 mS·cm–1 and a Coulombic efficiency of over 97%. In this context, Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP) and LAGTP have also been used as fillers based on their electrochemical stability window.

For Li-ion batteries, a composite SPE based on maleic acid (MA) with PVDF-LLZTO(Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12) has been produced (Figure 33a). This SPE shows a specific discharge capacity of 170.5 mAh·g–1 at 0.2 C and a high rate capability up to 1.0 C with 138 mAh·g–1. A SPE based on PVDF demonstrated that the crystalline phase affects battery performance, and the more suitable PVDF phase is the polar β-phase. Recently, a SPE based on PVDF with lithium perchlorate (LiClO4) has been developed and deposited in a polypropylene (PP) separator for mechanical reinforcement with a high ionic conductivity value of 0.15 mS·cm–1.

Considering electrochemical capacitor applications, poly(VDF-co-HFP)/LiBOB SPE have been developed as flexible solvent-free Li-ion symmetric supercapacitors. In this study, BOB– acts as a solid plasticizer and increases the ionic conductivity to 6.1 × 10–5 S·cm–1 (25 °C) and 5.7 × 10–4 S·cm–1 (80 °C) due to the enhancement of ion transport in te polymer solid electrolyte. The prepared material also was used as electrode layer to host GO/CNTs. An electrochemical capacitor with a specific capacitance of 267 F·g–1 at 1 A·g–1 was obtained for this solvent-free fexible supercapacitors. In order to improve the performance of this SPE, the same research group developed an on-chip solution with poly(VDF-co-HFP)/LiBOB/TiO2 SPE with in situ fabricated 3D polysilicon/nickel nanoforest electrodes, leading to a device capacitance of 4.32 F·cm–3 and high volumetric power density of 4.15 W·cm–3 at 1.25 mA·cm–2. The in situ monolithically integrated silicon/nickel nanoforests provided a new route to develop 3D electrode material with microscale patterns, avoiding ex situ active material transfer processes that normally require large interspace and electrode width (>50 μm).

Another strategy to improve battery performance for SPEs based on PVDF is the synthesis with perfluoro-2-methyl-3-oxa-5-sulfonimido[-3-oxa-5-sulfonyl fluoride] vinyl ether (VEPFSIS) initiated by potassium persulfate, leading to ionic conductivity values higher than 10–4 S·cm–1 at 30 °C.

An SPE composite with PEO, PVDF, lithium aluminum titanium phosphate (LATP), and bistrifluoroacetamide (BTFA) as plasticizer has been produced with excellent cycling and rate performance, as shown in Figure 33b. Another SPE based on LB, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), PMMA, and PVDF has been produced with continuous Li+ conduction pathways through LATP structure. Furthermore, a SPE based on PVP and polyetherimide (PEI) formed close stacks, with Janus PVP dispersed in the PVDF matrix. Together with LiTFSI salt, the developed SPE shows an ionic conductivity of 5.1 × 10–4 S·cm–1 and a high specific capacity of 122.1 mAh·g–1 discharge at the 100th cycle.

A new approach for SPEs development involved the implementation of a PEO/LiTFSI electrolyte matrix laminated on both sides by electrospun poly(VDF-co-HFP) membranes, the main achievement being the absence of short-circuiting up to 3600 h as shown in Figure 33c. Another SPE with the same components but also with N-methyl-N-propylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (PYR13TFSI) and MWCNT-COOH showed excellent stability against the Li anode and significantly increased Li+ migration ability, respectively.

Also for poly(VDF-co-HFP), a SPE with Li salts and porous carbon has been produced with a high ionic conductivity of 0.56 mS·cm–1 at room temperature. The battery performance is shown in Figure 33d.

Polymer/garnet solid oxide composite electrolytes based on Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 (LLZTO) and LiTFSI has been produced to improve contact with the electrodes and therefore leading to improved electrochemical performance, as shown in Figure 33e.

A electrospun composite polymer membrane has been also manufactured based on poly(VDF-co-HFP) with silica-coated Ag nanowires (AgNWs@SiO2) and PEO/LiTFSI. This SPE features high mechanical strength and wide electrochemical stability window, the battery performance being shown in Figure 33f.

To increase battery performance at room temperature, a three-component SPE based on poly(VDF-co-HFP), the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanate ([BMIM][SCN]), and clinoptilolite zeolite (CPT) has been produced, the SPE showing a battery performance of 160.3 mAh·g–1 at a C/15-rate, with a capacity retention of 76% after 50 cycles.

Another strategy that has been applied for SPE development is in situ polymerization to reduce the interface resistance on the electrode surface of a porous polymer film (poly(VDF-co-HFP)/PVDF) by curable monomers, including PEGDA/PETMP/TFEMA. Further, in order to improve the compatibility between electrode and SPE, a hybrid SPE based on Al-doped LLZO and poly(VDF-co-HFP) has been obtained with an ionic conductivity of 0.4 mS·cm–1.

Considering the high dielectric constant of poly(VDF-ter-TrFE-ter-CTFE) that promotes a stronger solvation capacity for Li-ions, a SPE has been developed with LiTFSI, showing a stable cycling performance at 25 °C.

Another route involving the use of gel polymer electrolytes (GPEs) in electrochemical capacitors has been studied due to the quasi-solid-state polymer electrolyte characteristics. This system combines the best characteristics of solid (cohesive properties) and liquid (diffusive properties) electrolytes by promoting the amorphous polymer content and decreasing its glass transition temperature, increasing the ion mobility. The combination of PVDF with PVA/H3PO4 and BaTiO3 gel electrolytes for electrochemical paper based capacitors show that, compared with PVDF gel electrolytes, the prepared samples improve the specific capacitance from 176 F·g–1 to 263 F·g–1 and 312 F·g–1, respectively.

In summary, PVDF and its copolymers are the most widely used polymers in the field of energy storage for the different battery components, due to the simple processing, high thermal and chemical stability, and excellent swelling properties in contact with different electrolyte solutions, among others. The focus of PVDF research in the area of energy storage is mainly to tailor overall properties to increase the electrochemical properties of the different battery components and the full battery. Further, green chemistry synthesis and recycling strategies of the polymer must be strongly improved to allow more sustainable energy storage systems.

Electrostatic Capacitors

Regarding electrostatic capacitors, PVDF offers exciting possibilities for improving the performance of dielectric capacitors. Thus, PVDF-based films, nanocomposites, and blends have been evaluated to enhance the energy storage capacity, breakdown strength, and dielectric constant of capacitors. To increase the dielectric constant, parameters such as type of filler, compatibilization with the polymeric matrix, and filler content play an important role. In these composites, different carbonaceous materials, MXene, ceramic oxides, AgNbO3 (ANO), and other particles have been used as fillers to improve the dielectric constant and decrease the dielectric loss.

For example, composites of plate-like (Ba0.6Sr0.4)TiO3 (P-BST) particles (particle size of 11.47 μm) with PVDF were prepared by tape casting, leading to a high dielectric constant of 62. Also, membranes based on PVDF with surface-modified graphene (SMG) were developed by electrospinning technique where the inclusion of 16 wt % of SMG leads to an increase of the dielectric constant to 84 at 1000 Hz, which is 10 times higher than for PVDF without filler.

In order to develop a multifunctional composite in which the fillers can be aligned during the manufacturing process by an external magnetic field, nickel nanowires (Ni NWs) were introduced in a poly(VDF-co-HFP) matrix, the highest dielectric constant being 41 at 1 kHz for the composite with 1.3 vol % of Ni NWs. In addition, composites of poly(VDF-ter-TrFE-ter-CFE) with MXene were produced to improve the dielectric constant up to 105 near the percolation limit of 15.3 wt % MXene content.

By tailoring the molecular structure and incorporating suitable fillers or additives, PVDF-based dielectric materials can exhibit enhanced electrical properties. Future advancements may involve the development of PVDF-based capacitors with higher energy density, improved reliability, and increased operating temperatures.

Environmental Monitoring and Remediation

Water contamination is a global problem that has received increased attention from the scientific community in recent decades. Anthropogenic pollution is the main cause of water contamination. The increasing lifestyle quality also enhanced the use of chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products, pesticides, and endocrine disruptors. The fate of all these compounds is invariably the effluents regardless if they have been previously treated or not. Generally, these chemicals are known as emergent pollutants and can be found in very low concentrations (ng·L–1 to mg·L–1) in contaminated and post-treated water. These pollutants are chemically stable and resistant to classical physical, chemical, and biological water treatments. Even at low concentrations, these pollutants threaten the aquatic environment though toxic and bioaccumulation processes of many hazardous compounds in aquatic organisms., Such context urges new approaches to tackle this problem. Among them, photocatalysis, adsorption, and membrane technologies have become attractive and are simple and efficient treatments against many water pollutants.

These techniques need advanced materials to be successfully applied, and fluorinated polymers such as PVDF, and its copolymers (e.g., poly(VDF-co-TrFE) and poly(VDF-co-HFP)) possess interesting physicochemical properties that allow several applications, including water remediation. Furthermore, such polymers can be easily processed into thin films, membranes, coatings, and fibers, broadening the range of possible applications. Additionally, these polymers show excellent chemical, mechanical, thermal, and UV radiation resilience, which is related to the polymer structure’s stable C–F bonds.,, The possibility of controlling the porosity and pore size is also critical for these applications., Similarly, these polymers withstand a large variety of fillers (e.g., nano/microparticles, zeolites, MOFs) that endow the membranes with photocatalytic and adsorptive properties, significantly enhancing their efficiency against specific contaminants or acquiring new properties.

Table 14 lists some works based on PVDF-based materials for water remediation applications, mainly focusing on photocatalysis and adsorption processes that are endowed by adding fillers with specific affinity for target contaminants.

Another possible application for these materials is for environmental sensing to monitor low concentrations of organic and inorganic contaminants in different water matrices. For instance, ZnO–TiO2 nanofibers have been produced by electrospinning and hydrothermal methods and deposited over a PVDF-formed nanofiber membrane in order to detect copper and lead ions. Poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) functionalized PVDF membranes have been used to detect mercury in water solution, detecting concentrations of 1 mg·L–1 in 2 h and l ng·L–1 after 24 h of adsorption. The authors also envisage this platform for detecting other heavy metals. In the framework of plasmonic sensors, a carbon nanotube/gold nanoparticle (CNT/AuNP) nanocomposite placed into a commercial PVDF has been used as a sensor. The sensor allowed to detect several molecular contaminants (e.g., melamine, paraquat) in concentrations ranging from 1 nM to 1 μM in aqueous samples, demonstrating its excellent field-testing and applicability characteristics for environmental monitoring. Despite the exciting news in environmental monitoring using PVDF and copolymers, the following subchapters will focus on environmental remediation based on photocatalysis and adsorption.

Photocatalysis

As previously mentioned, photocatalysis is one of the emerging techniques suitable for addressing some relevant environmental problems. However, to apply photocatalytic processes in a polymeric substrate, it must also present a high chemical stability to resist UV radiation and oxidative species produced by the photocatalytic nanoparticles (e.g., TiO2, ZnO, and WO3). In this context, PVDF and its copolymers have the necessary processability and chemical stability to produce, use, and reuse photocatalytic nanocomposite membranes.

Reports on photocatalytic,, and adsorptive, membranes for water treatment have strongly increased. Anran Zhou and co-workers have produced a PVDF-PVP-TiO2-dopamine (DA) (PPTD) functionalized ultrafiltration membrane. Including TiO2, PVP, and DA into the PVDF structure improved hydrophilicity, pore size, and porosity, favoring water flux through the polymeric matrix. Removal efficiencies of approximately 91% of sulfadiazine (SD) after 120 min under UV irradiation on the PPTD membrane are presented, corresponding to a significant increase of ∼20% compared with SD removal without UV irradiation.

Further, TiO2 nanoparticles have been immobilized into a poly(VDF-co-TrFE) matrix toward atrazine degradation in a solar photoreactor. An 8 wt % TiO2/poly(VDF-co-TrFE) nanocomposite was developed by solvent casting, obtaining a highly porous structure of ∼75% with interconnected pores (Figure 34a).

The obtained photocatalytic activity indicates a photoreactor degradation of ∼78% of tartrazine after 5 h of solar irradiation (Figure 34a). The nanocomposites’ reusability proved to be effective with just 10% efficiency loss after three uses, showing that the nanoparticles are efficiently attached to the porous structure, allowing remarkable efficiency and reusability. In a similar approach, the same nanocomposite was used to remediate oily wastewater. After 7 h of sunlight exposure, colorless oily wastewater was obtained, the photocatalytic results confirming the applicability for actual remediation strategies.

The SEM-EDX mapping images (Figure 34b) allow understanding that TiO2 nanoparticles are attached to the polymeric matrix and retained in the porous structure. Such information explains the remarkable reusability efficiency of these membranes, as most of the particles are kept inside the porous structure after use.

The TiO2/poly(VDF-co-TrFE) membranes were also tested against pharmaceuticals such as an antibiotic (CIP) and an anti-inflammatory (ibuprofen, IBP) besides MB). The materials were also reused four times, Figure 34c.

It was shown that the membrane is more efficient against MB and CIP, with 99 and 93% photocatalytic degradation, respectively. IBP reached 60% degradation, indicating the higher resilience of this pollutant. The membranes also show a remarkable reusability, as no substantial photocatalytic efficiency changes are identified after four uses, suggesting a suitable attachment of nanoparticles to the polymer substrate.

Poly(VDF-co-TrFE) membranes loaded with several amounts of TiO2 and TiO2/ GO (0, 3, 5, 8, and 20 wt %) (Figure 34d) have been produced by electrospinning, and the photocatalytic efficiency was assessed against MB, both under UV and visible radiation. The UV photocatalytic efficiencies are similar for the pristine TiO2 and the TiO2/GO nanocomposite (∼93% of MB degradation after 110 min). The results were different under visible radiation, with the 8% TiO2/GO nanocomposite completely degrading MB in 90 min (Figure 34d), compared to a 63% degradation for the sample containing the highest concentration of pristine TiO2 (20 wt %). The high surface area and porosity of the electrospun membranes and GO’s interesting electrical and structural properties allowed a notable performance.

The easy processability of PVDF and its copolymers allowed production of a photocatalytic coating based on 50 wt % TiO2/PVDF over PMMA optical fibers, using the dip-coating technique, being possible to produce coatings with thicknesses ranging from 66 to 887 μm (Figure 35).

The mechanical stability of the PVDF coating was confirmed with a tape test. The sample with better mechanical properties achieved a CIP (5 mg.L–1) degradation of ∼95% under visible radiation (72 h). After three consecutive uses, the efficiency loss was approximately 11%, confirming the immobilization of TiO2 nanoparticles into the PVDF porous matrix. In this work, the optical fibers promote radiation transport and serve as a substrate to immobilize the TiO2 nanoparticles. The potential of this coating over PMMA optical fibers allows photocatalytic processes in aquatic environments where the sunlight does not penetrate (e.g., turbid, deep, or underground water).

Besides photocatalytic applications, other multifunctional materials based on PVDF and copolymers are being developed. Salazar et al. produced avant-garde materials with high multifunctionality and efficiency. Membranes were produced with different morphologies and different Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles loadings to evaluate norfloxacin degradation and antimicrobial activity. The obtained results indicate that increasing loadings of Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles increase the photocatalytic activity in both morphologies and under UV and visible radiation. The 10% Ag-TiO2/poly(VDF-co-HFP) solvent casting membrane degraded approximately 81% of norfloxacin in the solution and presented a reduced efficiency loss after three consecutive uses. Moreover, both morphologies induced 1.3 bacterial log reduction in Escherichia coli, indicating its antimicrobial and multifunctional nature.

A PVDF-based material with immobilized TiO2 and Ag nanoparticles has been applied as capacitive sensor with photocatalytic self-cleaning properties. A nonporous thin film was produced that assures good electric properties envisaging capacitive sensing applications. Still, it limits the photocatalytic self-cleaning effect exclusively to the thin film surface, where the MB solution is in contact with the TiO2 nanoparticles under UV irradiation.

MOFs are emergent materials also abundantly used in photocatalytic water treatments due to their highly porous structure and the possibility to functionalize them according to applications. A MIL-53/(Fe)/PVDF nanocomposite membrane was produced through a phase inversion method to assess tetracycline removal in a photocatalytic membrane reactor under UV radiation. The introduction of MIL-53(Fe) into the PVDF matrix improved surface morphology and increased membrane hydrophilicity (higher permeability), promoting the degradation of 93% of tetracycline in the water matrix.

Adsorption

Similarly to photocatalytic processes, fluorinated polymers have also been employed in other water remediation processes, such as adsorption. In this case, the mechanical properties, porosity, and chemical stability of PVDF and its copolymers are particularly relevant. Because, in these cases, the used water flows are generally high, and unlike photocatalysis, the concentrations of fillers added to the membranes are typically higher.

In this scope, poly(VDF-co-HFP)/bayerite membranes have been prepared for arsenic (As) removal from water. These membranes possess interconnected porous structures with a degree of porosity from 65 to 75% (Figure 36a,b), a compressive strength higher than 100 kPa, and water flux between 65 and 215 Lh–1·m2.

The As adsorption assays reveal that using a bayrite/As ratio of 200/1 there was a rejection of ∼60% (40% of As removal) of As species present in the solution after 1 h of operation (Figure 36c). A novel microporous structure based on Fe3O4/poly(VDF-co-HFP) and Y2(CO3)3/poly(VDF-co-HFP) composites has been produced to remove As(V) and As(III) species from contaminated waters. The results indicate adsorption capacities around 93 mg·g–1 for As(III) and 137 mg·g–1 for As(V) removal employing the Fe3O4/poly(VDF-co-HFP) membrane. Additionally, this work contemplated reusability tests that resulted in an efficiency loss of 13% of the Fe3O4/poly(VDF-co-HFP) nanocomposite membrane and increased efficiency by around 6% with the yttrium carbonate Y2(CO3)3/poly(VDF-co-HFP) membrane, which confirms its stability after five uses.

Still, in the adsorption treatment, Salazar et al. manufactured a poly(VDF-co-HFP) membrane containing yttrium carbonate (Y2(CO3)3) and Fe3O4 to be used in a filtration reactor to remove As species from different water matrixes. This membrane is particularly interesting because it combines two processes to produce porous structures: salt leaching and TIPS. Such a highly porous structure (Figure 37a) allowed employment of this material in a filtration reactor that requires high porosity to allow water permeability. The prepared filters achieved maximum adsorption capacities of 101.9 and 212.8 mg·g–1 for As(III) and As(V), respectively. Additionally, the process was scaled up to a reactor with treated effluent, allowing removal of As species from effluents in the presence of interfering contaminants with efficiencies of 21.9 and 51.8% for As(III) and As(V), respectively (flow rate 20 L·h–1, pH = 7, 24 h of contact) (Figure 37b).

Adsorptive membranes can be multifunctional, exhibiting more than one functional application. In this regard, a poly(VDF-co-HFP) membrane has been developed with sorbent and photocatalytic properties. Two different active materials were added, Au/TiO2 and Y2(CO3)3 nanoparticles (Figure 37c), to degrade norfloxacin and adsorb As, respectively. In the multifunctional assay, the hybrid membrane with 10 wt % of Au/TiO2 and 10 wt % of Y2(CO3)3 degraded ∼61% under UV radiation. Regarding the same assay under VIS radiation, 70% of the antibiotic was eliminated (Figure 37d). Regarding adsorption on the multifunctional assay, 81%, 90%, and 93% of As removal efficiencies were obtained after 240 min without radiation, under UV radiation, and VIS radiation, respectively (Figure 37e). The results highlight the relevance of the poly(VDF-co-HFP) processability, allowing the incorporation of two different active materials and its robust porous structure.

In a similar context, a novel type of MOF/polymer matrix, MIL-68(Al)/PVDF (Figure 38a,b), was produced through solvent casting to test its adsorptive properties.

The adsorptive properties of these new membranes were tested against p-nitrophenol (PNP), and all MIL-68(Al)/PVDF samples showed higher adsorption compared to the pristine PVDF membrane. The maximum adsorption capacity was 183.49 μg·cm–2, almost 49.9 higher than pristine PVDF (Figure 38c).

The robustness of PVDF and copolymer membranes allows for reusability, which is very important to make the water purification processes less costly and more sustainable. The work developed by Queirós et al. focused on chromium adsorption (Cr(VI)) and the reusability of the produced membranes. The work employed Al(OH)3 and two metal–organic frameworks, namely the MIL-88-B(Fe) and UiO-66-NH2 Cr(VI) sorbents immobilized into a poly(VDF-co-HFP) matrix to remove Cr(VI) from water and real treated wastewater. It was shown that the membranes with Al(OH)3, MIL-88-B(Fe), and UiO-66-NH2 could retain 12, 62, and 97% of Cr in solution (5 mg.L–1), respectively, after 24 h of contact. Reusability studies were performed after composite membrane reactivation (stirring for 4 h with a 1 M HCl solution and washing with ultrapure water for 2 h). After three cycles, an efficiency loss of approximately 10% was observed, confirming the particle’s efficient attachment to the polymeric matrix and its suitability to reuse.

Similarly, a multifunctional membrane has been produced through TIPS, loaded with MIL-53 (Fe) for adsorption and catalytic oxidation. MB was used as a contaminant model to assess the produced PVDF membranes’ catalytic oxidation and adsorptive performance. Moreover, the microfiltration properties of the membrane were assessed using bovine serum albumin (BSA). The multifunctional membrane could remove over 75% of MB and retain 82–86% of BSA. Tests were also performed in natural wastewater, confirming the ability of this membrane to remove contaminants in a complex water matrix.

It has been shown in this section that water contamination is an increasingly worrying and complex problem to solve by humankind. One of the significant problems in this framework are the emergent contaminants (e.g., pharmaceuticals, pesticides, heavy metals), which can persist in water even after undergoing classical physicochemical or biological treatments and can be toxic even at low concentrations (ng to μg). In this context, novel materials and devices are necessary to address this massive variety of persistent contaminants. Water remediation techniques such as photocatalysis and adsorption have been widely applied due to their high efficiency and practicability. To employ these techniques, polymers such as PVDF and copolymers possess the perfect properties once it allows a large variety of processing conditions and morphology and it is mechanical, thermal and UV resistant. As stated in detail above, the production of polymeric membranes loaded with active materials of different types (e.g., TiO2 nanoparticles and MOFs) and controlling the porous microstructure and surface properties is essential to obtain an efficient removal of the contaminant. In the scope of photocatalysis, it is noted that TiO2 still is the most used photocatalyst despite new active materials’ arrival, whereas MOFs are emergent materials that present high flexibility in terms of design, allowing them to address complex water contamination problems in a customizable way.

Additionally, multifunctional materials are a noticeable trend, which is necessary as real contaminated water possesses a myriad of different contaminants to be addressed in different ways. In short, PVDF and copolymers reveal an outstanding processability that allows producing all types of structures in combination with a large variety of active materials and physicochemical functionalization. The polymeric matrix partly endows the presented materials’ efficiency, robustness, and reusability.

Microfluidics and Portable Analytical Devices

Microfluidics is the science of controlling and manipulating tiny amount of fluids, usually in the range of pico- to microliters, in networks of channels with sizes from ten to hundreds of micrometers. This discipline is perceived as a powerful tool for life science research and biotechnology by taking advantage of its small size, low volume sample consumption, user-friendly design, fast analysis, as well as the potential to carry out several analyses in parallel., These properties open the possibility of performing in situ and real-time measurements but depend on the design and integration of specific tools in order to allow multiple operational steps, including sampling, mixing, separation, isolation, detection, and analysis, among others., These tools must be simple, cost-effective, compact, easy to control, and simple to manufacture and assemble in the microfluidic platform. As previously described, PVDF-based polymers feature the highest piezoelectric coefficients among polymers, which together with its tunable structure, easy processing, low density, flexibility, and biocompatibility have been increasingly integrated or coupled to microfluidic platforms as piezoelectric sensors and actuators for diverse applications. In addition, PVDF-based materials have been used as passive membranes in microfluidic platforms, as described in the following.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Sensors

The development and integration of sensors in microfluidic systems play a key role to obtain low-cost, innovative, and portable platforms with a wide range of functionalities required for advanced applications., In this sense, piezoelectric materials that respond to both electrical and/or mechanical stimuli are suitable candidates for sensor applications. Within the class of piezoelectric materials, polymers such as PVDF and its copolymers represent an excellent alternative to common rigid piezoceramics due to their flexibility, versatility, facile processing, easy integration, and low cost. Moreover, their lower density usually results in a better sensitivity than quartz or PZT. In the following, relevant studies on designing and manufacturing PVDF-based sensors and their integration, testing, and characterization on microfluidic platforms are presented.

Microdiaphragm arrays based on piezoelectric poly(VDF-co-TrFE) copolymer with integrated microfluidic chip were designed and implemented for high-performance protein immunosensors. The diaphragm was fabricated using mold-transfer and hot-embossing techniques, allowing high throughput and reproducibility. The intrinsic hydrophobic surface of poly(VDF-co-TrFE) acts as a natural bioreceptor to bind proteins of interest, which greatly simplifies the sensor preparation by eliminating the self-assembled monolayers (SAM) formation and pretreatment steps. The poly(VDF-co-TrFE) diaphragm with 32 μm thickness and 1 mm of diameter (fundamental resonant frequency at 39.68 MHz) demonstrated good linearity for BSA concentrations from 1 to 1000 μg·mL–1. A sensorized microfluidic end-effector system has been also designed, calibrated, and implemented by means of a PTFE microtube for handling and deposition of nano- and microentities. The system integrates a highly sensitive PVDF beam sensing buffer between a DC microdiaphragm pump and a micropipette to provide controlled micro force and flow rate for precise microfluidic handling, droplet control, and manipulation. The PVDF sensing buffer consists of a double-end fixed PVDF sensing beam strip with one PVDF layer and one polyester layer. The microfluidic system showed a deposition success rate of CNTs close to 80%, demonstrating its potential for the manufacture of CNT-based sensors and detectors and ultimately for the manufacture of nano- and microsensors and devices. A capacitive-type microfluidic flow sensor based on piezoelectric PVDF was fabricated using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology to detect flow rates and impulse pressure signals. The flow rate is monitored by the frequency amplitude response that differs with flow rate variations as the frequency signal is coupled to the resistance and capacitance connections of the PVDF equivalent circuit. Impulse pressure is measured using a charge amplifier. This piezoelectric microfluidic platform takes advantage of the flexibility of PVDF, which is difficult to obtain with piezoceramics, and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to fabricate soft microfluidic sensors, proving to be effective in detecting flow rate at high pressure. A highly sensitive PDMS microfluidic flow sensor was also fabricated by integrating a 10 μm thick electrospun aligned piezoelectric poly(VDF-co-TrFE) nanofiber film (Figure 39a).

The flow sensor can linearly measure low flow rates ranging from 13 to 301 μL·h–1 with a sensitivity of 0.36 mV per 1 μL·h–1. Additionally, the system could measure in dynamic flow the viscosity of ethylene glycol aqueous solution ranging from 1 to 16.1 mPa·s at 25 °C. Another electrospun aligned poly(VDF-co-TrFE) fiber sensor was interfaced with a flexible plastic to create a NG for energy harvesting devices and self-powered mechanical systems with potential application in robotic and microfluidic platforms. The NG demonstrated ability to produce average voltage peak signals of ± 0.4 V when deformed by 8 mN of cantilever pressure at both 2 and 3 Hz. The piezoelectric response did not change after platform sterilization but dampened when placed in cell culture media. A similar self-powered microfluidic sensor that can simultaneously harvest the mechanical energy of fluids and monitor their properties was designed and fabricated. The NG is composed of flexible electrospun piezoelectric PVDF nanofibers integrated into a PDMS microfluidic system. The platform generates open-circuit high output voltage up to 1.8 V when a droplet of water flow past the suspended PVDF nanofibers. Moreover, the platform features self-powered sensing behavior with a decreased voltage amplitude with increasing input pressure and liquid viscosity, which demonstrates its potential as a self-powered microfluidic sensor for in situ monitoring of viscosity and pressure. A miniaturized and biocompatible flow sensor that closely mimics the structural architecture of the hair cell bundles in fish was fabricated (Figure 39b). It is constituted by arrays of PDMS micropillars with graded heights connected to electrospun piezoelectric PVDF nanofibers that act as biological tip links and elicit electric charges proportional to the stress induced in the fibers. A hydrogel was used to encapsulated the sensor so that the resulting cupula bends in response to an external flow and causes, therefore, the sensor to bend as well. Water flow sensing assays performed using a dipole stimulus showed sensitivity and threshold detection limit of 300 mV·(m·s–1)−1 and of 8 μm·s–1, respectively. Biomedical and microfluidic applications can take advantage of this self-powered, sensitive, and flexible sensor. A sensing microfluidic platform based on electrospun PVDF, PS, and PMMA nanofibers incorporated with MWCNTs was fabricated for the detection of acetone and toluene, which are target volatilomes associated with diabetes and lung cancer. This hand-held volatilome analyzer (Figure 39c) takes advantage of the varying solubility of these three polymer nanofibers in contact with acetone and toluene. This noninvasive platform test responds selectively to acetone in a concentration range between 35 ppb and 3 ppm and toluene between 1 ppb and 10 ppm in exhaled breath. Another interesting study combined a gecko-inspired nanotentacle skin integrated with a microfluidic system and a PVDF-based piezoelectric NG for multisensing. The system was successfully tested for the simultaneous detection of three sweat indicators, namely pH, lactic acid and urea, and also wrist pulse, demonstrating its potential for various applications, such as personal care, human–machine interaction, and artificial intelligence. PVDF Al-coated microcantilever beams, considered as a mechanical transducer, were developed to detect the biomechanical interaction of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) molecules and the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). The proposed technique demonstrates higher sensitivity and shorter response time (5 times lower) than similar methods such as piezoresistive methods used for studying biomolecular interaction of antibodies and antigen. Thus, this biosensor system has the potential for the development of advanced microfluidic biosensors.

In addition to the applicability of the piezoelectricity of PVDF-based polymers, the pyroelectric property has also been used for temperature variation monitoring in microfluidic systems. The microfluidic platform consists on a micromilled 1.5 mm thick PMMA bulk sealed with a 24 μm thick metalized and poled PVDF sheet. The development of the polymer pyroelectric sensor represents an effective solution in terms of ease of integration, sensitivity, and speed when prompt and accurate temperature monitoring is required. The pyroelectric response of the platform demonstrated to be suitable for most biological applications, with a better responsivity between 3.2 and 200 ms, even with a large temperature gradient. A modified setup uses a 28 μm thick piezoelectric PVDF film integrated into a PMMA microfluidic system to fabricate a high-performance and cost-effective temperature sensor that allows rapid monitoring of the localized temperature of biological fluids. In this approach, an infrared laser is combined with the pyroelectric PVDF film, which stimulates an active element located on the top of the microfluidic channel and allows measuring of the absolute temperature without the use of an adjunctive reference temperature sensor. In another study, a preamplifier developed in a 180 nm CMOS process converts the charge generated by a pyroelectric 20 μm thick PVDF transducer into a voltage signal, proving a measurement of the temperature variation in biological fluids. The proposed concept can provide a conversion gain of 0.8 mV·pC–1 while consuming just 2.1 μW of power. With a total area of 0.038 mm2, the developed charge-sensitive preamplifier is suitable for implementation in a lab-on-a-chip system.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Actuators

Controlled fluid transport and rapid analysis results are essential to improve the efficiency of microfluidic platforms and their applicability. Thus, the automatic and controllable transport and manipulation of fluids and their mixture in the shortest possible time are key aspects that must be considered when developing microfluidic platforms. Microfluidic technology is associated with resistance to flow at a micrometer scale and difficulties in the laminar flow regime. To overcome these limitations, large efforts are being made to design and fabricate mixing and pumping systems of suitable size for integration in microfluidic devices. Some solutions described in the literature use MEMS, such as microvalves and micropumps, to define fluid transport. Although efficient, they can be challenging to fabricate and integrate into a miniaturized chip and may cause damage when sensitive fluids are used, such as those containing cells., Other methods rely on long and complex channel geometries to favor passive mixing, which is often associated with long transit and mixing time, and they depend on the diffusion coefficients of the fluids involved., A suitable approach comes from piezoelectric polymer actuators that can be easily integrated into microfluidic systems and promote the manipulation of entities and fluids by converting electrical into mechanical energy. Although piezoelectric PVDF-based polymers feature a lower electromechanical coupling coefficient that piezoceramics such as PZT, their lower acoustic impedance ensure a low reflection coefficient between the piezoelectric material and the propagation medium. Moreover, while ceramics break easily and feature hard and dense structures, PVDF-based polymers are flexible, with low density, and easily produced into thin films, facilitating their integration. Relevant examples of microfluidic platforms that integrate piezoelectric PVDF-based actuators are presented in the following.

A fully integrated SU-8 disposable microfluidic platform that integrates a piezoelectric PVDF polymer film was developed for clinical diagnosis. The platform takes advantage of the acoustic waves generated by a 110 μm piezoelectric PVDF film located underneath the reaction chambers to improve the mixing and reaction time of fluids, a phenomenon called acoustic streaming. The results demonstrated that applying an electrical signal at the resonance frequency to the electrodes of the piezoelectric film showed better results in terms of mixing time. In addition, the heating generated by the piezoelectric film also contributes to the reduction of the reaction time when endothermic reactions are involved. An optimized system was developed for the same purpose. In this case, the piezoelectric transducer is based on a 25 μm thick poly(VDF-co-TrFE) film with aluminum doped zinc oxide (AZO) electrodes fabricated by a layer-by-layer deposition approach so that the entire system is transparent in the visible light spectrum, and allows optical detection (Figure 39d). The piezoelectric transducer, featuring a piezoelectric |d33| coefficient of 34 pC·N–1, was integrated underneath a PDMS microfluidic system and actuated with a peak-to-peak voltage amplitude of 10 V and a frequency of 48 MHz. In both cases, the reaction time for quantifying two clinically relevant analytes, uric acid and nitrite in urine, was reduced by 23% and 32%, respectively, compared with the reaction time achieved only by diffusion. In other studies, all inkjet-printed piezoelectric polymer actuators based on poly(VDF-co-TrFE) and Ag electrodes were fabricated on a PET substrate. The actuators feature piezoelectric d31 coefficients in the range of 7–10 pm.V–1, allowing the generation of significant actuator deflections and pump rates up to 130 μL·min–1 in microfluidic applications. A micropump based on a 28 μm thick commercial piezoelectric PVDF film was integrated into a PMMA microfluidic system and allowed for precise control of water flow rate in the range of 0–300 μL.min–1 by tuning the applied electrical signal voltage and frequency. The system was tested for the generation of droplets by integrating two piezoelectric PVDF pumps into one T-junction microfluidic system (Figure 39e). Controlled droplet size was achieved by tuning the applied electrical voltage. At low voltage, a nongassing miniature electroosmotic pump was also developed by assembling poly(2-ethyl aniline) (EPANI)–Prussian blue nanocomposite electrode and commercially available hydrophilic PVDF membranes (area of 0.28 cm2). Although linear with the applied voltage, the flow rate also depends on the electrode composition. At 5 V, flow rates were increased from 187.41 to 95.47 μL·min–1·cm–2 as the weight fraction of 2-ethyl aniline was increased.

