Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts

Amanda E Paluch, Shivangi Bajpai, David R Bassett and 42 more

The Lancet Public Health · 2022 · Meta-analysis · CC BY-NC-ND

doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00302-9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although 10 000 steps per day is widely promoted to have health benefits, there is little evidence to support this recommendation. We aimed to determine the association between number of steps per day and stepping rate with all-cause mortality. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we identified studies investigating the effect of daily step count on all-cause mortality in adults (aged ≥18 years), via a previously published systematic review and expert knowledge of the field. We asked participating study investigators to process their participant-level data following a standardised protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality collected from death certificates and country registries. We analysed the dose-response association of steps per day and stepping rate with all-cause mortality. We did Cox proportional hazards regression analyses using study-specific quartiles of steps per day and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) with inverse-variance weighted random effects models. FINDINGS: We identified 15 studies, of which seven were published and eight were unpublished, with study start dates between 1999 and 2018. The total sample included 47 471 adults, among whom there were 3013 deaths (10·1 per 1000 participant-years) over a median follow-up of 7·1 years ([IQR 4·3-9·9]; total sum of follow-up across studies was 297 837 person-years). Quartile median steps per day were 3553 for quartile 1, 5801 for quartile 2, 7842 for quartile 3, and 10 901 for quartile 4. Compared with the lowest quartile, the adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was 0·60 (95% CI 0·51-0·71) for quartile 2, 0·55 (0·49-0·62) for quartile 3, and 0·47 (0·39-0·57) for quartile 4. Restricted cubic splines showed progressively decreasing risk of mortality among adults aged 60 years and older with increasing number of steps per day until 6000-8000 steps per day and among adults younger than 60 years until 8000-10 000 steps per day. Adjusting for number of steps per day, comparing quartile 1 with quartile 4, the association between higher stepping rates and mortality was attenuated but remained significant for a peak of 30 min (HR 0·67 [95% CI 0·56-0·83]) and a peak of 60 min (0·67 [0·50-0·90]), but not significant for time (min per day) spent walking at 40 steps per min or faster (1·12 [0·96-1·32]) and 100 steps per min or faster (0·86 [0·58-1·28]). INTERPRETATION: Taking more steps per day was associated with a progressively lower risk of all-cause mortality, up to a level that varied by age. The findings from this meta-analysis can be used to inform step guidelines for public health promotion of physical activity. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 46

  1. 1.

    2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2018.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Fortune Business Insights. The global fitness tracker market is projected to grow from $36.34 billion in 2020 to $114.36 billion in 2028 at a CAGR of 15.4% in forecast period 2021–2028. May, 2021. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/fitness-tracker-market-103358 (accessed July 8, 2021).

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Pew Research Center Mobile fact sheet. April 7, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/(accessed July 8, 2021).

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Kamada M, Bassett DR, Matthews CE, Buring JE. Association of step volume and intensity with all-cause mortality in older women. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179: 1105–12.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0899

  6. 6.

    Saint-Maurice PF, Troiano RP, Bassett DR Jr, Association of daily step count and step intensity with mortality among US adults. JAMA 2020; 323: 1151–60.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.1382

  7. 7.

    Sisson SB, Camhi SM, Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. Characteristics of step-defined physical activity categories in U.S. adults. Am J Health Promot 2012; 26: 152–59.

    Not in our library10.4278/ajhp.100326-quan-95

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Jayedi A, Gohari A, Shab-Bidar S. Daily step count and all-cause mortality: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Sports Med 2021; published online Aug 21..

    Not in our library10.1007/s40279-021-01536-4

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2012. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed June 11, 2021).

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Tudor-Locke C, Han H, Aguiar EJ, How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 776–88.

    Not in our library10.1136/bjsports-2017-097628

  13. 13.

    Michel J-P, Leonardi M, Martin M, Prina M. WHO’s report for the decade of healthy ageing 2021–30 sets the stage for globally comparable data on healthy ageing. Lancet Healthy Longev 2021; 2: e121–22.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00002-7

  14. 14.

    Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65 (suppl): 1220S–28S.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1220s

  15. 15.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557–60.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

  16. 16.

    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629–34.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

  17. 17.

    Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 366: l4570.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.l4570

  18. 18.

    Crippa A, Discacciati A, Bottai M, Spiegelman D, Orsini N. One-stage dose-response meta-analysis for aggregated data. Stat Methods Med Res 2019; 28: 1579–96.

