Transcriptional Control by Premature Termination: A Forgotten Mechanism

1It is well established that early termination can serve as an important mechanism for transcriptional control. PTT (see Glossary), or ‘attenuation’, was demonstrated during the mid-1970s to be a key regulatory event for the synthesis of bacterial enzymes that make amino acids,, and first reported in 1979 to occur for RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription of a viral gene in mammalian cells. Many more cases of eukaryotic PTT have been identified, even though their analysis was hampered by technical limitations and the highly unstable nature of prematurely terminated RNA. The recent development of next-generation sequencing technologies combined with novel methods to measure nascent transcription, single-molecule footprints, and advanced live-imaging makes it possible to revisit this paradigm. In this review, we present recent findings on metazoan PTT, revealing its widespread nature and role in the regulation of protein-coding genes. While we focus on metazoans, a broader perspective of PTT in other kingdoms of life is summarised in Box 1. Our definition of PTT is the release of Pol II from the gene template between the TSS and 3′-untranslated region (UTR; Figure 1, Key Figure) of the gene. We note that transcription termination is tightly linked with RNA 3′ cleavage and polyadenylation (CPA). Consequently, these two terms are often used ambiguously or even confused in the literature. Multiple recent reviews provide a general background to RNA 3′ processing and transcription termination,,,,,,, as well as APA,,,,.PTT has been long known to be a key regulatory event in bacteria, referred to as attenuation. Classically, attenuation was shown to control the expression of enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis, such as the tryptophan and histidine operons,. Bacterial terminators can be intrinsic, associated with a hairpin RNA structure, or factor dependent, usually involving the RNA helicase Rho. Attenuation occurs when an antiterminator hairpin RNA forms ahead of an intrinsic terminator positioned near the 5′ end of an operon. Formation of the antiterminator hairpin precludes the formation of the intrinsic terminator hairpin and so allows transcription to read into the operon and express its protein-coding regions. Switching between the antiterminator and terminator hairpins is controlled by diverse regulators,. Given that translation occurs co-transcriptionally, PTT is closely coupled to translation regulation. This differentiates it from eukaryotic regulation.PTT is also a well-recognised regulatory mechanism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mediated by the Nrd1–Nab3–Sen1 (NNS) complex. The first example of attenuation by NNS was demonstrated for the NRD1 gene, which is autoregulated by PTT in response to Nrd1 activity. NNS-mediated PTT further regulates genes involved in nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis, as well as nitrogen metabolism, and is physiologically relevant upon nutritional shift,,,. The prematurely terminated transcripts sometimes initiate at a TSS upstream of the protein-coding gene. Interestingly, it was recently shown that the DNA repair gene DEF1 is attenuated by Sen1 and CPA factors, without Nrd1 and Nab3 involvement; therefore, PTT in S. cerevisiae might not be limited to the NNS pathway.There are no Nrd1/Nab3 homologues known in plants. However, PTT has an elaborate role in the control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. FLC is a transcription factor that acts as a master regulator of flowering. It is carefully titrated: small changes in FLC transcript levels significantly affect flowering. The accumulation of FLC mRNA is prevented by FCA and FPA, two RNA-binding proteins associated with RNA 3′-processing factors. FCA and FPA autoregulate their own levels by premature polyadenylation and termination, independently of each other,. Interestingly, they also promote early termination of the lncRNA COOLAIR,. COOLAIR is an antisense transcript to FLC, and functions in early cold-induced silencing of FLC transcription. As a result, several layers of premature termination of coding and noncoding transcripts act to control the timing of plant flowering. It is likely that other examples of PTT will be established in plants.Alt-text: Box 1

2PTT has been long known to be a key regulatory event in bacteria, referred to as attenuation. Classically, attenuation was shown to control the expression of enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis, such as the tryptophan and histidine operons,. Bacterial terminators can be intrinsic, associated with a hairpin RNA structure, or factor dependent, usually involving the RNA helicase Rho. Attenuation occurs when an antiterminator hairpin RNA forms ahead of an intrinsic terminator positioned near the 5′ end of an operon. Formation of the antiterminator hairpin precludes the formation of the intrinsic terminator hairpin and so allows transcription to read into the operon and express its protein-coding regions. Switching between the antiterminator and terminator hairpins is controlled by diverse regulators,. Given that translation occurs co-transcriptionally, PTT is closely coupled to translation regulation. This differentiates it from eukaryotic regulation.