The maximum stall pressure at zero flow for the best-developed pump was 1.2 KPa at 2 V. These characteristics make them promising for various microfluidic applications. A wearable, nozzle-diffuser microfluidic pump was designed, fabricated, and tested. The system is based on integrating core–shell structured Al2O3@CNTs nanofillers in poly(VDF-co-TrFE) to increase the induced strain. High controllability of the fluidic process is obtained with flow rates ranging from 13 to 135 μL·min–1. Dual light-activated optopiezoelectic microfluidic pumps based on a 9 μm thick commercial piezoelectric PVDF polymer film coated with a layer of titanyl phthalocyanine (TiOPc) photoconductive coating and ITO transparent electrode were fabricated and tested (Figure 39f)., They feature the advantage of being selectively activated and controlled, both spatially and temporally, by a single masked light source and voltage source, allowing operation of various micropumps independently at the same time. This approach allows to reduce the complexity and size of the driving element of a microfluidic system. Volume flow rates of 28.89 μm·s–1 were reached, optimizing the synchronization of the operating frequency of the light source and the driving voltage. Other optopiezoelectric system was fabricated and optimized to work as optical control valve array for digital microfluidic applications. The system is based on a piezoelectric poly(VDF-co-TrFE) film deposited by spin-coating and coated with a thin TiOPc electrode layer.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Membranes

In addition to its use as active sensors and actuators in microfluidic platforms, PVDF-based materials have also been applied as passive membranes in microfluidic systems for diverse applications, taking advantage of their easy processing, hydrophobicity, and mechanical resistance.

PVDF is a material commonly employed for the adsorption of proteins in Western blot analysis that follows protein acrylamine gel electrophoresis. Thus, the development of nanofibrous PVDF membranes by electrospinning has the ability to improve protein adsorption in such assays because of the increase of its specific surface area. This approach has been used in a PDMS microfluidic platform for cross-array immunoassays that can simultaneously detect protein–protein interactions. The processed electrospun PVDF membranes feature eight times more capacity for adsorbing proteins than conventional track-etched polycarbonate (TEPC). The performance of PVDF substrates (Durapore PVDF, 5 μm pore size) in electrokinetic microfluidic-based analytical devices was also studied by developing a laminate glass-PDMS-PVDF-PDMS-glass laminate structure. For that, 1 mm thick borosilicate glass microscope slides, 500–700 μm thick PDMS sheets, and PVDF microchannels with lengths ranging from 1–4 cm cut using a direct laser writing instrument were used. PVDF demonstrates the ability for electrophoretic separations of three amino acids mixture. It was also reported the functionalization of commercial PVDF membranes and their integration in a microfluidic platform for the capture and purification of porcine carboxylesterase and porcine LDH. PVDF membranes were also coated with carbon nanodots for the development of a POC photoluminescence membrane strip for the quantification of DA. A portable POC immunosensing platform was also developed for sensitive detection of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in biological fluids by coupling a digital multimeter readout with a flexible photosensitive pressure sensor made of photoactive methylammonium lead iodide (CH3NH3PbI3) and PVDF. Under optimum conditions, the digital multimeter immunoassay featured good analytical properties toward PSA within the dynamic linear range of 0.02–50 ng·mL–1 at a detection limit of 12.6 pg·mL–1. A POC electrochemical immunosensor that employed PVDF microparticles coated with streptavidin and AuNPs was developed for the highly sensitive detection of human thyroglobulin. Linear response from 2.0 to 10.0 ng·mL–1 with R2 of 0.985 was obtained with detection limits of 0.015 ng·mL–1. Porous hydrophobic flat and microstructured PVDF membranes fabricated by immersion precipitation and phase separation micromolding techniques, respectively, and integrated in a glass microfluidic platform to allow an efficient supply of gases into liquids or degassing of fluids within confined microchannels. O2 transport simulations and experiments were performed and shown that microstructured PVDF membranes enhance mass transport rates and exceed the performance of flat PVDF membranes. Another study reported a new type of wound dressing based on hybrid microfibers of konjac glucomannan and PVDF, having hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments, developed via microfluidic spinning. While PVDF is hydrophobic and allows good tensile strength, easy processing, and drug release properties, konjac glucomannan is a natural polysaccharide featuring hydrophilic properties, high drug-load efficiencies, good biocompatibility, and good biodegradability. Drug release tests were performed by loading the microfibers with enrofloxacin. The results show sustained drug release performance for 13 days, excellent heat resistance, antibacterial activity against E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, and promotion of wound healing. An array of four PVDF membranes impregnated with cationic poly(3-alkoxy-4-methylthiophene) (PMNT) as an optical indicator was also developed and evaluated for the colorimetric detection of lung cancer biomarker microRNA (mir21) and hepatitis B virus DNA biomarker (HBV-DNA). Linear response for mir21 and HBV-DNA from 1 nM to 10 μM was obtained with a limit of detection of 0.6 nM and 2 nM in distilled water and plasma, respectively. Moreover, a logic gate system was proposed for discrimination of mir21 and HBV-DNA using the colorimetric assay response as inputs. This result offers a promising approach for colorimetric profiling of nucleic acids and thus POC diagnosis. PVDF membranes were also assembled with cationic poly[N,N,N-triethyl-3-((4-methylthiophen-3-yl)oxy)propan-1-aminium bromide] to form a conjugated polyelectrolytes that along with the use of a smartphone allows the precise quantification of nucleic acid assays concentrations in a range down to 1 mM. The obtained system could be used for POC colorimetric nucleic acids assays in complex matrices without the need of expensive and sophisticated software and instrumentation. In another study, PVDF membranes were used to increase the colorimetric signal (color intensity) and thus enhance the performance of a stopped 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) colorimetric signal in paper-based biosensors. In fact, stopping the reaction of a colorimetric assay if often used in microfluidic systems to amplify and stabilize the colorimetric signal for detection, turning this approach extremely useful for this kind of application. Substrate-free electrospun PVDF and PVDF/zeolite A membranes were also produced using an optimized circle electrode collector with higher productivity and uniformity than traditional electrospinning process using flat collector. These membranes were successfully assembled and tested for humidity blocking, having also potential to be used and integrated into organ-on-a-chip, biochemical sensors, and microfluidic analytical platforms.

Last but not least, novel materials have been developed and tested as microfluidic substrates for the manufacture of portable analytical systems (or POC) as a potential pathway to complement the limited range of commercially available microfluidic substrates used for the manufacture of paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) mainly based on cellulose. The suitability, advantages, and application possibilities of microfluidic substrates based on poly(VDF-co-TrFE) membranes with tailored morphology, including spherulitic, porous, and randomly oriented and oriented fibers, were evaluated and compared with commercial paper substrates (Figure 40).

The poly(VDF-co-TrFE) membranes feature high wax printing quality, excellent mechanical properties (Young’s modulus from 71.4 ± 2.9 to 163.4 ± 5.1 MPa in the wet state, respectively), and tailorable capillary flow rate (from 35.7 ± 2.5 mm·min–1 to 88.3 mm·min–1), allowing matching process requirements for specific (bio)technological applications (such as collection, separation, preconcentration, mixing, among others). Moreover, wax-printed microfluidic platforms were designed, printed, and successfully tested for the colorimetric quantifications of glucose in the range of 25–100 mg·dL–1. Each microfluidic system includes eight reaction chambers, with each glucose concentration being measured in two reaction chambers separately and at the same time (Figure 41).

The results demonstrate the suitability of the developed poly(VDF-co-TrFE) as microfluidic substrates based on their tailorable morphology, improved capillary flow rate, wax print quality, homogeneous generation of colorimetric reaction, and excellent mechanical properties. Moreover, they can be reused after a simple cleaning process, while their electroactive properties make them suitable for the development of a new generation of eco-friendly and smart microfluidic substrates.

Despite the aforementioned advantages and advances in the use of electroactive PVDF-based materials in various aspects of the microfluidic technology, i.e., sensors, actuators, or even as functional substrates, which demonstrate the strong potential of this class of smart polymers, there is still a road ahead of intense and dynamic research to obtain specific tailored properties that will ultimately allow addressing of some of the most challenging (bio)technological applications in the near future.

Biomedical Applications: Tissue Engineering and Antimicrobial Surfaces

Electrical signals, including electromechanical ones, are present in a significat number of biological tissues within the human body. By applying electrical stimuli, important tissue regeneration may be achieved. More recently, the effect of this type of physical stimuli on prokaryotic cells (i.e., bacteria) has also been studied for antimicrobial purposes. Thus, electroactive materials and, in particular, piezoelectric ones, have been widely researched as a source of electrical and mechanoelectrical stimuli to a wide range of eukariotic and prokaryotic cells for advanced biomedical applications. The mechanism behind these phenomenon on both cells is based on the possibility of these material to create electroactive microenvironments (EAMs), upon mechanical stimulation, that act by itself as a tissue regenerator and/or antimicrobial agent. In the case of antimicrobial applications, the role of assisting and boosting the antimicrobial properties of other antimicrobial agents has also been researched.

The natural piezoelectric properties found in specific biological tissues such as bone, nerves, tendons, and skin make it evident that utilizing materials with similar characteristics could bring significant benefits to advanced tissue regeneration strategies, especially when adopting a biomimetic approach., The knowledge of the piezoelectric response of biological tissues may thus be important for highlighting their potential in this regard. Among the different piezoelectric polymers, PVDF presents the highest piezoelectric coefficient, is biocompatible and chemically stable, all important features in materials development for the biomedical field. For this reason, PVDF has been increasingly used for biomedical applications as it can be used as a sensor,,− actuator,− health monitoring,− and antimicrobial purposes.−

Tissue Engineering

Tissue engineering is a multidisciplinary scientific approach that combines different areas, in particular: medicine, molecular biology, chemical engineering, bioengineering, physiology, developmental biology, nanotechnology, and material science, with the aim to develop materials and cells based strategies to substitute tissues and/or to promote tissue repair/regeneration impaired by disease and/or trauma., This strategy emerged as an alternative to conventional methods and to overcome the gap between the growing list of patients waiting for organ transplantation and the limited number of donated organs available for such procedures., For that, the triad of tissue engineering is based on the complement of three components: cells, scaffolds, and signals (Figure 42).

One of the first paradigms of tissue engineering was the use of supportive materials/matrices capable of providing an appropriate environment for the different tissue grafts and organs of human origin for clinical therapeutics adhesion, growth, and differentiation toward the desired tissue, including fat, fascia, bone, skin, cornea, kidney, liver, heart, and dentin matrix, among others.

Tissue engineering promotes the design and production of scaffolds with mechanical, chemical, and physical properties similar to the 3D biological systems. To positively mimic biological tissues, an optimized scaffold should favor cell penetration, growth, and integration into the host system, and during healing or after healing should, preferably, ensure the degradation into nontoxic byproducts.

One primary requirement for a biomaterial is biocompatibility, and during the last 20 years, various biomaterials ranging from metals to ceramics and polymers have been proposed.,

Different materials from synthetic or natural origin and different morphologies have been evaluated in order to determine the most prone to replace the cell environment. Natural materials are attractive for biomedical and tissue engineering applications as they exhibit similar properties to the tissue to be replaced and can be obtained from natural sources., Nevertheless, natural polymers can be difficult to process and usually present poor mechanical and electrical properties.

Polymers are among the most applied materials for tissue engineering due to their chemical and mechanical tunability. Other parameters such as macro- and microarchitecture, biodegradability, and the physical stability of polymers allow addressing the complex functionalities possessed by each tissue type. Therefore, a wide range of synthetic polymers have been used to construct different materials/matrices for tissue engineering, mostly in a passive way, i.e., just working as support for the cells/tissues. However, many of the key functions in cells and organs of the human body are controlled by dynamical stimuli such as electrical signals. For example, electrical fields influence the metabolism and growth at different stages and can guide the migration and movement of different cell types such as epidermal, epithelial, and corneal cells,− and can modulate the phenotypes of vascular endothelial cells, regenerate nerve fibers, and influence ligament healing.− Also, among the different clues that determine tissue development, cells/organs repair and/or regeneration, together with cell behavior and function, electrical and electromechanical signals are essential for tissues such as bone, cartilage, skeletal and cardiac muscle, skin, and neural.−

In this way, physical signals are particularly relevant parameters to be considered for the development of active materials/scaffolds in order to mimic the body microenvironment, providing the appropriate stimuli for specific cell responses. Therefore, a new paradigm for tissue engineering emerged, based on the use of active/smart biomaterials with appropriate forms and geometries, aiming to properly regenerate specific tissues.

Such approach allows the induction of these stimuli more naturally, taking advantage of the presence of electrical or mechanical signals of the body. Therefore, multifunctional biomaterials based on smart materials have been applied in several tissue engineering fields, including bone, cartilage, skeletal and cardiac muscle, and neural regeneration. Among the different smart materials, PVDF-based polymers have already shown strong potential for novel tissue engineering and for such reason will be carefully reviewed in this section.

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Tissue Engineering

Knowing that the electromechanical stimulation can be effectively conducted with the use of PVDF, some studies demonstrated the biocompatibility of PVDF-based materials, reporting also its influence on the cellular activity., Because the bone is piezoelectric, the first studies regarding the use of PVDF as a biomaterial were performed to study the influence of the PVDF’s piezoelectricity on bone regeneration.,,

Additionally, the influence of PVDF́s surface charge on the interaction/adsorption of fibronectin was also studied, detecting a higher adsorption on surface charged PVDF rather than on nonsurface-charged PVDF. Later, the influence of the same surface charge on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts behavior, cultivated under static and dynamic conditions, was evaluated, verifying that positive charged surfaces promote higher osteoblast adhesion/proliferation, being even higher under dynamic conditions, i.e., with the application of a mechano-electrical stimuli. A similar approach was used by using human adipose stem cells (hASCs), being verified that both mechanical and electrical stimulation significantly improved the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs. Such osteogenic differentiation of hASCs was also enhanced by the dynamic piezoelectric stimulation of negative surface charged β-PVDF. Those studies demonstrated that negative surface charged β-PVDF films can provide the required electromechanical stimuli for the differentiation of specific cells, allowing the design of suitable bone tissue engineering strategies. The influence of electrical stimulation on the proliferation, migration, and maturation of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were also studied with PVDF/BT/MWCNT films. After 21 days of cell culture and stimulation, it was found that the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and also the calcium deposition and mineralization were enhanced. These PVDF/BT/MWCNT films were also implanted in a rat model, and no inflammatory response was observed. Moreover, there is supporting evidence indicating the occurrence of foreign body reactions accompanied by fibrous encapsulation, wherein the thickness of the encapsulating capsule gradually diminishes over time.

Stem cells (human induced pluripotent) were also cultured on PVDF-based composite nanofibers. The developed PVDF/collagen/platelet-rich plasma (PRP) composite nanofibers exhibited good biocompatibility. Additionally, the results obtained through the ALP activity and also calcium content assays proved that PVDF-based nanofibers promote higher osteoinductivity. Such results make this composite a promising candidate for the treatment of bone lesions. According to bone-related gene expression evaluation results (Figure 43a), it was concluded that the developed PVDF/collagen/PRP-based biomaterial present higher osteoinductivity when compared to the PVDF/collagen composite, demonstrating a promising bone bioimplant. PVDF was also combined with polycaprolactone (PCL) to create fibrous scaffolds for bone regeneration, demonstrating promotion of human mesenchymal stem cells differentiation into osteoblasts.

In vivo studies were also carried out to evaluate the influence of the electroactive features of β-PVDF films on bone defect recovery, verifying that poled β-PVDF films leads to more defect closure and bone remodeling than nonpoled PVDF films and randomly oriented electrospun fiber mats. A piezoelectric actuator has been also set in steomy cuts in the femur and tibia of sheep in order to mechanically stimulate bone tissues (Figure 43b–e), reporting that, after one-month implantation, a significantly higher total and new bone area were observed in the regions close to the actuators. Furthermore, significantly higher bone deposition rate was also observed in the mechanically stimulated areas, together with increased osteopontin expression.

The introduction of magnetostrictive fillers into the PVDF’s matrix allows the development of magnetoelectric materials that have been also explored for bone tissue engineering. This approach can be useful in the case of the immobilization of the patient, where the natural mechanical stimulus is not fully ensured or even impossible, allowing the use of an external magnetic field to remotely stimulate tissue regeneration/differentiation. Keeping this in mind, Terfenol-D/poly(VDF-co-TrFe) magnetoelectric composites have been applied to study the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells, noticing that when the cells were cultured under mechanical and electrical stimulation or with the application of a magnetic field, the cell proliferation was enhanced. Thus, it was proven that the magnetoelectric materials can be a successful strategy for tissue engineering.

Following this route, magnetoelectric nanocomposite scaffold composed of PVDF/GO/CoFe2O4 were used for high yield differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to neural-like cells. The neural-like cells tended to differentiate instead of proliferating when the magnetic field was applied to the cells, in same direction to the stimuli. The chemical differentiation factors, on the other hand, revealed just a lower cell differentiation compared to the cells incubated in the presence of a magnetic bioreactor. Beyond tissue engineering, the PVDF/GO/CoFe2O4 composites can also have potential applications as biosensors and bioactuators.

By placing materials on a secondary role, and geometry on a key role, a comparison of the potential of osteogenic differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells on 2D and 3D PVDF-based scaffolds has been addressed. The 3D-PVDF nanofibrous scaffold revealed a better osteoinductive properties when compared with the 2D PVDF film counterpart. The osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells has been also studied on electrospun β-phase scaffolds and compared to tissue culture with PS. Human mesenchymal stem cells cultured on both types of the scaffolds were successfully attached as proven by a spread morphology. Additionally, cells on PVDF-based scaffolds were found to exhibit the greatest ALP activity and early mineralization by day 10 as compared to tissue culture PS. Such results can be explained by the material similarity of the scaffolds and the bone, concluding that the 3D structure could lead to better/more efficient bone differentiation.

PVDF-based biomaterials for muscular tissue engineering have shown quite promising results, in particular with respect to the effect of materials surface charge on the enhancement of myoblast cell proliferation and differentiation. Magnetoelectric CoFe2O4/poly(VDF-co-TrFE) films were also used to investigate the influence of mechano- and electrical stimuli on the differentiation of myoblast cells. The myoblast differentiation is enhanced with the application of the mechanical and/or electrical stimulation, with higher values of maturation index of the myotubes under the mechanoelectrical stimuli. This work demonstrates the potential of the use of magnetoelectric stimulation for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.

In the area of heart tissue regeneration, β-PVDF based electrospun nanofibers were introduced as a promising material for the development of cardiac patches.

It was shown that the produced PVDF based biomaterial is mechanically stable, supporting the adhesion and differentiation of cardiomyocytes comparing to the standard nonpiezoelectric scaffolds used as control. These fibers were also coated with vitronectin-derived peptide-mussel adhesive protein fusion (VNm) and used to cultivation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). The results revealed that under cardiac differentiation conditions, more spontaneously beating colonies were generated, as well an upregulation of cardiac-related genes. Additionally, in vitro hemocompatibility studies (Figure 44) revealed that β-PVDF-PMMA/HAp/TiO2 (PPHT) nanofibers did not induced hemolysis to the red blood cells at the end of 6 h exposure time, where the PPHT scaffold can be interfaced with direct blood contact organs such as heart. This promising report conjugated with stem cell engineering strategies can be a disruptive tool for repairing damaged heart muscles. PVDF fibers have been also combined with gelatin and GO for cardiac tissue engineering in order to decrease the hydrophobic nature of the PVDF fibers. In this study, it was demonstrated that the introduction of GO into the PVDF matrix improves the piezoelectric properties of pristine PVDF. To study the potential of the produced PVDF/gelatin/GO fibers, embryonal cardiomyocyte cells (ECCs) were used, and the cell proliferation and gene expression (cardiac troponin, Connexin 43, and GATA-4 binding protein) was evaluated. It was verified that PVDF/gelatin/GO fibers present a higher gene expression and also induce a higher cell alignment when compared with the PVDF/gelatin and gelatin fibers. The results demonstrated the potential of the PVDF/gelatin/GO fibers to convert ECCs cell into heart muscle. Poly(VDF-co-TrFE) electrospun randomly oriented and aligned fibers were also produced to create myocardial implants., The differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) into cardiomyocytes and their long-term culture/maturation with the poly(VDF-co-TrFE) fibers was demonstrated. Poly(VDF-co-TrFE) was also combined with ILs as novel and promising platform for cardiac tissue engineering.

Drop-cast PVDF scaffolds have been also developed and treated by cold plasma for cardiac tissue engineeringin vitro and in vivo assays. In the in vitro assays, newborn rat primary cardiomyocytes were used and a higher cell adhesion, a well-organized sarcomeric structure and also higher gene expression related to adhesion and cardiac function were observed in the plasma-treated drop-cast PVDF scaffolds. After the promising results, an in vivo study was performed on healthy murine models in order to verify if the produced scaffolds when implanted on hearts did not increase inflammation. After 28 days of implantation, no toxic or immune responses were observed, demonstrating the potential of this kind of material to be used for cardiac tissue engineering.

Concerning neural tissue engineering studies, PVDF and its copolymer poly(VDF-co-TrFE) have been evaluated under static and dynamic conditions, reporting that the number of differentiated neurons of mouse neuroblastoma cells increased with the interaction with poled (i.e., overall average surface charge) PVDF substrates. Electrospun piezoelectric scaffolds of poly(VDF-co-TrFE) were also found to increase the neurite extension of primary neurons, noting that dorsal root ganglion neurons were successfully attached to all fibrous scaffolds. The effect of the alignment state of the poly(VDF-co-TrFE) fiber scaffolds on neurite extension was monitored by confocal fluorescent images (Figure 45), and it was shown that neurite extension was improved on aligned and annealed (135 °C for 96 h and quenched with ice water) poly(VDF-co-TrFE) comparing with annealed as-spun random poly(VDF-co-TrFE) scaffolds.

Poly(VDF-co-TrFE) aligned fibers were also produced and used to support Schwann cells growth, neurite extension, and myelination, demonstrating great potential for spinal cord repair.

In a different scaffold morphology, PVDF membranes have been acoustically stimulated in order to study the effect of dynamically induced surface electrical charges on the behavior of neuritogenesis of PC12 cells. It was discovered that the calcium channels were successfully activated, generating neurites via a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent pathway. PVDF films with different surface charge (none, positive, and negative) were also produced and submitted to dynamic mechanoelectrical stimuli in order to investigate their influence on neuron-like cells adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. It was verified that piezoelectric dynamic stimulation can enhance the proliferation of SH-SY5Y cells and also improve neurite extension and differentiation.

Also produced through electrospinning, PVDF/Au nanoparticles composites were used for nerve tissue regeneration, the composites showing the ability to increase growth and adhesion of cells without any toxicity, exhibiting also a suitable proliferation after culturing for 24 h.

3D structured self-powered PVDF/ PCL scaffolds were optimized for peripheral nerve regeneration (Figure 46).

It has been stated that 3D PVDF-based scaffolds promoted, in vitro, the adhesion and proliferation of the rat Schwann cells (RSCs), exhibiting substantial electrophysiological, morphological, and functional nerve restoration. Additionally, a significant electrophysiological recovery for the injured nerves was observed. The same materials (PVDF/PCL) were used to develop biodegradable piezoelectric nanotracts for long-gap peripheral nerve repair. The PVDF/PCL nanotracts were implanted in a 15 mm sciatic nerve defect of a rat model, and upon sono-electro-mechanical therapy, it was verified a higher renewal of complex motor functions, Schwann cell repopulation, axonal growth and maturity, and gastrocnemius muscle histology. The obtained results demonstrated that sono-electro-mechanical therapeutic system is a promising approach for clinical treatment of peripheral nerve injuries.

A novel strategy to induce neural differentiation based on piezotronics was also developed. For that, a layer of FeOOH nanorods was assembled on the surface of PVDF electrospun fibers. The hybrid nanofibrous membrane was stimulated under ultrasonic irradiation, inducing the neural differentiation of rat bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) cultured on the surface of these membranes. Furthermore, the differentiated cells generated fast peaking spontaneous [Ca2+], indicating the neural function of rBMSCs-derived neurons. In this way, this study provides a novel strategy for inducing neural differentiation without the need of neural inducing factors.

3D piezoelectric PVDF/GO scaffolds have been also produced in a porous morphology by NIPS method (Figure 47).

PVDF/GO properties were modulated by the GO nanoparticles incorporation, finding that the addition of 0.5–1 wt % of GO promoted optimized mechanical (tensile modulus of ∼8.1 MPa) and electrical properties (impedance of ∼804 Ω at 10 Hz), that in turn increased PC12 cell proliferation. Such PVDF/GO scaffolds can be easily adapted to nerve guidance conduits with four internal longitudinally aligned channels.

PVDF has been also combined with other polymers such as PU in form of fibers for wound healing applications in order to improve the activity/functionality of cells. Such studies proved that when the electrospun composites were subjected to a mechanical deformation, the scaffolds enhanced the fibroblast activities (both in vitro and in vivo), proving their high potential for wound healing treatments.

PVDF-based materials can also play pivotal role in patient’s bladder functional recovery as shown in PVDF nanofibrous scaffolds fabricated through electrospinning (with or without chitosan nanoparticles loading). 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-(diphenyltetrazolium bromide) tetrazolium reduction (MTT), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and immunocytochemistry results demonstrated that highest adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) proliferation rate and smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation potential were detected when cultured on the PVDF-transforming growth factor-β scaffold, enabling greater treatment possibilities in bladder tissue engineering applications.

Regarding esophagus tissue engineering, a PVDF mesh structure allows the local tissue regeneration of esophagus tissues. For that, semicircular esophageal defects of 0.5 × 1 cm2 were created 2 cm close to the cardia in 10 rabbits. These defects were filled with PVDF or polyglactin 910 and later covered by omental wrapping. The clinical results were evaluated by the clinical observation, X-ray contrast medium examinations, and regular esophagoscopies, the local tissue regeneration being verified by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. The results revealed that after 3 months, no anastomotic structures were detected, reporting a complete mucosal regeneration, with negligible inflammation reaction and also an initial muscle layer regeneration in the group where PVDF was used. In the group treated with polyglactin 910, it was observed that the patch presents failures with consecutive anastomotic leakage occurrences.

A electrospun poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/ZnO nanocomposite tissue engineering scaffold demonstrated to promote adhesion, migration, and proliferation of cells, as well as blood vessel formation (angiogenesis). Only minimal adverse effects have been detected of the poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/ZnO biomaterials with regard to in vitro blood compatibility, cytotoxicity, and biocompatibility, demonstrating that poly(VDF-co-TrFE)/ZnO nanocomposite scaffolds can be used for tissue engineering applications. Interestingly, human mesenchymal stem cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells cultured on the nanocomposite scaffolds exhibited higher cell viability, adhesion, and proliferation when compared to cells cultured on tissue culture plates or neat poly(VDF-co-TrFE) scaffolds.

PVDF-based materials have been also used for the manipulation of differentiated Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell sheets. The authors succeeded in harvesting confluent MDCK cell sheets and then transferring them intact to other culture plates using PVDF membranes that were hydrophilically modified as supporting materials. Immunocytochemistry tests in the transferred MDCK cells with anti-β-catenin antibody showed that the functional cell–cell junctions were well organized. The viability assay revealed that the transferred cells were not injured during the manipulation of the 2D cell sheet. Through transmission electron microscopy (TEM), it was observed that the harvested MDCK maintain the differentiated phenotypes, with a high number of microvilli and tight junctions at the apical and lateral plasma membranes, respectively. This technique of 2D cell-sheet manipulation opened other routes to the use of PVDF-biomaterials to be applied in epithelial cell sheets research.

The overall research scenario and the high number of developed materials/composites (Table 15) allows conclusion that the piezoelectric effect and PVDF, copolymers, and composites as active biomaterials have already successfully demonstrated its suitability for bone tissue engineering as well as the strong potential for other electrically active tissues, such as neural or muscular, that respond to electrical and mechano-electrical stimuli.

Antimicrobial Surfaces

A recent global study published by the journal The Lancet about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) reported that infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria caused 1.27 million deaths in 2019, killing more people than HIV/AIDS (864 000 deaths) or malaria (643 000 deaths). The imminent risk of infections caused by these bacteria is one of the biggest threats to human health and considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) a priority health issue. Although new drugs are constantly being sought, the pace of development is slow compared with the evolution and spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria.

That is why novel materials with antimicrobial properties and with capacity for inhibiting the adhesion of bacteria and inducing bactericidal effects have been highly researched. Even though PVDF and its copolymers are not intrinsically antimicrobial, they are often the polymers of choice to create such materials due to their low surface energy, chemical inertness, mechanical strength, and thermal stability, often related to the development of superhydrophobic membranes. Thus, these polymers are mainly used as a support for the incorporation of antimicrobial agents. As an example, PVDF-based superhydrophobic membranes have been developed where microsized PTFE particles and the photosensitizer Chlorin e6 were wrapped in nanosized PVDF fibers using electrospinning technique (Figure 48a). Upon light illumination, the membrane induced high antimicrobial properties, with extremely low bacterial survival rates (0% for S. aureus and ∼1% for E. coli). The bactericidal effect was photodynamically stimulated due to the formation of reactive oxidative species (ROS) upon Chlorin e6 irradiation. The same mechanism of action was used to obtain an antimicrobial PVDF-based material. The composite membrane composed of PVDF and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF8) induced strong bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative E. coli owed to the metal ions (Zn2+) and the generated ROS under photoexcitation.

In these cases, PVDF is selected based on its physicochemical characteristics and reliance on environmental factora, acting solely as a polymeric matrix for bearing the compounds with antimicrobial properties, not taking part on the antimicrobial activity. Table 16 presents an overview on recent applications of PVDF materials as a carrier of antimicrobial compounds.

Nonetheless, the possibility of piezoelectric polymers such as PVDF to take part on the antimicrobial process due to the possibility of these polymers to create EAMs on their surface when mechanically stimulated is a growing field of research. These are novel strategies that recently started to bloom and are interesting due to the possibility of piezoelectric materials to respond to mechanical cues present in our everyday life: touch, pressure, walk, run, and/or vibration. These technologies are even more appealing if we consider the fact that they avoid the emergence of resistant strains. The use of physical stimuli as an alternative to chemical compounds such as antibiotics mask the real “attacker” from recognition by the bacteria, which ultimately poses less evolutionary stress to bacteria and thus avoid AMR.

Understanding bacteria sensing mechanisms is essential to develop effective advanced approaches. Despite being an extremely simple organism, bacteria possess a remarkable capacity to develop resistance as a mechanism of survival and adapt to different environments, tolerating a big range of temperatures, pressures, and pHs. This is a result of their long evolutionary history, being exposed to vastly different physicochemical environments and being able to detect and respond to a wide range of signals such as chemical, thermal, mechanical, electrical, and magnetic fields. Nevertheless, this capacity for adaptation and sensing physical signals have been largely overlooked in bacterial cells.

On the other hand, it has been proven that mammalian cells feel the surrounding environment and respond to a range of physical signals. Therefore, a large amount of research has been performed on the piezoelectric effect present in polymers such as PVDF and its copolymers,,, or even in natural piezoelectric polymers such as silk− for triggering and enhancing cell responses such as adhesion, migration, differentiation, or proliferation. These materials allow the development of dynamic EAMs on their surface when mechanically stimulated and have been proven to enhance cell target functions, thus being successfully applied in regenerative medicine.− When piezoelectric materials are used, besides the electrical cues, mechanical forces are also provided to the cells and tissues, which ultimately affect biological entities in a process called mechanotransduction. In this process, cells and tissues react to mechanical stimuli and translate them into biochemical and biological responses, as explained in the previous section., The potential of using these stimuli have thus been widely researched for tissue engineering applications but poorly investigated for antimicrobial strategies.

This is paradoxical if the natural environment of microorganisms is take into consideration, which is in constant contact with mechanical forces, generated by fluid flow, shear stress, or through the interaction with the surface of other cells or materials (Figure 48b,c). Predominantly, outside the oceans, bacteria live in community, attaching to surfaces through the secretion of adhesive structures such as pili and flagella, also growing in the form of a protective biofilm, encased in a structure composed of exopolysaccharides (Figure 48b). Such mode of growth is seen as a protective way to survive to harsh environment, imparting resistance to bacteria. Diffusible signaling molecules are also used by bacteria to communicate and interact in community in a processed called quorum sensing. Mechanisms able to disrupt these structures/mechanisms are ideal to obtain an efficient antimicrobial purpose and physically based approaches have been showing a clear potential. This is valid if we consider that bacteria are subjected to interface mechanics that include hydrodynamic and adhesive forces as well as the rheology of their surroundings. In fact, the mechanical environment that a bacterium feels when attached to a surface is completely different than when in planktonic state.

When attached in a dry environment, the bacteria experience a local force identified as adhesive force but when a liquid flow is present the viscosity of the fluid creates a shear force in the same direction of the flow. Bacteria also feel the rheological properties of their surrounding extracellular matrix, which flows and/or deforms upon application of forces. Additionally, the transport of soluble compounds secreted or released by bacteria within biofilm communities can be highly affected by the fluid flow (advection) and Brownian motion (diffusion) (Figure 48c).

In fact, one of the first reports on how bacteria are able to feel their external environment through physical cues has led to the conclusion that they act in a similar way to that of mammalian cells, being activated by mechanical forces in a mechanotransduction process. This topic is extremely interesting because bacteria possess vast sensing systems whose input signals remain unidentified, some of which could potentially participate in transducing forces into a developmental response.

The bacterial mechanotransduction may be regarded as the succession of three elementary events: mechanotransmission, mechanosensing, and mechanoresponse (Figure 48d). Mechanotransmitting components are structures that bear and propagate the applied force. These are coupled with mechanosensors that modulate their biochemical activity in response to transmitted forces. Finally, mechanosensors induce a downstream mechanoresponse by modulating specific developmental programs.

Examples of mechanotransduction systems in bacteria may include the movement of cilia of certain microorganisms that transmit forces to membrane-associated mechanosensitive proteins. This result in mechanoresponses ranging from rapid influx of ions through membranes, transcriptional regulation, or morphogenesis.

The motility capacity of bacteria, a flagellum-dependent form of movement observed in some bacterial species, is an example of bacterial mechanotransduction. For instance, bacteria causing gonorrhea, the Neisseria gonorrheae, possess retractable polymer type IV pili on their surface that exert forces at nN range on their surroundings, the same amplitude of forces that mammalian cells exert on their own microenvironments. These forces trigger events such as accumulation of actin and other proteins, which are critical for the colonization of the host. The ability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to form biofilm is also activated by a mechanotransduction system, through a process that includes a surface-specific twitching motility machinery. Using this process, P. aeruginosa disarms predatory cells by injecting toxins upon contact with a host, activating specific transcriptional programs upon surface contact. More recently, it has been found that a mechanotransduction phenomenon also occurs in E. coli. The mechanism of action involves sensing the local mechanical environment through voltage-induced calcium flux, which causes the influx of calcium ions causing an electricity pulse through them.

Currently, apart from mechanical stimuli, one of the most used physical stimuli for antimicrobial strategies is the application of electrical charges. It has been regarded as a mean for preventing device-related infections, which are caused by biofilm formation, or even to disinfect contaminated liquids.− Nevertheless, these strategies require the direct application of a strong electrical fields which limits biomedical applicability.

The electrical-based killing mechanism of action involves cell membrane permeability increase, known as electropermeabilization. This occurs when the induced transmembrane voltage exceeds the threshold voltage (200–1000 mV), while the resting transmembrane potential ranges between −20 and −200 mV for most cells. For keeping the resting membrane potential nearly constant, the Na/K pump actively exudes three Na+ for every two K+ pumped into the cell. The perturbation of these ion concentrations can lead to hyperpolarization, wherein the membrane potential becomes more negative, or depolarization, wherein the membrane potential becomes less negative toward zero. The formation of ROS such as H2O2 and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) has also been indicated as a possible mechanism of action for the bactericidal effect of electric fields., These mechanisms however are not completely well-founded and may differ from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and thus should be investigated. Indeed, the knowledge of a drug’s mechanism of action enables better monitoring of its effects on the target pathway.

Recently, novel strategies based on the application of EAMs for antimicrobial strategies have been emerging. EAMs apply very low electrical voltage to the surrounding of cells, not posing a problem when biomedical applications are needed. EAMs may be induced on the bacterial cells using electroactive, piezoelectric, or magnetoelectric materials (Figure 49a).

