Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Feb 1, 2021.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 17, 2026 · Read the notice

SANDI: A compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion MRI

Marco Palombo, Andrada Ianus, Michele Guerreri and 4 more

NeuroImage · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116835

Abstract

This work introduces a compartment-based model for apparent cell body (namely soma) and neurite density imaging (SANDI) using non-invasive diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI). The existing conjecture in brain microstructure imaging through DW-MRI presents water diffusion in white (WM) and gray (GM) matter as restricted diffusion in neurites, modelled by infinite cylinders of null radius embedded in the hindered extra-neurite water. The extra-neurite pool in WM corresponds to water in the extra-axonal space, but in GM it combines water in the extra-cellular space with water in soma. While several studies showed that this microstructure model successfully describe DW-MRI data in WM and GM at b ≤ 3,000 s/mm2 (or 3 ms/μm2), it has been also shown to fail in GM at high b values (b≫3,000 s/mm2 or 3 ms/μm2). Here we hypothesise that the unmodelled soma compartment (i.e. cell body of any brain cell type: from neuroglia to neurons) may be responsible for this failure and propose SANDI as a new model of brain microstructure where soma of any brain cell type is explicitly included. We assess the effects of size and density of soma on the direction-averaged DW-MRI signal at high b values and the regime of validity of the model using numerical simulations and comparison with experimental data from mouse (bmax = 40,000 s/mm2, or 40 ms/μm2) and human (bmax = 10,000 s/mm2, or 10 ms/μm2) brain. We show that SANDI defines new contrasts representing complementary information on the brain cyto- and myelo-architecture. Indeed, we show maps from 25 healthy human subjects of MR soma and neurite signal fractions, that remarkably mirror contrasts of histological images of brain cyto- and myelo-architecture. Although still under validation, SANDI might provide new insight into tissue architecture by introducing a new set of biomarkers of potential great value for biomedical applications and pure neuroscience.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 105

  1. 1.

    Afzali M. Improving neural soma imaging using the power spectrum of the free gradient waveforms. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2020.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Aggarwal M., Jones M.V., Calabresi P.A., Mori S., Zhang J.Y. Probing mouse brain microstructure using oscillating gradient diffusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012;67(1):98-109.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.22981

  3. 3.

    Alexander D.C. A general framework for experiment design in diffusion MRI and its application in measuring direct tissue-microstructure features. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;60(2):439-448.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.21646

  4. 4.

    Alexander D.C. Orientationally invariant indices of axon diameter and density from diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2010;52(4):1374-1389.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.043

  5. 5.

    Alexander D.C., Dyrby T.B., Nilsson M., Zhang H. Imaging brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: practicality and applications. NMR Biomed. 2019;32(4).

    Not in our library10.1002/nbm.3841

  6. 6.

    Amunts K., Zilles K. Architectonic mapping of the human brain beyond Brodmann. Neuron. 2015;88(6):1086-1107.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.001

  7. 7.

    Amunts K. Broca’s region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999;412(2):319-341.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::aid-cne10>3.0.co;2-7

  8. 8.

    Amunts K., Malikovic A., Mohlberg H., Schormann T., Zilles K. Brodmann’s areas 17 and 18 brought into stereotaxic space - where and how variable? Neuroimage. 2000;11(1):66-84.

    Not in our library10.1006/nimg.1999.0516

  9. 9.

    Aronica E., Muhlebner A. Neuropathology of epilepsy. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2017;145:193-216.

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-802395-2.00015-8

  10. 10.

    Assaf Y. Imaging laminar structures in the gray matter with diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2019;197:677-688.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.096

  11. 11.

    Assaf Y., Basser P.J. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2005;27(1):48-58.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.042

  12. 12.

    Assaf Y., Blumenfeld-Katzir T., Yovel Y., Basser P.J. AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;59(6):1347-1354.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.21577

  13. 13.

