Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Feb 25, 2023.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 29, 2026 · Read the notice

  • Corrected on Aug 31, 2024. Source: the publisher, via Crossref · Read the notice

Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression

Daniel R Feikin, Melissa M Higdon, Laith J Abu-Raddad and 11 more

The Lancet · 2022 · Meta-analysis · CC BY

doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00152-0

Abstract

Background. Knowing whether COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness wanes is crucial for informing vaccine policy, such as the need for and timing of booster doses. We aimed to systematically review the evidence for the duration of protection of COVID-19 vaccines against various clinical outcomes, and to assess changes in the rates of breakthrough infection caused by the delta variant with increasing time since vaccination.

Methods. This study was designed as a systematic review and meta-regression. We did a systematic review of preprint and peer-reviewed published article databases from June 17, 2021, to Dec 2, 2021. Randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and observational studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness were eligible. Studies with vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates at discrete time intervals of people who had received full vaccination and that met predefined screening criteria underwent full-text review. We used random-effects meta-regression to estimate the average change in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness 1–6 months after full vaccination.

Findings. Of 13 744 studies screened, 310 underwent full-text review, and 18 studies were included (all studies were carried out before the omicron variant began to circulate widely). Risk of bias, established using the risk of bias 2 tool for randomised controlled trials or the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool was low for three studies, moderate for eight studies, and serious for seven studies. We included 78 vaccine-specific vaccine efficacy or effectiveness evaluations (Pfizer–BioNTech-Comirnaty, n=38; Moderna-mRNA-1273, n=23; Janssen-Ad26.COV2.S, n=9; and AstraZeneca-Vaxzevria, n=8). On average, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection decreased from 1 month to 6 months after full vaccination by 21·0 percentage points (95% CI 13·9–29·8) among people of all ages and 20·7 percentage points (10·2–36·6) among older people (as defined by each study, who were at least 50 years old). For symptomatic COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 24·9 percentage points (95% CI 13·4–41·6) in people of all ages and 32·0 percentage points (11·0–69·0) in older people. For severe COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 10·0 percentage points (95% CI 6·1–15·4) in people of all ages and 9·5 percentage points (5·7–14·6) in older people. Most (81%) vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates against severe disease remained greater than 70% over time.

Interpretation. COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against severe disease remained high, although it did decrease somewhat by 6 months after full vaccination. By contrast, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against infection and symptomatic disease decreased approximately 20–30 percentage points by 6 months. The decrease in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness is likely caused by, at least in part, waning immunity, although an effect of bias cannot be ruled out. Evaluating vaccine efficacy or effectiveness beyond 6 months will be crucial for updating COVID-19 vaccine policy.

Funding. Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.

References 49

  1. 1.

    WHO. Guidance document: status of COVID-19 vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ evaluation process. 2021.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    WHO. COVID-19 weekly epidemiological update, edition 50, 27 July 2021. 2021.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Harder T, Koch J, Vygen-Bonnet S, et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection: interim results of a living systematic review, 1 January to 14 May 2021. Euro Surveill. 2021;26.

    Not in our library10.2807/1560-7917.es.2021.26.28.2100563

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Higdon MM, Wahl B, Jones CB, et al. A systematic review of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.09.17.21263549

  6. 6.

    Kow CS, Hasan SS. Real-world effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: a meta-analysis of large observational studies. Inflammopharmacology. 2021;29:1075-1090.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10787-021-00839-2

  7. 7.

    Meggiolaro A, Schepisi MS, Nikolaidis G, Mipatrini D, Siddu A, Rezza G. Effectiveness of vaccination against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.08.25.21262529

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    International Vaccine Access Center. Results of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness & impact studies: an ongoing systematic review, methods. 2021.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM, et al. Waning immunity after the BNT162b2 vaccine in Israel. New Engl J Med. 2021;385:e85.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2114228

  11. 11.

    Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.i4919

  12. 12.

    Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.l4898

  13. 13.

    Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19. Nov 2, 2021.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Breslow NE, Day NE. The design and analysis of cohort studies. 1987;vol 2:1-406.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. 1982.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Kertes J, Gez SB, Saciuk Y, et al. Effectiveness of the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine six months after vaccination: findings from a large Israeli HMO. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.09.01.21262957

  17. 17.

