No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
One health, multiple challenges: The inter-species transmission of influenza A virus
Kirsty R. Short, Mathilde Richard, Josanne H. Verhagen and 6 more
One Health · 2015
doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2015.03.001
Abstract
Influenza A viruses are amongst the most challenging viruses that threaten both human and animal health. Influenza A viruses are unique in many ways. Firstly, they are unique in the diversity of host species that they infect. This includes waterfowl (the original reservoir), terrestrial and aquatic poultry, swine, humans, horses, dog, cats, whales, seals and several other mammalian species. Secondly, they are unique in their capacity to evolve and adapt, following crossing the species barrier, in order to replicate and spread to other individuals within the new species. Finally, they are unique in the frequency of inter-species transmission events that occur. Indeed, the consequences of novel influenza virus strain in an immunologically naïve population can be devastating. The problems that influenza A viruses present for human and animal health are numerous. For example, influenza A viruses in humans represent a major economic and disease burden, whilst the poultry industry has suffered colossal damage due to repeated outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of influenza A viruses by shedding light on interspecies virus transmission and summarising the current knowledge regarding how influenza viruses can adapt to a new host.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Influenza A viruses (Family Orthomyxoviridae) impose a large burden on both human and animal health worldwide. Influenza A viruses can be categorised into different subtypes based on genetic and antigenic differences in the two surface glycoproteins of the virus, the haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Wild waterfowl and shorebirds are the natural reservoirs of influenza A virus and can be infected with viruses harbouring combinations of 16 different HA subtypes and nine different NA subtypes. Recently, two novel influenza A virus subtypes (H17N10 and H18N11) have been identified in rectal swabs collected from the little yellow-shouldered bat [Sturnira lilium] and the flat-faced fruit-eating bat [Artibeus jamaicensis planirostris],,. Influenza viruses of this subtype have not been isolated from any other animal order and it is unknown whether these viruses might be able to cross the species barrier. In contrast, there is significant inter-species transmission of influenza viruses from waterbirds, such that animals ranging from domestic poultry to humans can also become infected. Accordingly, infection with influenza virus has wide-reaching ramifications. For example, whilst some influenza virus strains are largely asymptomatic in chickens (and are hence referred to as low pathogenic avian influenza [LPAI] viruses) others cause severe disease in chickens that is often fatal within 48 h (and are hence referred to as highly pathogenic avian influenza [HPAI] viruses). Outbreaks of HPAI viruses can cause devastation for the poultry industry resulting in the mass slaughter of millions of birds. Similarly, outbreaks of influenza viruses amongst thoroughbred horses have disrupted numerous race meetings and resulted in the death of infected horses. In humans, seasonal influenza viruses are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and constitute an economic burden of $10.4 billion dollars per year in the U.S.A. alone. The diversity and complexity of influenza virus infections across so many different animal species suggests that a one-health approach is the only comprehensive way to reduce the burden of disease. Here, we seek to highlight how influenza viruses spread from their natural avian hosts to mammals, and what the virus needs to overcome in order to ensure the success of these inter-species transmission events. We highlight the consequences that this inter-species transmission has, not only for human health, but also for the health of wild animals and the success of industries such as poultry farming.
Wild birds as a reservoir of LPAI viruses
Waterbirds and shorebirds of the orders Anseriformes (mainly ducks, geese and swans) and Charadriiformes (mainly gulls, terns and waders) are considered the natural host reservoirs of LPAI viruses (see Fig. 1). In wild birds LPAI viruses predominantly infect epithelial cells of the intestinal tract, and are subsequently excreted in the faeces. However, infection of wild birds with LPAI viruses is typically sub-clinical and occurs in the absence of obvious lesions,,. Every year, LPAI viruses cause outbreaks amongst waterbirds. These outbreaks are most commonly associated with the increased presence of juvenile, immunologically naïve birds in the population and occur during migration when contact rates between, and within, populations are high. The relatively high virus prevalence in waterbirds may be due, in part, to virus transmission through the faecal–oral route via surface waters.
Transmission of LPAI viruses to marine mammals
Influenza viruses from waterbirds can cross the species barrier and infect numerous other species (see Fig. 1). A recent example of bird-to-animal transmission is the mortality amongst harbour seals [Phoca vitulina] of the North-European coastal waters following infection with the LPAI H10N7 virus,,. Various outbreaks of LPAI H3, H4 and H7 viruses causing severe respiratory disease and mortality amongst harbour seals have also occurred in the past decades along the New England coast of the United States of America,,,. The exact transmission route between seals is unknown but it is likely to occur via the respiratory route, most probably whilst the seals are resting on land. It is currently unknown if adaptation of influenza viruses from waterbirds is needed to allow the virus to infect and transmit amongst seals. In addition to seals, LPAI viruses have been isolated from a long-finned pilot whale [Globicephala melas] and Balaenopterid whales (species unknown),, and serological evidence for infection was reported in various other marine mammal species (for review see ). However, the available data is very limited and it is remains unclear if LPAI viruses can also cause outbreaks of disease in other marine mammals similar to harbour seals.
Transmission of LPAI viruses to domesticated animals
In addition to transmission to marine mammals, LPAI viruses can also cross the species barrier and infect domesticated mammals and birds (see Fig. 1). Swine [Sus scrofa domesticus] have become infected with H4 and H9 viruses sporadically, whilst LPAI H1 and H3 viruses are endemic in pigs. Disease manifestations can range from as acute respiratory tract disease to an inapparent infection. Traditionally, swine infections were considered to be of particular importance because swine respiratory epithelial cells were thought to express both α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids. In general, human influenza viruses use α2,6-linked sialic acids as a receptor, whereas avian influenza viruses attach predominantly to α2,3-linked sialic acids. Accordingly, the presence of both α2,6- and α2,3-linked sialic acids would mean that swine may potentially be infected by both avian and human viruses. Due to its segmented genome, when two different influenza viruses infect a single host, virus gene segments can be inter-changed such that a novel so-called ‘reassortant’ virus is produced. Pigs were thus traditionally thought to act as a ‘mixing vessel’ and facilitate the generation of novel reassortant influenza viruses. However, recent studies suggest that there is in fact limited α2,3-linked sialic acid on swine tracheal cells. Rather, perhaps of greater importance for one health, is the presence of large numbers of pigs in close proximity to other animal species, increasing the risk of an inter-species transmission event.
Influenza viruses currently circulating in mammalian species, including dogs [Canis lupus familiaris] and horses [Equus ferus caballus], are also thought to have derived from avian influenza viruses,,. Viruses of the H3N8 and H3N2 subtypes are currently circulating amongst dogs. Whilst the H3N2 virus is a recent direct spill-over from birds, the H3N8 virus has been circulating amongst horses since at least the 1960s and was established in the dog population in the end of the last century or the early 2000s,,,,. Both viruses can cause severe respiratory disease in dogs,. In horses, H3N8 viruses were first detected in the 1960s and have subsequently become endemic,. The H7N7 virus emerged amongst horses in the 1950s but is currently thought to be extinct. Interestingly, the H3N8 virus was also detected in a Bactrian camel [Camelus bactrianus].
Terrestrial poultry can also become infected with numerous different LPAI viruses. A subset of the LPAI virus strains (namely H5, H6, H7, H9 viruses) that infect poultry can subsequently become endemic in this population,. Indeed, LPAI viruses appear to adapt upon infection of terrestrial poultry, as LPAI viruses isolated from wild birds do not replicate efficiently if used to experimentally infect poultry. In poultry LPAI viruses typically cause limited clinical signs. However, unlike in water birds, LPAI viruses predominately infect respiratory epithelial cells. Accordingly, it is thought that LPAI virus strains can also be transmitted amongst terrestrial poultry, roaming in dry pens at high densities, via respiratory droplets and aerosols. However, perhaps the most significant feature of LPAI virus infection of poultry is that in these species that some LPAI viruses are able to evolve into HPAI viruses.
HPAI viruses in domestic birds
In terrestrial poultry, LPAI viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes can subsequently evolve to become HPAI viruses by the insertion of a multi-basic cleavage site in the viral HA. The HA of LPAI viruses is cleaved by trypsin-like proteins, expressed in the intestinal and respiratory tracts of birds. However, the presence of the multi-basic cleavage site in the HA of HPAI viruses enables these viruses be cleaved by the furin family of enzymes. These enzymes are distributed throughout the body hence enabling HPAI viruses to cause a systemic viral infection. To date, this evolution to a highly pathogenic phenotype has only been observed in H5 and H7 influenza viruses. It remains unclear whether this represents a unique feature of these viral strains, or if this is simply a chance event. HPAI viruses typically cause a fatal and systemic infection in terrestrial poultry characterized by severe necrosis and inflammation of multiple organs, often with virus replication in endothelial cells. Upon its evolution in terrestrial poultry, HPAI viruses can once again cross the species barrier and be transmitted to other avian and mammalian species.
HPAI viruses in wild birds
The HPAI H5N1 virus is unusual in so far as it has infected and caused mortality in a variety of different waterbirds,. For example, in 2005 there was an outbreak of the HPAI H5N1 virus in China that resulted in a 10% decrease in the global population of bar-headed geese. Wild birds most probably become infected with HPAI H5N1 virus via the inhalation of infectious droplets or aerosols and/or contact with contaminated water. There is also evidence to suggest that wild birds of prey become infected with HPAI H5N1 viruses following consumption of infected carcasses. In ducks, the extent of disease observed following infection with HPAI H5N1 viruses varies depending on the duck species in question. For example, whilst tufted ducks (Aythya fuligula) and pochards (Aythya farina) display neurological signs upon infection with HPAI virus A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005(H5N1), no clinical signs were observed in mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), common teals (Anas crecca), Eurasian wigeon (Anas penelope) or gadwalls (Anas strepera) infected with same dose and strain of virus. Indeed, in light of these differences the mallard duck is considered the most likely candidate for a long-distance vector of HPAI H5N1 viruses, as this species excretes abundant amounts of virus without showing clinical signs or being debilitated by the disease. Similarly, the high seroprevalence of H5N8-specific antibodies in various duck species suggest that these animals are able to survive the initial virus infection and may be involved in the epidemiology of this lineage of HPAI H5 viruses.
HPAI viruses in non-human mammals
The HPAI H5N1 virus has also been detected in various animals living in captivity, including tigers [Panthera tigris], leopards [Panthera pardus], a dog, cats [Felis catus], Owston's palm civets [Chrotogale owstoni] and swine (for review see ). H5N1 viruses have also been detected in a free-living stone marten (Mustela foina) and an American mink (Mustela vison), (for review see ). Infection of carnivores occurs most likely via the ingestion of infected poultry or wild birds, although there has been evidence of horizontal transmission of HPAI H5N1 virus amongst tigers. Interestingly, infection of carnivores with the H5N1 virus caused severe respiratory and systemic disease, often with involvement of the central nervous system, whilst no severe disease was observed in swine, both after natural or experimental infection (for review see ).Antibodies were detected against multiple influenza virus strains in captive species of reptiles and amphibians, whilst influenza virus RNA was detected in captive crocodilians,,. In addition, in vitro and in ovo experiments suggest that alligators are susceptible to infection with avian influenza viruses. Since birds are evolutionarily closely related to reptiles, identification of divergent viruses that circulate amongst species of this order might provide interesting information about the evolutionary history of influenza viruses.