Porous material may be important to increase the contact area between material and bacteria, providing better stimuli, while the nonporous material may assist on antifouling effect.

One of the first reports emphasizing the effect of a piezoelectric material for killing bacteria was performed by Tan et al. Upon polarization of a piezoelectric ceramic, which results in a material with one side positively charged and the other one negatively charged, it has been found that the positively charged surface selectively killed bacteria through the formation of ROS owed to the microelectrolysis of water. The work suggested that the level of ROS necessary to kill bacteria was safe for normal mammalian cells.

Recently, polarized PVDF was used for proving the concept of antimicrobial strategies under dynamic conditions, i.e., using a mechanical bioreactor, for the creation of EAMs on the surface of the material.,, It shown that bacterial cells behavior can be tailored depending on the surface charge of PVDF and on the application of EAMs, promoted by the stimulation of a PVDF poled film. The results showed a different behavior between Gram-positive and Gram-negative cells. The conditions had little effect on E. coli, but an antifouling effect was observed on S. epidermidis at static conditions. On the other hand, at dynamic conditions, i.e., in the presence of an electrical stimuli, the lower frequency promoted antifouling effect, while at higher frequencies bacteria adhesion is stimulated (Figure 49b). This was the first work proving the concept of bacteria susceptibility to physical stimuli. These strategies are important to further define suitable anti- and pro-microbial strategies intended for pathogenic and functional bacteria, respectively.

The multifunctional nature of bacteria can thus be explored to develop novel strategies to tailor the bacterial response by exposing them to EAMs. Bactericidal, antifouling, or sensitization effects on pathogenic bacteria may be sought with these new approaches, which exerts less evolutionary stress and thus avoid the occurrence of resistance mechanisms. It has been also shown that poly(VDF-co-TrFE) films composites sensitize the bacteria to low doses of green-synthesized Ag nanoparticles, previously dispersed in the polymer matrix. When stimulated at a mechanical frequency of 4 Hz more than 80% the S. epidermidis bacterial growth was reduced in planktonic and biofilm form, allowing to conclude that EAMs sensitize the bacteria for the action of a low dose of Ag nanoparticles (1.69% (wt %/wt %)), without compromising the viability of mammalian cells.

The possibility for remote stimulation of a material though the EAMs and thus obtaining antimicrobial effects can also be achieved using magnetoelectric materials. This approach could also be valuable, for example, for the prevention of infection of orthopedic indwelling devices by external stimulation. Magnetostrictive nanostructures may be embedded in piezoelectric polymers to obtain magnetoelectric materials. When magnetically stimulated, the magnetostrictive component alters its size due to elastic deformation, which induces a mechanical stimulus on the piezoelectric polymer phase, further inducing an electrical polarization variation of the polymer. Magnetoelectric materials comprising magnetostrictive nanowires aligned within the polymer matrix may be used to obtain an anisotropic material and induce a strong EAMs. These materials allow to remotely stimulate tissues from outside of the human body.,

This approach has been developed based on PVDF films filled with nickel nanowires (NiNws) in an attempt to control and enhance the antimicrobial activity of the materials via a magnetic stimulus. More than 55% of bacterial growth inhibition was achieved by controlled dynamic magnetic conditions for representative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, compared to only 25% inhibition obtained under static conditions, i.e., without magnetic stimuli application, with the antibiofilm activity clearly improved as well upon dynamic conditions (Figure 50).

The works herein described successfully demonstrated the proof-of-concept for materials able to boost on demand antimicrobial activity upon dynamic conditions (mechanically or magnetically stimulated) and paves the way for applications as coatings in high-touch and high-traffic surfaces to restrain bacterial adhesion and proliferation and thus provide infection control. Thus, it is expected that PVDF will play a significant role in the development of antimicrobial materials that can effectively respond to various stimuli encountered in our daily lives, such as touch, vibrations, walking, jumping, and more. Importantly, when PVDF is mechanically stimulated, it can overcome several limitations associated with currently used antimicrobial agents. These include: (i) Resistance development: Preliminary results indicate that electroactive microenvironments (EAMs) formed by PVDF do not induce resistance in bacteria. Instead, they act on highly evolved bacterial membranes by inducing depolarization, making it a promising approach to combat resistance development. (ii) Spectrum of activity: EAMs generated by PVDF do not discriminate between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. This broad-spectrum activity is advantageous as it can effectively target a wide range of bacterial species, enhancing its overall effectiveness. (iii) Toxicity concerns: The low levels of voltage induced by PVDF do not pose any cytotoxicity risks to mammalian cells. Additionally, PVDF itself has been extensively proven to be biocompatible, alleviating concerns about potential toxicity issues when used in biomedical applications; (iv) Material degradation: PVDF exhibits high stability and resilience, making it resistant to degradation, damage from cleaning procedures, and exposure to various environmental factors. No leachable components have. been observed, ensuring its long-term effectiveness and safety.

Thus, PVDF demonstrates great potential as an antimicrobial material, offering improved performance and compatibility with biological systems. Its unique properties make it a promising candidate for the development of advanced biomedical applications.

Table 16 summarizes relevant PVDF-based materials for antimicrobial purposes, indicating the antimicrobial agent, the functionalization, main results in terms of antibacterial activity, as well as the main focused application.

Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Poly(vinylidene fluoride), PVDF, is a polymer known for its excellent chemical, thermal, mechanical and radiation resistance, as well as for their outstanding electroactive properties among polymers, including high dielectric, piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and ferroelectric response, when the polymer crystallizes in specific phases.

PVDF crystallizes in five distinct polymorphs: α (TGTG′ (trans-gauche–trans-gauche)), β (plane zigzag all trans TTTT), δ (TGTG′), γ (T3GT3G′), and ε (T3GT3G′), α- and ε-PVDF being nonpolar, whereas β-, δ-, and γ-PVDF are polar crystalline phases.

PVDF and its copolymers, including poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene, poly(PVDF-co-TrFE), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co- hexafluoropropylene), poly(VDF-co-HFP), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene), and poly(PVDF-co-CTFE), can crystallize in electroactive crystalline phases, and therefore are increasingly explored for a wide range of applications.

Poly(VDF-co-TrFE) copolymer is one of the most studied copolymers of PVDF as, when synthesized in specific copolymer contents, it always crystallizes in the crystallographic β phase, because the addition of the third fluorine atom in the TrFE monomer unit induces the ferroelectric β phase regardless of the processing method, either from the melt or from solution. In addition, poly(VDF-co-TrFE) shows high piezoelectric output, sensitivity, and wide frequency response with great potential for applications ranging from sensors/actuators to biomedical applications.

Poly(VDF-co-HFP) shows the highest piezoelectric constant d31 (21 pC·N–1) and a lower degree of crystallinity compared to PVDF, thus intensively used for energy storage applications, in particular for separator membranes and solid polymer electrolytes (SPE).

Finally, the properties of poly(VDF-co-CTFE) are dependent on the CTFE content, show a high electrostrictive strain response, and it is mostly used in energy storage applications.

PVDF and copolymers can be processed into a variety of morphologies, including dense thin films, porous membranes, fibers, microspheres, or specific patterns, among others. Further, the materials can be processed either from the melt or from solutions, by techniques including extrusion, doctor blade, electrospray, electrospinning, or additive manufacturing techniques, among others.

Based on those physicochemical and processing characteristics, PVDF and copolymers have been used for the development of a large variety of applications in areas including, sensors, actuators, energy harvesting, and storage systems, as well as membranes for environmental remediation and biomedical applications. For these applications, the control of morphology, polymer phase, degree of crystallinity and phsicochemistry electrical, mechanical, and electroactive properties is essential to obtain systems and devices with tailored functional performance.

This review presents an overview on PVDF and its copolymers as well as on their applications. The correlation between polymer chain conformation, processing, materials physicochemical characteristics and integrability is essential for achieving optimized performance within the different applications. For the main applications presented and discussed in this review, the challenges and future trends of PVDF-based materials are summarized in the following.

For sensors applications, PVDF-based materials mainly rely on the processing of the material in the electroactive β-phase and in optimizing the electroactive response, either piezo- or pyroelectric. Further, high dielectric constant and novel effects, such as magnetoelectricity, are obtained though the development of polymer composites, which are increasingly investigated. Challenges involve the fabrication of electroactive devices through additive manufacturing techniques that will allow low-cost, low-waste, high performance, and more sustainable systems with improved integration and free-form, allowing from micrometer-size to large area solutions. The main limitations of PVDF-based sensors are the still low electroactive response with respect to their ceramic counterparts; the introduction of specific fillers, including ceramics, mesoporous material, and ionic liquids (ILs) fillers allows addressing of this issue, but proper dispersion and stability over time must be achieved. Nevertheless, the flexibility, integrability and resilience of the materials make PVDF-based sensors an essential tool in the development of bionic robots, communication, and augmented reality gadgets, as well as for the implementation of smart environments, including smart cities and industry 4.0 solutions.

Regarding actuator applications, further developments are needed to improve actuator deformation in electronic actuators and actuator force in ionic ones, as well as to enhance stability over time in the latter. These improvements can rely on ternary composites with two different fillers, allowing improvement of functional response and stability over time simultaneously where interface engineering will be an important contribution.

Polymer composites are also essential to improve energy harvesting and SPE for energy storage systems. PVDF-based materials are increasingly used in energy harvesting and storage applications. With respect to energy harvesting systems, the focus should be on improving delivered power to integrate self-power sensors in various applications, including wearables and sensors and actuators in remote or difficult to access locations. In addition, it is essential to understand the interactions between fillers and polymer matrix for improving the device performance, stability over time, and to allow suitable processing by additive manufacturing techniques.

For energy storage systems, and as an overall challenge for PVDF-based materials, green chemistry synthesis and advanced recovering, recycling, and/or reuse strategies are necessary, considering that PVDF is the best material for applications in electrodes as a polymer binder. Furthermore, it is essential to study and understand the nanoscale interaction of the polymer with the electrolyte solution to reduce the amount of polymer binder and increase electrochemical performance. Concerning separator membranes and SPE, the improvement of the interaction with the electrolytes and fillers and the improvement of the ionic conductivity should still be addressed as well as to tune the interfaces with the electrodes through surface compatibilization.

In the area of environmental remediation, the excellent membrane forming characteristics, porosity, and pore size tunability, together with the chemical and radiation resistance, makes PVDF and copolymers one of the most suitable materials, the main challenge remaining the incorporation of specific fillers to match specific pollutants degradation and/or absorption requirements. Moreover, multifunctional materials such as adsorptive and photocatalytic or antimicrobial membranes will allow more robust membrane technologies to address a broader range of pollutants (organic, inorganic, and water disinfection). Stable composite membranes with different active layers will also allow avoiding or minimizing secondary pollution caused by the detachment and discharge of active materials like nanoparticles into natural water bodies. Improving the integration of the fillers into the polymer matrix and the regeneration of the membranes after use is essential to allow long-term reusability. In parallel, additive manufacturing will undoubtedly contribute to develop advanced multifunctional materials, mainly because of the possibility of producing tunable morphologies and functionalities with a layer-by-layer design.

Concerning microfluidics and portable analytical devices for biomedical, environmental, biodefense, and food monitoring applications, the main challenge is to implement sensors and actuators, among other operation systems, in order to allow the development of complete, autonomous, and more user-friendly platforms for specific applications. In this sense, electroactive polymer-based materials, such as PVDF and its copolymers, are suitable for microfluidic applications based on their biocompatibility, flexibility, low mechanical and acoustic impedance, and controlled optical transparency, critical parameters in many microfluidic applications. Moreover, they are easily integrated or can even be directly printed on the microfluidic platform to work not just as actuation or sensing systems but also as smart tailorable membranes to produce portable, cost-effective, and smart miniaturized platforms. Still, a road ahead of intense and dynamic research is required to obtain improved functionality and to address some of the most challenging microfluidic applications requirements, e.g., complex multistep analysis, with the ultimate goal of promoting their quicker standardization and further commercialization.

For biomedical applications, PVDF-based materials have proven their suitability for developing active electromechanical cell microenvironments for advanced tissue engineering strategies of various tissues, including bone, heart, skin, and neuronal, among others. Nevertheless, the proper combination of PVDF and copolymers with biochemical factors and the tailorability of the microstructure for specific 2D and 3D tissue microenvironments are a pivotal challenge to reach regeneration strategies translated to clinical use.

The possibility of using a versatile polymer such as PVDF for antimicrobial solutions, taking advantage of the physically and chemical stability of the polymer as well as the possibility of imparting stimuli (mechanically)-responsive properties to it, may change the paradigm of antimicrobial research. Smart antimicrobial materials that inactivate bacteria upon daily actions such as touch, vibration, or walking will undoubtedly pave the way for a new generation of materials to be applied in common high-traffic surfaces in clinical settings, schools, or domestic environments. Even though initial assessment indicates that the physical stimuli provided by piezoelectric materials avoid the emergence of resistant strains, a systematic study on their mechanism of action and resistance development is still needed to infer without any doubt that they avoid the undesired phenomenon of antimicrobial resistance.

Overall, PVDF, its copolymers, composites, and blends show a large variety of outstanding physicochemical characteristics, with a particular focus on the electroactive ones, that will certainly play an essential and increasing role in the ongoing energy transition, the digitalization of society and economy, and the new biomedical approaches. Precisely tailoring material characteristics and functional response, integration into devices and properly addressing the sustainability of materials and fabrication processes are critical challenges to further expand the limits of technologies and applications based on this extraordinary family of polymers.

References 764

  1. 1.

    Corona B.; Shen L.; Reike D.; Rosales Carreón J.; Worrell E. Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 151, 104498.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498

  2. 2.

    Velenturf A. P. M.; Purnell P. Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1437–1457..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018

  3. 3.

    Khan I. H.; Javaid M. Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Adoption of Industry 4.0. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2022, 7, 515–533..

    Not in our library10.1142/s2424862221500068

  4. 4.

    Malik P. K.; Sharma R.; Singh R.; Gehlot A.; Satapathy S. C.; Alnumay W. S.; Pelusi D.; Ghosh U.; Nayak J. Industrial Internet of Things and its Applications in Industry 4.0: State of The Art. Comput. Commun. 2021, 166, 125–139..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.comcom.2020.11.016

  5. 5.

    Brighenti R.; Li Y.; Vernerey F. J. Smart Polymers for Advanced Applications: A Mechanical Perspective Review. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 196.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmats.2020.00196

  6. 6.

    Tan L.; Davis A. C.; Cappelleri D. J. Smart Polymers for Microscale Machines. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2007125.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.202007125

  7. 7.

    Costa C. M.; Costa P.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Chapter One - Overview on lightweight, multifunctional materials. In Advanced Lightweight Multifunctional Materials, Costa P.; Costa C. M., Lanceros-Méndez S. Eds.; Woodhead Publishing, 2021; pp 1-24.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Saxena P.; Shukla P. A comprehensive review on fundamental properties and applications of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF). Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2021, 4 (1), 8–26..

    Not in our library10.1007/s42114-021-00217-0

  9. 9.

    Carvalho E.; Fernandes L.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Piezoelectric Polymer Composites for Sensors and Actuators. In Encyclopedia of Materials: Composites, Brabazon D. Ed.; Elsevier, 2021; pp 473-486.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Holmes-Siedle A. G.; Wilson P. D.; Verrall A. P. PVdF: An electronically-active polymer for industry. Mater. Des. 1983, 4 (6), 910–918..

    Not in our library10.1016/0261-3069(84)90003-7

  11. 11.

    Martins P.; Lopes A. C.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Electroactive phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride): Determination, processing and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39 (4), 683–706..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.006

  12. 12.

    Ranjan V.; Yu L.; Nardelli M. B.; Bernholc J. Phase Equilibria in High Energy Density PVDF-Based Polymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99 (4), 047801.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.99.047801

  13. 13.

    Liu Y.; Aziguli H.; Zhang B.; Xu W.; Lu W.; Bernholc J.; Wang Q. Ferroelectric polymers exhibiting behaviour reminiscent of a morphotropic phase boundary. Nature 2018, 562 (7725), 96–100..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0550-z

  14. 14.

    Babu A.; Ranpariya S.; Sinha D. K.; Chatterjee A.; Mandal D. Deep Learning Enabled Early Predicting Cardiovascular Status Using Highly Sensitive Piezoelectric Sensor of Solution-Processable Nylon-11. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2023, 8, 2202021.

    Not in our library10.1002/admt.202202021

  15. 15.

    Ma X.; Zhukov S.; von Seggern H.; Sessler G. M.; Ben Dali O.; Kupnik M.; Dai Y.; He P.; Zhang X. Biodegradable and Bioabsorbable Polylactic Acid Ferroelectrets with Prominent Piezoelectric Activity. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2023, 9, 2201070.

    Not in our library10.1002/aelm.202201070

  16. 16.

    Zheng T.; Yue Z.; Wallace G. G.; Du Y.; Higgins M. J. Nanoscale piezoelectric effect of biodegradable PLA-based composite fibers by piezoresponse force microscopy. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 375708.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6528/ab96e3

  17. 17.

    Wu P.; Chen P.; Xu C.; Wang Q.; Zhang F.; Yang K.; Jiang W.; Feng J.; Luo Z. Ultrasound-driven in vivo electrical stimulation based on biodegradable piezoelectric nanogenerators for enhancing and monitoring the nerve tissue repair. Nano Energy 2022, 102, 107707.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107707

  18. 18.

    Szewczyk P. K.; Berniak K.; Knapczyk-Korczak J.; Karbowniczek J. E.; Marzec M. M.; Bernasik A.; Stachewicz U. Mimicking natural electrical environment with cellulose acetate scaffolds enhances collagen formation of osteoblasts. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (15), 6890–6900..

    Not in our library10.1039/d3nr00014a

  19. 19.

    Kawai H. The Piezoelectricity of Poly (vinylidene Fluoride). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1969, 8 (7), 975–976..

    Not in our library10.1143/jjap.8.975

  20. 20.

    Tasaka S.; Miyata S. The origin of piezoelectricity in poly(vinylidene fluoride). Ferroelectrics 1981, 32 (1), 17–23..

    Not in our library10.1080/00150198108238668

  21. 21.

    Bozorg M.; Altomare A.; Loos K. 4 - Synthesis of polyvinylidene fluoride and its copolymers. In Organic Ferroelectric Materials and Applications, Asadi K. Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, 2022; pp 85–112.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Xin Y.; Sun H.; Tian H.; Guo C.; Li X.; Wang S.; Wang C. The use of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) films as sensors for vibration measurement: A brief review. Ferroelectrics 2016, 502 (1), 28–42..

    Not in our library10.1080/00150193.2016.1232582

  23. 23.

    Chen X.; Han X.; Shen Q.-D. PVDF-Based Ferroelectric Polymers in Modern Flexible Electronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3 (5), 1600460.

    Not in our library10.1002/aelm.201600460

  24. 24.

    Banerjee S.; Soulestin T.; Patil Y.; Ladmiral V.; Ameduri B. Towards new strategies for the synthesis of functional vinylidene fluoride-based copolymers with tunable wettability. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7 (24), 4004–4015..

    Not in our library10.1039/c6py00508j

  25. 25.

    Ameduri B. From vinylidene fluoride (VDF) to the applications of VDF-containing polymers and copolymers: recent developments and future trends. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109 (12), 6632–6686..

    Not in our library10.1021/cr800187m

  26. 26.

    Veiga A. G.; Dias F. G. d. A.; Batista L. d. N.; Rocco M. L. M.; Costa M. F. Reprocessed poly(vinylidene fluoride): A comparative approach for mechanical recycling purposes. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101269.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101269

  27. 27.

    Dohany J. E. Fluorine-Containing Polymers, Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride). In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; Wiley, 2001.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Ameduri B.; Sawada H. Fluorinated Polymers: Volume 2: Applications; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Lovinger A. J. Ferroelectric Polymers. Science 1983, 220 (4602), 1115–1121..

    Not in our library10.1126/science.220.4602.1115

  30. 30.

    Zhu L.; Wang Q. Novel Ferroelectric Polymers for High Energy Density and Low Loss Dielectrics. Macromolecules 2012, 45 (7), 2937–2954..

    Not in our library10.1021/ma2024057

  31. 31.

    Gallantree H. Review of transducer applications of polyvinylidene fluoride. IEE Proc. Solid State Electron Dev. 1983, 130 (5), 219–224..

    Not in our library10.1049/ip-i-1.1983.0040

  32. 32.

    Nakamura K.; Sawai D.; Watanabe Y.; Taguchi D.; Takahashi Y.; Furukawa T.; Kanamoto T. Effect of annealing on the structure and properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) β-form films. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2003, 41 (14), 1701–1712..

    Not in our library10.1002/polb.10525

  33. 33.

    Takahashi Y.; Matsubara Y.; Tadokoro H. Crystal structure of form II of poly(vinylidene fluoride). Macromolecules 1983, 16 (10), 1588–1592..

    Not in our library10.1021/ma00244a007

  34. 34.

    Karasawa N.; Goddard W. A. Force fields, structures, and properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) crystals. Macromolecules 1992, 25 (26), 7268–7281..

    Not in our library10.1021/ma00052a031

  35. 35.

    Nalwa H. S. Ferroelectric Polymers: Chemistry: Physics, and Applications; Taylor & Francis, 1995.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Cui Z.; Hassankiadeh N. T.; Zhuang Y.; Drioli E.; Lee Y. M. Crystalline polymorphism in poly(vinylidenefluoride) membranes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 51, 94–126..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.007

  37. 37.

    Botelho G.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Gonçalves A. M.; Sencadas V.; Rocha J. G. Relationship between processing conditions, defects and thermal degradation of poly(vinylidene fluoride) in the β-phase. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2008, 354 (1), 72–78..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.07.012

  38. 38.

    Nguyen T. Degradation of Poly[vinyl Fluoride] and Poly[vinylidene Fluoride]. J. Macromol. Sci., Part C 1985, 25 (2), 227–275..

    Not in our library10.1080/15583728509412823

  39. 39.

    Li J.; Meng Q.; Li W.; Zhang Z. Influence of crystalline properties on the dielectric and energy storage properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 122 (3), 1659–1668..

    Not in our library10.1002/app.34020

  40. 40.

    Rui G.; Huang Y.; Chen X.; Li R.; Wang D.; Miyoshi T.; Zhu L. Giant spontaneous polarization for enhanced ferroelectric properties of biaxially oriented poly(vinylidene fluoride) by mobile oriented amorphous fractions. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9 (3), 894–907..

    Not in our library10.1039/d0tc04632a

  41. 41.

    Huang Y.; Rui G.; Li Q.; Allahyarov E.; Li R.; Fukuto M.; Zhong G.-J.; Xu J.-Z.; Li Z.-M.; Taylor P. L.; et al. Enhanced piezoelectricity from highly polarizable oriented amorphous fractions in biaxially oriented poly(vinylidene fluoride) with pure β crystals. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 675.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-020-20662-7

  42. 42.

    Silva M. P.; Costa C. M.; Sencadas V.; Paleo A. J.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Degradation of the dielectric and piezoelectric response of β-poly(vinylidene fluoride) after temperature annealing. J. Polym. Res. 2011, 18 (6), 1451–1457..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10965-010-9550-x

  43. 43.

    Sencadas V.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Sabater i Serra R.; Andrio Balado A.; Gómez Ribelles J. L. Relaxation dynamics of poly(vinylidene fluoride) studied by dynamical mechanical measurements and dielectric spectroscopy. Eur. Phys. J. E. 2012, 35, 41.

    Not in our library10.1140/epje/i2012-12041-x

  44. 44.

    Costa C. M.; Sencadas V.; Pelicano I.; Martins F.; Rocha J. G.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Microscopic origin of the high-strain mechanical response of poled and non-poled poly(vinylidene fluoride) in the β-phase. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2008, 354 (32), 3871–3876..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.05.008

  45. 45.

    Nunes-Pereira J.; Martins P.; Cardoso V. F.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. A green solvent strategy for the development of piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) films for sensors and actuators applications. Mater. Des. 2016, 104, 183–189..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.023

  46. 46.

    Martins P.; Nunes J. S.; Hungerford G.; Miranda D.; Ferreira A.; Sencadas V.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Local variation of the dielectric properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) during the α- to β-phase transformation. Phys. Lett. A 2009, 373 (2), 177–180..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physleta.2008.11.026

  47. 47.

    Ribeiro C.; Costa C. M.; Correia D. M.; Nunes-Pereira J.; Oliveira J.; Martins P.; Gonçalves R.; Cardoso V. F.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based structures for advanced applications. Nat. Protoc. 2018, 13 (4), 681–704..

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2017.157

  48. 48.

    Barbosa J. C.; Dias J. P.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Costa C. M. Recent Advances in Poly(vinylidene fluoride) and Its Copolymers for Lithium-Ion Battery Separators. Membranes 2018, 8 (3), 45.

    Not in our library10.3390/membranes8030045

  49. 49.

    Gregorio R. Jr. Determination of the α, β, and γ crystalline phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride) films prepared at different conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 3272–3279..

    Not in our library10.1002/app.23137

  50. 50.

    Bae J.-H.; Chang S.-H. PVDF-based ferroelectric polymers and dielectric elastomers for sensor and actuator applications: a review. Funct. Compos. Struct. 2019, 1 (1), 012003.

    Not in our library10.1088/2631-6331/ab0f48

  51. 51.

    Xia W.; Zhang Z. PVDF-based dielectric polymers and their applications in electronic materials. IET Nanodielectrics 2018, 1 (1), 17–31..

    Not in our library10.1049/iet-nde.2018.0001

  52. 52.

    Gebrekrstos A.; Madras G.; Bose S. Journey of Electroactive β-Polymorph of Poly(vinylidenefluoride) from Crystal Growth to Design to Applications. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19 (9), 5441–5456..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00381

  53. 53.

    Sameni J.; Jaffer S. A.; Tjong J.; Yang W.; Sain M. Continuous foam extrusion of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF): Chemical microfoam formation. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2020, 3 (1), 36–45..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.12.001

  54. 54.

    Zhang H.; Wan T.; Cheng B.; Li W.; Wang S.; Li X. Polyvinylidene fluoride injection electrets: preparation, characterization, and application in triboelectric nanogenerators. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9 (6), 12643–12653..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.020

  55. 55.

    Szewczyk P. K.; Gradys A.; Kim S. K.; Persano L.; Marzec M.; Kryshtal A.; Busolo T.; Toncelli A.; Pisignano D.; Bernasik A.; et al. Enhanced Piezoelectricity of Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride Fibers for Energy Harvesting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 (11), 13575–13583..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.0c02578

  56. 56.

    Cardoso V. F.; Correia D. M.; Ribeiro C.; Fernandes M. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Fluorinated Polymers as Smart Materials for Advanced Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2018, 10 (2), 161.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym10020161

  57. 57.

    Cardoso V. F.; Knoll T.; Velten T.; Rebouta L.; Mendes P. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Minas G. Polymer-based acoustic streaming for improving mixing and reaction times in microfluidic applications. RSC Adv. 2014, 4 (9), 4292–4300..

    Not in our library10.1039/c3ra46420b

  58. 58.

    Wang X.; Sun F.; Yin G.; Wang Y.; Liu B.; Dong M. Tactile-Sensing Based on Flexible PVDF Nanofibers via Electrospinning: A Review. Sensors 2018, 18 (2), 330.

    Not in our library10.3390/s18020330

  59. 59.

    Barbosa J. C.; Gonçalves R.; Valverde A.; Martins P. M.; Petrenko V. I.; Márton M.; Fidalgo-Marijuan A.; Fernández de Luis R.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Metal organic framework modified poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) separator membranes to improve lithium-ion battery capacity fading. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 443, 136329.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2022.136329

  60. 60.

    Salazar H.; Nunes-Pereira J.; Correia D. M.; Cardoso V. F.; Gonçalves R.; Martins P. M.; Ferdov S.; Martins M. D.; Botelho G.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene)/bayerite composite membranes for efficient arsenic removal from water. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 183, 430–438..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.08.049

  61. 61.

    Brito-Pereira R.; Macedo A. S.; Tubio C. R.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Cardoso V. F. Fluorinated Polymer Membranes as Advanced Substrates for Portable Analytical Systems and Their Proof of Concept for Colorimetric Bioassays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (15), 18065–18076..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.1c00227

  62. 62.

    Li Y.; Liao C.; Tjong S. C. Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Fibrous Scaffolds with Piezoelectric Characteristics for Bone and Neural Tissue Engineering. Nanomaterials 2019, 9 (7), 952.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano9070952

  63. 63.

    Mokhtari F.; Azimi B.; Salehi M.; Hashemikia S.; Danti S. Recent advances of polymer-based piezoelectric composites for biomedical applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 122, 104669.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104669

  64. 64.

    Alaaeddin M. H.; Sapuan S. M.; Zuhri M. Y. M.; Zainudin E. S.; Al-Oqla F. M. Properties and Common Industrial Applications of Polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) and Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 409, 012021.

    Not in our library10.1088/1757-899x/409/1/012021

  65. 65.

    Wang A.; Chen C.; Liao L.; Qian J.; Yuan F.-G.; Zhang N. Enhanced β-Phase in Direct Ink Writing PVDF Thin Films by Intercalation of Graphene. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30 (5), 1497–1502..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10904-019-01310-0

  66. 66.

    Sico G.; Montanino M.; Loffredo F.; Borriello C.; Miscioscia R. Gravure Printing for PVDF Thin-Film Pyroelectric Device Manufacture. Coatings 2022, 12 (7), 1020.

    Not in our library10.3390/coatings12071020

  67. 67.

    Marshall J. E.; Zhenova A.; Roberts S.; Petchey T.; Zhu P.; Dancer C. E. J.; McElroy C. R.; Kendrick E.; Goodship V. On the Solubility and Stability of Polyvinylidene Fluoride. Polymers 2021, 13 (9), 1354.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym13091354

  68. 68.

    Li Q.; Zhao J.; He B.; Hu Z. Solution processable poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based ferroelectric polymers for flexible electronics. APL Mater. 2021, 9, 010902.

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0035539

  69. 69.

    Gören A.; Mendes J.; Rodrigues H. M.; Sousa R. E.; Oliveira J.; Hilliou L.; Costa C. M.; Silva M. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. High performance screen-printed electrodes prepared by a green solvent approach for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 334, 65–77..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.019

  70. 70.

    Berni A.; Mennig M.; Schmidt H. Doctor Blade. In Sol-Gel Technologies for Glass Producers and Users, Aegerter M. A., Mennig M. Eds.; Springer US, 2004; pp 89–92.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    Cardoso V. F.; Marques-Almeida T.; Rodrigues-Marinho T.; Minas G.; Rebouta L.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Layer-by-layer fabrication of highly transparent polymer based piezoelectric transducers. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5 (6), 065313.

    Not in our library10.1088/2053-1591/aac682

  72. 72.

    Guo M.; Guo C.; Han J.; Chen S.; He S.; Tang T.; Li Q.; Strzalka J.; Ma J.; Yi D.; et al. Toroidal polar topology in strained ferroelectric polymer. Science 2021, 371 (6533), 1050–1056..

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abc4727

  73. 73.

    Haque R. I.; Vié R.; Germainy M.; Valbin L.; Benaben P.; Boddaert X. Inkjet printing of high molecular weight PVDF-TrFE for flexible electronics. Flexible Printed Electron. 2016, 1 (1), 015001.

    Not in our library10.1088/2058-8585/1/1/015001

  74. 74.

    Yin Z.; Tian B.; Zhu Q.; Duan C. Characterization and Application of PVDF and Its Copolymer Films Prepared by Spin-Coating and Langmuir-Blodgett Method. Polymers 2019, 11 (12), 2033.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym11122033

  75. 75.

    Lee M.; Chen C.-Y.; Wang S.; Cha S. N.; Park Y. J.; Kim J. M.; Chou L.-J.; Wang Z. L. A Hybrid Piezoelectric Structure for Wearable Nanogenerators. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (13), 1759–1764..

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201200150

  76. 76.

    Cardoso V. F.; Botelho G.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Nonsolvent induced phase separation preparation of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) membranes with tailored morphology, piezoelectric phase content and mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 390–397..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.018

  77. 77.

    Cardoso V. F.; Lopes A. C.; Botelho G.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) Porous Films: Tailoring Microstructure and Physical Properties by Solvent Casting Strategies. Soft Mater. 2015, 13 (4), 243–253..

    Not in our library10.1080/1539445x.2015.1083444

  78. 78.

    Cardoso V. F.; Machado A. R.; Pinto V. C.; Sousa P. J.; Botelho G.; Minas G.; Lanceros-Méndez S. From superhydrophobic- to superhydrophilic-patterned poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) architectures as a novel platform for biotechnological applications. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2016, 54 (18), 1802–1810..

    Not in our library10.1002/polb.24099

  79. 79.

    Koroglu L.; Ayas E.; Ay N. 3D Printing of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Based Piezoelectric Nanocomposites: An Overview. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2100277.

    Not in our library10.1002/mame.202100277

  80. 80.

    He Z.; Rault F.; Lewandowski M.; Mohsenzadeh E.; Salaün F. Electrospun PVDF Nanofibers for Piezoelectric Applications: A Review of the Influence of Electrospinning Parameters on the β Phase and Crystallinity Enhancement. Polymers 2021, 13 (2), 174.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym13020174

  81. 81.

    Xue J.; Wu T.; Dai Y.; Xia Y. Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (8), 5298–5415..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593

  82. 82.

    Correia D. M.; Gonçalves R.; Ribeiro C.; Sencadas V.; Botelho G.; Ribelles J. L. G.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Electrosprayed poly(vinylidene fluoride) microparticles for tissue engineering applications. RSC Adv. 2014, 4 (62), 33013–33021..

    Not in our library10.1039/c4ra04581e

  83. 83.

    Santos J. P. F.; de Melo Carvalho B.; Suman Bretas R. E. Remarkable change in the broadband electrical behavior of poly(vinylidene fluoride)-multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites with the use of different processing routes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136 (17), 47409.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.47409

  84. 84.

    Ramazanov M.; Maharramov A.; Shirinova H.; Palma L. D. Structure and electrophysical properties of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)/magnetite nanocomposites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2020, 33 (1), 138–149..

    Not in our library10.1177/0892705718796542

  85. 85.

    Gerhard-Multhaupt R. Poly(vinylidene fluoride): A piezo-, pyro- and ferroelectric polymer and its poling behaviour. Ferroelectrics 1987, 75 (1), 385–396..

    Not in our library10.1080/00150198708008991

  86. 86.

    Costa C. M.; Silva M. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Battery separators based on vinylidene fluoride (VDF) polymers and copolymers for lithium ion battery applications. RSC Adv. 2013, 3 (29), 11404–11417..

    Not in our library10.1039/c3ra40732b

  87. 87.

    Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Recent advances on battery separators based on poly(vinylidene fluoride) and its copolymers for lithium-ion battery applications. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 29, 100752.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100752

  88. 88.

    Hu X.; Yu S.; Chu B. Increased effective piezoelectric response of structurally modulated P(VDF-TrFE) film devices for effective energy harvesters. Mater. Des. 2020, 192, 108700.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108700

  89. 89.

    Yang L.; Li X.; Allahyarov E.; Taylor P. L.; Zhang Q. M.; Zhu L. Novel polymer ferroelectric behavior via crystal isomorphism and the nanoconfinement effect. Polymer 2013, 54 (7), 1709–1728..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymer.2013.01.035

  90. 90.

    Soulestin T.; Ladmiral V.; Dos Santos F. D.; Améduri B. Vinylidene fluoride- and trifluoroethylene-containing fluorinated electroactive copolymers. How does chemistry impact properties?. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 72, 16–60..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.04.004

  91. 91.

