Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on May 18, 2024.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 15, 2026 · Read the notice

Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

Mohsen Naghavi, Kanyin Liane Ong, Amirali Aali and 97 more

The Lancet · 2024 · CC BY

doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00367-2

Abstract

Background. Regular, detailed reporting on population health by underlying cause of death is fundamental for public health decision making. Cause-specific estimates of mortality and the subsequent effects on life expectancy worldwide are valuable metrics to gauge progress in reducing mortality rates. These estimates are particularly important following large-scale mortality spikes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. When systematically analysed, mortality rates and life expectancy allow comparisons of the consequences of causes of death globally and over time, providing a nuanced understanding of the effect of these causes on global populations.

Methods. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2021 cause-of-death analysis estimated mortality and years of life lost (YLLs) from 288 causes of death by age-sex-location-year in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations for each year from 1990 until 2021. The analysis used 56 604 data sources, including data from vital registration and verbal autopsy as well as surveys, censuses, surveillance systems, and cancer registries, among others. As with previous GBD rounds, cause-specific death rates for most causes were estimated using the Cause of Death Ensemble model—a modelling tool developed for GBD to assess the out-of-sample predictive validity of different statistical models and covariate permutations and combine those results to produce cause-specific mortality estimates—with alternative strategies adapted to model causes with insufficient data, substantial changes in reporting over the study period, or unusual epidemiology. YLLs were computed as the product of the number of deaths for each cause-age-sex-location-year and the standard life expectancy at each age. As part of the modelling process, uncertainty intervals (UIs) were generated using the 2·5th and 97·5th percentiles from a 1000-draw distribution for each metric. We decomposed life expectancy by cause of death, location, and year to show cause-specific effects on life expectancy from 1990 to 2021. We also used the coefficient of variation and the fraction of population affected by 90% of deaths to highlight concentrations of mortality. Findings are reported in counts and age-standardised rates. Methodological improvements for cause-of-death estimates in GBD 2021 include the expansion of under-5-years age group to include four new age groups, enhanced methods to account for stochastic variation of sparse data, and the inclusion of COVID-19 and other pandemic-related mortality—which includes excess mortality associated with the pandemic, excluding COVID-19, lower respiratory infections, measles, malaria, and pertussis. For this analysis, 199 new country-years of vital registration cause-of-death data, 5 country-years of surveillance data, 21 country-years of verbal autopsy data, and 94 country-years of other data types were added to those used in previous GBD rounds.

Findings. The leading causes of age-standardised deaths globally were the same in 2019 as they were in 1990; in descending order, these were, ischaemic heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lower respiratory infections. In 2021, however, COVID-19 replaced stroke as the second-leading age-standardised cause of death, with 94·0 deaths (95% UI 89·2–100·0) per 100 000 population. The COVID-19 pandemic shifted the rankings of the leading five causes, lowering stroke to the third-leading and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to the fourth-leading position. In 2021, the highest age-standardised death rates from COVID-19 occurred in sub-Saharan Africa (271·0 deaths [250·1–290·7] per 100 000 population) and Latin America and the Caribbean (195·4 deaths [182·1–211·4] per 100 000 population). The lowest age-standardised death rates from COVID-19 were in the high-income super-region (48·1 deaths [47·4–48·8] per 100 000 population) and southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania (23·2 deaths [16·3–37·2] per 100 000 population). Globally, life expectancy steadily improved between 1990 and 2019 for 18 of the 22 investigated causes. Decomposition of global and regional life expectancy showed the positive effect that reductions in deaths from enteric infections, lower respiratory infections, stroke, and neonatal deaths, among others have contributed to improved survival over the study period. However, a net reduction of 1·6 years occurred in global life expectancy between 2019 and 2021, primarily due to increased death rates from COVID-19 and other pandemic-related mortality. Life expectancy was highly variable between super-regions over the study period, with southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania gaining 8·3 years (6·7–9·9) overall, while having the smallest reduction in life expectancy due to COVID-19 (0·4 years). The largest reduction in life expectancy due to COVID-19 occurred in Latin America and the Caribbean (3·6 years). Additionally, 53 of the 288 causes of death were highly concentrated in locations with less than 50% of the global population as of 2021, and these causes of death became progressively more concentrated since 1990, when only 44 causes showed this pattern. The concentration phenomenon is discussed heuristically with respect to enteric and lower respiratory infections, malaria, HIV/AIDS, neonatal disorders, tuberculosis, and measles.

Interpretation. Long-standing gains in life expectancy and reductions in many of the leading causes of death have been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the adverse effects of which were spread unevenly among populations. Despite the pandemic, there has been continued progress in combatting several notable causes of death, leading to improved global life expectancy over the study period. Each of the seven GBD super-regions showed an overall improvement from 1990 and 2021, obscuring the negative effect in the years of the pandemic. Additionally, our findings regarding regional variation in causes of death driving increases in life expectancy hold clear policy utility. Analyses of shifting mortality trends reveal that several causes, once widespread globally, are now increasingly concentrated geographically. These changes in mortality concentration, alongside further investigation of changing risks, interventions, and relevant policy, present an important opportunity to deepen our understanding of mortality-reduction strategies. Examining patterns in mortality concentration might reveal areas where successful public health interventions have been implemented. Translating these successes to locations where certain causes of death remain entrenched can inform policies that work to improve life expectancy for people everywhere.

Funding. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

For more than three decades, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) has been systematically and comprehensively recording and analysing causes of human death stratified by age, sex, and time across the world., This information has been used to guide policy solutions, reduce modifiable risk factors, monitor and evaluate national and sub-national health interventions, and ultimately improve health recommendations at both regional and local levels. Assessing trends in cause-specific mortality is essential to inform health policy that must continuously evolve to account for rapid changes to the global health landscape, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Comprehensive updates to levels and trends in causes of death give insight into emerging global health challenges and can facilitate benchmarking in the case of a new pandemic or other events that can lead to a staggering loss of life. Therefore, documenting novel changes to mortality, such as an emerging pandemic, in real time, is important.

Causes of death are not uniformly distributed between populations; rather, large variability in the leading causes often reflects important social and geographical differences. These differences can include access to and quality of health care, timeliness of health system responsiveness, and exposure to causes that are endemic to specific geographical locations. Mortality patterns continually evolve, as some areas become successful in their reduction efforts, whereas other causes persist within specific locations. The past 30 years have seen improvements among many causes of mortality, some of which have considerably narrowed in geographical range and are now concentrated within smaller areas worldwide. This change enables us to identify the resulting areas of concentrated mortality—areas where deaths from that cause are occurring within a limited subset of the global population. Our analysis provides an opportunity to answer important epidemiological questions that have been at the forefront of global and public health discourse—eg, which causes have contributed to the largest increase or decrease in life expectancy, which locations are experiencing greater concentrations of preventable causes of death, and how has COVID-19 and other pandemic-related mortality (OPRM) affected life expectancy and the overall fatal burden of diseases? Regional variation in many of the leading causes of death remains evident in these most recent estimates, representing important opportunities for creating tailored health policy to improve disparities and alleviate concentrations of mortality.

GBD 2021 provides an updated, comprehensive set of the fatal burden of disease summarised with cause-specific mortality metrics and years-of-life-lost (YLLs) metrics for 288 causes by age and sex across 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021, an update from the previously published estimates covering 1990–2019. In this study, we present mortality concentrations and a decomposition analysis of life expectancy due to different causes of death and illustrate the impact of causes of death on global, regional, and country-specific life expectancy, as well as highlighting locations that are most affected by concentrated geographical mortality burden. As with previous iterations of GBD, this cycle incorporates newly available data sources and improved methodological approaches to re-estimate the entire time series, providing updated estimates that supersede all previous GBD cause-of-death publications. GBD 2021 includes an estimation of several different models for disease and injury outcomes. This manuscript was produced as part of the GBD Collaborator Network and in accordance with the GBD Protocol.

Evidence before this study The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) has provided regular updates on the complex patterns and trends in population health around the world since the first GBD publication in 1993. With each subsequent iteration, there have been important methodological updates, new datasets included, and an expanded list of causes, risk factors, and locations for which estimates of the burden of disease are produced. In 1993, mortality and years of life lost (YLLs) were reported for 107 categories of diseases that covered all possible causes of death, for eight regions. In the last GBD cycle—GBD 2019—estimates of mortality and YLLs were produced for 286 causes of death in 204 countries and territories, including all WHO member states, and for subnational locations in 21 countries and territories, for every year from 1990 to 2019. Although many groups have reported on national-level, cause-specific mortality and other population-health metrics, including the WHO World Health Statistics reports, GBD is the most detailed and transparent research effort to date. Further, estimates of COVID-19-related deaths in 2020 and 2021 have been reported by several sources, including GBD studies that have quantified excess mortality due to the pandemic within a subset of GBD locations. However, no previous publications have quantified the effect of COVID-19 on life expectancy, while considering the full spectrum of disease mortality over the past three decades, across all countries and territories. This study presents, for the first time, 288 causes of death from 1990 to 2021, complementary to the all-cause mortality findings presented in the GBD 2021 Demographics analysis. Combined, these studies provide a comprehensive view of all-cause and cause-specific mortality from 1990 to 2021. Added value of this study Alongside the all-cause mortality and life-expectancy assessments in companion publications for GBD 2021, this analysis delineates cause-specific mortality and its effect on life expectancy. This study includes a comprehensive decomposition analysis elucidating the primary cause of death influencing life expectancy on a global, regional, and national level. Additionally, we present causes of death and YLLs for all countries and territories, providing policy makers with valuable insights into variations in cause-specific mortality. This study is also the first of its kind to publish 2021 estimates of COVID-19-related deaths and YLLs for 204 countries and territories in the context of the global burden of disease. Although other publications have estimated deaths due to COVID-19, those deaths have not previously been compared with deaths from other causes. By modelling COVID-19 deaths within a hierarchy of mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive causes of death, this study provides policy makers with information that is essential for setting health priorities around the world. To obtain more comprehensive insights from life expectancy, it is necessary to break it down into age-specific mortality, which is influenced by cause-specific mortality rates. We examined the effect of COVID-19 and other causes of death on life expectancy by decomposing death counts into different cause-specific mortality rates across various dimensions, including country or territory, region, super-region, and five distinct time periods: 1990–2000, 2000–2010, 2010–2019, 2019–2021, and 1990–2021. We could therefore systematically calibrate the COVID-19 pandemic against other causes of mortality over the period 1990–2021. Finally, our study identified several causes of death that exhibited increased geographical concentration over time—ie, causes with a disproportionate impact within a specific geographical area compared with the rest of the global observations. This analysis provides policy makers important information on regional variation and inequalities in cause-specific mortality. Also new to GBD 2021, we report on 12 additional causes of death: COVID-19 and other pandemic-related mortality, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and nine cancer types—hepatoblastoma, Burkitt lymphoma, other non-Hodgkin lymphoma, eye cancer, retinoblastoma, other eye cancers, soft tissue and other extraosseous sarcomas, malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage, and neuroblastoma and other peripheral nervous-cell tumours. Granularity of the estimation of deaths in children younger than 5 years was enhanced by the addition of four new age groups: 1–5 months, 6–11 months, 12–23 months, and 2–4 years. Implications of all the available evidence Our study provides a full analysis of causes of death worldwide and across time, alongside the changing patterns in life expectancy precipitated by those causes. Increasing geographical concentration of mortality was observed for many causes of death, highlighting disparities between regions and substantial differences in cause-specific contributions to life expectancy. On a global scale, this information provides an opportunity to examine whether reductions in mortality were resilient to the onset of a novel pandemic. On a regional level, the estimates generated by our study provide important detail on the evolving impact of causes of death among countries, allowing crucial insight into differential success by geography, time, and cause. The comprehensive nature of GBD 2021 cause-of-death estimation provides valuable opportunities to learn from mortality gains and losses, helping to accelerate progress in reducing mortality.

