Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

Human embryonic genome activation initiates at the one-cell stage

Maki Asami, Brian Y.H. Lam, Marcella K. Ma and 5 more

Cell Stem Cell · 2022 · CC BY

doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.11.012

Abstract

In human embryos, the initiation of transcription (embryonic genome activation [EGA]) occurs by the eight-cell stage, but its exact timing and profile are unclear. To address this, we profiled gene expression at depth in human metaphase II oocytes and bipronuclear (2PN) one-cell embryos. High-resolution single-cell RNA sequencing revealed previously inaccessible oocyte-to-embryo gene expression changes. This confirmed transcript depletion following fertilization (maternal RNA degradation) but also uncovered low-magnitude upregulation of hundreds of spliced transcripts. Gene expression analysis predicted embryonic processes including cell-cycle progression and chromosome maintenance as well as transcriptional activators that included cancer-associated gene regulators. Transcription was disrupted in abnormal monopronuclear (1PN) and tripronuclear (3PN) one-cell embryos. These findings indicate that human embryonic transcription initiates at the one-cell stage, sooner than previously thought. The pattern of gene upregulation promises to illuminate processes involved at the onset of human development, with implications for epigenetic inheritance, stem-cell-derived embryos, and cancer.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Fertilizing spermatozoa and metaphase II (mII) oocytes are transcriptionally quiescent. The first transcription in newly formed embryos is known as embryonic genome activation (EGA), but its onset, timing, and profile are poorly understood. In human embryos, EGA is held to have occurred by the eight-cell stage, up to ∼68 h (∼3 days) after fertilization, but this model is likely incomplete. First, it does not accommodate hints that transcription initiates earlier, albeit previous analyses are restricted by poor signal-to-noise ratios, low embryo or donor numbers, and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) library preparation protocols that reflect mRNA polyadenylation status (recruitment). Second, the model does not explain how the embryo genome is maintained in a transcriptionally silent state during cell proliferation to the eight-cell stage. Third, no mechanism has been proposed that explains how maternal factor activity required for early development is regulated at different phases of the first two-to-three cell cycles in the absence of endogenous transcription. Fourth, the model does not address the cue that instigates transcription, which can be provided either in vivo or in vitro or whether it is the cumulative consequence of transcription-independent processes. We, therefore, evaluated the open possibility that gene expression is triggered after fertilization in human one-cell embryos.

Results

We sought to determine the gene expression profile of human one-cell embryos and relate it to development (Figure 1A). Human mII oocytes (n = 12, from seven donors, aged 22.5–31) and bipronuclear (2PN) one-cell embryos (n = 12, from six couples, with no oocyte donor overlap) from various ethnic backgrounds and that appeared healthy (Figure 1B) were subjected to single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) that avoided poly(A) capture and its attendant potential library bias. Whole-transcriptome amplification produced indistinguishable yields between oocytes and one-cell embryos (p = 0.595), and in-depth scRNA-seq yielded a mean of 66.3 million reads per cell. Principal component analysis, coupled with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), segregated transcriptomes into discrete oocyte and embryo groups (Figure 1C), and comparison revealed 2,879 differentially expressed genes (DEGs; FDR < 0.1; Figures 1D and S1A). The number of DEGs inversely correlated with fold-change (FC, log2FC; Figure S1B), and there were 1,395 DEGs with an absolute log2FC of ≥0.5 (of which 1,081 survived an FDR cutoff of 0.05). Expression levels of 1,557 genes (54.1% of DEGs; FDR < 0.1) decreased in one-cell embryos, reflecting maternal transcript degradation (Figures 1D and S1C). These excluded orthologs of classically down-regulated mouse transcripts, including MOS and GDF9, consistent with relatively slow human maternal transcript degradation lasting several cell cycles (i.e., days). Outputs from Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) corresponded to the initiation of embryogenesis and conclusion of gametogenesis (Figure 1A; Table S1).

In addition to down-regulation, expression of 1,322 genes increased in one-cell embryos compared with mII oocytes (FDR < 0.1) (Figure 1D). To test this, we assessed the overlap between upregulated DEGs and 657 transcripts common to four datasets of stably expressed human genes (n = 6,040 ± 2,549 genes;;; ). Of these, 542 were expressed in one-cell embryos, most (90.4%) at levels indistinguishable from those in oocytes. Single-cell qPCR of upregulated DEGs in different one-cell embryos mirrored increases revealed by scRNA-seq (log2FC > 0.5; n ≥ 3 different embryos per target; n = 14 targets; Figure 1E). Most (76.3%) upregulated DEGs encoded annotated proteins (Figure 1F) and transcriptome re-assembly de novo predicted the use of canonical transcription start sites in 60.9% (n = 357) of cases and normative splicing in 85.1% (Figure 1G). Sashimi plots demonstrated increases in the levels of mature mRNA transcripts spliced at canonical exon junctions in one-cell embryos, with evidence of embryo-specific alternative splicing (Figure 2A). Exon-flanking qPCR further corroborated mature, spliced mRNA level increases (Figure 1E). These findings reveal the onset of human EGA in one-cell embryos to produce canonically spliced mRNA transcripts.