    Not in our library10.1177/0962280218773122

  19. 19.

    Kuo PL, Schrack JA, Shardell MD, A roadmap to build a phenotypic metric of ageing: insights from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Intern Med 2020; 287: 373–94.

    Not in our library10.1111/joim.13024

  20. 20.

    Toth LP, Park S, Springer CM, Feyerabend MD, Steeves JA, Bassett DR. Video-recorded validation of wearable step counters under free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2018; 50: 1315–22.

    Not in our library10.1249/mss.0000000000001569

  21. 21.

    Tarp J, Hansen BH, Fagerland MW, Steene-Johannessen J, Anderssen SA, Ekelund U. Accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time in a cohort of US adults followed for up to 13 years: the influence of removing early follow-up on associations with mortality. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17: 39.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12966-020-00945-4

  22. 22.

    Fox KR, Ku PW, Hillsdon M, Objectively assessed physical activity and lower limb function and prospective associations with mortality and newly diagnosed disease in UK older adults: an OPAL four-year follow-up study. Age Ageing 2015; 44: 261–68.

    Not in our library10.1093/ageing/afu168

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Yamamoto N, Miyazaki H, Shimada M, Daily step count and all-cause mortality in a sample of Japanese elderly people: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 2018; 18: 540.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12889-018-5434-5

  25. 25.

    Hansen BH, Dalene KE, Ekelund U, Step by step: association of device-measured daily steps with all-cause mortality-a prospective cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 1705–11.

    Not in our library10.1111/sms.13726

  26. 26.

    Dwyer T, Pezic A, Sun C, Objectively measured daily steps and subsequent long term all-cause mortality: the Tasped prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0141274.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0141274

  27. 27.

    Pettee Gabriel K, Griswold ME, Wang W, Physical activity trajectories and subsequent fall risk: ARIC Study. Prev Med 2019; 121: 40–46.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.007

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Kraus WE, Yates T, Tuomilehto J, Relationship between baseline physical activity assessed by pedometer count and new-onset diabetes in the NAVIGATOR trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2018; 6: e000523.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000523

  30. 30.

    Newton RL Jr, Han H, Johnson WD, Steps/day and metabolic syndrome in African American adults: the Jackson Heart Study. Prev Med 2013; 57: 855–59.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.09.018

  31. 31.

    Spartano NL, Davis-Plourde KL, Himali JJ, Association of accelerometer-measured light-intensity physical activity with brain volume: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e192745.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2745

  32. 32.

    Klenk J, Dallmeier D, Denkinger MD, Rapp K, Koenig W, Rothenbacher D. Objectively measured walking duration and sedentary behaviour and four-year mortality in older people. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0153779.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0153779

  33. 33.

    Patel AV, Jacobs EJ, Dudas DM, The American Cancer Society’s Cancer Prevention Study 3 (CPS-3): recruitment, study design, and baseline characteristics. Cancer 2017; 123: 2014–24.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.30561

  34. 34.

    DeFina LF, Radford NB, Barlow CE, Association of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality with high levels of physical activity and concurrent coronary artery calcification. JAMA Cardiol 2019; 4: 174–81.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4628

  35. 35.

    Buddhadev HH, Smiley AL, Martin PE. Effects of age, speed, and step length on lower extremity net joint moments and powers during walking. Hum Mov Sci 2020; 71: 102611.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.humov.2020.102611

  36. 36.

    van der Vorst A, Zijlstra GA, Witte N, Limitations in activities of daily living in community-dwelling people aged 75 and over: a systematic literature review of risk and protective factors. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0165127.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0165127

  37. 37.

    Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 1510–30.

    Not in our library10.1249/mss.0b013e3181a0c95c

  38. 38.

    Blair SN, Kohl HW 3rd, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 1989; 262: 2395–401.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.262.17.2395

  39. 39.

    Tudor-Locke C, Ducharme SW, Aguiar EJ, Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 41 to 60-year-old adults: the CADENCE-adults study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17: 137.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12966-020-01045-z

  40. 40.

    Keadle SK, Shiroma EJ, Kamada M, Matthews CE, Harris TB, Lee IM. Reproducibility of accelerometer-assessed physical activity and sedentary time. Am J Prev Med 2017; 52: 541–48.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.010

All 46 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.