    Bellet-Amalric E.; Legrand J. F. Crystalline structures and phase transition of the ferroelectric P(VDF-TrFE) copolymers, a neutron diffraction study. Eur. Phys. J. B. 1998, 3 (2), 225–236..

    Not in our library10.1007/s100510050307

  92. 92.

    Tanaka A.; Sawada H.; Kojima Y. Application of Poly(vinylidene fluoride) and Poly(methyl methacrylate) Blends to Optical Material. Polym. J. 1990, 22 (6), 463–467..

    Not in our library10.1295/polymj.22.463

  93. 93.

    Li Z.; Wang Y.; Cheng Z.-Y. Electromechanical properties of poly(vinylidene-fluoride-chlorotrifluoroethylene) copolymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 062904.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2170425

  94. 94.

    Zhang X.; Shen Y.; Shen Z.; Jiang J.; Chen L.; Nan C.-W. Achieving High Energy Density in PVDF-Based Polymer Blends: Suppression of Early Polarization Saturation and Enhancement of Breakdown Strength. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (40), 27236–27242..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.6b10016

  95. 95.

    Qian X.; Han D.; Zheng L.; Chen J.; Tyagi M.; Li Q.; Du F.; Zheng S.; Huang X.; Zhang S.; et al. High-entropy polymer produces a giant electrocaloric effect at low fields. Nature 2021, 600 (7890), 664–669..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-04189-5

  96. 96.

    Schirrmann C.; Costache F. Measurements of electromechanical properties of electrostrictive polymer actuators. Procedia Eng. 2011, 25, 475–478..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.118

  97. 97.

    Xia F.; Klein R.; Bauer F.; Zhang Q. M. High Performance P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) Terpolymer for BioMEMs and Microfluidic Devices. MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) 2003, 785, D5.8.

    Not in our library10.1557/proc-785-d5.8

  98. 98.

    Chen X.; Qin H.; Qian X.; Zhu W.; Li B.; Zhang B.; Lu W.; Li R.; Zhang S.; Zhu L.; et al. Relaxor ferroelectric polymer exhibits ultrahigh electromechanical coupling at low electric field. Science 2022, 375 (6587), 1418–1422..

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abn0936

  99. 99.

    Barbosa J. C.; Pinto R. S.; Hilliou L.; Silva M. M.; Costa C. M.; Gonçalves R.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene-chlorofluoroethylene): A New Binder for Conventional and Printable Lithium-Ion Batteries. ASC Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (12), 14129–14140..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaem.1c02897

  100. 100.

    Mooti A.; Costa C. M.; Maceiras A.; Pereira N.; Tubio C. R.; Vilas J. L.; Besbes-Hentati S.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Magnetic and high-dielectric-constant nanoparticle polymer tri-composites for sensor applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55 (34), 16234–16246..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-020-05165-6

  101. 101.

    Chowdhury T.; D’Souza N.; Berman D. Electrospun Fe3O4-PVDF Nanofiber Composite Mats for Cryogenic Magnetic Sensor Applications. Textiles 2021, 1 (2), 227–238..

    Not in our library10.3390/textiles1020011

  102. 102.

    Mu X.; Zhang H.; Zhang C.; Yang S.; Xu J.; Huang Y.; Xu J.; Zhang Y.; Li Q.; Wang X.; et al. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/cobalt ferrite composite films with a self-biased magnetoelectric effect for flexible AC magnetic sensors. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56 (16), 9728–9740..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-021-05937-8

  103. 103.

    Martins P.; Costa C. M.; Benelmekki M.; Botelho G.; Lanceros-Mendez S. On the origin of the electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride) β-phase nucleation by ferrite nanoparticles via surface electrostatic interactions. CrystEngComm 2012, 14 (8), 2807–2811..

    Not in our library10.1039/c2ce06654h

  104. 104.

    Vicente J.; Costa P.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Abete J. M.; Iturrospe A. Electromechanical Properties of PVDF-Based Polymers Reinforced with Nanocarbonaceous Fillers for Pressure Sensing Applications. Materials 2019, 12 (21), 3545.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma12213545

  105. 105.

    Nunes-Pereira J.; Sharma P.; Fernandes L. C.; Oliveira J.; Moreira J. A.; Sharma R. K.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites with carbon nanotubes decorated with metal nanoparticles. Composites Part B 2018, 142, 1–8..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.047

  106. 106.

    Kaspar P.; Sobola D.; Castkova K.; Dallaev R.; Stastna E.; Sedlak P.; Knapek A.; Trcka T.; Holcman V. Case Study of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Doping by Carbon Nanotubes. Materials 2021, 14 (6), 1428.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma14061428

  107. 107.

    Abdolmaleki H.; Agarwala S. PVDF-BaTiO3 Nanocomposite Inkjet Inks with Enhanced β-Phase Crystallinity for Printed Electronics. Polymers 2020, 12 (10), 2430.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym12102430

  108. 108.

    Mendes S. F.; Costa C. M.; Caparros C.; Sencadas V.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Effect of filler size and concentration on the structure and properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/BaTiO3 nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47 (3), 1378–1388..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-011-5916-7

  109. 109.

    Sorayani Bafqi M. S.; Bagherzadeh R.; Latifi M. J. J. o. P. R. Fabrication of composite PVDF-ZnO nanofiber mats by electrospinning for energy scavenging application with enhanced efficiency. J. Polym. Res. 2015, 22, 130.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10965-015-0765-8

  110. 110.
  111. 111.

    Arularasu M. V.; Harb M.; Vignesh R.; Rajendran T. V.; Sundaram R. PVDF/ZnO hybrid nanocomposite applied as a resistive humidity sensor. Surf. Interfaces 2020, 21, 100780.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100780

  112. 112.

    Tan J. Z. Y.; Nursam N. M.; Xia F.; Truong Y. B.; Kyratzis I. L.; Wang X.; Caruso R. A. Electrospun PVDF-TiO2 with tuneable TiO2 crystal phases: synthesis and application in photocatalytic redox reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (2), 641–648..

    Not in our library10.1039/c6ta08266a

  113. 113.

    Mishra J. R.; Samal S. K.; Mohanty S.; Nayak S. K. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)/Ag@TiO2 nanocomposite membrane with enhanced fouling resistance and antibacterial performance. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 268, 124723.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124723

  114. 114.
  115. 115.

    Lopes A. C.; Costa C. M.; Tavares C. J.; Neves I. C.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Nucleation of the electroactive γ phase and enhancement of the optical transparency in low filler content poly(vinylidene)/clay nanocomposites. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011, 115 (37), 18076–18082..

    Not in our library10.1021/jp204513w

  116. 116.

    Lopes A. C.; Silva M. P.; Gonçalves R.; Pereira M. F. R.; Botelho G.; Fonseca A. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Neves I. C. Enhancement of the Dielectric Constant and Thermal Properties of α-Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/Zeolite Nanocomposites. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010, 114 (34), 14446–14452..

    Not in our library10.1021/jp1052997

  117. 117.

    Guo S.; Duan X.; Xie M.; Aw K. C.; Xue Q. Composites, Fabrication and Application of Polyvinylidene Fluoride for Flexible Electromechanical Devices: A Review. Micromachines 2020, 11 (12), 1076.

    Not in our library10.3390/mi11121076

  118. 118.

    Shen Z.-H.; Wang J.-J.; Lin Y.; Nan C.-W.; Chen L.-Q.; Shen Y. High-Throughput Phase-Field Design of High-Energy-Density Polymer Nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (2), 1704380.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201704380

  119. 119.

    Aid S.; Eddhahak A.; Khelladi S.; Ortega Z.; Chaabani S.; Tcharkhtchi A. On the miscibility of PVDF/PMMA polymer blends: Thermodynamics, experimental and numerical investigations. Polym. Test. 2019, 73, 222–231..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.11.036

  120. 120.

    Nogueira J. S.; Malmonge L. F.; Mattoso L. H. C. Blends of PVDF and a conducting polymer. In Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Electrets (ISE 8),1994; pp 644–6497–9 Sept 1994.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    Farooqui U. R.; Ahmad A. L.; Hamid N. A. Effect of polyaniline (PANI) on Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexaflouro propylene) (PVDF-co-HFP) polymer electrolyte membrane prepared by breath figure method. Polym. Test. 2017, 60, 124–131..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.03.012

  122. 122.

    Dong W.; Wang H.; Ren F.; Zhang J.; He M.; Wu T.; Li Y. Dramatic Improvement in Toughness of PLLA/PVDF Blends: the Effect of Compatibilizer Architectures. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016, 4 (8), 4480–4489..

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01420

  123. 123.

    Wang S.; Li T.; Chen C.; Chen S.; Liu B.; Crittenden J. Non-woven PET fabric reinforced and enhanced the performance of ultrafiltration membranes composed of PVDF blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA for industrial applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 1072–1079..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.193

  124. 124.

    Zhang Q.; Zhang S.; Zhang Y.; Hu X.; Chen Y. Preparation of PVDF/PVC composite membrane for wastewater purification. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51 (19–21), 3854–3857..

    Not in our library10.1080/19443994.2013.781735

  125. 125.

    Xi J.; Qiu X.; Li J.; Tang X.; Zhu W.; Chen L. PVDF-PEO blends based microporous polymer electrolyte: Effect of PEO on pore configurations and ionic conductivity. J. Power Sources 2006, 157 (1), 501–506..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.08.009

  126. 126.

    Krishna Bama G.; Indra Devi P.; Ramachandran K. Structural and thermal properties of PVDF/PVA blends. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44 (5), 1302–1307..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-009-3271-8

  127. 127.

    Li R.; Xue B.; Pei J. Enhancement of the dielectric performance of PA11/PVDF blends by a solution method with dimethyl sulfoxide. e-Polym. 2015, 15 (6), 439–445..

    Not in our library10.1515/epoly-2015-0131

  128. 128.

    Masuelli M. A. Ultrafiltration of oil/water emulsions using PVDF/PC blend membranes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 53 (3), 569–578..

    Not in our library10.1080/19443994.2013.846539

  129. 129.

    Shamsuri A. A.; Daik R.; Jamil S. N. A. Md. A Succinct Review on the PVDF/Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid Blends and Composites: Preparations, Properties, and Applications. Processes 2021, 9, 761.

    Not in our library10.3390/pr9050761

  130. 130.

    Lu B.; Lamnawar K.; Maazouz A.; Zhang H. Revealing the dynamic heterogeneity of PMMA/PVDF blends: from microscopic dynamics to macroscopic properties. Soft Matter 2016, 12 (13), 3252–3264..

    Not in our library10.1039/c5sm02659h

  131. 131.

    Li M.; Stingelin N.; Michels J. J.; Spijkman M.-J.; Asadi K.; Feldman K.; Blom P. W. M.; de Leeuw D. M. Ferroelectric Phase Diagram of PVDF:PMMA. Macromolecules 2012, 45 (18), 7477–7485..

    Not in our library10.1021/ma301460h

  132. 132.

    Juyal A.; Panwar V. Synthesis and Characterization of PVDF/PMMA-Based Piezoelectric Blend Membrane. Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2021; pp 889–895.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    Liang Y. Z.; Cheng S. C.; Zhao J. M.; Zhang C. H.; Qiu Y. P. Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun PVDF/PMMA Composite Fibrous Membranes-Based Separator for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 750–752, 1914–1918..

    Not in our library10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.750-752.1914

  134. 134.

    Guselnikova O.; Svanda J.; Postnikov P.; Kalachyova Y.; Svorcik V.; Lyutakov O. Fast and Reproducible Wettability Switching on Functionalized PVDF/PMMA Surface Controlled by External Electric Field. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4 (5), 1600886.

    Not in our library10.1002/admi.201600886

  135. 135.

    Charlot B.; Gauthier S.; Garraud A.; Combette P.; Giani A. PVDF/PMMA blend pyroelectric thin films. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2011, 22 (12), 1766–1771..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10854-011-0360-7

  136. 136.

    Benabid F. Z.; Zouai F.; Douibi A. Spectroscopic Study of Poly (Vinylidene Fluoride)/Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) (PVDF/PMMA) Blend. J. New Technol. Mater. 2015, 5 (2), 28–32..

    Not in our library10.12816/0019430

  137. 137.

    Martins J. N.; Kersch M.; Altstädt V.; Oliveira R. V. B. Electrical conductivity of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polyaniline blends under oscillatory and steady shear conditions. Polym. Test. 2013, 32 (5), 862–869..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.04.001

  138. 138.

    Sengupta P.; Ghosh A.; Bose N.; Mukherjee S.; Roy Chowdhury A.; Datta P. A comparative assessment of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/conducting polymer electrospun nanofiber membranes for biomedical applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 49115.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.49115

  139. 139.

    Polasik J. T.; Schmidt V. H. Conductive polymer PEDOT/PSS electrodes on the piezoelectric polymer PVDF. In Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD); SPIE, 2005; Vol. 5759, pp 114–120.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.

    Correia D. M.; Fernandes L. C.; Martins P. M.; García-Astrain C.; Costa C. M.; Reguera J.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Ionic Liquid-Polymer Composites: A New Platform for Multifunctional Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1909736.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201909736

  141. 141.

    Améduri B.; Hori H. Recycling and the end of life assessment of fluoropolymers: recent developments, challenges and future trends. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52 (13), 4208–4247..

    Not in our library10.1039/d2cs00763k

  142. 142.

    Hu X.; An A. K. J.; Chopra S. S. Life Cycle Assessment of the Polyvinylidene Fluoride Polymer with Applications in Various Emerging Technologies. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (18), 5708–5718..

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05350

  143. 143.

    Ismail N.; Essalhi M.; Rahmati M.; Cui Z.; Khayet M.; Tavajohi N. Experimental and theoretical studies on the formation of pure β-phase polymorphs during fabrication of polyvinylidene fluoride membranes by cyclic carbonate solvents. Green Chemistry 2021, 23 (5), 2130–2147..

    Not in our library10.1039/d1gc00122a

  144. 144.

    Tocci E.; Rizzuto C.; Macedonio F.; Drioli E. Effect of Green Solvents in the Production of PVDF-Specific Polymorphs. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59 (12), 5267–5275..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06701

  145. 145.

    Honma R.; Hori H.; da Cunha F. R.; Horiike N.; Steinbach L.; Ameduri B. Permanganate-Induced Efficient Mineralization of Poly(vinylidene fluoride) and Vinylidene-Fluoride Based Copolymers in Low-Temperature Subcritical Water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58 (29), 13030–13040..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01921

  146. 146.

    Wahlström M. P. E., Yli-Rantala E., Behringer D., Herzke D., Mudge S. M., Beekman M., de Blaeij A., Devilee J., Gabbert S., van Kuppevelt M., Zare Jeddi M., Gabrielsen P., Trier X. Fluorinated Polymers in a Low Carbon, Circular and Toxic-Free Economy; European Topic Centre Waste and Materials in a Green Economy, 2021.

    Not in our library

  147. 147.

    Alex T. Solvay and Arkema to boost PVDF output. C&EN Global Enterprise 2022, 100 (5), 10–10.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    Nshizirungu T.; Rana M.; Khan M. I. H.; Jo Y. T.; Park S.-J.; Park J.-H. Rare metals recycling from spent NCM cathode materials and simultaneous dehydrofluorination of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) in subcritical water. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11 (1), 109160.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jece.2022.109160

  149. 149.

    Yang X.; Liu G.; Guo Q.; Wen H.; Huang R.; Meng X.; Duan J.; Tang Q. Triboelectric sensor array for internet of things based smart traffic monitoring and management system. Nano Energy 2022, 92, 106757.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106757

  150. 150.

    Lang S. B.; Sollish B. D.; Moshitzky M.; Frei E. H. Model Of A Pvdf Piezoelectric Transducer For Use In Biomedical Studies. Ferroelectrics 1980, 24 (1), 289–292..

    Not in our library10.1080/00150198008238657

  151. 151.

    Alavi A. H.; Jiao P.; Buttlar W. G.; Lajnef N. Internet of Things-enabled smart cities: State-of-the-art and future trends. Measurement 2018, 129, 589–606..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.067

  152. 152.

    Singh R. K.; Lye S. W.; Miao J. PVDF Nanofiber Sensor for Vibration Measurement in a String. Sensors 2019, 19, 3739.

    Not in our library10.3390/s19173739

  153. 153.

    Stadlober B.; Zirkl M.; Irimia-Vladu M. Route towards sustainable smart sensors: Ferroelectric polyvinylidene fluoride-based materials and their integration in flexible electronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (6), 1787–1825..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8cs00928g

  154. 154.

    Parangusan H.; Ponnamma D.; Almaadeed M. A. A. Investigation on the effect of γ-irradiation on the dielectric and piezoelectric properties of stretchable PVDF/Fe-ZnO nanocomposites for self-powering devices. Soft Matter 2018, 14 (43), 8803–8813..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8sm01655k

  155. 155.

    Xin Y.; Guo C.; Qi X.; Tian H.; Li X.; Dai Q.; Wang S.; Wang C. Wearable and unconstrained systems based on PVDF sensors in physiological signals monitoring: A brief review. Ferroelectrics 2016, 500 (1), 291–300..

    Not in our library10.1080/00150193.2016.1230440

  156. 156.

    Martins P.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Polymer-based magnetoelectric materials: To be or not to be. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 15, 558–561..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apmt.2019.04.004

  157. 157.

    Wang D.; Chen J. S. Progress on the applications of piezoelectric materials in sensors. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 848, 749–756..

    Not in our library10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.848.749

  158. 158.

    Pedotti A.; Assente R.; Fusi G.; De Rossi D.; Dario P.; Domenici C. Multisensor piezoelectric polymer insole for pedobarography. Ferroelectrics 1984, 60, 163–174..

    Not in our library10.1080/00150198408017519

  159. 159.
  160. 160.

    Arshak K. I.; McDonagh D.; Durcan M. A. Development of new capacitive strain sensors based on thick film polymer and cermet technologies. Sens. Actuators, A 2000, 79 (2), 102–114..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0924-4247(99)00275-7

  161. 161.

    Gauster W. B.; Breazeale M. A. Detector for measurement of ultrasonic strain amplitudes in solids. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1966, 37 (11), 1544–1548..

    Not in our library10.1063/1.1720040

  162. 162.

    Khan N.; Omran H.; Yao Y.; Salama K. N. Flexible PVDF ferroelectric capacitive temperature sensor. In Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 02–05 August 2015;

    Not in our library10.1109/mwscas.2015.7282063

  163. 163.

    Luo Z.; Chen J.; Zhu Z.; Li L.; Su Y.; Tang W.; Omisore O. M.; Wang L.; Li H. High-Resolution and High-Sensitivity Flexible Capacitive Pressure Sensors Enhanced by a Transferable Electrode Array and a Micropillar-PVDF Film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (6), 7635–7649..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.0c23042

  164. 164.

    Keum K.; Heo J. S.; Eom J.; Lee K. W.; Park S. K.; Kim Y. H. Highly sensitive textile-based capacitive pressure sensors using PVDF-HFP/ionic liquid composite films. Sensors 2021, 21, 442.

    Not in our library10.3390/s21020442

  165. 165.

    Danova R.; Avvari V. D.; Olejnik R.; Slobodian P.; Matyas J.; Kimmer D. Enhanced PVDF Electrospun Nanofiber Capacitive Pressure Sensor for Wearable Electronic. In 15th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular System, NEMS 2020; IEEE, 2020; pp 115–119.

    Not in our library

  166. 166.

    Zhang X.; Zhai Z.; Wang J.; Hao X.; Sun Y.; Yu S.; Lin X.; Qin Y.; Li C. Zr-MOF Combined with Nanofibers as an Efficient and Flexible Capacitive Sensor for Detecting SO2. ChemNanoMat 2021, 7 (10), 1117–1124..

    Not in our library10.1002/cnma.202100185

  167. 167.

    Shirinov A. V.; Schomburg W. K. Pressure sensor from a PVDF film. Sens. Actuators, A 2008, 142 (1), 48–55..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2007.04.002

  168. 168.

    Pullano S. A.; Mahbub I.; Islam S. K.; Fiorillo A. S. PVDF Sensor Stimulated by Infrared Radiation for Temperature Monitoring in Microfluidic Devices. Sensors 2017, 17, 850.

    Not in our library10.3390/s17040850

  169. 169.

    Jia Y.; Ni Q.; Chen X.; Ju C.; Xing K.; Jin T. Simulation and experiment of PVDF temperature sensor. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 303–306, 109–113..

    Not in our library10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.303-306.109

  170. 170.

    Lee J. S.; Shin K. Y.; Cheong O. J.; Kim J. H.; Jang J. Highly sensitive and multifunctional tactile sensor using free-standing ZnO/PVDF thin film with graphene electrodes for pressure and temperature monitoring. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7887.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep07887

  171. 171.

    Yuji J. I.; Sonoda C. A PVDF tactile sensor for static contact force and contact temperature. Proceedings of IEEE Sensors 2006, 738–741..

    Not in our library10.1109/icsens.2007.355574

  172. 172.

    Xia K.; Zhu Z.; Zhang H.; Xu Z. A triboelectric nanogenerator as self-powered temperature sensor based on PVDF and PTFE. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2018, 124, 520.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00339-018-1942-5

  173. 173.

    Gupta S.; Lorenzelli L.; Dahiya R. Multifunctional flexible PVDF-TrFE/BaTiO3 based tactile sensor for touch and temperature monitoring. Proceedings of IEEE Sensors 2017, 1–3..29780437

    Not in our library10.1109/icsens.2017.8234096

  174. 174.

    Hernández-Rivera D.; Suaste-Gómez E. Fabrication of piezoelectric PVDF/graphene membranes by electrospinning for respiratory rate and temperature sensing. IFMBE Proceedings 2017, 60, 397–400..

    Not in our library10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_100

  175. 175.

    Sun Z.; Zhu M.; Zhang Z.; Chen Z.; Shi Q.; Shan X.; Yeow R. C. H.; Lee C. Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) Enabled Virtual Shop Applications Using Self-Powered Sensor Enhanced Soft Robotic Manipulator. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100230.

    Not in our library10.1002/advs.202100230

  176. 176.

    Liu H.; Zhao T.; Jiang W.; Jia R.; Niu D.; Qiu G.; Fan L.; Li X.; Liu W.; Chen B.; et al. Flexible Battery-Less Bioelectronic Implants: Wireless Powering and Manipulation by Near-Infrared Light. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25 (45), 7071–7079..

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201502752

  177. 177.

    Li H.; Wu T.; Xie M.; Shi Y.; Shen S.; Zhao M.; Yang X.; Figueroa-Cosme L. M.; Ke Q.; Xia Y. Enhancing the tactile and near-infrared sensing capabilities of electrospun PVDF nanofibers with the use of gold nanocages. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6 (38), 10263–10269..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8tc02671h

  178. 178.

    Gokana M. R.; Wu C.-M.; Motora K. G.; Qi J. Y.; Yen W.-T. Effects of patterned electrode on near infrared light-triggered cesium tungsten bronze/poly(vinylidene)fluoride nanocomposite-based pyroelectric nanogenerator for energy harvesting. J. Power Sources 2022, 536, 231524.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231524

  179. 179.

    Domenici C.; De Rossi D.; Bacci A.; Bennati S. Shear Stress Detection in an Elastic Layer by a Piezoelectric Polymer Tactile Sensor. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 1989, 24 (6), 1077–1081..

    Not in our library10.1109/14.46341

  180. 180.

    Kärki S.; Lekkala J.; Kuokkanen H.; Halttunen J. Development of a piezoelectric polymer film sensor for plantar normal and shear stress measurements. Sens. Actuators, A 2009, 154 (1), 57–64..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2009.07.010

  181. 181.

    Du G.; Li Z.; Song G. A PVDF-Based Sensor for Internal Stress Monitoring of a Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) Column Subject to Impact Loads. Sensors 2018, 18 (6), 1682.

    Not in our library10.3390/s18061682

  182. 182.

    Akitegetse C.; Volat C.; Farzaneh M. Measuring bending stress on an ice/aluminium composite beam interface using an embedded piezoelectric PVDF (polyvinylidene-fluoride) film sensor. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2008, 19 (6), 065703.

    Not in our library10.1088/0957-0233/19/6/065703

  183. 183.

    Cai J.; Fu X.; Liu H. Design of PVDF stress sensor and its application in the stress test of foam plastic. In Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Measurement, Information and Control, MIC 2012, 2012; Vol. 2, pp 821–824.

    Not in our library

  184. 184.

    Ma Z.; Wang G.; Rui X.; Yang F.; Wang Y. Temperature compensation of a PVDF stress sensor and its application in the test of gun propellant charge compression stress. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28 (2), 025018.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-665x/aaf2bd

  185. 185.

    Li F.; Akiyama Y.; Wan X.; Okamoto S.; Yamada Y. Built-in Sensor System for Monitoring Internal Shear Strain and Stress Distribution in Soft Materials. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 319–327..

    Not in our library10.1109/access.2021.3138890

  186. 186.

    Zhao H.; Dai Z.; He T.; Zhu S.; Yan X.; Yang J. Fabrication of PANI-modified PVDF nanofibrous yarn for pH sensor. e-Polym. 2022, 22 (1), 69–74..

    Not in our library10.1515/epoly-2022-0013

  187. 187.

    Yang B.; Yang X.; Liu B.; Chen Z.; Chen C.; Liang S.; Chu L.-Y.; Crittenden J. PVDF blended PVDF-g-PMAA pH-responsive membrane: Effect of additives and solvents on membrane properties and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 541, 558–566..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.045

  188. 188.

    Saravanakumar B.; Soyoon S.; Kim S. J. Self-powered pH sensor based on a flexible organic-inorganic hybrid composite nanogenerator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6 (16), 13716–13723..

    Not in our library10.1021/am5031648

  189. 189.

    Ying L.; Wang P.; Kang E. T.; Neoh K. G. Synthesis and Characterization of Poly(acrylic acid)-graft-poly(vinylidene fluoride) Copolymers and pH-Sensitive Membranes. Macromolecules 2002, 35 (3), 673–679..

    Not in our library10.1021/ma0112568

  190. 190.

    Ferro L.; Scialdone O.; Galia A. Preparation of pH sensitive poly(vinilydenefluoride) porous membranes by grafting of acrylic acid assisted by supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 66, 241–250..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.supflu.2011.09.004

  191. 191.

    Ju J.; Wang C.; Wang T.; Wang Q. Preparation and characterization of pH-sensitive and antifouling poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration membranes blended with poly(methyl methacrylate-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-acrylic acid). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 434, 175–180..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.007

  192. 192.

    Pastore A.; Badocco D.; Cappellin L.; Pastore P. Enhancement of the pH measurement of a PVDF-supported colorimetric sensor by tailoring hue changes with the addition of a second dye. Microchem. J. 2020, 154, 104552.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.microc.2019.104552

  193. 193.

    Khalifa M.; Anandhan S. Highly sensitive and wearable NO2 gas sensor based on PVDF nanofabric containing embedded polyaniline/g-C3N4 nanosheet composites. Nanotechnology 2021, 32 (48), 485504.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6528/ac1f54

  194. 194.

    Mandelis A.; Garcia J. A. Pd/PVDF thin film hydrogen sensor based on laser-amplitude-modulated optical-transmittance: dependence on H2 concentration and device physics. Sens. Actuators, B 1998, 49 (3), 258–267..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0925-4005(98)00137-3

  195. 195.

    Magori V. Ultrasonic sensors in air. Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1994, 471–481..

    Not in our library10.1109/ultsym.1994.401632

  196. 196.

    Lehnen T.; Valldor M.; Nižňanský D.; Mathur S. Hydrothermally grown porous FeVO4 nanorods and their integration as active material in gas-sensing devices. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2 (6), 1862–1868..

    Not in our library10.1039/c3ta12821k

  197. 197.

    Qureshi A.; Altindal A.; Mergen A. Electrical and gas sensing properties of Li and Ti codoped NiO/PVDF thin film. Sens. Actuators, B 2009, 138 (1), 71–75..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2009.01.063

  198. 198.

    Imai Y.; Kimura Y.; Niwano M. Organic hydrogen gas sensor with palladium-coated β-phase poly(vinylidene fluoride) thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 181907.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.4764064

  199. 199.

    Imai Y.; Tadaki D.; Ma T.; Kimura Y.; Hirano-Iwata A.; Niwano M. Response characteristics of hydrogen gas sensor with porous piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride) film. Sens. Actuators, B 2017, 247, 479–489..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.001

  200. 200.

    Glück A.; Halder W.; Lindner G.; Müller H.; Weindler P. PVDF-excited resonance sensors for gas flow and humidity measurements. Sens. Actuators, B 1994, 19 (1–3), 554–557..

    Not in our library10.1016/0925-4005(93)01083-g

  201. 201.

    Chen D.; Wang J.; Li D.; Liu Y.; Song H.; Liu Q. A poly(vinylidene fluoride)-coated ZnO film bulk acoustic resonator for nerve gas detection. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2011, 21 (8), 085017.

    Not in our library10.1088/0960-1317/21/8/085017

  202. 202.

    Xu S.; Zhang R.; Cui J.; Liu T.; Sui X.; Han M.; Zheng F.; Hu X. Surface Acoustic Wave DMMP Gas Sensor with a Porous Graphene/PVDF Molecularly Imprinted Sensing Membrane. Micromachines 2021, 12, 552.

    Not in our library10.3390/mi12050552

  203. 203.

    Manesh K. M.; Santhosh P.; Gopalan A.; Lee K. P. Electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(aminophenylboronic acid) composite nanofibrous membrane as a novel glucose sensor. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 360 (2), 189–195..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ab.2006.09.021

  204. 204.

    Zhang P.; Zhao X.; Zhang X.; Lai Y.; Wang X.; Li J.; Wei G.; Su Z. Electrospun doping of carbon nanotubes and platinum nanoparticles into the β-phase polyvinylidene difluoride nanofibrous membrane for biosensor and catalysis applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6 (10), 7563–7571..

    Not in our library10.1021/am500908v

  205. 205.

    Tanaka M.; Lévêque J. L.; Tagami H.; Kikuchi K.; Chonan S. The ″Haptic Finger″ - A new device for monitoring skin condition. Sking Res. Technol. 2003, 9 (2), 131–136..

    Not in our library10.1034/j.1600-0846.2003.00031.x

  206. 206.

    Hwang S. H.; Lee H. J.; Yoon H. N.; Jung D. W.; Lee Y. J. G.; Lee Y. J.; Jeong D. U.; Park K. S. Unconstrained sleep apnea monitoring using polyvinylidene fluoride film-based sensor. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 61 (7), 2125–2134..

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2014.2314452

  207. 207.

    Chen D.; Wang C.; Chen W.; Chen Y.; Zhang J. X. PVDF-Nafion nanomembranes coated microneedles for in vivo transcutaneous implantable glucose sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 1047–1052..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.036

  208. 208.

    Xing Y.; Gao G.; Zhu G.; Gao J.; Ge Z.; Yang H. A nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensor based on Ni(OH)2-CNT-PVDF composite and its application in measuring serum glucose. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 161 (5), B106–B110..

    Not in our library10.1149/2.002406jes

  209. 209.

    Hartono A.; Sanjaya E.; Ramli R. Glucose Sensing Using Capacitive Biosensor Based on Polyvinylidene Fluoride Thin Film. Biosensors 2018, 8, 12.

    Not in our library10.3390/bios8010012

  210. 210.

    Sanguino P.; Monteiro T.; Marques F.; Dias C. J.; Igreja R.; Franco R. Interdigitated capacitive immunosensors with PVDF immobilization layers. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14 (4), 1260–1265..

    Not in our library10.1109/jsen.2013.2294435

  211. 211.

    Zhao B.; Hu J.; Ren W.; Xu F.; Wu X.; Shi P.; Ye Z. G. A new biosensor based on PVDF film for detection of nucleic acids. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41 (S1), S602–S606..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.253

  212. 212.

    Santiago-Malagon S.; Rio-Colin D.; Azizkhani H.; Aller-Pellitero M.; Guirado G.; Del Campo F. J. A self-powered skin-patch electrochromic biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 175, 112879.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2020.112879

  213. 213.

    Shah V.; Wang B.; Li K. High-performance PVDF membranes prepared by the combined crystallisation and diffusion (CCD) method using a dual-casting technique: A breakthrough for water treatment applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14 (10), 5491–5500..

    Not in our library10.1039/d1ee02009a

  214. 214.

    Garain S.; Jana S.; Sinha T. K.; Mandal D. Design of in Situ Poled Ce3+-Doped Electrospun PVDF/Graphene Composite Nanofibers for Fabrication of Nanopressure Sensor and Ultrasensitive Acoustic Nanogenerator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (7), 4532–4540..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.5b11356

  215. 215.

    Guo R.; Zhang H.; Cao S.; Cui X.; Yan Z.; Sang S. A self-powered stretchable sensor fabricated by serpentine PVDF film for multiple dynamic monitoring. Mater. Des. 2019, 182, 108025.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108025

  216. 216.

    Hernandez-Rivera D.; Rodriguez-Roldan G.; Mora-Martinez R.; Suaste-Gomez E. A Capacitive Humidity Sensor Based on an Electrospun PVDF/Graphene Membrane. Sensors 2017, 17, 1009.

    Not in our library10.3390/s17051009

  217. 217.

    Huang S.; Wang J.; Liu H.; Wu P.; Chen E.; Chiu F.; Guo J. Development of low cost PVDF pressure sensors for sensing the motion of a robot fish. 2013 IEEE International Underwater Technology Symposium (UT) 2013, 1–6. 5–8 March 2013.

    Not in our library10.1109/ut.2013.6519907

  218. 218.

    Bobinger M.; Keddis S.; Hinterleuthner S.; Becherer M.; Kluge F.; Schwesinger N.; Salmeron J. F.; Lugli P.; Rivadeneyra A. Light and Pressure Sensors Based on PVDF With Sprayed and Transparent Electrodes for Self-Powered Wireless Sensor Nodes. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19 (3), 1114–1126..

    Not in our library10.1109/jsen.2018.2879122

  219. 219.

    Jang M.; Jung D.; Lee J.; Lee S. M.; Lee A.; Yim S.; Song W.; Myung S.; Lee S. S.; Kang Y. C.; et al. PVDF-stimulated surface engineering in ZnO for highly sensitive and water-stable hydrazine sensors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 585, 152747.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152747

  220. 220.

    Liu J.; Qiao S. Z.; Hu Q. H.; Lu G. Q. M. Magnetic nanocomposites with mesoporous structures: Synthesis and applications. Small 2011, 7, 425–443..

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201001402

  221. 221.

    Brito-Pereira R.; Tubio C. R.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Martins P. A Facile Nanoimpregnation Method for Preparing Paper-Based Sensors and Actuators. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 6, 2100476.

    Not in our library10.1002/admt.202100476

  222. 222.

    Dias J. C.; Lopes A. C.; Magalhães B.; Botelho G.; Silva M. M.; Esperança J. M. S. S.; Lanceros-Mendez S. High performance electromechanical actuators based on ionic liquid/poly(vinylidene fluoride). Polym. Test. 2015, 48, 199–205..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.10.012

  223. 223.

    Sheng M.; Han Y.; Li Q.; Li X.; Dang Z. Experimental investigation of active vibration control on plate structures using laminated PVDF actuators. In Proceedings of 2017 14th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology, IBCAST 2017; IBCAST, 2017; pp 671–674.

    Not in our library

  224. 224.

    Gu J.; Yang H.; Fan F.; Su M. A transmission and reflection coupled ultrasonic process tomography based on cylindrical miniaturized transducers using PVDF films. J. Instrum. 2017, 12 (12), P12026–P12026..

    Not in our library10.1088/1748-0221/12/12/p12026

  225. 225.

    Sousa R. E.; Kundu M.; Gören A.; Silva M. M.; Liu L.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) (PVDF-CTFE) lithium-ion battery separator membranes prepared by phase inversion. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (110), 90428–90436..