The degree of overlap between upregulated DEGs and previous expression data for cleavage-stage human embryos (Figures S1D and S1E) possibly reflected protocol differences (e.g., poly(A) capture in library preparation), donor ethnicity, and timing of gamete and embryo collection. Only 3.8% of 3,476 human-sperm-intact RNAs corresponded to upregulated DEGs (FDR < 0.1; Figure S1E), although sperm-associated RNA may not enter mII oocytes. Of the top 200 upregulated genes (FDR < 0.1), 153 were differentially expressed in two-, four-, and eight-cell embryos (Figure S1F). Most (119/153; 77.8%) exhibited sustained expression throughout two-to-four-cell stages and markedly declined by the eight-cell stage (clusters II and III, Figure S1F).

We investigated expression of upregulated transcripts in tripronuclear (3PN) one-cell embryos, which have been adopted for genome editing studies. Of 14 targets upregulated in 2PN embryos that we evaluated, levels of 12 (85.7%) were lower (p < 0.2) in 3PN embryos (Figure 2B). This suggests that EGA initiation was disrupted in most 3PN one-cell embryos, which undergo developmental failure. Moreover, expression of 10 of the 14 targets (71.4%; p < 0.2) was lower in monopronuclear (1PN) one-cell embryos (Figure 2B).

IPA of upregulated DEGs indicated that expressed gene function corresponded to developmental processes in healthy 2PN embryos (Figures 1A and 2C; Table S1). These included ATM activation, which induces G2-/M-phase arrest in response to DNA damage in the mouse, protective redox-dependent systems, and chromosome segregation, consistent with the elimination of aneuploid two-cell embryos. Upregulated DEGs associated with early developmental arrest included WEE2 (p = 0.006; ) and BTG4 (p = 0.015; ) as well as disease-associated nuclear genes involved in mitochondrial function (e.g., TFB2M, p = 6.71e-05; MFN1, p = 1.34e-05), consistent with important early embryonic roles played by mitochondria.

We found no evidence for major upregulation of LINE-1 retrotransposons or transcription factors (TFs) thought to drive cleavage-stage EGA, including OCT4, LEUTX, and DUX4. However, upregulated DEGs included 63 human endogenous retrovirus (hERV) loci (Figures S2A and S2B). Trans-activators of EGA initiation predicted by IPA (FDR < 0.1) included MYC (p = 1.94e-6), MYCN (p = 4.54e-8), RABL6 (p = 0.02), FYN (p = 0.05), and E2F4 (p = 6.48e-12) (Figures 2D–2F and S2C–S2I). Transcripts for a third of these (33/97) were detected by scRNA-seq in mII oocytes and down-regulation of E2F4 correlates with one-cell arrest.

Discussion

These findings have several implications. First, they suggest that transcription is instated soon after fertilization, during meiotic progression and gamete reprogramming, which should illuminate mechanisms that coordinate chromatin remodeling, the cell cycle, and transcription complex assembly. Second, they provide a readout of epigenetic states that support embryonic transcription and locate genomic addresses of active chromatin. Third, they indicate that decoding gamete chromatin modifications acutely after fertilization might mediate epigenetic inheritance. Fourth, commencement of human gene expression in one-cell embryos accommodates previous hints of early transcription, circumvents protracted genome latency and autonomous regulation, and suggests the trigger for EGA: fertilization.

Other contexts relevant to cellular potency also manifest small magnitude transcript-level changes that may be common in cellular potency transitions. Trans-activation by MYC induces relevant target gene expression less than two-fold and mouse pluripotency factor; Esrrb apparently causes less than two-fold upregulation of embryonic-stem-cell-specific genes. The average negative effect of the transcription regulator, Polycomb, is about two-fold, and its associated histone modification, H3K27me3, modulates cellular potency and imprinting. Several lines of evidence suggest that transcription at the one-cell stage is functional. Upregulated transcripts exhibited a stereotypical pattern that corresponded to early embryonic processes, encoded protein, and utilized canonical exons and transcriptional start sites. Predicted transcription regulator functions mapped to one-cell embryonic processes and the regulation of cancer (Figures 1A, 2C–2F, and S2C–S2I). The switch at fertilization that activates presumptive maternal TFs may involve phospho-relay signaling, as MYC, MYCN, FOXM1, E2F4, and others are regulated by kinases. Trajectory analysis (Figure S1F) implied that TFs responsible for early expression are deactivated during the four-to-eight-cell transition, coinciding with a major wave of EGA.