    Balinov B., Jonsson B., Linse P., Söderman O. The NMR self-diffusion method applied to restricted diffusion. Simulation of echo attenuation from molecules in spheres and between planes. J. Magn. Reson., Ser. A. 1993;104:17-25.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Bianciardi M. Toward an in vivo neuroimaging template of human brainstem nuclei of the ascending arousal, autonomic, and motor systems. Brain Connect. 2015;5(10):597-607.

    Not in our library10.1089/brain.2015.0347

  15. 15.

    Bianciardi M. Validation and application of soma and neurite density imaging (SANDI) for in vivo human brainstem nuclei atlasing. Proc. Int. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2020.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Brodmann K. 1909.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. 2002.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Callaghan P.T., Soderman O. Examination of the lamellar phase of aerosol ot-water using pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic-resonance. J Phys. Chem. 1983;87(10):1737-1744.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Callaghan P.T., Jolley K.W., Lelievre J. Diffusion of water in the endosperm tissue of wheat grains as studied by pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance. Biophys. J. 1979;28(1):133-141.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(79)85164-4

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Celebre G., Coppola L., Ranieri G.A. Water self-diffusion in lyotropic systems by simulation of pulsed field gradient-spin echo nuclear-magnetic-resonance experiments. J. Chem. Phys. 1992;97(10):7781-7785.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Cheung M.M. Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study. Neuroimage. 2009;45(2):386-392.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.018

  23. 23.

    Coelho S., Pozo J.M., Jespersen S.N., Jones D.K., Frangi A.F. Resolving degeneracy in diffusion MRI biophysical model parameter estimation using double diffusion encoding. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;82(1):395-410.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.27714

  24. 24.

    Cook P.A. 2006;vol. 2759:2759.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Criminisi A., Shotton J. 2013.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2013.01.001

  26. 26.

    Deipolyi A.R. Comparing microstructural and macrostructural development of the cerebral cortex in premature newborns: diffusion tensor imaging versus cortical gyration. Neuroimage. 2005;27(3):579-586.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.027

  27. 27.

    Dhital B., Reisert M., Kellner E., Kiselev V.G. Intra-axonal diffusivity in brain white matter. Neuroimage. 2019;189:543-550.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.015

  28. 28.

    Diaz-Cintra S. Ultrastructural analysis of hippocampal pyramidal neurons from apolipoprotein E-deficient mice treated with a cathepsin inhibitor. J. Neurocytol. 2004;33(1):37-48.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:neur.0000029647.41374.98

  29. 29.

    Dortch R.D., Harkins K.D., Juttukonda M.R., Gore J.C., Does M.D. Characterizing inter-compartmental water exchange in myelinated tissue using relaxation exchange spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;70(5):1450-1459.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.24571

  30. 30.

    Ferizi U. White matter compartment models for in vivo diffusion MRI at 300mT/m. Neuroimage. 2015;118:468-483.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.027

  31. 31.

    Fieremans E., Jensen J.H., Helpern J.A. White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage. 2011;58(1):177-188.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006

  32. 32.

    Fukutomi H. Neurite imaging reveals microstructural variations in human cerebral cortical gray matter. Neuroimage. 2018;182:488-499.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.017

  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    Geyer S., Schormann T., Mohlerg H., Zilles K. Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of human primary somatosensory cortex - 2. Spatial normalization to standard anatomical space. Neuroimage. 2000;11(6):684-696.

    Not in our library10.1006/nimg.2000.0548

  35. 35.

    Glasser M.F. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013;80:105-124.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127

  36. 36.

    Greve D.N., Fischl B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage. 2009;48(1):63-72.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060

  37. 37.

    Gyori N., Clark C., Dragonu I., Alexander D.C., Kaden E. In-vivo neural soma imaging using B-tensor encoding and deep learning. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2019.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Hall M.G., Alexander D.C. Convergence and parameter choice for Monte-Carlo simulations of diffusion MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2009;28(9):1354-1364.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2009.2015756

  39. 39.