    Israel A, Merzon E, Schäffer AA, et al. Elapsed time since BNT162b2 vaccine and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: test negative design study. BMJ. 2021;375.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj-2021-067873

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    El Sahly HM, Baden LR, Essink B, et al. Efficacy of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at completion of blinded phase. New Engl J Med. 2021;385:1774-1785.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2113017

  20. 20.

    Thomas SJ, Moreira ED, Kitchin N, et al. Six month safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159

  21. 21.

    US Food and Drug Administration. FDA briefing document, EUA amendment request for a booster dose for the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. Oct 15, 2021.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Chemaitelly H, Tang P, Hasan MR, et al. Waning of BNT162b2 vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Qatar. New Engl J Med. 2021;385:e83.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2114114

  23. 23.

    Martínez-Baz I, Trobajo-Sanmartín C, Miqueleiz A, et al. Product-specific COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against secondary infection in close contacts, Navarre, Spain, April to August 2021. Euro Surveill. 2021;26.

    Not in our library10.2807/1560-7917.es.2021.26.39.2100894

  24. 24.

    Thompson MG, Stenehjem E, Grannis S, et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines in ambulatory and inpatient care settings. New Engl J Med. 2021;385:1355-1371.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2110362

  25. 25.

    Andrews N, Tessier E, Stowe J, et al. Vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection of Comirnaty, Vaxzevria and Spikevax against mild and severe COVID-19 in the UK. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.09.15.21263583

  26. 26.

    Bruxvoort KJ, Sy LS, Qian L, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against Delta, Mu, and other emerging variants. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.09.29.21264199

  27. 27.

    Self WH, Tenforde MW, Rhoads JP, et al. Comparative effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) vaccines in preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations among adults without immunocompromising conditions: United States, March–August 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:1337-1343.

    Not in our library10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1

  28. 28.

    Tartof SY, Slezak JM, Fischer H, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2021;398:1407-1416.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02183-8

  29. 29.

    Lin D-Y, Gu Y, Wheeler B, et al. Effectiveness of covid-19 vaccines in the United States over 9 months: surveillance data from the state of North Carolina. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.10.25.21265304

  30. 30.

    Nordström P, Ballin M, Nordström A. Effectiveness of covid-19 vaccination against risk of symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and death up to 9 months: a Swedish total-population cohort study. SSRN. 2021.

    Not in our library10.2139/ssrn.3949410

  31. 31.

    Skowronski DM, Setayeshgar S, Febriani Y, et al. Two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness with mixed schedules and extended dosing intervals: test-negative design studies from British Columbia and Quebec, Canada. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.10.26.21265397

  32. 32.

    Tenforde MW, Self WH, Naioti EA, et al. Sustained effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines against COVID-19 associated hospitalizations among adults: United States, March–July 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:1156-1162.

    Not in our library10.15585/mmwr.mm7034e2

  33. 33.

    Irizarry RA, Robles-Fontán MM, Nieves EG, Cardona-Gerena I. Time-varying effectiveness of three COVID-19 vaccines in Puerto Rico. SSRN. 2021.

    Not in our library10.2139/ssrn.3957118

  34. 34.

    Poukka E, Baum U, Palmu AA, et al. Cohort study of covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers in Finland, December 2020–October 2021. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.11.03.21265791

  35. 35.

    Hall V, Foulkes S, Insalata F, et al. Effectiveness and durability of protection against future SARS-CoV-2 infection conferred by COVID-19 vaccination and previous infection; findings from the UK SIREN prospective cohort study of healthcare workers March 2020 to September 2021. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.11.29.21267006

  36. 36.

    Baden LR, Sahly HME, Essink B, et al. Covid-19 in the phase 3 trial of mRNA-1273 during the Delta-variant surge. medRxiv. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.09.17.21263624

  37. 37.

    US Food and Drug Administration. BNT162b2 [Comirnaty (COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA)] evaluation of a booster dose (third dose) vaccines and related biological products advisory committee briefing document. 2021.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Rosenberg ES, Dorabawila V, Easton D, et al. Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness in New York state. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:116-127.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2116063

  39. 39.

    Dolgin E. COVID vaccine immunity is waning: how much does that matter? Nature. 2021;597:606-607.

    Not in our library10.1038/d41586-021-02532-4

  40. 40.

    Hamady A, Lee J, Loboda ZA. Waning antibody responses in COVID-19: what can we learn from the analysis of other coronaviruses? Infection. 2021.

    Not in our library10.1007/s15010-021-01664-z

All 49 references

Cited by papers we hold 8

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.