Influenza A viruses in reptiles
Antibodies were detected against multiple influenza virus strains in captive species of reptiles and amphibians, whilst influenza virus RNA was detected in captive crocodilians,,. In addition, in vitro and in ovo experiments suggest that alligators are susceptible to infection with avian influenza viruses. Since birds are evolutionarily closely related to reptiles, identification of divergent viruses that circulate amongst species of this order might provide interesting information about the evolutionary history of influenza viruses.
Human influenza A virus infections
To date, the four best described influenza A virus pandemics amongst humans are the 1918 H1N1 ‘Spanish flu’, the 1957 H2N2 ‘Asian flu’, the 1968 H3N2 ‘Hong Kong flu’ and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. These pandemics have been of varying severity and origin. For example, whilst the 1918 pandemic virus is thought to be avian descent, the 1968 H3N2 virus was derived from a reassortment event between the circulating human H2N2 virus and the HA and PB1 genes from avian influenza virus strain. Although some of these pandemic viruses have become extinct (such as the 1957 H2N2 virus), others have become established in the human population and are responsible for seasonal outbreaks of influenza virus observed every year. The two seasonal influenza A virus strains currently circulating in humans (pH1N1 and H3N2) cause approximately 500,000 deaths worldwide, with infection typically manifesting as an acute respiratory tract infection. Thus, influenza viruses, and in particular influenza virus strains that have been recently introduced into the human population, represents a continuous threat to human health. The vast majority of zoonotic events are restricted to sporadic individual cases, without evidence of sustained human-to-human transmission. However, the acquisition of human-to-human transmissibility by a zoonotic virus could mark the beginning of a new influenza virus pandemic.
Zoonotic events
Since the first report of transmission of HPAI H5N1 viruses to humans in 1997, it became clear that as well as infecting a variety of other species, avian influenza viruses could also infect humans,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. To date, avian influenza viruses of subtypes H5, H6, H7, H9 and H10, have crossed the species barrier and caused human infections (see Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Of particular concern are the HPAI H5N1 and LPAI H7N9 virus strains due to the frequency of zoonoses and/or the severity of disease they cause (see Fig. 2, Fig. 3).
HPAI H5N1 viruses were first detected in humans in Hong Kong in 1997. During this outbreak 18 people were infected with six fatalities. In 2003 and 2004, H5N1 viruses spread from East Asia to Southeast Asia, where sporadic human infections were recorded along with outbreaks in terrestrial and aquatic poultry. Following an outbreak of HPAI H5N1 influenza virus amongst waterfowl at Qinghai lake, China, in 2005, H5N1 viruses spread from China, westward to India, to Europe, and Northern and Central Africa. In these countries, HPAI H5N1 viruses were detected in poultry, many species of wild birds and mammals. HPAI H5N1 viruses currently represent a major threat to both human and animal health owing to their unique characteristics. For example, H5N1 viruses represent the only lineage of HPAI viruses that are enzootic in poultry in many parts of the world, and this has been the case for over a decade. Quarantining of infected farms, and culling of infected or potentially exposed poultry causes severe damage to the poultry industry and animal health worldwide, with an estimation of 400 million of birds culled and economic losses equivalent to US$20 billion. This continued circulation in poultry led to a diversification in different genetic clades, either by reassortment or by accumulation of point mutations (for a review, see ). HPAI H5N1 viruses are also exceptional in the diversity of species that they infect, by the high incidence of zoonotic events and the severity of human infections that they cause. Indeed, since 1997 HPAI H5N1 viruses have been reported to infect almost 700 people, with a case fatality rate close to 60% (Fig. 3). Although a few clusters of human cases were reported, no sustained human-to-human transmission has been recorded. Rather, human infections typically occur following close contact with infected birds. Live poultry markets and backyard production with poly-culture farming (i.e. farming more than one animal species in the same location) have thus played an important role in the inter-species transmission of HPAI H5N1 viruses and may help explain, in part, the preponderance of HPAI H5N1 virus infections in Asia and North Africa,,.
In addition to HPAI H5N1 viruses, the emergence of a novel LPAI H7N9 virus in humans in March 2013 has been a cause for concern. H7N9 viruses were first detected in China and the number of human cases peaked in April 2013,. The incidence of infection subsequently declined, most probably due to the implementation of control strategies such as the closure of live bird markets and increased public awareness. Indeed, it is thought that the closure of live poultry markets in Shanghai reduced the mean daily number of human H7N9 virus infections by 99%. A rise in the number of cases occurred in the Northern Hemisphere winter of 2013/2014, constituting a second wave, and cases are still being detected in China, resulting in the third wave. Both the second and third waves coincided with the influenza season in China. Since the first wave of zoonotic events in 2013, more than 500 laboratory-confirmed human infections, with a case fatality rate of 36%, have been reported. As a LPAI virus, H7N9 viruses do not cause severe disease in poultry and therefore circulate undetected, making it more difficult to contain and/or eradicate outbreaks. Cluster of human infections with H7N9 have been reported, demonstrating that human-to-human transmission may have occurred. However, H7N9 viruses do not so far have the ability to transmit efficiently between humans.
Pathogenesis and transmission
The severity of the disease caused by avian zoonotic influenza viruses is diverse. Symptoms range from conjunctivitis (often associated with the H7 subtype) to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and encephalitis,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. H7N9 and HPAI H5N1 stand out by the severity of the disease they cause. Indeed, human infections with H7N9 and HPAI H5N1 are typified by severe respiratory insufficiency and the development of ARDS. Histologically this is characterized by diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) with necrosis of alveolar epithelium, intraluminal oedema, fibrin, haemorrhage, neutrophils and increased numbers of alveolar macrophages. In the later stage there is also type II hyperplasia, interstitial infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells and fibrosis. The mechanisms underlying influenza virus-induced DAD and the associated respiratory insufficiency are both complex and multi-faceted (for a more extensive list of the key players in damage see, ). One striking feature of these severe and sometimes fatal influenza virus infections is the high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by alveolar epithelial cells and leukocytes. This has led to the theory that a ‘cytokine storm’ (i.e. an uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response) contributes to disease severity. Interestingly, in vitro infection of primary human macrophages and alveolar epithelial cells suggests that whilst H7N9 viruses are more potent inducers of pro-inflammatory cytokines than H1N1 viruses, neither virus strain is as potent as HPAI H5N1 viruses. This may offer a potential explanation for the differential mortality observed between H7N9 and HPAI H5N1 infections. However, it is important to note that exactly how these pro-inflammatory cytokines damage alveolar function remains unclear. Damage may occur indirectly via the recruitment of specific leukocyte subsets to lung. Alternatively, specific cytokines may induce epithelial cell death and hence facilitate pulmonary oedema. The relative important of these different mechanisms during infection remains an important area for future research.
The severity of HPAI H5N1 virus infections in humans compared to other influenza virus strains may be due, in part, to the receptor tropism of these viruses. As described above, the receptor tropism of influenza viruses is determined by the HA, which can bind to either α2,6-linked sialic acid (typically seen with human-derived HAs) or α2,3-linked sialic acid (typically seen with avian-derived HAs), or both. In humans, α2,6-linked sialic acids are strongly expressed in ciliated epithelial cells (such as those present in the upper respiratory tract, trachea and bronchus) whilst within the alveolus type II pneumocytes express predominantly α-2,3 linked sialic acids,. Accordingly, virus histochemistry has shown that HPAI H5N1 viruses attach predominantly to non-ciliated cuboidal cells (club cells) in the bronchiole and type II pneumocytes and alveolar macrophages in the alveoli,,,,. It is therefore tempting to speculate that avian viruses can cause severe disease in humans by infecting the cells in the lower respiratory tract, but that this lower respiratory tract binding pattern limits their transmissibility. However, this association between the attachment pattern, disease pathogenesis and transmission efficiency in humans is not always so straightforward. For example, unlike HPAI H5N1 viruses, H7N9 viruses attach to epithelial cells of both the human upper and lower respiratory tract. Although the attachment to cells of the lower respiratory tract corresponds to the severe disease caused by H7N9 viruses in humans, the attachment to ciliated epithelial cells of the upper respiratory tract has not resulted in efficient aerosol transmission amongst humans nor between ferrets, an animal model for influenza virus transmission,,. In addition, HPAI H5N1 influenza viruses with mutations that result in attachment to ciliated epithelial cells of the upper respiratory tract, did not result in aerosol transmission in a ferret model,.
The above studies clearly indicate that attachment to ciliated epithelial cells of the upper respiratory tract is likely to be necessary, but not sufficient, for efficient viral transmission amongst humans. To further define what limits the transmissibility of avian viruses amongst humans, studies assessing the airborne transmissibility of experimentally generated HPAI H5N1 viruses amongst ferrets have been performed,. In addition to mutations that were intentionally introduced in the receptor binding site (RBS) of HA to enhance binding to α2,6-linked sialic acid and decrease binding to α2,3-linked sialic acid, both studies found two other mutations in the viral HA during ferret passage (see Fig. 4). These mutations affected the stability of HA (see below), or resulted in the loss of a potential N-linked glycosylation site close to the receptor binding site, thereby increasing virus binding to sialic acid receptors,.
After binding of the HA to sialic acid receptors on the host cells, virus particles enter the cell through a process called receptor-mediated endocytosis. The acidic environment in the endosome triggers a conformational change of the HA, enabling fusion of the viral and endosomal membrane, and the subsequent release of the viral genome in the cytoplasm. The pH at which the HA undergoes this conformational change varies between the HA subtypes and virus strains. Interestingly, the pH of fusion of many avian influenza viruses is higher (less acidic) than that of human influenza viruses. The two mutations that were identified in the HA of airborne H5N1 viruses (H110Y, T318I, H3 numbering) stabilized the HA protein, as demonstrated by a lower pH of fusion, and a higher temperature stability,.
Dozens of other mutations that modulate the pH of fusion have been described, some of which have been proven to change the replication and transmission in mammals (for an extensive review see Mair et al., 2014). For example, lowering the pH threshold of fusion by an H18Q (HA1) or K58I (HA2) substitution in an avian H5N1 HA resulted in enhanced replication in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets,. The requirement for a low pH of fusion may also explain the lack of sustained transmission of H7N9 between humans, since the pH of fusion of H7N9 HA is relatively high compared to the HA of human influenza viruses.