    Not in our library10.1039/c5ra19335d

  226. 226.

    Kaneko R.; Froemel J.; Tanaka S. PVDF - TrFE/SiO2 Composite Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator for Frequency-Modulated Sensor Application. In IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS; IEEE, 2018.

    Not in our library10.1109/ultsym.2018.8580123

  227. 227.

    Lu A. X.; McEntee M.; Browe M. A.; Hall M. G.; Decoste J. B.; Peterson G. W. MOFabric: Electrospun Nanofiber Mats from PVDF/UiO-66-NH2 for Chemical Protection and Decontamination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (15), 13632–13636..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.7b01621

  228. 228.

    Nunes-Pereira J.; Silva A. R.; Ribeiro C.; Carabineiro S. A. C.; Buijnsters J. G.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Nanodiamonds/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites for tissue engineering applications. Composites Part B 2017, 111, 37–44..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.014

  229. 229.

    Lima A. C.; Pereira N.; Policia R.; Ribeiro C.; Correia V.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Martins P. All-printed multilayer materials with improved magnetoelectric response. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7 (18), 5394–5400..

    Not in our library10.1039/c9tc01428d

  230. 230.

    Polícia R.; Lima A. C.; Pereira N.; Calle E.; Vázquez M.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Martins P. Transparent Magnetoelectric Materials for Advanced Invisible Electronic Applications. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5 (12), 1900280.

    Not in our library10.1002/aelm.201900280

  231. 231.

    Gonçalves R.; Larrea A.; Zheng T.; Higgins M. J.; Sebastian V.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Martins P. Synthesis of highly magnetostrictive nanostructures and their application in a polymer-based magnetoelectric sensing device. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 84, 685–692..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.055

  232. 232.

    Martins P.; Kolen’Ko Y. V.; Rivas J.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Tailored Magnetic and Magnetoelectric Responses of Polymer-Based Composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7 (27), 15017–15022..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.5b04102

  233. 233.

    Silva M. P.; Martins P.; Lasheras A.; Gutiérrez J.; Barandiarán J. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Size effects on the magnetoelectric response on PVDF/Vitrovac 4040 laminate composites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 377, 29–33..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.040

  234. 234.

    Sang M.; Wang S.; Liu M.; Bai L.; Jiang W.; Xuan S.; Gong X. Fabrication of a piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride/carbonyl iron (PVDF/CI) magnetic composite film towards the magnetic field and deformation bi-sensor. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 165, 31–38..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.006

  235. 235.

    Brito-Pereira R.; Ribeiro C.; Pereira N.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Martins P. Printed multifunctional magnetically activated energy harvester with sensing capabilities. Nano Energy 2022, 94, 106885.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106885

  236. 236.

    Lima A. C.; Pereira N.; Ribeiro C.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Martins P. Greener Solvent-Based Processing of Magnetoelectric Nanocomposites. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (13), 4122–4132..

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06967

  237. 237.

    Nivedhitha D. M.; Jeyanthi S. Polyvinylidene fluoride—An advanced smart polymer for electromagnetic interference shielding applications—A novel review. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2023, 34 (6), 1781–1806..

    Not in our library10.1002/pat.6015

  238. 238.

    Qin Q.; Hu Y.; Guo S.; Yang Y.; Lei T.; Cui Z.; Wang H.; Qin S. PVDF-based composites for electromagnetic shielding application: a review. J. Polym. Res. 2023, 30, 130.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10965-023-03506-y

  239. 239.

    Dargahi J.; Parameswaran M.; Payandeh S. Micromachined piezoelectric tactile sensor for an endoscopic grasper - theory, fabrication and experiments. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2000, 9 (3), 329–335..

    Not in our library10.1109/84.870059

  240. 240.

    Choi S.; Jiang Z. A novel wearable sensor device with conductive fabric and PVDF film for monitoring cardiorespiratory signals. Sens. Actuators, A 2006, 128 (2), 317–326..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2006.02.012

  241. 241.

    Wang Y. R.; Zheng J. M.; Ren G. Y.; Zhang P. H.; Xu C. A flexible piezoelectric force sensor based on PVDF fabrics. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011, 20 (4), 045009.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/045009

  242. 242.

    Eswaraiah V.; Balasubramaniam K.; Ramaprabhu S. Functionalized graphene reinforced thermoplastic nanocomposites as strain sensors in structural health monitoring. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (34), 12626–12628..

    Not in our library10.1039/c1jm12302e

  243. 243.

    Costa P.; Nunes-Pereira J.; Oliveira J.; Silva J.; Moreira J. A.; Carabineiro S. A. C.; Buijnsters J. G.; Lanceros-Mendez S. High-performance graphene-based carbon nanofiller/polymer composites for piezoresistive sensor applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 153, 241–252..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.001

  244. 244.

    Ionov L. Polymeric Actuators. Langmuir 2015, 31 (18), 5015–5024..

    Not in our library10.1021/la503407z

  245. 245.

    Ahn J.; Gu J.; Choi J.; Han C.; Jeong Y.; Park J.; Cho S.; Oh Y. S.; Jeong J.-H.; Amjadi M.; et al. A Review of Recent Advances in Electrically Driven Polymer-Based Flexible Actuators: Smart Materials, Structures, and Their Applications. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2200041.

    Not in our library10.1002/admt.202200041

  246. 246.

    Martins P.; Correia D. M.; Correia V.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Polymer-based actuators: back to the future. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22 (27), 15163–15182..

    Not in our library10.1039/d0cp02436h

  247. 247.

    White B. T.; Long T. E. Advances in Polymeric Materials for Electromechanical Devices. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, 1800521.

    Not in our library10.1002/marc.201800521

  248. 248.

    Benouhiba A.; Belharet D.; Bienaimé A.; Chalvet V.; Rakotondrabe M.; Clévy C. Development and characterization of thinned PZT bulk technology based actuators devoted to a 6-DOF micropositioning platform. Microelectron. Eng. 2018, 197, 53–60..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mee.2018.05.007

  249. 249.
  250. 250.

    Dias J. C.; Martins M. S.; Ribeiro S.; Silva M. M.; Esperança J. M. S. S.; Ribeiro C.; Botelho G.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Electromechanical actuators based on poly(vinylidene fluoride) with [N1 1 1 2(OH)][NTf2] and [C2mim] [C2SO4]. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51 (20), 9490–9503..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-016-0193-0

  251. 251.

    Lee C.; Park H.; Lee J.-H. Recent Structure Development of Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Piezoelectric Nanogenerator for Self-Powered Sensor. Actuators 2020, 9 (3), 57.

    Not in our library10.3390/act9030057

  252. 252.

    Park S. W.; Kim S. J.; Park S. H.; Lee J.; Kim H.; Kim M. K. Recent Progress in Development and Applications of Ionic Polymer-Metal Composite. Micromachines 2022, 13 (8), 1290.

    Not in our library10.3390/mi13081290

  253. 253.

    Gao X.; Yang J.; Wu J.; Xin X.; Li Z.; Yuan X.; Shen X.; Dong S. Piezoelectric Actuators and Motors: Materials, Designs, and Applications. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 1900716.

    Not in our library10.1002/admt.201900716

  254. 254.

    Bazghaleh M.; Grainger S.; Mohammadzaheri M. A review of charge methods for driving piezoelectric actuators. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2018, 29 (10), 2096–2104..

    Not in our library10.1177/1045389x17733330

  255. 255.

    Sharafkhani S.; Kokabi M. High performance flexible actuator: PVDF nanofibers incorporated with axially aligned carbon nanotubes. Composites Part B 2021, 222, 109060.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109060

  256. 256.

    Mohith S.; Upadhya A. R.; Navin K. P.; Kulkarni S. M.; Rao M. Recent trends in piezoelectric actuators for precision motion and their applications: a review. Smart Mater. Struct. 2021, 30 (1), 013002.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-665x/abc6b9

  257. 257.

    Hofmann V.; Twiefel J. Self-Sensing with loaded piezoelectric Bending actuators. Sens. Actuators, A 2017, 263, 737–743..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2017.06.004

  258. 258.

    Chen Z.; Kwon K.-Y.; Tan X. Integrated IPMC/PVDF sensory actuator and its validation in feedback control. Sens. Actuators, A 2008, 144 (2), 231–241..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2008.01.023

  259. 259.

    Morita T.; Kadota Y.; Hosaka H. Shape memory piezoelectric actuator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 082909.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2709985

  260. 260.

    Zhang C.; Sun H.; Zhu Q. Preparation and Property Enhancement of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) (PVDF)/Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT) Composite Piezoelectric Films. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50 (11), 6426–6437..

    Not in our library10.1007/s11664-021-09172-4

  261. 261.

    Park J.-M.; Gu G.-Y.; Wang Z.-J.; Kwon D.-J.; DeVries K. L. Interfacial durability and electrical properties of CNT or ITO/PVDF nanocomposites for self-sensor and micro actuator applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 287, 75–83..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.069

  262. 262.

    Kalel S.; Wang W. C. Integration of SMP with PVDF Unimorph for Bending Enhancement. Polymers 2021, 13 (3), 415.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym13030415

  263. 263.
  264. 264.

    Kiyohara K.; Sugino T.; Asaka K. Mechanism of Electroactive Polymer Actuator. In Next-Generation Actuators Leading Breakthroughs; Higuchi T., Suzumori K., Tadokoro S., Eds.; Springer: London, 2010; pp 303–313.

    Not in our library

  265. 265.

    Correia D. M.; Barbosa J. C.; Costa C. M.; Reis P. M.; Esperança J. M. S. S.; De Zea Bermudez V.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Ionic Liquid Cation Size-Dependent Electromechanical Response of Ionic Liquid/Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Based Soft Actuators. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123 (20), 12744–12752..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00868

  266. 266.

    Dias J. C.; Correia D. M.; Costa C. M.; Ribeiro C.; Maceiras A.; Vilas J. L.; Botelho G.; de Zea Bermudez V.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Improved response of ionic liquid-based bending actuators by tailored interaction with the polar fluorinated polymer matrix. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 296, 598–607..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.049

  267. 267.

    Mejri R.; Dias J. C.; Hentati S. B.; Martins M. S.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Effect of anion type in the performance of ionic liquid/poly(vinylidene fluoride) electromechanical actuators. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2016, 453, 8–15..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.09.014

  268. 268.

    Park M.; Kim J.; Song H.; Kim S.; Jeon M. Fast and Stable Ionic Electroactive Polymer Actuators with PEDOT:PSS/(Graphene(-)Ag-Nanowires) Nanocomposite Electrodes. Sensors 2018, 18, 3126.

    Not in our library10.3390/s18093126

  269. 269.

    Inamuddin; Abbas Kashmery H. Polyvinylidene fluoride/sulfonated graphene oxide blend membrane coated with polypyrrole/platinum electrode for ionic polymer metal composite actuator applications. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9877.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-46305-6

  270. 270.

    Vekariya R. L. A review of ionic liquids: Applications towards catalytic organic transformations. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 227, 44–60..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.123

  271. 271.

    Ye Y.-S.; Rick J.; Hwang B.-J. Ionic liquid polymer electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1 (8), 2719–2743..

    Not in our library10.1039/c2ta00126h

  272. 272.
  273. 273.

    Mejri R.; Dias J. C.; Besbes Hentati S.; Botelho G.; Esperança J. M. S. S.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros- Mendez S. Imidazolium-based ionic liquid type dependence of the bending response of polymer actuators. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 85, 445–451..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.052

  274. 274.

    Fernandes L. C.; Correia D. M.; Pereira N.; Tubio C. R.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Highly Sensitive Humidity Sensor Based on Ionic Liquid-Polymer Composites. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1 (10), 2723–2730..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsapm.9b00675

  275. 275.

    Terasawa N. High-performance ionic and non-ionic fluoropolymer/ionic liquid gel hybrid actuators based on single-walled carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv. 2017, 7 (5), 2443–2449..

    Not in our library10.1039/c6ra24925f

  276. 276.

    Guo D.; Han Y.; Huang J.; Meng E.; Ma L.; Zhang H.; Ding Y. Hydrophilic Poly(vinylidene Fluoride) Film with Enhanced Inner Channels for Both Water- and Ionic Liquid-Driven Ion-Exchange Polymer Metal Composite Actuators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (2), 2386–2397..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.8b18098

  277. 277.

    Põldsalu I.; Johanson U.; Tamm T.; Punning A.; Greco F.; Peikolainen A.-L.; Kiefer R.; Aabloo A. Mechanical and electro-mechanical properties of EAP actuators with inkjet printed electrodes. Synth. Met. 2018, 246, 122–127..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.10.009

  278. 278.

    Terasawa N.; Asaka K. High-performance cellulose nanofibers, single-walled carbon nanotubes and ionic liquid actuators with a poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene)/ionic liquid gel electrolyte layer. RSC Adv. 2019, 9 (15), 8215–8221..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ra10221j

  279. 279.

    Correia D. M.; Barbosa J. C.; Serra J. P.; Pinto R. S.; Fernandes L. C.; Tubio C. R.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Costa C. M. Comparative Assessment of Ionic Liquid-Based Soft Actuators Prepared by Film Casting Versus Direct Ink Writing. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2021, 23, 2100411.

    Not in our library10.1002/adem.202100411

  280. 280.

    Correia D. M.; Fernandes L. C.; Pereira N.; Barbosa J. C.; Serra J. P.; Pinto R. S.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. All printed soft actuators based on ionic liquid/polymer hybrid materials. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 22, 100928.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100928

  281. 281.

    Fukada E. Recent developments of polar piezoelectric polymers. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2006, 13 (5), 1110–1119..

    Not in our library10.1109/tdei.2006.247839

  282. 282.

    Yun S.; Zhang Y.; Xu Q.; Liu J.; Qin Y. Recent advance in new-generation integrated devices for energy harvesting and storage. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 600–619..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.074

  283. 283.

    Costa P.; Nunes-Pereira J.; Pereira N.; Castro N.; Gonçalves S.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Recent Progress on Piezoelectric, Pyroelectric, and Magnetoelectric Polymer-Based Energy-Harvesting Devices. Energy Technol. 2019, 7 (7), 1800852.

    Not in our library10.1002/ente.201800852

  284. 284.

    Wan C.; Bowen C. R. Multiscale-structuring of polyvinylidene fluoride for energy harvesting: the impact of molecular-, micro- and macro-structure. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (7), 3091–3128..

    Not in our library10.1039/c6ta09590a

  285. 285.

    Sarker M. R.; Julai S.; Sabri M. F. M.; Said S. M.; Islam M. M.; Tahir M. Review of piezoelectric energy harvesting system and application of optimization techniques to enhance the performance of the harvesting system. Sens. Actuators, A 2019, 300, 111634.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2019.111634

  286. 286.

    Lu L.; Ding W.; Liu J.; Yang B. Flexible PVDF based piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105251.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105251

  287. 287.

    Kim M.-S.; Jo S.-E.; Ahn H.-R.; Kim Y.-J. Modeling of a honeycomb-shaped pyroelectric energy harvester for human body heat harvesting. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24 (6), 065032.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/065032

  288. 288.

    Poprawski W.; Gnutek Z.; Radojewski J.; Poprawski R. Pyroelectric and dielectric energy conversion - A new view of the old problem. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 90, 858–868..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.07.031

  289. 289.

    Surmenev R. A.; Chernozem R. V.; Pariy I. O.; Surmeneva M. A. A review on piezo- and pyroelectric responses of flexible nano- and micropatterned polymer surfaces for biomedical sensing and energy harvesting applications. Nano Energy 2021, 79, 105442.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105442

  290. 290.

    Chandrasekaran S.; Bowen C.; Roscow J.; Zhang Y.; Dang D. K.; Kim E. J.; Misra R. D. K.; Deng L.; Chung J. S.; Hur S. H. Micro-scale to nano-scale generators for energy harvesting: Self powered piezoelectric, triboelectric and hybrid devices. Phys. Rep. 2019, 792, 1–33..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.001

  291. 291.

    Yoon H.-J.; Ryu H.; Kim S.-W. Sustainable powering triboelectric nanogenerators: Approaches and the path towards efficient use. Nano Energy 2018, 51, 270–285..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.075

  292. 292.

    Patnam H.; Dudem B.; Graham S. A.; Yu J. S. High-performance and robust triboelectric nanogenerators based on optimal microstructured poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) polymers for self-powered electronic applications. Energy 2021, 223, 120031.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.energy.2021.120031

  293. 293.

    Nozariasbmarz A.; Collins H.; Dsouza K.; Polash M. H.; Hosseini M.; Hyland M.; Liu J.; Malhotra A.; Ortiz F. M.; Mohaddes F.; et al. Review of wearable thermoelectric energy harvesting: From body temperature to electronic systems. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114069.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114069

  294. 294.

    Li C.; Jiang F.; Liu C.; Liu P.; Xu J. Present and future thermoelectric materials toward wearable energy harvesting. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 15, 543–557..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apmt.2019.04.007

  295. 295.

    Zabek D.; Morini F. Solid state generators and energy harvesters for waste heat recovery and thermal energy harvesting. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2019, 9, 235–247..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tsep.2018.11.011

  296. 296.

    Martins P.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Polymer-Based Magnetoelectric Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23 (27), 3371–3385..

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201202780

  297. 297.

    Surmenev R. A.; Orlova T.; Chernozem R. V.; Ivanova A. A.; Bartasyte A.; Mathur S.; Surmeneva M. A. Hybrid lead-free polymer-based nanocomposites with improved piezoelectric response for biomedical energy-harvesting applications: A review. Nano Energy 2019, 62, 475–506..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.090

  298. 298.

    Zeng W.; Tao X.-M.; Chen S.; Shang S.; Chan H. L. W.; Choy S. H. Highly durable all-fiber nanogenerator for mechanical energy harvesting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6 (9), 2631–2638..

    Not in our library10.1039/c3ee41063c

  299. 299.

    Zhou M.; Al-Furjan M. S. H.; Zou J.; Liu W. A review on heat and mechanical energy harvesting from human - Principles, prototypes and perspectives. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 3582–3609..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.102

  300. 300.

    Hu D.; Yao M.; Fan Y.; Ma C.; Fan M.; Liu M. Strategies to achieve high performance piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2019, 55, 288–304..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.053

  301. 301.

    Rodrigues-Marinho T.; Lima A. C.; Martins P.; Costa P.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Introduction to piezoelectricity and electrospun piezoelectric materials and devices. In Energy Harvesting Properties of Electrospun Nanofibers; IOP Publishing, 2019; pp 2–1–2–41.

    Not in our library

  302. 302.

    Nunes-Pereira J.; Costa P.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Piezoelectric Energy Production. Comprehensive Energy Systems 2018, 3–5, 380–415..

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-809597-3.00324-2

  303. 303.

    Yang Z.; Zhou S.; Zu J.; Inman D. High-Performance Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters and Their Applications. Joule 2018, 2 (4), 642–697..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.011

  304. 304.

    Fu J.; Hou Y.; Gao X.; Zheng M.; Zhu M. Highly durable piezoelectric energy harvester based on a PVDF flexible nanocomposite filled with oriented BaTi2O5 nanorods with high power density. Nano Energy 2018, 52, 391–401..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.006

  305. 305.

    Yan J.; Liu M.; Jeong Y. G.; Kang W.; Li L.; Zhao Y.; Deng N.; Cheng B.; Yang G. Performance enhancements in poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based piezoelectric nanogenerators for efficient energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2019, 56, 662–692..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.010

  306. 306.

    Chang C.; Tran V. H.; Wang J.; Fuh Y. K.; Lin L. Direct-write piezoelectric polymeric nanogenerator with high energy conversion efficiency. Nano letters 2010, 10 (2), 726–731..

    Not in our library10.1021/nl9040719

  307. 307.

    Shin D.-J.; Ji J.-H.; Kim J.; Jo G. H.; Jeong S.-J.; Koh J.-H. Enhanced flexible piezoelectric energy harvesters based on BaZrTiO3-BaCaTiO3 nanoparticles/PVDF composite films with Cu floating electrodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 802, 562–572..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.363

  308. 308.

    Rodrigues-Marinho T.; Perinka N.; Costa P.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Printable lightweight polymer-based energy harvesting systems: materials, processes, and applications. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 21, 100292.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100292

  309. 309.

    Zhang X.-S.; Han M.-D.; Meng B.; Zhang H.-X. High performance triboelectric nanogenerators based on large-scale mass-fabrication technologies. Nano Energy 2015, 11, 304–322..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.012

  310. 310.

    Wang Z. L.; Lin L.; Chen J.; Niu S.; Zi Y. Triboelectrification. In Triboelectric Nanogenerators; Springer International Publishing, 2016; pp 1–19.

    Not in our library

  311. 311.

    Dharmasena R. D. I. G.; Silva S. R. P. Towards optimized triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2019, 62, 530–549..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.057

  312. 312.

    Pan S.; Zhang Z. Fundamental theories and basic principles of triboelectric effect: A review. Friction 2019, 7 (1), 2–17..

    Not in our library10.1007/s40544-018-0217-7

  313. 313.

    Diaz A. F.; Felix-Navarro R. M. A semi-quantitative tribo-electric series for polymeric materials: the influence of chemical structure and properties. J. Electrost. 2004, 62 (4), 277–290..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.elstat.2004.05.005

  314. 314.

    Zhang H.; Quan L. Theoretical Prediction and Optimization Approach to Triboelectric Nanogenerator. In Electrostatic Discharge; Voldman S. H., Ed.; Intechopen, 2019.

    Not in our library

  315. 315.

    Elhajjar R.; Law C.-T.; Pegoretti A. Magnetostrictive polymer composites: Recent advances in materials, structures and properties. Prog. Mater Sci. 2018, 97, 204–229..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.005

  316. 316.

    Varghese R.; Narayanan S.; Leber D.; Viswan R.; Mu M.; Sanghadasa M.; Priya S. Magnetoelectric macro fiber composite. Sens. Actuators, A 2015, 235, 64–70..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2015.09.033

  317. 317.

    Lasheras A.; Gutiérrez J.; Reis S.; Sousa D.; Silva M.; Martins P.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Barandiarán J. M.; Shishkin D. A.; Potapov A. P. Energy harvesting device based on a metallic glass/PVDF magnetoelectric laminated composite. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24 (6), 065024.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/065024

  318. 318.

    Du Y.; Xu J.; Paul B.; Eklund P. Flexible thermoelectric materials and devices. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 12, 366–388..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apmt.2018.07.004

  319. 319.

    Tan G.; Zhao L.-D.; Kanatzidis M. G. Rationally Designing High-Performance Bulk Thermoelectric Materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 (19), 12123–12149..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00255

  320. 320.

    Bharti M.; Singh A.; Samanta S.; Aswal D. K. Conductive polymers for thermoelectric power generation. Prog. Mater Sci. 2018, 93, 270–310..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.09.004

  321. 321.

    Mehdizadeh Dehkordi A.; Zebarjadi M.; He J.; Tritt T. M. Thermoelectric power factor: Enhancement mechanisms and strategies for higher performance thermoelectric materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2015, 97, 1–22..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mser.2015.08.001

  322. 322.

    Sun Y.-C.; Terakita D.; Tseng A. C.; Naguib H. E. Study on the thermoelectric properties of PVDF/MWCNT and PVDF/GNP composite foam. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24 (8), 085034.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/24/8/085034

  323. 323.

    Zhang H.; Xie Y.; Li X.; Huang Z.; Zhang S.; Su Y.; Wu B.; He L.; Yang W.; Lin Y. Flexible pyroelectric generators for scavenging ambient thermal energy and as self-powered thermosensors. Energy 2016, 101, 202–210..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.002

  324. 324.

    Xue H.; Yang Q.; Wang D.; Luo W.; Wang W.; Lin M.; Liang D.; Luo Q. A wearable pyroelectric nanogenerator and self-powered breathing sensor. Nano Energy 2017, 38, 147–154..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.056

  325. 325.

    Zabek D.; Seunarine K.; Spacie C.; Bowen C. Graphene Ink Laminate Structures on Poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) for Pyroelectric Thermal Energy Harvesting and Waste Heat Recovery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (10), 9161–9167..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.6b16477

  326. 326.

    Cuadras A.; Gasulla M.; Ferrari V. Thermal energy harvesting through pyroelectricity. Sens. Actuators, A 2010, 158 (1), 132–139..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2009.12.018

  327. 327.

    Li X.; Lu S.-G.; Chen X.-Z.; Gu H.; Qian X.-s.; Zhang Q. M. Pyroelectric and electrocaloric materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1 (1), 23–37..

    Not in our library10.1039/c2tc00283c

  328. 328.
  329. 329.

    Yuan X.; Gao X.; Shen X.; Yang J.; Li Z.; Dong S. A 3D-printed, alternatively tilt-polarized PVDF-TrFE polymer with enhanced piezoelectric effect for self-powered sensor application. Nano Energy 2021, 85, 105985.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105985

  330. 330.

    Chen X.; Li X.; Shao J.; An N.; Tian H.; Wang C.; Han T.; Wang L.; Lu B. High-Performance Piezoelectric Nanogenerators with Imprinted P(VDF-TrFE)/BaTiO3 Nanocomposite Micropillars for Self-Powered Flexible Sensors. Small 2017, 13 (23), 1604245.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201604245

  331. 331.

    Tien N. T.; Trung T. Q.; Seoul Y. G.; Kim D. I.; Lee N.-E. Physically Responsive Field-Effect Transistors with Giant Electromechanical Coupling Induced by Nanocomposite Gate Dielectrics. ACS Nano 2011, 5 (9), 7069–7076..

    Not in our library10.1021/nn2017827

  332. 332.

    Greeshma T.; Balaji R.; Nayak M. M.; Jayakumar S. The Influence of Individual Phases on Piezoelectric Coefficient of PZT-PVdF Composites. Ferroelectrics 2009, 393 (1), 88–93..

    Not in our library10.1080/00150190903412978

  333. 333.

    Parangusan H.; Ponnamma D.; Al Ali AlMaadeed M. Flexible tri-layer piezoelectric nanogenerator based on PVDF-HFP/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2017, 7 (79), 50156–50165..

    Not in our library10.1039/c7ra10223b

  334. 334.

    Karan S. K.; Bera R.; Paria S.; Das A. K.; Maiti S.; Maitra A.; Khatua B. B. An Approach to Design Highly Durable Piezoelectric Nanogenerator Based on Self-Poled PVDF/AlO-rGO Flexible Nanocomposite with High Power Density and Energy Conversion Efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6 (20), 1601016.

    Not in our library10.1002/aenm.201601016

  335. 335.

    Pal A.; Sasmal A.; Manoj B.; Rao D. S. D. P.; Haldar A. K.; Sen S. Enhancement in energy storage and piezoelectric performance of three phase (PZT/MWCNT/PVDF) composite. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 244, 122639.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122639

  336. 336.

    Singh D.; Choudhary A.; Garg A. Flexible and Robust Piezoelectric Polymer Nanocomposites Based Energy Harvesters. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (3), 2793–2800..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.7b16973

  337. 337.

    Hoque N. A.; Thakur P.; Biswas P.; Saikh M. M.; Roy S.; Bagchi B.; Das S.; Ray P. P. Biowaste crab shell-extracted chitin nanofiber-based superior piezoelectric nanogenerator. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (28), 13848–13858..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ta04074e

  338. 338.

    Singh H. H.; Khare N. Flexible ZnO-PVDF/PTFE based piezo-tribo hybrid nanogenerator. Nano Energy 2018, 51, 216–222..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.055

  339. 339.

    Guo Y.; Zhang X.-S.; Wang Y.; Gong W.; Zhang Q.; Wang H.; Brugger J. All-fiber hybrid piezoelectric-enhanced triboelectric nanogenerator for wearable gesture monitoring. Nano Energy 2018, 48, 152–160..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.033

  340. 340.

    Huang T.; Zhang Y.; He P.; Wang G.; Xia X.; Ding G.; Tao T. H. ″Self-Matched″ Tribo/Piezoelectric Nanogenerators Using Vapor-Induced Phase-Separated Poly(vinylidene fluoride) and Recombinant Spider Silk. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907336.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201907336

  341. 341.

    Zhang J.-H.; Li Y.; Du J.; Hao X.; Huang H. A high-power wearable triboelectric nanogenerator prepared from self-assembled electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride) fibers with a heart-like structure. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (19), 11724–11733..

    Not in our library10.1039/c9ta01956a

  342. 342.

    Lapcinskis L.; Malnieks K.; Linarts A.; Blums J.; Smits K.; Jarvekulg M.; Knite M.; Sutka A. Hybrid Tribo-Piezo-Electric Nanogenerator with Unprecedented Performance Based on Ferroelectric Composite Contacting Layers. ASC Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 4027–4032..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaem.9b00836

  343. 343.

    Kaur N.; Bahadur J.; Panwar V.; Singh P.; Rathi K.; Pal K. Effective energy harvesting from a single electrode based triboelectric nanogenerator. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38835.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep38835

  344. 344.

    Garcia C.; Trendafilova I.; Guzman de Villoria R.; Sanchez del Rio J. Self-powered pressure sensor based on the triboelectric effect and its analysis using dynamic mechanical analysis. Nano Energy 2018, 50, 401–409..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.046

  345. 345.

    Mayeen A.; M. S K.; Jayalakshmy M. S.; Thomas S.; Rouxel D.; Philip J.; Bhowmik R. N.; Kalarikkal N. Dopamine functionalization of BaTiO3: an effective strategy for the enhancement of electrical, magnetoelectric and thermal properties of BaTiO3-PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 2039–2051..

    Not in our library10.1039/c7dt03389c

  346. 346.

    Dietze M.; Es-Souni M. Structural and functional properties of screen-printed PZT-PVDF-TrFE composites. Sens. Actuators, A 2008, 143 (2), 329–334..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2007.11.016

  347. 347.

    Batra A.; Bhattacharjee S.; Chilvery A.; Aggarwal M.; Edwards M.; Bhalla A. Simulation of energy harvesting from roads via pyroelectricity. J. Photonics Energy 2011, 1 (1), 014001.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.3656395

  348. 348.

    Thakur P.; Kool A.; Hoque N. A.; Bagchi B.; Khatun F.; Biswas P.; Brahma D.; Roy S.; Banerjee S.; Das S. Superior performances of in situ synthesized ZnO/PVDF thin film based self-poled piezoelectric nanogenerator and self-charged photo-power bank with high durability. Nano Energy 2018, 44, 456–467..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.065

  349. 349.

    Dun C.; Hewitt C. A.; Huang H.; Xu J.; Zhou C.; Huang W.; Cui Y.; Zhou W.; Jiang Q.; Carroll D. L. Flexible n-type thermoelectric films based on Cu-doped Bi2Se3 nanoplate and Polyvinylidene Fluoride composite with decoupled Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity. Nano Energy 2015, 18, 306–314..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.012

  350. 350.

    Dun C.; Hewitt C. A.; Huang H.; Montgomery D. S.; Xu J.; Carroll D. L. Flexible thermoelectric fabrics based on self-assembled tellurium nanorods with a large power factor. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17 (14), 8591–8595..

    Not in our library10.1039/c4cp05390g

  351. 351.

    Jiao F.; Di C.-a.; Sun Y.; Sheng P.; Xu W.; Zhu D. Inkjet-printed flexible organic thin-film thermoelectric devices based on p- and n-type poly(metal 1,1,2,2-ethenetetrathiolate)s/polymer composites through ball-milling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2014, 372 (2013), 20130008.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2013.0008

  352. 352.

    Martins P.; Moya X.; Caparrós C.; Fernandez J.; Mathur N. D.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Large linear anhysteretic magnetoelectric voltage coefficients in CoFe2O4/polyvinylidene fluoride 0–3 nanocomposites. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1825.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11051-013-1825-9

  353. 353.

    Shi Z.; Nan C. W.; Liu J. M.; Filippov D. A.; Bichurin M. I. Influence of mechanical boundary conditions and microstructural features on magnetoelectric behavior in a three-phase multiferroic particulate composite. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70 (13), 134417.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.70.134417

  354. 354.

    Cai N.; Nan C.-W.; Zhai J.; Lin Y. Large high-frequency magnetoelectric response in laminated composites of piezoelectric ceramics, rare-earth iron alloys and polymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84 (18), 3516–3518..

    Not in our library10.1063/1.1739277

  355. 355.

    Lin Y.; Cai N.; Zhai J.; Liu G.; Nan C.-W. Giant magnetoelectric effect in multiferroic laminated composites. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72 (1), 012405.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.72.012405

  356. 356.

    Jin J.; Lu S.-G.; Chanthad C.; Zhang Q.; Haque M. A.; Wang Q. Multiferroic Polymer Composites with Greatly Enhanced Magnetoelectric Effect under a Low Magnetic Bias. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3853–3858..

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201101790

  357. 357.

    Reis S.; Silva M. P.; Castro N.; Correia V.; Rocha J. G.; Martins P.; Lasheras A.; Gutierrez J.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Electronic optimization for an energy harvesting system based on magnetoelectric Metglas/poly(vinylidene fluoride)/Metglas composites. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25 (8), 085028.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085028

  358. 358.

    Choi M.; Murillo G.; Hwang S.; Kim J. W.; Jung J. H.; Chen C.-Y.; Lee M. Mechanical and electrical characterization of PVDF-ZnO hybrid structure for application to nanogenerator. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 462–468..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.062

  359. 359.

    Parangusan H.; Ponnamma D.; Al-Maadeed M. A. A. Stretchable Electrospun PVDF-HFP/Co-ZnO Nanofibers as Piezoelectric Nanogenerators. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 754.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-19082-3

  360. 360.

    Si S. K.; Karan S. K.; Paria S.; Maitra A.; Das A. K.; Bera R.; Bera A.; Halder L.; Khatua B. B. A strategy to develop an efficient piezoelectric nanogenerator through ZTO assisted γ-phase nucleation of PVDF in ZTO/PVDF nanocomposite for harvesting bio-mechanical energy and energy storage application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 213, 525–537..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.013

  361. 361.

    Mao Y.; Zhao P.; McConohy G.; Yang H.; Tong Y.; Wang X. Sponge-Like Piezoelectric Polymer Films for Scalable and Integratable Nanogenerators and Self-Powered Electronic Systems. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4 (7), 1301624.

    Not in our library10.1002/aenm.201301624

  362. 362.

    Dudem B.; Kim D. H.; Bharat L. K.; Yu J. S. Highly-flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators with silver nanowires and barium titanate embedded composite films for mechanical energy harvesting. Appl. Energy 2018, 230, 865–874..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.009

  363. 363.

    Shin Y.-H.; Jung I.; Noh M.-S.; Kim J. H.; Choi J.-Y.; Kim S.; Kang C.-Y. Piezoelectric polymer-based roadway energy harvesting via displacement amplification module. Appl. Energy 2018, 216, 741–750..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.074

  364. 364.

    Jung I.; Shin Y.-H.; Kim S.; Choi J.-y.; Kang C.-Y. Flexible piezoelectric polymer-based energy harvesting system for roadway applications. Appl. Energy 2017, 197, 222–229..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.020

  365. 365.

    Fan F. R.; Tang W.; Wang Z. L. Flexible Nanogenerators for Energy Harvesting and Self-Powered Electronics. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (22), 4283–4305..

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201504299

  366. 366.

    Panicker S. S.; Rajeev S. P.; Thomas V. Impact of PVDF and its copolymer-based nanocomposites for flexible and wearable energy harvesters. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2023, 34, 100949.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoso.2023.100949

  367. 367.

    Kumar V.; Kumar P.; Deka R.; Abbas Z.; Mobin S. M. Recent Development of Morphology-Controlled Hybrid Nanomaterials for Triboelectric Nanogenerator: A Review. Chem. Rec. 2022, 22, e202200067.

    Not in our library10.1002/tcr.202200067

  368. 368.