Evidence before this study

The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) has provided regular updates on the complex patterns and trends in population health around the world since the first GBD publication in 1993. With each subsequent iteration, there have been important methodological updates, new datasets included, and an expanded list of causes, risk factors, and locations for which estimates of the burden of disease are produced. In 1993, mortality and years of life lost (YLLs) were reported for 107 categories of diseases that covered all possible causes of death, for eight regions. In the last GBD cycle—GBD 2019—estimates of mortality and YLLs were produced for 286 causes of death in 204 countries and territories, including all WHO member states, and for subnational locations in 21 countries and territories, for every year from 1990 to 2019. Although many groups have reported on national-level, cause-specific mortality and other population-health metrics, including the WHO World Health Statistics reports, GBD is the most detailed and transparent research effort to date. Further, estimates of COVID-19-related deaths in 2020 and 2021 have been reported by several sources, including GBD studies that have quantified excess mortality due to the pandemic within a subset of GBD locations. However, no previous publications have quantified the effect of COVID-19 on life expectancy, while considering the full spectrum of disease mortality over the past three decades, across all countries and territories. This study presents, for the first time, 288 causes of death from 1990 to 2021, complementary to the all-cause mortality findings presented in the GBD 2021 Demographics analysis. Combined, these studies provide a comprehensive view of all-cause and cause-specific mortality from 1990 to 2021.

Added value of this study

Alongside the all-cause mortality and life-expectancy assessments in companion publications for GBD 2021, this analysis delineates cause-specific mortality and its effect on life expectancy. This study includes a comprehensive decomposition analysis elucidating the primary cause of death influencing life expectancy on a global, regional, and national level. Additionally, we present causes of death and YLLs for all countries and territories, providing policy makers with valuable insights into variations in cause-specific mortality. This study is also the first of its kind to publish 2021 estimates of COVID-19-related deaths and YLLs for 204 countries and territories in the context of the global burden of disease. Although other publications have estimated deaths due to COVID-19, those deaths have not previously been compared with deaths from other causes. By modelling COVID-19 deaths within a hierarchy of mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive causes of death, this study provides policy makers with information that is essential for setting health priorities around the world. To obtain more comprehensive insights from life expectancy, it is necessary to break it down into age-specific mortality, which is influenced by cause-specific mortality rates. We examined the effect of COVID-19 and other causes of death on life expectancy by decomposing death counts into different cause-specific mortality rates across various dimensions, including country or territory, region, super-region, and five distinct time periods: 1990–2000, 2000–2010, 2010–2019, 2019–2021, and 1990–2021. We could therefore systematically calibrate the COVID-19 pandemic against other causes of mortality over the period 1990–2021. Finally, our study identified several causes of death that exhibited increased geographical concentration over time—ie, causes with a disproportionate impact within a specific geographical area compared with the rest of the global observations. This analysis provides policy makers important information on regional variation and inequalities in cause-specific mortality. Also new to GBD 2021, we report on 12 additional causes of death: COVID-19 and other pandemic-related mortality, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and nine cancer types—hepatoblastoma, Burkitt lymphoma, other non-Hodgkin lymphoma, eye cancer, retinoblastoma, other eye cancers, soft tissue and other extraosseous sarcomas, malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage, and neuroblastoma and other peripheral nervous-cell tumours. Granularity of the estimation of deaths in children younger than 5 years was enhanced by the addition of four new age groups: 1–5 months, 6–11 months, 12–23 months, and 2–4 years.

Implications of all the available evidence

Our study provides a full analysis of causes of death worldwide and across time, alongside the changing patterns in life expectancy precipitated by those causes. Increasing geographical concentration of mortality was observed for many causes of death, highlighting disparities between regions and substantial differences in cause-specific contributions to life expectancy. On a global scale, this information provides an opportunity to examine whether reductions in mortality were resilient to the onset of a novel pandemic. On a regional level, the estimates generated by our study provide important detail on the evolving impact of causes of death among countries, allowing crucial insight into differential success by geography, time, and cause. The comprehensive nature of GBD 2021 cause-of-death estimation provides valuable opportunities to learn from mortality gains and losses, helping to accelerate progress in reducing mortality.

Overview

In GBD 2021, we produced estimates for each epidemiological quantity of interest for 288 causes of death by age-sex-location-year for 25 age groups from birth to 95 years and older; for males, females, and both sexes combined; in 204 countries and territories grouped into 21 regions and seven super-regions; and for every year from 1990 to 2021. GBD 2021 also includes subnational analyses for 21 countries and territories (appendix 1 section 2.1). An international network of collaborators provides, reviews, and analyses the available data to generate these metrics; GBD 2021 drew on the expertise of more than 11 000 collaborators from more than 160 countries and territories.

The methods used to generate these estimates closely followed those for GBD 2019. These methods have been extensively peer reviewed over previous rounds of the GBD study,,,, and as part of the peer-review process for GBD 2021. Here, we provide an overview of the methods with an emphasis on the main methodology changes since GBD 2019; a comprehensive description of the analytical methods for GBD 2021 is provided in appendix 1. Detailed descriptions of analytical methods and models for each cause of death are also available in a searchable online tool.

The GBD 2021 cause-of-death estimates described here include cause-specific mortality and the premature death metric (YLLs). We calculated YLLs as the number of deaths for each cause-age-sex-location-year multiplied by the standard life expectancy at each age (appendix 1 section 6.3). Standard life expectancy is calculated from the lowest age-specific mortality rate between countries. Briefly, we estimated cause-specific death rates for 209 causes using the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), and we used alternative strategies to model causes with little data, substantial changes in reporting over the study period, or unusual epidemiology. The modelling strategy used for all causes of death can be found in appendix 1 (table S10). CODEm is a modelling tool developed specifically for GBD that assesses the out-of-sample predictive validity of different statistical models and covariate permutations and then combines the results from those assessments to produce cause-specific estimates of the burden of mortality. Methodological improvements for cause-of-death estimates in the present round of estimation focused on several key areas. First, cause-of-death data were updated to include age data for the following age groups younger than 5 years: 1–5 months, 6–11 months, 12–23 months, and 2–4 years. Second, we implemented enhanced methods to account for stochastic variation in cause-of-death data and improve the estimation of small cause fractions present in less common causes of death. Third, we added 199 new country-years of vital registration cause-of-death data, 5 country-years of surveillance data, 21 country-years of verbal autopsy data, and 94 country-years of other data types. Lastly, we incorporated COVID-19 and OPRM, which includes excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, excluding deaths from COVID-19, lower respiratory infections, measles, malaria, and pertussis.

The GBD disease and injury hierarchy

GBD classifies diseases and injuries into a hierarchy with four levels that include both fatal and non-fatal causes. Level 1 causes include three broad aggregate categories (communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional [CMNN] diseases; non-communicable diseases [NCDs]; and injuries) and Level 2 disaggregates those categories into 22 clusters of causes, which are further disaggregated into Level 3 and Level 4 causes. At the most detailed level, 288 fatal causes are estimated. For a full list of causes of death by level, see appendix 1 (table S2). For GBD 2021, we separately report on 12 causes of death for the first time: COVID-19, OPRM, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and nine cancer types: hepatoblastoma, Burkitt lymphoma, other non-Hodgkin lymphoma, eye cancer, retinoblastoma, other eye cancers, soft tissue and other extraosseous sarcomas, malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage, and neuroblastoma and other peripheral nervous cell tumours.

Data sources, processing, and assessing for completeness

The GBD 2021 cause-of-death database included data sources identified in previous rounds of estimation in addition to 9248 new sources (appendix 1 table S5). We included multiple data types to capture the widest array of information, including vital registration and verbal autopsy for all 288 causes as well as survey, census, surveillance, cancer registry, police records, open-source databases, and minimally invasive tissue sampling. To standardise these data so that they can be compared by cause, age, sex, location, and time, we applied a set of data processing corrections. First, deaths with insufficient age data to estimate the GBD age groups or missing age and sex data underwent age and sex splitting to assign GBD age groups as well as sex (appendix 1 section 3.5). Additionally, garbage codes, which are non-specific, implausible, or intermediate, rather than underlying cause of death codes from the International Classification of Diseases, were redistributed to appropriate targets to assign the underlying cause of death. We excluded data sources with more than 50% of all deaths assigned to major garbage codes (class 1 or class 2 garbage codes) in a given year for a specific location (location-year) to mitigate the potential for bias from these sources (appendix 1 section 3.7). For GBD 2021, we established a buffer system so that location-years that were included in the previous GBD cycle would not be dropped from the current cycle as long as less than 55% of all deaths were assigned to major garbage codes. This 5% buffer ensured greater consistency in data source inclusion from one cycle to the next.

Assessing data completeness illustrates the coverage from a data source on overall mortality for the country. Vital registration and verbal autopsy data completeness—a source-specific estimate of the percentage of total cause-specific deaths that are reported in a given location and year—was assessed by location-year, and sources with less than 50% completeness were excluded. We excluded 142 country-years of data because of completeness. As with garbage codes, we used a 5% buffer so that sources included in the previous GBD cycle would not be excluded from the current cycle if they had at least 45% completeness, allowing us to retain 24 country-years that had previously been dropped. We then multiplied the estimated all-cause mortality for each age-sex-location-year by the cause fraction for the corresponding age-sex-location-year to adjust all included sources to 100% completeness. Verbal autopsy and vital registration data availability, completeness, and quality rating for each location-year are available in appendix 1 (section 3), as well as full details on all data processing corrections.

Adjustments for stochastic variation

In GBD 2021, we made two primary improvements to the methods used to reduce stochastic variation, most affecting causes of death with small sample sizes. First, we updated the Bayesian algorithm used in the noise reduction of these data to improve the preservation of real trends in data with large sample sizes, and imparted additional information from regional trends for data with small sample sizes. Second, the non-zero floor, a method that addresses distorted data shapes and nonsensical trends caused by small numbers when transformed to log space, was updated to be time-invariant and independent of demographic inputs. The full details of these two key improvements, as well as other improvements that address stochastic variation, can be found in appendix 1 (section 3.14).

COVID-19 and OPRM estimation

We derived COVID-19 and OPRM estimates from an analysis of the overall excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Full details of the estimation of excess mortality, COVID-19 deaths, and OPRM are provided in appendix 1 (section 5). To estimate excess mortality, we first developed a database of all-cause mortality by week and month after accounting for reporting lags, anomalies such as heat waves, and under-registration of deaths. Next, we developed an ensemble model to predict expected deaths in the absence of the COVID-19 pandemic for the years 2020 and 2021. In location and time combinations with data used for these models, we estimated excess mortality as observed mortality minus expected mortality. To estimate excess mortality for location-years without data, we developed a statistical model to directly predict the excess mortality due to COVID-19, using covariates that pertained to both the COVID-19 pandemic and background population-health-related metrics at the population level before SARS-CoV-2 emerged. Uncertainty was propagated through each step of this estimation procedure.

To produce the final estimates of COVID-19 deaths used in GBD 2021, we used a counterfactual approach. The counterfactual estimates the number of deaths if infection detection rates were at the highest observed value for each location-year. Using the ratio of counterfactual over estimated excess deaths and the ratio of reported COVID-19 deaths over excess deaths, we calculated the ratio of total COVID-19 deaths over reported COVID-19 deaths and multiplied this figure by the number of reported COVID-19 deaths for our final estimates of COVID-19 deaths.

To account for increases in excess mortality in 2020 and 2021 that could not be attributed to particular causes, we introduced a residual cause, OPRM. We identified four causes of death—lower respiratory infections, measles, malaria, and pertussis—as related to the COVID-19 pandemic and having reliable enough estimates to not contribute to OPRM. Thus, we calculated OPRM as the difference between excess mortality and the sum of deaths due to COVID-19 and these four causes.

Presentation of cause-specific mortality estimates

Cause-specific mortality estimates for 2021 are given in death counts and age-standardised rates per 100 000 population, calculated using the GBD standard-population structure. For changes over time, we present percentage changes over the period 1990–2021, and annualised rates of change as the difference in the natural log of the values at the start and end of the time interval divided by the number of years in the interval. We computed uncertainty intervals (UIs) for all metrics using the mean estimate across 1000 draws (appendix 1 sections 2–3), and 95% UIs are given as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentiles of that distribution.