Although more in vitro data is accumulating on HA stability, one must remember that these properties may merely be a surrogate for another (as yet unknown) phenotype. This phenotype may be the stability of the HA in aerosols, resistance to drought, stability in mucus or altered pH in the host environment. For example, studies in humans have shown that the respiratory tract environment is mildly acidic, with a mean pH of 6.3, but with a range between pH 5 and 8. Therefore, it is possible that an unmodified avian influenza virus with a relative unstable HA (i.e. pH of fusion around 5.6, as has been demonstrated for H5N1), might be inactivated by a premature, pH-triggered conformational change before it can bind and enter its target cell in the respiratory tract.After virus replication, the receptor-destroying activity of the NA protein facilitates the release of newly formed virus particles from the cell surface. An optimal interplay between the receptor-binding of the HA and receptor-destroying activity of the NA is required. Changes in the receptor binding activity can disturb this functional balance, which can be restored by compensatory mutations in the HA, NA or both. One striking example of this balance is the concomitant glycosylation of the HA and NA stalk truncature as the result of adapting to terrestrial birds. It has also been hypothesised that a fine balance between HA and NA functions is necessary for progeny virions to be released as single particles, which might be beneficial for airborne transmission. Providing definitive experimental evidence to support this hypothesis remains an important area for future studies.
A balanced approach
After virus replication, the receptor-destroying activity of the NA protein facilitates the release of newly formed virus particles from the cell surface. An optimal interplay between the receptor-binding of the HA and receptor-destroying activity of the NA is required. Changes in the receptor binding activity can disturb this functional balance, which can be restored by compensatory mutations in the HA, NA or both. One striking example of this balance is the concomitant glycosylation of the HA and NA stalk truncature as the result of adapting to terrestrial birds. It has also been hypothesised that a fine balance between HA and NA functions is necessary for progeny virions to be released as single particles, which might be beneficial for airborne transmission. Providing definitive experimental evidence to support this hypothesis remains an important area for future studies.
Pathogenesis and transmission
After release of the viral genome in the cytoplasm, and transportation of the gene segments to the nucleus, the attached viral polymerase complex consisting of the basic polymerase 2 (PB2), basic polymerase 1 (PB1) and acidic polymerase (PA), needs to produce a high amount of viral genomes and proteins for the generation of new virus particles. The high copy rate of the viral genome also ensures the fast accumulation of (potentially beneficial) mutations, a hallmark of a host species switch by RNA viruses. However, the polymerase activity of avian influenza viruses is strongly restricted in mammalian cells. Avian influenza viruses normally replicate at a temperature of ~ 41 °C, i.e. the temperature in the avian intestinal tract, and after transmission to humans, they need to adapt to replicate at ~ 33 °C, the accepted temperature for efficient replication in the mammalian upper respiratory tract.
PB2 was the first polymerase protein in which a mutation that helped overcome this host restriction was identified. Whilst avian influenza A virus isolates contain almost exclusively a glutamic acid at position 627 of the polymerase PB2 protein (PB2-E627), this position is frequently mutated to a lysine in human-derived isolates. Mutation to PB2-E627K is accompanied by improved viral replication at low temperatures, and enhanced binding of the viral polymerase to the nucleoprotein in human cells, thereby also evading recognition by the pathogen sensor RIG-I. In addition, PB2-E627K was shown to be required to confer airborne transmissibility to a HPAI H5N1 virus between ferrets,. Notably, fatal infections of humans with avian viruses of the H5N1 and H7N9 subtype that retained the avian like glutamic acid at position 627 of PB2 are frequent. These data suggest that PB2-E627K is not always strictly necessary for avian viruses to cross the species barrier and infect mammals. Recently, a PB2-K526R substitution was found to increase polymerase activity, especially in concert with PB2-E627K. Interestingly, this mutation was found in all subtypes of seasonal influenza viruses, as well as in human isolates of H5 and H7 infections, but is rare in avian isolates. In guinea pigs PB2-D701N could substitute for the lack of PB2-E627K for contact as well as aerosol transmission, possibly by improved nuclear import of the polymerase subunit PB2. Other mutations known to play a role in host adaptation (increased polymerase complex activity, or virulence) have been described elsewhere,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
In addition to PB2, features of avian PB1 may also restrict the human-to-human spread of avian influenza viruses. For example, for the ferret airborne-transmissible HPAI H5N1 virus, it was shown that, together with PB2-E627K, PB1-H99Y increased polymerase activity, by improving the balance between transcription and replication, a requirement for efficient airborne transmission between ferrets. Other mutations in the polymerase complex protein, nucleoprotein (which binds to the viral genome to prevent degradation by host cell enzymes) and the non-structural protein NS2/NEP may also help avian influenza viruses overcome replication restrictions mammalian hosts. Indeed, escape mutants in the viral nucleoprotein can reduce sensitivity of avian influenza viruses to the human protein MxA which possess strong antiviral activity and helps limit viral replication,,,. Whilst the effects of most of these mutations on airborne transmissibility have not been studied, it is anticipated that these mutations, alone, or in concert with other (compensatory) mutations may affect transmissibility by improving viral polymerase activity in mammals.
The recently solved structure of the influenza polymerase bound to its promoter may help shed light on location and interplay of known adaptive mutations as well as those yet to be identified. A proposed RNA exit channel located between the PB1-subunit and the cap-binding domain contains most of the adaptive mutations of PB2. For human influenza viruses, only PB2-E627K, PB2-D701N, PB1-H99Y and likely PB2-Q591R could be conclusively associated with efficient transmission and therefore successful adaptation (see Fig. 5),,,. As these amino acid positions are located in close proximity with each other, it remains to be shown if amino acid changes in other parts of the polymerase can lead to a similar level of adaptation to mammals.
Influenza viruses that infect humans via an intermediate mammalian host
In addition to being directly infected by avian influenza virus strains, humans can also be infected with influenza virus strains that have passed through an intermediate mammalian host (e.g. swine) (see Fig. 6). Indeed, prior to the outbreak of HPAI H5N1 viruses in 1997, the dogma was that infection via an intermediate host was the only path by which a new influenza virus strain could enter the human population. Several influenza virus lineages have become enzootic in swine populations upon transmission of influenza viruses from birds and humans to pigs. Influenza viruses of H1N1, H1N2 and H3N2 subtypes, as well as reassortants between these enzootic influenza viruses, have then crossed the species barrier and caused human infections. Perhaps the most striking example of a virus that, via swine, can infect humans was the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus. This virus had a unique gene constellation combining the genes from human, avian and swine influenza viruses. The 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus was first detected in humans in February, 2009. This virus then rapidly spread across the globe, infecting between 10 and 20% of the world's population and eventually replacing the human seasonal H1N1 virus. Consistent with this efficient transmission, the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus was able to bind to α2,6-linked sialic acid and to a lesser extent α2,3-linked sialic acid. However, experimental studies suggest that transmission determinants of this virus resided in the matrix gene segment (which encodes the protein (M) matrix (M1) and proton channel (M2) proteins) as well as the NA,,. It was suggested that M1 and/or M2 affect the functionality of NA by changing the virion morphology. Surprisingly, the pandemic influenza 2009 H1N1 virus did not contain the mammalian adaptation residues 627K and/or 701N. When the substitutions E627K or D701N were introduced in pandemic influenza 2009 H1N1, no differences in virulence or transmissibility were observed. The lack of these mammalian adaptation markers in PB2 were partially compensated by substitutions G590S/Q591R, which may affect interaction with viral and/or cellular factors and promote virus replication in mammals.
Despite a high rate of transmission, the mortality rate of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus was relatively low: approximately 29 deaths per 100,000 infections. Interestingly, there were marked differences in the severity of disease observed during the pandemic. For example, whilst most patients displayed mild, self-limiting symptoms some developed ARDS reminiscent of HPAI H5N1 virus infection. Indeed, some patients even displayed signs of CNS disease following infection,. The development of severe respiratory disease was associated, in part, with the presence of specific viral mutations. For example, the D222G mutation in the HA of the pH1N1 virus was associated with some severe and fatal infections. This is thought to relate to an increased preference of these viruses to bind to α2,3-linked sialic acid and thus infect of cells within the lower respiratory tract. Severe disease was also associated with the presence of co-morbidities such as asthma, obesity and pregnancy,. Indeed, many of the identified risk factors were related to a compromised immune system or aerodynamic ventilation problems. Interestingly, most patients with pH1N1 infection were (young) adults with a median age of 36 years. This is in direct contrast to seasonal influenza virus infections, where it is those in the extreme of age who are at the highest risk of severe disease. Monsalvo and colleagues offer an elegant explanation as to why, at least some, young adults developed severe disease. Monsalvo et al. demonstrated that during the 2009 pandemic many middle aged adults possessed cross-reactive, but not protective, antibodies to the virus. Severe disease was associated with the ability of these antibodies to form immune complexes and activate the complement cascade within the respiratory tract. Thus, whilst the presence of cross-reactive antibodies can protect against disease development, non-protective cross-reactive antibodies represent an important host factor that exacerbates disease development.
In addition to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus, numerous other influenza virus strains have infected humans via an intermediate swine host. The vast majority of these reported human cases are located in the United States (see Fig. 6). Of particular interest is the H3N2 variant (H3N2v) variant virus. This virus is a reassortant virus which contains the M gene of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus and the remaining genes of the North American swine influenza virus lineage. Since the first documented cases of human H3N2v virus infections in 2011, over 350 human infections with swine H3N2v virus have been reported, including one death of a person with multiple underlying conditions. Typically, these infections are associated with close contact with pigs during activities such as care giving, visiting live-animal markets or fairs. However, a limited number of cases reported no contact with swine, indicating the possibility of limited human-to-human transmission of H3N2v virus. Indeed, experimental studies in ferrets show that H3N2v is capable of replicating in the upper respiratory tract and transmitting efficiently to naïve ferrets via respiratory droplets.
Sustained transmission in humans
Finally, it is important to recognise that when a new influenza virus strain enters the human population the virus will continue to adapt and change. For example, the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus, despite already being transmissible, evolved towards a more acid stable virus due to an E47K (HA2) substitution which gave rise to a higher infectivity in ferrets. It remains to be determined how other influenza virus strains have evolved during the course of a pandemic. Reassortment with contemporary influenza viruses is also possible in order to improve viral replication and/or transmissibility. It was demonstrated that reassortment between 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus and seasonal H3N2 virus resulted in increased replication and more severe pulmonary lesions in ferrets, whilst maintaining the capacity of airborne transmission. However, this is yet to be recorded in humans. Future reassortment events are not unlikely since at least three of the four last pandemic influenza viruses occurred upon reassortment events between viruses of diverse origin.
Whereas the influenza virus HA has an important role in determining the virus host range and virulence, HA is also the main target of neutralizing antibodies. As a result, amino acid substitutions in the HA protein can result in escape from antibody-mediated neutralization. This process is referred to as antigenic drift, and allows the virus to re-infect individuals that have acquired immunity to previously circulating strains through infection or vaccination. Therefore, once a new virus is established in the human population, antigenic variants are expected to emerge as a result of increasing population immunity. Consistent with this notion, it was recently shown that single amino acid substitutions near the RBS were sufficient to cause major antigenic changes during evolution of H3N2 and H5N1,. Thus, humans are not only susceptible to infection with influenza viruses from a variety of different sources, but these viruses continue to mutate and reassort in a constant battle to ensure efficient transmission and evasion of the host immune response.