Transcriptional initiation in human one-cell embryos also has clinical implications. Disruption of cancer-associated genes might manifest as both impaired fertility and cancer, and female infertility is indeed associated with ∼15% elevated cancer risk. It is also possible that parentally inherited epigenetic marks (e.g., those associated with acquired obesogenic traits) affect gene expression immediately after fertilization. Maternal factors required to initiate EGA may include polar body markers of oocyte quality and reveal processes in artificial oocytes or embryos necessary for embryonic transcription and totipotency. Although stem-cell-derived human embryos (blastoids) may one day bypass embryonic totipotency, EGA initiation may alternatively be indispensable for normative development. Finally, evaluating genome editing in 3PN embryos should accommodate disrupted gene expression to have clinical utility.

Limitations of the study

Human 2PN one-cell embryos that may legitimately be used for research are extremely rare, in part reflecting current standard practice among assisted reproduction facilities. This study sourced archival 2PN embryos, placing constraints on sample availability that, inter alia, precluded corroborative analysis orthogonal to high-resolution scRNA-seq, including inhibitor studies (e.g., to block transcription by RNA polymerase II) and confirmatory immunofluorescence (e.g., of predicted maternal TFs). The findings are likely to be evaluated in more tractable (e.g., mouse) models in the foreseeable future, and perhaps eventually in closely related primate (e.g., baboon) models.

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to the lead contact, Tony Perry (perry135@aol.com).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Human oocyte and embryo sample collection

Human oocytes and single monopronuclear (1PN), bipronuclear (2PN) and tripronuclear (3PN) one-cell embryos were supplied anonymously subject to informed consent for use in research by couples who had finished family building or decided for other reasons to discontinue fertility treatment. Consents strictly adhered to guidelines of the Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Embryos were cryopreserved and lysed on site at Ovation Fertility before being anonymized and shipped for analysis.

Human metaphase II oocytes and one-cell embryos (zygotes)

Patients underwent ovarian stimulation according to guidelines of each clinic, where protocols included agonist luteal phase and antagonist suppression. On the day of retrieval (day 0), mature, metaphase II (mII) oocytes were either cryopreserved by a slow freeze method using propanediol (PROH) 3-6 h post-collection, or used to produce embryos by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI. One-cell embryos used here were morphologically assessed for pronuclear number 19-23 h post-fertilization, cryopreserved 1-5 h later using dimethylsulfoxide and stored under liquid nitrogen. Some sibling embryos of morphologically normal bipronuclear (2PN) one-cell embryos (i.e., each containing two pronuclei) gave rise to children. When required, cryopreserved oocytes and one-cell embryos were thawed by rapid warming using a Vit-Warm Kit (FUJI Irvine Scientific, USA) according to the recommended protocol, and viability confirmed. All mII oocytes and one-cell embryos were washed in protein-free multi-purpose handling medium (FUJI Irvine Scientific, USA) and each placed in a 0.2 ml PCR tube containing 0.8 μl 1x single-cell lysis buffer supplemented with RNase inhibitor (Takara Clontech, USA). Oocyte and one-cell embryo (2PN; monopronuclear, 1PN; tripronuclear, 3PN) donor groups did not overlap; mII oocytes and one-cell embryos came from different individuals (Table S3). For scRNA-seq, there were seven mII oocyte donors (six were aged 22.5, 24.5, 25, <30, 27 and 31 years); six were Caucasian and one African American/Hispanic. There were six 2PN one-cell embryo donor couples; for two, male and female ages were respectively 36 and 38, and 40 and 50 (data are unavailable for the other couples) and five of the couples were Caucasian, with one Asian couple.

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of oocytes and one-cell embryos

RNA sequencing libraries from 14 mII oocytes and 13 bipronuclear (2PN) one-cell embryos (Table S3) were prepared using the Clontech SMARTer Total RNA-Seq Kit Pico Input (V2) system (Takara Clontech). Briefly, total RNA was liberated by lysis of single oocytes or one-embryos in 0.8 μl lysis buffer supplemented with RNase inhibitor (both from Takara Clontech). The RNA was incubated with SMART Pico N6 primers at 72°C for 3 min and then subjected to first-strand synthesis with SMARTScribe reverse transcription using a Pico v2 SMART adapter (template-switching oligo, TSO). After first strand synthesis, cDNA amplification was performed using SeqAmp DNA polymerase with Illumina barcoded adapters for 5 cycles of 15 sec at 98°C; 15 sec at 55°C; 15 sec at 68°C, followed by final extension for 2 min at 68°C. Ribosomal cDNA was removed using the ZapR v2 and R-Probes v2, after which there was a second round of cDNA amplification with SeqAmp DNA Polymerase for 15 cycles of 15 sec at 98°C, 15 sec at 55°C, and 30 sec at 68°C, to generate the final sequencing libraries. Libraries were analyzed using High-sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape and Agilent TapeStation 4200 (Agilent, USA). All samples were subjected to the same amplification protocol and produced indistinguishable final library yields, with mean±SD respectively of 54.9±25.3 nM and 50.7±9.7 nM for oocytes and one-cell embryos; p=0.595). For next-generation sequencing, libraries were combined at equimolar concentrations before loading onto an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument (Illumina, USA) for paired-end 100 (PE100) sequencing to generate an average of ∼88.2 million raw read pairs per sample.