Life-expectancy decomposition

The objective of life-expectancy decomposition is to analyse the difference in life expectancy by age and location, quantifying contributions from specific causes (appendix 1 section 7). We examined temporal trends in causes over continuous time periods across different locations. We aimed to identify the effect of causes of death on life expectancy by using three main decomposition steps. For this study, we investigated the top-20 Level 2 and Level 3 GBD causes contributing to change in life expectancy. The remaining causes were then combined as “other communicable and maternal disorders” or “other NCDs”. The first step involved decomposing the difference in life expectancy by age. We calculated age-specific contributions to understand the variation in life expectancy across different age groups. In the second step, each age-specific contribution was further decomposed into cause-age-specific contributions. This analysis allowed for the identification of the specific causes of death that contributed to the differences in life expectancy within each age group. Finally, we aggregated the cause-age-specific contributions across age groups to produce cause-specific contributions to the overall difference in life expectancy. This aggregation provided a comprehensive understanding of how different causes of death contributed to the observed variations in life expectancy. By applying this decomposition approach, we gain insights into the relative effect of different causes of death on changes in life expectancy by age and location.

Calculation of mortality concentration

Concentrated causes in GBD refer to causes that exhibit a disproportionate impact in a specific geographical subset of the data compared with the rest of the global observations. In GBD 2021, we used two different methods to identify these concentrated causes: coefficient of variation and mortality concentration.

Coefficient of variation

For each GBD cause, we calculated a coefficient of variation using standard statistical methods. This measure assesses the variability of a population relative to its mean. The observations considered for this calculation were national, age-standardised, both-sex mortality rates, using the mean mortality rate between 2019 and 2021. Causes with larger coefficients of variation have data that are less centred around the mean and indicate a greater likelihood of a concentrated cause.

Mortality concentration

To identify concentrations of mortality—geographical locations or groups of locations with populations that are disproportionately affected by a particular cause—we first calculated the total number of all-age, both-sex deaths in 2021 by cause in each of the 811 subnational locations and sorted these locations by number of deaths in descending order. We then calculated the cumulative percentage of deaths by dividing location-specific cumulative deaths by the number of global deaths for each cause. When the cumulative percentage reached or exceeded 90% for a given cause, we divided the population of the geographical subset included in that cumulative percentage by the total global population in 2021, using population estimates from the GBD population model described in previous publications., This identification of geographical subsets that contain at least 90% of deaths from a given cause but represent a comparatively small share of the global population was used to identify potential inequalities in the incidence of mortality between locations and populations. In addition to identifying these concentrations of mortality in 2021, we repeated this same analysis for 1990. By comparing the respective proportions of affected global population in these two years, we were able to differentiate causes that showed increased, decreased, or unchanged concentrations of mortality. The causes highlighted in this study were those characterised by an age-standardised mortality rate greater than 0·5 per 100 000 population. The purpose of presenting mortality concentrations is to illustrate causes that are disproportionately affecting specific populations, when previously that cause affected large swaths of the population. Thus, we did not calculate the mortality concentration for causes that are endemic to certain regions, as the mortality rate is already known to be concentrated among specific parts of the global population. We excluded two endemic causes, Ebola virus disease and Chagas disease, from this calculation.

GBD research and reporting practices

This research is compliant with the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting recommendations (GATHER; appendix 1 table S4). Software packages used in the cause-of-death analysis for GBD 2021 were Python (version 3.10.4), Stata (version 13.1), and R (version 4.2.1). Statistical code used for GBD estimation is publicly available online.

Role of the funding source

The funder of this study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or the writing of the report.

Results

Estimates described in the Article are viewable in appendix 2. Detailed results for each cause of death in the analysis are available in downloadable form through the GBD Results tool and via visual exploration through the online tool GBD Compare. Summaries of results for each cause of death included in the analysis are available online.

Global causes of death

Estimates described in the Article are viewable in appendix 2. Detailed results for each cause of death in the analysis are available in downloadable form through the GBD Results tool and via visual exploration through the online tool GBD Compare. Summaries of results for each cause of death included in the analysis are available online.

From 1990 to 2019, the annual rate of change in global deaths from all causes ranged from –0·9% (95% UI –2·7 to 0·8) to 2·4% (0·1 to 4·7; appendix 2 figure S1). The corresponding annual rates of change in the global age-standardised mortality rate ranged from –3·3% (–5·0 to –1·6) to 0·4% (–1·9 to 2·5). In 2020, however, the total number of deaths worldwide increased by 10·8% (6·4 to 15·4) compared with 2019, from 57·0 million deaths (54·9 to 59·5) in 2019 to 63·1 million deaths (60·6 to 65·9) in 2020. This trend persisted in 2021, with an increase of 7·5% (3·1 to 12·4) relative to 2020, to 67·9 million (65·0 to 70·8) deaths. The age-standardised mortality rate followed a similar pattern, increasing by 8·1% (3·9 to 12·4) in 2020 and an additional 5·2% (1·0 to 9·7) in 2021. In 2020 and 2021, deaths from COVID-19 and OPRM changed the pattern of mortality for the leading causes of age-standardised death (Figure 1, Figure 2; table 1). At Level 3 of the GBD cause-classification hierarchy, the rankings of the four causes of death with the highest age-standardised mortality rates were the same in 2019 as they were in 1990, with each showing a steady decline in its age-standardised death rate (figure 1). These causes were, in descending order, ischaemic heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lower respiratory infections. In 2021, however, COVID-19 replaced stroke as the second leading cause of age-standardised death globally (with 94·0 deaths [95% UI 89·2 to 100·0] per 100 000 population), with stroke becoming the third leading cause. Additionally, OPRM—which includes excess mortality associated with the pandemic, excluding COVID-19, lower respiratory infections, measles, and pertussis causes—emerged as the fifth leading cause of age-standardised deaths in 2021; lower respiratory infections decreased from the fourth to the seventh leading cause. The effect of COVID-19 on age-standardised mortality was similar to that of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2020 but increased by 60·2% (53·1 to 67·6) in 2021, becoming similar to that of stroke and ischaemic heart disease (figure 2; table 1).

COVID-19 and OPRM

Our estimates show that 4·80 million (95% UI 4·56–5·11) deaths due to COVID-19 occurred globally in 2020, and 7·89 million (7·49–8·40) in 2021. Age-standardised rates of death due to COVID-19 were highly variable among GBD super-regions (table 1). In 2021, the rankings from highest to lowest were sub-Saharan Africa (271·0 deaths [250·1–290·7] per 100 000 population); Latin America and the Caribbean (195·4 deaths [182·1–211·4] per 100 000 population); north Africa and the Middle East (172·4 deaths [150·3–191·5] per 100 000 population); central Europe, eastern Europe, and central Asia (168·8 deaths [150·6–186·1] per 100 000 population); south Asia (156·5 deaths [150·4–164·4] per 100 000 population); high income (48·1 deaths [47·4–48·8] per 100 000 population); and southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania (23·2 deaths [16·3–37·2] per 100 000 population; table 1).

Deaths from both COVID-19 and OPRM also varied substantially by age, with older ages being disproportionately affected (table 2). Individuals aged 70–74 years had the highest number of deaths from both COVID-19 and OPRM in 2020 and again in 2021. The highest percentage of total deaths from COVID-19 was found in those aged 40–44 years, whereas the highest mortality rate occurred in those aged 95 years and older. Death rates from OPRM were high among older age groups and among the youngest ages, with a rate of 141·2 deaths (95% UI 58·0–277·5) per 100 000 population for infants aged 0–6 days, and 77·3 deaths (44·0–118·0) per 100 000 population in infants aged 7–27 days. At a global scale, COVID-19 deaths and OPRM were slightly higher for males than for females in most age groups in 2021 (appendix 2 figure S5). Exceptions to this trend include those aged 90–94 years and those aged 95 years and older (appendix 2 figure S5).

Leading causes of global YLLs

The causes of death with the highest age-standardised YLL rates show shifting epidemiological trends from CMNN diseases to NCDs at Level 3 of the cause hierarchy (appendix 2 figure S2). Globally, the leading three causes of age-standardised YLLs in 1990 were all CMNN diseases. Ranked in descending order, these causes were neonatal disorders, lower respiratory infections, and diarrhoeal diseases. In 2019, neonatal disorders remained the leading cause of age-standardised YLLs, but the second and third leading causes were replaced by NCDs: ischaemic heart disease (ranked second) and stroke (ranked third). In 2021, COVID-19 was the second-leading cause of global age-standardised YLLs, making the leading two causes CMNN diseases (with neonatal disorders ranked first), with ischaemic heart disease ranked third. Among the leading causes of age-standardised YLLs, malaria was the only cause to show an increase in age-standardised YLL rates between 2019 and 2021 (ranking ninth in 2019 and seventh in 2021).

Decomposition of global life expectancy

We found long-standing positive trends in global life expectancy since the early 1990s, with steady increases occurring across each decade between 1990 and 2019 (appendix 2 table S4). Altogether, the global increase in life expectancy from 1990 to 2019 totalled 7·8 years (95% UI 7·1–8·5). In 2019–21, however, we found a global decline in life expectancy of 2·2 years due to deaths from COVID-19 and OPRM combined. This decrease was partly offset by reductions in other diseases, for a net reduction in global life expectancy of 1·6 years. Despite this notable reduction, we observed an overall increase in life expectancy of 6·2 years (5·4–7·0) across the entire study period. This decomposition analysis provides insights into the specific causes that influenced changes in life expectancy over the defined time periods. Among the various contributing factors to a change in life expectancy, the cause with the greatest effect on the increase in life expectancy worldwide was the reduction in deaths caused by enteric infections (figure 3). This category includes diarrhoeal, typhoid, and paratyphoid diseases. A reduction in deaths from these diseases is responsible for a substantial increase in life expectancy of 1·1 years during 1990–2021, but this increase was most pronounced between 1990 and 2000 compared with other time periods. The second-largest effect on increasing life expectancy is attributed to the reduction in deaths from lower respiratory infection, contributing 0·9 years of gained life expectancy from 1990 to 2021. Other leading factors include reduced mortality from stroke, CMNN diseases, neonatal deaths, ischaemic heart disease, and neoplasms, each of which increased global life expectancy by 0·6–0·8 years over the study period. Changing rates of HIV/AIDS and malaria mortality both contributed positively to the overall global life expectancy in some years but negatively affected life expectancy in others. Beginning in 2000, reductions in HIV/AIDS-related mortality were evident following substantial negative effects in earlier years. Reductions in deaths from malaria, however, were less sustained, increasing life expectancy by 0·1 years from 2010 to 2019 but having no effect from 2019 to 2021. Across all causes, the largest effect on the change in global life expectancy was from COVID-19, which resulted in a decline of 1·6 years between 2019 and 2021.

Decomposition of super-region, regional, and country-level life expectancy

Each of the seven super-regions experienced an overall increase in life expectancy between 1990 and 2021, despite progress in each being differentially affected by COVID-19 (Figure 4, Figure 5). Southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania showed the highest gain, with a net improvement of 8·3 years (95% UI 6·7–9·9), while also being the least affected by COVID-19, which contributed a loss in life expectancy of just 0·4 years. The overall increase in life expectancy in southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania can largely be attributed to reduced mortality from chronic respiratory diseases, contributing to a gain of 1·2 years, whereas reduced mortality from stroke, lower respiratory infections, and neoplasms were among other causes that contributed to the 8·3-year (6·7–9·9) increase. The second-largest gain occurred in south Asia, where life expectancy increased by 7·8 years (6·7–8·9), which can be largely attributed to reduced mortality from enteric infectious diseases, contributing a substantial gain of 3·1 years in life expectancy. The largest reduction in overall life expectancy due to COVID-19 occurred in the super-region of Latin America and the Caribbean, which experienced a loss of 3·6 years. Reductions in deaths due to malaria throughout sub-Saharan Africa led to an increase in life expectancy of 0·8 years for the super-region.

The differential effect of COVID-19 on reduced life expectancy was observed across GBD regions (figure 6). Although most regions experienced overall improvements in life expectancy between 1990 and 2021, a reduction occurred in southern sub-Saharan Africa, which faced the greatest impact of HIV and was also heavily affected by COVID-19. The overall decrease in life expectancy of 4·3 years (95% UI 3·0–5·8) included a reduction of 2·4 years due to HIV/AIDS and 3·4 years due to COVID-19, which were only partly offset by reductions in mortality due to other causes. Notably, COVID-19 reduced life expectancy in Andean Latin America by 4·9 years, although the region had an overall gain of 2·6 years (1·0–4·1) between 1990 and 2021. The effect of COVID-19 in eastern sub-Saharan Africa, which resulted in a reduction in life expectancy of 2·7 years, was offset by steady improvements across many different causes, which resulted in the highest overall increase in life expectancy among GBD regions (10·7 years [9·0–12·2]). Control of enteric infections in this region contributed to an increase in life expectancy of 1·9 years, along with reductions in lower respiratory infections and tuberculosis, each of which contributed to an additional 1·6 years' increase in life expectancy. Each region in sub-Saharan Africa experienced reductions in the number of enteric infections, which improved life expectancy in those regions between 0·8 and 2·4 years.