Conclusions
The ecology of influenza virus infections described in this review exemplifies the need for, and benefits of, a one-health approach to infectious disease. Indeed, the chance of a human influenza virus infection or pandemic is the direct result of a dynamic interplay between animal health, environmental factors and the immune system of the human host. Interestingly, despite the wealth of different influenza virus subtypes that circulate in birds only a limited number of influenza virus subtypes have been detected in humans. This clearly demonstrates that there are barriers to inter-species transmission. Some of these barriers may relate to the virus itself. For example, specific mutations in avian viruses appear to be necessary in order to ensure efficient human-to-human transmission. Alternatively, certain environmental factors may determine the rate of inter-species transmission such as close contact with infected animals or contact with contaminated water.
The human-animal interface remains in a constant state of flux and as our activities continue to change so too will the risk of influenza virus infection and inter-species transmission. Indeed, it is perhaps not surprising that the increase in poultry and swine populations observed worldwide since the industrial revolution have been associated with an increased frequency of zoonotic influenza virus infections in humans. Currently of particular concern are activities such as cock fights, illegal trading of birds, live poultry markets and using poultry faeces to feed fish — all of which have been associated with the spread of HPAI H5N1 viruses. Approaches which seek to curb the prevalence of these activities may thus have direct benefits for human health. However, any attempts to limit such activities must be accompanied by financial reimbursement for the relevant stakeholders and take into account local cultural practices and norms. Moreover, the success of such preventative measures will depend upon the perceived risk of an outbreak or pandemic. Thus, one-health solutions must be accompanied by campaigns to increase awareness about the potentially global consequences of influenza virus zoonosis. Ultimately, it is important to recognise that our understanding of the reservoirs and transmission of influenza virus continues to change as the virus itself evolves. This highlights the need for not only sound and up-to-date experimental studies, but also extensive surveillance and the continued emphasis on the fact that that human health is directly and inextricably linked to the health of animals and the surrounding environment.
References 233
- 1.
- 2.
Tong S., Li Y., Rivailler P., Conrardy C., Castillo D.A.A., Chen L.-M. A distinct lineage of influenza A virus from bats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012;109(11):4269-4274.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1116200109
- 3.
Mehle A. Unusual influenza A viruses in bats. Viruses. 2014;6(9):3438-3449.
Not in our library10.3390/v6093438
- 4.
Health WOfA. Update on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Animals (TYPE H5 and H7). 2015.
Not in our library
- 5.
Cullinane A., Newton J. Equine influenza—a global perspective. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;167(1):205-214.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.03.029
- 6.
Molinari N.A., Ortega-Sanchez I.R., Messonnier M.L., Thompson W.W., Wortley P.M., Weintraub E. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine. Jun 28 2007;25(27):5086-5096.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.046
- 7.
Webster R.G., Bean W.J., Gorman O.T., Chambers T.M., Kawaoka Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol. Rev. 1992;56(1):152-179.
Not in our library10.1128/mr.56.1.152-179.1992
- 8.
Daoust P.Y., Kibenge F.S., Fouchier R.A., van de Bildt M.W., van Riel D., Kuiken T. Replication of low pathogenic avian influenza virus in naturally infected Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) causes no morphologic lesions. J. Wildl. Dis. Apr 2011;47(2):401-409.
Not in our library10.7589/0090-3558-47.2.401
- 9.
Hofle U., Van de Bildt M.W., Leijten L.M., Van Amerongen G., Verhagen J.H., Fouchier R.A. Tissue tropism and pathology of natural influenza virus infection in black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus). Avian Pathol. Dec 2012;41(6):547-553.
Not in our library10.1080/03079457.2012.744447
- 10.
França M.S., Brown J.D. Influenza pathobiology and pathogenesis in avian species. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014;385:221-242.
Not in our library10.1007/82_2014_385
- 11.
Pantin-Jackwood M., Swayne D. Pathogenesis and pathobiology of avian influenza virus infection in birds. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2009;28(1):113-136.
Not in our library
- 12.
Kuiken T. Is low pathogenic avian influenza virus virulent for wild waterbirds? Proc. Biol. Sci. Jul 22 2013;280(1763):20130990.
Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2013.0990
- 13.
van Dijk J.G., Hoye B.J., Verhagen J.H., Nolet B.A., Fouchier R.A., Klaassen M. Juveniles and migrants as drivers for seasonal epizootics of avian influenza virus. J. Anim. Ecol. Jan 2014;83(1):266-275.
Not in our library10.1111/1365-2656.12131
- 14.
Zohari S., Neimanis A., Harkonen T., Moraeus C., Valarcher J.F. Avian influenza A(H10N7) virus involvement in mass mortality of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in Sweden. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(46).
Not in our library10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.46.20967
- 15.
Krog J.S., Hansen M.S., Holm E., Hjulsager C.K., Chriél M., Pedersen K. Influenza A(H10N7) virus in dead harbor seals, Denmark. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;21(4).
Not in our library10.3201/eid2104.141484
- 16.
Bodewes R., Bestebroer T.M., van der Vries E., Verhagen J.H., Herfst S., Koopmans M. Avian influenza A(H10N7) virus-associated mass deaths among Harbor Seals. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;21(4).
Not in our library10.3201/eid2104.141675
- 17.
- 18.
Fereidouni S., Munoz O., Von Dobschuetz S., De Nardi M. Influenza Virus Infection of Marine Mammals. Ecohealth. Sep 18 2014.
Not in our library10.1007/s10393-014-0968-1
- 19.
Webster R.G., Hinshaw V.S., Bean W.J., Van Wyke K.L., Geraci J.R., St Aubin D.J. Characterization of an influenza A virus from seals. Virology. Sep 1981;113(2):712-724.
Not in our library10.1016/0042-6822(81)90200-2
- 20.
Callan R.J., Early G., Kida H., Hinshaw V.S. The appearance of H3 influenza viruses in seals. J. Gen. Virol. Jan 1995;76(Pt 1):199-203.
Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-76-1-199
- 21.
Hinshaw V.S., Bean W.J., Geraci J., Fiorelli P., Early G., Webster R.G. Characterization of two influenza A viruses from a pilot whale. J. Virol. May 1986;58(2):655-656.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.58.2.655-656.1986
- 22.
Lvov D.K., Zdanov V.M., Sazonov A.A., Braude N.A., Vladimirtceva E.A., Agafonova L.V. Comparison of influenza viruses isolated from man and from whales. Bull. World Health Organ. 1978;56(6):923-930.
Not in our library
- 23.
Janke B.H. Influenza A, virus infections in swine: pathogenesis and diagnosis. Vet. Pathol. Mar 2014;51(2):410-426.
Not in our library10.1177/0300985813513043
- 24.
Rogers G.N., Paulson J.C. Receptor determinants of human and animal influenza virus isolates: differences in receptor specificity of the H3 hemagglutinin based on species of origin. Virology. Jun 1983;127(2):361-373.
Not in our library10.1016/0042-6822(83)90150-2
- 25.
Trebbien R., Larsen L.E., Viuff B.M. Distribution of sialic acid receptors and influenza A virus of avian and swine origin in experimentally infected pigs. Virol. J. 2011;8:434.
Not in our library10.1186/1743-422x-8-434
- 26.
Gray G.C., Trampel D.W., Roth J.A. Pandemic influenza planning: shouldn't swine and poultry workers be included? Vaccine. May 30 2007;25(22):4376-4381.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.036
- 27.
Parrish C.R., Murcia P.R., Holmes E.C. Influenza A virus reservoirs and intermediate hosts: dogs, horses, and new possibilities for human infections. J. Virol. Dec 24 2014;89(6):2990-2994.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03146-14
- 28.
Paillot R., Hannant D., Kydd J.H., Daly J.M. Vaccination against equine influenza: quid novi? Vaccine. May 8 2006;24(19):4047-4061.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.030
- 29.
Vijaykrishna D., Smith G.J., Pybus O.G., Zhu H., Bhatt S., Poon L.L. Long-term evolution and transmission dynamics of swine influenza A virus. Nature. May 26 2011;473(7348):519-522.
Not in our library10.1038/nature10004
- 30.
Parrish C.R., Murcia P.R., Holmes E.C. Influenza virus reservoirs and intermediate hosts: dogs, horses, and new possibilities for influenza virus exposure of humans. J. Virol. Mar 15 2015;89(6):2990-2994.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03146-14
- 31.
Anderson T.C., Bromfield C.R., Crawford P.C., Dodds W.J., Gibbs E.P., Hernandez J.A. Serological evidence of H3N8 canine influenza-like virus circulation in USA dogs prior to 2004. Vet. J. Mar 2012;191(3):312-316.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.11.010
- 32.
Crawford P.C., Dubovi E.J., Castleman W.L., Stephenson I., Gibbs E.P., Chen L. Transmission of equine influenza virus to dogs. Science. Oct 21 2005;310(5747):482-485.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1117950
- 33.
Waddell G.H., Teigland M.B., Sigel M.M. A new influenza virus associated with equine respiratory disease. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. Sep 15 1963;143:587-590.
Not in our library
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.
Gibbs E.P., Anderson T.C. Equine and canine influenza: a review of current events. Anim. Health Res. Rev. Jun 2010;11(1):43-51.
Not in our library10.1017/s1466252310000046
- 37.
Yondon M., Zayat B., Nelson M.I., Heil G.L., Anderson B.D., Lin X. Equine influenza A(H3N8) virus isolated from Bactrian camel, Mongolia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. Dec 2014;20(12):2144-2147.
Not in our library10.3201/eid2012.140435
- 38.
Huang K., Zhu H., Fan X., Wang J., Cheung C.L., Duan L. Establishment and lineage replacement of H6 influenza viruses in domestic ducks in southern China. J. Virol. Jun 2012;86(11):6075-6083.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.06389-11
- 39.
Chu Y.C., Cheung C.L., Hung Leung C.Y., Man Poon L.L., Chen H., Peiris J.S. Continuing evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses endemic in poultry in southern China. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses. May 2011;5(Suppl. 1):68-71.
Not in our library
- 40.
Swayne D.E., Slemons R.D. Comparative pathology of a chicken-origin and two duck-origin influenza virus isolates in chickens: the effect of route of inoculation. Vet. Pathol. Mar 1994;31(2):237-245.
Not in our library10.1177/030098589403100211
- 41.
Mo I.P., Brugh M., Fletcher O.J., Rowland G.N., Swayne D.E. Comparative pathology of chickens experimentally inoculated with avian influenza viruses of low and high pathogenicity. Avian Dis. Jan-Mar 1997;41(1):125-136.
Not in our library
- 42.