    Hansen M.B., Jespersen S.N., Leigland L.A., Kroenke C.D. Using diffusion anisotropy to characterize neuronal morphology in gray matter: the orientation distribution of axons and dendrites in the NeuroMorpho.org database. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2013;7:31.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnint.2013.00031

  40. 40.

    Henriques R.N., Jespersen S.N., Shemesh N. Microscopic anisotropy misestimation in spherical-mean single diffusion encoding MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81(5):3245-3261.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.27606

  41. 41.

    Henriques R.N., Jespersen S.N., Shemesh N. 2019.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116605

  42. 42.

    Holley J.E., Gveric D., Newcombe J., Cuzner M.L., Gutowski N.J. Astrocyte characterization in the multiple sclerosis glial scar. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2003;29(5):434-444.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00491.x

  43. 43.

    Huang H. White and gray matter development in human fetal, newborn and pediatric brains. Neuroimage. 2006;33(1):27-38.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.009

  44. 44.

    Huang H. Anatomical characterization of human fetal brain development with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2009;29(13):4263-4273.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2769-08.2009

  45. 45.

    Huang H. Coupling diffusion imaging with histological and gene expression analysis to examine the dynamics of cortical areas across the fetal period of human brain development. Cerebr. Cortex. 2013;23(11):2620-2631.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhs241

  46. 46.

    Jelescu I.O., Veraart J., Fieremans E., Novikov D.S. Degeneracy in model parameter estimation for multi-compartmental diffusion in neuronal tissue. NMR Biomed. 2016;29(1):33-47.

    Not in our library10.1002/nbm.3450

  47. 47.

    Jespersen S.N., Kroenke C.D., Ostergaard L., Ackerman J.J., Yablonskiy D.A. Modeling dendrite density from magnetic resonance diffusion measurements. Neuroimage. 2007;34(4):1473-1486.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.037

  48. 48.

    Jespersen S.N. Neurite density from magnetic resonance diffusion measurements at ultrahigh field: comparison with light microscopy and electron microscopy. Neuroimage. 2010;49(1):205-216.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.053

  49. 49.

    Jespersen S.N., Leigland L.A., Cornea A., Kroenke C.D. Determination of axonal and dendritic orientation distributions within the developing cerebral cortex by diffusion tensor imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2012;31(1):16-32.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2011.2162099

  50. 50.

    Jespersen S.N., Olesen J.L., Ianus A., Shemesh N. Effects of nongaussian diffusion on "isotropic diffusion" measurements: an ex-vivo microimaging and simulation study. J. Magn. Reson. 2019;300:84-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmr.2019.01.007

  51. 51.

    Jones D.K. Microstructural imaging of the human brain with a ’super-scanner’: 10 key advantages of ultra-strong gradients for diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2018;182:8-38.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.047

  52. 52.
  53. 53.

    Keil B. A 64-channel 3T array coil for accelerated brain MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;70(1):248-258.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.24427

  54. 54.

    Kellner E., Dhital B., Kiselev V.G., Reisert M. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn. Reson. Med. 2016;76(5):1574-1581.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.26054

  55. 55.

    Kroenke C.D., Ackerman J.J., Yablonskiy D.A. On the nature of the NAA diffusion attenuated MR signal in the central nervous system. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52(5):1052-1059.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.20260

  56. 56.

    Kunz N., da Silva A.R., Jelescu I.O. Intra- and extra-axonal axial diffusivities in the white matter: which one is faster? Neuroimage. 2018;181:314-322.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.020

  57. 57.

    Lampinen B. Neurite density imaging versus imaging of microscopic anisotropy in diffusion MRI: a model comparison using spherical tensor encoding. Neuroimage. 2017;147:517-531.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.053

  58. 58.

    Lampinen B. Searching for the neurite density with diffusion MRI: challenges for biophysical modeling. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019;40(8):2529-2545.

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.24542

  59. 59.

    Li H., Jiang X., Xie J., Gore J.C., Xu J. Impact of transcytolemmal water exchange on estimates of tissue microstructural properties derived from diffusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2017;77(6):2239-2249.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.26309

  60. 60.