HIV/AIDS had a substantial negative effect on life-expectancy trends in southern sub-Saharan Africa from 1990 to 2021 (appendix 2 figure S27). Despite improvements in each of the time periods 2000–2010, 2010–2019, and 2019–2021, this region was unable to recover the 9·0 years lost during 1990–2000. Although we found a net decline in deaths due to HIV/AIDS between 2000 and 2019, improvements slowed substantially from 2019 to 2021, when only 0·2 years in life expectancy were gained as a result of reduced HIV/AIDS mortality. Conversely, eastern sub-Saharan Africa had the highest level of recovery to their life expectancy among the regions, gaining 1·5 years of life expectancy over the entire study period.

In 1990, malaria-related deaths had almost no effect on life expectancy in eight of the 21 GBD regions (appendix 2 figure S13). By 2021, however, 90% of malaria deaths across all age groups occurred in locations with only 12% of the global population. Efforts to control malaria in various regions of sub-Saharan Africa have yielded modest gains in life expectancy. Central sub-Saharan Africa gained 0·7 years in life expectancy between 2000 and 2010, western sub-Saharan Africa gained 0·9 years during 2010–19, and eastern sub-Saharan Africa gained 0·7 years in 2000–10. Despite these advancements, many regions with malaria transmission experienced a decline in life expectancy from 2019 to 2021. The most noticeable reductions were in eastern sub-Saharan Africa, with a decrease of 0·2 years, followed by western sub-Saharan Africa, which lost 0·1 years in life expectancy over the same period.

At the national level, some of the highest gains in life expectancy between 1990 and 2021 occurred in the eastern region of sub-Saharan Africa (appendix 2 figure S12). Life expectancy in Ethiopia increased by 18·2 years (95% UI 16·3–19·8) as a result of reductions in deaths from many causes, most notably other communicable and maternal disorders (3·2 years), tuberculosis (3·1 years), and enteric infectious diseases (2·4 year). The largest reduction in life expectancy occurred in Lesotho, at 12·9 years (10·1–15·7), largely attributed to increased deaths from HIV/AIDS, which resulted in a reduction of 7·3 years (appendix 2 figures S12, S27, table S4).

Effect of CMNN diseases on life expectancy and trends in mortality concentration

Among CMNN causes, several key trends emerged in their effect on global life expectancy and the localisation of deaths over time. First, the reduction of deaths due to enteric disease had a substantial impact on global life expectancy, with notable regional variations (figure 7). As 160 countries and territories made progress in reducing CMNN disease-related mortality, mortality concentration emerged. Deaths became more concentrated into certain countries or regions, persisting alongside advancements made in other parts of the world. An illustrative example is the shift in deaths due to enteric diseases in children younger than 5 years, with 90% of deaths occurring in locations containing 63% of the population of children younger than 5 years in 1990, decreasing to locations containing 51% of the population by 2021 (appendix 2 figure S28). Second, the reduction in the number of lower respiratory infections yielded positive effects on life expectancy in some regions. Regions such as Andean Latin America and western and eastern sub-Saharan Africa had gains of 1·6 years in life expectancy due to reduced deaths from lower respiratory infections. This progress is further underscored by the transformation from 90% of deaths from lower respiratory infections in children younger than 5 years occurring in locations with 71% of the population of the under-5 population in 1990 to 90% occurring in locations with 58% of the under-5 population by 2021, signalling substantial improvements in some regions and increased concentration of this cause in others (figure 8; appendix 2 figure S29). Third, HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact on life-expectancy trends, particularly in southern sub-Saharan Africa, and with 90% of deaths concentrated in locations containing 46% of the entire population and 39% of the under-5 population in 2021 (appendix 2 figures S27, S30). However, HIV/AIDS was less concentrated in 2021 than in 1990. Fourth, efforts to control malaria in sub-Saharan Africa resulted in modest gains in life expectancy. Similarly, 90% of malaria-related deaths in 2021 occurred in locations containing only 12% of the entire population and 20% of the under-5 population, showing mortality concentration (figure 5; appendix 2 figures S13, 31). Fifth, reductions in tuberculosis-related deaths had a positive effect on life expectancy across all regions, and changes in mortality rates indicated mortality concentration, with 90% of deaths occurring in locations containing 66% of the entire population in 1990, decreasing to 62% by 2021 (figure 9; appendix 2 figure S14). Lastly, although measles had a relatively small global effect on life expectancy, this cause showed high mortality concentration. The disease remained contained globally, with 90% of deaths concentrated in locations containing only 15% of the entire population and 24% of the under-5 population in 2021 (figure 3; appendix 2 figure S15).

Reductions in neonatal deaths contributed to a 0·6-year increase in global life expectancy. Also, 90% of neonatal deaths were concentrated in locations containing 71% of the population in 1990, decreasing to 51% by 2021 (appendix 2 figures S16, S34). Finally, nutritional deficiencies had a relatively small global impact on life expectancy but substantial effects on specific regions—eastern sub-Saharan Africa, central sub-Saharan Africa, and south Asia saw notable increases. We found a shift towards mortality concentration, with 90% of nutritional deficiency-related deaths in children younger than 5 years concentrated in locations containing 49% of the population in this age group by 2021, compared with 59% in 1990 (appendix 2 figures S18, S35). Overall, CMNN diseases showed a large degree of mortality concentration.

Effect of NCDs on life expectancy and trends in mortality concentration

Among NCDs, several findings reflect their effect on global life expectancy and death concentration. Reductions in stroke led to a notable gain in life expectancy of 0·8 years, but stroke deaths were not concentrated, with 90% occurring in locations containing 84% of the global population (appendix 2 figures S23, S36). Similarly, ischaemic heart disease had a substantial effect on improvement to life expectancy, contributing 0·6 years to global life expectancy; yet, as with stroke, ischaemic heart disease showed little mortality concentration, with 90% of deaths concentrated in locations containing 84% of the population in 2021 (appendix 2 figures S17, S37). Neoplasms added 0·6 years to life expectancy, with high-income regions greatly benefiting; as with other NCDs, 90% of neoplasms deaths occurred in locations containing 86% of the population in 2021, indicating a consistent risk of dying from cancer regardless of geography (appendix 2 figures S19, S38). Chronic respiratory diseases contributed an increase of 0·5 years to life expectancy, with east Asia contributing the most to this increase through substantial improvements in mortality in China. Chronic respiratory diseases also showed little mortality concentration, with 90% of deaths occurring in locations containing 79% of the population (appendix 2 figures S20, S39). Digestive diseases and cirrhosis had a substantial negative effect on life expectancy, with little improvement from 2010 to 2019, and showed little mortality concentration (appendix 2 figures S21, S40). Diabetes and kidney diseases had a negative effect on life expectancy, resulting in a global loss of 0·1 years in life expectancy. This cause also had little mortality concentration, with 90% of deaths occurring in locations representing 89% of the population (appendix 2 figures S22, S41). Overall, NCDs largely did not show concentration, meaning that we did not observe mortality from these causes moving towards more restricted geographical areas (appendix 2 figure S42).

Effect of injuries on life expectancy and trends in mortality concentration

The reduction in transport injuries had a positive effect on life expectancy, contributing to a gain of 0·2 years. However, as with NCDs, transport injury-related mortality was not concentrated, with 90% of deaths concentrated in locations containing 88% of the population in 1990, decreasing slightly to 84% of the population by 2021 (appendix 2 figures S24, S43). Unintentional injuries also showed little mortality concentration, with 90% of deaths occurring in locations containing 88% of the population in 2021 (appendix 2 figures S26, S44). Lastly, the overall reduction in mortality rates from self-harm and interpersonal violence contributed to a 0·2-year increase in life expectancy with variable mortality concentration, showing concentration in central and tropical Latin America and South Africa, but not exclusively in these locations (appendix 2 figures S25, S45).

Main findings

The COVID-19 pandemic has emerged as one of the most defining global health events of recent history. Our latest comprehensive estimates of cause-specific mortality give insight into the global landscape of disease before and during the first 2 years of the pandemic, revealing the important changes in disease-burden patterns that followed. After more than three decades of consistent improvements in global life expectancy and declining age-standardised death rates, COVID-19 reversed long-standing progress and disrupted trends in the epidemiological transition. As the second leading cause of age-standardised deaths in 2021, COVID-19 had a pronounced influence on the reduction in global life expectancy that occurred. The heterogeneous influence of the disease across the globe provides important insights for improving future pandemic preparedness and ensuring that nations are equitably equipped to respond to new outbreaks. Additionally, our analysis of geographical and temporal trends in mortality enables us to observe the changing patterns in causes of death worldwide. Many causes have exhibited a reduced geographical reach—a reflection of dedicated and persistent mitigation efforts to reduce the burden of certain causes, as well as potential changes to risk-factor exposure. This study offers an opportunity to apply the lessons learned from these successes to further reduce deaths from causes that are now present within smaller, more concentrated areas throughout the world.

The COVID-19 pandemic

The emergence and spread of COVID-19 follows a similar pattern of regional heterogeneity that is common among many leading communicable causes of death, with higher rates of infection and increased fatalities occurring in lower-resource settings.,, Although heterogeneity in COVID-19 outcomes in 2020 and 2021 varied by the income status of a country or territory, outcomes were also directly related to age, government actions to close borders, and the implementation of transmission-reduction policies. This general pattern did not always hold true at the national level, however, where estimates from some high-income countries showed a much greater burden than would have been expected, indicating important opportunities for improved pandemic preparedness and response in these nations. The varying effects across locations emphasises the complexity of the pandemic. Diverse social, economic, and political influences contributed to the variations in death rates observed between locations. In general, areas with advanced health-care systems and robust medical facilities were better able to manage abrupt increases in the number of COVID-19 cases. By contrast, locations with poorer health-care infrastructure were less equipped to handle the surge in infections that occurred, although strong health-care systems did not singularly influence the outcome of the pandemic. Improving preparedness for future pandemics should also include engagement strategies to enhance the trust that individuals place in public health recommendations. Additionally, identifying methods to enhance death-reporting systems and overcome political obstacles to ensure accurate reporting will be crucial steps for monitoring COVID-19 and future pandemic occurrences.,

Our study shows that COVID-19 was one of the leading global causes of death during the first 2 years of the pandemic and provides an opportunity to delineate between the disease's direct and indirect mortality effects as well as its effect on life expectancy. As previously predicted, COVID-19 shifted baseline patterns of mortality for diseases and injuries that were affected by physical-distancing measures and other government-mandated restrictions. Deferred care-seeking during the height of the pandemic also probably contributed to shifts in patterns of mortality for some diseases and injuries and might also have contributed to the emergence of pandemic-related deaths not attributable directly to COVID-19, lower respiratory infections, measles, malaria, or pertussis (OPRM). Deferred care-seeking might also have been a contributing factor in the notable divergence in the age distribution in deaths between COVID-19 and OPRM, whereby COVID-19 deaths were substantially higher in older ages, whereas the highest rate of OPRM was seen in older ages as well as in children younger than 23 months. Mortality might have increased in the youngest ages because caregivers might have hesitated to seek medical care during the peak of the virus's spread. Understanding these disparities is imperative for shaping future health policies and preparedness efforts.

Important trends in life expectancy

Advancements over the past three decades in the prevention and control of infectious diseases have contributed to increases in life expectancy in many locations, increasing the need to support populations living with NCDs. The global decline in life expectancy that occurred in 2020 and 2021 confounds the longer-term trend of increase. Our decomposition analysis suggests that this decline was predominantly a result of the pandemic (combined COVID-19 and OPRM), but the degree of severity varied greatly by location. Although large improvements in many causes—including HIV/AIDS and lower respiratory and enteric infections—somewhat counterbalanced the decline, the decrease in life expectancy was also compounded by increasing rates of mortality from other causes, such as diabetes and kidney diseases.