Hooper P., Selleck P. Pathology of low and high virulent influenza virus infections. Avian Dis. 2003;134-141.
Not in our library
- 43.
Reperant L.A., Kuiken T., Osterhaus A. Influenza viruses: from birds to humans. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2012;8(1):7-16.
Not in our library10.4161/hv.8.1.18672
- 44.
Short K.R., Veldhuis Kroeze E.J., Reperant L.A., Richard M., Kuiken T. Influenza virus and endothelial cells: a species specific relationship. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:653.
Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2014.00653
- 45.
Globig A., Staubach C., Beer M., Köppen U., Fiedler W., Nieburg M. Epidemiological and ornithological aspects of outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 of Asian lineage in wild birds in Germany, 2006 and 2007. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2009;56(3):57-72.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1865-1682.2008.01061.x
- 46.
Chen H., Li Y., Li Z., Shi J., Shinya K., Deng G. Properties and dissemination of H5N1 viruses isolated during an influenza outbreak in migratory waterfowl in western China. J. Virol. 2006;80(12):5976-5983.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00110-06
- 47.
Fouchier R.A., Munster V.J., Keawcharoen J., Osterhaus A., Kuiken T. Virology of avian influenza in relation to wild birds. J. Wildl. Dis. 2007;43(3):S7.
Not in our library
- 48.
van den Brand J., Krone O., Wolf P., van de Bildt M., van Amerongen G., Osterhaus A. Host-specific exposure and fatal neurologic disease in wild raptors from highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 during the 2006 outbreak in Germany. Vet. Res. 2015;46(24).
Not in our library10.1186/s13567-015-0148-5
- 49.
- 50.
Jeong J., Kang H.M., Lee E.K., Song B.M., Kwon Y.K., Kim H.R. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N8) in domestic poultry and its relationship with migratory birds in South Korea during 2014. Vet. Microbiol. Oct 10 2014;173(3–4):249-257.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.002
- 51.
Reperant L.A., Rimmelzwaan G.F., Kuiken T. Avian influenza viruses in mammals. Rev. Sci. Tech. Apr 2009;28(1):137-159.
Not in our library10.20506/rst.28.1.1876
- 52.
Klopfleisch R., Wolf P.U., Wolf C., Harder T., Starick E., Niebuhr M. Encephalitis in a stone marten (Martes foina) after natural infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1. J. Comp. Pathol. Aug–Oct 2007;137(2–3):155-159.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcpa.2007.06.001
- 53.
Kiss I., Gyarmati P., Zohari S., Ramsay K.W., Metreveli G., Weiss E. Molecular characterization of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses isolated in Sweden in 2006. Virol. J. 2008;5:113.
Not in our library10.1186/1743-422x-5-113
- 54.
- 55.
Davis L.M., Spackman E. Do crocodilians get the flu? Looking for influenza A in captive crocodilians. J. Exp. Zool. A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 2008;309(10):571-580.
Not in our library10.1002/jez.454
- 56.
Mancini D., Mendonca R., Cianciarullo A., Kobashi L., Trindade H., Fernandes W. Influenza in heterothermic animals. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2003;37(3):204-209.
Not in our library10.1590/s0037-86822004000300002
- 57.
Mancini D., Mendonça R., Kawamoto A., Giorgetti M., Trindade H., Fernandes W. Identification and characterization of influenza virus isolated from Brazilian snakes. Commun. Curr. Res. Educ. Top. Trends Appl. Microbiol. Badajoz: Formatex Microbiol. Ser. 2007;1:868-874.
Not in our library
- 58.
Temple B.L., Finger J.W., Jones C.A., Gabbard J.D., Jelesijevic T., Uhl E.W. In ovo and in vitro susceptibility of American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) to avian influenza virus infection. J. Wildl. Dis. 2015;51(1):187-198.
Not in our library10.7589/2013-12-321
- 59.
Taubenberger J.K., Kash J.C. Influenza virus evolution, host adaptation, and pandemic formation. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7(6):440-451.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2010.05.009
- 60.
Fiers W., De Filette M., Birkett A., Neirynck S., Min Jou W. A “universal” human influenza A vaccine. Virus Res. Jul 2004;103(1–2):173-176.
Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.030
- 61.
Subbarao K., Katz J. Avian influenza viruses infecting humans. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. Nov 2000;57(12):1770-1784.
Not in our library10.1007/pl00000657
- 62.
de Jong J.C., Claas E.C., Osterhaus A.D., Webster R.G., Lim W.L. A pandemic warning? Nature. Oct 9 1997;389(6651):554.
Not in our library10.1038/39218
- 63.
Li K.S., Guan Y., Wang J., Smith G.J., Xu K.M., Duan L. Genesis of a highly pathogenic and potentially pandemic H5N1 influenza virus in eastern Asia. Nature. Jul 8 2004;430(6996):209-213.
Not in our library10.1038/nature02746
- 64.
Liu J., Xiao H., Lei F., Zhu Q., Qin K., Zhang X.W. Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in migratory birds. Science. Aug 19 2005;309(5738):1206.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1115273
- 65.
Chakrabarti A.K., Pawar S.D., Cherian S.S., Koratkar S.S., Jadhav S.M., Pal B. Characterization of the influenza A H5N1 viruses of the 2008–09 outbreaks in India reveals a third introduction and possible endemicity. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7846.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0007846
- 66.
Artois M., Bicout D., Doctrinal D., Fouchier R., Gavier-Widen D., Globig A. Outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Europe: the risks associated with wild birds. Rev. Sci. Tech. Apr 2009;28(1):69-92.
Not in our library10.20506/rst.28.1.1854
- 67.
Ducatez M.F., Olinger C.M., Owoade A.A., Tarnagda Z., Tahita M.C., Sow A. Molecular and antigenic evolution and geographical spread of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in western Africa. J. Gen. Virol. Aug 2007;88(Pt 8):2297-2306.
Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.82939-0
- 68.
FAO. H5N1 HPAI. Global overview. January–March 2012.
Not in our library
- 69.
Guan Y., Smith G.J. The emergence and diversification of panzootic H5N1 influenza viruses. Virus Res. Dec 5 2013;178(1):35-43.
Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2013.05.012
- 70.
WHO. Cumulative number of confirmed human cases for avian influenza A(H5N1) reported to WHO, 2003–2015. 2015.
Not in our library
- 71.
Kandun I.N., Wibisono H., Sedyaningsih E.R., Yusharmen, Hadisoedarsuno W., Purba W. Three Indonesian clusters of H5N1 virus infection in 2005. N. Engl. J. Med. Nov 23 2006;355(21):2186-2194.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa060930
- 72.
Webster R.G. Wet markets—a continuing source of severe acute respiratory syndrome and influenza? Lancet. Jan 17 2004;363(9404):234-236.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15329-9
- 73.
Abdelwhab E., Selim A., Arafa A., Galal S., Kilany W., Hassan M. Circulation of avian influenza H5N1 in live bird markets in Egypt. Avian Dis. 2010;54(2):911-914.
Not in our library10.1637/9099-100809-resnote.1
- 74.
El-Zoghby E.F., Aly M.M., Nasef S.A., Hassan M.K., Arafa A.-S., Selim A.A. Surveillance on A/H5N1 virus in domestic poultry and wild birds in Egypt. Virol. J. 2013;10:203.
Not in our library10.1186/1743-422x-10-203
- 75.
- 76.
Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Notes from the field: highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H7N3) virus infection in two poultry workers—Jalisco, Mexico, July 2012. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. Sep 14 2012;61(36):726-727.
Not in our library
- 77.
Ostrowsky B., Huang A., Terry W., Anton D., Brunagel B., Traynor L. Low pathogenic avian influenza A (H7N2) virus infection in immunocompromised adult, New York, USA, 2003. Emerg. Infect. Dis. Jul 2012;18(7):1128-1131.
Not in our library10.3201/eid1807.111913
- 78.
Kurtz J., Manvell R.J., Banks J. Avian influenza virus isolated from a woman with conjunctivitis. Lancet. Sep 28 1996;348(9031):901-902.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)64783-6
- 79.
Nguyen-Van-Tam J.S., Nair P., Acheson P., Baker A., Barker M., Bracebridge S. Outbreak of low pathogenicity H7N3 avian influenza in UK, including associated case of human conjunctivitis. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(5).
Not in our library10.2807/esw.11.18.02952-en
- 80.
Avian influenza A/(H7N2) outbreak in the United Kingdom. Euro Surveill. May 2007;12(5).
Not in our library
- 81.
Promed. Avian influenza A (H1N7), humans, avians — Egypt: correction (2004). 2004.
Not in our library
- 82.
Promed. Avian influenza, human (44): Egypt (ASWAN) H9N2, first case. 2015.
Not in our library
- 83.
Fouchier R.A., Schneeberger P.M., Rozendaal F.W., Broekman J.M., Kemink S.A., Munster V. Avian influenza A virus (H7N7) associated with human conjunctivitis and a fatal case of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. Feb 3 2004;101(5):1356-1361.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0308352100
- 84.
Puzelli S., Di Trani L., Fabiani C., Campitelli L., De Marco M.A., Capua I. Serological analysis of serum samples from humans exposed to avian H7 influenza viruses in Italy between 1999 and 2003. J. Infect. Dis. Oct 15 2005;192(8):1318-1322.
Not in our library10.1086/444390
- 85.
Promed. Low pathogenic avian influenza (H9N2), human — Bangladesh: (DHAKA), request for information. 2011.
Not in our library
- 86.
Guo Y., Li J., Cheng X. Discovery of men infected by avian influenza A (H9N2) virus. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. Jun 30 1999;13(2):105-108.
Not in our library
- 87.
Gou Y., Xie J., Wang M. A strain of influenza A H9N2 virus repeatedly isolated from human population in China. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. Sep 2000;14(3):209-212.
Not in our library
- 88.
Peiris M., Yuen K.Y., Leung C.W., Chan K.H., Ip P.L., Lai R.W. Human infection with influenza H9N2. Lancet. Sep 11 1999;354(9182):916-917.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03311-5
- 89.
Butt K.M., Smith G.J., Chen H., Zhang L.J., Leung Y.H., Xu K.M. Human infection with an avian H9N2 influenza A virus in Hong Kong in 2003. J. Clin. Microbiol. Nov 2005;43(11):5760-5767.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.43.11.5760-5767.2005
- 90.
(CDC) CfDCaP. Avian influenza A virus infections of humans. 2008.
Not in our library
- 91.
Cheng V.C., Chan J.F., Wen X., Wu W.L., Que T.L., Chen H. Infection of immunocompromised patients by avian H9N2 influenza A virus. J. Infect. May 2011;62(5):394-399.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jinf.2011.02.007
- 92.
WHO. Influenza at the human–animal interface. Summary and assessment as of 26 January 2015.
Not in our library
- 93.
Control ECfDPa. Epidemiological update: Human infection with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, China 2015.
Not in our library
- 94.