Ratiometric real-time-PCR (qPCR)

For qPCR, total RNA was liberated by lysis of single oocytes or one-embryos in 0.8 μl lysis buffer supplemented with RNase inhibitor (Takara Clontech). Synthesis of cDNA employed a method modified from the Clontech SMARTer protocol using a total RNA-Seq Kit Pico Input (V2). In brief, total RNA was incubated with SMART Pico Oligos mix v2 at 72°C for 3 min and immediately chilled on ice for 2 min. Samples were then subjected to first-strand synthesis with SMARTSCribe RT (Takara Clontech). First step cDNA amplification was performed using SeqAmp DNA Polymerase, skipping the addition of Illumina barcode adapters and incubating for 1 min at 94°C, followed by 5 cycles of (15 sec at 98°C; 15 sec at 55°C; 15 sec at 68°C) and then for 2 min at 68°C. Second step amplification was performed with SeqAmp DNA Polymerase and PCR2 Primer 2v2, incubating for 1 min at 94°C, followed by 16 cycles of (15 sec at 98°C; 15 sec at 55°C; 30 sec at 68°C) and cDNA stored at -20°C until required. qPCR reactions were performed in a QuantStudio 7 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) or ABI 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, CA) in reactions (20 μl) containing 1-2 μl template cDNA, forward and reverse primers (100 nM each) and 12.5 μl of Power SYBR (ABI), using standard parameters. Data for each target were obtained from n=3 or 4 biological replicates (i.e., independent single cells) collected on at least two days, and included technical replicates of each biological replicate. Primer sequences are given in Table S2. Primer sets (Sigma-Merck) were non-dimerizing under the conditions employed. Reactions lacking input cDNA were used to verify absence of contamination in cocktail components. Steady state transcript levels were normalized with respect to internal reference, RNA18s5, or in most cases, H3F3A. H3F3A gave mean cycle threshold (Ct) values (±s.e.m.) of 24.51±0.30 for mII oocytes (n=45 replicates over all, n=5 biological replicates) and 24.56±0.33 for 2PN one-cell embryos (n=51 replicates over all, n=8 biological replicates); p=0.829 for mII oocytes vs embryos.

Bioinformatic analysis

Raw read pairs were mapped onto the Human GRCh38 genome and Ensembl 92 gene model using STAR (2.5.0a), employing the following parameters: (--outFilterScoreMinOverLread 0.3 --outFilterMatchNminOverLread 0.3 --outSAMstrandField intronMotif --outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate). Post-alignment reads (BAMs) were further processed by Stringtie (1.3.6) to remodel the transcriptome using default parameters and the Ensembl 92 gene model as base reference. Once the re-assembly was complete, a gene-level count was performed using htseq-count (0.6.1p1). For transcript-level analysis, Stringtie was used to generate estimated counts for all detected transcripts.

Gene- and transcript-level count tables were imported into edgeR for downstream differential gene expression analysis. For gene-level analysis, genes expressed at low levels (<1 count per million, >13 samples) were filtered, retaining a final total of 16,625 genes. Due to minimal differences detected in the library yields (see above), samples were subjected to trim-mean of M values (TMM) normalization from the edgeR package (for details, see ), a common normalization method where a weighted trimmed mean of the log expression ratios is used to normalize sequencing depth. This has been shown to be among the most robust methods for RNA-sequencing differential expression analysis, including single-cell studies where global gene expression differences are large. A subtle normalization factor of 1.00±0.07 (mean±SD) was applied. Normalized gene abundance was listed as read counts per million of mapped reads (CPM) and determined using the formula:

To generate a visual overview of transcriptome profiles, we employed the Rtsne package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rtsne/Rtsne.pdf) to perform dimensionality reduction via the principal component analysis (PCA, ndims=50) coupled with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), using the normalized abundance (CPM) of all genes as input with the default parameters. The advantage of using t-SNE over PCA is that it provides superior resolution with which to differentiate samples in fewer dimensions (two projections were used here) and it is commonly used in single-cell RNA sequencing studies. Two mII oocytes were excluded as outliers, and one 2PN one-cell embryo failed to amplify and had to be abandoned (Table S3). The remaining 24 samples (n=12 each oocytes and one-cell embryos) were re-normalized (mean normalization factor ±SD: 1.03±0.02 for mII oocytes and 0.97±0.03 for one-cell embryos) to give a final average of 66.3±9.5 (±SD) million usable read pairs. t-SNE was also re-performed using the same parameters. For differential gene expression, a generalized linear model (GLM) was applied to determine the common, trend and gene-wise dispersions, and likelihood-ratio tests were employed to detect differential gene expression. Genes with a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.1 were considered differentially expressed.