    Leng Q.; Chen L.; Guo H.; Liu J.; Liu G.; Hu C.; Xi Y. Harvesting heat energy from hot/cold water with a pyroelectric generator. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2 (30), 11940–11947..

    Not in our library10.1039/c4ta01782j

  369. 369.

    Sharma M.; Chauhan A.; Vaish R.; Chauhan V. S. Pyroelectric materials for solar energy harvesting: a comparative study. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24 (10), 105013.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105013

  370. 370.

    Cheng Y.; Peng B.; Hu Z.; Zhou Z.; Liu M. Recent development and status of magnetoelectric materials and devices. Phys. Lett. A 2018, 382 (41), 3018–3025..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.physleta.2018.07.014

  371. 371.

    Yang Y.; Zhang H.; Zhu G.; Lee S.; Lin Z.-H.; Wang Z. L. Flexible Hybrid Energy Cell for Simultaneously Harvesting Thermal, Mechanical, and Solar Energies. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (1), 785–790..

    Not in our library10.1021/nn305247x

  372. 372.

    Dong L.; Closson A. B.; Jin C.; Trase I.; Chen Z.; Zhang J. X. J. Vibration-Energy-Harvesting System: Transduction Mechanisms, Frequency Tuning Techniques, and Biomechanical Applications. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4 (10), 1900177.

    Not in our library10.1002/admt.201900177

  373. 373.
  374. 374.

    Li S.; Crovetto A.; Peng Z.; Zhang A.; Hansen O.; Wang M.; Li X.; Wang F. Bi-resonant structure with piezoelectric PVDF films for energy harvesting from random vibration sources at low frequency. Sens. Actuators, A 2016, 247, 547–554..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2016.06.033

  375. 375.

    Hassan G.; Bae J.; Lee C. H. Ink-jet printed transparent and flexible electrodes based on silver nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2018, 29 (1), 49–55..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10854-017-7886-2

  376. 376.

    Tsypkin M. Induction motor condition monitoring: Vibration analysis technique — diagnosis of electromagnetic anomalies. 2017 IEEE AUTOTESTCON 2017, 1–7. 9–15 Sept. 2017.

    Not in our library10.1109/autest.2017.8080483

  377. 377.

    Mishra S.; Unnikrishnan L.; Nayak S. K.; Mohanty S. Advances in Piezoelectric Polymer Composites for Energy Harvesting Applications: A Systematic Review. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304 (1), 1800463.

    Not in our library10.1002/mame.201800463

  378. 378.

    Alluri N. R.; Chandrasekhar A.; Jeong J. H.; Kim S.-J. Enhanced electroactive β-phase of the sonication-process-derived PVDF-activated carbon composite film for efficient energy conversion and a battery-free acceleration sensor. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5 (20), 4833–4844..

    Not in our library10.1039/c7tc00568g

  379. 379.

    Lang C.; Fang J.; Shao H.; Wang H.; Yan G.; Ding X.; Lin T. High-output acoustoelectric power generators from poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) electrospun nano-nonwovens. Nano Energy 2017, 35, 146–153..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.038

  380. 380.

    Cha S.; Kim S. M.; Kim H.; Ku J.; Sohn J. I.; Park Y. J.; Song B. G.; Jung M. H.; Lee E. K.; Choi B. L.; et al. Porous PVDF as effective sonic wave driven nanogenerators. Nano letters 2011, 11 (12), 5142–5147..

    Not in our library10.1021/nl202208n

  381. 381.

    Choi C.; Park J. W.; Kim K. J.; Lee D. W.; de Andrade M. J.; Kim S. H.; Gambhir S.; Spinks G. M.; Baughman R. H.; Kim S. J. Weavable asymmetric carbon nanotube yarn supercapacitor for electronic textiles. RSC Adv. 2018, 8 (24), 13112–13120..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ra01384e

  382. 382.

    Kavarthapu V. S.; Graham S. A.; Manchi P.; Paranjape M. V.; Yu J. S. Electrospun ZnSnO3/PVDF-HFP Nanofibrous Triboelectric Films for Efficient Mechanical Energy Harvesting. Adv. Fiber Mater.2023.

    Not in our library10.1007/s42765-023-00295-3

  383. 383.

    Lee J. W.; Cho H. J.; Chun J.; Kim K. N.; Kim S.; Ahn C. W.; Kim I. W.; Kim J. Y.; Kim S. W.; Yang C.; et al. Robust nanogenerators based on graft copolymers via control of dielectrics for remarkable output power enhancement. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1602902.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.1602902

  384. 384.

    Bai P.; Zhu G.; Zhou Y. S.; Wang S.; Ma J.; Zhang G.; Wang Z. L. Dipole-moment-induced effect on contact electrification for triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Res. 2014, 7 (7), 990–997..

    Not in our library10.1007/s12274-014-0461-8

  385. 385.

    Zheng H.; Zi Y.; He X.; Guo H.; Lai Y.-C.; Wang J.; Zhang S. L.; Wu C.; Cheng G.; Wang Z. L. Concurrent Harvesting of Ambient Energy by Hybrid Nanogenerators for Wearable Self-Powered Systems and Active Remote Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (17), 14708–14715..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.8b01635

  386. 386.

    Kim J. Y.; Mo J. H.; Kang Y. H.; Cho S. Y.; Jang K. S. Thermoelectric fibers from well-dispersed carbon nanotube/poly(vinyliedene fluoride) pastes for fiber-based thermoelectric generators. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (42), 19766–19773..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8nr06415f

  387. 387.

    Lee J. P.; Lee J. W.; Baik J. M. The Progress of PVDF as a Functional Material for Triboelectric Nanogenerators and Self-Powered Sensors. Micromachines 2018, 9 (10), 532.

    Not in our library10.3390/mi9100532

  388. 388.
  389. 389.

    Liu Y.; Mo J.; Fu Q.; Lu Y.; Zhang N.; Wang S.; Nie S. Enhancement of Triboelectric Charge Density by Chemical Functionalization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2004714.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.202004714

  390. 390.

    Shaikh M. O.; Huang Y. B.; Wang C. C.; Chuang C. H. Wearable Woven Triboelectric Nanogenerator Utilizing Electrospun PVDF Nanofibers for Mechanical Energy Harvesting. Micromachines 2019, 10 (7), 438.

    Not in our library10.3390/mi10070438

  391. 391.

    Sripadmanabhan Indira S.; Aravind Vaithilingam C.; Oruganti K. S. P.; Mohd F.; Rahman S. Nanogenerators as a Sustainable Power Source: State of Art, Applications, and Challenges. Nanomaterials 2019, 9 (5), 773.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano9050773

  392. 392.

    Lou Z.; Li L.; Wang L.; Shen G. Recent Progress of Self-Powered Sensing Systems for Wearable Electronics. Small 2017, 13 (45), 1701791.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201701791

  393. 393.

    Forouhi S.; Dehghani R.; Ghafar-Zadeh E. CMOS based capacitive sensors for life science applications: A review. Sens. Actuators, A 2019, 297, 111531.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2019.111531

  394. 394.

    Cansiz M.; Altinel D.; Kurt G. K. Efficiency in RF energy harvesting systems: A comprehensive review. Energy 2019, 174, 292–309..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.100

  395. 395.

    Vermesan O.; Friess P. Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems; 2013; pp 153–204

    Not in our library

  396. 396.

    Chen X.; Milosevic M. M.; Stanković S.; Reynolds S.; Bucio T. D.; Li K.; Thomson D. J.; Gardes F.; Reed G. T. The Emergence of Silicon Photonics as a Flexible Technology Platform. Proc. IEEE 2018, 106 (12), 2101–2116..

    Not in our library10.1109/jproc.2018.2854372

  397. 397.

    Guyomar D.; Badel A.; Lefeuvre E.; Richard C. Toward energy harvesting using active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 2005, 52 (4), 584–595..

    Not in our library10.1109/tuffc.2005.1428041

  398. 398.

    Ottman G. K.; Hofmann H. F.; Bhatt A. C.; Lesieutre G. A. Adaptive piezoelectric energy harvesting circuit for wireless remote power supply. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2002, 17 (5), 669–676..

    Not in our library10.1109/tpel.2002.802194

  399. 399.

    Lefeuvre E.; Badel A.; Richard C.; Petit L.; Guyomar D. A comparison between several vibration-powered piezoelectric generators for standalone systems. Sens. Actuators, A 2006, 126 (2), 405–416..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2005.10.043

  400. 400.

    Lefeuvre E.; Badel A.; Richard C.; Guyomar D. Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Device Optimization by Synchronous Electric Charge Extraction. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2005, 16 (10), 865–876..

    Not in our library10.1177/1045389x05056859

  401. 401.

    Richard C.; Guyomar D.; Audigier D.; Bassaler H. Enhanced Semi-Passive Damping Using Continuous Switching of a Piezoelectric Device on an Inductor; SPIE, 2000.

    Not in our library

  402. 402.

    Wu Y.; Badel A.; Formosa F.; Liu W.; Agbossou A. E. Piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting by optimized synchronous electric charge extraction. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2013, 24 (12), 1445–1458..

    Not in our library10.1177/1045389x12470307

  403. 403.

    Liu C.; Sun J.; Zheng P.; Jiang L.; Liu H.; Chai J.; Liu Q.; Liu Z.; Zheng Y.; Rui X. Recent advances of non-lithium metal anode materials for solid-state lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10 (32), 16761–16778..

    Not in our library10.1039/d2ta03905b

  404. 404.

    Yang Y.; Okonkwo E. G.; Huang G.; Xu S.; Sun W.; He Y. On the sustainability of lithium ion battery industry - A review and perspective. Energy Stor. Mater. 2021, 36, 186–212..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.019

  405. 405.

    Cho K. Y.; Kwon Y. I.; Youn J. R.; Song Y. S. Evaluation of slurry characteristics for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48 (8), 2922–2926..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.026

  406. 406.

    Gören A.; Costa C. M.; Silva M. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. State of the art and open questions on cathode preparation based on carbon coated lithium iron phosphate. Composites Part B 2015, 83, 333–345..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.064

  407. 407.

    Choi N.-S.; Lee Y.-G.; Park J.-K. Effect of cathode binder on electrochemical properties of lithium rechargeable polymer batteries. J. Power Sources 2002, 112 (1), 61–66..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-7753(02)00337-3

  408. 408.

    Costa C. M.; Lee Y.-H.; Kim J.-H.; Lee S.-Y.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Recent advances on separator membranes for lithium-ion battery applications: From porous membranes to solid electrolytes. Energy Stor. Mater. 2019, 22, 346–375..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.024

  409. 409.

    Gonçalves R.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Costa C. M. Electrode fabrication process and its influence in lithium-ion battery performance: State of the art and future trends. Electrochem. Commun. 2022, 135, 107210.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.elecom.2022.107210

  410. 410.

    Lee Y. K. The Effect of Active Material, Conductive Additives, and Binder in a Cathode Composite Electrode on Battery Performance. Energies 2019, 12 (4), 658.

    Not in our library10.3390/en12040658

  411. 411.

    Zheng H.; Yang R.; Liu G.; Song X.; Battaglia V. S. Cooperation between Active Material, Polymeric Binder and Conductive Carbon Additive in Lithium Ion Battery Cathode. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116 (7), 4875–4882..

    Not in our library10.1021/jp208428w

  412. 412.

    Zhu Z.; Tang S.; Yuan J.; Qin X.; Deng Y.; Qu R.; Haarberg G. M. Effects of Various Binders on Supercapacitor Performances. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11 (10), 8270–8279..

    Not in our library10.20964/2016.10.04

  413. 413.

    Sung S. H.; Kim S.; Park J. H.; Park J. D.; Ahn K. H. Role of PVDF in Rheology and Microstructure of NCM Cathode Slurries for Lithium-Ion Battery. Materials 2020, 13 (20), 4544.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma13204544

  414. 414.

    Sztymela K.; Bienia M.; Rossignol F.; Mailley S.; Ziesche S.; Varghese J.; Cerbelaud M. Fabrication of modern lithium ion batteries by 3D inkjet printing: opportunities and challenges. Heliyon 2022, 8 (12), e12623.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12623

  415. 415.

    Lee S.; Yang J.; Lu W. Debonding at the interface between active particles and PVDF binder in Li-ion batteries. Extreme Mech. Lett. 2016, 6, 37–44..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eml.2015.11.005

  416. 416.

    Lee S. Molecular Dynamics Study of the Separation Behavior at the Interface between PVDF Binder and Copper Current Collector. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 4253986.

    Not in our library10.1155/2016/4253986

  417. 417.

    Young B. T.; Nguyen C. C.; Lobach A.; Heskett D. R.; Woicik J. C.; Lucht B. L. Role of binders in solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium ion batteries studied with hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Mater. Res. 2019, 34 (1), 97–106..

    Not in our library10.1557/jmr.2018.363

  418. 418.

    Zhao X.; Niketic S.; Yim C.-H.; Zhou J.; Wang J.; Abu-Lebdeh Y. Revealing the Role of Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Binder in Si/Graphite Composite Anode for Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (9), 11684–11690..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.8b01388

  419. 419.

    Gören A.; Cíntora-Juárez D.; Martins P.; Ferdov S.; Silva M. M.; Tirado J. L.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Influence of Solvent Evaporation Rate in the Preparation of Carbon-Coated Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode Films on Battery Performance. Energy Technol. 2016, 4 (5), 573–582..

    Not in our library10.1002/ente.201500392

  420. 420.

    M A.; Paul A. Importance of Electrode Preparation Methodologies in Supercapacitor Applications. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 8039–8050..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.7b01275

  421. 421.

    Gören A.; Costa C. M.; Silva M. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Influence of fluoropolymer binders on the electrochemical performance of C-LiFePO4 based cathodes. Solid State Ionics 2016, 295, 57–64..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ssi.2016.07.012

  422. 422.

    Spreafico M. A.; Cojocaru P.; Magagnin L.; Triulzi F.; Apostolo M. PVDF Latex As a Binder for Positive Electrodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53 (22), 9094–9100..

    Not in our library10.1021/ie403239s

  423. 423.

    Zheng M.; Fu X.; Wang Y.; Reeve J.; Scudiero L.; Zhong W.-H. Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)-Based Blends as New Binders for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5 (16), 2288–2294..

    Not in our library10.1002/celc.201800553

  424. 424.

    Wang L.; Fu Y.; Battaglia V. S.; Liu G. SBR-PVDF based binder for the application of SLMP in graphite anodes. RSC Adv. 2013, 3 (35), 15022–15027..

    Not in our library10.1039/c3ra42773k

  425. 425.

    Bouharras F. E.; Raihane M.; Baccour M.; Louvain N.; Ameduri B. Evaluation of core-shell poly(vinylidene fluoride)-grafted-Barium titanate (PVDF-g-BaTiO3) nanocomposites as a cathode binder in batteries. Solid State Ionics 2020, 356, 115441.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115441

  426. 426.

    Liang X.; Wu X.; Wang Y.; Li X.; Gai Q.; Mao J. Study on Preparation and Performance of PEO-PVDF Composite Binder for Lithium ion Batteries. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci 2020, 15, 8471–8478..

    Not in our library10.20964/2020.09.79

  427. 427.

    Liu S.; Zhong H.; Zhang C.; Yan X.; Zhao X.; Zhang L. Improving the processability and cycling stability of nano-LiFePO4 cathode by using PVDF/TX binary binder. Compos. Interfaces 2019, 26 (11), 1013–1024..

    Not in our library10.1080/09276440.2019.1578574

  428. 428.

    Bai Z.; Li H.; Li M.; Li C.; Wang X.; Qu C.; Yang B. Flexible carbon nanotubes-MnO2/reduced graphene oxide-polyvinylidene fluoride films for supercapacitor electrodes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40 (46), 16306–16315..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.065

  429. 429.

    Dong J.; Wang Z.; Kang X. The synthesis of graphene/PVDF composite binder and its application in high performance MnO2 supercapacitors. Colloids Surf., A 2016, 489, 282–288..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.10.060

  430. 430.

    Suganya G.; Kalpana G. Investigation of graphene based NiS nanocomposite by solvothermal method for energy storage application. Mater. Lett.: X 2021, 12, 100112.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mlblux.2021.100112

  431. 431.

    Forouzandeh P.; Pillai S. C. MXenes-based nanocomposites for supercapacitor applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2021, 33, 100710.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coche.2021.100710

  432. 432.

    Le A. V.; Wang M.; Noelle D. J.; Shi Y.; Yoon H.; Zhang M.; Meng Y. S.; Qiao Y. Effects of macromolecular configuration of thermally sensitive binder in lithium-ion battery. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134 (31), 45078.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.45078

  433. 433.

    Le A. V.; Wang M.; Noelle D. J.; Shi Y.; Shirley Meng Y.; Wu D.; Fan J.; Qiao Y. Using high-HFP-content cathode binder for mitigation of heat generation of lithium-ion battery. Int. J. Energy Res. 2017, 41 (14), 2430–2438..

    Not in our library10.1002/er.3824

  434. 434.

    Song W.-J.; Joo S. H.; Kim D. H.; Hwang C.; Jung G. Y.; Bae S.; Son Y.; Cho J.; Song H.-K.; Kwak S. K.; et al. Significance of ferroelectric polarization in poly (vinylidene difluoride) binder for high-rate Li-ion diffusion. Nano Energy 2017, 32, 255–262..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.037

  435. 435.

    Luo J.; Fang C.-C.; Wu N.-L. High Polarity Poly(vinylidene difluoride) Thin Coating for Dendrite-Free and High-Performance Lithium Metal Anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8 (2), 1701482.

    Not in our library10.1002/aenm.201701482

  436. 436.

    Guzmán G.; Vazquez-Arenas J.; Ramos-Sánchez G.; Bautista-Ramírez M.; González I. Improved performance of LiFePO4 cathode for Li-ion batteries through percolation studies. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 247, 451–459..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.172

  437. 437.

    Sousa R. E.; Oliveira J.; Gören A.; Miranda D.; Silva M. M.; Hilliou L.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. High performance screen printable lithium-ion battery cathode ink based on C-LiFePO4. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 196, 92–100..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.189

  438. 438.

    Sliz R.; Valikangas J.; Silva Santos H.; Vilmi P.; Rieppo L.; Hu T.; Lassi U.; Fabritius T. Suitable Cathode NMP Replacement for Efficient Sustainable Printed Li-Ion Batteries. ASC Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5 (4), 4047–4058..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaem.1c02923

  439. 439.

    Chernysh O.; Khomenko V.; Makyeyeva I.; Barsukov V. Effect of binder’s solvent on the electrochemical performance of electrodes for lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. Mater. Today: Proc. 2019, 6, 42–47..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.073

  440. 440.

    Wang H.; Sencadas V.; Gao G.; Gao H.; Du A.; Liu H.; Guo Z. Strong affinity of polysulfide intermediates to multi-functional binder for practical application in lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 2016, 26, 722–728..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.036

  441. 441.

    Lacey M. J.; Jeschull F.; Edström K.; Brandell D. Porosity Blocking in Highly Porous Carbon Black by PVdF Binder and Its Implications for the Li-S System. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014, 118 (45), 25890–25898..

    Not in our library10.1021/jp508137m

  442. 442.

    Papp J. K.; Forster J. D.; Burke C. M.; Kim H. W.; Luntz A. C.; Shelby R. M.; Urban J. J.; McCloskey B. D. Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) Binder Degradation in Li-O2 Batteries: A Consideration for the Characterization of Lithium Superoxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8 (6), 1169–1174..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00040

  443. 443.

    Ross B. J.; LeResche M.; Liu D.; Durham J. L.; Dahl E. U.; Lipson A. L. Mitigating the Impact of Thermal Binder Removal for Direct Li-Ion Battery Recycling. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8 (33), 12511–12515..

    Not in our library10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03424

  444. 444.

    Ji Y.; Jafvert C. T.; Zyaykina N. N.; Zhao F. Decomposition of PVDF to delaminate cathode materials from end-of-life lithium-ion battery cathodes. J. Cleaner Prod. 2022, 367, 133112.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133112

  445. 445.

    Tarascon J. M.; Gozdz A. S.; Schmutz C.; Shokoohi F.; Warren P. C. Performance of Bellcore’s plastic rechargeable Li-ion batteries. Solid State Ionics 1996, 86–88, 49–54..

    Not in our library10.1016/0167-2738(96)00330-x

  446. 446.

    Boudin F.; Andrieu X.; Jehoulet C.; Olsen I. I. Microporous PVdF gel for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 1999, 81–82, 804–807..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-7753(99)00154-8

  447. 447.

    Kataoka H.; Saito Y.; Sakai T.; Quartarone E.; Mustarelli P. Conduction Mechanisms of PVDF-Type Gel Polymer Electrolytes of Lithium Prepared by a Phase Inversion Process. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000, 104 (48), 11460–11464..

    Not in our library10.1021/jp001657+

  448. 448.

    Kim D.-W.; Sun Y.-K. Electrochemical characterization of gel polymer electrolytes prepared with porous membranes. J. Power Sources 2001, 102 (1), 41–45..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00771-6

  449. 449.

    Prosini P. P.; Villano P.; Carewska M. A novel intrinsically porous separator for self-standing lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2002, 48 (3), 227–233..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0013-4686(02)00601-1

  450. 450.

    Croce F.; Focarete M. L.; Hassoun J.; Meschini I.; Scrosati B. A safe, high-rate and high-energy polymer lithium-ion battery based on gelled membranes prepared by electrospinning. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4 (3), 921–927..

    Not in our library10.1039/c0ee00348d

  451. 451.

    Costa C. M.; Rodrigues L. C.; Sencadas V.; Silva M. M.; Rocha J. G.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Effect of degree of porosity on the properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluorethylene) for Li-ion battery separators. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 407–408, 193–201..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.044

  452. 452.

    Costa C. M.; Gomez Ribelles J. L.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Appetecchi G. B.; Scrosati B. Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based, co-polymer separator electrolyte membranes for lithium-ion battery systems. J. Power Sources 2014, 245, 779–786..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.151

  453. 453.

    Romanyuk K.; Costa C. M.; Luchkin S. Y.; Kholkin A. L.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Giant Electric-Field-Induced Strain in PVDF-Based Battery Separator Membranes Probed by Electrochemical Strain Microscopy. Langmuir 2016, 32 (21), 5267–5276..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01018

  454. 454.

    Kundu M.; Costa C. M.; Dias J.; Maceiras A.; Vilas J. L.; Lanceros-Méndez S. On the Relevance of the Polar β-Phase of Poly(vinylidene fluoride) for High Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Separators. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017, 121 (47), 26216–26225..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09227

  455. 455.

    Tõnurist K.; Thomberg T.; Jänes A.; Romann T.; Sammelselg V.; Lust E. Influence of separator properties on electrochemical performance of electrical double-layer capacitors. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2013, 689, 8–20..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.11.024

  456. 456.

    Tabani Z.; Maghsoudi H.; Fathollahi Zonouz A. High electrochemical stability of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) porous membranes using phase inversion methods for lithium-ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2021, 25 (2), 651–657..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10008-020-04842-5

  457. 457.

    Luiso S.; Petrecca M. J.; Williams A. H.; Christopher J.; Velev O. D.; Pourdeyhimi B.; Fedkiw P. S. Structure-Performance Relationships of Li-Ion Battery Fiber-Based Separators. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4 (5), 3676–3686..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsapm.2c00216

  458. 458.

    Prasad G.; Liang J.-W.; Zhao W.; Yao Y.; Tao T.; Liang B.; Lu S.-G. Enhancement of solvent uptake in porous PVDF nanofibers derived by a water-mediated electrospinning technique. J. Materiomics 2021, 7 (2), 244–253..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmat.2020.05.004

  459. 459.

    Gao X.; Sheng L.; Xie X.; Yang L.; Bai Y.; Dong H.; Liu G.; Wang T.; Huang X.; He J. Morphology optimizing of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofiber separator for safe lithium-ion battery. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 52154.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.52154

  460. 460.

    Arthi R.; Jaikumar V.; Muralidharan P. Development of electrospun PVdF polymer membrane as separator for supercapacitor applications. Energy Sources, Part A 2022, 44 (1), 2294–2308..

    Not in our library10.1080/15567036.2019.1649746

  461. 461.

    Arthi R.; Jaikumar V.; Muralidharan P. Comparative performance analysis of electrospun TiO2 embedded poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanocomposite membrane for supercapacitors. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50323.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.50323

  462. 462.

    Solarajan A. K.; Murugadoss V.; Angaiah S. Montmorillonite embedded electrospun PVdF-HFP nanocomposite membrane electrolyte for Li-ion capacitors. Appl. Mater. Today 2016, 5, 33–40..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apmt.2016.09.002

  463. 463.

    Yang M.; Liu Y.; Yuan B.; Guang Z.; Liu J.; Dong L.; Ji Y.; Li Q.; Liang Y.; Dong Y.; et al. Ethyl cyanoacrylate reinforced polyvinylidene fluoride separators for robust lithium ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5 (5), 2434–2441..

    Not in our library10.1039/d0qm00976h

  464. 464.

    Gao Z.; Wen R.; Deng H.; Luo L.; Cui X.; Yang Z.; Zheng Z.; Zhang J. Composite Membrane of Poly(vinylidene fluoride) and 2D Ni(OH)2 Nanosheets for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4 (2), 960–970..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsapm.1c01413

  465. 465.

    Xu P.; Yan X.; Zhou Y.; Wang C.; Cheng H.; Zhang Y. High-performance composite separators based on the synergy of vermiculite and laponite for lithium-ion batteries. Soft Matter 2022, 18 (13), 2522–2527..

    Not in our library10.1039/d1sm01772a

  466. 466.

    Bui V. T.; Nguyen V. T.; Nguyen N. A.; Umapathi R.; Larina L. L.; Kim J. H.; Kim H. S.; Choi H. S. Multilayered PVDF-HFP Porous Separator via Phase Separation and Selective Solvent Etching for High Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries. Membranes 2021, 11 (1), 41.

    Not in our library10.3390/membranes11010041

  467. 467.

    Pinto R. S.; Serra J. P.; Barbosa J. C.; Gonçalves R.; Silva M. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Costa C. M. Direct-Ink-Writing of Electroactive Polymers for Sensing and Energy Storage Applications. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2100372.

    Not in our library10.1002/mame.202100372

  468. 468.

    Gonçalves R.; Miranda D.; Marques-Almeida T.; Silva M. M.; Cardoso V. F.; Almeida A. M.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Patterned separator membranes with pillar surface microstructures for improved battery performance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 596, 158–172..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.138

  469. 469.

    Bicy K.; Mathew D. E.; Stephen A. M.; Royaud I.; Poncot M.; Godard O.; Aranda L.; Rouxel D.; Kalarikkal N.; Thomas S. Sustainable lithium-ion battery separators derived from polyethylene oxide/lignocellulose coated electrospun P(VDF-TrFE) nanofibrous membranes. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 29, 101716.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101716

  470. 470.

    Ren Y.; Zhang J.; Yang Y.; Liu F. Polyvinyl Butyral/SiO2 Nanoparticles Composite Coating on Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Separators for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Macromol. Sci., Part B 2022, 61 (2), 194–205..

    Not in our library10.1080/00222348.2021.1996559

  471. 471.

    Parikh D.; Jafta C. J.; Thapaliya B. P.; Sharma J.; Meyer H. M.; Silkowski C.; Li J. Al2O3/TiO2 coated separators: Roll-to-roll processing and implications for improved battery safety and performance. J. Power Sources 2021, 507, 230259.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230259

  472. 472.

    Terella A.; De Giorgio F.; Rahmanipour M.; Malavolta L.; Paolasini E.; Fabiani D.; Focarete M. L.; Arbizzani C. Functional separators for the batteries of the future. J. Power Sources 2020, 449, 227556.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227556

  473. 473.

    Chaturvedi P.; Kanagaraj A. B.; Alhammadi A.; Al Shibli H.; Choi D. S. Fabrication of PVDF-HFP-based microporous membranes by the tape casting method as a separator for flexible Li-ion batteries. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2021, 44, 161.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12034-021-02420-7

  474. 474.

    WU H. Electrospun Graphene Oxide (GO)/polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) Nanofiber Separator for Lithium-Ion Battery. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2022, 24, 82–87.

    Not in our library

  475. 475.

    Liang T.; Liang W.-H.; Cao J.-H.; Wu D.-Y. Enhanced Performance of High Energy Density Lithium Metal Battery with PVDF-HFP/LAGP Composite Separator. ASC Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (3), 2578–2585..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaem.0c03162

  476. 476.

    Feng Y.; Wang G.; Kang W.; Deng N.; Cheng B. Taming polysulfides and facilitating lithium-ion migration: Novel electrospinning MOFs@PVDF-based composite separator with spiderweb-like structure for Li-S batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 365, 137344.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137344

  477. 477.

    Zonouz A. F.; Ashrafi M.; Ghiyasiyan-Arani M.; Hamadanian M. Effect of sol-gel synthesized Al0.1Zr0.9O1.95 nanoparticles and PVP on PVDF-based separators in lithium-ion battery performance: The RSM study. J. Elastomers Plast. 2021, 53 (3), 241–257..

    Not in our library10.1177/0095244320928574

  478. 478.

    Hou Y.; Huang Z.; Chen Z.; Li X.; Chen A.; Li P.; Wang Y.; Zhi C. Bifunctional separators design for safe lithium-ion batteries: Suppressed lithium dendrites and fire retardance. Nano Energy 2022, 97, 107204.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107204

  479. 479.

    Du Q.; Shi S.; Zhang L.; Yan Z.; Zeng X.; Wu J.; Zhou W.; Huang Z.-D.; Masese T.; Ma Y. Silica Nanowires Reinforced with Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene): Separator for High-Performance Lithium Batteries. ChemNanoMat 2022, 8, e202100392.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnma.202100392

  480. 480.

    Zhou P.; Yao D.; Zuo K.; Xia Y.; Yin J.; Liang H.; Zeng Y.-P. Highly dispersible silicon nitride whiskers in asymmetric porous separators for high-performance lithium-ion battery. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 621, 119001.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2020.119001

  481. 481.

    Zhao X.; Zhu M.; Tang C.; Quan K.; Tong Q.; Cao H.; Jiang J.; Yang H.; Zhang J. ZIF-8@MXene-reinforced flame-retardant and highly conductive polymer composite electrolyte for dendrite-free lithium metal batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 620, 478–485..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.018

  482. 482.

    Guo H.; Zhong S.; Chen L.; Peng G.; Wang F. F.; Yan T.; Hu J. Study on PVDF-HFP/PMMA/CMC Blended Polymer as Membranefor Lithium-Ion Batteries. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci 2022, 17, 220145.

    Not in our library10.20964/2022.01.47

  483. 483.

    Sahoo S.; Krishnamoorthy K.; Pazhamalai P.; Mariappan V. K.; Manoharan S.; Kim S.-J. High performance self-charging supercapacitors using a porous PVDF-ionic liquid electrolyte sandwiched between two-dimensional graphene electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (38), 21693–21703..

    Not in our library10.1039/c9ta06245a

  484. 484.

    Javadi O.; Fathollahi Zonouz A.; Soltanieh M.; Mousavi S. A. PVDF/PU blend membrane separator for lithium-ion batteries via non-solvent-induced phase separation (NIPS). J. Solid State Electrochem. 2021, 25 (8), 2385–2394..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10008-021-05010-z

  485. 485.

    Zhai Y.; Wang X.; Chen Y.; Sang X.; Liu H.; Sheng J.; Wu Y.; Wang X.; Li L. Multiscale-structured polyvinylidene fluoride/polyacrylonitrile/ vermiculite nanosheets fibrous membrane with uniform Li+ flux distribution for lithium metal battery. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 621, 118996.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118996

  486. 486.

    Xiao Y.; Wang Y.; Bo S.-H.; Kim J. C.; Miara L. J.; Ceder G. Understanding interface stability in solid-state batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5 (2), 105–126..

    Not in our library10.1038/s41578-019-0157-5

  487. 487.

    Zhao Y.; Wang L.; Zhou Y.; Liang Z.; Tavajohi N.; Li B.; Li T. Solid Polymer Electrolytes with High Conductivity and Transference Number of Li Ions for Li-Based Rechargeable Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003675.

    Not in our library10.1002/advs.202003675

  488. 488.

    Gonçalves R.; Miranda D.; Almeida A. M.; Silva M. M.; Meseguer-Dueñas J. M.; Ribelles J. L. G.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Costa C. M. Solid polymer electrolytes based on lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide/poly(vinylidene fluoride -co-hexafluoropropylene) for safer rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Sustainable Mater. Technol. 2019, 21, e00104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00104

  489. 489.

    Sun Y.; Zhan X.; Hu J.; Wang Y.; Gao S.; Shen Y.; Cheng Y.-T. Improving Ionic Conductivity with Bimodal-Sized Li7La3Zr2O12 Fillers for Composite Polymer Electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (13), 12467–12475..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.8b21770

  490. 490.

    Yi S.; Xu T.; Li L.; Gao M.; Du K.; Zhao H.; Bai Y. Fast ion conductor modified double-polymer (PVDF and PEO) matrix electrolyte for solid lithium-ion batteries. Solid State Ionics 2020, 355, 115419.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115419

  491. 491.

    Wei Z.; Chen S.; Wang J.; Wang Z.; Zhang Z.; Yao X.; Deng Y.; Xu X. Superior lithium ion conduction of polymer electrolyte with comb-like structure via solvent-free copolymerization for bipolar all-solid-state lithium battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (27), 13438–13447..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ta04477e

  492. 492.

    Ovsyannikov N. A.; Romadina E. I.; Akhmetov N. O.; Gvozdik N. A.; Akkuratov A. V.; Pogosova M. A.; Stevenson K. J. All-organic non-aqueous redox flow batteries with advanced composite polymer-ceramic Li-conductive membrane. J. Energy Storage 2022, 46, 103810.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.est.2021.103810

  493. 493.

    Ashraf Gandomi Y.; Krasnikova I. V.; Akhmetov N. O.; Ovsyannikov N. A.; Pogosova M. A.; Matteucci N. J.; Mallia C. T.; Neyhouse B. J.; Fenton A. M. Jr; Brushett F. R.; et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Lithium-Conducting Composite Polymer-Ceramic Membranes for Use in Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (45), 53746–53757..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.1c13759

  494. 494.

    Peng L.; Lu Z.; Zhong L.; Jian J.; Rong Y.; Yang R.; Xu Y.; Jin C. Enhanced ionic conductivity and interface compatibility of PVDF-LLZTO composite solid electrolytes by interfacial maleic acid modification. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 613, 368–375..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.031

  495. 495.

    Nakazawa S.; Matsuda Y.; Ochiai M.; Inafune Y.; Yamato M.; Tanaka M.; Kawakami H. Enhancing Lithium ion conductivity and all-solid-state secondary battery performance in polymer composite electrolyte membranes with β-Crystalline-rich Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Nanofibers. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 394, 139114.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139114

  496. 496.

    Shi K.; Xu Z.; Huang M.; Zou L.; Zheng D.; Yang Z.; Zhang W. Solid-state polymer electrolytes with polypropylene separator-reinforced sandwich structure for room-temperature lithium ion batteries. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 638, 119713.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119713

  497. 497.

    Chi C.; Li Y.; Li D.; Huang H.; Wang Q.; Yang Y.; Huang B. Flexible solvent-free supercapacitors with high energy density enabled by electrical-ionic hybrid polymer nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (28), 16748–16760..

    Not in our library10.1039/c9ta04612g

  498. 498.

    Chi C.; Li D.; Li Y.; Qi X.; Huang H.; Wang Q.; Lin C.; Zhang X.; Ma W.; Huang B. Silicon-nanoforest-based solvent-free micro-supercapacitors with ultrahigh spatial resolution via IC-compatible in situ fabrication for on-chip energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8 (43), 22736–22744..