The effect of COVID-19 on life expectancy showed varying degrees of severity, ranging from a large loss of 4·9 years in Andean Latin America to almost no change in east Asia. From 1990 to 2021, reductions in many of the leading causes of death resulted in overall life-expectancy increases across most regions, despite heavy setbacks for many because of the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that despite Andean Latin America having the largest regional reduction in life expectancy due to the pandemic, overall life-expectancy reductions across the region were tempered by improvements in other causes, with reductions in rates of death from lower respiratory infections and neonatal disorders responsible for an increase in life expectancy of 2·6 years overall between 1990 and 2021. The impressive reductions in neonatal disorders throughout many countries in Andean Latin America have been attributed to the improvements made in implementing effective maternal and neonatal health intervention strategies.

The reduction in life expectancy in southern sub-Saharan Africa also exceeded the global average by a substantial margin, with a reduction of 3·4 years due to COVID-19. Although life expectancy in the region was substantially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, the reduction was also attributable to high mortality rates from HIV/AIDS. Some nations with high pandemic-related death tolls were among those already burdened by high rates of other infectious diseases. Several countries in southern sub-Saharan Africa navigated the challenges of the pandemic, alongside long histories of combatting some of the highest HIV/AIDS prevalence rates in the world., A subset of countries were faced with a triple burden of COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis. The combined burden of these causes across southern sub-Saharan Africa was not offset by sufficient improvements in mortality from other causes, leading to an overall reduction in the region's life expectancy of more than 4 years over the entire study period.

Cause-specific patterns of mortality concentration

Estimates of mortality concentration reflect shifting patterns of disease over time, from diseases that have a widespread presence moving to more geographically reduced subsets of the global population. These changes highlight differences between populations and their progress towards reducing mortality due to diseases and injuries. These findings also provide an important opportunity to improve how best public health practices are applied to further disease reduction. Broadly, widespread declines in many communicable diseases resulted in mortality from these causes exhibiting more concentrated geographical distributions in 2021 relative to patterns seen in 1990. The degree of mortality concentration estimated by this study for enteric and lower respiratory infections, malaria, HIV/AIDS, neonatal disorders, and tuberculosis reflects substantial global progress in reducing mortality from these causes over the study period, underscoring the success of several public health campaigns, global commitments, and improvements in communicable-disease programmes.,, Estimates of mortality concentration can be used to examine where disease mitigation strategies have been successful, where they can be further implemented to reduce inequality, and where more research might be needed to develop effective treatment and intervention strategies.

Notably, our estimates support previous findings that show deaths from malaria are becoming increasingly concentrated and are now particularly concentrated within western sub-Saharan Africa, with an additional corridor running through central Africa and into Mozambique. Countries in western sub-Saharan Africa with the highest under-5 death rates from malaria in 2021 included Burkina Faso, Sierra Leone, and Niger. This concentration of malaria mortality reflects both differential rates of population growth across Africa, as well as the varying rates of progress in reducing transmission, most notably by malaria nets treated with long-lasting insecticide and in strengthening case management. At a time of growing threats to progress against malaria, including emerging parasite and vector resistance and budgetary pressures, but also amid promising new tools such as second vaccine for malaria, it is more important than ever that changing patterns of mortality are quantified and understood.,

Enteric infections showed large disease concentration. Under-5 deaths from enteric infections were largely concentrated within sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia with the highest under-5 death rates from enteric infections in 2021 included Chad, South Sudan, and the Central African Republic. There are many contributing factors that should be considered when examining how to reduce enteric infections in the remaining concentrated locations. Alongside the provision of oral rehydration solution and rotavirus vaccines, critical public health improvements such as in water, sanitation, and hygiene might have contributed to decreases in enteric deaths., Childhood growth failure, also a leading risk factor for deaths from lower respiratory infections, malaria, and measles, must be addressed through interventions to improve women's health including anaemia, promotion of early exclusive breastfeeding, and management of acute malnutrition, among others., Countries with the highest burden of infectious disease mortality in children younger than 5 years tend to be geographically clustered, suggesting multisectoral approaches are necessary to continue reducing mortality in the countries with the highest rates.

A broad and recurring theme from this study is that reductions in enteric infections contributed to improved life expectancies over the past several decades. The reductions in childhood mortality associated with diarrhoeal diseases that have occurred across many parts of Africa,,, can also be partly explained by many combined local efforts in improved immunisation; access to water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities;, breastfeeding; oral rehydration therapy; and zinc supplementation, alongside global initiatives such as the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhea. Given that enteric disease-related mortality and specifically diarrhoeal disease-related mortality continued to decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, the post-pandemic period might offer opportunities to accelerate progress on prevention and treatment. Diarrhoeal diseases are particularly amenable to public health intervention, and given this cause's high burden among children, we must continue to direct resources towards its prevention., Several locations still do not have the necessary financing, governance, and political commitment to reduce rates of enteric infections. To accelerate progress in reducing enteric disease-related mortality, routine and catch-up immunisation programmes must be strengthened and expanded, including building on the global success of the rotavirus roll-out and countering disruptions in childhood immunisation during the pandemic. Additionally, efforts should focus on advancing candidate vaccines against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, norovirus, and shigella.,,,,

Our study also found that some vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, have shown widespread reductions in mortality rates and were geographically concentrated. Under-5 deaths from measles were concentrated within western and eastern sub-Saharan Africa. Although multiple factors contribute to decreases in infectious disease burden, improvements in measles mortality have largely been attributable to the global availability of a safe and effective vaccine against measles, producing life-long immunity, with two-dose efficacy exceeding 95%. Measles incidence has decreased dramatically where vaccination efforts have been successful, including North America, South America, Europe, and Australia;,,,, although, since 2016, endemic measles transmission has been re-established in ten countries that previously had achieved measles elimination. We found that, as of 2021, measles mortality was concentrated in countries and regions with insufficient access to the measles vaccine, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Although valuable insights can be drawn from countries that have achieved measles control through effective vaccination programmes and surveillance systems, interventions still must be tailored to the affected communities and countries for successful reductions in mortality.

Some infectious diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, also showed mortality concentration. Deaths from HIV/AIDS were largely concentrated within sub-Saharan Africa, most notably southern sub-Saharan Africa. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa with the highest age-standardised mortality rate in 2021 included Lesotho, Eswatini, and Botswana. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa with the highest under-5 death rates from HIV in 2021 included Lesotho, Equatorial Guinea, and Guinea-Bissau. This concentration highlights how HIV-control campaigns, preventative measures,, improved treatment with the emergence of antiretroviral therapy, access to testing and health care, and research advancements might have contributed to the reduced global mortality of HIV. Despite these successes, substantial barriers remain to reducing HIV mortality, such as stigma discouraging people from accessing treatment and care,, insufficient health-care infrastructure, access to testing, coverage of antiretroviral therapy, and complications due to co-occurring diseases such as tuberculosis and HIV. Preventative measures are particularly important for the reduction of HIV mortality because HIV prevalence is the primary contributor to high mortality rates. Although countries can learn from successful HIV campaigns and strategies, global support is needed to ensure HIV treatment and preventative measures are accessible to all populations at risk.,,

In many high-income nations, the overall rate of neonatal deaths decreased between 1990 and 2021, becoming more concentrated over time. Deaths from neonatal disorders in 2021 were concentrated within sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. Countries in these regions with the highest under-5 death rates from neonatal disorders in 2021 included Mali, South Sudan, and Sierra Leone. However, the disparity in mortality between high-income and low-income countries and regions highlights inequality in progress. Newborn care that can reduce mortality includes resuscitation, prevention of hypothermia and infection, in-facility delivery, and exclusive breastfeeding., Neonatal mortality might be reduced globally if policy makers examine the strategies that led to successes elsewhere.

Conversely, although the burden of many NCDs has also been reducing, these causes have typically not followed the same pattern of mortality concentration seen in CMNN diseases. These trends emphasise a key distinction in the spatial dynamics of NCDs compared with many communicable diseases. Although non-communicable causes might not exhibit the same degree of concentration as communicable causes, the mortality burden has changed in distribution, reducing over time in high-income countries and regions, while persisting in low-income countries and regions. Age-standardised mortality rates due to NCDs decreased in most locations within the high-income; Latin America and the Caribbean; north Africa and the Middle east; and central Europe, eastern Europe, and central Asia super-regions between 1990 and 2021. However, NCDs in the south Asia; sub-Saharan Africa; and southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania super-regions have either increased or decreased at notably lower levels in 2021 compared with in 1990. Examples of this trend include ischaemic heart disease, neoplasms, and stroke, all of which largely declined over the study period—although their reductions have been widely dispersed and not as targeted as the CMNN causes. These findings show that NCDs do not appear to be moving towards more condensed geographical locations over time in the same way that many CMNN diseases are, which could make interventions and policies more complex to implement.

Ultimately, the extent of mortality concentration reflects both the progress achieved in health-care advancements and the shortcomings that persist in their equitable implementation. Disease concentration is evidence that there are effective interventions and policies that have successfully reduced disease burden in many locations, but these innovations have not been equitably distributed throughout the world or have been ineffective at addressing the specific challenges certain populations face. There remains a global need to improve access to new interventions and vaccines, to invest in the implementation of validated public health policies, and to strategise with geographical sources of disease in mind. Future efforts should continue the ongoing mitigation of communicable diseases, focusing on locations where these causes have become more geographically concentrated, while also initiating efforts to combat chronic causes within low-resourced settings. Additionally, patterns of high geographical concentration among infectious causes and low geographical concentration among chronic causes reflect the global epidemiological transition, wherein mortality rates of infectious deaths declined throughout most years of our study. The increased concentration of a cause of death, particularly communicable diseases, illustrates success in mitigation that can be adapted within the countries and regions with mortality concentration identified in our study, with the potential to greatly reduce mortality from those causes of death.

Limitations

Methodological advancements have enabled GBD 2021 to produce cause-specific estimates of mortality more easily than in previous iterations; however, as with any study of this scope, there are several important limitations to acknowledge. Cause-specific limitations for every cause of death in GBD are detailed in appendix 1 (section 3). Here, we describe cross-cutting limitations with applicability across many causes. First, sparsity of data or unreliability of data from specific regions, time periods, or age groups can influence the accuracy of our estimates, particularly poor data quality and coverage from western, eastern, southern, and central sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. Second, the quality of cause-of-death and verbal-autopsy data rely on accurately coded death certificates to the international standards set by the International Classification of Diseases and are subject to the practice of the doctor completing the death certificate, who may or may not have received training to facilitate comparability of reporting underlying causes of death. This process is further complicated by comorbidities at the time of death, which might affect the accuracy of both vital-registration and verbal-autopsy data sources. A key data-processing method for GBD is the re-allocation of incorrectly or vaguely assigned deaths—referred to as garbage codes—to a more accurate, plausible underlying cause of death. This step helps to create comparable cause-specific estimates of mortality by underlying cause. Third, GBD assesses quality of cause-of-death data partly by examining levels of completeness, which indicate the accuracy with which the vital registration can capture deaths that occur in a location-year, irrespective of the percentage of garbage coding. Data completeness depends on the percentage of well-certified data, which is not necessarily indicative of low garbage coding. Fourth, some sources of uncertainty, including the covariates used in models, are not captured in our estimation process. Fifth, we used a negative binomial modelling approach to improve our estimation of deaths for some causes with over-dispersed data, but do not have a standardised empirical approach for selecting causes to which we apply this method. Sixth, to provide estimates for locations with low levels of completeness, as well as to address the lags in data reporting that occur, our estimates for the most recent years depend more heavily on the modelling process. For causes where data are limited, providing estimates with appropriate uncertainty is preferable to providing no information. Seventh, in the calculation of life expectancy decomposition, there is instability when the difference in all-cause deaths is too small. In this case, we use the reduced Das Gupta equation (appendix 1 section 7). Additionally, to avoid assigning positive life-expectancy contributions to COVID-19-related causes, if the signs for the change in life expectancy and all-cause deaths were the same, we used the same reduced Das Gupta formula, except in the case that the cause in question was COVID-19-related (either COVID-19 or OPRM), when a modified version was used. When viewing life expectancy decomposition, it is important to understand the effects of fatal discontinuity events, such as earthquakes or conflict. If life-expectancy decomposition is calculated for 2 consecutive years, we can see the effect of unique, stochastic events, but for the longer time periods, the interpretation of the effect of these events will be misleading. This method works well with causes that have continuous time trends, and not for causes that have mortality spikes in select years and locations. This type of event confounds true health trends within a time period because the absence or presence of a disaster is seen as a change in life expectancy. Finally, this cycle of GBD contains additional limitations that pertain to modelling deaths and related mortality from the COVID-19 pandemic. The limitations of the methods used to calculate COVID-19 have been fully outlined in previous publications, but it is important to reiterate that COVID-19 estimates are limited by data-source availability. The methods to estimate COVID-19-related deaths were especially limited in certain regions, such as sub-Saharan Africa, which means our estimates in these areas are solely driven by relationships with covariates. Future development of these data sources is crucial because estimates improve as the quality of the underlying data sources improves. Subsequent GBD cycles will provide revised estimates after additional data for recent years become available.