3PTT is also a well-recognised regulatory mechanism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mediated by the Nrd1–Nab3–Sen1 (NNS) complex. The first example of attenuation by NNS was demonstrated for the NRD1 gene, which is autoregulated by PTT in response to Nrd1 activity. NNS-mediated PTT further regulates genes involved in nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis, as well as nitrogen metabolism, and is physiologically relevant upon nutritional shift,,,. The prematurely terminated transcripts sometimes initiate at a TSS upstream of the protein-coding gene. Interestingly, it was recently shown that the DNA repair gene DEF1 is attenuated by Sen1 and CPA factors, without Nrd1 and Nab3 involvement; therefore, PTT in S. cerevisiae might not be limited to the NNS pathway.

4There are no Nrd1/Nab3 homologues known in plants. However, PTT has an elaborate role in the control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. FLC is a transcription factor that acts as a master regulator of flowering. It is carefully titrated: small changes in FLC transcript levels significantly affect flowering. The accumulation of FLC mRNA is prevented by FCA and FPA, two RNA-binding proteins associated with RNA 3′-processing factors. FCA and FPA autoregulate their own levels by premature polyadenylation and termination, independently of each other,. Interestingly, they also promote early termination of the lncRNA COOLAIR,. COOLAIR is an antisense transcript to FLC, and functions in early cold-induced silencing of FLC transcription. As a result, several layers of premature termination of coding and noncoding transcripts act to control the timing of plant flowering. It is likely that other examples of PTT will be established in plants.

5Alt-text: Box 1

6PTT of a protein-coding gene can be divided into termination events occurring close to the TSS or within the gene body (Figure 1). We predict that PTTs at these two locations are likely to be functionally and mechanistically different, since they occur at different stages of the transcription cycle.

7For many genes, their TSS is characterised by high accumulation of Pol II, as measured by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). This depends on the action of negative elongation factor (NELF) and DRB sensitivity-inducing factor (DSIF), typically occurring 30–50 base pairs downstream of the TSS. Such a Pol II ‘pileup’ is usually interpreted as stable pausing of engaged Pol II. However, it may be also due to PTT with concomitant Pol II turnover. Several lines of evidence support the latter: termination and RNA 3′-processing factors have been observed to accumulate at the 5′ ends of genes,, short nuclear capped transcripts have been detected, and RNA cleavage sites near the TSS were identified. Over the past 2 years, more direct experiments have demonstrated that a high percentage of TSS-bound Pol II molecules terminate prematurely.

8Pol II binding to the genome was recently measured at a single-molecule resolution in Drosophila, with the aid of a novel single-molecule footprinting method. This revealed unexpectedly high levels of Pol II turnover at the promoters of paused genes. In particular, the measured Pol II half-life at promoters of model paused genes was comparable to ‘nonpaused’, normally elongating genes. Therefore, Pol II accumulation at these promoters appears to be largely due to PTT, rather than to stable pausing of transcription-competent polymerases. This interpretation is further supported by an independent study that analysed the real-time dynamics of Pol II in live human cells using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Computational modelling of Pol II kinetics showed that initiating Pol II remains chromatin bound for only 2.4 s and promoter-paused Pol II for 42 s, in contrast to elongating Pol II, which remained chromatin bound on average for 23 min. These big differences in Pol II residence times suggest that only a small fraction of initiating and pausing Pol II proceeds through a complete transcription cycle, whereas most Pol II is released from chromatin at the promoter. Indeed, the determined rate constants showed that only ~10% of Pol II molecules that initiate transcription will go on to promoter pausing and, of those, only ~10% continue into productive elongation. Thus, this study indicates that 99% of transcription initiation events result in PTT at the promoter, with only 1% giving rise to mRNA. This surprisingly inefficient transcription initiation process is consistent with previous Pol II measurements on a lacO array. Furthermore, the inhibition of PTT is the most plausible explanation for the dramatic increase in promoter-associated Pol II within 2–3 min after H2O2 addition to U2OS cells. As a further clever way to investigate promoter-associated Pol II, the differential sensitivity of transcription initiation and elongation to high ionic strength has been used. This showed that blocking recruitment of Pol II to promoters (but not elongation) by high salt treatment affected its binding in ChIP followed by next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq), and revealed an almost complete loss of Pol II from promoter-proximal pause sites within 2–5 min. This loss was rapidly reversible and unaffected by transcriptional inhibitors. Therefore, Pol II removal from pause sites appears not to require elongation. Instead, a high rate of assembly and eviction of pre-initiated Pol II complexes at TSS is predicted. Although the above-mentioned studies used different methodologies, they all describe high turnover rates of Pol II at Drosophila or human promoters in various cell types,,,,. Therefore, it is unlikely that the observed turnover is an artefact from any one procedure or an unusual cell type. In conclusion, most initiating Pol II molecules appear to terminate prematurely. It follows that the release of Pol II into productive elongation may be regulated by inhibition of this promoter proximal Pol II termination.