For transcript-level analysis, transcripts from the 24 samples with low expression were first removed and estimated transcript level counts TMM-normalized (normalization factor = 1.00±0.05) and CPM determined by limma-voom. The total number of transcripts that remained in the analysis was 42,230. We then calculated a gene-variability statistic to adjust for the mean-variance relationship using limma-voom and differential expression was determined using empirical Bayesian t-test (eBayes) from the limma package. Transcripts with an FDR <0.1 were considered differentially expressed.

Pathway and upstream regulator analyes were performed using Qiagen Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software using HGNC gene symbols and a raw cut-off of p<0.05. Loci encompassing multiple genes were split in the analysis. Sashimi plots were generated using all mapped reads accumulated from oocytes and one-cell embryos using Integrative Genome Viewer (IGV) version 2.4.19.

For bioinformatic analysis of data from, 65 raw fastq files for individual blastomeres of biparental two-, four- and eight-cell embryo were downloaded via the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession number GSE133854) using the fastq-dump command from the SRA toolkit, with the --split-files argument to split reads 1 & 2. The fastq files were then mapped onto the Human GRCh38 genome, and gene abundance (Ensembl V97) counted using standard STAR 2.5.0a, as described above. The average usable read pair counts (uniquely mapped read pairs to gene) per sample was 24.47 ± 1.2 (s.e.m.) million. Count data were imported into edgeR (3.32.1) and normalized via TMM. Samples were quality checked using the plotMDS function and samples SRR9645989, SRR9645990, SRR9645991, SRR9645992, SRR9645993, SRR9645994, SRR9645995, SRR9645996 and SRR9645997 were removed, leaving a total of 56 samples. Genes with low expression (<1 CPM in ≥ 46 samples) were removed and counts re-normalized with an average normalization factor of 1.012 ± 0.020. Differential gene expression across all stages was determined by fitting a generalized log linear model followed by likelihood ratio test with a false discovery rate (FDR) cutoff of <0.1; 11,083 (out of 16,810) genes were detected as being differentially expressed. The intersection of the differentially expressed genes in this dataset and the top 200 up-regulated genes (ranked by FDR) from our mII vs one-cell embryo dataset were extracted and we found the majority of the genes (153/200; 76.5%) were differentially expressed in both datasets. A heatmap of the 153 genes was drawn using the pHeatmap package (1.0.12), employing z-scoring to reveal clusters of gene expression trajectories.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment used n≥3 experimental samples, as indicated in the text and figure legends, and are presented as mean ± s.e.m. Statistical differences between pairs of qPCR datasets were analyzed by two-tailed unpaired t-tests. Values of p <0.05 were considered statistically significant unless stated otherwise.

References 84

  1. 1.

    Alizadeh Z., Kageyama S.-I., Aoki F. Degradation of maternal mRNA in mouse embryos: selective degradation of specific mRNAs after fertilization. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2005;72:281-290.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrd.20340

  2. 2.

    Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum. Reprod. 2011;26:1270-1283.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/der037

  3. 3.

    Amanai M., Brahmajosyula M., Perry A.C.F. A restricted role for sperm-borne microRNAs in mammalian fertilization. Biol. Reprod. 2006;75:877-884.

    Not in our library10.1095/biolreprod.106.056499

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Asami M., Lam B.Y.H., Hoffmann M., Suzuki T., Lu X., VerMilyea M.D., Yoshida N., Ma M.K., Rainbow K., Braun S., et al. Mouse fertilization triggers a conserved transcription program in one-cell embryos. bioRxiv. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.09.15.298018

  6. 6.

    Baluapuri A., Wolf E., Eilers M. Target gene-independent functions of MYC oncoproteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:255-267.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41580-020-0215-2

  7. 7.

    Bernstein B.E., Mikkelsen T.S., Xie X., Kamal M., Huebert D.J., Cuff J., Fry B., Meissner A., Wernig M., Plath K., et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2006;125:315-326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041

  8. 8.

    Berrozpe G., Bryant G.O., Warpinski K., Spagna D., Narayan S., Shah S., Ptashne M. Polycomb responds to low levels of transcription. Cell Rep. 2017;20:785-793.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.076

  9. 9.

    Blower M.D., Jambhekar A., Schwarz D.S., Toombs J.A. Combining different mRNA capture methods to analyze the transcriptome: analysis of the Xenopus laevis transcriptome. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77700.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0077700

  10. 10.

    Braude P., Bolton V., Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 1988;332:459-461.

    Not in our library10.1038/332459a0

  11. 11.

    Camus M., Van den Abbeel E., Van Waesberghe L., Wisanto A., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A.C. Human embryo viability after freezing with dimethylsulfoxide as a cryoprotectant. Fertil. Steril. 1989;51:460-465.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60554-x

  12. 12.