    Lu H., Jensen J.H., Ramani A., Helpern J.A. Three-dimensional characterization of non-Gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed. 2006;19(2):236-247.

    Not in our library10.1002/nbm.1020

  61. 61.

    MacKay A. In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994;31(6):673-677.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.1910310614

  62. 62.

    Madler B., Drabycz S.A., Kolind S.H., Whittall K.P., MacKay A.L. Is diffusion anisotropy an accurate monitor of myelination? Correlation of multicomponent T-2 relaxation and diffusion tensor anisotropy in human brain. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2008;26(7):874-888.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.047

  63. 63.

    McKinnon E.T., Jensen J.H., Glenn G.R., Helpern J.A. Dependence on b-value of the direction-averaged diffusion-weighted imaging signal in brain. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2017;36:121-127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mri.2016.10.026

  64. 64.

    McKinstry R.C. Radial organization of developing preterm human cerebral cortex revealed by non-invasive water diffusion anisotropy MRI. Cerebr. Cortex. 2002;12(12):1237-1243.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/12.12.1237

  65. 65.

    Nedjati-Gilani G.L. Machine learning based compartment models with permeability for white matter microstructure imaging. Neuroimage. 2017;150:119-135.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.013

  66. 66.

    Neil J.J. Normal brain in human newborns: apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion anisotropy measured by using diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology. 1998;209(1):57-66.

    Not in our library10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769812

  67. 67.

    Neuman C.H. Spin-echo of spins diffusing in a bounded medium. J. Chem. Phys. 1974;60(11):4508-4511.

    Not in our library

  68. 68.

    Nilsson M., Lasic S., Drobnjak I., Topgaard D., Westin C.F. Resolution limit of cylinder diameter estimation by diffusion MRI: the impact of gradient waveform and orientation dispersion. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(7):e3711.

    Not in our library10.1002/nbm.3711

  69. 69.

    Novikov D.S., Kiselev V.G., Jespersen S.N. On modeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;79(6):3172-3193.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.27101

  70. 70.

    Novikov D.S., Veraart J., Jelescu I.O., Fieremans E. Rotationally-invariant mapping of scalar and orientational metrics of neuronal microstructure with diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2018;174:518-538.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.006

  71. 71.

    Novikov D.S., Fieremans E., Jespersen S.N., Kiselev V.G. Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: theory and parameter estimation. NMR Biomed. 2019;32(4):e3998.

    Not in our library10.1002/nbm.3998

  72. 72.

    Ouyang M., Dubois J., Yu Q., Mukherjee P., Huang H. Delineation of early brain development from fetuses to infants with diffusion MRI and beyond. Neuroimage. 2019;185:836-850.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.017

  73. 73.

    Ouyang M. Differential cortical microstructural maturation in the preterm human brain with diffusion kurtosis and tensor imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116(10):4681-4688.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1812156116

  74. 74.

    Palombo M. New paradigm to assess brain cell morphology by diffusion-weighted MR spectroscopy in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016;113(24):6671-6676.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1504327113

  75. 75.

    Palombo M., Shemesh N., Ianus A., Alexander D.C., Zhang H. A compartment based model for non-invasive cell body imaging by diffusion MRI. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2018.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Palombo M., Nunes D., Alexander D.C., Zhang H., Shemesh N. Histological validation of the brain cell body imaging with diffusion MRI at ultrahigh field. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2019.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Palombo M., Shemesh N., Ianus A., Alexander D.C., Zhang H. Abundance of cell bodies can explain the stick model’s failure in grey matter at high b-value. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2018.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    Palombo M. New potential MRI markers of glial scarring and tissue damage in multiple sclerosis spinal cord pathology using diffusion MRI. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2020.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Palombo M., Alexander D.C., Zhang H. A generative model of realistic brain cells with application to numerical simulation of the diffusion-weighted MR signal. Neuroimage. 2019;188:391-402.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.025

  80. 80.