Promed. Avian influenza, human (73): China (JIANXI) H10N8, fatal. 2014.
Not in our library
- 95.
Promed. Avian influenza, human (164): China (HONG KONG) H9N2. 2013.
Not in our library
- 96.
Promed. Avian influenza, human (02): China (HONG KONG), H9N2 ex (HUNAN). 2014.
Not in our library
- 97.
Promed. Avian influenza, human (41): China (YUNNAN) H5N6. 2015.
Not in our library
- 98.
(CDC) CfDC. Laboratory-confirmed case of human infection with avian influenza A(H6N1) virus in Taiwan recovered; Taiwan CDC urges public to take precautions to stay healthy. 2013.
Not in our library
- 99.
- 100.
Gao R., Cao B., Hu Y., Feng Z., Wang D., Hu W. Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N. Engl. J. Med. May 16 2013;368(20):1888-1897.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1304459
- 101.
Yu H., Wu J.T., Cowling B.J., Liao Q., Fang V.J., Zhou S. Effect of closure of live poultry markets on poultry-to-person transmission of avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an ecological study. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):541-548.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61904-2
- 102.
Liu Y., Paquette S.G., Zhang L., Leon A.J., Liu W., Xiuming W. The Third Wave: H7N9 Endemic Reassortant Viruses and Patient Clusters. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2015;9(2):122-127.
Not in our library10.3855/jidc.6759
- 103.
Gao H.N., Lu H.Z., Cao B., Du B., Shang H., Gan J.H. Clinical findings in 111 cases of influenza A (H7N9) virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. Jun 13 2013;368(24):2277-2285.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1305584
- 104.
Guarner J., Paddock C.D., Shieh W.J., Packard M.M., Patel M., Montague J.L. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of fatal influenza virus infection in children during the 2003–2004 season. Clin. Infect. Dis. Jul 15 2006;43(2):132-140.
Not in our library10.1086/505122
- 105.
Taubenberger J.K., Morens D.M. The pathology of influenza virus infections. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2008;3:499-522.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154316
- 106.
van den Brand J.M., Haagmans B.L., van Riel D., Osterhaus A.D., Kuiken T. The pathology and pathogenesis of experimental severe acute respiratory syndrome and influenza in animal models. J. Comp. Pathol. Jul 2014;151(1):83-112.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcpa.2014.01.004
- 107.
Short K.R., Kroeze E.J., Fouchier R.A., Kuiken T. Pathogenesis of influenza-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Infect. Dis. Jan 2014;14(1):57-69.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70286-x
- 108.
Cheung C.Y., Poon L.L., Lau A.S., Luk W., Lau Y.L., Shortridge K.F. Induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human macrophages by influenza A (H5N1) viruses: a mechanism for the unusual severity of human disease? Lancet. 2002;360(9348):1831-1837.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11772-7
- 109.
Chan M.C., Chan R.W., Chan L.L., Mok C.K., Hui K.P., Fong J.H. Tropism and innate host responses of a novel avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an analysis of ex-vivo and in-vitro cultures of the human respiratory tract. Lancet Respir. Med. Sep 2013;1(7):534-542.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-2600(13)70138-3
- 110.
Nicholls J., Chan M., Chan W., Wong H., Cheung C., Kwong D. Tropism of avian influenza A (H5N1) in the upper and lower respiratory tract. Nat. Med. 2007;13(2):147-149.
Not in our library10.1038/nm1529
- 111.
Shinya K., Ebina M., Yamada S., Ono M., Kasai N., Kawaoka Y. Avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature. 2006;440(7083):435-436.
Not in our library10.1038/440435a
- 112.
Shinya K., Ebina M., Yamada S., Ono M., Kasai N., Kawaoka Y. Avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature. Mar 23 2006;440(7083):435-436.
Not in our library10.1038/440435a
- 113.
van Riel D., den Bakker M.A., Leijten L.M., Chutinimitkul S., Munster V.J., de Wit E. Seasonal and pandemic human influenza viruses attach better to human upper respiratory tract epithelium than avian influenza viruses. Am. J. Pathol. Apr 2010;176(4):1614-1618.
Not in our library10.2353/ajpath.2010.090949
- 114.
van Riel D., Munster V.J., de Wit E., Rimmelzwaan G.F., Fouchier R.A., Osterhaus A.D. H5N1 virus attachment to lower respiratory tract. Science. Apr 21 2006;312(5772):399.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1125548
- 115.
- 116.
van Riel D., Leijten L.M., de Graaf M., Siegers J.Y., Short K.R., Spronken M.I. Novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus attaches to epithelium in both upper and lower respiratory tract of humans. Am. J. Pathol. Oct 2013;183(4):1137-1143.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.011
- 117.
Hu J., Zhu Y., Zhao B., Li J., Liu L., Gu K. Limited human-to-human transmission of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, Shanghai, China, March to April 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(25).
Not in our library10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.25.20838
- 118.
Herfst S., Fouchier R. Epidemiological and genetic investigations of human-to-human transmission of zoonotic influenza viruses. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(25).
Not in our library10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.25.20840
- 119.
Richard M., Schrauwen E.J., de Graaf M., Bestebroer T.M., Spronken M.I., van Boheemen S. Limited airborne transmission of H7N9 influenza A virus between ferrets. Nature. 2013;501(7468):560-563.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12476
- 120.
Chutinimitkul S., Herfst S., Steel J., Lowen A.C., Ye J., van Riel D. Virulence-associated substitution D222G in the hemagglutinin of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus affects receptor binding. J. Virol. Nov 2010;84(22):11802-11813.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01136-10
- 121.
Herfst S., Schrauwen E.J., Linster M., Chutinimitkul S., de Wit E., Munster V.J. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science. Jun 22 2012;336(6088):1534-1541.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1213362
- 122.
Imai M., Watanabe T., Hatta M., Das S.C., Ozawa M., Shinya K. Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5 HA confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortant H5 HA/H1N1 virus in ferrets. Nature. Jun 21 2012;486(7403):420-428.
Not in our library10.1038/nature10831
- 123.
Linster M., van Boheemen S., de Graaf M., Schrauwen E.J., Lexmond P., Manz B. Identification, characterization, and natural selection of mutations driving airborne transmission of A/H5N1 virus. Cell. Apr 10 2014;157(2):329-339.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.040
- 124.
Byrd-Leotis L., Galloway S.E., Agbogu E., Steinhauer D.A. Influenza HA stem region mutations that stabilize or destabilize the structure of multiple HA subtypes. J. Virol. Feb 4 2015;89(8):4504-4516.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00057-15
- 125.
- 126.
Mair C.M., Ludwig K., Herrmann A., Sieben C. Receptor binding and pH stability — how influenza A virus hemagglutinin affects host-specific virus infection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Apr 2014;1838(4):1153-1168.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.10.004
- 127.
Shelton H., Roberts K.L., Molesti E., Temperton N., Barclay W.S. Mutations in haemagglutinin that affect receptor binding and pH stability increase replication of a PR8 influenza virus with H5 HA in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets and may contribute to transmissibility. J. Gen. Virol. Jun 2013;94(Pt 6):1220-1229.
Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.050526-0
- 128.
Zaraket H., Bridges O.A., Duan S., Baranovich T., Yoon S.W., Reed M.L. Increased acid stability of the hemagglutinin protein enhances H5N1 influenza virus growth in the upper respiratory tract but is insufficient for transmission in ferrets. J. Virol. Jul 3 2013;87(17):9911-9922.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01175-13
- 129.
Richard M., Schrauwen E.J., de Graaf M., Bestebroer T.M., Spronken M.I., van Boheemen S. Limited airborne transmission of H7N9 influenza A virus between ferrets. Nature. Sep 26 2013;501(7468):560-563.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12476
- 130.
Washington N., Steele R.J., Jackson S.J., Bush D., Mason J., Gill D.A. Determination of baseline human nasal pH and the effect of intranasally administered buffers. Int. J. Pharm. Apr 5 2000;198(2):139-146.
Not in our library10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00442-1
- 131.
Wagner R., Matrosovich M., Klenk H.D. Functional balance between haemagglutinin and neuraminidase in influenza virus infections. Rev. Med. Virol. 2002;12(3):159-166.
Not in our library10.1002/rmv.352
- 132.
Baigent S.J., McCauley J.W. Glycosylation of haemagglutinin and stalk-length of neuraminidase combine to regulate the growth of avian influenza viruses in tissue culture. Virus Res. 2001;79(1):177-185.
Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1702(01)00272-6
- 133.
Cauldwell A.V., Long J.S., Moncorge O., Barclay W.S. Viral determinants of influenza A virus host range. J. Gen. Virol. Jun 2014;95:1193-1210.
Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.062836-0
- 134.
Almond J.W. Single gene determines host range of influenza-virus. Nature. 1977;270(5638):617-618.
Not in our library10.1038/270617a0
- 135.
- 136.
- 137.
Labadie K., Afonso E.D., Rameix-Welti M.A., van der Werf S., Naffakh N. Host-range determinants on the PB2 protein of influenza A viruses control the interaction between the viral polymerase and nucleoprotein in human cells. Virology. Jun 5 2007;362(2):271-282.
Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2006.12.027
- 138.
Weber M., Sediri H., Felgenhauer U., Binzen I., Banfer S., Jacob R. Influenza virus adaptation PB2-627 K modulates nucleocapsid inhibition by the pathogen sensor RIG-I. Cell Host Microbe. Feb 17 2015;17(3):309-319.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.005
- 139.
Manz B., Schwemmle M., Brunotte L. Adaptation of avian influenza A virus polymerase in mammals to overcome the host species barrier. J. Virol. Jul 2013;87(13):7200-7209.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00980-13
- 140.
- 141.
- 142.
Zhou B., Li Y., Halpin R., Hine E., Spiro D.J., Wentworth D.E. PB2 residue 158 is a pathogenic determinant of pandemic H1N1 and H5 influenza a viruses in mice. J. Virol. Jan 2011;85(1):357-365.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01694-10
- 143.
Kim J.H., Hatta M., Watanabe S., Neumann G., Watanabe T., Kawaoka Y. Role of host-specific amino acids in the pathogenicity of avian H5N1 influenza viruses in mice. J. Gen. Virol. May 2010;91(Pt 5):1284-1289.
Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.018143-0
- 144.
Mok C.K., Yen H.L., Yu M.Y., Yuen K.M., Sia S.F., Chan M.C. Amino acid residues 253 and 591 of the PB2 protein of avian influenza virus A H9N2 contribute to mammalian pathogenesis. J. Virol. Sep 2011;85(18):9641-9645.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00702-11
- 145.
Manzoor R., Sakoda Y., Nomura N., Tsuda Y., Ozaki H., Okamatsu M. PB2 protein of a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strain A/chicken/Yamaguchi/7/2004 (H5N1) determines its replication potential in pigs. J. Virol. Feb 2009;83(4):1572-1578.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01879-08
- 146.