    Capmany G., Taylor A., Braude P.R., Bolton V.N. The timing of pronuclear formation, DNA synthesis and cleavage in the human 1-cell embryo. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1996;2:299-306.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/2.5.299

  13. 13.

    Chronis C., Fiziev P., Papp B., Butz S., Bonora G., Sabri S., Ernst J., Plath K. Cooperative binding of transcription factors orchestrates reprogramming. Cell. 2017;168:442-459.e20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.016

  14. 14.

    De Iaco A., Planet E., Coluccio A., Verp S., Duc J., Trono D. DUX-family transcription factors regulate zygotic genome activation in placental mammals. Nat. Genet. 2017;49:941-945.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3858

  15. 15.

    Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., Gingeras T.R. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15-21.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635

  16. 16.

    Eisenberg E., Levanon E.Y. Human housekeeping genes, revisited. Trends Genet. 2013;29:569-574.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.010

  17. 17.

    Evans C., Hardin J., Stoebel D.M. Selecting between-sample RNA-Seq normalization methods from the perspective of their assumptions. Brief. Bioinform. 2018;19:776-792.

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbx008

  18. 18.

    Facucho-Oliveira J.M., St John J.C. The relationship between pluripotency and mitochondrial DNA proliferation during early embryo development and embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2009;5:140-158.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12015-009-9058-0

  19. 19.

    Gao L., Wu K., Liu Z., Yao X., Yuan S., Tao W., Yi L., Yu G., Hou Z., Fan D., et al. Chromatin accessibility landscape in human early embryos and its association with evolution. Cell. 2018;173:248-259.e15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.028

  20. 20.

    Gook D.A., Osborn S.M., Johnston W.I. Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindle. Hum. Reprod. 1993;8:1101-1109.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138201

  21. 21.

    Hendrickson P.G., Doráis J.A., Grow E.J., Whiddon J.L., Lim J.W., Wike C.L., Weaver B.D., Pflueger C., Emery B.R., Wilcox A.L., et al. Conserved roles of mouse Dux and human Dux4 in activating cleavage-stage genes and MERVL/HERVL retrotransposons. Nat. Genet. 2017;49:925-934.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3844

  22. 22.

    Huypens P., Sass S., Wu M., Dyckhoff D., Tschöp M., Theis F., Marschall S., Hrabě de Angelis M., Beckers J. Epigenetic germline inheritance of diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:497-499.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3527

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Jouhilahti E.M., Madissoon E., Vesterlund L., Töhönen V., Krjutškov K., Plaza Reyes A., Petropoulos S., Månsson R., Linnarsson S., Bürglin T., et al. The human PRD-like homeobox gene LEUTX has a central role in embryo genome activation. Development. 2016;143:3459-3469.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.134510

  25. 25.

    Jukam D., Shariati S.A.M., Skotheim J.M. Zygotic genome activation in vertebrates. Dev. Cell. 2017;42:316-332.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2017.07.026

  26. 26.

    Kang X., He W., Huang Y., Yu Q., Chen Y., Gao X., Sun X., Fan Y. Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016;33:581-588.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10815-016-0710-8

  27. 27.

    Katz Y., Wang E.T., Airoldi E.M., Burge C.B. Analysis and design of RNA sequencing experiments for identifying isoform regulation. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:1009-1015.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1528

  28. 28.

    Klatsky P.C., Wessel G.M., Carson S.A. Detection and quantification of mRNA in single human polar bodies: a minimally invasive test of gene expression during oogenesis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2010;16:938-943.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/gaq077

  29. 29.

    Kola I., Trounson A., Dawson G., Rogers P. Tripronuclear human oocytes: altered cleavage patterns and subsequent karyotypic analysis of embryos. Biol. Reprod. 1987;37:395-401.

    Not in our library10.1095/biolreprod37.2.395

  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Leng L., Sun J., Huang J., Gong F., Yang L., Zhang S., Yuan X., Fang F., Xu X., Luo Y., et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis of uniparental embryos reveals parent-of-origin effects on human preimplantation development. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25:697-712.e6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2019.09.004

  33. 33.

    Li G., Liu Y., Zeng Y., Li J., Wang L., Yang G., Chen D., Shang X., Chen J., Huang X., Liu J. Highly efficient and precise base editing in discarded human tripronuclear embryos. Protein Cell. 2017;8:776-779.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13238-017-0458-7

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Lin Y., Ghazanfar S., Strbenac D., Wang A., Patrick E., Lin D.M., Speed T., Yang J.Y.H., Yang P. Evaluating stably expressed genes in single cells. GigaScience. 2019;8:giz106.

    Not in our library10.1093/gigascience/giz106

  36. 36.

