What is sexual wellbeing and why does it matter for public health?

1The widely-adopted definition of sexual health developed by WHO is expansive. It includes concepts such as the absence of disease and coercion, and draws attention to sexual rights and to the possibility of sexual pleasure. Yet, wellbeing is mentioned as an adjunctive element of sexual health; the unique elements of wellbeing— distinct from sexual health—are not identified.

2The WHO definition of sexual health reduces stigma by helping researchers, educators, clinicians, and policy makers acknowledge positive sexuality and sexual experiences as key public health outcomes. However, public health approaches to sexuality remain rooted firmly in the medical and biological sectors, with their focus largely on adverse health outcomes and concomitant risks. This risk-focused approach has come to be viewed as the standard for public health, eclipsing other aspects of sexuality, even though health is seldom—if ever—the primary reason for engaging sex. Such a public health vision overlooks a contemporary body of evidence from scientific research supporting perspectives far broader than those associated with sexual health. In practice, perspectives on what constitutes normal sexuality are understood through a public health lens. In research, confusion and inconsistency across different studies, often in reference to the same issues, make it difficult to advance the science in this area. Most importantly, the conflation of sexual wellbeing and sexual health obscures the diversity of experiences—not clearly addressed in definitions of sexual health—that people identify as relevant to their broader wellbeing. This truncated perspective ultimately limits our ability to understand and address everyday sexual issues.

3The absence of a sharp distinction between sexual wellbeing and sexual health has created ambiguity in policy rhetoric, and hindered conceptualisation of sexual wellbeing as a valid outcome of public health interventions. For more than a decade, advocates and thought leaders have acknowledged the need to expand the scope of inquiry and intervention in public health from a singular focus on sexual health to attention on sexual wellbeing as a distinct concept. The call to make this shift partly emerged from a WHO–UN Population Fund meeting in 2007. At that time there was considerable difficulty agreeing on the meaning of sexual wellbeing. Since then, efforts to adopt sexual wellbeing as part of a comprehensive, holistic, and progressive goal for public health have stalled indefinitely, awaiting additional justification, articulation, and operationalisation.

4This Viewpoint constitutes a long overdue effort to effectively resolve this impasse. We build on increasing awareness of the limits and constraints of a sole focus on sexual health, and an emerging body of research on the relevance of sexuality to wellbeing. This emerging interest mirrors the greater attention given to population wellbeing of late. A more nuanced, multi-dimensional framework is required.

5Our conceptualisation of sexual wellbeing resonates with the biopsychosocial–cultural framework based in people’s perspectives on sexual wellbeing in mid and later life. This perspective locates sexual wellbeing firmly in relation to sexual health, and in relation to two other pillars of public health focused inquiry—sexual pleasure and sexual justice—each needed to address structural determinants of sexual inequities (figure). Here, we describe the interconnections of these four pillars and the conceptual overlap with sexual wellbeing.

6A guiding premise of our argument is that the concept of sexual wellbeing demands recognition, not as an extension, subclass, or alternate form of sexual health, but as a distinct and revolutionary concept that challenges our accepted thinking, and has far-reaching global applications in public health that have been neglected to date. However, our interest in expanding recognition of the public health relevance of sexual wellbeing does not undermine the importance of sexual health, sexual pleasure, and sexual rights. Rather, we believe sexual wellbeing brings conceptual clarity to our shared understanding of sexual health, identifies areas of conceptual difference, and clarifies a much broader public health perspective on sexuality beyond sexual health alone.

7Our model follows key issues identified in the WHO definition of sexual health: fertility regulation, prevention and management of sexually transmitted infections (STIs; including HIV), sexual violence prevention, and sexual functions (including sexual desire and arousal). The relevance of these issues to global public health were underlined by the 2018 Guttmacher–Lancet Commission on sexual and reproductive health and rights focusing on the role of the Sustainable Development Goals in promoting specific areas of sexual health. The WHO Working Group to Operationalize Sexual Health explicitly linked these aspects of sexual health to “physical, emotional, mental, and social wellbeing in relation to sexuality”, centred within an interconnected framework of sexual health influences, including attention to human rights and positive approaches to sexuality.