9While promoter-proximal PTT has been largely overlooked, Pol II pausing in this location is well established in metazoans, and is tightly regulated by negative and positive elongation factors, such as P-TEFb,,. Several previous studies described longer median half-lives of paused Pol II,,,. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is the use of triptolide to block initiation. This blocks open complex formation by inhibition of TFIIH-associated XPB, and was assumed to prevent recruitment of stable Pol II complexes at promoters. However, triptolide also disturbs transcriptional regulation and Pol II stability. Additionally, there is a lag in the onset of XBP inhibition, which may prevent accurate half-life determination,. Further studies using different drugs and methods are required to resolve this discrepancy and so determine the relative contribution of promoter-proximal Pol II pausing versus PTT, to Pol II occupancy at promoters and to the control of productive elongation. Although technically challenging, it will be important to more directly determine the percentage of RNA molecules associated with paused Pol II, which, in physiological conditions, lead to mRNA production; that is, to demonstrate their assumed precursor–product relationship. Notably, paused Pol II blocks transcription initiation of additional polymerases,. As Pol II residence times are variable on different genes, the relevance of PTT and Pol II pausing is likely to be gene specific. Importantly, the two models explaining promoter-associated Pol II accumulation are not mutually exclusive; Pol II pausing may even have a direct role in early termination. Currently the mechanism of TSS-associated PTT remains unclear. For example, does Pol II disengagement from DNA in the vicinity of the TSS require a prior RNA cleavage step?

10Once Pol II overcomes the TSS-associated elongation checkpoint, subsequent PTT likely requires a co-transcriptional cleavage reaction at a cryptic polyadenylation site (PAS), mainly located in introns. PAS-mediated cleavage within internal exons appears to be a small fraction compared with introns, and leads to transcripts without a stop codon, which typically get rapidly degraded through the nonstop decay pathway, although, in rare cases, they can result in truncated proteins. PTT in the beginning of the first intron is frequent in conditions were U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex (U1 snRNP) or the cap-binding complex (CBC) are depleted,,, and partially coincides with a second Pol II stalling event at stable nucleosomes downstream of CpG island promoters. Such PTT leads to unstable transcripts that undergo rapid degradation (see next section). Most current knowledge of intragenic PTT comes from the analysis of stable premature polyadenylated transcripts, which can be readily detected by various RNA-sequencing methodologies. These stable transcripts are classified as instances of APA, as reviewed in. APA within the gene body, upstream of the 3′-UTR, has been referred to as coding sequence APA (CDS-APA), upstream region APA (UR-APA), intronic polyadenylation (IPA/IpA) or alternative last exon (ALE). We use the term ‘IPA’ here. IPA was first described for specific genes in 1980,,, but only recently has its widespread nature and significance been appreciated, due to the development of different PAS-sequencing methods. Thus, ~40% of murine genes and 16% of genes in human immune cells have been reported to express IPA isoforms. In particular, IPA has been shown to be a frequent genome-wide event, with diverse roles in immune cells, inactivation of tumour suppressor genes,and regulation of DNA repair genes. Notably, a systematic analysis of IPA in normal human tissues, primary immune cells, and multiple myeloma samples has been used to create an atlas of 4927 high-confidence IPA events in these cell types. IPA isoforms were shown to yield stable transcripts, which, in the case of 5′-proximal IPA, tend to produce noncoding RNA (ncRNA). By contrast, more 3′-proximal IPA events tend to produce truncated proteins.