Future directions

In the next iteration of GBD, we will include over 100 location-years of vital registration and other data types that have been reported since GBD 2021 estimates were produced. Additionally, we will continue to expand the estimation of causes of death by disaggregating broad categories of causes of death into more detailed causes where available. These improvements aim to enhance precision and timeliness of estimates of COVID-19-related deaths and other cause of death. We also plan to simplify our approach to estimating COVID-19-related deaths. In lieu of the residual OPRM category reported in GBD 2021, we will use all available location-years of cause-of-death data to attribute mortality to specific causes, removing this residual category. We anticipate that this method will facilitate more timely and actionable insights for public health planning and policy making, especially as we expect to observe more regular and modellable mortality patterns in the post-pandemic years. Through these advancements, we will improve the utility and accuracy of the GBD study as a tool for effective public strategies.

Conclusion

Findings from GBD 2021 provide a comprehensive overview of long-term mortality trends along with important insights into the COVID-19 pandemic years. The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally changed the landscape of global health and mortality. As a leading cause of death, COVID-19 reduced life expectancy in 2 years nearly as much as reductions in communicable and NCDs have improved it over decades. The changes in mortality caused by the pandemic were not predictable through the standard GBD estimation methods and required the development and application of novel estimation methods as the pandemic emerged in real time. These timely updates on causes of death are essential for monitoring progress, identifying prevailing health concerns, guiding targeted interventions, and optimising resource allocation. GBD 2021 shows that better life expectancy outcomes might be achieved by leveraging past successes in mortality reduction. If future policy efforts are guided by the successes made in countries and regions with effective disease-mitigation programmes, such achievements might be replicated in locations where high mortality persists. While COVID-19 and other health challenges continue, GBD 2021 can offer valuable guidance for public health investment and policy making.

For the GBD data sources see http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2021For the statistical code see http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2021/code

For the GBD data sources see http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2021

For the statistical code see http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2021/code

Data sharing

To download the data used in these analyses, please visit the Global health Data Exchange GBD 2021 website (https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2021/sources).