8Sexual pleasure is related to both sexual health and sexual wellbeing but its distinct relevance to public health is increasingly recognised., A recent definition of sexual pleasure addresses the diverse physical and psychological satisfactions of sexual experience, and key enabling factors, such as self-determination, consent, safety, privacy, confidence, and the ability to communicate and negotiate sexual relations. Furthermore, this definition specifies that pleasure requires fundamental social and cultural conditions of sexual rights in terms of equality, non-discrimination, autonomy, bodily integrity, and freedom of expression. To improve the operationalisation of sexual pleasure, we propose the inclusion of two key elements (figure): events (eg, key features of a sexual occasion, such as the repertoire, timing, and spacing of different sexual practices, occurrence of orgasm, use of a condom or contraception) and people (eg, interactional elements of sexual pleasure, encompassing interpersonal dynamics, such as communication, negotiation, and trust). These elements illustrate the conceptual relationships of pleasure with sexual health and sexual wellbeing, and help to summarise the diverse factors associated with sexual pleasure without privileging pleasure as the cornerstone of wellbeing.,

9Sexual justice represents larger global efforts to ensure social, cultural, and legal supports for equitable, person-centred sexual and reproductive experiences. Public health plays an instrumental role in documentation and mitigation of adverse outcomes associated with disparities in human rights. Public health also contributes to the promotion of equal access to distributive and restorative justice, helping combat historical restrictions of sexual citizenship on the basis of ethnicity, sex, and sexual and gender identity., Among many specific examples, public health has played a central role in addressing violence and discrimination linked to sexuality among people living with HIV. With regard to the pillar of sexual justice, we propose trauma-informed, sex positive public health practices as a specific tool for enacting social justice. This practice implies restorative approaches that acknowledge and address adverse sexual experiences, trauma that resonates through the life course, and the effects on sexual wellbeing., Sex positivity is central to a public health relevant concept of sexual wellbeing. Trauma-informed, sex positive practices refer to perspectives and approaches that emphasise contributions of sexuality and sexual expression to overall wellbeing.

10We believe it is now imperative for the field of public health to adopt and integrate sexual wellbeing in efforts to address pervasive inequities related to sexuality and sexual behaviour, in particular, those driven by gender and sexual identity. Our framework allows distinct attention to the role of sexual wellbeing in overall wellbeing and better support for operationalisation, measurement, and potential public health intervention.

11Operationalisation and measurement of sexual wellbeing is challenged by diverse perspectives on its definition and meaning. Outside of professional spheres, people rarely refer to sexual wellbeing per se, although the concept is inferred in the idea of a sex life that is supposedly good or going well. Pharmacies sometimes sell products, such as vaginal tightening gel, nutritional supplements, and fertility aids, under the banner of sexual wellbeing. This commodification probably influences public understanding and focuses attention on a narrow set of assessment criteria to judge whether a sex life is going well. However, definitions of sexual wellbeing in academic literature attend to a broader range of aspects. Several measures have been developed, which inlclude unidimensional measures defined in terms of a global assessment of one’s sex life. Laumann and colleagues defined sexual wellbeing as “the cognitive and emotional evaluation of an individual’s sexuality”, and used four satisfaction judgments. Muise and colleagues used a similar definition, but extended the domains to include satisfaction with sexual relationships and functioning, sexual awareness, sexual self-esteem, and body image esteem. Syme and colleagues, in a study of sexuality in mid and later life, referred to sexual wellness with four dimensions: psychological (eg, cognitions, emotions, and concepts), social (eg, relationship and shared experience), biological and behavioural (eg, functioning, behaviours and scripted sexual activities), and cultural (eg, age or time in life, and gender and sexual orientation).

12In operationalising sexual wellbeing, we developed a model with seven core domains: sexual safety and security, sexual respect, sexual self-esteem, resilience in relation to past sexual experiences, forgiveness of past sexual events, self-determination in one’s sex life, and comfort with one’s sexuality (table). Domains were identified and refined through intensive engagement with wide-ranging literature, including a review of sexual wellbeing definitions and measures. In developing this new concept of sexual wellbeing, we specified five criteria: (1) the concept should be distinct from sexual health, sexual satisfaction, sexual pleasure, and sexual function; (2) the concept should be applicable to people regardless of whether they are sexually active; (3) the concept should apply to people irrespective of their partnership status (including those who are unpartnered); (4) the concept should be based in elements amenable to change through policy, public health action, clinical support, or personal growth; and (5) the concept should focus both on a person’s summation of experience and assessment of prospects for sexual wellbeing in the near future. For each of the seven domains, we provide a working definition and show its contribution to sexual wellbeing, provide examples of relevance to public health, and offer examples of how the domain might be operationalised (table).