11PTT may lead to three outcomes: rapid transcript degradation; formation of a more stable ncRNA; or production of a protein-coding, polyadenylated mRNA isoform (Figure 2). The more 5′ proximal a transcript is terminated, the more likely it is to be degraded. TSS-linked PTT might not require cleavage and could lead to unprocessed, unprotected, nonpolyadenylated RNA. Further downstream, transcripts may be cleaved and at least partially polyadenylated. Short transcripts appear to generally undergo quick degradation, similar to promoter upstream transcripts (PROMPT)/upstream antisense RNA, which also often yield exosome-sensitive RNA,,,. In the case of short sense transcripts, while PAS usage allows for transcript cleavage, this might not lead to efficient polyadenylation. Another explanation for the instability of short transcripts is that the 3′ entry site for the nuclear exosome in such transcripts is physically close to the 5′-capped end of the transcript, which is bound by the CBC, known to contribute to exosomal decay, especially of some classes of ncRNA,,. Overall, different surveillance pathways may operate at different parts of the gene. It is also plausible that productive 3′-end processing and RNA stability are transcript dependent and influenced by the new coding potential of the shorter isoform, its new 3′-UTR regulatory elements, and so on.

12Stable prematurely terminated RNAs are mainly polyadenylated and contribute to the IPA transcriptome. They can be further subdivided into ncRNA and protein-coding mRNA isoforms (Figure 2). Some ncRNA contain an open reading frame (ORF) and, therefore, might produce a micropeptide (<100 amino acids). Other ncRNA could serve specific functions. For example, PTT of ASCC3 leads to the formation of a stable ncRNA, which is critical for the recovery of transcription following ultraviolet (UV) damage. IPA-generated ncRNA also interact with RNA-binding proteins, which are normally enriched in the 3′-UTRs of coding transcripts, such as FUS, ELAVL1, PUM2, TAF15, and TIAL1. Such ncRNAs could act as scaffolds for RBPs and so regulate other RNA in trans.

13In the third scenario, protein-coding IPA isoforms (Figure 2) contribute to the diversity of the proteome, for example by generating proteins with physiologically distinct functions, or truncated dominant negative proteins. In the classic case of B cell expressed immunoglobulin M heavy chain mRNA, cellular activation causes a switch from full-length to IPA mRNA isoforms, resulting in a change from membrane-bound to secreted forms of the antibody,,. IPA appears to regulate membrane-anchoring properties of many other proteins. Computational analysis revealed that 376 mouse genes are likely to use the IPA mechanism to generate proteins with changes to their transmembrane domains (TMD). In human cells, although TMD-containing proteins are significantly depleted among IPA genes, 499 genes encoding transmembrane proteins undergo IPA and, in 152 cases, these lead to loss of the TMD. For example, IPA generates various mRNA isoforms of the transmembrane T cell co-stimulator CD46, which are predicted to form soluble CD46. Similarly, PTT variants encoding proteins with dominant negative functions, such as retinoblastoma-binding protein 6 (RBBP6),, MAGI3, or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα), have been also described. Interestingly, the site of premature polyadenylation is frequently located within a domain mediating either protein–protein interactions or DNA or RNA binding, such as zinc finger arrays. The partial loss of such interaction surfaces may lead to altered binding affinities for protein interaction partners and altered nucleic acid-binding specificity, respectively. Therefore, IPA may be physiologically relevant by allowing a diversification of protein function. By contrast, the widespread pathological use of premature polyadenylation has been uncovered in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Here, mRNA truncations by IPA are recurrent and predominantly affect genes with tumour-suppressive functions. This leads to either their inactivation or transformation into oncogenes. In conclusion, proteome alteration occurring as a result of IPA can be either beneficial or harmful.

14Regardless of whether the prematurely terminated transcript is stable or unstable, and independently of its ability to produce a functional ncRNA or protein, a potential outcome of early termination is the repression of the corresponding full-length mRNA (Figure 3). Such negative regulation has been demonstrated for the CSTF3 gene (known also as CSTF77), originally in Drosophila and then in humans,,. CSTF3 is a CPA complex subunit, stimulating cleavage. Premature CPA of CSTF3 is induced by high levels of CSTF3 protein, thus forming a negative feedback loop controlling its own activity, which is important for cell cycle control. The CSTF3 example suggested that PTT could be a more general mechanism to repress gene expression in metazoans.

15Supporting this possibility, the abundant U1 snRNP has been shown to function not only in splicing, but also by blocking widespread PTT in thousands of vertebrate genes,. Vertebrate genes often contain large introns, with numerous cryptic poly(A) signals. Therefore, they are inherently susceptible to PTT, although this is suppressed by U1. Interestingly, PTT is strongly activated upon UV treatment of cells, and correlates with decreased U1 snRNA levels and a slowdown in transcription elongation. These studies demonstrated the widespread predisposition of vertebrate genes to IPA. However, it was unclear whether PTT serves a regulatory role genome wide, or is a harmful genomic accident, induced by DNA damage and suppressed by U1. Physiological regulation is usually achieved by limiting factors, whereas U1 snRNP is extremely abundant, at ~1 million copies per human cell.