This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com on April 19, 2024

This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com on April 19, 2024

Declaration of interests

S Afzal reports support for the present manuscript from King Edward Medical University including study material, research articles, valid data sources and authentic real time information for this manuscript; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from King Edward Medical University and collaborative partners including University of Johns Hopkins, University of California, University of Massachusetts, KEMCAANA, KEMCA-UK Scientific Conferences and Webinars; support for attending meetings and/or travel from King Edward Medical University to attend meetings; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with National Bioethics Committee Pakistan, King Edward Medical University Ethical Review Board, as well as Ethical Review Board Fatima Jinnah Medical University and Sir Ganga Ram Hospital; leadership or fiduciary roles in board, society, committee or advocacy groups, paid or unpaid with Pakistan Association of Medical Editors, Fellow of Faculty of Public Health Royal Colleges UK (FFPH), and Society of Prevention, Advocacy And Research, King Edward Medical University (SPARK); and other support as Dean of Public Health and Preventive Medicine at King Edward Medical University, as the Chief Editor Annals of King Edward Medical University, as the Director of Quality Enhancement Cell King Edward Medical University, as an international-level Fellow of Faculty of Public Health United Kingdom, as an Advisory Board Member and Chair Scientific Session KEMCA-UK, as a Chairperson of KEMCAANA (the International Scientific Conference), as a national-level member on the Research and Publications Higher Education Commission (HEC Pakistan), as a member of the Research and Journals Committee (Pakistan) the Medical and Dental Council (Pakistan), the National Bioethics Committee (Pakistan), the Corona Experts Advisory Group (Punjab), the Chair of the Dengue Experts Advisory Group, and a member of the Punjab Residency Program Research Committee; all outside the submitted work. R Ancuceanu reports consulting fees from Abbvie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Abbvie, Sandoz, B. Braun, Laropharm, and MagnaPharm; all outside the submitted work. J Ärnlöv reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca and Novartis for lecture fees; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with AstraZeneca, Astella, Boehringer Ingelheim; all outside the submitted work. O C Baltatu reports support for the present manuscript from National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, 304224/2022-7) and Anima Institute (AI research professor fellowship); Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, as Founding Member of the Health and Biotechnology Advisory Board at Technology Park São José dos Campos–Center for Innovation in Health Technologies (CITS), outside the submitted work. T W Bärnighausen reports grants or contracts from National Institutes of Health, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, German National Research Foundation (DFG), European Union, German Ministry of Education and Research, German Ministry of the Environment, Wellcome, and KfW, all as payments to their institution; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board on two Scientific Advisory Boards for NIH-funded research projects in Africa on Climate Change and Health; stock or stock options in CHEERS, an SME focusing on approaches to measure climate change and health-related variables in population cohorts; all outside the submitted work. S Barteit reports grants from Carl-Zeiss Foundation and the German research foundation (DFG); stock or stock options in CHEERS, a for-profit company focusing on climate change and health evaluation and response systems; all outside the submitted work. M Beghi reports consulting fees from Lundbeck and Angelini, all outside the submitted work. Y Bejot reports consulting fees from Medtronic and Novartis; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from BMS, Pfizer, Medtronic, Amgen, NovoNordisk, and Servier; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Medtronic; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, with the French Neurovascular Society; all outside the submitted work. M Bell reports grants or contracts from US EPA, NIH, High Tide Foundation, Health Effects Institute, Yale Women Faculty Forum, Environmental Defense Fund, Yale Climate Change and Health Center, Wellcome Trust Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Hutchinson Postdoctoral Fellowship (all paid to their institution); Consulting fees from Clinique; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or education events from Colorado School of Public Health, Duke University, University of Texas, Data4Justice, Korea University, Organization of Teratology Information Specialists, University of Pennsylvania, Boston University, IOP Publishing, NIH, Health Canada, PAC-10, UKRI, AXA Research Fund Fellowship, Harvard University and the University of Montana; Support for attending meeting and/or travel from Colorado School of Public Health, University of Texas, Duke University, Boston University, University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, American Journal of Public Health, Columbia University and Harvard University; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid with Fifth National Climate Assessment and Lancet Countdown, Johns Hopkins Advisory Board, Harvard external advisory committee for training grant, WHO Global Air Pollution and Health Technical Advisory group and the National Academies Panels and Committee; and paid with the US EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC); outside the submitted work. L Belo reports other financial or non-financial interests with UCIBIO – FFUP through support from FCT in the scope of the project UIDP/04378/2020 and UIDB/04378/2020 of UCIBIO and the project LA/P/0140/2020 of i4HB, all outside the submitted work. R S Bernstein reports other financial or non-financial support as a full-time Medical Consultant employee of the California Department of Public Health in the Center for Heal Care Quality; outside the submitted work. P J G Bettencourt reports patents planned, issued, or pending (WO2020229805A1, BR112021022592A2, EP3965809A1, OA1202100511, US2023173050A1, EP4265271A2, and EP4275700A2); other financial or non-financial interests with the Botnar Foundation as project reviewer, outside the submitted work. S Bhaskar reports grants or contracts from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) and JSPS and the Australian Academy of Science; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid with Rotary District 9675 as the district chair, Global Health & Migration Hub Community as Chair and Manager (Berlin, Germany), PLOS One, BMC Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology, Frontiers in Stroke, Frontiers in Public Health and the BMC Medical Research Methodology as an Editorial Board Member, and as a Member of the College of Reviewers (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada); outside the submitted work. B Bikbov reports grants or contracts from the European Commission and The University of Rome; Support for attending meetings/travel from the European Renal Association; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid in an advocacy group with the International Society of Nephrology and unpaid on the Western Europe Regional Board of the International Society of Nephrology; Other financial or non-financial support from Scientific-Tools.org; outside the submitted work. A Biswas reports consulting fees from INTAS Pharmaceuticals Ltd, India, Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, India, and Alkem Laboratories, India as personal payments; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche Diagnostics, India, as personal payments; all outside the submitted work. E J Boyko reports payment or Honoria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or education events from the Korean Diabetes Association, Diabetes Association of the R.O.C (Taiwan), the American Diabetes Association, and the International Society for the Diabetic Foot; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Korean Diabetes Association; Diabetes Association of the R.O.C (Taiwan), International Society for the Diabetic Foot; outside the submitted work. M Carvalho reports other financial or non-financial interests from LAQV/REQUIMTE, University of Porto (Porto, Portugal) and acknowledges the support from FCT under the scope of the project UIDP/50006/2020; outside the submitted work. E Chung reports support for the present manuscript from the National Institute of Health NICHD T32HD007233. J Conde reports grants or contracts form the European Research Council Starting Grant ERC-StG-2019-848325 (funding 1.5M Euro), outside the submitted work. S Cortese reports grants or contracts from National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)and the European Research Executive Agency; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from the Association of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, British Association of Psychopharmacology, Medice, and Canadian ADHD Resource Alliance; support for attending meetings and/or travel the Association of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, British Association of Psychopharmacology, Medice, and Canadian ADHD Resource Alliance; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, with the European ADHD Guidelines Group and the European Network for Hyperkinetic Disorders; all outside the submitted work. Sa Das reports leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, with the Association for Diagnostics and Laboratory Medicine as program chair, and the Women in Global Health India Chapter, outside the submitted work. A Dastiridou reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from THEA and ABBVIE, outside the submitted work. L Degenhardt reports untied educational grants from Indivior and Seqirus to examine new opioid medications in Australia, outside the submitted work. A K Demetriades reports leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, with the AO Knowledge Forum Degenerative Steering Committee, Global Neuro Foundation Board, and the European Association of Neurological Societies Board of Officers, all outside the submitted work. A Faro reports support for the present manuscript from National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, CNPq, Brazil as CNPq Researcher (scholarship). I Filip reports support for the present manuscript from Avicenna Medical and Clinical Research Institute. D Flood reports grants or contracts from NHLBI (award number K23HL161271), the University of Michigan Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (award number 5P30AG024824), and the University of Michigan Caswell Diabetes Institute Clinical Translational Research Scholars Program; consulting fees from the World Health Organization as payments to their institution; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, as Staff Physician for Maya Health Alliance, a non-governmental health organization in Guatemala; all outside the submitted work. A A Fomenkov reports support for the present manuscript from Development of effective biotechnologies based on cell cultures, tissues and organs of higher plants, microalgae and cyanobacteria. The research carried out within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. 122042600086-7). M Foschi reports consulting fees from Roche and Novartis; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol, and Merck; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, with MBase Foundation; all outside the submitted work. R Franklin reports grants or contracts from Heatwaves (Queensland Government, Queensland, Australia) and Arc Flash (Human Factors, Queensland Government, Queensland, Australia), and Mobile Plant Safety (Agrifutures); Support for attending meetings and/or travel from ACTM Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine Conference 2022 and 2023, and ISTM Travel Medicine Conference in Basel 2023; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid as the president/director of Kidsafe, the director of Auschem, a member of the governance committee of ISASH, the director of Farmsafe, the Vice President of ACTM, and as a PHAA Injury Prevention SIG Convenor; outside the submitted work. P S Gill reports support for the present manuscript from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) as Senior Investigator with payments to their institution; the views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. A Guha reports grants or contracts from the American Heart Association and Department of Defense; consulting fees from Pfizer, Novartis, and Myovant; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with ZERO Prostate Cancer Health Equity Task Force and Doctopedia as a founding medical partner; all outside the submitted work. C Herteliu reports grants or contracts from the Romanian Ministry of Research Innovation and Digitalization, MCID, project number ID-585-CTR-42-PFE-2021; grant of the European Commission Horizon 4P-CAN (Personalised Cancer Primary Prevention Research through Citizen Participation and Digitally Enabled Social Innovation); Project “Societal and Economic Resilience within multi-hazards environment in Romania” funded by European Union – NextgenerationEU and Romanian Government, under National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, contract no.760050/ 23.05.2023, cod PNRR-C9-I8-CF 267/ 29.11.2022, through the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, within Component 9, Investment I8; Project “A better understanding of socio-economic systems using quantitative methods from Physics” funded by European Union–NextgenerationEU and Romanian Government, under National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, contract number 760034/ 23.05.2023, cod PNRR-C9-I8-CF 255/ 29.11.2022, through the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, within Component 9, Investment I8; outside the submitted work. M Hultström reports support for the present manuscript from Knut och Alice Wallenberg Foundation and the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, all as payments to their institution; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from the American Physiological Society and the Swedish Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with the American Physiological Society, Water and Electrolyte Section; all outside the submitted work. I Ilic and M Ilic report support for the present manuscript from Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia. S M Islam reports support for the present manuscript from NHMRC and Heart Foundation, N E Ismail reports leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, as Bursar (Council Member) of the Malaysian Academy of Pharmacy, outside the submitted work. T Joo reports support for the present manuscript from National Research, Development, and Innovation Office in Hungary (RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00006), Data-Driven Health Division of National Laboratory for Health Security. G Joshy reports grants or contracts from the Department of Health and Aged Care 2023 (Understanding the fatal burden of COVID-19 in residential aged care facilities); support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Statistical Society of Australia Grant 2023 supporting conference registration; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board with the Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute (AMSI) and the Statistical Society of Australia (SSA) for the project Community-led nutrition and Lifestyle program for weight loss and metabolic Health: a randomised Controlled trial (ELCHO), 2022; all outside the submitted work. J Jozwiak reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Novartis, Adamed, and Amgen; outside the submitted work. N Kawakami reports grants or contracts from the Junpukai Foundation and the Department of Digital Mental Health is an endowment department, supported with an unrestricted grant from 15 enterprises (https://dmh.m.u-tokyo.ac.jp/c); consulting fees from Riken Institute, JAXA, Sekisui Chemicals, and SB@WORK; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with the Japan Society for Occupational Health; all outside the submitted work. J H Kempen reports grants or contracts from the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Surgery Program and Sight for Souls through payments to their institution; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, as President of Sight for Souls; stock or stock options with Betaliq and Tarsier; all outside the submitted work. T Kocsis reports grants or contracts from Novartis Magyarország Ltd through payment for market access activities, outside the submitted work. K Krishan reports other non-financial interests from the UGC Centre of Advanced Study, CAS II, awarded to the Department of Anthropology, Panjab University (Chandigarh, India); outside the submitted work. B Lacey reports support for the present manuscript from the UK Biobank, funded largely by the UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome, through their employment at the University of Oxford. M Lee reports support for the present manuscript from the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1I1A4A01057428) and Bio-convergence Technology Education Program through the Korea Institute for Advancement Technology (KIAT) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (No. P0017805). M-C Li reports grants or contracts from The National Science and Technology Council in Taiwan (NSTC 112-2410-H-003-031; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, as the technical editor of the Journal of the American Heart Association; outside the submitted work. J Liu reports support for the present manuscript from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 72122001; 72211540398). S Lorkowski reports grants or contracts from Akcea Therapeutics Germany through payments to their institution; consulting fees from Danone, Novartis Pharma, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (SOBI), and Upfield; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Akcea Therapeutics Germany, AMARIN Germany, Amedes Holding, AMGEN, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo Deutschland, Danone, Hubert Burda Media Holding, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly Deutschland, Novartis Pharma, Novo Nordisk Pharma, Roche Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, and SYNLAB Holding Deutschland & SYNLAB Akademie; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AMGEN; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Akcea Therapeutics Germany, AMGEN, Daiichi Sankyo Deutschland, Novartis Pharma, and Sanofi-Aventis; all outside the submitted work. M A Mahmoud reports grant or contract funding from the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia (project number 445-5-748). L G Mantovani reports support for the present manuscript from the Italian Ministry of Health. H R Marateb reports support for the present manuscript from The Beatriu de Pinós post-doctoral programme from the Office of the Secretary of Universities and Research from the Ministry of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia programme: 2020 BP 00261. R Matzopoulos reports consulting fees from New York University and DG Murray Trust; Support for attending meetings/travel paid by SA MRC and University of Cape Town; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, as a Board member of Gun Free South Africa; Stock or Stock options with Sanlam; outside the submitted work. R J Maude reports support for the present manuscript from Wellcome Trust [Grant number 220211] as it provides core funding for Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research and contributes to his salary. A-F A Mentis reports grants or contract funding from ‘MilkSafe: A novel pipeline to enrich formula milk using omics technologies’, a research co financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH - CREATE - INNOVATE (project code: T2EDK-02222), as well as from ELIDEK (Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation, MIMS-860) (both outside of the present manuscript); payment for expert testimony from serving as external peer-reviewer for FONDAZIONE CARIPLO, ITALY; participation in a Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board as Editorial Board Member for “Systematic Reviews”, for “Annals of Epidemiology”, and as Associate Editor for “Translational Psychiatry”; stock or stock options from a family winery; and other financial interests as the current scientific officer for BGI Group; outside the submitted work. S A Meo reports support from King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (RSP-2024 R47). T R Miller reports grants or contracts from AB InBev Foundation, National Institute for Mental Health (Santa Clara County, CA), and Everytown for Gun Safety; payment for expert testimony in the states of Michigan, Nevada & New Mexico Mobile County Board of Health; outside the submitted work. P B Mitchell reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events, from Janssen (Australia), outside the submitted work. L Monasta reports support for the present manuscript from the Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 34/2017) through payments made to the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo. R S Moreira reports grants or contracts from CNPq Research Productivity Scholarship (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) scholarship registration number 316607/2021-5; outside the submitted work. J Mosser reports support for the present manuscript from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; grants or contractions from Gavi; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; outside the submitted work. S Nomura reports support for the present manuscript from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (21H03203) and Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJPR22R8). B Norrving reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Simbec Orion, outside the submitted work. A P Okekunle reports support for the present manuscript from the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2020H1D3A1A04081265). A Ortiz reports grants or contracts from Sanofi as payments to their institution; consulting fees, speaker fees or support for travel from, Advicciene, Astellas, Astrazeneca, Amicus, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Fresenius Medical, Care, GSK, Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Menarini, Mundipharma, Kyowa Kirin, Lilly, Alexion, Freeline, Idorsia, Chiesi, Otsuka, Novo-Nordisk, Sysmex and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal, Pharma and is Director of the Catedra, Mundipharma-UAM of diabetic kidney disease, and the Catedra Astrazeneca-UAM of chronic, kidney disease and electrolytes; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with the European Renal Association; stock or stock options with Telara Farma; all outside the submitted work. P K Pal reports grants or contracts paid to their institution from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), the Department of Science & Technology (DST)-Science and Engineering Research Board, the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), DST-Cognitive Science Research Initiative, Wellcome Trust UK-India Alliance DBT, PACE scheme of BIRAC, Michael J. Fox Foundation, and SKAN (Scientific Knowledge for Ageing and Neurological ailments)-Research Trust; Payment and honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events as Faculty/Speaker/Author from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, and Movement Disorder Societies of Korea, Taiwan and Bangladesh; support for attending meetings and/or travel from the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, and Movement Disorder Societies of Korea, Taiwan and Bangladesh; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, as the Past President of Indian Academy of Neurology, Past Secretary of Asian and Oceanian subsection of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS-AOS), Editor-in-Chief of Annals of Movement Disorders, Chair of the Education Committee of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (IPMDS), President of the Parkinson Society of Karnataka, Chair of Infection Related Movement Disorders Study Group of MDS, Member of Rare Movement Disorders Study Group of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (IPMDS), Member of Education Committee of IAPRD, Member of Rating Scales Education and Training Program Committee of IPMDS, Member of Neurophysiology Task Force of IPMDS, Member of Movement Disorders in Asia Study Group, Member of Post-Stroke Movement Disorders, Member of Ataxia Study Group of IPMDS, and as a Member of Ataxia Global Initiative; all outside the submitted work. C Palladino reports grants or contracts from FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (national funding), under a contract-programme as defined by DL No. 57/2016 and Law No. 57/2017 (DL57/2016/CP1376/CT0004). DOI 10.54499/DL57/2016/CP1376/CT0004 (https://doi.org/10.54499/DL57/2016/CP1376/CT0004). R F Palma-Alvarez reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Angelini, Lundbeck, Casen Recordati and Takeda; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen and Lundbeck; all outside the submitted work. A M Pantea Stoian reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Sandoz, and Sanofi; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Sandoz, Medochemie, Servier, and Sanofi; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, and Medochemie; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, with the Central European Diabetes Association and the Association for Renal-Metabolic & Nutritional Studies(ASRMN); outside the submitted work. R Passera reports Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with the non-profit clinical trial “Consolidation with ADCT-402 (loncastuximab tesirine) after immunochemotherapy: a phase II study in BTKi-treated/ineligible Relapse/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) patients” - sponsor FIL, Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, Alessandria-I (unpaid role); leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, Member of the Statistical Committee of the EBMT – European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation, Paris-F (unpaid role); outside the submitted work. A E Peden reports support for the present manuscript from the [Australian] National Health and Medical Research Council (Grant Number: APP2009306). V C F Pepito reports grants or contracts from Sanofi Consumer Healthcare and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation; outside the submitted work. M Pigeolet reports a grant from the Belgian Kids' Fund for Pediatric Research, outside the submitted work. T Pilgrim reports grants paid to the institution without personal remuneration from Biotronik, Edwards Lifesciences, and ATSens; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Biosensors, and Highlife; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for EMPIRE study sponsored by Biosensors; and receipt of equipment (AT-Patches) from ATSens; outside the submitted work. D Prieto-Alhambra reports support for the present manuscript from European Medicines Agency and Innovative Medicines Initiative, through their institution; grants or contracts from Amgen, Chiesi-Taylor, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB Biopharma through their institution; consulting fees from Astra Zeneca and UCB Biopharma; other financial or non-financial interest in Amgen, Astellas, Janssen, Synapse Management Partners and UCB Biopharma for supported training programmes; outside the submitted work. A Radfar reports support for the present manuscript from Avicenna Medical and Clinical Research Institute. A Rane reports stock or stock options as a full-time employee at Agios Pharmaceuticals; outside the submitted work. L F Reyes reports grants or contracts form MSD and Pfizer; consulting fees from GSK, MSD, and Pfizer; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from GSK and Pfizer; payment for expert testimony from GSK and MSD; support for attending meetings and/or travel from GSK; outside the submitted work. T G Rhee reports grants or contracts from the NIH (R21AG070666; R21DA057540; R21AG078972; R01MH131528; R01AG080647); outside the submitted work. S Sacco reports grants or contracts from Novartis and Uriach; consulting fees from Novartis, Allergan-Abbvie, Teva, Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, Abbott, AstraZeneca; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Novartis, Allergan-Abbvie, Teva, Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, Abbott, AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Lilly, Novartis, Teva, Lundbeck; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, as the President elect of the European Stroke Organization, and the Second vice-president of the European Headache Federation; receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Allergan-Abbvie, Novo Nordisk; all outside the submitted work. P Sachdev reports grants or contracts from national Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the US National Institutes of Health; Payment or honoraria for lectures from Alkem Labs for the Frontiers of Psychiatry June 2023 Seminar, Mumbai, India; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Biogen Australia and Roche Australia; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid, with the VASCOG Society and the World Psychiatric Association; all outside the submitted work. Y L Samodra reports grants or contracts from Taipei Medical University; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with the Benang Merah Research Center; all outside the submitted work. J Sanabria reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Department of Surgery, Marshall University School of Medicine; three patents pending; participation in quality assessment and assurance for surgeries of the Department of Surgery; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid with SSAT, ASTS, AHPBA, IHPBA, and AASLD; all outside the submitted work. N Scarmeas reports grants or contracts with Novo Nordisk as the Local PI of recruiting site for multinational, multicenter industry sponsored phase III treatment trial for Alzheimer's disease with funding paid to the institution; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Albert Einstein College of Medicine (NIH funded study) as the Chair of Data Safety Monitoring Board; all outside the submitted work. A E Schutte reports Speaker Honoraria from Servier, Novartis, Sanofi, Medtronic, Abbott, Omron, Aktiia; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Servier, Medtronic, and Abbott; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Abbott Pharmaceuticals Advisory Board, Skylabs devices Advisory Board; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with Co-Chair: National Hypertension Taskforce of Australia, Board Member: Hypertension Australia, Company Secretary: Australian Cardiovascular Alliance; all outside the submitted work. B M Schaarschmidt reports research grants from Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundatuin, DFG, and PharmaCept; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Bayer AG; all outside the submitted work. M Šekerija reports consulting fees from Roche; Payment or Honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Johnson and Johnson, and Astellas; outside the submitted work. A Sharifan reports leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, unpaid with Cochrane as a steering member of the Cochrane Early Career Professionals Network; and receipt of thirty days of complimentary access to ScienceDirect, Scopus, Reaxys, and Geofacets after reviewing manuscripts for two journals published by Elsevier; outside the submitted work. S Sharma reports support for the present manuscript from the John J. Bonica Postdoctoral Fellowship from the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP; 2021-2023); Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events and a travel grant for delivering a talk on “Technologies for pain education in developing countries” conducted by the Pain Education SIG of the IASP at the World Pain Congress in Toronto (2022); outside the submitted work. V Sharma reports other financial or non-financial support from DFSS (MHA)'s research project (DFSS28(1)2019/EMR/6) at Institute of Forensic Science & Criminology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, outside the submitted work. K Shibuya reports support for the present manuscript from Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research. V Shivarov reports one patent and one utility model with the Bulgarian Patent Office; stock or stock options from ICONplc (RSUs); and other financial interests from an ICONplc salary; all outside the submitted work. S Shrestha reports other financial interests from the Graduate Research Merit Scholarship from the School of Pharmacy at Monash University Malaysia, outside the submitted work. J P Silva reports support for the present manuscript from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through payment of their salary (contract with reference 2021.01789.CEECIND/CP1662/CT0014). L M L R Silva reports grants or contracts from CENTRO-04-3559-FSE-000162, Fundo Social Europeu (FSE), outside the submitted work. C R Simpson reports grants or contracts from MBIE (NZ), HRC (NZ), Ministry of Health (NZ), MRC (UK), and CSO (UK); Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid with the New Zealand Government Data Ethics Advisory Group as the Chair; outside the submitted work. D J Stein reports consulting fees from Discovery Vitality, Johnson & Johnson, Kanna, L'Oreal, Lundbeck, Orion, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, and Vistagen, outside the submitted work. K Stibrant Sunnerhagen reports Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid as the head of the scientific committee of the Sweidhs Stroke Foundation; outside the submitted work. S Stortecky reports grants or contracts paid to their institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; consulting fees from Teleflex; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Boston Scientific/BTG; outside the submitted work. A G Thrift reports grants or contracts paid to their institution from the National Health & Medical Research Council (Australia) (grant numbers 1171966, 1182071), Heart Foundation (Aus) and the Stroke Foundation (Australia); outside the submitted work. J H V Ticoalu reports Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with Benang Merah Research Center as co-founder, outside the submitted work. M V Titova reports support for the present manuscript from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. 122042600086-7). S J Tromans reports grants or contracts from the 2023 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey team, collecting epidemiological data on community-based adults living in England. This is a contracted study from NHS Digital, via the Department of Health and Social Care; outside the submitted work. P Willeit reports consulting fees from Novartis; outside the submitted work. M Zielińska reports other financial interest as an AstraZeneca employee, outside the submitted work. A Zumla reports grants or contracts from The Pan-African Network on Emerging and Re-Emerging Infections (PANDORA-ID-NET, CANTAM-3, and EACCR-3) funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, the EU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Senior Investigator, and Mahathir Science Award and EU-EDCTP Pascoal Mocumbi Prize Laureate; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board member of the WHO Mass Gatherings Expert Group and WHO Health Emergencies Programme in Geneva, a member of the EU-EDCTP3-Global Health (Brussels) Scientific Committee; all outside the submitted work.

