Ainda persiste um gap de género na investigação cardiológica nacional? Uma revisão de dados da Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

1. 1.

   Gender bias in scholarly peer review · 2017

7 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.