16Finally, it was recently shown that a subset of protein-coding genes is downregulated by PTT under physiological conditions, both in cultured human cells and during zebrafish embryogenesis. This is triggered by an RNA 3′-processing and termination factor called PCF11. Similar to CSTF3, PCF11 uses PTT as an autoregulatory mechanism,. However, 218 other human genes were additionally identified as downregulated by PCF11-mediated PTT. This is likely an underestimate, because many genes undergoing PCF11-mediated PTT might also be dependent on PCF11 for efficient full-length transcript expression. Interestingly, half of the PCF11-attenuated genes show PTT without detectable IPA products. This suggests that many transcripts generated by PTT under physiological conditions are unstable and that IPA corresponds to only a subset of intragenic PTT. Therefore, it will be important that future PTT studies also assay the nascent transcriptome. Notably, genes undergoing PCF11-mediated PTT are enriched for transcriptional regulators, both in humans and in zebrafish. Similarly, in primary human tissues, IPA has been shown to occur preferentially on genes encoding transcriptional regulators. PCF11 levels are an order of magnitude lower compared with other 3′-processing factors, but vary between tissues, making PCF11 a likely regulatory factor. Overall, those data indicate that PTT is a naturally occurring, widespread, and controlled phenomenon in vertebrates.

17Since PCF11 acts at both gene ends and throughout the gene body, it appears likely that other canonical CPA and termination factors are involved in PTT (Figure 4). Notably, XRN2, the nuclear 5′–3′ exonuclease ‘torpedo’ that facilitates transcription termination at the 3′ ends of genes, has been shown by ChIP-seq to also localise near TSS, and interact with decapping factors. Coupled decapping of nascent transcripts and PTT has been suggested to limit bidirectional Pol II elongation. PCF11 as well as CPSF73 is enriched at TSS in ChIP-seq. Additionally, in vivo crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) revealed that all analysed CPA factors (CPSF73, CstF64, CstF64t, CPSF160, CPSF30, and CFIm25) were significantly detected on both strands in the vicinity of the TSS,. Finally, depletion of CPA and termination factors (CPSF73, CSTF64, XRN2, and PCF11) resulted in increased mammalian native elongating transcript sequencing (mNET-seq) signal specifically at the TSS in both sense and antisense direction,. This suggests that TSS-linked nonproductive RNA synthesis may be terminated by the same factors that are responsible for 3′ processing and transcription termination at gene ends.

18Apart from PCF11, the involvement of the termination machinery in premature cleavage within the gene body is less well defined. However, IPA globally correlates with the preferential use of proximal PASs in 3′-UTRs,,,, which are both more prevalent in proliferating cells but less so during cell differentiation. Consequently, IPA and 3′-UTR APA are likely to be coregulated. In addition to PCF11, FIP1 is a likely candidate for PTT stimulation, because it is the only other CPA factor known to promote early PAS usage.

19Besides the factors that are known to mediate 3′-processing and transcription termination at gene ends, others have emerged that stimulate PTT (Figure 4). In budding yeast, premature termination is tightly linked with RNA degradation by the nuclear exosome. Similarly, mutation of the catalytic subunit of the human nuclear exosome complex, DIS3, resulted in accumulation of truncated RNA, likely to be PTT products. Furthermore, the mammalian nuclear exosome interacts with the CBC. Two CBC-associated proteins, ZC3H18 and SRRT/2, have also been connected with PTT events in the first introns of protein-coding genes.

20Another candidate factor for PTT is the Integrator complex. This multiprotein complex interacts with Pol II and was initially identified as a RNA 3′-processing complex for snRNA,. Two Integrator subunits, IntS9 and IntS11, are homologous to the CPA factors CPSF100 and CPSF73, respectively. More recently, experimental evidence emerged that suggested that Integrator also has a role in the activation of protein-coding genes, particularly in Pol II pause–release and elongation,,,. The subunit containing endonuclease activity, Ints11, was found to bind around TSS and to be required for TSS–proximal Pol II pause–release. This function was dependent on its endonucleolytic activity. Thus, it is conceivable that the Integrator complex is involved in TSS-associated PTT.