References 78

  1. 1.

    Murray CJL. The Global Burden of Disease Study at 30 years. Nat Med. 2022;28:2019-2026.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-022-01990-1

  2. 2.

    World Bank. 1993.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Protocol for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD). Version 4.0. March, 2020.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385:117-171.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61682-2

  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Johnson SC, Cunningham M, Dippenaar IN, et al. Public health utility of cause of death data: applying empirical algorithms to improve data quality. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21:175.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12911-021-01501-1

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Doi SAR, Williams GM. Methods of clinical epidemiology. 2013.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Stevens GA, Alkema L, Black RE, et al. Guidelines for accurate and transparent health estimates reporting: the GATHER statement. Lancet. 2016;388:e19-e23.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30388-9

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Levin AT, Owusu-Boaitey N, Pugh S, et al. Assessing the burden of COVID-19 in developing countries: systematic review, meta-analysis and public policy implications. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008477

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Telles CR, Roy A, Ajmal MR, et al. The impact of COVID-19 management policies tailored to airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmission: policy analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7.

    Not in our library10.2196/20699

  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response. COVID-19: make it the last pandemic. May 21, 2021.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01095-3

  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Haws R, Winch PJ, Castillo J. 2004.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Whiteside A, Henry FE. The impact of HIV and AIDS research: a case study from Swaziland. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9(suppl 1):S9.

    Not in our library10.1186/1478-4505-9-s1-s9

  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.

    Duarte R, Silva DR, Rendon A, et al. Eliminating tuberculosis in Latin America: making it the point. J Bras Pneumol. 2018;44:73-76.

    Not in our library10.1590/s1806-37562017000000449

  29. 29.

    WHO. 2022.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    WHO. 2023.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Rosenthal PJ, John CC, Rabinovich NR. Malaria: how are we doing and how can we do better? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;100:239-241.

    Not in our library10.4269/ajtmh.18-0997

  32. 32.

    Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207-211.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature15535

  33. 33.

    WHO. 2023.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Naddaf M. Second malaria vaccine to win global approval is cheaper and easier to make. Nature. 2023.

    Not in our library10.1038/d41586-023-03115-1

  35. 35.

    Black R, Fontaine O, Lamberti L, et al. Drivers of the reduction in childhood diarrhea mortality 1980-2015 and interventions to eliminate preventable diarrhea deaths by 2030. J Glob Health. 2019;9.

    Not in our library10.7189/jogh.09.020801

  36. 36.
  37. 37.

    Das JK, Salam RA, Saeed M, Kazmi FA, Bhutta ZA. Effectiveness of interventions for managing acute malnutrition in children under five years of age in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12:116.

    Not in our library10.3390/nu12010116

  38. 38.

    Mertens A, Benjamin-Chung J, Colford JM, et al. Causes and consequences of child growth faltering in low-resource settings. Nature. 2023;621:568-576.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-023-06501-x

  39. 39.

    Reiner RC, Hay SI. The overlapping burden of the three leading causes of disability and death in sub-Saharan African children. Nat Commun. 2022;13.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-34240-6

  40. 40.

    Shah MP, Tate JE, Mwenda JM, Steele AD, Parashar UD. Estimated reductions in hospitalizations and deaths from childhood diarrhea following implementation of rotavirus vaccination in Africa. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16:987-995.

    Not in our library10.1080/14760584.2017.1371595

  41. 41.

    Reiner RC, Graetz N, Casey DC, et al. Variation in childhood diarrheal morbidity and mortality in Africa, 2000–2015. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1128-1138.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1716766

  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    Deshpande A, Miller-Petrie MK, Lindstedt PA, et al. Mapping geographical inequalities in access to drinking water and sanitation facilities in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000–17. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e1162-e1185.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30278-3

  45. 45.

    Bhattacharjee NV, Schaeffer LE, Hay SI, et al. Mapping inequalities in exclusive breastfeeding in low- and middle-income countries, 2000-2018. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5:1027-1045.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41562-021-01108-6

  46. 46.

    Wiens KE, Lindstedt PA, Blacker BF, et al. Mapping geographical inequalities in oral rehydration therapy coverage in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000–17. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e1038-e1060.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30230-8

  47. 47.

    Reiner RC, Graetz N, Casey DC, et al. Local variation in childhood diarrheal morbidity and mortality in Africa, 2000-2015. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1128-1138.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1716766

  48. 48.
  49. 49.

    Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Enteric and diarrheal diseases.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.
  51. 51.
  52. 52.

    Barros LL, Barros LL, do Carmo RF, et al. Change in rotavirus vaccine coverage in Brazil from before (2015–2019) through the COVID-19 pandemic period (2020–2021). Viruses. 2023;15:292.

    Not in our library10.3390/v15020292

  53. 53.

    DeSilva MB, Haapala J, Vazquez-Benitez G, et al. Association of the COVID-19 pandemic with routine childhood vaccination rates and proportion up to date with vaccinations across 8 US health systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176:68-77.

    Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4251

  54. 54.

    WHO. 2023.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    WHO. 2023.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Moss WJ, Strebel PM. Plotkin's Vaccines. 2023;629-663.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    PAHO, WHO. Measles elimination in the Americas. Sept 27, 2016.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Gidding HF, Martin NV, Stambos V, et al. Verification of measles elimination in Australia: application of World Health Organization regional guidelines. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2016;6:197-209.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jegh.2015.12.004

  59. 59.

    WHO. Tenth meeting of the European Regional Verification Commission for Measles and Rubella Elimination: summary of virtual sessions held on Oct 6, 2021, Nov 2, 2021, Dec 8, 2021, and Feb 16, 2022.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Sbarra AN, Rolfe S, Nguyen JQ, et al. Mapping routine measles vaccination in low- and middle-income countries. Nature. 2021;589:415-419.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-03043-4

  61. 61.

    Minta AA, Ferrari M, Antoni S, et al. Progress toward regional measles elimination—worldwide, 2000–2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:1489-1495.

    Not in our library10.15585/mmwr.mm7147a1

  62. 62.

    Majekodunmi OB, Oladele EA, Greenwood B. Factors affecting poor measles vaccination coverage in sub-Saharan Africa with a special focus on Nigeria: a narrative review. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022;116:686-693.

    Not in our library10.1093/trstmh/trac013

  63. 63.

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Condom use for preventing HIV infection. 2018.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. HIV prevention. 2020.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.
  66. 66.

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. HIV undetectable=untransmittable (U=U), or treatment as prevention. 2019.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    Akpa OM, Adeolu-Olaiya V, Olusegun-Odebiri CA, Aganaba D. HIV/AIDS-related stigma and access to HIV treatments by people living with HIV/AIDS: a case study of selected states in north-west Nigeria. HIV AIDS Rev. 2011;10:19-25.

    Not in our library

  68. 68.

    Oturu K. Stigma in access to HIV treatment in African countries: the importance of social connections. Grounded Theory Rev. 2011;10:63-90.

    Not in our library

  69. 69.
  70. 70.

    Global HIV Prevention Working Group. Access to HIV prevention: closing the gap. Foreign Aff. 2003;82:1-42.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    Ford N, Boulle A, Egger M. Accounting for and responding to HIV-associated mortality. AIDS. 2016;30:521-523.

    Not in our library10.1097/qad.0000000000000900

  72. 72.

    Straetemans M, Bierrenbach AL, Nagelkerke N, Glaziou P, van der Werf MJ. The effect of tuberculosis on mortality in HIV positive people: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010;5.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0015241

  73. 73.

    Piot P, Bartos M, Larson H, Zewdie D, Mane P. Coming to terms with complexity: a call to action for HIV prevention. Lancet. 2008;372:845-859.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60888-0

  74. 74.

    Gupta GR, Parkhurst JO, Ogden JA, Aggleton P, Mahal A. Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet. 2008;372:764-775.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60887-9

  75. 75.
  76. 76.

    Saugstad OD. Reducing global neonatal mortality is possible. Neonatology. 2011;99:250-257.

    Not in our library10.1159/000320332

  77. 77.
  78. 78.

    Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Exemplars in global health. July 25, 2020.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 17

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.