Bussey K.A., Bousse T.L., Desmet E.A., Kim B., Takimoto T. PB2 residue 271 plays a key role in enhanced polymerase activity of influenza A viruses in mammalian host cells. J. Virol. May 2010;84(9):4395-4406.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02642-09
- 147.
Cauldwell A.V., Moncorge O., Barclay W.S. Unstable polymerase–nucleoprotein interaction is not responsible for avian influenza virus polymerase restriction in human cells. J. Virol. Jan 2013;87(2):1278-1284.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02597-12
- 148.
Foeglein A., Loucaides E.M., Mura M., Wise H.M., Barclay W.S., Digard P. Influence of PB2 host-range determinants on the intranuclear mobility of the influenza A virus polymerase. J. Gen. Virol. Jul 2011;92(Pt 7):1650-1661.
Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.031492-0
- 149.
Gabriel G., Dauber B., Wolff T., Planz O., Klenk H.D., Stech J. The viral polymerase mediates adaptation of an avian influenza virus to a mammalian host. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. Dec 20 2005;102(51):18590-18595.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0507415102
- 150.
Yamaji R., Yamada S., Le M.Q., Li C., Chen H., Qurnianingsih E. Identification of PB2 mutations responsible for the efficient replication of H5N1 influenza viruses in human lung epithelial cells. J. Virol. Jan 21 2015;89(7):3947-3956.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03328-14
- 151.
Seyer R., Hrincius E.R., Ritzel D., Abt M., Mellmann A., Marjuki H. Synergistic adaptive mutations in the hemagglutinin and polymerase acidic protein lead to increased virulence of pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus in mice. J. Infect. Dis. Jan 15 2012;205(2):262-271.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jir716
- 152.
Bussey K.A., Desmet E.A., Mattiacio J.L., Hamilton A., Bradel-Tretheway B., Bussey H.E. PA residues in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus enhance avian influenza virus polymerase activity in mammalian cells. J. Virol. Jul 2011;85(14):7020-7028.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00522-11
- 153.
Song M.S., Pascua P.N., Lee J.H., Baek Y.H., Lee O.J., Kim C.J. The polymerase acidic protein gene of influenza a virus contributes to pathogenicity in a mouse model. J. Virol. Dec 2009;83(23):12325-12335.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01373-09
- 154.
Manz B., Brunotte L., Reuther P., Schwemmle M. Adaptive mutations in NEP compensate for defective H5N1 RNA replication in cultured human cells. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:802.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms1804
- 155.
Mehle A., Dugan V.G., Taubenberger J.K., Doudna J.A. Reassortment and mutation of the avian influenza virus polymerase PA subunit overcome species barriers. J. Virol. Feb 2012;86(3):1750-1757.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.06203-11
- 156.
Yamaji R., Yamada S., Le M.Q., Ito M., Sakai-Tagawa Y., Kawaoka Y. Mammalian adaptive mutations of the PA protein of highly pathogenic avian H5N1 influenza virus. J. Virol. Jan 28 2015;89(8):4117-4125.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03532-14
- 157.
Xu C., Hu W.B., Xu K., He Y.X., Wang T.Y., Chen Z. Amino acids 473 V and 598P of PB1 from an avian-origin influenza A virus contribute to polymerase activity, especially in mammalian cells. J. Gen. Virol. Mar 2012;93(Pt 3):531-540.
Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.036434-0
- 158.
Mehle A., Doudna J.A. Adaptive strategies of the influenza virus polymerase for replication in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. Dec 15 2009;106(50):21312-21316.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0911915106
- 159.
Dittmann J., Stertz S., Grimm D., Steel J., Garcia-Sastre A., Haller O. Influenza A virus strains differ in sensitivity to the antiviral action of Mx-GTPase. J. Virol. Apr 2008;82(7):3624-3631.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01753-07
- 160.
Zimmermann P., Manz B., Haller O., Schwemmle M., Kochs G. The viral nucleoprotein determines Mx sensitivity of influenza A viruses. J. Virol. Aug 2011;85(16):8133-8140.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00712-11
- 161.
- 162.
Riegger D., Hai R., Dornfeld D., Manz B., Leyva-Grado V., Sanchez-Aparicio M.T. The nucleoprotein of newly emerged H7N9 influenza A virus harbors a unique motif conferring resistance to antiviral human MxA. J. Virol. Feb 15 2015;89(4):2241-2252.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02406-14
- 163.
Pflug A., Guilligay D., Reich S., Cusack S. Structure of influenza A polymerase bound to the viral RNA promoter. Nature. Dec 18 2014;516(7531):355-360.
Not in our library10.1038/nature14008
- 164.
Sutton T.C., Finch C., Shao H., Angel M., Chen H., Capua I. Airborne transmission of highly pathogenic H7N1 influenza virus in ferrets. J. Virol. Jun 2014;88(12):6623-6635.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02765-13
- 165.
Vincent A., Awada L., Brown I., Chen H., Claes F., Dauphin G. Review of influenza A virus in swine worldwide: a call for increased surveillance and research. Zoonoses Public Health. Feb 2014;61(1):4-17.
Not in our library10.1111/zph.12049
- 166.
Garten R.J., Davis C.T., Russell C.A., Shu B., Lindstrom S., Balish A. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A (H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science. 2009;325(5937):197-201.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1176225
- 167.
Fraser C., Donnelly C.A., Cauchemez S., Hanage W.P., Van Kerkhove M.D., Hollingsworth T.D. Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A (H1N1): early findings. Science. 2009;324(5934):1557-1561.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1176062
- 168.
Cheng V.C., To K.K., Tse H., Hung I.F., Yuen K.-Y. Two years after pandemic influenza A/2009/H1N1: what have we learned? Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012;25(2):223-263.
Not in our library10.1128/cmr.05012-11
- 169.
Childs R.A., Palma A.S., Wharton S., Matrosovich T., Liu Y., Chai W. Receptor-binding specificity of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus determined by carbohydrate microarray. Nat. Biotechnol. Sep 2009;27(9):797-799.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt0909-797
- 170.
Ma W., Liu Q., Bawa B., Qiao C., Qi W., Shen H. The neuraminidase and matrix genes of the 2009 pandemic influenza H1N1 virus cooperate functionally to facilitate efficient replication and transmissibility in pigs. J. Gen. Virol. Jun 2012;93(Pt 6):1261-1268.
Not in our library10.1099/vir.0.040535-0
- 171.
Chou Y.Y., Albrecht R.A., Pica N., Lowen A.C., Richt J.A., Garcia-Sastre A. The M segment of the 2009 new pandemic H1N1 influenza virus is critical for its high transmission efficiency in the guinea pig model. J. Virol. Nov 2011;85(21):11235-11241.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.05794-11
- 172.
- 173.
Campbell P.J., Danzy S., Kyriakis C.S., Deymier M.J., Lowen A.C., Steel J. The M segment of the 2009 pandemic influenza virus confers increased neuraminidase activity, filamentous morphology, and efficient contact transmissibility to A/Puerto Rico/8/1934-based reassortant viruses. J. Virol. Apr 2014;88(7):3802-3814.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03607-13
- 174.
Herfst S., Chutinimitkul S., Ye J., de Wit E., Munster V.J., Schrauwen E.J. Introduction of virulence markers in PB2 of pandemic swine-origin influenza virus does not result in enhanced virulence or transmission. J. Virol. Apr 2010;84(8):3752-3758.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02634-09
- 175.
Dawood F.S., Iuliano A.D., Reed C., Meltzer M.I., Shay D.K., Cheng P.Y. Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study. Lancet Infect. Dis. Sep 2012;12(9):687-695.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70121-4
- 176.
To K.K., Hung I.F., Li I.W., Lee K.L., Koo C.K., Yan W.W. Delayed clearance of viral load and marked cytokine activation in severe cases of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. Mar 15 2010;50(6):850-859.
Not in our library10.1086/650581
- 177.
Patel M., Dennis A., Flutter C., Khan Z. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza. Br. J. Anaesth. Jan 2010;104(2):128-142.
Not in our library10.1093/bja/aep375
- 178.
Glaser C.A., Winter K., DuBray K., Harriman K., Uyeki T.M., Sejvar J. A population-based study of neurologic manifestations of severe influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 in California. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012;55(4):514-520.
Not in our library10.1093/cid/cis454
- 179.
Mukherjee A., Peterson J.E.G., Sandberg G., Takei H., Adesina A., Goodman J. Central nervous system pathology in fatal swine-origin influenza A H1N1 virus infection in patients with and without neurological symptoms: an autopsy study of 15 cases. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122(3):371-373.
Not in our library10.1007/s00401-011-0854-7
- 180.
Rykkvin R., Kilander A., Dudman S.G., Hungnes O. Within-patient emergence of the influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 HA1 222G variant and clear association with severe disease, Norway. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(3).
Not in our library
- 181.
Chutinimitkul S., Herfst S., Steel J., Lowen A.C., Ye J., van Riel D. Virulence-associated substitution D222G in the hemagglutinin of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus affects receptor binding. J. Virol. 2010;84(22):11802-11813.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01136-10
- 182.
To K.K.W., Hung I.F.N., Li I.W.S., Lee K.L., Koo C.K., Yan W.W. Delayed clearance of viral load and marked cytokine activation in severe cases of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010;50(6):850-859.
Not in our library10.1086/650581
- 183.
Mauad T., Hajjar L.A., Callegari G.D., da Silva L.F.F., Schout D., Galas F.R.B.G. Lung pathology in fatal novel human influenza A (H1N1) infection. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010;181(1):72-79.
Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200909-1420oc
- 184.
Shieh W.J., Blau D.M., Denison A.M., Deleon-Carnes M., Adem P., Bhatnagar J. 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1): pathology and pathogenesis of 100 fatal cases in the United States. Am. J. Pathol. Jul 2010;177(1):166-175.
Not in our library10.2353/ajpath.2010.100115
- 185.
Monsalvo A.C., Batalle J.P., Lopez M.F., Krause J.C., Klemenc J., Hernandez J.Z. Severe pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza disease due to pathogenic immune complexes. Nat. Med. 2011;17(2):195-199.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.2262
- 186.
McKinney W.P., Volkert P., Kaufman J. Fatal swine influenza pneumonia during late pregnancy. Arch. Intern. Med. Jan 1990;150(1):213-215.
Not in our library
- 187.
Wentworth D.E., Thompson B.L., Xu X., Regnery H.L., Cooley A.J., McGregor M.W. An influenza A (H1N1) virus, closely related to swine influenza virus, responsible for a fatal case of human influenza. J. Virol. Apr 1994;68(4):2051-2058.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.68.4.2051-2058.1994
- 188.
Claas E.C., Kawaoka Y., de Jong J.C., Masurel N., Webster R.G. Infection of children with avian-human reassortant influenza virus from pigs in Europe. Virology. Oct 1994;204(1):453-457.
Not in our library10.1006/viro.1994.1553
- 189.
