Controversies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Immediate versus watchful waiting for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ventingCentral Message
Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas, MD, MSc, Pierre-Emmanuel Noly, MD, PhD, Gurmeet Singh, MD, MSc and 1 more
JTCVS Open · 2021
doi:10.1016/j.xjon.2021.10.008 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may improve systemic perfusion without increasing myocardial work. Restoration of oxygen delivery with reduced myocardial oxygen demand favors myocardial recovery. The hemodynamic effects of MCS have been extensively studied and elegantly reviewed previously. Pressure-volume loop simulations suggest that although venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may improve systemic perfusion, accompanying consequences on left ventricular (LV) dynamics may be detrimental.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References32
- 11.
- 12.
- 24.
29 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.