    Panagiotaki E. Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: a taxonomy and comparison. Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2241-2254.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081

  81. 81.

    Parker T.D. Cortical microstructure in young onset Alzheimer’s disease using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018;39(7):3005-3017.

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.24056

  82. 82.

    Pedregosa F. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011;12:2825-2830.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    Price W.S. Pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance as a tool for studying translational diffusion.1. Basic theory. Concepts Magn. Reson. 1997;9(5):299-336.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    Price W.S. 2009.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    Scherrer B. Characterizing brain tissue by assessment of the distribution of anisotropic microstructural environments in diffusion-compartment imaging (DIAMOND). Magn. Reson. Med. 2016;76(3):963-977.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.25912

  86. 86.

    Setsompop K. Pushing the limits of in vivo diffusion MRI for the human connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013;80:220-233.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.078

  87. 87.

    Shemesh N. Metabolic properties in stroked rats revealed by relaxation-enhanced magnetic resonance spectroscopy at ultrahigh fields. Nat. Commun. 2014;5.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms5958

  88. 88.

    Sotiropoulos S.N., Behrens T.E., Jbabdi S. Ball and rackets: inferring fiber fanning from diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroimage. 2012;60(2):1412-1425.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.056

  89. 89.

    Stanisz G.J., Szafer A., Wright G.A., Henkelman R.M. An analytical model of restricted diffusion in bovine optic nerve. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997;37(1):103-111.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.1910370115

  90. 90.

    Taquet M. Extra-axonal restricted diffusion as an in-vivo marker of reactive microglia. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):13874.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-50432-5

  91. 91.

    Tax C.M.W., Szczepankiewicz F., Nilsson M., Jones D.K. 2019;584730.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116534

  92. 92.

    Tournier J.D., Calamante F., Connelly A. MRtrix: diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int. J. Imag. Syst. Technol. 2012;22(1):53-66.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    Veraart J., Novikov D.S., Fieremans E. TE dependent Diffusion Imaging (TEdDI) distinguishes between compartmental T2 relaxation times. Neuroimage. 2018;182:360-369.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.030

  94. 94.

    Veraart J., Fieremans E., Novikov D.S. On the scaling behavior of water diffusion in human brain white matter. Neuroimage. 2019;185:379-387.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.075

  95. 95.
  96. 96.

    Vincent M., Palombo M., Valette J. Revisiting double diffusion encoding MRS in the mouse brain at 11.7T: which microstructural features are we sensitive to? Neuroimage. 2019;116399.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116399

  97. 97.

    Westin C.F. Q-space trajectory imaging for multidimensional diffusion MRI of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2016;135:345-362.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.039

  98. 98.

    White N.S., Leergaard T.B., D’Arceuil H., Bjaalie J.G., Dale A.M. Probing tissue microstructure with restriction spectrum imaging: histological and theoretical validation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013;34(2):327-346.

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.21454

  99. 99.

    Whittall K.P. In vivo measurement of T-2 distributions and water contents in normal human brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997;37(1):34-43.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.1910370107

  100. 100.
  101. 101.

    Yablonskiy D.A., Bretthorst G.L., Ackerman J.J. Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003;50(4):664-669.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.10578

  102. 102.

    Yang D.M. Intracellular water preexchange lifetime in neurons and astrocytes. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;79(3):1616-1627.

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.26781

  103. 103.

    Yu Q. Structural development of human fetal and preterm brain cortical plate based on population-averaged templates. Cerebr. Cortex. 2016;26(11):4381-4391.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhv201

  104. 104.

    Zhang H., Schneider T., Wheeler-Kingshott C.A., Alexander D.C. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2012;61(4):1000-1016.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072

  105. 105.

    Zhao C., Teng E.M., Summers R.G., Ming G.L., Gage F.H. Distinct morphological stages of dentate granule neuron maturation in the adult mouse hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2006;26(1):3-11.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3648-05.2006

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.