What theory, for whom and in which context? Reflections on the application of theory in the development and evaluation of complex population health interventions

Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing emphasis on the value of building and testing middle range theory throughout the development and evaluation of complex population health interventions. We agree that a coherent theoretical basis for intervention development, and use of evaluation to test key causal assumptions and build theory, are crucial. However, in this editorial, we argue that such recommendations have often been operationalised in somewhat simplistic terms with potentially perverse consequences, and that an uncritical assumption that an intervention explicitly based on theory is inherently superior carries significant risks. We first argue that the drive for theory-based approaches may have exacerbated a propensity to select 'off-the-shelf' theories, leading to the selection of inappropriate theories which distract attention from the mechanisms through which a problem is actually sustained. Second, we discuss a tendency toward over-reliance on individual-level theorising. Finally, we discuss the relatively slow progress of population health intervention research in attending to issues of context, and the ecological fit of interventions with the systems whose functioning they attempt to change. We argue that while researchers should consider a broad range of potential theoretical perspectives on a given population health problem, citing a popular off-the-shelf theory as having informed an intervention and its evaluation does not inherently make for better science. Before identifying or developing a theory of change, researchers should develop a clear understanding of how the problem under consideration is created and sustained in context. A broader conceptualisation of theory that reaches across disciplines is vital if theory is to enhance, rather than constrain, the contribution of intervention research. Finally, intervention researchers need to move away from viewing interventions as discrete packages of components which can be described in isolation from their contexts, and better understand the systems into which change is being introduced.

References 28

1. 1.

   Ajzen I., Kuhl J., Beckman J. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action-control: From cognition to behavior. 1985;11-39.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Berwick D.M. The science of improvement. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008;299:1182-1184.

   Not in our library10.1001/jama.299.10.1182

3. 3.

   Bonell C., Allen E., Christie D., Elbourne D., Fletcher A., Grieve R. Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:1-14.

   Not in our library10.1186/1745-6215-15-381

4. 4.

   Bonell C., Fletcher A., Morton M., Lorenc T., Moore L. Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Social Science Medicine. 2012;75:2299-2306.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032

5. 5.

   Brainard J., Hunter P.R. Do complexity-informed health interventions work? A scoping review. Implementation Science. 2016;11:1-11.

   Not in our library10.1186/s13012-016-0492-5

6. 6.

   Craig P., Dieppe P., Macintyre S., Michie S., Nazareth I., Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.

   Not in our library10.1136/bmj.a1655

7. 7.
   Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions · 2014

   No notice
8. 8.

   Glouberman S., Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: What would successful reform of medicare look like? Romanow Papers. 2002;2:21-53.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Grimshaw J.M., Presseau J., Tetroe J., Eccles M.P., Francis J.J., Godin G. Looking inside the black box: Results of a theory-based process evaluation exploring the results of a randomized controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians' diabetic retinopathy referrals [Trial registration number ISRCTN72772651]. Implementation Science. 2014;9:86.

   Not in our library10.1186/1748-5908-9-86

10. 10.

    Hallingberg B., Fletcher A., Murphy S., Morgan K., Littlecott H., Roberts C. Do stronger school smoking policies make a difference? Analysis of the health behaviour in school-aged children survey. The European Journal of Public Health, ckw0. 2016;93.

    Not in our library10.1093/eurpub/ckw093

11. 11.

    Hawe P. Minimal, negligible and negligent interventions. Social Science Medicine. 2015;138:265-268.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.025

12. 12.

    Hawe P., Shiell A., Riley T. Theorising Interventions as Events in Systems. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2009;43:267-276.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9

13. 13.

    Howarth E, Devers K, Moore G, O’Cathain A, Dixon-Woods M. Contextual issues and qualitative research. In Raine R, Fitzpatrick R, Barratt H, Bevan G, Black N, Boaden R, et al. Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. Health Serv Deliv Res 2016;4(16). pp. 105–20.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Jamal F., Fletcher A., Shackleton N., Elbourne D., Viner R., Bonell C. The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: A theoretical and methodological case-example. Trials. 2015;16:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13063-015-0980-y

15. 15.

    Markham W.A., Aveyard P. A new theory of health promoting schools based on human functioning, school organisation and pedagogic practice. Social Science Medicine. 2003;56:1209-1220.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00120-x

16. 16.

    Michie S., Richardson M., Johnston M., Abraham C., Francis J., Hardeman W. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2013;46:81-95.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6

17. 17.
    Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance · 2015

    No notice
18. 18.

    Moore L., Roberts C., Tudor-Smith C. School smoking policies and smoking prevalence among adolescents: Multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from Wales. Tobacco Control. 2001;10:117-123.

    Not in our library10.1136/tc.10.2.117

19. 19.
    A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS? · 2007

    No notice
20. 20.

    Pawson R., Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. 1997.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Presseau J., Grimshaw J.M., Tetroe J.M., Eccles M.P., Francis J.J., Godin G. A theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians' prescription of thiazide diuretics for hypertension [ISRCTN72772651]. Implementation Science. 2016;11:121.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13012-016-0485-4

22. 22.

    Prestwich A., Sniehotta F.F., Whittington C., Dombrowski S.U., Rogers L., Michie S. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychology. 2014;33:465.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0032853

23. 23.

    Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983;51.

    Not in our library10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390

24. 24.

    Salas X.R. The ineffectiveness and unintended consequences of the public health war on obesity. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2015;106:E79.

    Not in our library10.17269/cjph.106.4757

25. 25.

    Sniehotta F.F., Presseau J., Araújo-Soares V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review. 2014;8:1-7.

    Not in our library10.1080/17437199.2013.869710

26. 26.

    West R. Time for a change: Putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest. Addiction. 2005;100:1036-1039.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01139.x

27. 27.
    Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID) · 2015

    No notice
28. 28.

    Zwarenstein M., Grimshaw J.M., Presseau J., Francis J.J., Godin G., Johnston M. Printed educational messages fail to increase use of thiazides as first-line medication for hypertension in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN72772651]. Implementation Science. 2016;11:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13012-016-0486-3

Cited by papers we hold 11

• Effects of a co-created occupational health intervention on stress and psychosocial working conditions within the construction industry: A controlled trial · 2022
  Not checked
• Towards a Program Theory for Family-Focused Practice in Adult Mental Health Care Settings: An International Interview Study With Program Leaders · 2021
  Not checked
• Development of a decision support intervention for family members of adults who lack capacity to consent to trials · 2021
  Not checked
• How leisure activities affect health: a narrative review and multi-level theoretical framework of mechanisms of action · 2021
  Corrected
• How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review · 2020
  No notice
• Population health intervention research: the place of theories · 2019
  Not checked
• A classroom-based intervention targeting working memory, attention and language skills in 4–5 year olds (RECALL): study protocol for a cluster randomised feasibility trial · 2019
  Not checked
• Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance · 2019
  No notice
• From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation · 2018
  No notice
• CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials · 2018
  No notice
• Behavior Change Techniques and Their Mechanisms of Action: A Synthesis of Links Described in Published Intervention Literature · 2018
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.