13We anticipate some resistance to considering wellbeing as a valid goal of public health. Critics refer to the subjective and variable qualities of wellbeing, necessarily influenced by social and cultural contexts, and played out in individual attitudes and actions. Introduction of surveillance infrastructures and goals in diverse national and cultural settings will require persistence and careful data gathering. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic and the life-changing interruptions of migration have changed sexual priorities such that even delimiting appropriate sexual wellbeing timeframes is challenging., There might be resource constraints to monitoring that requires a multi-dimensional measure, and political resistance to giving prominence to sexual wellbeing alongside risk-focused outcomes. Acknowledging these issues, we set out four ways in which sexual wellbeing is highly relevant to core functions of contemporary public health.

14Within the field of public health, population wellbeing approaches seek to establish measurable and achievable goals toward equity. Sexual wellbeing is an appropriate marker of population wellbeing, given inequities related to sexuality and sexual expression. These inequities include systemic and pervasive racial, ethnic, or immigrationbased discrimination, gender-based violence, sexual identity-based violence, and STIs and HIV. A sexual wellbeing approach recognises the transgenerational traumas that mark the unique needs of marginalised people. This recognition then supports implementation of population health approaches that are anti-oppressive, intersectional, and culturally and contextually adapted.,

15As population wellbeing continues to be an aspirational goal of public health, sexual wellbeing emerges as an important component of overall wellbeing. A populationbased study has shown the positive contribution of a measure of sexual wellbeing in population surveys. Sexual wellbeing provides important insights into population wellbeing over the entire life course. Data on sexual wellbeing would add new dimensions to community engagement in health issues, address structural determinants of health at local levels, and link local and larger public health policy and practice related to sexual and reproductive health.

16Sexual wellbeing incorporates outcomes that are increasingly recognised as important to, but distinct from, biomedically focused sexual health intervention. In a review of English-language sexual health promotion interventions published from 2010–14, four of 33 interventions’ stated goals were related to sexual wellbeing; most interventions (n=28) either targeted sexual wellbeing in addition to biomedical sexual health, or addressed sexual health outcomes through a focus on sexual wellbeing. Tracking sexual wellbeing also shows key population trends in the importance of sex to broader wellbeing. For example, in four decades of French national surveys (1970s to 2006), the proportion of people reporting that sexual intercourse was considered essential to feeling good about oneself increased from 48% to 60% for women and from 55% to 69% for men.

17Positioning sexual wellbeing as a driver for cross-cutting public health innovation challenges the structural origins of sexual inequities and requires acknowledging that sexual wellbeing is experienced by people in relation to contexts and surroundings. This suggests that surveillance of sexual wellbeing, at individual and community levels, is required, and thus challenges the centrality of privacy in sexuality. Public health surveillance is well established in sexual health prevention and control (eg, for STIs). However, extension to sexual wellbeing refocuses such surveillance—and the capacity to offer intervention—into areas traditionally outside of public health function. We contend that such surveillance is necessary to focus resources on populations of greatest need, and to track those who enter or exit intervals of greater need. Such functions might require redefinition of relationships between communities and public health entities to create trust and full engagement while protecting privacy.

18We believe that the adoption and integration of sexual wellbeing as an essential concept in efforts to address sexual inequities is imperative for the field of public health. A broad and consistent body of research supports the relevance of sexual wellbeing as a distinct correlate of sexual health whose importance has been obscured by conflation of the two concepts. Our conceptualisation of sexual wellbeing relates to sexual health and pleasure (a primary motivation for sex), and to social, cultural, and political frameworks of sexual justice. By identifying trauma-informed sex positivity as a central guiding public health value, we anchor our approach to sexual wellbeing with a corresponding recognition of the notable significance of both sexuality and sexual trauma in our lives. Inclusion of sexual wellbeing as a public health goal is attainable but requires an additional data-driven vision and specified objectives. Our initial steps toward an approach, and ultimately conceptualisation, of sexual wellbeing builds on existing measures and intentionally focuses on dimensions and an organisational structure that might be addressed effectively by public health policy and intervention.

19The personal losses of illness and death, the threats to the health of families, the interpersonal effects of quarantine and physical distancing, and the pervasive economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic will almost certainly have enduring effects on sexual wellbeing that have yet to be fully described and appreciated. Significant public health resources will be needed, simply to meet the basic needs of many people. Our proposed shift in thinking about sexuality in public health will facilitate movement forward in the process of reorganising social structures to meet these effects, including attention to population wellbeing.