    Not in our library10.1039/d0ta07540j

  499. 499.

    Nguyen T. K. L.; Lopez G.; Iojoiu C.; Bouchet R.; Ameduri B. Novel single-ion conducting electrolytes based on vinylidene fluoride copolymer for lithium metal batteries. J. Power Sources 2021, 498, 229920.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229920

  500. 500.

    Hao S.; Ran Q.; Xiao Y.; Li L.; Ji Y.; Liu J.; Yang Y. C.; Liu X. Bistrifluoroacetamide-Activated Double-Layer Composite Solid Electrolyte for Dendrite-Free Lithium Metal Battery. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2101486.

    Not in our library10.1002/admi.202101486

  501. 501.

    Jin Y.; Zong X.; Zhang X.; Liu C.; Li D.; Jia Z.; Li G.; Zhou X.; Wei J.; Xiong Y. Interface regulation enabling three-dimensional Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3-reinforced composite solid electrolyte for high-performance lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 2021, 501, 230027.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230027

  502. 502.

    Li L.; Shan Y.; Wang F.; Chen X.; Zhao Y.; Zhou D.; Wang H.; Cui W. Improving Fast and Safe Transfer of Lithium Ions in Solid-State Lithium Batteries by Porosity and Channel Structure of Polymer Electrolyte. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (41), 48525–48535..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.1c11489

  503. 503.

    Lee J.-Y.; Chung P.-H.; Yeh S.-C.; Yu T.-Y.; Lee W.-Y.; Wu N.-L.; Jeng R.-J. Tough Polymer Electrolyte with an Intrinsically Stabilized Interface with Li Metal for All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021, 125 (48), 26339–26347..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07359

  504. 504.

    Wang Y.; Tian Y.; Estevez D.; Peng H.-X.; Qin F. Complementary hybrid design of solvated electrolyte membranes enabled by porous carbon reinforcement for high-performance lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 2021, 506, 230127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230127

  505. 505.

    Gu Y.; She S.; Hong Z.; Huang Y.; Wu Y. Enabling lithium metal battery with flexible polymer/garnet type solid oxide composite electrolyte. Solid State Ionics 2021, 368, 115710.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ssi.2021.115710

  506. 506.

    Gan H.; Li S.; Zhang Y.; Wang J.; Xue Z. Electrospun Composite Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Enabled with Silica-Coated Silver Nanowires. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 2021 (45), 4639–4646..

    Not in our library10.1002/ejic.202100710

  507. 507.

    Cai D.; Wu X.; Xiang J.; Li M.; Su H.; Qi X.; Wang X.; Xia X.; Gu C.; Tu J. Ionic-liquid-containing polymer interlayer modified PEO-based electrolyte for stable high-voltage solid-state lithium metal battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 424, 130522.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2021.130522

  508. 508.

    Yu H.; Jin Y.; Zhan G. D.; Liang X. Solvent-Free Solid-State Lithium Battery Based on LiFePO4 and MWCNT/PEO/PVDF-HFP for High-Temperature Applications. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (43), 29060–29070..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.1c04275

  509. 509.

    Xu L.; Zhang L.; Hu Y.; Luo L. Enhancing Li-ion conduction in composite polymer electrolytes using Li0.33La0.56TiO3 nanotubes. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57 (84), 11068–11071..

    Not in our library10.1039/d1cc04220c

  510. 510.

    Liang Y.; Dong L.; Zhong S.; Yuan B.; Dong Y.; Liu Y.; Yang C.; Tang D.; Han J.; He W. Zeolitic imidazolate framework enables practical room-temperature operation of solid-state lithium batteries. Mater. Today Phys. 2021, 21, 100554.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100554

  511. 511.

    Mengesha T. H.; Beshahwured S. L.; Wu S.-H.; Wu Y.-S.; Jose R.; Lue S. J.; Yang C.-C. Freestanding Trilayer Hybrid Solid Electrolyte with Electrospun Interconnected Al-LLZO Nanofibers for Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries. ASC Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (12), 14554–14574..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaem.1c03202

  512. 512.

    Gao L.; Luo S.; Li J.; Cheng B.; Kang W.; Deng N. Core-shell structure nanofibers-ceramic nanowires based composite electrolytes with high Li transference number for high-performance all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. Energy Stor. Mater. 2021, 43, 266–274..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.013

  513. 513.

    Xu Y.; Li J.; Li W. Evolution in electrochemical performance of the solid blend polymer electrolyte (PEO/PVDF) with the content of ZnO nanofiller. Colloids Surf., A 2022, 632, 127773.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127773

  514. 514.

    Yu G.; Wang Y.; Li K.; Sun S.; Sun S.; Chen J.; Pan L.; Sun Z. Plasma optimized Li7La3Zr2O12 with vertically aligned ion diffusion pathways in composite polymer electrolyte for stable solid-state lithium metal batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132874.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2021.132874

  515. 515.

    Aval L. F.; Ghoranneviss M.; Pour G. B. Graphite nanoparticles paper supercapacitor based on gel electrolyte. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2018, 7, 29.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40243-018-0136-6

  516. 516.

    Zhang Q.; Wang Q.; Huang S.; Jiang Y.; Chen Z. Preparation and electrochemical study of PVDF-HFP/LATP/g-C3N4 composite polymer electrolyte membrane. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 131, 108793.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108793

  517. 517.

    Xiong W.; Huang T.; Feng Y.; Ye X.; Li X.; Liang J.; Ye S.; Ren X.; Li Y.; Zhang Q.; et al. Rapid ionic conductivity of ternary composite electrolytes for superior solid-state batteries with high-rate performance and long cycle life operated at room temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9 (34), 18338–18348..

    Not in our library10.1039/d1ta05751k

  518. 518.

    Yadav P.; Beheshti S. H.; Kathribail A. R.; Ivanchenko P.; Mierlo J. V.; Berecibar M. Improved Performance of Solid Polymer Electrolyte for Lithium-Metal Batteries via Hot Press Rolling. Polymers 2022, 14 (3), 363.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym14030363

  519. 519.

    Yang H.; Tay K.; Xu Y.; Rajbanshi B.; Kasani S.; Bright J.; Boryczka J.; Wang C.; Bai P.; Wu N. Nitrogen-Doped Lithium Lanthanum Titanate Nanofiber-Polymer Composite Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168 (11), 110507.

    Not in our library10.1149/1945-7111/ac30ad

  520. 520.

    Wang Y.; Qin F. Effects of Components in Solvent-Enhanced PVDF-HFP-Based Polymer Electrolyte on Its Electrochemical Performance. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50 (9), 5049–5056..

    Not in our library10.1007/s11664-021-08971-z

  521. 521.

    Huang J.; Huang Y.; Zhang Z.; Gao H.; Li C. Li6.7La3Zr1.7Ta0.3O12 Reinforced PEO/PVDF-HFP Based Composite Solid Electrolyte for All Solid-State Lithium Metal Battery. Energy Fuels 2020, 34 (11), 15011–15018..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03124

  522. 522.

    Xu Y.; Wang K.; An Y.; Liu W.; Li C.; Zheng S.; Zhang X.; Wang L.; Sun X.; Ma Y. Rapid Ion Transport Induced by the Enhanced Interaction in Composite Polymer Electrolyte for All-Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12 (43), 10603–10609..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02701

  523. 523.

    Barbosa J. C.; Correia D. M.; Fernandez E. M.; Fidalgo-Marijuan A.; Barandika G.; Goncalves R.; Ferdov S.; de Zea Bermudez V.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. High-Performance Room Temperature Lithium-Ion Battery Solid Polymer Electrolytes Based on Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) Combining Ionic Liquid and Zeolite. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (41), 48889–48900..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.1c15209

  524. 524.

    Li X.; An X.; Li Y.; Chen L.; Guo S.; Wang R.; Huang L.; Li S.; He Y.-B. An Organic/Inorganic Composite Gel Electrolyte Inducing Uniformly Lithium Deposition at High Current Density and Capacity. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 8, 2100790.

    Not in our library10.1002/admi.202100790

  525. 525.

    Tong R.-A.; Chen L.; Fan B.; Shao G.; Liu R.; Wang C.-A. Solvent-Free Process for Blended PVDF-HFP/PEO and LLZTO Composite Solid Electrolytes with Enhanced Mechanical and Electrochemical Properties for Lithium Metal Batteries. ASC Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (10), 11802–11812..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaem.1c02566

  526. 526.

    Huang Y.-F.; Gu T.; Rui G.; Shi P.; Fu W.; Chen L.; Liu X.; Zeng J.; Kang B.; Yan Z.; et al. A relaxor ferroelectric polymer with an ultrahigh dielectric constant largely promotes the dissociation of lithium salts to achieve high ionic conductivity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14 (11), 6021–6029..

    Not in our library10.1039/d1ee02663a

  527. 527.

    Karuppiah C.; Beshahwured S. L.; Wu Y.-S.; Babulal L. M.; Walle K. Z.; Tran H. K.; Wu S.-H.; Jose R.; Yang C.-C. Patterning and a Composite Protective Layer Provide Modified Li Metal Anodes for Dendrite-Free High-Voltage Solid-State Lithium Batteries. ASC Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (10), 11248–11257..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaem.1c02097

  528. 528.

    Hu J.; Zhang S.; Tang B. 2D filler-reinforced polymer nanocomposite dielectrics for high-k dielectric and energy storage applications. Energy Stor. Mater. 2021, 34, 260–281..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ensm.2020.10.001

  529. 529.

    Yang L.; Wang H.; Fang S.; Li M. Research progress on energy storage performance enhancement strategies for polyvinylidene fluoride-based composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 960, 170831.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170831

  530. 530.

    Zhao B.; Hamidinejad M.; Zhao C.; Li R.; Wang S.; Kazemi Y.; Park C. B. A versatile foaming platform to fabricate polymer/carbon composites with high dielectric permittivity and ultra-low dielectric loss. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (1), 133–140..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ta05556d

  531. 531.

    Ma W.; Yang K.; Wang H.; Li H. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene)-MXene Nanosheet Composites for Microcapacitors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3 (8), 7992–8003..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsanm.0c01459

  532. 532.

    Liu X.; Hu P.; Yu J.; Fan M.; Ji X.; Sun B.; Shen Y. Topologically distributed one-dimensional TiO2 nanofillers maximize the dielectric energy density in a P(VDF-HFP) nanocomposite. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8 (35), 18244–18253..

    Not in our library10.1039/d0ta06513g

  533. 533.

    Zhu W.; Zhao W.; Kang J.; Zhang P.; Li Y.; Chen Q.; Yao Z.; Pan Z.; Zhao Y.; Hong J. Ultralow contents of AgNbO3 fibers induced high energy storage density in ferroelectric polymer nanocomposites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 223904.

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0094131

  534. 534.

    Wang L.; Gao F.; Xu J.; Zhang K.; Kong J.; Reece M.; Yan H. Enhanced dielectric tunability and energy storage properties of plate-like Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites through texture arrangement. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 158, 112–120..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.015

  535. 535.

    Lin B.; Li Z.-T.; Yang Y.; Li Y.; Lin J.-C.; Zheng X.-M.; He F.-A.; Lam K.-H. Enhanced dielectric permittivity in surface-modified graphene/PVDF composites prepared by an electrospinning-hot pressing method. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 172, 58–65..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.003

  536. 536.

    Zhou Y.; Chen S.; Wu D.; Liu L.; Luo H.; Zhang D. Enhanced dielectric properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) nanocomposites using oriented nickel nanowires. Compos. Commun. 2019, 16, 11–19..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coco.2019.08.004

  537. 537.

    Tu S.; Jiang Q.; Zhang X.; Alshareef H. N. Large Dielectric Constant Enhancement in MXene Percolative Polymer Composites. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (4), 3369–3377..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b08895

  538. 538.

    Feng Q.-K.; Zhong S.-L.; Pei J.-Y.; Zhao Y.; Zhang D.-L.; Liu D.-F.; Zhang Y.-X.; Dang Z.-M. Recent Progress and Future Prospects on All-Organic Polymer Dielectrics for Energy Storage Capacitors. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122 (3), 3820–3878..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00793

  539. 539.

    Peña-Guzmán C.; Ulloa-Sánchez S.; Mora K.; Helena-Bustos R.; Lopez-Barrera E.; Alvarez J.; Rodriguez-Pinzón M. Emerging pollutants in the urban water cycle in Latin America: A review of the current literature. J. Environ. Manage. 2019, 237, 408–423..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.100

  540. 540.

    Farré M. l.; Pérez S.; Kantiani L.; Barceló D. Fate and toxicity of emerging pollutants, their metabolites and transformation products in the aquatic environment. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2008, 27 (11), 991–1007..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trac.2008.09.010

  541. 541.
  542. 542.

    Hong W.; Li C.; Tang T.; Xu H.; Yu Y.; Liu G.; Wang F.; Lei C.; Zhu H. The photocatalytic activity of the SnO2/TiO2/PVDF composite membrane in rhodamine B degradation. New J. Chem. 2021, 45 (5), 2631–2642..

    Not in our library10.1039/d0nj04764c

  543. 543.

    Zhao H.; Zhang D.; Sun H.; Zhao Y.; Xie M. Adsorption and detection of heavy metals from aqueous water by PVDF/ATP-CDs composite membrane. Colloids Surf., A 2022, 641, 128573.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128573

  544. 544.

    Kang G.-d.; Cao Y.-m. Application and modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes - A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 463, 145–165..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.055

  545. 545.

    Teixeira S.; Martins P. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Kühn K.; Cuniberti G. Reusability of photocatalytic TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles immobilized in poly(vinylidene difluoride)-co-trifluoroethylene. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 384, 497–504..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.073

  546. 546.

    Nunes-Pereira J.; Lopes A. C.; Costa C. M.; Rodrigues L. C.; Silva M. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Microporous membranes of NaY zeolite/poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) for Li-ion battery separators. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2013, 689 (0), 223–232..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.10.030

  547. 547.

    Ferreira A.; Silva J.; Sencadas V.; Gómez-Ribelles J. L.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) (72/28) interconnected porous membranes obtained by crystallization from solution. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 2011, 1312, 811.

    Not in our library10.1557/opl.2011.914

  548. 548.

    Liu Y.; Shen L.; Lin H.; Yu W.; Xu Y.; Li R.; Sun T.; He Y. A novel strategy based on magnetic field assisted preparation of magnetic and photocatalytic membranes with improved performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 612, 118378.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118378

  549. 549.

    Zhou S.; Gao J.; Zhu J.; Peng D.; Zhang Y.; Zhang Y. Self-cleaning, antibacterial mixed matrix membranes enabled by photocatalyst Ti-MOFs for efficient dye removal. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 610, 118219.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118219

  550. 550.

    Biswas M. R. U. D.; Oh W.-C. Synthesis of BiVO 4 -GO-PVDF nanocomposite: An excellent, newly designed material for high photocatalytic activity towards organic dye degradation by tuning band gap energies. Solid State Sci. 2018, 80, 22–30..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.03.021

  551. 551.

    Lee C.-G.; Javed H.; Zhang D.; Kim J.-H.; Westerhoff P.; Li Q.; Alvarez P. J. J. Porous Electrospun Fibers Embedding TiO2 for Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Water Pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52 (7), 4285–4293..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.est.7b06508

  552. 552.

    De Filpo G.; Pantuso E.; Armentano K.; Formoso P.; Di Profio G.; Poerio T.; Fontananova E.; Meringolo C.; Mashin A. I.; Nicoletta F. P. Chemical Vapor Deposition of Photocatalyst Nanoparticles on PVDF Membranes for Advanced Oxidation Processes. Membranes 2018, 8 (3), 35.

    Not in our library10.3390/membranes8030035

  553. 553.

    Zhang Z.-G.; Liu H.; Wang X.-X.; Zhang J.; Yu M.; Ramakrishna S.; Long Y.-Z. One-Step Low Temperature Hydrothermal Synthesis of Flexible TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 Core-Shell Heterostructured Fibers for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysis and Self-Cleaning. Nanomaterials 2019, 9 (3), 431.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano9030431

  554. 554.

    Benhabiles O.; Galiano F.; Marino T.; Mahmoudi H.; Lounici H.; Figoli A. Preparation and Characterization of TiO(2)-PVDF/PMMA Blend Membranes Using an Alternative Non-Toxic Solvent for UF/MF and Photocatalytic Application. Molecules 2019, 24 (4), 724.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules24040724

  555. 555.

    Görgün N.; Özer C.; Polat K. A new catalyst material from electrospun PVDF-HFP nanofibers by using magnetron-sputter coating for the treatment of dye-polluted waters. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2019, 2, 423–430..

    Not in our library10.1007/s42114-019-00105-8

  556. 556.

    Salazar H.; Martins P. M.; Santos B.; Fernandes M. M.; Reizabal A.; Sebastián V.; Botelho G.; Tavares C. J.; Vilas-Vilela J. L.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Photocatalytic and antimicrobial multifunctional nanocomposite membranes for emerging pollutants water treatment applications. Chemosphere 2020, 250, 126299.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126299

  557. 557.

    Chen L.; Liu F.; Wu Y.; Zhao L.; Li Y.; Zhang X.; Qian J. In situ formation of La(OH)3-poly(vinylidene fluoride) composite filtration membrane with superior phosphate removal properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 347, 695–702..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.086

  558. 558.

    Tan Y.; Sun Z.; Meng H.; Han Y.; Wu J.; Xu J.; Xu Y.; Zhang X. A new MOFs/polymer hybrid membrane: MIL-68(Al)/PVDF, fabrication and application in high-efficient removal of p-nitrophenol and methylene blue. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 215, 217–226..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.seppur.2019.01.008

  559. 559.

    Dognani G.; Hadi P.; Ma H.; Cabrera F. C.; Job A. E.; Agostini D. L. S.; Hsiao B. S. Effective chromium removal from water by polyaniline-coated electrospun adsorbent membrane. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 341–351..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.154

  560. 560.

    Li T.; Zhang W.; Zhai S.; Gao G.; Ding J.; Zhang W.; Liu Y.; Zhao X.; Pan B.; Lv L. Efficient removal of nickel(II) from high salinity wastewater by a novel PAA/ZIF-8/PVDF hybrid ultrafiltration membrane. Water Res. 2018, 143, 87–98..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.031

  561. 561.

    Efome J. E.; Rana D.; Matsuura T.; Lan C. Q. Metal-organic frameworks supported on nanofibers to remove heavy metals. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (10), 4550–4555..

    Not in our library10.1039/c7ta10428f

  562. 562.

    Salazar H.; Martins P. M.; Valverde A.; Fernández de Luis R.; Vilas-Vilela J. L.; Ferdov S.; Botelho G.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Reusable Nanocomposite Membranes for Highly Efficient Arsenite and Arsenate Dual Removal from Water. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2101419.

    Not in our library10.1002/admi.202101419

  563. 563.

    Martins P. M.; Santos B.; Salazar H.; Carabineiro S. A. C.; Botelho G.; Tavares C. J.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Multifunctional hybrid membranes for photocatalytic and adsorptive removal of water contaminants of emerging concern. Chemosphere 2022, 293, 133548.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133548

  564. 564.

    Chen Z.; Mahmud S.; Cai L.; He Z.; Yang Y.; Zhang L.; Zhao S.; Xiong Z. Hierarchical poly(vinylidene fluoride)/active carbon composite membrane with self-confining functional carbon nanotube layer for intractable wastewater remediation. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 603, 118041.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118041

  565. 565.

    da Silva R. J.; Mojica-Sánchez L. C.; Gorza F. D. S.; Pedro G. C.; Maciel B. G.; Ratkovski G. P.; da Rocha H. D.; do Nascimento K. T. O.; Medina-Llamas J. C.; Chávez-Guajardo A. E.; et al. Kinetics and thermodynamic studies of Methyl Orange removal by polyvinylidene fluoride-PEDOT mats. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 100, 62–73..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jes.2020.04.034

  566. 566.

    Zhou L.; Xiao G.; He Y.; Wu J.; Shi H.; Zhong F.; Yin X.; Li Z.; Chen J. Multifunctional filtration membrane with anti-viscous-oils-fouling capacity and selective dyes adsorption ability for complex wastewater remediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125379.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125379

  567. 567.

    Bangari R. S.; Yadav A.; Bharadwaj J.; Sinha N. Boron nitride nanosheets incorporated polyvinylidene fluoride mixed matrix membranes for removal of methylene blue from aqueous stream. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (1), 107052.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jece.2021.107052

  568. 568.

    Wu G.; Ma J.; Wang S.; Chai H.; Guo L.; Li J.; Ostovan A.; Guan Y.; Chen L. Cationic metal-organic framework based mixed-matrix membrane for extraction of phenoxy carboxylic acid (PCA) herbicides from water samples followed by UHPLC-MS/MS determination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 394, 122556.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122556

  569. 569.

    Ibrahim Y.; Naddeo V.; Banat F.; Hasan S. W. Preparation of novel polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-Tin(IV) oxide (SnO2) ion exchange mixed matrix membranes for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 250, 117250.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117250

  570. 570.

    Queirós J. M.; Salazar H.; Valverde A.; Botelho G.; Fernández de Luis R.; Teixeira J.; Martins P. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Reusable composite membranes for highly efficient chromium removal from real water matrixes. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135922.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135922

  571. 571.

    Chang H.-C.; Hsu Y.-L.; Tsai C.-Y.; Chen Y.-H.; Lin S.-L. Nanofiber-based brush-distributed sensor for detecting heavy metal ions. Microsyst. Technol. 2017, 23 (2), 507–514..

    Not in our library10.1007/s00542-016-3231-6

  572. 572.

    Bessbousse H.; Zran N.; Fauléau J.; Godin B.; Lemée V.; Wade T.; Clochard M. C. Poly(4-vinyl pyridine) radiografted PVDF track etched membranes as sensors for monitoring trace mercury in water. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 118, 48–54..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.011

  573. 573.

    Zhang K.; Ji J.; Fang X.; Yan L.; Liu B. Carbon nanotube/gold nanoparticle composite-coated membrane as a facile plasmon-enhanced interface for sensitive SERS sensing. Analyst 2015, 140 (1), 134–139..

    Not in our library10.1039/c4an01473a

  574. 574.

    Martins P. M.; Miranda R.; Marques J.; Tavares C. J.; Botelho G.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Comparative efficiency of TiO2 nanoparticles in suspension vs. immobilization into P(VDF-TrFE) porous membranes. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (15), 12708–12716..

    Not in our library10.1039/c5ra25385c

  575. 575.

    Martins P. M.; Gomez V.; Lopes A. C.; Tavares C. J.; Botelho G.; Irusta S.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Improving Photocatalytic Performance and Recyclability by Development of Er-Doped and Er/Pr-Codoped TiO2/Poly(vinylidene difluoride)-Trifluoroethylene Composite Membranes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014, 118 (48), 27944–27953..

    Not in our library10.1021/jp509294v

  576. 576.

    Guo Y.; Jia Z.; Wang S.; Su Y.; Ma H.; Wang L.; Meng W. Sandwich membranes based on PVDF-g-4VP and surface modified graphene oxide for Cu(II) adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 377, 17–23..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.044

  577. 577.

    Gopakumar D. A.; Arumukhan V.; Gelamo R. V.; Pasquini D.; de Morais L. C.; Rizal S.; Hermawan D.; Nzihou A.; Khalil H. P. S. A. Carbon dioxide plasma treated PVDF electrospun membrane for the removal of crystal violet dyes and iron oxide nanoparticles from water. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 18, 100268.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoso.2019.100268

  578. 578.

    Zhou A.; Jia R.; Wang Y.; Sun S.; Xin X.; Wang M.; Zhao Q.; Zhu H. Abatement of sulfadiazine in water under a modified ultrafiltration membrane (PVDF-PVP-TiO2-dopamine) filtration-photocatalysis system. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 234, 116099.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116099

  579. 579.

    Aoudjit L.; Martins P. M.; Madjene F.; Petrovykh D. Y.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Photocatalytic reusable membranes for the effective degradation of tartrazine with a solar photoreactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 408–416..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.053

  580. 580.

    Zioui D.; Salazar H.; Aoudjit L.; Martins P. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Polymer-Based Membranes for Oily Wastewater Remediation. Polymers 2020, 12 (1), 42.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym12010042

  581. 581.

    Martins P. M.; Ribeiro J. M.; Teixeira S.; Petrovykh D. Y.; Cuniberti G.; Pereira L.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Photocatalytic Microporous Membrane against the Increasing Problem of Water Emerging Pollutants. Materials 2019, 12 (10), 1649.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma12101649

  582. 582.

    Almeida N. A.; Martins P. M.; Teixeira S.; Lopes da Silva J. A.; Sencadas V.; Kühn K.; Cuniberti G.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Marques P. A. A. P. TiO2/graphene oxide immobilized in P(VDF-TrFE) electrospun membranes with enhanced visible-light-induced photocatalytic performance. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51 (14), 6974–6986..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-016-9986-4

  583. 583.

    Teixeira S.; Magalhães B.; Martins P. M.; Kühn K.; Soler L.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Cuniberti G. Reusable Photocatalytic Optical Fibers for Underground, Deep-Sea, and Turbid Water Remediation. Global chall. 2018, 2 (3), 1700124.

    Not in our library10.1002/gch2.201700124

  584. 584.

    Tubio C. R.; Pereira N.; Campos-Arias L.; Martins P. M.; Vilas-Vilela J. L.; Costa C. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Multifunctional Ternary Composites with Silver Nanowires and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles for Capacitive Sensing and Photocatalytic Self-Cleaning Applications. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4 (8), 3815–3824..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsaelm.2c00439

  585. 585.

    Wu C.-J.; Valerie Maggay I.; Chiang C.-H.; Chen W.; Chang Y.; Hu C.; Venault A. Removal of tetracycline by a photocatalytic membrane reactor with MIL-53(Fe)/PVDF mixed-matrix membrane. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138990.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2022.138990

  586. 586.

    Salazar H.; Martins P. M.; Fernandes M. M.; Costa P.; Ferdov S.; Botelho G.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Reusable nanocomposite-filters for arsenite and arsenate dual real effluents remediation in an up-scaled membrane reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 440, 129756.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129756

  587. 587.

    Ren Y.; Li T.; Zhang W.; Wang S.; Shi M.; Shan C.; Zhang W.; Guan X.; Lv L.; Hua M.; et al. MIL-PVDF blend ultrafiltration membranes with ultrahigh MOF loading for simultaneous adsorption and catalytic oxidation of methylene blue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 365, 312–321..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.013

  588. 588.

    Chin C. D.; Linder V.; Sia S. K. Lab-on-a-chip devices for global health: Past studies and future opportunities. Lab Chip 2007, 7 (1), 41–57..

    Not in our library10.1039/b611455e

  589. 589.

    Dittrich P. S.; Manz A. Lab-on-a-chip: Microfluidics in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2006, 5 (3), 210–218..

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd1985

  590. 590.

    Pandey C. M.; Augustine S.; Kumar S.; Kumar S.; Nara S.; Srivastava S.; Malhotra B. D. Microfluidics Based Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Biotechnol. J. 2018, 13 (1), 1700047.

    Not in our library10.1002/biot.201700047

  591. 591.

    Yager P.; Edwards T.; Fu E.; Helton K.; Nelson K.; Tam M. R.; Weigl B. H. Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health. Nature 2006, 442 (7101), 412–418..

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05064

  592. 592.

    Murphy T. W.; Zhang Q.; Naler L. B.; Ma S.; Lu C. Recent advances in the use of microfluidic technologies for single cell analysis. Analyst 2018, 143 (1), 60–80..

    Not in our library10.1039/c7an01346a

  593. 593.

    Wejinya U. C.; Shen Y.; Xi N.; Zhang J. Microfluidic end effector for manufacturing of nano devices. In Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; IEEE, 2006; Vol. 2006, pp 1384–1389.

    Not in our library

  594. 594.

    Kumar S.; Kumar S.; Ali M. A.; Anand P.; Agrawal V. V.; John R.; Maji S.; Malhotra B. D. Microfluidic-integrated biosensors: Prospects for point-of-care diagnostics. Biotechnol. J. 2013, 8 (11), 1267–1279..

    Not in our library10.1002/biot.201200386

  595. 595.

    Zarei M. Portable biosensing devices for point-of-care diagnostics: Recent developments and applications. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 91, 26–41..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trac.2017.04.001

  596. 596.

    Li C.; Wu P. M.; Browne A.; Lee S.; Ahn C. H. Hot-embossed piezoelectric polymer micro-diaphragm arrays integrated with lab-on-a-chip for protein analysis. Proceedings of IEEE Sensors 2007, 462–465..

    Not in our library10.1109/icsens.2007.4388436

  597. 597.

    Wejinya U. C.; Shen Y.; Xi N.; Chiu Lai K. W.; Zhang J. An efficient approach of handling and deposition of micro and nano entities using sensorized microfluidic end-effector system. Sens. Actuators, A 2008, 147 (1), 6–16..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2008.03.021

  598. 598.

    Chang W.-Y.; Chu C.-H.; Lin Y.-C. A Flexible Piezoelectric Sensor for Microfluidic Applications Using Polyvinylidene Fluoride. IEEE Sens. J. 2008, 8 (5), 495–500..

    Not in our library10.1109/jsen.2008.918749

  599. 599.

    Zhang L.; Yu X.; You S.; Liu H.; Zhang C.; Cai B.; Xiao L.; Liu W.; Guo S.; Zhao X. Highly sensitive microfluidic flow sensor based on aligned piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) nanofibers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 242901.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.4937733

  600. 600.

    Asadnia M.; Kottapalli A. G.; Karavitaki K. D.; Warkiani M. E.; Miao J.; Corey D. P.; Triantafyllou M. From Biological Cilia to Artificial Flow Sensors: Biomimetic Soft Polymer Nanosensors with High Sensing Performance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32955.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep32955

  601. 601.

    Yucel M.; Akin O.; Cayoren M.; Akduman I.; Palaniappan A.; Liedberg B.; Hizal G.; Inci F.; Yildiz U. H. Hand-Held Volatilome Analyzer Based on Elastically Deformable Nanofibers. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90 (8), 5122–5129..

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05187

  602. 602.

    Zhao B.; Cui X.; Ren W.; Xu F.; Liu M.; Ye Z. G. A Controllable and Integrated Pump-enabled Microfluidic Chip and Its Application in Droplets Generating. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11319.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-10785-1

  603. 603.

    Wang H. H.; Wu T. J.; Lin S. J.; Gu J. T.; Lee C. K.; Cheng I. C.; Hsu Y. H. Dual light-activated microfluidic pumps based on an optopiezoelectric composite. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2017, 27, 125003.

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6439/aa91fc

  604. 604.

    Beringer L. T.; Xu X.; Shih W.; Shih W.-H.; Habas R.; Schauer C. L. An electrospun PVDF-TrFe fiber sensor platform for biological applications. Sens. Actuators, A 2015, 222, 293–300..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sna.2014.11.012

  605. 605.

    Wang Z.; Tan L.; Pan X.; Liu G.; He Y.; Jin W.; Li M.; Hu Y.; Gu H. Self-Powered Viscosity and Pressure Sensing in Microfluidic Systems Based on the Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting of Flowing Droplets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (34), 28586–28595..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.7b08541

  606. 606.

    Gao B.; Wang X.; Li T.; Feng Z.; Wang C.; Gu Z. Gecko-Inspired Paper Artificial Skin for Intimate Skin Contact and Multisensing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4 (1), 1800392.

    Not in our library10.1002/admt.201800392

  607. 607.

    Amritsar J.; Foroughi S.; Raju D.; Pakkiriswami S.; Packirisamy M. Conformational detection of heat shock protein through bio-interactions with microstructures. Res. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 36 (1), 89–98..

    Not in our library10.1007/s42600-019-00038-7

  608. 608.

    Pullano S. A.; Islam S. K.; Fiorillo A. S. Pyroelectric sensor for temperature monitoring of biological fluids in microchannel devices. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14 (8), 2725–2730..

    Not in our library10.1109/jsen.2014.2315738

  609. 609.

    Wang H.; Britton C.; Quaiyum F.; Pullano S. A.; Taylor L.; Fiorillo A. S.; Islam S. K. A Charge Sensitive Pre-Amplifier for Smart Point-of-Care Devices Employing Polymer-Based Lab-on-a-Chip. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2018, 65 (8), 984–988..

    Not in our library10.1109/tcsii.2018.2798929

  610. 610.

    Bayareh M.; Ashani M. N.; Usefian A. Active and passive micromixers: A comprehensive review. Chem. Eng. Process. 2020, 147, 107771.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cep.2019.107771

  611. 611.

    Nguyen N.-T.; Hejazian M.; Ooi C.; Kashaninejad N. Recent Advances and Future Perspectives on Microfluidic Liquid Handling. Micromachines 2017, 8 (6), 186.

    Not in our library10.3390/mi8060186

  612. 612.
  613. 613.

    Mark D.; Haeberle S.; Roth G.; Von Stetten F.; Zengerle R. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: Requirements, characteristics and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39 (3), 1153–1182..

    Not in our library10.1039/b820557b

  614. 614.

    Au A. K.; Lai H.; Utela B. R.; Folch A. Microvalves and Micropumps for BioMEMS. Micromachines 2011, 2 (2), 179–220..

    Not in our library10.3390/mi2020179

  615. 615.

    Cardoso V. F.; Minas G. Micro total analysis systems. In Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Handbook: Fabrication, Implementation, and Applications; CRC Press, 2016; pp 319–365.

    Not in our library

  616. 616.

    Lee C. Y.; Wang W. T.; Liu C. C.; Fu L. M. Passive mixers in microfluidic systems: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 288, 146–160..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.122

  617. 617.

    Brown L. F. Ferroelectric polymers: Current and future ultrasound applications. In Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE, 1992; pp 539–550.

    Not in our library

  618. 618.

    Cardoso V. F.; Catarino S. O.; Serrado Nunes J.; Rebouta L.; Rocha J. G.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Minas G. Lab-on-a-chip with beta-poly(vinylidene fluoride) based acoustic microagitation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57 (5), 1184–1190..

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2009.2035054

  619. 619.

    Cardoso V. F.; Costa C. M.; Minas G.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Improving the optical and electroactive response of poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) spin-coated films for sensor and actuator applications. Smart Mater. Struct. 2012, 21 (8), 085020.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/21/8/085020

  620. 620.

    Pabst O.; Perelaer J.; Beckert E.; Schubert U. S.; Eberhardt R.; Tünnermann A. All inkjet-printed piezoelectric polymer actuators: Characterization and applications for micropumps in lab-on-a-chip systems. Org. Electron. 2013, 14 (12), 3423–3429..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.009

  621. 621.

    Pabst O.; Hölzer S.; Beckert E.; Perelaer J.; Schubert U. S.; Eberhardt R.; Tünnermann A. Inkjet printed micropump actuator based on piezoelectric polymers: Device performance and morphology studies. Org. Electron. 2014, 15 (11), 3306–3315..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.007

  622. 622.

    Chola N. M.; Sreenath S.; Dave B.; Nagarale R. K. A non-gassing electroosmotic pump with sandwich of poly(2-ethyl aniline)-Prussian blue nanocomposite and PVDF membrane. Electrophoresis 2019, 40 (22), 2979–2987..

    Not in our library10.1002/elps.201900230

  623. 623.

    Zhao F.; Chen X.; Zhang J.; Zhang X.; Xie J.; Jin L.; Liu Z.; Zhuang J.; Ren W.; Ye Z. G. A wearable, nozzle-diffuser microfluidic pump based on high-performance ferroelectric nanocomposites. Sens. Actuators, B 2021, 347, 130611.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2021.130611

  624. 624.

    Wang H. H.; Wu T. J.; Hsu C. C.; Lee C. K.; Hsu Y. H. A light-activated optopiezoelectric thin-film actuator for microfluidic applications. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE 2015, 9320, 5.