    Liu X., Tan J.P., Schröder J., Aberkane A., Ouyang J.F., Mohenska M., Lim S.M., Sun Y.B.Y., Chen J., Sun G., et al. Modelling human blastocysts by reprogramming fibroblasts into iBlastoids. Nature. 2021;591:627-632.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03372-y

  37. 37.

    McConnell J.M., Petrie L. Mitochondrial DNA turnover occurs during preimplantation development and can be modulated by environmental factors. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2004;9:418-424.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61277-1

  38. 38.

    Morillo S.M., Abanto E.P., Román M.J., Frade J.M. Nerve growth factor-induced cell cycle reentry in newborn neurons is triggered by p38MAPK-dependent E2F4 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012;32:2722-2737.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00239-12

  39. 39.

    Murugappan G., Li S., Lathi R.B., Baker V.L., Eisenberg M.L. Risk of cancer in infertile women: analysis of US claims data. Hum. Reprod. 2019;34:894-902.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dez018

  40. 40.

    Mutia K., Wiweko B., Iffanolida P.A., Febri R.R., Muna N., Riayati O., Jasirwan S.O., Yuningsih T., Mansyur E., Hestiantoro A. The frequency of chromosomal euploidy Among 3PN embryos. J. Reprod. Infertil. 2019;20:127-131.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    Nilsson J.A., Keller U.B., Baudino T.A., Yang C., Norton S., Old J.A., Nilsson L.M., Neale G., Kramer D.L., Porter C.W., Cleveland J.L. Targeting ornithine decarboxylase in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis prevents tumor formation. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:433-444.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.036

  42. 42.

    Oh B., Hwang S., McLaughlin J., Solter D., Knowles B.B. Timely translation during the mouse oocyte-to-embryo transition. Development. 2000;127:3795-3803.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.127.17.3795

  43. 43.

    Pauerova T., Radonova L., Kovacovicova K., Novakova L., Skultety M., Anger M. Aneuploidy during the onset of mouse embryo development. Reproduction. 2020;160:773-782.

    Not in our library10.1530/rep-20-0086

  44. 44.

    Paynton B.V., Rempel R., Bachvarova R. Changes in state of adenylation and time course of degradation of maternal mRNAs during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 1988;129:304-314.

    Not in our library10.1016/0012-1606(88)90377-6

  45. 45.

    Percharde M., Lin C.J., Yin Y., Guan J., Peixoto G.A., Bulut-Karslioglu A., Biechele S., Huang B., Shen X., Ramalho-Santos M. A LINE1-nucleolin partnership regulates early development and ESC identity. Cell. 2018;174:391-405.e19.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.043

  46. 46.

    Perreault S.D., Barbee R.R., Slott V.L. Importance of glutathione in the acquisition and maintenance of sperm nuclear decondensing activity in maturing hamster oocytes. Dev. Biol. 1988;125:181-186.

    Not in our library10.1016/0012-1606(88)90070-x

  47. 47.

    Perry A.C.F. Hijacking oocyte DNA repair machinery in transgenesis? Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2000;56:319-324.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(200006)56:2+<319::aid-mrd24>3.0.co;2-p

  48. 48.

    Perry A.C.F., Verlhac M.-H. Second meiotic arrest and exit in frogs and mice. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:246-251.

    Not in our library10.1038/embor.2008.22

  49. 49.

    Pertea M., Pertea G.M., Antonescu C.M., Chang T.-C., Mendell J.T., Salzberg S.L. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015;33:290-295.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3122

  50. 50.
  51. 51.

    Reich A., Klatsky P., Carson S., Wessel G. The transcriptome of a human polar body accurately reflects its sibling oocyte. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:40743-40749.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111.289868

  52. 52.
  53. 53.

    Robinson J.T., Thorvaldsdóttir H., Winckler W., Guttman M., Lander E.S., Getz G., Mesirov J.P. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:24-26.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1754

  54. 54.

    Robinson M.D., McCarthy D.J., Smyth G.K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139-140.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616

  55. 55.
  56. 56.

    Rusecka J., Kaliszewska M., Bartnik E., Tońska K. Nuclear genes involved in mitochondrial diseases caused by instability of mitochondrial DNA. J. Appl. Genet. 2018;59:43-57.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13353-017-0424-3

  57. 57.

    Samata M., Alexiadis A., Richard G., Georgiev P., Nuebler J., Kulkarni T., Renschler G., Basilicata M.F., Zenk F.L., Shvedunova M., et al. Intergenerationally maintained histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation is instructive for future gene activation. Cell. 2020;182:127-144.e23.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.026

  58. 58.

    Sang Q., Li B., Kuang Y., Wang X., Zhang Z., Chen B., Wu L., Lyu Q., Fu Y., Yan Z., et al. Homozygous mutations in WEE2 cause fertilization failure and female infertility. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;102:649-657.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.02.015

  59. 59.
  60. 60.