21In terms of the genetic elements that promote PTT, cryptic poly(A) signals within introns are likely candidates. Interestingly, intragenic enhancers also appear to stimulate PTT, because transcription at these enhancers interferes with, and attenuates, host gene transcription during productive elongation. Further genetic elements might also exist that can trigger PTT.

22Since PTT is disruptive to full-length transcription, many mechanisms and factors must exist to suppress this process (Figure 4). A major factor in preventing PTT is U1 snRNP, as described earlier. Furthermore, DNA sequences likely evolved to prevent harmful, yet reinforce beneficial, termination events. Around the TSS, poly(A) signals are depleted in the sense direction relative to the upstream antisense direction, while U1 snRNP recognition sites show the opposite pattern. This sequence asymmetry has been proposed to control promoter directionality,. It has also been reported that codon usage biases coevolve with transcription termination machinery to suppress PTT and allow optimal gene expression. Termination inhibition can also occur in a chromatin-dependent, and sequence-independent manner, as shown in Drosophila for the piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) transcription regulator Cutoff. Cutoff prevents cleavage of nascent RNA at PAS by interfering with recruitment of the CPA complex and also protects processed transcripts from degradation. In addition, RNA modifications might prevent PTT, because a negative correlation between N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of mRNA and PTT has been reported. Other factors that could protect against PTT are RNA-binding proteins. For example, in neural progenitor cells, Sam68 binding to an intronic PAS in Aldh1a3 prevented its recognition and consequent PTT, promoting cell self-renewal. It was further demonstrated in male germ cells that Sam68 interacts with U1 snRNP and is required for U1 snRNP recruitment to Sam68-regulated intronic PAS. In addition, the FET family of proteins (FUS, EWSR1, and TAF15), mutations in which cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, has been demonstrated to interact with U1 snRNP, and might participate in U1 snRNP-mediated PTT prevention.

23Modifying Pol II activity may be another way to oppose PTT. When Pol II misincorporates a base or runs into a ‘roadblock’ such as a nucleosome, it arrests and backtracks. Pol II elongation is rescued by TFIIS stimulating the RNA endonuclease activity of Pol II, which produces a new 3′ end in the active site. It was recently shown that TFIIS stimulation of Pol II cleavage activity antagonises both premature TSS-proximal and gene end termination. Pol II is further regulated by phosphorylation of the CTD of its largest subunit. Depletion of the CTD kinase CDK12 results in genome-wide increased IPA, indicating that CDK12 suppresses PTT. Interestingly, many DNA repair genes harbour more IPA sites than other expressed genes, and are particularly sensitive to the loss of CDK12. IPA is also opposed by CPA factors that favour distal APA events, especially the CFIm complex subunits, PABPN1 and PABPC1,. While this article was in review, a new study described a role for previously uncharacterised Pol II CTD-binding proteins SCAF4 and SCAF8 in binding to RNA upstream of early PAS and suppressing PTT in ~1300 human genes. Interestingly, both factors interact with the CPSF subcomplex of the CPA machinery; therefore, the mechanism of SCAF4 and SCAF8-mediated PTT prevention might involve an effect on the CPA complex.

24Since premature cleavage and polyadenylation are mutually exclusive with splicing of the intron in which the PAS is located, competition between splicing and PTT can be anticipated. Indeed, knockdown of various splicing factors as well as inhibition of 5′ splice site recognition by antisense nucleotide consistently results in IPA,. Therefore, antagonism between splicing and PTT goes beyond U1 snRNP-mediated PAS blocking, as described earlier. Further to splicing, Pol II elongation rates have been shown to influence PTT, because IPA events increase under conditions where Pol II elongation is slowed,,. Slower Pol II provides a longer window of opportunity for CPA before the 3′ splice site is reached. Hence, changes in the balance between splicing and PTT, together with Pol II pausing, predispose it to termination.