    Not in our library10.1117/12.2079873

  625. 625.

    Lin P.; Hsu Y. H.; Lee C. K. Universal lab on a smartphone - A research of TiOPc thin film as a light dependence electrode. In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE; SPIE, 2014; Vol. 8951. pp 98–104.

    Not in our library

  626. 626.

    Liu Y.; Yang D.; Yu T.; Jiang X. Incorporation of electrospun nanofibrous PVDF membranes into a microfluidic chip assembled by PDMS and scotch tape for immunoassays. Electrophoresis 2009, 30 (18), 3269–3275..

    Not in our library10.1002/elps.200900128

  627. 627.

    Casto L. D.; Schuster J. A.; Neice C. D.; Baker C. A. Characterization of low adsorption filter membranes for electrophoresis and electrokinetic sample manipulations in microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Anal. Methods 2018, 10 (29), 3616–3623..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ay01237g

  628. 628.

    Shimazaki Y.; Hashimoto A. A microfluidic device containing membrane-immobilized antibodies for successively capturing cytosolic enzymes. Talanta 2014, 125, 400–404..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.talanta.2014.03.001

  629. 629.

    Babu P. J.; Saranya S.; Raichur A. M.; Doble M. Design of photoluminescence point-of-care membrane strip for the detection of dopamine. Mater. Lett. 2020, 277, 128316.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128316

  630. 630.

    Zhu L.; Lv Z.; Yin Z.; Li M.; Tang D. Digital multimeter-based point-of-care immunoassay of prostate- specific antigen coupling with a flexible photosensitive pressure sensor. Sens. Actuators, B 2021, 343, 130121.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2021.130121

  631. 631.

    de Moraes M. O. S.; de Moraes Segundo J. d. D. P.; Paula M. M. d. S.; Sales M. G. F.; Brito W. R. Highly sensitive electrochemical immunosensor using a protein-polyvinylidene fluoride nanocomposite for human thyroglobulin. Bioelectrochemistry 2021, 142, 107888.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107888

  632. 632.

    Karatay E.; Lammertink R. G. H. Oxygenation by a superhydrophobic slip G/L contactor. Lab Chip 2012, 12 (16), 2922–2929..

    Not in our library10.1039/c2lc21296j

  633. 633.

    Ni Y.; Lin W.; Mu R. J.; Wu C.; Wang L.; Wu D.; Chen S.; Pang J. Robust microfluidic construction of hybrid microfibers based on konjac glucomannan and their drug release performance. RSC Adv. 2018, 8 (47), 26432–26439..

    Not in our library10.1039/c8ra05600e

  634. 634.

    Ammanath G.; Yeasmin S.; Srinivasulu Y.; Vats M.; Cheema J. A.; Nabilah F.; Srivastava R.; Yildiz U. H.; Alagappan P.; Liedberg B. Flow-through colorimetric assay for detection of nucleic acids in plasma. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1066, 102–111..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.aca.2019.03.036

  635. 635.

    Aydin H. B.; Cheema J. A.; Ammanath G.; Toklucu C.; Yucel M.; Ozenler S.; Palaniappan A.; Liedberg B.; Yildiz U. H. Pixelated colorimetric nucleic acid assay. Talanta 2020, 209, 120581.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120581

  636. 636.

    Harpaz D.; Eltzov E.; Ng T. S. E.; Marks R. S.; Tok A. I. Y. Enhanced Colorimetric Signal for Accurate Signal Detection in Paper-Based Biosensors. Diagnostics 2020, 10 (1), 28.

    Not in our library10.3390/diagnostics10010028

  637. 637.

    Kang D. H.; Kang H. W. Advanced electrospinning using circle electrodes for freestanding PVDF nanofiber film fabrication. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 251–257..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.211

  638. 638.

    Pimentel E. S.; Brito-Pereira R.; Marques-Almeida T.; Ribeiro C.; Vaz F.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Cardoso V. F. Tailoring Electrospun Poly(l-lactic acid) Nanofibers as Substrates for Microfluidic Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 (1), 60–69..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.9b12461

  639. 639.

    Kim K. J.; Tadokoro S. Electroactive Polymers for Robotic Applications: Artificial Muscles and Sensors; Springer, 2007.

    Not in our library

  640. 640.

    Gallego D.; Ferrell N. J.; Hansford D. J. Fabrication of piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) microstructures by soft lithography for tissue engineering and cell biology applications. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2007, 1002, 405.

    Not in our library10.1557/proc-1002-n04-05

  641. 641.

    Suaste-Gomez E.; Rodriguez-Roldan G.; Reyes-Cruz H.; Teran-Jimenez O. Developing an Ear Prosthesis Fabricated in Polyvinylidene Fluoride by a 3D Printer with Sensory Intrinsic Properties of Pressure and Temperature. Sensors 2016, 16, 332.

    Not in our library10.3390/s16030332

  642. 642.

    Reis J.; Frias C.; Canto e Castro C.; Botelho M. L.; Marques A. T.; Oliveira Simoes J. A.; Capela e Silva F.; Potes J. A new piezoelectric actuator induces bone formation in vivo: a preliminary study. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 613403.

    Not in our library10.1155/2012/613403

  643. 643.

    Maksimkin A. V.; Dayyoub T.; Telyshev D. V.; Gerasimenko A. Y. Electroactive Polymer-Based Composites for Artificial Muscle-like Actuators: A Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2272.

    Not in our library10.3390/nano12132272

  644. 644.

    Frias C.; Reis J.; Capela e Silva F.; Potes J.; Simões J.; Marques A. T. Piezoelectric actuator: Searching inspiration in nature for osteoblast stimulation. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70 (13), 1920–1925..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.011

  645. 645.

    Groo L.; Inman D. J.; Sodano H. A. Dehydrofluorinated PVDF for structural health monitoring in fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 214, 108982.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108982

  646. 646.

    Maity K.; Garain S.; Henkel K.; Schmeißer D.; Mandal D. Self-Powered Human-Health Monitoring through Aligned PVDF Nanofibers Interfaced Skin-Interactive Piezoelectric Sensor. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2 (2), 862–878..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsapm.9b00846

  647. 647.

    Guzmán E.; Cugnoni J.; Gmür T. Monitoring of composite structures using a network of integrated PVDF film transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24 (5), 055017.

    Not in our library10.1088/0964-1726/24/5/055017

  648. 648.
  649. 649.

    Moreira J.; Fernandes M. M.; Carvalho E. O.; Nicolau A.; Lazic V.; Nedeljkovic J. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Exploring electroactive microenvironments in polymer-based nanocomposites to sensitize bacterial cells to low-dose embedded silver nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2022, 139, 237–248..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.067

  650. 650.

    Fernandes M. M.; Martins P.; Correia D. M.; Carvalho E. O.; Gama F. M.; Vazquez M.; Bran C.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Magnetoelectric Polymer-Based Nanocomposites with Magnetically Controlled Antimicrobial Activity. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4 (1), 559–570..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsabm.0c01125

  651. 651.

    Uto K.; Tsui J. H.; DeForest C. A.; Kim D. H. Dynamically tunable cell culture platforms for tissue engineering and mechanobiology. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 65, 53–82..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.09.004

  652. 652.
  653. 653.

    Girlanda R. Deceased organ donation for transplantation: Challenges and opportunities. World J Transplant 2016, 6 (3), 451–459..

    Not in our library10.5500/wjt.v6.i3.451

  654. 654.

    Tonndorf R.; Aibibu D.; Cherif C. Isotropic and Anisotropic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Collagen, Conventional, and Textile Fabrication Technologies and Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9561.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms22179561

  655. 655.

    Chen F.-M.; Liu X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 86–168..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004

  656. 656.

    S S.; Thomas S.; Radhakrishnan E. K. Polymer based tissue engineering strategies for neural regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017, 2, 98–103..

    Not in our library10.15406/atroa.2017.02.00016

  657. 657.

    Ding J.; Zhang J.; Li J.; Li D.; Xiao C.; Xiao H.; Yang H.; Zhuang X.; Chen X. Electrospun polymer biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 90, 1–34..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.01.002

  658. 658.

    Chen Q.; Liang S.; Thouas G. A. Elastomeric biomaterials for tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38 (3–4), 584–671..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.05.003

  659. 659.

    Ribeiro C.; Pärssinen J.; Sencadas V.; Correia V.; Miettinen S.; Hytönen V. P.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Dynamic piezoelectric stimulation enhances osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2015, 103 (6), 2172–2175..

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.35368

  660. 660.

    Sionkowska A. Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: Review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36 (9), 1254–1276..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.003

  661. 661.

    Yoo H. S.; Kim T. G.; Park T. G. Surface-functionalized electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2009, 61 (12), 1033–1042..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.007

  662. 662.

    Nair L. S.; Laurencin C. T. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32 (8–9), 762–798..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017

  663. 663.

    Sosnik A.; Gotelli G.; Abraham G. A. Microwave-assisted polymer synthesis (MAPS) as a tool in biomaterials science: How new and how powerful. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36 (8), 1050–1078..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.12.001

  664. 664.

    Ribeiro S.; Puckert C.; Ribeiro C.; Gomes A. C.; Higgins M. J.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Surface Charge-Mediated Cell-Surface Interaction on Piezoelectric Materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 (1), 191–199..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.9b17222

  665. 665.

    Homaeigohar S.; Tsai T. Y.; Young T. H.; Yang H. J.; Ji Y. R. An electroactive alginate hydrogel nanocomposite reinforced by functionalized graphite nanofilaments for neural tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115112.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115112

  666. 666.

    Sulik G. L.; Soong H. K.; Chang P. C. T.; Parkinson W. C.; Elner S. G.; Elner V. M. Effects of steady electric fields on human retinal pigment epithelial cell orientation and migration in culture. Acta Ophthalmol. 1992, 70 (1), 115–122..

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02102.x

  667. 667.

    Zhao M.; Agius-Fernandez A.; Forrester J. V.; McCaig C. D. Orientation and directed migration of cultured corneal epithelial cells in small electric fields are serum dependent. J. Cell Sci. 1996, 109, 1405–1414..

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.109.6.1405

  668. 668.

    Pu J.; McCaig C. D.; Cao L.; Zhao Z.; Segall J. E.; Zhao M. EGF receptor signalling is essential for electric-field-directed migration of breast cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120 (19), 3395–3403..

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.002774

  669. 669.

    Wang E.; Zhao M.; Forrester J. V.; McCaig C. D. Bi-directional migration of lens epithelial cells in a physiological electrical field. Exp. Eye Res. 2003, 76 (1), 29–37..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0014-4835(02)00257-9

  670. 670.

    Bouaziz A.; Richert A.; Caprani A. Vascular endothelial cell responses to different electrically charged poly(vinylidene fluoride) supports under static and oscillating flow conditions. Biomaterials 1997, 18 (2), 107–112..

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(96)00114-7

  671. 671.

    Valentini R. F.; Vargo T. G.; Gardella J. A. Jr.; Aebischer P. Electrically charged polymeric substrates enhance nerve fibre outgrowth In vitro. Biomaterials 1992, 13, 183–190..

    Not in our library10.1016/0142-9612(92)90069-z

  672. 672.

    Chao P. H.; Lu H. H.; Hung C. T.; Nicoll S. B.; Bulinski J. C. Effects of applied DC electric field on ligament fibroblast migration and wound healing. Connect. Tissue Res. 2007, 48 (4), 188–197..

    Not in our library10.1080/03008200701424451

  673. 673.

    Ribeiro C.; Sencadas V.; Correia D. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Piezoelectric polymers as biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Colloids Surf. B 2015, 136, 46–55..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.043

  674. 674.

    Hoon J. L.; Tan M. H.; Koh C. G. The regulation of cellular responses to mechanical cues by rho gtpases. Cells 2016, 5, 17.

    Not in our library10.3390/cells5020017

  675. 675.

    Bras-Pereira C.; Moreno E. Mechanical cell competition. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2018, 51, 15–21..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2017.10.003

  676. 676.

    Gaut C.; Sugaya K. Critical review on the physical and mechanical factors involved in tissue engineering of cartilage. Regener. Med. 2015, 10 (5), 665–679..

    Not in our library10.2217/rme.15.31

  677. 677.

    Yu C.; Zhu W.; Sun B.; Mei D.; Gou M.; Chen S. Modulating physical, chemical, and biological properties in 3D printing for tissue engineering applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018, 5, 041107.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.5050245

  678. 678.

    Jin G.; Yang G. H.; Kim G. Tissue engineering bioreactor systems for applying physical and electrical stimulations to cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2015, 103 (4), 935–948..

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.33268

  679. 679.

    Costa R.; Ribeiro C.; Lopes A. C.; Martins P.; Sencadas V.; Soares R.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Osteoblast, fibroblast and in vivo biological response to poly(vinylidene fluoride) based composite materials. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2013, 24 (2), 395–403..

    Not in our library10.1007/s10856-012-4808-y

  680. 680.

    Ribeiro C.; Panadero J. A.; Sencadas V.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Tamaño M. N.; Moratal D.; Salmerón-Sánchez M.; Gómez Ribelles J. L. Fibronectin adsorption and cell response on electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride) films. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 7 (3), 035004–035013..

    Not in our library10.1088/1748-6041/7/3/035004

  681. 681.

    Ahmadi N.; Kharaziha M.; Labbaf S. Core-shell fibrous membranes of PVDF-Ba(0.9)Ca(0.1)TiO(3)/PVA with osteogenic and piezoelectric properties for bone regeneration. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 15 (1), 015007.

    Not in our library10.1088/1748-605x/ab5509

  682. 682.

    Ribeiro C.; Moreira S.; Correia V.; Sencadas V.; Rocha J. G.; Gama F. M.; Gómez Ribelles J. L.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Enhanced proliferation of pre-osteoblastic cells by dynamic piezoelectric stimulation. RSC Adv. 2012, 2 (30), 11504–11509..

    Not in our library10.1039/c2ra21841k

  683. 683.

    Bhaskar N.; Kachappilly M. C.; Bhushan V.; Pandya H. J.; Basu B. Electrical field stimulated modulation of cell fate of pre-osteoblasts on PVDF/BT/MWCNT based electroactive biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2023, 111 (3), 340–353..

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.37472

  684. 684.

    Bhaskar N.; Basu B. Osteogenesis, hemocompatibility, and foreign body response of polyvinylidene difluoride-based composite reinforced with carbonaceous filler and higher volume of piezoelectric ceramic phase. Biomaterials 2023, 297, 122100.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122100

  685. 685.

    Abazari M. F.; Soleimanifar F.; Amini Faskhodi M.; Mansour R. N.; Amini Mahabadi J.; Sadeghi S.; Hassannia H.; Saburi E.; Enderami S. E.; Khani M. M.; et al. Improved osteogenic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells cultured on polyvinylidene fluoride/collagen/platelet-rich plasma composite nanofibers. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020, 235 (2), 1155–1164..

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.29029

  686. 686.

    Bagherzadeh E.; Sherafat Z.; Zebarjad S. M.; Khodaei A.; Amin Yavari S. Stimuli-responsive piezoelectricity in electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL)/Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) fibrous scaffolds for bone regeneration. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 23, 379–390..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.007

  687. 687.

    Ribeiro C.; Correia D. M.; Rodrigues I.; Guardão L.; Guimarães S.; Soares R.; Lanceros-Méndez S. In vivo demonstration of the suitability of piezoelectric stimuli for bone reparation. Mater. Lett. 2017, 209, 118–121..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.099

  688. 688.

    Mehta M.; Schmidt-Bleek K.; Duda G. N.; Mooney D. J. Biomaterial delivery of morphogens to mimic the natural healing cascade in bone. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2012, 64 (12), 1257–1276..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2012.05.006

  689. 689.

    Ribeiro C.; Correia V.; Martins P.; Gama F. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Proving the suitability of magnetoelectric stimuli for tissue engineering applications. Colloids Surf. B 2016, 140, 430–436..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.055

  690. 690.

    Esmaeili E.; Soleimani M.; Ghiass M. A.; Hatamie S.; Vakilian S.; Zomorrod M. S.; Sadeghzadeh N.; Vossoughi M.; Hosseinzadeh S. Magnetoelectric nanocomposite scaffold for high yield differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to neural-like cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234 (8), 13617–13628..

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28040

  691. 691.

    Mirzaei A.; Moghadam A. S.; Abazari M. F.; Nejati F.; Torabinejad S.; Kaabi M.; Enderami S. E.; Ardeshirylajimi A.; Darvish M.; Soleimanifar F.; et al. Comparison of osteogenic differentiation potential of induced pluripotent stem cells on 2D and 3D polyvinylidene fluoride scaffolds. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234 (10), 17854–17862..

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.28415

  692. 692.

    Damaraju S. M.; Wu S.; Jaffe M.; Arinzeh T. L. Structural changes in PVDF fibers due to electrospinning and its effect on biological function. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 8 (4), 045007.

    Not in our library10.1088/1748-6041/8/4/045007

  693. 693.

    Martins P. M.; Ribeiro S.; Ribeiro C.; Sencadas V.; Gomes A. C.; Gama F. M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Effect of poling state and morphology of piezoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 2013, 3 (39), 17938–17944..

    Not in our library10.1039/c3ra43499k

  694. 694.

    Ribeiro S.; Ribeiro C.; Carvalho E. O.; Tubio C. R.; Castro N.; Pereira N.; Correia V.; Gomes A. C.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Magnetically Activated Electroactive Microenvironments for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Regeneration. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3 (7), 4239–4252..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsabm.0c00315

  695. 695.

    Arumugam R.; Srinadhu E. S.; Subramanian B.; Nallani S. beta-PVDF based electrospun nanofibers - A promising material for developing cardiac patches. Med. Hypotheses 2019, 122, 31–34..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mehy.2018.10.005

  696. 696.

    Arumugam R.; Chinnadurai R. K.; Subramaniam B. N.; Devaraj B.; Subramanium V.; Sekhar S. E.; Nallani S. Scalable novel PVDF based nanocomposite foam for direct blood contact and cardiac patch applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 88, 270–280..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.020

  697. 697.

    Park S. E.; Yeon G. B.; Goo H. G.; Seo D. S.; Dayem A. A.; Lee K. E.; Park H. M.; Cho S. G.; Kim D. S. Maintenance and differentiation of human ES cells on polyvinylidene fluoride scaffolds immobilized with a vitronectin-derived peptide. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236 (5), 3510–3520..

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.30095

  698. 698.

    Dorkhani E.; Noorafkan Y.; Salehi Z.; Ghiass M. A.; Tafti S. H. A.; Heirani-Tabasi A.; Tavafoghi M. Design and fabrication of polyvinylidene fluoride-graphene oxide/gelatine nanofibrous scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2023, 34 (9), 1195–1216..

    Not in our library10.1080/09205063.2022.2161779

  699. 699.

    Adadi N.; Yadid M.; Gal I.; Asulin M.; Feiner R.; Edri R.; Dvir T. Electrospun Fibrous PVDF-TrFe Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering, Differentiation, and Maturation. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 1900820.

    Not in our library10.1002/admt.201900820

  700. 700.

    Hitscherich P.; Wu S.; Gordan R.; Xie L.-H.; Arinzeh T.; Lee E. J. The effect of PVDF-TrFE scaffolds on stem cell derived cardiovascular cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113 (7), 1577–1585..

    Not in our library10.1002/bit.25918

  701. 701.

    Meira R. M.; Correia D. M.; García Díez A.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Ribeiro C. Ionic liquid-based electroactive materials: a novel approach for cardiac tissue engineering strategies. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10 (34), 6472–6482..

    Not in our library10.1039/d2tb01155g

  702. 702.

    Kitsara M.; Revet G.; Vartanian-Grimaldi J.-S.; Simon A.; Minguy M.; Miche A.; Humblot V.; Dufour T.; Agbulut O. Cyto- and bio-compatibility assessment of plasma-treated polyvinylidene fluoride scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1008436.

    Not in our library10.3389/fbioe.2022.1008436

  703. 703.

    Lee Y. S.; Collins G.; Livingston Arinzeh T. Neurite extension of primary neurons on electrospun piezoelectric scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7 (11), 3877–3886..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.013

  704. 704.

    Wu S.; Chen M.-S.; Maurel P.; Lee Y.-s.; Bunge M. B.; Arinzeh T. L. Aligned fibrous PVDF-TrFE scaffolds with Schwann cells support neurite extension and myelination in vitro. J. Neural Eng. 2018, 15 (5), 056010.

    Not in our library10.1088/1741-2552/aac77f

  705. 705.
  706. 706.

    Marques-Almeida T.; Fernandes H. J. R.; Lanceros-Mendez S.; Ribeiro C. Surface charge and dynamic mechanoelectrical stimuli improves adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of neuron-like cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 11 (1), 144–153..

    Not in our library10.1039/d2tb01933g

  707. 707.

    Motamedi A. S.; Mirzadeh H.; Hajiesmaeilbaigi F.; Bagheri-Khoulenjani S.; Shokrgozar M. A. Piezoelectric electrospun nanocomposite comprising Au NPs/PVDF for nerve tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2017, 105 (7), 1984–1993..

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.a.36050

  708. 708.

    Cheng Y.; Xu Y.; Qian Y.; Chen X.; Ouyang Y.; Yuan W.-E. 3D structured Self-Powered PVDF/PCL scaffolds for peripheral nerve regeneration. Nano Energy 2020, 69, 104411.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104411

  709. 709.

    Pi W.; Rao F.; Cao J.; Zhang M.; Chang T.; Han Y.; Zheng Y.; Liu S.; Li Q.; Sun X.; et al. Sono-electro-mechanical therapy for peripheral nerve regeneration through piezoelectric nanotracts. Nano Today 2023, 50, 101860.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101860

  710. 710.

    Zhang R.; Han S.; Liang L.; Chen Y.; Sun B.; Liang N.; Feng Z.; Zhou H.; Sun C.; Liu H. Ultrasonic-driven electrical signal-iron ion synergistic stimulation based on piezotronics induced neural differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on FeOOH/PVDF nanofibrous hybrid membrane. Nano Energy 2021, 87, 106192.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106192

  711. 711.

    Abzan N.; Kharaziha M.; Labbaf S. Development of three-dimensional piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride-graphene oxide scaffold by non-solvent induced phase separation method for nerve tissue engineering. Mater. Des. 2019, 167, 107636.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107636

  712. 712.

    Guo H. F.; Li Z. S.; Dong S. W.; Chen W. J.; Deng L.; Wang Y. F.; Ying D. J. Piezoelectric PU/PVDF electrospun scaffolds for wound healing applications. Colloids Surf. B 2012, 96, 29–36..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.03.014

  713. 713.

    Ardeshirylajimi A.; Ghaderian S. M.; Omrani M. D.; Moradi S. L. Biomimetic scaffold containing PVDF nanofibers with sustained TGF-beta release in combination with AT-MSCs for bladder tissue engineering. Gene 2018, 676, 195–201..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2018.07.046

  714. 714.

    Lynen Jansen P.; Klinge U.; Anurov M.; Titkova S.; Mertens P. R.; Jansen M. Surgical mesh as a scaffold for tissue regeneration in the esophagus. Eur. Surg. Res. 2004, 36, 104–111..

    Not in our library10.1159/000076650

  715. 715.

    Augustine R.; Dan P.; Sosnik A.; Kalarikkal N.; Tran N.; Vincent B.; Thomas S.; Menu P.; Rouxel D. Electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/zinc oxide nanocomposite tissue engineering scaffolds with enhanced cell adhesion and blood vessel formation. Nano Res. 2017, 10 (10), 3358–3376..

    Not in our library10.1007/s12274-017-1549-8

  716. 716.

    Kushida A.; Yamato M.; Kikuchi A.; Okano T. Two-dimensional manipulation of differentiated Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell sheets: The noninvasive harvest from temperature-responsive culture dishes and transfer to other surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001, 54 (1), 37–46..

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<37::aid-jbm5>3.0.co;2-7

  717. 717.

    Collins A. The Global Risks Report 2019; 978-1-944835-15-6; World Economic Forum, 2019.

    Not in our library

  718. 718.

    Tenover F. C. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria. Am. J. Med. 2006, 119 (6), S3–S10..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.011

  719. 719.

    Wei Z.; Teng S.; Fu Y.; Zhou Q.; Yang W. Micro/nano-structured electrospun membranes with superhydrophobic and photodynamic antibacterial performances. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 164, 106703.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106703

  720. 720.

    Geng Q.; Dong S.; Li Y.; Wu H.; Yang X.; Ning X.; Yuan D. High-Performance photoinduced antimicrobial membrane toward efficient PM2.5–0.3 capture and Oil-Water separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 284, 120267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120267

  721. 721.

    Riduan S. N.; Armugam A.; Zhang Y. Antibiotic resistance mitigation: the development of alternative general strategies. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8 (30), 6317–6321..

    Not in our library10.1039/d0tb01241f

  722. 722.

    Ribeiro C.; Correia D. M.; Ribeiro S.; Fernandes M. M.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Piezo- and Magnetoelectric Polymers as Biomaterials for Novel Tissue Engineering Strategies. MRS Adv. 2018, 3 (30), 1671–1676..

    Not in our library10.1557/adv.2018.223

  723. 723.

    Brito-Pereira R.; Correia D. M.; Ribeiro C.; Francesko A.; Etxebarria I.; Pérez-Álvarez L.; Vilas J. L.; Martins P.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Silk fibroin-magnetic hybrid composite electrospun fibers for tissue engineering applications. Composites Part B 2018, 141, 70–75..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.046

  724. 724.

    Fernandes M. M.; Correia D. M.; da Costa A.; Ribeiro S.; Casal M.; Lanceros-Méndez S.; Machado R. Multifunctional magnetically responsive biocomposites based on genetically engineered silk-elastin-like protein. Composites Part B 2018, 153, 413–419..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.019

  725. 725.

    Reizabal A.; Brito-Pereira R.; Fernandes M. M.; Castro N.; Correia V.; Ribeiro C.; Costa C. M.; Perez L.; Vilas J. L.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Silk fibroin magnetoactive nanocomposite films and membranes for dynamic bone tissue engineering strategies. Materialia 2020, 12, 100709.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100709

  726. 726.

    H. Cartmell S.; Dobson J. The Use of Magnetic Particles in Tissue Engineering. In Nanotechnologies for the Life Sciences; Kumar C., Ed.; Vol. 4; Wiley, 2011; pp 293–308.

    Not in our library

  727. 727.

    Bidan C. M.; Fratzl M.; Coullomb A.; Moreau P.; Lombard A. H.; Wang I.; Balland M.; Boudou T.; Dempsey N. M.; Devillers T.; et al. Magneto-active substrates for local mechanical stimulation of living cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1464.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-19804-1

  728. 728.

    Pérez R. A.; Won J.-E.; Knowles J. C.; Kim H.-W. Naturally and synthetic smart composite biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2013, 65 (4), 471–496..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.009

  729. 729.
  730. 730.

    Qazi T. H.; Rai R.; Boccaccini A. R. Tissue engineering of electrically responsive tissues using polyaniline based polymers: A review. Biomaterials 2014, 35 (33), 9068–9086..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.020

  731. 731.

    Persat A.; Nadell C. D.; Kim M. K.; Ingremeau F.; Siryaporn A.; Drescher K.; Wingreen N. S.; Bassler B. L.; Gitai Z.; Stone H. A. The Mechanical World of Bacteria. Cell 2015, 161 (5), 988–997..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.005

  732. 732.

    Rusconi R.; Garren M.; Stocker R. Microfluidics Expanding the Frontiers of Microbial Ecology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2014, 43 (1), 65–91..

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-022916

  733. 733.

    Persat A. Bacterial mechanotransduction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 36, 1–6..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mib.2016.12.002

  734. 734.

    Hoffman B. D.; Grashoff C.; Schwartz M. A. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature 2011, 475 (7356), 316–323..

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10316

  735. 735.

    Biais N.; Higashi D. L.; Brujic J.; So M.; Sheetz M. P. Force-dependent polymorphism in type IV pili reveals hidden epitopes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107 (25), 11358–11363..

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0911328107

  736. 736.

    Howie H. L.; Glogauer M.; So M. The N. gonorrhoeae Type IV Pilus Stimulates Mechanosensitive Pathways and Cytoprotection through a pilT-Dependent Mechanism. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3 (4), e100.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pbio.0030100

  737. 737.

    Persat A.; Inclan Y. F.; Engel J. N.; Stone H. A.; Gitai Z. Type IV pili mechanochemically regulate virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015, 112 (24), 7563–7568..

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1502025112

  738. 738.

    Bruni G. N.; Weekley R. A.; Dodd B. J. T.; Kralj J. M. Voltage-gated calcium flux mediates Escherichia coli mechanosensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114 (35), 9445–9450..

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1703084114

  739. 739.

    Gall I.; Herzberg M.; Oren Y. The effect of electric fields on bacterial attachment to conductive surfaces. Soft Matter 2013, 9 (8), 2443–2452..

    Not in our library10.1039/c2sm27270a

  740. 740.

    Poortinga A. T.; Smit J.; van der Mei H. C.; Busscher H. J. Electric field induced desorption of bacteria from a conditioning film covered substratum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 76 (4), 395–399..

    Not in our library10.1002/bit.10129

  741. 741.

    Istanbullu O.; Babauta J.; Duc Nguyen H.; Beyenal H. Electrochemical biofilm control: mechanism of action. Biofouling 2012, 28 (8), 769–778..

    Not in our library10.1080/08927014.2012.707651

  742. 742.

    van der Borden A. J.; van der Mei H. C.; Busscher H. J. Electric block current induced detachment from surgical stainless steel and decreased viability of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biomaterials 2005, 26 (33), 6731–6735..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.052

  743. 743.

    Hong S. H.; Jeong J.; Shim S.; Kang H.; Kwon S.; Ahn K. H.; Yoon J. Effect of electric currents on bacterial detachment and inactivation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100 (2), 379–386..

    Not in our library10.1002/bit.21760

  744. 744.

    Valič B.; Pavlin M.; Miklavčič D. The effect of resting transmembrane voltage on cell electropermeabilization: a numerical analysis. Bioelectrochemistry 2004, 63 (1), 311–315..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.12.006

  745. 745.

    Valič B.; Golzio M.; Pavlin M.; Schatz A.; Faurie C.; Gabriel B.; Teissié J.; Rols M.-P.; Miklavčič D. Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment. Eur. Biophys. J. 2003, 32 (6), 519–528..

    Not in our library10.1007/s00249-003-0296-9

  746. 746.

    Boda S. K.; Basu B. Engineered biomaterial and biophysical stimulation as combinatorial strategies to address prosthetic infection by pathogenic bacteria. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2017, 105 (7), 2174–2190..

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.b.33740

  747. 747.

    Hasan J.; Chatterjee K. Recent advances in engineering topography mediated antibacterial surfaces. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (38), 15568–15575..

    Not in our library10.1039/c5nr04156b

  748. 748.

    Tan G.; Wang S.; Zhu Y.; Zhou L.; Yu P.; Wang X.; He T.; Chen J.; Mao C.; Ning C. Surface-Selective Preferential Production of Reactive Oxygen Species on Piezoelectric Ceramics for Bacterial Killing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (37), 24306–24309..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.6b07440

  749. 749.

    Carvalho E. O.; Fernandes M. M.; Padrao J.; Nicolau A.; Marques-Marchan J.; Asenjo A.; Gama F. M.; Ribeiro C.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Tailoring Bacteria Response by Piezoelectric Stimulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (30), 27297–27305..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.9b05013

  750. 750.

    Dobson J. Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 139.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2008.39

  751. 751.

    Guduru R.; Khizroev S. Magnetic Field-Controlled Release of Paclitaxel Drug from Functionalized Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles. Part. Part. Syst. Char. 2014, 31 (5), 605–611..

    Not in our library10.1002/ppsc.201300238

  752. 752.

    Wang Z.; Tang Y.; Wang T.; Liang K. Nano CuAl2O4 spinel mineral as a novel antibacterial agent for PVDF membrane modification with minimized copper leachability. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 368, 421–428..

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.081

  753. 753.

    He R.; Li J.; Chen M.; Zhang S.; Cheng Y.; Ning X.; Wang N. Tailoring moisture electroactive Ag/Zn@cotton coupled with electrospun PVDF/PS nanofibers for antimicrobial face masks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 428, 128239.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128239

  754. 754.

    Lin Q.; Wu L.; Hu W.; Wan X.; Wu Z.; Zhang C. Antifouling and antimicrobial modification of polyvinylidene fluoride micropore membrane by plant tannic acid and polyhexamethylene guanidine. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 29, 101708.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101708

  755. 755.

    Dongmei L.; Wenjie L.; Shubin L.; Zhiqiang Z.; Junyu L.; Tianyue Z.; Xiaoyong L.; Yi H.; Haiqiang C.; Zhicheng L. The synthesis of an amended membrane coated with graphene oxide and dopamine and guanidyl-based modifier and its antifouling properties. Water Sci. Technol. 2022, 85 (5), 1470–1483..

    Not in our library10.2166/wst.2022.044

  756. 756.

    Wang A.; Shao M.; Yang F.; Shao C.; Chen C. Preparation and properties of antibacterial PVDF composite thin films. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 160, 110803.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110803

  757. 757.

    Han D. J.; Kim S.; Heo H. J.; Jin C.; Kim J.-y.; Choi H.; Park I. J.; Kang H. S.; Lee S. G.; Lee J.-C.; et al. Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based film with strong antimicrobial activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 562, 150181.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150181

  758. 758.

    Baji A.; Truong V. K.; Gangadoo S.; Yin H.; Chapman J.; Abtahi M.; Oopath S. V. Durable Antibacterial and Antifungal Hierarchical Silver-Embedded Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) Fabricated Using Electrospinning. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3 (8), 4256–4263..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsapm.1c00705

  759. 759.

    Ahmed M. K.; El-Naggar M. E.; Mahmoud K. H.; Abdel-Rahim F. M.; Menazea A. A. Electrospun membranes of cellulose acetate/polyvinylidene difluoride containing Au/Se nanoparticles via laser ablation technique for methylene blue degradation. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 324.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10965-021-02680-1

  760. 760.

    Jang S.; Jung S.; Song S.; Lee S.; Lee H.; Cho E.; Lee H. J.; Park S.; Youn B.; Park K. H. Preparation and characterization of multifunctional nanofibers containing metal-organic frameworks and Cu2O nanoparticles: Particulate matter capture and antibacterial activity. Environ. Sci.: Nano 2021, 8 (5), 1226–1235..

    Not in our library10.1039/d1en00032b

  761. 761.

    Gontarek-Castro E.; Rybarczyk M. K.; Castro-Muñoz R.; Morales-Jiménez M.; Barragán-Huerta B.; Lieder M. Characterization of PVDF/Graphene Nanocomposite Membranes for Water Desalination with Enhanced Antifungal Activity. Water 2021, 13 (9), 1279.

    Not in our library10.3390/w13091279

  762. 762.

    Ni L.; Zhu Y.; Ma J.; Wang Y. Novel strategy for membrane biofouling control in MBR with CdS/MIL-101 modified PVDF membrane by in situ visible light irradiation. Water research 2021, 188, 116554.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.watres.2020.116554

  763. 763.

    Nunes-Pereira J.; Costa P.; Fernandes L.; Carvalho E. O.; Fernandes M. M.; Carabineiro S. A. C.; Buijnsters J. G.; Tubio C. R.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Properties of Fluorinated Polymers with Embedded Functionalized Nanodiamonds. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2 (11), 5014–5024..

    Not in our library10.1021/acsapm.0c00869

  764. 764.

    Yang F.; Ding G.; Wang J.; Liang Z.; Gao B.; Dou M.; Xu C.; Li S. Self-cleaning, antimicrobial, and antifouling membrane via integrating mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride into polyvinylidene fluoride. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 606, 118146.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118146

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.