    Schatten G., Simerly C., Palmer D.K., Margolis R.L., Maul G., Andrews B.S., Schatten H. Kinetochore appearance during meiosis, fertilization and mitosis in mouse oocytes and zygotes. Chromosoma. 1988;96:341-352.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00330700

  61. 61.
  62. 62.

    Sjostrom S.K., Finn G., Hahn W.C., Rowitch D.H., Kenney A.M. The Cdk1 complex plays a prime role in regulating N-Myc phosphorylation and turnover in neural precursors. Dev. Cell. 2005;9:327-338.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2005.07.014

  63. 63.

    Soneson C., Robinson M.D. Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods. 2018;15:255-261.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.4612

  64. 64.

    Sun Y.H., Wang A., Song C., Shankar G., Srivastava R.K., Au K.F., Li X.Z. Single-molecule long-read sequencing reveals a conserved intact long RNA profile in sperm. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1361.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-021-21524-6

  65. 65.

    Suo L., Zhou Y.X., Jia L.L., Wu H.B., Zheng J., Lyu Q.F., Sun L.H., Sun H., Kuang Y.P. Transcriptome profiling of human oocytes experiencing recurrent total fertilization failure. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:17890.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-018-36275-6

  66. 66.

    Swain J.E., Pool T.B. ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2008;14:431-446.

    Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmn025

  67. 67.

    Temeles G.L., Schultz R.M. Transient polyadenylation of a maternal mRNA following fertilization of mouse eggs. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1997;109:223-228.

    Not in our library10.1530/jrf.0.1090223

  68. 68.

    Tesarík J., Kopecný V., Plachot M., Mandelbaum J. Early morphological signs of embryonic genome expression in human preimplantation development as revealed by quantitative electron microscopy. Dev. Biol. 1988;128:15-20.

    Not in our library10.1016/0012-1606(88)90261-8

  69. 69.

    Vassena R., Boué S., González-Roca E., Aran B., Auer H., Veiga A., Izpisua Belmonte J.C. Waves of early transcriptional activation and pluripotency program initiation during human preimplantation development. Development. 2011;138:3699-3709.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.064741

  70. 70.

    VerMilyea M.D., Maneck M., Yoshida N., Blochberger I., Suzuki E., Suzuki T., Spang R., Klein C.A., Perry A.C.F. Transcriptome asymmetry within mouse zygotes but not between early embryonic sister blastomeres. EMBO J. 2011;30:1841-1851.

    Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2011.92

  71. 71.

    Vervoorts J., Lüscher-Firzlaff J., Lüscher B. The ins and outs of MYC regulation by posttranslational mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:34725-34729.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.r600017200

  72. 72.
  73. 73.

    Wang E.T., Sandberg R., Luo S., Khrebtukova I., Zhang L., Mayr C., Kingsmore S.F., Schroth G.P., Burge C.B. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature. 2008;456:470-476.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07509

  74. 74.

    Wu J., Xu J., Liu B., Yao G., Wang P., Lin Z., Huang B., Wang X., Li T., Shi S., et al. Chromatin analysis in human early development reveals epigenetic transition during ZGA. Nature. 2018;557:256-260.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0080-8

  75. 75.

    Xue Z., Huang K., Cai C., Cai L., Jiang C.-y., Feng Y., Liu Z., Zeng Q., Cheng L., Sun Y.E., et al. Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature. 2013;500:593-597.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12364

  76. 76.

    Yamashiro C., Sasaki K., Yabuta Y., Kojima Y., Nakamura T., Okamoto I., Yokobayashi S., Murase Y., Ishikura Y., Shirane K., et al. Generation of human oogonia from induced pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Science. 2018;362:356-360.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aat1674

  77. 77.

    Yan L., Yang M., Guo H., Yang L., Wu J., Li R., Liu P., Lian Y., Zheng X., Yan J., et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013;20:1131-1139.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.2660

  78. 78.
  79. 79.

    Yanagimachi R., Knobil E., Neill J.D. 1994;1:189-317.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    Yeh C.D., Richardson C.D., Corn J.E. Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:1468-1478.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41556-019-0425-z

  81. 81.

    Yu L., Wei Y., Duan J., Schmitz D.A., Sakurai M., Wang L., Wang K., Zhao S., Hon G.C., Wu J. Blastocyst-like structures generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2021;591:620-626.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03356-y

  82. 82.

    Zheng W., Zhou Z., Sha Q., Niu X., Sun X., Shi J., Zhao L., Zhang S., Dai J., Cai S., et al. Homozygous mutations in BTG4 cause zygotic cleavage failure and female infertility. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020;107:24-33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.010

  83. 83.

    Zhou D., Suzuki T., Asami M., Perry A.C.F. Caput epididymidal mouse sperm support full development. Dev. Cell. 2019;50:5-6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.012

  84. 84.

    Zhou L.-q., Dean J. Reprogramming the genome to totipotency in mouse embryos. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:82-91.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2014.09.006

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.