25Here, we have outlined recent evidence that demonstrates the widespread occurrence of PTT in protein-coding genes, both TSS proximal and intragenic. PTT limits and opposes full-length transcription. Consequently, it may contribute to pathological processes, such as host gene downregulation during viral infection and to carcinogenesis by inactivation of tumour suppressor genes. PTT is globally suppressed by genic DNA sequence biases, and various cellular factors, such as U1 snRNP. By contrast, PTT can be also beneficial: it diversifies the transcriptome and proteome, and contributes to gene regulation. Gene regulation by PTT occurs in at least four kingdoms of life: Eubacteria, Fungi, Plantae, and Animalia (Box 1). Yet, the regulatory aspect of PTT has been largely overlooked in metazoan research. This is partially because the machinery triggering PTT varies in different organisms. The well-researched Nrd1–Nab3–Sen1 (NNS) complex regulating PTT in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is absent not only in plants and animals, but also in the less evolutionarily distant Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Even so, the mechanisms modulating PTT appear conserved. In budding yeast, NNS cooperates with PCF11, and both NNS and PCF11 levels are controlled by PTT,. In vertebrates, PCF11 uses PTT to regulate own levels, as well as the levels of other 3′-processing factors and transcriptional regulators. Therefore, vertebrate PCF11 may have at least partially coopted the function of the yeast NNS complex. Currently, many questions about the regulation and function of PTT remain (see Outstanding Questions). In particular, we do not understand the mechanisms that lead to, or prevent, PTT. It is also unclear which of the factors enhancing and preventing PTT are able to do so directly. Despite these current gaps in our knowledge, we anticipate that PTT in metazoans is a critical feature of gene regulation. It is also possible that this process can be manipulated to achieve clinical and biotechnological benefits (Box 2).Aberrant PTT is associated with several pathological processes: inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; downregulation of the expression of Kv11.1 potassium channel leading to a heart rhythm condition; and loss of neuronal growth-associated factor stathmin-2 in neurodegeneration. Blocking pathological PTT by antisense morpholinos has been suggested as a potential therapeutic strategy. Conversely, induction of PTT to prevent formation of disease-inducing transcripts has also been proposed as a therapeutic approach. In particular, the insertion of intronic poly(A) signals upstream of toxic expanded CTG repeats in the DMPK gene as associated with myotonic dystrophy type 1 was demonstrated to revert the pathological phenotype of patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Similar approaches could also be used in biotechnology. Of note, two small-molecule modulators of APA have been discovered that promote distal-to-proximal APA usage. These could prove a useful tool for APA and PTT manipulations.Alt-text: Box 2

26Aberrant PTT is associated with several pathological processes: inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; downregulation of the expression of Kv11.1 potassium channel leading to a heart rhythm condition; and loss of neuronal growth-associated factor stathmin-2 in neurodegeneration. Blocking pathological PTT by antisense morpholinos has been suggested as a potential therapeutic strategy. Conversely, induction of PTT to prevent formation of disease-inducing transcripts has also been proposed as a therapeutic approach. In particular, the insertion of intronic poly(A) signals upstream of toxic expanded CTG repeats in the DMPK gene as associated with myotonic dystrophy type 1 was demonstrated to revert the pathological phenotype of patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Similar approaches could also be used in biotechnology. Of note, two small-molecule modulators of APA have been discovered that promote distal-to-proximal APA usage. These could prove a useful tool for APA and PTT manipulations.

27Alt-text: Box 2

28What is the relative contribution of Pol II pausing and transcription termination to Pol II accumulation at promoters and to the control of transcription elongation?What is the molecular mechanism of PTT and which pathways are involved? Is PTT always preceded by RNA cleavage?What is the role of canonical RNA 3′-processing and termination factors in PTT? Are early and normal termination processes at gene ends co-regulated?How are the prematurely terminated RNAs processed and what determines their stability?Which biological processes depend on early termination? Which PTT events are beneficial and which are harmful? How widespread is transcriptional regulation by PTT in physiological conditions?In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, many prematurely terminated transcripts use different TSS to the full-length transcript. Does this also occur in metazoans?Which factors control PTT directly and which influence it indirectly? What further factors trigger or prevent PTT?

29What is the relative contribution of Pol II pausing and transcription termination to Pol II accumulation at promoters and to the control of transcription elongation?

30What is the molecular mechanism of PTT and which pathways are involved? Is PTT always preceded by RNA cleavage?

31What is the role of canonical RNA 3′-processing and termination factors in PTT? Are early and normal termination processes at gene ends co-regulated?

32How are the prematurely terminated RNAs processed and what determines their stability?

33Which biological processes depend on early termination? Which PTT events are beneficial and which are harmful? How widespread is transcriptional regulation by PTT in physiological conditions?

34In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, many prematurely terminated transcripts use different TSS to the full-length transcript. Does this also occur in metazoans?

35Which factors control PTT directly and which influence it indirectly? What further factors trigger or prevent PTT?