No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

How do income changes impact on mental health and wellbeing for working-age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rachel M Thomson, Erik Igelström, Amrit Kaur Purba and 7 more

The Lancet Public Health · 2022 · Meta-analysis · CC BY

Abstract

Background. Lower incomes are associated with poorer mental health and wellbeing, but the extent to which income has a causal effect is debated. We aimed to synthesise evidence from studies measuring the impact of changes in individual and household income on mental health and wellbeing outcomes in working-age adults (aged 16–64 years).

Methods. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ASSIA, EconLit, and RePEc on Feb 5, 2020, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quantitative non-randomised studies. We had no date limits for our search. We included English-language studies measuring effects of individual or household income change on any mental health or wellbeing outcome. We used Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tools. We conducted three-level random-effects meta-analyses, and explored heterogeneity using meta-regression and stratified analyses. Synthesis without meta-analysis was based on effect direction. Critical RoB studies were excluded from primary analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020168379.

Findings. Of 16 521 citations screened, 136 were narratively synthesised (12·5% RCTs) and 86 meta-analysed. RoB was high: 30·1% were rated critical and 47·1% serious or high. A binary income increase lifting individuals out of poverty was associated with 0·13 SD improvement in mental health measures (95% CI 0·07 to 0·20; n=42 128; 18 studies), considerably larger than other income increases (0·01 SD improvement, 0·002 to 0·019; n=216 509, 14 studies). For wellbeing, increases out of poverty were associated with 0·38 SD improvement (0·09 to 0·66; n=101 350, 8 studies) versus 0·16 for other income increases (0·07 to 0·25; n=62 619, 11 studies). Income decreases from any source were associated with 0·21 SD worsening of mental health measures (–0·30 to –0·13; n=227 804, 11 studies). Effect sizes were larger in low-income and middle-income settings and in higher RoB studies. Heterogeneity was high (I2=79-87%). GRADE certainty was low or very low.

Interpretation. Income changes probably impact mental health, particularly where they move individuals out of poverty, although effect sizes are modest and certainty low. Effects are larger for wellbeing outcomes, and potentially for income losses. To best support population mental health, welfare policies need to reach the most socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Funding. Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Chief Scientist Office, and European Research Council.

References 179

1.
Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:171-78.
Not in our library10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00505-2
2.
Sick on the Job? Myths and realities about mental health and work. 2012.
Not in our library
3.
Cohen BE, Edmondson D, Kronish IM. State of the art review: depression, stress, anxiety, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28:1295-302.
Not in our library10.1093/ajh/hpv047
4.
Thornicroft G. Premature death among people with mental illness. BMJ. 2013;346:969.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.f2969
5.
Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365:1099-104.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71146-6
6.
Subramanian SV, Belli P, Kawachi I. The macroeconomic determinants of health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:287-302.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140540
7.
Kiely KM, Leach LS, Olesen SC, Butterworth P. How financial hardship is associated with the onset of mental health problems over time. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50:909-18.
Not in our library10.1007/s00127-015-1027-0
8.
Marmot M, Wilkinson RG. Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: a response to Lynch. BMJ. 2001;322:1233-36.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1233
9.
Piketty T. Capital and ideology. 2020.
Not in our library
10.
Hills J. Good times, bad times: the welfare myth of them and us, revised edn. 2017.
Not in our library
11.
Reiss F. Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2013;90:24-31.
Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.026
12.
Mackenbach JP. Re-thinking health inequalities. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30:615.
Not in our library10.1093/eurpub/ckaa001
13.
Benzeval M, Bond L, Campbell M, et al. How does money influence health? 2014.
Not in our library
14.
Gunasekara FI, Carter K, Blakely T. Change in income and change in self-rated health: systematic review of studies using repeated measures to control for confounding bias. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:193-201.
Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.029
15.
Owusu-Addo E, Renzaho AMN, Smith BJ. The impact of cash transfers on social determinants of health and health inequalities in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:675-96.
Not in our library10.1093/heapol/czy020
16.
Lucas PJ, McIntosh K, Petticrew M, Roberts H, Shiell A. Financial benefits for child health and well-being in low income or socially disadvantaged families in developed world countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD006358.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd006358.pub2
17.
Pega F, Liu SY, Walter S, Pabayo R, Saith R, Lhachimi SK. Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11:CD011135.
Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd011135.pub2
18.
Cesarini D, Lindqvist E, Ostling R, Wallace B. Wealth, health, and child development: evidence from administrative data on Swedish lottery players. Q J Econ. 2016;131:687-738.
Not in our library
19.
Lindqvist E, Ostling R, Cesarini D. Long-run effects of lottery wealth on psychological well-being. 2018.
Not in our library
20.
Thomson RM, Niedzwiedz CL, Katikireddi SV. Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat crosssectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e022924.
Not in our library10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924
21.
Beckfield J, Krieger N. Epi + demos + cracy: linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities-evidence, gaps, and a research agenda. Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:152-77.
Not in our library10.1093/epirev/mxp002
22.
McCartney G, Hearty W, Arnot J, Popham F, Cumbers A, McMaster R. Impact of political economy on population health: a systematic review of reviews. Am J Public Health. 2019;109:e1-12.
Not in our library10.2105/ajph.2019.305001
23.
Cooper K, Stewart K. Does money in adulthood affect adult outcomes. 2015.
Not in our library
24.
McGuire J, Kaiser C, Bach-Mortensen AM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of cash transfers on subjective wellbeing and mental health in low-and middle-income countries. Nat Hum Behav. 2022;6:359-70.
Not in our library10.1038/s41562-021-01252-z
25.
Ridley M, Rao G, Schilbach F, Patel V. Poverty, depression, and anxiety: causal evidence and mechanisms. Science. 2020;370:eaay0214.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aay0214
26.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement · 2015
No notice
27.
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline · 2020
No notice
28.
Thomson RM, Shimonovich M, Igelström E, et al. How do changes in individual or household income impact on mental health for working-age adults? A protocol for a systematic review and metaanalysis. 2020.
Not in our library
29.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.l4898
30.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.i4919
31.
The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods · 2020
No notice
32.
McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 6.2). 2021.
Not in our library
33.
Van den Noortgate W, López-López JA, Marín-Martínez F, Sánchez-Meca J. Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behav Res Methods. 2013;45:576-94.
Not in our library10.3758/s13428-012-0261-6
34.
Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis · 2015
No notice
35.
Mackenbach JP, Martikainen P, Looman CW, Dalstra JA, Kunst AE, Lahelma E. The shape of the relationship between income and selfassessed health: an international study. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:286-93.
Not in our library10.1093/ije/dyh338
36.
Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 6.2). 2021.
Not in our library
37.
Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019;22:153-60.
Not in our library10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
38.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-26.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad
39.
Abbott S, Hobby L. Welfare benefits advice in primary care: evidence of improvements in health. Public Health. 2000;114:324-27.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.ph.1900680
40.
Abbott S, Hobby L, Cotter S. What is the impact on individual health of services in general practice settings which offer welfare benefits advice? Health Soc Care Community. 2006;14:1-8.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00582.x

All 179 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.