Rimmelzwaan G.F., de Jong J.C., Bestebroer T.M., van Loon A.M., Claas E.C., Fouchier R.A. Antigenic and genetic characterization of swine influenza A (H1N1) viruses isolated from pneumonia patients in The Netherlands. Virology. Apr 10 2001;282(2):301-306.
Not in our library10.1006/viro.2000.0810
- 190.
Wentworth D.E., McGregor M.W., Macklin M.D., Neumann V., Hinshaw V.S. Transmission of swine influenza virus to humans after exposure to experimentally infected pigs. J. Infect. Dis. Jan 1997;175(1):7-15.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/175.1.7
- 191.
Kimura K., Adlakha A., Simon P.M. Fatal case of swine influenza virus in an immunocompetent host. Mayo Clin. Proc. Mar 1998;73(3):243-245.
Not in our library10.4065/73.3.243
- 192.
Gregory V., Lim W., Cameron K., Bennett M., Marozin S., Klimov A. Infection of a child in Hong Kong by an influenza A H3N2 virus closely related to viruses circulating in European pigs. J. Gen. Virol. Jun 2001;82(Pt 6):1397-1406.
Not in our library10.1099/0022-1317-82-6-1397
- 193.
Gregory V., Bennett M., Thomas Y., Kaiser L., Wunderli W., Matter H. Human infection by a swine influenza A (H1N1) virus in Switzerland. Arch. Virol. Apr 2003;148(4):793-802.
Not in our library10.1007/s00705-002-0953-9
- 194.
Komadina N., Roque V., Thawatsupha P., Rimando-Magalong J., Waicharoen S., Bomasang E. Genetic analysis of two influenza A (H1) swine viruses isolated from humans in Thailand and the Philippines. Virus Genes. Oct 2007;35(2):161-165.
Not in our library10.1007/s11262-007-0097-9
- 195.
Dawood F.S., Dong L., Liu F., Blau D.M., Peebles P.J., Lu X. A pre-pandemic outbreak of triple-reassortant swine influenza virus infection among university students, South Dakota, 2008. J. Infect. Dis. Oct 15 2011;204(8):1165-1171.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jir502
- 196.
Adiego Sancho B., Omenaca Teres M., Martinez Cuenca S., Rodrigo Val P., Sanchez Villanueva P., Casas I. Human case of swine influenza A (H1N1), Aragon, Spain, November 2008. Euro Surveill. Feb 19 2009;14(7).
Not in our library
- 197.
Cox C.M., Neises D., Garten R.J., Bryant B., Hesse R.A., Anderson G.A. Swine influenza virus A (H3N2) infection in human, Kansas, USA, 2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. Jun 2011;17(6):1143-1144.
Not in our library10.3201/eid1706.101488
- 198.
Bastien N., Antonishyn N.A., Brandt K., Wong C.E., Chokani K., Vegh N. Human infection with a triple-reassortant swine influenza A(H1N1) virus containing the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes of seasonal influenza virus. J. Infect. Dis. Apr 15 2010;201(8):1178-1182.
Not in our library10.1086/651507
- 199.
(ECDC) ECfDPaC. Update—Swine-origin Triple Reassortant Influenza A(H3N2) Variant Viruses in North America. 2012.
Not in our library
- 200.
- 201.
Newman A.P., Reisdorf E., Beinemann J., Uyeki T.M., Balish A., Shu B. Human case of swine influenza A (H1N1) triple reassortant virus infection, Wisconsin. Emerg. Infect. Dis. Sep 2008;14(9):1470-1472.
Not in our library10.3201/eid1409.080305
- 202.
- 203.
Robinson J.L., Lee B.E., Patel J., Bastien N., Grimsrud K., Seal R.F. Swine influenza (H3N2) infection in a child and possible community transmission, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. Dec 2007;13(12):1865-1870.
Not in our library10.3201/eid1312.070615
- 204.
Bastien N., Bowness D., Burton L., Bontovics E., Winter A.L., Tipples G. Parotitis in a child infected with triple-reassortant influenza A virus in Canada in 2007. J. Clin. Microbiol. Jun 2009;47(6):1896-1898.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.01684-08
- 205.
Yassine H.M., Khatri M., Zhang Y.J., Lee C.W., Byrum B.A., O'Quin J. Characterization of triple reassortant H1N1 influenza A viruses from swine in Ohio. Vet. Microbiol. Oct 20 2009;139(1–2):132-139.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.04.028
- 206.
Shinde V., Bridges C.B., Uyeki T.M., Shu B., Balish A., Xu X. Triple-reassortant swine influenza A (H1) in humans in the United States, 2005–2009. N. Engl. J. Med. Jun 18 2009;360(25):2616-2625.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0903812
- 207.
Prevention CfDCa. H1N2 variant virus detected in Minnesota. 2012.
Not in our library
- 208.
Smith T.F., Burgert E.O., Dowdle W.R., Noble G.R., Campbell R.J., Van Scoy R.E. Isolation of swine influenza virus from autopsy lung tissue of man. N. Engl. J. Med. Mar 25 1976;294(13):708-710.
Not in our library10.1056/nejm197603252941308
- 209.
Gaydos J.C., Hodder R.A., Top F.H., Soden V.J., Allen R.G., Bartley J.D. Swine influenza A at Fort Dix, New Jersey (January–February 1976). I. Case finding and clinical study of cases. J. Infect. Dis. Dec 1977;136:S356-S362.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s356
- 210.
Prevention CfDCa. Case count: detected U.S. human infections with H3N2v by State since August 2011. 2014.
Not in our library
- 211.
Dacso C.C., Couch R.B., Six H.R., Young J.F., Quarles J.M., Kasel J.A. Sporadic occurrence of zoonotic swine influenza virus infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. Oct 1984;20(4):833-835.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.20.4.833-835.1984
- 212.
Patriarca P.A., Kendal A.P., Zakowski P.C., Cox N.J., Trautman M.S., Cherry J.D. Lack of significant person-to-person spread of swine influenza-like virus following fatal infection in an immunocompromised child. Am. J. Epidemiol. Feb 1984;119(2):152-158.
Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113733
- 213.
Chuvakova Z.K., Rovnova Z.I., Isaeva E.I., Kim E.V., Ignat'eva T.V. [3 cases of isolating the influenza A virus with human hemagglutinin Hsw1 in 1983 in Alma-Ata] Tri sluchaia izoliatsii virusa grippa A s gemaggliutininom Hswl ot liudei v 1985 g. v Alma-Ate. Vopr. Virusol. 1985 Sep-Oct;30(5):530-536.
Not in our library
- 214.
de Jong J.C., Paccaud M.F., de Ronde-Verloop F.M., Huffels N.H., Verwei C., Weijers T.F. Isolation of swine-like influenza A(H1N1) viruses from man in Switzerland and The Netherlands. Ann. Inst. Pasteur Virol. Oct-Dec 1988;139(4):429-437.
Not in our library10.1016/s0769-2617(88)80078-9
- 215.
Thompson R.L., Sande M.A., Wenzel R.P., Hoke C.H., Gwaltney J.M. Swine-influenza infection in civilians. Report of two cases. N. Engl. J. Med. Sep 23 1976;295(13):714-715.
Not in our library10.1056/nejm197609232951307
- 216.
O'Brien R.J., Noble G.R., Easterday B.C., Kendal A.P., Shasby D.M., Nelson D.B. Swine-like influenza virus infection in a Wisconsin farm family. J. Infect. Dis. Dec 1977;136:S390-S396.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s390
- 217.
Dowdle W.R., Hattwick M.A. Swine influenza virus infections in humans. J. Infect. Dis. Dec 1977;136:S386-S389.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s386
- 218.
Prevention CfDCa. Influenza—Missouri. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 1976;25:376.
Not in our library
- 219.
Prevention CfDCa. Influenza—Wisconsin and Washington, DC. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 1976;25:392.
Not in our library
- 220.
Webster R.G., Geraci J., Petursson G., Skirnisson K. Conjunctivitis in human beings caused by influenza A virus of seals. N. Engl. J. Med. Apr 9 1981;304(15):911.
Not in our library10.1056/nejm198104093041515
- 221.
CfDCa Prevention. Limited human-to-human transmission of novel influenza A (H3N2) virus — Iowa, November 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). 2011.
Not in our library
- 222.
Prevention CfDCa. CDC reports more cases, hospitalizations and nation's first H3N2v-associated death. 2012.
Not in our library
- 223.
Reperant L.A., Kuiken T., Osterhaus A.D. Adaptive pathways of zoonotic influenza viruses: from exposure to establishment in humans. Vaccine. 2012;30(30):4419-4434.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.049
- 224.
Epperson S., Jhung M., Richards S., Quinlisk P., Ball L., Moll M. Human infections with influenza A(H3N2) variant virus in the United States, 2011–2012. Clin. Infect. Dis. Jul 2013;57(Suppl. 1):S4-S11.
Not in our library10.1093/cid/cit272
- 225.
Pearce M.B., Jayaraman A., Pappas C., Belser J.A., Zeng H., Gustin K.M. Pathogenesis and transmission of swine origin A(H3N2)v influenza viruses in ferrets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. Mar 6 2012;109(10):3944-3949.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1119945109
- 226.
- 227.
Schrauwen E.J., Herfst S., Chutinimitkul S., Bestebroer T.M., Rimmelzwaan G.F., Osterhaus A.D. Possible increased pathogenicity of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus upon reassortment. Emerg. Infect. Dis. Feb 2011;17(2):200-208.
Not in our library10.3201/eid1702.101268
- 228.
Virelizier J.L. Host defenses against influenza virus: the role of anti-hemagglutinin antibody. J. Immunol. Aug 1975;115(2):434-439.
Not in our library
- 229.
Koel B.F., Burke D.F., Bestebroer T.M., van der Vliet S., Zondag G.C., Vervaet G. Substitutions near the receptor binding site determine major antigenic change during influenza virus evolution. Science. Nov 22 2013;342(6161):976-979.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1244730
- 230.
Koel B.F., van der Vliet S., Burke D.F., Bestebroer T.M., Bharoto E.E., Yasa I.W. Antigenic variation of clade 2.1 H5N1 virus is determined by a few amino acid substitutions immediately adjacent to the receptor binding site. MBio. 2014;5(3).
Not in our library10.1128/mbio.01070-14
- 231.
Reperant L.A., Cornaglia G., Osterhaus A.D. The importance of understanding the human–animal interface: from early hominins to global citizens. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013;365:49-81.
Not in our library10.1007/82_2012_269
- 232.
Peiris J.S., de Jong M.D., Guan Y. Avian influenza virus (H5N1): a threat to human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Apr 2007;20(2):243-267.
Not in our library10.1128/cmr.00037-06
- 233.
Coker R., Rushton J., Mounier-Jack S., Karimuribo E., Lutumba P., Kambarage D. Towards a conceptual framework to support one-health research for policy on emerging zoonoses. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011;11(4):326-331.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70312-1
Cited by papers we hold 2
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.